ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

It is almost impossible to disagree with a proposal seeking to slow things down to minimize harm to the planet. However, the question is where. The manifesto in The Case for Degrowth acknowledges the challenge of asking distinct populations to lower their economic growth and well-being. They suggest alliances, echoing the commons, and highlight ancient cultural traditions that have envisioned other worlds. In contrast, the discussion offered by Deepak Lamba-Nieves through the case of Puerto Rico and its colonial subjugation - shared or equivalent to many in the Global South and elsewhere - asks us to reflect upon who is demanding or expecting us to degrowth.
151 | decrecer

, 

Keywords Dialogue
Colonialism
Plurality
Debate
Degrowth
It is almost impossible to disagree with a proposal seeking to slow things down
to minimize harm to the planet. However, the question is where. The manifesto
in The Case for Degrowth acknowledges the challenge of asking distinct
populations to lower their economic growth and well-being. They suggest
alliances, echoing the commons, and highlight ancient cultural traditions that
have envisioned other worlds. In contrast, the discussion offered by Deepak
Lamba-Nieves through the case of Puerto Rico and its colonial subjugation –
shared or equivalent to many in the Global South and elsewhere – asks us to
reflect upon who is demanding or expecting us to degrowth.
 | , 152
Giorgos Kallis
<georgios.kallis@uab.cat>
Bachelor in Chemistry and Master in Environmental Engineering, Imperial
College. PhD in Environmental Policy, University of the Aegean. Master in
Economics, Barcelona Graduate School of Economics. He is an ecological
economist and political ecologist working on environmental justice and limits to
growth. He is an  professor since .
Susan Paulson
<spaulson@latam.ufl.edu>
 and PhD in Anthropology, University of Chicago. Paulsons scholarship
explores theoretical frontiers in political ecology and degrowth, and
approaches gender and environment with attention to masculinities and
intersectionality. She is a professor at the Center for Latin American Studies,
University of Florida.
153 | decrecer
Federico Demaria
<federico.demaria(a)ub.edu>
 in Political Economy, MSc in Environmental Studies (Ecological Economics),
and PhD in Ecological Economics and Political Ecology. He is an assistant
professor at the University of Barcelona, and an associate researcher at the
Institute of Environmental Science and Technology , Autonomous
University of Barcelona.
Giacomo D’Alisa
<giacomodalisa@ces.uc.pt>
PhD in Economics and Technology for Sustainable Development, . He
currently is a political ecologist at the Centre for Social Studies at the University
of Coimbra, Portugal, and researches a new understanding of the commons
and alternative commons-based resource management suitable for low-
carbon societies that prosper without growing.
   ¹

Alliance-Building
In this daunting political environment,
alliances are fundamental. Millions of
potential allies can be found among
nature-lovers, care-providers, families with
children, biking fanatics, vegans, overworked
professionals, hippies, unemployed people,
indebted families, climate refugees, back-to-
the-landers, senior citizens, people engaged
in anti-colonial and anti-capitalist movements,
and more. Here we look at a few among many
vital allies: workers, feminists, anti-racists, and
members of low-income communities.
[...] Why would billions of people living
in low-income communities and countries
support a movement that seems to hinder
hopes of enjoying some of the promised
benefits of economic grow th? First, we must
recognize the extremely different conditions
and positions among these populations. To
many living on frontiers of global expansion,
the contraction of European or North American
economies can bring relief. Indigenous
communities we have worked with in Brazil,
Bolivia, Mexico, and Ecuador risk their lives
fighting against incursions of mining, logging,
drilling, roads, and agribusiness, in defense of
long-evolving solidarity and kin economies.
Degrowth may seem less appealing to
urban middle classes and political leaders in
Latin America, Africa, and elsewhere, who are
trying to improve standards of living and pay
off debts with the pittances they obtain from
extractivist concessions, taxes on multinational
corporations, and similar. Not to mention
China, where generations who had suffered
deprivation are now caught up in economic
and material growth at scales unprecedented in
human history.
Our case illuminates ways in which the
drive for growth has shaped colonialism,
sexism, racism, and other inequities; but we
do not argue that our proposals for degrowth
are relevant for all actors positioned in the
resulting uneven terrains. Operating from
positions in wealthy northern societies, we
seek to learn with and from others. Drawing
on feminist and decolonial approaches to
support mobilization less influenced by
historical hierarchies, Dengler and Seebacher
(:) argue that
[...] degrowth is not to be misunder stood as
proposal from the Global North imposed
on the Global South, but rather a Norther n
supplement to Southern concepts,
movements and lines of t hought. It is therefore
imperative for degrow th to seek alliances with
these Southern ‘fellow travelers’.
Arturo Escobar (:) identifies points of
convergence among moves toward degrowth
in the north and toward post-development
in Latin America: originating from different
intellectual traditions and operating through
different epistemic and political practices,
they combine radical questioning of core
assumptions of growth and economism
with visions of alternative worlds based on
ecological integrity and social justice.
Those in other parts of the world who are
fighting on their own terms for meaningful,
equitable, and ecologically sustainable worlds
should know that we are engaged in a parallel
fight, in the belly of the beast. Even sincere
commitments to dialogue and alliance across
these differences meet obstacles (Beling, et
al., ). In interviews with environmental
justice activists, Beatriz Rodríguez-Labajos (et
al., :) and colleagues found that “In
parts of Africa, Latin America and many other
regions of the Global South, including poor
and marginalised communities in Northern
countries, the term degrowth is not appealing,
and does not match people’s demands.”
Susan Paulson () has identified rewards,
as well as challenges, of dialogue across
difference during a multi-year collaboration
among researchers from varied cultural,
linguistic, and national backgrounds learning
from communities around the world who
prioritize wellbeing and solidarity, rather than
increased production and consumption. In
our experience, common senses of degrowth,
rather than the word itself, do resonate with
people living in diverse low-income contexts.
In sum, degrowth visions and proposals
draw from and take root among ideas and
practices of people in many positions, including
long-established religious or spiritual beliefs
and everyday life in low-income communities.
Rather than replace traditions of worker’s
struggles or modern development with a new
universalizing path, we learn from allies like
the Global Tapestry of Alternatives to support
conditions in which a plurality of pathways can
thrive in mutual respect, reflecting the Zapatista
dream of “a world where many worlds fit.”²

1. Excerpt originally published in Giorgos Kallis, Susan Paulson, Giacomo
D’Alisa Federico Demaria, The Case for Degrowth (Cambridge, UK: Polity
Press, 2020): 97-104.
2. See the Global Tapestry of Alternatives (GTA): <https://globaltapestry-
ofalternatives.org>.
bibliogr afía | 
 .; , . . ”What About the Global South?
Towards a Feminist Decolonial Degrowth Approach”. Ecological
Economics  ().
 , . “Degrow th, Postdevelopment, and Tran sitions:
A Prelim inary Convers ation”. Sustainability Science vol. , no.
 ( ).
 .;  , .;  , .; , .;  , .;
, . “Discursive Synergies for a ‘Great Transformation’
Towards Sustainability: Pragmatic Contributions to a
Necessary Dialogue Between Human Development, Degrowth,
and Buen Vivir”. Ecological Economics no. , : -.
- , .;  , .; , .;  , .;
 , .;  , .;  , . “Not So Natural an
Alliance? Degrowth and Environmental Justice Movements in
the Global South”. Ecological Economics  ().
, . “Pluriversal Learning: Pathways Toward a World
of Many Worlds”. Nordia Geographical Publications vol. , no. 
(): -.
... Despite these new policy trends, however, hardly any public administration has engaged explicitly with the notion of degrowth. Meanwhile, degrowth is becoming a rather common agenda among environmental activists, designers, and architects (D' Alisa et al., 2013;Kallis et al., 2020;Kaika et al., 2023;Savini, 2022). ...
Article
Full-text available
Cities are searching for policy strategies able to meet climate and social targets while reducing their material footprint. To this end, post-growth approaches to urban sustainability have been rapidly gaining momentum. Rejecting the idea of green growth, the notion of post-growth includes a variety of agendas and approaches—for example, well-being economy, circular economy, degrowth, and doughnut economics. City officials, urban agencies, and policymakers recognize these terms as part of a same policy trend, one that focuses on the socio-ecological quality of urban development rather than its size. Yet, they often use them interchangeably and, in so doing, they risk making policy scenarios seem less incisive and inconsistent to the public. This commentary gives a guideline to the use of these terms in policy. It compares the terms of post-growth, degrowth, circular economy, and doughnut economics. It argues that post-growth is an approach, the doughnut is a tool, degrowth is an agenda, and circular economy is a business model. The article concludes with a manifesto for a post-growth city, a set of principles that can be used to build an urban post-growth policy strategy.
Article
Degrowth calls for a profound socio-ecological transformation towards a socially just and environmentally sound society. So far, the global dimensions of such a transformation in the Global North have arguably not received the required attention. This article critically reflects on the requirements of a degrowth approach that promotes global intragenerational justice without falling into the trap of reproducing (neo-)colonial continuities. Our account of social justice is inherently tied to questions of gender justice. A postcolonial reading of feminist standpoint theory provides the theoretical framework for the discussion. In responding to two main points of criticism raised by feminist scholars from the Global South, it is argued that degrowth activism and scholarship has to reflect on its coloniality and necessarily needs to seek alliances with social movements from around the world on equal footing. Acknowledging that this task is far from easy, some cornerstones of a feminist decolonial degrowth approach are outlined.
Article
OPEN ACCESS, Ecological Economics https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.11.007 Both environmental justice (EJ) and degrowth movements warn against increasing the physical size of the economy. They both oppose extractivism and debt-fuelled economies, as well as the untrammelled profit motive which fails to incorporate full environmental and social costs. They both rely upon social movements that have led scholarship in its activities and achievements, in part through challenging power structures. Therefore, some argue the existence of an obvious alliance between degrowth and EJ movements in the Global South. Yet, direct observation unveils concerns from EJ activists in the Global South about the plausibility of alliances until some significant divergences have been examined and reconciled. Activists inspire, promote and disseminate transformations that overcome several forms of domination. Their perspectives on degrowth advance informed cooperation. Our aim is thus to systematically evaluate tensions and possible analogies between the scope of action of EJ organisations operating in the Global South and the main propositions of the Degrowth movement. The argument relies on methodical scrutiny of core themes in the degrowth debate by critical thinkers in the Global South. It incorporates insights from EJ struggles in Ecuador, Italy, Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, Uruguay, with important implications in Brazil, Mozambique, and Indonesia. The paper contributes to an exploration of the implications of the degrowth debate for the Global South, with the purpose of strengthening potential synergies, through an assertive recognition of the barriers to doing so.
Article
There is a growing awareness that a whole-societal "Great Transformation" of Polanyian scale is needed to bring global developmental trajectories in line with ecological imperatives. The mainstream Sustainable Development discourse, however, insists in upholding the myth of compatibility of current growth-based trajectories with biophysical planetary boundaries. This article explores potentially fertile complementarities among trendy discourses challenging conventional notions of (un)sustainable development - Human Development, Degrowth, and Buen Vivir - and outlines pathways for their realization. Human Development presents relative transformative strengths in political terms, while Degrowth holds keys to unlocking unsustainable material-structural entrenchments of contemporary socio-economic arrangements, and Buen Vivir offers a space of cultural alterity and critique of the Euro-Atlantic cultural constellation. The weaknesses or blind spots ('Achilles heels') of each discourse can be compensated through the strengths of the other ones, creating a dialogical virtuous circle that would open pathways towards a global new "Great Transformation". As one of the main existing platforms for pluralist and strong-sustainability discussions, Ecological Economics is in a privileged position to deliberately foster such strategic discursive dialogue. A pathway towards such dialogue is illuminated through a model identifying and articulating key discursive docking points.
Article
This paper seeks to initiate a conversation between degrowth (DG) and postdevelopment (PD) frameworks by placing them within the larger field of discourses for ecological and civilizational transitions and by bridging proposals emerging from the North with those from the Global South. Not only can this dialogue, it is argued, be mutually enriching for both movements but perhaps essential for an effective politics of transformation. Part I of the paper presents a brief panorama of transition discourses (TDs), particularly in the North. Part II discusses succinctly the main postdevelopment trends in Latin America, including Buen Vivir (BV), the rights of Nature, civilizational crisis, and the concept of ‘alternatives to development’. With these elements in hand, Part III attempts a preliminary dialogue between degrowth and postdevelopment, identifying points of convergence and tension; whereas they originate in somewhat different intellectual traditions and operate through different epistemic and political practices, they share closely connected imaginaries, goals, and predicaments, chiefly, a radical questioning of the core assumption of growth and economism, a vision of alternative worlds based on ecological integrity and social justice, and the ever present risk of cooptation. Important tensions remain, for instance, around the critique of modernity and the scope for dematerialization. This part ends by outlining areas of research on PD that could be of particular interest to degrowth scholars. The conclusion, finally, envisions the dissolution of the very binary of ‘Global North’ and ‘Global South’ by adopting a pluriversal perspective.
Pluriversal Learning: Pathways Toward a World of Many Worlds
  • S Paulson
PAULSON, S. "Pluriversal Learning: Pathways Toward a World of Many Worlds". Nordia Geographical Publications vol. 47, no. 5 (2019): 85-109.