ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Zolpidem is indicated in cases of severe insomnia in adults and, as for BDZs, its assumption should be limited to short periods under close medical supervision. Since several drugs cause corrected QT interval (QTc) elongation, the authors investigated whether high daily doses of Zolpidem could cause QTc elongation. The study was conducted in the Addiction Medicine Unit of the G.B. Rossi University Hospital in Verona. The data were collected from hospitalizations carried out between January 2015 and February 2020 and refer to a total of 74 patients, 38 males and 36 females, who were treated for detoxification from high doses of Zolpidem with the “Verona Detox Approach With Flumazenil.” One patient out of 74 had QTc elongation (479 ms). The patient was male and took a daily dose of 50 mg of Zolpidem; he did not take concomitant therapies that could cause QTc lengthening. He had no electrolyte alterations, no contemporary or previous intake of barbiturates, heroin, cocaine, THC, alcohol, NMDA or nicotine which could cause an elongation of the QTc interval. The present study highlights the low risk of QTc elongation due to high dosages of Zolpidem; however, if, on one hand, we can affirm that Zolpidem is a safe drug, on the other, the widespread use of high dosages of this drug for prolonged periods of time is problematic and worrying.
Content may be subject to copyright.
fpsyt-13-1033061 October 19, 2022 Time: 10:39 # 1
TYPE Case Report
PUBLISHED 20 October 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1033061
OPEN ACCESS
EDITED BY
James Rowlett,
University of Mississippi Medical
Center, United States
REVIEWED BY
Bradford Fischer,
Cooper Medical School of Rowan
University, United States
Roberta Tittarelli,
University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy
*CORRESPONDENCE
Lorenzo Zamboni
lorenzo.zamboni88@gmail.com
SPECIALTY SECTION
This article was submitted to
Addictive Disorders,
a section of the journal
Frontiers in Psychiatry
RECEIVED 31 August 2022
ACCEPTED 04 October 2022
PUBLISHED 20 October 2022
CITATION
Campagnari S, Zamboni L, Fusina F,
Casari R and Lugoboni F (2022) Case
Report: High doses of Zolpidem
and QT interval lengthening: Is there
a relationship? A case series.
Front. Psychiatry 13:1033061.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1033061
COPYRIGHT
© 2022 Campagnari, Zamboni, Fusina,
Casari and Lugoboni. This is an
open-access article distributed under
the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License (CC BY). The use,
distribution or reproduction in other
forums is permitted, provided the
original author(s) and the copyright
owner(s) are credited and that the
original publication in this journal is
cited, in accordance with accepted
academic practice. No use, distribution
or reproduction is permitted which
does not comply with these terms.
Case Report: High doses of
Zolpidem and QT interval
lengthening: Is there a
relationship? A case series
Simone Campagnari 1, Lorenzo Zamboni1,2*,
Francesca Fusina 3,4, Rebecca Casari 1and
Fabio Lugoboni 1
1Unit of Addiction Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, G.B. Rossi Hospital, Verona, Italy,
2Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement, University of Verona, Verona, Italy,
3Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy, 4Padova Neuroscience
Center, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
Zolpidem is indicated in cases of severe insomnia in adults and, as for
BDZs, its assumption should be limited to short periods under close medical
supervision. Since several drugs cause corrected QT interval (QTc) elongation,
the authors investigated whether high daily doses of Zolpidem could cause
QTc elongation. The study was conducted in the Addiction Medicine Unit of
the G.B. Rossi University Hospital in Verona. The data were collected from
hospitalizations carried out between January 2015 and February 2020 and
refer to a total of 74 patients, 38 males and 36 females, who were treated for
detoxification from high doses of Zolpidem with the “Verona Detox Approach
With Flumazenil.” One patient out of 74 had QTc elongation (479 ms). The
patient was male and took a daily dose of 50 mg of Zolpidem; he did not
take concomitant therapies that could cause QTc lengthening. He had no
electrolyte alterations, no contemporary or previous intake of barbiturates,
heroin, cocaine, THC, alcohol, NMDA or nicotine which could cause an
elongation of the QTc interval. The present study highlights the low risk of
QTc elongation due to high dosages of Zolpidem; however, if, on one hand,
we can affirm that Zolpidem is a safe drug, on the other, the widespread use
of high dosages of this drug for prolonged periods of time is problematic
and worrying.
KEYWORDS
Zolpidem, abuse, high dose, addiction, QTc, Z-drug
Introduction
Benzodiazepines (BDZs) and Z-drugs (Zolpidem, Zaleplon, Zopiclone) are among
the most prescribed drugs in Western countries and, while there has been a downward
trend in annual BDZ prescriptions, Z-drug prescriptions have instead increased
exponentially. This is probably due to a widespread opinion among doctors that the
Frontiers in Psychiatry 01 frontiersin.org
fpsyt-13-1033061 October 19, 2022 Time: 10:39 # 2
Campagnari et al. 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1033061
latter don’t involve the problems associated with chronic use
of BDZs, while, in fact, Z-Drug (ZD) use requires the same
safeguards that apply to BDZs (14).
The use of ZDs is indicated in cases of severe insomnia
in adults and, as for BDZs, it should be limited to short
periods under close medical supervision. The pharmacokinetic
differences between the molecules allow for some important
considerations with respect to the selection criteria of these
drugs. Zolpidem and Zopiclone, being eliminated more slowly,
are more suitable for the treatment of insomnia with central
awakenings, unlike Zaleplon, which has a rapid elimination
and is thus best suited for the management of initial insomnia
(5). The main contraindications to the use of Z-drugs are
the following: drug hypersensitivity, myasthenia gravis, severe
respiratory insufficiency, Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome
(OSAS) and advanced hepatic insufficiency. The use of ZDs is
contraindicated in children.
ZDs, like BDZs, are characterized by high manageability,
and starting from their introduction on the market it was
initially thought that they could offer advantages in terms
of efficacy and safety compared to classic BDZs. However,
over time it was shown that even this class of drugs can
lead to important side effects, such as cognitive impairment,
worsening of psychomotor performance, and increasing the risk
of falls and fractures, especially if taken at higher doses or in
association with other psychoactive substances such as alcohol.
(69).
Zolpidem and Zopiclone abuse are primarily described
in patients with a history of drug addiction, alcoholism or
psychiatric disorders and, minimally, also in patients not
belonging to these categories. Their use should, therefore, reflect
careful indications concerning posology (10,11).
Zolpidem is an imidazopyrimidine and, although it is not
structurally connected to BDZs, it has a similar mechanism
of action: it enhances the inhibitory effect of GABA on nerve
transmission, binding the related receptor with consequent
increases in permeability to chlorine ions.
Although early reports highlighted a profile of low abuse risk
for Zolpidem, in recent years an important increase in Zolpidem
dependence has been detected; for this reason, Zolpidem was
transferred to Schedule IV of the 1971 Convention (i.e., for
drugs inducing dependence such as BDZs) in 2001 (1214).
High-dose Zolpidem use (600-2000 mg/die) has
been associated with psychostimulant effects, such as
feelings of well-being, euphoria (“high”), energy, alertness,
sociability, talkativeness, delusions and psychotic experiences,
sleepwalking, falling asleep while driving, sleep-related eating
disorders or engaging in other activities while not fully awake
(1517).
It is also interesting to note that, in a large number of
hypnotic drug abusers, a selective preference for Zolpidem was
reported by subjects that were positive at screening tests for
adult Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (18,19).
Finally, intense craving, inability to stop use and
withdrawal were associated with long-term high dose Zolpidem
consumption. Through the analysis of adverse reaction data
provided by the European Medicines Agency and after assessing
the potential for abuse and dependence of ZDs, it has been
shown that Zolpidem is more frequently involved in both abuse
and withdrawal problems.
The QT interval begins with the beginning of the QRS
complex and ends with the end of the T wave and has an inverse
relationship with heart rate (HR). A rate-related (or corrected)
QT interval (QTc) according to Bazetts formula (20) can be
calculated as:
QTc =QT interval
cardiac cycle insecond
The upper limit of a normal QTc interval is 470 ms in males
and 480 ms in females. As for the lower limits of the QTc, they
have not been well established, but sometimes values between
330 and 360 ms are mentioned. (21).
Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a myocardial repolarization
disorder characterized by a prolonged QT interval on the
electrocardiogram (ECG). The main symptoms in patients
presenting LQTS include palpitations, syncope, seizures and
sudden cardiac death. This syndrome can be congenital or
acquired. The acquired form is related to drug therapy and the
presence of hypokalemia and hypomagnesaemia may accentuate
the risk of drug-induced LQTS development. One of the main
risks of LQTS is that it generates polymorphic ventricular
tachycardia, i.e., a ventricular rhythm greater than 100 bpm
with frequent changes in the QRS axis, its morphology, or both
(22,23).
Torsades de pointes (TdP) is a form of polymorphic
ventricular tachycardia which derives from either acquired or
congenital QT interval prolongation, and manifests with a
heart rate between 160 and 250 bpm. These variations take the
form of a progressive, sinusoidal and cyclical evolution of the
QRS axis; the peaks of the QRS complexes appear to “twist”
around the isoelectric line of the recording. This condition
tends to spontaneously regress; however, multiple episodes can
occur in rapid succession and may degenerate into ventricular
fibrillation and sudden cardiac death. Determining the absolute
and comparative risk of many drugs associated with QT interval
prolongation is difficult, as most of the available data comes
from case reports or small series of observations. Furthermore,
the incidence of QT prolongation without torsades de pointes
(Tdp) is much higher than the incidence of TdP itself.
The pathophysiological mechanism underlying drug-
induced TdP is the development of abnormal depolarizations
of the cell membrane in the final part of the action potential,
defined as early post-depolarization (EAD), or during diastolic
repolarization, termed late post-depolarization (DAD).
Almost all drugs that cause LQTS cause blockage of the
potassium channel, thereby inhibiting the rapid outward flow
of potassium ions and, therefore, cellular repolarization (24,25).
Frontiers in Psychiatry 02 frontiersin.org
fpsyt-13-1033061 October 19, 2022 Time: 10:39 # 3
Campagnari et al. 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1033061
Furthermore, lower heart rates result in a smaller potassium
output from the cell during repolarization, as there are
fewer repolarization events; also, the reduction of extracellular
potassium increases the degree of inhibition induced by the drug
on the rapid potassium current, consequently increasing the QT
interval. (25).
Most patients with drug-induced LQT have one or more risk
factors for the condition.
In a review of the literature that included 249 patients with
non-cardiac drug-associated QT prolongation, 97% had at least
one risk factor and 71% had at least two. These included: female
sex in 71%, history of heart disease in 41%, concomitant use of
another QT prolonging drug in 39%, hypokalemia in 28%, a high
dose of the drug in 19%, and a previous history of LQTS in 18%.
The most common risk factor for drug-induced LQTS is
being female. In a review of the literature of 332 patients
with cardiovascular drug-associated Torsades de pointes (Tdp),
70% were women. Compared to males, females have a longer
QTc and a greater response to drugs that block the rapid
potassium channel, favoring Tdp, possibly due to the effect of
sex steroids on ion channel expression. Estrogen potentiates the
prolongation of the QT interval induced by bradycardia and the
development of arrhythmia. Conversely, androgens reduce the
QT interval and make it less sensitive to drugs. (2628).
In scientific literature, benzodiazepines and Z-Drugs are
considered safe concerning LQTS (29); to date, however, there
are no studies which address the abuse of high dosage of Z-drugs
and QTc elongation risk.
Since several drugs cause QTc elongation, with this case
series we want to analyze if QTc lengthening occurs on a total of
74 patients admitted to the Addiction Medicine Unit in Verona,
Italy for daily use of high doses of Zolpidem.
Patients and methods
The study was conducted in the Addiction Medicine
Unit of the G.B. Rossi University Hospital in Verona. The
data were collected from hospitalizations carried out between
January 2015 and February 2020 and refer to a total of
74 patients, of which 38 were males and 36 were females,
that were being treated for detoxification from high doses of
Zolpidem with “Verona Detox Approach With Flumazenil”
(30,31).
The criterion of dependence on high doses of ZDs
was defined on the criteria established by the DSM IV-
TR, which provide for the presence of continuous use
for a period greater than 6 months, a daily intake of
Zolpidem greater than at least five times the maximum
recommended daily dose and problematic use of ZDs, such
as mixing various molecules, increasing dosages, using for
pleasure, obtaining them through illegal means or deriving
negative social consequences. The dosage assumed was obtained
from a drug use history assessment performed by the
staff doctors.
The variables examined were demographic ones, that
considered age and sex, and clinical ones, that considered the
following: type of BDZ used; DDDE (mg); heart rate (HR;
bpm); QY (ms); QTc (ms); Na+; K +; Cl-; additional therapy
other than the BDZ.
Upon admission, blood samples were taken to assess
electrolyte concentration and an electrocardiogram was
performed in order to obtain HR and the QT interval. QT was
corrected with HR using Bazett’s formula : QTc =QT/Vrr.
Results
A total of 74 patients including 38 males and 36 females
(Table 1) that were hospitalized, between January 2015 and
February 2020, to the Addiction Medicine Unit of the G.B. Rossi
University Hospital in Verona, Italy.
The average age of these patients was 44 years (SD 11,77)
with a minimum of 23 and a maximum of 74 years; 38 were
workers, 25 were unemployed and 11 were students (Table 2).
The mean daily dose of Zolpidem was 402.36 mg/day
(SD ±368.88) (Table 3), with a minimum of 20 mg/day
and a maximum of 2,250 mg/day, while the mean DDD is
50.21 mg/day.
Assuming that the threshold value of QTc is 470 ms in
males and 480 in females, we recorded a single case exceeding
these threshold values (32). The patient was a male presenting
a QTc of 479 ms and taking 50 mg/day of Zolpidem (25 mg
of Diazepam equivalents daily dose); he also did not have
concomitant therapies that could have caused QTc lengthening,
no electrolyte alterations (Na 140 mmol/L, K + 3.75 mmol/L,
Cl- 105 mmol / L), no contemporary or previous intake of
barbiturates, heroin, cocaine, THC, alcohol, NMDA or nicotine.
It should also be noted that the QTc value of one of the 74
patients was not recorded.
TABLE 1 Gender.
Gender Frequency Percentage
Male 38 51.35
Female 36 48.65
Total 74 100
TABLE 2 Status.
Status Frequency Percentage
Worker 38 51.35
Unemployed 25 33.78
Other (student, retired) 11 14.86
Total 74 100
Frontiers in Psychiatry 03 frontiersin.org
fpsyt-13-1033061 October 19, 2022 Time: 10:39 # 4
Campagnari et al. 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1033061
TABLE 3 Drug dosage.
N Minimum Maximum Mean SD
Dosage mg
(mean)
74 20 2,250 402.36 368.88
DDD 74 2 300 50.21 58.61
Discussion
Zolpidem is a non-benzodiazepine receptor modulator used
in short-term treatment of insomnia aimed at patients with
difficulty starting sleep; it improves measures of sleep latency,
sleep duration, and reduces the number of awakenings in
patients with transient insomnia. It also improves sleep quality
in patients with chronic insomnia and can act as a minor muscle
relaxant. (3335).
The main thing to consider when starting patients on
Zolpidem is the possibility of addiction and the development
of withdrawal symptoms following drug dismission if the
drug has been taken for a long time. An interprofessional
team approach comprising healthcare professionals such as a
pharmacist, a therapist, a nurse, and a clinician is critical;
patients should also be educated on possible withdrawal effects
resulting from the medication. Because Zolpidem has the
potential to cause dependence, it should not be prescribed for
long periods of time.
Moreover, long term use of Z-drugs causes cognitive
impairments: several case control studies report that
benzodiazepine or Z-drug use approximately doubles the
risk of being involved in a motor vehicle accident (7,36). Other
effects may include dependence (37), and next-day cognitive,
memory, psychomotor and balance impairments (38).
There is a mistaken belief that Z-drugs have advantages
both in terms of efficacy and safety compared to BDZs, and,
for this reason, many countries have seen a lower prescription
of BDZs in favor of an increase in prescriptions of Z-drugs,
especially Zolpidem. However, even this class of drugs can have
important side effects, such as reduced functionality of cognitive
abilities and worsening of psychomotor performances (14,
6,8,9).
Inadequate prescribing (non-therapeutic high-dosage
administration, long duration of the treatment, association
with different drugs, absence of monitoring) and poor overall
assessment of the risks associated with their prescribing
carries many potential risks to patients, including the risk of
developing addiction.
Several drugs have been proven or suspected to cause QT
prolongation; many of these medications are frequently used
in the intensive care unit (ICU), such as different types of
anesthetics, sedatives, antibiotics, antimycotics, antidepressants
and antipsychotics. The mechanism behind drug-induced
QT prolongation is primarily the blockade of potassium
ion channels (Ikr) in myocytes, causing prolonged cardiac
repolarization. A secondary mechanism is the blockade
of hepatic drug degradation because of inhibition of the
cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP3A4. Awareness on the many
medications known to cause drug-induced LQTS is imperative,
especially when the drugs are combined in the same patient
(39,40).
In literature there is no study that correlates the use of high
doses of Z-drugs, in particular Zolpidem, with the analysis of
QTc on the ECG. With this study we analyzed whether there was
a correlation between the intake of high doses of Zolpidem and
QTc prolongation.
The data collected showed that 1.35% of Zolpidem abusers
developed QTc elongation, which corresponds to only one
subject of the 74 total (with the exception of the single patients
for whom we didn’t record QTc data). We could deduce that
Zolpidem does not represent a significant cause of this side
effect, but this is the only study in literature that treats this
problem with very selective criteria. Regarding the population
that was taken into consideration, we can affirm that QTc
lengthening can be explained by the simultaneous intake of
other drugs that present this problem among their side effects
(41,42).
With the information we have, we are unable to formulate
a hypothesis that explains this phenomenon. Perhaps other
studies focusing on gender differences of patients taking high
doses of BDZs or Z-drugs might be more insightful.
Limitation
This study presents several limitations: it’s a retrospective
study, Zolpidem dosage was reported by subjects, no follow-up
was included and the sample size is small.
Conclusion
The present study shows a low risk of QTc elongation
caused by high daily doses of Zolpidem; however, it must
be considered that this is the only study currently present
in literature and it could be useful to expand the data by
analyzing a larger sample. Z-drugs and Zolpidem, proved to
be safe drugs considering the risk of QTc lengthening, however
the problem of abuse and dependence of this drug represents
a growing phenomenon which is often underestimated by
healthcare professionals.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will
be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Frontiers in Psychiatry 04 frontiersin.org
fpsyt-13-1033061 October 19, 2022 Time: 10:39 # 5
Campagnari et al. 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1033061
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed
and approved by the ethics committee of the Verona University
Hospital (approval code 683CESC). The patients/participants
provided their written informed consent to participate
in this study.
Author contributions
SC, LZ, RC, and FL were responsible for the study concept
and design. SC, FF, and LZ drafted the manuscript. LZ was
responsible for the study methodology. All authors critically
reviewed the content and approved the final version of the
manuscript for publication.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted
in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships
that could be construed as a potential conflict
of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the
authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated
organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the
reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or
claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed
or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Hoffmann F. Perceptions of German GPs on benefits and risks of
benzodiazepines and Z-drugs. Swiss Med Weekly. (2013) 143:w13745. doi: 10.4414/
smw.2013.13745
2. Islam MM, Conigrave KM, Day CA, Nguyen Y, Haber PS. Twenty-year trends
in benzodiazepine dispensing in the Australian population. Intern Med J. (2014)
44:57–64. doi: 10.1111/imj.12315
3. Paulose-Ram R, Safran MA, Jonas BS, Gu Q, Orwig D. Trends in psychotropic
medication use among U.S. adults. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. (2007) 16:560–70.
doi: 10.1002/pds.1367
4. Siriwardena AN, Qureshi Z, Gibson S, Collier S, Latham M. GPs’ attitudes to
benzodiazepine and “Z-drug” prescribing: a barrier to implementation of evidence
and guidance on hypnotics. Br J Gen Pract. (2006) 56:964–7.
5. Drover DR. Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of short-
acting hypnosedatives: zaleplon, zolpidem and zopiclone. Clin Pharmacokinet.
(2004) 43:227–38. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200443040- 00002
6. Becker PM, Somiah M. Non-Benzodiazepine receptor agonists for Insomnia.
Sleep Med Clin. (2015) 10:57–76.
7. Gunja N. In the Zzz zone: the effects of Z-drugs on human performance and
driving. J Med Toxicol. (2013) 9:163–71. doi: 10.1007/s13181-013- 0294-y
8. Stranks EK, Crowe SF. The acute cognitive effects of zopiclone, zolpidem,
zaleplon, and eszopiclone: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Exp
Neuropsychol. (2014) 36:691–700. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2014.928268
9. Zammit G. Comparative tolerability of newer agents for Insomnia. Drug
Safety. (2009) 32:735–48. doi: 10.2165/11312920-000000000- 00000
10. Hajak G, Müller WE, Wittchen HU, Pittrow D, Kirch W. Abuse and
dependence potential for the non-benzodiazepine hypnotics zolpidem and
zopiclone: a review of case reports and epidemiological data. Addiction. (2003)
98:1371–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00491.x
11. Liappas IA, Malitas PN, Dimopoulos NP, Gitsa OE, Liappas AI, Nikolaou
CK, et al. Zolpidem dependence case series: possible neurobiological mechanisms
and clinical management. J Psychopharmacol. (2003) 17:131–5. doi: 10.1177/
0269881103017001723
12. Marsden J, White M, Annand F, Burkinshaw P, Carville S, Eastwood B, et al.
Medicines associated with dependence or withdrawal: a mixed-methods public
health review and national database study in England. Lancet Psychiatry. (2019)
6:935–50. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30331- 1
13. Rush CR. Behavioral pharmacology of zolpidem relative to benzodiazepines:
a review. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. (1998) 61:253–69. doi: 10.1016/S0091-
3057(98)00102-6
14. Schifano F, Chiappini S, Corkery JM, Guirguis A. An insight into Z-Drug
abuse and dependence: an examination of reports to the european medicines
agency database of suspected adverse drug reactions. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol.
(2019) 22:270–7. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyz007
15. Chattopadhyay AC, Shukla L, Kandasamy A, Benegal V. High-dose zolpidem
dependence - Psychostimulant effects? A case report and literature review. Ind
Psychiatry J. (2016) 25:222–4. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_80_14
16. Sabe M, Kashef H, Gironi C, Sentissi O. Zolpidem stimulant effect: induced
mania case report and systematic review of cases. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol
Psychiatry. (2019) 94:109643. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.109643
17. Victorri-Vigneau C, Dailly E, Veyrac G, Jolliet P. Evidence of zolpidem abuse
and dependence: results of the French Centre for Evaluation and Information
on Pharmacodependence (CEIP) network survey. Br J Clin Pharmacol. (2007)
64:198–209. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02861.x
18. Federico A, Mantovani E, Casari R, Bertoldi A, Lugoboni F, Tamburin S.
Adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms, cognitive dysfunction
and quality of life in high-dose use of benzodiazepine and Z-drug. J Neural Trans.
(2021) 128:1109–19. doi: 10.1007/s00702-020- 02285-w
19. Lugoboni F, Bertoldi A, Casari R, Mantovani E, Morbioli L, Tamburin
S. Adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and quality of life in high-dose
benzodiazepine and related Z-Drug users. Eur Addict Res. (2020) 26:274–82. doi:
10.1159/000507852
20. Bazett HC. An analysis of the time-relations of electrocardiograms. Heart.
(1920) 7:353–70.
21. Jordan MP. ECG: Basic Principles of ECG Analysis. Waltham, MA: UpToDate
(2019).
22. Khan IA. Long QT syndrome: diagnosis and management. Am Heart J. (2002)
143:7–14. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2002.120295
23. Passman R, Kadish A. Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, long Q-T
syndrome, and torsades de pointes. Med Clin North Am. (2001) 85:321–41. doi:
10.1016/s0025-7125(05)70318- 7
24. Suessbrich H, Schönherr R, Heinemann SH, Attali B, Lang F, Busch AE.
The inhibitory effect of the antipsychotic drug haloperidol on HERG potassium
channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Br J Pharmacol. (1997) 120:968–74. doi:
10.1038/sj.bjp.0700989
25. Yang T, Roden DM.E xtracellularpot assiummodulation of drug block of IKr.
implications for torsade de pointes and reverse use-dependence. Circulation. (1996)
93:407–11. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.93.3.407
26. Drici MD, Clément N. Is gender a risk factor for adverse drug reactions?
The example of drug-induced long QT syndrome. Drug Saf. (2001) 24:575–85.
doi: 10.2165/00002018-200124080- 00002
27. Makkar RR, Fromm BS, Steinman RT, Meissner MD, Lehmann MH. Female
gender as a risk factor for torsades de pointes associated with cardiovascular drugs.
JAMA. (1993) 270:2590–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.270.21.2590
28. Zeltser D, Justo D, Halkin A, Prokhorov V, Heller K, Viskin S. Torsade de
pointes due to noncardiac drugs: most patients have easily identifiable risk factors.
Medicine. (2003) 82:282–90. doi: 10.1097/01.md.0000085057.63483.9b
Frontiers in Psychiatry 05 frontiersin.org
fpsyt-13-1033061 October 19, 2022 Time: 10:39 # 6
Campagnari et al. 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1033061
29. Ozeki Y, Fujii K, Kurimoto N, Yamada N, Okawa M, Aoki T, et al. QTc
prolongation and antipsychotic medications in a sample of 1017 patients with
Schizophrenia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. (2010) 34:401–5. doi:
10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.01.008
30. Casari R, Metastasio A, Zamboni L, Biasioli M, Campagnari S, Lugoboni F.
Addiction of high dose of benzodiazepine: verona detox approach with flumazenil.
Front Psychiatry. (2022) 13:857376. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.857376
31. Federico A, Lugoboni F, Mantovani E, Martini A, Morbioli L, Casari R,
et al. Detoxification improves multidomain cognitive dysfunction in high-dose
benzodiazepine abusers. Front Neurosci. (2020) 14:747. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.
00747
32. Priori SG, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A, Blom N, Borggrefe M,
Camm J, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular
arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: the task force for
the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of
sudden cardiac death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by:
Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). Eur Heart
J. (2015) 36:2793–867.
33. Bjurström MF, Irwin MR. Perioperative pharmacological sleep-promotion
and pain control: a systematic review. Pain Pract. (2019) 19:552–69. doi: 10.1111/
papr.12776
34. Kim HM, Gerlach LB, Van T, Yosef M, Conroy DA, Zivin K. Predictors of
long-term and high-dose use of zolpidem in veterans. J Clin Psychiatry. (2019)
80:18m12149. doi: 10.4088/JCP.18m12149
35. Sharma MK, Kainth S, Kumar S, Bhardwaj A, Agarwal HK, Maiwall R,
et al. Effects of zolpidem on sleep parameters in patients with cirrhosis and sleep
disturbances: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Mol Hepatol. (2019)
25:199–209. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2018.0084
36. Thomas RE. Benzodiazepine use and motor vehicle accidents. Systematic
review of reported association. Can Fam Phys. (1998) 44:799–808.
37. Lugoboni F, Mirijello A, Faccini M, Casari R, Cossari A, Musi G, et al. Quality
of life in a cohort of high-dose benzodiazepine dependent patients. Drug Alcohol
Depend. (2014) 142:105–9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.06.020
38. Mets MA, de Vries JM, de Senerpont Domis LM, Volkerts E, Olivier B,
Verster JC. Next-day effects of ramelteon (8 mg), zopiclone (7.5 mg), and placebo
on highway driving performance, memory functioning, psychomotor performance,
and mood in healthy adult subjects. Sleep. (2011) 34:1327–34. doi: 10.5665/SLEEP.
1272
39. Beitland S, Platou ES, Sunde K. Drug-induced long QT syndrome and fatal
arrhythmias in the intensive care unit. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. (2014) 58:266–72.
doi: 10.1111/aas.12257
40. Kallergis EM, Goudis CA, Simantirakis EN, Kochiadakis GE, Vardas PE.
Mechanisms, risk factors, and management of acquired long QT syndrome: a
comprehensive review. ScientificWorldJournal. (2012) 2012:212178.
41. Katchman AN, Koerner J, Tosaka T, Woosley RL, Ebert SN. Comparative
evaluation of HERG currents and QT intervals following challenge with suspected
torsadogenic and nontorsadogenic drugs. J Pharmacol Exp Therap. (2006)
316:1098–106. doi: 10.1124/jpet.105.093393
42. Ray WA, Murray KT, Meredith S, Narasimhulu SS, Hall K, Stein CM. Oral
erythromycin and the risk of sudden death from cardiac causes. N Engl J Med.
(2004) 351:1089–96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040582
Frontiers in Psychiatry 06 frontiersin.org
... However, it should be emphasized that the effects of zolpidem are individually variable. Recent studies have reported that zolpidem can prolong the QT interval [15,16]. Surprisingly, a Swiss analysis of single-substance poisoning cases from 2000-2010 shows a higher mortality rate in suicide attempts with zolpidem compared to benzodiazepines [17]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Zolpidem, widely prescribed for short-term management of insomnia, is a non-benzodiazepine hypnotic agent. It carries a high potential for abuse and an elevated risk of suicide. Overdose generally results in mild central nervous system depression, though severe outcomes are possible when co-ingested with other CNS depressants. Standard treatments include gastric lavage, flumazenil administration, and intravenous fluids. This case report describes a 66-year-old female admitted after an apparent suicidal ingestion of approximately 200 mg of zolpidem. Upon admission, she was unconscious, with bradypnea and hypotension, scoring 5 on the Glasgow Coma Scale. Gastric lavage and N-acetylcysteine were administered due to elevated liver enzymes suggesting concomitant paracetamol poisoning, which was confirmed by urine tests. Flumazenil temporarily improved her condition, and she was subsequently transferred to the Intensive Care Unit for mechanical ventilation. Her clinical status stabilized, leading to extubation on the second day and transfer to the Psychiatry Unit. This case highlights the critical need for timely intervention and continuous monitoring in zolpidem overdose scenarios, particularly when polypharmacy is involved. In instances of respiratory failure following zolpidem overdose, it is imperative to investigate the potential co-ingestion of additional substances.
Article
Full-text available
Benzodiazepines and zolpidem are commonly used in suicide attempts. They have previously been thought to have very few side effects outside of central nervous system depression, and are considered relatively safe even in overdoses. Cardiovascular manifestations of these overdoses are exceedingly rare. We depict a case where an unknown woman appearing to be in her 50s presented to our emergency department somnolent after a large ingestion of alprazolam, clonazepam, and zolpidem. During the evaluation, the patient became bradycardic to 35 beats per minute on the monitor, which responded to atropine administration. Therefore, it is important for an emergency medicine provider to be aware that both benzodiazepine and zolpidem overdoses can cause profound sinus bradycardia, which can respond to atropine.
Article
Full-text available
Benzodiazepine (BDZ) addiction is a widespread and multifaceted phenomenon. For many patients, especially females, the concomitant use of other drugs also increases their risk of QTc prolongation, possibly leading to complications such as seizures and even sudden death. However, the relationship between BDZ use and QTc prolongation is currently unclear. The present study aims to examine patterns of polysubstance use among a sample of Italian adults with BDZ dependence in relation with their QTc prolongation risk. We used Latent Class Analysis (LCA) on data collected from 251 inpatients of the Addiction Medicine Unit in Verona to group patients into three classes according to their substance use and their QTc prolongation risk. Results showed no significant relationship between QTc prolongation and BDZ use in any of the classes considered. We conclude that BDZs, even if used long-term and at high dosages, can be considered safe in terms of cardiovascular complications for patients.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Since the 1990s there has been evidence of the significant role Flumazenil (FLU) has in benzodiazepines (BZD) detoxes. The Verona Detox approach has been developed for high dose BZD and Z-drug detoxification via continuous subcutaneous infusion of FLU, a selective BZD receptor antagonist acting on the BZD subunit of the GABA-A receptor. Flumazenil is licensed in the United Kingdom and other countries to treat only BZD overdose although numerous studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in rapidly resetting GABA-A receptors, quickly reducing tolerance and dependence from BZD, and providing a safe and rapid detox from benzodiazepines. Objective The aim of this article is to provide all healthcare professional who are interested in BZD detoxification with an approach and clear practical information on how to administer FLU. Method In this article we outline the approach in detail, describing all medical and nursing procedures day by day. This detox treatment is indicated for patients abusing from at least 5 Defined Daily Dose (DDD) of BZDs or Z-drugs. The process lasts 7 days, and is conducted under medical supervision (daily reviews) and continuous nursing (24/7). During this period, 7mg of FLU is administered (1 mg/24) through an elastomeric pump, via continuous subcutaneous infusion. Conclusion To this day, the largest database of FLU detoxification was published by our group, showing how this treatment is safe, with very little side effects even in patients with significant medical comorbidities.
Article
Full-text available
High-dose use of benzodiazepines (BZDs) and Z-drugs was found to be associated with adult attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and multidomain cognitive deficits, but the interplay between these factors and its effect on quality of life (QoL) is unclear. We explored (a) whether cognitive dysfunction differs in high-dose BZD/Z-drug users with and without adult ADHD and (b) the impact of cognitive deficits and adult ADHD on QoL in this substance-use disorder (SUD). From January 2015 to December 2019, we recruited 207 high-dose BZD/Z-drug users seeking treatment. We assessed the presence of adult ADHD with a screening tool, which was validated in SUD patients, and collected demographic, clinical and QoL data from the 76 included patients. A neuropsychological battery explored five cognitive domains. We found that: (a) screening for adult ADHD was frequently positive; (b) Short Form-36 (SF-36), a self-administered QoL questionnaire, was worse than the general population and worse in patients positive (ADHD+) vs. those negative (ADHD−) to ADHD screening tool; (c) executive function was significantly worse in ADHD+ than ADHD− patients; (d) some SF-36 dimensions were negatively influenced by executive dysfunction; (e) multivariate analysis showed an interplay between adult ADHD and cognitive dysfunction in worsening QoL. We documented a complex interplay between adult ADHD, cognitive dysfunc-tion and QoL in high-dose BZD/Z-drug users. Assessing adult ADHD, neuropsychological measures and QoL may offer a full scenario of these patients, who are frequently impaired in everyday activities. Future research should explore whether pharmacological treatment might improve cognitive dysfunction and QoL in this SUD.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose High-dose benzodiazepines (BZDs) abuse has been documented to cause multidomain cognitive dysfunction. We explored whether cognitive abnormalities to high-dose BZD abuse might be reversed by detoxification with slow subcutaneous infusion of flumazenil. Methods We recruited 96 patients consecutively admitted to the Department of Internal Medicine, Addiction Medicine Unit, Verona University Hospital, Italy for detoxification from high-dose BZD dependence. After selection for inclusion and exclusion criteria, 50 patients (23 men, 27 women; age 42.7 ± 10.3 years) were included. They underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological battery to explore verbal memory, visuospatial memory, working memory, attention, and executive functions 28–30 days prior to admission for detoxification (T0) and at the end of detoxification, i.e., 7 days after admission (T1). A group of 50 healthy adults (24 men, 26 women; mean age 44.5 ± 12.8 years) matched for age, sex, and education served as controls. Results At T0, patients scored significantly worse than healthy controls in all the neuropsychological tests. Depression and anxiety scores were associated with impaired verbal memory at T0 in patients. T1–T0 comparison showed improved performances in all neuropsychological tests after the end of detoxification in patients. Conclusion We confirmed that all neuropsychological domains were significantly and profoundly impaired by high-dose BZD abuse and documented that cognitive abnormalities improved after detoxification with slow subcutaneous infusion of flumazenil.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Problematic high-dose benzodiazepine (BZD) and related Z-drug use for a long period is a substance use disorder previously found to be associated with adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and worse quality of life (QoL). Whether adult ADHD impacts QoL in high-dose BZD/Z-drug users has not been explored. Aim: The aim of the study was to explore the impact of adult ADHD on QoL in high-dose BZD and related Z-drug users. Methods: We recruited 393 patients (205 men and 188 women) consecutively admitted to the Department of Medicine, Addiction Medicine Unit, Verona University Hospital, Italy, from July 2016 to July 2019 for detoxification from high-dose BZD or Z-drug dependence. Demographic and clinical variables and QoL measures were recorded. The World Health Organization ADHD Self-Report Scale version 1.1 Symptom Checklist Part A was used to detect adult ADHD. Results: In our sample, 39.4% of patients were positive to adult ADHD testing (ADHD+), with some clinical features differing in comparison to patients negative to ADHD testing (ADHD-). QoL was worse in high-dose BZD/Z-drug users than the general population. The ADHD+ group showed significantly worse QoL measures than the ADHD- group. Multivariate analysis, including potential covariates showed adult ADHD and age to have the most robust and consistent positive effect for age (i.e., higher QoL) and negative effect for ADHD (i.e., lower QoL) on QoL measures. Conclusions: Adult ADHD is associated with worse QoL measures in high-dose BZD/Z-drug users. Future studies should explore whether appropriate BZD/Z-drug detoxification might improve QoL measures and whether the most appropriate detoxification protocol differs in ADHD+ versus ADHD- populations.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Antidepressants, opioids for non-cancer pain, gabapentinoids (gabapentin and pregabalin), benzodiazepines, and Z-drugs (zopiclone, zaleplon, and zolpidem) are commonly prescribed medicine classes associated with a risk of dependence or withdrawal. We aimed to review the evidence for these harms and estimate the prevalence of dispensed prescriptions, their geographical distribution, and duration of continuous receipt using all patient-linked prescription data in England. Methods: This was a mixed-methods public health review, comprising a rapid evidence assessment of articles (Jan 1, 2008, to Oct 3, 2018; with searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO, and the Cochrane and King's Fund libraries), an open call-for-evidence on patient experience and service evaluations, and a retrospective, patient-linked analysis of the National Health Service (NHS) Business Services Authority prescription database (April 1, 2015, to March 30, 2018) for all adults aged 18 years and over. Indirectly (sex and age) standardised rates (ISRs) were computed for all 195 NHS Clinical Commissioning Groups in England, containing 7821 general practices for the geographical analysis. We used publicly available mid-year (June 30) data on the resident adult population and investigated deprivation using the English Indices of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) quintiles (quintile 1 least deprived, quintile 5 most deprived), with each patient assigned to the IMD quintile score of their general practitioner's practice for each year. Statistical modelling (adjusted incident rate ratios [IRRs]) of the number of patients who had a prescription dispensed for each medicine class, and the number of patients in receipt of a prescription for at least 12 months, was done by sex, age group, and IMD quintile. Findings: 77 articles on the five medicine classes were identified from the literature search and call-for-evidence. 17 randomised placebo-controlled trials (6729 participants) reported antidepressant-associated withdrawal symptoms. Almost all studies were rated of very low, low, or moderate quality. The focus of qualitative and other reports was on patients' experiences of long-term antidepressant use, and typically sudden onset, severe, and protracted withdrawal symptoms when medication was stopped. Between April 1, 2017, and March 31, 2018, 11·53 million individuals (26·3% of residents in England) had a prescription dispensed for at least one medicine class: antidepressants (7·26 million [16·6%]), opioids (5·61 million [12·8%]), gabapentinoids (1·46 million [3·3%]), benzodiazepines (1·35 million [3·1%]), and Z-drugs (0·99 million [2·3%]). For three of these medicine classes, more people had a prescription dispensed in areas of higher deprivation, with adjusted IRRs (referenced to quintile 1) ranging from 1·10 to 1·24 for antidepressants, 1·20 to 1·85 for opioids, and 1·21 to 1·85 for gabapentinoids across quintiles, and higher ISRs generally concentrated in the north and east of England. In contrast, the highest ISRs for benzodiazepines and Z-drugs were generally in the southwest, southeast, and east of England, with low ISRs in the north. Z-drugs were associated with increased deprivation, but only at the highest quintile (adjusted IRR 1·11 [95% CI 1·01-1·22]). For benzodiazepines, prescribing was reduced for people in quintiles 4 (0·90 [0·85-0·96]) and 5 (0·89 [0·82-0·97]). In March, 2018, for each of medicine class, about 50% of patients who had a prescription dispensed had done so continuously for at least 12 months, with the highest ISRs in the north and east. Long-term prescribing was associated with a gradient of increased deprivation. Interpretation: In 1 year over a quarter of the adult population in England had a prescription dispensed for antidepressants, opioids (for non-cancer pain), gabapentinoids, benzodiazepines, or Z-drugs. Long-term (>12 months) prescribing is common, despite being either not recommended by clinical guidelines or of doubtful efficacy in many cases. Enhanced national and local monitoring, better guidance for personalised care, and better doctor-patient decision making are needed. Funding: Public Health England.
Article
Full-text available
Background/aims: The aim of this study was to study the efficacy and safety of zolpidem for sleep disturbances in patients with cirrhosis. Methods: Fifty-two Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class A or B cirrhotics with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index >5 were randomized to either zolpidem 5 mg daily (n=26) or placebo (n=26) for 4 weeks. Results: The therapy of 4 weeks was completed by 23 patients receiving zolpidem (3 stopped treatment due to excessive daytime drowsiness) and 24 receiving placebo (2 refused to continue the study). In the zolpidem group, after 4 weeks of therapy, there was significant increase in total sleep time (TST) and sleep efficiency compared to baseline and improvement in polysomnographic parameters of sleep initiation and maintenance (i.e., decrease in sleep latency time, decrease in wake time, and decreases in number of arousals and periodic limbs movements per hour of sleep), without any significant change in sleep architecture. Conclusions: Four weeks of 5 mg daily zolpidem in CTP class A or B cirrhosis patients with insomnia led to significant increases in TST and sleep efficiency and improvement in polysomnographic parameters of sleep initiation and maintenance without any significant change in sleep architecture.
Article
Full-text available
Abstract Background Although originally marketed as safe alternatives to the habit-forming benzodiazepines, growing numbers of zaleplon, zolpidem, and zopiclone (‘Z-drugs’) clinical concerns relating to their potential of abuse, dependence and withdrawal have been reported overtime. We aimed here at assessing these issues analysing datasets of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) provided by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) through the EudraVigilance (EV) system. Methods Analysing the ADR databases of each Z-drug, descriptive analyses have been performed on cases, and Proportional Reporting Ratios (PRRs) computed. Results An overall number of 33,240 (e.g. 23,420 zolpidem; 9,283 zopiclone; and 537 zaleplon) misuse/abuse/dependence/withdrawal-related ADRs, corresponding to some 6,246 unique patients given Z-drugs, were here identified. Cases were studied and described, including demographic characteristics and clinical data, such as concomitant drugs, doses, routes of administration, and outcomes of the reactions, being fatalities recorded. Considering PRR values, and in comparison with zopiclone, zolpidem was more frequently involved in both misuse/abuse and withdrawal issues. Zolpidem and zopiclone presented with the same dependence risk, but zopiclone was the most involved in overdose ADRs. If compared with zaleplon, zopiclone presented higher dependence and overdose-related issues, but slightly lower misuse/abuse and withdrawal PRR values. Conclusion Current data may only represent a gross underestimate of the Z-drugs’ misusing issues’ real prevalence. Caution should be exercised when prescribing those molecules, especially for patients with psychiatric illnesses and/or history of drug abuse. We recommend the need to invest in proactive pharmacovigilance activities to better and promptly detect, understand and prevent any possible misusing potential of prescribed medications.
Article
Introduction: Zolpidem is the most worldwide prescribed hypnotic agent. This easy access drug seems to have a high addictive potential among specific population and is now listed by the World Health Organization (WHO) as dangerous as benzodiazepine for dependence and abuse. Many side-effects have been reported, still drug-induced mania are extremely rare. We conducted a systematic review to study the zolpidem-induced stimulation, euphoric or manic effects. Methods: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Science Direct, and Google Scholar, were searched for articles in English, French, German, Italian and Spanish language published up to the 15th October 2018. Results: 18 relevant cases were identified, highlighting the need for more reports; therefore, one case that occurred in our department was included. Mean usual dose was 363.31 mg (± 292.2), minimum dose was of 10 mg and maximum dose was 2000 mg, mean intake duration was 35.20 months (±48.0). We found that 89.4% of cases where euphoric and 15.7% had drug-induced mania with delusions. 15.7% of cases took zolpidem for relaxant and stimulated effects, 47% of cases suffered various depression or anxiety disorders, of which 62.5% used zolpidem to cope with depression or anxious disorder. 26.3% of cases had concomitant drug dependence or abuse. 75% of cases suffering of depression consumed zolpidem for more than one year, with significant more important daily doses than non-depressed cases (p<0.5). Conclusions: Last FDA recommendations of lowering zolpidem doses should be adopted by all countries. Zolpidem prescription should be contraindicated for populations with identified risk factors.
Article
Background Sleep macrostructure is commonly disturbed after surgery. Postoperative pain control remains challenging. Given the bidirectional interaction between sleep and pain, understanding the role of modulation of sleep during the perioperative period on postoperative pain is needed. Methods Systematic review. Controlled trials examining the effects of perioperative sleep‐promoting pharmacological agents on postoperative pain and analgesic consumption were identified through a systematic search strategy utilizing multiple electronic databases. Results Fourteen studies (9 melatonin, 5 zolpidem) involving 921 patients (melatonin n=586, zolpidem n=335) were included. Compared to placebo, melatonin reduced postoperative pain scores ≥30% and significantly decreased opioid consumption in 3 studies (postoperative day (POD) 1‐2), whereas 4 studies reported no significant effect of melatonin on postoperative pain. Compared to placebo, zolpidem reduced postoperative pain scores during POD1‐7/POD1‐14 in two studies, but only one trial suggested clinically meaningful improvement (i.e., relative reduction of pain score ≥30%). Whereas 3 zolpidem trials showed no significant differences regarding postoperative pain ratings, zolpidem treatment was associated with decreased analgesic consumption in 4 out of 5 trials. Several limitations of the included studies were identified; only 1 study out of 14 was deemed low risk of bias, and heterogeneity of study design and outcome assessment precluded meta‐analysis. Conclusion Perioperative addition of a sleep‐promoting pharmacological agent may improve pain control, but underlying evidence is weak and results are inconsistent. Only 5 of the 14 studies objectively evaluated changes in sleep (polysomnography – 2 zolpidem studies; actigraphy – 3 melatonin studies) which complicates conclusions regarding links between perioperative sleep and pain. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Article
Objective: Prescriptions for sedative hypnotics are routinely initiated and renewed to treat insomnia, despite evidence supporting nonpharmacologic treatments as comparable and more favorable over time. We used national Veterans Health Administration data to assess patient characteristics associated with high-dose and long-term zolpidem use. Method: The study included outpatients with new zolpidem prescriptions (January 1, 2013, to June 3, 2014). We defined high-dose use as use of doses above those recommended in the 2013 FDA safety warning (> 5 mg for women, > 10 mg for men) and defined long-term use as at least 180 days of continued supply. We fit separate logistic regression models by sex to evaluate how patient factors, adjusting for facilities, predicted high-dose and long-term use. Results: Of 139,525 new zolpidem users, < 1% of men and 41% of women used high doses within 180 days of initiation, and 20% continued to use zolpidem long-term. Prior-year use of other sleep medications was associated with both high-dose and long-term use. Substance abuse/dependence was associated with high-dose use in women (odds ratio = 1.20, P < .001). Although long-term use was less likely in those over the age of 85 years, about 1 in 5 users aged 65 to 85 continued long-term. In both sexes, individuals of Hispanic ethnicity and nonwhite races were less likely to use long-term, whereas those with ICD-9-CM-defined psychiatric and sleep disorder diagnoses were more likely to use long-term. Conclusions: Zolpidem use at a higher-than-recommended dose was common in women who were new zolpidem users. In both sexes, 1 in 5 users continued to use zolpidem for at least 180 days. Efforts to improve access to effective nonpharmacologic treatment alternatives may benefit from attention to subpopulations with higher risk of high-dose and long-term use.