Content uploaded by Francesco Donati
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Francesco Donati on Oct 17, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
Geographia Technica, Vol. 17, Issue 2, 2022, pp 47 to 53
A DIRECT METHOD TO DELIMIT WEIR POOLS
Francesco DONATI
1
DOI : 10.21163/GT_ 2022.172.05
ABSTRACT:
Weir pools are one of the most widespread artificial aquatic environments in Europe. In recent years,
they draw the attention of scientists and managers, who try to understand how they work and put in
place strategies to manage them. However, these studies confront with the difficulty of delimiting the
spatial extension of weir pools: to solve this problem, we created a direct technique that permits to
identify their perimeter through the measure of the raising of the waterline and the slowing down of
the flow generated by weirs. To verify its validity and efficiency we tested it in two weir pools located
in France to check whether it can find them. In both cases, the results obtained are convincing and they
demonstrate how this methodology can be used to study and manage the spaces that form upstream
weirs.
Key-words: Weir, Weir pool, Run-of-river dam, Weir pool perimeter.
1. INTRODUCTION
A weir pool is the space where occurs the raising of the water line and the slowing of the flow
caused by weir, a hydraulic structure generally of small dimensions, overflows and transverses to the
river bed of a stream (Degoutte, 2012). Over time, this kind of environment became very common in
European rivers, especially in countries where industrialization developed in previous times, such as
in France, where several thousands of weir pools have been built, mostly to operate water mills
(Barraud et al., 2013; Rivals, 2000).
From an ecological point of view, the main characteristic of a weir pool is the flow velocity
gradient which develops from upstream to downstream and whose intensity varies according to the
time of year, determining the typical hybrid operation of this kind of environment, which cross lotic
and lentic features (Donati, 2021; Donati et al., 2019; Donati et al., 2020 a; Donati et al., 2020 b).
That can create some environmental impacts, such as the retention of sediments transported by the
waters or the formation of thermal stratifications and the consequent warming of the waters
downstream of the weirs. For this reason, especially after the promulgation of the Water Framework
Directive and the diffusion of the concept of Ecological Continuity, everywhere in Europe weir pools
draw the attention of scientists and managers, who try to understand how their work and put in place
strategies to manage them (e.g. Malavoi, 2003; Rickard et al., 2003; Anderson et al., 2015).
However, any study about weir pools must be confronted with some practical constraints that
they pose: one of these is the delimitation of their spatial extent. Indeed, their perimeter is not
immediately recognizable, because weirs do not cause the overflow of the watercourse that they
1
Science Research Firm « Ecolimneau », 8 Rue René Coty – 85000 La Roche-Sur-Yon, France,
fdonati@ecolimneau.fr.
48
obstruct, unlike other structures which create real waterbodies, for example the dams or the pond’s
dykes. To overcome this issue, in the scientific literature it is possible to find indirect methods, which
are based on geometric calculations made from the height of the structure, the slope of the water line
or that of the bed. (e.g. Csiki & Rhoads, 2010; Maniere, 2013; Pearson & Pizzuto, 2015). They have
several advantages such as being cheap and less time-consuming, but our experience taught us that
they can also be inaccurate and not always reliable. So, we created a direct method that permits to
limits a weir pools thanks field measurements and that we consider very efficient. The purpose of this
article is to illustrate it, so that scientists can use it in their research and managers as decision support
for their action about weir pools.
2. STUDY AREA
To verify the reliability and efficiency of our methodology we tested it in two study area located
in Metropolitan France.
2.1. The Saint-Hilaire weir pool
The first site we tested is the Saint-Hilaire weir pool, located in central France, in the Loiret
department, to the west of Orléans. It is supplied by the Mauves, a watercourse of approximately 40
km, with an average flow of 1,075 m3/s (Banque Hydro data). It is created by the weir of the
homonymous water mill, which is 0,5 meters tall and which is surmounted by a gate.
The peculiarity of this weir pool is that we know its spatial extent. Indeed, in previous times its
water level was regulated at a precise height, registered in a local law, in order not to interfere with
the operation of the Pantin water mill, which is located upstream. This height is still respected today
by the site manager and for this reason we know that the weir pool extends throughout all the space
that separates these two ancient factories. Therefore, this study area is ideal for testing the reliability
of our methodology, observing whether the results reflect the reality.
2.2. The Baerenthal weir pool
The second site we tested is the Baerenthal weir pool, located in the North-East of France, in the
Moselle department, to the South-East of Bitche. It is supplied by the Zinsel du Nord, a river of
approximately 40 km with an average flow of 0,596 m3/s (Regional Natural Park of Vosges du Nord
data). More precisely, it is supplied by the confluence of this river and an artificial canal that comes
from a pond. This study area is characterized by a concrete weir, which is 1 m tall and which is devoid
of any moving element.
The peculiarityy of this weir pool is that the slowing down of flow caused by the weir forming it
cause the deposition of a large quantity of sediment over its bottom. Therefore, this study area is ideal
to test the effectiveness of our methodology in a real study, verifying if it permits to bring a better
understanding of the phenomena which characterize this type of environment. In this specific case we
are observing if the limits that it permits to fix intercept the sectors that are silted up.
3. DATA AND METHODS
The methodology that we created to delimit weir pools is based on the direct observation of the
two main effects generated by weirs, that are the raising of the water line and the slowing of the flow.
More specifically, it makes possible to set the upstream limit of a weir pool, the downstream one
coinciding with the weir.
Francesco DONATI / A DIRECT METHOD TO DELIMIT WEIR POOLS 49
To do this, first of all it is necessary to select a homogeneous section of river, between the weir
that forms the studied weir pools and another hydraulic structure, a confluence, a sudden change in
the stream hydromorphology, etc. Second of all, in this sector, from downstream, we position fifteen
equidistant transects which will serve as a measuring station, by lining the last one up with the weir.
This number of transects was established from other protocols used for rivers study, according to
which fifteen measurement stations are sufficient to be able to assess the features of a river section.
(e.g. the French protocol CARHYCE, see Onema, 2010). Furthermore, this same number of transects
was found to be effective in other studies whose purpose was to study the characteristics of the spaces
located upstream of weirs (Bellot, 2014; Donati et al., 2020). In Saint-Hilaire, a transect was placed
every 37 meters, between the two water mills that delimit this study area; In Baerenthal, a transect
was placed every 24 meters, between the weir and a confluence located a few hundred meters
upstream.
On the fifteen transects, the average speed of the flow (m/s) is measured using a current meter.
The kind of instrument that is used is established by the conformation of the study area: if from one
hand it is possible to prospect it by foot it is possible to use a conventional current meter (helices or
doppler), on the other hand if the depth is too great it is possible to use a floating profiler. In this study
we used a doppler current meter, the “FlowTracker 2”. With this instrument, on each transect of the
two-study area, the speed was measured in three verticals: two beside the banks and one in the center
of the river. The number and depth of the measurement points were automatically calculated by the
current meter, as the average speed of each transect.
On the fifteen transects, the average water depth (m) is also measured. Indeed, at the raising of
the water line generated by the weir corresponds a progressive increase in the thickness of the water
column, an effect that in Hydraulics we associate to a back water curve designated with the acronym
“M1” (Chanson, 2004; Dingman, 2009; Martin, 2013). To measure this, there are several solutions:
it is possible to use a graduated staff, the bar of the current meter or the average depth value that the
profilers usually give after each measurement. In the first two cases, it is necessary to measure the
velocity depth in several verticals and then calculate the average depth for each measuring station.
Finally, we enter the data collected in a Cartesian graph with an abscise axis for the transects and
a double ordinate axis for the speed and the average depth of the flow. The intersection between the
two curves materializes the upstream limit of the weir pool as the point where these two phenomena
begin.
From a temporal point of view, this methodology should be applied during low flows, when the
velocity gradient that characterizes the weir pool is stronger and better visible. Rather, it shouldn’t
be applied during high flows, when the energy gradient is lower, especially during floods when the
hydrological effects of the weir can be completely canceled.
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
In the two fields of study that we studied/tested, the application of this methodology gave the
following results
4.1. The results in Saint-Hilaire weir pool
Regarding the Saint-Hilaire study area, the data that we collected show that the raising of the
water line and the slowing of the flow begin at the beginning of the reach upstream the old water mill
(Fig. 1). More precisely, the curves of these two hydrological parameters intersect at the level of
transect number 2, where we fix the upstream limit of weir pool (Fig. 2). It has an area of about 0,5
ha, an average width of 8 m and an average depth of 0,54 m. This perimeter corresponds to the
information that the manager gave us on this study area before the application of our methodology,
that is the weir pool is spread over the entire length of the reach that divide the Saint Hilaire and
Pantin water mill.
50
Fig. 1. The extension of Saint-Hilaire weir pool (Realization: Francesco Donati).
Fig. 2. The evolution of the depth and the speed of the flow in the Saint-Hilaire weir pool; the red bars
show the extension of weir pool (Realization: Francesco Donati).
Francesco DONATI / A DIRECT METHOD TO DELIMIT WEIR POOLS 51
4.2. The results in Baerenthal weir pool
Regarding the Baerenthal study area, the data that we collected show that the raising of the water
line and the slowing of the flow appear shortly after half of the reach created by the weir (Fig. 3).
More precisely, the curves of these two hydrological parameters intersect at the level of transect
number 9, where fix the upstream limit of weir pool (Fig. 4).
Fig. 3. The extension of Baerenthal weir pool (Realization: Francesco Donati).
Fig. 4. The evolution of the depth and the speed of the flow in the Baerenthal weir pool; the red bars show
the extension of weir pool (Realization: Francesco Donati).
52
It has an area of about 0,2 ha, an average width of 11 m and an average depth of 0,78 m. As it is
possible to see from figure 4, the depth and speed curves also intersect before the transect number 9:
this is not due to the effect of the weir, but to the morphology of the site. In fact, between transects 1
and 4, the speed of the water before increases because of the confluence of the two streams that supply
this this study area, after it decrease due to the widening of the riverbed. On the other hand, between
transects 4 and 8, the riverbed suddenly narrows, causing the increase of water depth, while the energy
of the flow remains constant.
As we explained above, this study area was selected to verify whether this methodology makes
possible to delimit some aspects of the functioning of the weir pool, in this specific case the silting up
of the bottom. To study this phenomenon, we collected additional data, using a technique commonly
deployed upstream of any type of reservoir (Carlini, 2006; Donati et al., 2020; Maleval & Alain, 2002;
Maleval & Pitois, 2017). On each transect used to study the hydrological parameters, the depth of the
water and the substrate were measured using a graduated staff, in three verticals.
First of all, we measured the water depth, after which we measured the depth of the substrate: the
difference between these two data gives the thickness of the layer of sediment covering the bottom.
When we cross these data with those used to determine the extent of the sill reservoir, we observe that
the area silted up are included almost perfectly within the perimeter of the weir pool that we identified
and they coincide with the sudden change in flow velocity and the consequent decrease in its sediment
competence (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5. The evolution of the thickness of sediments and the speed of the flow in the Baerenthal weir pool;
the red bars show the extension of weir pool (Realization: Francesco Donati).
6. CONCLUSIONS
These results that we obtained seems to demonstrate the reliability of the methodology that we
created to delimit weir pools. Indeed, the perimeters that we identified thanks to it reflect the
informations we had about the two-study area before its application. So, this technique looks like a
valid tool for researchers and technicians, for example during studies about the operation of this kind
of environments or projects of river restauration. Of course, compared to indirect methodologies, it
requires the use of instruments that can be expensive or the deployment of several people to realize
the measurements. However, it allows to avoid generalizations that may be wrong and to better
consider the environmental context of each weir pool.
Francesco DONATI / A DIRECT METHOD TO DELIMIT WEIR POOLS 53
R EF ER EN CE S
Anderson, D., Moggridge, H., Warren, P., & Shucksmith, J. (2015). The impacts of ‘run-of-river’
hydropower on the physical and ecological condition of rivers: Physical and ecological impacts
of ROR hydropower. Water and Environment Journal, 29(2), pp. 268‑276.
Barraud, R., Lespez, L., Germaine, M.-A., Ballut, C., & Fournier, P. (2013). Moulins à eau et
ouvrages hydrauliques, outils de reconstitution et d’interprétation des trajectoires paysagères des
fonds de vallées. In Au fil de l’eau. Ressources, risques et gestion du Néolithique à nos jours (p.
71‑88). Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
Carlini, M. (2006). Morphologie et hydrodynamique des plans d’eau : Le cas des étangs-lacs en
Limousin.
Chanson, H. (2004). Hydraulics of Open Channel Flow. Elsevier.
Csiki, S., & Rhoads, B. L. (2010). Hydraulic and geomorphological effects of run-of-river dams.
Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 34(6), pp. 755‑780.
Degoutte, G. (2012). Diagnostic, aménagement et gestion des rivières : Hydraulique et morphologie
fluviales appliquées (2e éd.). Éd. Tec & doc: Lavoisier.
Dingman, S. L. (2009). Fluvial Hydraulics. Oxford University Press.
Donati F., Touchart L., & Bartout P. (2019). Do rivers upstream weirs have lotics or lentics
characteristics? Geographia Technica, 14(2), pp. 1‑9.
Donati, F., Touchart, L., & Bartout, P. (2020 a). Les seuils en rivière transforment-ils les milieux
lotiques en milieux lentiques ? Physio-Géo, Volume 15, pp. 111‑131.
Donati F., Touchart L., Bartout P., & Choffel Q. (2020 b). Anciens et nouveaux écosystèmes
aquatiques : Une revue sur leur fonctionnement abiotique. Dynamiques Environnamentales, 45,
pp. 11‑21.
Donati F. (2021). La nature des retenues de seuil : Une question limnologique ? Étude
hydrodynamique, thermique et sédimentaire (Loiret, Moselle, Mayenne). Phd thesis, Université
d’Orléans, 238 p.
Malavoi, J.-R. (2003). Stratégie d’intervention de l’Agence de l’eau sur les seuils en rivière (No
AFF02011; p. 135). Agence de l’Eau Loire Bretagne.
Maleval, V., & Alain, J. (2002). La sédimentation dans un lac artificiel. L’exemple de Saint-Pardoux
(Massif d’Ambazac, Limousin). Géomorphologie : relief, processus, environnement, 4, pp. 307-
319.
Maleval, V., & Pitois, F. (2017). Fonctionnement hydro-sédimentaire et bilan sédimentaire du lac de
Saint-Germain-de-Confolens (Charente, France) : Paramètres géomorphologiques à prendre en
considération dans la gestion du lac. Physio-Géo - Géographie Physique et Environnement, pp.
197-227.
Maniere, L. (2013). Mise au point d’un protocole ’évaluation de l’impact des ouvrages transversaux
sur la continuité sédimentaire dans le cadre d’une approche multiscalaire. Université de Lyon 2
- Agnece de l’Eau Loire Bretagne.
Martin, J. L. (2013). Hydro-Environmental Analysis : Freshwater Environments. CRC Press.
Onema. (2010). Carhyce : Caractérisation hydromorphologique des cours d’eau (p. 48). Onema.
Pearson, A. J., & Pizzuto, J. (2015). Bedload transport over run-of-river dams, Delaware, U.S.A.
Geomorphology, 248, pp. 382‑395.
Rickard, C., Day, R., & Purseglove, J. (2003). River Weirs—Good Practice Guide (No W5B-
023/HQP; p. 157). Environment Agency.
Rivals, C. (2000). Le moulin et le meunier. Mille ans de meunerie en France et en Europe (Vol. 1 &
2). Empreinte Éditions.