ArticlePublisher preview available

Participatory process for marine spatial planning: perception of Mar del Plata’s residents on offshore hydrocarbon exploration in the North Argentina Basin (Argentina)

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

Offshore hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation are activities developed internationally in the advance of the energy industry. Conflicts generated by incompatibility with others or with social actors, make the approach from Marine Spatial Planning necessary. In Argentina, although it is a process that has been developing since the middle of the 20th century, it was not until 2014 when the National Government promoted the activity. The North Argentine Basin (NAB) constitutes a hydrocarbon exploration area that was delimited in 2018 by Resolution 65/2018. This activity in the NAB has given rise to conflicts between intervening social actors, which was manifested in the Public Hearing (AP1/21) held in July 2021. That is why the objective of this work was to analyze the results of the AP1/21 and contrast them with the opinion of Mar del Plata's residents. For this, 682 semi-open surveys were carried out, where they were asked about the activity and the AP1/21. As a result, it was obtained that 373 people were expressed in favor (4%) and against (96%) of the project. Topics such as climate change, energy planning, and disagreement with the steps of the participatory process and the environmental impact study were presented. In the case of the surveys, opinions similar to those expressed in the audience were found, corroborating results and conclusions between both processes. In summary, the work allowed us to know not only the opinion of Mar del Plata's population but also the type of information available on the economic activity analyzed. Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11852-022-00896-x.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 3
Journal of Coastal Conservation (2022) 26:51
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-022-00896-x
Participatory process formarine spatial planning: perception ofMar
del Plata’s residents onoffshore hydrocarbon exploration intheNorth
Argentina Basin (Argentina)
EleonoraM.Verón1,2 · JulianaSocrate2 · MónicaC.García2
Received: 15 March 2022 / Revised: 10 May 2022 / Accepted: 24 September 2022 / Published online: 5 October 2022
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022
Abstract
Offshore hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation are activities developed internationally in the advance of the energy
industry. Conflicts generated by incompatibility with others or with social actors, make the approach from Marine Spatial
Planning necessary. In Argentina, although it is a process that has been developing since the middle of the 20th century, it
was not until 2014 when the National Government promoted the activity. The North Argentine Basin (NAB) constitutes a
hydrocarbon exploration area that was delimited in 2018 by Resolution 65/2018. This activity in the NAB has given rise to
conflicts between intervening social actors, which was manifested in the Public Hearing (AP1/21) held in July 2021. That is
why the objective of this work was to analyze the results of the AP1/21 and contrast them with the opinion of Mar del Plata’s
residents. For this, 682 semi-open surveys were carried out, where they were asked about the activity and the AP1/21. As a
result, it was obtained that 373 people were expressed in favor (4%) and against (96%) of the project. Topics such as climate
change, energy planning, and disagreement with the steps of the participatory process and the environmental impact study
were presented. In the case of the surveys, opinions similar to those expressed in the audience were found, corroborating
results and conclusions between both processes. In summary, the work allowed us to know not only the opinion of Mar del
Plata’s population but also the type of information available on the economic activity analyzed.
Keywords Offshore hydrocarbon exploration· Public audience· North Argentina Basin· Marine spatial planning
Introduction
Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) constitutes a public process
that aims to analyze and assign the spatial and temporal dis-
tribution of human activities in marine areas to achieve pre-
viously defined ecological, economic and social objectives
(Ehler and Douvere 2009). Being a political process, MSP
must necessarily be based on governance and governability
schemes, present from the first stages of the analysis. This is
essential to achieve its success, since the social and political
viability of the initiatives that are implemented depends on
it (Díaz Merlano and Jiménez Ramón 2021). In this way,
cooperation between the authorities (at different scales),
representatives of the uses and activities present within
the considered area and all those people who are affected,
directly and indirectly by the MSP, should be included in
the analysis. Therefore, citizen participation is fundamental
in an MSP process because it allows opening the space for
dialogue to all the actors involved (Díaz Merlano and Jimé-
nez Ramón 2021; García Sanabria etal. 2021; Elrick-Barr
etal. 2022).
MSP is a strategic process that allows studying and
assigning uses to specific areas of the ocean in order to
minimize conflicts between the activities that are carried out.
This is to achieve the greatest benefit, while guaranteeing
the recovery of marine ecosystems (IOC-UNESCO 2022).
In this way, MSP must manage both spatially and temporally
uses and activities involved and analyze the accumulated
impacts, to anticipate measures that will manage the areas or
resources. Among these, it can be mentioning the provision
* Eleonora M. Verón
eleonorav@mdp.edu.ar
1 National Council forScientific andTechnical Research –
CONICET - CCT/MDP, MardelPlata, Argentina
2 Geographic andSocio-Environmental Research Center
- CIGSA, National University ofMar del Plata, Funes,
3350MardelPlata, Argentina
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Article
Full-text available
This study investigates public perceptions of offshore hydrocarbon activities in the North Argentine Basin (NAB), focusing on awareness, environmental concerns, and socio-economic benefits. Conducted through semi-structured surveys, the research explores how demographic factors such as education and residency influence public opinion. Key findings reveal that knowledge of the NAB’s location is significantly shaped by educational attainment and regional residency. However, perceptions of environmental impacts and socio-economic benefits are more closely tied to educational levels rather than age or residency. The study underscores the importance of targeted educational campaigns to enhance public understanding and engagement. Furthermore, the research highlights the critical role of public participation in marine spatial planning (MSP) and environmental decision-making processes. Effective stakeholder and public participation engagement is essential for mitigating conflicts, promoting inclusive policy-making, and ensuring diverse viewpoints are considered. These insights contribute to global discussions on environmental governance, advocating for integrated approaches that balance economic development with environmental sustainability. For Argentine policymakers, the study recommends incorporating public input through tailored educational initiatives and participatory methodologies to achieve more equitable and effective management of offshore hydrocarbon activities.
Article
Full-text available
Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) is dealt at a national level, but generally it includes ecological, physical processes and administrative jurisdictions of multiple countries. The transboundary cooperation on MSP is a complex challenge, that could be better addressed with a participatory process, to achieve coherent planning processes in shared marine socio-ecological systems. This paper focuses on the process followed to reach consensus on cross-border MSP in archipelagic remote regions with no visible and distant maritime borders. Among the results obtained is the design of a European Macaronesia (Canary Islands, Madeira & Azores) Ocean Pilot Program to strengthen marine governance. This work was part of the results of the EU project ‘Macaronesia Maritime Spatial Planning (MarSP)’
Article
Full-text available
Legal-administrative borders in the marine environment rarely coincide with the boundaries of marine ecosystems and their ecological processes. Thus, cooperation in the processes of marine spatial planning (MSP) across borders is essential to apply an ecosystem-based approach. This research analyzes the usefulness of the work flow undertaken to promote cross-border cooperation in MSP for the European Macaronesia. Given the vast extension of the sea basin, it is especially important to define the cooperation scope. The planning of cross-border cooperation initiatives must consider the capacity of the different competent authorities to progress in the MSP process as well as the specific stage that each of the parties involved is. The importance of ensuring the engagement of all competent authorities across all work phases has been confirmed, but it is highlighted the relevance of including those authorities competent in foreign affairs. It is recommended that cross-border cooperation efforts go beyond the process strictly related to spatial planning of the maritime sectors and are used as tools to overcome structural limitations and enhance the natural advantages derived from the island’s condition of insularity and outermost regions. Thus, the proposed work process has proven to be useful as a roadmap to promote cross-border cooperation adapted to the legal-administrative singularities and to respond to the physical-natural and socio-economic realities of the case study.
Article
Full-text available
Este trabajo reflexiona sobre las particularidades que tiene la participación en materia ambiental. Las distintas maneras como los ordenamientos jurídicos la recogen y regulan fundamenta una cierta distancia teórica con el tratamiento general que se da a la participación en la gestión pública. No obstante, se indaga también en otros factores de distanciamiento con el debate general sobre participación, lo que involucra la existencia de variables que tensionan la participación ambiental, como los conceptos de riesgo, deliberación, justicia ambiental y acceso a la justicia. Lo anterior conduce a plantear la necesidad de construir un tratamiento teórico diferenciado, que integre miradas interdisciplinarias (derecho, ciencias políticas, sociología, entre otras) en orden a entender y regular adecuadamente el asunto.
Article
Full-text available
Integrating stakeholder knowledge, views and needs in marine or maritime spatial planning (MSP) processes is important from a governance and social sustainability perspective both for MSP practitioners and for the evolving field of MSP research. Transboundary MSP appears particularly challenging for participation, which is why it is important to identify opportunities and address obstacles for stakeholder integration in this specific context. This article examines how stakeholder integration is currently practiced in the Baltic Sea Region (BSR), an enclosed sea where policy coherence and addressing conflicting interests across borders are especially relevant. It synthesises a range of challenges and enablers for stakeholder participation and mobilisation that have emerged from two transboundary MSP research and development projects, BaltSpace and Baltic SCOPE. The article finds that with the exception of statutory authorities, stakeholder engagement in the BSR is mostly limited to self-motivated stakeholders and consultation rather than more inclusive forms of participation. This can reduce the quality and legitimacy of MSP processes and risks to concentrate power in the hands of a small group of actors. For transboundary stakeholder integration to become more interactive and effective, five types of challenges need attention, regarding a) timing, b) governance systems, c) capacity and processes, d) stakeholder characteristics and e) knowledge and language. These obstacles can be addressed by (1) a dedicated research and development agenda that critically reflects on integrative tools and processes, and (2) by encouraging transnational institutions in the BSR to devote more resources to transboundary stakeholder integration and adopt flexible and adaptive strategies and tools that can facilitate stakeholder involvement throughout the MSP policy cycle.
Book
Full-text available
Cita bibliográfica: Radovich, Violeta S. (2018). Implicancias ambientales de la exploración y la explotación hidrocarburífera en el mar con especial referencia al régimen de la República Argentina y del MERCOSUR (tesis doctoral). Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Derecho. [consultado: 6/3/2019] Disponible en el Repositorio Digital Institucional de la Universidad de Buenos Aires: <http://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=posgrauba&cl=CL1&d=HWA_2760>
Article
Full-text available
El desarrollo de hidrocarburos no convencionales en Estados Unidos ha generado una revolución en la industria petrolera en el ámbito mundial. Luego, otros países comienzan a explorar sus recursos. La cuenca Neuquina, Golfo San Jorge y, más recientemente, la Austral Magallanes en la Argentina observan desde la década de 2010 el desembarco de la actividad en sus territorios. Estos últimos se transforman económica, social y ambientalmente debido a las nuevas dinámicas que se instalan. Este trabajo busca analizar las principales transformaciones en las ciudades argentinas cercanas a la actividad hidrocarburífera no convencional. Para ello, se trabajó con fuentes primarias, a partir de entrevistas a informantes calificados y fuentes secundarias, principalmente material bibliográfico y de prensa. Se observa que la cuenca Neuquina, pionera en el desarrollo de la actividad, atraviesa las mayores transformaciones en su territorio, sobre todo en la ciudad de Añelo. En cambio, en la cuenca Golfo San Jorge y Austral Magallanes, las incipientes exploraciones en su territorio todavía no generan importantes cambios.
Article
Man-made marine structures (MMS) are commonly used to describe any artificial structure in the marine environment, encompassing oil and gas infrastructure and pipelines, artificial reefs, jetties, piers and shipwrecks. MMS are increasingly proposed to address issues facing marine planners, including augmenting fish stocks through the creation of artificial reefs and the repurposing of redundant offshore oil and gas infrastructure (‘rigs to reefs’). Marine spatial planning is a highly contested process, characterised by multiple stakeholders with often divergent priorities due to competing objectives and values. Understanding stakeholder perspectives in relation to MMS is therefore critical in formulating appropriate policies. This review presents the first systematic and comprehensive integration of information from academic journals and ‘grey’ literature relating to social and economic values and perceptions of MMS. The review identifies that, despite advocacy for research on social and economic values of MMS, there are significant gaps in knowledge, in particular relating to comparative assessments of stakeholder values across different types of MMS. Priority areas for future research are highlighted.
Article
This paper reports findings from research which surveyed coastal residents’ attitudes toward offshore oil and gas drilling in China. An online survey was carried out in 22 coastal Chinese cities using a questionnaire aimed at collecting demographic information and measuring offshore drilling support, risk, and trust. The data reveal that coastal residents hold a low support, high risk-perception, and moderate trust over offshore oil and gas drilling. NIMBY (Not-In-My-Back-Yard) mentality shows up in citizens’ support towards offshore drilling. Coastal residents hold different levels of confidence in offshore drilling claims, based on source and contents. People tend to trust scientific statements more from environmental groups than from the oil industry and have more trust in information according to which offshore drilling is riskier instead of safer than previously anticipated. In addition, demographic differences were captured on support for and trust in offshore oil and gas drilling. Gender, occupation, religious attitude, and dietary habits are uncovered to be predictors of offshore drilling support.
Article
As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is an evident decrease in economic activity, especially in the tourism sector. On the southwest coast of the Buenos Aires Province (Argentina), coastal cities base their economy on 3S tourism. In this context, the analysis of social views is crucial for participatory coastal management. As well as the forecast of beach use areas in semi-diurnal mesotidal and low-slope beach conditions, wherein few hours the available beach can double or disappear. Therefore, our objective was to determine the beach's optimal use according to its tides, socio-environmental characteristics, and the perception of the interested parties about the 2020/2021 summer season in the pandemic context in Pehuén Co Beach. We employed camera images (January 2019 and 2020) to obtain the behaviour of normal, spring and neap tides, beach geomorphology, and daily and hourly beach use curves. Online surveys were also conducted with residents, second homeowners, and Pehuén Co visitors about their perception for the 2020/2021 summer season. With this analysis, we were able to divide the beach into four areas according to its potential carrying capacity. During low tide, users' maximum capacity on the beach, respecting sanitary distances, may be 6400 people. Meanwhile, at low tide, this number may rise to 34,000. This information is essential for coastal management after the COVID-19 irruption to ensure maximum efficiency in using the beach maintaining a safe social distance.