No full-text available
To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.
Real-world treatment utilization and economic implications of lupus nephritis disease activity in the United States
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lupus nephritis (LN) is a common and severe complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), with approximately 40% of patients with SLE developing LN. Even with treatment, 10%-30% of patients will progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Although many studies have assessed the clinical value of low disease activity in LN, the economic implications are less defined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate treatment utilization and health care costs associated with active disease, low disease activity, and ESRD in patients with LN. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of Optum pharmacy and medical claims data from 2015 to 2019 was performed and included patients with a diagnosis of SLE (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision or Tenth Revision codes 710.0 or M32, respectively) and additional prespecified criteria for LN. Total health care payer costs for medical and pharmacy services and treatment utilization for commonly prescribed medications were determined for periods of low disease activity, active disease, or ESRD. RESULTS: A total of 21,251 patients (mean age 60.3 years; 87% female; 55% White patients and 18% Black patients) with a mean follow-up period of 30.6 months were included; the majority of patients had active disease (67.3%), followed by low disease activity (51.3%), and ESRD (10.5%). Glucocorticoids were used 2 times more often and mycophenolate mofetil was used 4 times more often in patients with active disease vs low disease activity. Glucocorticoids, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus were more commonly used in patients with ESRD vs those with low disease activity. Mean medical costs were 18,084 per month in ESRD vs $2,523 per month in low disease activity. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment burden and costs are high for patients with active disease and ESRD in LN. Treatments that allow patients to achieve and maintain low disease activity may help improve patient outcomes and reduce medication use and overall health care costs. DISCLOSURES: Maria Dall'Era and Kenneth Kalunian are consultants of Aurinia Pharmaceuticals. Eric Turowski, Vanessa Birardi, Neil Solomons, Simrat Randhawa, and Paola Mina-Osorio are employees and stockholders of Aurinia Pharmaceuticals. Michael Eaddy is a former employee of Xcenda, LLC. Augustina Ogbonnaya and Eileen Farrelly are employees of Xcenda, LLC, which was contracted by Aurinia Pharmaceuticals to assist in the conduct of this study and the writing of this manuscript. Aurinia Pharmaceuticals provided funding for this study and the preparation of the manuscript. Aurinia Pharmaceuticals had a role in writing the report and decision to submit for publication.
... Our study examines the independent impact of these different definitions of remission and LDA on direct and indirect costs in this cohort. Select studies have demonstrated that lupus disease activity, [9][10][11] severity [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] and flares 13 15 18 20 21 drive costs, but none examined inception cohorts, most were limited by reliance on a single centre or administrative data, and very few report indirect costs. Ours is the first study to assess direct and indirect costs associated with various definitions of disease activity and remission in an international inception cohort. ...
... Previous studies have mostly examined costs stratified by disease severity (defined by claims or healthcare utilisationbased algorithms, 12 19 flare frequency or severity, major organ involvement or therapy requirements 13-15 17 20 ), and consistently demonstrated increased costs for those with more severe disease. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] However, few studies have documented costs of SLE stratified by disease activity, [9][10][11] a different construct than disease severity. Our observations are consistent with previous work demonstrating lower costs in patients who maintain LDA. ...
... Our observations are consistent with previous work demonstrating lower costs in patients who maintain LDA. [9][10][11] Yeo et al assessed 200 SLE patients in Australia (358 person-years of observation) and calculated mean annual direct costs of US$7413 (SD $13 133) per year. When ≥50% of the observation period was spent in LLDAS, there was a 25.9% reduction in annual direct medical costs (p=0.04). ...
Objectives
This study aims to determine the independent impact of definitions of remission/low disease activity (LDA) on direct/indirect costs (DCs, ICs) in a multicentre inception cohort.
Methods
Patients from 31 centres in 10 countries were enrolled within 15 months of diagnosis and assessed annually. Five mutually exclusive disease activity states (DAS) were defined as (1) remission off-treatment: clinical (c) SLEDAI-2K=0, without prednisone/immunosuppressants; (2) remission on-treatment: cSLEDAI-2K=0, prednisone ≤5 mg/day and/or maintenance immunosuppressants; (3) LDA-Toronto Cohort (TC): cSLEDAI-2K≤2, without prednisone/immunosuppressants; (4) modified lupus LDA state (mLLDAS): SLEDAI-2K≤4, no activity in major organs/systems, no new activity, prednisone ≤7.5 mg/day and/or maintenance immunosuppressants and (5) active: all remaining assessments.
At each assessment, patients were stratified into the most stringent DAS fulfilled and the proportion of time in a DAS since cohort entry was determined. Annual DCs/ICs (2021 Canadian dollars) were based on healthcare use and lost workforce/non-workforce productivity over the preceding year.
The association between the proportion of time in a DAS and annual DC/IC was examined through multivariable random-effects linear regressions.
Results
1692 patients were followed a mean of 9.7 years; 49.0% of assessments were active. Remission/LDA (per 25% increase in time in a remission/LDA state vs active) were associated with lower annual DC/IC: remission off-treatment (DC −C2507), remission on-treatment (DC −C2604,) LDA-TC (DC −C1040). There were no cost differences between remission/LDA states.
Conclusions
Our data suggest that systemic lupus erythematosus patients who achieve remission, both off and on-therapy, and reductions in disease activity incur lower costs than those experiencing persistent disease activity.
... Indeed, while SoC arms in randomized trials typically reach CR rates of approximately 30-40% (including the Belimumab International Study in Lupus Nephritis (BLISS-LN) and AURORA trials), clearly suggesting an unmet need, real-life data from recent observational cohorts report considerably higher response rates. [17][18][19][20][21] To this end, to decide for which subsets of patients additional treatments are needed, it is desirable to quantify the unmet need with SoC treatments in LN in real-world settings by assessing response rates to initial treatment and, more importantly, to identify predictors of non-response that lead to treatment modifications. 22 23 In this study, we sought to evaluate in a contemporary multicentre cohort of patients with LN (i) 1-year and 2-year renal response rates and longitudinal treatment modifications to achieve these responses, and () predictors for failure to achieve response, which could identify potential candidate patients for initial combination treatments. ...
... Interestingly, a real-world analysis of patients with LN in Germany indicated frequent use of high-dose glucocorticoids during the first year, 20 and a recent study from the US based on claims data, found a similar percentage (24.6%) to our study regarding the switch between induction therapies within the first year. 19 Of note, less than 50% of patients who underwent any treatment change ultimately reached CR at 12 months, highlighting again the importance of the choice of optimal immunosuppressive therapy at the start of treatment. Pending the identification of reliable biomarkers that would optimise the selection of patients for early combination therapies, those who require frequent increases in glucocorticoid doses or those at high risk for glucocorticoid side effects due to comorbidities, may be suitable candidates for such treatment regimens. ...
Objective
To estimate real-life European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR)/European Renal Association (ERA)-European Dialysis and Transplantation Association (EDTA) response rates and predictors for no response in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) managed with conventional immunosuppressive therapies.
Methods
Ambidirectional cohort study of patients with new-onset LN (period 2014–to date). Response rates in the first year were calculated, and all treatment modifications were recorded. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to assess determinants of failure to respond at 12 months.
Results
140 patients were included (81.4% women, median (IQR) age at LN diagnosis 38 (22) years). Among them, 32.1% presented with nephrotic range proteinuria, 28.6% with glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min, 76.6% had proliferative and 19.7% class V LN. Initial treatment consisted of cyclophosphamide in 51.4% of patients (84.7% high-dose, 15.3% low-dose) and mycophenolate in 32.1%. 120 patients had available data at 12 months. EULAR/ERA-EDTA renal response rates at 3, 6 and 12 months were achieved by 72.6%, 78.5% % and 69.2% of patients, respectively. In multivariate analysis, increased Chronicity Index at baseline was associated with failure to achieve either complete or partial response at 12 months (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.35 to 3.77). Notably, 20% of patients required treatment modifications due to suboptimal response during the first 12 months, with the addition of or switch to a different immunosuppressive drug in seven and nine patients, respectively.
Conclusions
More than two-thirds of patients with LN attain EULAR/ERA-EDTA response rates by 12 months, but 20% require therapy modifications within this time period. Patients with increased chronicity in baseline biopsy, when combined with histological activity, are at higher risk for a lack of clinical response.
... To mitigate the effects of this on the results, we used a previously validated claims definition to identify patients with LN [30], though the use of specific LN ICD-10 codes (M32.14 and M32.15) in the absence of other renal-related ICD-10 codes (e.g., end-stage kidney disease after SLE diagnosis) has not been fully evaluated. Finally, while the 12-month baseline period is greater than other studies in the literature [21,23,29,36], it could not guarantee that patients were newly diagnosed with LN, as it is possible that patients had renal involvement but not a formal ICD diagnosis of LN. Herein lies one of the challenges of administrative claims analyses, in the reliance on ICD codes to identify diagnosed patients. ...
Background
We aimed to describe healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and healthcare costs in patients with newly confirmed lupus nephritis (LN) in the United States over a 5-year follow-up period.
Methods
This retrospective, longitudinal cohort study (GSK Study 214102) utilized administrative claims data to identify individuals with a newly confirmed diagnosis of LN between August 01, 2011, and July 31, 2018, based on LN-specific International Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes. Index was the date of first LN-related diagnosis code claim. HCRU, healthcare costs, and incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) flares were reported annually among eligible patients with at least 5 years continuous enrollment post-index.
Results
Of 2,159 patients with a newly confirmed diagnosis of LN meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria, 335 had at least 5 years continuous enrollment post-index. HCRU was greatest in the first year post-LN diagnosis across all categories (inpatient admission, emergency room [ER] visits, ambulatory visits, and pharmacy use), and trended lower, though remained substantial, in the 5-year follow-up period. Among patients with LN and HCRU, the mean (standard deviation [SD]) number of ER visits and inpatient admissions were 3.7 (4.6) and 1.8 (1.5), respectively, in Year 1, which generally remained stable in Years 2–5; the mean (SD) number of ambulatory visits and pharmacy fills were 35.8 (25.1) and 62.9 (43.8), respectively, in Year 1, and remained similar for Years 2–5. Most patients (≥ 91.6%) had ≥ 1 SLE flare in each of the 5 years of follow-up. The proportion of patients who experienced a severe SLE flare was higher in Year 1 (31.6%) than subsequent years (14.3–18.5%). Total costs (medical and pharmacy; mean [SD]) were higher in Year 1 (29,444 [52,310]–21,181 [58,886]; subsequent years: 9,389 [29,283]).
Conclusions
Patients with a newly confirmed diagnosis of LN have substantial HCRU and healthcare costs, particularly in the year post-diagnosis, largely driven by inpatient costs. This highlights the need for improved disease management to prevent renal damage, improve patient outcomes, and reduce costs among patients with renal involvement.
Objective:
Patients with lupus nephritis (LN), a severe renal manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus, should be monitored for progression of chronic kidney disease to end-stage renal disease but data on renal function testing in LN patients are limited. This real-world analysis aimed to evaluate nephrologists' use of renal function tests to support LN diagnosis and monitoring and to examine the impact of disease progression in LN patients in Europe.
Methods:
Data were drawn from the Adelphi Lupus Disease Specific Programme, a cross-sectional survey of nephrologists and their next five consulting patients with LN in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom in 2021. Nephrologists provided demographic and clinical information for each patient and the same patients completed a self-reported questionnaire. Using a checkbox, patients provided informed consent to take part in the survey.
Results:
Nephrologists (n = 72) provided data on 376 patients with LN. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or proteinuria testing was not undertaken in around 10% and 50% of these patients, respectively. Regression analysis predicted reduction in renal function (disease progression) following LN diagnosis whilst bivariate analyses showed significantly worse outcomes for patients with progressed disease: worse pain, fatigue, treatment satisfaction, and patient-reported health state and activity impairment.
Conclusion:
Our study revealed lower-than-expected nephrologist-reported use of renal function testing to support diagnosis/monitoring of patients with LN in real-world clinical settings in Europe. Lower quality of life (QoL) was observed in patients with more progressed disease. Increased use of renal function testing is needed so that all LN patients are monitored closely to manage disease progression and avoid the associated QoL impact.
Introduction
Rare kidney diseases (RKDs) place a substantial economic burden on patients and health systems, the extent of which is unknown and may be systematically underestimated by health economic techniques. We aimed to investigate the economic burden and cost-effectiveness evidence base for RKDs.
Methods
We conducted a systematic scoping review to identify economic evaluations, health technology assessments, and cost-of-illness studies relating to RKDs, published since 2012.
Results
A total of 161 published studies, including 66 cost-of-illness studies and 95 economic evaluations; 72 grey literature reports were also included. Most published literature originated from high-income nations, particularly the USA (81 studies), and focused on a handful of diseases, notably renal cell carcinomas (70) and systemic lupus erythematosus (36). Limited evidence was identified from lower-income settings and there were few studies of genetic conditions, which make up most RKDs. Some studies demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of existing treatments; however, there were limited considerations of broader economic impacts on patients that may be important to those with RKDs. Included health technology assessments highlighted difficulties in obtaining high-quality clinical evidence for treatments in very small patient populations, and often considered equity issues and other patient impacts qualitatively alongside clinical and economic evidence in their recommendations.
Conclusion
We found large gaps in the economic evidence base for RKDs and limited adaptation of methods to account for the uniqueness of these diseases. There may be significant scope for innovation in building an investment case for RKD treatments, as well as in decision-making processes to inform investment decisions.
Lupus Nephritis (LN) still represents one of the most severe complications of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and a major risk factor for morbidity and mortality. However, over the last few years, several studies have paved the way for a deeper understanding of its pathogenetic mechanisms and more targeted treatments. This review aims to provide a comprehensive update on progress on several key aspects in this setting: pathogenetic mechanisms of LN, including new insight into the role of autoantibodies, complement, vitamin D deficiency, and interaction between infiltrating immune cells and kidney resident ones; the evolving role of renal biopsy and biomarkers, which may integrate information from renal histology; newly approved drugs such as voclosporin (VOC) and belimumab (BEL), allowing a more articulate strategy for induction therapy, and other promising phase III-immunosuppressive (IS) agents in the pipeline. Several adjunctive treatments aimed at reducing cardiovascular risk and progression of chronic renal damage, such as antiproteinuric agents, represent an important complement to IS therapy. Furthermore, non-pharmacological measures concerning general lifestyle and diet should also be adopted when managing LN. Integrating these therapeutic areas requires an effort towards a holistic and multidisciplinary approach. At the same time, the availability of an increasingly wider armamentarium may translate into improvements in patient’s renal outcomes over the next decades.
Background:
Lupus nephritis (LN) is a severe manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus; up to 30% of patients with LN will develop end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). One of the main treatment goals for LN is preservation of kidney function, with early decreases in proteinuria associated with improved long-term outcomes. Voclosporin, a second-generation calcineurin inhibitor, was approved in the United States in 2021 for the treatment of active LN combined with background immunosuppression. The AURORA 1 study found that the use of voclosporin with low doses of mycophenolate mofetil and glucocorticoids yielded significant reductions in proteinuria. The AURORA 2 study showed long-term efficacy and safety of voclosporin over a 3-year period with kidney function preservation. The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) is a nonprofit organization that evaluates medical evidence to help improve patient outcomes and control costs. In 2021, ICER published an economic model to estimate the impact and cost-effectiveness of LN therapies. From a US health care perspective, voclosporin was cost-effective at 131,528 per equal value of life-years gained (evLYG). At the time of the LN cost-effectiveness model (CEM) development, voclosporin was not yet approved in the United States and the cost of treating patients with LN with ESKD was not captured in the literature.
Objective:
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of voclosporin given the emergence of new data.
Methods:
The LN CEM uses a short-term trial-based Markov model and long-term extrapolation using partitioned survival modeling data assuming adults with LN start with active disease, transitioning to complete or partial renal response, kidney failure, or death. In the current analysis, clinical data for voclosporin, duration of voclosporin treatment for nonresponders, and drug costs reflecting the 2023 price of voclosporin were updated. Additionally, health care payer costs of disease management were incorporated based on real-world claims data on the costs of treating patients with LN.
Results:
Using the LN CEM with inputs reflecting the latest and most relevant evidence, the incremental cost of voclosporin per QALY was 77,643. For a subpopulation of Black, Hispanic, and Latino patients, the incremental cost of voclosporin per QALY was 67,828.
Conclusions:
Following the inclusion of updated data in the cost-effectiveness analysis, voclosporin remains a cost-effective therapy for the treatment of active LN including in a Black, Hispanic, and Latino subpopulation, substantially below the ICER willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/QALY.
This retrospective cohort study (GSK213737) aimed to characterize treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and costs in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) initiating immunosuppressant therapy in clinical practice in Germany, to better understand the full picture of the real-world burden of LN.
Adult patients with LN who initiated mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), intravenous cyclophosphamide (CYC), azathioprine (AZA), tacrolimus, cyclosporin A, or rituximab therapy in 2011–2017 (index therapy) were identified from the Betriebskrankenkassen German Sickness Fund database. Treatment patterns, including immunosuppressant discontinuations, and therapy switches, were assessed (maximum follow-up 4 years). Corticosteroid use, HCRU, and total economic costs were also evaluated. HCRU and costs were compared with matched controls (individuals without systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE]/LN matched by age, sex, and baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index).
Among 334 patients with LN, the median (interquartile range) duration of index immunosuppressant therapy use was 380.5 (126, 1064) days. Of those patients with 4 years complete enrollment, 70.8% had ≥ 1 discontinuation and 28.8% switched therapy. While most patients (71.2%) received only one immunosuppressant, gaps in treatment were common. After 1 year of follow-up, 41.6% of patients had a prednisone-equivalent corticosteroid dose of ≥ 7.5 mg/day. Patients with LN had greater HCRU use for most categories assessed and increased mean total costs per person-year versus controls (€15,115.99 versus €4,081.88 in the first year of follow-up).
This real-world analysis demonstrated the considerable burden of immunosuppressant-treated LN in Germany, with a high rate of discontinuations, frequent use of high-dose corticosteroids, and substantial HCRU/costs.
Objective
To describe the characteristics, treatment patterns, health care resource utilization (HCRU), and cost of care for members of a large United States (US) health insurance plan with lupus nephritis (LN).
Methods
A retrospective observational study was conducted using a health insurance plan database to identify adult members with a diagnosis of LN. Medical and pharmacy claims were used to describe demographics, comorbidities, HCRU, and cost patterns over a 12-month follow-up period for each patient, between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016. All study variables were examined descriptively.
Results
A total of 1039 patients were available for analysis (median age, 47 years; 83% female). The median Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 3.3. Less than half (41%) of patients received immunosuppressive therapies commonly used to treat LN. Evidence indicated that 58% of the study population were prescribed corticosteroid therapy, in most cases (73%) for more than 60 days. Adverse events known to be associated with corticosteroid therapy were recorded in 58% of patients. Guideline-recommended preventive therapy with hydroxychloroquine was prescribed for 54% of members with LN. Nearly half (47%) of members with LN did not see a nephrologist and more than one-third (36%) did not see a rheumatologist over 1 year of follow-up. Rates of all-cause hospitalization and emergency department (ED) use were 25% and 35%, respectively. The mean all-cause per-member-per-month (PMPM) medical cost for the study population was 1147 PMPM.
Conclusion
Patients with LN who are insured through a large US health plan appeared to underutilize outpatient specialist services and guideline-recommended hydroxychloroquine therapy. Corticosteroid use and adverse events known to be associated with corticosteroids were common in this cohort.
Objective
To update the 2012 EULAR/ERA–EDTA recommendations for the management of lupus nephritis (LN).
Methods
Following the EULAR standardised operating procedures, a systematic literature review was performed. Members of a multidisciplinary Task Force voted independently on their level of agreeement with the formed statements.
Results
The changes include recommendations for treatment targets, use of glucocorticoids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and management of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). The target of therapy is complete response (proteinuria <0.5–0.7 g/24 hours with (near-)normal glomerular filtration rate) by 12 months, but this can be extended in patients with baseline nephrotic-range proteinuria. Hydroxychloroquine is recommended with regular ophthalmological monitoring. In active proliferative LN, initial (induction) treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF 2–3 g/day or mycophenolic acid (MPA) at equivalent dose) or low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (CY; 500 mg × 6 biweekly doses), both combined with glucocorticoids (pulses of intravenous methylprednisolone, then oral prednisone 0.3–0.5 mg/kg/day) is recommended. MMF/CNI (especially tacrolimus) combination and high-dose CY are alternatives, for patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria and adverse prognostic factors. Subsequent long-term maintenance treatment with MMF or azathioprine should follow, with no or low-dose (<7.5 mg/day) glucocorticoids. The choice of agent depends on the initial regimen and plans for pregnancy. In non-responding disease, switch of induction regimens or rituximab are recommended. In pure membranous LN with nephrotic-range proteinuria or proteinuria >1 g/24 hours despite renin–angiotensin–aldosterone blockade, MMF in combination with glucocorticoids is preferred. Assessment for kidney and extra-renal disease activity, and management of comorbidities is lifelong with repeat kidney biopsy in cases of incomplete response or nephritic flares. In ESKD, transplantation is the preferred kidney replacement option with immunosuppression guided by transplant protocols and/or extra-renal manifestations. Treatment of LN in children follows the same principles as adult disease.
Conclusions
We have updated the EULAR recommendations for the management of LN to facilitate homogenization of patient care.
Objective
Treat‐to‐target end points for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been assessed for their impact on damage accrual and flare, but whether they have an impact on the high health care utilization and costs in SLE has not been studied. The purpose of this study was to examine our hypothesis that the recently described lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) would be associated with reduced health care cost.
Methods
Data from a single tertiary hospital longitudinal SLE cohort were assessed. Baseline demographics, disease activity (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 [SLEDAI‐2K], physician global assessment [PhGA], and flare index), and medication use were evaluated, and direct health care utilization and cost data were obtained from hospital information systems. LLDAS was defined as previously published: briefly, SLEDAI‐2K ≤4 with no new activity, PhGA ≤1, prednisolone ≤7.5 mg/day, and optimal standard immunosuppressive agents. Analysis was performed using multivariable linear regression.
Results
Two hundred SLE patients, contributing 357.8 person‐years of observation, were included. A history of lupus nephritis was present in 42% of patients, and damage (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index >0) was present at study commencement in 57.3% of patients. The mean ± SD annual direct medical cost per patient was US$7,413 ± 13,133/year. In multivariable analysis, increased cost was associated with the presence of baseline organ damage (41.7% increase; P = 0.009) and corticosteroid use (>7.5–15 mg/day: 55.7% increase; P = 0.02; and >15 mg/day: 202% increase; P < 0.001). In contrast, spending ≥50% of the observation period in LLDAS was associated with a 25.9% reduction in annual direct medical cost (P = 0.04).
Conclusion
Greater time spent in LLDAS was associated with significantly reduced direct hospital health care costs among patients with SLE.
Objective
End points currently used in lupus nephritis (LN) clinical trials lack uniformity and questionably reflect long‐term kidney survival. This study was undertaken to identify short‐term end points that predict long‐term kidney outcomes for use in clinical trials.
Methods
A database of 944 patients with LN was assembled from 3 clinical trials and 12 longitudinal cohorts. Variables from the first 12 months of treatment after diagnosis of active LN (prediction period) were assessed as potential predictors of long‐term outcomes in a 36‐month follow‐up period. The long‐term outcomes examined were new or progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD), severe kidney injury (SKI), and the need for permanent renal replacement therapy (RRT). To predict the risk for each outcome, hazard index tools (HITs) were derived using multivariable analysis with Cox proportional hazards regression.
Results
Among 550 eligible subjects, 54 CKD, 55 SKI, and 22 RRT events occurred. Variables in the final CKD HIT were prediction‐period CKD status, 12‐month proteinuria, and 12‐month serum creatinine level. The SKI HIT variables included prediction‐period CKD status, International Society of Nephrology (ISN)/Renal Pathology Society (RPS) class, 12‐month proteinuria, 12‐month serum creatinine level, race, and an interaction between ISN/RPS class and 12‐month proteinuria. The RRT HIT included age at diagnosis, 12‐month proteinuria, and 12‐month serum creatinine level. Each HIT validated well internally (c‐indices 0.84–0.92) and in an independent LN cohort (c‐indices 0.89–0.92).
Conclusion
HITs, derived from short‐term kidney responses to treatment, correlate with long‐term kidney outcomes, and now must be validated as surrogate end points for LN clinical trials.
Glucocorticoids exert anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive activities by genomic and nongenomic effects. The classic genomic effects are mediated by cytosolic glucocorticoid receptors that can upregulate the expression of anti-inflammatory proteins in the nucleus (transactivation) or repress the translocation of proinflammatory transcription factors from the cytosol into the nucleus (transrepression). The nongenomic effects are probably mediated by membrane glucocorticoid receptors. Glucocorticoid receptors are expressed also in podocytes and experimental data suggest that glucocorticoids may protect from podocyte injury. Glucocorticoids have a low therapeutic index and may exert a number of time-dependent and dose-dependent side effects. Measures to prevent or attenuate side effects include single-morning administration of short-acting glucocorticoids, dietetic counseling, increasing physical activity, frequent monitoring, and adapting the doses to the clinical conditions of the patient. Synthetic glucocorticoids, either given alone or in combination with other immunosuppressive drugs, are still the cornerstone therapy in multiple glomerular disorders. However, glucocorticoids are of little benefit in C3 glomerulopathy and may be potentially deleterious in patients with maladaptive focal glomerulosclerosis. Their efficacy depends not only on the type and severity of glomerular disease, but also on the timeliness of administration, the dosage, and the duration of treatment. Whereas an excessive use of glucocorticoids can be responsible for severe toxicity, too low a dosage and too short duration of glucocorticoid treatment can result in false steroid resistance.
Objective:
The Manhattan Lupus Surveillance Program (MLSP) is a population-based registry designed to determine the prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in 2007 and the incidence from 2007 to 2009 among residents of New York County (Manhattan), New York, and to characterize cases by race/ethnicity, including Asians and Hispanics, for whom data are lacking.
Methods:
We identified possible SLE cases from hospital records, rheumatologist records, and administrative databases. Cases were defined according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria, the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification criteria, or the treating rheumatologist's diagnosis. Rates among Manhattan residents were age-standardized, and capture-recapture analyses were conducted to assess case underascertainment.
Results:
By the ACR definition, the age-standardized prevalence and incidence rates of SLE were 62.2 and 4.6 per 100,000 person-years, respectively. Rates were ∼9 times higher in women than in men for prevalence (107.4 versus 12.5) and incidence (7.9 versus 1.0). Compared with non-Hispanic white women (64.3), prevalence was higher among non-Hispanic black (210.9), Hispanic (138.3), and non-Hispanic Asian (91.2) women. Incidence rates were higher among non-Hispanic black women (15.7) compared with non-Hispanic Asian (6.6), Hispanic (6.5), and non-Hispanic white (6.5) women. Capture-recapture adjustment increased the prevalence and incidence rates (75.9 and 6.0, respectively). Alternate SLE definitions without capture-recapture adjustment revealed higher age-standardized prevalence and incidence rates (73.8 and 6.2, respectively, by the SLICC definition and 72.6 and 5.0 by the rheumatologist definition) than the ACR definition, with similar patterns by sex and race/ethnicity.
Conclusion:
The MLSP confirms findings from other registries on disparities by sex and race/ethnicity, provides new estimates among Asians and Hispanics, and provides estimates using the SLICC criteria.
Objective
Two recent important lupus nephritis trials reported that proteinuria was a good predictor of renal outcome in Caucasians, but data on real-life situation, other races and severe nephritis are lacking to substantiate this finding as a simple test to guide clinical practice. The aim of this study was to validate proteinuria as a predictor of long-term renal outcome in real-life situation in a racially diverse group of patients with severe nephritis.
Methods
Proteinuria, serum creatinine (SCr) and urine red blood cells were assessed at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months, as early predictors of long-term renal outcome (SCr <1.5 mg/dL at 7 years), in 94 patients with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis. The parameter performance and cut-off values were computed by receiver operating characteristic curves. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to validate the parameter.
Results
A proteinuria <0.8 g/24 hours at 12 months was the best single predictor of long-term renal outcome (sensitivity 90%, specificity 78%, positive predictive value 67%, negative predictive value (NPV) 94% and area under the curve 0.86; p<0.001). Addition of other variables to proteinuria such as SCr and haematuria at 12 months did not improve its performance. The proteinuria cut-off value of 0.8 g/24 hours at 12 months was a good predictor of 7-year renal survival (years free of dialysis) for patients with pure membranous (p=0.005) and proliferative nephritis (p=0.043), as well as black (p=0.002) and white race (p=0.001), anti-dsDNA positive (p=0.001) and anti-dsDNA negative (p=0.04) and male (p=0.028) and female (p=0.003) patients.
Conclusion
We provided novel evidence that, in a real-life situation, proteinuria at 12 months of follow-up was the single best predictor of renal outcome at 7 years for an ethnically diverse group of patients with severe nephritis and a valid parameter for distinct histological classes, races, genders and anti-dsDNA profiles. The remarkably high NPV obtained reinforces its recommendation as the ideal predictor for clinical practice, since it is of low cost, easy to interpret, non-invasive and widely available.
Background:
Although an early decrease in proteinuria has been correlated with good long-term renal outcome in lupus nephritis (LN), studies aimed at defining a cut-off proteinuria value are missing, except a recent analysis performed on patients randomised in the Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial, demonstrating that a target value of 0.8 g/day at month 12 optimised sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of good renal outcome. The objective of the current work is to validate this target in another LN study, namely the MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial (MNT).
Methods:
Long-term (at least 7 years) renal function data were available for 90 patients randomised in the MNT. Receiver operating characteristic curves were built to test the performance of proteinuria measured within the 1st year as short-term predictor of long-term renal outcome. We calculated the positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV).
Results:
After 12 months of treatment, achievement of a proteinuria <0.7 g/day best predicted good renal outcome, with a sensitivity and a specificity of 71% and 75%, respectively. The PPV was high (94%) but the NPV low (29%). Addition of the requirement of urine red blood cells ≤5/hpf as response criteria at month 12 reduced sensitivity from 71% to 41%.
Conclusions:
In this cohort of mainly Caucasian patients suffering from a first episode of LN in most cases, achievement of a proteinuria <0.7 g/day at month 12 best predicts good outcome at 7 years and inclusion of haematuria in the set of criteria at month 12 undermines the sensitivity of early proteinuria decrease for the prediction of good outcome. The robustness of these conclusions stems from the very similar results obtained in two distinct LN cohorts.
Trial registration number:
NCT00204022.
To determine nephritis outcomes in a prospective multi-ethnic/racial SLE inception cohort.
Patients in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics inception cohort (≤15 months of SLE diagnosis) were assessed annually for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), proteinuria and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Health-related quality of life was measured by the Short Form (36 questions) health survey questionnaire (SF-36) subscales, mental and physical component summary scores.
There were 1827 patients, 89% females, mean (s.d.) age 35.1 (13.3) years. The mean (s.d.) SLE duration at enrolment was 0.5 (0.3) years and follow-up 4.6 (3.4) years. LN occurred in 700 (38.3%) patients: 566/700 (80.9%) at enrolment and 134/700 (19.1%) during follow-up. Patients with nephritis were younger, more frequently men and of African, Asian and Hispanic race/ethnicity. The estimated overall 10-year incidence of ESRD was 4.3% (95% CI: 2.8%, 5.8%), and with nephritis was 10.1% (95% CI: 6.6%, 13.6%). Patients with nephritis had a higher risk of death (HR = 2.98, 95% CI: 1.48, 5.99; P = 0.002) and those with eGFR <30 ml/min at diagnosis had lower SF-36 physical component summary scores (P < 0.01) and lower Physical function, Physical role and Bodily pain scores. Over time, patients with abnormal eGFR and proteinuria had lower SF-36 mental component summary (P ≤ 0.02) scores compared to patients with normal values.
LN occurred in 38.3% of SLE patients, frequently as the initial presentation, in a large multi-ethnic inception cohort. Despite current standard of care, nephritis was associated with ESRD and death, and renal insufficiency was linked to lower health-related quality of life. Further advances are required for the optimal treatment of LN.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Large administrative databases such as Medicaid billing databases could be used to study care and outcomes of lupus nephritis if these patients could be correctly identified from claims data. We aimed to develop and validate an algorithm for the correct identification of cases of lupus nephritis using ICD-9 billing codes. We used the Research Patient Data Resource query tool at our institution to identify patients with potential lupus nephritis. We compared four ICD-9 code based strategies, identifying patients seen between 2000 and 2007 with Medicaid medical insurance with greater than two claims for a diagnosis of SLE (ICD-9 code 710.0) and a combination of greater than two nephrologist visits and/or renal ICD-9 codes. We assessed performance using the positive predictive value. Two hundred and thirty four subjects were identified and medical records reviewed. Our third strategy, based on a combination of lupus and renal ICD-9 codes and nephrologist encounter claims, had the highest positive predictive value (88%) for the identification of patients with lupus nephritis. This strategy may offer a sound method of identifying patients with lupus nephritis for health services research in addition to serving as a model for using claims data as a way to better understand rare diseases such as lupus.
The 2009 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guideline on the monitoring, management, and treatment of kidney transplant recipients is intended to assist the practitioner caring for adults and children after kidney transplantation. The guideline development process followed an evidence-based approach, and management recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant treatment trials. Critical appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The guideline makes recommendations for immunosuppression, graft monitoring, as well as prevention and treatment of infection, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, and other complications that are common in kidney transplant recipients, including hematological and bone disorders. Limitations of the evidence, especially on the lack of definitive clinical outcome trials, are discussed and suggestions are provided for future research.
Upcoming paradigm shift in the way we treat lupus nephritis. Traditionally, the management of lupus nephritis has been separated into an induction and maintenance phase of therapy. Novel treatment concepts retain the early use of steroids but rather involve the continued use of a combination of immunosuppressive drugs to control the underlying chronic systemic autoimmune disease. This different strategy allows the physician to taper corticosteroids faster.
Systemic lupus erythematosus is a multisystem autoimmune disease that commonly affects the kidneys. Lupus nephritis (LN) is the most common cause of kidney injury in systemic lupus erythematosus and a major risk factor for morbidity and mortality. The pathophysiology of LN is heterogeneous. Genetic and environmental factors likely contribute to this heterogeneity. Despite improved understanding of the pathogenesis of LN, treatment advances have been few and risk for kidney failure remains unacceptably high. This installment in the Core Curriculum of Nephrology provides an up-to-date review of the current understanding of LN epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Challenging issues such as the management of LN in pregnancy, timing of transplantation, and the evolving role of corticosteroid use in the management of LN are discussed. We review the currently accepted approach to care for patients with LN and highlight deficiencies that need to be addressed to better preserve long-term kidney health and improve outcomes in LN.
Objective:
This observational study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected Hopkins Lupus Cohort data to compare longterm renal survival in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) who achieved complete (CR), partial (PR), or no remission following standard-of-care LN induction therapy.
Methods:
Eligible patients with biopsy-proven LN (revised American College of Rheumatology or Systemic Lupus Collaborating Clinics criteria) were identified and categorized into ordinal (CR, PR, or no remission) or binary (response or no response) renal remission categories at 24 months post-diagnosis [modified Aspreva Lupus Management Study (mALMS) and modified Belimumab International Lupus Nephritis Study (mBLISS-LN) criteria]. The primary endpoint was longterm renal survival [without endstage renal disease (ESRD) or death].
Results:
In total, 176 patients met the inclusion criteria. At Month 24 postbiopsy, more patients met mALMS remission criteria (CR = 59.1%, PR = 30.1%) than mBLISS-LN criteria (CR = 40.9%, PR = 16.5%). During subsequent followup, 18 patients developed ESRD or died. Kaplan-Meier plots suggested patients with no remission at Month 24 were more likely than those with PR or CR to develop the outcome using either mALMS (p = 0.0038) and mBLISS-LN (p = 0.0097) criteria for remission. Based on Cox regression models adjusted for key confounders, those in CR according to the mBLISS-LN (HR 0.254, 95% CI 0.082-0.787; p = 0.0176) and mALMS criteria (HR 0.228, 95% CI 0.063-0.828; p = 0.0246) were significantly less likely to experience ESRD/mortality than those not in remission.
Conclusion:
Renal remission status at 24 months following LN diagnosis is a significant predictor of longterm renal survival, and a clinically relevant endpoint.
Objective:
Estimates of the incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in the US have varied widely. The purpose of this study was to conduct the California Lupus Surveillance Project (CLSP) to determine credible estimates of SLE incidence and prevalence, with a special focus on Hispanics and Asians.
Methods:
The CLSP, which is funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, is a population-based registry of individuals with SLE residing in San Francisco County, CA, from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2009. Data sources included hospitals, rheumatologists, nephrologists, commercial laboratories, and a state hospital discharge database. We abstracted medical records to ascertain SLE cases, which we defined as patients who met ≥4 of the 11 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for SLE. We estimated crude and age-standardized incidence and prevalence, which were stratified by sex and race/ethnicity.
Results:
The overall age-standardized annual incidence rate was 4.6 per 100,000 person-years. The average annual period prevalence was 84.8 per 100,000 persons. The age-standardized incidence rate in women and men was 8.6 and 0.7 per 100,000 person-years, respectively. This rate was highest among black women (30.5), followed by Hispanic women (8.9), Asian women (7.2), and white women (5.3). The age-standardized prevalence in women per 100,000 persons was 458.1 in blacks, 177.9 in Hispanics, 149.7 in Asians, and 109.8 in whites. Capture-recapture modeling estimated 33 additional incident cases and 147 additional prevalent cases.
Conclusion:
Comprehensive methods that include intensive case-finding provide more credible estimates of SLE in Hispanics and Asians, and confirm racial and ethnic disparities in SLE. The disease burden of SLE is highest in black women, followed by Hispanic women, Asian women, and white women.
Lupus is no longer an unknown chameleon of medicine. Significant progress has been made on unraveling the pathogenesis of lupus and lupus nephritis, and how to treat the disease. Here we provide an update on the pathophysiology of lupus and its related kidney disease, consider areas of controversy in disease management, and discuss the unmet needs of lupus nephritis and how to address these needs. We focus on rethinking how innovative therapies for lupus nephritis should be evaluated and evolving strategies to more efficiently mitigate irreversible nephron loss in patients with lupus nephritis.
Lupus nephritis is a common and severe manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus that disproportionately affects nonwhites and those in lower socioeconomic groups. This review discusses recent data on the incidence, prevalence, and outcomes of patients with lupus nephritis with a focus on low-income US Medicaid patients. We also review recent guidelines on diagnosis, treatment, and screening for new onset and relapses of lupus nephritis. Finally, we discuss the management of lupus nephritis from a rheumatologist's perspective, including vigilance for the common adverse events related to disease and treatment, and we review prevention and new treatment strategies.
To report the 10-year follow-up of the MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial comparing azathioprine (AZA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as maintenance therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis, and to test different definitions of early response as predictors of long-term renal outcome.
In 2014, data on survival, kidney function, 24 h proteinuria, renal flares and other outcomes were collected for the 105 patients randomised between 2002 and 2006, except in 13 lost to follow-up.
Death (2 and 3 in the AZA and MMF groups, respectively) and end-stage renal disease (1 and 3, respectively) were rare events. Time to renal flare (22 and 19 flares in AZA and MMF groups, respectively) did not differ between AZA and MMF patients. Patients with good long-term renal outcome had a much more stringent early decrease of 24 h proteinuria compared with patients with poor outcome. The positive predictive value of a 24 h proteinuria <0.5 g/day at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months for a good long-term renal outcome was excellent (between 89% and 92%). Inclusion of renal function and urinalysis in the early response criteria did not impact the value of early proteinuria decrease as long-term prognostic marker.
The long-term follow-up data of the MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial do not indicate that MMF is superior to AZA as maintenance therapy in a Caucasian population suffering from proliferative lupus nephritis. Moreover, we confirm the excellent positive predictive value of an early proteinuria decrease for long-term renal outcome.
NCT00204022.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Objective: There is a need to determine which response measures in lupus nephritis trials are most predictive of good long-term renal function. We utilized data from the Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial (ELNT) to evaluate the performance of proteinuria, serum creatinine (SCr), and urine red blood cells (RBCs) as predictors of good long-term renal outcome. Methods: ELNT subjects with measures of proteinuria, SCr, and urine RBCs at 3, 6 or 12 months and a minimum 7 year follow-up were included (n=76). We assessed the ability of these clinical biomarkers at 3, 6, and 12 months after randomization to predict good long-term renal outcome (defined as SCr ≤ 1.0mg/dL) at 7 years. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to assess parameter performance at these time points and to select the best cutoff for individual parameters; sensitivity and specificity were calculated for the parameters alone and in combination. Results: Proteinuria of <0.8g/day 12 months after randomization was the single best predictor of good long-term renal function (sensitivity=81%, specificity=78%). The addition of SCr to proteinuria did not improve performance; addition of urine RBCs significantly decreased sensitivity to 47%. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the level of proteinuria at 12 months is the individual best predictor of long-term renal outcome. Inclusion of urine RBCs as part of a composite outcome measure actually undermines the predictive value of the trial data. We therefore suggest that urine RBCs should not be included as a component of clinical trial response criteria in lupus nephritis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
© 2015 American College of Rheumatology.
Objective:
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that can affect multiple organ systems, including the kidneys (lupus nephritis) and the central nervous system (neuropsychiatric lupus, or NPSLE). The healthcare costs and resource utilization associated with treating lupus nephritis and NPSLE in a large US managed care plan were studied.
Methods:
SLE subjects ≥18 years of age and with claims-based evidence of nephritis or neuropsychiatric conditions were identified from a health plan database. An index date was set as a randomly drawn date from all qualifying claims during 2003-2008 for study subjects. Subjects were matched on the basis of demographic and clinical characteristics to unaffected controls. Costs and resource use were determined during a fixed 12-month post-index period.
Results:
Nine hundred and seven lupus nephritis subjects were matched to controls, and 1062 subjects with NPSLE were matched to controls. Mean overall post-index healthcare costs were significantly higher among subjects with lupus nephritis in comparison to matched controls (5347, p < 0.001). Similarly, mean overall post-index healthcare costs were significantly higher among subjects with NPSLE compared to controls (4646, p < 0.001). Subjects with lupus nephritis or NPSLE had higher mean post-index numbers of ambulatory visits, specialist visits, emergency department visits and inpatient hospital stays, compared to controls (all p < 0.001).
Limitations:
Additional research, such as medical chart review, could provide validation for the claims-based identification of lupus nephritis and NPSLE subjects. Also, indirect costs were not evaluated in this study.
Conclusion:
Subjects with lupus nephritis or NPSLE have high costs and resource use, compared to unaffected controls.
To develop recommendations for the management of adult and paediatric lupus nephritis (LN).
The available evidence was systematically reviewed using the PubMed database. A modified Delphi method was used to compile questions, elicit expert opinions and reach consensus.
Immunosuppressive treatment should be guided by renal biopsy, and aiming for complete renal response (proteinuria <0.5 g/24 h with normal or near-normal renal function). Hydroxychloroquine is recommended for all patients with LN. Because of a more favourable efficacy/toxicity ratio, as initial treatment for patients with class III-IV(A) or (A/C) (±V) LN according to the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society 2003 classification, mycophenolic acid (MPA) or low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (CY) in combination with glucocorticoids is recommended. In patients with adverse clinical or histological features, CY can be prescribed at higher doses, while azathioprine is an alternative for milder cases. For pure class V LN with nephrotic-range proteinuria, MPA in combination with oral glucocorticoids is recommended as initial treatment. In patients improving after initial treatment, subsequent immunosuppression with MPA or azathioprine is recommended for at least 3 years; in such cases, initial treatment with MPA should be followed by MPA. For MPA or CY failures, switching to the other agent, or to rituximab, is the suggested course of action. In anticipation of pregnancy, patients should be switched to appropriate medications without reducing the intensity of treatment. There is no evidence to suggest that management of LN should differ in children versus adults.
Recommendations for the management of LN were developed using an evidence-based approach followed by expert consensus.
Based on a literature search, there are limited data on the economic burden of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), particularly in patients with lupus nephritis.
The objective of this study was to compare health care resource utilization and direct medical care costs over a period of 12 months in patients with a history of SLE with or without nephritis.
Patients aged >or=18 years with >or=1 claim for an immunosuppressive/disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, antimalarial agent, NSAID/cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, or other SLE-related treatment (eg, opioid and combination analgesic, antianxiety agent, antihyperlipidemic agent, antihypertensive agent, bisphosphonate, vitamin D) dated between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2007, were identified using a nationally representative, US commercial insurance claims database. The date of the first dispensation of the treatment represented the index date. Patients were required to have >or=2 claims containing a diagnosis of SLE during a 6-month preindex period through 3 months postindex and to have continuous health plan enrollment for 6 months before and 12 months after the index date. Patients with >or=1 claim containing a diagnosis of nephritis during the preindex period were identified. Health care resource utilization and direct medical care cost data were assessed over a period of 12 months; paid amounts were used as a proxy for costs and were expressed in year-2008 US dollars.
A total of 15,590 patients with SLE were identified (13,828 women, 1762 men; mean age, 48 years); 1068 (6.9%) had a history of nephritis. The mean age of patients with SLE without nephritis was significantly greater compared with the group with nephritis (47.9 vs 46.5 years, respectively; P < 0.001), and a greater proportion of this group were women (89.0% vs 84.7%; P < 0.001). Over a period of 12 months, 30.3% of patients with nephritis were hospitalized compared with 13.6% of those without nephritis (P < 0.001); the mean lengths of hospital stays were 16.52 and 9.69 days (P < 0.001) in patients with and without nephritis, respectively. Patients with nephritis also underwent more outpatient laboratory tests (mean, 64.42 vs 30.96; P < 0.001) and had a significantly higher mean number of intravenous infusions (mean, 1.7 vs 1.1; P < 0.001), and total 12-month follow-up costs were significantly greater in patients with nephritis compared with those without nephritis (mean, 12,029; P < 0.001). Costs associated with inpatient and outpatient care were 252% and 146% higher in patients with SLE with nephritis, respectively. Outpatient costs were associated with approximately half of the total costs in patients with or without nephritis; pharmacy costs accounted for 20% of the total costs in patients with SLE and nephritis and 27% of total costs among those without nephritis. Significantly higher costs also were found in patients with nephritis when only SLE-related costs were assessed and after differences in patient characteristics and comorbidities were adjusted through multivariate analyses (all, P < 0.05).
The present data analysis found that patients with SLE with nephritis consumed significantly more health care resources, with >2.5-fold the costs, compared with those without nephritis. The majority (84%) of added costs were attributable to inpatient hospitalizations and outpatient services, and 16% were attributable to pharmacy services.
To estimate the long-term direct medical costs and health care utilization for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and a subset of SLE patients with nephritis.
Patients with newly active SLE were found in the MarketScan Medicaid Database (1999-2005), which includes all inpatient, outpatient, emergency department, and pharmaceutical claims for more than 10 million Medicaid beneficiaries. The date a patient became newly active was defined as the earliest observed SLE diagnosis code, with a 6-month clean period prior to the diagnosis. This method identified 2,298 patients with a consecutive followup of 5 years. A reference group of patients without SLE was constructed using propensity score matching. Nephritis was assessed based on diagnosis and procedure codes involving the kidney.
Mean annual medical costs for SLE patients totaled 6,831) than that for reference patients. Costs decreased slightly at year 2 but then increased yearly at an average rate of 16% through year 5, to 967-3,756 higher than the reference patients. SLE patients with nephritis (n = 489) had costs $13,228-34,907 greater than the reference group. Inpatient visits for the nephritis subgroup were 0.6-1.0 per capita, which are approximately twice the rate for all SLE patients and 3 to 4 times higher than the reference group.
SLE is a costly condition to treat. Medical expenses incurred by SLE patients increase steadily over time, particularly for patients with nephritis.
The value of a complete remission in severe lupus nephritis is well known but little is known about the impact of a partial remission in this patient population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term prognosis of achieving a complete or partial remission in a well-defined group of patients with severe lupus nephritis.
In this study, 86 patients with diffuse lupus glomerulonephritis were reviewed for assessment of the value of a partial remission (50% reduction in baseline proteinuria to < or =1.5 g/d and < or =25% increase in baseline creatinine) and complete remission (proteinuria < or =0.33 g/d and serum creatinine < or =1.4 mg/dl) on outcomes compared with patients who did not attain a remission. These well-characterized patients were entered into a prospective therapeutic trial conducted by the Collaborative Study Group and were followed for more than 10 yr.
All biopsies showed diffuse lupus nephritis. A complete remission was attained in 37 (43%) patients, a partial remission in 21 (24%) patients, and no remission in 28 (32%) patients. Baseline clinical and serologic features were similar among the groups, but patients with a complete remission had a lower serum creatinine and chronicity index compared with patients with partial or no remission. The patient survival at 10 yr was 95% for complete remission, 76% for partial remission, and 46% for no remission. The renal survival at 10 yr was 94% for complete remission, 45% for partial remission, and 19% for no remission, and the patient survival without end-stage renal disease at 10 yr was 92% for complete remission, 43% for partial remission, and 13% for no remission.
Even a partial remission in lupus nephritis is associated with a significantly better patient and renal survival compared with no remission.
The incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus
- P M Izmirly
- I Wan
- S Sahl
Izmirly PM, Wan I, Sahl S, et al. The
incidence and prevalence of systemic
lupus erythematosus in New York
County (Manhattan), New York: The
Manhattan Lupus Surveillance Program.
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(10):2006-17.
doi:10.1002/art.40192
Update of the Joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of lupus nephritis
- A Fanouriakis
- M Kostopoulou
- K Cheema
Fanouriakis A, Kostopoulou M,
Cheema K, et al. 2019 Update of the Joint
European League Against Rheumatism
and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant
Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of lupus
nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(6):713-23. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-216924
Lupus low disease activity state and reduced direct health care costs in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
- A L Yeo
- R Koelmeyer
- R Kandane-Rathnayake
Yeo AL, Koelmeyer R, Kandane-Rathnayake R, et al. Lupus low disease
activity state and reduced direct health
care costs in patients with systemic
lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res
(Hoboken). 2020;72(9):1289-95. doi:10.1002/
acr.24023
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Transplant Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients
Kidney Disease: Improving Global
Outcomes (KDIGO) Transplant Work
Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline
for the care of kidney transplant
recipients. Am J Transplant. 2009;
MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial Investigators. A proteinuria cut-off lupus nephritis: Data from the MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial
- F Tamirou
- B R Lauwerys
- M Dall'era
Tamirou F, Lauwerys BR, Dall'Era M,
et al; MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial
Investigators. A proteinuria cut-off
lupus nephritis: Data from
the MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial. Lupus
Sci Med. 2015;2(1):e000123. doi:10.1136/
lupus-2015-000123
Early proteinuria response: A valid real-life situation predictor of long-term lupus renal outcome in an ethnically diverse group with severe biopsy-proven nephritis?
- M R Ugolini-Lopes
- Lpc Seguro
- Mxf Castro
Ugolini-Lopes MR, Seguro LPC,
Castro MXF, et al. Early proteinuria
response: A valid real-life situation predictor of long-term lupus renal outcome
in an ethnically diverse group with
severe biopsy-proven nephritis? Lupus
Sci Med. 2017;4(1):e000213. doi:10.1136/
lupus-2017-000213
Predictors of long-term renal outcome in lupus nephritis trials: Lessons learned from the Euro-Lupus Nephritis cohort
- M Dall'era
- M G Cisternas
- D E Smilek
Dall'Era M, Cisternas MG, Smilek DE,
et al. Predictors of long-term renal
outcome in lupus nephritis trials:
Lessons learned from the Euro-Lupus
Nephritis cohort. Arthritis Rheumatol.
2015;67(5):1305-13. doi:10.1002/art.39026
Establishing surrogate kidney end points for lupus nephritis clinical trials: Development and validation of a novel approach to predict future kidney outcomes
- M Mackay
- M Dall'era
- J Fishbein
Mackay M, Dall'Era M, Fishbein J,
et al. Establishing surrogate kidney
end points for lupus nephritis clinical
trials: Development and validation of
a novel approach to predict future
kidney outcomes. Arthritis Rheumatol.
2019;71(3):411-9. doi:10.1002/art.40724
Long-term follow-up of the MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial, comparing azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil as maintenance therapy of lupus nephritis
- Maintain Nephritis Trial
- Group
MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial Group.
Long-term follow-up of the MAINTAIN
Nephritis Trial, comparing azathioprine
and mycophenolate mofetil as maintenance therapy of lupus nephritis. Ann
Rheum Dis. 2016;75(3):526-31. doi:10.1136/
annrheumdis-2014-206897