ArticlePDF Available

Rituximab-Induced Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis

Authors:
  • Sancaktepe Training and Research Hospital
161
© 2022 Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Rituximab‑Induced Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis
examination revealed no abnormalities. Laboratory tests
performed to assess any organ involvement or related
systemic diseases were all normal. A skin biopsy was
performed, and the histopathologic ndings revealed
LCV [Figure 2a and b].
Based on the temporal association between the rituximab
infusion and skin lesions and the clinicohistopathologic
ndings, a diagnosis of rituximab‑induced LCV was
made. Rituximab therapy was discontinued. Due to severe
arthralgia accompanying purpuric lesions, a short‑term
oral steroid regimen was planned in addition to topical
corticosteroids. In 2 weeks, both her skin lesions and
arthralgia showed regression, and no recurrence was
observed during a 3‑month follow‑up period [Figure 1b].
Discussion
LCV encompasses a wide and heterogeneous group of
small‑vessel vasculitis. Half of all cases of LCV are
single‑organ skin‑limited presentations characterized by
self‑limiting petechial lesions or palpable purpura, as well
as urticarial and necrotic‑ulcerative lesions. They most
commonly develop on gravity‑dependent areas, such as
the lower legs or sometimes up to the buttocks, the inferior
part of the trunk, and upper arms.[2,10] Distinguishing
medication‑related vasculitis from other etiologies of LCV,
such as systemic diseases, infection, and malignancy,
can be challenging. If LCV is suspected, a punch biopsy
should be performed for histopathologic correlation.[10] In
our case, the temporal correlation between the exposure to
the oending medication and the onset of the skin lesions
with a typical pattern helped in establishing the diagnosis.
The skin biopsy conrmed our diagnosis.
The majority of LCV cases are self‑limited and resolve
within weeks to months of onset; therefore, symptomatic
relief is the only focus in this group. In systemic
forms, the prognosis depends on the severity of internal
organ involvement and may require corticosteroids,
immunosuppressive agents, rituximab, and plasma
exchange to some degree.[2,3]
The pathogenesis of medication‑induced vasculitis
is unclear and is speculated to be multifactorial.
Studies suggest that as an environmental trigger, the
oending drug may act as a hapten and stimulate
immune responses that drive a cascade of inammation
involving small vessels in an individual with a genetic
predisposition.[4]
Letter to Editor
Leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV) is small‑vessel
vasculitis involving arterioles, capillaries, and
postcapillary venules. It is histopathologically
characterized by an inammatory inltrate consisting
of neutrophils with brinoid necrosis and nuclear debris
referred to as “leukocytoclasia.”[1] The microscopic
changes seen in LCV are not specic to any disease
entity; thus, this kind of histopathologic picture may
occur in various types of small‑vessel vasculitis aecting
the skin and internal organs. However, because of the
dominancy of single‑organ skin‑limited presentations,
the name LCV is more commonly used synonymously
for cutaneous small‑vessel vasculitis and cutaneous
leukocytoclastic angiitis.[2]
LCV usually presents as palpable purpura, symmetrically
distributed on the lower extremities, with or without
systemic involvement.[2,3] It may be either idiopathic
or associated with an underlying pathology such
as systemic diseases, medications, infections, or
malignancy. In medication‑induced LCV, antibiotics
and nonsteroidal anti‑inammatory drugs are the most
common triggers.[3] In recent years, however, with
increased use, biologic agents have taken their place in
the literature as new suspects in the etiology of LCV.[4]
Among these publications, very few rituximab‑induced
LCV cases stand out.[5‑9]
Here, we report the case of a 28‑year‑old woman with
a 3‑year history of generalized myasthenia gravis (MG)
presenting with LCV developing shortly after rituximab
infusion.
A 28‑year‑old woman, with a history of uctuating
weakness and diplopia following the postpartum period,
was diagnosed as having anti‑acetylcholine receptor
antibody‑positive MG at the age of 25 years. Her past
disease‑modifying treatment record included prednisolone
(PLN), intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), and
mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). In the early period,
treatment response to PLN was good, but she soon
developed marked iatrogenic Cushing’s syndrome. IVIG
failed to improve her condition without PLN. Recently,
MMF was stopped after 15 months due to a lack of
benets. Rituximab therapy was considered after all these
treatment attempts. Ten days after the rst i.v. infusion of
1000‑mg rituximab, skin lesions suddenly appeared on
the lower extremities of her body, which were compatible
with nonblanching purpuric lesions [Figure 1a]. Her vital
parameters were within normal range, and systemic
[Downloaded free from http://www.nsnjournal.org on Friday, September 30, 2022, IP: 197.237.185.40]
Letter to Editor
162 Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology ¦ Volume 39 | Issue 3 | July-September 2022
Rituximab is a chimeric mouse/human monoclonal
antibody directed to the CD20 B‑cell surface antigen.
Targeting CD20 B cells with rituximab provided
promising results for several autoimmune diseases
including refractory or severe MG.[11] The majority of
adverse events involving rituximab therapy are usually
mild and infusion‑related.[12] Vasculitis is not a commonly
reported toxicity for rituximab therapy. On the contrary,
rituximab has a well‑established role in the treatment
of systemic diseases associated with LCV, such as
anti‑neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody‑associated vasculitis,
cryoglobulinemic vasculitis, and hypocomplementemic
urticarial vasculitis.[2] There are some suggested
etiopathogenetic theories for this paradoxical reaction.
The development of an immune complex‑mediated
hypersensitivity vasculitis with the development of
antibodies to rituximab itself or its metabolites following
infusion is one of these theories. The second is thought to
be related to cytokine release syndrome. Cytokines released
after rituximab infusion may have a role in altering vessel
walls, as well as triggering a cascade of reactions leading
to the development of genuine vasculitis.[6,8]
In conclusion, it should be noted that although rituximab
is a treatment option in patients with systemic vasculitic
manifestations, it is itself a rare but true trigger for
LCV in skin‑limited forms. Further studies are needed
to determine the underlying pathophysiology for
rituximab‑induced vasculitis.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all
appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the
patient has given her consent for her images and other
clinical information to be reported in the journal. The
patient understands that name and initials will not be
published, and due efforts will be made to conceal
the identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conicts of interest
There are no conicts of interest.
Damla Cetinkaya Tezer, Ipek Gungor Dogan,
Cigdem Dicle Arican1, Serkan Demir, Melih Tutuncu2
Department of Neurology, Sancaktepe Sehit Prof. Dr. Ilhan Varank
Training and Research Hospital, 1Department of Pathology,
Sancaktepe Sehit Prof. Dr. Ilhan Varank Training and Research
Hospital, 2Department of Neurology, Istanbul University‑
Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
Address for correspondence: Dr. Ipek Gungor Dogan,
Department of Neurology, Sancaktepe Sehit Prof. Dr. Ilhan Varank
Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
E‑mail: dripekgngr@gmail.com
Submitted: 15‑Aug‑2021
Revised: 03‑Mar‑2022
Accepted: 07‑Mar‑2022
Published: 30‑Sep‑2022
References
1. Caproni M, Verdelli A. An update on the nomenclature for
cutaneous vasculitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2019;31:46‑52.
2. Fraticelli P, Benfaremo D, Gabrielli A. Diagnosis and management
of leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Intern Emerg Med 2021;16:831‑41.
3. Baigrie D, Goyal A, Crane JS. Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis. In:
StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing;
2022. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/
NBK482159/. [Last updated on 2021 Aug 11].
4. Grau RG. Drug‑induced vasculitis: New insights and a changing
lineup of suspects. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2015;17:71.
5. Fathallah N, Ouni B, Mokni S, Baccouche K, Atig A, Ghariani N,
et al. Drug‑induced vasculitis. Therapie 2019;74:347‑54.
6. Abe K, Itoh M, Asahina A. Rituximab‑induced vasculitis: Does
the immune complex of rituximab play a key role in developing
paradoxical adverse events? J Dermatol 2019;46:e311‑2.
7. Kandula P, Kouides PA. Rituximab‑induced leukocytoclastic
vasculitis: A case report. Arch Dermatol 2006;142:246‑7.
8. Kim MJ, Kim HO, Kim HY, Park YM. Rituximab‑induced
vasculitis: A case report and review of the medical published
work. J Dermatol 2009;36:284‑7.
9. Dereure O, Navarro R, Rossi JF, Guilhou JJ. Rituximab‑induced
vasculitis. Dermatology 2001;203:83‑4.
10. Alberti‑Violetti S, Berti E, Marzano AV. Cutaneous and systemic
vasculitides in dermatology: A histological perspective. G Ital
Dermatol Venereol 2018;153:185‑93.
Figure 1: (a) Nonblanching purpuric skin lesions 10 days after
infusion (b) Improved skin lesions after 2 weeks
ab
Figure 2: (a) Mild acanthosis in the epidermis, dense neutrophils
in the upper and middle dermis, perivascular inflammatory cell
inltration consisting of fewer eosinophils and lymphocytes, prominent
leukocytoclasia, swelling of the vascular endothelium, brinoid material
in the vessel wall, abundant extravasated erythrocytes (b) Fibrinoid
material in the vessel wall with elastin stain
ab
[Downloaded free from http://www.nsnjournal.org on Friday, September 30, 2022, IP: 197.237.185.40]
Letter to Editor
163
Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology ¦ Volume 39 | Issue 3 | July-September 2022
Access this article online
Quick Response Code:
Website: www.nsnjournal.org
DOI: 10.4103/nsn.nsn_153_21
This is an open access journal, and arcles are distributed under the terms of the Creave
Commons Aribuon‑NonCommercial‑ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to
remix, tweak, and build upon the work non‑commercially, as long as appropriate credit is
given and the new creaons are licensed under the idencal terms.
How to cite this article: Tezer DC, Dogan IG, Arican CD, Demir S,
Tutuncu M. Rituximab-induced leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Neurol Sci
Neurophysiol 2022;39:161-3.
© 2022 Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology | Published by Wolters
Kluwer - Medknow
11. Tandan R, Hehir MK 2nd, Waheed W, Howard DB. Rituximab
treatment of myasthenia gravis: A systematic review. Muscle
Nerve 2017;56:185‑96.
12. Kimby E. Tolerability and safety of rituximab (MabThera).
Cancer Treat Rev 2005;31:456‑73.
[Downloaded free from http://www.nsnjournal.org on Friday, September 30, 2022, IP: 197.237.185.40]
Article
Rituximab is an anti-CD20 chimeric murine/human mAb mainly used to treat certain types of lymphoproliferative malignancies and autoimmune diseases. Although it has been used in the treatment of vasculitis in recent years, it rarely triggers severe vascular skin reactions such as leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV). Physicians should be aware of this rare adverse event that requires discontinuation of rituximab, which can occur days or even weeks after rituximab treatment. Here, we report a case of LCV observed in a patient with low-grade orbital B-cell lymphoma treated with weekly rituximab and local radiotherapy. In our case, discontinuation of rituximab and initiation of oral methylprednisolone therapy were sufficient to achieve complete resolution of the LCV.
Article
Rituximab is a chimeric murine/human monoclonal antibody that targets the CD20 antigen expressed on B lymphocytes. It is Food and Drug Administration-approved for use in pemphigus vulgaris (PV). Usual adverse effects are mild, and vasculitis has been reported very rarely. There are only three biopsy-proven case reports of rituximab-induced vasculitis in medical published literature and none in pemphigus. Here, we report a case of rituximab-induced vasculitis in a 46-year-old female with PV.
Article
Full-text available
Leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV) is a histopathologic description of a common form of small vessel vasculitis (SVV), that can be found in various types of vasculitis affecting the skin and internal organs. The leading clinical presentation of LCV is palpable purpura and the diagnosis relies on histopathological examination, in which the inflammatory infiltrate is composed of neutrophils with fibrinoid necrosis and disintegration of nuclei into fragments (“leukocytoclasia”). Several medications can cause LCV, as well as infections, or malignancy. Among systemic diseases, the most frequently associated with LCV are ANCA-associated vasculitides, connective tissue diseases, cryoglobulinemic vasculitis, IgA vasculitis (formerly known as Henoch–Schonlein purpura) and hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis (HUV). When LCV is suspected, an extensive workout is usually necessary to determine whether the process is skin-limited, or expression of a systemic vasculitis or disease. A comprehensive history and detailed physical examination must be performed; platelet count, renal function and urinalysis, serological tests for hepatitis B and C viruses, autoantibodies (anti-nuclear antibodies and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies), complement fractions and IgA staining in biopsy specimens are part of the usual workout of LCV. The treatment is mainly focused on symptom management, based on rest (avoiding standing or walking), low dose corticosteroids, colchicine or different unproven therapies, if skin-limited. When a medication is the cause, the prognosis is favorable and the discontinuation of the culprit drug is usually resolutive. Conversely, when a systemic vasculitis is the cause of LCV, higher doses of corticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents are required, according to the severity of organ involvement and the underlying associated disease.
Article
Full-text available
An increasing number of therapeutic agents have been associated with a vasculitic syndrome. This usually involves small vessels, primarily capillaries, venules, and arterioles in leukocytoclastic vasculitis, small-vessel disease similar to an antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-related vasculitis, or mid-sized muscular arteries in a polyarteritis-like picture. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies are present in many cases of vasculitis regardless of the size of the vessel involved. Monoclonal antibodies used to treat many autoimmune disorders have become the most common agents associated with drug-induced vasculitis. Important advances in epigenetics, genetics, and neutrophil apoptosis are providing new insights into the pathogenesis of both drug-induced vasculitis and idiopathic vasculitis. Although management has not changed significantly in the past few years where withdrawal of the offending agent is the primary intervention, increasing awareness of drug-induced vasculitis can lead to earlier diagnosis and prevention of severe organ damage and fatalities.
Article
Purpose of review: Cutaneous vasculitis reflects a spectrum ranging from skin limited to severe systemic forms. To date, there is still no generally acknowledged nomenclature for cutaneous vasculitis. This review aims to summarize the recent advances in the nomenclature of cutaneous vasculitis. Recent findings: The most widely adopted vasculitis classification system is the one of 2012 Revised Chapel Hill Consensus Conference (CHCC) which represent not such a classification but a nomenclature system that name vasculitis on the basis of the size of the vessel affected. The CHCC 2012 did not deal with the special features of cutaneous vasculitis and did not explicitly discuss the presence of skin-limited or skin-dominant forms of vasculitis. Therefore, a consensus group was formed to propose an Addendum to CHCC 2012, focusing on cutaneous vasculitis. The Addendum better clarify the main aspects of some single-organ vasculitis, including IgM/IgG vasculitis, nodular vasculitis, erythema elevatum et diutinum and recurrent macular vasculitis in hypergammaglobulinemia. Moreover, it differentiated normocomplementemic from hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis. Finally, it recognized cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa as a distinct subtype of polyarteritis nodosa. Summary: Classification criteria are useful tools to standardize names and definitions for cutaneous vasculitis; however, they do not represent diagnostic criteria. Collaborative efforts are still needed to get a shared classification and valid diagnostic criteria for cutaneous vasculitis.
Article
Cutaneous vasculitides encompass a wide and heterogeneous group of diseases affecting skin blood vessels that are clinically characterized by polymorphic skin lesions, including in particular palpable purpura as well as urticarial and necrotic-ulcerative lesions, with possible, albeit rare, extracutaneous involvement. Cutaneous leukocytoclastic angiitis and urticarial vasculitis, which are the two prototypic and most common variants of this group, are usually idiopathic but may also be induced by different triggers, notably drugs and infections, or may manifest in association with systemic disorders, particularly lupus erythematosus. Vasculitis skin lesions can also occur during the chronic-relapsing course of systemic vasculitides, such as granulomatosis with polyangiitis and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, with which cutaneous vasculitides can share clinical and histological features. In order to make the diagnosis of a specific form of vasculitis, the cutaneous picture and clinical history of the patient have to be correlated with the histological pattern, direct immunofluorescence findings, laboratory data and possible presence of extracutaneous manifestations. Histology is pivotal for the diagnosis of vasculitis and timing of the biopsy is relevant to correctly evaluate the characteristics of the inflammatory infiltrate. In this review, we will focus in particular on the histological features of cutaneous vasculitides in order to differentiate them from the systemic forms and to avoid misdiagnosis when skin involvement is the presenting sign of a multisystem vasculitis.
Article
Rituximab is a chimeric mouse/human anti-CD20 monoclonal immunoglobulin. We reviewed the efficacy and safety of rituximab in 169 myasthenia gravis (MG) patients from case reports and series. Antibodies to the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) were present in 59% and muscle specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) in 34%. Modified Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America post-intervention scale of minimal manifestations (MM) occurred in 44%, and combined pharmacological and chronic stable remission in 27% overall; MM or better was achieved in 72% of MuSK MG and 30% of AChR MG (P<0.001). Post-treatment relapses decreased more in MuSK MG (P=0.05). Response predictors were MuSK MG, less severe disease, and younger age at treatment. Among a responder subset, 26% of AChR and 82% of MuSK MG patients showed decreased post-treatment antibody titers. Rituximab was generally well tolerated. Detectable serum rituximab and depleted CD20+ B-cells were observed up to 20 and 16 weeks, respectively, after 4 weekly infusions. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Article
Rituximab is an anti-CD20 chimeric murine/human monoclonal antibody mainly used in the treatment of patients with a cutaneous lymphoid malignancy. Among the side-effects associated with rituximab administration, vasculitis has been rarely reported. There are two reported cases in the English language medical published work. We describe a 38-year-old Korean man with cutaneous vasculitis occurring 1 day after rituximab administration.
Article
Rituximab, a human/mouse chimeric anti-CD20 antibody, has become part of standard therapy for patients with CD20-expressing B-cell lymphoma, and is currently under investigation for other indications including autoimmune diseases, in particular rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Its characteristic tolerability profile was established soon after clinical testing began and compares favourably with chemotherapy. The majority of patients experience mild to moderate infusion-related reactions (IRRs) during the first administration of rituximab, but the incidence decreases markedly with subsequent infusions. Current data suggest that the type of adverse events in patients with RA are similar to those in lymphoma, but that adverse events related to the rituximab infusions are less severe and less frequent. Rituximab induces a rapid depletion of normal CD20-expressing B-cells in the peripheral blood, and levels remain low or undetectable for 2-6 months before returning to pretreatment levels, generally within 12 months. Serum immunoglobulin levels remain largely stable, although a reduction in IgM has been described. T-cells are unaffected by rituximab and consequently opportunistic infections rarely occur in association with rituximab therapy. When used in combination with a variety of chemotherapeutic regimens, rituximab does not add to the toxicity of chemotherapy, with the exception of a higher rate of neutropenia. However, this does not translate into a higher infection rate. Over 540,000 patients worldwide have now received rituximab and serious adverse reactions have occurred in a small minority of patients, but for the great majority of patients, rituximab is safe and well tolerated.
Article
1 +D’Arcy CAMannik M Serum sickness secondary to treatment with the murine human chimeric antibody IDEC-C2B8 (rituximab). Arthritis Rheum 2001;441717- 1718PubMed Link to Article[[XSLOpenURL/10.1002/(ISSN)1529-0131]]2 +Herishanu Y Rituximab-induced serum sickness. Am J Hematol 2002;70329PubMed Link to Article[[XSLOpenURL/10.1002/(ISSN)1096-8652]]3 +Dereure ONavarro RRossi JFGuilhou JJ Rituximab-induced vasculitis Dermatology 2001;20383- 84PubMed Link to Article[[XSLOpenURL/10.1159/000051713]]4 + Rituxan (Rituximab). Genentech Inc and Biogen Idec Inc.,Available at:http://www.rituxan.com/rituxan/pi/#reactionsAccessed August 12, 20055 +Winkler UJensen MManzke OSchulz HDiehl VEngert A Cytokine-release syndrome in patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia and high lymphocyte counts after treatment with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab, IDEC-C2B8). Blood 1999;942217- 2224PubMed