ArticlePublisher preview available

Video Consent for Upper Endoscopy and Colonoscopy Improves Patient Comprehension in a Safety-net, Multi-lingual Population

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

The challenges of consenting for procedures are well documented and are compounded when patients have limited English proficiency (LEP). Standardized video consent has been studied, but research in gastroenterology is limited. We created educational videos in English and Spanish covering the elements of traditional consent for colonoscopy and upper endoscopy. All participants underwent traditional verbal consent and a subset viewed the language and procedure specific video. Participants from a multilingual, safety-net hospital patient population were then given a questionnaire to assess their comprehension and satisfaction. Participants who watched the video had higher comprehension scores than those who received traditional verbal consent alone. This difference persisted when data was stratified by language and procedure, and when controlled for educational level and prior procedure. Video consent improves comprehension and satisfaction for endoscopy and may mitigate some of the challenges encountered when consenting patients with LEP.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol:.(1234567890)
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health (2023) 25:350–356
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-022-01398-6
1 3
ORIGINAL PAPER
Video Consent forUpper Endoscopy andColonoscopy Improves
Patient Comprehension inaSafety‑net, Multi‑lingual Population
ZoeLawrence1 · GabrielCastillo1· JaniceJang1· TimothyZaki4· DemetriosTzimas2· AlexandraGuttentag3·
AdamGoodman1· AndrewDikman1· ReneeWilliams1
Accepted: 15 August 2022 / Published online: 24 September 2022
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022
Abstract
The challenges of consenting for procedures are well documented and are compounded when patients have limited English
proficiency (LEP). Standardized video consent has been studied, but research in gastroenterology is limited. We created edu-
cational videos in English and Spanish covering the elements of traditional consent for colonoscopy and upper endoscopy. All
participants underwent traditional verbal consent and a subset viewed the language and procedure specific video. Participants
from a multilingual, safety-net hospital patient population were then given a questionnaire to assess their comprehension
and satisfaction. Participants who watched the video had higher comprehension scores than those who received traditional
verbal consent alone. This difference persisted when data was stratified by language and procedure, and when controlled
for educational level and prior procedure. Video consent improves comprehension and satisfaction for endoscopy and may
mitigate some of the challenges encountered when consenting patients with LEP.
Keywords Limited English proficiency· Gastroenterology· Endoscopy· Consent
Background
Informed consent involves a thorough understanding of the
planned procedure and its risks, benefits, and alternatives
[1]. On the day of the procedure, when patients are fasting
and anxiety levels are elevated, information presented during
verbal consent can often be overwhelming and difficult to
retain. Data on adult learning theory have shown low reten-
tion rates from lecture-style teaching for the adult learner
[2]. In patients with limited English Proficiency (LEP), the
challenges of verbal consent are even more pronounced
[3]. Individuals with LEP make up 9% of the United States
population, and this segment of the population has been
increasing steadily since the 1990s largely due to immigra-
tion [4]. In New York City, almost 25% of the population
has LEP [5]. Limited Health Literacy (LHL) is also highly
prevalent ranging from 19 to 61% for various medical con-
ditions [6]. This is particularly relevant to the healthcare
field, asindividuals with LEP and LHL are more likely to
be uninsured, less likely to seek medical care and to receive
high-quality care compared to their English-proficient (EP)
counterparts [7]. Despite these obstacles, healthcare provid-
ers still rely on traditional verbal consent for most medical
procedures.
Studies evaluating the use of videos during the informed
consent process for procedures such as cataract surgery,
knee arthroscopy, hysterectomies, cystoscopies, and spinal
surgery [812] demonstrate that the use of videos improves
patient comprehension relative to traditional verbal consent.
Patients who watch a video prior to consent consistently
score higher on knowledge-based questionnaires. Addition-
ally, enhancing traditional verbal consent with a video has
been shown to shorten the consent process [10]. This evi-
dence is consistent with principles of adult learning theory
in practice which posit that active construction is integral to
successful learning [2]. Most learners will develop a pref-
erence for a particular learning method such as auditory
* Zoe Lawrence
zoe.lawrence@nyulangone.org
1 Division ofGastroenterology, NYU Langone Health,
NewYork, NY10016, USA
2 Department ofGastroenterology, Northwell Health,
Huntington, NY11743, USA
3 NYU School ofGlobal Public Health, NewYork, NY10003,
USA
4 Department ofMedicine, The University ofTexas
Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX75390, USA
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... Likewise, non-compliance with post-procedural guidelines may result in preventable complications. Effectual patient education and communication play a pivotal role in addressing this challenge, as highlighted in reference [75]. ...
... This may be due to cost, lack of training, and the inertia of established practice patterns. Efforts are needed to facilitate the broader adoption of these advanced techniques, including cost-effectiveness analyses and targeted educational interventions [75,76]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The quality of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (EGD) is crucial and carries significant consequences for patient outcomes, the employment of healthcare resources, and the future course of gastroenterology as a medical specialty. In this review, we navigate through the terrain of the Quality Indicators (QIs) for EGD, shedding light on their indispensable function in ensuring and augmenting the quality of patient care throughout the pre-procedural, intra-procedural, post-procedural, and outcome-oriented facets of the practice. We delve into the comprehensive scope of the QIs and the challenges impeding the delivery of high-quality EGD, from variability in practitioner training and patient compliance to the systemic limitations of current QIs and the barriers hindering the adoption of advanced techniques. Future directions for bolstering the quality of EGD are highlighted, encapsulating the integration of emergent endoscopic technologies, the evolution of patient-centered metrics, the refinement of endoscopist training and credentialing processes, and the promise held by Artificial Intelligence (AI). Particular emphasis is placed on the role of advanced endoscopic techniques and equipment in enhancing EGD quality. This article presents a cogent narrative, promoting the pursuit of excellence in EGD as an ever-evolving endeavor that necessitates the collective dedication of clinicians, researchers, educators, and policymakers.
... Currently, video-assisted informed consent is considered a strong option compared to oral and written interventions and can be used in a variety of procedures, such as rhinoplasty, colonoscopy, endoscopy, and spine surgery [33][34][35][36]. The literature supports that video serves as a supplement to initial consultations in an educational and beneficial manner, especially for individuals with low health literacy [34]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Dental anxiety (DA) is characterized by the expression of tension, stress, apprehension, irritation, anger, and frustration experienced by patients during dental appointment. The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature to assess the effectiveness of the use of informative videos in reducing DA in patients undergoing 3 M surgeries. Methods Searches were carried out on MEDLINE (via PubMed), the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Virtual Health Library (VHL), and the Web of Science. Articles published until November 20, 2021, were included. There were no restrictions on the data or language of publication. Results A total of 9 randomized clinical trials were included in this review, and five studies were included in the meta-analysis, comprising 529 patients. There was no significant difference in DA between the groups in the baseline when it was evaluated by any of the tools, indicating sample balancing at the beginning of the study. After intervention (video vs. verbal and/or written orientation) in the preoperative period, DA was assessed again; however, there was no difference in DA between the groups when assessed by the MDAS or STAI-S tools. After 3 M removals, the DA was still not significantly different between the groups when measured by the different considered tools. Conclusion Informative videos addressing 3 M removal surgeries used in the preoperative period did not show an influence on the reduction of pre- and postoperative DA when compared to the verbal and/or written informative presentation.
Article
Objective To understand medical interpreter’s perspectives on surgical informed consent discussions and provide feedback for surgeons on improving these conversations. Summary Background Data Informed consent is a critical component of patient-centered surgical decision-making. For patients with limited English proficiency (LEP), this conversation may be less thorough, even with a medical interpreter, leaving patients with an inadequate understanding of their diagnosis or treatment options. Methods A semi-structured interview guide was developed with input from interpreters and a qualitative research expert. We purposively sampled medical interpreters representing multiple languages until thematic saturation was achieved. Participants discussed their experience with the surgical consent discussion and process. Interview transcripts were analyzed using emergent thematic analysis. Results Among 22 interpreters, there were ten languages represented and an average experience of 15 years (range 4-40 y). Four major themes were identified. First, interpreters consistently described their roles as patient advocates and cultural brokers. Second, interpreters reported unique patient attributes that influence the discussion, often based on patients’ cultural values/expectations, anticipated decisional autonomy, and family support. Third, interpreters emphasized the importance of surgeons demonstrating compassion and patience, using simple terminology, conversing around the consent, providing context about the form/process, and initiating a pre-encounter discussion. Finally, interpreters suggested reducing legal terminology on consent forms and translation into other languages. Conclusions Experienced interpreters highlighted multiple factors associated with effective and culturally tailored informed consent discussions. Surgeons should recognize interpreters’ critical and complex roles, be cognizant of cultural variations among patients with LEP, and improve interpersonal and communication skills to facilitate effective understanding.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives The British Association of Spinal Surgeons recently called for updates in consenting practice. This study investigates the utility and acceptability of a personalised video consent tool to enhance patient satisfaction in the preoperative consent giving process. Design A single-centre, prospective pilot study using questionnaires to assess acceptability of video consent and its impacts on preoperative patient satisfaction. Setting A single National Health Service centre with individuals undergoing surgery at a regional spinal centre in the UK. Outcome measure As part of preoperative planning, study participants completed a self-administered questionnaire (CSQ-8), which measured their satisfaction with the use of a video consent tool as an adjunct to traditional consenting methods. Participants 20 participants with a mean age of 56 years (SD=16.26) undergoing spinal surgery. Results Mean patient satisfaction (CSQ-8) score was 30.2/32. Median number of video views were 2–3 times. Eighty-five per cent of patients watched the video with family and friends. Eighty per cent of participants reported that the video consent tool helped to their address preoperative concerns. All participants stated they would use the video consent service again. All would recommend the service to others requiring surgery. Implementing the video consent tool did not endure any significant time or costs. Conclusions Introduction of a video consent tool was found to be a positive adjunct to traditional consenting methods. Patient–clinician consent dialogue can now be documented. A randomised controlled study to further evaluate the effects of video consent on patients’ retention of information, preoperative and postoperative anxiety, patient reported outcome measures as well as length of stay may be beneficial.
Article
Full-text available
Background and study aims Youth undergoing pediatric endoscopic procedures and their parents demonstrate suboptimal comprehension of the informed consent (IC) process. We developed informational videos discussing key IC elements for pediatric endoscopy and evaluated their effects on youth and parental comprehension of the IC process. Patients and methods A randomized controlled trial of the video intervention was performed among youth undergoing endoscopy and their parents at an academic children’s hospital. Randomization occurred at the time of enrollment using permutated blocks. Following the IC process with the proceduralist, subjects underwent structured interviews to assess IC comprehension. An Informed Consent Overall Score (ICOS: range 0 – 4) for comprehension was calculated. Results Seventy-seven pairs of children and their parents participated. Intervention recipients (N = 37 pairs) demonstrated higher ICOS scores as compared to control counterparts (mean (standard deviation): 3.6 (0.7) v. 2.9 (0.9), intervention v. control parents, P < 0.0001 and 2.7 (1.1) v. 1.7 (1.1), intervention v. control youth, P < 0.0001). Conclusions A media intervention addressing key elements of the IC process for pediatric endoscopy was effective in improving comprehension of IC for youth undergoing endoscopic procedures and their parents.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose . To investigate whether adding video assistance to traditional verbal informed consent advisement improved satisfaction among cataract surgery patients. Methods . This trial enrolled 80 Chinese patients with age-related cataracts scheduled to undergo unilateral phacoemulsification surgery. Patients were randomized into two groups: the video group watched video explaining cataract-related consent information and rewatched specific segments of the video at their own discretion, before receiving traditional verbal consent advisement; the control group did not watch the video. Outcomes included patient satisfaction, refusal to consent, time to complete the consent process, and comprehension measured by a ten-item questionnaire. Results . All 80 enrolled patients signed informed consent forms. Compared with the control group, members of the video group exhibited greater satisfaction (65% versus 86%, p=0.035 ) and required less time to complete the consent process ( 12.3±6.7 min versus 5.6±5.4 min, p<0.001 ), while also evincing levels of comprehension commensurate with those reported for patients who did not watch the video (accuracy rate, 77.5% versus 80.2%, p=0.386 ). Conclusion . The video-assisted informed consent process had a positive impact on patients’ cataract surgery experiences. Additional research is needed to optimize patients’ comprehension of the video.
Article
Background. Patient comprehension is fundamental to valid informed consent. Current practices often result in inadequate patient comprehension. Purpose. An updated review to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of interventions to improve patient comprehension in clinical informed consent. Data Sources. Systematic searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE (2008–2018). Study Selection. We included randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials evaluating interventions to improve patient comprehension in clinical informed consent. Data Extraction. Reviewers independently abstracted data using a standardized form, comparing all results and resolving disagreements by consensus. Data Synthesis. Fifty-two studies of 60 interventions met inclusion criteria. Compared with standard informed consent, a statistically significant improvement in patient comprehension was seen with 43% (6/14) of written interventions, 56% (15/27) of audiovisual interventions, 67% (2/3) of multicomponent interventions, 85% (11/13) of interactive digital interventions, and 100% (3/3) of verbal discussion with test/feedback or teach-back interventions. Eighty-five percent of studies (44/52) evaluated patients’ understanding of risks, 69% (41/52) general knowledge about the procedure, 35% (18/52) understanding of benefits, and 31% (16/52) understanding of alternatives. Participants’ education level was reported heterogeneously, and only 8% (4/52) of studies examined effects according to health literacy. Most studies (79%, 41/52) did not specify participants’ race/ethnicity. Limitations. Variation in interventions and outcome measures precluded conduct of a meta-analysis or calculation of mean effect size. Control group processes were variable and inconsistently characterized. Nearly half of studies (44%, 23/52) had a high risk of bias for the patient comprehension outcome. Conclusions. Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent are heterogeneous. Interactive interventions, particularly with test/feedback or teach-back components, appear superior. Future research should emphasize all key elements of informed consent and explore effects among vulnerable populations.
Article
Aim: Informed consent (IC) prior to endoscopy is often inconsistently and poorly performed. We compared use of video-assisted consent to standard verbal consent for enhancing patients' recollection of procedural risks, understanding and fulfilment of expectation. Method: Two hundred patients attending for gastroscopy or colonoscopy were randomised to either video-assisted consent (n=100) or verbal consent (n=100). The primary outcomes measured via a questionnaire were the recollection of procedural risks (sum of all correct answers for risk recall items) and patient experience compared to information provided in the consent process. Secondary outcomes included reported patient understanding and staff satisfaction between groups. Results: There was no difference between video or verbal groups in terms of risk recall scores (p=0.46), with less than half the patients able to recall more than two risks. There was a signal towards improved recall of bleeding as a potential risk in the video as compared to the verbal arm but it did not reach statistical significance (p=0.059). Patients' perceived understanding and fulfilment of expectation was high (>96%) in both groups. Seventy-one percent of the staff preferred using the video over the verbal IC. Conclusion: Video-assisted consent made no significant difference to the IC process in terms of patient recollection or experience compared to usual verbal IC. Despite very poor recollection of procedural risks, patients in both the video and verbal groups reported understanding of the procedure and satisfaction with the IC process. Reasons for this mismatch are unclear. Further action to prioritise information delivery during IC is required. Future studies in this field should include patient-centred outcomes as a measure of success.
Article
Background Individuals with limited English proficiency (LEP) have worse healthcare access and report lower quality of care compared to individuals who are proficient in English. Policy efforts to improve patient-provider communication for LEP individuals have been going on for decades but linguistic disparities persist. Objective To describe trends in patient-provider communication by limited English proficiency (LEP) from 2006 to 2015. Design We estimated interrupted time series models for three measures of patient-provider communication, testing for differences in both means (intercepts) and trends (slopes) before and after 2010 and differences in differences by English proficiency. Participants A nationally representative sample of the US non-institutionalized population with at least one office-based medical visit from the 2006–2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (N = 27,001). Main Measures Patient-provider communication is measured with three variables indicating whether individuals reported that their providers always explained things in a way that was easy to understand, showed respect for what they had to say, and listened carefully. Key Results Although patient-provider communication improved for all groups over the study period, before 2010, it was getting worse among LEP individuals and disparities in patient-provider communication were widening. After 2010, patient-provider communication improved for LEP individuals and language disparities by English proficiency either narrowed or remained the same. For example, between 2006 and 2010, the percent of LEP individuals reporting that their provider explained things clearly declined by, on average, 1.4 percentage points per year (p value = 0.102); after 2010, it increased by 3.0 percentage points per year (p value = 0.003). Conclusions Our study sheds light on trends in patient-provider communication before and after 2010, a year that marked substantial efforts to reform the US healthcare system. Though patient-provider communication among LEP individuals has improved since 2010, linguistic disparities persist and constitute a formidable challenge to achieving healthcare equity, a long-standing US policy goal.
Article
Background: Informed consent is an integral part of the preoperative counseling process. It is important that we know the best way to relay this information to patients undergoing surgery, specifically, hysterectomy. Objective: To determine whether supplementing normal physician counseling with a video presentation improves patient comprehension during the informed consent process for hysterectomy. Study design: In a randomized, mixed factorial controlled trial, standard physician counseling (control arm) was compared to physician counseling plus video presentation (video arm) during the pre-hysterectomy informed consent process. Primary outcome was improvement in patient comprehension measured by assessments at baseline, post-counseling, day of surgery, and post-surgery. Patient satisfaction was measured by a validated questionnaire. Audiotaped patient-physician interactions were analyzed to determine time spent counseling, number of patient questions, and whether standard counseling included 11 predetermined critical components included in the video. A sample size of 60 per group (N=120) was planned to compare both groups. Results: From May 2014 to June 2015, 120 patients were enrolled and 116 randomized: 59 to the video arm, 57 to the control arm. All characteristics were similar between groups. Video arm subjects demonstrated greater improvement in comprehension scores in both post-counseling (9.9% improvement, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.2-15.7%, p=0.0009) and day-of-surgery questionnaires (7.2% improvement, 95% CI 0.96-13.4%, p=0.02). Scores 4-6 weeks after surgery returned to baseline for both groups. Control subjects were less likely to be counseled about risk of thrombosis (p<0.0001), colostomy (p<0.0001), further medical/surgical therapy (p=0.002), hormone replacement therapy (p<0.0001), or postoperative expectations (p<0.0001). Physicians spent more time counseling patients who did not watch the video (8 vs 12 minutes, p=0.003) but number of questions asked by patients in each group was similar. Conclusion: Enhancing pre-hysterectomy counseling with a video improves patient comprehension through day of surgery, increases thoroughness of counseling, and reduces physician time.
Article
Health literacy is the degree to which individuals are able to access and process basic health information and services and thereby participate in health-related decisions. Limited health literacy is highly prevalent in the United States and is strongly associated with patient morbidity, mortality, healthcare use, and costs. The objectives of this American Heart Association scientific statement are (1) to summarize the relevance of health literacy to cardiovascular health; (2) to present the adverse associations of health literacy with cardiovascular risk factors, conditions, and treatments; (3) to suggest strategies that address barriers imposed by limited health literacy on the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease; (4) to demonstrate the contributions of health literacy to health disparities, given its association with social determinants of health; and (5) to propose future directions for how health literacy can be integrated into the American Heart Association's mandate to advance cardiovascular treatment and research, thereby improving patient care and public health. Inadequate health literacy is a barrier to the American Heart Association meeting its 2020 Impact Goals, and this statement articulates the rationale to anticipate and address the adverse cardiovascular effects associated with health literacy.
Article
Objectives: Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have to deal with a poor quality of life (QOL) and psychomorbidity resulting from an incurable illness. We aimed to study the effect of patient education on QOL, compliance, anxiety and depression in IBD. Methods: Patients were prospectively enrolled over two years beginning July 2014 and divided into an interventional and usual care group. Both received the standard of care, but the former in addition received an 8 minute session of video-assisted education. Compliance to drugs was defined as drug intake of > 80% of the prescribed dose, and adherence to scheduled follow up visits were also compared. Self-administered questionnaires namely Short IBD questionnaire (SIBDQ), Beck Anxiety and Depression Inventory (BAI, BDI-II), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were used to assess QOL, anxiety and depression respectively at baseline, 6 months and 1 year. Results: Of the 91 patients enrolled, 84 [92.3%; male = 66 (78.57%)] completed the follow up. Significantly more patients were compliant to follow up visits in the intervention and usual care groups respectively at 6 months (88.4% versus 65.8% respectively; p<0.01) and 1 year (72.1% versus 46.3% respectively; p<0.01). The median (IQR) scores for HADS-Depression over 1 year were significantly better in the interventional group than usual care (p<0.049). The differences in SIBDQ, BDI-II, BAI, HADS-Anxiety and compliance to drug therapy between the groups did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: Video assisted patient education improved compliance to follow up visits and depression scores in IBD. Further modifications in the educational video content and delivery might improve compliance to drug therapy, QOL and anxiety scores.