Content uploaded by João Paulo Pereira de Sousa
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by João Paulo Pereira de Sousa on Sep 19, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
ScienceDirect
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
Procedia Computer Science 204 (2022) 315–323
1877-0509 © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0)
Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Industry Sciences and Computer Sciences
Innovation
10.1016/j.procs.2022.08.038
10.1016/j.procs.2022.08.038 1877-0509
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0)
Peer-review under responsibility of the scientic committee of the International Conference on Industry Sciences and Computer
Sciences Innovation
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect
Procedia Computer Science 00 (2021) 000–000
www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia
1877-0509 © 2022 The Authors. Published by ELSEVIER B.V.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0)
Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Industry Sciences and Computer Sciences
Innovation
International Conference on Industry Sciences and Computer Science Innovation
Review and analysis of research on Video Games and Artificial
Intelligence: a look back and a step forward
João Paulo Sousaa,b* , Rogério Tavaresa,c, João Pedro Gomesa, Vitor Mendonçaa
aInstituto Politécnico de Bragança, Bragança, Portugal
bResearch Centre in Digitalization and Intelligent Robotics, Bragança, Portugal
cCenter for Informatics and systems of the University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Abstract
This article shows the intimate relationship between Artificial Intelligence (AI) and video games research in 13 categories of
analysis based on a bibliometric survey carried out in the Scopus database. We first briefly reviewed the relation between video
games and AI. Then, we introduced the methodology of literature collection, presented and discussed the query, as well the flow
of data treatment in the applications and plugins used. Since the article is concerned with a historical point of view of the relationship
between digital games and AI the results were many and, therefore, we focused on the top 10 of each ranking, and discussed these
results separately. Finally, we discuss the limitations of our review, proposing future research directions for scholars.
© 2022 The Authors. Published by ELSEVIER B.V.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0)
Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Industry Sciences and Computer
Sciences Innovation
Keywords: Computer games; AI; Games, Bibliometric analysis, Virtual Reality.
1. Introduction
Since the beginning of AI, it has been related to games [1]. These games were fundamentally used to measure the
ability and performance of the AI. In 1950 Shannon shared the main aspects of computational routine in the article
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +351300029900; fax: +351278201340.
E-mail address: address: jpaulo@ipb.pt
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect
Procedia Computer Science 00 (2021) 000–000
www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia
1877-0509 © 2022 The Authors. Published by ELSEVIER B.V.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0)
Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Industry Sciences and Computer Sciences
Innovation
International Conference on Industry Sciences and Computer Science Innovation
Review and analysis of research on Video Games and Artificial
Intelligence: a look back and a step forward
João Paulo Sousaa,b* , Rogério Tavaresa,c, João Pedro Gomesa, Vitor Mendonçaa
aInstituto Politécnico de Bragança, Bragança, Portugal
bResearch Centre in Digitalization and Intelligent Robotics, Bragança, Portugal
cCenter for Informatics and systems of the University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Abstract
This article shows the intimate relationship between Artificial Intelligence (AI) and video games research in 13 categories of
analysis based on a bibliometric survey carried out in the Scopus database. We first briefly reviewed the relation between video
games and AI. Then, we introduced the methodology of literature collection, presented and discussed the query, as well the flow
of data treatment in the applications and plugins used. Since the article is concerned with a historical point of view of the relationship
between digital games and AI the results were many and, therefore, we focused on the top 10 of each ranking, and discussed these
results separately. Finally, we discuss the limitations of our review, proposing future research directions for scholars.
© 2022 The Authors. Published by ELSEVIER B.V.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0)
Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Industry Sciences and Computer
Sciences Innovation
Keywords: Computer games; AI; Games, Bibliometric analysis, Virtual Reality.
1. Introduction
Since the beginning of AI, it has been related to games [1]. These games were fundamentally used to measure the
ability and performance of the AI. In 1950 Shannon shared the main aspects of computational routine in the article
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +351300029900; fax: +351278201340.
E-mail address: address: jpaulo@ipb.pt
316 João Paulo Sousa et al. / Procedia Computer Science 204 (2022) 315–323
2 Author name / Procedia Computer Science 00 (2019) 000–000
“Programming a computer for playing chess” [1]. The paper introduces a process for the computer to be able to decide
which move to perform next. For this, the minimax procedure was used, based on an evaluation function of a certain
chess position.
In 1952 a British professor of computer science, Alexander Douglass, created the OXO game also known as tic-
tac-toe, as part of his Ph.D. research on human-computer interaction for the University of Cambridge. OXO was a
single-player game in which one player plays against the computer. The first computer game is generally assumed to
be "Spacewar!", developed in 1962 at MIT. Pac-Man, a simple arcade game from 1981 introduced different AI
heuristics to each one of the four ghosts of the game, creating personalities for these enemies. The first sequel of Pac-
Man, Ms. Pac-Man, released in 1982, is more challenging and according to [2] the version Ms. Pac-Man vs. Ghosts
is a preference for the current AI's competitions since it supports the two main approaches to train videogame bots:
Genetic Algorithms and Reinforcement Learning. There is a common criticism about game AI, based on its objective,
that this kind of AI needs only to look intelligent from a player's perspective, while AI, on an industrial approach, for
example, must focus on real-world problems [3]. But, since the '90s, when games evolve to be more complex, mixing
different genres, it is possible to see the uses of genetic algorithms, neural networks, evolutionary approaches [4], and
Deep Learning (a subset of Machine Learning) in video games, thereby decreasing the difference between AI and
game AI. Nowadays game critics include the performance of AI in a game in the same way they assess its graphics,
settings, physics, narrative, and more [5]. The Holy Grail for AI is to surpass the best human players in complex games
such as StarCraft (Blizzard Entertainment, 1998), a sci-fi military-strategic game with intense resource management,
where players assume three different roles using three different races. According to [6] the mastering of StarCraft is a
challenge for artificial agents to compete and coordinate with other agents inside complex environments, so this game
has emerged as a real target for artificial intelligence research. Since 1998, its release date, the StarCraft agents never
come close to matching the best StarCraft players abilities, but in 2019 the StarCraft's agent AlphaStar surpasses
99,8% of the best human players in all 3 races of the game Protoss, Terrans, and Zergs, reaching a new milestone for
the AI.
Despite the number of scientific papers related to this topic, and to the best of our knowledge, there is no
bibliometric, scientometric, or informetric analysis of the existing scientific literature on the use of AI in video games.
A search on Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases, with no proper results, seems to confirm that. Therefore,
we intend to make a first contribution to filling this gap, by conducting a bibliometric study on the distribution and
interest of publications relating to research between video games and AI, as well to identify the sources and authors
with more scientific production. Thus, the research questions that this paper attempt to answer are the following: What
are the most influential published articles? What are the main publication sources? Who are the most prolific authors
from de search? What are the most frequently used keywords in articles published? To respond to these research
questions, the major purpose of this study is to provide a holistic review of video games and AI research and to identify
the challenges and gaps that are needed to be addressed by future research. The rest of the paper is structured as
follows: first, the methodology used to obtain the dataset is described. Then, in Section 3, the results and quantitative
analysis are presented, and finally, the discussion of the results and future work are addressed in Section 4.
2. Methodology
Before performing this search, topic keywords were applied to Scopus and WoS databases. As the Scopus took a
significantly larger number than WoS, it was chosen. Our bibliometric analysis was carried out on publications
published in peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings; other documents such as books, reviews were
excluded from this bibliometric analysis. Only publications written in English were considered, there were no time
restrictions, and the search returned articles from 1971 to 2021. The resulting query is as follows:
(TITLE-ABS-KEY("computer game" OR "video game" OR videogame) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY("artificial intelligence")) AND (
LIMIT-TO ( DOCTYPE,"cp" ) OR LIMIT-TO ( DOCTYPE,"ar" ) ) AND ( LIMIT-TO ( LANGUAGE,"English" ))
A set of 2604 publications was returned. This data was then downloaded in RIS format. Later, this dataset was
imported to the Biblioshiny for Bibliometrix in R 4.1.1. R is an open-source environment for statistical computing
and graphics, with a collection of several packages such as Bibliometrix, developed specifically for bibliometric and
scientometric studies [7]. Biblioshiny is a user-friendly web interface for Bibliometrix, to perform comprehensive
João Paulo Sousa et al. / Procedia Computer Science 204 (2022) 315–323 317
Author name / Procedia Computer Science 00 (2019) 000–000 3
science mapping analysis. Using those tools were carried out an analysis of a publication dataset and built matrices to
perform network analysis for conceptual structure, intellectual structure , and social structure.
3. Analysis
Table 1 shows key information about data and document types retrieved from the Scopus database query on
November 12, 2021. A total of 2604 publications from 1971 to 2022 were retrieved, of which 456 were journal articles ,
and 2148 articles from conference proceedings. A total of 5865 authors were identified, the average of authors per
publication was 2.25 and 88% of the documents were written by more than one author.
Table 1. Main information about the search.
Description Results
Total publications 2604
Articles 456
Proceedings papers 2148
Period 1971-2022
Date of query 12-10-2021
Authors 5864
Authors per document 2.25
Co-Authors per documents 3.19
Single-authored documents 351
Sources (Journals,proceedings) 810
Countries 77
3.1. Documents
The chart in Fig. 1(a) shows the growth of the number of publications published annually and the mean of total
citations by year. The first publication returned was from 1971. Before 1999, the number of publications on AI and
video games was on a slow-growth trend, ranging from 0 to 5. Starting from 1998, the number of publications has
been increasing rapidly. Specifically, from 2004 to 2006 that duplicated the number of publications, and also between
2012 and 2016 the number of articles tripled, reaching its maximum of 316 publications in 2006. This trend is also
consistent with the findings reported in other studies related to bibliometric analysis in the video games field [8] and
[9]. But not in line with bibliometric analysis in the AI field ([10], [11]) where the biggest growth curve was in other
periods. The underlying reason that video games and AI research has grown rapidly after 2004 could be attributed to
the increase of interest in using AI solutions to solve classical problems of video games AI as pathfinding, decision
making, strategy, and procedural generation [4].
Fig. 1. (a) Annual Scientific Production and citation and (b) documents by subject area
In Fig. 1(a) it is possible to identify two citation peaks: the first in 1995 and the second in 2015. Two of the three
318 João Paulo Sousa et al. / Procedia Computer Science 204 (2022) 315–323
4 Author name / Procedia Computer Science 00 (2019) 000–000
works that the research returned this year contributed to the first peak ([12], [13]) with 847 and 527 citations
respectively. For the peak of 2015, [14] contributed a lot with 8905 citations, completely distancing itself from the
other publications this year. Looking at the graph in Fig. 1(b), it is clear that the most published field of research of
Computer Sciences, followed by Mathematics and Engineering. This is no surprise given that video games and AI are
inherently related to those fields. Table 2 shows the 10 most influential publications in video games in the AI field,
based on the number of citations. As previously mentioned, [14] is the most cited publication with 8905 citations. The
paper presents the first deep learning model capable of achieving the performance of a professional player in 49 games,
having as input the pixels and the score of the game. In second place with 939 citations appears [15]. This publication
unveils the smart technologies coded and used in Kinect for sensor calibration, human skeleton tracking, and facial
expression tracking. With 833 citations, [12] presents the game-learning program using neural networks to play the
game Gammon, coming in third place. In fourth position comes [16] with 654 citations. This paper presents the
algorithm which would later defeat the best GO player in the world, and register one of the most important moments
in the history of AI. In [13] is used the video game Tetris to study interactive processes of how agents configure their
workplace for specific tasks and how they can continuously manage that workplace. In [17] the authors reflect on
what is necessary for current AI systems to think like humans. For this, they review the progress of cognitive science
and point out paths for what they learn and how they learn. In [6] a new breakthrough in AI and video games is
announced, the multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithm (AlphaStar) is presented. After training, reaches the level
of the grandmaster level in the real-time strategy game (StarCraft II), being able to beat 99.8 percent of all human
players in the competition. In [18] cooperative algorithms based on the A* algorithm are provided that address specific
cooperative pathfinding problems. [19] presents the algorithm for imperfect information settings adapted for games,
where players have perfect information, and it was tested in a professional poker tournament. In [20] an algorithm
based on the A* algorithm is presented, for finding paths in grids with locked and unlocked cells, used to represent
3D terrain in video games. Finally, [21] presents a program for playing poker, which uses learning techniques to build
statistical models of each.
Table 2 - Most Global Cited Documents
Paper
DOI
Total Citations
MNIH V, 2015, NATURE
10.1038/nature14236
8905
HAN J, 2013, IEEE TRANS CYBERN
10.1109/TCYB.2013.2265378
939
TESAU C, 1995, COMMUN ACM
10.1145/203330.203343
833
SILVER D, 2018, SCI
10.1126/science.aar6404
654
KIRSH D, 1995, ARTIF INTELL
10.1016/0004-3702(94)00017-U
517
LAKE BM, 2017, BEHAV BRAIN SCI
10.1017/S0140525X16001837
502
VINYALS O, 2019, NATURE
10.1038/s41586-019-1724-z
437
SILVER D, 2005, PROC ART. INT. INTER. DIG. ENTERT. CONF., AIIDE
NA
291
MORAVČÍK M, 2017, SCIENCE
10.1126/science.aam6960
280
BILLINGS D, 2002, ARTIF INTELL
10.1016/S0004-3702(01)00130-8
191
3.2. Sources
Figure 2 shows an exaggerated concentration on few actors in Most Local Cited Sources, in which the first three
sources account for 46% of the citations, while the other 7 share the rest.
João Paulo Sousa et al. / Procedia Computer Science 204 (2022) 315–323 319
Author name / Procedia Computer Science 00 (2019) 000–000 5
Fig. 2. Top 10 most local cited sources
In Table 3 it is clear the predominance of two main sources. From the top ten publications, the first one alone holds
40%, and the first and the second together hold 58%. This also points to a preponderance of Bioinformatics, as the
source that holds 41% of publications focuses on this area.
Table 3 - Top 10 sources and number of papers published during the period.
Sources
Number of papers
Lecture Notes In Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes In AI And In Bioinformatics)
417
AAAI Workshop - Technical report
183
Communications in computer and information science
80
IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games CIG
65
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series
58
IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
57
Proceedings of CGames 2005 - 7th International Conference on Computer Games
47
CEUR Workshop Proceedings
46
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
45
Expert Systems With Applications
43
However, in Table 4, the Source Local Impact presents a more balanced distribution. Even with the first four places
concentrating just over half of the local impact, the distribution is more homogeneous, considering the H-index, since
the difference from first to last place is little more than double, 2.2x (20 vs 9), and not 9.7 times as much (471 vs 43)
as in Most Relevant Sources. In the G-index this difference is greater, 3.5 times (45 vs 10) but it also maintains a more
homogeneous distribution.
Table 4 - Top 10 most impact sources.
Element
h_index
g_index
IJCAI International Joint Conference On Artificial Intelligence
20
29
Lecture Notes In Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes In AI And In Bioinformatics)
20
31
Proceedings Of The National Conference On Artificial Intelligence
19
35
AAAI Workshop - Technical Report
15
28
IEEE Conference On Computational Intelligence And Games, CIG
13
25
Artificial Intelligence
12
13
IEEE Transactions On Cybernetics
12
14
IEEE Transactions On Computational Intelligence And AI In Games
11
26
2008 Ieee Symposium On Computational Intelligence And Games, CIG 2008
9
10
Proceedings Of The 4th Artificial Intelligence And Interactive Digital Entertainment Conference, AIIDE
2008
9
18
320 João Paulo Sousa et al. / Procedia Computer Science 204 (2022) 315–323
6 Author name / Procedia Computer Science 00 (2019) 000–000
3.3. Authors
The documents analyzed were authored by 5864 different researchers, with an aver age of 0.444 documents per
author. The large majority of those authors, 5555 (95%), produced documents in co-authorship, while 309 (5%)
authors produced their documents without collaboration. There were 351 (13%) single-author documents.
Relatively to co-authorship indices, the Authors per Documents index is 2.25 and The Co-Authors per Documents
is 3.19, the former being the ratio between the total number of authors and the total number of articles and the latter
being the average number of co-authors per article. The collaboration index, that is, the ratio between the number of
authors of multi-authored documents and the number of multi-authored documents is 2.47. Fig. 3(a) shows the most
relevant authors per number of authored documents. The two most productive ones are Vadim Bulitko (University of
Alberta, Canada) with 35 documents, an average of 2.5 per year published continuously from 2005 to 2019, and Julian
Togelius (New York University, USA) with 31 documents, with the first publication happening only in 2014 but with
an average of 3.875 documents a year since then. There are several measures used to quantify the impact of individual
authors. The table in Fig. 3(b) shows the 10 authors with more local impact, by h-index. This is the most common
measure used, although studies suggest that the use of the h-index in ranking scientists should be reconsidered [22].
Fig. 3. (a) The 10 most relevant authors by the number of documents; (b) The 10 most relevant authors by local impact.
3.4. Most Frequent Words
The analysis of the most cited words must be careful, due to the occurrence of synonyms and specializations. For
example, the most cited term (Fig. 4), Artificial Intelligence, is a broad term that involves several specializations, such
as machine learning, deep learning, and neural networks, which appear in 2nd, 14th, and 17th respectively. As for
synonyms, Artificial Intelligence's abbreviation, AI, appears in 10th place, which would increase the initial count of
329 appearances for the keyword to 362, approximately 10% more. Regarding synonyms, we have the broad concept
of digital games, which appears as computer games, or video games, usually, a difference in the hardware used, games,
an abbreviation, computer game and video game, singular forms of the aforementioned plurals, serious game, a game
genre, videogames, a synonym, and AI games and game design, digital games specialization areas. If added, these
terms together come in at 427, that is, more than Artificial Intelligence and its abbreviation together (showing that
these people know how to have fun). When used to analyze trends, as we will see later in Fig. 5, the separation of
synonyms and technologies is important, as it allows us to observe how keywords evolve and become less general
over the years, but when it comes to analyzing only the amount of words, without the need of a timeline, they can be
put together without problems of interpretation.
João Paulo Sousa et al. / Procedia Computer Science 204 (2022) 315–323 321
Author name / Procedia Computer Science 00 (2019) 000–000 7
Fig. 4. Most relevant words by occurrences
Although the term Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) first appeared in 2006 by Remí Coulom [23], it ends up
standing out in 2016 when it is successfully combined with neural networks at work [16] and the era of deep learning
is created. Procedural content generation in video games has a long history, but Fig. 5 shows that in recent years there
has been an increase in interest around challenges posed by game content generation due to the emergence of deep
learning tools. This search trend will likely remain a search for the foreseeable future.
Fig. 5. Trend topics since 2007.
4. Discussion
Through the analysis of articles returned by the query, it was possible to identify two relationships between AI and
video games: video games can use AI algorithms to incorporate into their gameplay. For example, the case of using
an AI algorithm to create certain behaviors in an NPC, controlling the real-time strategy (RTS) game AI, or the
procedural level generation. The use of video games to test and assess the ability of the algorithm to solve problems.
Video games are usually designed to challenge humans and allow you to recreate more or less complex virtual
environments. This makes video games excellent tools to test various cognitive problems, including reasoning,
planning, strategy, coordination, perception, behavior, kinesthetics, among others. One example is the use of video
games in learning algorithms ([6], [16], [19]). In the top 10 of the most cited articles, and through co-occurrence, it is
322 João Paulo Sousa et al. / Procedia Computer Science 204 (2022) 315–323
8 Author name / Procedia Computer Science 00 (2019) 000–000
possible to observe that researchers around the world are using video games to create environments to be used in
learning algorithms. The doubling of the number of articles published in 2016, can be due to the convergence of some
factors that promoted the rapid growth of deep learning, including the availability of a great amount of data and more
processing power given by GPUs evolution, new algorithms like convolutional neural networks, in 2012, Generative
Adversarial Networks, in 2014, and the availability of more user-friendly machine learning frameworks, like
Tensorflow, introduced by Google in 2015.
Future work could deal with some shortcomings of this study: Incorporated other databases such as WoS, and
others. To perform a screening strategy, analyze the content of the publication to verify if its focus is related to AI and
videogames, and thus obtain a better sample. Lastly, considering the limitations of bibliometrics, a deeper content
analysis of papers can be conducted to gain a deeper understanding of the AI and videogames relations.
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by FCT---Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia within the Project Scope: UIDB/05757/2020.
References
[1] C. E. Shannon, ‘Programming a Computer for Playing Chess’, in Computer Chess Compendium, D. Levy, Ed. New York, NY: Springer New
York, 1988, pp. 2–13. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-1968-0_1.
[2] F. Domınguez-Estevez, A. A. Sanchez-Ruiz, and P. Pablo, ‘Training Pac-Man bots using Reinforcement Learning and Case-based Reasoning’,
p. 12, 2017.
[3] G. N. Yannakakis, ‘Game AI revisited’, in Proceedings of the 9th conference on Computing Frontiers - CF ’12, Cagliari, Italy, 2012, p. 285.
doi: 10.1145/2212908.2212954.
[4] M. Straeubig, ‘Games, AI and Systems’, Eludamos J. Comput. Game Cult., vol. 10, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Apr. 2020.
[5] ‘Red Dead Redemption 2: A deep dive into Rockstar’s game design’, VentureBeat, Dec. 05, 2018. https://venturebeat.com/2018/12/05/red-
dead-redemption-a-deep-dive-into-rockstars-game-design/ (accessed Nov. 22, 2021).
[6] O. Vinyals et al., ‘Grandmaster level in StarCraft II using multi-agent reinforcement learning’, Nature, vol. 575, no. 7782, pp. 350–354, Nov.
2019, doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1724-z.
[7] M. Aria and C. Cuccurullo, ‘bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis’, J. Informetr., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 959–975,
Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.
[8] P. García-Sánchez, A. M. Mora, P. A. Castillo, and I. J. Pérez, ‘A bibliometric study of the research area of videogames using Dimensions.ai
database’, Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 162, pp. 737–744, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.12.045.
[9] A. R. Martins, S. Monteiro, J. C. Duarte, and L. R. Oliveira, ‘Games and learning: a bibliometric analysis of the scientific production’, 2015.
Accessed: Nov. 19, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/
[10] J. M. Alonso, C. Castiello, and C. Mencar, ‘A Bibliometric Analysis of the Explainable Artificial Intelligence Research Field’, in Information
Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems. Theory and Foundations, Cham, 2018, pp. 3–15. doi: 10.1007/978-3-
319-91473-2_1.
[11] W. Tu, J. Fang, Fangyu, Jiao, and Y. Ci, ‘Bibliometric research in the field of artificial intelligence’, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1883, no. 1, p.
012165, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1883/1/012165.
[12] C. Tesau and G. Tesau, ‘Temporal Difference Learning and TD-Gammon’, Commun. ACM, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 58–68, 1995, doi:
10.1145/203330.203343.
[13] D. Kirsh, ‘The intelligent use of space’, Artif. Intell., vol. 73, no. 1–2, pp. 31–68, 1995, doi: 10.1016/0004 -3702(94)00017-U.
[14] V. Mnih et al., ‘Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning’, Nature, vol. 518, no. 7540, pp. 529–533, 2015, doi:
10.1038/nature14236.
[15] J. Han, L. Shao, D. Xu, and J. Shotton, ‘Enhanced Computer Vision With Microsoft Kinect Sensor: A Review’, IEEE Trans. Cybern ., vol. 43,
no. 5, pp. 1318–1334, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2013.2265378.
[16] D. Silver et al., ‘Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search’, Nature, vol. 529, no. 7587, pp. 484–489, 2016, doi:
10.1038/nature16961.
[17] B. M. Lake, T. D. Ullman, J. B. Tenenbaum, and S. J. Gershman, ‘Building Machines That Learn and Think Like People’, ArXiv160400289
Cs Stat, Nov. 2016, Accessed: Dec. 04, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.00289
[18] D. Silver, ‘Cooperative pathfinding’, in Proceedings of the First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital
Entertainment, Marina del Rey, California, Jun. 2005, pp. 117–122.
[19] M. Moravčík et al., ‘DeepStack: Expert-level artificial intelligence in heads-up no-limit poker’, Science, vol. 356, no. 6337, pp. 50 8–513, 2017,
doi: 10.1126/science.aam6960.
[20] K. Daniel, A. Nash, S. Koenig, and A. Felner, ‘Theta*: Any-Angle Path Planning on Grids’, J Artif Intell Res JAIR, vol. 39, Jan. 2014, doi:
João Paulo Sousa et al. / Procedia Computer Science 204 (2022) 315–323 323
Author name / Procedia Computer Science 00 (2019) 000–000 9
10.1613/jair.2994.
[21] D. Billings, A. Davidson, J. Schaeffer, and D. Szafron, ‘The challenge of poker’, Artif. Intell., vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 201–240, Jan. 2002, doi:
10.1016/S0004-3702(01)00130-8.
[22] V. Koltun and D. Hafner, ‘The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation’, PLOS ONE, vol. 16, no. 6, p. e0253397,
Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253397.
[23] R. Coulom, ‘Efficient Selectivity and Backup Operators in Monte-Carlo Tree Search’, in 5th International Conference on Computer and Games,
Turin, Italy, May 2006. Accessed: Dec. 17, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00116992