ArticlePublisher preview available

Therapist-Targeted Googling: Characteristics and Consequences for the Therapeutic Relationship

Authors:
  • NeuroDiverse Online Ltd
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Therapist-targeted googling (TTG) refers to a patient searching online to find information about their therapist. The present study investigated TTG prevalence and characteristics in a sample of adult psychotherapy clients. Participants (n = 266) who had attended at least one session with a therapist completed an anonymous online survey about TTG prevalence, motivations, and perceived impact on the therapeutic relationship. Two-thirds of the sample had conducted TTG. Those participants who were having therapy privately had worked with more than one therapist, or were having sessions more often than weekly were significantly more likely to conduct TTG; this profile was particularly common among patients who were having psychodynamic psychotherapy. Motivations included wanting to see if the therapist is qualified, curiosity, missing the therapist, and wanting to know them better. Nearly a quarter who undertook TTG thought the findings impacted the therapeutic relationship but only one in five had disclosed TTG to the therapist. TTG beyond common sense consumerism can be conceptualized as a patient’s attempt to attain closeness to the therapist but may result in impacts on trust and ability to be open. Disclosures of TTG may constitute important therapeutic material.
Therapist-Targeted Googling: Characteristics and Consequences for the
Therapeutic Relationship
Kathryn E. Cox, Laura M. Simonds, and Alesia Moulton-Perkins
School of Psychology, University of Surrey
Therapist-targeted googling (TTG) refers to a patient searching online to nd information about their
therapist. The present study investigated TTG prevalence and characteristics in a sample of adult
psychotherapy clients. Participants (n=266) who had attended at least one session with a therapist
completed an anonymous online survey about TTG prevalence, motivations, and perceived impact on the
therapeutic relationship. Two-thirds of the sample had conducted TTG. Those participants who were having
therapy privately had worked with more than one therapist, or were having sessions more often than weekly
were signicantly more likely to conduct TTG; this prole was particularly common among patients who
were having psychodynamic psychotherapy. Motivations included wanting to see if the therapist is
qualied, curiosity, missing the therapist, and wanting to know them better.Nearly a quarter who undertook
TTG thought the ndings impacted the therapeutic relationship but only one in ve had disclosed TTG to the
therapist. TTG beyond common sense consumerism can be conceptualized as a patients attempt to attain
closeness to the therapist but may result in impacts on trust and ability to be open. Disclosures of TTG may
constitute important therapeutic material.
Public Signicance Statement
This study suggests that there are multiple motivations for clients searching online for information about
their therapist. It highlights the need for practitioners to carefully consider the information available
about them online and the importance of client searching to the therapeutic relationship.
Keywords: therapist-targeted googling, therapeutic relationship, disclosure
The term therapist-targeted googling(TTG) has been used to
refer to the act of a psychotherapy patient using the internet in any
way to obtain information about their therapist (Eichenberg &
Sawyer, 2016). Zur et al. (2009) proposed various ways of classi-
fying TTG, apparently increasing in intrusiveness: Visiting the
therapists professional webpage; using a search engine such as
Google; searching for the therapist on a social networking site and
perhaps friendingthe therapist; joining a professional chat room
as an anonymous user or under the guise of a professional; paying
for a specialized yet legal background check on the therapist; and
hiring a company to conduct an illegal search for personal
information. The extent to which these types of TTG have been
empirically derived and validated is, however, unclear.
There are several possible reasons why therapy patients might
engage in TTG. The most obvious are curiosity and establishing
professional credentials. Beyond this, it has been observed that
patients in therapy may be motivated to balance what is perceived as
an unequal power relationship (Simonds & Spokes, 2017). This can
be understood in terms of humansinnate expectation of reciprocity
in their interpersonal relationships (Buunk & Schaufeli, 1999);
information-sharing in a therapeutic relationship is not reciprocal.
It is therefore understandable that a patient may be motivated to
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
This article was published Online First July 22, 2021.
Kathryn E. Cox https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3964-6258
Laura M. Simonds https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8173-4051
Alesia Moulton-Perkins https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1820-9753
KATHRYN E. COX received her doctorate in clinical psychology from the
University of Surrey. As a practising clinical psychologist, her current
clinical work involves providing community-based support for older adults,
including evidence-based psychological interventions and neuropsychologi-
cal assessment. Her areas of professional and research interest include the
therapeutic relationship, attachment theory, and professional ethics in a
healthcare context.
LAURA M. SIMONDS received her PhD in psychology from the University of
Greenwich. She is currently an academic director of the clinical psychology
professional doctorate at the University of Surrey. Her research interests
include stigmatized identities, shame, disclosure, and the therapeutic
relationship.
ALESIA MOULTON-PERKINS received her doctorate in clinical psychology
from the University of Surrey. She is currently a part-time PhD student at the
University of Sussex and a clinical psychologist in private practice delivering
online therapy, supervision and training. Her areas of professional interest
include evaluating the acceptability and feasibility of delivering
Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy by videoconferencing. In connection
with the British Psychological Society, Division of Clinical Psychology, she
has been involved in developing competencies and training materials for
psychological therapists in digital mental health.
We have no conicts of interest to disclose.
CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING THIS ARTICLE should be addressed to Laura
M. Simonds, School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford,
Surrey GU2 7XH, United Kingdom. Email: l.simonds@surrey.ac.uk
Professional Psychology: Research and Practice
© 2021 American Psychological Association 2021, Vol. 52, No. 6, 533541
ISSN: 0735-7028 https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000405
533
... Moreover, therapists should be offered with interfaces to easily list their qualifications, as well as their previous history of dealing with patients in anonymized case story format. Prior research suggests that it may bring more credibility to the users [34] and boost user satisfaction with the therapy process [26]. ...
Preprint
Mobile mental health applications are seen as a promising way to fulfill the growing need for mental health care. Although there are more than ten thousand mental health apps available on app marketplaces, such as Google Play and Apple App Store, many of them are not evidence-based, or have been minimally evaluated or regulated. The real-life experience and concerns of the app users are largely unknown. To address this knowledge gap, we analyzed 2159 user reviews from 117 Android apps and 2764 user reviews from 76 iOS apps. Our findings include the critiques around inconsistent moderation standards and lack of transparency. App-embedded social features and chatbots were criticized for providing little support during crises. We provide research and design implications for future mental health app developers, discuss the necessity of developing a comprehensive and centralized app development guideline, and the opportunities of incorporating existing AI technology in mental health chatbots.
Article
Mobile mental health applications are seen as a promising way to fulfill the growing need for mental health care. Although there are more than ten thousand mental health apps available on app marketplaces, such as Google Play and Apple App Store, many of them are not evidence-based, or have been minimally evaluated or regulated. The real-life experience and concerns of the app users are largely unknown. To address this knowledge gap, we analyzed 2159 user reviews from 117 Android apps and 2764 user reviews from 76 iOS apps. Our findings include the critiques around inconsistent moderation standards and lack of transparency. App-embedded social features and chatbots were criticized for providing little support during crises. We provide research and design implications for future mental health app developers, discuss the necessity of developing a comprehensive and centralized app development guideline, and the opportunities of incorporating existing AI technology in mental health chatbots.
Article
Full-text available
Eight U.S.-based psychotherapists were interviewed regarding their personal and professional use of social media networks (SMNs), professional SMN policies, and experiences of navigating a significant Facebook (FB)-related discussion with a client. Discussions were stimulated by clients seeking FB contact with therapists, with the majority being attempts to “friend” therapists. Most discussions involved therapists explaining why they do not “friend” clients, largely because of concerns about boundaries and how the therapy relationship differs from relationships clients have with others. Positive consequences included the impact of the incident and discussion on strengthening SMN practices/policies and enhancing the therapy relationship. In contrast, negative consequences included evoking distressing emotions in clients and eliciting discomfort for practitioners. Participants offered a range of advice for avoiding problematic FB interactions with clients, with many suggesting strict and consistent policies regarding FB/SMN with clients. Implications for practice and research are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
We review definitions and provide case examples of therapist self-disclosure (TSD) and immediacy (Im). We then present a qualitative meta-analysis of 21 studies that examined the subsequent process following TSD and Im in psychotherapy (excluding analogue and correlational studies). Across the 21 studies, the most frequent subsequent processes were enhanced therapy relationship, improved client mental health functioning, gains in insight, and overall helpfulness, suggesting that most often TSD and Im were followed by positive and beneficial therapeutic processes. In additional analyses, TSD was associated more often with improved mental health functioning, overall helpfulness, and enhanced therapy relationships, whereas Im was associated more often with clients opening up and being immediate. We also consider possible moderating variables, including client contributions and diversity issues. The article concludes with research-informed recommendations for judiciously using TSD and Im in practice.
Article
Full-text available
The present study unpacks an important dimension of clinical practice from the therapists’ vantage point. We interviewed 26 therapists in private practice about how the personal relationship with the client works from their perspective and conducted a grounded theory analysis. Three categories emerged. One refers to scope, aims and corollaries of the connection with the client; a second to preventing harm and managing drawbacks; and a third to taking therapeutic advantage of challenges related to closeness. Together, these categories form a model that describes how the close connection modifies therapeutic effects and generates challenges the therapist needs to deal with. The closer the dyad, the easier therapists will affect and be affected by the client. Therapists try to direct closeness to where it can nourish client process without harming the relationship, the client or themselves, and when closeness backfires, they may still try to harness uninvited effects for the benefit of therapy. This model concerning therapists’ lived experience is offered to inform research on the therapist-client relationship and as a contribution to clinical competency models.
Article
Full-text available
As qualitative research becomes increasingly recognized and valued, it is imperative that it is conducted in a rigorous and methodical manner to yield meaningful and useful results. To be accepted as trustworthy, qualitative researchers must demonstrate that data analysis has been conducted in a precise, consistent, and exhaustive manner through recording, systematizing , and disclosing the methods of analysis with enough detail to enable the reader to determine whether the process is credible. Although there are numerous examples of how to conduct qualitative research, few sophisticated tools are available to researchers for conducting a rigorous and relevant thematic analysis. The purpose of this article is to guide researchers using thematic analysis as a research method. We offer personal insights and practical examples, while exploring issues of rigor and trustworthiness. The process of conducting a thematic analysis is illustrated through the presentation of an auditable decision trail, guiding interpreting and representing textual data. We detail our step-by-step approach to exploring the effectiveness of strategic clinical networks in Alberta, Canada, in our mixed methods case study. This article contributes a purposeful approach to thematic analysis in order to systematize and increase the traceability and verification of the analysis.
Article
Full-text available
Background: The use of the Internet as a source of health information is growing among people who experience mental health difficulties. The increase in Internet use has led to questions about online information-seeking behaviors, for example, how psychotherapists and patients use the Internet to ascertain information about each other. The notion of psychotherapists seeking information about their patients online (patient-targeted googling, PTG) has been identified and explored. However, the idea of patients searching for information online about their psychotherapists (therapist-targeted googling, TTG) and the associated motives and effects on the therapeutic relationship remain unclear. Objective: This study investigated former and current German-speaking psychotherapy patients' behavior and attitudes relating to TTG. In addition, patients' methods of information gathering, motives, and success in searching for information were examined. Furthermore, patients' experiences and perceptions of PTG were explored. Methods: Overall, 238 former and current psychotherapy patients responded to a new questionnaire specifically designed to assess the frequency, motives, use, and outcomes of TTG as well as experiences and perceptions of PTG. The study sample was a nonrepresentative convenience sample recruited online via several German-speaking therapy platforms and self-help forums. Results: Of the 238 former and current patients who responded, 106 (44.5%) had obtained information about their therapists; most of them (n=85, 80.2%) had used the Internet for this. Besides curiosity, motives behind information searches included the desire to get to know the therapist better by attempting to search for both professional and private information. TTG appeared to be associated with phases of therapy in which patients felt that progress was not being made. Patients being treated for personality disorders appear to engage more frequently in TTG (rphi = 0.21; P=.004). In general, however, information about therapists sought for online was often not found. Furthermore, most patients refrained from telling their therapist about their information searches. Conclusions: Patients appear to engage in TTG to obtain both professional and private information about their psychotherapists. TTG can be viewed as a form of client-initiated disclosure. It is therefore important to include TTG as a subject in therapists' education and also to raise awareness within patient education. This investigation provides the first findings into TTG to begin debate on this subject.
Article
Full-text available
Psychotherapists are becoming more concerned about their personal information being accessible on the Internet. Professional articles and ethics workshop presenters encourage clinicians to be aware of the availability and accessibility of this information; however, little is known about the phenomenon of clients searching for clinicians’ personal information, or how this may impact the psychotherapy relationship. This study involved 332 psychotherapy patients who had found their clinicians’ personal information, professional information, or both, in the course of their online activities. This article, however, focuses primarily on questions that addressed those who found personal information about their clinician, including information about the clinicians’ family members. The researchers explored where clients searched, why clients felt compelled to search, and whether they revisited sites to obtain ongoing updates about clinicians. They also explored clients’ reports regarding how access to this personal information affected their experience of treatment. Neutral, positive, and negative experiences are described. Recommendations are made for how psychotherapists might manage the accessibility of this information, and how they may respond in clinically sensitive ways when clients disclose regarding online searching or discovery of clinician personal information.
Article
Full-text available
Research suggests that psychotherapy relationships formed by adult clients can exhibit all the essential elements of attachment bonds identified by Mikulincer and Shaver. Specifically, some clients: (i) regard their therapist as stronger and wiser; (ii) seek proximity through emotional connection and regular meetings; (iii) rely upon their therapist as a safe haven when they feel threatened; (iv) derive a sense of felt security from their therapist, who serves as a secure base for psychological exploration; and (v) experience separation anxiety when anticipating loss of their therapist. This paper presents a conceptual model describing how therapists can regulate therapeutic distance to create the relationship conditions best suited for clients with a hyperactivating versus deactivating attachment pattern. These therapists create a corrective emotional experience by offering the same client not one static attachment relationship, but rather a progressively changing series of relationships that promote more adaptive functioning.
Article
Full-text available
All psychotherapists engage in self-disclosure with their clients. At times it may be deliberate or nondeliberate, verbal or nonverbal, and avoidable or unavoidable. Yet, modern-day Internet technologies have redefined the meaning and applications of self-disclosure and transparency in psychotherapy. Consumers of mental health services can easily access large amounts of information about their psychologists. Clients' online searches about their psychotherapists may range from normal curiosity to criminal stalking. Following an examination of these issues, three invited experts share their commentaries on the issues raised. A historical review of self-disclosure in the mental health professions and the opposition of many theorists and practitioners to its use are provided. Further, the roles of Internet social networking and online communities for psychotherapists and their clients and prospective clients are explored, along with the clinical meaning of the ever-increasing digital transparencies of psychologists, trainees, and clients. Advice is provided for how to view, understand, and consider web postings by psychotherapists, clients, and others. Implications for clinical practice and training are provided along with recommendations for how to effectively address issues of digital transparency. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Evidence is mixed regarding the potential utility of therapist self-disclosure. The current study modelled relationships between perceived helpfulness of therapist self-disclosures, therapeutic alliance, patient non-disclosure, and shame in participants (n = 120; 95% women) with a history of eating problems. Serial multiple mediator analyses provided support for a putative model connecting the perceived helpfulness of therapist self-disclosures with current eating disorder symptom severity through therapeutic alliance, patient self-disclosure, and shame. The analyses presented provide support for the contention that therapist self-disclosure, if perceived as helpful, might strengthen the therapeutic alliance. A strong therapeutic alliance, in turn, has the potential to promote patient disclosure and reduce shame and eating problems.
Article
This chapter explores the nature of shame experiences and how they can interfere with the seeking of psychotherapy and the process of therapy. The latter half of the chapter outlines aspects of compassion focused therapy (CFT), which was specially developed for high shame problems. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)