ArticlePDF Available

Navigating social interactions and constructing vaping social identities: A qualitative exploration with New Zealand young adults who smoke

Authors:

Abstract

Introduction: Social interactions help smoking and vaping practices evolve, and are essential when constructing social identities. Among people who smoke, vaping offers an alternative practice to 'smoking' and 'non-smoking', and using e-cigarettes blurs the boundaries between 'smoker' and 'non-smoker' social identities. In this study, we explored the development of vaping and smoking social identities over time among young adults who smoked and used e-cigarettes. Methods: Over 18-24 weeks during 2018-2019, we conducted five interviews with each of 11 New Zealand young adults aged 19-29 years who tried vaping to stop smoking. We analysed participants' interview transcripts for social interactions involving smoking or vaping and used social identity theory to explore their construction of vaping social identities. Results: Participants entered the study with smoke-free goals, and constructed social identities explicitly in relation to a smoke-free transition. Two key identity processes, 'adopting legitimacy' and 'transferring considerateness', informed participants' social identity construction as they attempted to reconcile their e-cigarette use with their pre-study characterisations of vaping as 'illegitimate' and 'obnoxious'. Our findings suggest that adopting a 'legitimate' vaper identity focussed on smoking cessation, and being perceived and accepted by others as a 'legitimate vaper', were essential in participants' identification as 'vapers'. Identifying as a 'legitimate' vaper was a pre-requisite to transferring a 'considerate' identity from smoking to vaping. Discussion and conclusion: Participants' construction of vaping social identities suggests that negotiating and reconciling valued aspects of a smoking social identity with nascent vaping practices may be important during smoking-to-vaping transition attempts.
ORIGINAL PAPER
Navigating social interactions and constructing vaping
social identities: A qualitative exploration
with New Zealand young adults who smoke
Mei-Ling Blank
1
| Janet Hoek
2
1
Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
2
Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
Correspondence
Mei-Ling Blank, Department of
Preventive and Social Medicine,
University of Otago, 18 Frederick Street,
Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.
Email: meiling.blank@otago.ac.nz
Funding information
Royal Society Te Ap
arangi, Grant/Award
Number: 17-UOO-129
Abstract
Introduction: Social interactions help smoking and vaping practices evolve,
and are essential when constructing social identities. Among people who
smoke, vaping offers an alternative practice to smokingand non-smoking,
and using e-cigarettes blurs the boundaries between smokerand non-
smokersocial identities. In this study, we explored the development of vaping
and smoking social identities over time among young adults who smoked and
used e-cigarettes.
Methods: Over 1824 weeks during 20182019, we conducted five interviews
with each of 11 New Zealand young adults aged 1929 years who tried vaping to
stop smoking. We analysed participantsinterview transcripts for social interac-
tions involving smoking or vaping and used social identity theory to explore their
construction of vaping social identities.
Results: Participants entered the study with smoke-free goals, and constructed
social identities explicitly in relation to a smoke-free transition. Two key iden-
tity processes, adopting legitimacyand transferring considerateness,
informed participantssocial identity construction as they attempted to recon-
cile their e-cigarette use with their pre-study characterisations of vaping as
illegitimateand obnoxious. Our findings suggest that adopting a legiti-
matevaper identity focussed on smoking cessation, and being perceived and
accepted by others as a legitimate vaper, were essential in participantsiden-
tification as vapers. Identifying as a legitimatevaper was a pre-requisite to
transferring a considerateidentity from smoking to vaping.
Discussion and Conclusion: Participantsconstruction of vaping social identi-
ties suggests that negotiating and reconciling valued aspects of a smoking social
identity with nascent vaping practices may be important during smoking-to-
vaping transition attempts.
Received: 13 December 2021 Revised: 7 August 2022 Accepted: 16 August 2022
DOI: 10.1111/dar.13542
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any
medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
© 2022 The Authors. Drug and Alcohol Review published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs.
268 Drug Alcohol Rev. 2023;42:268276.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/dar
KEYWORDS
e-cigarettes, qualitative research, smoking, social identity, vaping
Key points
Understanding how vaping social identities are constructed may help identify
new opportunities for individual-level smoking cessation interventions.
Support that enables people to discover how to adopt legitimacyand transfer
considerationmay foster more successful, and complete, smoking-to-vaping
transitions.
1|INTRODUCTION
Social interactions help establish and maintain smoking
and vaping practices [13]. For people who smoke,
e-cigarettes may change the meanings they associate with
these practices and their social identities as they come to
see themselves and are seen by others in a different way
[4, p. 55]. Social identities arise as people affiliate with
some groups and not with others (e.g., smokersand
non-smokers)[
5] and help explain relations between
groups with different social standing. For example, in
countries like New Zealand, tobacco policies have denor-
malised smoking practices [6], which have lost the social
acceptability they once enjoyed, and reinforced distinc-
tions between less accepted smokersand more accepted
non-smokers[7]. Social identities depend on social
interactions: individuals observe and categorise people
into groups, and identify with groups that maintain and
enhance their self-esteem. Through continued observa-
tion, people compare groups and refine, strengthen or
weaken their affiliations and social identities [5]. Incon-
gruity between current and desired statuses may prompt
change processes to enhance individual and collective
positions [5].
Using e-cigarettes potentially blurs boundaries between
traditional smokerand non-smokersocial identities.
Studies suggest long-term smoking cessation may par-
tially depend on embracing a new non-smokeror absti-
nentsocial identity [811]. Yet, while status differences
between smokersand non-smokersare clear [7], vap-
ings position is ambiguous. Young adults report vaping-
related stigma [12, 13] and, coupled with the difficulty of
a smoking-to-vaping behavioural transition [14], there is
uncertainty for people who smoke adopting a vaping
practice and social identity.
Studies have generally categorised vaping social iden-
tities as functional (primarily motivated by smoking ces-
sation), recreational (primarily motivated by pleasure)
and ambivalent [15], and highlighted the contextualising
role of social norms [16]. For example, in studies that
included young adult participants, Tokle and Pedersen,
and McCausland et al. identified substitutesand cloud
chasers[17, 18], while Ward et al. nuanced these catego-
ries, describing recreational invested vapers, functional
enthusiastic switchersand nicotine quitters[19]. Peo-
ple adopting functional identities felt acutely aware that
smoking stigma could transfer to vaping [19] and man-
aged their personal vaping visibility using avoidance or
minimisation strategies, especially when around children
[18, 19]. By contrast, recreational vapers felt less con-
cerned about the visual impact of their vaping [19],
which they sometimes used as a performative statement
to signal their identification as a vaper[17, 20]. People
in this latter group may become enmeshed in vaping sub-
cultures and countercultures that celebrate community
and creativity [17, 18].
While studies have reported broadly similar vaping
social identity outcomes among established e-cigarette
users, we are unaware of any work describing the early
stages of social identity formation over time among people
using e-cigarettes for smoking cessation. To explore this
gap, we analysed longitudinal interviews undertaken with
New Zealand young adults who tried e-cigarettes to stop
smoking. Interviewing every participant five times over
1824 weeks allowed us to explore social interactions involv-
ing smoking or vaping, and their social identity construction
during the first months of their smoking-to-vaping attempt.
2|METHODS
The methods report provides full details of the study [21].
Briefly, data were collected in Dunedin, New Zealand
from May to December 2018 and March to September
2019 as part of the longitudinal, qualitatively focussed
mixed-methods Smoking-to-Vaping study (interviews,
daily surveys, videography) that investigated social, psy-
chological and behavioural transitions among smokers
trying vaping. New Zealands e-cigarette market was
unregulated during the study period, with no marketing
restrictions or quality standards for devices, components
and e-liquids. Participants were recruited via posting on
local Facebook groups and word-of-mouth. Participants
were purposively sampled (age, gender, ethnicity, cigarettes
VAPING SOCIAL IDENTITIES 269
per day) and invited to participate if they were at least
18 years old, smoked at least one cigarette per week, did
not currently use an e-cigarette once a week or more often
(i.e., regularuse), were not currently trying to quit using
any means (including e-cigarettes, nicotine replacement
therapy and cold turkey),hadneverstoppedsmokingfor
30 or more days with the aid of an e-cigarette, and were
willing to use an e-cigarette to try and stop smoking. Those
who had tried otherse-cigarettes in social settings, but who
were not regularusers, were eligible. Overall, 45 partici-
pants enrolled and completed at least one interview
(29 completed all five interviews). The enrolled participants
mean age was 33 years (range: 1956 years old), 26 were
female and 13 were M
aori (Indigenous peoples of
New Zealand). We focussed on participants aged up to
30yearsinthisanalysisbecausecross-culturalevidence
suggests younger adults have more frequent daily social
interactions than older adults [22].
Participants attended up to five interviews (intake
(T[ime]1), and approximately 2, 6, 12 and 18 [T5] weeks
after intake); the timing of the fifth interview was depen-
dent on participantsavailability with a small number
interviewed 1924 weeks after intake. We attempted to
interview each participant five times in order to obtain
more contemporaneous accounts of changes in vaping
and smoking than is possible when intervals between
interviews are longer. All gave written consent before
each interview. During intake (T1), participants selected
an e-cigarette starter kit (up to NZ$80 value purchased
with research funds and gifted to the participant;
Data S1, Supporting Information) from a collaborating
retailer and allowed to use their device as they wished
(i.e., no requirement to adhere to a particular usage
pattern). Participants were reimbursed a maximum of
NZ$290 (in 2019; NZ$260 in 2018) to recognise their
contribution. Participants were considered lost to follow-up
if they did not respond to at least two researcher-initiated
contacts to reschedule missed interviews.
We created semi-structured interview guides for each
participant at each time point and developed participant-
specific questions based on past interviews. Core topics at
every interview included self-reported smoking and vap-
ing; physical, psychological and social experiences of vap-
ing; and smoking perceptions in relation to vaping
experiences. The interview guides were developed based
on the preliminary findings of an 8-week pilot study [23],
with more details available in the methods report [21].
Formal cessation support was not provided; however,
some participants interpreted the interviews and daily
surveys as support. Interviews lasted between 45 and
80 minutes. Audio files were transcribed by an online ser-
vice with transcripts compared with the audio files to
ensure accuracy.
We analysed the transcripts using reflexive thematic
analysis [24]. We identified all real and hypothetical
(e.g., speculation about upcoming parties) social interac-
tions involving smoking or vaping described by partici-
pants. We included hypothetical interactions as these
could offer rich insight into how participants wished to be
seen, or imagined they were seen, by others. To explore
potential changes over comparable periods (i.e., approxi-
mately 18 weeks), we decided to exclude from the analysis
participants who completed three or fewer interviews
(i.e., nine young adult participants excluded because they
withdrew from the study or were lost to follow-up). There
were no appreciable demographic or baseline smoking dif-
ferences between the included and excluded participants.
Transcripts for each participant were first analysed line-by-
line, chronologically from T1 to T5, to identify themes and
patterns within individuals. Next, we compared participants
at each time point (i.e., T1, T2, etc) to identify themes and
patterns across individuals, while recursively revisiting and
revising our chronological within-person analyses and inter-
pretations. Finally, we considered the participants as a
group over time to explore possible group-level changes or
trajectories in smoking and vaping identities. Analytical
memos were written and revised for each participant, and
at each stage of the analysis. Mei-Ling Blank selected three
participants, based on data richness, for Janet Hoek to inde-
pendently analyse, and we met to discuss and nuance
themes and interpretations.
3|RESULTS
Forty-five participants enrolled, including 20 aged 18
30 years. Eleven young adults completed all five inter-
views and were included in this analysis (Table 1). These
11 participants averaged 23 years old, included 7 women,
and smoked from one to over 40 cigarettes a day at
intake. Eight reported at least one occasion of social vap-
ingbeforeentrybutnonewereregularlyvapingatT1.
E-cigarette use varied by participant, from vaping only a
few times throughout the study, to consistent daily (includ-
ing hourly) use. Vapings novelty evaporated quickly; few
participants reported substantive behavioural, perceptual or
attitudinal changes after T3 (approximately 6 weeks after
T1). Attempting to integrate vaping into daily life was not
linear, smooth or consistent; we observed considerable vari-
ation within individuals over time. Those who struggled
with the technicalities of vaping (e.g., inhalation technique,
nicotine titration, charging and maintenance routines) also
had fewer social interaction opportunities to negotiate iden-
tities because of their reluctance to vape around others. At
T5, participants self-reported the gamut of behavioural out-
comes (return to exclusive smoking, transition to exclusive
270 BLANK AND HOEK
vaping, dual use[both smoking and vaping]). At exit, most
participants still aspired to become both smokefree and
vapefree. Only two viewed vaping as a desirable long-term
outcome.
In the next section, we present findings from our analy-
sis of the 11 young adult participants. We first outline their
pre-study social categorisations (as reported at T1) of people
who smoke and those who vape, then elaborate on two key
processes central to their vaping identity negotiations dur-
ing social interactions. Quotations are identified by pseudo-
nym and interview number (T1, etc.).
3.1 |Consideratesmokers, obnoxious
vapers and legitimacythrough
acknowledging addiction
Participants viewed people who smoke or who vape as
occupying lower status positions than non-smokers.
However, the status difference between smokersand
vaperswas ambiguous. Participants described people
who smoke as filthy,carelessand constantly broke.
Some identified deeply with these descriptors, as Louise
(T1) stated, We smell like cigarettes(emphasis added).
However, alongside these labels, participants claimed
considerate smokeridentities. As Ryan (T1) explained,
I still smoke, but I try to be polite about it, you know? I
will cross the street if I see a lady with her kids, just to
make sure Im not too close. Politeness was both a delib-
erate choice to limit the spread of toxins and smells to
others, and a strategy to reclaim status when engaging in
a socially disparaged activity.
People who vape were described as less smellyand
cleaner, but also as lameand uncool. Participants
ridiculed vapers for their appearance, which they carica-
tured as the hipster, long hair, beard(Ryan T1). They
scorned ostentatious displays of vaping that produced
obnoxious white clouds(Noah T1) and upended norms
of politeness and discretion. The obnoxiousmaterial
attributes of vaping clouds (size, visibility, smell) chal-
lenged valued considerate smokeridentities.
Crucially, vaping obtained its legitimacyas an alter-
native to smoking, and participants criticised people they
thought vaped purely for pleasure or the look. Smoking
and nicotine addiction were essential precursors of legit-
imatevaping and formed the basis of an acceptable
vaperidentity among participants. As Lily (T1) stated,
if you dont smoke and youre not addicted to nicotine,
whats the point in having a vape?. Many feared categor-
isation as an illegitimatevaper. As Clara (T1) explained,
Im scared people will look at me and be like, Uh, she
thinks shes one of those cool kids who vapesits a big
worry that people would think that.
Pre-study interactions with people who vape reflected
unattractive illegitimateand obnoxiousidentities.
Participants who accepted vapersocial identities
TABLE 1 Characteristics of the participants included in the current analysis
Pseudonym Gender Age
a
Highest
completed
education Ethnicity
Number of
cigarettes/
day reported
at intake
Time to
first
cigarette
at intake
Vaping
experience
before intake
Smoking
reported at
last
interview
Vaping
reported at
last interview
Clara F 19 High school M
aori 4244 5 min No Yes, daily Yes
Lily
b
F 19 Certificate/diploma NZE 1415 630 min No Yes, occasional Yes
Abigail F 22 High school NZE 1 >60 min Yes No Yes
Louise
b
F 23 High school NZE 6 630 min Yes Yes, daily No
Amanda
b
F 26 Bachelors Asian 4 >60 min Yes Yes, daily No
Charlotte
b
F 27 No formal
qualification
M
aori, NZE 20 5 min Yes No Yes
Andrea
b
F 29 High school M
aori, NZE 2227 5 min Yes Yes, daily No
Oscar
b
M 20 High school Asian 3, plus 3 dokha
bowls
c
630 min No No Yes
George
b
M 20 High school NZE 910 3160 min Yes Yes, daily Yes
Noah
b
M 24 High school NZE 13 630 min Yes Yes, daily Yes
Ryan M 26 Bachelors NZE 1014 630 min Yes No Yes
Abbreviations: F, female; M, male; NZE, New Zealand European.
a
Based on birth year.
b
2018 participant.
c
Dokha is a Middle Eastern tobacco product smoked in a midwakh pipe.
VAPING SOCIAL IDENTITIES 271
(with varying degrees of enthusiasm) needed to navi-
gate identity transitions informed by their social inter-
actions. Adopting a legitimatesocial identity was a
pre-requisite to transferring a considerateidentity
from smoking to vaping.
3.2 |Legitimateidentities
Throughout the study, social interactions reinforced
distinctions between legitimateand illegitimate
identities, which participants always framed in refer-
ence to smokeridentities. George (T3) watched
strangers vaping to try and figure out if they were a
smoker beforehand by looking at them.Otherswere
assigned identities based on their e-cigarette, as Clara
(T4) explained, people who more want the effect of
like, cool smoke, and like clouds, and like the enjoy-
ment, of like the fun of it, they normally have the big,
bulky hardcore ones. Whereas Ive noticed people
who are trying to quit smoking, they more just have
the pen looking ones. The materiality of e-cigarettes
cued participantscategorisation of legitimateand
illegitimatesocial identities.
Ironically, acknowledging nicotine addiction and identi-
fying as a smokerduring personal social interactions cre-
ated opportunities to adopt higher status legitimate vaper
identities. For example, Clara (T2) explained, when people
ask questions [about her e-cigarette], then Ill be like, Oh,
well I smoke,and theyll be like, Oh, well good on you”’.
Coupling her smokerand legitimate vaperidentities
ameliorated her earlier fears of being perceived as an ille-
gitimate’‘cool kidvaper. This feedback also encouraged
Clara to seek out supportive situations where her vaping
inspired others who smoked, which reinforced her nascent
legitimateidentity.
3.3 |Considerateidentities
Social interactions also bolstered status differences
between considerate smokerand obnoxious vaper
identities. All participants tried to transfer considerate
identities to vaping as they sought to mitigate harsh
judgements directed at obnoxious vapers,whoselowly
status remained consistent throughout the study. Con-
trolling vaping clouds was as important as controlling
smoke, and many successfully transitioned politeness
strategies directly from smoking to vaping. As Charlotte
(T3) explained, I was always aware that people dont
like smoke and dont want it near them. So I was always
mindful about not doing that around people. So I think
Ive probably taken that on board with the vaping as
well, just being mindful that some people might not
want that near them. While acknowledging elements,
like wind, which were outside of their control, making
an effort and being mindfulof others applied to both
vaping and smoking practices.
3.4 |Social identity transitions:
Adopting legitimacy before transferring
considerateness
Adopting a legitimateidentity and being perceived as a
legitimate vaperwere essential pre-cursors to transfer-
ring a considerateidentity from smoking to vaping. For
example, shortly after starting vaping, Noah feared facing
the same criticism he had levelled against obnoxious
vapers, as he explained, my hang ups from always
thinking, Oh my god. Theres people blowing these big
clouds are obnoxious and annoying [sic].Um, now I feel
like Im doing it I feel its more acceptable to have a
cigarette then just sitting there with my vape, because of
the big cloud of smoke [vaping cloud](T2). Noahs key
moment of identity negotiation occurred at a concert
where, for the first time, he interacted with large num-
bersofpeoplevaping.Hedescribedtheseparategroups
of smokers and vapers, and how he physically situated
himself in the middle of these groups, as he explained,
obviously older people that had quit smoking and
started vaping. Um, and yeah, they were also standing
in a group. And there was all the young smokers over
there,andtherewaskindofjustlikeagroupinthemid-
dle and so we stuck with them There were lots of peo-
ple doing it [vaping], so I just felt like I fit in(T3).
These interactions reflected the normalisation of legiti-
matevaping identities, which started shifting his atti-
tude about considerateness, as he explained, Istill
think theyre obnoxious, but Im becoming more accept-
ing about that Just of the fact that like, good on them
for choosing that over smoking, or choosing to do it
either way just as long as youre not directly blowing
it at someone, its not really that bad. Thatsjustrude,
doesnt matter whether its cigarette smoke or anything
(T3). Legitimate motivations coupled with deliberate
efforts at politeness made being a vapermore accept-
able. Later, Noahs identity metaphorically shifted to the
middle as he reflected on changing perceptions of
obnoxiousnessand vapings social acceptability, as he
explained, Ithinkits having the second option. So like
rather than just being a smoker and thinking all vapers
are twats, itslike,um,Ive got an option now that I can
just go have a little bit, or I can go have a cigarette
Well, I guess Im not the smoker I used to be A good
mix of both. Vaper and smoker(T4).
272 BLANK AND HOEK
3.5 |Longitudinal case studies
In this section, we present two longitudinal case studies
and focus on the role of social interactions in validating,
or invalidating, legitimateidentities. We focus on legit-
imacyas it was central to most participantsexperiences
throughout the study. The two participants differed in
how frequently they reported social interactions while
vaping. They were not selected as exemplars of partici-
pantsexperiences or identity change processes.
Vaper through and through
Social interactions could help resolve the gap between
how participants perceived themselves and how they
thought others perceived them when they vaped. These
interactions created opportunities to form desirable iden-
tities by facilitating the adoption of vaperidentities and
the discarding of smokeridentities.
Lily was a 19 year old New Zealand European female
who had smoked daily for 1 year. She lived with her
mother and studied cooking at the local polytechnic. At
T1 she smoked about 15 cigarettes a day and had no
experience with using e-cigarettes, although her mother
used a cigalike to remain smokefree. Lily strongly identi-
fied with other smokers, as she stated, were just nor-
mal people. I mean, wedbe the same if we didnt smoke,
but the difference is that we do[emphasis added]. Her
strong smoker identification made legitimacycrucial to
her early vaping, as she opined, if you dont smoke and
youre not addicted to nicotine, whats the point in hav-
ing a vape?. She condemned people she perceived as
illegitimate, labelling them stupid,idiotsand hipster
teenagers.
Lily continued to hold strong opinions about personal
and social legitimacy of vaping at T2. Nicotine addiction
remained essential for her personal legitimacy, as she
explained, I dont think that I would still keep vaping if
there wasnt any nicotine in the e-liquid, cause if theres
no nicotine, then whats the point?. These beliefs helped
her identify with other people who smoked and hoped to
switch to vaping. As she stated, I still dont like people
that vape that dont have nicotine in it whereas if
someone that has nicotine in the vape, then Im like,
Well, great,you know it always cheers me up a bit.
At T3, Lily missed the smoking community camara-
derie at her local pub, and felt others viewed her with
suspicion for indulging in a hipstery trend. However,
seeing more people using vaping to stop smoking (at the
pub, at polytech) started to shift her perceptions of legiti-
macy in two ways. First, nicotines centrality diminished
as she started to view people who formerly smoked but
who currently vaped with zero nicotine as acceptable.
She acknowledged vapings ability to substitute valued
inhaling and exhaling practices, not just nicotine con-
sumption, and the safety blanketconferred by transfer-
ring some of smokings physical rituals to vaping. Lily
started personally identifying with other people she saw
vaping and described the difference between vaper identi-
fication and smoker identification, as she recounted,
someone at the polytech has the exact same vape and
the exact same colour as me. And we saw each other and
we were like, Ah, same vape!Which was very exciting.
Whereas, you know, if I was smoking, I was down at the
neighbours, we wouldnt be like, Ha! Same tobacco!”’.
Here, social interactions that reflected Lilys own vaping
materials and experiences facilitated vaper identification.
Lilys social identity transformed after attending a
local Vape Day festival (T4) where feeling accepted as a
vaping community member substituted the communal
feeling she experienced when smoking with others at the
pub. Her legitimacyconcerns dissolved as she inter-
acted with people who vaped for many reasons, as she
explained, well, after that [Vape Day] Im much happier
to be like, Yep, Im a vaper. Sign me up for things.You
know, whereas before I was a bit like, Hmm.You
know, theres a stigma around it and people who vape
with no nicotine are a bit weird. You know, whats the
point? But now Im kind of like, Meh. You know,
Were all one big group, go for it.
Lilysvaperidentity transition consolidated at T5 when
she declared herself, definitely a vaper. Vaper through and
through. Her perception of legitimacyshifted and vaper
identities now encompassed smokers, non-smokers and
never-smokers, as she explained, a vaper, you know, and
they might have smoked, but they might not have.Identify-
ing with others who vape felt normal rather than novel, as
she explained, Ithink,Oh, yeah, cool.Idont, Im not feel-
ing, go up to them and be like, Hey, same vapebut its
nice to see other people vaping because itsakindofa
sense of community. So itskindoflikea,Hey, Imnotthe
only whosdoingthis”’.
Well call me a social smoker, shall we?
Social interactions also created occasions that could
impede adoption of a vaper identity and some partici-
pants struggled to reconcile the gap between their vaping
and othersresponse to their choice. Smokeridentities
became reinforced when participants could not negotiate
and reconcile these identity gaps during interactions with
others.
Andrea was a 29 year old home healthcare worker
who identified as M
aori and New Zealand European. She
had her first cigarette at 11 years old and regularly
smoked at 13. She smoked 2030 cigarettes a day at T1,
VAPING SOCIAL IDENTITIES 273
and her only experience with vaping before the study was
trying her boyfriends e-cigarette once or twice. Her boy-
friend had tried vaping to stop smoking, and she had
heard about people who had successfully stopped smok-
ing using e-cigarettes.
Andrea described a conflicted relationship with smok-
ing at T1. Her first cigarette at age 11 offered her a sense
of belonging, as she described, that social interaction
with other ones my age that were doing it as well. And I
guess, being with the cool kids . However, she admit-
ted that although she despises smoking, it simulta-
neously filled a voidshe could not describe.
Andrea had few social interactions while vaping dur-
ing the study. At T2 she mostly vaped alone, and
described vaping as antisocialand lonely. As she
explained, Well, for me at the moment, vapings antiso-
cial. Um, its something I do on my own at night, or in
the car on my own, whereas smoking is something that I
generally do with other people that smoke Smoking, I
guess, um, for me, in a way, is a social thing, I guess. You
know? Well, my partner smokes, his father smokes, his
brother smokes, the sister smokes, you know? Um, so its
all, you know, when were around each other, its always
with smoking around each other, so were interacting in
that way. The thought of vaping if others were smoking
was almost unthinkable, as she explained, Oh no. I guess
Id feel different and left out if theyre smoking and Im
vaping, if that makes sense?.
Things had changed at T3 as Andrea reported a rela-
tionship breakdown and subsequent emerging relation-
ship with a new flatmate, whom she had introduced to
vaping. In contrast to other participants, Andrea reported
almost no curiosity from others about her vaping, and
most of her interactions while vaping elicited neither pos-
itive nor negative reactions from others, simply Noth-
ing. The lack of social engagement while vaping meant
Andrea could not begin identity negotiations with others.
Vaping was described as, my own dirty little secret I
just dont do it out in public. However, Andreas interac-
tions with her new flatmate provided the first opportuni-
ties to negotiate a legitimate vaperidentity with another
person. Her girlfriends smoking quickly declined after
she started vaping and Andrea was inspired by her
progress.
At T4, Andrea reported substantial changes to her
vaping and smoking as her new relationship evolved.
She was vaping more often, although not daily, and
while she still identified as a heavy smoker,vaping
had become social, while smoking had become solitary.
As she explained, well both just puff away on our
vapes, um, and then have the occasional cigarette.
Whereas, if its myself, I just constantly smoke, yeah.
As vaping became more integrated into her life,
Andrea began trying to assert a legitimate vaperiden-
tity with her father, an ex-smoker with whom she had
a fraught relationship. However, these interactions
simply repeated the unsupportive patterns in their rela-
tionship. For example, as she recalled, I was vaping
inside, and he goes, Dontdothatinside!Isaid,
Why?”“Because its like a cigarette.Isaid,No, its
not. It doesnt leave a vapour or an odour behind, or
tar and that, like a cigarette does.Hesveryantivapes,
but, yeah.
Andreas final interview was delayed for personal rea-
sons. At T5 she reported that she had not used her e-
cigarette since her last interview approximately 12 weeks
before. Vaping had never filled the voidthat smoking
filled, as she explained, It just, it wasnt smoking. While
she had abandoned vaping, at exit she identified as a
social smoker, as she mused, Well call me a social
smoker, shall we? a smokers someone that smokes all
the time, like I was, 25, 30, you know, cigarettes every
day. Whereas a social smoker is someone that will smoke
with someone else that is smoking. Which is generally
what I do now.
4|DISCUSSION
We used longitudinal interviews to explore the social
interactions of New Zealand young adults who tried to
substitute vaping for smoking. Participants entered the
study with smoke-free goals and constructed social iden-
tities explicitly in relation to a smoke-free transition. Our
findings suggest attempts to construct vaping social iden-
tities hinged on adopting a legitimatevaper identity
before attempting to transfer a considerateidentity from
smoking to vaping. We observed considerable variation
within and across individuals over time. However, for all
participants, social interactions (public and private;
acquaintances and strangers) with others trying vaping
for legitimatemotivations influenced whether and how
their progress from a smokerto a vaperoccurred.
Interactions perceived as supportive rapidly normalised
vaping, facilitated participantsadoption of legitimate
vaperidentities, and helped diminish self-consciousness
that lingered from important pre-study considerate
smokeridentities. Seeing others vape as an alternative to
smoking helped many participants adopt legitimateand
considerateidentities. Successfully navigating these pro-
cesses led some to accept vaperidentities, with varying
degrees of enthusiasm. However, participants who stopped
vaping and returned to exclusive smoking found personal
interactions invalidated their attempts to adopt and be per-
ceived as legitimatevapers and consolidated pre-study
smokeridentities. These participants felt their legitimate
274 BLANK AND HOEK
vaperidentities were not accepted by others, which
obstructed their e-cigarette use, frustrated their identity
negotiations and entrenched smokeridentities.
Our study has limitations and strengths. Participants
were purposively sampled for gender, ethnicity and
smoking consumption at baseline, and were selected for
this analysis because they completed all five interviews.
This approach generated rich qualitative data and
allowed us to explore social identity processes over an
extended period. We enrolled nine participants aged 1830
who failed to complete more than three interviews; fur-
ther insights into vaping social identity processes may
have been obtained if we had retained these participants
for all five interviews. The social context of vaping also
changed during the study. Nicotine salt pods became
available in New Zealand mid-way through the 2018
enrolment. Participants were not permitted to choose
these devices during their T1 shop visit though could
change or upgrade their device using their own funds at
any time during the study. As pod devices produce negli-
gible vaping clouds, participantssocial experiences of
vaping may have differed if they had been allowed to
select these devices at T1. Furthermore, the New Zealand
government subsequently endorsed vaping for smoking
cessation. Vaping is now publicly promoted for harm
reduction to achieve the Governments smokefree 2025
goal [25]. Conducting the study in this changed environ-
ment could yield different, or additional, insights.
Many participants grappled with adopting legitimate
identities. While smoking and nicotine dependence were
important pre-requisites for legitimatevaping, transfer-
ring physical dependence from smoking to vaping created
uncomfortable, reluctant vaperidentities for some. Most
participants still aspired to become nicotine-free and vape-
free, which as Ward et al. [19] highlighted, suggests an
important transitional component to abstinence-focussed
vaping identities. Thus, a liminal betwixt and between
[26] identity may be a crucial step towards a non-smoking,
non-vaping, nicotine-free identity. By contrast, Tokle and
Pedersen contend that long-term replacementgoals, as
opposed to abstinence, may not depend on becoming vape
free and nicotine abstinent, but encompass reduced health
risks, minimised smoking-related stigma, and manageable
nicotine dependence [17].
Transferring a considerateidentity from smoking to
vaping was important for all participants, but depended on
adopting and being perceived as a legitimatevaper. Suc-
cessful transfer helped some identify with a vapersocial
identity. A study of Scottish young adults who tried vaping
also discussed identity transfer attempts [3]. However,
while most of our participants found ways to transfer a
valued considerateidentity from smoking to vaping, this
study reported that most failed to transfer a controlled
smokeridentity to vaping. Unsuccessfully managing vap-
ing use was a factor that impeded the Scottish participants
attempts to integrate vaping into their lives.
Constructing vaping social identities in relation to
smoking perpetuates the traditional narrative that
stoppingor quittingsmoking depends on individual
effort and self-control [27]. Social identities hinging on
substitutionor long-term replacementfocusonper-
sonal betterment and identity enhancement, and do
nothing to alter the collective status of people who
smoke or people who vape. Instead, these social identi-
ties utilise individual-level social mobilisationpro-
cesses to maintain or enhance personal self-esteem [5].
Other studies have described recreational cloud chas-
ing vapersengaging in collective action, including
actively building vaping communities, cultivating
interest in vaping technology and skills, and becoming
politically empowered to challenge restrictive vaping
legislation [17, 18]. These efforts created a distinctive
space for vaping as an independent, non-conformist
practice no longer framed in traditional terms of
smokingand non-smoking.
Social interactions shape how vaping practices and
social identities evolve. Participantsconstruction of
vaping identities suggests that negotiating and recon-
ciling valued aspects of their smoking social identities
with nascent vaping practices may be important as they
attempt to transition from smoking to vaping. Transfer-
ring considerateness and adopting legitimacy may
influence how nicotine inhalation practices develop
and influence how well vaping, or other non-smoking
practices, can attract people who smoke. These insights
mayhelpidentifynewopportunitiesforcessation
intervention services. Recognising that smoking-to-
vaping transitions involve more than substituting nico-
tine administration may aid more complete smoke-free
transitions.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
MB and JH conceptualised this project. MB led the analy-
sis, data interpretation and drafting of the manuscript.
JH reviewed data interpretation and provided critical
feedback on the manuscript. MB is the guarantor.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank Ms Grace Teah for her assistance with
interviewing two participants, and Associate Professor
Tamlin Conner, Dr Shelagh Ferguson, Associate Profes-
sor Lee Thompson and Dr Kerri Haggart, who were
members of the overall project team. Open access pub-
lishing facilitated by University of Otago, as part of the
Wiley - University of Otago agreement via the Council of
Australian University Librarians.
VAPING SOCIAL IDENTITIES 275
ETHICS STATEMENT
University of Otago Human Ethics Committee (Health)
(HECH 18/014). M
aori consultation: University of Otago
Ng
ai Tahu Research Consultation Committee.
ORCID
Mei-Ling Blank https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0728-4598
REFERENCES
1. Simons-Morton BG, Farhat T. Recent findings on peer group
influences on adolescent smoking. J Prim Prev. 2010;31:
191208.
2. Buu A, Hu YH, Wong SW, Lin HC. Comparing American col-
lege and noncollege young adults on e-cigarette use patterns
including polysubstance use and reasons for using e-cigarettes.
J Am Coll Heal. 2020;68:6106.
3. Lucherini M, Rooke C, Amos A. Theyre thinking, well its
not as bad, I probably wont get addicted to that. But its still
got the nicotine in it, so: maturity, control, and socializing:
negotiating identities in relation to smoking and vaping - a
qualitative study of young adults in Scotland. Nicotine Tob
Res. 2019;21:817.
4. Shove E, Pantzar M, Watson M. The dynamics of social prac-
tice: everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage Publica-
tions; 2012.
5. Tajfel H, Turner JC. The social identity theory of intergroup
behaviour. In: Worchel S, Austins WG, editors. Psychology of
intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson; 1986. p. 724.
6. Thompson L, Pearce J, Barnett JR. Moralising geographies:
stigma, smoking islands and responsible subjects. Area. 2007;
39:50817.
7. Hoek J, Edwards R, Waa A. From social accessory to societal
disapproval: smoking, social norms and tobacco endgames.
Tob Control. 2022;31:35864.
8. Notley C, Colllins R. Redefining smoking relapse as recovered
social identitysecondary qualitative analysis of relapse narra-
tives. J Subst Use. 2018;23:6606.
9. Vangeli E, West R. Transition towards a non-smoker
identity following smoking cessation: an interpretative
phenomenological analysis. Br J Health Psychol. 2012;17:
17184.
10. Vangeli E, Stapleton J, West R. Residual attraction to smoking
and smoker identity following smoking cessation. Nicotine
Tob Res. 2010;12:8659.
11. Tombor I, Shahab L, Herbec A, Neale J, Michie S, West R.
Smoker identity and its potential role in young adultssmok-
ing behavior: a meta-ethnography. Health Psychol. 2015;34:
9921003.
12. Hiler M, Spindle TR, Dick D, Eissenberg T, Breland A,
Soule E. Reasons for transition from electronic cigarette use to
cigarette smoking among young adult college students.
J Adolesc Health. 2020;66:5663.
13. Katz SJ, Erkinnen M, Lindgren B, Hatsukami D. Beliefs about
e-cigarettes: a focus group study with college students.
Am J Health Behav. 2019;43:7687.
14. Conner TS, Zeng J, Blank ML, He V, Hoek J. A descriptive
analysis of transitions from smoking to electronic nicotine
delivery system (ENDS) use: a daily diary investigation. Int J
Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:6301.
15. Farrimond H. A typology of vaping: identifying differing
beliefs, motivations for use, identity and political interest
amongst e-cigarette users. Int J Drug Policy. 2017;48:8190.
16. Smith H, Lucherini M, Amos A, Hill S. The emerging norms
of e-cigarette use among adolescents: a meta-ethnography of
qualitative evidence. Int J Drug Policy. 2021;94:103227.
17. Tokle R, Pedersen W. Cloud chasersand substitutes: e-cig-
arettes, vaping subcultures and vaper identities. Sociol Health
Illn. 2019;41:91732.
18. McCausland K, Jancey J, Leaver T, Wolf K, Freeman B,
Maycock B. Motivations for use, identity and the vaper subcul-
ture: a qualitative study of the experiences of Western
Australian vapers. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1552.
19. Ward E, Dawkins L, Holland R, Notley C. Responsibility, nor-
malisation and negotiations of harm: e-cigarette usersopin-
ions and experiences of vaping around children. Int J Drug
Policy. 2021;88:103016.
20. Lucherini M, Rooke C, Amos A. E-cigarettes, vaping and per-
formativity in the context of tobacco denormalisation. Sociol
Health Illn. 2018;40:103752.
21. Hoek J, Blank M, Conner T, Ferguson S, Thompson L,
Teah G, et al. Smoking-to-vaping (S2V) study: methods report.
Wellington: ASPIRE 2025; 2020.
22. OECD. Hows life? 2020: measuring well-being. Paris: Organi-
sation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2021.
23. Blank M-L, Hoek J, George M, Gendall P, Conner TS, Thrul J,
et al. An exploration of smoking-to-vaping transition attempts
using a smartelectronic nicotine delivery system. Nicotine
Tob Res. 2019;21:133946.
24. Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis. In: Cooper H,
Camic PM, Long DL, Panter AT, Rindskopf D, Sher KJ, edi-
tors. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol
2 research designs: quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychologi-
cal, and biological. Washington, DC: American Psychological
Association; 2012. p. 5771.
25. Ministry of Health, Agency HP. Vaping to Quit Smoking 2019
[updated 2019]. Available from: https://vapingfacts.health.nz/
vaping-to-quit-smoking/.
26. Turner VW. Betwixt and between: the liminal period in rites
de passage. In: Turner VW, editor. The Forest of symbols:
aspects of Ndembu ritual. Ithaca, New York: Cornell Univer-
sity Press; 1967. p. 93111.
27. White C, Oliffe JL, Bottorff JL. Tobacco and the invention of
quitting: a history of gender, excess and will-power. Sociol
Health Illn. 2013;35:77892.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Additional supporting information can be found online
in the Supporting Information section at the end of this
article.
How to cite this article: Blank M-L, Hoek J.
Navigating social interactions and constructing
vaping social identities: A qualitative exploration
with New Zealand young adults who smoke. Drug
Alcohol Rev. 2023;42(2):26876. https://doi.org/10.
1111/dar.13542
276 BLANK AND HOEK
... er sånn: «Åh, kult!» Samtalen illustrerer hvordan bruken av e-sigaretter som ungdomskultur kan handle om identitet, performativet og sosial anerkjennelse. Flere kvalitative studier viser at ungdom anser vaping som en identitetsmarkør og en sosial praksis som utvikler seg gjennom sosial interaksjon i ungdomstiden(Blank & Hoek, 2023;Tokle, 2020b;Yule & Tinson, 2017). Dette er kjente tema fra tidligere studier om røyking(Scheffels, 2009;Scheffels & Tokle, 2017), og kan kobles til alder og den transformative fasen mellom barndom og voksenliv.Ungdomstiden er preget av biologisk, kognitiv og psykososial utvikling som kan medføre økt impulsivitet(Romer et al., 2011), risikovilje og tilbøyelighet til å søke nye opplevelser(Czerwenka et al., 2013;Tymula et al., 2012). ...
Article
Full-text available
There has been concern about increased use of e-cigarettes (vaping) among adolescents in many countries. New figures from Oslo, Norway, suggest that vaping may be on the rise. Why is this, and how concerned should we be? We integrate our understanding of the time during which the increase has happened, of the products, and of age-related factors to unpack vaping in contemporary Norwegian youth culture. In the chapter, we show first that changes in the tobacco landscape have limited the current generation’s exposure to tobacco, smoking and anti-smoking efforts. At the same time, developments in digital technology and social media have increased their exposure to new tobacco-related trends, including vaping. Adolescents often perceive e-cigarettes as distinct consumer products. Second, innovation within the e-cigarette market has expanded the array of e-cigarette-products, flavors and vaping practices in ways that have made vaping more socially appealing. Third, vaping is strongly associated with use of other tobacco products and nicotine addiction. However, it is also an inherently social practice embedded in adolescents’ identity projects. Thus, vaping resonates with adolescence as a developmental period characterized by heightened risk-taking, concerns with social status and peers. Finally, based on these insights, we address challenges and knowledge gaps, particularly regarding new product developments, diverse usage patterns and the online marketplace.
... The overall study used a longitudinal, qualitative-focused mixedmethods design (five in-person interviews, daily surveys, optional videography) over 18-24 weeks to explore participants' experiences and perceptions as they tried to transition from smoking tobacco to e-cigarettes [23][24][25][26][27]. The study time-frame was informed by previous research examining smoking-to-vaping transitions [28], and balanced participant burden with the likelihood that they would transition fully from smoking to vaping during the study. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background and aim Social practices such as smoking–drinking co‐use often go ‘hand‐in‐hand’, linked by the coordination of materials, skills and meanings. However, the experience of using e‐cigarettes while drinking among people who smoke (and drink) remains underexplored. We used social practice theory to show how smoking, vaping and drinking intersect and to explain how vaping created two new social practices among people who tried e‐cigarettes to stop smoking: ‘vaping–drinking’ co‐use and ‘smoking–vaping–drinking’ poly‐use. Methods We conducted five in‐depth interviews over 18–24 weeks during 2018–19, with each of nine Aotearoa New Zealand young adults aged 20–29 years. Participants smoked daily, did not regularly use e‐cigarettes at entry and wished to try vaping to stop smoking. We analysed participants’ reports of smoking or vaping while drinking using thematic analysis. Results Individual participants reported both co‐use and poly‐use occasions throughout the study. Vaping–drinking co‐use arose from practice ‘replacement’ processes, where vaping fully substituted smoking. Smoking–vaping–drinking poly‐use arose from ‘adjacency’ processes where vaping complemented smoking. Participants used both processes flexibly over time, which required new skills in material, temporal, pleasure and social coordination to try to recreate valued meanings of comfort, security and communality associated with well‐established smoking–drinking practices. Unsuccessful coordination attempts maintained smoking–drinking co‐use. Conclusion Among Aotearoa New Zealand young adult smokers who want to use vaping to stop smoking, drinking occasions may help to maintain existing smoking–drinking practices and facilitate the development of vaping–drinking co‐use and smoking–vaping–drinking poly‐use practices, potentially prolonging individuals’ exposure to smoking.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives: We aimed to examine patterns in smoking and electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) use over an extended period of time (up to 20 weeks) in people who smoked and who had never previously made a successful quit attempt using an ENDS. Design and setting: We conducted a longitudinal mixed-methods study in Dunedin, New Zealand, during 2018 and 2019. Participants: Purposively selected participants (N = 45; age (≥18 years), gender, ethnicities, cigarettes/day) who wished to quit smoking. Interventions: Participants were provided with a second-generation ENDS device (vape pen or starter "tank" device) at the start of their quit attempt, and asked to complete smartphone-based daily diary surveys assessing smoking and ENDS use. Outcome measures: Sunburst plots and a sequence plot were used to describe weekly and daily patterns of smoking and ENDS use (smoking only, ENDS use only, dual use, abstinent). Results: The most frequently reported movements among participants, classified according to their study week behaviour, occurred between dual use and exclusive ENDS use (and vice versa). A smaller group reported moving from dual use to exclusive smoking (and often back to dual use), and a small number reported moving between abstinence and different ENDS and smoked tobacco usage behaviours. Data visualisations focussing on those participants who had provided data during each of weeks 9-12 indicate that only a minority reported sustained dual use; instead, most participants indicated varied smoked tobacco and ENDS use, which included periods of dual use. Conclusions: The considerable variety observed within and between study participants suggests that high variability is typical rather than exceptional. Transitions from smoking to ENDS use may involve considerable periods of dual use, which is likely to be dynamic and potentially sustained over several months.
Article
Full-text available
Background Vaping is a relatively new practice, and therefore its symbolic meanings and social practices are yet to be fully understood, especially within Australia where the practice is strictly regulated. This study aimed to examine vapers motivations for use, reinforcing influences, and association with the vaper subculture. Methods Working from a constructivist epistemology and a symbolic interaction framework, in-depth interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 37 current (89%) and former (11%) adult vapers, 70% male, mean age of 32.5. Data was analysed via thematic analysis. Results Vapers largely started vaping to quit smoking and underwent common experiences during their initiation phase. Subsequently, vapers tended to adopt one of two dominant identities, that of the ‘cloud chaser’ or the ‘substitute’, which some users moved between during different stages of their vaping career. The social and symbolic meaning of e-cigarettes and vaping varied and involved concepts of harm reduction, addiction, pleasure, stigma and community, and for some, connection to the vaper subculture. Conclusions Understanding the complexities of vaping, and the nuanced differences of ‘cloud chasers’ and ‘substitute’ vapers may have important implications for health communication, research and policy. E-cigarette users within this sample were not a homogeneous group and differed in their motivations for use, association with the vaper subculture and relationship with the vape community. These findings provide new insights into the socialisation process and subsequent identity adoption of vapers within the unique regulatory environment of Western Australia.
Article
While qualitative research has indicated that adolescents’ motivation for e-cigarette use is different than adults’, this body of literature has not yet been brought together and synthesised. We reviewed qualitative evidence on perceptions and uses of e-cigarettes in order to explore the emerging norms of vaping among adolescents. We searched five databases for qualitative research in October 2019 with no restrictions on date of publication or data collection. We identified fifteen papers from thirteen studies. Using a meta-ethnographic approach, we identified a spectrum of descriptive and injunctive norms of vaping across the themes of addiction; perceptions of comparative harm; parental perceptions and peer perceptions. We found addiction and perceptions of comparative harm to reflect descriptive norms, while we found clearer evidence explaining the use and non-use of e-cigarettes through parental and peer approval of vaping. However, these norms were fluid, diverse and sometimes contradictory. This review provides a resource for researchers, policymakers and practitioners to better understand the ways that emerging norms could be influenced through policy and practice.
Article
Background Concern about youth uptake of vaping is widespread. Regulation and education campaigns aim to protect children from initiating use, yet it is likely that children will be primarily influenced by the behaviour of people in their immediate environment. This is the first known study exploring e-cigarette users’ views and reported experiences of vaping around children. Methods Following informed consent, semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 40 adults who had attempted to give up smoking by vaping. Participants were recruited from England as part of a wider study into e-cigarette use trajectories and smoking relapse (ECtra study). Data were extracted from 28 interviews where participants had spontaneously discussed vaping around children. Extracted data were analysed thematically and situated in previous analysis of vaping identity which distinguished between recreational and medicinal vapers. Results Vaping behaviour around children was in part a habituated replication of smoking norms but also guided by broad vaping identity; recreational users were more permissive and medicinal users more secretive. Vaping in the home appeared to be determined by caregivers’ need to reconcile vaping behaviour so that it was congruent with parental identity as a responsible caregiver. Participant perspectives reflected existing moral discourses applied to e-cigarettes around the use of “harm reduction for smokers” and “potential for youth harm”. Conclusion Vaping is likely to be role modelled within the community and home despite attempts by e-cigarette users to conceal the behaviour. The ambivalent contextualisation of e-cigarettes means that e-cigarette users may lack a clear narrative to draw on when discussing vaping with children. Public health guidance for vaping around children could be helpful, but to be most effective, should take into consideration users’ vaping identity.
Article
Purpose: Longitudinal studies indicate that e-cigarette use among youth and young adults is associated with cigarette smoking initiation. The purpose of this study was to identify reasons why nonsmoking young adults transition from e-cigarette use to cigarette smoking. Methods: The study used concept mapping (CM), a mixed-method participatory approach. Fifty-five college students who endorsed initiation of e-cigarettes before cigarettes (lifetime e-cigarette uses ≥ 100 and ≥ 100 cigarettes in lifetime) completed at least one part of the study. In an online program, participants brainstormed (n = 54) statements describing reasons for transition from e-cigarette use to cigarette smoking, sorted statements (n = 46) into conceptually similar categories, and rated (n = 47) how true each statement was for them. Results: Participants generated 60 unique statements, and multidimensional scaling analysis generated eight thematic clusters characterizing reasons for transition which included the following: "Sharing with Others," "Psychological Coping," "Cigarette Appeal," "Reinforcing Effects of Cigarettes," "Accessibility," "Social Influence," "Vaping Stigma," and "Vaping Deficiencies." Participants rated "Sharing with Others" and "Psychological Coping" highest (most true) and "Vaping Deficiencies" lowest (least true). For college students, the ability to share cigarettes with peers and access cigarettes from peers and smoking for stress/anxiety management were among the top reasons for transition. Conclusions: Results suggest that tailored prevention efforts aimed at reducing cigarette smoking uptake among college students who use tobacco as a means for psychological coping or social facilitation may be warranted. Furthermore, regulatory decisions aimed at limiting cigarette appeal, reinforcing effects, and accessibility may be relevant to reducing transition.
Article
Objective: Existing literature on young adults’ e-cigarette and polysubstance use focused on college students. This study examined the differences between college and noncollege groups on prevalence and patterns of e-cigarette and other substance use using data from a national survey. Participants: Adults aged 18–24 from the 2013–2014 Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study (n = 6,608). Methods: Independent sample t-tests and Chi-square tests were conducted to examine group differences. Results: Noncollege young adults had higher prevalence of cigarette, e-cigarette, and marijuana use; college students had higher prevalence of alcohol use. Among current e-cigarette users, college students had higher prevalence of polysubstance use of alcohol and marijuana. College students used e-cigarettes for socializing purposes more. Conclusions: Differences in prevalence and patterns of e-cigarette and other substance use between college and noncollege groups exist. Future interventions should target the social context of college life and reach out to noncollege young adults in workplaces.
Article
The use of e‐cigarettes is increasing, a practice denoted as vaping. We explore user motives, self‐identity as vapers and involvement in vaping subcultures, drawing on sociological theory of stigma, subcultures and symbolic boundaries. Based on analyses of semi‐structured interviews with 30 Norwegian vapers, we find that there is a vaping subculture in Norway. We identify two dominant vaper identities. The first is labelled cloud chasers. These were dedicated vapers who identified with symbols and values in the subculture. Many were politically engaged in improving vaping regulation regimes and felt a sense of belonging to a vaping community. The second group is labelled substitutes. These were former daily smokers who used e‐cigarettes for smoking cessation in a more pragmatic and defensive manner, to avoid health risks, to escape the stigma of smoking and to manage nicotine addiction. In this group, self‐identity as a vaper was generally lacking. Vaping was often symbolically linked to the stigmatised smoker identity they wanted to escape, and was restricted to private contexts. The perceived symbolic meaning of e‐cigarettes varies: for some, they are a symbol of pleasure and community. For others, they connote the stigmatised status of the addicted smoker seeking an alternative to cigarettes.
Article
Objectives: In this study, we consider how best to prevent recreational uptake of e-cigarettes among tobacco nonusers; it is important to investigate the underlying beliefs that young adults have about e-cigarettes and package elements. Methods: Using the focus group method of belief elicitation, we explore underlying belief structures that undergraduate students at a large Midwestern public university have about e-cigarettes. Beliefs are analyzed using the constantcomparative approach and categorized using the theory of planned behavior. Results: Participants describe a dual view, wherein e-cigarettes are a cool and causal item to use at a party, while holding a negative stigma toward everyday use. They acknowledged confusion over nicotine and focused on the flavors and smoke tricks as attractions to the product. In response to package elements, participants describe the flavors and modified risk statement as undermining the health warning. Conclusions: Findings suggest it may be useful to supplement the required warning labels with a public education campaign that improves understanding of nicotine and to regulate the amount of nicotine permissible in e-cigarettes in order to prevent addiction in recreational users, while at the same time supporting use of the product for smoking cessation.
Article
Although many people in the general population manage to quit smoking, relapse is common. Theory underpinning the determinants of smoking relapse is underdeveloped. This article aims to specify theoretical insight into the process of relapse to smoking, to underpin effective intervention development. Secondary qualitative analysis of extended narratives of smoking relapse (n = 23) were inductively coded within our conceptual framework of a socially situated narrative theoretical approach to identity. Smoking relapse is conceptualized as a situated rational response to a “disruption” in individual narrative identity formation, and an attempt to recover a lost social identity. Emotional reactions to relapse, such as not only pleasure, but also guilt and shame, support this assertion by demonstrating the ambivalence of re-engaging in a behavior that is situated and rational in terms of individual identity formation, yet ostracized and stigmatized by wider culture.