ArticlePDF Available

URBANISATION AND DISASTER RISKS IN THE HIMALAYA

Authors:
  • South Asia Institute of Advanced Studies

Abstract and Figures

Haphazard urban expansion and poorly planned infrastructure development have increased and intensified disaster risks in the geologically fragile Himalaya. Against this backdrop, consolidating and interpreting the findings from four articles included in this special issue on “urbanisation and disaster risk in the Himalaya”, this paper analyses the interrelation between urbanisation and disaster risk in rapidly urbanising areas of Nepal Himalaya. The key findings that we pull together from the papers are: (1) large-scale construction activities, including the real estate boom in peri-urban Nepal, increasingly delink traditional communities from their land and culture; (2) disconnected policies and contradicting implementation in the informal to formal transitions have sustained informality and deepened risk in urban Nepal; (3) institutional inertia sustains poor coordination between stakeholders in relation to knowledge sharing, technology and resources which hinder proactive disaster management at the community level; and (4) operational and knowledge gaps emerge from failures to delineate authority, responsibility and accountability between concerned institutions, and weak institutional capacity between agencies, impeding the adoption of early warning and action system in Nepal. Based on these findings, we conclude that while the political restructuring and decentralisation of the local governments have provided authorities with the legitimacy to devise disaster management policies, enhancing overall institutional capability in terms of access to and mobilisation of knowledge, technologies and resources is needed to reduce disaster risks in the Himalaya.
Content may be subject to copyright.
1
Poudel et al. Urbanisation and disaster risks in the Himalaya
EDITORIAL: URBANISATION AND DISASTER RISKS IN THE HIMALAYA
DilliP.Poudel1*,AnushiyaShrestha1,DilKhatri1,JonathanEnsor2
ABSTRACT
Haphazardurbanexpansionandpoorlyplannedinfrastructuredevelopmenthaveincreasedand
intensieddisasterrisksinthegeologicallyfragileHimalaya.Againstthisbackdrop,consolidang
andinterprengthendingsfromfourarclesincludedinthisspecialissueon“urbanisaonand
disaster risk in the Himalaya”, this paper analyses the interrelaon between urbanisaon and
disasterriskinrapidlyurbanisingareasofNepalHimalaya.Thekeyndingsthatwepulltogether
from the papers are: (1) large-scale construcon acvies, including the real estate boom in
peri-urban Nepal, increasingly delink tradional communies from their land and culture; (2)
disconnectedpoliciesandcontradicngimplementaonintheinformaltoformaltransionshave
sustained informality and deepened risk in urban Nepal; (3) instuonal inera sustains poor
coordinaonbetweenstakeholdersinrelaontoknowledgesharing,technologyand resources
whichhinder proacvedisastermanagementat the community level; and(4) operaonaland
knowledge gaps emerge from failures to delineate authority, responsibility and accountability
betweenconcernedinstuons,andweakinstuonalcapacitybetweenagencies,impedingthe
adopon of early warning and acon system in Nepal. Based on these ndings, we conclude
thatwhilethepolicalrestructuringanddecentralisaonofthelocalgovernmentshaveprovided
authories with the legimacy to devise disaster management policies, enhancing overall
instuonal capability in terms of access to and mobilisaon of knowledge, technologies and
resourcesisneededtoreducedisasterrisksintheHimalaya.
Keywords: early-warningand acon; haphazardurbanisaon; Himalayandisaster;instuonal
limit;neoliberalurbanism;urbaninformality
1SouthasiaInstuteofAdvancedStudies(SIAS),Nepal
2UniversityofYork(UoY)andStockholmnEnvironmentInstute(SEI),UK
*Correspondingemail:dilli.poudel@hotmail.com
NEw
ANgLE
Nepal Journal of
Social Science
and Public Policy
Published by SIAS
Available at newangle.sias-southasia.org
2021, Vol. 7 ( 1 ), pp.1-10
DOI: hps://doi.org/10.53037/na.v7i1.74
© Poudel et al., 2021
2
New Angle: Nepal Journal of Social Science and Public Policy Vol. 7 ( 1 ), 2021
1. INTRODUCTION
The Himalaya is always in a process of geomorphological changes with acve geology and
dynamicgeography(Panday,1984; Rusk etal.,2022; WymannVonDachet al., 2017).Studies,
however, suggestthat the recentanthropogenicintervenonsin theHimalayadriven byrapid
buthaphazardurbanisaonanduncontrolledconstruconalacvies (Gurung,2021;Kargelet
al.,2016;Rimaletal.,2020)haveoverlooked“mountainspecicies”i.e.inaccessibility,fragility,
marginalityandheterogeneity(seeJodha,1992;WymannVonDachetal.,2017;Anbalagan,1993).
Thefragilegeophysicalcondionscoupledwithhaphazardlygrowingurbanisaonandrampant
construconacviesinmountaingeographyhavetriggeredmul-hazards3(e.g.,landslide,ood)
andsimultaneouslyelevatedexposureoftheHimalayandwellerstotheriskofdisasters(Tiwari
etal.,2018;Walker,2011;Westeretal., 2019;Poudeletal.,2021;Rusketal.,2022)whichare
likelytointensifyinthefuture(Mestaetal.,2022;Westeretal.,2019).IntheNepalHimalaya,an
averageof500naturalandnon-naturalhazardsoccurannuallywhichonanaveragekill900and
aectaround6,40,000peopleeveryyear(NPC,2019).
Figure 1: Disaster events and casuales in Nepal Himalaya
(Sources BIPAD portal(bipadportal.gov.np/)andUNDRRDesInventar(www.desinventar.net/)
Note:No.ofincidentsincludesbothnaturalandnon-naturalhazards
Ofthe total240millioninhabitantsoftheHimalayancountries(alsocalledHinduKushregion),
around30 - 50% ofthetotalpopulaonliveinurbancentres(Singhetal.,2019;Westeretal.,
2019),andtheurbanisaonisgrowing(UNDESA,2014;Westeretal.,2019).InNepal,contributed
3AccordingtoUNDRR,thetermmul-hazard,whichincludesbiological,environmental,geological,hydrometeorologicalandtechnologicalpro-
cessesandphenomena,refers(1)theseleconofmulplemajorhazardsthatthecountryfaces,and(2)thespeciccontextswherehazardous
eventsmayoccursimultaneously,cascadinglyorcumulavelyoverme,andtakingintoaccountthepotenalinterrelatedeects(www.undrr.
org/terminology/hazard).Itposesarangeofaddionalchallengesduetothedieringcharacteriscsofprocesses,andthegoalofmul-hazard
assessmentistoreducetheriskofdisasters(Kappesetal.,2012).
3
Poudel et al. Urbanisation and disaster risks in the Himalaya
primarilyby the ruraltourban migraon,urbanpopulaon increased atan annual averageof
about six percent between 1970s and 2013 (Gabriela, 2013). The recent staggering increase
in the urban populaon of the country from 17% in 2013 to 40% in 2014/15, and to 66%in
2021is(seegure2),however,alsodrivenbythepolico-administraverestructuringaerthe
federalismin2008anddesignangruralareasasmunicipalies4(Timsinaetal.,2020;Ishaque
etal.,2017).Withrapidurbanisaon,theinformalpopulaonlivinginslumsandriverbankshave
alsosubstanallyincreasedduringthelasttwodecades(Sengupta,2011;K.C.andPahari,2011;
Shresthaetal.,2021, Shresthaetal.,2020).Andexpandingisthespectrumofrisk thatimpact
everydaylivesinurbanNepal(Ruszczyk,2018).Therapidgrowthinurbanpopulaonintandem
withgrowingurbanslumdwellersandmul-hazardriskdemandstudyonthenuancesofurban
disastersintheregion.
Figure 2: Urbanisaon trend in Nepal (Source: Central Bureau of Stascs (CBS), (cbs.gov.np)
Manyoftherecenturbangovernanceiniavesandinfrastructuredevelopmentacvies(ledby
bothgovernmentaland non-governmentalorganisaons)inNepalhaveincreasinglypriorised
improveddisastermanagementindevisingandimplemenngprojects,plans,policies(Poudeland
Blackburn,2020).However, not allurbandwellershavereceivedequalaenon,leavingsome
morevulnerablethanothers(BhaaraiandConway,2010;Mestaetal.,2022).Giventhenature
of Himalayan people’s exposure to mul-hazard risks, understanding diverse experiences and
perceponsofrisks,rootcausesofrisks(biophysical,socio-technicalandpolical-instuonal),
andthe underlying narravesthatinform dierenal responses and abilies to dealwith and
reducesuchrisks arecrucial.Such scrunycanhelp inembracinga widerperspecveon risk,
and enhancing the risk management abilies, including those of marginalised dwellers and
4InNepal,municipaliesareconsideredasurbanareas.Presently,Nepalhas293municipalies,includingsixmetropolitanand11sub-metro-
politancies(hps://www.mofaga.gov.np/).
4
New Angle: Nepal Journal of Social Science and Public Policy Vol. 7 ( 1 ), 2021
theirrepresentaves,therebysengthe groundformoreequitableandresilientcies(Man
et al., 2018; Ruszczyk, 2018). Furthermore, such nuanced interpretaons help to expose how
risk management instuons and actors interact, and how urban governance assemblages
explicitlyorimplicitlypriorisedevelopmentacviesinmul-hazardscontexts.Exploringlocal
risks,urbandwellers’needs,narraves,instuons,andpracceswilltherefore,notonlybean
instrumenttoco-produceknowledgeonmul-hazardriskbutalsoinformrelatedstakeholdersto
adoptinnovavepolicysoluonstoaddressexisngandavertpotenalhazardsanddisastersin
thefuture.
Urbangovernance,parcularlyin thenewlydeclaredurban areas,frequentlylackinstuonal
capacity,illustratedbyalackofauthority,knowledgeandaccesstoresources(Khatrietal.,2022),
parcularly in relaon to the disaster preparedness, exposing dwellers to mul-hazard risks
(Aryal,2014).Addionally,theexposuretomul-hazardriskandeectsofdisastersonresidents
vary based on class, caste/ethnicity, gender which is co-shaped by social sgma and uneven
capabiliestoaccessandinuencethedisastermanagementpoliciesandpraxisinthecountry.
Understandingdisasterriskandsocialvulnerabilitycan,therefore,beapragmacentrypointto
foreseesaferfuturecies.Againstthisbackdrop,throughthisspecialissueentled“Urbanisaon
andDisasterRisksintheHimalaya”,wetrytounderstandhowhaphazardurbanisaonincreases
disasterriskintheHimalaya.Specically,weconsolidateknowledgeonurbanisaonandurban
policies aecng formal and informal populaons of urban core and peripheries, the extent
to which local instuons can deal with local hazards, exploring ‘instuonal limits’, and the
importanceofearlywarningsystemtoreducedisasterrisk.Theanalysisanddebatesinthisissue
willhelpimproveourunderstandingontheinterlinkedprocessesthatgeneraterisks,dierenate
experiencesofrisksandriskreduconstrategies,contributetoenhancingknowledgeondisaster
governance, and help diverse stakeholders- parcularly state actors - to undertake necessary
stepstoplanforandreducetherisksexperiencedinpresentandfuturecies.
Thisspecialissuecompilesfourempiricallygroundedandtheorecallyinformedpapers.Inthe
rst paper, Timsina et al. analyse the polical economy of urban change in KathmanduValley
(KV).Specically,authorsexaminethecontradiconsandcontestaonsbroughtbythecentrally
planneddevelopmentandconstruconalprojectsasapartofurbanisaonprocessinKhokana,
a suburb located in the southern part of Lalitpur Metropolitan City (LMC) in KV. The massive
owofcapitalandlabourinthe1990sandduringandaertheMaoistemergency(1996-2006)
framedanenablingenvironmentforthecapitalinvestmentinland,housingandrealestatewhich
acceleratedtheconversionofproducveagriculturallandintobuiltupareasin KV,parcularly
in the periurban areas such as Khokana. Consequently, the rapid urbanisaon densies the
corecies andincreases an uncontrolled urbansprawl ofunplanned growthof built-upareas
in the periphery, which authors categorise as ‘haphazard urbanisaon’. The real estate boom
inducedmanyperiurban farmersto sell theirland, alienang themfromagriculturalacvies.
InKhokana,centralgovernment’siniaonofimplemenngseverallarge-scaleprojectssuchas
theFastTrackandOuterRingRoads,electricitytransmissionlines,andtheBagmaCorridorand
5
Poudel et al. Urbanisation and disaster risks in the Himalaya
SmartCitydevelopmentwithlileornocommunityvoices,hasgeneratedsignicantcommunity
dissasfacon. These phenomena of urban change have brought tension and contradicons
in the communies in various forms, including protests against the public spaces captured by
thepowerfulindividuals,companies,andtheinfrastructuredevelopmentprojectimplemented
by the central government. Consequently, several community members consider themselves
alienatedfromtheirland,tradion,andculture.Authorsanalysesuchurbanisaonasaproduct
ofneoliberal urbanismbecause theywere drivenby theforces of marketand capitaland the
liberalpoliciesadoptedbythecountryaerthe1990s,whichfacilitatedinvestorstobuyahuge
chunkoflandforotherlandusepurposes.Althoughthepolicaleconomyofurbanchangehas
shiedurbanisaonfromcoretoperiphery,manyissuesidenedbythelocalcommunityremain
unresolved.Thus,inthecontextsofstaterestructuringandurbanisingNepaliruralsociees,the
Khokanacaseprovidesanimportantavenuetorethinkurbanisaonpoliciestoachieveinclusive
futurecies.
Inthesecondpaper,Shresthaetal.unfoldtheparadoxofprolongedurbaninformalityissuesand
associateddebatesinNepalbasedon theanalysesofurbaninformality-relatedformalpolicies,
literature, and media publicaons. The paper demonstrates that although there have been
progressiveandparadigmacshisingovernmentpoliciesinaddressingurbaninformalityissues,
policiesissuedbydierentgovernmentauthoriesaredisconnected.Thegovernmentdominantly
framesinformalselersasthe“encroachers”andlegalisaondenestheirselementasarisk.
Hence,formalpraccesoencontradictapparentlyprogressivepolicies,creangambiguityand,
paradoxically, generangnew risks(ofevicon) fortheinformalselersin urban sengs.The
authorsarguethatsuch(dis)conneconsbetweenpoliciesandpraccesandcontradiconswithin
policiessmulatetheselerstoseekpolicalprotecon-sustaininginformalityinNepalamid
therhetorical priority for informal toformaltransion. Inthese contexts,the authors suggest
thattheiniavestoseekapermanentsoluontoproliferangurbaninformalityshouldprevent
instuonalinconsistenciesandbuildontheco-learningprocessesthatenablethepercepons
andambionsofallthestakeholders,includingtheinformalselers-tobeexplored,understood
and reconciled. It is equally important that such iniaves should also pay aenon to the
underlyingsocial,economic,andpolicalfactorsthatinterlinkandsustaininformality.
Thethirdpaper,Ojhaetal.drawingonthecaseofalandslideatDhamilikuwavillageofRainas
Municipality(Lamjung district)and advancing theconcept of ‘instuonallimit,examinesthe
extenttowhichlocalinstuonscandeliveradaptaonoutcomesintermsofprovidingresponses
totheclimate-induceddisasters.Theauthorsshowthelimits ofexisngpublicandcommunity
instuonstoaddressingclimate-relatedrisksandthevulnerabilityofpeopletodisasterrisks.As
thecasestudyshowed,thescaleandthenatureofriskposedbythelandslide,whichwastriggered
byariveroodbutalsolinkedtoanumberofsocialandenvironmentalfactors,wasbeyondthe
capacityofthelocalcommunityandaectedhouseholdstohandle.Whiletheaectedhouseholds
struggledtoadaptto the landslides,instuonsoperangatthreelevels– community,village
andthe district–delivered too lileto reduce andmanage the landsliderisk andits impacts.
6
New Angle: Nepal Journal of Social Science and Public Policy Vol. 7 ( 1 ), 2021
Whatisparcularlyworryingisthatdespiteradicalpolicsofinclusionanddemocracyspurred
bythecivilwarinNepal,theinstuonalresponseswereextremelylimitedforthepeopleinthe
lowerstrataofthesocialstructure.Theauthorsidenedatleastfourlimitsoflocalinstuons:
a) inera created by the social norms and structure embedded in the exisng instuons; b)
redundancywhereinconvenonalformalandinformalinstuonsarelessrelevanttotacklethe
newchallengesposedbyclimatechange;c)fragmentaonofinstuonaleortsinvolvingpoor
horizontal and vercal coordinaon among organisaons; and d) accountability lapses rooted
inthewiderpolicalsystem.Thiscasestudyrepornginstuonallimitcomesinstarkcontrast
tothehighlevelofexpectaonfromthenewlyinstutedlocalgovernments(municipalies)to
managedisasterrisks.Theauthorsarguethatthenoonof‘instuonallimit’canenhanceour
understandingofwhatinstuonscan(orcannot)deliverforeecvelocal responsetourban
disaster.Thesendingshavemajorimplicaonsfortheopmismplacedontheroleandcapacity
oflocalinstuonstoadapttoclimate-induceddisasterrisks.
Taking into account increasing frequency and severity of risk in urbanising Nepal, in the last
paper, Bhandari et al. discuss the importance of forecast-based ancipatory approaches for
eecvedisasterpreparednessandresponsesandreectonthechallengestoshithedisaster
managementapproachinNepalfrompost-eventrescueandrelieftoforecast-basedapproaches
andacons.Theirobservaons,arguments,andreeconsarebasedonthereviewofliterature
oninternaonalpraccesandapproachestoForecast-basedearlyAcon(FbA)andForecast-based
Financing(FbF),analysisofthe naonal policy documents,andinsightsfromtheirprofessional
engagementsin community-centredoodearlywarningsystemsinNepalandothercountries.
Theauthorspointtothelackofproperdelineaonofauthority,responsibilityandaccountability
betweendierentlevelsofthegovernmentsandlackofadequateinstuonalcapacity,including
thesocio-technologicalknowledgeandoperaonalgapsbetweenagenciesasthemajorbarriers
toproacveearlyacons.Thesechallenges,theyargue,canbeovercomethroughpragmaclegal
provisions, technical guidelines, and protocols to clarify the roles, responsibilies, and strong
policalwill,instuonalcommitment,accountabilityoftheauthoriesandbeerunderstanding
ofthecommunity.Theauthorsconcludebreakingdownexisngsilosbetweendierentdisaster
management agencies and creang enabling instuonal environment to adopt advanced
forecast-based technologies is the key to improving disaster preparedness and responses and
achievingthetargetsoftheNaonalDisasterRiskReduconStrategicAconPlan(2018-2030).
2. CONCLUSION AND POLICY RECOMMENDATION
This special issue analysed disaster risk producon and management in the context of rapid
urbanisaonintheHimalayanregion.Indoingso,our intenonwasto understandandreect
ontheinterrelaonsbetweencurrenturbanisaonanddisastermanagementtrendswithafocus
onthe NepalHimalaya.The fourcasesin thiscollecon exemplifyhow rapidand unregulated
urbanisaonisexposingcommunies,infrastructure,development,andsocietytomultudeof
risks.
7
Poudel et al. Urbanisation and disaster risks in the Himalaya
The cases are social phenomena specic to me and place (Ragin, 1992) so their selecon is
inherently parcularintermsofsociety,placeandtheirimportancetothecommunity(Burawoy,
1991).Allstudiedcasesconsistently and explicitlydocumentthe existence of a lack of coordinaon
(in terms of sharing knowledge, capacity and resources) among governing instuons of
urbanisaon and disaster risk management which in turn exacerbate mul-hazard risks. The
rstcasestudyunpacksthelackofpolicalcommitment,instuonalcapacityandcoordinaon
reinforcedundertherubricofneoliberalurbanpolicy,thusthestate-ledintervenonsconnue
to accelerate rather than control haphazard urbanisaon. Such unplanned, haphazard and
capitalist urbanisaon has been termed a disaster waing to happen” (Madden, 2021). The
lack of commitment, capacity and coordinaonis further evidenced in the second case study
whichtakesacloserlookattheparadoxofprolongedurbaninformalityissuesinNepal.Thisstudy
uncoversthepolicalandpolicyentanglementsofinformaltoformaltransioning,whichworkto
undermineeortsatresolvingurbaninformalityissues(seealsoSharp,2022;Banksetal.,2019).
In line with Allen’s (2006) warnings that treang community-based instuons as a panacea
to disaster management can be problemac, the third paper points to the limits of local risk
governance in the contexts of entrenched social norms and structures, and poor instuonal
capacity,coordinaonandaccountability.Finally,thefourthcasestudyfurthersubstanatesthat
theoperaonalgapsbetweenagenciesandthelackofinstuonalcapacityandproperdelineaon
ofauthority,responsibilityandaccountabilitybetweendierentlevelsofthegovernmentsarethe
majorbarrierstoproacveimplementaonofearlywarningaconsinNepalwhichundoubtedly
increasethevulnerabilitytofuturedisasters.
Althoughtheestablishmentofthe federalstructurehas opened awaytodevolveauthorityto
localgovernments,studieshavehighlightedthereisalackofinstuonalcapabilitytoundertake
the roles entrusted to them (Khatri et al., 2022). Consequently, the governing instuons at
mulplescaleslacktheabilitytoregulatehaphazardurbanisaonandassociatedriskproducon.
Byanalysingthecasesincludedinthisspecialissue,weconcludethatwhilepolicalrestructuring
and decentralised local governance have improved authority to devise policies and acons,
enhancingoverallinstuonalcapabilityremainsacrucialandunmetneed.Thisneedsclarityin
distribuonofauthorityacrossdierentlevelsofgovernmentsandrobustmechanismsforsharing
knowledge,technology,andotherresources,which,subsequently,willhelpenhanceinstuonal
capacity to understand local risks and prepare for and respond to mul-hazard disaster risks
interfacinghaphazardurbanisaon.
3. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The editorial team would like to thank the United Kingdom Research Iniave (UKRI) Global
ChallengesResearchFund (GCRF) grant“Tomorrow’sCies“ (Urban Disaster Risk) Hub project
(NE/S009000/1)forthenancialsupportforthepublicaonofthisspecialissue.Therst,second
andfourthauthors’involvementinthisspecialissuewasalsoparallyfundedbytheUKRI-GCRF-
8
New Angle: Nepal Journal of Social Science and Public Policy Vol. 7 ( 1 ), 2021
EconomicandSocialResearchCouncil(ESRC)grantES/T00259X/1“PolicalCapabilies”project.
Special thanks and congratulaons to all the contribung authors for their perseverance and
paence. We aregrateful to the anonymous reviewers who provided valuable comments and
feedbackandalsothankeverybodywhoresponsedtothiscallforpaper.Weextendourthanksto
Mr.BinodAdhikariandMs.RojaniManandharfortheirhelpingenerangguresforthiseditorial
paper.AbigthankstoMs.GyanuMaskey,Ms.AvipshaRayamajhi,Ms.ParbaPandey,Ms.Monika
Giri,andMr.PradipDhakalfortheirecienttechnicalandadministravehelpsthroughout.
4. REFERENCES
Allen,K.M.,2006.Community-baseddisasterpreparednessandclimateadaptaon:Localcapacity-
buildinginthePhilippines.Disasters,30,pp.81-101.
Anbalagan,R.,1993.Environmentalhazardsofunplannedurbanizaonofmountainousterrains:Acase
studyofahimalayantown.Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology,26,pp.179-
184.
Aryal,K.R.,2014.DisastervulnerabilityinNepal.Internaonal Journal of Disaster Risk Reducon,9,
pp.137-146.
Banks,N.,Lombard,M.andMitlin,D.,2019.Urbaninformalityasasiteofcricalanalysis.The Journal of
Development Studies,56,pp.223-238.
Bhaarai,K.andConway,D.,2010UrbanvulnerabiliesintheKathmanduvalley,Nepal:Visualizaonsof
human/hazardinteracons.Journal of Geographic Informaon System, 2,pp.63-84.
Burawoy,M.,1991.,Theextendedcasemethod.In:M.Burawoy,A.Burton,A.A.Aferguson,K.J.Fox,
J.Gamson,N.Cartrell,L.Hurst,C.Kurzman,L.SalxingerandJ.Schiman,eds.1991.Ethnography
unbounded: Power and resistance in the modern metropolis.California:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
Coppola,D.P.,2011.Introducon to internaonal disaster management, Boston,Buerworth-
Heinemann.
Gabriela,M.E.a.A.,2013.Urban growth and spaal transion in Nepal an inial assessment,Direcons
inDevelopment.Washington,DC:WorldBank.doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-9659-9.License:Creave
CommonsAribuonCCBY3.0.
Gurung,P.,2021.Challenginginfrastructuralorthodoxies:Policalandeconomicgeographiesofa
himalayanroad.Geoforum,120,pp.103-112.
Ishaque,A.,Shrestha,M.andChhetri,N.,2017.Rapidurbangrowthinthekathmanduvalley,Nepal:
MonitoringlanduselandcoverdynamicsofaHimalayancitywithlandsatimageries.Environments,4,
p.72.
Jodha,N.S.,1992.Mountainperspecveanditsulity:Aframeworkfordevelopmentstrategies.The
Himalayan Review,XX-XXIII,pp.11-24.
K.C.,K.andPahari,K.,2011.AstudyonsquaerselementsofKathmanduusingGIS,aerialphotography,
remotesensingandhouseholdsurvey.Nepalese Journal of Geoinformacs,10,pp.1-8.
Kargel,J.S.etal.,2016.GeomorphicandgeologiccontrolsofgeohazardsinducedbyNepal’s2015Gorkha
earthquake.Science,351,aac8353.
Khatri,D.B.,Nighngale,A.J.,Ojha,H.,Maskey,G.andLama‘Tsumpa’,P.N.,2022.Mul-scalepolicsin
9
Poudel et al. Urbanisation and disaster risks in the Himalaya
climatechange:Themismatchofauthorityandcapabilityinfederalizingnepal.Climate Policy,pp.1-
13.
Madden,D.J.,2021.Disasterurbanizaon:Thecitybetweencrisisandcalamity.Sociologica,15,pp.91-
108.
Man,N.,Forrester,J.andEnsor,J.,2018.Whatisequitableresilience?World Development,109,pp.197-
205.
Mesta,C.,Cremen,G.andGalasso,C.,2022.Urbangrowthmodellingandsocialvulnerabilityassessment
forahazardousKathmanduValley.Scienc Reports,12(1),pp.1-16.
NPC,2019.Fieenth plan - approach(inNepali).Kathmandu:NaonalPlanningCommission(NPC).
Panday,R.K.,1984.Physical geography of Nepal(inNepali), Jawalakhel,Lalitpur,TethisPandey.
Poudel,D.P.andBlackburn,S.,2020.MappingDRRinstuonsandactorsacrossscalesfromcentreto
local:Kathmandu,Nepal.SIAS,Tomorrow’sCies,UKRI&GCRF.
Poudel,D.P.,Ensor,J.andAlejandro,B.,2021.ProduconofrisksandlocalriskgovernanceinKathmandu
valley.SIAS,Tomorrow’sCies,GCRF&UKRI.
Ragin,C.C.,1992.Introducon:Casesof“Whatisacase?”In:C.C.RaginandH.S.Becker,eds.1992.What
is a case?: Exploring the foundaons of social inquiry.CambridgeUniversityPress,pp.1-17.
Rimal,B.,Sloan,S.,Keshtkar,H.,Sharma,R.,Rijal,S.andShrestha,U.B.,2020.Paernsofhistoricaland
futureurbanexpansioninNepal.Remote Sensing, 12,p.628.
Rusk,J.,Maharjan,A.,Tiwari,P.,Chen,T.K.,Shneiderman,S.,Turin,M.andSeto,K.C.,2022.Mul-hazard
suscepbilityandexposureassessmentoftheHinduKushHimalaya.Sci Total Environ,804,150039.
Ruszczyk,H.A.,2018.Aconnuumofperceivedurbanrisk–fromtheGorkhaearthquaketoeconomic
insecurity.Environment and Urbanizaon,30,pp.317-332.
Sengupta,U.,2011.Thedividedcity?:Squaers’strugglesforurbanspaceinKathmandu.In:J.S.Anjaria
andC.McFarlane,eds.2011.Urban navigaons: polics, space and the city in South Asia. Routledge,
pp.105-137.
Sharp,D.,2022.Haphazardurbanisaon:Urbaninformality,policsandpowerinEgypt.Urban Studies,
59,pp.734-749.
Shrestha,A.,Poudel,D.P.andKhatri,D.,2020.Development, disasters and squaer selements in
urban Nepal: A review of characteriscs and challenges.WorkingReport.hps://sias-southasia.org/
development-disasters-and-squaer-selements-in-urban-nepal-a-review-of-characteriscs-and-
challenges/
Shrestha,A.,Poudel,D.P.andKhatri,D.B.,2021.Recognionandreconciliaonremainpivotalto
resolveissuesofinformalselers.NepalPress,[online]Availableat:hps://english.nepalpress.
com/2021/06/03/recognion-and-reconciliaon-remain-pivotal-to-resolve-issues-of-informal-selers/
[Accessed03June2021].
Singh,S.,TanvirHassan,S.M.,Hassan,M.andBhar,N.,2019.Urbanisaonandwaterinsecurityinthe
HinduKushHimalaya:InsightsfromBangladesh,India,NepalandPakistan.Water Policy, 22,pp.9-32.
Timsina,N.P.,Shrestha,A.,Poudel,D.P.andUpadhyay,R.,2020.TrendofurbangrowthinNepalwitha
focusinKathmanduvalley:Areviewofprocessesanddriversofchange.Tomorrow’s Cies Working
Paper 001.DOI: hp://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/722
10
New Angle: Nepal Journal of Social Science and Public Policy Vol. 7 ( 1 ), 2021
Tiwari,P.C.,Tiwari,A.andJohsi,B.,2018.UrbangrowthinHimalaya:Understandingtheprocessand
oponsforsustainabledevelopment.Journal of Urban and Regional Studies on Contemporary India,
4,pp.15-27.
UNDESA,2014.Worldurbanizaonprospects:The2014revision.
VanAsselt,M.B.A.andRenn,O.,2011.Riskgovernance.Journal of Risk Research,14,pp.431-449.
Walker,B.,2011.Urban peaks in the Himalayas.ChinaDialogue,[online]Availableat:hps://
chinadialogue.net/en/cies/4306-urban-peaks-in-the-himalayas/
Wester,P.,Mishra,A.,Mukherji,A.andShrestha,A.B.,eds.2019.The Hindu Kush Himalaya Assessment:
Mountains, climate change, sustainability and people, Kathmandu:ICIMOD,HIMAP,Springer.
WymannVonDach,S.,Bachmann,F.,Alcántara-Ayala,I.,Fuchs,S.,Keiler,M.,Mishra,A.andSötz,E.,
eds.2017.Safer lives and livelihoods in mountains: Making the sendai framework for disaster risk
reducon work for sustainable mountain development, Bern,Switzerland:CentreforDevelopment
andEnvironment(CDE),UniversityofBern,withBernOpenPublishing(BOP).
... The study provides a comprehensive overview of the current water security and biodiversity status in Jammu City. The study explores the role of ecosystem services in promoting water degradation, and increased risks and vulnerabilities (Khawas, 2009;Poudel et al., 2021). ...
Article
Full-text available
Human well-being, human development and peaceful coexistence require healthy ecosystems and ecosystem services. The complex interlinkages between water security and biodiversity are crucial for sustainable development. Biodiversity plays a crucial role in regulating the nutrient cycle and water and mitigating the impacts of climate change. However, the increasing demand for water due to population growth, urbanization, and economic development poses a threat to both water security and biodiversity. The need for a holistic approach to water security, which includes the protection of aquatic biodiversity, is emphasized. Understanding their interconnectedness is vital for effective environmental management. Employing an ecosystem-based approach, the paper investigates the interlinkages between water security and biodiversity in Sub-Himalayan Jammu City as the city faces significant challenges in maintaining water and biodiversity security due to varied anthropogenic and natural factors. The study provides a comprehensive overview of the current water security and biodiversity status in Jammu City. The study explores the role of ecosystem services in promoting water security, such as water purification, flood regulation, and habitat provision, while examining the issue of land use changes. Moreover, it investigates how preserving and restoring biodiversity can enhance ecosystem resilience and contribute to sustainable water management practices. The study highlights the need for a paradigm shift towards ecosystem-based approaches to develop more sustainable and resilient water management strategies in Jammu City while safeguarding its rich biodiversity.
Article
Full-text available
Nepal’s transition to federalism in 2015 involved a significant redistribution of authority across three levels of government, with a greater level of autonomy granted to provincial and local levels. We examine multi-scale climate policy and politics in Nepal, focusing on three elements that are important for policy development and implementation: (a) the authority to make decisions; (b) the knowledge and expertise to develop and implement policies; and (c) the ability to access and mobilize resources, primarily external funding, by government bodies at different levels. Our findings show that the newly decentralized local governments are constrained in their ability to develop and implement climate change-related policies and practical responses by a mismatch between the authority granted to them and existing institutional capabilities. These governmental bodies have limited opportunities to develop, access and mobilize knowledge of climate and development and financial resources, which are needed to put new policies into action. Based on this analysis, we argue that decentralization of governmental authority is not likely to produce effective climate policy outcomes if this mismatch remains unaddressed. KEY POLICY INSIGHTS • The ability of the provincial and local governments in federal Nepal to respond to climate change has been constrained by a pervasive mismatch between authority granted and institutional capabilities, in terms of opportunities to access and mobilize knowledge and financial resources. • The devolution of power is not adequate for effective climate change responses; rather, there is a need to strengthen the institutional capabilities and opportunities of the decentralized local governments to address climate change. • Formal allocation of authority is always blurred in practice, as agencies at different levels of governance engage in power struggles within and beyond formally delineated boundaries. This suggests the need for more operational clarity on policy implementation procedures. • There is a need for a clear exchange of knowledge and a flow of resources to the level where responsibilities lie to respond to climate change.
Article
Full-text available
In our rapidly urbanizing world, many hazard-prone regions face significant challenges regarding risk-informed urban development. This study addresses this issue by investigating evolving spatial interactions between natural hazards, ever-increasing urban areas, and social vulnerability in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. The methodology considers: (1) the characterization of flood hazard and liquefaction susceptibility using pre-existing global models; (2) the simulation of future urban built-up areas using the cellular-automata SLEUTH model; and (3) the assessment of social vulnerability, using a composite index tailored for the case-study area. Results show that built-up areas in Kathmandu Valley will increase to 352 km² by 2050, effectively doubling the equivalent 2018 figure. The most socially vulnerable villages will account for 29% of built-up areas in 2050, 11% more than current levels. Built-up areas in the 100-year and 1000-year return period floodplains will respectively increase from 38 km² and 49 km² today to 83 km² and 108 km² in 2050. Additionally, built-up areas in liquefaction-susceptible zones will expand by 13 km² to 47 km². This study illustrates how, where, and to which extent risks from natural hazards can evolve in socially vulnerable regions. Ultimately, it emphasizes an urgent need to implement effective policy measures for reducing tomorrow's natural-hazard risks.
Article
Full-text available
The Egyptian military regime of Abd al-Fattah el-Sisi has announced as part of its Vision 2030 its intention to eliminate informal urban areas. The regime has identified these areas – commonly known by the Arabic term ‘ashwa’iyyat (which means haphazard) – as a threat to the nation. The Egyptian state, however, has no clear conception of what urban informality constitutes or what exactly it is eradicating. To understand how and why the state has placed urban informality as central to its politics, I contend that we have to examine the political processes through which this uncertain yet powerful concept is produced. Urban informality, I argue, is a political intervention that is always fleeting and geographically specific in an otherwise haphazard context. Haphazard urbanisation points to the complex power struggles by a range of actors, both within and beyond the state, through which the formal and informal divide can mark urban life. In a critical reading of the first major study of informality in Egypt, I show how the urban was divided into the formal and informal through outdated laws. I detail, by engaging sources in English and Arabic, how the Egyptian state militarised urban informality from the 1990s onwards. I argue that it is through this historical framing that we must understand el-Sisi’s current war against urban informality. In turn, I argue that the regime’s attempt to eliminate informality has not resulted in greater control over what and how urban informality appears but has deepened the hazardisation of urban life.
Article
Full-text available
Mountainous regions are highly hazardous, and these hazards often lead to loss of human life. The Hindu Kush Himalaya (HKH), like many mountainous regions, is the site of multiple and overlapping natural hazards, but the distribution of multi-hazard risk and the populations exposed to it are poorly understood. Here, we present high-resolution transboundary models describing susceptibility to floods, landslides, and wildfires to understand population exposure to multi-hazard risk across the HKH. These models are created from historical remotely sensed data and hazard catalogs by the maximum entropy (Maxent) machine learning technique. Our results show that human settlements in the HKH are disproportionately concentrated in areas of high multi-hazard risk. In contrast, low-hazard areas are disproportionately unpopulated. Nearly half of the population in the region lives in areas that are highly susceptible to more than one hazard. Warm low-altitude foothill areas with perennially moist soils were identified as highly susceptible to multiple hazards. This area comprises only 31% of the study region, but is home to 49% of its population. The results also show that areas susceptible to multiple hazards are also major corridors of current migration and urban expansion, suggesting that current rates and patterns of urbanization will continue to put more people at risk. This study establishes that the population in the HKH is concentrated in areas susceptible to multiple hazards and suggests that current patterns of human movement will continue to increase exposure to multi-hazards in the HKH.
Article
Full-text available
Globally, urbanization is increasing at an unprecedented rate at the cost of agricultural and forested lands in peri-urban areas fringing larger cities. Such land-cover change generally entails negative implications for societal and environmental sustainability, particularly in South Asia, where high demographic growth and poor land-use planning combine. Analyzing historical land-use change and predicting the future trends concerning urban expansion may support more effective land-use planning and sustainable outcomes. For Nepal’s Tarai region—a populous area experiencing land-use change due to urbanization and other factors—we draw on Landsat satellite imagery to analyze historical land-use change focusing on urban expansion during 1989–2016 and predict urban expansion by 2026 and 2036 using artificial neural network (ANN) and Markov chain (MC) spatial models based on historical trends. Urban cover quadrupled since 1989, expanding by 256 km2 (460%), largely as small scattered settlements. This expansion was almost entirely at the expense of agricultural conversion (249 km2). After 2016, urban expansion is predicted to increase linearly by a further 199 km2 by 2026 and by another 165 km2 by 2036, almost all at the expense of agricultural cover. Such unplanned loss of prime agricultural lands in Nepal’s fertile Tarai region is of serious concern for food-insecure countries like Nepal.
Technical Report
This research is a part of the UKRI GCRF funded project Tomorrow’s Cities, which has the objective to encourage pro-poor risk-sensitive planning in Istanbul, Kathmandu, Nairobi and Quito. It contributes to the first of its four Work Packages (WPs). WP1, namely Understandings of Risk, broadly analyses how understandings of risks and of the root causes of risks (URRCRs) have emerged and are sustained in the city. WP1 has been further divided into four themes - Risk and Narratives (theme 1), Governance and Institutions (theme 2), Urban Change (theme 3), and Vulnerability and Capacity (theme 4). This study, belongs to theme 2 of WP1 and takes a community-level case, analyses the “gaps” between how risks are being produced at the community level and how they are managed by municipal and local governments and exposes the lines of disconnection between policy and practice.
Article
This paper asks what critical urban theory can add to the sociology of disasters. If the fundamental insight of disaster studies is that there's no such thing as a natural disaster, the starting point for critical urban studies is that capitalist urbanization is a disaster waiting to happen. Disasters are promoted and inflected by the specific forms of crisis and vulnerability created by neoliberal urbanization. Disasters are also ways in which urban space is produced and remade, in a process that can be called disaster urbanization. A critical account of the relationship between contemporary urbanization and disaster can help us better understand the disaster-prone, unevenly urbanizing future.
Article
National and international development narratives frame Nepal’s Karnali region as synonymous with remoteness and food insecurity. These narratives often position food insecurity as a direct outcome of geographical remoteness associated with the lack of motorable road. Road building is thus presented as the solution to food insecurity. I challenge this orthodox narrative using the concept of “infrastructural orthodoxies”. Drawing on interdisciplinary literature on infrastructures and critical human geography scholarship on vulnerability, I argue that rather than resolving food insecurity, road increases vulnerability. This occurs in at least two ways: 1) through the proletarianization of wage workers and petty contractors in the road building market, and 2) through increasing dependence on cash and distant markets for the production and reproduction of local social lives. However, I neither suggest road building as inherently negative nor limit my discussion to the normative evaluation of the success or failure of road. Instead, I ask: what is it that these road projects are actually doing? This question helps turn our attention to the multivalent effects of road and illustrate why the orthodoxy is problematic. I thus present two unintended effects of road that exceed and are obscured by the orthodoxy: 1) road as key sites of electoral politics, and 2) road as vectors of new economic and labor geographies in the Himalayan borderlands. This paper contributes to the knowledge on the relationship between road and food (in)security, and to the interdisciplinary literature that view infrastructures as contingent and always in the process of becoming.