ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

This article maps the existing academics and working papers about cryptocurrency, or digital currency that uses blockchain. Cryptocurrency is one of the applications of blockchain that can accelerate economic digitalization within countries, which in the end could improve economic efficiency, effectiveness, and access for citizens. By the type of issuers, cryptocurrencies can be placed into three categories: central bank-issued digital currency, private institution digital currency, and peer-to-peer crypto-assets. The advent of cryptocurrencies requires strong regulatory frameworks to protect the users, ethics guidelines to direct the development, risk benefits study to identify pitfalls, users’ psychology, law enforcement guidelines to ensure a safe environment, and economic initiatives to provide society with maximized benefits. This paper shows research findings, methods, and future research directions in cryptocurrency.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 151
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
Gatot Gunarso and Stephanie
Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Kristen Krida Wacana,
Indonesia
Abstract
This article maps the existing academics and working papers about cryptocurrency or digital currency
that uses blockchain. Cryptocurrency is one of the applications of blockchain that can accelerate
economic digitalization within countries, which in the end could improve economic efficiency,
effectiveness, and access for citizens. By the type of issuers, cryptocurrencies can be placed into three
categories: central bank-issued digital currency, private institution digital currency, and peer-to-peer
crypto-assets. The advent of cryptocurrencies requires strong regulatory frameworks to protect the
users, ethics guidelines to direct the development, risk benefits study to identify pitfalls, users’
psychology, law enforcement guidelines to ensure a safe environment, and economic initiatives to
provide society with maximized benefits. This paper shows research findings, methods, and future
research directions in cryptocurrency.
Keywords: cryptocurrency, digital currency, digitalization, blockchain
Author Note
Gatot Gunarso 0000-0001-7447-6931
Stephanie 0000-0003-2704-9552
We have no known conflict of interest to disclose.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Gatot Gunarso, Faculty of
Economics and Business, Universitas Kristen Krida Wacana, Indonesia.
Email: gatotgunarso@ukrida.ac.id.
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 152
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
Financial technology (fintech) is an industry that grows rapidly and has a high
compound annual growth rate (CAGR) (CB Insights, 2019). Fintech is the future of the
financial industry, by which consumers and businesses can access financial services and
products digitally, innovative market participants can deploy new innovative technologies,
and existing business models can upgrade their capacities and capabilities to fulfill consumers'
needs. Fintech helps consumers and businesses handle the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic.
To integrate digital technology innovations into people’s lives, users need to feel long-
lasting valuable effects. To sustain this integration, firms must gain sustainable competitive
advantages. Fintech refers to the financial service companies that dominantly use information
technologies in their operation to deliver their products to serve consumers. Fintech
companies offer financial services and products that are entirely or mostly in the information
technologies domain, and those services or products are difficult or impossible to perform in
conventional business because of the limitations in infrastructure.
Authorities see fintech as a means to increase financial inclusion for consumers and
encourage companies to innovate processes, services, and products. Fintech helps reduce
costs, increase the reachability of customers, and manage risks more efficiently. Fintech
companies provide quicker, better quality, more convenient, and cheaper financial services
with a seamless process 24 hours a day, seven days a week, or nonstop, compared to
conventional financial companies.
Fintech uses advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, machine learning,
and data science to develop solutions for financial needs (Hua et al., 2019). One example of a
development in fintech is cryptocurrency. This paper examines research findings, methods,
and future research directions to identify to map the existing landscape of cryptocurrency. As
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 153
cryptocurrency technology is still developing, a comprehensive cryptocurrency literature
review will help researchers to advance research in this particular field.
Cryptocurrency is not a new term that exclusively belongs to this era; in 1983, David
Chaum wrote about the use of cryptography applications for future e-cash. Cryptocurrency,
also known as virtual currency, is an online payment system that may function as real
currency but is not administered or ratified by a central government (Lovell, 2019).
The European Central Bank (ECB) sees cryptocurrency as one type of crypto asset,
which is defined as a new type of “asset recorded in digital form and enabled by the use of
cryptography that does not represent a financial claim on, or a liability of, any identifiable
entity” (Agur et al., 2022). Cryptocurrency is electronic-based money or virtual currency that
exists only on the internet, that may or may not have intrinsic value backed by an institution,
and that uses cryptography to secure the generation, transaction, and storage of its value (Wu
et al., 2022).
Since the beginning of the 21st century, people all over the world have seen a decline
in the use of cash, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic. The ECB recorded that in 2019,
only 48% of the total transactions in Europe used cash (European Central Bank, 2020).
Consumers use commercial bank money, private-issued electronic payment forms of money,
and private-issued cryptocurrency (Cœuré & Loh, 2018).
Literature Review
Cryptocurrency, as part of fintech, uses blockchain technology combined with
cryptography or encryption as the core to secure the financial activities related to its currency
function. With blockchain, the participants of a financial system can easily find out the list of
approved transactions by entering the private key into the system. Once verified, the
transaction will become part of the blockchain (Afzal & Asif, 2019).
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 154
Cryptocurrencies utilize blockchain technology to enable the remote peer-to-peer
transfer of electronic value where there is no trust between participants, also known as zero
trust architecture. In a conventional system, the electronic representations of money are
exchanged via centralized infrastructures, where one of the more trusted intermediaries
verifies and settles the transactions.
Blockchain is often referred to as a distributed ledger technology that enables
participants within the systems to transact without the need for a centralized trusted authority
that stores peer-to-peer transactions record in blocks that are subsequently appended as new
transactions happen (Mendling et al., 2018; Woodside & Amiri, 2018). In other words,
blockchain is a decentralized cryptography platform that records all information about the
transactions ever executed within the system, using consensus protocols in a digital ledger
stored in every participant’s location that ensures a verifiable, unchangeable, and secure way
to fulfill immutability, transparency and anonymity principles.
Distributed ledger technology (DLT) refers to the algorithms, protocols, and
infrastructures that allow computers or machines in various locations to request a transaction,
validate the transaction, and update transaction records in a synchronized way across a
network. Cryptocurrencies have a distributed database in a decentralized way, where every
transaction is validated using a consensus-based checking procedure and cryptographic
parameters. Transactions are broadcast to the entire set of participants who will validate them
in batches of data known as "blocks," without any centralized authority, or popularly known
as “peer-to-peer.” The ledger of these activities is recorded in separate but connected digital
blocks; thus blockchain is also known as "blockchain technology."
Figure 1 below shows how blockchain works in cryptocurrency, from a transaction
request to the final stage of a transaction. The advent of cryptocurrencies generates many
opportunities such as fast, efficient, anonymous, and unmediated transactions (Arias-Oliva et
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 155
al., 2021). However, there are still concerns regarding blockchain and its applications in
society. As understanding the potential consequences of blockchain technology develops,
moral and ethical challenges need to be addressed (Tang et al., 2020).
Figure 1
Blockchain Process from Transaction Request to Final Settlement (World Economic Forum)
Adapted from “Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain and Regulation: A Review,” by Afzal and Asif
(2019).
There are numerous cryptocurrencies currently in the market, but generally, they can
be categorized into three groups of issuers: Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC),
commercial banks, and crypto-assets. In the CDBC case, the central banks supply
cryptocurrencies in the form of electronic reserves, which are available only to the banking
sector and are then distributed through financial institutions.
As for the cryptocurrencies issued by commercial banks, they are created by credit
extensions that are backed by a real capital investment of fiat money. As for the crypto-assets,
the cryptocurrencies issued have no centralized technical processing, without the precondition
of trust to any institution, and without preset liability of any party to vouch for the intrinsic
User X wants to
transact with Y
using
cryptocurrency
Online
transaction is
converted into
data “block”
Every computer in
the network
receives the
broadcasted block
Every computer in
the network
receives the
broadcasted block
Every computer in
the network
tries to
get the “key” and
verify the validity of
the transaction
using certain
cryptography
The finder of the
“key” then convert
the key and the
transaction into a
new block that is
added to the data
“chain” of all existing
transactions
The new data “chain” that
represents the successful
transaction, is now already
created and broadcasted as
the new “ledger” to each
computer in the network.
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 156
value. Among the most popular crypto-assets are Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple, Litecoin,
Monero, Ethereum Classic, NEM, Dash, IOTA, Waves, Dogecoin, and Augur (Milutinović,
2018).
Many countries have their cryptocurrencies issued by private institutions in various
countries, such as Gopay by Gojek, QQ Diamond by QQ, Libra by Facebook, and E-money
by Indonesian government banks. Currently, there are numerous pilot projects and launched
CBDC, including e-Yuan in China, Digital Euro in Europe, e-Krona in Sweden, and DCash in
Eastern Caribbean nations (Bordo & Levin, 2017; Mitschke, 2021). Cryptocurrencies have
attracted the attention of information technology professionals, economists, investors, banks,
governments, and law enforcement agencies (Molling et al., 2020).
The potential impacts of cryptocurrencies have been recognized by government
institutions such as the European Central Bank, the US Federal Reserve, the UK Treasury, the
People’s Bank of China, the Bank of Indonesia, and other related governmental institutions.
Corporate reports, government agencies' working papers, and academic research papers about
cryptocurrencies are answering the challenge to understand cryptocurrencies. Countries such
as China, Europe, and the UK, along with international financial organizations, have produced
policy recommendations, guidance, and principles to apply cryptocurrencies in the current
financial system. This paper maps the landscape of cryptocurrency academic research.
Research Method
We conducted a review of the existing academic and working papers concerning
cryptocurrency or digital currency that uses blockchain. A review is a method to map and
identify key points within existing literature considered suitable for the complex research
area.
To achieve a systematic review, relevant documents about cryptocurrency were
retrieved using ProQuest search. The search keywords were “Fintech” and “Crypto.” We then
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 157
selected documents that were available with full text in scholarly journals that had gone through
peer-review, with English as the language of the text. As the result, 19 papers remained.
Figure 2
Framework to Select the Articles
In Google Scholar, three relevant working papers from the European Commission and
National Bureau of Economic Research about Digital Currency and Cryptocurrency were also
selected. Thus, in total, there were 22 papers used in the review. The purposes and methods of
the collected documents were then put in a table for future review. The last step was to further
elaborate on the selected papers and provide conclusions for future research suggestions.
Results and Discussion
Blockchain technology has become a popular new technology that brought forth
digital products such as cryptocurrencies, smart contracts, smart identification, and tracking,
among others. Blockchain technology itself is a distribution register consisting of blocks of
Search data using Proquest website with keywords: “Fintech and Crypto”
The search found: 28.426 documents
Only accept articles that discuss Cryptocurrency in an academic journal
Peer reviewed and only use English papers
Filter the articles that directly discuss fintech and cryptocurrency
The selection reduces the number to 300 papers
Number of articles that have been successfully collected: 19
Analyze and review the journal to list the conclusion for each paper
Identify and categorize the objectives of each paper
Write the Review
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 158
interconnected transactions. Transaction blocks are called registry nodes. In general, they
represent a decentralized database designed to store and confirm the reliability of information
(Tsindeliani & Egorova, 2020).
Figure 3
How Blockchain Works
Adapted from various sources, illustrated by the author
When a participant in the system requests a transaction, the request is broadcast to all
peers (computer nodes) in the network, and eventually reaches certain computer nodes that
function as miners. A miner will initiate the process to append the transaction into the global
ledger by including the request in the transactions pool, which the miner then adds the hashes
to the metadata and a nonce to try to produce a hash below a target value (defined by the
complexity of the network).
Once a miner is successful in producing the needed hash, the miner broadcasts the
transactions pool and its associated hash as a new block replacing all the previous blocks in
all active nodes. Included within the metadata in the new block is a reference to the
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 159
previously mined block, allowing the acceptance of the miner’s new block into the
blockchain.
Miners are incentivized by two rewards: the fees in individual transactions, and a
system-specific mining reward, for example, 0.01 Bitcoin. These rewards are then collected in
a special coin generation transaction within the new block’s transaction pool.
Blocks serve to generate the money supply through the mining rewards included in
each new block and to provide partial transaction orders that come before the new block is
generated. This algorithm allows all participants in the network to impose a global or partial
transactions order. The algorithm will prevent double-spending by maintaining a list of
unspent blocks and validating a transaction only if its input address appears in this list. The
storage of the maintained list is called a crypto-wallet.
The market capitalization of cryptocurrencies was non-existent before February 2010,
virtually very small before 2013, and was relatively stable at less than $20 billion until the
end of 2016 when it became volatile and has been ever since (Fan et al., 2022). At the end of
2017, it rose to over $200 billion, then at the beginning of 2018, the market capitalization rose
to over $800 billion. In December 2018, the capitalization fell to below $130 billion and was
volatile again after the Covid-19 pandemic spread throughout the world in March 2020, when
the capitalization peaked again at over $2 trillion in May 2021. The market cap then fell to
$1.2 trillion in June 2021 after the second wave of COVID-19, peaked all-time-high of $2.9
trillion in November 2021 after the US and European countries relaxed their pandemic
restrictions, fell deep to $1.2 trillion due to the massive selling in March 2022 after the
Russian invasion over Ukraine, then fell deeper to $868 billion in June 2022 due to the fear of
worldwide recession.
The following graph shows the volatility of the market capitalization of
cryptocurrencies, which implies the volatility of the value of cryptocurrencies in the face of
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 160
fiat money. Volatility also indicates the popularity, trading volume, and susceptibility of
cryptocurrencies to speculative bubbles, high energy prices, and geopolitical situations among
other factors. Although not directly related, the graph also implies the number of
manipulations, scams, and fraud risks related to the popularity of cryptocurrency.
Figure 4
Total Cryptocurrency Market Capitalization from 2016 to 2022
Adapted from www.coinmarketcap.com
The graph alone represents the growing expectations and hopes of the consumers to
use an electronic representation of money, whether for the real purpose of payment or
speculative purposes. The growth shows the importance of mapping the knowledge landscape
about cryptocurrencies related to the economic condition of countries, including trade,
commerce, law and regulation, security, and safety matters.
There are several benefits of cryptocurrency. First, the government cannot appropriate,
manipulate, or change the value of the cryptocurrency. Second, it is considered a secure
transaction against fraud and identity theft, an immediate and final settlement, and
information-accessible for all participants. Third, it has lower transaction, maintenance,
storage, and circulation fees. Fourth, cryptocurrency is more convenient for the participants to
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 161
transact without the need for an intermediary or centralized regulator. Fifth, it offers a higher
degree of freedom to transact due to the anonymous nature of cryptocurrencies.
However, all these perks are not entirely certain. For example, the government can
still confiscate the hardware that holds the digital wallet containing the cryptocurrencies. The
hackers still can steal the digital wallet stored in the cloud server. The device to mine
cryptocurrencies requires very high-performance capability. Additionally, the participants still
need a cryptocurrency exchange platform to trade the cryptocurrency for fiat money, and
there are limited types of goods and services available for trade with the cryptocurrencies.
The disadvantages of cryptocurrencies are price volatility (Todorof, 2019), lack of
market transparency (Commission, 2018; Cumming et al., 2019), low market integrity (Lee,
2020), and lack of investor and consumer protection (Kharisma, 2021), lack of adequate law
and supervision process (Tsindeliani & Egorova, 2020), high demand of high-performance
computing hardware (Ghiro et al., 2021), high consumption of electrical power (Schinckus et
al., 2020), susceptibility to energy prices (Gurrib, 2019), operational weaknesses, popularity
as a tool for illicit payment for illegal transactions (Afzal & Asif, 2019), the technical
vulnerabilities of services and trading venues (European Central Bank, 2020), the difficulty to
intervene the exchange rate with conventional monetary policy (Mitschke, 2021), and the
possibility of using cryptocurrencies for criminal purposes (Șcheau et al., 2020), including
money laundering and tax evasion (Barnes, 2018; Todorof, 2019).
Table 1
List of Papers, Purpose, and Methods
Author
Purpose of Articles
Method
Scheau et al., 2020
Examines the worldwide operation of cryptocurrencies
and their connections with cybercrime.
Literature
review and
quantitative
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 162
Author
Purpose of Articles
Method
Lovell (2019)
Explores different issues surrounding Bitcoin and how
the U.S. government, specifically the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS), should regulate cryptocurrencies to solve
the issues inherent within Bitcoin.
Case study
Chu (2018)
Explores experiences of broker-dealers, and the
similarities between the problems confronting
cryptocurrency platforms today and those that broker-
dealers faced in the late 1960s. Widespread broker-
dealer failures during the late 1960s revealed problems
with mishandled client assets, insufficient capital, and
inadequate protection of customer assets in bankruptcy.
Literature
review
Barnes (2018)
Examines the trading and popularity of
cryptocurrencies as investments and the susceptibility
of their pricing to speculative bubbles, manipulation,
scams, and fraud.
Quantitative
Afzal & Asif (2019)
Addresses various risks associated with an unregulated
cryptocurrency market and, discusses possible avenues
of regulation as well as applications of the
cryptocurrency technology for Pakistan.
Framework
building and
quantitative
Milutinović (2018)
Addresses the theme of cryptocurrency and its role in
economic growth. Types of cryptocurrencies are shown
as well as their expansion in countries in transition. The
market of cryptocurrency in Serbia and Switzerland is
discussed.
Framework
building and
quantitative
Molling et al. (2020)
Identifies main topics, main discussions, and
controversies on each topic presented in the literature
on cryptocurrencies.
Literature
review and
framework
building
Tsindeliani &
Egorova (2020)
Shows the legal status quo of cryptocurrencies in the
Russian Federation. Describes
references to the existing
and proposed legislation as well as to the statements of
Qualitative
and
descriptive
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 163
Author
Purpose of Articles
Method
several international, supranational, and national
regulatory bodies.
Cortez & Mongrut
(2021)
Determines the best model for predicting the short-term
log rates of the bid-ask spreads in the three biggest
cryptocurrencies—Bitcoin, Ripple, and Ethereum—and
in the 16 major fiat currencies listed by Bloomberg.
Literature
review and
quantitative
Arias-Oliva et al.
(2021)
Shows empirically that fsQCA provides a
complementary and enriching perspective to interpret
data about the use of cryptocurrencies.
Literature
review and
quantitative
Kliber & Włosik
(2019)
Investigates interdependencies between leading
cryptocurrency exchanges (American, European, and
Japanese).
Literature
review and
quantitative
Mazambani &
Mutambara (2020)
Applies the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to predict
behavioral intention to adopt cryptocurrency.
Literature
review and
quantitative
Cumming et al. (2019)
Explains the regulatory and security issues around
blockchain and initial coin offerings (ICOs) in an
increasingly decentralized economy. Examines ICO
structures and how this crowdfunding mechanism has
the promise for economic innovation. Explains how
fraud may be carried out within these innovative asset
classes, and the evolving regulatory struggles.
Framework
building
Duma & Gligor (2018)
Identifies general insights of payment behavior of the
students about cryptocurrencies. Assesses students’
overall knowledge about cryptocurrencies.
Qualitative
Othman et al. (2020)
Investigates the long- and short-run effects of
cryptocurrencies’ market capitalization development on
the banks’ deposit variability in the Gulf Cooperation
Council (GCC) region.
Literature
review and
quantitative
Stepanov et al. (2019)
Identifies provisions needed for implementing law
enforcement internationally for digitalization-related
matters, including prosecution process, decision
Literature
review
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 164
Author
Purpose of Articles
Method
making, coordination among law enforcement officers,
and assessment of performance. Comparison of legal
methods, dialectical methods, and analytic methods
within countries concerning digitalization matters.
Tang et al. (2020)
Reviews the ethics of blockchain, the main socio-
technical challenges in technology and applications,
and ethical issues of blockchain. Builds a conceptual
framework for blockchain ethics study.
Literature
review
Hua et al. (2019)
Reviews studies in the fintech areas, such as artificial
intelligence, blockchain, and crowdfunding.
Summarizes the contributions made by all six papers in
the special issue where this paper was published.
Literature
review
European Central Bank
(2020)
Examines the issuance of the Digital Euro as a central
bank digital currency (CBDC) from the perspective of
the Eurosystem.
Literature
review
Mitschke (2021)
Examines the effectiveness of Central Bank Digital
Currency and monetary policies.
Quantitative
European Central Bank
(2021)
Analyzes the digital adoption across the Euro
area and EU c
ountries, the implications of digitalization
for measurement, productivity,
labor markets and inflation, and the coronavirus
(COVID-19) pandemic and its implications.
Literature
review
Vasiliev et al.
(2020)
Analyzes opportunities and prospects for the
implementation of artificial intelligence in the legal
system. Identifies possible areas of large-scale digital
legal activities.
Literature
review and
framework
building
Cryptocurrency uses the digitization process of money that has grown in popularity
with fintech adoption that making money movement cheaper, faster, and more secure.
Cryptocurrency works on a peer-to-peer basis to facilitate the creation, transfer, or storage of
funds with or without a centralized ledger. The peer-to-peer basis can be distributed
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 165
physically or logically in separated areas, as well as in one area. Cryptocurrency can be
regulated or non-regulated by a government, depending on the initial design.
According to their liability’s bearer, cryptocurrencies can be categorized into three
types: central bank, private entities, and no-bearer. For a cryptocurrency or digital currency
issued by a central bank within a country or region, the same central bank is liable at all times
to ensure the value of the cryptocurrency for buying goods and services does not fluctuate
over time (European Central Bank, 2020). A central bank is accountable to the citizens where
it is located. In theory, a central bank cannot default or fail to fulfill its obligation to the
citizens.
Table 2
Characteristics of CBDC and Other Money-like Assets
.
Adapted from Central Bank Digital Currencies and Monetary Policy Effectiveness in the
Euro Area,” by A. Mitschke (2021).
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 166
For a cryptocurrency issued by a commercial bank or private institution, the
commercial bank or private institution holds the liabilities and must comply with the
regulations supervised by public authorities. In theory, the private entity could default and be
unable to fulfill its liabilities or the claims of its customers. Although the customers are
protected by a legally binding regulatory framework within a country, the private issuer is
only accountable within their promises and business limits. The regulator or public authority,
through law and regulations, could require the private entity to be protected by deposit
insurance schemes. The regulator could also provide lending for a troubled private entity in
exceptional situations.
For a cryptocurrency issued by an unknown entity or in the popular term “crypto-
assets,” no entity is liable to ensure anything of any kind. For this type of cryptocurrency,
there is no reliable framework to sustain its value and protect its direct holders. These assets
are unregulated, highly volatile in price due to lack of intrinsic value, and potentially could
result in the loss of the entire amount of assets due to inconvertibility to fiat money.
One of the problems that emerge due to the cryptocurrency application is cybercrime,
which includes the problem of manipulation and fraud that harms the owners of
cryptocurrencies (Barnes, 2018; Cumming et al., 2019; Șcheau et al., 2020; Stepanov et al.,
2019; Vasiliev et al., 2020).
A cryptocurrency exchange platform conducted a survey among 1108 traders between
April 23 and April 30, 2018, and identified the three biggest problems in the cryptocurrency
market: lack of security (40%), high trading fees (37%), and lack of liquidity (36%), where
more specifically the biggest issue is the sophisticated hackers who compromised the
exchange platform (Cortez et al., 2021). Types of crime related to cryptocurrency include
crypto fraud, uncertain regulations, cyber security fraud, fictitious assets, fake investment
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 167
funds/advisors, unregulated manipulated crypto exchanges, exchange hacks, social media
identity hacking, ransomware, crypto-jacking, and taxation fraud (Cumming et al., 2019).
Undoubtedly, this problem came about due to a lack of regulation, accountability, and
a desire to create security with the brokerage by the founders, owners, and developers
(Barnes, 2018). There are very few companies that comprehensively assess the risk of
corruption or compromise of data privacy (Șcheau et al., 2020), so there are still many users
who are afraid to invest in this currency because there is no guarantee of asset safety.
In response to the above problems, the US Congress and the SEC enacted the same
application as broker-dealers who failed in the market and operational turmoil during the late
1960s. The need to issue regulations for broker-dealers is explained as follows (Chu, 2018):
Historical Background – Understanding the regulations and potential applications of
the currency platform will help bring understanding to its historical background.
Congress enacted SIPA in 1970 in response to a series of broker-dealer failures that
occurred.
Customer Protection Rule - Customer protection rules are intended to separate the
broker-dealer's activities and assets from those of its customers, ensuring that there are
sufficient assets to satisfy the customer's claims in the event of a failure.
Net Capital Rule - The net capital rule ensures that broker-dealers maintain sufficient
liquidity to meet their customers' claims. However, the purpose of the net capital rule
is not to avoid broker-dealer failure.
Broker-Dealer Bankruptcy - Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (SIPA)
provides further protection for customers. Looking for an alternative to the bankruptcy
code, Congress established the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) to
oversee bankruptcy proceedings for broker-dealers.
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 168
Currency digitalization requires the solution of optimizing the decision-making
process based on data collection, coordinating of actions of a large number of law
enforcement officers, and permitting criminal cases to be conducted in an electronic form
(Stepanov et al., 2019). The future of legal regulation is related to the implementation of
criminal jurisdictional activities.
Future study is needed to assess the large-scale digital revolution that affects all
spheres of society, including the area of legal activity, such as the initiative to use robot
lawyers in legal corporations, automation of legal processes, use of smart contracts,
application of blockchain technologies, and the proliferation of cryptocurrencies, including
law enforcement about cybercrime (Vasiliev et al., 2020).
Cryptocurrencies are partly considered a threat to the banking sector, especially
commercial banks, the central banking system, and the global financial system. With their
continued use, appreciation of value, and speculative bubbles, cryptocurrencies threaten the
economic stability of the foreign exchange market (Barnes, 2018; Othman et al., 2020).
Digital payments dominate the market related of the activities of buyers who make online
payments, and their money stored in an e-wallet is maintained. The literature (Duma &
Gligor, 2018) includes research on some Romanian citizens, especially those who focused on
Generation Z, as well as Gen-Tech or iGen who grew up with internet technologies.
The future of cryptocurrencies seems secure given the global push toward the Internet
of Things. Institutional innovation and adoption of cryptocurrencies are in overdrive as they
predict an increase in the use of digital currencies. There are shining accounts that can be
changed by the widespread use of digital currencies and the democratization of the economy,
especially in developing countries (Mazambani & Mutambara, 2020).
Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other non-CBDCs are now mostly considered digital assets
that are used only for speculative investing. Meanwhile, DCash, e-Yuan, Digital Euro, and
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 169
other CBDCs from central banks of established countries are in the course to complement
legal currency used for real-life transactions in their respective countries. Gopay, Wechat pay,
Alipay, Samsung pay, Apple pay, Libra, and other various digital currencies are widely used
in society's daily lives in various countries.
Bitcoin, as one of the non-CBDCs, is one of the most demanded cryptocurrency
products in the market. Research from (Kliber & Włosik, 2019) says that the price
interdependence between markets that allows Bitcoin trading in the same traditional currency
(Euro and US dollar), is slightly higher than the spillover between Bitcoin market quotes in
different fiat currencies. The problem of price determination and stability becomes one of the
problems facing non-CBDCs. The problem will bring difficulties for the market in using
cryptocurrencies as a stable and reliable currency.
Conclusion
This article shows that cryptocurrency is a very important innovation to the digital
world of financial transactions, enabling its entire network to control multiple spending
without the need for a central authority to permanently monitor and validate financial data.
Cryptocurrencies will develop, along with their benefits and disadvantages, driven by
technology and their need among consumers and financial institutions.
It should be noted that modern technology development will always precede
regulations and all regulations have loopholes for criminal acts to enter. Therefore, the
government must as soon as possible provide legal frameworks and standards for digital-
based security to protect digital assets use, including the use of cryptocurrency. The modern
stage of digitalization of justice requires the proactive introduction of modern technical means
to achieve the objectives of market integrity, investor protection, and market sustainability
with high effectiveness and efficiency (Stepanov et al., 2019).
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 170
Regulations that will be or are being made must facilitate safe and open financial
markets and be adaptive enough to accommodate future developments in cryptocurrency. By
adopting the principles of technology-neutral, a strategic framework for ethical
cryptocurrency adoption, and clear law-making objectives, the government can design a legal
framework that can minimize the adverse effects of using cryptocurrency as the complement
for fiat money.
Future research direction should be aimed at identifying how to accelerate the
development and adoption of cryptocurrencies within society. Research could also be aimed
at identifying problems concerning cryptocurrency and its effect on productivity, the labor
market, inflation, and monetary policy. There are also concerns about cryptocurrencies
created by private entities would jeopardize the sovereignty of nations, thus deserving further
investigation.
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 171
References
Afzal, A. & Asif, A. (2019). Cryptocurrencies, blockchain and regulation: A review. The
Lahore Journal of Economics, 24(1), 103–130.
https://doi.org/10.35536/lje.2019.v24.i1.a5
Agur, I., Ari, A., & Dell’Ariccia, G. (2022). Designing central bank digital currencies.
Journal of Monetary Economics, 125, 62–79.
Arias-Oliva, M., de Andrés-Sánchez, J., & Pelegrín-Borondo, J. (2021). Fuzzy set qualitative
comparative analysis of factors influencing the use of cryptocurrencies in Spanish
households. Mathematics, 9(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9040324
Barnes, P. (2018). Cryptocurrency and its susceptibility to speculative bubbles, manipulation,
scams and fraud. Journal of Advanced Studies in Finance, 9(2), 60.
https://doi.org/10.14505//jasf.v9.2(18).03
Bordo, M. D., & Levin, A. T. (2017). Central bank digital currency and the future of
monetary policy. National Bureau of Economic Research.
CB Insights. (2019, January 29). Fintech Trends To Watch In 2019.
https://www.cbinsights.com/research/report/fintech-trends-2019/
Chaum, D. (1983). Blind signatures for untraceable payments BT. In D. Chaum, R. L. Rivest,
& A. T. Sherman (Eds.), Advances in cryptology: Proceedings of Crypto 82 (pp. 199–
203). Springer US.
Chu, D. (2018). Broker-dealers for virtual currency: Regulating cryptocurrency wallets and
exchanges. In Columbia Law Review (Vol. 118, Issue 8).
Cœuré, B., & Loh, J. (2018, March 13). Bitcoin not the answer to a cashless society.
Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/31abc532-25d0-11e8-b27e-cc62a39d57a0
Cortez, K., Rodríguez-García, M. D. P., & Mongrut, S. (2021). Exchange market liquidity
prediction with the k-nearest neighbor approach: Crypto vs. fiat currencies. Mathematics,
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 172
9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9010056
Cumming, D. J., Johan, S., & Pant, A. (2019). Regulation of the crypto-economy: Managing
risks, challenges, and regulatory uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Financial
Management, 12(3), 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12030126
Duma, F., & Gligor, R. (2018). Study regarding Romanian students’ perception and behaviour
concerning the fintech area with a focus on cryptocurrencies and online payments.
Online Journal Modelling the New Europe, 27, 86–106.
https://doi.org/10.24193/OJMNE.2018.27.04
European Central Bank. (2020, October 2). Report on a digital euro.
https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/Report_on_a_digital_euro~4d7268b458.en.pdf
European Central Bank. (2021, September). Digitalisation: Channels, impacts and
implications for monetary policy in the euro area. ECB Strategy Review, 266.
https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops/ecb.op266~1056aea77c.en.pdf
European Commission. (2018, March 8). FinTech action plan: For a more competitive and
innovative European financial sector. https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/180308-
action-plan-fintech_en
Fan, F., Carmine, V., Michail, B., Kanthan, L., Martinez-Rego, D., Wu, F., & Li, L. (2022).
Cryptocurrency trading: a comprehensive survey. Financial Innovation, 8(1).
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-021-00321-6
Ghiro, L., Restuccia, F., D’Oro, S., Basagni, S., Melodia, T., Maccari, L., & Cigno, R. Lo.
(2021). What is a blockchain? A definition to clarify the role of the blockchain in the
Internet of Things. In arXiv.org. https://www.proquest.com/working-papers/what-is-
blockchain-definition-clarify-role/docview/2487642357/se-2
Gurrib, I. (2019). Are Energy Block Chain Currencies Affected by the Major US Energy
Markets? International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(1), 218–227.
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 173
https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/are-energy-block-chain-currencies-
affected-major/docview/2256130779/se-2
Hua, X., Huang, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2019). Current practices, new insights, and emerging
trends of financial technologies. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(7), 1401–
1410. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2019-0431
Kharisma, D. B. (2021). Urgency of financial technology (Fintech) laws in Indonesia.
International Journal of Law and Management, 63(3), 320–331.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-08-2020-0233
Kliber, A., & Włosik, K. (2019). Isolated islands or communicating vessels? Bitcoin price and
volume spillovers across cryptocurrency platforms. Journal of Economics and Finance
(Finance a Uver), 69(4), 324–341.
Lee, J. (2020). Access to finance for artificial intelligence regulation in the financial services
industry. European Business Organization Law Review, 21(4), 731–757.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-020-00200-0
Lovell, A. M. (2019). Avoiding liability: Changing the regulatory structure of
cryptocurrencies to better ensure legal use. Iowa Law Review, 104(2), 927–955.
Mazambani, L., & Mutambara, E. (2020). Predicting FinTech innovation adoption in South
Africa: The case of cryptocurrency. African Journal of Economic and Management
Studies, 11(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEMS-04-2019-0152
Mendling, J., Decker, G., Hull, R., Reijers, H. A., & Weber, I. (2018). How do machine
learning, robotic process automation, and blockchains affect the human factor in
business process management? Communications of the Association for Information
Systems, 43(1), 19.
Milutinović, M. (2018). Cryptocurrency. Ekonomika, 64(1), 105–122.
https://doi.org/10.5937/ekonomika1801105m
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 174
Mitschke, A. (2021). Central bank digital currencies and monetary policy effectiveness in the
Euro area. [Working Papers Dissertations 74, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business
Administration and Economics]. https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/pdndispap/74.htm
Molling, G., Klein, A., Hoppen, N., & Dalla Rosa, R. (2020). Cryptocurrency: A Mine of
Controversies. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 17.
https://doi.org/10.4301/s1807-1775202017010
Othman, A. H. A., Alhabshi, S. M., Kassim, S., & Sharofiddin, A. (2020). The impact of
cryptocurrencies market development on banks’ deposits variability in the GCC region.
Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 12(2), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFEP-02-
2019-0036
Șcheau, M. C., Crăciunescu, S. L., Brici, I., & Achim, M. V. (2020). A cryptocurrency
spectrum short analysis. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(8), 184.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13080184
Schinckus, C., Nguyen, C. P., & Ling, F. C. H. (2020). Crypto-currencies trading and energy
consumption. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(3), 355–364.
https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/crypto-currencies-trading-energy-
consumption/docview/2459622123/se-2
Stepanov, O., Pechegin, D., & Dolova, M. (2019). Conceptual legal viewpoints on the
exercise of criminal jurisdiction in the context of digitalization. Journal of Advanced
Research in Law and Economics, 10(5), 1541–1560.
https://doi.org/10.14505/jarle.v10.5(43).25
Tang, Y., Xiong, J., Becerril-Arreola, R., & Iyer, L. (2020). Ethics of blockchain: A
framework of technology, applications, impacts, and research directions. Information
Technology & People, 33(2), 602–632. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-10-2018-0491
Todorof, M. (2019). FinTech on the dark web: The rise of cryptos. Era Forum, 20(1), 1–20.
Cryptocurrency and Its State of Research
International Dialogues on EducationVolume 9 Issue 1July 2022 https://idejournal.org 175
Tsindeliani, I., & Egorova, M. (2020). Cryptocurrency as object of regulation by public and
private law. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 9(3), 1060.
https://doi.org/10.14505/jarle.v11.3(49).41
Vasiliev, A. A., Pechatnova, Y. V., & Mamychev, A. Y. (2020). Digital ecology: Artificial
intelligence impact on legal and environmental sphere. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology,
10(5), 150–154. https://doi.org/10.15421/2020_222
Woodside, J. M., & Amiri, S. (2018). Healthcare hyperchain: Digital transformation in the
healthcare value chain. AMCIS 2018 Proceedings 10.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2018/Health/Presentations/10
Wu, R., Ishfaq, K., Hussain, S., Asmi, F., Ahmad, N. S., & Anwar, M. A. (2022).
Investigating e-Retailers’ Intentions to Adopt Cryptocurrency Considering the Mediation
of Technostress and Technology Involvement. Sustainability, 14(2), 641.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020641
... Global governmental efforts to formulate cryptocurrency regulations aiming to deter malefactions and shield consumers have been recognized [41,42]. It is anticipated, based on trends, that as the gravitas of cryptocurrencies amplifies, regulatory architectures will adapt in tandem [43]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Digital forensics, a crucial subset of cybersecurity, encompasses sophisticated tools and methodologies for the interpretation, analysis, and investigation of digital evidence, facilitating the identification and mitigation of cybercrimes and security breaches. With the advent of cryptocurrencies, an array of unique challenges has emerged in the domain of digital forensic investigations. This review elucidates the prevailing state of digital forensic practices vis-à-vis cryptocurrencies, emphasizing the obstacles and limitations inherent in probing decentralized and intricate technologies. Notable deficiencies in extant investigative practices were observed. Solutions proffered encompass the formulation of novel software applications tailored for cryptocurrency analyses, the integration of machine learning and artificial intelligence capabilities, and the employment of advanced analytics to discern patterns and irregularities within blockchain transactions. Furthermore, a pioneering methodology, merging traditional digital forensic strategies with blockchain-specific techniques, is posited for efficacious cryptocurrency inquiries. The analysis underscores the imperative for a renewed paradigm in digital forensic examinations to surmount the challenges integral to cryptocurrency probes. By forging novel methodologies and standardizing investigative procedures, support for legal enforcement endeavors can be enhanced, facilitating the efficacious detection and prosecution of cryptocurrency-associated misdemeanors.
Article
Full-text available
Blok zincir kavramı, ilk olarak 2008 yılında Satoshi Nakamoto tarafından Bitcoin'in temel teknolojisi olarak tanıtılmıştır. Bitcoin'in yaygın olarak bilinmesiyle birlikte, blok zinciri teknolojisi diğer alanlarda da kullanılmaya başlamıştır. Araştırmamızda, Web of Science (WoS) üzerindeki yayınların bibiyometrik analizi ortaya konulmaktadır. Türkiye filtrelenmiş ve son veri setinde 330 makaleye erişilmiştir. Türkiye 330 doküman ile dünyada on sekizinci sırada yer almıştır. İlk sıradaki Çin’in ABD’den iki katından fazla ilgili alanda yayın üretmiştir. Hindistan’ın ilgili alanda bilimsel üretkenlik açısından ABD’ye çok yakın olması, Suudi Arabistan ve Pakistan gibi ülkelerin ilgili konuda dünyada ilk on’da yer alması ilginç bulgulardır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre blok zincir konusunda, 5G, teknoloji yönetim olgusu, bilgi güvenliği, sistem performansı, nesnelerin interneti, endüstri 4.0, büyük veri ve bulut teknolojisi gibi entegre sistemler, bilişim sistemi mimarisi, mahremiyet, akıllı kontratlar, islami finans, sürdürülebilirlik, akıllı araçlar, öne çıkan başlıklardır. İlgili teknoloji dijitalleşme veya dijital dönüşüm altında farklı sektörlerdeki firmalar için mahremiyet konusunda çözüm olarak sunulmaktadır. Genelde sağlık sektörü veri mahremiyetinin önem kazandığı benzer sektörlerde blok zincir Türkiye’de yoğun ilgi görmüştür.
Article
Full-text available
In recent years, the tendency of the number of financial institutions to include cryptocurrencies in their portfolios has accelerated. Cryptocurrencies are the first pure digital assets to be included by asset managers. Although they have some commonalities with more traditional assets, they have their own separate nature and their behaviour as an asset is still in the process of being understood. It is therefore important to summarise existing research papers and results on cryptocurrency trading, including available trading platforms, trading signals, trading strategy research and risk management. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of cryptocurrency trading research, by covering 146 research papers on various aspects of cryptocurrency trading ( e . g ., cryptocurrency trading systems, bubble and extreme condition, prediction of volatility and return, crypto-assets portfolio construction and crypto-assets, technical trading and others). This paper also analyses datasets, research trends and distribution among research objects (contents/properties) and technologies, concluding with some promising opportunities that remain open in cryptocurrency trading.
Article
Full-text available
Cryptocurrencies have transgressed ever-changing economic trends in the global economy , owing to their conveyance, security, trust, and the ability to make transactions without the aid of formal institutions and governing bodies. However, the adoption of cryptocurrency remains low among stakeholders, including e-retailers. Thus, the current work explores the intentions of e-retailers in the Asia and Pacific region to adopt cryptocurrencies. This study considers the TAM-based SOR, with a combination of non-cognitive attributes (compatibility and convenience) proposed as stimuli for e-retailers to adopt the examined cryptocurrencies. The findings indicate that the proposed non-cognitive attributes are critical in determining e-retailers' technostress (emotional state). Moreover, it was found that technostress among e-retailers profoundly impacts their intentions to adopt cryptocurrency in business settings. Meanwhile, regulatory support communication can be used to help regulatory bodies and governing institutions control the future economy worldwide. The proposed study offers significant theoretical and practical contributions through its investigation of e-retailers' intentions to adopt cryptocurrency for the first time in the particular context of technostress and regulatory support.
Article
Full-text available
This paper assesses the variables influencing the expansion of cryptocurrency (crypto for short) use in households. To carry on the study we apply a consumer-behavior focus and so-called fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA). In a previous research, that was grounded on Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and Partial Least Squares (PLS), we found that main factors to explain the intention to use of cryptos by individuals were performance expectancy (in fact, it was the main factor), effort expectancy and facilitating conditions. We did not found evidences about the relevance of social influence, perceived risk and financial literacy. This study revisits these results by applying fsQCA instead PLS. Empirical research on factors influencing cryto use is relatively scarce due to the novelty of blockchain techs, so the present paper expands the literature on this topic by using an original analytical tool in this context. The main contribution of this paper consists in showing empirically that fsQCA provides a complementary and enriching perspective to interpret data about the use of cryptos. We obtain again that the most relevant factor to explain the intention of using cryptocurrencies is perceived expectancy and that also effort expectancy and facilitation conditions are relevant. But also fsQCA has allowed us discovering that despite social influence, perceived risk and financial literacy were not significant in the PLS model, they impact on the intention to use cryptocurrencies when are combined with other factors. Social influence acts as an “enable factor” for the rest of explanatory variables and it is linked positively with intention to use cryptos. Also financial literacy is relevant because its lack is a sufficient condition for the non-acceptance of that blockchain tech. Likewise we have checked that perceived risk influences the intention of using cryptos. However, this influence may be positive or negative depending of the circumstances.
Article
Full-text available
In this paper, we compare the predictions on the market liquidity in crypto and fiat currencies between two traditional time series methods, the autoregressive moving average (ARMA) and the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH), and the machine learning algorithm called the k-nearest neighbor (KNN) approach. We measure market liquidity as the log rates of bid-ask spreads in a sample of three cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple) and 16 major fiat currencies from 9 February 2018 to 8 February 2019. We find that the KNN approach is better suited for capturing the market liquidity in a cryptocurrency in the short-term than the ARMA and GARCH models maybe due to the complexity of the microstructure of the market. Considering traditional time series models, we find that ARMA models perform well when estimating the liquidity of fiat currencies in developed markets, whereas GARCH models do the same for fiat currencies in emerging markets. Nevertheless, our results show that the KNN approach can better predict the log rates of the bid-ask spreads of crypto and fiat currencies than ARMA and GARCH models.
Article
Full-text available
New century turns out the intensive scientific revolution, which leads to the extension the digital technologies. The research is devoted to the analysis the opportunities and prospects for the implementation of the artificial intelligence in the legal system. The urgency of the study predetermines by the large-scale digital revolution that affects all spheres of society, including the area of legal activity (for example, the initiative to use lawyers-robots in the legal corporations; the idea to automate legal activity; the appearance of smart contracts, blockchain technologies, cryptocurrency, which are not regulated by the Russian law yet; increase if the cybercrime and others). The purpose of the study is to analyze the advantages and disadvantages, opportunities and limits of introducing the digital technologies into the legal environment. Research methods are analysis, synthesis and comparative law. The study contains several positions. Firstly, the analysis the points of view about the theme of research among the national and foreign scientists are presented. Secondly, the comprehensive assessment of the artificial intelligence influence on the legal sphere is given. Thirdly, the opportunities for regulation changed relationships, connected with digital technologies, in the current Russian legislation, and the advantages and disadvantages of fixing new categories in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation are researched. Fourthly, examples of the negative impact of legal vacuum on the law enforcement practice and the ways for its overcoming are given. By the way, specific decisions of the courts given as the arguments. Fifthly, the analysis of current trends in the introduction of digital technologies in the legal sphere in the Russian Federation and in the over countries is carried out. There are some contradictory opinions of scientists and practitioners regarding the possibility of using robotic technologies in the legal system. Sixthly, it presents own conclusion based on the conducted research, which is to substantiate the positive trend towards digitalization in the legal system, but the negativity of the possible effects excessive interference of the artificial intelligence in the legal activity.
Article
Full-text available
This paper discusses the design of the legal and regulatory framework for using artificial intelligence (AI) in the financial services markets to enhance access to finance (financial inclusion). The author argues that the development of AI should continue to adhere to the regulatory objectives of market safety, consumer protection, and market integrity. However, to ensure equality and fairness, access to finance should be made a clear policy choice. In the first part, the author discusses how AI can lead to systemic risks and market manipulation on trading platforms. For example, by examining the use of algorithms for trading on the capital market, the author discerns the regulatory objectives and the possible methods of regulation for peer-to-peer platforms. In the second part, the author discusses how the use of AI to provide consumers with investment advice, such as financial advice provided from robo-advisers, can close the investment advisory gap and provide consumers with access to finance. The current regime does not provide adequate protection to financial consumers in this regard. In the third part, the author discusses how AI can be used as a form of RegTech to streamline compliance processes, thereby increasing competition in financial markets and providing a benefit to consumers. However, this use may be in conflict with privacy, data protection, and ethical concerns. The author makes policy recommendations and suggests some directions for governance in the use of AI in financial services to enhance access to finance. The findings of this paper are relevant to research on the future governance of AI in financial services, public policy innovation, and urban development.
Article
Full-text available
Cryptocurrency is attracting the attention of many disciplines. Based on a systematic literature review, the state of art of academic research on cryptocurrency was investigated, demonstrating its complexity and the lack of consensus about several issues, as its definition, its operation without a financial institution, the impacts on economy and its future developments. Considering these issues, Actor-Network Theory was selected as a theory that can provide methods, such as controversy mapping, to understand this complex subject. The article analyzes this scenario, presenting a set of research topics that can be considered to study controversies related to cryptocurrency.
Article
The optimal design of a central bank digital currency (CBDC) is analyzed in an environment where agents sort into cash, CBDC, and bank deposits according to their preferences over anonymity and security; and where network effects make the convenience of a payment instrument depend on the number of its users. A CBDC can be designed with attributes similar to cash or deposits, and can be interest bearing: a CBDC that closely competes with deposits depresses bank credit and output, while a cash-like CBDC may lead to the disappearance of cash. Then, the optimal CBDC design trades off bank intermediation against the social value of maintaining diverse payment instruments. When network effects matter, an interest-bearing CBDC alleviates the central bank’s tradeoff.
Article
Purpose This paper aims to elaborate the reasons why Indonesia needs Law on Fintech. This paper also identifies the flaws in the existing regulations and policies on Fintech, and it also proposes an ideal framework for a fintech law as a strategy to strengthen consumer protection and to accelerate the growth of the digital economy in Indonesia. Design/methodology/approach This is normative research with a legal approach. Data were collected through a literature study and analyzed using legal norm method. Findings The promising potential and growth of the fintech industry in Indonesia need to be supported by a sound legal framework in the form of Indonesian Law. In regards to fintech, Indonesia does not yet have a specific law on fintech. Existing regulations in the Bank of Indonesia Regulations (PBI) and Indonesia Financial Services Authority Regulations (POJK) only regulate the technical aspects of the industry, thus providing a less sound legal power. Bank of Indonesia (BI) and Indonesia Financial Services Authority (OJK) have limited authority in the making of regulations and the regulations produced by these institutions cannot stipulate criminal provisions. This results in inadequate consumer protection measures. The Investment Alert Task Force reported 2,018 illegal P2P lending, 472 illegal investment companies and 69 illegal pawnbrokers. The accumulation of online lending transactions in December 2019 reached a total of IDR81.50tn, seeing a 259.56% increase from the previous year. Meanwhile, the amount of bad debt reached IDR13.6tn, seeing a 169.48% increase. These reasons illustrate how urgently Indonesia needs Fintech Law. Research limitations/implications This research only examines the existing Fintech regulations in Indonesia. The approach method used is normative legal research. Practical implications This research is expected to be useful for The House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia (DPR), the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, the Indonesia Financial Services Authority (OJK) and Bank of Indonesia (BI) in drafting the Fintech Law. Social implications This research is expected to increase protection for consumers, investors and providers of fintech services and accelerate the growth of the digital economy in Indonesia. Originality/value Regulating fintech in the Indonesian Law is meant to give legal certainty and better legal protection for consumers, investors and providers of fintech services. Seeing that the value of the Indonesian digital economy in 2019 has reached USD40bn (approximately IDR586tn), Indonesia is philosophically, juridically and sociologically in urgent need of Fintech Law.