ArticlePDF Available

Rhinogenic Contact Point Headache – a Review

Authors:
  • All India Institute of Medical SciencesBhubaneswar

Abstract and Figures

Headache is a universal symptom in the course of everyone's life. There are myriads of causes for headache ranging from simple migraine, tension headache, refractory errors in the eye, temporomandibular joint arthralgia, and myofascial spasm to severe form of headache by brain tumors. The anatomical variations in the nasal cavity result in mucosal contact between the opposing surface and cause rhinogenic contact point headache (RCPH). RCPH is a new type of headache in medical literature. The pathogenesis of the RCPH is still the subject of controversy. Nose has diverse anatomical variations. Deviated nasal septum or spur, middle turbinate concha bullosa, and enlarged bulla ethmoidalis are the common anatomical variation in the nasal cavity which can cause RCPH. Diagnostic nasal endoscopy and computed tomography scan are helpful to confirm the mucosal contact points inside the nasal cavity. The precise excision of the contact points with the help of endoscopic approach in patients of RCPH is very effective. Clinicians should not ignore the anatomical variation of the nasal cavity during management of the headache. There is not much literature for RCPH indicating that this clinical entity is neglected. This review article presents an overview of the current aspect of RCPH.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Print ISSN 2521-0807
Online ISSN 2521-0424
Matrix Science Medica
Volume 6 • Issue 3 • July-September 2022
The Official Publication of Medic & Public Health Association, Malaysia (MPHAM)
ww w.mat rix sci med .or g
© 2022 Matrix Science Medica | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 65
Review Article
intROductiOn
Headache is a very common clinical manifestation among
human beings. The incidence of headache in a lifetime is
approximately 90%.[1] Patients often attend otolaryngology
clinic for sinus headache. The common presentations of the
sinus headache are facial pain or pressure over the maxillary,
frontal, ethmoid sinuses, mandibular or maxillary pain, facial
spasm, temporal pain, or otalgia.[2] Rhinogenic contact point
headache (RCPH) is a secondary headache newly added in the
International Classication of Headache Disorder-2.[3] RCPH
is described as intermittent pain conned to the periorbital and
medial canthal or temporozygomatic areas, associated with
intranasal mucosal contact points conrmed by diagnostic
nasal endoscopy or computed tomography (CT) scan and
supported by limited evidence.[3] However, there has been
controversy regarding mucosal contact point headaches
since its introduction in literature. Many studies on RCPH
emphasized mucosal contact between the nasal septum and
middle turbinate or inferior turbinate of the nasal cavity.
This review article aims to discuss the details of history,
epidemiology, etiopathology, clinical presentations, diagnosis,
and current treatment of RCPH.
MethOds Of liteRAtuRe seARch
Multiple systematic methods were used to find current
research publications on RCPH. We started by searching the
Scopus, PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar databases
online. A search strategy using Preferred Reporting Items
for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was
developed. This search strategy recognized the abstracts of
published articles, while other research articles were discovered
manually from the citations. Randomized controlled studies,
observational studies, comparative studies, case series, and
case reports were evaluated for eligibility. There were total
numbers of articles 96 (42 original articles, 28 case series,
and 26 case reports) [Figure 1]. This paper focuses only
on RCPH. This paper examines the history, epidemiology,
Rhinogenic Contact Point Headache – A Review
Santosh Kumar Swain
Department of Otorhinolar yngology and Head and Neck Surgery, IMS and SUM Hospital, Siksha “O” Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
Headache is a universal symptom in the course of everyone’s life. There are myriads of causes for headache ranging from simple migraine,
tension headache, refractory errors in the eye, temporomandibular joint arthralgia, and myofascial spasm to severe form of headache by brain
tumors. The anatomical variations in the nasal cavity result in mucosal contact between the opposing surface and cause rhinogenic contact point
headache (RCPH). RCPH is a new type of headache in medical literature. The pathogenesis of the RCPH is still the subject of controversy.
Nose has diverse anatomical variations. Deviated nasal septum or spur, middle turbinate concha bullosa, and enlarged bulla ethmoidalis are
the common anatomical variation in the nasal cavity which can cause RCPH. Diagnostic nasal endoscopy and computed tomography scan are
helpful to conrm the mucosal contact points inside the nasal cavity. The precise excision of the contact points with the help of endoscopic
approach in patients of RCPH is very eective. Clinicians should not ignore the anatomical variation of the nasal cavity during management
of the headache. There is not much literature for RCPH indicating that this clinical entity is neglected. This review article presents an overview
of the current aspect of RCPH.
Keywords: Deviated nasal septum, intranasal mucosal contact point, middle turbinate concha bullosa, rhinogenic contact point headache,
spur
Address for correspondence: Dr. Santosh Kumar Swain,
Department of Otorhinolar yngology and Head and Neck Surgery, IMS
and SUM Hospital, Siksha “O” Anusandhan University, K8, Kalinga Nagar,
Bhubaneswar ‑ 751 003, Odisha, India.
E‑mail: santoshvoltaire@yahoo.co.in
Access this article online
Quick Response Code:
Website:
www.matrixscimed.org
DOI:
10.4103/mtsm.mtsm_1_22
Abstract
How to cite this article: Swain SK. Rhinogenic contact point headache – A
review. Matrix Sci Med 2022;6:65-9.
Received: 14-01-2022, Revised: 18-01-2022,
Accepted: 21-01-2022, Published: 25-08-2022
This is an open access journal, and arcles are distributed under the terms of the Creave
Commons Aribuon‑NonCommercial‑ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix,
tweak, and build upon the work non‑commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and
the new creaons are licensed under the idencal terms.
For reprints contact: WKHLRPMedknow_reprints@wolterskluwer.com
Swain: Rhinogenic contact point headache
Matrix Science Medica ¦ Volume 6 ¦ Issue 3 ¦ July-September 2022
66
etiopathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and
treatment of RCPH. This analysis provides a foundation for
future prospective trials of intranasal mucosal contact point
and its manifestations as RCPH. It will also serve as a catalyst
for additional study into RCPH and its manifestations on along
with early diagnosis and treatment.
histORy
McAuliffe et al. in 1943 explicated that the stimulation
of certain anatomical areas of the nasal cavity can lead to
trigeminal nerve stimulation and release of the substance
P (SP) which cause headache in the absence of sinonasal
inammatory diseases.[4] Later on, Zechner used the word
RCPH as the cause of headache due to intranasal mucosal
contact point.[5] Headache classication subcommittee of the
International Headache Society included the RCPH among the
secondary sinonasal causes for headache in 2004.[6] Stamberger
and Wolf described the role of the SP in etiopathogenesis of
RCPH.[7]
epideMiOlOgy
Headache may be classied into primary and secondary
types where primary headache does not have any specic
etiology and include migraine, tension headache, and
cluster headache. Secondary headache is due to trauma,
infections, neoplasm, vascular lesions, and metabolic
diseases.[8] Anatomical variations of the nasal cavity can
result in mucosal contact and headache. Intranasal contact
points are seen in approximately 4% of the noses.[9] Deviated
nasal septum (DNS) is the most common anatomical
variation of the nasal cavity which causes headache (in
approximately 35.18%).[10] Spur is the second most common
cause for RCPH followed by middle turbinate concha
bullosa, inferior turbinate hypertrophy, enlarged ethmoidal
bulla, enlarged pneumatized superior turbinate, medialized
middle turbinate, and nasal septal bullosa.[10] The most
common site for RCPH is frontal area followed by glabellar
region.[1] Occipital region is the rare location for headache
in RCPH.
etiOpAthOlOgy
Headache patients are classied into three groups such as (1)
headache due to sinonasal pathology like inflammatory
diseases or barotraumas; (2) headache not related to sinus
causes like seasonal allergies, migraine, neuralgic pain, and
vascular headache; and (3) headache where sinus origin cannot
be identied.[11] The third category is concerned for clinicians
where nasal mucosal contact point results in referred pain
in the face or head. The pathophysiology for RCPH is still a
subject of debate. A study suggested that anatomical variations
such as concha bullosa or inferior turbinate hypertrophy
cause contact of the mucosa to the nasal septum and result in
pain.[12] One report showed that contact between the superior
turbinate and septum can cause headache.[13] Bulla ethmoidalis
is the largest anterior ethmoidal cell area. When it is larger
than usual, it may push the vertical lamella of the middle
turbinate and cause contact with the septum. In rare cases,
it may be so large that it will contact with septum by itself.
This situation can cause RCPH. Mechanical irritant such as
pressure eect on the mucosal surface of the nasal cavity may
cause release of the neuropeptides through central orthodromic
impulse and peripheral local, antidromic impulse. The
released neuropeptides such as SP and calcitonin gene-related
peptide (CGRP) result in vasodilatation and mucosal edema
in the nasal cavity, which again aggravate the pressure eects
at the contact area. The neuropeptides released from the
central nervous system cause pain sensation which usually
mimic to the migraine without aura. The duration and onset
of the pain are usually similar to the beginning and duration
of the nasal cycle.[14] SP, neurokinin, and CGRP are seen in
nociceptive bers at the central nervous system and also in the
trigeminovascular system. Hence, the contact area between
the opposing mucosal layers in the nasal cavity may result in
secondary headache. SP plays a vital role in etiopathogenesis
of the RCPH. Release of SP results in vasodilatation, plasma
extravasations, and perivascular inammation and manifests
headache similar to migraine without aura.[15] The mucosal
layers of the nasal cavity usually have higher concentration of
SP than chronic hyperplastic mucosa or polypoidal tissues. This
is the explanation for headache due to intranasal contact points
in the absence of rhinosinusitis.[16] There is also controversy
in intranasal contact points and headache. Regarding fact that
intranasal mucosal contact points may be found in the person
who does not have a headache where the causal association
between the mucosal contact points and headache is still not
easily established. The debate over RCPH in the scientic
community has long history.
clinicAl pResentAtiOns
In everyone’s life, headache is a common symptom. Headache
is often associated with various severities. There are dierent
characteristics of headache associated with dierent etiologies
such as migraine, vascular headache, temporomandibular
joint dysfunction, ophthalmological condition, intracranial
lesions, dental abscess, and head-and-neck tumors.[17] One
Figure 1: Flowchart for literature search
Swain: Rhinogenic contact point headache
Matrix Science Medica ¦ Volume 6 ¦ Issue 3 ¦ July-September 2022 67
study showed that the pain in mucosal contact point headache
is localized to the frontal region.[18] Headache and facial pain
by sinus and nasal origin in the absence of the inammatory
sinonasal pathology favors the diagnosis of the RCPH. In the
current clinical practice, headache due to RCPH has received
attention in both otorhinolaryngology and neurology. There
are dierent types of intranasal anatomical variations resulting
in mucosal contact points in the nasal cavity that result in
RCPH. The characteristics of headache in RCPH dier as per
the type of intranasal anatomical variations. Many clinicians
are not well versed with anatomical variations of the nasal
cavity and its impact on headache. One study documented
that DNS and spur cause referred headache in the absence of
the inammation.[19] The DNS may be cartilaginous deviation,
bony deviation, bony spur, and high septal deviation. The
signicant referred headache is seen in sharp septal spur.
Concha bullosa is hypertrophied pneumatized middle turbinate
and rarely found in superior. The mucosal contact between
concha bullosa and nasal septum or other mucosal surfaces of
the nasal cavity can cause referred pain at periorbital or ocular
pain via anterior ethmoidal nerve, a branch of ophthalmic
division of the fth cranial nerve.[19] The contact point between
hypertrophied superior turbinate and upper part of the septum
can cause RCPH. The hypertrophied superior turbinate
often causes pain over the forehead and medial and lateral
canthus.[20] Sometimes, medialized middle turbinate results in
mucosal contact with nasal septum. Bulla ethmoidalis is the
large hypertrophied anterior ethmoidal cell.[21] Hypertrophied
bulla ethmoidalis may push the middle turbinate and cause
a contact with nasal septum. The headache due to sinusitis
can be distinguished by a way such as pain in the sinusitis is
worsened by tilting the head forward and performing Valsalva
maneuvers.[22] The sinusitis is often over diagnosed as a cause
of headache as a belief that pain over the paranasal sinuses
must be associated to the sinuses. However, it is important
to dierentiate the sinus pain from severe headache which
responds poorly to the medication, usually conned to the
frontal and periorbital region of the face. However, the
clinical history, endoscopic examination, and imaging do not
indicate the presence of diseases of the mucous membranes
in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses.[23] The headache is
usually dull ache and associated with a sense of pressure, which
oscillates in intensity and localization or pulsates as per the
nasal cycle.[23] Sometimes, the intranasal mucosal contact point
causes referred otalgia through trigeminal nerve.[24]
investigAtiOn
The diagnosis of RCPH needs a multidisciplinary approach.
The diagnosis of the RCPH is often misdiagnosed. This clinical
entity may not be suspected during preliminary evaluation.
Patients with headache in the absence of inammation of
the sinonasal area should be examined by a neurologist,
ophthalmologist, dentist, and internist to rule out other
causes. Diagnostic nasal endoscopy and CT scan of the nose
and paranasal [Figure 2] sinuses are helpful to conrm the
intranasal contact points and also to rule our sinusitis.[25] The
patency is better assessed by endoscopic evaluation along the
exact site of the intranasal mucosal contact points. CT scan
of the paranasal sinuses is helpful to identify the pathological
ndings which cannot be seen by endoscopic examination and
helpful to decide the type of surgery.[26] CT scan is helpful to
decide the exact location of contact pints and necessity before
the surgery.[26] The nasal resistance can be assessed by anterior
rhinomanometry. The intensity of headache is usually evaluated
by using visual analog score. The headache severity is graded
on a scale of 0–10 points, where 0 indicates trouble free and 10
indicates worst thinkable troublesome. To reverse such contact
point, anterior ethmoidectomy and lateralization of the middle
turbinate is required. In RCPH, anterior rhinoscopy is helpful
to rule out sinusitis such as purulent nasal discharge, postnasal
drip, and foul smelling from nasal cavity. Application of local
anesthetics at the contact point relieves the headache which
conrms the diagnosis of the RCPH. In one study of 30 patients
with RCPH, application of local anesthetic agents, 43% showed
complete recovery, 47% showed partial improvement, and 10%
showed no improvement.[27] After diagnostic nasal endoscopy
and CT scan of the paranasal sinuses, it is important to do a
lidocaine test. This lidocaine test help not only the diagnosis
of this type of headache but also useful as an indicator of the
success of the surgical excision of the intranasal mucosal
contact points.[28] There is another nasal shrinkage test where
nasal decongestant with topical anesthetic agents is applied at
the intranasal contact points of the nasal cavity.[14]
tReAtMent
Headache is a common clinical symptom for which patients
need medical attention. Headache is considered a major
factor for disability in the community. RCPH is an important
etiology for secondary headache which can be treated by
surgical or medical therapy. The treatment of RCPH requires
multidisciplinary approaches for early diagnosis and treatment.
Topical nasal decongestant or steroids can relieve the RCPH,
Figure 2: Computed tomography scan of the nose and paranasal sinuses
showing left side spur with mucosal contact to inferior turbinate
Swain: Rhinogenic contact point headache
Matrix Science Medica ¦ Volume 6 ¦ Issue 3 ¦ July-September 2022
68
however, the long-term relieve needs surgical interventions.
[29] The topical nasal steroid improves the patency of the
nasal cavity on short-term basis.[30] Endoscopic surgery is an
ideal technique to relieve mucosal contact point headache.[29]
Endoscopic surgical treatment oers superior visualization
of the intranasal mucosal contact points, which is important
for limited resection of the mucosal contacts and allows for
a more controlled and precise surgery with minimal injury to
the adjacent mucosa. The surgery is usually performed under
general anesthesia. Septoplasty or spurectomy is helpful to
correct the nasal septum deviation and relive contact between
the turbinate and septum. Middle turbinate can be lateralized
to avoid the mucosal contact and also it exposes the superior
turbinate and superior meatus. The superior turbinate can be
lateralized to remove the mucosal contact between the superior
turbinate and nasal septum. Optimum care should be taken
for injuring the olfactory area during the surgical procedure.
If the mucosal contact is present in both sides of nostrils, the
surgery on the other side should be done at the same time after
completion of one side. Endoscopic lateral lamellectomy is
the treatment of choice for middle turbinate concha bullosa.
[31] However, there is chance of recurrence of mucosal contact
points inside the nasal cavity after surgery with formation of
synechia leading to frontal sinus disease as a complication.[32]
Before introduction of the endoscopic sinus surgery, complete
excision of the middle turbinate was done for treating the
middle turbinate concha bullosa. Sometimes, the medialized
middle turbinate contacts with septum and causes RCPH.
Creating a space between the septum and middle turbinate
is required for reversing the contact points between the
medialized middle turbinate and septum. Following surgery,
diagnostic nasal endoscopy, and pain intensity score, average
number of headache attacks per months and average duration
of headache in each attack should be documented at follow-up
visit. Headache is usually resolved in less than a week
following removal of the mucosal contact point of the nasal
cavity.[33] One study with 66 patients of RCPH due to middle
turbinate concha bullosa and DNS and enlarged ethmoidal
bulla showed resolution of the headache after excision of the
contact points.[34] Chow showed a reduction of the frequency
and severity of the headache in approximately 82% of the
patients with RCPH after surgical excision of the intranasal
mucosal contact points.[35] Another study of RCPH showed
reduction of the frequency and severity of the headache after
endoscopic excision of the intranasal mucosal contact points
in approximately 91% of the cases.[36] A systematic review of
the literature with 973 patients of mucosal contact points in
nasal cavity showed no facial pain in majority of patients.
[17] Hence, the authors concluded that the presence of the
mucosal contact point is not a good predictor of facial pain.
They also observed that removal of the contact point rarely
causes complete elimination of the headache. The improvement
of the postoperative symptoms after excision of the mucosal
contact points may be explained by cognitive dissonance or
neuroplasticity.[17]
cOnclusiOn
RCPH is a well-represented clinical entity. RCPH is often
considered an exclusion of diagnosis. The correct identication
of the intranasal mucosal contact points can act as specic
trigger points and responsible for RCPH. Nasal cavity has a
diverse anatomical variation. DNS and septal spur are common
anatomical variations of the nose resulting contact point
headache followed by middle turbinate concha bullosa and
bulla ethmoidalis. Proper investigation is helpful for eective
and appropriate treatment. Diagnostic nasal endoscopy and
CT scan of the nose and paranasal sinuses are important tools
for diagnosis of anatomical variations inside the nasal cavity
causing RCPH. Endoscopic surgical approach is highly useful
for elimination of the mucosal contact points and symptomatic
relief of the headache.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conicts of interest.
RefeRences
1. Cady RK, Schreiber CP. Sinus headache: A clinical conundrum.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2004;37:267-88.
2. Kim R, Patel ZM. Sinus headache: Dierential diagnosis and an
evidence-based approach. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2020;53:897-904.
3. Headache Classication Committee of the International Headache
Society (IHS). In: The international classication of headache
disorders, cranial neuralgias, and facial pain. 2nd edition. Cephalalgia
2004;24:1-160.
4. McAulie GW, Goodell H, Wol HG. Experimental studies on
headache: Pain from the nasal and a paranasal structure. Assoc Res Nerv
Mental Dis 1943;23:185-208.
5. Zechner G. Otorhinolaryngological aspects of headache: (Author’s
transl). MMW Munch Med Wochenschr 1977;119:453-6.
6. Abbas BA, Tawque SA. Surgical outcome for rhinogenic contact point
headache in Rizgary Teaching Hospital in Erbil, Iraq. Zanco J Med Sci
2019;23:177-83.
7. Stammberger H, Wolf G. Headaches and sinus disease: The endoscopic
approach. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1988;134:3-23.
8. Cady RK, Schreiber CP. Sinus headache: A clinical conundrum.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2004;37:267-88.
9. Peric A, Baletic N, Sotirovic J. A case of an uncommon anatomic
variation of the middle turbinate associated with headache. Acta
Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2010;30:156-9.
10. Swain SK, Das A, Sahu MC. Anatomical variations of nose causing
rhinogenic contact point headache – A study at a tertiary care hospital of
eastern India. Polish Ann Med 2018;25:51-5.
11. Potter R, Probyn K, Bernstein C, Pincus T, Underwood M, Matharu M.
Diagnostic and classication tools for chronic headache disorders:
A systematic review. Cephalalgia 2019;39:761-84.
12. Fahy C, Jones NS. Nasal polyposis and facial pain. Clin Otolaryngol
Allied Sci 2001;26:510-3.
13. Homsioglou E, Balatsouras DG, Alexopoulos G, Kaberos A,
Katotomichelakis M, Danielides V. Pneumatized superior turbinate as a
cause of headache. Head Face Med 2007;3:3.
14. La Mantia I, Grillo C, Andaloro C. Rhinogenic contact point headache:
Surgical treatment versus medical treatment. J Craniofac Surg
2018;29:e228-30.
15. Behin F, Lipton RB, Bigal M. Migraine and intranasal contact
point headache: Is there any connection? Curr Pain Headache Rep
2006;10:312-5.
16. Swain SK, Sahu MC, Banerjee A. Non-sinonasal isolated facio-orbital
Swain: Rhinogenic contact point headache
Matrix Science Medica ¦ Volume 6 ¦ Issue 3 ¦ July-September 2022 69
mucormycosis – A case report. J Mycol Med 2018;28:538-41.
17. Harrison L, Jones NS. Intranasal contact points as a cause of facial pain
or headache: A systematic review. Clin Otolaryngol 2013;38:8-22.
18. Altin F, Haci C, Alimoglu Y, Yilmaz S. Is septoplasty eective
rhinogenic headache in patients with isolated contact point between
inferior turbinate and septal spur? Am J Otolaryngol 2019;40:364-7.
19. Smith BC, George LC, Svider PF, Nebor I, Folbe AJ, Sheyn A,
et al. Rhinogenic headache in pediatric and adolescent patients: An
evidence-based review. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2019;9:443-51.
20. Swain SK, Behera IC, Sahu MC. Primary sinonasal tuberculosis: Our
experiences in a tertiary care hospital of eastern India. Egypt J Ear Nose
Throat Allied Sci 2017;18:237-40.
21. Swain SK. Middle turbinate concha bullosa and its relationship with
chronic sinusitis: A review. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg
2021;7:1062-7.
22. Marmura MJ, Silberstein SD. Headaches caused by nasal and paranasal
sinus disease. Neurol Clin 2014;32:507-23.
23. Roozbahany NA, Nasri S. Nasal and paranasal sinus anatomical
variations in patients with rhinogenic contact point headache. Auris
Nasus Larynx 2013;40:177-83.
24. Swain SK, Sahu MC, Samantray K. An unusual cause of otalgia in a
child – A case report. Pediatr Pol 2016;91:480-3.
25. Swain SK, Baliarsingh P. Rhinogenic contact point headache in pediatric
age group: A review. Int J Contemp Pediatr 2022;9:135-9.
26. Karataş D, Yüksel F, Şentürk M, Doğan M. The contribution of computed
tomography to nasal septoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 2013;24:1549-51.
27. Tosun F, Gerek M, Ozkaptan Y. Nasal surgery for contact point
headaches. Headache 2000;40:237-40.
28. Mokbel KM, Abd Elfattah AM, Kamal el-S. Nasal mucosal contact
points with facial pain and/or headache: Lidocaine can predict the
result of localized endoscopic resection. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
2010;267:1569-72.
29. Swain SK, Behera IC, Mohanty S, Sahu MC. Rhinogenic contact
point headache-frequently missed clinical entity. Apollo Med
2016;13:169-73.
30. Peric A, Rasic D, Grgurevic U. Surgical treatment of rhinogenic contact
point headache: An experience from a tertiary care hospital. Int Arch
Otorhinolaryngol 2016;20:166-71.
31. Kennedy DW, Zinreich SJ. The functional endoscopic approach
to inammatory sinus disease: Current perspectives and technique
modications. Am J Rhinol 1988;2:89-96.
32. Har-el G, Slavit DH. Turbinoplasty for concha bullosa:
A non-synechiae-forming alternative to middle turbinectomy. Rhinology
1996;34:54-6.
33. Albirmawy OA, Elsherif HS, Shehata EM, Younes A. Middle turbinate
evacuation conchoplasty in management of contact-point rhinogenic
headache in children. Int J Clin Pediatr 2010;1:115-23.
34. Huang HH, Lee TJ, Huang CC, Chang PH, Huang SF.
Non-sinusitis-related rhinogenous headache: A ten-year experience. Am
J Otolaryngol 2008;29:326-32.
35. Chow JM. Rhinologic headaches. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
1994;111:211-8.
36. Parsons DS, Batra PS. Functional endoscopic sinus surgical outcomes
for contact point headaches. Laryngoscope 1998;108:696-702.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: The idea that headaches can be triggered by nasal or sinus abnormalities is well-established. The proposed mechanism involves mucosal contact between the nasal septum and the middle turbinate, which acts as a mechanical stimulus, triggering an axonal reflex that result in pain.
Article
Full-text available
Headache is a common clinical entity of pediatric patients in routine clinical practice. Anatomical variation in the nasal cavity may result in headaches due to contact of the opposing mucosal surfaces, called rhinogenic contact point headache (RCPH). RCPH has recently begun to be of interest among clinicians and is accepted as a cause of headache by international headache society classification. The pressure of the two opposing mucosal surfaces in the nasal cavity without any evidence of inflammation can be an etiology for headache or facial pain. Anatomical variations in the nasal cavity like deviated nasal septum (DNS), spur, concha bullosa, hypertrophied inferior turbinate, medialized middle turbinate, and septal bullosa are important causes for contact point headache. RCPH is often misdiagnosed by clinicians during the assessment of headaches in pediatric patients and is sometimes considered a headache of unknown etiology. Endoscopic examination of the nasal cavity and computed tomography (CT) scans are important tools for the diagnosis of anatomical variations in the nasal cavity causing RCPH. Endoscopic resection of the contact point in the nasal cavity is the treatment of choice. There is not much literature for RCPH in pediatric patients, indicating that these clinical entities are neglected. This review article discusses the details of the epidemiology, etiopathology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment of the RCPH in pediatric patients.
Article
Full-text available
p class="abstract">Sinonasal diseases are serious health issues found in the clinical practice. Sinonasal diseases are often associated with anatomical variants in the sinonasal tract. There are numerous sinonasal anatomical variants found frequently in computed tomography (CT) scans of the paranasal sinuses. Middle turbinate concha bullosa is a common anatomical variant found in the nasal cavity. Pneumatization of the middle turbinate is called as concha bullosa. The pneumatization of the middle turbinate is mostly via the anterior ethmoidal air cells. Pneumatizations through posterior ethmoid air cells are also reported. There are three types of concha bullosa such as lamellar, bulbous and extensive. Majority of the patients with middle turbinate concha bullosa are asymptomatic. Sometimes this is accidentally detected during proper evaluation of the headache. Sometimes the middle turbinate concha bullosa is associated with chronic sinusitis. However, there are very few literatures which correlate the middle turbinate concha bullosa and chronic sinusitis. Although chronic sinusitis is a clinical diagnosis, the imagings like CT scan are useful to assess the extent of the disease and demonstrate the sinonasal anatomy. CT scan of the paranasal sinuses and diagnostic nasal endoscopy are important tests useful for evaluation of the middle turbinate concha bullosa and its relations with chronic sinusitis. This review article discusses on the details of the middle turbinate concha bullosa and its relationship with chronic sinusitis.</p
Article
Full-text available
Background and objective: The definition of an intranasal contact point is when two regions within the nasal cavity are opposing each other and resist separation following the application of a topical decongestant. A contact point should be identified by endoscopy, but some authors have used the appearance on computed tomography for the selection criteria. This study aimed to assess the role of some anatomical variations of the nose in rhinogenic contact point headache and to determine the role of surgery in the management of such headache. Methods: This prospective (case-series) study included 30 patients from Rizgary Teaching Hospital in Erbil city, Iraq during the period of March 2015 to March 2017. All patients involved in this study were having symptoms for at least more than one year and not responding to medications. Results: The study participants were 18 females and 12 males; their ages range between 18 and 43 years with a mean age of 26.90 years. Regarding surgical outcome, all patients underwent appropriate surgery and followed up for at least six months postoperatively. Twenty seven (90%) patients had a complete cure, three (10%) patients with ties or remaining the same and none (0%) with positive ranks. Conclusion: The removal of contact points in patients with Rhinogenic Contact Point Headache is very effective for relieving the pain in carefully selected patients.
Article
Full-text available
Background or aim: Despite guidelines and the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-III beta) criteria, the diagnosis of common chronic headache disorders can be challenging for non-expert clinicians. The aim of the review was to identify headache classification tools that could be used by a non-expert clinician to classify common chronic disorders in primary care. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review of studies validating diagnostic and classification headache tools published between Jan 1988 and June 2016 from key databases: MEDLINE, ASSIA, Embase, Web of Knowledge and PsycINFO. Quality assessment was assessed using items of the Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). Results: The search identified 38 papers reporting the validation of 30 tools designed to diagnose, classify or screen for headache disorders; nine for multiple headache types, and 21 for one headache type only. We did not identify a tool validated in a primary care that can be used by a non-expert clinician to classify common chronic headache disorders and screen for primary headaches other than migraine and tension-type headache in primary care. Conclusions: Despite the availability of many headache classification tools we propose the need for a tool that could support primary care clinicians in diagnosing and managing chronic headache disorders within primary care, and allow more targeted referral to headache specialists.
Article
Full-text available
Rhinogenic contact point headache (RCPH) is a headache syndrome secondary to mucosal contact points in the sinonasal cavities, in the absence of inflammatory signs, hyperplastic mucosa, purulent discharge, sinonasal polyps, or masses. It may result from pressure on the nasal mucosa due to anatomic variations among which the septal deviation, septal spur, and concha bullosa, are the most commonly observed. In recent years, RCPH has remained a subject of controversy regarding both its pathogenesis and treatment. This study aimed to investigate the effect of surgical and medical treatment of pain relief in patients with RCPH, evaluating the intensity, duration, and frequency of headaches, and the impact of different treatments on quality of life. Ninety-four patients with headache, no symptoms or signs of acute and chronic sinonasal inflammation and who present with intranasal mucosal contact points positive to the lidocaine test were randomized into 2 equal groups and given medical or surgical treatment. The authors used visual analog scale, number of hours, and days with pain to characterize the headache and Migraine Disability Assessment score (MIDAS) to assess the migraine disability score before and 3 to 6 months after treatment. After treatment the severity, duration, and frequency of the headache decreased significantly (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.031, respectively) as well as the MIDAS in the surgical group compared with medical group. Our results suggest that surgical removal of mucosal contact points is more effective than local medical treatment improving the therapeutic outcomes in patients with contact point headache.
Article
Background: Rhinogenic headache is a painful sensation in the head and face due to intranasal contact point without any mass or inflammatory findings. Surgery is recommended in patients with nasal obstruction; however the approach in case of isolated mucosal contact point that does not cause obstruction is controversial. Our aim is to observe changes in the severity of headache in patients with isolated mucosal contact point and headache who do not complain of nasal obstruction. Methods: Our study included patients with unilateral headache without any nasal and/or paranasal sinus pathology. We confirmed the presence of mucosal contact by nasal endoscopy and by computed tomography (CT). One hundred patients with isolated mucosal contact point without any problem in breathing were included in this study. All participants were treated by topical nasal corticosteroid for a month. Surgery was recommended to the patients with no satisfactory relieve of headache. Visual Analog Scales (VAS) were used to evaluate the severity of headache in patients at time of diagnosis (0 month), after a medical treatment (1st month) and after a surgical or medical treatment (6th month). The results were compared with each other statistically. Results: There was a decrease in VAS values after a month of medical treatment in all patients with isolated contact point (Z = -8.352; p = 0.0). VAS values significantly improved after surgical treatment group (Z = -4.97; p = 0.0). However, VAS values of patients increased at 6th month in medical treatment group (Z = -5341 p = 0.0). After a successful surgical removal of mucosal contacts, the decrease of headache severity was more intense in patients with surgical treatment group than in the patients with medical treatment group (Z = -8.441; p = 0.0). Conclusion: Surgical correction provides a more effective outcome in patients with rhinogenic headache. However, it is difficult to convince that headache may improve with surgery in these patients especially with isolated mucosal contact point and without nasal obstruction. In order to prove the benefit of surgery, we believe that medical treatment can be used as a guide.
Article
Background Although some causes of rhinogenic headache, such as acute sinusitis, have clear diagnostic criteria, others, such as “sinus headache” and mucosal contact points, are more nebulous. Misdiagnosis of these entities and primary headaches may result in unnecessary medical or surgical treatment. The purpose of this systematic review is to delineate current understanding of diagnosis and treatment of rhinogenic headaches, including sinus and mucosal contact point headaches, in children. Methods PubMed, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane databases were searched for studies on sinus headache and mucosal contact point headaches in children. Studies were assessed for level of evidence, and risk of bias was assessed by Methodological Index for Non‐Randomized Studies (MINORS) scoring. Diagnostic criteria, management strategies, and other clinical data were analyzed. Results Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Level of evidence was predominantly 4. Forty percent of pediatric patients with migraine had been previously misdiagnosed with sinus headache. Of 327 pediatric patients in two studies, between 55% and 73% had at least 1 cranial autonomic symptom associated with their migraine. For children with mucosal contact point headaches, surgical management in select patients improved headache intensity or severity in 17 (89%) cases. Conclusion The majority of pediatric patients with sinus headache harbor a primary headache disorder, with migraine being most common. Physicians should suspect primary headache disorders in pediatric patients with chronic headaches and a normal exam. Although some case series are supportive of surgical management for mucosal contact point headaches in children, the level of evidence supporting these recommendations is insufficient. High‐quality clinical trials are necessary for continuing to improve outcomes in patients with these clinical entities.
Article
Mucormycosis is a rare clinical entity, often affect immunocompromised patients. It is an emergency situation and has poor prognosis. Prompt diagnosis with tissue biopsy, local control of the disease by aggressive surgical debridement and appropriate systemic antifungal treatment improve the prognosis and survival of the patients. Treatment of mucormycosis needs antifungal agents such as Amphotericin B and wide surgical debridement. Early diagnosis and treatment is often needed for survival of the patients. We describe a rare case of mucormycosis affecting facio-orbital area without involving sinon-nasal cavity.