Article

The Effect of Overthinking on Mental Health: A Case Study from University Students in Multan District

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Overthinking is most common in students nowadays after the COVID-19 pandemic in Pakistan. The main reason behind this is due to lockdown or quarantine at home for a long time. The coronavirus infected many people some have died, and this may cause worry and ruminative thoughts that result in mental illness. This research is designed to study the significant exposure of overthinking in which we take five factors related to overthinking. For this purpose, we used a sample of 150 students from different universities in Multan via purposive and snowball sampling. The variables of the study are Rumination, Depression, Brooding, Worry, and the Mental health of the students. These were measured on the Likert scale through the questionnaire. The findings concluded that there is a positive correlation among all the variables of the study. From the correlation matrix, we see that mental health is strongly correlated with rumination and worry. Mental health is one of the causes of overthinking, it is used as a dependent variable in this study. Furthermore, a multiple linear regression model is used to check the effect of rumination, brooding, depression, and worry on mental health. Results show that rumination and worry were the significant exposures for making changes in mental health. The study concluded that as rumination and worry increase, mental health disturbs so which may result in overthinking in the students. This study will be helpful for worldwide students to overcome mental health problem and fight against overthinking during any pandemic.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.

... Another aspect of the thinking stage of the information processing model is overthinking. Overthinking involves excessive analysis and dwelling on the root causes and consequences of information, often involving predictions and assumptions (Qasim et al., 2022). At the same time, however, individuals with depression often anticipate less positive outcomes, particularly in comparison to those without depression (Macleod et al., 2010). ...
... Moreover, these circumstances have also led to financial difficulties, such as the inability to pay tuition fees, further exacerbating the students' distress (Gamayanti, 2016). There are also cases of students who almost committed suicide due to overthinking (Qasim et al., 2022) and disappointment with their families (Chaniang et al., 2022). ...
Article
Full-text available
This study investigates the relationship between religious belief, religious tolerance, and students’ happiness. It aims to explore the moderating effect of religious tolerance on the relationship between religious belief and students’ happiness. The study adopts a quantitative methodology, surveying 734 university students. The data is analyzed using Structural Equation Modelling in Mplus. The results indicate that religious belief influences students’ happiness. Additionally, religious belief influences religious tolerance and happiness positively. Religious tolerance also has a direct effect on happiness. The study highlights the moderating influence of religious tolerance on the association between religious belief and happiness. It also suggests that the level of religious tolerance can influence the effect of religious belief on happiness. In order to increase students' happiness while pursuing a bachelor's degree, the implications of these findings highlight the significance of universities considering and promoting religious tolerance among students.
Article
Full-text available
This qualitative study investigates the practices of Bachelor of Secondary Education (BSED) English majors in dealing with English language anxiety. Through interviews with the eleven research participants, peers, and classmates, the study identifies triggers, manifestations, and coping strategies associated with language anxiety among BSED English students. Findings reveal that past negative experiences, fear of criticism, lack of confidence, and performance pressure contribute to language anxiety, manifested in various physical and emotional symptoms. Coping mechanisms include self-talk, self-acceptance, breathing techniques, and preparation, which highlight the importance of psychological and practical approaches in managing anxiety. The study concludes that language anxiety poses significant challenges for BSED English students but can be effectively managed through targeted interventions and support strategies. Recommendations include integrating anxiety-reduction techniques into teaching practices, providing opportunities for practice and feedback, fostering a supportive classroom atmosphere, offering mindfulness workshops, and conducting further research on effective interventions. Implementation of these recommendations can enhance students' academic performance and well-being, creating a more inclusive and supportive learning environment for English language learners.
Article
Full-text available
Cel pracy Zdobywanie i selekcja informacji są kluczowymi umiejętnościami współczesnego świata. Według badaczy wyszukiwanie informacji mieści się w obszarze czterech tzw. umiejętnościach podstawowych – obok pisania, czytania i rachowania. Kompetencje informacyjne umożliwiają efektywne uczenie się, mają istotny wpływ na skuteczność procesu nauki, badawczego eksplorowania oraz refleksji nad wiedzą, wpływają także na jakość wykonywania obowiązków zawodowych i codziennych aktywności. Stanowią kluczowy element adaptacji do zmieniających się warunków w otoczeniu informacyjnym oraz umożliwiają ciągłe uczenie się. Kompetencje te powinni już mieć studenci. Postanowiono więc zbadać studentów pierwszego roku studiów medialnych. Materiał i metody W grudniu 2023 roku studenci kierunków: dziennikarstwa i komunikacja społeczna oraz media design i marketingu wizerunkowego z Uniwersytetu Dolnośląskiego DSW we Wrocławiu otrzymali kwestionariusze ankiet. Były one rozsyłane drogą elektroniczną, stworzone i udostępniane za pomocą aplikacji Microsoft Forms. Ankieta zawierała 30 pytań zamkniętych, w tym 3 umożliwiały dokonania wielokrotnego wyboru spośród podanych odpowiedzi. W sumie przebadano 283 osoby. Wyniki Badanie wykazało, że studenci zdają sobie sprawę z ważności posiadania kompetencji informacyjnych, ale nie są świadomi trudności, które wiążą się z rzetelną oceną źródeł. Źródła, z których korzystają, to najczęściej social media, nie zaś źródła naukowe, poparte autorytetem, recenzowane. Wnioski Zdecydowana większość studentów nie wynosi ze szkoły kompetencji informacyjnych. Wydaje się więc zasadne, by uwzględniać w programach szkół wyższych treści związane z poszukiwaniem rzetelnych źródeł oraz z selekcją i krytycznym podejściem do informacji.
Article
Full-text available
The current study examined the correlation of Overthinking with Professional life stress then Job Satisfaction amongst 300 professionals. Their age range was 22-48 years. Data was collected by using convenient sampling technique. Overthinking, Professional life stress and Job satisfaction were the study variables which were measured through Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire (PTQ Ehring etal., 2010), Professional life stress Scale (PLSS David Fontana 1989) and Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) by Weiss etal.,1967 respectively. Results supported all the hypotheses that are Overthinking positively correlated with Professional Life Stress, Overthinking and Professional Life stress are adversely associated with Job satisfaction. Results also exposed that there are no substantial changes between professional groups off these variables. All professional groups were high on their job satisfaction and lower on overthinking and professional life stress.
Book
Full-text available
Language is a powerful tool that not only facilitates communication but also shapes our understanding of the world and the societies we inhabit. It is through language that we share our thoughts, emotions, and knowledge, enabling us to connect with one another across diverse cultures and backgrounds. In this anthology, aptly titled "Exploring Language, Culture, and Society," we embark on a captivating journey through various essays that delve into the multifaceted aspects of language and its impact on education, the environment, literature, and social dynamics. The first section, "Language Education and Language Acquisition," sheds light on the challenges and strategies involved in learning and teaching languages. From addressing the needs of older learners to harnessing the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) while promoting critical thinking, these essays provide valuable insights into fostering language proficiency in diverse contexts. Moving on, the section on "Environmental and Scientific Studies" delves into pressing environmental issues, such as climate change and deforestation. These essays invite us to contemplate the profound consequences of human actions on the planet and encourage us to take responsibility for preserving the environment for future generations. In "Literature and Language Analysis," we explore the beauty and complexity of literary genres, from poetry to drama, fiction to nonfiction. Through close reading and analysis, we unravel the layers of meaning woven into literary works, expanding our perspectives on the human experience. The section "Health and Social Studies" touches on the psychological and social dimensions of our lives. From examining university student burnout to understanding the impact of self-concept on our behavior, these essays remind us of the significance of mental and emotional well-being in today's fast-paced world. As we delve into the essays on "English Language History," we encounter the fascinating evolution of one of the world's most widely spoken languages. From its ancient roots to its modern-day prominence, English has undergone profound transformations, shaped by historical events and cultural influences. The essays in this anthology serve as a testament to the richness and interconnectedness of language, culture, and society. They invite us to explore, question, and appreciate the intricate tapestry that language weaves in our lives. As readers, we are encouraged to contemplate our roles as global citizens, responsible for fostering understanding, empathy, and positive change in the world. We extend our heartfelt gratitude to the diverse authors who have contributed their insights and research to this anthology. Their collective expertise and passion have enriched these pages with valuable knowledge and thought-provoking ideas. May this anthology inspire readers to embrace language as a bridge that connects us all, transcending borders and cultural divides. Let us embark on this enlightening journey of exploration and understanding, for it is through the power of language that we can collectively shape a brighter, more inclusive, and more compassionate world.
Article
Full-text available
Background: In the wake of the worldwide spread of the novel coronavirus and the resultant restrictive measures, mental health has become a crucial issue. Physical health is not the only aspect of humans that is at risk. Globally, the rates and severity of mental illness are being significantly impacted by this pandemic. Two scales have been validated to measure the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the levels of anxiety and obsessional thinking in clinical and non-clinical populations. The present study was designed to investigate the levels of anxiety and obsessions related to COVID-19 in the general public of Lahore, Pakistan. Materials and Methods: Data were collected via snowball sampling from May 9 to May 19. An online survey consisting of a demographic profile and two scales, Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS) and Obsession with COVID-19 Scale (OCS), was sent through email, WhatsApp, and Facebook groups to adults (18 years and above) of Lahore, Pakistan. Results: A total of 240 individuals (20% men and 80% women) recorded their responses. The majority belonged to a nuclear family system (60%), and their education level ranged from high school to Ph.D. The cut-off score for probable dysfunctional coronavirus anxiety and obsession levels was not met within this sample (CAS, M = 3.24, SD = 4.21; OCS, M = 4.14, SD = 3.15), suggesting that the general population of Lahore, Pakistan is not suffering from dysfunctional anxiety or obsessions related to COVID-19. Forty-seven participants' score on OCS and 35 participants' scores on CAS were above the cut-off, i.e., ≥7 and ≥9, respectively. The results of the correlation analysis showed a significant positive relationship (**p < 0.619) between anxiety and obsessions related to COVID-19. Conclusion: One important, yet surprising, conclusion of this study is that the average adult in Lahore does not show much anxiety or obsessions related to COVID-19. Other studies around the world using these measurement tools have indicated significantly high levels of both anxiety and obsessions related to COVID-19. These findings may demonstrate the resilience of Pakistanis or perhaps the lack of understanding of the seriousness of the situation.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
After the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak in China, many international students stuck there due to lockdown or quarantine. Their friends and family members got infected by the Corona virus and some died; which affected mental health by worry and ruminative thoughts. The present study was conducted to explore the impact of rumination and worry on the mental health of purposively selected 300 international students (i.e., Asia, Europe, America, and Africa) in China. Rumination, Worry, and Mental health of students were measured by the Rumination response scale, Penn State Worry Questionnaire, and Warwick Mental Wellbeing Scale respectively. The findings of the study revealed that not only rumination and worry had significant negative relationships with mental health but also were the significant predictors for mental health. Furthermore, findings revealed that females had more worries with ruminative thoughts during the COVID-19 pandemic Outbreak. This study would be helpful for international students worldwide to understand the importance of mental health to fight with COVID-19. Discussion and suggestions for future researchers are also reflected upon.
Article
Full-text available
Background The psychological impact of the COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak and lockdown measures on the Italian population are unknown. The current study assesses rates of mental health outcomes in the Italian general population three to 4 weeks into lockdown measures and explores the impact of COVID-19 related potential risk factors. Methods A web-based survey spread throughout the internet between March 27th and April 6th 2020. Eighteen thousand one hundred forty-seven individuals completed the questionnaire, 79.6% women. Selected outcomes were post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS), depression, anxiety, insomnia, perceived stress, and adjustment disorder symptoms (ADS). Seemingly unrelated logistic regression analysis was performed to identify COVID-19 related risk factors. Results Endorsement rates for PTSS were 6,604 (37%), 3,084 (17.3%) for depression, 3,700 (20.8%) for anxiety, 1,301 (7.3%) for insomnia, 3,895 (21.8%) for high perceived stress and 4,092 (22.9%) for adjustment disorder. Being woman and younger age were associated with all of the selected outcomes. Quarantine was associated with PTSS, anxiety and ADS. Any recent COVID-related stressful life event was associated with all the selected outcomes. Discontinued working activity due to the COVID-19 was associated with all the selected outcomes, except for ADS; working more than usual was associated with PTSS, Perceived stress and ADS. Having a loved one deceased by COVID-19 was associated with PTSS, depression, perceived stress, and insomnia. Conclusion We found high rates of negative mental health outcomes in the Italian general population 3 weeks into the COVID-19 lockdown measures and different COVID-19 related risk factors. These findings warrant further monitoring on the Italian population’s mental health.
Article
Full-text available
The outbreak of COVID-19 in Spain started at the end of February. By 9th April 2020 Spain was the second country in confirmed cases and in deaths. On March 14, 2020, the Spanish Government declared the state of alarm to limit viral transmission. During such state, citizens must stay confined at home with few justified exceptions. This whole situation drastically changed the life of the population, which can cause a wide range of psychosocial impacts. This study explored the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the general adult population (N = 3055) during the first stages of the outbreak in Spain, as well as their anxiety, stress and depression levels. We also examined the extent to which the following variables were associated to participants’ mental health: (1) demographics; (2) degree of concern about the pandemic; (3) environmental conditions during the home confinement, (4) changes in daily life as a consequence of the pandemic; (5) contact with the COVID-19 disease; (6) actual and perceived severity of the crisis; (7) information about the COVID-19, (8) perceived health status and (9) leisure activities conducted within the last 24 h. Our results show that Spanish consider the current COVID-19 health crisis as fairly severe, and the majority felt that the COVID-19 crisis had greatly impacted on their daily life, including changes in their daily routines and cancelation of important activities. About 36% of the participants reported moderate to severe psychological impact, 25% showed mild to severe levels of anxiety, 41% reported depressive symptoms, and 41% felt stressed. Women, young, and those who that lost their job during the health crisis showed the strongest negative psychological symptoms. What worried Spaniards the most was the likelihood of suffering an economic crisis derived from the pandemic. We found factors associated with better mental health, such as being satisfied with the information received about the health crisis, conducting leisure activities, and the perception of being in good health. These findings can be used to design psychological interventions to help coping with COVID-19 pandemic, both in Spain and other countries.
Article
Full-text available
While the epidemiologic burden of mental health disorders in the United States has been well described over the past decade, we know relatively little about trends in how these disorders are being studied through clinical research. We examined all US interventional mental health trials submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov between October 1, 2007 and April 30, 2018 to identify trends in trial characteristics, comparisons with non-mental health trials, and trial attributes associated with discontinuation and results reporting. International data were excluded to minimize potential confounding. Over this period, mental health and non-mental health trials grew at similar rates, though Industry and US government-funded trials declined and academic medical center/hospital/other (AMC/Hosp/Oth) funded trials grew faster in mental health research. The proportion of trials with safeguards against bias, including blinding and oversight by data monitoring committees (DMCs), decreased. This occurred during growth in the proportion of trials studying behavioral and non-pharmacological interventions, which often cannot be blinded and do not require DMC oversight. There was concurrent decline in pharmaceutical trials. There was significant growth in trials studying Non-DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5) conditions (e.g. suicidality and wellness), as well as substance use, anxiety, and neurocognitive disorders. One in 12 trials was discontinued. Trial discontinuation was associated with industry and AMC/Hosp/Oth funders, pharmaceutical interventions, and lack of DMC oversight. Only 29.9% of completed trials reported results to the registry. Decreased results reporting was associated with behavioral interventions, phase 1 trials, and industry and AMC/Hosp/Oth funders. The main implications of these data are that funding is shifting away from traditional government and industry sources, there is increasing interest in non-pharmacological treatments and Non-DSM conditions, and there are changing norms in trial design characteristics regarding safeguards against bias. These trends can guide researchers and funding bodies when considering the trajectory of future mental health research.
Article
Full-text available
Background The pandemic of Corona Virus (COVID-19) hit India recently; and the associated uncertainty is increasingly testing psychological resilience of the masses. When the global focus has mostly been on testing, finding a cure and preventing transmission; people are going through a myriad of psychological problems in adjusting to the current lifestyles and fear of the disease. Since there is a severe dearth of researches on this issue, we decided to conduct an online survey to evaluate its psychological impact. Methods From 26th to 29th March an online survey (FEEL-COVID) was conducted using principles of snowballing, and by invitation through text messages to participate. The survey collected data on socio-demographic and clinical variables related to COVID-19 (based on the current knowledge); along with measuring psychological impact with the help of Impact of Event–revised (IES-R) scale. Results There were a total of 1106 responses from around 64 cities in the country. Out of these 453 responses had at least one item missing; and were excluded from the analysis. The mean age of the respondents was around 41 years with a male female ratio of 3:1 and around 22% respondents were health care professionals. Overall approximately one third of respondents had significant psychological impact (IES-R score > 24). Higher psychological impact was predicted with younger age, female gender and comorbid physical illness. Presence of physical symptoms and contact history predicted higher psychological impact, but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion During the initial stages of COVID-19 in India, almost one-third respondents had a significant psychological impact. This indicates a need for more systematic and longitudinal assessment of psychological needs of the population, which can help the government in formulating holistic interventions for affected individuals.
Article
Full-text available
The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared a world pandemic due to COVID-19. In response, most affected countries have enacted measures involving compulsory confinement and restrictions on free movement, which likely influence citizens' lifestyles. This study investigates changes in health risk behaviors (HRBs) with duration of confinement. An online cross-sectional survey served to collect data about the Spanish adult population regarding health behaviors during the first 3 weeks of confinement. A large sample of participants (N = 2,741) (51.8% women; mean age 34.2 years [SD 13.0]) from all Spanish regions completed the survey. Binomial logistic regressions adjusted for socioeconomic characteristics (i.e., gender, age, civil status, education, and occupation), body mass index (BMI), previous HRBs, and confinement context (i.e., solitude and exposure to COVID-19) were conducted to investigate associations between the number of weeks confined and a set of six HRBs (physical activity, alcohol consumption, fresh fruit and vegetable consumption, smoking, screen exposure, and sleep hours). When adjusted, we observed significantly lower odds of experiencing a higher number of HRBs than before confinement overall in a time-dependent fashion: OR 0.63; 95% CI: 0.49–0.81 for the second and OR 0.47; 95% CI: 0.36–0.61 for the third week of confinement. These results were equally consistent in all age and gender subgroup analyses. The present study indicates that changes toward a higher number of HRBs than before confinement, as well as the prevalence of each HRB except screen exposure, decreased during the first 3 weeks of COVID-19 confinement, and thus the Spanish adult population may have adapted to the new situational context by gradually improving their health behaviors.
Article
Full-text available
How did a health crisis translate to an economic crisis? Why did the spread of the coronavirus bring the global economy to its knees? The answer lies in two methods by which coronavirus stifled economic activities. First, the spread of the virus encouraged social distancing which led to the shutdown of financial markets, corporate offices, businesses and events. Second, the exponential rate at which the virus was spreading, and the heightened uncertainty about how bad the situation could get, led to flight to safety in consumption and investment among consumers, investors and international trade partners. We focus on the period from the start of 2020 through March when the coronavirus began spreading into other countries and markets. We draw on real-world observations in assessing the restrictive measures, monetary policy measures, fiscal policy measures and the public health measures that were adopted during the period. We empirically examine the impact of social distancing policies on economic activities and stock market indices. We also empirically the effect of COVID infection cases and COVID deaths on macroeconomic performance during the 2020 to 2021 period. The findings reveal that the increasing number of lockdown days, monetary policy decisions and international travel restrictions severely affected the level of economic activities and the closing, opening, lowest and highest stock price of major stock market indices. We also find that the rising number of COVID cases and rising death cases led to a significant increase in global inflation rate, global unemployment rate, and global energy commodity index.
Article
Full-text available
Background: The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic is a public health emergency of international concern and poses a challenge to psychological resilience. Research data are needed to develop evidence-driven strategies to reduce adverse psychological impacts and psychiatric symptoms during the epidemic. The aim of this study was to survey the general public in China to better understand their levels of psychological impact, anxiety, depression, and stress during the initial stage of the COVID-19 outbreak. The data will be used for future reference. Methods: From 31 January to 2 February 2020, we conducted an online survey using snowball sampling techniques. The online survey collected information on demographic data, physical symptoms in the past 14 days, contact history with COVID-19, knowledge and concerns about COVID-19, precautionary measures against COVID-19, and additional information required with respect to COVID-19. Psychological impact was assessed by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and mental health status was assessed by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). Results: This study included 1210 respondents from 194 cities in China. In total, 53.8% of respondents rated the psychological impact of the outbreak as moderate or severe; 16.5% reported moderate to severe depressive symptoms; 28.8% reported moderate to severe anxiety symptoms; and 8.1% reported moderate to severe stress levels. Most respondents spent 20–24 h per day at home (84.7%); were worried about their family members contracting COVID-19 (75.2%); and were satisfied with the amount of health information available (75.1%). Female gender, student status, specific physical symptoms (e.g., myalgia, dizziness, coryza), and poor self-rated health status were significantly associated with a greater psychological impact of the outbreak and higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.05). Specific up-to-date and accurate health information (e.g., treatment, local outbreak situation) and particular precautionary measures (e.g., hand hygiene, wearing a mask) were associated with a lower psychological impact of the outbreak and lower levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.05). Conclusions: During the initial phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in China, more than half of the respondents rated the psychological impact as moderate-to-severe, and about one-third reported moderate-to-severe anxiety. Our findings identify factors associated with a lower level of psychological impact and better mental health status that can be used to formulate psychological interventions to improve the mental health of vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 epidemic.
Article
Full-text available
Rumination (negative thinking about the past) and worry (anxious apprehension) are two forms of repetitive thinking associated with psychopathology. Prior research indicates that rumination and worry have both distinct and overlapping features, but the extent to which there are separable groups of individuals who engage in rumination, worry, or both has yet to be examined. We used latent profile analysis, a person-centered statistical technique, to examine profiles of repetitive thinkers in two samples (ns = 635 and 755). In both studies, profiles emerged of individuals who rarely ruminate or worry (low repetitive thinkers), individuals who primarily ruminate (ruminators), individuals who primarily worry (worriers), and individuals who frequently ruminate and worry (high repetitive thinkers). In Study 2, a fifth profile of average repetitive thinkers also emerged. Across both samples, high repetitive thinkers showed the highest levels of depression and anxiety symptoms, followed by worriers and ruminators, and then by low repetitive thinkers. In Study 2, the average repetitive thinkers fell below the ruminators and worriers but above the low repetitive thinkers. Thus, there are distinct groups of ruminators and worriers, but individuals who engage in both rumination and worry exhibit the worst outcomes. As such, these findings support adopting a person-centered approach to better understand repetitive thinking styles.
Article
Full-text available
A sample of clients diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) provided descriptions of the two major problems they worried about and of potential negative consequences associated with these problems, once before and once after they received cognitive–behavioral therapy. When descriptions were rated for concreteness and compared to those of normal controls, results showed that untreated GAD clients provided less concrete descriptions of their major worries relative to controls. After successful therapy, problem descriptions of GAD clients showed the same level of concreteness as those of controls. These findings add further support to the reduced-concreteness theory of worry. Moreover, they indicate that concretization of worries may play a prominent role in the reduction of pathological worry.
Article
The COVID-19 pandemic is considered as the most crucial global health calamity of the century and the greatest challenge that the humankind faced since the 2nd World War. In December 2019, a new infectious respiratory disease emerged in Wuhan, Hubei province, China and was named by the World Health Organization as COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019). A new class of corona virus, known as SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) has been found to be responsible for occurrence of this disease. As far as the history of human civilization is concerned there are instances of severe outbreaks of diseases caused by a number of viruses. According to the report of the World Health Organization (WHO as of April 18 2020), the current outbreak of COVID-19, has affected over 2164111 people and killed more than 146,198 people in more than 200 countries throughout the world. Till now there is no report of any clinically approved antiviral drugs or vaccines that are effective against COVID-19. It has rapidly spread around the world, posing enormous health, economic, environmental and social challenges to the entire human population. The coronavirus outbreak is severely disrupting the global economy. Almost all the nations are struggling to slow down the transmission of the disease by testing & treating patients, quarantining suspected persons through contact tracing, restricting large gatherings, maintaining complete or partial lock down etc. This paper describes the impact of COVID-19 on society and global environment, and the possible ways in which the disease can be controlled has also been discussed therein.
Article
The COVID-19 pandemic has aggravated higher mental health sufferings including suicidality throughout the world. But there are no prior studies assessing either COVID-19-related psychiatric sufferings or suicides in Pakistan. Hence, after the removal of non-COVID-19 suicides, this study investigated a total 11-suicide cases (i.e., 7-confirmed and 4-suspected COVID-19 cases) from the Pakistani press reports. All but one of the confirmed COVID-19 victims were suffered from lockdown-related economic recession and being partially unemployed. Thus, lockdown is a tough choice for developing countries like Pakistan as a large number of unprivileged-poor people will be starving to death in many times to come.
Article
The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared that the Corona Virus (COVID-19) has become a global pandemic. This study aimed to investigate the psychological symptoms of ordinary Chinese citizens during the Level I Emergency Response throughout China. From January 31 to February 2 2020, an online questionnaire, Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) was designed, and differences in GSI T-scores among subgroups were examined by ANOVA. Based on a cut-off point of the GSI T-scores of 63, the overall sample was divided into high and low-risk groups. of the 1,060 participants investigated in China, more than 70% of them have moderate and higher level of psychological symptoms specifically elevated scores for obsessive compulsion, interpersonal sensitivity, phobic anxiety, and psychoticism. There were no significant differences between males and females. Those who were of over 50 years old, had an undergraduate education and below, were divorced or widowed, and agricultural workers had significantly more symptoms. However, significantly more minors and medical staff were in the high-risk group. These results show that COVID-19 has a significant adverse socio-psychological influence on ordinary citizens. Therefore, governments should equip psychological health departments and pay attention to the people who are in high-risk groups, providing psychological interventions and assistance.
Features, evaluation, and treatment of coronavirus (COVID-19). Statpearls
  • M Cascella
  • M Rajnik
  • A Aleem
  • S C Dulebohn
  • R Di Napoli
Cascella, M., Rajnik, M., Aleem, A., Dulebohn, S. C., & Di Napoli, R. (2022). Features, evaluation, and treatment of coronavirus (COVID-19). Statpearls [internet].
Humanitarian Response Baluchistan Drought Needs Assessment (BDNA)
  • Humanitarian Response
Humanitarian Response. Humanitarian Response Baluchistan Drought Needs Assessment (BDNA) Report. (2019). https://reliefweb.int/report/pakistan/balochistandrought-needs-assessment-bdna-report-february-2019
Coronavirus disease (COVID-2019) situation reports
  • W H Organization
Organization WH. (2020). Coronavirus disease (COVID-2019) situation reports. Geneva: WHO.
Psychological impact of COVID-19 on Pakistani university students and how they are coping
  • M Salman
  • N Asif
  • Z U Mustafa
  • T M Khan
  • N Shehzadi
  • K Hussain
  • . . Khan
Salman, M., Asif, N., Mustafa, Z. U., Khan, T. M., Shehzadi, N., Hussain, K.,... & Khan, M. T. (2020). Psychological impact of COVID-19 on Pakistani university students and how they are coping. Medrxiv.