ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Opioid-Induced Sexual Dysfunction in Cancer Patients

MDPI
Cancers
Authors:
  • Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Opole

Abstract

Sexual dysfunction is common in patients with advanced cancer, although it is frequently belittled, and thus consistently underdiagnosed and untreated. Opioid analgesics remain fundamen- tal and are widely used in cancer pain treatment. However, they affect sexual functions primarily due to their action on the hypothalamus–pituitary–gonadal axis. Other mechanisms such as the impact on the central and peripheral nervous systems are also possible. The opioid-induced sexual dysfunction includes erectile dysfunction, lack of desire and arousal, orgasmic disorder, and lowered overall sexual satisfaction. Around half of the individuals taking opioids chronically may be affected by sexual dysfunction. The relative risk of sexual dysfunction in patients on chronic opioid therapy and opioid addicts increased two-fold in a large meta-analysis. Opioids differ in their potential to induce sexual dysfunctions. Partial agonists and short-acting opioids may likely cause sexual dysfunction to a lesser extent. Few pharmaceutical therapies proved effective: testosterone replacement therapy, PDE5 inhibitors, bupropion, trazodone, opioid antagonists, and plant-derived medicines such as Rosa damascena and ginseng. Non-pharmacological options, such as psychosexual or physical therapies, should also be considered. However, the evidence is scarce and projected primarily from non-cancer populations, including opioid addicts. Further research is necessary to explore the problem of sexuality in cancer patients and the role of opioids in inducing sexual dysfunction.
Citation: Salata, B.; Kluczna, A.;
Dzier˙
zanowski, T. Opioid-Induced
Sexual Dysfunction in Cancer
Patients. Cancers 2022,14, 4046.
https://doi.org/10.3390/
cancers14164046
Academic Editor: António Araújo
Received: 30 May 2022
Accepted: 17 August 2022
Published: 22 August 2022
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2022 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
cancers
Review
Opioid-Induced Sexual Dysfunction in Cancer Patients
Bartłomiej Salata , Agnieszka Kluczna and Tomasz Dzier˙
zanowski *
Laboratory of Palliative Medicine, Department of Social Medicine and Public Health,
Medical University of Warsaw, ul. Oczki 3, 02-007 Warsaw, Poland
*Correspondence: tomasz.dzierzanowski@wum.edu.pl
Simple Summary:
Sexual disorders affect up to 80% of cancer patients, depending on the type of
cancer, yet they are commonly overlooked and untreated. Opioid-induced sexual dysfunction (OISD)
is reported in half of opioid users. The pathophysiology of OISD—still a subject for research—may
include disorders of both the endocrine and nervous systems, expressed in, among other things,
erectile dysfunction and declined sexual desire, sexual arousal, orgasm, and general satisfaction with
one’s sex life. The etiology of sexual dysfunction in cancer patients is usually multifactorial, so the
management should be multifaceted and individualized by targeting pathophysiological factors. The
treatment options for OISD are few and include testosterone replacement therapy, bupropion, opioid
antagonists, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, plant-derived substances, and non-pharmacological
treatments, although the evidence is insufficient. One of the treatment options may also be a choice
of an opioid that is less likely to cause sexual dysfunction, yet further research is necessary.
Abstract:
Sexual dysfunction is common in patients with advanced cancer, although it is frequently
belittled, and thus consistently underdiagnosed and untreated. Opioid analgesics remain fundamen-
tal and are widely used in cancer pain treatment. However, they affect sexual functions primarily due
to their action on the hypothalamus–pituitary–gonadal axis. Other mechanisms such as the impact on
the central and peripheral nervous systems are also possible. The opioid-induced sexual dysfunction
includes erectile dysfunction, lack of desire and arousal, orgasmic disorder, and lowered overall
sexual satisfaction. Around half of the individuals taking opioids chronically may be affected by
sexual dysfunction. The relative risk of sexual dysfunction in patients on chronic opioid therapy and
opioid addicts increased two-fold in a large meta-analysis. Opioids differ in their potential to induce
sexual dysfunctions. Partial agonists and short-acting opioids may likely cause sexual dysfunction to
a lesser extent. Few pharmaceutical therapies proved effective: testosterone replacement therapy,
PDE5 inhibitors, bupropion, trazodone, opioid antagonists, and plant-derived medicines such as Rosa
damascena and ginseng. Non-pharmacological options, such as psychosexual or physical therapies,
should also be considered. However, the evidence is scarce and projected primarily from non-cancer
populations, including opioid addicts. Further research is necessary to explore the problem of
sexuality in cancer patients and the role of opioids in inducing sexual dysfunction.
Keywords: cancer; pain management; opioid; sexual dysfunction; sexual disorder; erectiledysfunction
1. Introduction
Sexuality is an essential aspect of life, also for cancer patients [
1
]. Despite this, many
of them believe that they do not receive proper care in this sphere of life [
2
], and only one in
ten cancer patients are asked by a doctor about the quality of their sex life [
3
]. The quality
of the sexual life of these patients has often deteriorated, and there are various reasons for
this, such as pain and other physical symptoms, deformities of the body due to cancer or
after medical interventions, the feeling of being unattractive, medications, or the lack of
privacy conditions in long-term care facilities [
4
6
]. As opioids are often used in this group
of patients, their influence on libido and the quality of sexual function is essential. This
Cancers 2022,14, 4046. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14164046 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/cancers
Cancers 2022,14, 4046 2 of 12
publication aims to synthesize the current knowledge on the relationship between the use
of opioids and the occurrence of sexual dysfunctions.
2. Etiology and Pathophysiology
The etiology of sexual dysfunctions is often multifactorial, making it challenging to
distinguish these dysfunctions and then clearly set a proper diagnosis. The fundamental
problem is whether a given disorder is due to organic dysfunction or is psychological
in origin. The International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11) divides
sexual disorders into sexual dysfunctions and sexual pain disorders [
7
]. Additional coding
(HA40.2) is recommended for the conditions associated with the use of opioids (Table 1).
Table 1. ICD-11 classification of sexual disorders possibly associated with opioids [7].
17 Conditions Related to Sexual Health
Sexual dysfunctions
HA00 Hypoactive sexual desire dysfunction
HA01 Sexual arousal dysfunctions
HA02 Orgasmic dysfunctions
HA03 Ejaculatory dysfunctions
HA0Y Other specified sexual dysfunctions
HA0Z Sexual dysfunctions, unspecified
Sexual pain disorders
HA20 Sexual pain-penetration disorder
HA2Y Other specified sexual pain disorders
HA2Z Sexual pain disorders, unspecified
HA40 Aetiological considerations in sexual dysfunctions and sexual pain disorders
HA40.2 Associated with use of psychoactive substance or medication
In cancer patients, occurrence of sexual dysfunctions depends on the primary tumor
location and treatment used. It is associated with, among other things, damage to the
vascularization or innervation of the genital organs and their damage or post-surgical
scarring, radiotherapy, high-dose chemotherapy, hormonal disorders, chronic fatigue and
pain [
6
,
8
]. It results in (1) loss of desire; (2) genitourinary atrophy, dryness and pain,
(3) difficulty experiencing pleasure and reaching orgasm, and (4) erectile dysfunction.
Additionally, they may also be a sequela of psychological problems, such as unacceptance
of one’s body image. On top of that, stomas in patients with gastrointestinal or urinary
tract cancers may impede sexual activity as well.
2.1. The Role of Hormones
Hormones are an essential factor in modulating sexual functions. The role of testos-
terone, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and prolactin are best known, while the functions
of estrogen, oxytocin, and progesterone are less clear. Testosterone in men increases libido,
the degree of excitement, sexual satisfaction, the degree of penile stiffness, and the time
of erectile response [
9
]. In women, it increases desire, excitement, vaginal congestion,
and orgasm. These effects in women may, to some extent, be the effect of testosterone
conversion to dihydrotestosterone and estradiol [10,11].
DHEA, produced by the adrenal glands, works mainly as a prohormone, and testos-
terone, dihydrotestosterone, estrone, and estriol are formed as a result of its subsequent
transformations. It has a positive effect on desire, arousal, frequency of sexual thoughts, and
satisfaction with the physical and emotional aspects of sexuality, among other things [12].
Prolactin most likely inhibits sexual functions. It delays ejaculation and reduces
craving. Its concentration increases after the onset of orgasm, and it is responsible for the
subsequent refractory period (feeling of sexual satiety and inhibited sexual behavior) [
13
].
Estrogens affect proper vaginal lubrication in women, increase excitement and, through
muscle relaxation, prevent dyspareunia [
14
]. Oxytocin at high doses probably reduces
Cancers 2022,14, 4046 3 of 12
sexual arousal and causes a refractory period after orgasm in males, whereas, at lower
doses, it probably stimulates sexual behavior. Its secretion increases during sexual arousal
and probably also stimulates the occurrence of erection—its concentration in the central
nervous system is reduced in men with erectile dysfunction [
15
]. Progesterone is poorly
understood in this respect. It probably inhibits sexual functions [14].
The effects of opioids on the endocrine system are probably mainly related to their
effects on the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis (Figure 1). The mu-opioid receptors
(MOR) are found in the hypothalamus [
16
], pituitary [
17
], testes [
18
], and ovaries [
19
].
Therefore, inhibition by opioid agonists of both the hypothalamus’s pulsatile secretion of
the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (gonadoliberin; GnRH) causing hypogonadotropic
hypogonadism, and the testosterone secretion directly in the testes occur. Another mecha-
nism is related to the increase in prolactin secretion by the pituitary gland, which reduces
the secretion of testosterone [
20
]. In addition, the production of DHEA in the adrenal cortex
may be reduced [
20
], and a study on rats in which morphine was used shows that there
may be an increase in the mRNA expression of enzymes that break down testosterone [
21
].
Cancers 2022, 14, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 13
and satisfaction with the physical and emotional aspects of sexuality, among other things
[12].
Prolactin most likely inhibits sexual functions. It delays ejaculation and reduces crav-
ing. Its concentration increases after the onset of orgasm, and it is responsible for the sub-
sequent refractory period (feeling of sexual satiety and inhibited sexual behavior) [13].
Estrogens affect proper vaginal lubrication in women, increase excitement and, through
muscle relaxation, prevent dyspareunia [14]. Oxytocin at high doses probably reduces
sexual arousal and causes a refractory period after orgasm in males, whereas, at lower
doses, it probably stimulates sexual behavior. Its secretion increases during sexual arousal
and probably also stimulates the occurrence of erection—its concentration in the central
nervous system is reduced in men with erectile dysfunction [15]. Progesterone is poorly
understood in this respect. It probably inhibits sexual functions [14].
Figure 1. The impact of opioids on the hypothalamuspituitarygonadal axis.
The effects of opioids on the endocrine system are probably mainly related to their
effects on the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis (Figure 1.). The mu-opioid receptors
(MOR) are found in the hypothalamus [16], pituitary [17], testes [18], and ovaries [19].
Therefore, inhibition by opioid agonists of both the hypothalamus’s pulsatile secretion of
the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (gonadoliberin; GnRH) causing hypogonadotropic
hypogonadism, and the testosterone secretion directly in the testes occur. Another mech-
anism is related to the increase in prolactin secretion by the pituitary gland, which reduces
the secretion of testosterone [20]. In addition, the production of DHEA in the adrenal cor-
tex may be reduced [20], and a study on rats in which morphine was used shows that
there may be an increase in the mRNA expression of enzymes that break down testos-
terone [21].
Figure 1. The impact of opioids on the hypothalamuspituitarygonadal axis.
2.2. Sexual Desire
Sexual desire can be defined as a subjective psychological state related to the initiation
and maintenance of sexual behavior caused by internal or external factors [
22
] or as the
sum of factors that motivate or demotivate a person to engage in sexual activity [
23
]. It
depends on biological, psychological, and social aspects. The biological aspects comprise,
inter alia, the actions of the endocrine system and neurotransmitters. The stimulating
neurotransmitters include dopamine, norepinephrine, oxytocin and melanocortins (beta-
endorphin, adrenocorticotropic hormone, and alpha-melanotropin). The inhibitory ones
include serotonin, endogenous cannabinoids, and opioids [
24
]. In the DSM-5 (Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) classification, there is a concept of Female
Sexual Interest–Arousal Disorder (FSIAD), defined as the absence or a significant reduction
in sexual interest or arousal. It consists of six domains: (1) sexual activity, (2) sexual or erotic
thoughts or fantasies, (3) initiation of sexual activity, (4) excitement or pleasure during
Cancers 2022,14, 4046 4 of 12
sexual activity, (5) sexual interest or arousal, and (6) genital or non-genital sensations during
sexual activity. The absence, or a significant reduction, of at least three of them for at least
six months and 75–100% of the time allows the diagnosis of the disorder [25].
In men, a similar disorder, in the DSM-5 classification, is the reduction of sexual desire
in men, defined as Male Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder (MHSDD) [25].
2.3. Erection
Male erection is a complex neurovascular process dependent on balancing inhibitory
and stimulating factors (sympathetic and parasympathetic systems, respectively). The
reflex is caused by the stimulation from the sacral (S2–S4) section of the spinal cord,
triggered by stimulation of penile afferents or by higher centers of the central nervous
system upon visual, olfactory, and tactile stimulation, or imagination [
26
28
]. It causes the
extension of the penile arteries, and simultaneous pressure on the venous vessels causes
blood stagnation in the corpus cavernosum of the penis and, as a result, an erection.
Erectile dysfunction (ED) in a man can be diagnosed when during almost all occasions
of sexual activity (75–100% on average), at least one of the following three symptoms
occurs: (1) marked difficulty in obtaining an erection during sexual activity, (2) marked
difficulty in maintaining an erection until completion of sexual activity, (3) marked decrease
in erectile rigidity [
25
]. The incidence of ED in the general population ranges from 10–15%
in men aged 40–49 to 50–70% in men aged 60–79 years [
29
,
30
] Risk factors include age,
cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, obesity, smoking, and depression [
31
,
32
]. The incidence
of ED in the cancer patient population may be around 29% at the time of diagnosis and
43% after treatment, but it is strongly dependent on the type of cancer and may be up to
80–90% for prostate, anus or colorectal cancers [
33
]. The effect of opioids on male erection
is not well known. Several mechanisms that may coincide are suggested. First of all, by
affecting MOR located in the area of the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus,
these drugs can inhibit the synthesis of nitric oxide (NO), which is part of the neurological
pathway responsible for inducing an erection [
27
,
34
]. Another mechanism is related to the
aforementioned reduction of testosterone concentration by inhibiting GnRH secretion in
the hypothalamus and directly inhibiting testosterone secretion in the testes [
20
]. Based on
studies in animal models, it can be assumed that there are other mechanisms affecting the
peripheral nervous system [35].
2.4. Orgasm
A woman’s orgasm can be defined as “a variable, transient peak sensation of intense
pleasure creating an altered state of consciousness usually with an initiation accompanied
by involuntary, rhythmic contractions of the pelvic striated circumvaginal musculature
often with concomitant uterine and anal contractions and myotonia that resolves the
sexually-induced vasocongestion (sometimes only partially) and myotonia usually with an
induction of well-being and contentment” [
36
]. In men, orgasm is related to ejaculation and
results from stimulation of the vulvar nerve by increasing pressure in the posterior part
of the urethra during ejaculation, stimulation of verumontanum, and contraction of the
urethra and accessory sexual organs [
37
]. Physiological changes during a male orgasm are
similar to those in the female body: contractions of the pelvic muscles and anal sphincter,
hyperventilation, tachycardia, and increased blood pressure [
38
]. An orgasmic disorder
listed in the ICD-10 classification is inhibition of orgasm (anorgasmia). It occurs when
orgasm is not achieved despite high levels of excitement, or the intensity of the feeling of
orgasm is reduced or delayed. It is more common in women than men [25].
The data on a prevalence of orgasmic disorders in cancer patients and mechanisms
of influence of opioids on orgasm is scarce. In women it may be connected with low
testosterone level [20].
Cancers 2022,14, 4046 5 of 12
3. Diagnostic Tools
Apart from the regular history, the most frequently used tools for diagnosing and as-
sessing the effectiveness of sexual disorders treatment are self-report techniques consisting
of the patient’s self-assessment by answering the questions posed in a given questionnaire.
They facilitate a conversation about the sexual domain of the patient’s life and consecutive
diagnostics. They can be especially beneficial for practitioners inexperienced in collecting
sexological history. None of the available tools refer to opioid use, nor have they been
validated in the opioid users’ population.
3.1. Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)
For women, the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) can be used (Table 2). It consists
of 19 items combined in six areas: (1) desire, (2) arousal, (3) lubrication, (4) orgasm,
(5) sexual satisfaction, and (6) pain, assessed for the last four weeks [
39
]. This questionnaire
has been validated in cancer survivors [
40
] and is suggested by the Cancer Patient-Reported
Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sexual Function Committee [
41
].
Additionally, the Brief Sexual Symptom Checklist for Women (SSFF-A) can be used as a
primary screening tool of women with cancer [42].
Table 2.
Areas assessed by the diagnostic tools in women (Female Sexual Function Index) and men
(International Index of Erectile Function) [39,43].
Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)
Desire
Arousal
Lubrication
Orgasm
Sexual satisfaction
Pain
Erectile function
Orgasmic function
Sexual desire
Intercourse satisfaction
Overall satisfaction
3.2. International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)
In men, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), which is also suggested by
the PROMIS Sexual Function Committee [
41
], can be used. It is a 15-item questionnaire
assessing five areas (Table 2) in the four weeks prior to testing [
43
]. The IIEF-5 questionnaire,
i.e., a shortened version of the IIEF consisting of five items, may be more convenient in
clinical practice [44].
Additionally, there are questionnaires developed for specific cancer populations: Uni-
versity of California-Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA PCI) [
45
], Sexual Function-
Vaginal Changes Qeustionnaire [
46
] for the assessment after gynecological cancer and FSFI
adaption for breast cancer patients (FSFI-BC) [47].
4. Epidemiology
4.1. Sexual Disorders in Cancer Patients
Sexual disorders are a common problem in cancer patients, and their occurrence
depends on the primary tumor location and treatment used [
6
,
8
]. On average, they affect
more than half of patients, but they vary widely depending on specific cancers. In female
breast cancer, it may be around 66% [
48
], 65–90% in colorectal cancers [
33
,
48
], 78% in
gynecological cancers [48] and up to 80% in prostate cancer [49].
4.2. Sexual Dysfunction in Patients Taking Opioids
There has been little research on sexual dysfunction with opioids in people with cancer
as yet, so most of the evidence comes from studies in other patient populations.
In a case–control study by Rajagopal et al. [
50
], the incidence of hypogonadism and
sexual dysfunction in men on chronic opioid therapy for cancer pain was assessed. The
study and control groups consisted of 20 men each, who had taken at least 200 mg/day
Cancers 2022,14, 4046 6 of 12
of an oral morphine equivalent (OME) dose for at least one year, or placebo, respectively.
The total testosterone, FSH, and LH concentrations were measured, and the quality of
sexual function was assessed using the Sexual Desire Inventory (SDI) questionnaire. The
mean concentration of all three hormones was two to three times lower in the study than
in a control group. The mean SDI score was 18.5 vs. 40 in the control group, and it was
statistically significant (p= 0.01).
In a study by Venkatesh et al. [
51
], the sexual function of 100 men with a history of at
least one year of opioid dependence vs. 50 men in the control group was assessed. Forty-
eight percent, vs. eight percent in the control group, had sexual dysfunction according
to the Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX). Of them, 45% had ED, defined as less
than 25 points on the IIEF-5 scale, significantly more often than in the control group (16%).
Ninety-two percent of the study group had impairment of at least one of the five functions
tested on the IIEF-5 scale, vs. sixteen percent in the control group. Other sexual functions
were also impaired vs. the control group: desire (41% vs. 8%), sexual arousal (29% vs. 2%),
the ability to achieve orgasm (21% vs. 0%), and satisfaction with orgasm (25% vs. 6%).
In a meta-analysis by Zhao et al. [
52
] of nine cross-sectional studies and one cohort
study involving 8829 patients on chronic opioid therapy, or heroin- or opium-addicted, the
relative risk (RR) of ED approached 2. In addition, a strong association between long-term
opioid use (>3 years) and ED was reported (RR 2.25), also in men under 50 years (RR 2.21).
Deyo et al. [
53
] investigated the frequency of prescribing medications or testosterone
replacement therapy (TRT) for ED in 11,327 men prescribed opioids for lower back pain.
It appeared to be associated with the doses and duration of opioid use, and in the case of
long-term opioid use (>120 days or at least ten prescriptions over >90 days), it equaled
13.1% and was higher (19%) in the presence of a high daily opioid dose (OME > 120 mg).
In a prospective observational study (Ajo et al. [
54
]), opioid-induced sexual disorders
were reported in 33% of patients. ED was present in 27.6%, and in 64% of cases it was
assessed as severe.
In a study on men by Rubinstein et al. [
55
], use of long-acting opioids was connected
with higher frequency of hypogonadism than in men using short-acting opioids—74%
(34/46) vs. 34% (12/35). After controlling for daily dosage and body mass index, men on
long-acting opioids had 4.78 times greater odds of becoming hypogonadal than men on
short-acting opioids. The studies on long-acting (sustained release) opioids seem to be of
great importance, as opioids of that type are a base of cancer pain treatment.
4.2.1. Tramadol
In a case–control study, Hashim et al. [
56
] compared sexual function in a group of
opioid addicts in tramadol, heroin, and control groups of 30 patients each. The mean scores
on the IIEF-5 scale regarding erection were 8.6, 15, and 29.9, respectively, and the differences
between the groups were statistically significant (p< 0.001). Compared to placebo, tramadol
worsened orgasm (p= 0.003), desire (p= 0.002), and overall satisfaction (p< 0.001). The
concentrations of free testosterone (p= 0.041) and LH (p= 0.004) were also significantly
reduced versus the control group. However, all the assessed indicators were significantly
better among tramadol addicts than heroin users (p< 0.001).
In a small study by Kabbash et al. [
57
], ED occurred in 44% of addicts taking tra-
madol and 10% in the placebo control group (p= 0.001). The occurrence of ED was dose-
related and equaled 14.3% in the individuals taking
400 mg/day, 48.4% in the case of
400–1000 mg/day, and 50% when the dose exceeded 1000 mg/day, although the differences
between the groups were not statistically significant (p= 0.23). Notably, a higher incidence
of ED was reported when the daily dose exceeded the maximum recommended for regular
medical use. Furthermore, the incidence of ED depended on the duration of tramadol
use and was 20% for 1–2 years, 30.4% for 2–5 years, and 63.6% for more than 5 years
(p= 0.04). Serum testosterone concentration was significantly lower in tramadol addicts
than in the control group (p= 0.001), whereas serum prolactin concentration was sig-
nificantly higher (p= 0.001). Consistently, a higher incidence of decreased libido was
Cancers 2022,14, 4046 7 of 12
noticed in the group taking tramadol than in the control group (48% vs. 16.7%; p= 0.005).
Noteworthily, 20% of the individuals in this study reported off-label tramadol use for the
prevention of premature ejaculation [
57
]. Based on animal models, low tramadol doses
may stimulate ejaculation, while high doses have an inhibitory effect [
58
]. According to a
few studies, it may be effective in treating premature ejaculation [
59
]; however, the quality
of evidence is low. Interestingly, one of reported adverse events was erectile dysfunction.
4.2.2. Morphine
So far, there is no clinical evidence of morphine concerning sexual dysfunction. How-
ever, based on animal models, the intraperitoneal administration of morphine to male rats
reduces the likelihood of erections proportionally to its dose, and the effect was reversed by
naloxone [
60
]. Interestingly, the administration of naloxone alone at the lowest dose tested
(0.1 mg/kg) also inhibited erection, and this effect was not observed at higher doses (1 and
10 mg/kg).
Additionally, the impact of morphine on sexual functions can be extrapolated from
diamorphine (diacetylmorphine, heroine), a pro-drug deacetylated to morphine as an
active molecule.
4.2.3. Methadone and Buprenorphine
Methadone and buprenorphine, especially as an opioid substitution therapy, are
collectively the subject of the largest number of research papers on this topic. In a meta-
analysis of 16 studies on the prevalence of sexual dysfunction among male patients on
methadone and buprenorphine therapy by Yee et al. [
61
], 52% of the 1570 methadone-
treated patients reported sexual dysfunction. ED was assessed in 12 studies and occurred
in 46% of patients. Decreased desire or libido was observed in 51% of patients in four
studies collectively.
In the meta-analysis by Zhao et al. [
52
], the use of methadone was associated with a
lower risk of ED (RR = 1.82) compared to other opioids (heroin and opium; RR = 2.04) in
this study, which may explain the improvement in sexual function after starting methadone
replacement therapy.
In the above-cited meta-analysis by Yee et al. [
61
], the incidence of sexual dysfunction
in patients taking buprenorphine was 24%. A meta-analysis of four studies comparing
the incidence of these disorders in patients taking buprenorphine and methadone re-
vealed that methadone was associated with a five-fold higher risk of sexual dysfunction
(OR = 4.95). Another study by this author [
62
] showed that patients taking buprenorphine
(average dose 2.4 mg/day) reported a higher degree of sexual desire than patients using
methadone (average dose 74.5 mg/day)—7.6 and 6.1 on the IIEF scale, respectively—and
higher testosterone concentrations (18.5 vs. 12.5 nmol/L).
In turn, in a small study by Hallinan et al. [
63
], the mean IIEF score did not dif-
fer significantly between buprenorphine and control groups and was better than in the
methadone-treated patients (61 vs. 50).
In a study of 258 women, mean age of 38 years, taking methadone (mean 61 mg/day)
or buprenorphine (mean 11 mg/day) as opioid maintenance therapy, 56% of patients
reported sexual dysfunction [
64
]. Notably, the patients with sexual dysfunction were
characterized, inter alia, by older age, lower levels of education, higher doses of methadone,
and worse mental health than patients without sexual dysfunction.
The lower incidence of sexual dysfunction in buprenorphine use compared to other
opioids may be explained by its partial agonist/antagonist mode of action [65].
4.2.4. Tapentadol
In a 12-week randomized clinical study, Baron et al. [
66
] compared the safety of
prolonged-release tapentadol with prolonged-release oxycodone/naloxone tablets in pa-
tients with severe chronic low back pain with a neuropathic component. The participants
were <64 years old and had an initial testosterone concentration within the normal range.
Cancers 2022,14, 4046 8 of 12
Mean doses of opioids were 362 mg for tapentadol and 83 mg for oxycodone/naloxone. In
45.5% of the oxycodone/naloxone patients, testosterone concentrations decreased below
the norm, while this only occurred in 10.5% of the tapentadol group.
An important limiting factor for the presented studies is a lack of control for confound-
ing factors (e.g., pain, mental health, physical health, quality of life) between opioid and
non-opioid groups. Additionally, most of the evidence is derived from patients addicted to
opioids, and this population may not be representative for patients taking opioids for cancer
pain as addiction differs from appropriate prescription opioid use and both populations
are also different.
5. Treatment of Opioid-Induced Sexual Dysfunction
There are few treatment options for sexual dysfunction (Table 3), and most of the
studies were based on male groups only. The choice of an opioid with a less-negative
impact on the endocrine system, such as buprenorphine or tapentadol, seems to be a
vital element of management, but clinical evidence for the effectiveness of such a strategy
is scarce.
Table 3. Pharmacological treatment options for opioid-induced sexual dysfunction.
Pharmacological Treatment Options
Testosterone Replacement Therapy
Bupropion
Trazodone
Opioid antagonist (naltrexone, nalmefene)
Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors
Plant-derived medicines (damask rose oil, ginseng)
5.1. Testosterone Replacement Ttherapy
In a medium-sized, 3-year prospective observational study, Ajo et al. [
54
] verified the
effectiveness of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) and the phosphodiesterase type
5 inhibitor (PDE5i) for the treatment of ED in patients using opioids (the mean duration
of opioid therapy was 5 years and 6 months, the mean opioid dose was 107.1 mg/day
OME). After six months of therapy, 42% of patients experienced a significant improvement
as measured by the IIEF questionnaire. A positive correlation was also observed between
the improvement in the IIEF score and the quality of sexual life and a reduction of anxiety.
However, one systematic review [
67
] suggests that TRT may be effective only in improving
pain and emotional functioning, but not sexual function. The quality of evidence is low,
and further research is needed.
5.2. Bupropion and Trazodone
A small-sized, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigated the effi-
cacy of 50 mg bupropion twice a day in the treatment of sexual dysfunction in men using
methadone (mean 70 mg for 46 months) [
68
]. The mean erection quality score measured on the
IIEF-15 scale improved from 18.1 to 22.6, and sexual satisfaction from 7 to 8.8, with statistically
significant differences, compared to the control group (p= 0.03 and p= 0.02, respectively).
The efficacy of trazodone on erectile dysfunction in men on methadone maintenance
therapy was evaluated in a small study [
69
]. Patients received 50 mg/day of trazodone
for four days, then the dosage was increased to 100 mg/day and maintained for six weeks.
The mean score on the Erectile Dysfunction Intensity Scale (EDIS) improved from 12.21 to
16.78 (p< 0.05; 5–10—severe ED, 11–15—moderate ED, 16–20—mild ED, 21–25—no ED)
5.3. Opioid Receptor Antagonists
Another therapeutic option for ED is the use of an opioid receptor antagonist. In a
study by van Ahlen et al. [
70
], the efficacy of naltrexone in the treatment of idiopathic ED
has been investigated. Patients in the study group took 25 mg of naltrexone for four weeks
Cancers 2022,14, 4046 9 of 12
followed by 50 mg of naltrexone for another four weeks. An improvement in the number
of morning spontaneous erections was reported for both the 25 mg and 50 mg naltrexone
treatment arms. Such an improvement was not seen in the placebo group. Neither libido,
nor FSH, LH, or testosterone, changed in either the research or the placebo groups. The
authors attribute the erectile-stimulating effect of naltrexone in the group of patients not
taking opioids to the antagonization of endogenous opioids, which may inhibit sexual
function and lower LH release. An alternative to naltrexone may be nalmefene, which may
also increase FSH, LH, and testosterone levels [71].
In one study the frequency of sexual dysfunctions in patients on buprenorphine and
naltrexone maintenance therapy was compared [
72
]. Erection difficulty and reduction
of sexual desire was reported more often by patients in the naltrexone group than in
the buprenorphine group (66.7% vs. 43.3% and 46.7% vs. 33.3%) when asked about
experiencing them “ever”. However, when asked about the last month, both groups
reported similar frequency of erection difficulty, and the reduction of sexual desire was
higher in the buprenorphine group (10% vs. 26.7%). Additionally, sexual functions were
similar between the two groups when measured with Brief Male Sexual Functioning
Inventory (BMSFI) and asked about the last month. The quality of evidence is rather poor.
There are no studies on peripheral restricted opioid receptor antagonists as a treatment
for opioid-induced sexual dysfunction.
5.4. Plant-Derived Medicines
There is limited evidence for the effectiveness of herbal products, including damask
rose oil. It has been tested in a small, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of
women undergoing methadone replacement therapy [
73
]. Improvement was demonstrated
in all domains of the FSFI scale after eight weeks of treatment.
Another randomized controlled trial shows that ginseng may also have a positive
effect on methadone-induced sexual function, both in men and women [74].
5.5. Non-Pharmacological Methods
There are no studies on the effectiveness of non-pharmacological methods for the
treatment of opioid-induced sexual dysfunction. However, as these drugs may be only one
of the etiological factors, the use of standard non-pharmacological methods in these disor-
ders should be considered. These include, among others, psychotherapy or psychosexual
therapy [
75
,
76
], physiotherapy [
77
], physical therapy with the use of instruments [
78
] and
the use of lubricants in women [75], and the use of erection aids in men [79].
6. Conclusions
Sexual disorders are common among cancer patients undergoing opioid therapy,
yet they are frequently overlooked and untreated. The etiology of these disorders is
multifactorial and, therefore, difficult to interpret, as the disease itself and its treatment
could be confounding variables not controlled in the presented studies. However, despite
the scarce evidence, opioids may be one of the etiological factors not widely known so
far. The pathophysiology of this phenomenon is not yet clear and should be a subject
for future research. It may include disorders of both the endocrine and nervous systems,
resulting in, among other things, ED and deteriorating sexual desire, sexual arousal, orgasm,
and general satisfaction with sex life. The treatment options for opioid-induced sexual
dysfunction include testosterone replacement therapy, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors,
bupropion, opioid antagonists, and plant-derived means, such as damask rose oil and
ginseng. However, most of them were studied in males, and further research on treatment
for women is needed. Although opioids are believed to be an important cause, the etiology
is usually multifactorial, so management should be multifaceted and individualized by
targeting pathophysiological factors. One of the treatment options may also be a choice of
an opioid that is less likely to cause sexual dysfunction, yet further research is necessary.
Cancers 2022,14, 4046 10 of 12
Author Contributions:
Conceptualization, B.S. and T.D.; evidence query, B.S.; writing—original draft
preparation, B.S.; writing—review and editing, A.K. and T.D.; visualization, B.S. and TD.; supervision,
T.D.; project administration, T.D.; funding acquisition, T.D. All authors have read and agreed to the
published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Rosales, A.R.; Byrne, D.; Burnham, C.; Watts, L.; Clifford, K.; Zuckerman, D.S.; Beck, T. Comprehensive Survivorship Care with
Cost and Revenue Analysis. J. Oncol. Pract. 2013,10, e81–e85. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2.
Schover, L.R.; van der Kaaij, M.; van Dorst, E.; Creutzberg, C.; Huyghe, E.; Kiserud, C.E. Sexual Dysfunction and Infertility as
Late Effects of Cancer Treatment. Eur. J. Cancer Suppl. 2014,12, 41–53. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3.
Lemieux, L.; Kaiser, S.; Pereira, J.; Meadows, L.M. Sexuality in Palliative Care: Patient Perspectives. Palliat. Med.
2004
,18, 630–637.
[CrossRef]
4.
Ussher, J.M.; Perz, J.; Gilbert, E. Perceived Causes and Consequences of Sexual Changes after Cancer for Women and Men: A
Mixed Method Study. BMC Cancer 2015,15, 268. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Shell, J.A. Sexual Issues in the Palliative Care Population. Semin. Oncol. Nurs. 2008,24, 131–134. [CrossRef]
6.
Bond, C.B.; Jensen, P.T.; Groenvold, M.; Johnsen, A.T. Prevalence and Possible Predictors of Sexual Dysfunction and Self-Reported
Needs Related to the Sexual Life of Advanced Cancer Patients. Acta Oncol. 2019,58, 769–775. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7. ICD-11 for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics. Available online: https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en (accessed on 22 May 2022).
8. Schover, L.R. Sexual Quality of Life in Men and Women after Cancer. Climacteric 2019,22, 553–557. [CrossRef]
9. Gannon, J.R.; Walsh, T.J. Testosterone and Sexual Function. Urol. Clin. N. Am. 2016,43, 217–222. [CrossRef]
10.
Basson, R.; Brotto, L.A.; Petkau, A.J.; Labrie, F. Role of Androgens in Women’s Sexual Dysfunction. Menopause
2010
,17, 962–971.
[CrossRef]
11.
Davis, S.R.; Wahlin-Jacobsen, S. Testosterone in Women-the Clinical Significance. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol.
2015
,3, 980–992.
[CrossRef]
12.
Traish, A.M.; Paco Kang, H.; Saad, F.; Guay, A.T. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)—A Precursor Steroid or an Active Hormone
in Human Physiology. J. Sex. Med. 2011,8, 2960–2982. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13.
Krüger, T.H.C.; Haake, P.; Hartmann, U.; Schedlowski, M.; Exton, M.S. Orgasm-Induced Prolactin Secretion: Feedback Control of
Sexual Drive? Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2002,26, 31–44. [CrossRef]
14.
Stuckey, B.G.A. Female Sexual Function and Dysfunction in the Reproductive Years: The Influence of Endogenous and Exogenous
Sex Hormones. J. Sex. Med. 2008,5, 2282–2290. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15.
Lee, H.J.; Macbeth, A.H.; Pagani, J.H.; Scott Young, W. Oxytocin: The Great Facilitator of Life. Prog. Neurobiol.
2009
,88, 127–151.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
16.
Bedos, M.; Antaramian, A.; Gonzalez-Gallardo, A.; Paredes, R.G. Paced Mating Increases the Expression of
µ
Opioid Receptors in
the Ventromedial Hypothalamus of Male Rats. Behav. Brain Res. 2019,359, 401–407. [CrossRef]
17.
Carretero, J.; Bodego, P.; Rodríguez, R.E.; Rubio, M.; Blanco, E.; Burks, D.J. Expression of the
µ
-Opioid Receptor in the Anterior
Pituitary Gland Is Influenced by Age and Sex. Neuropeptides 2004,38, 63–68. [CrossRef]
18.
Estomba, H.; Muñoa-Hoyos, I.; Gianzo, M.; Urizar-Arenaza, I.; Casis, L.; Irazusta, J.; Subirán, N. Expression and Localization of
Opioid Receptors in Male Germ Cells and the Implication for Mouse Spermatogenesis. PLoS ONE
2016
,11, e0152162. [CrossRef]
19.
Kaminski, T. The Involvement of Protein Kinases in Signalling of Opioid Agonist FK 33-824 in Porcine Granulosa Cells. Anim.
Reprod. Sci. 2006,91, 107–122. [CrossRef]
20. Katz, N.; Mazer, N.A. The Impact of Opioids on the Endocrine System. Clin. J. Pain 2009,25, 170–175. [CrossRef]
21.
Aloisi, A.M.; Ceccarelli, I.; Fiorenzani, P.; Maddalena, M.; Rossi, A.; Tomei, V.; Sorda, G.; Danielli, B.; Rovini, M.; Cappelli, A.; et al.
Aromatase and 5-Alpha Reductase Gene Expression: Modulation by Pain and Morphine Treatment in Male Rats. Mol. Pain
2010
,
6, 69. [CrossRef]
22.
Nimbi, F.M.; Tripodi, F.; Rossi, R.; Navarro-Cremades, F.; Simonelli, C. Male Sexual Desire: An Overview of Biological,
Psychological, Sexual, Relational, and Cultural Factors Influencing Desire. Sex. Med. Rev. 2020,8, 59–91. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23.
Dosch, A.; Rochat, L.; Ghisletta, P.; Favez, N.; van der Linden, M. Psychological Factors Involved in Sexual Desire, Sexual Activity,
and Sexual Satisfaction: A Multi-Factorial Perspective. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2016,45, 2029–2045. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24.
Kingsberg, S.A.; Clayton, A.H.; Pfaus, J.G. The Female Sexual Response: Current Models, Neurobiological Underpinnings and
Agents Currently Approved or under Investigation for the Treatment of Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder. CNS Drugs
2015
,29,
915–933. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25.
McCabe, M.P.; Sharlip, I.D.; Atalla, E.; Balon, R.; Fisher, A.D.; Laumann, E.; Lee, S.W.; Lewis, R.; Segraves, R.T. Definitions of
Sexual Dysfunctions in Women and Men: A Consensus Statement from the Fourth International Consultation on Sexual Medicine.
J. Sex. Med. 2016,13, 135–143. [CrossRef]
26.
Jung, J.; Jo, H.W.; Kwon, H.; Jeong, N.Y. Clinical Neuroanatomy and Neurotransmitter-Mediated Regulation of Penile Erection.
Int. Neurourol. J. 2014,18, 58. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cancers 2022,14, 4046 11 of 12
27.
Andersson, K.-E. Mechanisms of Penile Erection and Basis for Pharmacological Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction. Pharmacol. Rev.
2011,63, 811–859. [CrossRef]
28.
Andersson, K.-E. Erectile Physiological and Pathophysiological Pathways Involved in Erectile Dysfunction. J. Urol.
2003
,170,
S6–S14. [CrossRef]
29.
Mckinlay, J. The Worldwide Prevalence and Epidemiology of Erectile Dysfunction. Int. J. Impot. Res.
2000
,12, S6–S11. [CrossRef]
30. Chew, K.K. Prevalence of Erectile Dysfunction in Community-Based Studies. Int. J. Impot. Res. 2004,16, 201–202. [CrossRef]
31.
Grover, S.A.; Lowensteyn, I.; Kaouache, M.; Marchand, S.; Coupal, L.; DeCarolis, E.; Zoccoli, J.; Defoy, I. The Prevalence of Erectile
Dysfunction in the Primary Care Setting: Importance of Risk Factors for Diabetes and Vascular Disease. Arch. Intern. Med.
2006
,
166, 213–219. [CrossRef]
32.
Nguyen, H.M.T.; Gabrielson, A.T.; Hellstrom, W.J.G. Erectile Dysfunction in Young Men—A Review of the Prevalence and Risk
Factors. Sex. Med. Rev. 2017,5, 508–520. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
33.
Pizzol, D.; Xiao, T.; Smith, L.; Sanchez, G.F.L.; Garolla, A.; Parris, C.; Barnett, Y.; Ilie, P.C.; Soysal, P.; Shin, J.I.; et al. Prevalence of
Erectile Dysfunction in Male Survivors of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cross-Sectional Studies. Br. J. Gen.
Pract. 2021,71, e372. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
34.
Toda, N.; Kishioka, S.; Hatano, Y.; Toda, H. Interactions between Morphine and Nitric Oxide in Various Organs. J. Anesth.
2009
,
23, 554–568. [CrossRef]
35.
Agmo, A.; Rojas, J.; Vazquez, P. Inhibitory Effect of Opiates on Male Rat Sexual Behavior May Be Mediated by Opiate Receptors
Outside the Central Nervous System. Psychopharmacol. Berl. 1992,107, 89–96. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36. Meston, C.M.; Hull, E.; Levin, R.J.; Sipski, M. Disorders of Orgasm in Women. J. Sex. Med. 2004,1, 66–68. [CrossRef]
37.
Rowland, D.; McMahon, C.G.; Abdo, C.; Chen, J.; Jannini, E.; Waldinger, M.D.; Ahn, T.Y. Disorders of Orgasm and Ejaculation in
Men. J. Sex. Med. 2010,7, 1668–1686. [CrossRef]
38.
Alwaal, A.; Breyer, B.N.; Lue, T.F. Normal Male Sexual Function: Emphasis on Orgasm and Ejaculation. Fertil Steril
2015
,104, 1051.
[CrossRef]
39.
Meston, C.M.; Freihart, B.K.; Handy, A.B.; Kilimnik, C.D.; Rosen, R.C. Scoring and Interpretation of the FSFI: What Can Be
Learned From 20 Years of Use? J. Sex. Med. 2020,17, 17–25. [CrossRef]
40.
Baser, R.E.; Li, Y.; Carter, J. Psychometric Validation of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in Cancer Survivors. Cancer
2012
,
118, 4606–4618. [CrossRef]
41.
Jeffery, D.D.; Tzeng, J.P.; Keefe, F.J.; Porter, L.S.; Hahn, E.A.; Flynn, K.E.; Reeve, B.B.; Weinfurt, K.P. Initial Report of the Cancer
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sexual Function Committee: Review of Sexual Function
Measures and Domains Used in Oncology. Cancer 2009,115, 1142–1153. [CrossRef]
42.
Denlinger, C.S.; Carlson, R.W.; Are, M.; Baker, K.S.; Davis, E.; Edge, S.B.; Friedman, D.L.; Goldman, M.; Jones, L.; King, A.; et al.
Survivorship: Sexual Dysfunction (Female), Version 1.2013: Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw.
2014,12, 184. [CrossRef]
43.
Rosen, R.C.; Riley, A.; Wagner, G.; Osterloh, I.H.; Kirkpatrick, J.; Mishra, A. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): A
Multidimensional Scale For Assesment of Erectile Dysfunction. J. Sex. Med. 1997,49, 822–830. [CrossRef]
44.
Rosen, R.; Cappelleri, J.; Lipsky, J.; Pen, Ä.B. Development and Evaluation of an Abridged, 5-Item Version of the International
Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a Diagnostic Tool for Erectile Dysfunction. Nature 1999,11, 319–326. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
45.
Litwin, M.S.M.M.; Hays, R.D.P.; Fink, A.P.; Ganz, P.A.M.; Leake, B.P.; Brook, R.H.M.S. The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index:
Development, Reliability, and Validity of a Health-Related Quality of Life Measure. Med. Care
1998
,36, 1002–1012. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
46.
Jensen, P.T.; Klee, M.C.; Thranov, I.; Groenvold, M. Validation of a Questionnaire for Self-Assessment of Sexual Function and
Vaginal Changes after Gynaecological Cancer. Psycho-Oncology 2004,13, 577–592. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
47.
Bartula, I.; Sherman, K.A. Development and Validation of the Female Sexual Function Index Adaptation for Breast Cancer Patients
(FSFI-BC). Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2015,152, 477–488. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
48.
Maiorino, M.I.; Chiodini, P.; Bellastella, G.; Giugliano, D.; Esposito, K. Sexual Dysfunction in Women with Cancer: A Systematic
Review with Meta-Analysis of Studies Using the Female Sexual Function Index. Endocrine 2016,54, 329–341. [CrossRef]
49.
Bruner, D.W.; Calvano, T. The Sexual Impact of Cancer and Cancer Treatments in Men. Nurs. Clin. N. Am.
2007
,42, 555–580.
[CrossRef]
50.
Rajagopal, A.; Vassilopoulou-Sellin, R.; Palmer, J.L.; Kaur, G.; Bruera, E. Symptomatic Hypogonadism in Male Survivors of
Cancer with Chronic Exposure to Opioids. Cancer 2004,100, 851–858. [CrossRef]
51.
Venkatesh, K.; Mattoo, S.K.; Grover, S. Sexual Dysfunction in Men Seeking Treatment for Opioid Dependence: A Study from
India. J. Sex. Med. 2014,11, 2055–2064. [CrossRef]
52.
Zhao, S.; Deng, T.; Luo, L.; Wang, J.; Li, E.; Liu, L.; Li, F.; Luo, J.; Zhao, Z. Association Between Opioid Use and Risk of Erectile
Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Sex. Med. 2017,14, 1209–1219. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
53.
Deyo, R.A.; Smith, D.H.M.; Johnson, E.S.; Tillotson, C.J.; Donovan, M.; Yang, X.; Petrik, A.; Morasco, B.J.; Dobscha, S.K.
Prescription Opioids for Back Pain and Use of Medications for Erectile Dysfunction. Spine Phila Pa 1976
2013
,38, 909–915.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
54.
Ajo, R.; Segura, A.; Inda, M.-D.-M.; Margarit, C.; Ballester, P.; Martínez, E.; Ferrández, G.; Sánchez-Barbie, Á.; Peiró, A.M. Erectile
Dysfunction in Patients with Chronic Pain Treated with Opioids. Med. Clín. 2017,149, 49–54. [CrossRef]
Cancers 2022,14, 4046 12 of 12
55.
Rubinstein, A.L.; Carpenter, D.M.; Minkoff, J.R. Hypogonadism in Men With Chronic Pain Linked to the Use of Long-Acting
Rather Than Short-Acting Opioids. Clin. J. Pain 2013,29, 840–845. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
56.
Hashim, M.A.; el Rasheed, A.H.; Ismail, G.A.W.; Awaad, M.I.; el Habiby, M.M.; Mohsen Ibrahim, N.M.; Abdeen, M.S. Sexual
Dysfunction in Tramadol Hydrochloride Use Disorder Male Patients: A Case-Control Study. Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol.
2020
,35,
42–48. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
57.
Kabbash, A.; el Kelany, R.; Oreby, M.; el Gameel, D. Effect of Tramadol Dependence on Male Sexual Dysfunction. Interdiscip.
Toxicol. 2019,12, 157. [CrossRef]
58.
Kozyrev, N.; Coolen, L.M. Activation of Mu or Delta Opioid Receptors in the Lumbosacral Spinal Cord Is Essential for Ejaculatory
Reflexes in Male Rats. PLoS ONE 2015,10, e0121130. [CrossRef]
59.
Martyn-St James, M.; Cooper, K.; Kaltenthaler, E.; Dickinson, K.; Cantrell, A.; Wylie, K.; Frodsham, L.; Hood, C. Tramadol for
Premature Ejaculation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMC Urol. 2015,15, 6. [CrossRef]
60.
Gomez-Marrero, J.; Feria, M.; Mas, M. Stimulation of Opioid Receptors Suppresses Penile Erectile Reflexes and Seminal Emission
in Rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1988,31, 393–396. [CrossRef]
61.
Yee, A.; Loh, H.S.; Maria, H.; Hashim, H.; Ng, C.G. The Prevalence of Sexual Dysfunction among Male Patients on Methadone
and Buprenorphine Treatments: A Meta-Analysis Study. J. Sex. Med. 2013,11, 22–32. [CrossRef]
62. Yee, A.; Loh, H.S.; Loh, H.H.; Riahi, S.; Ng, C.G.; Sulaiman, A.H. bin A Comparison of Sexual Desire in Opiate-Dependent Men
Receiving Methadone and Buprenorphine Maintenance Treatment. Ann. Gen. Psychiatry 2019,18, 25. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
63.
Hallinan, R.; Byrne, A.; Agho, K.; McMahon, C.; Tynan, P.; Attia, J. Erectile Dysfunction in Men Receiving Methadone and
Buprenorphine Maintenance Treatment. J. Sex. Med. 2007,5, 684–692. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
64.
Zamboni, L.; Franceschini, A.; Portoghese, I.; Morbioli, L.; Lugoboni, F. Sexual Functioning and Opioid Maintenance Treatment in
Women. Results from a Large Multicentre Study. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2019,13, 97. [CrossRef]
65.
Varma, A.; Sapra, M.; Iranmanesh, A. Impact of Opioid Therapy on Gonadal Hormones: Focus on Buprenorphine. Horm. Mol.
Biol. Clin. Investig. 2018,36, 20170080. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
66.
Baron, R.; Jansen, J.P.; Binder, A.; Pombo-Suarez, M.; Kennes, L.; Müller, M.; Falke, D.; Steigerwald, I. Tolerability, Safety, and
Quality of Life with Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) Compared with Oxycodone/Naloxone PR in Patients with Severe
Chronic Low Back Pain with a Neuropathic Component: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label, Phase 3b/4 Trial. Pain Pract.
2016,16, 600–619. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
67.
AminiLari, M.; Manjoo, P.; Craigie, S.; Couban, R.; Wang, L.; Busse, J.W. Hormone Replacement Therapy and Opioid Tapering
for Opioid-Induced Hypogonadism among Patients with Chronic Noncancer Pain: A Systematic Review. Pain Med.
2019
,20,
301–313. [CrossRef]
68.
Yee, A.; Loh, H.S.; Ong, T.A.; Guan Ng, C.; Sulaiman, A.H. Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled
Trial of Bupropion as Treatment for Methadone-Emergent Sexual Dysfunction in Men. Am. J. Men Health
2018
,12, 1705–1718.
[CrossRef]
69.
Tatari, F.; Farnia, V.; Nasiri, R.F.; Najafi, F. Trazodone in Methandone Induced Erectile Dysfunction. Iran. J. Psychiatry
2010
,5, 164.
70.
van Ahlen, H.; Piechota, H.J.; Kiasa, H.J.; Brennemann’, W.; Klingmiillerb, D. Opiate Antagonists in Erectile Dysfunction: A
Possible New Treatment Option? Results of a Pilot Study with Naltrexone. Eur. Urol. 1995,28, 246–250. [CrossRef]
71.
Billington, C.J.; Shafer, R.B.; Morley, J.E. Effects of Opioid Blockade with Nalmefene in Older Impotent Men. Life Sci.
1990
,47,
799–805. [CrossRef]
72.
Ramdurg, S.; Ambekar, A.; Lal, R. Sexual Dysfunction among Male Patients Receiving Buprenorphine and Naltrexone Mainte-
nance Therapy for Opioid Dependence. J. Sex. Med. 2012,9, 3198–3204. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
73.
Farnia, V.; Tatari, F.; Alikhani, M.; Yazdchi, K.; Taghizadeh, M.; Sadeghi Bahmani, D.; Karbasizadeh, H.; Holsboer-Trachsler, E.;
Brand, S. Rosa Damascena Oil Improved Methadone-Related Sexual Dysfunction in Females with Opioid Use Disorder under
Methadone Maintenance Therapy—Results from a Double-Blind, Randomized, and Placebo-Controlled Trial. J. Psychiatr. Res.
2017,95, 260–268. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
74.
Farnia, V.; Alikhani, M.; Ebrahimi, A.; Golshani, S.; Sadeghi Bahmani, D.; Brand, S. Ginseng Treatment Improves the Sexual Side
Effects of Methadone Maintenance Treatment. Psychiatry Res. 2019,276, 142–150. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
75.
Basson, R.; Wierman, M.E.; van Lankveld, J.; Brotto, L. Summary of the Recommendations on Sexual Dysfunctions in Women.
J. Sex. Med. 2010,7, 314–326. [CrossRef]
76.
McCarthy, B.; McDonald, D. Assessment, Treatment, and Relapse Prevention: Male Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder. J. Sex
Marital. Ther. 2009,35, 58–67. [CrossRef]
77.
Stein, A.; Sauder, S.K.; Reale, J. The Role of Physical Therapy in Sexual Health in Men and Women: Evaluation and Treatment.
Sex. Med. Rev. 2019,7, 46–56. [CrossRef]
78.
Schroder, M.A.; Mell, L.K.; Hurteau, J.A.; Collins, Y.C.; Rotmensch, J.; Waggoner, S.E.; Yamada, S.D.; Small, W.; Mundt, A.J.
Clitoral Therapy Device for Treatment of Sexual Dysfunction in Irradiated Cervical Cancer Patients. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol.
Phys. 2005,61, 1078–1086. [CrossRef]
79.
Wassersug, R.; Wibowo, E. Non-Pharmacological and Non-Surgical Strategies to Promote Sexual Recovery for Men with Erectile
Dysfunction. Transl. Androl. Urol. 2017,6, S776–S794. [CrossRef]
... Działanie analgetyków opioidowych na różnych piętrach układu pokarmowego[19,[28][29][30] ...
... A more severe underlying disease could of course also lead to more pronounced SDs regardless of the drugs used (Aizenberg et al. 1995). However, if various drugs are used, e.g., due to other diseases, both the concomitant diseases and the medications must be categorized as potential additional risk factors (Salata et al. 2022;Pöttgen et al. 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
Sexual dysfunctions (SD) are common and debilitating side effects of antipsychotics. The current study analyzes the occurrence of antipsychotic-related SD using data from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). FAERS was queried for sexual dysfunction adverse events (encoded by 35 different MedDRA preferred terms) secondary to amisulpride, aripiprazole, chlorprothixene, clozapine, haloperidol, loxapine, olanzapine, pipamperone, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone from 2000 to 2023. Disproportionality signal analysis was performed by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI). During the observation period, 9203 cases of SD were reported in association with the antipsychotic drug use. Men reported these dysfunctions more frequently (68.4% of all cases) than women. Ziprasidone had the highest ROR for sexual dysfunction in FAERS, at 84.86 ; 95 % C I ( 77.50 , 92.94 ) ) , followed by aripirazole for sexual dysfunction ( R O R = 34.17 ; 95 % C I ( 32.06 , 36.43 ) ) . In general, aripiprazole, olanzapine, risperidone, ziprasidone, and quetiapine had higher risk signals across multiple adverse events (AEs), whereas chlorprothixene, loxapine, and amisulpride showed lower risk signals. The pathogenesis of SD does not appear to be limited to specific pathomechanisms and therefore not to specific substances. The differing report distributions by sex and the impact of polypharmacy on the symptoms warrant further investigations.
... Substance use rapidly reduces the response to biological rewards, including sex, and impairs the behaviors that are normally rewarding (30). Additionally, opioid agonists may inhibit the pulsatile secretion of the gonadotropinreleasing hormone in the hypothalamus, leading to hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, which may be one of the other underlying factors between OUD and sexual dysfunctions (31,32). Survivors of cancer who have chronically consumed opioids were shown to have higher levels of sexual dysfunction, which is probably due to similar etiopathogenetic mechanisms (33). ...
... The wide range is due to the heterogeneity of study populations (different opioids, different doses, age, impact of other medications and comorbidities) [41]. However, it should also be considered that sexual dysfunction is also common in patients with cancer, both due to the malignancy itself and the oncological treatments used [42]. The prevalence is estimated to be 66% in women with cancer [43]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Opinion statement Opioids are an important treatment in managing cancer pain. Uncontrolled pain can be detrimental to function and quality of life. Common adverse effects of opioids such as sedation, constipation and nausea are well recognised, but opioid effects on the endocrine and immune systems are less apparent. The evidence for the immunomodulatory effects of opioids suggest that some opioids might be immunosuppressive and that their use might be associated with reduced survival and increased rates of infection in patients with cancer. However, the quality of this evidence is limited. Opioid-induced endocrinopathies, in particular opioid-induced hypogonadism, may also impact cancer survival and impair quality of life. But again, evidence in patients with cancer is limited, especially with regard to their management. There are some data that different opioids influence immune and endocrine function with varying outcomes. For example, some opioids, such as tramadol and buprenorphine, demonstrate immune-sparing qualities when compared to others. However, most of this data is preclinical and without adequate clinical correlation; thus, no opioid can currently be recommended over another in this context. Higher opioid doses might have more effect on immune and endocrine function. Ultimately, it is prudent to use the lowest effective dose to control the cancer pain. Clinical presentations of opioid-induced endocrinopathies should be considered in patients with cancer and assessed for, particularly in long-term opioid users. Hormone replacement therapies may be considered where appropriate with support from endocrinology specialists.
... There are usually many concomitant causes of constipation in these patients, among which the behavioural factors, such as immobilisation, disability, and insufficient fluid and food intake, or dependence on the caregivers, seem to be essential in the aetiology of occurrence and degree of constipation [8,9]. Although several drugs may cause constipation, opioid analgesics, used commonly in the treatment of cancer pain, are regarded as the most important risk factor [10][11][12]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Constipation is one of the most frequent clinical and nursing problems both in palliative care patients and in nursing home residents. Aim: To assess the occurrence of constipation and its risk factors in adult inpatient palliative care units versus nursing homes. Material and methods: An epidemiological study was performed in an inpatient hospice and a nursing home. Results: Fifty-one hospice patients and 49 nursing home residents were included in the study. Cancer was the main clinical condition in 90% of the palliative care patients (PCPs), and dementia or other psychotic disorders were predominant in the nursing home residents (NHRs). More PCPs had constipation than did NHRs (80% vs. 59%; p = 0.02), although none of the single constipation symptoms differed statistically between these two groups. The insufficient food intake was twice as severe in the hospice patients (p = 0.0001). 68.6% of PCPs took strong opioids, while none of the NHRs did. Three times more NHRs spent at least 50% of daytime in bed than did PCPs (73.5% vs. 23.5%; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Constipation is very frequent in both palliative care patients and nursing home residents, but PCPs are more prone to it. The NHR and PCR groups should not be treated uniformly as the end-of-life population, referring to the prevention and treatment of constipation, therapy needs, and the means enrolled for optimal symptom control.
... It is one of the most common symptoms observed in palliative care patients [2,3]. There may be several concomitant causes of constipation in these patients [4,5]. Emphasis is placed on behavioral causes, such as those related to immobilization, disability, deconditioning, and insufficient fluid and food intake. ...
Article
Full-text available
Constipation is frequently encountered in palliative care patients and remains a significant therapeutic problem. The etiology of constipation is multifactorial. Nutritional and behavioral factors are considered common causes of constipation; however, their impact has not yet been assessed precisely. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between the frequency of bowel movements (FoBM) and risk factors of constipation in palliative care patients. A cohort retrospective study was performed in three palliative care centers, including outpatient, home, and inpatient care cancer patients using questionnaires on bowel dysfunction symptoms, behavioral risk factors, and opioid use. The inclusion criterion was adult patients examined on the day of admission. The exclusion criterion was Karnofsky performance status score ≤20. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to measure the statistical dependence between two variables and frequency analysis was performed using the chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test. Two hundred thirty-seven valid questionnaires were collected. We found the correlation between FoBM and insufficient food and fluid intake (p < 0.0001), as well as for inadequate conditions of privacy (p = 0.0008), dependency on a caregiver (p = 0.0059), and the patient's overall performance status (p = 0.013). We did not manage to prove bed rest as the independent risk factor of constipation. The main risk factors of constipation in palliative care patients appeared to be insufficient fluid and food intake, inadequate conditions of privacy, dependency on a caregiver, as well as poor general performance status.
Article
Background: Methadone-induced sexual dysfunction in men can significantly impair their quality of life and reduce methadone adherence, thereby interfering with its therapeutic benefits. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of bupropion and amantadine on reducing sexual dysfunction in methadone-dependent males. Methods: This clinical trial included 47 methadone-dependent males attending the Addiction Treatment Center in Babol, Iran. Participants were randomly assigned to either the amantadine group (n = 23) or the bupropion group (n = 24). Demographic data and addiction history were collected using a checklist, and sexual dysfunction was assessed with the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Questionnaire before and after the intervention. Paired t-tests, independent t-tests, and chi-squared tests were used to compare the two groups. Results: Both groups had similar demographic variables and sexual function scores before the intervention (P > 0.05). However, there was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of total sexual dysfunction scores (52.13 ± 13.07 for bupropion vs. 60.79 ± 4.47 for amantadine; P = 0.006). Additionally, significant differences were observed in sexual desire (P = 0.003), satisfaction with intercourse (P = 0.001), and overall satisfaction (P = 0.034), with higher scores in the bupropion group. Adverse medication-related effects were less prevalent in the bupropion group (54.2%) compared to the amantadine group (60.9%). Conclusions: Bupropion appears to be more effective in improving sexual function in methadone-dependent males undergoing methadone treatment, with patients in the bupropion group achieving better scores than those in the amantadine group. Additionally, the occurrence of adverse effects was lower in the bupropion group compared to the amantadine group.
Article
Full-text available
Objective This study assessed the association between erectile dysfunction (ED) and arthritis. Methods Weighted logistic regression and subgroup analyses were used to investigate the association between arthritis incidence and ED among participants in the 2001–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database. Results Among the participants, 27.8% and 18.5% had a self-reported history of ED and arthritis, respectively. ED was associated with arthritis (odds ratio [OR]=4.00; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.20–4.99; p<0.001], which remained significant after adjustment (OR=1.42, 95% CI: 1.00–1.96; p<0.001). Stratified by type of arthritis, after full adjustment, osteoarthritis remained significant (OR=1.11; 95% CI: 1.03–1.20; p=0.017), and rheumatoid arthritis (OR=1.03, 95% CI: 0.93–1.13; p= 0.5) and other arthritis (OR=1.04, 95% CI: 0.98–1.11; p=0.2) were not significantly correlated with ED. Multiple inference analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Conclusion Our study showed that arthritis was strongly associated with ED. There is an urgent need to raise awareness and conduct additional research on the reasons behind this association in order to implement more scientific and rational treatment programs for patients with ED and arthritis.
Article
Introduction Androgens play important roles in regulating the growth and development of the male reproductive system and maintaining libido and erectile function. The specific mechanisms by which androgen deficiency leads to erectile dysfunction (ED) are not yet fully understood. Objectives To understand the mechanisms and treatment of androgen deficiency–related ED. Methods A literature search in the past 10 years was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar to determine the effects of androgen deficiency on erectile function and the treatment of androgen deficiency. Results Androgen deficiency can be caused by hypothalamic-pituitary lesions and injuries, testicular-related diseases and injuries, endocrine and metabolic disorders, the side effects of medication, and age. Androgen deficiency can lead to ED by inhibiting the NOS/NO/cGMP pathway (nitric oxide synthase/nitric oxide/cyclic guanosine monophosphate) and altering the expression of ion channel proteins, as well as by inducing oxidative stress, death, and fibrosis in penile corpus cavernosum cells. Testosterone replacement therapy is effective at improving the serum testosterone levels and erectile function in patients with androgen deficiency. For patients who need to maintain a low androgenic state, erectile function can be improved by lifestyle changes, treatment with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy, and stem cell therapy. Conclusions Androgen deficiency can affect the structure and function of the penile corpus cavernosum, leading to ED. Areas of further study include how androgen replacement therapy can improve erectile function and how to improve the maintenance of erectile function in patients with hypoandrogenic status.
Article
Full-text available
Background Prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) in male survivors of cancer across cancer types has not been systematically analysed. Aim To estimate the prevalence of ED in all types of cancer and identify characteristics associated with ED in survivors of cancer. Design and setting Systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) of cross-sectional studies. Method MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EMBASE were searched, targeting reports published from inception to 1 February 2020. All retrospective or prospective studies reporting prevalence of ED in male patients with cancer and using a validated tool for detection of ED were included. A random-effects MA model was used to pool prevalence of ED as absolute estimates at three different stages, that is, ‘healthy’, ‘at diagnosis’, and ‘after treatment’. A univariate MA regression including the three-level group variable as the only independent variable was used to assess the difference in ED prevalence across the three groups. Further MAs were conducted for studies involving patients at diagnosis and after treatment, and statistical inferences were made with setting for multiple testing controlling for a false discovery rate (FDR) <0.05. Results In total, 1301 studies were assessed for inclusion. Of these, 141 were potentially eligible and subsequently scrutinised in full text. Finally, 43 studies were included with a total of 13 148 participants. Overall, pooled data of the included studies showed an ED prevalence of 40.72% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 31.80 to 50.29) in patients with cancer, with prevalences of 28.60% (95% CI = 12.10 to 53.83) at time of diagnosis and 42.70% (95% CI = 32.97 to 53.03) after treatment, with significant difference between these two stages and across cancer locations, controlling for an FDR <0.05. Conclusion Erectile dysfunction was particularly high in male survivors of cancer and was associated with cancer treatment, cancer site, and age.
Article
Full-text available
Tramadol dependence became an increasing and alarming problem in the Egyptian community. Wide availability of tramadol as a pain killer and its role in the treatment of premature ejaculation may be the most apparent causes of increased magnitude of the problem among youth who believe that tramadol has a positive impact on their sexual functions. This study aimed to explore the real impact of chronic tramadol administration on sexual functions in males dependent on tramadol. The study was carried on 80 subjects (50 subjects were tramadol dependent group and 30 subjects represented the control group). Personal, family and past histories were obtained from all the participants in addition to the toxicological history from tramadol dependent group. Urine screening for tramadol was done for all cases of history of tramadol dependence then confirmation by HPLC technique to measure tramadol blood level was done. Both groups were investigated for serum testosterone and prolactin level. Curiosity (22%) and treatment of premature ejaculation (20%) were the main motives for dependence. Erectile dysfunction and decreased libido occurred in 44% and 48% of tramadol dependent group respectively. Significant increase in erectile dysfunction and decreased libido was noted as the duration of dependence increased. Additionally, significant decrease in serum testosterone level and increase in serum prolactin level as tramadol daily dose and duration increased was found. In conclusion, men who take tramadol for premature ejaculation or any other purpose must know that they are very susceptible to many sexual dysfunctions.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Over the past 20 years, the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) has been considered the gold standard for the measurement of sexual function in women, with over 1,000 published manuscripts citing the article. Despite the measure’s widespread usage and excellent psychometric properties, there has been some confusion over how to best implement and score the measure and interpret corresponding findings. Aim The aim of the current article is to provide guidance, drawing from 20 years of use, on how to best implement the FSFI in research settings and interpret results based on the validation studies that have been conducted to date. Methods The overview of scoring and interpretation procedures found in this article is drawn from a review of the published literature on the psychometric properties of the FSFI. Main Outcome Measure The measure of interest for the present review is the FSFI. Results This review article provides information about implementing, scoring, and interpreting the full-scale FSFI. Domain-level scoring and interpretation procedures are also discussed across the 5 domains of the FSFI: arousal, satisfaction, desire, pain, and lubrication. Additionally, guidance is provided for evaluating translated versions of the FSFI and using the measure to examine sexual function in culturally diverse populations. Clinical Implications Guidance on appropriately scoring and interpretating the FSFI has the potential to strengthen our empirical understanding of sexual function, and consequently, to guide theory-driven treatment development and clinical practice. Strength & Limitations The present review provides applied guidance for the appropriate use of the FSFI specifically, but does not cover other common measures of sexual function or adaptations of the original measure. Conclusion It is our hope that the guidance found in this review will ultimately lead to more rigorous and appropriate usage of the FSFI in research settings.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Methadone is an effective therapy for opiate dependence. However, one of the commonest side effects is sexual dysfunction among male patients. Buprenorphine is an alternative to methadone. This study aimed to compare sexual desire among opiate-dependent male patients on buprenorphine (BMT) and methadone maintenance therapy (MMT). Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 126 male opiate-dependent patient who were tested for total testosterone (TT) and prolactin levels, and were interviewed and completed the Sexual Desire Inventory-2 (SDI-2), Malay language of International Index of Erectile Function (Mal-IIEF-15) and the Malay version of the self-rated Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-BM) questionnaires. Results: There were 95 (75.4%) patients on MMT and 31 (24.6%) on BMT. Patients on MMT scored significantly lower in the sexual desire domain (Mal-IIEF-15 scores) (p < 0.01), dyadic sexual desire (p = 0.04) and TT plasma level (p < 0.01) when compared to BMT group after controlling all the confounders. Conclusions: Patients on MMT are associated with lower sexual desire when compared with patients on BMT. Smoking may further lower testosterone and, hence, sexual desire in those already on methadone.
Article
Full-text available
Opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) is the most widespread therapy for both females and males opioid addicts. While many studies have evaluated the OMT impact on men’s sexuality, the data collected about the change in women’s sexual functioning is still limited despite the fact that it is now well-known that opioids - both endogenous and exogenous - affect the endocrine system and play an important role in sexual functioning. The present study aims to determine how OMT with buprenorphine (BUP) or methadone (MTD) affects sexual health in women; examining also any possible emerging correlation between sexual dysfunction (SD), type of opioid and patients’ mental health. This multi-center study case recruited 258 female volunteers attending Italian public Addiction Outpatients Centers that were stabilized with OMT for at least 3 months. SD was assessed with the Arizona Sexual Experience Scale. The twelve-item General Health Questionnaire was used to assess participants’ mental health conditions. The results show that 56.6% of women receiving OMT for at least 3 months presented SD without significant differences between MTD e BUP groups. The majority of the subjects with SD have a poorer quality of intimate relationships and worse mental health than the average. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the largest report on the presence of SDs in women as a side effects of MTD and BUP used in OMT. Since SDs cause difficulties in intimate relationships, lower patients’ quality of life and interfere with OMT beneficial outcomes, we recommend that women undertaking an opioid therapy have routine screening for SD and we highlight the importance to better examine opioid-endocrine interactions in future studies in order to provide alternative potential treatments such as the choice of opioid, opioid dose reduction and hormone supplementation.
Article
Evidence suggests that opioids can modulate gonadal function, with consequent decreased release of sex hormones. We attempted to investigate the sexual function of males using tramadol hydrochloride (HCL) and its relationship to levels of free testosterone, luteinizing hormone, and follicle stimulating hormone, and to compare them with heroin use disorder patients and healthy controls. Our sample consisted of 60 opiate use disorder patients (assessed by Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I) (30 heroin and 30 tramadol) and 30 healthy controls. Sexual dysfunction was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function. Free testosterone, follicle stimulating hormone, and luteinizing hormone levels were measured in morning blood samples using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results showed that there was a decrease of luteinizing hormone and free testosterone levels in opiate use disorder patients compared with healthy controls, with heroin-dependent patients having significantly lower levels than those using tramadol. Opiates' effect on follicle stimulating hormone had mixed results. Opioid-dependent patients (both tramadol HCL and heroin using patients) developed sexual dysfunction more than healthy controls, which was generalized, with erectile dysfunction being the most affected domain. These findings are of ultimate importance, considering the fact that people use opioids to enhance their sexual performance in many countries.
Article
Background: While methadone maintenance therapy (MMT) in patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) decreases the risk of substance use relapses and criminal and risky sexual behavior, a major disadvantage is its negative impact on sexual function. In the present study we tested whether, compared to placebo, ginseng extract ameliorates methadone-related sexual dysfunction among female and male patients with OUD and receiving MMT. Method: A total of 74 patients (26 females: mean age: M = 39.0 years; 48 males; mean age: 40.64 years) took part in a double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled study. Female and male patients were separately randomly assigned either to the ginseng or to a placebo condition. At the beginning of the study and four weeks later, patients completed questionnaires on sexual function. Results: Irrespective of gender, sexual function improved over time, but more so in the ginseng condition than in the placebo condition. Conclusions: Ginseng appears to counteract the sexual dysfunction resulting from methadone use in both female and male patients with OUD and undergoing MMT.
Article
Introduction: The literature showed the need for a better understanding of the male sexual response, which has historically been considered as simpler and more mechanistic compared with that in women. Aim: To examine the literature on biopsychosocial factors associated with the level of sexual desire in men and discuss some interesting directions for future research. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted. Main outcome measures: 169 articles published in Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library about male sexual desire and related biopsychosocial factors. Results: We found a lack of multidimensional studies on male sexual desire. Most existing research has focused on hypoactive sexual desire disorder in coupled heterosexual men. Biological factors play important roles in the level of sexual desire, but they are insufficient to explain the male sexual response. Psychological, relational, and sexual factors (eg depression, anxiety, emotions, attraction, conflicts, communication, sexual functioning, distress, satisfaction) are involved in the development/maintenance of lack of sexual interest in men. Cultural influence is also relevant, with cognitive factors linked to gender roles and sexual scripts of masculinity identified as important predictors of low sexual desire. Conclusion: Male sexual desire is characterized by an interplay among biological, psychological, sexual, relational, and cultural elements. This interplay merits further study to better understand how sexual desire works and how treatments for low sexual interest could be improved. Nimbi FM,Tripodi F, Rossi R, et al. Male Sexual Desire: An Overview of Biological, Psychological, Sexual, Relational, and Cultural Factors Influencing Desire. Sex Med Rev 2020;8:59-91.
Article
Background: Sexual dysfunction and problems are common late effects after treatment of cancer. However, little is known about the prevalence and risk factors for sexual dysfunction in patients with advanced cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and predictors of sexual problems and needs in a large sample of Danish patients with advanced cancer. Methodology: The data derived from a representative cross-sectional study of patients with advanced cancer. Patients who had been in contact with 1 of 54 hospital departments were invited to fill out a questionnaire on symptoms and problems. Five items asked about sexuality. Ordinal logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with sexual functioning in explorative analyses. Results: A total of 1,447 patients completed the questionnaire and of those, 961 patients (66%) completed the sexuality items. More than half of the patients (60%) had not been sexually active within the previous month, despite a high prevalence of desire for sexual intimacy (62%). More than half of the patients (57%) experienced that their physical condition or treatment had impaired their sex life. Of those, 52% experienced an unmet need for help with sexual problems from the health care system. Older patients were less likely to report sexual problems than younger patients. Having prostate or gynecologic cancer was associated with the feeling that one’s sexual life was negatively influenced. Conclusion: Sexual problems are common among patients with advanced cancer and should be addressed by the health care system.