Conference PaperPDF Available

Artificial Intelligence in Financial Technology

Authors:

Abstract

AI applications in health care, communications, and arts have brought about rapid and dramatic advances in these fields. Nevertheless, the rapidly expanding potential of AI in the economy and society has raised a set of challenging issues. The fields of AI and financial technology are not spared. How can artificial intelligence (AI) be utilized in financial technology (fintech)? What will be the impact? What actionable objectives are needed to realize value from AI? This research uses a systematic qualitative research methodology, Value-Focused Thinking, to identify the actionable objectives for deriving value from AI in the fintech industry. The results of this study will provide a theoretical framework for pursuing future research as more AI applications are developed in the fintech industry. The results of this research provide guidance to practitioners for achieving value in their AI ventures.
Artificial Intelligence in Financial Technology
CSWIM (Short Paper)
Keng Leng Siau
City University of Hong Kong
klsiau@cityu.edu.hk
Fiona Fui Hoon Nah
City University of Hong Kong
fuihnah@cityu.edu.hk
Yuzhou Qian
City University of Hong Kong
yuzhou.qian.20@alumni.uci.ac.uk
Brenda L. Eschenbrenner
University of Nebraska at Kearney
eschenbrenbl@unk.edu
Langtao Chen
Missouri University of Science & Technology
chenla@mst.edu
Abstract
AI applications in health care, communications, and arts have brought about rapid and dramatic
advances in these fields. Nevertheless, the rapidly expanding potential of AI in the economy and
society has raised a set of challenging issues. The fields of AI and financial technology are not
spared. How can artificial intelligence (AI) be utilized in financial technology (fintech)? What
will be the impact? What actionable objectives are needed to realize value from AI? This
research uses a systematic qualitative research methodology, Value-Focused Thinking, to
identify the actionable objectives for deriving value from AI in the fintech industry. The results of
this study will provide a theoretical framework for pursuing future research as more AI
applications are developed in the fintech industry. The results of this research provide guidance
to practitioners for achieving value in their AI ventures.
Keywords: artificial intelligence, fintech, value-focused thinking
1. Introduction
Financial technology (Fintech) is defined as "a new financial industry that applies technology to
improve financial activities" (Schueffel, 2016, p.45). Nowadays, the concept is used to illustrate
any innovative methods that enhance and automate financial services (Mention, 2019). The rapid
development of fintech is driven by innovative technologies, such as artificial intelligence and
blockchain, and it has gained attention from innovators, academics, and regulators (Mention,
2019). Startup firms promote more user-friendly products, scholars concentrate on the nature and
the effect of the new technology, and policy-makers determine the expected usage of fintech
(Hornuf et al., 2021; Mention, 2019). Although the scale of fintech is already large (with more
than 1,400 fintech firms reported by Ernst & Young), it is still expanding (Das, 2019). This paper
discusses the impact of one emerging technology - artificial intelligence - on the growth and
development of fintech.
Artificial intelligence (AI) aims at "making intelligent machines" (McCarthy, 2004, p.2). The
concept of "AI-empowered" is gaining increasing popularity. Currently, key participants in
modern finance are not entirely humans; instead, machines constitute a large proportion. They
take over routine and structured tasks such as standardized analysis. Since AI can help business
leaders automate time-consuming and labor-intensive operations, and it enables businesses to
505
offer innovative services to customers, the application of AI in the fields of finance has attracted
much attention and interest (Siau et al., 2018; Lin, 2019). The industry is evolving as
organizations that were customarily financial institutions are mutating into information
technology enterprises, and vice versa (Hendershott et al., 2021). With these transformations and
the potential of AI, it will be important for organizations to identify objectives that need to be
accomplished in order for the full value of AI to be realized.
This research addresses the following question: What objectives need to be achieved to realize
the greatest value from AI in the fintech industry? This study aims at discovering the future
development of the application of AI in the fintech industry. More specifically, to ensure that AI
reaches its potential contribution, it will be important to understand what fundamental objectives
need to be met for its value to be fully realized and what are the means objectives to achieve the
fundamental objectives. Understanding the means-end objective network will provide valuable
guidance for researchers and practitioners to derive value from AI in the fintech industry.
2. Literature review
Although definitions of AI are varied and multifaceted, AI can be conceptualized with five
attributes to differentiate it from other technologies. These five attributes are (Hamm and Klesel,
2021):
1. Ability to resolve complex problems AI solves issues that were once not conceivably
possible.
2. Processing that imitates humans – AI mirrors humans' cognitive functioning.
3. Associations with intelligence Some aspects of AI functions are considered
intelligence.
4. Technology-based – Technology is prominent in AI.
5. Leveraging external data – AI normally utilizes external data sources for learning.
Because of its distinctiveness and potential, AI has attracted much research attention over the
decades (Hyder et al., 2019). The rapid advancement in machine learning has spurred the interest
in AI (Wang and Siau, 2019). AI technologies and applications span from the use of deep
learning in self-driving cars to natural language processing to analyze text. AI has the potential to
automate tasks, engage with individuals (e.g., customers), generate insights and make decisions,
and support innovation. With AI's uniqueness in comparison to other technologies, it will be
essential to identify the actionable objectives needed to realize its value. Previous studies have
identified success factors associated with AI adoption, such as top management support and
appropriate resources (e.g., data) (Hamm and Klesel, 2021), as well as employees' perceptions
and attitudes prior to AI adoption (Chiu et al., 2021). What has not been identified, however, are
the actionable objectives needed to derive value from AI.
Financial technology (fintech) "encompasses innovative financial solutions enabled by IT"
(Puschmann, 2017). Artificial intelligence and data science are the promoters of the new
generation of fintech, as they have the potential to discover previously hidden relationships
among variables (Wall, 2018). Concepts and tasks in the fintech field are redefined as AI affects
the operation of financial organizations, transfers the way participants interact, and raises new
financial mechanisms. AI-empowered finance has promoted a new era of smart digital currencies,
risk management, and lending (Cao, 2022). Considering the substantial quantity and diversity of
506
data in the financial services industry, AI is of significant importance (Veloso et al., 2021). For
example, AI in fintech includes assessing loan applications with neural networks and approving
credit with rule-based expert systems. The development of AI helps improve the efficiency of
financial firms and the quality of financial services and products by reducing cost, enhancing
productivity, and promoting more tailored products (OECD, 2021). Based on AI technology,
security companies build an "intelligent control application system" which can analyze both
internal and external big data and identify and warn of hidden risks (Guo and Polak 2021, p.175).
Fintech lenders use complex AI algorithms to make credit decisions quickly (Jagtiani and John,
2018). Ant Financial, a leading Chinese fintech company, promoted the "Smile-to-Pay" service
based on computer vision technology. Customers can complete payment by "smiling" at a
vending machine without using phones or cash (Qi and Xiao, 2018). Further, investors analyze
big data to find customers' demand information with the help of AI and identify customer
investment preferences (Guo and Polak 2021, p.175).
As an emerging technology, AI also brings new risks and challenges to the financial industry.
Wall (2018) claimed that the AI algorithm could identify relationships that are not causal. This
could lead to biases against some protected classes (i.e., gender, race). Since the decision
processes are complex and invisible, it is hard for humans to regulate and intervene (Jagtiani and
John, 2018). Some studies found that it is hard to convince people to trust financial services and
advice provided solely by automated systems (Fenwick and Vermeulen, 2017). Researchers also
found that Fintech lenders may undermine existing financial regulations (Braggion et al., 2019).
Therefore, regulations that promote policies to protect consumers while encouraging the
innovation and development of new technologies need to be further improved (Jagtiani and John,
2018). For AI's potential contribution to be realized, it will be important to identify the value that
AI can provide and objectives that can be achieved to realize this value. Previous studies have
focused on other aspects of AI in fintech, such as the effectiveness of using machine learning in
P2P lending and methods of removing bias (Fu, Huang, and Singh, 2021), algorithmic trading
systems integrating investors' dispositions (Martínez, Román, and Casado, 2019), and investor
reliance on humanized robo-advisors (Hodge, Mendoza, and Sinha, 2021). However, research is
lacking in discerning the value that can be derived from AI in fintech and the objectives needed
to realize this value.
3. Research Question, Methodology, and Procedure
The application of AI in the fintech industry is relatively new, and much is unknown about the
domain. In this research, we employ a systematic, qualitative research methodology,
Value-Focused Thinking (VFT), to identify the values of AI in the fintech industry. VFT has
been utilized in many IS studies (e.g., Nah et al., 2005; Sheng et al., 2010; Rzepka, 2019; Smith
and Dillon, 2019) and is considered to be an effective methodology in the contexts of emerging
IT (Sheng et al., 2005, 2007).
In the context of decision-making, values should be the ultimate guide (Keeney, 1996). Although
alternatives are utilized in making decisions, they are utilized to achieve what one values. Values
are what we care about, and values are principles used for evaluation (Keeney, 1996). In this
case, values are used to evaluate the actual or potential consequences of action and inaction of
proposed AI alternatives and decisions. To derive values from AI in fintech, one should start
with identifying what one values. Values can encompass "ethics, desired traits, characteristics of
507
consequences that matter, guidelines for action, priorities, value tradeoffs, and attitudes toward
risk" (Keeney, 1992, p. 7). VFT provides specific procedures for articulating values by
identifying and structuring objectives qualitatively. These objectives include fundamental and
means objectives. Fundamental objectives are "the essential reasons for interest in the situation"
(Keeney, 1992, p. 34). Means objectives are important to achieving fundamental objectives or
other means objectives. The means objectives are differentiated from fundamental objectives by
using the "Why is it important?" test. If an objective is important because it helps to achieve
another objective, it is a means objective. Otherwise, it is a fundamental objective. The
means-ends objective network is derived from the objectives identified and relationships that
emerge through this process. Values are represented as objectives in the means-ends objective
network. The VFT process is depicted in Figure 1.
Figure 1 Process of Value-Focused Thinking Approach
The interviewees (i.e., subjects) for this research will be fintech professionals and business
executives in these fields. We will interview each of them individually and ask questions to
solicit the values that he or she believes are important in utilizing AI in the fintech industry.
When the interviewees do not generate any further new concepts (i.e., the point of saturation is
reached), we will remove duplicate objectives and combine similar objectives. The consolidated
list of objectives and their relationships describe the values of AI in fintech. Prompting questions
used in the interviews include:
What would you like to achieve with AI in the fintech industry?
What potential benefits can be derived from AI applications in the fintech industry?
If there were no limitations to AI in fintech, what are your expectations?
What issues do you see in AI applications in fintech?
This research will use snowball sampling, which is a type of convenience sampling, to recruit
subjects for this study. Fintech professionals that are known to the authors will be the initial
recruits for participation. These professionals will be requested to nominate other potential
participants who are also fintech professionals or are associated with the fintech industry
(chain-referral sampling method). The participants will need to have at least three years of
experience in the fintech industry as well as an understanding of AI to be eligible to participate.
The size of the sample will be determined by the point of saturation. The saturation point is
attained when further data collection does not contribute to the research. Saturation is a common
standard and a methodological principle in qualitative research.
4. Pilot Study and Expected Contributions
The pilot study for this research is ongoing. As one of the first studies in this stream of research
to identify the values of AI for fintech professionals using a systematic and well-accepted
508
qualitative research methodology, Value-Focused Thinking (VFT), the results of the VFT study
in the form of a means-ends objective network will provide a theoretical framework for
advancing this area of research. For practitioners, the means-ends objective network can help
them to understand the means to achieving the value of AI, and assist business executives in
planning for AI applications in the domain of fintech.
References
1. Cao, L. AI in Finance: Challenges, Techniques, and Opportunities. ACM Computing Surveys
(CSUR) (55:3), 2022, pp. 1-38.
2. Chiu, Y.-T., Zhu, Y.-Q., and Corbett, J. "In the Hearts and Minds of Employees: A Model of
Pre-adoptive Appraisal Toward Artificial Intelligence in Organizations," International
Journal of Information Management (60), 2021, pp. 102379.
3. Das, S. R. "The future of fintech," Financial Management. (48:4), 2019, pp. 981-1007.
4. Fenwick M., and Vermeulen E. P. M. "How to respond to artificial intelligence in
Fintech", Japan Spotlight, 2017, pp. 16–20.
5. Fu, R., Huang, Y., and Singh, P.V. "Crowds, lending, machine, and bias," Information
Systems Research (32:1), 2021, pp. 72-92.
6. Guo, H., and Polak, P. "Artificial intelligence and financial technology FinTech: How AI is
being used under the pandemic in 2020," In The Fourth Industrial Revolution:
Implementation of Artificial Intelligence for Growing Business Success, Hamdan, A.,
Hassanien, A. E., Razzaque, A., and Alareeni, B. (eds.), Springer, Cham, 2021, pp. 169-186.
7. Guthrie, J., and Parker, L. D. "Whither the accounting profession, accountants and
accounting researchers? Commentary and projections," Accounting, auditing, &
accountability (29:1), 2016, pp. 2-10.
8. Hamm, P., and Klesel, M. "Success Factors for the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in
Organizations: A Literature Review," in Proceedings of the Twenty-seventh Americas
Conference on Information Systems, Montreal, Canada, 2021.
9. Hendershott, T., Zhang, X. (M.), Zhao, J. L., and Zheng, Z. (E.). "FinTech as a Game
Changer: Overview of Research Frontiers," Information Systems Research (32:1), 2021, pp.
1-17.
10. Hodge, F. D., Mendoza, K.I., and Sinha, R. K. "The Effect of Humanizing Robo-Advisors on
Investor Judgments," Contemporary Accounting Research (38:1), 2021, pp. 770-792.
11. Hoffman, C.Accounting and auditing in the digital age, 2017. Available at http://xbrlsite.
azurewebsites.net/2017/Library/AccountingAndAuditingInTheDigitalAge.pdf.
12. Hornuf, L., Klus, M. F., Lohwasser, T. S., and Schwienbacher, A. “How do banks interact
with fintech startups?,” Small Business Economics (57:3), 2021, pp. 1505-1526.
13. Hyder, Z., Siau, K., and Nah, F., “Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and
Autonomous Technologies in Mining Industry,” Journal of Database Management (30:2),
2019, pp. 67-79.
14. Jagtiani, J., and John, K. "Fintech: The Impact on Consumers and Regulatory Responses,"
Journal of Economics and Business (100), 2018, pp. 1-6.
15. Keeney, R. L.Value-Focused Thinking. Harvard University Press, 1996.
16. Keeney, R. L. "Value-Focused Thinking: Identifying Decision Opportunities and Creating
Alternatives," European Journal of Operational Research, (92:3), 1996, pp. 537-549.
17. Keeney, R. L. "Creativity in Decision Making with Value-Focused Thinking," Sloan
Management Review, (35:4), 1994, 33-41.
509
18. Keeney, R. L. Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Making, Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
19. Lin, T. "Artificial intelligence, finance, and the law," Fordham Law Review (88:2), 2019,
531.
20. McCarthy, J. What is artificial intelligence? 2004. Available at:
www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/whatisai/whatisai.html.
21. Martínez, R.G., Román,M.P., and Casado, P. P. "Big Data Algorithmic Trading Systems
Based on Investors' Mood," Journal of Behavioral Finance (20:2), 2019, pp. 227-238.
22. Mention, A. L. "The future of fintech," Research-Technology Management (62:4), 2019, pp.
59-63.
23. Nah, F., Siau, K., and Sheng, H., The Value of Mobile Applications: A Utility Company
Study,” Communications of the ACM (48:2), February 2005, pp. 85-90.
24. OECD. Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Big Data in Finance: Opportunities,
Challenges, and Implications for Policy Makers, 2021. Available at:
https://www.oecd.org/finance/artificial-intelligence-machine-learningbig-data-in-finance.htm
25. Puschmann, T. “Fintech,” Business & Information Systems Engineering (59:1), 2017, pp.
69-76.
26. Qi, Y., and Xiao, J. "Fintech: AI powers financial services to improve people's lives,"
Communications of the ACM (61:11), 2018, pp. 65-69.
27. Rzepka, C. "Examining the Use of Voice Assistants: A Value-Focused Thinking Approach,"
in Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Cancún,
Mexico, 2019.
28. Schueffel, P. "Taming the beast: A scientific definition of fintech," Journal of Innovation
Management, (4:4), 2016, pp. 32-54.
29. Sheng, H., Nah, F., and Siau, K., “Strategic Implications of Mobile Technology: A Case
Study Using Value-Focused Thinking,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems (14:3),
2005, pp. 269-290.
30. Sheng, H., Nah, F.F.-H., and Siau, K. "Value-Focused Thinking and its Application in MIS
Research," Journal of Database Management (18:3), 2007, pp. i-v.
31. Sheng, H., Siau, K., and Nah, F. F-H. "Understanding the Values of Mobile Technology in
Education: A Value-Focused Thinking Approach," The DATA BASE for Advances in
Information Systems (41:2), 2010, pp. 25-44.
32. Siau, K., Hilgers, M., Chen, L., Liu, S., Nah, F., Hall, R. and Flachsbart, B., “FinTech
Empowerment: Data Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Machine Learning,” Cutter
Business Technology Journal (31:11/12), 2018, pp. 12-18.
33. Smith, K.J. and Dhillon, G. "Assessing Blockchain Potential for Improving the Cybersecurity
of Financial Transactions," Managerial Finance (46:6), 2019, pp.833-848.
34. Veloso, M., Balch, T., Borrajo, D., Reddy, P., and Shah, S. "Artificial Intelligence Research
in Finance: Discussion and Examples," Oxford Review of Economic Policy (37:3), 2021, pp.
564-584.
35. Wall, L. D. "Some financial regulatory implications of artificial intelligence," Journal of
Economics and Business (100), 2018, pp. 55-63.
36. Wang, W. and Siau, K., “Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Automation, Robotics,
Future of Work, and Future of Humanity A Review and Research Agenda,” Journal of
Database Management (30:1), 2019, pp. 61-79.
510
... In our previous work (Siau et al., 2022b;Siau et al., 2022c), we tried to obtain a more detailed view of how AI has been applied in various industries and fields, and we discussed in detail how such advanced technology could be embedded into accounting (Siau et al., 2022b) and Fintech (Siau et al., 2022c). For example, AI is one of the most significant technologies disrupting the traditional accounting profession (Leitner-Hanetseder et al., 2021;Baldwin et al., 2006). ...
... In our previous work (Siau et al., 2022b;Siau et al., 2022c), we tried to obtain a more detailed view of how AI has been applied in various industries and fields, and we discussed in detail how such advanced technology could be embedded into accounting (Siau et al., 2022b) and Fintech (Siau et al., 2022c). For example, AI is one of the most significant technologies disrupting the traditional accounting profession (Leitner-Hanetseder et al., 2021;Baldwin et al., 2006). ...
... The global economy is currently facing significant challenges, resulting in profound changes in our daily lives that may have longlasting effects (Siau et al., 2020a). AI, a developing technology, introduces novel risks and problems to the financial sector (Siau et al., 2022a). There is a concern among scholars that the extensive integration of AI technology may lead to significant reductions in employment opportunities and exacerbate wealth disparities (Velarde, 2019). ...
Article
Full-text available
Artificial intelligence (AI) is an umbrella term for a wide range of machine intelligence systems that can replicate the behavior of humans. AI and Big Data have emerged as defining characteristics of the fourth industrial revolution (IR). AI has developed tools. Because of the novelty, the investigation of IR, AI, and their environmental effects is still in the early stages of exploration. This study investigates how IR and AI affect human and environmental health and also discusses IR, AI, machine-human ideas, innovation, and AI's environmental benefits, further examines the challenges of these innovations, and recommends additional studies to explain their progress. As a result, the application of AI technology in environmental management, particularly concerning pollution, has become a significant advancement in reshaping our approach to monitoring the environment. Numerous countries are reaping substantial advantages by integrating AI in creating, executing, and assessing measures to address environmental degradation. These innovations can yield societal advantages and contribute to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2030; unfortunately, it is important to acknowledge that these benefits may not align well with environmental sustainability objectives, and the increasing number of electronic gadgets presents an additional concern. Conducting future research is crucial to investigate the growing prevalence of electronic devices utilized for AI, its potential ramifications for the future trajectory of climate change, and the approaches being taken to address the issue. Future research should prioritize conducting lifecycle environmental impact analyses, developing sustainable AI hardware, optimizing renewable energy usage, advancing climate modeling techniques, finding effective solutions for managing e-waste, utilizing AI for environmental monitoring and protection, conducting socio-environmental impact studies, developing policies and regulations, creating energy-efficient AI algorithms, and integrating circular economy principles to ensure that AI advancements align with environmental sustainability.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Artificial intelligence promises great potential to change, modify and enhance processes, products, and business models. Yet, many organizations struggle to leverage those potentials as they are not able to successfully implement AI technologies. While previous literature has already revealed success factors that are important to be considered when implementing AI projects, academia still lacks a sufficient overview in this field. With this background, this paper reviews existing literature on success factors related to the adoption of AI and provides a structured overview of 36 factors that have already been investigated by previous scholars. Specifically, we draw from the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework and reveal 12 factors related to the technological dimensions, 13 related to the organizational dimension, and 11 related to the environmental dimensions. Our results can help scholars and practitioners to include those factors in theory development and to implement AI projects more successfully.
Article
Full-text available
The increasing pervasiveness of technology-driven firms that offer financial services has led to growing pressure on traditional banks to modernize their core business activities and services. Many banks tackle the challenges of digitalization by cooperating with startup firms that offer technology-driven financial services and novel service packages (fintechs). In this article, we examine which banks typically collaborate with fintechs, how intensely they do so, and which form of alliance they prefer. Using hand-collected data covering the largest banks from Canada, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom, we provide detailed evidence on the different forms of alliances occurring in practice. We show that banks are significantly more likely to form alliances with fintechs when they pursue a well-defined digital strategy and/or employ a chief digital officer. Moreover, in line with incomplete contract theory, we find that banks more frequently invest in small fintechs but often build product-related collaborations with larger fintechs.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Speech interaction is becoming increasingly sophisticated and prevalent in everyday life due to recent advances in the area of artificial intelligence and high adoption rates of voice assistants (VAs). However, besides using a VA, individuals typically have various alternatives when pursuing certain tasks. To better understand when and why users choose speech interaction over traditional user interfaces, we conducted 31 one-to-one interviews. We analyzed the benefits and costs that users evaluate when using VA by applying means-end chain theory and value-focused thinking. Our findings reveal five fundamental (efficiency, convenience, ease of use, less cognitive effort, and enjoyment) and twelve means objectives that users evaluate when deciding on whether to use their VA or not. The resulting means-ends objectives network informs researchers by providing a comprehensive overview of relevant factors regarding VA use. Practitioners may learn how to further improve and sell VA characteristics.
Article
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a science and engineering discipline that is highly relevant to financial services, given the significant amount and diversity of data generated (and consumed) as those services are delivered worldwide. Global banks process billions of international payments each day, while equity exchanges handle trillions of orders and billions of transactions. All of this activity is recorded as data, and driven by exogenous information sources such as news services and social media. To address these challenges, at J.P. Morgan, we established a new group dedicated to research at the intersection of AI and finance in mid-2018 to investigate how to develop and optimize the use of AI. In this article, we introduce and discuss the directions of focus of AI Research and present a few selective projects that illustrate potential novel applications to finance.
Article
Organizations face increasing pressure to implement artificial intelligence (AI) within a variety of business processes and functions. Many perceived benefits surround AI, but a considerable amount of trepidation also exists because of the potential of AI to replace human employees and dehumanize work. Questions regarding the future of work in the age of AI are particularly salient in pre-adoption organizations, before employees have the opportunity to gain direct experience with AI. To cope with this potentially stressful situation, employees engage in cognitive appraisal processes based on their own knowledge and personal use of AI. These pre-adoptive appraisals of AI influence both affective and cognitive attitudes, which in turn trigger behavioral responses that influence an organization’s ability to leverage AI successfully. Our survey of 363 Taiwanese employees shows that perceptions of AI’s operational and cognitive capabilities are positively related to affective and cognitive attitudes toward AI, while concerns regarding AI have a negative relationship with affective attitude only. Interaction effects of employee knowledge and affective attitude are also observed. This work’s main contribution lies in the development of an empirically-tested model of the potential impact of AI on organizations from an employee perspective in the pre-adoption phase. These results have practical implications for how organizations prepare for the arrival of this transformative technology.
Chapter
The chapter is about the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology in finance, especially under the case of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. It does not only present the applications, but also the regulation of AI and Financial Technology FinTech. An innovation regulatory framework at the regulation level and compulsory restrictive guidance and supervision for AI-based technology to allow sustainable growth will promote the accelerated growth of AI in finance. The AI in the financial industry itself focuses on the main characteristics of “digitalization”, “onlineization”, “remoteization”, “visualization”, and “intelligence”, building a multi-functional, all-process end-to-end system based on data, enabling multi-user multi-terminal concurrent office, intelligently assisting in dealing with problems and giving solutions. The advent of AI and its ever-broader effects on other industries demands an assessment of its influence on achieving sustainable development goals.
Article
Can machines outperform crowds in financial lending decisions? Using data from a crowd-lending platform, we show that, compared with portfolios created by crowds, a reasonably sophisticated machine can construct financial portfolios that provide better returns while controlling for risk. Further, we find that the machine-created portfolios benefit not only the lenders, but also the borrowers. Borrowers receive loans at a much lower interest rate as the machine can weed out the riskiest loans better than the crowds. We also find suggestive evidence of algorithmic bias in machine decisions. We find that, compared with women, men are more likely to receive loans by machine. We propose a general and effective “debiasing” method that can be applied to any prediction-focused machine learning (ML) applications. We show that the debiased ML algorithm, which suffers from lower prediction accuracy, still improves the crowd’s investment decisions in our context. Our results indicate that ML can help crowd-lending platforms better fulfill the promise of providing access to financial resources to otherwise underserved individuals and ensure fairness in the allocation of these resources.
Article
We examine the effect of humanizing (naming) robo‐advisors on investor judgments, which has taken on increased importance as robo‐advisors have become increasingly common and there is currently little SEC regulation governing key aspects of their use. In our first experiment, we predict and find that investors are more likely to rely on the investment recommendation of an unnamed robo‐advisor, whereas they are more likely to rely on the investment recommendation of a named human advisor. Theory suggests one reason that naming a robo‐advisor may have drawbacks pertains to the complexity of the task the robo‐advisor performs. We explore the importance of task complexity in our second experiment. We predict and find that investors are less likely to rely on a named robo‐advisor when the advisor is perceived to be performing a relatively complex task, consistent with our first experiment, and more likely to rely on a named robo‐advisor when the advisor is perceived to be performing a relatively simple task, consistent with prior research on human‐computer interactions. Our findings contribute to the literature examining how technology influences the acquisition and use of financial information and the general literature on human‐computer interactions. Our study also addresses a call by the SEC to learn more about robo‐advisors. Lastly, our study has practical implications for wealth management firms by demonstrating the potentially negative effects of making robo‐advisors more humanlike in an attempt to engage and attract users. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Article
Purpose Blockchain holds promise as a potential solution to the problem of cybersecurity in financial transactions. However, difficulty exists for both the industry and organizations in assessing this potential solution. Hence, it is important to understand how organizations in the financial sector can address these concerns by exploring blockchain implementation for financial transactions in the context of cybersecurity. To do this, the problem question is threefold: first, what objectives are important based on the strategic values of an organization for evaluating cybersecurity to improve the security of financial transactions? Second, how can they be used to ensure the cybersecurity of financial transactions in a financial organization? Third, how can these objectives be used to evaluate blockchain as a potential solution for enhancing the cybersecurity of organizations in the financial sector relative to existing cybersecurity methods? The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach To accomplish this goal we utilize Keeney’s (1992) multi-objective decision analytics technique, termed value-focused thinking (VFT), to demonstrate how organizations can assess a blockchain solution’s value to maximize value-add within financial organization. Findings The presented model clearly demonstrates the viability of using Keeney’s (1992) VFT technique as a multi-criteria decision analysis tool for assessing blockchain technology. Further, a clear explanation of how this model can be extended and adapted for individual organizational use is provided. Originality/value This paper engages both the academic literature as well as an expert panel to develop an assessment model for blockchain technology related to financial transactions by providing a useful method for structuring the decision-making process of organizations around blockchain technology.