Content uploaded by Anton Chesnitskiy
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Anton Chesnitskiy on Nov 07, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
2022 IEEE 23rd INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF YOUNG PROFESSIONALS IN ELECTRON DEVICES AND MATERIALS (EDM)
Multibeam Antenna Implementation Using
Anisotropic Metasurfaces
Anton V. Chesnitskiy
Laboratory of Nanotechnologies and
Nanomaterials
Rzhanov Institute of Semiconductor
Physics, Siberian Branch of the
Russian Academy of Sciences
Novosibirsk, Russia
achesnitskiy@gmail.com
Aleksey N. Kosmynin
dept. of Research and Development
«Matrix Wave» LLC
Moscow, Russia
alekseykosmynin@matrixwave.tech
Oleg M. Kaigorodov
dept. of Research and Development
«Matrix Wave» LLC
Moscow, Russia
olegkaigorodov@matrixwave.tech
Pavel A. Sibirtsev
Higher School of Applied Physics and
Space Technologies
Peter the Great St.Petersburg
Polytechnic University
St.Petersburg, Russia
sibirtsev.pa@edu.spbstu.ru
Ksenia N. Kosmynina
dept. of Information Systems and
Technology
Skolkovo Institute of Science and
Technology
Moscow, Russia
ksenia.kosmynina@skoltech.ru
Konstantin V. Lemberg
Scientific Instrumentation Laboratory
Kirensky Institute of Physics, Siberian
Branch of the Russian Academy of
Sciences
Krasnoyarsk, Russia
lemkon@inbox.ru
Abstract—This study is devoted to the development and
research of multibeam antennas based on anisotropic
metasurfaces with one or several feed points. An innovative
technique for synthesizing the tensor impedance distribution for
the formation of three beams from a radiating metasurface was
proposed. Prototypes of the proposed antennas in the Ku-band
frequency with one and three feed points were fabricated, and
their characteristics were experimentally investigated. The gain
of the manufactured multibeam antennas reaches 23 dBi. Good
agreement between the results of the numerical simulation and
experimental data was achieved, which indicates the
reproducibility of the synthesis method in practice. Multibeam
antennas on anisotropic metasurfaces can be scaled to high
frequencies and effectively used at operating frequencies up to
the sub-terahertz range. Such antennas are promising for the
development of terrestrial communication infrastructure as
5/6G transmitters and repeaters, as well as for use as a payload
of low-orbit satellite systems.
Keywords—metasurface antennas, multibeam, beamforming,
5/6G Networks, LEO satellite, MIMO
I. INTRODUCTION
In recent years, 5/6 generation networks have rapidly
developed, and it has become necessary to transmit a signal
over one or more channels and redirect it in the necessary
directions [1]. When designing the infrastructure of multiple
access networks operating at higher frequencies, one of the
tasks is the effective redistribution of the signal using
multipath repeaters [2, 3]. Thus, for the implementation of
high-level technologies such as ultra-dense networks,
massive multiple inputs and multiple outputs (MIMO), and
full duplex, the development of multipath antennas is a
challenge [4, 5]. In addition, the relevance of these antennas
is dictated by the emergence of software-defined low-orbit
(LEO) satellite and high-altitude pseudo-satellite (HAPS)
communication systems and the creation of coverage areas
with high-speed Internet access on Earth's territories (Fig. 1)
[6]. Metasurfaces are known to effectively solve the problem
of controlling the amplitude, phase, and polarization of
radiation in the optical, microwave, and terahertz ranges [7-
10].
Antennas based on tensor metasurfaces are a promising
tool for beamforming [11, 12]. By setting the parameters of
the modulation of the impedance tensor over the surface, it is
possible to obtain the desired radiation patterns of antennas,
including those with oblique [13] and flattened beams [14].
The classical methods for forming several beams using Butler
matrices [15] and Luneberg lenses [16] have a number of
disadvantages (manufacturing complexity and high cost) that
limit their wide application. The key advantages of a
metasurface antenna (MSA) are its low weight and
dimensions, simple design, and low cost of mass production.
Fig. 1 Application of 3-beam metasurface antenna (MSA) for LEO satellite
communications.
The numerical simulation was supported by the Ministry of Science
and Higher Education of the Russian Federation.
The experimental research was carried out with the financial support of
the RFBR, the Government of the Krasnoyarsk Territory and the
Krasnoyarsk Regional Science Foundation within the framework of the
scientific project 20–47–243002.
978-1-6654-9804-3/22/$31.00 ©2022 IEEE
251
2022 IEEE 23rd International Conference of Young Professionals in Electron Devices and Materials (EDM) | 978-1-6654-9804-3/22/$31.00 ©2022 IEEE | DOI: 10.1109/EDM55285.2022.9855123
Authorized licensed use limited to: Skolkovo Institute of Science & Technology. Downloaded on September 03,2022 at 18:33:05 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2022 IEEE 23nd INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF YOUNG PROFESSIONALS IN ELECTRON DEVICES AND MATERIALS (EDM)
Planar MSA is more wind resistant compared to other
types of surround antennas and can also be easily integrated
into the body of small aircraft, drones, and microsatellites as
part of low-orbit constellations of satellite communications
[17].
This study proposes and implements a method for
synthesizing multibeam antennas based on anisotropic tensor
metasurfaces. Previously, it was shown [18] that anisotropic
metasurfaces are more flexible tools for beamforming and
have lower cross-polarization values than isotropic ones.
Prototypes of the proposed three-beam MSA with single
and three feed points were fabricated, and their characteristics
were investigated. The experimental results were in agreement
with the results obtained using the numerical FEM simulation.
The proposed multibeam MSAs are promising candidates for
building next-generation communication systems both on
Earth and in space.
II. METHODS
A. Synthesis of Anisotropic Metasurface
The electromagnetic properties of a two-dimensional
waveguide structure in the absence of heat losses are described
by the surface impedance tensor:
. (1)
If impedance modulation is introduced, the propagating
surface wave (SW) transforms into a leaky wave (LW), and
the structure radiates. Due to the fact that the previously
described impedance tensor is diagonal for mutual media,
only two components and given in polar
coordinates, determine the properties of the radiating surface.
Consider the distribution law of the surface impedance
component :
, (2)
where ρ is the radial coordinate of the point in cylindrical
coordinates, are the electric field strengths of the
object and reference waves, respectively, are the average
values of the impedance component realized by the cells,
is the range of values of the corresponding impedance
component.
In this study, the synthesis of antennas is based on the
calculation of the impedances of unit cells and the formation
of the target distribution of the impedance over the surface on
their basis [19]. An elliptical metal patch placed on the surface
of a 2 mm thick dielectric substrate with permittivity ε was
chosen as the unit cell of the anisotropic MSA (Fig. 2). A thin
metal screen is located under the dielectric and covers the 2D
waveguide structure from below. During the synthesis, the
geometric parameters of the anisotropic structure were varied,
such as the major and minor semi-axes of the ellipses a and b
and the angle of its rotation around the Z-axis. As a result, a
data array corresponding to a variety of elementary cell
impedances was formed. Subsequently, the target distribution
of the impedance over the surface was set according to (2) to
transform a cylindrical TM wave into a wave with the required
characteristics in free space.
Fig. 2 Geometry of anisotropic unit cell with dimensions 0.12λ0×0.12λ0.
By setting the modulation period of the impedance, the
direction of radiation, its polarization, and even the shape of
the beam can be changed. The impedance distributions
synthesized by this novel method for right-handed circular
polarization (RHCP) three-beam antennas with single and
three separate feed points are shown in Fig. 3. Based on the
distributions of impedances and impedances of individual
cells calculated at the previous stages, an aperture of a
multibeam metasurface antenna was formed.
Fig. 3 Variations of the Zρρ component impedance tensor for 3-beam MSA
(a) with single feed point in the center of the canvas; (b) with three separate
feed points.
ˆ
uu uv
s
vu vv
ZZ
Z
ZZ
éù
=êú
ëû
Z
rr
,Z
rj
Z
rr
( ) ( )
*
2
Δ
2
obj ref
ref
EE
Z
ZZ Re
E
rr
rr
rr rr
æö
ç÷
=+ ×
ç÷
èø
( ) ( )
,refobj
EE
Z
rr
ΔZ
rr
252
Authorized licensed use limited to: Skolkovo Institute of Science & Technology. Downloaded on September 03,2022 at 18:33:05 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2022 IEEE 23nd INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF YOUNG PROFESSIONALS IN ELECTRON DEVICES AND MATERIALS (EDM)
Fig. 4 Simulated 3D far-field radiation patterns of 3-beam MSA at 12 GHz (a) with single feed point. With three separate power points: (b) with feeding of the
first point; (c) with feeding of the second point; (d) with the power supply of the third point.
B. Numerical Simulation
A numerical simulation of the radiation patterns of the
synthesized multibeam antennas and their characteristics was
performed using the finite element method (FEM). The
parameters of the synthesized anisotropic MSA are included
in the model. Because the quality of the selected dielectric has
a key effect on the antenna characteristics, the real parameters
of the FR4 dielectric with losses (
) were used to calculate the radiation
patterns.
The simulation results obtained for the radiation patterns
of the proposed multibeam anisotropic metasurfaces are
shown in Fig. 4. Fig. 4a show the 3D far-field radiation pattern
of a three-beam antenna with a single feed point. The color
map shows three distinct pencil-shaped beams with a gain of
about 23 dBi. Thus, a wave was simultaneously excited from
one canvas of the MSA in three directions. The tilt angle for
all beams was ïθï ~ 30°, and the main angles φ were 60°, 180°
and 300°. Fig. 4b-d shows the results for a three-beam antenna
with three separate feed points, when each feed point was fed
in turn. It can be observed that, when fed on from each point,
only one beam is excited in the desired direction. Thus, three
independent beams that are emitted simultaneously or
sequentially in free space can be obtained from one canvas.
This approach is promising for building networks with the
MIMO architecture using a single multibeam antenna and for
increasing the channel throughput and signal-to-noise ratio [5,
20-22].
III. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
The practical implementation of the proposed method for
the synthesis of multibeam antennas based on anisotropic
impedance metasurfaces and its experimental confirmation
were performed in the Ku-band. The two prototypes of the
developed three-beam MSAs were manufactured using
standard printed circuit board (PCB) technology on a widely
available inexpensive dielectric FR4. The aperture of the
antennas had the shape of an octahedron with dimensions of
380 mm×380 mm. To excite a surface wave of the TM type,
feeders in the form of a rod with a disk were used, and SMA
connectors were used to connect the feeders. Photographs of
the manufactured prototypes with connected feeders are
shown in Fig. 5. The directivity characteristics of the
fabricated three-beam antennas were measured in an anechoic
chamber using a near-field scanning method.
The results obtained from the experimental investigation
are compared with the numerical simulation results, which are
represented by red lines in Fig. 6. In this study, narrow-band
sinusoidal signals were used for excitation antenna during
simulation and measurements. In order to avoid overlapping
graphs and improve the perception of results, the cross section
for beam №2 is given at -180°. Fig. 6a shows the cuts of the
radiation patterns of the manufactured three-beam MSA with
a single feed point at main angles φ equal to 60°, -180° and
300°. The graph shows three peaks corresponding to beams
excited simultaneously from one aperture at a single feed
point.
4.5, 0.022
r
tg
e
ed
==
253
Authorized licensed use limited to: Skolkovo Institute of Science & Technology. Downloaded on September 03,2022 at 18:33:05 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2022 IEEE 23nd INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF YOUNG PROFESSIONALS IN ELECTRON DEVICES AND MATERIALS (EDM)
0
Fig. 5 Fabricated Ku-band antenna prototypes implemented on anisotropic elements with single (a) and three (b) feed points in an anechoic chamber. The numbers
indicate the feeder numbers.
In Fig. 6b-d the cuts in the radiation pattern of the
manufactured three-beam MSA with three separate feed
points are shown. It can be seen from the graphs that when
one feeder is fed on, only one beam is formed from the
aperture at a present time. With a corresponding change in the
feed point, another beam is excited in the required direction.
Table I lists the results of the measurements for all beam
directions of the manufactured three-beam antennas based on
anisotropic metasurfaces. The gain for all beam directions of
Prototypes №1 and №2 reaches 23 dBi with a parameter
spread of less than 5%. The angular width at the level -3 dB
for all beams was approximately 5°. From the graphs
presented in Fig. 6, it can be seen that good agreement was
achieved with the results of the FEM simulation, which are
shown by red lines in all graphs. The developed synthesis
method based on anisotropic metasurfaces enables the
synthesis of planar antennas with an arbitrary radiation
pattern shape and the required beam tilt angles. Further
improvement of the proposed technique and the use of
modern materials with lower losses will increase the aperture
efficiency and gain of the antennas.
Fig. 6. The cuts of simulated and measured far-field radiation patterns of developed three-beam MSAs at a central frequency of 12 GHz: (a) with single feed
point at φ equal to 60°, -180°, 300°. With separate feed points (b) when feed point №1 is excited at φ = 60°; (c) when the feed point №2 is excited at φ = -180°;
(d) when the feed point №3 is excited at φ = 300°.
1
1
2
3
Prototype №1
Prototype №2
254
Authorized licensed use limited to: Skolkovo Institute of Science & Technology. Downloaded on September 03,2022 at 18:33:05 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
TABLE I. FABRICATED MULTIBEAM MSA PERFORMANCE
Characteristics
Prototype №1
(Single feed point)
Prototype №2
(Three separate feed
points)
Central frequency
12 GHz
12 GHz
Dimensions
380×380 mm
380×380 mm
Polarization
RHCP
RHCP
Main beam φ
angle
60°
180°
300°
60°
180°
300°
Main beam θ
angle
29°
29°
31°
30°
30°
31°
Gain, dBi
24.3
23.6
24.2
23.6
23.0
24.1
Angular width at
level -3dB
4.8°
4.8°
4.8°
5.3°
5.1°
4.3°
IV. CONCLUSION
This study proposes and implements a method for
forming multibeam antennas based on anisotropic
impedance metasurfaces. Using the proposed approach,
prototypes of planar low-cost three-beam Ku-band
antennas with single or three separate feed points were
fabricated. The gain of the MSAs reaches 23 dBi and
aperture efficiency was approximately 40%. The results of
the experimental measurements agreed well with the
results of the numerical FEM simulation. The proposed
antennas based on impedance metasurfaces are a
promising element base for building terrestrial networks
of 5/6 generations and implementing LEO satellite,
pseudo-satellite HAPS, and unmanned aerial vehicle
(UAV) communication systems.
REFERENCES
[1] W. Hong, Z. H. Jiang, C. Yu, J. Zhou, P. Chen, Z. Yu, H. Zhang, B.
Yang, X. Pang, M. Jiang, Y. Cheng, M. K. Taher Al-Nuaimi, Y. Zhang,
J. Chen, and S. He, “Multibeam antenna technologies for 5G wireless
communications,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation,
vol.68, no. 12, pp. 6231-6249, 2017.
[2] E. W. Matthews, W. G. Scott, and C. C. Han, “Multibeam antennas for
data communications satellites,” in Proceedings of the fifth symposium
on Data communications, pp. 2-20, 1977.
[3] W. Li, T. Qiu, J. Wang, L. Zheng, Y. Jing, Y. Jia, W. He, Y. Han, and
S. Qu, “Programmable coding metasurface reflector for reconfigurable
multibeam antenna application,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and
Propagation, vol.69 no. 1, pp. 296-301, 2020.
[4] F. Zhu, T. Ba, Y. Zhang, X. Gao, S. Zhai, and X. Gong, “Low
complexity detection method based on channel matrix periodic N-
diagonal equivalence for uplink MU-MIMO of multibeam satellite
communication systems,” International Journal of Satellite
Communications and Networking, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 509-523, 2021.
[5] Y. Hu, J. Zhan, Z. H. Jiang, C. Yu, and W. Hong, “An orthogonal
hybrid analog–digital multibeam antenna array for millimeter-wave
massive MIMO systems,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and
Propagation, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 1393-1403, 2020.
[6] M. Á. Vázquez, A. Perez-Neira, D. Christopoulos, S. Chatzinotas, B.
Ottersten, P. D. Arapoglou, A. Ginesi, and G. Taricco, “Precoding in
multibeam satellite communications: Present and future challenges,”
IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 23 no. 6, pp. 88-95, 2016.
[7] H. T. Chen, A. J. Taylor, and N. Yu, “A review of metasurfaces:
physics and applications,” Reports on progress in physics, vol. 79 no.
7, 2016.
[8] F. Ding, A. Pors, and S. I. Bozhevolnyi, “Gradient metasurfaces: a
review of fundamentals and applications,” Reports on Progress in
Physics, vol. 81, no.2, 2017.
[9] V. Y. Prinz, E. V. Naumova, S. V. Golod, V. A. Seleznev, A. A.
Bocharov, and V. V. Kubarev, “Terahertz metamaterials and systems
based on rolled-up 3D elements: designs, technological approaches,
and properties,” Scientific reports, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2017.
[10] S. V. Golod, V. A. Seyfi, A. F. Buldygin, A. E. Gayduk, and V. Y.
Prinz, “Large Area 3D-Printed Chiral Metasurface Composed of Metal
Helices,” Advanced Optical Materials, vol. 6, no. 19, 2018.
[11] J. Hu, S. Bandyopadhyay, Y. H. Liu, and L. Y. Shao, “A review on
metasurface: from principle to smart metadevices,” Frontiers in
Physics, no. 8, p. 502, 2021.
[12] M. Faenzi, G. Minatti, D. González-Ovejero, F. Caminita, E. Martini,
C. Della Giovampaola, and S. Maci, “Metasurface antennas: New
models, applications and realizations,” Scientific reports, vol. 9, no.1,
pp. 1-14, 2019.
[13] D. Gonsalez-Ovejero, G. Minatti, G. Chattopadhyay, and S. Maci,
“Multibeam by metasurface antennas,” IEEE Transactions on
Antennas and Propagation, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 2923-2930, 2017.
[14] M. Bodehou, E. Martini, S. Maci, I. Huinen, and C. Craeye,
“Multibeam and beam scanning with modulated metasurfaces,” IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 1273-
1281, 2019.
[15] J. Butler, “Beam-forming matrix simplifies design of electronically
scanned antennas,” Electronic design, vol. 12, pp. 170–173, 1961.
[16] R. K. Luneburg, “The Mathematical Theory of Optics,” Providence,
RI: Brown Univ, in press, 1944.
[17] K. Y. Zhong, Y. J. Cheng, H. N. Yang, and B. Zheng, “LEO Satellite
Multibeam Coverage Area Division and Beamforming Method,” IEEE
Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 20 no. 11, pp. 2115-
2119, 2021.
[18] G. Minatti, M. Faenzi, E. Martini, F. Caminita, P. De Vita, D.
González-Ovejero, M. Sabbadini, and S. Maci, “Modulated
metasurface antennas for space: Synthesis, analysis and
realizations,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 63, no. 4,
pp. 1288–1300, Apr. 2015.
[19] K. V. Lemberg, A. N. Kosmynin, A. M. Aleksandrin, E. O.
Grushevsky, and I. V. Podshivalov, “Method of Anisotropic
Metasurface Unit Cell Surface Impedance Calculation,” IEEE
Radiation and Scattering of Electromagnetic Waves, pp. 1273-1281,
2021.
[20] P. Harrop, M. Dyson, J. Edmondson, and R. Das, “6G communications
reconfigurable intelligent surface roadmap, material, market 2021-
2045”, 2021.
[21] G. K. Kurt, M. G. Khoshkholgh, S. Alfattani, A. Ibrahim, T. S. J.
Darwish, Md S. Alam, H. Yanikomeroglu, and A. Yongacoglu, “A
vision and framework for the high altitude platform station (HAPS)
networks of the future,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials,
vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 729-779, 2021.
[22] A. V. Chesnitskiy, E. A. Mikhantiev, “The detection limit of curved
InGaAs/AlGaAs/GaAs Hall bars,” Russian Microelectronics, vol. 45,
no. 2., pp. 105-111, 2016.
255
Authorized licensed use limited to: Skolkovo Institute of Science & Technology. Downloaded on September 03,2022 at 18:33:05 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.