ChapterPDF Available

Chapter 1. The legacy of Professor Michael H. Long and his influence in second language acquisition

Authors:
Alessandro Benati at University College Dublin
Alessandro Benati
John W. Schwieter
John W. Schwieter
Download full-text PDFDownload full-text PDF
Read full-text
Download citation

Abstract

Professor Michael H. Long (1945-2021) was one of the most influential scholars in the field of second language acquisition. This volume presents a set of chapters that honour some of his key contributions in language teaching and learning. Following a bibliometric analysis of the impact of his research to the field, the volume spans topics such as task-based language teaching, focus on form, age effects, transfer, feedback, interaction, incidental learning, stabilization, among many others.
Benati & Schwieter Offpri
nt.pdf
Content uploaded by John W. Schwieter
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by John W. Schwieter on Aug 18, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
Benati & Schwieter Offpri
nt.pdf
Content uploaded by John W. Schwieter
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by John W. Schwieter on Aug 18, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
View
Optimal input for language learning: Genuine, simplified, elaborated, or modified elaborated?
Article
  • Dec 2019
Discussions of optimal types of spoken and written input for language learning have traditionally focused on the relative merits of authentic and linguistically simplified spoken and written texts. I will argue that elaborated input and, in particular, modified elaborated input, constitute better options, with tasks, not just texts, functioning as important input sources. Modified elaborated input, potentially coupled with bimodal presentation, has many positive features, especially, but not only, for programs seeking to increase students' opportunities for enhanced incidental learning.
View
Instructed second language acquisition (ISLA)
Article
  • Jul 2017
Definitions are proposed for instructed second language acquisition (ISLA) and ISLA research. The quantity of research is partly driven by external geopolitical forces, its quality improved by such methodological developments as the growing deployment of statistical meta-analyses, new technology, especially eyetracking, and new instrumentation, e.g. Hi-Lab, a measure of aptitudes for both explicit and implicit language learning. Three major constraints on the design of L2 instruction are that: (1) the learning task is too large for either explicit or implicit learning alone; (2) direct effects of instruction are limited to manipulations of the linguistic environment, with intended cognitive processes ultimately under learner control; and (3) development of implicit knowledge is the priority. Three learning conditions that speak to what can best be achieved through incidental and intentional language learning are illustrated by recent studies of (1) resetting L1 parameters and dealing with blocking, and (2) instance learning of lexical items and collocations. Comparisons of L2 learning under the three conditions can help resolve long-standing disagreements over the merits of codefocused and meaning-focused instructional approaches.
View
View
In Defense of Tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and Real Issues
Article
  • Mar 2016
The first aim of this article, addressed in section 1, is to define what is meant, and not meant, by task and task-based language teaching (TBLT). The second is to summarize and evaluate 14 criticisms that have been made of both. Section 2 responds to five alleged problems with TBLT's psycholinguistic rationale, section 3 to six at the classroom level, and section 4 to three claimed problems with implementing TBLT in specific contexts. A few of the criticisms touch on important matters, but most, I will suggest, are nonissues . The third aim of the article is to identify some genuine problems in need of resolution— real issues —and briefly to illustrate research programs under way to address them.
View
Focus on Form
Chapter
  • Jan 1991
View
Does Second Language Instruction Make a Difference? A Review of Research
Article
  • Sep 1983
  • TESOL QUART
Does second language instruction promote second language acquisition? Some studies conclude that instruction does not help (or even that it is counter-productive); others find it beneficial. The picture becomes clearer if two distinctions are made. First, researchers may address one or both of two issues: the absolute effect of instruction, on the one hand, and its relative utility, on the other. Second, studies need to be subclassified according to whether or not the comparisons they make involve controlling for the total amount of instruction, exposure, or instruction plus exposure—that is, for the total opportunity to acquire the second language.Observing these distinctions, a review of research findings concludes that there is considerable (although not overwhelming) evidence that instruction is beneficial 1) for children as well as adults, 2) for beginning, intermediate, and advanced students, 3) on integrative as well as discrete-point tests, and 4) in acquisition-rich as well as acquisition-poor environments. These findings have implications for theories of second language acquisition, such as Krashen's Monitor Theory, which make predictions about second language acquisition with and without instruction, and also for those involved in educational administration, program design, and classroom teaching.
View
Process and Product in ESL Program Evaluation
Article
  • Sep 1984
  • TESOL QUART
A traditional distinction in the literature on program evaluation is that between formative and summative evaluation (Scriven 1967). It is argued here, however, that a process/product distinction is important, too. Process evaluation, in particular, addresses issues which are often ignored by formative studies, but which are of special interest where second language programs are concerned. Process evaluations can usefully draw upon the procedures and findings of classroom-centered research on language learning.
View
Native Speaker/Non-native Speaker Conversation and the Negotiation of Comprehensible Input
Article
  • Feb 1983
Linguistic input probably has to be comprehensible to the learner if it is to serve as data for second language acquisition. It is widely assumed that input becomes comprehensible through the speech modifications of native speakers addressing non-native speakers of the target language. Recent research on native speaker/non-native speaker conversation suggests, however, that modifications of the interactional structure of conversation are more important in this regard. They are more extensive and more consistently observed than input modifications, and often occur when the latter do not. Fifteen devices for the modification of interaction are described. They are of three kinds: strategies, which serve to avoid conversational trouble, tactics, which are used to repair the discourse when trouble occurs, and strategies and tactics, devices which serve both functions.
View
View