Content uploaded by Debaprasad Bandyopadhyay
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Debaprasad Bandyopadhyay on Aug 15, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
1
The End of Dialogue
দেবসাে ব্যাপাযায়
DEBAPRASAD BANDYOPADHYAY
আখর ব্যাপাযায়
Akhar Bandyopadhyay
The End of Dialogue VIEW VIMEO VIDEO HERE ⤡
Abstract
India is in a situation where dialogue is silenced by the
autocratic governmentality. In this video collage, three
consecutive situations are projected to show that all the
2
three different Indian political parties are acting in the
same way– halting the dialogue. Thus, this collage
proposes a decentralized, self-reliant partyless society
where logical dialogue without manipulation might be
possible keeping in mind the Habermasian emancipatory
praxis.
,
,
, -
,
,
- ,
People talking without speaking
People hearing without listening
People writing songs that voices never share
No one dared
disturb the sound of silence…⤡
3
See Also:
(Death of Dialogue) VIEW HERE ⤡
CHOMSKIAN LINGUISTIC CREATIVITY, CRIPPLED CREATIVITY
AND PSI-PROPERTIES VIEW HERE ⤡
, ,
,, ,
,
. ,
!
--
?
(++)
():
. / :
, , ,
)
(+ +)
4
!
. :() ,
-
() ,
;
, ,
- (+ +)
?
?
. , ,
()
- , -
,
,
!
[
-
!]
#
5
, ,
· , Atheism, Fundamentalism and
Anekantavada VIEW HERE ⤡
· Foregrounding Fundamentalism, Foreclosing Fundamentalism
VIEW HERE ⤡
· : VIEW HERE ⤡
·
[On Religion and Popular Culture] VIEW HERE
⤡
· “Little Boxes: (Il)logic(s) of Truth-Room(s)” VIEW HERE ⤡
· “ , : (-) (-) ‘Little Boxes: (Il)Logic(S)
of Truth-Room(S)’ ” VIEW HERE ⤡
·
: (A Commentary on Indian
Culture and Anekanta Vedanta) VIEW HERE ⤡
· “Chomsky and Habermas via Nyaya Theory of Debating”. VIEW
HERE ⤡
· ? [What do We have Left to Imagine?]
VIEW HERE ⤡
· “”( Philosophy of Science[s] for teens) VIEW HERE ⤡
· “ [Last Metanarrative]. VIEW HERE ⤡
· ! VIEW HERE ⤡
· Scraps on Indian Atheism VIEW HERE ⤡
6
Paradox of tolerance
(The Open Society and Its Enemies, )
,
, // - (not
religious, not spiritual)
( )
7
/ ,
,
)
(+ +) ,
(
/
, --
- ( )
-
?
?
? ,
tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we
extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not
prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the
intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.
In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always
suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can
8
counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public
opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim
the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily
turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational
argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their
followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach
them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should
therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the
The Open Society and Its Enemies-
Routledge Classics)
? -
-
[-
:
() , -
-
9
() ,
-;;
, ,
]
https://www.brainpickings.org/2016/10/06/bertrand-
russell-oswald-mosley/