ArticlePDF Available
Acta Scientific Ophthalmology (ISSN: 2582-3191)
Volume 5 Issue 8 August 2022
Different Therapeutic Approaches in Central Serous Corioretinopathy: A Case Series
Mary Romano2-3, Vanessa Ferraro1-2*, Jose Luis Vallejo-Garcia1,2,
Alessandro Randazzo1 and Paolo Vinciguerra1,2
1IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
2Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan,
Italy
3Multidisciplinary Department of Medical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University
of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Neaples, Italy
*Corresponding Author: Vanessa Ferraro, Department of Biomedical Sciences,
Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Case Series
Received: July 21, 2022
Published: July 29, 2022
© All rights are reserved by Vanessa
Ferraro., et al.
Abstract
Purpose: To give clinical feedback to what the literature states about the different treatment of Central Serous Corioretinopathy
(CSCR), outlining how, through different treatments customized on different characteristics of the patient it is possible to obtain
excellent results of visual recovery.
Observations: While in acute forms a broad consensus has been reached on whether a wait-and-see attitude can be taken, in chronic

Conclusions: In the acute form (aCSCR), which has a relatively high rate of spontaneous resolution, an effective treatment should
ideally prevent recurrences and subsequent disease progression. In the chronic form (cCSCR), the primary aim of treatment is

Keywords: Subthreshold Micropulse Laser; Argon Laser; Eplerenone; Photodinamyc
Introduction
Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) is the fourth most
common cause of central vision loss, affecting men 20-60 years
of age. To date, no consensus has been reached regarding the
treatment of this disease, in fact there are a variety of different
approaches proposed. According to the literature, many strategies
are available and effective, modulating the choice upon patient’s
characteristics. In the acute form, it is reasonable to wait and observe

could be reabsorbed spontaneously; otherwise, half-dose PDT or
high-density subthreshold micropulse laser could be considered.
In the chronic form, PDT could be performed, adding anti-VEGF
treatment if signs of CNV are present at multimodal imaging.
Another possibility is pharmacological treatment: antagonists of
mineralocorticoid receptors, spironolactone and eplerenone have

prospective randomised controlled trials have been conducted yet.
Findings
Case 1
A 50-year-old woman with a history of CSCR in her right eye
(RE) came to our center in 2019: her BCVA was 20/20 in her RE and
OCT showed parafoveal PED. FA showed a leaking point temporally
to the fovea, with no signs of neovascularization. Therapy with
acetazolamide and curcumin-based integrator was started in
cycles. OCT and BCVA stayed stable until 2021: the patient was
lost for two years at the follow up due to Covid-19 pandemic
DOI: 
Citation: Mary Romano., et al. “Different Therapeutic Approaches in Central Serous Corioretinopathy: A Case Series". 5.8
(2022): 101-105.

and neuroepitelium detachment. Pharmacological treatment with
acetazolamide was promptly restarted. Two weeks later BVCA
was 20/25 and OCT showed a reduction in height of PED. After
two weeks she underwent high-density subthreshold micropulse
laser (HSML) and her BVCA was again 20/20. HSML was performed
using these parameters: photonic radiation was delivered to the
retina in pulses lasting 200 msec, the duty cicle was set at 5%, the

Figure 1: OCT in 2019, showing a PED temporally to the fovea
(on the left), FA showing a leaking point in the same area (on
the centre) and ICGA showing iperpermeability in
correspondence (on the right). BCVA was 20/20.
Figure 2: OCT in 2021, showing a PED and a neuroepitelium


Figure 3: After high-density subthreshold micropulse laser
OCT shows the resolution of neuroepitelium detachment and
her BCVA was again 20/20.
Case 2
A 56-year-old man referred to our center in 2015, with a history

was performed: in both eyes there were multiple neuroepitelium
detachments, with focal PED and signs of macular subatrophy.
Indocianine-green angiography showed diffuse leakage of
choriocapillaris. Therapy with eplerenone 50 mg was promptly
started. OCT and BCVA were stable for three years, the patient had
continued his therapy with eplerenone 50 mg, that was reduced in
2018 to 25 mg. By the way, this patient too was lost at the follow
up due to Covid-19 and came back to our clinic in 2021: his BCVA

points and a diffuse neuroepitelium detachment, so PDT was
      2)
  2) and full treatment
            
20/200 in his LE.
Figure 4: FA showing leaking points (on the left) and OCT in
2021 showing diffuse neuroepitelium detachment in macular

and CF in his LE.
Figure 5: 
the detachment and BCVA was 20/50 in his RE and 20/200 in
his LE.
102
Different Therapeutic Approaches in Central Serous Corioretinopathy: A Case Series
Citation: Mary Romano., et al. “Different Therapeutic Approaches in Central Serous Corioretinopathy: A Case Series". 5.8
(2022): 101-105.
Case 3
        
in 2021 with a subfoveal neuroepitelium detachment in LE and a
leaking point nasal to the fovea in FA. His BCVA was 20/20 in his
RE and 20/25 in his LE. Treatment with curcumin-based integrator
was started and then argon laser was performed on leaking point.
         
diameter (150 µm), low intensity (70-80 mW), to achieve a slight
whitening of the retina, and short pulse duration (100 mSec). After

totally disappeared. After 6 months, BCVA was still 20/20, but in
OCT a PED reappeared in correspondence of the leaking point.

treatment.
Figure 6: OCT and FA showing a subfoveal neuroepitelium
detachment and a leaking point nasal to the fovea. At this time
BCVA was 20/25.
Figure 7: After argon laser treatment on leaking point OCT

Figure 8: After 6 months OCT showed again a little
neuropitelium detachment nasally to the fovea, but BCVA was
still 20/20.
Figure 9: With only pharmacological treatment after three

Discussion
We report three patients with CSCR that were treated in
different ways.
     
micropulse laser that consist of repetitive ultrashort laser pulses
targeting the RPE [1]. The pulses are targeted on the points of
           
released to the choroid and neurosensory retina, and thus avoiding
damaging those structures [2-5]. Micropulse laser treatment may
be more effective in cCSCR eyes with focal leakage compared to
eyes with diffuse leakage [6]. Our case was, indeed, perfect for this
treatment, because of the single points of leakage temporally to the
fovea.

Different Therapeutic Approaches in Central Serous Corioretinopathy: A Case Series
Citation: Mary Romano., et al. “Different Therapeutic Approaches in Central Serous Corioretinopathy: A Case Series". 5.8
(2022): 101-105.
The second patient has a chronic history of CSCR. He was
treated with PDT. It is supposed that PDT acts in CSCR by inducing
choroidal hypoperfusion, vascular narrowing and remodelling in
order to negate choroidal hyperpermeability which is often found
in CSCR [7]. Patients with cCSCR generally respond better to half-
dose PDT compared to HSML treatment [8].
The third patient was treated with argon laser on the point of
leakage. This method of laser treatment targets the focal leakage
points measured on FA and attempts to close the focal defect in
the outer blood-retina barrier by applying photocoagulation to
the affected area of the RPE. Laser photocoagulation should be
limited to extrafoveal leakage sites, as vision loss, scotoma, reduced
contrast sensitivity, and/or CNV can occur at the treated area [9-
11].
Conclusions
 
to controversy. Regarding aCSCR, treatment can often be deferred,
due to the high rate of spontaneous recovery. When treatment is
indicated in aCSCR, the current evidence suggests that half-dose or

of choice for accelerating SRF resolution, improving vision, and
decreasing the risk of recurrence. Regarding cCSCR half-dose (or
        
When a good visual result is obtained in these forms, the aim should
be the maintenance of the recovery and this can be reached by using
less invasive approaches such as pharmacological treatment which,

Patient Consent
Patient consent was obtained for this publication.
Acknowledgements and Disclosures
• No funding or grant support.
•      
JVG, AR, PV.
• All authors attest that they meet the current ICMJE criteria for
Authorship.
Intellectual Property
         
protection of intellectual property associated with this work and
that there are no impediments to publication, including the timing
of publication, with respect to intellectual property.
Bibliography
1. Sivaprasad S., et al. “Micropulsed diode laser therapy:
evolution and clinical applications”.  

2. Chen SN., et al. “Subthreshold diode micropulse
photocoagulation for the treatment of chronic central serous
    

3. Ricci F., et al. “Indocyanine green dye-enhanced micropulsed
diode laser: a novel approach to subthreshold RPE treatment
in a case of central serous chorioretinopathy”. European

4. Roisman L., et al. “Micropulse diode laser treatment for
chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: a randomized pilot
trial”.       

5. Romano MR., et al. “An international collaborative evaluation
of central serous chorioretinopathy: different therapeutic
approaches and review of literature. The European
Vitreoretinal Society central serous chorioretinopathy study”.
 (2019).
6. Chen SN., et al. “Subthreshold diode micropulse
photocoagulation for the treatment of chronic central serous
    

7. Chan WM., et al. “Choroidal vascular remodelling in central
serous chorioretinopathy after indocyanine green guided

the primary disease level”.    

8.    et al. “Patient characteristics of untreated
chronic central serous chorioretinopathy patients with
focal versus diffuse leakage”. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and

9. Daruich A., et al. “Central serous chorioretinopathy: Recent
     Progress in
Retinal and Eye Research 

Different Therapeutic Approaches in Central Serous Corioretinopathy: A Case Series
Citation: Mary Romano., et al. “Different Therapeutic Approaches in Central Serous Corioretinopathy: A Case Series". 5.8
(2022): 101-105.
10. Gemenetzi M., et al. “Central serous chorioretinopathy: an
update on pathogenesis and treatment”. Eye (Lond) 

11.    et al. “Central serous chorioretinopathy:
Towards an evidence-based treatment guideline”. Progress in
Retinal and Eye Research 
105
Different Therapeutic Approaches in Central Serous Corioretinopathy: A Case Series
Citation: Mary Romano., et al. “Different Therapeutic Approaches in Central Serous Corioretinopathy: A Case Series". 5.8
(2022): 101-105.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is a common cause of central vision loss, primarily affecting men 20–60 years of age. To date, no consensus has been reached regarding the classification of CSC, and a wide variety of interventions have been proposed, reflecting the controversy associated with treating this disease. The recent publication of appropriately powered randomised controlled trials such as the PLACE trial, as well as large retrospective, non-randomised treatment studies regarding the treatment of CSC suggest the feasibility of a more evidence-based approach when considering treatment options. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the current rationale and evidence with respect to the variety of interventions available for treating CSC, including pharmacology, laser treatment, and photodynamic therapy. In addition, we describe the complexity of CSC, the challenges …
Article
Full-text available
Purpose To describe the characteristics and potential differences between focal and diffuse phenotypes of untreated chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSC). Methods For this study, patients were divided in two groups. Focal leakage was defined as 1 “hot spot” of leakage, whereas diffuse leakage was defined as either > 1 hot spot or a larger area of widespread leakage on FA. Clinical characteristics were assessed at presentation. After Bonferroni correction, P values < 0.00125 were deemed statistically significant. Results The focal leakage group included 68 eyes (53 males), and the diffuse leakage group included 105 eyes (88 males). Mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 77.1 ± 8.1 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters in the focal group and 76.0 ± 9.6 ETDRS letters in the diffuse group (p = 0.440). In the focal group, mean age was 46.9 ± 8.8 years, whereas this was 49.7 ± 8.3 years in the diffuse group (p = 0.033). Mean central foveal thickness was 107.1 ± 21.3 μm in the focal group and 106.2 ± 27.3 μm in the diffuse group (p = 0.818). Mean choroidal thickness was 407.5 ± 114.8 μm in the focal group and 419.1 ± 113.9 μm in the diffuse group (p = 0.578). In the focal group, subretinal fluid was present in the fellow eye in 16% of the patients, as compared to 29% in the diffuse group (p = 0.067). Conclusions In untreated cCSC patients with focal or diffuse leakage on FA, no marked differences in clinical characteristics were found. Extensive choroidal abnormalities may be present in both groups, which are presumed to lie at the basis of the development of cCSC.
Article
Full-text available
Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) is a major cause of vision threat among middle-aged male individuals. Multimodal imaging led to the description of a wide range of CSCR manifestations, and highlighted the contribution of the choroid and pigment epithelium in CSCR pathogenesis. However, the exact molecular mechanisms of CSCR have remained uncertain. The aim of this review is to recapitulate the clinical understanding of CSCR, with an emphasis on the most recent findings on epidemiology, risk factors, clinical and imaging diagnosis, and treatments options. It also gives an overview of the novel mineralocorticoid pathway hypothesis, from animal data to clinical evidences of the biological efficacy of oral mineralocorticoid antagonists in acute and chronic CSCR patients. In rodents, activation of the mineralocorticoid pathway in ocular cells either by intravitreous injection of its specific ligand, aldosterone, or by over-expression of the receptor specifically in the vascular endothelium, induced ocular phenotypes carrying many features of acute CSCR. Molecular mechanisms include expression of the calcium-dependent potassium channel (KCa2.3) in the endothelium of choroidal vessels, inducing subsequent vasodilation. Inappropriate or over-activation of the mineralocorticoid receptor in ocular cells and other tissues (such as brain, vessels) could link CSCR with the known co-morbidities observed in CSCR patients, including hypertension, coronary disease and psychological stress. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Article
Full-text available
To evaluate 810-nm subthreshold diode micropulse (SDM) laser in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). Prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot trial. Patients were randomized to SDM laser treatment (group 1) or sham procedure (group 2). Primary outcome measure was change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA); secondary outcome was central macular thickness after 3 months. Laser treatment was performed along the detached area. At the 3-month visit, all patients were evaluated for re-treatment if they met re-treatment criteria. Fifteen patients were included in this study: five patients in the sham group and 10 in the treatment group. At 3 months, BCVA was significantly enhanced in the treatment group (P = .006) compared with the sham group (P = .498). All patients from the sham group needed treatment after 3 months. An improvement in central macular thickness and leakage on fluorescein angiography was noted in all treated patients (in both groups). In this limited-size, short-term exploratory study, SDM laser was effective in treating chronic CSC. There was no evidence of retinal damage induced by treatment. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2013;44:465-470.].
Article
Full-text available
Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is a chorioretinal disease, incompletely understood with systemic associations, a multifactorial aetiology, and a complex pathogenesis. Increased permeability from the choriocapillaris leads to focal or diffuse dysfunction of the retinal pigment epithelium causing a detachment of the neurosensory retina. CSC has been described in patients with endogenously high levels of corticosteroids as well as in patients with hypercortisolism due to the treatment of ocular or systemic diseases. It is therefore the only 'inflammatory' choroiditis, not proven to be associated with infection that is precipitated or worsened by glucocorticoids. Foveal attenuation, chronic macular oedema, and damage of the foveal photoreceptor layer have been reported as causes of visual loss in CSC. Photoreceptor atrophy in the fovea, despite successful retinal reattachment, typically occurs after a duration of symptoms of approximately 4 months. Treatment should therefore be considered after 3 months if there is angiographic evidence of ongoing foveal leakage in recurrent chronic CSC or in a single CSC episode accompanied by signs of chronic CSC alterations. Based on results of trials conducted so far, it appears that photodynamic therapy with verteporfin is effective and safer than argon laser treatment and should be considered as the treatment of choice, whereas micropulse diode laser photocoagulation seems to be an effective alternative. Glucocorticoid inhibitors are an interesting alternative treatment. Clinical trials are ongoing to test their efficacy. In addition, it is important, where possible, to discontinue any corticosteroid treatment. The possible association of CSC with stress should also be discussed with patients.
Article
Full-text available
To evaluate the changes in the choroidal vasculature in central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) after photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin and to assess its potential role as a treatment option. A prospective, non-comparative, interventional study was performed in eyes with persistent CSC or chronic CSC that had fluorescein leakage at the fovea. All eyes received one single session of PDT with verteporfin (6 mg/m2 body surface area) followed by application of 50 J/cm2 laser at 689 nm. The laser spot size was guided by findings in ICG-A. Six eyes from six patients with a mean follow up of 12.7 months were analysed. Narrowing of the original dilated choroidal vessels and decrease in extravascular leakage could be demonstrated in all (100%) PDT treated eyes. 3 months after PDT, the mean diameter of the dilated choroidal vessel reduced from 546 microm to 371 microm (p=0.028). Five (83%) patients had improvement in visual symptoms and best corrected visual acuity. Fluorescence leakage stopped at the 1 month follow up in five eyes (83%) and at 3 months in all six eyes (100%). One eye developed choroidal neovascularisation at 3 month follow up. There was no other serious ocular or systemic complication. PDT is successful in stopping the fluorescein leakage in all six patients without recurrence of CSC. The ICG-A findings of choroidal vascular remodelling and decreased choroidal permeability after PDT are encouraging. As the sample size is small and the mean follow up period is short, further trials of PDT with verteporfin for CSC are required to address the optimal parameters in ensuring longer term safety and efficacy outcome.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose To present a case of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) treated with indocyanine green (ICG) dye-enhanced subthreshold micropulsed diode laser photocoagulation. METHODS CASE REPORT A 35-year-old man presenting with recurrent CSC with persistent serous detachment of the sensory retina in his left eye who declined treatment with a 532 nm laser. Subthreshold treatment, with no visible endpoint, was performed with an 810 nm diode laser 15 minutes after the injection of 25 mg ICG in 2 cc of 5% glucose solution. The laser energy was delivered over the active leakage sites with a sequence of repeated 500 ms “envelopes” each containing a train of 250 micropulses with 500 mW peak power at 10% duty cycle (200 μs ON and 1,800 μs OFF) and each separated by 500 ms intra-envelopes relaxation time. Due to the absence of visible laser-induced lesions, post treatment ICG digital angiographic images were taken without further dye injection to verify that the hypofluorescent spots resulting from the subthreshold laser applications coincided with the points of leakage. Results After 7 days, the patient presented with a less hyperopic refraction, improved visual acuity, and reduction of serous neuroepithelial detachment. No signs of laser treatment were visible at fluorescein angiography. After 8 weeks, the serous neuroepithelial detachment was almost completely resolved. CONCLUSIONS ICG dye-enhanced subthreshold micropulsed diode laser photocoagulation appears to be a safe and effective treatment and tepresents a possible approach for the management of chronic CSC with persistent central serous neuroepithelial detachment. Immediate post treatment ICG angiography, without ICG reinjection, allows documenting the actual number and location of the delivered subthreshold laser applications.
Article
Purpose: To study and compare the efficacy of different therapeutic options for the treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR). Methods: This is a nonrandomized, international multicentre study on 1719 patients (1861 eyes) diagnosed with CSCR, from 63 centres (24 countries). Reported data included different methods of treatment and both results of diagnostic examinations [fluorescein angiography and/or optical coherent tomography (OCT)] and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before and after therapy. The duration of observation had a mean of 11 months but was extended in a minority of cases up to 7 years. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the different therapeutic options of CSCR in terms of both visual (BCVA) and anatomic (OCT) improvement. Results: One thousand seven hundred nineteen patients (1861 eyes) diagnosed with CSCR were included. Treatments performed were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory eye drops, laser photocoagulation, micropulse diode laser photocoagulation, photodynamic therapy (PDT; Standard PDT, Reduced-dose PDT, Reduced-fluence PDT), intravitreal (IVT) antivascular endothelial growth factor injection (VEGF), observation and other treatments. The list of the OTHERS included both combinations of the main proposed treatments or a variety of other treatments such as eplerenone, spironolactone, acetazolamide, beta-blockers, anti-anxiety drugs, aspirin, folic acid, methotrexate, statins, vitis vinifera extract medication and pars plana vitrectomy. The majority of the patients were men with a prevalence of 77%. The odds ratio (OR) showed a partial or complete resolution of fluid on OCT with any treatment as compared with observation. In univariate analysis, the anatomical result (improvement in subretinal fluid using OCT at 1 month) was favoured by age <60 years (p < 0.005), no previous observation (p < 0.0002), duration less than 3 months (p < 0.0001), absence of CSCR in the fellow eye (p = 0.04), leakage outside of the arcade (p = 0.05) and fluid height >500 μm (p = 0.03). The OR for obtaining partial or complete resolution showed that anti-VEGF and eyedrops were not statistically significant; whereas PDT (8.5), thermal laser (11.3) and micropulse laser (8.9) lead to better anatomical results with less variability. In univariate analysis, the functional result at 1 month was favoured by first episode (p = 0.04), height of subretinal fluid >500 μm (p < 0.0001) and short duration of observation (p = 0.02). Finally, there was no statistically significant difference among the treatments at 12 months. Conclusion: Spontaneous resolution has been described in a high percentage of patients. Laser (micropulse and thermal) and PDT seem to lead to significant early anatomical improvement; however, there is little change beyond the first month of treatment. The real visual benefit needs further clarification.
Article
Many clinical trials have demonstrated the clinical efficacy of laser photocoagulation in the treatment of retinal vascular diseases, including diabetic retinopathy. There is, however, collateral iatrogenic retinal damage and functional loss after conventional laser treatment. Such side effects may occur even when the treatment is appropriately performed because of morphological damage caused by the visible endpoint, typically a whitening burn. The development of the diode laser with micropulsed emission has allowed subthreshold therapy without a visible burn endpoint. This greatly reduces the risk of structural and functional retinal damage, while retaining the therapeutic efficacy of conventional laser treatment. Studies using subthreshold micropulse laser protocols have reported successful outcomes for diabetic macular edema, central serous chorioretinopathy, macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion, and primary open angle glaucoma. The report includes the rationale and basic principles underlying micropulse diode laser therapy, together with a review of its current clinical applications.
Article
To report the visual and clinical outcomes of subthreshold diode micropulse (SDM) laser photocoagulation for chronic idiopathic central serous chorioretinopathy (ICSC) with juxtafoveal leakage. Prospective, noncomparative, interventional case series. Twenty-six eyes in 25 patients with persistent ICSC and juxtafoveal leakage longer than 4 months' duration. All eyes were assigned to SDM photocoagulation. Eyes were divided into 3 groups based on the findings of fluorescein angiography. Groups 1 and 2 were those patients with source leakage without and with associated retinal pigment epithelial atrophy (RPE), respectively, whereas group 3 consisted of patients with diffuse RPE decompensation with indeterminate source leakage. All patients were followed-up for at least 6 months. The preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity, number of sessions of SDM photocoagulation, foveal thickness, and resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF) evaluated by ocular coherence tomography (OCT) were recorded. Patients also were tested for the presence or absence of laser-related scotoma with Amsler grid screening. Groups 1, 2, and 3 consisted of, respectively, 6, 9, and 11 eyes. In group 1, all patients had total SRF resorption after 1 session of SDM photocoagulation. Eight eyes in group 2 had total SRF resorption after 1 to 3 sessions of SMD laser, whereas 1 patient had persistent SRF. In group 3, only 5 eyes had SRF resorption at the end of the follow-up, and the other 6 eyes needed photodynamic therapy for final SRF resorption. At the end of follow-up, the average preoperative foveal thickness was reduced by more than half of its original thickness. A gain of visual acuity of 3 lines or more was achieved in 15 eyes (57.7%), and a gain of between 1 and 3 lines was achieved in 6 eyes (23.1%). Subthreshold diode laser is effective in the treatment of ICSC with point source leakage. However, for eyes with diffuse leakage, a less favorable response was noted. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial is needed to ascertain the real efficacy and the appropriate settings of SMD for chronic ICSC. The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.