Content uploaded by Hoceme Degaïchia
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Hoceme Degaïchia on Aug 02, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
Content uploaded by Hoceme Degaïchia
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Hoceme Degaïchia on Aug 02, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
Revista Mexicana Ciencias Agrícolas volume 13 number 5 June 30 - August 13, 2022
759
Article
Phytochemical screening and antibacterial effect of phenolic extracts from two
Mediterranean Cupressus
Hoceme Degaïchia1, 2§
Noussaiba Moualhi3
Meriem Benhamadi2
Atika Benrima2
1Agropastoral Research Center-Djelfa. Algeria. 2Research Laboratory in Plant Production Biotechnologies
Faculty of Natural and Life Sciences-Blida University Algeria. 3Aromatic and medicinal plants research
laboratory-Faculty of Natural and Life Sciences-Universidad Blida 1. Algeria.
§Corresponding author: degaichia.houssem@yahoo.fr.
Abstract
The objective of our research is to identify the chemical components and evaluate in vitro, the
antibacterial activity of the extracts from the leaves of Cupressus sempervirens L. and Cupressus
arizonica L. from northern Algeria against Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 9027. The extraction
was carried out by macerating the leaves in solvents of increasing polarity (chloroform, petroleum
ether and aqueous methanol). A screening of the phenolic compounds was carried out for a
qualitative characterization of the different extracts. The extracts obtained were put in contact with
a strain of P. aeruginosa to determine their antibacterial potential. Phytochemical screening
revealed the presence of several secondary metabolites: leucoanthocyanins, flavonols, flavonones,
anthraquinones, catechin tannins, gallic tannins, steroids, triterpenes, saponin, cardiac glycosides,
terpenoids, saponosides and free quinones. Aqueous methanol (high polarity) allows the extraction
of most metabolites. The best extraction yield of the three solvents is chloroform, with an extraction
yield of 61.23% (for C. sempervirens) and 52.27% (for C. arizonica), followed by the
hydroalcoholic solvent 33.55% and the ethereal solvent with 0.39%. Hydroalcoholic extraction
induces a very important sensitivity of P. aeruginosa, with a diameter of 16.2 mm for C. arizonica.
Ethereal and chloroformic extracts induce weak inhibition. P. aeruginosa is extremely sensitive to
the hydroalcoholic extract from C. sempervirens, the latter induces an inhibition zone with a
diameter of 19.95 mm, which is statistically equal to that induced by Vancomycin. These results
can be considered as a promising solution for the replacement of vancomycin with the
hydroalcoholic extract from C. sempervirens.
Keywords: Cupressus arizonica, Cupressus sempervirens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
hydroalcoholic extract.
Reception date: March 2022
Acceptance date: June 2022
Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. vol. 13 num. 5 June 30 - August 13, 2022
760
Introduction
In recent decades, scientific research has only confirmed the beneficial effects of plants on
health. It has been suggested that their high content of bioactive agents, especially polyphenols,
could be responsible for the prevention of many diseases and could be used as a natural
alternative to synthetic drugs (Nostro et al., 2000). It is estimated that the active ingredients of
plants represent about 25% of prescription drugs. That is a total of 120 natural compounds from
90 different plants (Djahra, 2014). Several scientific papers on polyphenols have been
published to inform and sensitize the population about their interests. These molecules are
recognized for their considerable antioxidant potentials, which are directly related to human
health (Bouayed et al., 2008).
Polyphenols have the ability to trap free radicals, permanently generated by our body or formed in
response to attacks from our environment or in case of infection. When ingested with food, they
strengthen natural defenses by protecting cells and tissues against oxidative stress (Scalbert, 2004).
Flavonoids prevent oxidative damage by different mechanisms of action: either by capturing
hydroxyl, superoxide and peroxide radicals (Hodek et al., 2002). Either by chelation of metals (iron
and copper), which are of great importance in the initiation of radical reactions or the inhibition of
enzymes responsible for the generation of free radicals resulting from the infection process
(Benavente-Garcia et al., 1997).
As for the antioxidant power of tannins, this property is very remarkable due to its phenolic nuclei
(Zimmer and Cordesse, 1996). Many bacteria have developed resistance to most antibiotics, and it
is a major health problem on a global scale (Lozniewski and Rabaud, 2010), which led us to study
the efficacy of plants with therapeutic virtues in order to isolate the active ingredients. Cypresses
(Cupressaceae) are medium-sized conifers, which contain more than 20 species distributed in the
Mediterranean region, tropical Asia and North America (Liu et al., 2010). Cypress is considered a
medicinal tree, widely used in traditional medicine, where its dried leaves are used for the relief of
stomach pain, joint and muscle pains, malaria, cough, gout and rheumatism, as well as a
hypoglycemic agent (Selim et al., 2014; Lakhdar et al., 2015).
The objective of the research is to identify the secondary metabolites that exist in the flakes of
Cupressus sempervirens and Cupressus arizonica after grinding (phytochemical screening).
Grinding allows increasing the contact surface of the sample with the solvent and better filtration
of the solvent inside the plant material, which results in an increase in extraction yield. The
objective of the extraction is to release the polyphenols present in the vacuolar structures by rupture
of the plant tissue and by diffusion. These are extracted by solid-liquid extraction using different
solvents with increasing polarity, namely: diethyl ether, chloroform and aqueous methanol. In the
laboratory, a comparative analysis of the different extracts is carried out to study their bactericidal
effect against Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 9027.
Materials and methods
The study is carried out according to an experimental model in randomized complete blocks.
Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. vol. 13 num. 5 June 30 - August 13, 2022
761
Plant material
The plants under study were chosen based on a meticulous literature search that showed that these
plant species are very little studied. The leaves of Cupressus sempervirens L. and Cupressus
arizonica used in this study were collected during April 2021, at the level of the Department of
Biotechnologies and Agroecology of the University of Blida 1 (Blida-Algeria). The identification
of the two species is made with the flora of Quezel and Santa (1963). In order not to damage the
tree, we have chosen very green leaves that appear at the ends of the branches.
Bacterial strain
The bacterial strain used in this study is Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 9027, pathogenic
bacterium, Gram-negative category, clinically isolated, its collection and isolation were carried
out in accordance with hygiene standards. The strain is stored and grown in Mueller-Hinton
medium. It is part of the collection of the research laboratory in Biotechnology of Plant
Production of the University of Blida 1 and was made available to us by the director Pr. Sid
Ahmed SNOUSSI.
Polyphenol extraction
Drying
After harvesting, the samples were cleaned (cleaned of debris) and spread on paper. The aerial parts
of the plant were dried in the dark at room temperature. We ventilate the samples every three days
to prevent mold growth. Drying lasted 30 days on average (Debib et al., 2014).
Grinding
The dried leaves were crushed, sieved and stored in airtight bottles (room temperature) protected
from moisture and light, until their use.
Preparation of raw extracts
For the extraction of polyphenols, we opted for the use of three solvents: petroleum ether,
chloroform and aqueous methanol.
Hydroalcoholic extract
Ten grams of each plant material were put in contact with 100 ml of a mixture of methanol-water
(70/30) (v/v). After 24 h of mechanical stirring at room temperature and protected from light, the
mixture is vacuum filtered with a 0.4 μm Millipore membrane and evaporated to dryness under
reduced pressure by a rotary evaporator (BUCHI R-215) at 45 °C to obtain the hydroalcoholic
extract. The residues obtained are stored at 4 °C until their use (Romani et al., 2006).
Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. vol. 13 num. 5 June 30 - August 13, 2022
762
Ethereal extract
First, 10 g of each plant material is macerated in 100 ml of petroleum ether. After 10 min of
mechanical stirring at room temperature and protected from light. The mixture is vacuum filtered
with a 0.4 μm Millipore membrane and concentrated in a rotary evaporator at a temperature of 30
°C to obtain the extract of diethyl ether. The residues obtained are stored at 4 °C until their use
(Drissa et al., 2004).
Chloroformic extract
First, 10 g of each plant material is macerated in 100 ml of chloroform. After 10 min of
mechanical stirring, at room temperature and protected from light, the mixture is vacuum
filtered with a 0.4 μm Millipore membrane and concentrated in a rotary evaporator at a
temperature of 40 °C to obtain one chloroformic extract. The resulting residues are stored at 4
°C until their use (Drissa et al., 2004). The heavy dry residues are captured by the solvents for
the phytochemical study and by Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) for the antibacterial activity (Debib
et al., 2014).
Extraction yield
The extraction yield is calculated by the formula proposed by Falleh et al. (2008): Y(%)=
Mext
Mdry ×100. Where: Y= percentage of yield %; Mext= mass of the extract after evaporation of the
solvent in g; Mdry= dry mass of the plant sample in g.
Phytochemical screening
Phytochemical screening is a qualitative test that allows highlighting the different chemical groups
contained in a plant organ, the results are classified into very positive reaction= +++; positive
reaction= ++; weak reaction= +; negative reaction= -; phytochemical tests were carried out on
extracts prepared from Cupressus leaves. The detection of some compounds is achieved using the
methods described by Harbone (1973); Trease and Evans (1989); Evans (1996) with some
modifications.
Flavonoids
Bate-Smith test (flavan-3,4-diols test)
We put 1 ml of the extract in a tube to which we add 250 μl of concentrated HCl. The tube was
subjected to a water bath for 30 min. The appearance of a red color indicates the presence of
leucoanthocyanins, which are derivatives of flavan-3,4-diols (Karumi, 2004).
Wilstater test (tests for flavonols and flavonones)
In separate tubes, 1 ml of each extract is placed and 0.1 g of magnesium (Mg) is added. A drop of
HCl is added and left to act under the hood. The appearance of a color that becomes purplish red
(flavonols) or purplish red (flavonones) confirms the existence of flavonoids (Karumi, 2004).
Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. vol. 13 num. 5 June 30 - August 13, 2022
763
Tannins
One hundred microliters of a 1% FeCl3 solution are added to a tube that contains 1 ml of the extract.
In the presence of tannins, a greenish or blue-black color appears. The color turns blackish brown
in the presence of gallic tannins (hydrolysable tannins) and greenish blue in the presence of
catechetical tannins (condensed tannins) (Harborne, 1998).
Saponosides
Put 0.5 g of crushed leaves in 80 ml of distilled water and stir for a few minutes. The appearance
of a foam in the medium proves the presence of saponosides (Trease and Evans, 2002).
Anthraquinones
We put 1 ml of the extract in a tube to which we add 500 μl of KOH. After stirring, the presence
of anthraquinones is confirmed when the aqueous phase turns red (Ribérreau, 1968).
Saponins
Libermann-Burchard reaction: to 5 ml of extracts, we add 5 ml of acetic anhydride (C4H6O3) and
a few drops of concentrated H2SO4. Steroids give a red color with this reaction, while triterpenes
give a green color (Bruneton, 1993).
Free quinones
The identification of free quinones in our extracts is carried out by adding a few drops of NaOH
(1%) to 1 ml of the extract. Their presence is indicated by the appearance of purple color; yellow
or red (Ribérreau, 1968).
Terpenoids
Five milliliters of extract were mixed with 2 ml of chloroform in a test tube. Three milliliters of
concentrated sulfuric acid were carefully added along the wall of the test tube to form a layer. An
interphase with a reddish-brown coloration indicates the presence of terpenoids (Bruneton, 1993).
Cardiac glycosides
One milliliter of concentrated sulfuric acid was poured into a test tube. Five milliliters of extract
were mixed with 2 ml of glacial acetic acid that contained a drop of ferric chloride. This mixture
was carefully added to 1 ml of concentrated sulfuric acid. The presence of cardiac glycosides was
detected by the formation of a brown ring (Trease and Evans, 2002).
Evaluation of antibacterial activity
The bacterial sensitivity test is performed using the agar diffusion method, also called the disk
method (Celiktas et al., 2007; Bssaibis et al., 2009).
Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. vol. 13 num. 5 June 30 - August 13, 2022
764
Seeding
In sterile Petri dishes (Ø: 90 mm), 20 ml of Mueller-Hinton agar is poured and left to solidify for
20 min. In this culture medium, 1 ml of bacterial suspension of 108 CFU ml-1 was inoculated on
the entire surface using a swab, the swab must be passed over the entire surface to obtain a
homogeneous inoculation (Shunying et al., 2005). Sterile blank disks (Liofilchem®) of 6 mm in
diameter are impregnated with a volume of 10 μl of extract and placed on the surface of the
solidified medium (Ngameni et al., 2009). The Petri dishes were incubated for 18-24 h, at 37 °C.
For the positive control, antibiotic disks (Penicillin and Vancomycin (Liofilchem®)) were used,
while for the negative control, the sterile blank disk was soaked with Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).
Reading
The determination of antibacterial activity was estimated by measuring the diameter (in
millimeters) of the inhibition zone around the disks, induced by the extracts. The calculation is
performed using the processing and measurement software Digimizer™. The results are
symbolized by signs that depend on the sensitivity of the strains to the extract (Ponce et al., 2003),
(Table 1).
Table 1. Sensitivity and degree of activity according to the diameter of inhibition.
Diameter of the inhibition halo (Ø)
Degree of susceptibility to germs
Ø < 8 mm
Non-sensitive/resistant
8.1 > Ø > 14 mm
Sensitive
14.1 > Ø >19 mm
Very sensitive
Ø > 19.1 mm
Extremely sensitive
Ponce et al. (2003).
Statistical data treating
The statistical analysis of the results obtained was carried out using the SPSS© software version
20.0.0 for Windows™. The experiments were repeated ten times to verify the normality of the
statistical distribution. The results show the same trends. An analysis of variance (Anova) is
performed, followed by a post-hoc Tukey test at the 5% threshold and a Student’s test to see the
existence of significant differences between the extraction methods according to the plant tested,
taking into account counts, extract yield and inhibition of the development of P. aeruginosa
ATCC 9027.
Results and discussion
Extract yield
For the two plants Cupressus sempervirens and Cupressus arizonica, the best extraction yield of
the three solvents used is chloroform, with an average extraction yield of 61.23% and 52.27%
respectively, followed by the hydroalcoholic solvent 33.55% and the ethereal solvent with 0.39%
(Figure 1). The extraction yields shown in the figure reveal a significant difference (C.
Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. vol. 13 num. 5 June 30 - August 13, 2022
765
sempervirens: F= 52.38; p= 0 and C. arizonica: F= 27.24; p= 0) compared to the solvent used. The
Anova test reveals three homogeneous groups (Table 2, Table 3). Statistically and according to
Student’s t-test, the three solvents (chloroform, hydroalcoholic, ethereal) differ significantly for the
two plants (Table 4).
Figure 1. Extraction yield of phenolic extracts.
Table 2. Distribution of extract yield in homogeneous groups for C. arizonica (Tukey’s test).
Extracts
N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1
2
3
Ethereal extracts
10
1.29
Hydroalcoholic extracts
10
33.56
Chloroformic extracts
10
52.28
Intragroup meaning
1 000
1 000
1 000
Table 3. Distribution of extract yield in homogeneous groups for C. sempervirens (Tukey’s test).
Extracts
N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1
2
3
Ethereal extracts
10
0.4
Hydroalcoholic extracts
10
33.23
Chloroformic extracts
10
61.26
Intragroup meaning
1 000
1 000
1 000
Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. vol. 13 num. 5 June 30 - August 13, 2022
766
Table 4. Student’s t-test for the comparison of the extracts according to the plants.
Extracts
t
dof
p
Mean difference
STD difference
Ethereal extracts
83.415
1 515
0.001
0.895
0.011
Chloroformic extracts
33.212
1 312
0
8.972
0.027
Hydroalcoholic extracts
13.98
1 984
0.005
0.331
0.024
Similarities are common in the leaves of trees harvested in the same place. Environmental
conditions have an important influence on the production of metabolites, so the extraction yields
of plants growing in the same place can be expected to be very similar (Graglia et al., 1996). Our
results refute this hypothesis and clearly show that the yield of the species is not related to
environmental conditions because the two trees are in the same area at a distance of 2.45 m.
These results correlate with those of Farhat et al. (2009), who explain that the variable yield of the
extracts is reduced to the differential solubility of the various phenolic compounds in solvents and
that this solubility is a function of their polymerization degrees. The interaction with the other
components and the nature and physicochemical characteristics of the solvents used and in
particular, their polarity. In fact, the solubility of the substances contained in the plant material in
a certain solvent depends on these properties. As a result, extraction yields and the composition of
extracts vary from solvent to solvent and plant to plant (Falleh et al., 2008).
Phytochemical screening
Phytochemical screening of C. arizonica and C. sempervirens indicates that the two species have
phenolic compounds whose presence differs depending on the type of solvent used
(hydroalcoholic, ethereal and chloroformic extract) (Table 5).
Table 5. Phytochemical screening of Cupressus arizonica and Cupressus sempervirens according
to the nature of the solvent.
Cupressus arizonica
Cupressus sempervirens
Ext (A)
Ext (E)
Ext (C)
Ext (A)
Ext (E)
Ext (C)
Saponosides
+ + +
+ + +
Flavonoids
Leucoanthocyanins
+ +
-
-
+ +
+
-
Flavonols
+ +
-
-
+ +
-
-
Flavonones
+
-
-
+
-
-
Anthraquinones
+ +
-
-
+ +
-
-
Tannins
Catechetical tannins
+ +
-
-
+ +
-
-
Gallic tannins
-
-
+ +
-
-
+ +
Saponin
Steroids
+
-
-
+
+
-
Triterpenes
-
+
+
-
+
+
Cardiac glycosides
+
-
-
+ +
-
-
Terpenoids
+
-
-
+
-
+ +
Free quinones
+ +
-
-
+ +
-
-
Ext (A)= hydroalcoholic extract; Ext (E)= ethereal extract; Ext (C)= chloroformic extract; +++= very positive reaction;
++= positive reaction; += weak reaction; -= negative reaction.
Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. vol. 13 num. 5 June 30 - August 13, 2022
767
Chloroform allows the extraction of gallic tannins, while the extraction with alcohol allows the
identification of catechetical tannins. Saponosides are strongly present in the leaves of C. arizonica
and C. sempervirens. The extraction with petroleum ether from the leaves of C. sempervirens
shows a weak reaction to leucoanthocyanins and steroids. On the other hand, the use of this solvent
for C. arizonica leaves results in a negative reaction.
Terpenoids are strongly observed when using chloroform extract for C. sempervirens leaves. This
is not the case with C. arizonica leaves. From these results, it can be deduced that the use of a
hydroalcoholic solvent allows a better extraction of phenolic compounds, except for gallic tannins,
which, as mentioned above, are available through the use of chloroform in the extraction process.
These results corroborate with those of Azzaz et al. (2019), they reported that the composition of
extracts from C. sempervirens leaves varies depending on the extraction solvent and the method
used. In addition, no studies have been conducted on extracts from C. arizonica. This study was
conducted for the first time in C. arizonica in order to prospect the various secondary metabolites
existing in this plant. Compounds such as flavonoids, terpenes, quinones, tannins, and saponins in
plants are known to be responsible for protection against biotic and abiotic stress, antifungal
activity and numerous biological activities (Hiermann et al., 1998; Kanwal et al., 2010).
Effect of phenolic extracts from C. sempervirens and C. arizonica on the development of P.
aeruginosa
The calculation of the inhibition diameter of P. aeruginosa induced by the different extracts and
by the antibiotics (Penicillin and Vancomycin) is shown in Figure 2. P. aeruginosa is extremely
sensitive to the positive control, vancomycin, where an inhibition zone diameter of 24.25 mm is
observed; the same occurs with the hydroalcoholic extract from C. sempervirens, where the test
organism is considered extremely sensitive. With an inhibition zone of the order of 19.95 mm. The
results indicate that the hydroalcoholic extraction induces a very pronounced sensitivity of P.
aeruginosa with a diameter of 16.2 mm for C. arizonica. Ethereal and chloroformic extracts induce
relatively weak inhibition (Table 6).
Figure 2. Variation of the diameter of the inhibition zone (mm) depending on the plant and the solvent.
Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. vol. 13 num. 5 June 30 - August 13, 2022
768
Table 6. Sensitivity of P. aeruginosa to phenolic extracts from C. sempervirens and C. arizonica.
Plant
Extract
Interpretation of the inhibition zone
C. arizonica
Hydroalcoholic
Very sensitive
Ethereal
Sensitive
Chloroformic
Sensitive
C. sempervirens
Hydroalcoholic
Extremely sensitive
Ethereal
Sensitive
Chloroformic
Sensitive
Controls
DMSO (control -)
Resistant
Penicillin (control +)
Resistant
Vancomycin (control ++)
Extremely sensitive
C. arizonica shows low numbers of the inhibition zone compared to C. sempervirens. Student’s
test (t-test) at the 5% level indicates that this difference is not statistically significant (p> 5%)
(Table 7).
Table 7. Student’s t-test for the comparison of the inhibition zones of the extracts according to
the plants.
Extracts
t
dof
p
Mean difference
STD difference
Ethereal extracts
-1.962
3.752
0.13
-4.02
2.05
Chloroformic extracts
-0.597
3.701
0.58
-2.29
3.84
Hydroalcoholic extracts
-2.284
4
0.08
-3.75
1.64
DMSO
-0.946
2.215
0.44
-1.19
1.26
Penicillin
0
4
1
0
0.02
Vancomycin
0
4
1
0
1.81
An analysis of variance using Anova at the level of 5% followed by a post-hoc Tukey test allows
dividing the inhibition diameter into homogeneous groups (F= 24.09; p= 0). In C. arizonica, the
distribution of inhibition diameters in three homogeneous groups was observed. The first is
represented by Penicillin, ether extract, DMSO and chloroform extract. The second is represented
by chloroform and hydroalcoholic extract. Vancomycin is isolated in group 03 (Table 8).
Table 8. Distribution of C. arizonica extracts in homogeneous groups according to their effects on
the inhibition of P. aeruginosa.
Extracts
N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1
2
3
Penicillin
10
6.03
Ethereal extracts
10
8.57
DMSO
10
9.14
Chloroformic extracts
10
11.61
11.61
Hydroalcoholic extracts
10
16.2
Vancomycin
10
24.25
Intragroup meaning
10
0.104
0.231
1 000
Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. vol. 13 num. 5 June 30 - August 13, 2022
769
Tukey’s test shows four homogeneous groups in C. sempervirens (F= 15.12; p= 0). The first is
represented by penicillin and DMSO. The second group is represented by DMSO, the ethereal
extract. The third group is represented by ethereal, chloroformic and hydroalcoholic extracts. The
effect of the hydroalcoholic extract is similar to the effect of vancomycin isolated in group 04
(Table 9).
Table 9. Distribution of C. sempervirens extracts in homogeneous groups according to their effects
on the inhibition of P. aeruginosa.
Extracts
N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1
2
3
4
Penicillin
10
6.03
DMSO
10
10.32
10.32
Ethereal extracts
10
12.59
12.59
12.59
Chloroformic extracts
10
13.9
13.9
Hydroalcoholic extracts
10
18.31
18.314
Vancomycin
10
24.24
Intragroup meaning
0.118
0.644
0.207
0.18
From the results obtained, it is deduced that the diameters of the inhibition zones vary depending
on the type of solvent studied. The antibacterial activity of these extracts is mainly due to their
chemical profile. It should be noted that the difference between the antimicrobial activities of the
extracts can be explained by the difference in the active compounds obtained. Therefore, this
activity is related to the polarity of the extracted bioactive substances and extraction solvents
(Machiex et al., 2005).
These results are better than those obtained by Hayouni et al. (2007) with chloroform extracts from
the fruits of Juniperus phoenicea (Cupressaceae) against P. aeruginosa ATCC 9027, where they
found halos of inhibition zones of 3.03mm ±0.21. The variable yield of the extracts is reduced to
the differential solubility of the different phenolic compounds in the solvents and that this solubility
is a function of their degree of polymerization, the interaction with the other constituents and the
type of solvent used (Falleh et al., 2008; Debib et al., 2014).
By combining the results of phytochemical screening, we were able to show that antibacterial
activity is linked to the presence of phenolic molecules in the leaves of both plants. These
secondary metabolites are responsible for various biological activities. Therefore, great
attention has been paid to natural products derived mainly from plants (Chaudhary et al., 2012;
Chaitra et al., 2015).
Conclusions
The present work shows that C. sempervirens and C. arizonica contain high-quality secondary
metabolites, which constitutes the scientific basis for the therapeutic use of the studied leaves. This
study is, therefore, a phytochemical contribution to the knowledge of the two species of cypress of
great interest in the field of pharmacology. Phytochemical screening revealed the presence of
Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. vol. 13 num. 5 June 30 - August 13, 2022
770
several secondary metabolites: leucoanthocyanins, flavonols, flavonones, anthraquinones, catechin
tannins, gallic tannins, saponin (steroids and triterpenes), cardiac glycosides, terpenoids,
saponosides and free quinones, which are closely related to the polarity of the solvents used.
The best extraction yield of the three solvents used is chloroform, with an average extraction yield
of 61.23% (for C. sempervirens) and 52.27% (for C. arizonica). The results indicate that the
hydroalcoholic extraction induces a very pronounced sensitivity of P. aeruginosa with a diameter
of 16.2 mm for C. arizonica. However, the study is limited by the clinical response of the bacterium
in a hospital environment. In fact, a clinical case study could give more visibility to the effect of
cypress extracts on the development of P. aeruginosa. In addition, a suitable formulation should
be considered to minimize the number of leaves and optimize the bactericidal effect of the
hydroalcoholic extract from C. sempervirens.
Cited literature
Azzaz, N. A.; Hamed, S. S. and Kenawy, T. A. 2019. Chemical studies on cypress leaves
(Cupressus sempervirens) and their activity as antimicrobial agents. Al-Azhar J. Agric.
Res. 44(2):100-109.
Benavente-Garcia, O.; Castillo, J.; Marin, F. R.; Ortuno, A. and Del-Rio, J. A. 1997. Uses and
properties of citrus flavonoids, J. Agric. Food Chem. 45(12):4505-4515.
Bouayed, J.; Rammal, H.; Younos, C.; Dicko, A. and Soulimani, R. 2008. Caractérisation et bio
évaluation des polyphénols: nouveaux domaines d’application en santé et nutrition.
Springer. 4(6):71-74.
Bruneton, J. 1993. Les tannins. (Ed.). Médicinales internationales. Paris. 404-407 pp.
Bssaibis, F.; Gmira, N. and Meziane, M. 2009. Activité antibactérienne de Dittrichia viscosa (L).
W. Greuter. Rev. Microbiol. Ind San Environ. 3:44-55.
Celiktas, O.; Hames-Kocabas, E.; Bedir, E.; Sukan, F.; Ozek, T. and Baser, K. 2007. Antimicrobial
activities of methanol extracts and essential oils of Rosmarinus officinalis L., depending on
location and seasonal variations. Food Chem. 100(2):553-9.
Chaitra, S.; Kumar, N.; Shalini, P.; Sindhu, R. and Raj, K. 2015. Phytochemical analysis and
antibacterial activity of Albergia paniculata roxb. International journal of pharmaceutical
sciences and research. 6(2):712-716.
Chaudhary, H.; Shahid, W.; Bano, A.; Ullah, F.; Munis, F.; Fahad, S. and Ahmad, I. 2012. In vitro
analysis of Cupressus sempervirens L. plant extracts antibaterial activity. J. Med. Plants
Res. 6(2):273-276.
Debib, A.; Tir-touil, A.; Mothana, R.; Meddah, B. and Sonnet, P. 2014. Phenolic content,
antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of two fruit varieties of Algerian Ficus carica L. J.
Food Bio. 38(2):207-215.
Djahra, A. 2014. Etude phytochimique et activité antimicrobienne, antioxydante,
antihépatotoxique du Marrube blanc ou Marrubium vulgare L. Universite badji mokhtar
annaba. Thèse de doctorat. 114-120 pp.
Evans, W. C. 1996. Phytochemical screening. In: Trease GE, Evans WC, (Ed). Textbook of
pharmacognosy. London: tindal limited. 541-548.
Falleh, H.; Ksouri, R.; Chaieb, K.; Karray-Bouraoui, N.; Trabelsi, N.; Boulaaba, M. and Abdelly,
C. 2008. Phenolic composition of Cynara cardunculus L. organs, and their biological
activities. Compt. Rend. Biol. 331(5):372-379.
Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. vol. 13 num. 5 June 30 - August 13, 2022
771
Farhat, A.; Ginies, C.; Romdhane, M. and Chemat, F. 2009. Eco-friendly and cleaner process for
isolation of essential oil using microwave energy: experimental and theoretical study. J.
Chromatogr. A. 1216(26):5077-5085.
Graglia, E.; Julkunen-Tïito, R. and Shaver, G. 1996. Environmental control and intersite variations
of phenolics in Betuna nana in tundra ecosystems. New Phytologist. 151(1):227-236.
Harborne, A. J. 1998. Phytochemical methods a guide to modern techniques of plant analysis, 3
ème (Ed.). Springer, Netherlands. 302-311.
Harborne, J. B. 1973. Phytochemical methods. London chapman and hall, Ltd. 49-56 pp.
Hayouni, E. A.; Abedrabba, M.; Bouix, M. and Hamdi, M. 2007. The effects of solvents and
extraction method on the phenolic contents and biological activities in vitro of Tunisian
(Quercus coccifera L.) and (Juniperus phoenicea L.) fruit extracts. Food Chem.
105(3):1126-34.
Hiermann, A.; Schramm, H. W. and Laufer, S. 1998. Antiinflammatory activity of myricitin-3-o-
beta-D-glucuronide and related compounds. Inflamm. 47(11):421-427.
Hodek, P.; Trefil, P. and Stiborov, A. M. 2002. Flavonoids-potent and versatile biologically active
compounds interacting with cytochromes P450. Chem. Biol. Interact. 139(1):1-21.
Kanwal, Q.; Hussain, I.; Latif-Siddiqui, H. and Javaid, A.2010. Antifungal activity of flavonoids
isolated from mango (Mangifera indica L.) leaves. Nat. Prod. Res. 24(20):1907-14.
Lakhdar, L. 2015. Evaluation de l’activite antibactérienne d’huiles essentielles marocaines sur
Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans: étude in vitro. Université mohammed v rabat.
Maroc. Thése de doctotrat. 183 p.
Liu, C. M.; Zhou, H. B. and Zhang, W. D. 2010. Terpenoids from stems and leaves of Cupressus
gigantea. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 8(6):0405-0410.
Lozniewski, A. and Rabaud, C. 2010. Résistance bactérienne aux antibiotiques, Fiches conseils
pour la prévention du risque infectieux-Infections associées aux soins, CCLIN, Sud-Est,
Nancy. 4- 6 pp.
Macheix, J. J.; Fleuriet, A. and Jay-Allemand, C. 2005. Les composées phénoliques des végétaux.
France. (Ed.). Presses Polytechniques. 192 p.
Ngameni, B.; Kuete, V.; Simo, I. K.; Mbaveng, A. T.; Awoussong, P. K.; Patnam, R.; Roy, R. and
Ngadjui, B. T. 2009. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of the crude extract and
compounds from Dorstenia turbinata (Moraceae). S. Afr. J. Bot. 75(2):256-61.
Nostro, N.; Germano, M.; Ángelo, V. D. and Cannatelli, M. 2000. Extraction methods and
bioautography for evaluation of medicinal plant antimicrobial activity. Letters Appl.
Microbiol. 30(5):379-384.
Ponce, A. G.; Fritz, R.; Del-Valle, C. and Roura, S. I. 2003. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils
on the native microflora of organic swiss chard. Lwt-Food Sci Technol. 36(7):679-84.
Quezel, P. and Santa, S.1963. Nouvelle flore de l’Algérie. Tome I. centre national de la recherche
scientifique. Paris, France. 34-35 pp.
Ribéreau-Gayon, P. 1968. Les composés phénoliques des végétaux. (Ed.). Dunod, Paris. 232-242 pp.
Romani, A.; Pinelli, P.; Cantini, C.; Cimato, A. and Heimler, D. 2006. Characterization of Violetto
di Toscana, a typical Italian variety of artichoke (Cynara scolymus L). J. Food Chem.
95(2):221-225.
Scalbert, A. 2004. Fruits et légumes, polyphénols et santé, laboratoires des maladies métaboliques
et micronutritions, INRA, Centre de recherche de clermont-ferrand/theix. 198-203 pp.
Selim, S. A.; Adam, M. E.; Hassan, S. M. and Albalawi, A. R. 2014. Chemical composition,
antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity of the essential oil and (Cupressus sempervirens L.).
BMC complementary and alternative medicine. 14(179):1-8.
Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. vol. 13 num. 5 June 30 - August 13, 2022
772
Shunying, Z.; Yang, Y.; Huaidong, Y.; Yue, Y. and Guolin, Z. 2005. Chemical composition and
antibacterial activity of the essential oils of Chrysanthemum indicum. J. Ethnopharmacol.
96(2):151-158.
Trease, G. E. and Evans, W. C. 1989. Pharmacognosy. 27. 13th (Ed.). London: ELBS/Bailliere
Tindall, London. 345-772 pp.
Trease, G. E. and Evans, W. C. 2002. Pharmacognosy. 15th (Ed.). Saunders. 214-393 pp.
Zimmer, N. and Cordesse, R. 1996. Influence des tannins sur la valeur nutritive des aliments des
ruminants. INRA. Prod Anim. 9(3):167-179.
