ArticlePDF Available

Regular Bedtimes Among Children Aged 5-17 Years: United States, 2020

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The American Academy of Sleep Medicine recommends 9-12 hours of sleep for children aged 6-12 years and 8-10 hours for those aged 13-18 (1), yet only two-thirds of children meet these recommendations (2). This report uses 2020 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data to describe regular bedtimes, defined as going to sleep at the same time most days or every day in a typical school week, among children aged 5-17 years. Estimates are presented by sociodemographic characteristics, family type, Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), family income, and urbanicity of residence.
Content may be subject to copyright.
NCHS Data Brief No. 437 June 2022
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Center for Health Statistics
Regular Bedtimes Among Children Aged 5–17 Years:
United States, 2020
Amanda E. Ng, M.P.H., Dzifa Adjaye-Gbewonyo, Ph.D., and Lindsey I. Black, M.P.H.
Key findings
Data from the National
Health Interview Survey
In 2020, 84.4% of children
aged 5–17 years had a regular
bedtime every day or most days
during a typical school week.
Children aged 12–17 years
(78.9%) were less likely than
children aged 5–11 years
(89.6%) to have a regular
bedtime every day or most days
in a typical school week.
Just over three-quarters
of children living in families
with a single parent and those
with incomes less than 100%
of the federal poverty level
had a regular bedtime every
day or most days in a typical
school week.
Children with a regular
bedtime every day or most days
were about one-half as likely
(5.9%) to be tired during the
day every day or most days
compared with children with a
regular bedtime on some days
or never (13.0%).
The American Academy of Sleep Medicine recommends 9–12 hours of sleep
for children aged 6–12 years and 8–10 hours for those aged 13–18 (1), yet only
two-thirds of children meet these recommendations (2). This report uses 2020
National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data to describe regular bedtimes,
defined as going to sleep at the same time most days or every day in a typical
school week, among children aged 5–17 years. Estimates are presented by
sociodemographic characteristics, family type, Social Vulnerability Index
(SVI), family income, and urbanicity of residence.
Overall, what percentage of children had a regular bedtime
in a typical school week?
In 2020, among children aged 5–17 years, 47.1% had a regular bedtime
every day, 37.3% most days, 10.5% some days, and 5.0% never had a
regular bedtime during a typical school week (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Percent distribution of how often school-aged children (5–17 years) had a regular
bedtime in a typical school week: United States, 2020
NOTES: Estimates are based on household interviews of a sample of the civilian noninstitutionalized population. Figures may not
add to 100 due to rounding. Access data table for Figure 1 at:
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db437-tables.pdf#1.
SOURCE: National Center for Health Statistics, National Health Interview Survey, 2020.
Never
5.0
Some days
10.5
Most days
37.3
Every day
47.1
NCHS reports can be downloaded from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/index.htm.
NCHS Data Brief No. 437 June 2022
■  2 
Did the percentage of children aged 5–17 years who had a regular bedtime
every day or most days in a typical school week vary by sociodemographic
characteristics?
Boys (84.7%) were as likely as girls (84.2%) to have a regular bedtime every day or most
days in a typical school week (Figure 2).
Children aged 12–17 years (78.9%) were less likely to have a regular bedtime every day or
most days compared with children aged 5–11 years (89.6%).
Non-Hispanic Black children (77.3%) and Hispanic children (83.0%) were less likely
to have a regular bedtime every day or most days than non-Hispanic White (86.9%) and
non-Hispanic Asian (88.5%) children.
Figure 2. Percentage of children aged 5–17 years who had a regular bedtime every day or most days in a typical school
week, by sex, age group, and race and Hispanic origin: United States, 2020
1
Significantly different from children aged 12–17 years (p < 0.05).
2
Significantly different from Non-Hispanic White children (p < 0.05).
3
Significantly different from Non-Hispanic Asian children (p < 0.05).
NOTES: Estimates are based on household interviews of a sample of the civilian noninstitutionalized population. Access data table for Figure 2 at:
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db437-tables.pdf#2
.
SOURCE: National Center for Health Statistics, National Health Interview Survey, 2020.
Percent
0 20 40 60 80
84.5
84.7
84.2
189.6
78.9
100
2,383.0
Hispanic
86.9
Non-Hispanic White
2,377.3
Non-Hispanic Black
88.5
Non-Hispanic Asian
12–17
5–11
Girls
Boys
Total
NCHS Data Brief No. 437 June 2022
■  3 
Were there differences in the percentage of children aged 5–17 years who
had a regular bedtime every day or most days in a typical school week by
family type, SVI, family income, or urbanicity?
Children living in single-parent families were less likely to have a regular bedtime every day
or most days (77.7%) compared with children in two-parent families (86.8%) (Figure 3). The
observed difference in the percentage of children with a regular bedtime between single-parent
families and other types of families (82.3%) was not significant.
The percentage of children who had a regular bedtime every day or most days was
higher among those living in areas of little to no social vulnerability (88.3%) compared
with children living in low (84.8%), medium (82.3%), and high (84.0%) areas of social
vulnerability.
The percentage of children who had a regular bedtime every day or most days increased
with increasing family income, from 76.1% of children from families with incomes less than
100% of the federal poverty level (FPL) to 82.5% of children from families with incomes
between 100%–199% of FPL to 87.2% of children from families with incomes greater than
or equal to 200% of FPL.
The observed difference between the percentage of children who had a regular bedtime
every day or most days in rural areas (86.7%) and urban areas (84.0%) was not significant.
Figure 3. Percentage of children aged 5–17 years who had a regular bedtime every day or most days in a typical school
week, by family type, social vulnerability, family income, and urbanicity: United States, 2020
1
Significantly different from children in a two-parent family (p < 0.05).
2
Significant linear trend by Social Vulnerability Index score (p < 0.05).
3
Significant linear trend by family income (p < 0.05).
NOTES: SV is social vulnerability. FPL is federal poverty level. Estimates are based on household interviews of a sample of the civilian noninstitutionalized
population. Access data table for Figure 3 at:
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db437-tables.pdf#3.
SOURCE: National Center for Health Statistics, National Health Interview Survey, 2020.
Percent
0 20 40 60 80 100
177.7
86.8
84.8
82.3
84.0
82.3
288.3
376.1
82.5
87.2
84.0
86.7
Rural
Urban
200% or more FPL
100%–199% FPL
Less than 100% FPL
High SV
Medium SV
Low SV
Little to no SV
Other
Two parents
Single parent
NCHS Data Brief No. 437 June 2022
■  4 
Were there differences in the percentage of children aged 5–17 years who
were tired during the day either most days or every day in a typical school
week by regular bedtime status?
Children who had a regular bedtime every day or most days were less likely (5.9%) to be
tired during the day most days or every day compared with children who had a regular
bedtime on some days or never (13.0%) (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Percentage of children aged 5–17 years who were tired during the day most days or every day in a typical
school week, by regular bedtime status: United States, 2020
1
Significantly different from children with a regular bedtime on some days or never (p < 0.05).
NOTES: Estimates are based on household interviews of a sample of the civilian noninstitutionalized population. Access data table for Figure 4 at:
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db437-tables.pdf#4
.
SOURCE: National Center for Health Statistics, National Health Interview Survey, 2020.
Percent
0
3
6
15.9
13.0
9
12
15
Some days or neverEvery day or most days
NCHS Data Brief No. 437 June 2022
■  5 
Summary
This report uses data from the 2020 NHIS to describe regular bedtimes among U.S. children
aged 5–17 years. Overall, 84.4% of children aged 5–17 had a regular bedtime every day or most
days in a typical school week. However, this percentage varied by selected characteristics. The
percentage of children with a regular bedtime was similar among boys and girls but varied by
age, with older children less likely to have a regular bedtime compared with younger children.
Children who were non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, living in single-parent families, living in
communities with higher social vulnerability, and living in families with lower incomes were
also less likely to have a regular bedtime. Children with a regular bedtime every day or most
days were less likely to be tired during the day than children who had a regular bedtime on some
days or never.
Previous research has documented disparities for short sleep duration and regular bedtime by race
and ethnicity and age (2,3). This report expands the understanding of children’s bedtime routines
by describing differences by a broad range of indicators and social determinants of health.
Implementing a consistent bedtime has been shown to help ensure sufficient sleep duration for
children (4).
Definitions
Being tired: Based on responses to the question, “In a typical school week, how often does
(sample child) complain about being tired during the day? Would you say never, some days, most
days, or every day?”
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Social Vulnerability Index: Developed at
CDC by the Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry’s Geospatial Research, Analysis,
and Services Program (GRASP), SVI uses U.S. Census Bureau data to determine the social
vulnerability of every census tract. SVI ranks each tract on 15 social factors. The factors are then
grouped into four related themes: socioeconomic status, household composition and disability,
racial and ethnic minority status and language, and housing type and transportation, as well as an
overall ranking. SVI indicates the relative vulnerability of every U.S. census tract as a percentile
ranking ranging from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating greater vulnerability. The overall tract
summary ranking variable for 2018 was used to categorize four quartiles of vulnerability: Scores
from 0 to 0.2500 are categorized as little to no social vulnerability; from 0.2501 to 0.5000, low
social vulnerability; from 0.5001 to 0.7500, medium social vulnerability; and from 0.7501 to 1.0,
high social vulnerability. For more information on SVI, please visit the
CDC/ATSDR’s GRASP website.
Family income as a percentage of FPL: Based on the federal poverty level, which was calculated
from the family’s income in the previous calendar year and family size using the U.S. Census
Bureau’s poverty thresholds (5). Family income was imputed when missing (6).
Family type: Children were categorized as living in single-parent families if they had a 1) single
parent, never married or 2) single parent, ever married. Children were categorized as living in
two-parent families if they had married parents living in the same household as the child, or
cohabitating parents living in the same household as the child. Children categorized as other
family type include those who had at least one related or unrelated adult (not a parent) in the same
household as the child.
NCHS Data Brief No. 437 June 2022
6 
Race and Hispanic origin: Children categorized as Hispanic may be of any race or combination of
races. Children categorized as non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, or non-Hispanic Asian
indicated one race only. Estimates for non-Hispanic children of other races or multiple races are
not shown.
Regular bedtime: Based on responses to the question, “In a typical school week, how often
does (sample child) go to bed at the same time? Would you say never, some days, most days, or
every day?”
Urbanization level: Counties were classified according to their metropolitan status using the
National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Urban–Rural Classification Scheme (7). Urban
counties include large central counties (inner cities); the fringes of large counties (suburbs); and
medium and small counties. Rural counties include micropolitan statistical areas and noncore
areas, including open countryside, rural towns (populations of less than 2,500), and areas with
populations of 2,500–49,999 that are not part of larger labor market areas (urban areas).
Data source and methods
NHIS is a nationally representative household survey of the civilian noninstitutionalized U.S.
population. It is conducted continuously throughout the year by NCHS. Interviews are typically
conducted in respondents’ homes, but follow-ups to complete interviews may be conducted
over the telephone. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, data collection procedures in 2020 were
disrupted. From April through June all interviews were conducted by telephone only, and from
July through December interviews were attempted by telephone first with follow-ups to complete
interviews by personal visit. For more information about NHIS, visit
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm.
Point estimates and the corresponding confidence intervals for this analysis were calculated using
SAS-callable SUDAAN software (8) to account for the complex sample design of NHIS. All
estimates are based on parent or guardian report and meet NCHS data presentation standards for
proportions (9). Differences between percentages were evaluated using two-sided significance
tests at the 0.05 level. Linear and quadratic trends by age group, family income, and SVI quartile
were evaluated using Proc Descript, poly option.
About the authors
Amanda E. Ng, Dzifa Adjaye-Gbewonyo, and Lindsey I. Black are with NCHS’ Division of
Health Interview Statistics.
NCHS Data Brief No. 437 June 2022
■  7 
References
1. Paruthi S, Brooks LJ, D’Ambrosio C, Hall WA, Kotagal S, Lloyd RM, et al. Recommended
amount of sleep for pediatric populations: A consensus statement of the American Academy of
Sleep Medicine. J Clin Sleep Med 12(6):785–6. 2016.
2. Wheaton AG, Claussen AH. Short sleep duration among infants, children, and adolescents
aged 4 months–17 years—United States, 2016–2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
70(38):1315–21. 2021.
3. Smith JP, Hardy ST, Hale LE, Gazmararian JA. Racial disparities and sleep among preschool
aged children: A systematic review. Sleep Health 5(1):49–57. 2019.
4. Pyper E, Harrington D, Manson H. Do parents’ support behaviours predict whether or not
their children get sufficient sleep? A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 17(1):432. 2017.
5. United States Census Bureau. Poverty thresholds. 2021. Available from: https://www.census.
gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/income-poverty/historical-poverty-thresholds.html.
6. National Center for Health Statistics. Multiple imputation of family income in 2020 National
Health Interview Survey: Methods. 2021. Available from: https://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_
Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/NHIS/2020/NHIS2020-imputation-techdoc-508.pdf.
7. Ingram DD, Franco SJ. 2013 NCHS urban–rural classification scheme for counties. National
Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2(166). 2014.
8. RTI International. SUDAAN (Release 11.0.3) [computer software]. 2018.
9. Parker JD, Talih M, Malec DJ, Beresovsky V, Carroll M, Gonzalez Jr JF, et al. National
Center for Health Statistics data presentation standards for proportions. National Center for
Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2(175). 2017.
NCHS Data Brief No. 437 June 2022
Keywords: sleep routine • health behavior • pediatric • National Health
Interview Survey
Suggested citation
Ng AE, Adjaye-Gbewonyo D, Black LI.
Regular bedtimes among children aged 5–17
years: United States, 2020. NCHS Data
Brief, no 437. Hyattsville, MD: National
Center for Health Statistics. 2022. DOI:
https://dx.doi.org/10.15620/cdc:117489.
Copyright information
All material appearing in this report is in
the public domain and may be reproduced
or copied without permission; citation as to
source, however, is appreciated.
National Center for Health
Statistics
Brian C. Moyer, Ph.D., Director
Amy M. Branum, Ph.D., Associate Director
for Science
Division of Health Interview Statistics
Stephen J. Blumberg, Ph.D., Director
Anjel Vahratian, Ph.D., M.P.H., Associate
Director for Science
For e-mail updates on NCHS publication
releases, subscribe online at:
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/email-updates.htm.
For questions or general information
about NCHS:
Tel: 1–800–CDC–INFO (1–800–232–4636)
TTY: 1–888–232–6348
Internet: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs
Online request form: https://www.cdc.gov/info
ISSN 1941–4927 Print ed.
ISSN 1941–4935 Online ed.
CS331646
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF
HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Center for Health Statistics
3311 Toledo Road, Room 4551, MS P08
Hyattsville, MD 20782–2064
OFFICIAL BUSINESS
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE, $300
For more NCHS Data Briefs, visit:
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs.htm.
FIRST CLASS MAIL
POSTAGE & FEES PAID
CDC/NCHS
PERMIT NO. G-284
... A su vez, las recomendaciones del tiempo recomendado de sueño aportadas por la Academia Americana de Medicina del Sueño, avaladas por la Academia Americana de Pediatría (Moon et al., 2022), son de 9 a 12 horas por día para niños entre 6-12 años y de entre 13-18 años para adolescentes. La duración del sueño disminuye con la edad, sin embargo, la calidad del sueño puede mejorar con el paso de los años, por lo que estudios encaminados a monitorear los patrones de sueño deberían realizarse mediante actigrafía y polisomnografía en el domicilio (Adjaye-Gbewonyo et al., 2022;Galland et al., 2018;Hamilton et al., 2023;Stores y Crawford, 1998). Además, los valores de duración y calidad de sueño en niños y adolescentes pueden verse afectados significativamente por factores demográficos, sociales y/o ambientales (Larrinaga-Undabarrena et al., 2023). ...
Article
Full-text available
Resumen. Un sueño adecuado es crucial para el desarrollo físico, emocional y cognitivo de los niños y adolescentes, ya que afecta significativamente a su salud y al bienestar en general. En este contexto, el presente estudio presenta los valores de referencia de los parámetros del sueño en escolares de Educación Básica en Euskadi. Se analiza una muestra representativa de 1.073 escolares de entre 5 y 18 años, utilizando actigrafía para medir el tiempo total en cama, tiempo total de sueño, despertares nocturnos y eficiencia de sueño. Los resultados indican una disminución general en el tiempo total en cama y tiempo total de sueño a mayor edad, mientras que la eficiencia del sueño mejora gradualmente. Estos valores de referencia proporcionan una herramienta útil (percentiles) para la detec-ción de valores en patrones de calidad sueño y diseño de políticas de salud y programas de intervención en edad escolar. Palabras clave: sueño, niñas y niños, tiempo total de sueño, tiempo total en cama, eficiencia de sueño, actigrafía, percentil. Abstract. Appropriate sleep is crucial for the physical, emotional and cognitive development of children and adolescents, as it significantly affects their overall health and well-being. In this context, the present study presents the reference values of sleep parameters in elementary school children in the Basque Country. A representative sample of 1,073 schoolchildren aged 5 to 18 was analysed, using actigraphy to measure total time in bed, total sleep time, nighttime awakenings and sleep efficiency. The results indicate a general decrease in total time in bed and total sleep time with increasing age, while sleep efficiency gradually improves. These reference values provide a useful tool (percentiles) for the detection of values in sleep quality patterns and design of health policies and intervention programs at school age.
Chapter
Sleep disturbances are common in persons with intellectual disability and are known to exacerbate health, mental health, and behavioral problems. The treatment of sleep disturbances can greatly improve quality of life. Sleep health should be an element of all person-centered planning. Mental health professionals must be versed in a wide range of behavioral interventions to address the challenges faced by persons dually diagnosed with intellectual disability and sleep disturbances. This chapter reviews the treatments for sleep disturbances, highlighting the application of general treatment principles for persons with intellectual disabilities with a focus on clinical interventions for the mental health professional.
Article
Objectives: This study examined differences in sleep patterns by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES) among children with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS), and linkages between sleep patterns and neurobehavioral functioning. Method: We used baseline data from the Childhood Adenotonsillectomy Study (CHAT), a multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of early adenotonsillectomy versus watchful waiting with supportive care for children with OSAS. Participants included children with OSAS (ages 5.0-9.9 years). SES indicators were obtained via questionnaire and geocoding (ArcGIS version 10.1). Caregivers and teachers reported on child inattention/impulsivity and executive functioning. Nighttime sleep duration and variability were measured using five-night sleep diaries. Results: Black children experienced shorter nighttime sleep duration than White children, by about 25 min, as well as greater sleep duration variability, while sleep duration was more variable in children of "other" racial and ethnic backgrounds versus White children. Of the socioeconomic correlates, only lower family income was associated with sleep duration variability. A short and more variable nighttime sleep duration were each associated with caregiver-rated child inattention and impulsivity. Greater sleep duration variability was linked to greater teacher-rated, but not caregiver-rated, executive functioning impairments. Conclusions: Compared to White children with OSAS, Black children with OSAS experience a shorter and more variable nighttime sleep duration. Having a short and/or variable sleep duration may increase risk for neurobehavioral impairments in youth with OSAS, underscoring the potential benefits of sleep health promotion in the context of OSAS care.
Article
Full-text available
Infants, children, and adolescents who do not get sufficient sleep are at increased risk for injuries, obesity, type 2 diabetes, poor mental health, attention and behavior problems, and poor cognitive development (1). The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) provides age-specific sleep duration recommendations to promote optimal health (1). CDC analyzed data from the 2016-2018 National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) to assess the prevalence of short sleep duration among persons in the United States aged 4 months-17 years. Overall, on the basis of parent report, 34.9% of persons aged 4 months-17 years slept less than recommended for their age. The prevalence of short sleep duration was higher in southeastern states and among racial and ethnic minority groups, persons with low socioeconomic status, and those with special health care needs. The prevalence of short sleep duration ranged from 31.2% among adolescents aged 13-17 years to 40.3% among infants aged 4-11 months. Persons aged 4 months-17 years with a regular bedtime were more likely to get enough sleep. Public health practitioners, educators, and clinicians might advise parents on the importance of meeting recommended sleep duration and implementing a consistent bedtime for healthy development.
Article
Full-text available
Sleep disorders and sleep insufficiency are common among preschool-aged children. Studies among school-aged children show disordered sleep is often more prevalent among racial minority groups. The primary aim of this systematic review was to critically appraise empirical data to elucidate the relationship between race and key sleep variables among children aged 2 to 5 years old. By systematically searching PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases, we identified empirical research articles conducted in the United States that investigate this relationship. We searched for variables relevant to (1) insufficient sleep duration, (2) poor sleep quality, (3) irregular timing of sleep, including sleep/wake problems and irregular bedtime onset and wake times (4) and sleep/circadian disorders. Nine studies satisfied the criteria for inclusion: five investigated nocturnal sleep duration, five investigated bedtime-related variables, four investigated daytime sleep (napping), three investigated total sleep, two investigated sleep quality, and one investigated wake times. Four studies specifically addressed racial and demographic differences in sleep variables as the primary aim, while the remaining five contained analyses addressing racial and demographic differences in sleep as secondary aims. Non-Hispanic white, white, or European-American race was used as the reference category in all studies. The results provided consistent evidence that white, non-Hispanic children were more likely to go to bed earlier and more regularly, have longer nocturnal sleep, and nap less than most racial and ethnic minorities. Combined, this literature presents a compelling narrative implicating race as an important factor in sleep patterns among a preschool age population.
Article
Full-text available
Background The National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) disseminates information on a broad range of health topics through diverse publications. These publications must rely on clear and transparent presentation standards that can be broadly and efficiently applied. Standards are particularly important for large, cross-cutting reports where estimates cannot be individually evaluated and indicators of precision cannot be included alongside the estimates. Objective This report describes the NCHS Data Presentation Standards for Proportions. Results The multistep NCHS Data Presentation Standards for Proportions are based on a minimum denominator sample size and on the absolute and relative widths of a confidence interval calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method. Proportions (usually multiplied by 100 and expressed as percentages) are the most commonly reported estimates in NCHS reports. Conclusions The NCHS Data Presentation Standards for Proportions will be applied to all NCHS publications. Using these Standards, some estimates will be identified as unreliable and suppressed and some estimates will be flagged for statistical review. For reports where estimates are evaluated individually, a particular proportion not meeting the NCHS Data Presentation Standards could be identified as unreliable but not be suppressed if it can be interpreted appropriately in the context of subject-specific factors and report objectives. © 2017, National Center for Health Statistics. All Rights Reserved.
Article
Full-text available
Background Sleep is an essential component of healthy cognitive and physical development. Lack of sleep may put children at risk for a variety of mental and physical health outcomes, including overweight, obesity and related chronic diseases. Given that children’s sleep duration has decreased in recent decades, there is a need to understand the determinants of child sleep, including the role of parental support behaviours. This study aims to determine the relative contribution of different types of parental support behaviours for predicting the likelihood that children meet recently established Canadian sleep guidelines. Methods Data were collected using Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews (CATI) of parents or guardians with at least one child under the age of 18 living in Ontario, Canada. To align with sleep guidelines, parents included in this analysis had at least one child between 5 and 17 years of age (n = 1622). Two multivariable logistic regression models were built to predict whether or not parents reported their child was meeting sleep guidelines – one for weekday sleep and another for sleep on weekends. Independent variables included parent and child age and gender, motivational and regulatory parental support behaviours, and socio-demographic characteristics. Results On weekdays, enforcing rules about child bedtime was a significant positive predictor of children meeting sleep guidelines (OR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.03–2.44); while encouraging the child to go to bed at a specific time was a significant negative predictor of child meeting sleep guidelines (OR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.13–0.65). On weekends, none of the parental support behaviours contributed significantly to the predictions of child sleep. For both weekdays and weekends, the child’s age group was an important predictor of children meeting sleep guidelines. Conclusions The contribution of parental support behaviours to predictions of children meeting sleep guidelines varied with the type of support provided, and weekend versus weekday sleep. While only enforcing bedtime rules on weekdays contributed to children meeting sleep guidelines, the importance of children getting a good night’s sleep, and the capacity of parents to help them do so, should be emphasized in public health efforts promoting healthy child development.
Article
Full-text available
This report details the National Center for Health Statistics' (NCHS) development of the 2006 NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties and provides some examples of how the scheme can be used to describe differences in health measures by urbanization level. The 2006 NCHS urban-rural classification scheme classifies all U.S. counties and county-equivalents into six levels--four for metropolitan counties and two for nonmetropolitan counties. The Office of Management and Budget's delineation of metropolitan and nonmetropolitan counties forms the foundation of the scheme. The NCHS scheme also uses the cut points of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural-Urban Continuum Codes to subdivide the metropolitan counties based on the population of their metropolitan statistical area (MSA): large, for MSA population of 1 million or more; medium, for MSA population of 250,000-999,999; and small, for MSA population below 250,000. Large metro counties were further separated into large central and large fringe metro categories using classification rules developed by NCHS. Nonmetropolitan counties were assigned to two levels based on the Office of Management and Budget's designated micropolitan or noncore status. The 2006 scheme was applied to data from the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) and the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) to illustrate its ability to capture health differences by urbanization level. Application of the 2006 NCHS scheme to NVSS and NHIS data shows that it identifies important health disparities among communities, most notably those for inner city and suburban communities. The design of the NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties makes it particularly well-suited for assessing and monitoring health differences across the full urbanization continuum.
Recommended amount of sleep for pediatric populations: A consensus statement of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine
  • S Paruthi
  • L J Brooks
  • D 'ambrosio
  • C Hall
  • W A Kotagal
  • S Lloyd
Paruthi S, Brooks LJ, D'Ambrosio C, Hall WA, Kotagal S, Lloyd RM, et al. Recommended amount of sleep for pediatric populations: A consensus statement of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. J Clin Sleep Med 12(6):785-6. 2016.