Content uploaded by Mary Steen
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Mary Steen on Aug 17, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
Fathers providing kangaroo care in neonatal
intensive care units: a scoping review
Qiuxia Dong1, Mary Steen, Diane Wepa
1Corresponding author
Date submitted: 6 September 2021. Date accepted: 25 January 2022. First published: 31 January 2022.
Background: Kangaroo care (KC) has been used widely in neonatal care to promote
bonding/attachment and neurodevelopment for preterm and term infants. However,
current literature suggests that research mainly focuses on infants’ and mothers’
experiences. The role of fathers in caring for their infant/child is changing and evolving in
many countries around the globe yet little is known about fathers’ experiences of KC in
neonatal units. This review, therefore, aims to scope the current evidence of father–infant
KC (PKC) in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).
Research question: What impact does KC have on fathers when their baby is cared for
in an NICU?
Search method: A scoping review was conducted, guided by the Arksey & O’Malley (2005)
framework. The data sources consisted of MEDLINE, Embase, the American Psychological
Association (APA) PsycInfo, Emcare, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR),
Web of Science, Google Scholar and ProQuest.
The study inclusion criteria were: 1. studies involving fathers who had experience of KC
with their baby while in NICUs and other neonatal care settings (such as Special Care Baby
Nursery (SCBU), delivery/labour room and postnatal ward); 2. literature published from
2000 to 2020; 3. primary studies including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods
studies; 4. studies published in English.
Results: The total number of studies identied were 13. Seven studies were qualitative and
six were quantitative. None were mixed-methods studies. Studies reported several positive
KC benets for fathers such as reduced stress, promotion of paternal role and enhanced
father–infant bond. It was highlighted that KC could be time-consuming for fathers and
challenging to practise when balancing work and family life commitments.
Conclusion: This review provides evidence that KC practice has health and wellbeing
benets for fathers and infants in NICUs and other relevant neonatal care settings. The
ndings of this review support the justication to promote PKC in NICU environments, and
guide policies to include father involvement. Implementing PKC in NICU settings will assist
fathers to care and connect with their baby. Further research is needed to explore how to
facilitate and evaluate KC education for fathers from diverse backgrounds and cultures.
Keywords: kangaroo care, skin-to-skin, fathers, neonatal, NICU, Evidence Based Midwifery
Introduction
Kangaroo care (KC) is often referred to as skin-to-
skin or kangaroo mother care (KMC). KC refers to
a method of holding an infant, naked (except for a
diaper/nappy), in an upright and prone position, skin-
to-skin, on a caregiver’s bared chest (Conde-Agudelo
& Díaz-Rossello 2016, Chen et al 2017).
KC was originally introduced at the Instituto
Materno Infantil in Santa Fede Bogotá, Colombia in
1978. The initial reason KC was introduced in this
maternity unit was due to a shortage of incubators;
the lack of incubators led to a study being undertaken
at the hospital. Lower neonatal mortality rates and
increased weight gain for low birth weight (LBW)
babies (that is, babies weighing less than 2500gms,
regardless of gestational age) were reported compared
to newborns receiving conventional care in an
incubator (Whitelaw & Liestøl 1994).
The World Health Organization (WHO) reported
that KC was a cost-effective method of achieving
optimised health outcomes for premature and full-
term babies (WHO 2003). It was acknowledged that
ABSTRACT
Dong Q, Steen M, Wepa D (2022). Fathers providing kangaroo care in neonatal intensive care units: a scoping review.
Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
20The Royal College of Midwives, Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
KC is a fundamental method of achieving thermal
control for preterm and LBW infants (WHO 2015).
Additionally, KC has been shown to reduce neonate
infection rates and hospitalisation length and enhance
maternal–infant bonding (Conde-Agudelo & Díaz-
Rossello 2016).
Babies in NICUs experience stress from numerous
interventions and separation from their mothers
(Stevens et al 2011). KC has been reported as
a primary method for mothers and babies to
complete an integral physiological process following
childbirth, while providing nurturing care (Jesus
et al 2015). Mothers have been recognised as the
main KC provider by health professionals in the
NICU environment (Jesus et al 2015). In contrast,
fathers are often referred to as ‘bystanders’ in the
engagement of maternal and neonatal care (Steen et al
2012). However, due to some societal, economic, and
cultural changes, there has been a steady increase in
the father’s role in providing care to their infant/child
(Yogman et al 2016).
Research has provided evidence that fathers have
an innate biological connection to their infants
similar to mothers (Yogman et al 2016). This
intrinsic connection enables father–infant KC to be
implemented and is benecial during the separation
of mothers and infants (Shorey et al 2016), thus
promoting and increasing KC practice in fathers
(Jesus et al 2015). Additionally, PKC has been found
to be associated with increased paternal involvement
(Jesus et al 2015) and an enhanced paternal role
(Varela et al 2018). Moreover, PKC has been shown
to have the same effect as KMC on preterm and term
infants’ physiological stability (Shorey et al 2016).
Current literature on KC mainly investigates or
explores mother and infant practices and experiences.
There seems to be a lack of research exploring PKC
(Martel et al 2016) and therefore a clear justication
to undertake a scoping review of the literature.
A scoping review examines a broad topic to identify
its volume, nature, and characteristics by mapping
the related evidence with the relevant time, location,
and origin, and detecting possible research-based
gaps (Peters et al 2015). This type of review is
suited to explore a unique and complex question
when research appears limited for a specic topic.
Therefore, this review used a scoping review
framework to guide the review approach, to identify
relevant studies to answer the research question
and to collect evidence in accordance with inclusion
criteria that incorporated core elements of Population,
Concept, Context (PCC) in a wide range of databases
(Peters et al 2020).
This framework recommends that ndings are
mapped, synthesised, presented narratively and
summarised in tables. The clinical implications
associated with PKC will be reported. It is envisaged
that this review will provide evidence to support the
practice of PKC in NICUs.
The aim of this review is to examine the literature
relating to research exploring the views and
experiences of fathers providing KC to their babies
while they are being cared for in NICUs.
Methods
Protocol and registration
A protocol was developed to guide the undertaking
of this scoping review (Dong et al 2021); the scoping
review framework described by Arksey & O’Malley
(2005) was used. According to the international
prospective register of systematic reviews
administered by the University of York’s Centre for
Reviews and Dissemination (PROSPERO), scoping
reviews do not meet the eligibility to be registered in
the database (University of York Centre for Reviews
and Dissemination n.d.). Therefore, no registration
was required for this review.
Research question
What impact does KC have on fathers when their
baby is cared for in an NICU?
Eligibility criteria
In this review, the search strategy approach to nding
studies was sought by utilising the core components:
Population, Concept, Context (PCC). The inclusion
criteria were aligned with the PCC components to
guide the undertaking of this review (Peters et al
2020).
Population
Fathers, including all age groups >18 years old,
from all geographical locations and all cultural
backgrounds were included. Infants included in this
review were referred to as neonates (that is, infants
under 28 days of age) from different geographical
areas with diverse cultural backgrounds. Babies who
were beyond the neonatal period were excluded.
Concept
The core concept examined by this review is the
experience of KC.
Context
The context of this review was mainly referred to as
NICUs. However, other relevant settings where PKC
might be practised were included, such as a Special
Care Baby Nursery (SCBU), delivery/labour room or
postnatal ward. =
The types of evidence searched
Given that little is known, or published, about PKC
the search timeframe was set from 2000 to 2020
(Peters et al 2020). The core content and type of
Dong Q, Steen M, Wepa D (2022). Fathers providing kangaroo care in neonatal intensive care units: a scoping review.
Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
21The Royal College of Midwives, Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
papers meeting the inclusion criteria associated with
the components of PCC were searched. Primary
studies using qualitative, quantitative, and mixed
methods were included. Only articles in English
were selected.
Information sources and search strategies
A wide range of literature searches was performed
in databases, registers, and some additional sources,
in October 2020. Databases involved MEDLINE,
Embase, the American Psychological Association
(APA), PsycInfo, Emcare. Registers include Cochrane
Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)
and Clinical Trials.
The keywords and the Medical Subject Headings
(MeSH) terms used in MEDLINE are listed in
Table 1. The search strategy in MEDLINE is
provided as an example for replicability and
auditability (Peters et al 2020).
An additional search of grey literature was conducted.
The rst 200 articles (Bramer et al 2017) were
selected from Google Scholar under ‘Father kangaroo
care’. Theses and dissertations were searched in
the ProQuest platform. Other searches included
Web of Science, clinical guidelines, conference
abstracts, hand-searching through reference lists,
communication with peers or experts via media.
Study screen and selection
All the identied literature (n=1298) was exported
into the bibliographic software EndNote X9.0 and
duplicates were removed using the same software.
The duplicating process was double-checked by an
experienced librarian.
The initial selection was undertaken by screening
titles and abstracts with a second reviewer. The
further screening (n=38) was carried out by reading
the full text to obtain the articles which meet the
inclusion criteria. Clarications were sought with a
third reviewer to achieve consensus to nalise the
selected articles for the scoping review (n=13). The
search strategy is demonstrated using a PRISMA
2020 ow chart for transparency and reexivity
(Figure 1).
Data charting
Microsoft Excel software was used to record data
extracted from the 13 articles reporting a study
aligned with the research question. Data extraction
elds include author/s, year of publication, title of
publication, country of origin, type of study, aim/
objectives, methods, population and sample size,
setting, factors associated with PKC, impact of PKC,
limitations and strengths, clinical implications. Three
reviewers dened the extracted data, which are
shown in the Summary of included studies table
(see Supplementary information).
Results
A total of 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of
these, seven studies were reported to undertake
qualitative research (Fegran et al 2008, Blomqvist et
al 2012, Helth & Jarden 2013, Magee & Nurse 2014,
Jesus et al 2015, Olsson et al 2017, Günay & Coşkun
Şimşek 2021).
Five of the qualitative studies used a
phenomenological research approach (Fegran et al
2008, Blomqvist et al 2012, Helth & Jarden 2013,
Jesus et al 2015; Günay & Coşkun Şimşek 2021).
One qualitative study reported using a descriptive
approach (Olsson et al 2017) and the remaining study
was a case study (Magee & Nurse 2014).
Six studies were reported to conduct quantitative
research (Varela et al 2014, Mörelius et al 2015,
Cong et al 2015, Chen et al 2017, Varela et al 2018,
Dongre et al 2020). Quantitative studies included
ve experimental designs, two randomised controlled
trials (RCTs) (Mörelius et al 2015, Chen et al 2017),
one crossover study (Cong et al 2015), one quasi-
experimental study (Varela et al 2014), and one
pre- and post-observational study (Varela et al 2018).
No mixed methods studies were identied.
Figure 2 demonstrates an upward trend in the
number of studies undertaken on PKC between 2000
and 2020. Only one included study (Fegran et al
Dong Q, Steen M, Wepa D (2022). Fathers providing kangaroo care in neonatal intensive care units: a scoping review.
Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
Table 1. MEDLINE search strategy (literature search)
1. Fathers/
2. Father-Child Relations/
3. (father* or dad* or paternal* or parent*).ti,ab,kw.
4. 1 or 2 or 3
5. Infant, Newborn/
6. ((preterm or premature* or term or full term or low
birth weight or LBW or postnatal) adj4 (baby or babies or
neonatal* or infant$1)).ti,ab,kw.
7. 5 or 6
8. Kangaroo. Mother Care Method/
9. ((Kangaroo or Skin to Skin) adj5 (care or contact or
method)).ti,ab,kw.
10. 8 or 9
11. Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/
12. Postnatal Care/
13. Operating Rooms/
14. Nurseries, Hospital/
15. Delivery Rooms/
16. (NICU* or neonatal intensive care or neonatal care or
intensive care units or newborn icus or neonatal or
special baby care unit or SCBU or postnatal ward or
delivery room or labo?r ward or theatre or operating
room or recovery room or parenting room or birthing
center).ti,ab,kw.
17. 1 or 12 or 13 or 14 or 15 or 16
18. 4 and 7 and 10 and 17
19. Limit 18 to yr=“2000-2020”
22The Royal College of Midwives, Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
Dong Q, Steen M, Wepa D (2022). Fathers providing kangaroo care in neonatal intensive care units: a scoping review. Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
23The Royal College of Midwives, Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
Figure 1. PRISMA ow chart of the selected articles for scoping review Source: Adapted from Page et al (2021).
Included Screening Identification
Records screened
(n=378)
Records excluded**
(n=347)
Reports sought for retrieval
(n=31)
Reports not retrieved
(n=0)
Reports sought for retrieval
(n=8)
Reports not retrieved
(n=1)
Reports assessed for eligibility
(n=7) Reports excluded:
Reason: Non-English (n=3)
Reports assessed for eligibility
(n=31)
Reports excluded:
Reason 1: Commentary (n=1)
Reason 2: Reviews (n=3)
Reason 3: Proposal (n=2)
Reason 4: Non-English (n=2)
Reason 3: Uncompleted clinical
trial (n=3)
Reason 4: Wrong intervention
(n=11)
Studies included in review
(n=13)
Reports of included studies
(n=0)
Records identied from*:
Darabases (n=768)
Registers (n=99)
Records removed
before screening:
Duplicate records removed
(n=489)
Records marked as ineligible
by automation tools (n=0)
Records removed for other
reasons (n=0)
Records identied from:
Websites (n=200)
Organisations (n=216)
Theses and disertations (15)
Other searches (n=0)
Identification of studies via databases and registers Identification of studies via other methods
2008) was conducted between 2000 and 2009. Four
studies were published during the 2011–2014 period
(Blomqvist et al 2012, Helth & Jarden 2013, Magee
& Nurse 2014, Varela et al 2014). Eight studies were
published in the ve years from 2015–2020 (Cong
et al 2015, Jesus et al 2015, Mörelius et al 2015,
Chen et al 2017, Olsson et al 2017, Varela et al 2018,
Dongre et al 2020, Günay & Coşkun Şimşek 2021).
Figure 3 highlights the geographical distribution of
studies and demonstrates that northern European
countries conducted more studies for PKC.
Three studies were undertaken in Sweden, one in
the UK, one in Norway, and one in Denmark. Fewer
studies were conducted in the Mediterranean and
South East Asian regions: two in India, one in Turkey.
One study was conducted in a Far East Asian country:
Taiwan. Only one study was completed in Canada
and one in the United States of America (USA). None
have been undertaken in Australia.
The data relevant to factors associated with PKC
are detailed in the Factors associated with father KC
table (see Supplementary information) which shows
the length of KC, the facilities/aids for KC, and the
cultural and policy background.
In Sweden, single-family rooms with beds were
available in NICU settings. Parental leave and
allowance enabled fathers to spend more time
implementing KC. Blomqvist et al (2012) showed that
fathers had KC with their babies for up to 24 hours
a day, and 7–19.6 hours a day was reported in the
study by Mörelius et al (2015).
In regions where fathers had to manage most of the
family’s nancial responsibilities, KC duration was
between 15–90 minutes (Varela et al 2014, Cong et al
2015, Chen et al 2017, Varela et al 2018, Dongre et al
2020, Günay & Coşkun Şimşek 2021). The cot-side
chair provided for KC was reported in four studies
(Cong et al 2015, Chen et al 2017, Varela et al 2018,
Günay & Coşkun Şimşek 2021). However, three
studies did not report on the provision of this aid
(Helth & Jarden 2013, Magee & Nurse 2014, Jesus
et al 2015).
The data related to clinical implications in the Factors
associated with father KC table (see Supplementary
information) demonstrate that ve studies reported
that staff educated fathers about KC (Blomqvist et al
2012, Magee & Nurse 2014, Jesus et al 2015, Chen
et al 2017, Günay & Coşkun Şimşek 2021). One
study (Blomqvist et al 2012) described a care plan
to promote and support fathers to provide KC. One
study (Fegran et al 2008) recommended mother’s
encouragement, and another study (Günay & Coşkun
Şimşek 2021) established policies to support PKC
practice. Interestingly, Varela et al (2014) reported
less KC practice in a single room than in the open
intensive care room.
Table 2 highlights which studies reported which
impacts of PKC, including enhancement of paternal
role and initiating and strengthening the father-infant
bond.
An important nding was that increasing fathers’
competence and affection was associated with a
reduction of paternal stress and anxiety. Additionally,
two studies (Jesus et al 2015, Olsson et al 2017)
reported that the father’s role was promoted as a
primary carer in certain circumstances, when the
mother was not available. Other ndings included
promoting the relationship between fathers and
mothers; Dongre et al (2020) also showed KC
to be an excellent opportunity to establish better
communication between fathers and NICU staff.
Collectively, these ndings indicate clear benets
associated with PKC. However, Olsson et al (2017)
reported that KC was an energy-draining practice,
and sometimes led to guilty feelings because of
spending less time with other siblings. Helth & Jarden
(2013) highlighted fathers’ conict between working
and spending time with the infant. However, Jesus
et al (2015) found that KC was a valuable learning
experience for fathers, and this was conrmed by
Olsson et al (2017).
Dong Q, Steen M, Wepa D (2022). Fathers providing kangaroo care in neonatal intensive care units: a scoping review.
Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
Figure 2. Publication year of the journals containing
selected studies
Figure 3. Geographical distribution of the selected studies
24The Royal College of Midwives, Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
Discussion
As far as the authors are aware, this is the rst
scoping review undertaken to search current literature
relating to fathers’ experiences of providing KC to
their baby in an NICU.
The 13 included studies for this review were
undertaken in various geographical regions. The
researchers acknowledge that clinical and cultural
neonatal variations in NICUs and other neonatal care
settings need to be considered. Fathers being involved in
their infant’s care will vary throughout the world and,
generally speaking, most societies continue to recognise
mothers as the primary caregiver. However, over the last
few decades, there has been increasing involvement and
caregiving by fathers (Steen et al 2012).
A specically designed website (www.familyincluded.
com) provides information on studies undertaken
around the globe where fathers and families are
being researched, and there appear to be several
benets when they are engaged in infant care. There
is also a useful website for fathers to access (www.
birthingdads.com.au).
Reecting on this review, it highlights that there has
been a growing interest in fathers’ experiences of
KC, mostly from northern European countries, but
some research has also been undertaken in North
America, Canada and in the Mediterranean, South
East and Far East Asian regions. Nevertheless, it has
been recommended that further research and studies
that involve more diverse backgrounds are required
(Magee & Nurse 2014).
The collective evidence from this review conrms
that there are health and wellbeing benets when
PKC is undertaken, and this conrms earlier ndings
reported in an integrative review by Shorey et al
(2016). These researchers concluded that PKC had
positive effects on understanding the father’s role,
promoting improved paternal interaction with infants
and reducing paternal stress.
Over the last few decades, fathers’ involvement in
childcare has been increasing and is associated with
the dual-income family structure that has evolved
from a transformation of the socio-economic
environment (Faris 2016). The responsibilities
pertaining to the father’s role include involvement
in childcare and inuencing the child’s physical and
mental development (Varela et al 2014, Yogman
et al 2016).
PKC can provide fathers with an opportunity to gain
caregiving skills and connect with their baby, which is
supported by Varela et al’s (2014) study conducted in
India. These researchers reported that fathers with KC
experiences showed a more empathetic and emotional
connection to their child. Fathers with a baby in an
NICU are at increased risk of developing anxiety
and depression (Givrad et al 2021): the practice of
KC may assist fathers to manage anxiety and stress
when caring for their newborn in an NICU (Magee &
Nurse 2014, Mörelius et al 2015, Olsson et al 2017).
Feeling competent as a father will also contribute
to fathers’ health and wellbeing (Fegran et al 2008,
Blomqvist et al 2012, Helth & Jarden 2013, Magee
& Nurse 2014, Varela et al 2014, Varela et al 2018,
Günay & Coşkun Şimşek 2021).
Adamsons & Johnson (2013) reported that positive
father involvement in a child’s upbringing may
enhance academic achievement, emotional wellbeing,
and social behaviours. Garnica-Torres et al (2021)
suggested that the attainment of fatherhood is
driven by men’s emotions and mental wellbeing.
PKC appears to assist fathers to review their views
about fatherhood and acts as a lived workshop
about becoming a father, as described by Olsson et
al (2017). This review found evidence to suggest that
PKC supported fathers in connecting and bonding
with their infants, which positively impacted fathers’
condence and self-esteem when engaging in their
baby’s care in an NICU environment.
These key ndings conrm research by Logan &
Dormire (2018) who conducted semi-structured
interviews with seven fathers about the experience of
caring for their premature babies in the rst weeks in
an NICU and reported that KC played a critical role
in connecting to their infant.
According to John Bowlby’s evolutionary concept of
attachment theory, infants seek proximity gures that
respond to their stress behaviours, such as crying,
to help them survive (McLeod 2017). By acting as
a caregiver, fathers could instinctively enable the
father–infant attachment to be established, and
Dong Q, Steen M, Wepa D (2022). Fathers providing kangaroo care in neonatal intensive care units: a scoping review.
Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
Table 2. Categories of impact of father KC on fathers by study
The impact of father KC on fathers Study
Initiating and strengthening father–
infant bond
S1, S2, S3, S6, S7, S9,
S11, S12
Enhancement of paternal role S1, S6, S7, S8, S9, S10,
S11, S12, S13
Feeling in control S9, S10, S11
Improvement of competence as a
father
S1, S6, S7, S8, S9, S12,
S13
Reduction of paternal stress or
anxiety
S1, S5, S6, S7, S11, S13
Aection S1, S2, S7, S8, S11
Better communication between
fathers and NICU sta
S5
Promotion of family relationships S2, S4, S5, S10
KC information availability S2, S11
Acting as a primary carer (motherly
role)
S1, S9
Energy-draining, feeling guilty
about other siblings at home
S1, S11
Conict between working and
spending time with their infant
S8
25The Royal College of Midwives, Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
then a reciprocal interaction between them might
be created. This physiological relationship between
fathers and infants was also illustrated by Bloch-
Salisbury et al (2014). They reported that premature
infants’ respiratory stability corresponded to the KC
providers’ cardiac rhythm during KC sessions and
babies were calmer.
Interestingly, bonding between fathers and babies
often occurs during pregnancy. Genesoni (2009)
found that fathers psychologically bonded to
their babies in the rst trimester of their partner’s
pregnancy. However, during the childbirth continuum,
fathers are often seen as a ‘bystander’ and receive
education and information ‘second-hand’ (Steen et
al 2012). Nevertheless, the NICU environment may
provide opportunities to promote the father–infant
bond and connection by supporting the practice
of PKC.
Theoretically, close touch between fathers and infants
through KC activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-
adrenal axis stress system to produce oxytocin, which
leads to decreased levels of cortisone, also referred
to as a stress predictor (Cong et al 2015). This
reduction in stress was clearly shown by Varela et
al (2018). These researchers collected saliva samples
from fathers and reported a signicant reduction
in cortisone level one-hour post-KC compared to
before and during KC. Interestingly, Cong et al (2015)
found similar results in their crossover study: fathers’
oxytocin level was raised after KC and maintained
at the same high level for 30 minutes after KC.
Hence, the stress-free advantage produced by KC
might act as a catalyst to enhance the paternal role,
as highlighted by Blomqvist et al (2012). Evidence
to support the promotion of PKC in NICU settings
appears to be emerging over the last decade.
In some circumstances if a mother is unavailable
as the result of a critical medical condition, such
as following an emergency caesarean section,
the father is available and can provide PKC. The
benets of PKC were also clearly shown in the case
study reported by Magee & Nurse (2014). These
researchers discussed how a bereaved father cared
for his premature daughter in the NICU when her
mother died nine days after giving birth. Therefore,
health professionals may advocate KC to fathers to
maximise the facilitation of KC.
Nevertheless, this review detected some negative
impacts associated with PKC. Some fathers reported
that providing KC to their newborn baby was time-
consuming and it was perceived by some as an
energy-draining task (Blomqvist et al 2012, Helth
& Jarden 2013, Olsson et al 2017). The negativity
reported might be related to prolonged KC events
and nding time for KC from the father’s multiple
responsibilities: being a father and a supporter for
mother or an economic provider. One issue that
surfaced was that fathers’ involvement in providing
KC led to an imbalance between working and family
life (Helth & Jarden 2013, Garnica-Torres et al
2021). Another was that fathers felt guilty about
spending less time with other siblings at home when
providing KC for their newborn baby in the NICU
(Blomqvist et al 2012, Olsson et al 2017).
These negative impacts might be associated with
socio-cultural factors and variations in health policies
in different geographic areas. In some European
countries, where NICU facilities/aids included single
rooms with a bed and leisure equipment, parents
are well-supported to offer their infants KC for up
to 24 hours a day (Blomqvist et al 2012). Paternal
leave enables fathers to be available for KC provision
(Blomqvist et al 2012, Mörelius et al 2015). In
contrast, parental leave is not provided in some
countries, which impacted the availability of fathers.
This nding is consistent with the studies reported by
Garnica-Torres et al (2021) and Günay & Coşkun
Şimşek (2021).
Mixed reports of facilities/aids and support for
fathers to provide KC appears to be the current
situation. Comfortable chairs and single rooms might
help. Paid paternal leave could be advocated by the
local government to reduce the nancial burden
and create more opportunities for fathers’ to be
available. Negative outcomes might be circumvented
by designing a PKC care plan to support fathers who
wish to conduct KC with their infant (Blomqvist et
al 2012) and introducing a exible approach to the
length of time for which KC is provided. Care plans
for PKC may promote more positive experiences for
fathers while their infant is in a NICU setting and
address the negative aspects raised by some fathers.
As for clinical implementation, the ndings of this
review have demonstrated that PKC enhances couple
and family relationships (Cong et al 2015, Jesus et al
2015, Mörelius et al 2015, Dongre et al 2020) and
is therefore worthy of support for the practice. This
positive outcome on relationships may be explained
by a pattern of an interlinked inuence circle of
mother to child, child to father and father to mother,
where the father–child bond that emerges from the
involvement in PKC plays a pivotal role in linking
the relationship between family members (Lindsey
& Caldera 2006). The improved interaction reported
between fathers and nursing staff associated with
PKC (Dongre et al 2020) provides an opportunity
for nurses and midwives to understand the fathers’
perspective to help them communicate more
effectively. Improved communication with a father
will promote better engagement in their infant’s care
while in the NICU (Cong et al 2015).
Some studies mentioned education for PKC, and this
seems to have had a positive outcome on supporting
fathers to undertake the practice (Helth & Jarden
2013, Mörelius et al 2015, Chen et al 2017, Olsson et
al 2017, Günay & Coşkun Şimşek 2021). Therefore,
Dong Q, Steen M, Wepa D (2022). Fathers providing kangaroo care in neonatal intensive care units: a scoping review.
Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
26The Royal College of Midwives, Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
it appears that providing PKC education to fathers
before, or shortly after, admission of their infant to
an NICU would be advantageous. However, further
studies on educating and mentoring fathers to provide
KC in NICUs are required.
Strengths and limitations
A strength of this review is that a protocol was
developed, and rigorous steps were undertaken to
identify relevant quantitative and qualitative studies.
A scoping of the literature was undertaken and PKC
in NICU settings is a topic currently emerging as an
area of interest. However, the included studies were
limited to some countries and therefore, may not be
generalisable to a global population. A limitation
is that the reviewed articles were only written in
English, and therefore studies written in other
languages may have been missed.
Some quantitative studies’ sample sizes were small
and underpowered and further larger studies are
required. No longitudinal studies were reported, and
this is a limitation. Most qualitative studies used a
phenomenological approach and further studies may
benet from using an ethnographic design where
the NICU environment, staff and fathers may all be
considered and participate in the research. Mixed-
method studies may also contribute to providing
further evidence for PKC in NICU settings.
Conclusion
Research evidence to support PKC in NICU settings
is emerging and this review has provided and
consolidated current literature evidence by answering
the research question: what impact does KC have upon
fathers when their baby is cared for in an NICU?
This review has shown that there are health and
wellbeing benets for fathers and their babies when
PKC is undertaken in NICUs and other clinical
settings. The ndings from this review provide some
evidence to support the implementation of PKC in
NICUs and other clinical settings and will inform
policies and clinical practices in countries where
paternal involvement is evolving. Paid paternal
leave may reduce nancial burdens and create
more opportunities for fathers to be available to
provide PKC.
Adopting a exible approach strategy for the length
of time to provide PKC that meets individual father’s
and their baby’s needs may enhance the experience.
Care plans for PKC may promote more positive
experiences for fathers while their infant is in an
NICU setting and address the negative aspects raised
by some fathers.
Further research is needed about how, and what, to
provide to fathers in terms of KC education and the
evaluation of PKC care plans. Fathers from a wide
range of diverse backgrounds need to be included in
further research studies to enable an international
perspective to be investigated and explored in
more depth.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the support of Upeksha
Amarathunga and Natalie Dempster, librarians
respectively from the University of South Australia
and the Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Adelaide,
South Australia, who assisted with the database
searches. The authors are also grateful to Dr Trudi
Mannix for helpful comments when writing up
this review.
Conict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conict
of interest.
Funding
This research is being funded by an Australian
Government Research Training Program (RTP).
Authors
Corresponding author
Qiuxia Dong RN Dip(Nur), BMed(Nur), Master
Candidate, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of Women’s
and Children’s Hospital, Adelaide, Australia. Masters by
Research student at the University of South Australia,
Australia. Email: qiuxia.dong@mymail.unisa.edu.au or
qiuxia.dong@gmail.com.
Co-authors
Professor Mary Steen PhD, RGN, RM, DipClinHyp, BHSc,
PGCRM, PG Dip HE, MCGI, Professor of Midwifery,
Dept of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Faculty of
Health and Life Sciences, University of Northumbria,
United Kingdom; Adjunct Professor at University of South
Australia, Australia; Clinical & Health Sciences, University
of South Australia, Australia.
Dr Dianne Wepa PhD BSW, MPhil, Cert Adult Learning
& Teaching, Cert Clinical Supervision, PhD, AMHSW,
Associate Professor Mental Health, School of Nursing
& Healthcare Leadership, Faculty of Health Studies,
University of Bradford, United Kingdom; Adjunct research
fellow at University of South Australia, Australia; Clinical
& Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Australia.
Dong Q, Steen M, Wepa D (2022). Fathers providing kangaroo care in neonatal intensive care units: a scoping review.
Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
27The Royal College of Midwives, Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
References
Adamsons K, Johnson SK (2013). An updated and expanded
meta-analysis of nonresident fathering and child well-being.
Journal of Family Psychology 27(4):589-99.
Arksey H, O’Malley L (2005). Scoping studies: towards a
methodological framework. International Journal of Social
Research Methodology 8(1):19-32.
Bloch-Salisbury E, Zuzarte I, Indic P, Bednarek F, Paydarfar D
(2014). Kangaroo care: cardio-respiratory relationships between
the infant and caregiver. Early Human Development 90(12):
843-50.
Blomqvist YT, Rubertsson C, Kylberg E, Jöreskog K, Nyqvist KH
(2012). Kangaroo mother care helps fathers of preterm infants
gain condence in the paternal role. Journal of Advanced Nursing
68(9):1988-96.
Borton T (1970). Reach, teach and touch. London: McGraw Hill.
Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Kleijnen J, Franco OH (2017).
Optimal database combinations for literature searches in
systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. Systematic
Reviews 6(245). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y
[Accessed 16 July 2021].
Chen E-M, Gau M-L, Liu C-Y, Lee T-Y (2017). Effects of father-
neonate skin-to-skin contact on attachment: a randomized
controlled trial. Nursing Research and Practice 2017:8612024.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8612024 [Accessed 15 February
2022].
Conde-Agudelo A, Díaz-Rossello JL (2016). Kangaroo mother
care to reduce morbidity and mortality in low birthweight
infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 8. Art.
No.: CD002771. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002771.pub4
[Accessed 15 February 2022].
Cong X, Ludington-Hoe SM, Hussain N, Cusson RM, Walsh
S, Vazquez V, Briere C-E, Vittner D (2015). Parental oxytocin
responses during skin-to-skin contact in pre-term infants. Early
Human Development 91(7):401-6.
Dong Q, Steen M, Wepa D (2021). Fathers providing kangaroo
care in the neonatal intensive care unit settings: a scoping review
protocol. University of South Australia. https://www.unisa.edu.
au/contentassets/c3fc1163eada41348177a0d2d6c68a01/scoping-
review-protocol-full-text-.pdf [Accessed 11 July 2021].
Dongre S, Desai S, Nanavati R (2020). Kangaroo father care to
reduce paternal stress levels: a prospective observational before-
after study. Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine 13(3):403-11.
Faris M (2016). First time fathers’ cognitions and beliefs
about infant sleep: a qualitative study of their lived experience
[Dissertation]. Texas Woman’s University. https://twu-ir.tdl.org/
handle/11274/9605?show=full [Accessed 15 February 2022].
Fegran L, Helseth S, Fagermoen MS (2008). A comparison of
mothers’ and fathers’ experiences of the attachment process in
a neonatal intensive care unit. Journal of Clinical Nursing
17(6):810-6.
Garnica-Torres Z, Gouveia Jr A, da Silva Pedroso J (2021).
Attachment between father and premature baby in kangaroo
care in a neonatal unit of a public hospital. Journal of Neonatal
Nursing 27(5):334-40.
Genesoni L, Tallandini MA (2009). Men’s psychological
transition to fatherhood: an analysis of the literature, 1989–
2008. Birth 36(4):305-18.
Givrad S, Hartzell G, Scala M (2021). Promoting infant mental
health in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU): a review of
nurturing factors and interventions for NICU infant-parent
relationships. Early Human Development 154:105281.
Graneheim UH, Lundman B (2004). Qualitative content analysis
in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to
achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today 24(2):105-12.
Günay U, Coşkun Şimşek D (2021). Emotions and experience
of fathers applying kangaroo care in the Eastern Anatolia
Region of Turkey: a qualitative study. Clinical Nursing Research
30(6):840-6.
Helth TD, Jarden M (2013). Fathers’ experiences with the skin-
to-skin method in NICU: competent parenthood and redened
gender roles. Journal of Neonatal Nursing 19(3):114-21.
Hsieh HF, Shannon SE (2005). Three approaches to qualitative
content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15(9):1277-88.
Jesus NC de, Vieira BDG, Alves VH, Rodrigues DP, de Mattos
Pereira de Souza R, Paiva ED (2015). The experience of the
kangaroo method: the perception of the father. Journal of
Nursing UFPE On Line 9(7):8542-50. https://periodicos.ufpe.
br/revistas/revistaenfermagem/article/download/10626/11620
[Accessed 15 February 2022].
Lindsey EW, Caldera YM (2006). Mother-father-child triadic
interaction and mother-child dyadic interaction: gender
differences within and between contexts. Sex Roles 55(7-8):
511-21.
Logan RM, Dormire S (2018). Finding my way: a
phenomenology of fathering in the NICU. Advances in Neonatal
Care 18(2):154-62.
Magee J, Nurse S (2014). Supporting the bereaved father in
the NICU: a reective case study. Journal of Neonatal Nursing
20(1):20-3.
Martel M-J, Milette I, Bell L, Tribble DS-C, Payot A (2016).
Establishment of the relationship between fathers and premature
infants in neonatal units. Advances in Neonatal Care
16(5):390-8.
McLeod SA (2017). Bowlby’s attachment theory. Simply
Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/bowlby.html
[Accessed 2 August 2021].
Mörelius E, Örtenstrand A, Theodorsson E, Frostell A (2015).
A randomised trial of continuous skin-to-skin contact after
preterm birth and the effects on salivary cortisol, parental stress,
depression, and breastfeeding. Early Human Development
91(1):63-70.
Olsson E, Eriksson M, Anderzén-Carlsson A (2017). Skin-to-skin
contact facilitates more equal parenthood - a qualitative study
from fathers’ perspective. Journal of Pediatric Nursing 34:e2-
9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2017.03.004 [Accessed 15
February 2022].
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC,
Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE,
Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM,
Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA,
Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher
D (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline
for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. https://doi.
org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [Accessed 18 January 2022].
Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D,
Soares CB (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping
reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare
13(3):141-6.
Dong Q, Steen M, Wepa D (2022). Fathers providing kangaroo care in neonatal intensive care units: a scoping review.
Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
28The Royal College of Midwives, Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
How to cite this paper:
Dong Q, Steen M, Wepa D (2022). Fathers providing kangaroo care in neonatal intensive care units: a scoping
review. Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2):20-36
Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco A, Pollock D, Munn Z, Lyndsay
A, McInererney O, Godfrey CM, Khalil H (2020). Updated
methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
JBI Evidence Synthesis 18(10):2119-26.
Shorey S, He H-G, Mörelius E (2016). Skin-to-skin contact by
fathers and the impact on infant and paternal outcomes: an
integrative review. Midwifery 40:207-17.
Steen M, Downe S, Bamford N, Edozien L (2012). Not-patient
and not-visitor: a metasynthesis fathers’ encounters with
pregnancy, birth and maternity care. Midwifery 28(4):422-31.
Stevens BJ, Abbott LK, Yamada J, Harrison D, Stinson J, Taddio
A, Barwick M, Latimer M, Scott SD, Rashotte J, Campbell F,
Finley GA (2011). Epidemiology and management of painful
procedures in children in Canadian hospitals. Canadian Medical
Association Journal 183(7):E403-10. https://doi.org/10.1503/
cmaj.101341 [Accessed 15 February 2022].
University of North Carolina (UNC) (2021). Creating a PRISMA
ow diagram. https://guides.lib.unc.edu/prisma/step-by-step
[Accessed 18 January 2022].
University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination
(n.d.). Inclusion criteria. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/
prospero/#aboutpage [Accessed 2 August 2021].
Varela N, Muñoz P, Tessier R, Plata S, Charpak N (2014). Indian
fathers and their premature baby - an early beginning: a pilot
study of skin-to-skin contact, culture and fatherhood. Fathering
12(2):211-17.
Varela N, Tessier R, Tarabulsy G, Pierce T (2018). Cortisol and
blood pressure levels decreased in fathers during the rst hour of
skin-to-skin contact with their premature babies. Acta Paediatrica
107(4):628-32.
Whitelaw A, Liestøl K (1994). Mortality and growth of low
birth weight infants on the kangaroo mother program in Bogota,
Colombia. Pediatrics 94(6):931-2.
World Health Organization (WHO) (2003). Kangaroo
mother care: a practical guide. Geneva: WHO. https://www.
who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_
health/9241590351/en/ [Accessed 22 July 2021].
World Health Organization (WHO) (2015). WHO
recommendations on interventions to improve preterm
birth outcomes. Geneva: WHO. https://www.who.int/
reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/
preterm-birth-guideline/en/ [Accessed 22 July 2021].
Yang SC, Chen CH (2001). A correlational study of father’s
attitudes regarding breastfeeding, father-infant attachment and
marital adjustment during postnatal period [article in Chinese].
Hu Li Yan Jiu 9(3):279-88. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.
gov/17953072 [Accessed 4 March 2022].
Yogman M, Gareld CF, Committee on Psychological Aspects of
Child and Family Health (2016). Fathers’ roles in the care and
development of their children: the role of pediatricians. Pediatrics
138(1):e20161128. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1128
[Accessed 15 February 2022].
Dong Q, Steen M, Wepa D (2022). Fathers providing kangaroo care in neonatal intensive care units: a scoping review.
Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
29The Royal College of Midwives, Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
Dong Q, Steen M, Wepa D (2022). Fathers providing kangaroo care in neonatal intensive care units: a scoping review. Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
30The Royal College of Midwives, Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
Supplementary information
Summary of included studies
Author(s)/year/
country
Type of study Aim/objectives Methods Population and sample size Settings Fathers’ demographic
prole
S1 Blomqvist et al
2012, Sweden
Qualitative
descriptive study
- Phenomenology
To describe
fathers’
experiences of
providing KC to
their preterm
infant
Data collection: questionnaires
completed by fathers while their babies
were in hospital; individual semi-
structured interviews at four months ±
two weeks post-discharge; data analysis:
using qualitative content analysis
described by Grameheim & Lundman
(2004)
Inclusion criteria: fathers
whose babies were born at the
gestational age of 28 to 33 + 6
weeks and medically stable.
Sample size: x 7
Level 3 NICUs at two
Swedish hospitals
Age range: 34 to 42
years old, 56.6% rst-
time fathers
S2 Jesus et al 2015,
Brazil
Qualitative
descriptive study
- Phenomenology
To identify
father’s
perceptions
about KC; to
explore how
nurses could
foster the father-
child relationship
Data collection: semi-structured
interviews through open and closed
questions; data analysis: using content
analysis
Inclusion criteria: fathers who
were 1) biological parents of
premature infants and/or low
birth weight; 2) Fathers over 18
years of age; 3) Experiencing
Kangaroo Care; 4) Interest
participate
Sample size: x6
Maternal hospitals
x 2, Brazil, no wards
specied
Not reported
S3 Chen et al 2017,
Taiwan
Quantitative
study - RCT
To observe the
eects of KC
on father-child
attachment
Pilot study performed: intervention
group ( = 3) control group ( = 3);
Data collection: computer program
generated a random stratied
allocation. Intervention group: KC
provided for at least 15 minutes/for the
rst three days of life; control group:
received standard care, KC provided
at fathers’ request; Both groups
received KC information on admission.
Data collection: instruments used:
Demographic Information Survey; Early
Childcare for Fathers, Nursing Pamphlet;
Father-Child Attachment Scale (FCAS)
developed by Yang & Chen (2001): self-
reported by fathers; Data analysis: SPSS
and Windows 20.0
Inclusion criteria: 1) new fathers;
2) older than 20 years old; 3) at
the hospital daily until discharge;
4) non-smokers; 5) not have
an alcohol addiction or be
diagnosed with a psychological
disorder; 6) signed an informed
consent agreement; 7) babies of
gestational age ≥ 37 weeks, stable
vital signs and no congenital
abnormalities or diseases. Sample
size: total n=83 participants:
intervention group (n=41) and
control group (n=42)
Postnatal ward in a
teaching hospital,
maternal clinic in
Taiwan
Age range: 34 to 42
years old, 56.6% rst-
time fathers, 50.6%
college education,
85.5% antenatal class
attendance
S4 Cong et al 2015,
USA
Quantitative
study - Crossover
study
To examine
oxytocin
mechanism in
modulating
parental stress
and anxiety
during M-KC
and paternal KC
(P-KC) with their
preterm infants
Data collection: the mother-father-
infant triad was assigned randomly by a
computer-program to study sequences:
M-KC on day 1 and P-KC on day 2 or vice
versa. Process: parents’ saliva collected
using a standard unstimulated passive
drool method and a validated visual-
analog scale (VAS) measuring anxiety
and self-reported at the end of the
period of pre-KC (10mins), during-KC
(30 mins) and post-KC (30 mins) phases.
Data collection: measurements: salivary
oxytocin assay, salivary cortisol, parental
anxiety; Data analysis: Using IBM SPSS
20.0 (Armonk, NY)
Used a convenience sampling
approach. Power analysis to
determine the sample size.
Inclusion criteria: parents were >
18 years old, with no depression
history, whose babies were the
gestational age of 30-34+6 weeks
@ the age of 3-10 days, cared for
in an incubator, NPO or on bolus
feeds. Sample size: 26 triads.
Sequence 1 (M-KC on day -1 and
P - KC on day - 2), n=14; Sequence
2 (P-KC on day -1 and M - KC on
day - 2), n=12; mothers: n=26;
fathers: n=19
A level IV NICU in
Connecticut, USA
68% of fathers were
white, 79% with higher
education, 53% had
KC experience before
study participation
S5 Dongre et al
2020, India
Quantitative
study -
Prospective
observational
study
To study stress
in fathers after
initiation of KC
Data collection: total study period:
6 months. Demographic details
collected. Likert type scale was rated by
participants before KC, Parental Stressor
Scale: neonatal intensive unit (PSS
NICU) were used to assess fathers’ stress
level in 5 aspects after KC X 3 on the
consecutive days; Data analysis: SPSS
software version 16, Wilcoxon signed
rank-sum test
Inclusion criteria: fathers with
no major medical and surgical
illnesses, whose babies were
at the gestational age of 28-35
weeks, birth weight < 1500 grams,
not ventilated, no congenital
abnormalities. Sample size: n =30
A tertiary level neonatal
unit, India
Mean age: 28.5 years
old; 63.2% of fathers
were lower-middle
socio-economic class
S6 Fegran et al
2008, Norway
Qualitative
- descriptive
Phenomenology
- hermeneutic
approach
To obtain
in-depth
knowledge
of, and to
compare parents’
individual
experiences of
the attachment
process
immediately
after a premature
birth.
Data collection: interviews with
mothers and fathers individually.
Interview length: 40 minutes. Interview
audiotaped. Demographic data
collected. Data analysis: NUD*IST
computer software ORS used.
A convenience sample of parents.
Inclusion criteria: Parents of
infants at the gestational age of
27 to 32 weeks, staying at the
same hospital with their infants
from birth until discharge. Sample
size: 6 parents
A 13-bed NICU in a
regional Norwegian
hospital
Age range: 27 - 59
years old
S7 Günay & Coşkun
Şimşek 2021,
Turkey
Qualitative
descriptive study
- Phenomenology
To investigate
the emotions
and experiences
of fathers in
Eastern Anatolia
region of Turkey
who experienced
KC in the NICU.
Data collection: face-to-face, audio-
taped, individual interviews were
conducted for 45-50 minutes at two
weeks after experiencing KC from
January to May 2019. Questions X 2,
open-ended. Data analysis: inductive
qualitative content analysis by
Graneheim & Lundman (2004)
Inclusion criteria: Fathers whose
babies were at the gestational age
of 27 to 36 weeks, birth weight
≥1000 grams, who visited their
babies regularly and experienced
KC. Sample size: fathers x 12
NICU in a training and
research hospital in the
Eastern Anatolia region
of Turkey
Mean age: 29.7 years
old; First-time fathers x
6; education: primary
to university; fathers x
5 from village
Dong Q, Steen M, Wepa D (2022). Fathers providing kangaroo care in neonatal intensive care units: a scoping review. Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
31The Royal College of Midwives, Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
S8 Helth & Jarden
2013, Denmark
Qualitative -
Phenomenology
- hermeneutic
approach
To explore
how fathers
of premature
infant’s
experience
and potentially
benet from
experiencing
KC during their
infants’ stay in
NICU.
Data collection: Semi-structured
interviews for 30-45 mins. Data analysis:
Theoretical framework by Kvale and
Brinkman (2009).
Inclusion criteria:1) Danish-
speaking fathers, 2) Infants at the
gestational age < 35 weeks, @
stable condition, 3) Admission to
the NICU > 1 week; Sample size:
Purposeful sampling, fathers x 5
Copenhagen University
Hospital, Hvidovre
Hospital, Denmark.
Age: range: 28-37 years
old, university degree
x 3, employed x 4,
student x1, all rst-time
fathers, twins X1
S9 Magee & Nurse
2014, UK
Case study -
Reective study -
Qualitative study
To explore
the nurse’s
role acting as
an eective
advocate for the
baby and the
role of the father
in the neonatal
unit
Data collection: reective study for a
case of a bereaved father who cared for
his premature daughter in the NICU;
Data analysis:Framework Guiding
Reective Activities by Borton’s model
(1970)
Father x 1, a bereavement father NICU x 1 in UK A father whose wife
passed away nine days
after birth of breast
cancer, carried family
commitments
S10 Mörelius et al
2015, Sweden
RCT -
Quantitative
study
To compare the
eects of almost
continuous KC
(CKC) on salivary
cortisol, parental
stress, parental
depression, and
breastfeeding
with standard KC
(SKC)
Data collection: Apr 2008-Apr 2012, An
RCT between two groups of parents;
one group experiencing KC and the
other experiencing SKC. Continuous
KC: almost 24 hours a day, baby stayed
with parents since birth. Standard
KC: separate from parents after
the birth of a baby. Measurements
were collected at discharge during
home-visit at CA of 1 and 4 months.
Medical data was collected from
the parents’ journal. Measurements
included: salivary cortisol, Swedish
Parenthood Stress Questionnaire (SPSQ)
Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
(EPDS), Questions about health and
breastfeeding, Ainsworth’s Sensitivity
scale; Data analysis: statistical software
SPSS 20.0
Inclusion criteria: mothers -
healthy, procient in Swedish,
give birth to a single child who is
at the gestation age of 32 to 35
weeks; Sample size: families x 42,
CKC: 23, SKC: 19
Level 3 NICU x 1 and
Level 2 NICU x1, in
Sweden
Not reported
S11 Olsson et al
2017, Sweden
Qualitative
descriptive study
To describe
fathers’
experiences of
KC with their
premature infant.
Data collection: between January 2014
and June 2015, eligible fathers were
interviewed using a semi-structured
interview guide. Data analysis: direct
qualitative content analysis by Hsieh &
Shannon (2005)
Inclusion criteria: fathers of
preterm infants, had provided
KC for their infants on at least
one occasion. Sample size: a
purposeful sample. Fathers x 20
Neonatal units x 2 (one
in a county hospital,
the other in a university
hospital) in central
Sweden
Mean age: 32 years old.
6/20 fathers had more
than two children
Dong Q, Steen M, Wepa D (2022). Fathers providing kangaroo care in neonatal intensive care units: a scoping review. Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
32The Royal College of Midwives, Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
S12 Varela et al
2014, India
Quantitative
study - quasi-
experimental
design - a pilot
study
To evaluate the
impact of KC
on the sensitive
care that fathers
provided to
their premature
babies in 5
Kangaroo
Mother Care
programs in
India.
Data collection: socio-demographic
survey completed. The Kangaroo
position adherence survey was
conducted to assign participants into
two groups: intervention group (KC)
and control group (non-KC). Paternal
sensitive behaviour and perception
of paternal role assessed by two
people, using a Q-Sort methodology
during a 60-minute period of KC. Data
analysis: SPSS 17.0 for Windows, a non-
parametric statistical test: the Mann-
Whitney U, T-tests, and a Cohen’s d.
Inclusion criteria: fathers of
preterm infants. Intervention
group: n=14; Control group: n=23
Hospitals x 5 in India;
No details of clinical
setting/wards
Age range: 25-48 years
old. Education level:
up to high school.
Spouse: the majority
were classied as a
housewife and related
to both families.
Not all fathers were
procient in English;
for fathers who did not
speak English, a local
translator served as an
interpreter
S13 Varela et al
2018, Canada
Quantitative
study -
Pre- and Post-
investigation
To explore the
physiological
stress responses
of fathers during
their rst KC with
their new baby.
Data collection: salivary cortisol
measured from 6 saliva samples and
simultaneous blood pressure and heart
rate measured on arrival in the room,
immediately before starting KC, at 30
minutes and 60 minutes into KC, and 15
and 30 minutes after the end of KC. Data
analysis: SPSS statistics version 21.0
Inclusion criteria: fathers who
were in a relationship with the
infant’s mother, no anxiety or
depression, whose babies’ GA
was up to 33+3 weeks, medically
stable. Sample size: fathers x 49
The NICU of the
University Laval
Hospital Centre’s
pediatric department in
Quebec City, Canada
Mean age: 31 years old;
Mean education level:
14.1 years of education;
Mean working hours/
week: 43.3
Dong Q, Steen M, Wepa D (2022). Fathers providing kangaroo care in neonatal intensive care units: a scoping review. Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
33The Royal College of Midwives, Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
Factors associated with father KC
Factors associated with father KC Findings of impact of father KC on fathers Strengths and
limitations
Clinical
implications
KC frequency &
duration
KC facilities/aids Culture and
policies
KC
education
Forming and
strengthening
father–infant
bond
Enhancing
paternal
role
Decreasing
paternal
emotional and
physiological
stress
Promoting
relationship
between
fathers
and family
members
Negative
impacts
S1 Up to 24 hours/
day
Cot-side beds
or recliners plus
privacy screen;
Co-care rooms
containing beds
Parents
post-partum
allowance -
Parental leave
up to 480 days/
child + NICU
temporary
parental leave
Nil 3 3 3 Not
reported 3Adequate
sample size
used, rigour and
trustworthiness
achieved,
theoretical
saturation
achieved
Early KC education
needed. Father KC
could be initiated as
early as after birth.
Care plan would
help in increasing
the frequency of
Father KC
S2 Not reported Not reported Not reported Nil 3 3 3 Not
reported
Not
reported
No demographic
details of
participant.
Transparent data
collection and
analysis
Nurses can
promote Father KC
by explaining the
purpose of KC and
the benets of KC
to baby, father, and
mother
S3 Once a day. At
least 15-min
session
An armchair with
a footrest, a pillow
and a blanket,
private screen
provided
Traditional
women’s
connement
after birth;
workforce
limitations; KC
session provided
after 2 hours of
feeding and a
bath
KC
information
(pamphlets)
provided on
admission
3Not
reported
Not reported Not
reported
Not
reported
Workforce
limitations
stopped the
provision of
personalised
instruction to the
participants.
Father KC is
recommended
when mother is
not available. KC
education should
be started as early
as during childbirth
education and
antenatal period
S4 30-min session A La Fuma recliner
chair, a footrest, a
privacy screen, a
hospital gown, a
blanket
Study was
undertaken
at 1-3 pm,
between feeds,
after parent’s
lunch, and with
consideration
of the timing of
mother’s milk
expression
Not reported Not reported Not
reported 3 3 Not
reported
Small sample
size
Paternal touch
will contribute
to parenting
development
S5 90-min KC
episode for 3
consecutive days
Not reported Not reported The benets
and method
of KC were
taught by
a senior
registrar
Not reported Not
reported 3 3 3 Limited KC
application
length; No
consideration
about other
relevant paternal
stress stimuli,
e.g., nancial,
physical, and
social factors;
singleton
context, small
sample size
Not reported
S6 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 3 3 3 Not
reported
Not
reported
The method
of collecting
demographics
was not
mentioned. A
small sample.
Triangulation of
data collection
Father KC was
promoted
by mothers’
encouragement
Dong Q, Steen M, Wepa D (2022). Fathers providing kangaroo care in neonatal intensive care units: a scoping review. Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
34The Royal College of Midwives, Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
S7 KC x 2/day for
15 days, each KC
lasted for 15 - 30
min
A comfortable chair
provided next to an
incubator
Turkish culture
requires men to
return to work
early due to the
traditional role
of the male in
this society, i.e.
nancial support
and limited role
in caring for
children
PowerPoint
presentation
+ A
handbook
about KC
process
3 3 3 Not
reported
Not
reported
Transparent data
collection and
analysis process
Health professionals
should encourage
father–infant
KC. The hospital
facilities/aids and
policies need to
be established to
facilitate father KC
S8 Not reported Not reported Not reported KC method
introduced
Not reported 3Not reported Not
reported 3Small sample
size. Credibility
was increased
by using direct
quotations.
Future studies on
the importance
of the father’s
presence in the
early infant’s life
Parents, nurses,
midwives, and
hospital services
need to recognise
that fathers can
participate equally
in parenthood
S9 KC practised
every second
day; KC duration
not mentioned.
Not reported Not reported Not reported 3 3 Not reported Not
reported
Not
reported
The ethical
approval was
unclear
No visiting
restriction for
NICUs. NICU
nurses/midwives
should give fathers
education in
advance about
the NICU father’s
experience
S10 SSC: 19.6 hours/
day; SC: 7.0
hours/day
Single rooms
equipped
with beds for
parents, medical
equipment.
KC accessories
provided such as
tube tops, scarves,
and blouses
KC is standard
care for both
parents in these
NICUs; the
Swedish health
care system
allows parents to
stay in the NICU
as long as they
can
KC method
was
introduced
before the
study. A
lesson was
given about
noticing and
responding
to their
preterm
baby’s signals
Not reported 3Not reported 3Not
reported
No comparison
with a baby who
has no KC from
parents as KC is
routine care in
their NICU
If both parents
engage after the
birth of preterm
infants, this can
strengthen the
relationship
between the
parents
Dong Q, Steen M, Wepa D (2022). Fathers providing kangaroo care in neonatal intensive care units: a scoping review. Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
35The Royal College of Midwives, Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
S11 Median times: 18
(4-80) min
Cot-side in the
intensive care
room with a private
screen; a bed in
the family rooms;
television
The Swedish
parental
allowance
system allows
fathers and
mothers to stay
with the infant
in the NICU
and provide
KC to him/her
while receiving
nancial
compensation
Information
about the
benets of
KC was given
by the NICU
sta
3 3 3 Not
reported 3Trustworthiness
(conrmability,
credibility,
transferability)
was achieved.
Triangulation of
data collection
methods
(interviewers X 2)
NICU sta need
to identify the
father’s individual
KC preference to
advocate equal
parenthood. Less
KC practised in
single rooms
than in the open
intensive care room
S12 1 hour/day for at
least 1 week.
Not reported The father is not
the primary carer
in India. Fathers
do not live with
mothers during
the rst months
after giving birth,
mothers live with
their mothers.
Many Indian
families have a
preference for
boys over girls.
Well-structured
KC programs
+ a pediatric
follow-up. KC
was provided
by fathers once
premature
infants had
adapted to
extra-uterine life
and were able to
breastfeed
Not reported 3 3 Not reported Not
reported
Not
reported
Small sample.
Language
interpretation
bias existed
during data
collection due to
using a language
translator.
Triangulation
data collection
Father KC provides
opportunities for
fathers to increase
their paternal
role in a culture
where this is not
recognised. Fathers
did not display any
gender preference
S13 1 hour The room contained
less than six
incubators equipped
with comfortable
chairs
Fathers were
asked not
to consume
nicotine, caeine,
food, or drugs
for at least one
hour before their
arrival to the NICU
Not reported Not reported Not
reported 3Not
reported
Not
reported
No control group
were involved in
this study due
to the lack of
consensus from
the clinical team
Not reported
Dong Q, Steen M, Wepa D (2022). Fathers providing kangaroo care in neonatal intensive care units: a scoping review. Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36
36The Royal College of Midwives, Evidence Based Midwifery 20(2): 20-36