Access to this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from AIDS Research and Therapy
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Wangetal. AIDS Research and Therapy (2022) 19:28
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-022-00456-1
REVIEW
Evidence andimplication ofinterventions
acrossvarious socioecological levels
toaddress pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake
andadherence amongmen who have sex
withmen intheUnited States: asystematic
review
Ying Wang1, Jason W. Mitchell2, Chen Zhang3 and Yu Liu1,4*
Abstract
Background: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) represents a proven biomedical strategy to prevent HIV transmissions
among men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States (US). Despite the design and implementation of
various PrEP-focus interventions in the US, aggregated evidence for enhancing PrEP uptake and adherence is lacking.
The objective of this systematic review is to synthesize and evaluate interventions aimed to improve PrEP uptake and
adherence among MSM in the US, and identify gaps with opportunities to inform the design and implementation of
future PrEP interventions for these priority populations.
Methods: We followed the PRISMA guidelines and conducted a systematic review of articles (published by Novem-
ber 28, 2021) with a focus on PrEP-related interventions by searching multiple databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Web
of Science and PsycINFO). Details of PrEP interventions were characterized based on their socioecological level(s),
implementation modalities, and stage(s) of PrEP cascade continuum.
Results: Among the 1363 articles retrieved from multiple databases, 42 interventions identified from 47 publica-
tions met the inclusion criteria for this review. Most individual-level interventions were delivered via text messages
and/or apps and incorporated personalized elements to tailor the intervention content on participants’ demographic
characteristics or HIV risk behaviors. Interpersonal-level interventions often employed peer mentors or social network
strategies to enhance PrEP adoption among MSM of minority race. However, few interventions were implemented at
the community-, healthcare/institution- or multiple levels.
Conclusions: Interventions that incorporate multiple socioecological levels hold promise to facilitate PrEP adoption
and adherence among MSM in the US given their acceptability, feasibility, efficacy and effectiveness. Future PrEP inter-
ventions that simultaneously address PrEP-related barriers/facilitators across multiple socioecological levels should be
© The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which
permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the
original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or
other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line
to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory
regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this
licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecom-
mons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Open Access
AIDS Research and Therapy
*Correspondence: yu_liu@urmc.rochester.edu
4 Division of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health Sciences, University
of Rochester Medical Center, 256 Crittenden Blvd, Ste. 3305, Rochester, NY
14642, USA
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Page 2 of 12
Wangetal. AIDS Research and Therapy (2022) 19:28
Introduction
Men who have sex with men (MSM) experience a dis-
proportionate burden of HIV in the US, accounting for
approximately 70% of the 36 thousand new HIV diagno-
ses in 2019 [1]. Particularly, MSM of color (e.g., Black and
Hispanic/Latino MSM) continue to be the priority popu-
lations most affected by HIV, representing nearly half of
the new infections among all MSM in the US [1–4]. e
challenges of HIV prevention in MSM are further com-
plicated by their low perception of HIV risk, the lack of
sustainable use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), low
HIV testing uptake, and high prevalence of behaviors that
increase acquisition/transmission of HIV (e.g., condom-
less receptive/insertive anal sex, multiple anal sex part-
ners, and exchange of sex for money/drugs) [5–7].
Currently approved medications for PrEP, a prescrip-
tion medicine to prevent HIV infections, include Truvada
(for all people at risk for HIV) and Descovy (for peo-
ple at risk for HIV through anal sex and less impact on
kidney and bone health) [8]. When taken as prescribed,
daily oral PrEP has been shown to lower the risk of HIV
infection from sex by > 99% and from injection drug use
by > 74% [9–12]. Mathematical models showed that HIV
infections among people who were at high risk for HIV
while adhering to PrEP had decreased by 18% from 2016
to 2020 [13]. erefore, high-impact prevention interven-
tions to enhance PrEP uptake among MSM provide one
effective strategy to end the HIV epidemic in the US [14,
15].
PrEP care continuum is usually used to evaluate
interventions for PrEP, including (1) awareness (knowl-
edge about PrEP), (2) willingness/intention (likelihood
of initiating PrEP), (3) access (linking PrEP candidates
to healthcare system), (4) uptake (PrEP initiation),
and (5) adherence (adherence to PrEP and retention
in PrEP care) [14]. Despite the increased availability
and proven efficacy in preventing new HIV infections,
the level of engagement along the PrEP care contin-
uum remains low among MSM in the US [5, 16–18].
For example, pooled analyses showed that only 13.9%
of MSM have reported ever using PrEP in their life-
time (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 8.8–21.1) [16].
Numerous observational studies with MSM in the US
have revealed important barriers across multiple socio-
ecological levels that may affect the uptake/adherence
of PrEP, including individual—(e.g., perception of low
HIV risk, insufficient PrEP knowledge and concerns
over side effects) [19–21], interpersonal—(e.g., lack of
parent/peer support) [20–22], healthcare system—(e.g.,
high cost and low PrEP care quality) [5, 19, 20] and
social-cultural—(e.g., stigma, discrimination and medi-
cal mistrust) levels [5, 19–21, 23].
Since 2017, there has been an increasing number of
interventions to enhance the engagement in PrEP care
continuum among MSM by modifying their individ-
ual health behaviors or social networks. For example,
PrEPmate was one of the early mobile health interven-
tions that utilized daily text messages to remind young
MSM (YMSM) of PrEP medication [24]. Interventions
that leveraged peer influence to improve intentions and
willingness to use PrEP among MSM of color were also
reported in recent years [25–27]. While these interven-
tions employed novel strategies (e.g., mobile health and
social network) and showed efficacy in improving PrEP
care continuum in MSM, some limitations were also
acknowledged by the authors, including sustainability
post intervention period, discrepancy between inter-
vention content and participants’ time-varying inter-
vention needs, and lack of parent/school engagement in
PrEP interventions [24–26].
Despite the design and implementation of various
PrEP interventions for MSM in the US, there is a need
to systematically summarize the practical/theoreti-
cal components, modalities, strengths, and limitations
of these PrEP-focused HIV prevention interventions
for MSM. Aggregated evidence presented on different
socioecological levels (e.g., individual, interpersonal,
community and healthcare/institution levels)—via a
systematic review—enables us to compare interven-
tions across socioecological levels (e.g., acceptability,
feasibility or efficacy), informs HIV prevention sci-
entists about successful intervention strategies that
modify physical or social environments rather than
changing only individual health behaviors, as well as
reveals ways to improve current and former PrEP inter-
ventions. We conducted a systematic review of inter-
vention studies that aimed to improve one or more
aspects of the PrEP care continuum among MSM in the
US, by summarizing included studies and their socioec-
ological mechanistic levels, implementation modalities
(peer/couple-based, technology-assisted, social net-
work, etc.), and which aspects of the PrEP cascade (e.g.,
initiation, uptake, and adherence) they targeted.
enhanced with a focus to tackle contextual and structural barriers (e.g., social determinants of health, stigma or medi-
cal mistrust) at the community- and healthcare/institution-level to effectively promote PrEP use for MSM of color.
Keywords: Pre-exposure prophylaxis, Intervention, Men who have sex with men, Systematic review, United States
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Page 3 of 12
Wangetal. AIDS Research and Therapy (2022) 19:28
Methods
Literature search strategy
is systematic review was conducted by searching
articles via multiple databases (PubMed, MEDLINE,
Web of Science and PsycINFO) published by November
28, 2021, following the PRISMA guidelines [28]. e
final search terms included: (“gay” OR “men who have
sex with men” OR “bisexual” OR “homosexual” OR
“homosexuality” OR “same-gender-loving” OR “sexual
minority”) AND (“PrEP” OR “pre-exposure prophy-
laxis” OR “preexposure prophylaxis”) AND (“interven-
tion” OR “trial” OR “experiment” OR “randomized” OR
“pre-post”).
Inclusion/exclusion criteria
Studies were included in this systematic review if they
met the following criteria: (1) published journal articles
excluding abstracts, conference proceedings, reviews,
meta-analyses, editorials or commentaries; (2) con-
ducted in the US; (3) the current and/or the parent
study was based on an experimental or quasi-experi-
mental design (e.g., randomized controlled trial (RCT),
randomized interventional studies, and pre-post trial)
to evaluate the efficacy or effectiveness of a PrEP inter-
vention; (4) reported at least one PrEP care continuum
outcome (e.g., awareness, willingness, intention, uptake
and adherence); (5) conducted among males who self-
identified as gay, bisexual, or reported having sex with
men within a past time window; and (6) published in
English.
To achieve our goal of comprehensively summarizing
PrEP interventions for MSM in the US, we also included
the following studies for potential evaluation: (1) studies
conducted among MSM and other priority populations
(e.g., transgender women); (2) studies that used an exper-
imental design to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility,
cost-effectiveness of a PrEP intervention with reporting
PrEP-related outcomes; (3) studies using an non-experi-
mental design (e.g., qualitative or cross-sectional study)
to assess the acceptability, feasibility or cost-effectiveness
of an eligible intervention if details about its implementa-
tion to evaluate efficacy/effectiveness could be retrieved
from their published parent trials by checking the refer-
ence lists; (4) we also included protocols that elaborated
the design and implementation to supplement our sum-
mary of the PrEP interventions. We excluded studies that
used a composite measure of HIV risk with PrEP uptake
as one of the risk calculation criteria if PrEP uptake was
not explicitly reported. We also excluded papers that
described the development/adaptation of eligible inter-
ventions without reporting interested PrEP-related
outcomes.
Study screening anddata extraction
Titles and abstracts of all identified records were first
screened for duplicate removal and relevancy by two
independent reviewers (Y.W. and Y.L.). e full text
review and data extraction were then conducted indepen-
dently by one author (Y.W.), and further cross-checked
by the other author (Y.L.) for accuracy. Disagreements
were resolved by consensus-based discussion. e fol-
lowing information was extracted from eligible studies:
study location/setting, study/recruitment period, study
design, recruitment strategy, participant characteristics,
intervention content, theoretical/conceptual framework,
control group, sample size and retention, study out-
come measures (e.g., PrEP care continuum outcomes)
and major findings from the interventions (e.g., efficacy,
effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability).
We categorized all interventions into different socio-
ecological levels based on the primary barriers the inter-
ventions aimed to address. e original socioecological
model to guide HIV studies was composed of four layers:
individual, interpersonal, community and structural level
[29]. We replaced structural level with healthcare level
(i.e., interventions implemented in healthcare settings)
since we did not identify interventions that may impact
laws or policies. We additionally modified this model by
adding a layer of multiple levels to describe interventions
that address PrEP-related barriers/facilitators across
multiple socioecological levels.
Results
Search results
A total of 1363 articles were found through the initial
search of multiple databases. After removing duplicates
and ineligible articles through title/abstract screening,
66 papers were further assessed via full-text review, with
47 papers representing 42 interventions retained for the
final systematic review. Of the included studies, twenty-
three papers evaluated the acceptability (n = 8), feasibility
(n = 8), efficacy (n = 18) or effectiveness (n = 1) of inter-
ventions aimed at improving PrEP uptake and adherence
among MSM in the US. Twenty-four of the 47 articles
described the protocols for the design and implementa-
tion of relevant interventions. Study selection process is
shown in Fig.1.
Study characteristics
Forty-two interventions were categorized into 5 socio-
ecological levels and characteristics of interventions
on each level are presented in Additional file1: Tables
S1–S5, respectively. PrEP interventions for MSM were
reported to implement in the US South (Florida, Geor-
gia, Texas, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina and
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Page 4 of 12
Wangetal. AIDS Research and Therapy (2022) 19:28
D.C.) [30–40], Northeast (Pennsylvania, New York, Mas-
sachusetts and Rhode Island) [27, 31–33, 36, 38, 41–49],
Midwest (Illinois, Michigan, and Wisconsin) [24–26,
32, 33, 36, 47, 50–52], West (California) [51, 53–58]
and nationwide [59–63]. irty-seven of the 42 studies
focused solely on MSM [24–27, 30–34, 36–41, 43–47,
49–54, 56, 58–72], with some targeting Black, Hispanic/
Latino MSM or MSM younger than 34 years old [24–27,
30–34, 36–40, 44–46, 49, 50, 52, 56, 58, 60–63, 70]. Five
studies were conducted among MSM and other prior-
ity populations(e.g., transgender women or heterosex-
ual men) [35, 42, 48, 55, 57]. A RCT design was used to
evaluate 37 interventions on their effect on PrEP-related
outcomes [24, 25, 27, 30–42, 44–48, 50, 52–56, 58–63,
66–72], whereas 5 interventions were evaluated using a
quasi-experimental design [26, 43, 49, 51, 57] and 4 via a
pretest-posttest design [26, 49, 51, 57].
Study outcomes acrosspre‑exposure prophylaxis care
continuum
Most interventions were evaluated by PrEP-related
outcomes across the PrEP care continuum with PrEP
uptake (n = 29) and adherence (n = 24) most commonly
reported. Awareness of PrEP was measured by partici-
pants’ knowledge about PrEP including medication pur-
pose, side effects and self-efficacy [25–27, 31, 33, 39, 40,
43–45, 49, 56, 60, 63, 70]. PrEP willingness/intention
focused on participants’ attitudes towards PrEP use such
as their likelihood of initiating PrEP across various con-
ditions or during a future time window (e.g., within the
next 3 or 6 months) [25–27, 31, 33, 34, 39, 44, 57, 59, 60,
63, 70]. Access to PrEP was referred to participants’ link-
age to healthcare system (e.g., scheduling or attending
an appointment for PrEP consultation) [25, 27, 33–35,
39, 52, 58, 69–71]. PrEP uptake was measured by self-
reported PrEP initiation or a recipient of a prescription
for PrEP [25, 30, 31, 34–36, 38, 39, 43–46, 52, 54, 55, 57,
58, 60, 69–72]. Adherence to PrEP utilized both behavio-
ral (e.g., self-reported retention in PrEP care or number
of doses missed in the past 30 days) [30–33, 36, 40, 46,
48–51, 58, 60, 73] or biological measurements (e.g., PrEP
concentration in dried blood spots) [24, 32, 33, 37, 40–42,
53, 72]. Outcomes out of the PrEP care continuum were
also reported in a few studies, including descriptive and
subjective PrEP norms, PrEP-related stigma and barriers
to PrEP [25–27].
Fig. 1 Flowchart of study selection and inclusion procedure
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Page 5 of 12
Wangetal. AIDS Research and Therapy (2022) 19:28
Intervention strategies andndings
Building on the Social-ecological Model and the char-
acteristics of the reviewed interventions [29], we
categorized 42 interventions into individual-, inter-
personal-, community-, healthcare/institution-level,
and multilevel interventions. e vast majority of these
interventions were delivered at the individual or inter-
personal level. e sub-categories under individual-
level interventions were not mutually exclusive (e.g., a
technology-assisted intervention may include personal-
ized/individualized elements). Hence, the intervention
types/levels presented below were used to provide the
audience with examples of various interventions.
Individual‑level interventions
PrEP regimen interventions
PrEPare was one of the initial intervention trials that
tested the effect of daily tablets combined with a behav-
ioral intervention on adherence to PrEP in YMSM
compared to placebo pill control combined with the
behavioral intervention and behavioral intervention
alone [50]. Another trial implemented in New York City
evaluated 3 different dosing regimens of PrEP, 1 tablet
twice weekly with a post-sex dose, 1 tablet before and
after sex and 1 tablet daily [42]. Both interventions sug-
gest that daily oral PrEP was associated with a high
level of medication adherence compared to other dos-
ing recommendations [42, 50].
Technology‑assisted interventions
In recent years, text messages have become one of the
most indispensable components used in PrEP interven-
tions [33, 52]. For example, participants in LifeSteps
received text messages on a weekly basis as a motiva-
tional reminder to enhance PrEP adherence [33]. Using
the Behavioral eories and Information-Motivation-
Behavioral Skills (IMB) framework, bidirectional text
message interventions were implemented to boost
communication between participants and research
team [24, 52, 53]. For example, daily pill reminder mes-
sages were sent to participants at a personally selected
time, with study staff providing assistance to partici-
pants who did not respond to the message or reported
any difficulty with PrEP use [24, 51, 53]. Partner Ser-
vices PrEP study also used text messages to deliver
booster sessions to follow up on participants’ experi-
ences getting linked to PrEP medication [52]. Overall,
text message interventions based on mobile technol-
ogy were found to be feasible, acceptable and effica-
cious when the messages were personalized and able to
address specific needs of the target population [24, 51,
53].
e development of app-based interventions address-
ing individual level barriers/facilitators has proliferated
since 2017. Most apps were grounded in health behav-
ior change theories, such as Social Cognitive eory
(SCT), Social Learning eory and the IMB model [30,
32, 40, 45, 47, 61, 70]. e apps compiled relevant infor-
mation that may influence PrEP use (e.g., education of
correct HIV risk perception, medication efficacy, self-
efficacy and social norms) and integrated supports from
local PrEP providers to improve participants’ awareness
of PrEP and facilitate linkage to PrEP care [30, 37, 45,
47, 61, 62, 70]. Other key features that might facilitate
participants’ adherence to PrEP included medication
reminder, graphical tracking of medication adherence
and day-to-day strategies to counter relevant barriers
(e.g., PrEP stigma) [32, 49]. App-based interventions
were found to be acceptable and feasible [57, 64, 65],
but their efficacy remains unclear as most studies are
still ongoing [32, 37, 47, 61, 62, 70, 72].
Of particular note, game-based interventions have
been gaining popularity in recent years. For example,
Viral Combat is one of the early apps that used gamifica-
tion to increase adherence to PrEP among YMSM. In this
game, players gain points by engaging with healthcare
providers (HCPs), initiating and adhering to the PrEP
medication [40]. is game demonstrated that interven-
tion participants were 3.75 times more likely to engage in
optimal PrEP dosing compared to those who received a
non-PrEP related mobile game (95% CI 1.20–11.77).
Other technology-based interventions at the individual
level included interventional videos or messages deliv-
ered through open network social media platforms/web-
sites (e.g., Facebook, Instagram, Reddit, Twitter) [44, 59,
63]. For example, van den Berg etal. examined whether
SCT-based and culturally congruent social media mes-
sages would increase PrEP knowledge among Black and
Hispanic MSM [44]. is trial is ongoing and the results
have not yet been reported.
Personalized interventions
Some technology-assisted interventions often incorpo-
rate personalized/individualized elements by custom-
izing the intervention content based on participants’
demographic characteristics or HIV risk behaviors [31,
44, 47, 49, 62]. For example, M-Cubed intervention tai-
lored HIV prevention messages to participants’ self-
reported HIV status and level of HIV risk [47]. In an
intervention for MSM of color, cognitive interviewing
was used to develop HIV prevention information tailored
to participants’ serostatus and culture [44]. Most person-
alized interventions are ongoing and have not reported
their results [31, 44, 47, 62].
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Page 6 of 12
Wangetal. AIDS Research and Therapy (2022) 19:28
Other individual‑level intervention strategies
e PrEPARE2 intervention tested whether provision of
objective HIV risk score to MSM had a positive impact
on their uptake of PrEP [54]. e score was generated
from a mathematic model that considered both HIV risk
behavior (e.g., condomless anal intercourse) and bio-
logical outcomes [e.g., sexually transmitted infections
(STIs)]. It is reported that PrEPARE2 did not increase
PrEP initiation among MSM (11% vs. 10%, p > 0.99) [54].
Interpersonal‑level interventions
Overall peer‑based interventions
Most peer-based interventions utilized peer interven-
tionists to enhance engagement of minority MSM in the
PrEP care continuum. In an ongoing peer-navigation
intervention, Spanish–English bilingual peer lay navi-
gators delivered PrEP-focused educational modules to
Latino MSM [58]. In a different intervention that utilized
enhanced PrEP adherence support, peer navigators led
both in-person and online groups to provide adherence
support to Black MSM [48]. However, favorable changes
in self-reported PrEP adherence were not observed for
this enhanced adherence intervention [48].
We also observed that peer-based interventions often
incorporated personalized elements [34, 38, 55, 56]. In a
culturally-tailored counseling intervention, Black MSM
interventionists helped participants identify and address
their barriers to PrEP initiation (e.g., health insurance,
mental health violence, alcohol and substance abuse)
based on their prevention needs, and referred them to
appropriate prevention resources [34]. is counseling
intervention demonstrated preliminary efficacy where
24% of participants in the intervention group initiated
PrEP compared to no one in the control group (p = 0.02)
[34].
Motivational interviewing (MI) was another common
strategy applied in peer-based interventions. Peer men-
tors would use MI to help MSM resolve their ambiva-
lence about behavioral change as they moved through
the different stages of change (e.g., contemplation, deter-
mination and action) [38, 55, 56]. In an ongoing coach-
based, mobile-enhanced intervention, participants who
reported barriers to telephonic engagement in HIV pre-
vention services would be connected with peer coaches,
who would empathize with them and assist by exploring
alternative means to help retain them in the study [38].
Couples‑based intervention
We identified one young male couple-based interven-
tion, We Prevent [60]. Guided by relationship-oriented
IMB model, We Prevent aimed to enhance MSM-spe-
cific sexual health knowledge (e.g., risk within dyads),
motivation (e.g., peer norms towards HIV prevention in
relationships) and HIV risk-reduction skills (e.g., cou-
ples HIV testing and counseling and PrEP) via two ses-
sions delivered to male couples. e intervention also
employed MI techniques to teach identification of
unhealthy relationships and communication strategies
with partners to help them prepare for engaging in HIV
prevention services as a couple [60]. is couples-based
intervention is ongoing and its efficacy is unknown.
Social network interventions
Based on the framework of IMB and SCT, three social
network interventions, E-PrEP, PrEP Chicago and one
conducted in Wisconsin, were developed for young Black
or Latino MSM [25–27]. ese interventions focused on
improving participants’ knowledge about PrEP and sub-
sequent PrEP initiation, and leveraged peer influence to
scale up PrEP uptake in peers’ social networks. Partici-
pants in the E-PrEP intervention posted targeted materi-
als on social media to provide PrEP education to peers
in their existing online networks [27]. e other two peer
change agent-based interventions emphasized training
of communication skills and conversational strategies
to ensure peer change agents could advocate PrEP use
effectively. Peer change agents learned how to address
their friends’ concerns about PrEP (e.g., sigma, miscon-
ception, effectiveness and side effects) while also engag-
ing with them to help facilitate development of positive
attitudes toward PrEP [25, 26]. Social network interven-
tions exhibited high acceptability and efficacy in improv-
ing PrEP knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy among
young minority MSM [26, 68].
Community‑level interventions
An active PrEP patient navigation was one of the few
interventions that leveraged community engagement
in HIV prevention programs [35]. Guided by the model
of community-based case management that focused on
utilization of support and resources in the community,
patient navigators assisted participants with overcoming
barriers to PrEP linkage and identifying available sources
of support in the community [35]. For example, if partici-
pants reported administrative costs (e.g., notary services)
as a barrier to PrEP initiation, patient navigators would
then provide them with information on related commu-
nity services free of charge. e community-level inter-
vention showed preliminary efficacy to facilitate PrEP
initiation, yet no significant differences existed between
the intervention and control groups [35].
Healthcare/institution‑level interventions
Interventions at the healthcare/institution level usually
involved HCP for PrEP promotion in various health-
care settings. In most healthcare-level interventions,
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Page 7 of 12
Wangetal. AIDS Research and Therapy (2022) 19:28
HCPs (e.g., nurses, STI clinic counselors) provided par-
ticipants with information on PrEP access, used MI to
encourage PrEP initiation, or taught behavioral skills to
address PrEP-related barriers (e.g., PrEP stigma coping)
[36, 41, 43, 69]. Life-Steps for PrEP and one brief behav-
ioral intervention additionally offered booster sessions to
construct/refine medication adherence plans and moni-
tor participants’ long-term adherence to PrEP [41, 69].
Healthcare-level interventions were found to be effica-
cious for improving PrEP awareness, PrEP appointment
scheduling, and PrEP initiation among MSM [43, 69].
However, significant differences for PrEP adherence, via
measurement by an electronic pill storage device, were
not observed in the Life-Steps for PrEP intervention [41].
Multilevel interventions
Interventions that address PrEP determinants across
multiple socioecological levels represent an important
interventional mechanism to effectively promote PrEP
use among MSM [31, 57]. One of the few examples was
Get Connected, a web app-based intervention guided by
Integrated Behavioral Model and Self-Determination
eory, that combined both individual- and healthcare-
level strategies to help YMSM overcome multiple bar-
riers to PrEP care [31]. At the individual level, the app
delivered personalized educational materials to partici-
pants to increase their awareness of HIV risk and self-
efficacy for HIV prevention. At the healthcare/institution
level, participants were asked to rate the clinic where
they got tested for HIV or received PrEP evaluation. e
assessment used a composite measure which took into
account the clinical environment, service quality, pri-
vacy/confidentiality, perceived provider competency,
etc. Participants’ evaluations were sent to sites to help
them understand and improve their performance that
may benefit their future PrEP clients [31]. is app is still
being tested and the results have not been reported.
We Are Family represents another multilevel interven-
tion conducted in San Francisco [57]. At the individual
level, information on HIV prevention and local preven-
tion resources were delivered to participants through
in-person group sessions and the We Are Family app.
Participants were allowed to support and connect with
each other by sharing their stories of battling HIV-related
stigma. e research team also hosted or sponsored
community-level events such as prevention balls, game
nights and holiday parties to leverage community norms
to facilitate PrEP uptake in MSM. At the healthcare level,
a healthcare provider worked with the community to
provide HIV prevention services including HIV testing
or PrEP referral. is multilevel intervention was found
to be acceptable, feasible, and demonstrated preliminary
efficacy in facilitating PrEP intention, initiation and
adherence among MSM [57].
Discussion
e present systematic review provides a concise,
informative summary of what PrEP-related interventions
have occurred with MSM in the US. Most individual-
level PrEP interventions were technology-assisted and
delivered via messaging platforms and/or apps. Com-
pared with traditional venue-based interventions, tech-
nologically delivered PrEP interventions are convenient,
cost-effective, and may help overcome system-level barri-
ers to PrEP care (e.g., transportation to clinics and incon-
venient clinic locations and hours) [74, 75]. In addition,
app-based interventions included in this review provided
extensive information on PrEP, ranging from medica-
tion effectiveness, side effects, self-efficacy to local PrEP
resources—all aimed to improve participants’ aware-
ness of PrEP and help them build behavioral skills to
use PrEP [30, 32, 45, 47, 61, 70]. Some of the app-based
interventions included interactive features (e.g., quiz-
zes, exercises, discussions and games) to facilitate par-
ticipants’ continued use of the app (i.e., engagement) [32,
57, 61]. In contrast, text message interventions contained
fewer interactive features. One key strength of text mes-
sage interventions centered on them requiring fewer
resources for development and pilot testing (vs. apps).
In general, text message interventions were found to be
high acceptable by MSM [24, 48, 51, 53]. Further, partici-
pants could tailor for when and how often text messages
would be sent to accommodate their schedules for daily
PrEP intake [24, 51, 53]. Bidirectional messages may pro-
vide researchers with opportunities to better understand
participants’ medication adherence patterns and identify
when to provide assistance when necessary [24, 51, 53].
ese findings suggest text messaging interventions have
the potential to retain MSM in PrEP care.
It is also important to acknowledge the gaps in current
technology-assisted interventions. Development of apps
and platforms for interventions remain a barrier [51, 65].
Commonly reported issues regarding app design and
functions included lack of diversity in the presentation
of educational information, inability to link social media
profiles, lack of common functions (e.g., customizable
reminders), and technical glitches (e.g., slow responsive-
ness and app crashing) [30, 45, 51]. erefore, formative
studies to learn participants’ preference regarding the app
design are necessary to ensure the successful implemen-
tation of technology-based interventions. In addition,
there might be a mismatch between intervention content
and time-evolving prevention needs of MSM [24, 51].
For example, some visual/textual components used in an
intervention might only offer introductory information
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Page 8 of 12
Wangetal. AIDS Research and Therapy (2022) 19:28
skills to facilitate PrEP initiation, which would be less
useful to experienced PrEP users with challenges with
PrEP adherence [24]. To meet the evolving needs of
MSM, future PrEP interventions could be designed and
tailored to better align with the PrEP continuum and
men’s ongoing needs.
We observed that approximately 60% of the existing
PrEP interventions were designed for YMSM; and more
than 70% of these interventions relied on technology to
facilitate PrEP uptake. is finding aligns with the ever-
growing efforts in recent years to address the elevated
HIV epidemic among YMSM in the US [4]. Given the low
rates of PrEP use among YMSM and preference of inter-
vention modality supported by technology (e.g., social
media, networking apps, internet) [76, 77], technology-
assisted interventional components may bode well in
future PrEP interventions to enhance the PrEP care con-
tinuum among YMSM [24, 49, 52, 66].
Several interpersonal-level PrEP interventions designed
and implemented among YMSM (e.g., peer-deliver/
navigation, couple-based, social network-based inter-
ventions) met inclusion criteria for the present review.
However, interpersonal interventions that involve par-
ent or school educators to promote PrEP among YMSM
are notably missing from the current review. Substantial
evidence indicates parent’s low level of PrEP awareness,
perceived HIV and LGBTQ+ related stigma and nega-
tive reaction to PrEP, along with adolescents’ poor self-
efficacy to communicate with parents about PrEP and/
or sexual orientation were all reported barriers to PrEP
use among YMSM [22, 78, 79]. Interventions that address
parental negative attitudes towards PrEP and sexuality,
and that also promote parent-adolescent communication
may hold promise to enhance PrEP uptake and adher-
ence among YMSM. None of the included interventions
were implemented in school settings or educational
agencies. As adolescents and YMSM may spend a major-
ity of their day at school, the development and imple-
mentation of contextually appropriate interventions at
schools, by involving trusted school-based peers/counse-
lors, may offer unique opportunities to provide education
about PrEP and HIV prevention among these priority
populations.
Black and Hispanic/Latino MSM (i.e., MSM of color)
were also priority populations in the included PrEP
interventions, given their heightened HIV burden and
low rates of PrEP uptake [2, 3, 80, 81]. Findings from the
present review revealed that some of the most important
strategies in PrEP interventions for MSM of color was
the utilization of peer influence, which led to increased
cultural congruence, reduced PrEP/HIV-related stigma,
facilitated trust/access to PrEP care, and motivated con-
formity to peer norms/behaviors (i.e., social comparison)
to promote PrEP initiation/adherence [25–27, 34, 38, 48,
56, 58].
However, challenges remain for PrEP interventions for
MSM of color. First, MSM of color may be less likely to
participate in online HIV interventions given the racial/
ethnic disparities in the use of technology for health-
related purposes [82, 83]. For example, almost all Black
MSM completed the face-to-face session in Partner Ser-
vices PrEP study, while only a limited number of partici-
pants completed the booster session delivered via mobile
phone [52]. Second, our aggregated evidence reflects the
lack of interventions to tackle community-level determi-
nants of PrEP care for MSM of color. Community-level
interventions that address broader contextual and struc-
tural issues by improving social determinants of health
(e.g., neighborhood environment, housing and food
insecurity) should be further strengthened [48, 84]. Last,
we identified only one intervention, Get Connected, that
overcame system- and structural-level barriers to PrEP
(e.g., stigma and medical mistrust) by providing HIV care
that is sensitive and inclusive to MSM of color. Inter-
ventions delivered to HCPs to enhance clinical experi-
ences of MSM of color are still missing from the current
literature.
We identified four interventions implemented at
the healthcare/institution level. All these interven-
tions involved educational modules delivered by HCPs
in HIV/STI clinics [36, 41, 43, 69]. One of the gaps in
the healthcare/institution-level interventions is the
lack of follow-up for long-term adherence to PrEP.
We observed improvement in behaviors that align
with the earlier stages of the PrEP continuum (e.g.,
increased PrEP awareness, scheduling and attend-
ing a PrEP appointment, and initiating PrEP care) [43,
69], but significant differences were not observed for
long-term adherence to PrEP [41]. Current models of
care in HIV/STI clinics primarily provide STI and HIV
testing services and are not well suited for transition-
ing to a longitudinal model of HIV prevention/care
due to the absence of protocols to guide clinical prac-
tice and low capacity of trained HCPs to provide PrEP
care [73]. One potential solution is to provide training
to PrEP counselors, who would then be responsible for
monitoring PrEP use among those who have initiated
the medication and providing follow-up counseling
services. Another gap is the lack of culturally trained
primary healthcare providers (PCPs) with specialty in
HIV/STI prevention/care for sexual and gender minor-
ity populations. Although HIV/STI clinics are ideal
settings to reach populations who are at elevated risk
for HIV infection [85], PCPs as the first point of con-
tact into healthcare have a unique opportunity to reach
the majority of patients who are less aware of PrEP and
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Page 9 of 12
Wangetal. AIDS Research and Therapy (2022) 19:28
may be in need of this preventative medication. For
example, evidence from an HIV prevention program
in Washington State showed a pronounced increase in
uptake of HIV prevention services (e.g., HIV testing)
among MSM who received healthcare from provid-
ers that were not from HIV/STI clinics, suggesting the
great potential of the entire healthcare system rather
than only HIV/STI care providers in promoting uptake
of HIV prevention services [86]. Additionally, the pre-
scription of PrEP in primary healthcare settings, where
the primary purpose is not HIV prevention and care,
may have the potential to reduce stigma surrounding
HIV among MSM and thereby may help promote PrEP
acceptance [73]. However, barriers such as insufficient
PrEP knowledge and lack of skills/motivation to discuss
PrEP with MSM clients must be addressed among PCPs
before effective structural/institution interventions can
be implemented [87–89].
Our study is among the few that have systematically
summarized and evaluated PrEP interventions for
MSM in the US to inform the design and implemen-
tation of future interventions. ere are also limita-
tions to this review. First, the literature search strategy
may be not comprehensive and thus we were unable
to incorporate all relevant interventions into this sys-
tematic review. Second, the categorization of interven-
tions into each socioecological level was based on the
primary barriers the interventions aimed to address.
erefore, the intervention levels presented in this
review may be not precise and were used to provide
examples of interventions across socioecological levels
only. ird, more than 40% of the studies are ongoing.
eir effect on promoting PrEP uptake and adher-
ence is unknown. However, our primary objective is
to summarize the practical/theoretical components,
modalities, strengths, and limitations of these stud-
ies to inform the design of future PrEP interventions.
In addition, some studies with small sample size may
have low statistical power [26, 34, 35, 41, 49–51, 54].
Scaled-up RCTs as well as intervention assessment in
real-world settings are further required to replicate
their results. Finally, this systematic review identi-
fies the following research opportunities based on the
gaps in existing studies: (1) expanding the spectrum of
participants (e.g., MSM with injection drug use) given
their elevated risk for HIV; (2) testing the effect of dif-
ferent regimens of PrEP (e.g., daily oral pill vs. long-
acting injectable medication) on PrEP care continuum
engagement given the evidence that reduced pill bur-
den may increase PrEP uptake/adherence among MSM
[42, 50]; and (3) taking into account different brands of
PrEP when designing and evaluating interventions in
light of the recent approval of Descovy for PrEP.
Conclusions
Low level of PrEP uptake and medication adherence
among MSM, especially young and/or those of color,
is concerning. Interventions to improve PrEP uptake
and adherence among MSM have been designed and
implemented at multiple socioecological levels (e.g.,
individual, interpersonal, community and healthcare/
institution) in recent years, with many of them cur-
rently in progress via a RCT. Fully evaluated interven-
tions, as well as those currently in progress, may hold
promise to help facilitate PrEP adoption among MSM;
mechanisms used to help improve one or more stages
of the PrEP continuum were also noted in the included
interventions. Areas for improvement were identified
and were presented as future research opportunities
to improve current and future PrEP interventions for
MSM in the US.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at https:// doi.
org/ 10. 1186/ s12981- 022- 00456-1.
Additional le1: TableS1. Summaryof study characteristics: individ-
ual-level interventions. TableS2. Summary of study characteristics:
interpersonal-levelinterventions. TableS3. Summary ofstudy charac-
teristics: community-level interventions. TableS4. Summary of study
characteristics: healthcare system-levelinterventions. TableS5. Summary
ofstudy characteristics: multilevel interventions.
Author contributions
YL designed the research study. YW led the systematic review and drafted
the first version of this manuscript. YW and YL conducted title and abstract
screening. YW conducted full text review and extracted data which was
cross-checked by YL. JM, CZ and YL reviewed and revised the manuscript.
All authors critically interpreted the results and revised the manuscript. All
authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published
article and its Additional files.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author details
1 Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical
Center, Rochester, NY, USA. 2 Department of Health Promotion and Disease
Prevention, Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida Interna-
tional University, Miami, FL, USA. 3 School of Nursing, University of Rochester
Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA. 4 Division of Epidemiology, Department
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Page 10 of 12
Wangetal. AIDS Research and Therapy (2022) 19:28
of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, 256 Crit-
tenden Blvd, Ste. 3305, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Received: 23 February 2022 Accepted: 16 June 2022
References
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV in the United States and
dependent areas. 2021. https:// www. cdc. gov/ hiv/ stati stics/ overv iew/
atagl ance. html. Accessed 10 Jan 2022.
2. Crepaz N, Hess KL, Purcell DW, Hall HI. Estimating national rates of HIV
infection among MSM, persons who inject drugs, and heterosexuals in
the United States. AIDS. 2019. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ qad. 00000 00000
002111.
3. McCree DH, Williams AM, Chesson HW, Beer L, Jeffries WL, Lemons A,
et al. Changes in disparities in estimated HIV incidence rates among
Black, Hispanic/Latino, and White men who have sex with men (MSM)
in the United States, 2010–2015. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019.
https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ qai. 00000 00000 001977.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV and youth. 2021. https://
www. cdc. gov/ hiv/ group/ age/ youth/ diagn oses. html. Accessed 10 Jan
2022.
5. Russ S, Zhang C, Liu Y. Pre-exposure prophylaxis care continuum, barriers,
and facilitators among Black men who have sex with men in the United
States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Behav. 2021. https://
doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10461- 020- 03156-x.
6. Noble M, Jones AM, Bowles K, DiNenno EA, Tregear SJ. HIV testing among
internet-using MSM in the United States: systematic review. AIDS Behav.
2017. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10461- 016- 1506-7.
7. Hess KL, Chavez PR, Kanny D, DiNenno E, Lansky A, Paz-Bailey G. Binge
drinking and risky sexual behavior among HIV-negative and unknown
HIV status men who have sex with men, 20 US cities. Drug Alcohol
Depend. 2015. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. druga lcdep. 2014. 12. 013.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About PrEP. 2022. https://
www. cdc. gov/ hiv/ basics/ prep/ about- prep. html#: ~: text= There% 20are%
20two% 20med icati ons% 20app roved ,getti ng% 20HIV% 20from% 20vag
inal% 20sex.
9. Grant RM, Anderson PL, McMahan V, Liu A, Amico KR, Mehrotra M, et al.
Uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis, sexual practices, and HIV incidence
in men and transgender women who have sex with men: a cohort study.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2014. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ s1473- 3099(14) 70847-3.
10. Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, McMahan V, Liu AY, Vargas L, et al. Preex-
posure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with
men. N Engl J Med. 2010. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1056/ NEJMo a1011 205.
11. Choopanya K, Martin M, Suntharasamai P, Sangkum U, Mock PA,
Leethochawalit M, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV infection in
injecting drug users in Bangkok, Thailand (the Bangkok Tenofovir Study):
a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet.
2013. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ s0140- 6736(13) 61127-7.
12. Martin M, Vanichseni S, Suntharasamai P, Sangkum U, Mock PA,
Leethochawalit M, et al. The impact of adherence to preexposure prophy-
laxis on the risk of HIV infection among people who inject drugs. AIDS.
2015. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ qad. 00000 00000 000613.
13. Khurana N, Yaylali E, Farnham PG, Hicks KA, Allaire BT, Jacobson E, et al.
Impact of improved HIV care and treatment on PrEP effectiveness in the
United States, 2016–2020. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018. https:// doi.
org/ 10. 1097/ qai. 00000 00000 001707.
14. Nunn AS, Brinkley-Rubinstein L, Oldenburg CE, Mayer KH, Mimiaga M,
Patel R, et al. Defining the HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis care continuum.
AIDS. 2017. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ qad. 00000 00000 001385.
15. The White House. National HIV/AIDS strategy for the United States
2022–2025. 2021.
16. Kamitani E, Johnson WD, Wichser ME, Adegbite AH, Mullins MM, Sipe TA.
Growth in proportion and disparities of HIV PrEP use among key popula-
tions identified in the United States national goals: systematic review and
meta-analysis of published surveys. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2020.
https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ qai. 00000 00000 002345.
17. García M, Harris AL. PrEP awareness and decision-making for Latino MSM
in San Antonio, Texas. PLoS ONE. 2017. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journ al.
pone. 01840 14.
18. Holloway IW, Dougherty R, Gildner J, Beougher SC, Pulsipher C, Montoya
JA, et al. Brief report: PrEP uptake, adherence, and discontinuation among
California YMSM using geosocial networking applications. J Acquir
Immune Defic Syndr. 2017. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ qai. 00000 00000
001164.
19. Ezennia O, Geter A, Smith DK. The PrEP care continuum and Black men
who have sex with men: a scoping review of published data on aware-
ness, uptake, adherence, and retention in PrEP care. AIDS Behav. 2019.
https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10461- 019- 02641-2.
20. Mayer KH, Agwu A, Malebranche D. Barriers to the wider use of pre-
exposure prophylaxis in the United States: a narrative review. Adv Ther.
2020. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s12325- 020- 01295-0.
21. Klein H, Washington TA. Older versus younger men who have sex with
men: awareness of and potential barriers to the use of pre-exposure
prophylaxis (PrEP) medication to prevent the transmission of HIV. J AIDS
HIV Treat. 2020. https:// doi. org/ 10. 33696/ aids.2. 006.
22. Moskowitz DA, Macapagal K, Mongrella M, Pérez-Cardona L, Newcomb
ME, Mustanski B. What if my dad finds out!? Assessing adolescent men
who have sex with men’s perceptions about parents as barriers to PrEP
uptake. AIDS Behav. 2020. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10461- 020- 02827-z.
23. Dubov A, Galbo P Jr., Altice FL, Fraenkel L. Stigma and shame experiences
by MSM who take PrEP for HIV prevention: a qualitative study. Am J Mens
Health. 2018. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 15579 88318 797437.
24. Liu AY, Vittinghoff E, von Felten P, Amico KR, Anderson PL, Lester R, et al.
Randomized controlled trial of a mobile health intervention to promote
retention and adherence to preexposure prophylaxis among young peo-
ple at risk for human immunodeficiency virus: the EPIC study. Clin Infect
Dis. 2019. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ cid/ ciy810.
25. Young LE, Schumm P, Alon L, Bouris A, Ferreira M, Hill B, et al. PrEP
Chicago: a randomized controlled peer change agent intervention to
promote the adoption of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention
among young Black men who have sex with men. Clin Trials. 2018.
https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 17407 74517 730012.
26. Kelly JA, Amirkhanian YA, Walsh JL, Brown KD, Quinn KG, Petroll AE, et al.
Social network intervention to increase pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)
awareness, interest, and use among African American men who have sex
with men. AIDS Care Psychol Socio-Med Asp AIDS/HIV. 2020. https:// doi.
org/ 10. 1080/ 09540 121. 2020. 17392 07.
27. Patel VV, Ginsburg Z, Golub SA, Horvath KJ, Rios N, Mayer KH, et al.
Empowering with PrEP (E-PrEP), a peer-led social media-based interven-
tion to facilitate HIV preexposure prophylaxis adoption among young
Black and Latinx gay and bisexual men: protocol for a cluster randomized
controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2196/ 11375.
28. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting
items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
PLoS Med. 2009. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journ al. pmed. 10000 97.
29. Baral S, Logie CH, Grosso A, Wirtz AL, Beyrer C. Modified social ecologi-
cal model: a tool to guide the assessment of the risks and risk contexts
of HIV epidemics. BMC Public Health. 2013. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/
1471- 2458- 13- 482.
30. Jones J, Dominguez K, Stephenson R, Stekler JD, Castel AD, Mena LA, et al.
A theoretically based mobile app to increase pre-exposure prophylaxis
uptake among men who have sex with men: protocol for a randomized
controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2196/ 16231.
31. Bauermeister JA, Golinkoff JM, Horvath KJ, Hightow-Weidman LB, Sullivan
PS, Stephenson R. A multilevel tailored web app-based intervention for
linking young men who have sex with men to quality care (get con-
nected): protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018.
https:// doi. org/ 10. 2196/ 10444.
32. LeGrand S, Knudtson K, Benkeser D, Muessig K, McGee A, Sullivan PS,
et al. Testing the efficacy of a social networking gamification app to
improve pre-exposure prophylaxis adherence (P3: prepared, protected,
empowered): protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc.
2018. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2196/ 10448.
33. Biello KB, Psaros C, Krakower DS, Marrow E, Safren SA, Mimiaga MJ, et al.
A pre-exposure prophylaxis adherence intervention (LifeSteps) for young
men who have sex with men: protocol for a pilot randomized controlled
trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2196/ 10661.
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Page 11 of 12
Wangetal. AIDS Research and Therapy (2022) 19:28
34. Desrosiers A, Levy M, Dright A, Zumer M, Jallah N, Kuo I, et al. A rand-
omized controlled pilot study of a culturally-tailored counseling interven-
tion to increase uptake of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among young
Black men who have sex with men in Washington, DC. AIDS Behav. 2019.
https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10461- 018- 2264-5.
35. Doblecki-Lewis S, Butts S, Botero V, Klose K, Cardenas G, Feaster D. A
randomized study of passive versus active PrEP patient navigation for
a heterogeneous population at risk for HIV in South Florida. J Int Assoc
Provid AIDS Care. 2019. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 23259 58219 848848.
36. Parsons JT, Starks T, Gurung S, Cain D, Marmo J, Naar S. Clinic-based
delivery of the young men’s health project (YMHP) targeting HIV risk
reduction and substance use among young men who have sex with
men: protocol for a type 2, hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial.
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2196/ 11184.
37. Siegler AJ, Brock JB, Hurt CB, Ahlschlager L, Dominguez K, Kelley CF, et al.
An electronic pre-exposure prophylaxis initiation and maintenance home
care system for nonurban young men who have sex with men: protocol
for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019. https:// doi. org/
10. 2196/ 13982.
38. Arrington-Sanders R, Hailey-Fair K, Wirtz A, Cos T, Galai N, Brooks D, et al.
Providing unique support for health study among young Black and Latinx
men who have sex with men and young Black and Latinx transgender
women living in 3 urban cities in the United States: protocol for a coach-
based mobile-enhanced randomized control trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020.
https:// doi. org/ 10. 2196/ 17269.
39. Rouffiac AE, Whiteley L, Brown L, Mena L, Craker L, Healy M, et al. A
mobile intervention to improve uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis for
southern Black men who have sex with men: protocol for intervention
development and pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc.
2020. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2196/ 15781.
40. Whiteley L, Olsen E, Mena L, Haubrick K, Craker L, Hershkowitz D, et al. A
mobile gaming intervention for persons on pre-exposure prophylaxis:
protocol for intervention development and randomized controlled trial.
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2196/ 18640.
41. Mayer KH, Safren SA, Elsesser SA, Psaros C, Tinsley JP, Marzinke M,
et al. Optimizing pre-exposure antiretroviral prophylaxis adherence in
men who have sex with men: results of a pilot randomized controlled
trial of “life-steps for PrEP.” AIDS Behav. 2017. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/
s10461- 016- 1606-4.
42. Grant RM, Mannheimer S, Hughes JP, Hirsch-Moverman Y, Loquere A,
Chitwarakorn A, et al. Daily and nondaily oral preexposure prophylaxis
in men and transgender women who have sex with men: the human
immunodeficiency virus prevention trials network 067/ADAPT study. Clin
Infect Dis. 2018. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ cid/ cix10 86.
43. Raifman J, Nunn A, Oldenburg CE, Montgomery MC, Almonte A, Agwu
AL, et al. An evaluation of a clinical pre-exposure prophylaxis education
intervention among men who have sex with men. Health Serv Res. 2018.
https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ 1475- 6773. 12746.
44. van den Berg JJ, Silverman T, Fernandez MI, Henny KD, Gaul ZJ, Sutton MY,
et al. Using eHealth to reach Black and Hispanic men who have sex with
men regarding treatment as prevention and preexposure prophylaxis:
protocol for a small randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018.
https:// doi. org/ 10. 2196/ 11047.
45. Biello KB, Marrow E, Mimiaga MJ, Sullivan P, Hightow-Weidman L, Mayer
KH. A mobile-based app (MyChoices) to increase uptake of HIV testing
and pre-exposure prophylaxis by young men who have sex with men:
protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019.
https:// doi. org/ 10. 2196/ 10694.
46. Starks TJ, Robles G, Pawson M, Jimenez RH, Gandhi M, Parsons JT, et al.
Motivational interviewing to reduce drug use and HIV incidence among
young men who have sex with men in relationships and are high priority
for pre-exposure prophylaxis (project PARTNER): randomized controlled
trial protocol. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2196/ 13015.
47. Sullivan PS, Zahn RJ, Wiatrek S, Chandler CJ, Hirshfield S, Stephenson R,
et al. HIV prevention via mobile messaging for men who have sex with
men (M-Cubed): protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res
Protoc. 2019. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2196/ 16439.
48. Colson PW, Franks J, Wu Y, Winterhalter FS, Knox J, Ortega H, et al. Adher-
ence to pre-exposure prophylaxis in Black men who have sex with men
and transgender women in a community setting in Harlem, NY. AIDS
Behav. 2020. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10461- 020- 02901-6.
49. Weitzman PF, Zhou Y, Kogelman L, Rodarte S, Vicente SR, Levkoff SE.
mHealth for pre-exposure prophylaxis adherence by young adult men
who have sex with men. Mhealth. 2021. https:// doi. org/ 10. 21037/ mheal
th- 20- 51.
50. Hosek SG, Siberry G, Bell M, Lally M, Kapogiannis B, Green K, et al. The
acceptability and feasibility of an HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) trial
with young men who have sex with men. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic
Syndr. 2013. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ QAI. 0b013 e3182 801081.
51. Fuchs JD, Stojanovski K, Vittinghoff E, McMahan VM, Hosek SG, Amico
KR, et al. A mobile health strategy to support adherence to antiretroviral
preexposure prophylaxis. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2018. https:// doi. org/
10. 1089/ apc. 2017. 0255.
52. da Silva DT, Bouris A, Ramachandran A, Blocker O, Davis B, Harris J, et al.
Embedding a linkage to preexposure prophylaxis care intervention in
social network strategy and partner notification services: results from a
pilot randomized controlled trial. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr.
2021. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ qai. 00000 00000 002548.
53. Moore DJ, Jain S, Dube MP, Daar ES, Sun XY, Young J, et al. Randomized
controlled trial of daily text messages to support adherence to preexpo-
sure prophylaxis in individuals at risk for human immunodeficiency virus:
the TAPIR study. Clin Infect Dis. 2018. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1093/ cid/ cix10 55.
54. Blumenthal J, Jain S, Mulvihill E, Sun S, Hanashiro M, Ellorin E, et al.
Perceived versus calculated HIV risk: implications for pre-exposure
prophylaxis uptake in a randomized trial of men who have sex with men.
JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ qai.
00000 00000 001888.
55. Edwards GG, Reback CJ, Cunningham WE, Hilliard CL, McWells C,
Mukherjee S, et al. Mobile-enhanced prevention support study for men
who have sex with men and transgender women leaving jail: protocol for
a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020. https:// doi. org/ 10.
2196/ 18106.
56. Harawa NT, Schrode KM, McWells C, Weiss RE, Hilliard CL, Bluthenthal RN.
Small randomized controlled trial of the new passport to wellness HIV
prevention intervention for black men who have sex with men (BMSM).
AIDS Educ Prev. 2020. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1521/ aeap. 2020. 32.4. 311.
57. Arnold EA, Saberi P, Wong JFO, Pollack LM, Neilands TB, Benjamin M, et al.
We are family: a feasibility and acceptability study of an HIV prevention
intervention with the house ball and gay family communities. JAIDS J
Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ qai. 00000
00000 002805.
58. Blashill AJ, Gordon JR, Rojas SA, Ramers CB, Lin CD, Carrizosa CM, et al.
Pilot randomised controlled trial of a patient navigation intervention
to enhance engagement in the PrEP continuum among young Latino
MSM: a protocol paper. BMJ Open. 2021. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1136/ bmjop
en- 2020- 040955.
59. Mustanski B, Ryan DT, Sanchez T, Sineath C, Macapagal K, Sullivan PS.
Effects of messaging about multiple biomedical and behavioral HIV
prevention methods on intentions to use among US MSM: results of an
experimental messaging study. AIDS Behav. 2014. https:// doi. org/ 10.
1007/ s10461- 014- 0811-2.
60. Gamarel KE, Darbes LA, Hightow-Weidman L, Sullivan P, Stephenson
R. The development and testing of a relationship skills intervention to
improve HIV prevention uptake among young gay, bisexual, and other
men who have sex with men and their primary partners (we prevent):
protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019. https://
doi. org/ 10. 2196/ 10370.
61. Kuhns LM, Garofalo R, Hidalgo M, Hirshfield S, Pearson C, Bruce J, et al. A
randomized controlled efficacy trial of an mHealth HIV prevention inter-
vention for sexual minority young men: MyPEEPS mobile study protocol.
BMC Public Health. 2020. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s12889- 020- 8180-4.
62. Muessig KE, Golinkoff JM, Hightow-Weidman LB, Rochelle AE, Mulawa MI,
Hirshfield S, et al. Increasing HIV testing and viral suppression via stigma
reduction in a social networking mobile health intervention among Black
and Latinx young men and transgender women who have sex with men
(HealthMpowerment): protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR
Res Protoc. 2020. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2196/ 24043.
63. Mustanski B, Moskowitz DA, Moran KO, Newcomb ME, Macapagal
K, Rodriguez-Diaz C, et al. Evaluation of a stepped-care eHealth HIV
prevention program for diverse adolescent men who have sex with men:
protocol for a hybrid type 1 effectiveness implementation trial of SMART.
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2196/ 19701.
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
Page 12 of 12
Wangetal. AIDS Research and Therapy (2022) 19:28
•
fast, convenient online submission
•
thorough peer review by experienced researchers in your field
•
rapid publication on acceptance
•
support for research data, including large and complex data types
•
gold Open Access which fosters wider collaboration and increased citations
maximum visibility for your research: over 100M website views per year
•
At BMC, research is always in progress.
Learn more biomedcentral.com/submissions
Ready to submit your research
Ready to submit your research
? Choose BMC and benefit from:
? Choose BMC and benefit from:
64. Biello KB, Hill-Rorie J, Valente PK, Futterman D, Sullivan PS, Hightow-
Weidman L, et al. Development and evaluation of a mobile app designed
to increase HIV testing and pre-exposure prophylaxis use among young
men who have sex with men in the United States: open pilot trial. J Med
Internet Res. 2021. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2196/ 25107.
65. Sullivan PS, Driggers R, Stekler JD, Siegler A, Goldenberg T, McDougal SJ,
et al. Usability and acceptability of a mobile comprehensive HIV preven-
tion app for men who have sex with men: a pilot study. JMIR Mhealth
Uhealth. 2017. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2196/ mheal th. 7199.
66. Whiteley L, Craker L, Haubrick KK, Arnold T, Mena L, Olsen E, et al. The
impact of a mobile gaming intervention to increase adherence to
pre-exposure prophylaxis. AIDS Behav. 2021. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/
s10461- 020- 03118-3.
67. Wray TB, Chan PA, Simpanen E, Operario DA, Pilot. Randomized controlled
trial of HIV self-testing and real-time post-test counseling/referral on
screening and preventative care among men who have sex with men.
AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2018. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1089/ apc. 2018. 0049.
68. Schneider JA, Young L, Ramachandran A, Michaels S, Cohen H, Robinson
I, et al. A pragmatic randomized controlled trial to increase PrEP uptake
for HIV prevention: 55-week results from PrEPChicago. JAIDS J Acquir
Immune Defic Syndr. 2021. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ qai. 00000 00000
002518.
69. Chan PA, Nunn A, van den Berg JJ, Cormier K, Sowemimo-Coker G, Napo-
leon SC, et al. A randomized trial of a brief behavioral intervention for
PrEP uptake among men who have sex with men at increased risk for HIV
infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ qai.
00000 00000 002671.
70. Liu A, Coleman K, Bojan K, Serrano PA, Oyedele T, Garcia A, et al. Develop-
ing a mobile app (LYNX) to support linkage to HIV/sexually transmitted
infection testing and pre-exposure prophylaxis for young men who have
sex with men: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc.
2019. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2196/ 10659.
71. Wray TB, Chan PA, Klausner JD, Mena LA, Brock JB, Simpanen EM, et al.
eTest: a limited-interaction, longitudinal randomized controlled trial of a
mobile health platform that enables real-time phone counseling after HIV
self-testing among high-risk men who have sex with men. Trials. 2020.
https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s13063- 020- 04554-1.
72. Reback CJ, Fletcher JB, Mata RP. A theory-based mHealth inter vention
(getting off ) for methamphetamine-using men who have sex with men:
protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021. https://
doi. org/ 10. 2196/ 22572.
73. Arnold EA, Hazelton P, Lane T, Christopoulos KA, Galindo GR, Steward
WT, et al. A qualitative study of provider thoughts on implementing pre-
exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in clinical settings to prevent HIV infection.
PLoS ONE. 2012. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journ al. pone. 00406 03.
74. Nydegger LA, Dickson-Gomez J, Ko Ko TA, Longitudinal. Qualitative explo-
ration of perceived HIV risk, healthcare experiences, and social support
as facilitators and barriers to PrEP adoption among black women. AIDS
Behav. 2021. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10461- 020- 03015-9.
75. Nydegger LA, Dickson-Gomez J, Ko TK. Structural and syndemic barriers
to PrEP adoption among Black women at high risk for HIV: a qualitative
exploration. Cult Health Sex. 2021. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 13691 058.
2020. 17202 97.
76. Saberi P, Siedle-Khan R, Sheon N, Lightfoot M. The use of mobile health
applications among youth and young adults living with HIV: focus group
findings. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2016. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1089/ apc. 2016.
0044.
77. Fedele DA, Cushing CC, Fritz A, Amaro CM, Ortega A. Mobile health inter-
ventions for improving health outcomes in youth: a meta-analysis. JAMA
Pediatr. 2017. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1001/ jamap ediat rics. 2017. 0042.
78. Brooks RA, Nieto O, Landrian A, Fehrenbacher A, Cabral A. Experiences
of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)-related stigma among Black MSM
PrEP users in Los Angeles. J Urban Health. 2020. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/
s11524- 019- 00371-3.
79. Schnarrs PW, Gordon D, Martin-Valenzuela R, Sunil T, Delgado AJ, Glidden
D, et al. Perceived social norms about oral PrEP use: differences between
African-American, Latino and White gay, bisexual and other men who
have sex with men in Texas. AIDS Behav. 2018. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/
s10461- 018- 2076-7.
80. Elopre L, Kudroff K, Westfall AO, Overton ET, Mugavero MJ. Brief report:
the right people, right places, and right practices: disparities in PrEP
access among African American men, women, and MSM in the deep
south. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1097/ qai.
00000 00000 001165.
81. Saleska JL, Lee SJ, Leibowitz A, Ocasio M, Swendeman D. A tale of two
cities: exploring the role of race/ethnicity and geographic setting on PrEP
use among adolescent cisgender MSM. AIDS Behav. 2021. https:// doi.
org/ 10. 1007/ s10461- 020- 02951-w.
82. Walker DM, Hefner JL, Fareed N, Huerta TR, McAlearney AS. Exploring
the digital divide: age and race disparities in use of an inpatient portal.
Telemed J e-Health. 2020. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1089/ tmj. 2019. 0065.
83. Din HN, McDaniels-Davidson C, Nodora J, Madanat H. Profiles of a health
information-seeking population and the current digital divide: cross-
sectional analysis of the 2015–2016 California health interview survey. J
Med Internet Res. 2019. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2196/ 11931.
84. Burns PA, Williams MS, Mena LA, Bruce MA, Bender M, Burton ET, et al.
Leveraging community engagement: the role of community-based
organizations in reducing new HIV infections among Black men who
have sex with men. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2020. https:// doi. org/
10. 1007/ s40615- 019- 00691-9.
85. Liu A, Cohen S, Follansbee S, Cohan D, Weber S, Sachdev D, et al. Early
experiences implementing pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV pre-
vention in San Francisco. PLoS Med. 2014. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journ
al. pmed. 10016 13.
86. Katz DA, Dombrowski JC, Kerani RP, Aubin MR, Kern DA, Heal DD, et al.
Integrating HIV testing as an outcome of STD partner services for men
who have sex with men. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2016. https:// doi. org/ 10.
1089/ apc. 2016. 0027.
87. Turner L, Roepke A, Wardell E, Teitelman AM. Do you PrEP? A review of
primary care provider knowledge of PrEP and attitudes on prescribing
PrEP. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2018. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jana. 2017.
11. 002.
88. Blackstock OJ, Moore BA, Berkenblit GV, Calabrese SK, Cunningham CO,
Fiellin DA, et al. A cross-sectional online survey of HIV pre-exposure
prophylaxis adoption among primary care physicians. J Gen Intern Med.
2017. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s11606- 016- 3903-z.
89. Petroll AE, Walsh JL, Owczarzak JL, McAuliffe TL, Bogart LM, Kelly JA. PrEP
awareness, familiarity, comfort, and prescribing experience among US
primary care providers and HIV specialists. AIDS Behav. 2017. https:// doi.
org/ 10. 1007/ s10461- 016- 1625-1.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in pub-
lished maps and institutional affiliations.
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Terms and Conditions
Springer Nature journal content, brought to you courtesy of Springer Nature Customer Service Center GmbH (“Springer Nature”).
Springer Nature supports a reasonable amount of sharing of research papers by authors, subscribers and authorised users (“Users”), for small-
scale personal, non-commercial use provided that all copyright, trade and service marks and other proprietary notices are maintained. By
accessing, sharing, receiving or otherwise using the Springer Nature journal content you agree to these terms of use (“Terms”). For these
purposes, Springer Nature considers academic use (by researchers and students) to be non-commercial.
These Terms are supplementary and will apply in addition to any applicable website terms and conditions, a relevant site licence or a personal
subscription. These Terms will prevail over any conflict or ambiguity with regards to the relevant terms, a site licence or a personal subscription
(to the extent of the conflict or ambiguity only). For Creative Commons-licensed articles, the terms of the Creative Commons license used will
apply.
We collect and use personal data to provide access to the Springer Nature journal content. We may also use these personal data internally within
ResearchGate and Springer Nature and as agreed share it, in an anonymised way, for purposes of tracking, analysis and reporting. We will not
otherwise disclose your personal data outside the ResearchGate or the Springer Nature group of companies unless we have your permission as
detailed in the Privacy Policy.
While Users may use the Springer Nature journal content for small scale, personal non-commercial use, it is important to note that Users may
not:
use such content for the purpose of providing other users with access on a regular or large scale basis or as a means to circumvent access
control;
use such content where to do so would be considered a criminal or statutory offence in any jurisdiction, or gives rise to civil liability, or is
otherwise unlawful;
falsely or misleadingly imply or suggest endorsement, approval , sponsorship, or association unless explicitly agreed to by Springer Nature in
writing;
use bots or other automated methods to access the content or redirect messages
override any security feature or exclusionary protocol; or
share the content in order to create substitute for Springer Nature products or services or a systematic database of Springer Nature journal
content.
In line with the restriction against commercial use, Springer Nature does not permit the creation of a product or service that creates revenue,
royalties, rent or income from our content or its inclusion as part of a paid for service or for other commercial gain. Springer Nature journal
content cannot be used for inter-library loans and librarians may not upload Springer Nature journal content on a large scale into their, or any
other, institutional repository.
These terms of use are reviewed regularly and may be amended at any time. Springer Nature is not obligated to publish any information or
content on this website and may remove it or features or functionality at our sole discretion, at any time with or without notice. Springer Nature
may revoke this licence to you at any time and remove access to any copies of the Springer Nature journal content which have been saved.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Springer Nature makes no warranties, representations or guarantees to Users, either express or implied
with respect to the Springer nature journal content and all parties disclaim and waive any implied warranties or warranties imposed by law,
including merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose.
Please note that these rights do not automatically extend to content, data or other material published by Springer Nature that may be licensed
from third parties.
If you would like to use or distribute our Springer Nature journal content to a wider audience or on a regular basis or in any other manner not
expressly permitted by these Terms, please contact Springer Nature at
onlineservice@springernature.com
Content uploaded by Yu Liu
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Yu Liu on Jul 21, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
