No full-text available
To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.
Microscope-Controlled Internal Sinus Floor Elevation (MCI-SFE): A new technique to evaluate the sinus membrane during transcrestal lifting
Abstract
Minimally invasive procedures are ubiquitous in medicine and now show an increased presence in invasive disciplines of dentistry. In implantology, this requires three-dimensional diagnostics, microsurgical instruments and suture materials, and especially optical magnification with axially aligned illumination.
The operating microscope (OPMI) combines these last two requirements, which are essential even at high magnification. Customized sterile draping sheets allow the OPMI to be used even under the aseptic conditions of implant surgery.
The advantages of the OPMI in implantology are numerous and are apparent especially in clinical assessment, diagnosis, management of the esthetic zone, sinus lift procedures, soft tissue management, and photographic and video documentation. Technical developments such as autofocus, xenon illumination, magnetic fixation, and charge-coupled device and high-definition digital cameras enhance the precision of the OPMI while also improving ergonomics.
This article describes the main indications for using the OPMI in minimally invasive implantology
... In this regard, in a case series by Sirinirund et al. 31 , the OM could enhance clinical visualization for lateral and vertical sinus augmentation procedures, therefore, aiding precise hard and soft tissue manipulation and resulting in a 100% success rate in 6 months for the placed implants with minimal intraoperative sinus membrane perforation (only 5% among 20 cases). This was in accordance with the results of a study by Shakibaie 32 in 2013 in which the microsurgical approach for transcrestal sinus floor elevation was introduced 33 . The results revealed optimal visualization of the membrane and detection of the perforations and a significantly lower incidence of perforation when <2 mm of elevation is performed. ...
... Based on the current evidence, it seems that the beneficial role of OM in sinus floor elevation procedures seems sufficient enough to conclude its advantages in the prevention and management of the sinus membrane perforations 17,31,33,82 . However, as can be noticed from the formed keyword clusters in Fig. 2 and also the lower density of the keywords regarding dental implants in Fig. 3, the evidence regarding other aspects of implant microsurgery is still scarce. ...
Objectives:
The aim of this systematic review was to comprehensively explore the current trends and therapeutic approaches in which an operating microscope (OM) is used in periodontics and dental implant surgeries.
Materials and methods:
A systematic search strategy was built to detect studies including various surgical techniques performed under an OM. PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases were searched. No limitations in terms of time and language were applied. The data regarding the study design, type of procedure, treatment groups, and surgical outcomes were collected and analyzed descriptively. In addition, a bibliometric analysis was performed concerning the co-authorship and keyword co-occurrence network.
Results:
Out of 1985 articles, finally, 55 met the inclusion criteria. Current periodontal and implant microsurgery trends consist of: periodontal therapy, dental implant microsurgery, soft tissue grafting and periodontal plastic surgery, bone augmentation, ridge preservation, and ortho-perio microsurgery. The bibliometric analysis revealed "guided tissue regeneration", "periodontal regeneration" and "root coverage" being the most repeated keywords (landmark nodes). 132 authors within 29 clusters were identified, publishing within the frameworks of "periodontal and implant microsurgery".
Conclusion:
Within its limitations, this systematic review provides an overview of the latest trends in periodontal and implant microsurgery when considering the use of an OM as the magnification tool. Also, it discusses the reported success and outcomes of the mentioned procedures.
... Endodoscopic investigations have demonstrated that the maximum elastic limit of the Schneiderian membrane is in the range of 3-5 mm and to avoid perforations, it is suggested that this limit not be exceeded during internal SFE procedures [73,102]. Using microscope-controlled SFE, Shakibaie [111] found that the risk of injury to the osteomucosal layer and the associated risk of incurring additional complications such as implant loss and sinusitis significantly increased where elevation and grafting heights were ≥4 mm. These reports, along with two cadaver studies [22,103] seem to confirm the conclusions of two earlier publications [13,112] that OMSFE methods should limit elevation height to approximately 5.0 mm to avoid perforations. ...
... As graft removal is not possible without lateral access, implant removal may be necessary. Perforation, whether detected or not, may increase the risk for early sinus infection or implant failure [111,153]. ...
As a less invasive, rapidly healing alternative to the lateral window osteotomy (LWO), transcrestal sinus floor elevation (TSFE) has gained increasing popularity with a growing number of recently introduced innovations and published reports. However, the transcrestal approach can be technically demanding and is associated with a broad range of complications, the most frequent being membrane perforation due to the limited visibility during surgery. Appropriate patient selection, treatment planning with the use of tomography and a thorough understanding of the anatomy of this region can help to reduce the risk of complications. A review of the relevant literature on TSFEas well as the authors' extensive clinical experience provides detailed information on the potential complications, their etiology, avoidance and management.
A retrospective clinical evaluation of patients consecutively treated from multiple centers was performed. The treatment of these patients utilized the bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation (BAOSFE) procedure with immediate implant fixation. The BAOSFE method employs a specific set of osteotome instruments to tent the sinus membrane with bone graft material placed through the osteotomy site. A total of 174 implants was placed in 101 patients. Implants were of both screw and cylinder shapes with machined, titanium plasma-sprayed, and hydroxyapatite surfaces from various manufacturers. The 9 participating clinicians used autografts, allografts, and xenografts alone or in various combinations, and the type of graft was selected by the individual clinicians. The choice of graft material did not appear to influence survival rates. Loading periods varied from 6 to 66 months. The survival rate was 96% or higher when pretreatment bone height was 5 mm or more and dropped to 85.7% when pretreatment bone height was 4 mm or less. The most important factor influencing implant survival with the BAOSFE was the preexisting bone height between the sinus floor and crest. This short-term retrospective investigation suggests that the BAOSFE can be a successful procedure with a wide variety of implant types and grafting procedures.
It was the aim of the present prospective study to quantify the gain in height of implant sites by endoscopically controlled osteotome sinus floor elevations (ECOSFE) with simultaneous implant placement and to report the number of sinus membrane perforations.
From October 1999 to December 2000, of 92 sinus floor elevations, 18 were carried out endoscopically controlled with an osteotome technique. As augmentation material, beta-tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP) or autogenous bone was used; 22 implants were placed.
The residual height of the alveolar crest in the posterior maxilla was 6.8 +/- 1.6 mm on average. The implant lengths ranged from 10 to 16 mm (mean implant length 12.2 +/- 1.4 mm). They were significantly larger than the residual height of the alveolar crests (P < .0005). Elevation of the sinus floor with an osteotome had to be supported by conventional sinus floor elevation instruments after a mean elevation of 3.0 +/- 0.8 mm to prevent perforation of the sinus membrane. However, 1 perforation occurred, which was repaired with a periosteal patch. At stage 2 surgery, 2 implants were removed because of mobility. Endoscopic control revealed one case in which beta-TCP could be found within the sinus; another case showed areas of polypoid mucosa on the sinus floor.
With the ECOSFE, perforations of the sinus membrane can be visualized; however, they cannot be avoided. Although this technique is less invasive than the lateral window technique, it cannot be recommended as a standard procedure in the posterior maxilla because of the large amount of additional equipment needed and the technically demanding procedure.
The use of the ECOSFE should be confined to scientific trials.
The aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate the survival rate of titanium plasma spray-coated cylindric and machined screw-type implants placed in sinuses grafted with anorganic bovine bone mixed with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) or with anorganic bovine bone alone.
The patients included in this study were treated with a 1- or 2-stage technique, according to the volume of residual bone. This determined the possibility of primary stabilization and the duration of the treatment, which was 9 or 12 months, respectively.
The overall implant survival rate was 94.5% after a mean functioning period of 6.5 +/- 1.9 years. The Implant survival rate was better in sinuses grafted with anorganic bovine bone alone than with a mixture of anorganic bovine bone with DFDBA (96.8% versus 90%). The implant survival rate was similar for cylindric and screw-type implants in sinuses grafted with anorganic bovine bone alone.
Because of the good bone quality, the implant survival rate was similar for cylindric and screw-type implants in sinuses grafted with anorganic bovine bone.
Anorganic bovine bone used alone appears to be a suitable material for sinus floor augmentation.
Various techniques of sinus floor elevation (SFE) are described. The elevation with osteotomes (OSFE) from a crestal approach is a relatively new technique. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the clinical outcome of implants placed into the maxillary sinus augmented with an OSFE technique.
A systematic online and manual review of the literature identified articles dealing with OSFE. Applying rigid inclusion criteria, screening and data abstraction were performed independently by two reviewers. The follow-up of loaded implants was a minimum of 6 months. The identified articles were analyzed regarding implant outcome and defined surgical aspects. Survival and success rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves.
Eight out of 44 articles dealing with osteotome sinus floor elevation met the inclusion criteria. Five of the studies met established success criteria. The survival and success rates were 95.7% and 96.0% after 24 months and 36 months, respectively. The median and mean follow-up periods were 24 and 18.73 months for the survival rate and 24 and 19.7 months for the success rate. Regarding different surgical elements, i.e., osteotome techniques, implant types, and augmentation materials, the database was multivariate. Thus, no statistical analysis could be performed on these parameters.
Short-term clinical success/survival (<or years) of implants placed with an osteotome sinus floor elevation technique seems to be similar to that of implants conventionally placed in the partially edentulous maxilla. Controlled prospective clinical studies are needed to evaluate the long-term outcome and various surgical modifications of OSFE.
To evaluate the long-term stability of peri-implant bone formation following implant placement without grafting into resorbed posterior maxillae.
Twenty-five implants of 10 mm were placed in 17 patients to rehabilitate atrophic maxillae by means of an osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE) procedure without grafting. Mean residual bone height was 5.4±2.3mm. Bone levels were evaluated at 1, 3 and 5 years using periapical radiographs.
All implants fulfilled survival criteria and gained peri-implant bone (mean increase 3.2±1.3mm). Implant protrusion into the sinus decreased from 4.9±1.9mm after surgery to 1.5±0.9mm after 5 years. Mean crestal bone loss amounting to 0.8±0.8mm stabilized over the 5-year observation interval. Twenty implants showed additional peri-implant bone gain following the 1-year control.
Implant rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae may be greatly simplified using implants 10mm and the OSFE technique without grafting. Grafting material is not needed to gain at least 3mm of bone in the atrophic maxilla. The procedure appears predictable with favourable long-term results.
AND CONCLUSIONS
The root and sinus series of the Omnii system have been used extensively since 1981. They are very versatile in their ability to be used within edentulous areas of the maxilla. Their design attempts to maximize the use of the available bone, and placement techniques allow the manipulation of bone to form sockets in otherwise deficient areas of bone. The root implants can be used as free-standing implants or as multiple abutments. The sinus implant is always used as an abutment. It may be used in conjunction with other implants or with natural abutments. Maxillary implants are not loaded until a 6-month healing time has elapsed following placement. An understanding of the different qualities of bone found in the maxilla is important to achieving the successful loading of these implants. Different times are required to allow physiologic loading in different qualities of maxillary bone. Restorative treatment is normally done with fixed bridge work, and the use of any type of stress breaker attachments is not recommended.
Previous articles in The Compendium (February 1994, April 1994) described the features of the osteotome technique. In the initial article, a procedure that uses osteotomes to elevate the floor of the sinus, called the osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE), was mentioned. This article provides details and case reports on the OSFE. An enhanced version of the OSFE in which bone is added to the osteotomy will also be presented. The author concludes that the OSFE and the bone-added OSFE techniques are suitable means of altering the floor of the sinus so that in many patients, longer implants can be inserted in a less invasive manner.
A method of performing an osteotomy in the maxilla using hand instruments was recently introduced in The Compendium (February 1994). This new procedure is called the osteotome technique. Part of this previous article described a means of placing implants in locations that are too thin to permit the use of standard implant drills. A bone enlargement technique, called the ridge expansion osteotomy (REO), that allows the surgeon to widen the ridge in a routine office procedure was also introduced. This article provides additional details about the REO, including an analysis of the advantages of the REO over other methods of ridge expansion. Clinical cases are presented that show the suitability of the REO for anterior and posterior locations, and the effects of the REO technique on implant angulation and esthetics are discussed.
This article reviews the limitations of drilling into soft bone to place endosseous implants. Differences among bone types and the anatomy of the maxilla are described. The osteotome technique, which is a new method of placing implants into maxillary bone without drilling, and the rationale for two other procedures, the osteotome sinus floor elevation and the ridge expansion osteotomy, are detailed. How osteotomes conserve osseous tissue and may improve bone density around the implant is also discussed. A pilot study that shows excellent results with several types of press-fit implants using the osteotome technique is provided. The author concludes that the osteotome technique is superior to drilling for many applications in soft maxillary bone. Furthermore, the osteotome technique allows more implants to be inserted in a greater variety of sites during a routine office procedure.
The purpose of this study was to compare three different methods for sinus elevation: (1) the lateral antrostomy as a two-step procedure, (2) the lateral antrostomy as a one-step procedure, and (3) the osteotome technique with a crestal approach. Indication criteria were defined, based on the residual bone height measured from computed tomography scans, for the sake of applying the appropriate technique.
In 30 patients designated for implant treatment in the resorbed posterior maxilla, 79 implants were placed in combination with a bone-grafting material for sinus augmentation. The final bone heights were measured from panoramic radiographs or post-operative computed tomography scans.
The success rate for the osteotome technique was 95% during the 30-month study period; no failures occurred in any site treated with a lateral antrostomy. The gain in bone height was comparable for the one-step (median = 10 mm) and two-step (median = 12.7 mm) lateral antrostomies. These sites exhibited a significantly greater increase in bone height (p < 0.001) than did the sites in which the osteotome technique was applied (mean = 3.5 mm). The histologic sections showed both bone apposition in intimate contact with the bone-grafting material particles and initial signs of its remodeling.
The results indicate that the osteotome technique can be recommended when more than 6 mm of residual bone height is present and an increase of about 3 to 4 mm is expected. In cases of more advanced resorption a one-step or two-step lateral antrostomy has to be performed.
This study assessed the efficacy of augmentation grafting of the maxillary sinus with simultaneous placement of dental implants in patients with less than 5 mm of alveolar crestal bone height in the posterior maxilla prior to grafting, although the procedure has traditionally been contraindicated based on empirical data. A total of 160 hydroxyapatite-coated implants was placed into 63 grafted maxillary sinuses in 63 patients whose crestal bone height in this region ranged from 3 to 5 mm. Patients were followed for 2 to 4 years after the placement of definitive prostheses. There were no postoperative sinus complications. Following uncovering of the implants at 9 months after surgery, there was no clinical or radiographic evidence of crestal bone loss around the implants. Histologic examination of bone cores from the grafted sites revealed successful integration and a high degree of cellularity. All patients maintained stable implant prostheses during follow-up. These findings indicate that the single-step procedure is a feasible option for patients with as little as 3 mm of alveolar bone height prior to augmentation grafting, utilizing hydroxyapatite-coated implants and autogenous bone.
Patients who have been partially edentulous in the posterior segments for many years frequently present with reduced alveolar bone and/or enlarged sinuses. The choice of treatment for these patients will depend on the volume of residual bone, morphology of the alveolar crest, and amount of space available for the prosthesis. A new, minimally invasive surgical procedure using Summers osteotomes is described for the treatment of the edentulous posterior maxilla in which the bone thickness below the sinus is limited (> or = 5 mm). This suggested modified treatment is based on the use of a combination of osteotomes, drills, and screw-type implants with a rough surface texture.
Although augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous bone grafts has become a well established preimplantology procedure, its effect on the function of the maxillary sinus has not been the subject of prospective human studies. In this prospective study the effects of sinus floor augmentation on maxillary sinus performance were evaluated. Seventeen consecutive patients who were to undergo augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor with an iliac crest autogenous bone graft agreed to participate in this study. All patients were subject to (i) extensive anamnestic and clinical investigation on sinusitis, (ii) conventional radiography (Waters' projection) and (iii) unilateral endoscopic inspection of the maxillary sinus. This triad of evaluations was performed preoperatively, immediately preceding the augmentation procedure (the maxillary sinus to be inspected endoscopically was randomly selected), and at 3 (at insertion of the implants) and 9 months (at uncovering of implants) postaugmentation. None of the 17 patients showed clinical or radiological signs of actual sinus pathology preoperatively, though 5 patients had a history of an impeded sinus clearance. By contrast, unilateral endoscopic evaluation revealed pre-existing subclinical mucosal pathology in two out of five patients with a history of sinus clearance impairment and in one out of the other 12 patients. At 3 months' postaugmentation, clinical and radiographical examination showed chronic maxillary sinusitis in one non-compromised patient. Moreover, serial unilateral endoscopic evaluation revealed subclinical maxillary mucosal pathology in four other patients (two of whom had a history of an impeded sinus clearance), confirmed by Waters' projection in three of these four patients. At 9 months' postaugmentation, only subclinical maxillary mucosal pathology was detected endoscopically in two patients (one compromised, one non-compromised patient), confirmed by Waters' projection in this last patient. Five implants were lost during the 9-month observation period. As is obvious from this prospective evaluation, the effects of the augmentation procedure on maxillary sinus performance in patients without signs of maxillary sinusitis are of no clinical significance.
The aim of the present study was to assess long-term changes in sinus-graft height after maxillary sinus floor augmentation and simultaneous placement of implants. A total of 191 patients who underwent maxillary sinus floor augmentation were radiographically followed for up to about 10 years. A 2 : 1 mixture of autogenous bone and bovine xenograft (Bio-Oss) was used as the graft material. Sinus-graft height was measured using 294 panoramic images immediately after augmentation and up to 108 months subsequently. Changes in sinus-graft height were calculated with respect to implant length and original sinus height. Patients were divided into three groups based on the height of the grafted sinus floor relative to the implant apex: Group I, in which the grafted sinus floor was above the implant apex; Group II, in which the implant apex was level with the grafted sinus floor; and Group III, in which the grafted sinus floor was below the implant apex. After augmentation, the grafted sinus floor was consistently located above the implant apex. After 2-3 years, the grafted sinus floor was level with or slightly below the implant apex. This relationship was maintained over the long term. Sinus-graft height decreased significantly and approached original sinus height. The proportion of patients classified as belonging to Group III reached a maximum from year 3 onwards. The clinical survival rate of implants was 94.2%. All implant losses occurred within 3 years after augmentation. We conclude that progressive sinus pneumatization occurs after augmentation with a 2 : 1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture, and long-term stability of sinus-graft height represents an important factor for implant success.
The aim of the article was to introduce a new subantroscopic laterobasal sinus augmentation (SALSA) tecnique as a minimally invasive approach to maxillary peri-implant surgery.
The SALSA technique consists of the following steps: (1) microsurgical opening of the subantral space (SAS) with detachment of the sinus membrane (SM) under supported videoendoscopy; (2) enlargement of the SAS by laterobasal tunnelling; (3) subantroscopic examination of the SAS with (4) optional reinforcement or repair of the SM; (5) implant site preparation with subantroscopic identification of the cavities; and (6) precise stepwise placement of graft material under endoscopic control.
Since 1996, 118 sinus augmentations have been performed on 83 patients using particulate alloplastic augmentation material (tricalcium phosphate) with various amounts of autogenous bone and blood. Mean augmentation height was 8.6 mm (range, 1 to 15 mm). Twenty-eight perforations of sinus mucosa were observed without further complication (1 case of sinusitis was treated and re-augmented endoscopically). Of 211 titanium screw-type implants placed, 11 failures were observed.
SALSA is a predictable surgical technique. With this minimally invasive method, adequate bone height can be achieved.
SALSA may offer advantages related to lower morbidity, conservation of bone volume and blood supply, optimized view of the surgical field, and high acceptance by patients.
Grafting the floor of the maxillary sinus has become the most common surgical intervention for increasing alveolar bone height prior to the placement of endosseous dental implants in the posterior maxilla. Outcomes of this procedure may be affected by specific surgical techniques, simultaneous versus delayed implant placement, use of barrier membranes over the lateral window, selection of graft material, and the surface characteristics and the length and width of the implants.
The primary objective of this systematic review was to determine the efficacy of the sinus augmentation procedure and compare the results achieved with various surgical techniques, grafting materials, and implants.
In patients requiring dental implant placement, what is the effect on implant survival of maxillary sinus augmentation versus implant placement in the non-grafted posterior maxilla?
MEDLINE, the Cochrane Oral Health Group Specialized Trials Register, and the Database of Abstracts and Reviews of Effectiveness were searched for articles published through April 2003. Hand searches were performed on Clinical Oral Implants Research, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, and the International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry and the bibliographies of all relevant papers and review articles. In addition, researchers, journal editors, and industry sources were contacted to see if pertinent unpublished data that had been accepted for publication were available.
Human studies with a minimum of 20 interventions, a minimum follow-up period of 1-year loading, an outcome measurement of implant survival, and published in English, regardless of the evidence level, were considered.
Studies involving multiple simultaneous interventions (e.g., simultaneous ridge augmentation) and studies with missing data that could not be supplied by the study authors were excluded.
Where adequate data were available, subgroups of dissimilar interventions (e.g., surgical techniques, graft materials, implant surfaces, membranes) were isolated and subjected to meta-regression, a form of meta-analysis.
1. Forty-three studies, 3 randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs), 5 controlled trials (CTs), 12 case series (CS), and 23 retrospective analyses (RA) were identified. Thirty-four were lateral window interventions, 5 were osteotome interventions, 2 were localized management of the sinus floor, and 2 involved the crestal core technique. 2. Meta-regression was performed to determine the effect of the variables of block versus particulate grafting techniques, implant surface, graft material, and the use of a membrane over the lateral window. 3. The survival rate of implants placed in sinuses augmented with the lateral window technique varied between 61.7% and 100%, with an average survival rate of 91.8%. For lateral window technique: 4. Implant survival rates reported in this systematic review compare favorably to reported survival rates for implants placed in the non-grafted posterior maxilla. 5. Rough-surfaced implants have a higher survival rate than machine-surfaced implants when placed in grafted sinuses. 6. Implants placed in sinuses augmented with particulate grafts show a higher survival rate than those placed in sinuses augmented with block grafts. 7. Implant survival rates were higher when a membrane was placed over the lateral window. 8. The utilization of grafts consisting of 100% autogenous bone or the inclusion of autogenous bone as a component of a composite graft did not affect implant survival. 9. There was no statistical difference between the covariates of simultaneous versus delayed implant placement, types of rough-surfaced implants, length of follow-up, year of publication, and the evidence level of the study.
Insufficient data were present to statistically evaluate the effects of smoking, residual crestal bone height, screw versus press-fit implant design, or the effect of implant surface micromorphology other than machined versus rough surfaces. There are insufficient data to recommend the use of platelet-rich plasma in sinus graft surgery.
The objective of this study was to review the literature with respect to the root and canal systems in the maxillary first molar. Root anatomy studies were divided into laboratory studies (in vitro), clinical root canal system anatomy studies (in vivo) and clinical case reports of anomalies. Over 95% (95.9%) of maxillary first molars had three roots and 3.9% had two roots. The incidence of fusion of any two or three roots was approximately 5.2%. Conical and C-shaped roots and canals were rarely found (0.12%). This review contained the most data on the canal morphology of the mesiobuccal root with a total of 8399 teeth from 34 studies. The incidence of two canals in the mesiobuccal root was 56.8% and of one canal was 43.1% in a weighted average of all reported studies. The incidence of two canals in the mesiobuccal root was higher in laboratory studies (60.5%) compared to clinical studies (54.7%). Less variation was found in the distobuccal and palatal roots and the results were reported from fourteen studies consisting of 2576 teeth. One canal was found in the distobuccal root in 98.3% of teeth whereas the palatal root had one canal in over 99% of the teeth studied.
Die balonassistierte Sinusbodenschleimhaut (BASS)-Elevation -Anatomische Studien mit einer minimalinvasiven Technik des Sinuslifts
- K-U Benner
- F Bauer
- K-H Heukmann
Benner K-U, Bauer F, Heukmann
K-H. Die balonassistierte Sinusbodenschleimhaut (BASS)-Elevation
-Anatomische Studien mit einer minimalinvasiven Technik des Sinuslifts.
Implantologie 2005; 13(1):53-60.
Die mikroskopisch geführte externe Sinusbodenelevation (MGES) -Eine neue minimalinvasive Operationstechnik
- M B Shakibaie
Shakibaie-M B. Die mikroskopisch
geführte externe Sinusbodenelevation
(MGES) -Eine neue minimalinvasive
Operationstechnik. Implantologie
2008; 16(1):21-31.
Einsatzgebiete des Operationsmikroskops im Rahmen der minimalinvasiven Implantologie
- Shakibaie-M B
Shakibaie-M B. Einsatzgebiete des
Operationsmikroskops im Rahmen
der minimalinvasiven Implantologie.
Quintessenz 2010; 61(3):293-308.