Content uploaded by Apip Amrullah
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Apip Amrullah on Jun 22, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
PAPER • OPEN ACCESS
Coconut shell bio-oil distillation: Its characteristic
and product distribution
To cite this article: Apip Amrullah and S. Eko Teguh 2022 IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 1038
012018
View the article online for updates and enhancements.
You may also like
Solubility analysis of elastomers in a bio-
based lubricant using Hansen parameters
Leonardo Israel Farfan-Cabrera, José
Pérez-González and Ezequiel Alberto
Gallardo-Hernández
-
Biogeochemical potential of biomass
pyrolysis systems for limiting global
warming to 1.5 °C
C Werner, H-P Schmidt, D Gerten et al.
-
Progress on research and development of
bio-oil as a fuel in Indonesia
H Y Setyawan, J R Dewi, N M S Sunyoto
et al.
-
This content was downloaded from IP address 110.136.216.231 on 21/06/2022 at 23:29
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd
AESAP-2021
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1038 (2022) 012018
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1038/1/012018
1
Coconut shell bio-oil distillation: Its characteristic and product
distribution
Apip Amrullah, Eko Teguh S.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Lambung Mangkurat University,
Jl. Brigjen H. Hasan Basri, Kayu Tangi, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
Email: apip.amrullah@ulm.ac.id
Abstract. The properties of bio-oil distillation and product distribution are critical for parameter
optimization and reaction conditions. In this work, low-reaction temperature of 96, 97, 98, 99,
and 100 °C was conducted. The slow pyrolysis process at 500 °C with a 1 hour holding period
yielded the coconut shell bio-oil employed in this research. The characteristic components of
bio-oil were thoroughly evaluated using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The
research founded that during the distillation reaction process, a similar critical point was
thoroughly established, which might be attributed to the steady system created by the hydroxyl
group. As a result, bio-oil distillation might be divided into 3 stages: steady, explosive, and
heating. The content of acetic acid, 2-Furancarboxaldehyde, and phenol are dominated. Acetic
acid yield showed an increase, followed by the distillation reaction temperature. Phenol yield
was also observed as a dominant product in the bio-oil. The higher phenol yield was observed at
a temperature of 98 oC is 38 %. The observed phenomena could be related to the oxidation of
hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin to form phenol, the bio-major oil component. The specific
distillation properties and product distribution provide a great look at the reaction process and
component enrichment patterns, which can aid formulation and parameter adjustment.
1. Introduction
Renewable energy production is gaining popularity as a technique of decreasing pollution and attaining
a long-term aim. Biomass can be utilized to generate energy and chemicals using pyrolysis technology,
which is a valuable renewable resource (bio-oil, charcoal, and syngas) [1–4]. However, crudes bio-oil,
a low-quality by-product of thermal decomposition, cannot be used in engines. [5–7]. As a result, along
with its low price and availability of use, bio-oil distillation process is one of the technologies for
enhancing bio-oil quality, is commonly utilized to upgrade bio-oil [8,9]. Bio-oil was originally
supposed to be a substitute for petroleum fuels due to its similar appearance and properties. Bio-oil
needed to be refined before it could be used as a drop-in fuel because of its fluidity, calorific value,
and corrosiveness [10]. Researchers have developed a number of upgrading processes, including
catalytic cracking, catalytic pyrolysis, hydrodeoxygenation, supercritical fluids, and esterification
[11,12]. Nevertheless, harsh circumstances, difficulties in controlling, expensive equipment costs, and
low conversion rates hampered bio-oil commercialization. Furthermore, the commercial prospects for
bio-oil as a fuel were clouded by the continued low worldwide crude prices. As a consequence, the
chemical feedstock might be used to make commercial bio-oil.
Phenol, acetic acid, eugenol, guaiacol, and levoglucosan are among the high-value-added
compounds present in bio-oil [13]. As a result, it's presently one of the much potential low-cost fine
chemical raw materials available. Condensation, centrifugation, extraction, and distillation are some
of the extraction and filtration process that have been used on bio-oils in previous work [13–16].
However, distillation appears to be one of the most promising technologies among the many available,
given its low price and potential for large-scale application. Distillation could evaporate low-boiling
AESAP-2021
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1038 (2022) 012018
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1038/1/012018
2
elements to produce component distinction and purifying depending on difference in boiling points of
various substances [17]. Distillation was extensively used in the oil refining and fine chemical plants
since it did not involve any extra solvents and prevented the introduction of new contaminants.
Consequently, with a well-established separation process, distillation can separate and purify bio-
oil, and several researchers have attempted to upgrade bio-oil using distillation. Choi et al. [18] used
suction simple distillation to evaluated the composition and properties of crude bio-oil from brown
algae. Tao et al. [19] thought that a multi-step distillation separation could help solve the bio-oil
heterogeneity problem. Huang et al. [20] used a fluidized bed reactor to perform hydrothermal process
and liquid - liquid extraction of rice husks, and they examined at the effects of the different parameters
on product distributions. Nonetheless, to the best of authors knowledge, most research focus on
percentage and product quality in relative temperature ranges, with just a few complete investigations
on bio-oil distillation products and characteristic outside a range of temperatures. To the best of the
authors’ knowledge, such a upgrading process is still unexplored in the available literature. Therefore,
the aim of this to evaluated the effect of distillation temperature (96, 97, 98, 99, and 100 °C) on the
products distribution and bio-oil characteristic produced from coconut shell. Hence, the thorough
investigation of coconut shell bio-oil distillation would be beneficial not only for environmental
mitigation but also for producing bioenergy and value-added chemicals and providing a more profound
understanding for future research and implementation.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Feedstock
The bio-oil feedstock used in this research was produced from slow pyrolysis of coconut shell using
the reactor with 2 kg/h production capacity with the temperature reaction of 500 oC. To avoid unwanted
degradation, the feedstock was stored at 10 °C after filtration. The ultimate analysis of coconut bio-oil
was conducted previously by Thamizhvel et al. [21]. The C contained was 64 %, H (5.1 %), N (2.4
%), O (29 %), and S (0.03 %), respectively. The volatile matter and fixed carbons were 52 wt% and
46 wt%, respectively.
2.2. Distillation process
A lab-scale distillation device was installed (Fig.1).
Fig.1. Photo of distillation equipment
To optimize for the temperature and minimize steam condensation on the inner pipe, a silicone heating
connection was wrapped around the distillation head. Throughout the heating phase, the silicone
heating connection was kept at a constant temperature of 100 °C. In this work, 100 g bio-oil feedstock
was placed in a flask, and the reaction temperature was adjusted at 96, 97, 98, 99, and 100 °C,
respectively. To achieve thorough distillation, the reaction period was set to 2 hours. After collecting
the components and separating them into oil and aqueous phases, these were preserved. Experiments
were carried out twice in order to minimise the errors.
AESAP-2021
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1038 (2022) 012018
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1038/1/012018
3
2.3. Analytical method
The GC-MS analyzer used in this study was pointed out by Amrullah et. al. [22]. The furnace box's
heating technique was to keep it at 40°C for 2 minutes, then raise it to 180 °C at 3 °C/min for 2 minutes,
then to 280 °C for 3 minutes at 10 °C/min. The target compounds were identified and quantified using
standard chemicals and/or the NIST mass spectral library.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Effect of distillation temperature on product distribution
Fig. 2 showed the effect of distillation temperature (96, 97, 98, 99, and 100 oC) on the product
distribution of bio-oil (bio-oil, solid, and gaseous). The temperature is important in supplying the heat
required for biomass decomposition. Temperature changes enhance bio-oil and gaseous yield.
Fig. 2. Effect of temperature on product distributions
Bio-oil increased from 37-50 % by increasing temperature from 96-100 oC. Meanwhile,
increasing the temperature from 96 to 100 oC reduced solid yield from 3 to 1.5 %. These findings
followed with prior research that found that the degradation of volatiles, which thermally decompose
into low molecular weight liquids and gas components as lignocellulosic biomass decomposes, is
connected to a reduction in char yield as temperature rises [23,24].
3.2. GC-MS analysis of distilled bio-oil
This research examined through into effect of temperature distillation on bio-oil characteristics. Table
1 shows the general chemicals identified by GC-MS.
AESAP-2021
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1038 (2022) 012018
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1038/1/012018
4
Table 1. Compound identified in coconut shell bio-oil by GC-MS
No
Compounds name
Formula
Percentage under different distillation
temperature
Group
96 oC
97 oC
98 oC
99 oC
100 oC
1
Acetaldehyde
C₂H₄O
1.66
0.21
n/a
n/a
n/a
Aldehyde
2
Pentalenone
C8H6O
10.95
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Ketone
3
N-ethyl-N-nitroso-
C3H7N3O2
10.75
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Aldehyde
4
2-Butanone
C4H8O
22.19
n/a
0.34
0.38
n/a
Ketone
5
Acetic acid
CH₃COOH
14.06
n/a
46.36
51.8
65.45
Acid
6
Propanoic acid
C₃H₆O₂
4.26
3.21
2.94
3.21
3.01
Acid
7
2-Butenal
C4H6O
0.49
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Butanol
8
Ethanol
C2H5OH
1.89
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Ethanol
9
Butanoic acid
C4H8O2
0.95
n/a
1.12
1.06
n/a
Acid
10
3-Penten-2-one
C5H8O
0.44
n/a
2.19
2.32
n/a
Ketone
11
FURAN
C4H4O
0.53
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Furan
12
1,3-Dioxolan-2-one
C3H4O3
0.74
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Ketone
13
Cyclopentanone
C5H8O
2.93
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Ketone
14
2-Furancarboxaldehyde
C10H8N2O2
10.88
10.43
0.33
n/a
n/a
Furan
15
2-Pentanone
C5H10O
0.26
2.29
2.94
3.59
n/a
Ketone
16
2-Cyclopenten-1-one
C5H6O
1.27
1.18
0.43
1.81
0.95
Ketone
17
Ethanone
C5H8O
1.26
1.47
0.72
0.28
n/a
Ethanol
18
Phenol
C6H6O
13.85
36.27
38.34
34.74
27.82
Phenol
19
2,3-Dimethyl-2-cyclopenten-
C7H10O
0.24
0.36
0.36
0.28
n/a
Ketone
20
2-Methoxy-4-methylphenol
C8H10O2
0.41
0.85
0.85
0.51
n/a
Phenol
From table above showed that the main compounds were acetic acid, propanoic acid, 2-
Cyclopenten and phenol. Meanwhile, butanoic acid, 3-penten-2-one, 2-Furancarboxaldehyde, 2-
Pentanone, 2,3-Dimethyl-2-cyclopenten, and 2-Methoxy-4-methylphenol were obtained as a side-
products of ketone and phenolic compounds. In this study, acetic acid was the most prevalent
component in the bio-oil product. When the temperature was elevated, the output of acetic acid
increased from 14 to 65 (wt%), showing that lignin and hemicelluloses were degraded to create acetic
acid [25,26]. The decomposition of lignin can generate not even just acid but also phenol. According
to Zhang et al. (2012), thermal decomposition of lignin generates phenol in two steps: firstly, lignin
decomposes into different phenolics; secondly, phenol compounds undergo decarboxylation,
demethylation, and other phenol reactions to produced phenol [27].
4. Conclusion
The characteristics and distribution of compounds during the distillation process of bio-oil are
examined in this study. Based on functional groups, the compounds in the fraction were divided into
7 chemical groups: aldehyde, ketone, acid, butanol, ethanol, furan, and phenol. The maximum bio-oil
yield of 50% was obtained at 100 ° C. The bio-oil phase has a phenol content of up to 38 %. The
oxidation of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin to produce phenol, which is the major component of
bio-oil, could explain the observed behaviors.
AESAP-2021
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1038 (2022) 012018
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1038/1/012018
5
5. Acknowledgement
The present study was supported by Mechanical Engineering Department, Lambung Mangkurat
University, Banjarmasin, Indonesia.
6. References
[1] Chen D, Liu D, Zhang H, Chen Y, Li Q. 2015 Fuel 148:79–86.
[2] Li W, Dang Q, Brown RC, Laird D, Wright MM. 2017 Bioresour Technol 241:959–68.
[3] Martínez JD, Veses A, Mastral AM, Murillo R, Navarro M V., Puy N, et al. 2014 Fuel Process
Technol 119:263–71.
[4] Amrullah A, Farobie O, Pramono GP. 2022 Korean J Chem Eng 39:389–97.
[5] Farobie O, Matsumura Y, Syaftika N, Amrullah A, Hartulistiyoso E, et al. Y. 2021. Bioresour.
Technol. Rep. 16: 100844.
[6] Xue J, Dou G, Ziade E, Goldfarb JL. 2017 Energy Convers Manag 142:143–52.
[7] Farobie O, Changkiandee P, Inoue S, Inoue T, Kawai Y, et al. 2017. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 56:
6401–6407
[8] Zhang XS, Yang GX, Jiang H, Liu WJ, Ding HS. 2013 Sci Rep 3:1–7.
[9] Pérez-Cisneros ES, Mena-Espino X, Rodríguez-López V, Sales-Cruz M, Viveros-García T,
Lobo-Oehmichen R. 2016 Comput Chem Eng 91:233–46.
[10] Farobie O, Amrullah A, Bayu A, Syaftika N, Hartulistiyoso E, et al. 2022. RSC Advances.
12(16):9567-9578.
[11] Saber M, Nakhshiniev B, Yoshikawa K. 2016 Renew Sustain Energy Rev 58:918–30.
[12] Khosravanipour Mostafazadeh A, Solomatnikova O, Drogui P, Tyagi RD. 2018 Biomass
Conversion and Biorefinery 8:13399.
[13] Tumbalam Gooty A, Li D, Briens C, Berruti F. 2014 Sep Purif Technol 124:81–8.
[14] Kim JS. 2015 Bioresour Technol 178:90–8.
[15] Mujahid R, Riaz A, Insyani R, Kim J. 2020 Fuel 262:116628.
[16] Wang S, Zhou H, Feng T, Wu R, Sun X, Guan N, et al. 2014 Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 24:248–
55.
[17] Guzelciftci B, Park KB, Kim JS. 2020 Energy 200:117536.
[18] Choi JH, Kim SS, Woo HC. 2017 J Ind Eng Chem 51:206–15.
[19] Tao J, Li C, Li J, Yan B, Chen G, Cheng Z, et al. 2020 Fuel Process Technol 202:106366.
[20] Huang AN, Hsu CP, Hou BR, Kuo HP. 2018 Powder Technol 323:588–93.
[21] Thamizhvel R, Suryavarman K, Velmurugan V, Sethuraman N. 2021 Mater Today Proc 05.350.
[22] Amrullah A, Farobie O, Widyanto R. 2021 Bioresour Technol Reports 13:100642.
[23] Amrullah, A.; Farobie, O., Bayu, A., Syaftika N., Hartulistiyoso E, et al. 2022. Sustainability. 14
(6), 3233.
[24] Chandra S, Bhattacharya J. 2019 J Clean Prod 215:1123–39.
[25] Sjöberg G, Nilsson SI, Persson T, Karlsson P. 2004 Soil Biol Biochem 36:1761–8.
[26] Rony AH, Kong L, Lu W, Dejam M, Adidharma H, Gasem KAM, et al. 2019 Bioresour Technol
284:466–73.
[27] Zhang M, Resende FLP, Moutsoglou A, Raynie DE. 2012 J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 98:65–71.