ArticlePublisher preview available

Promoting Pride but Missing the Need for Preparation for Bias: Racial-Ethnic Socialization Among Indian American Families Living in the Southeast U.S.

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Indian Americans are an under researched population within the racial-ethnic socialization (RES) literature, and very little is known about how Indian American immigrant families navigate these conversations. To fill this gap in the literature, the present study explored parent and youth perspectives of RES processes in Indian American families. A total of six focus groups were conducted with 13 adolescents (mean age = 13.6; 60% girls) and 15 parents (mean age = 42.0; 62% mothers). Inductive thematic analysis of focus group transcripts revealed that cultural socialization and the lack of preparation for bias were the most salient RES messages Indian American parents provided their adolescents. Parents’ messages related to cultural socialization heavily centered on cultural and ethnic pride. These pride messages were often consistent with the model minority stereotype. Despite many parents and adolescents reporting experiencing discrimination, parents typically refrained from providing preparation for bias messages. Parents’ perspectives also revealed a shared difficulty in discerning when an event was racially discriminatory. When parents did provide coping with discrimination messages, these messages most often encouraged adolescents to simply “avoid it” or “ignore it.” Consequently, adolescents reported feeling ill-prepared to face racial-ethnic discrimination, indicating an unmet need for timely and helpful preparation for bias messages.
Promoting Pride but Missing the Need for Preparation for Bias:
Racial-Ethnic Socialization Among Indian American Families
Living in the Southeast U.S.
Puja Patel
1
, Michelle Y. Martin Romero
1
, Gabriela Livas Stein
1
, and Vaishali Raval
2
1
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro
2
Department of Psychology, Miami University
Indian Americans are an under researched population within the racial-ethnic socialization (RES) literature,
and very little is known about how Indian American immigrant families navigate these conversations. To ll
this gap in the literature, the present study explored parent and youth perspectives of RES processes in
Indian American families. A total of six focus groups were conducted with 13 adolescents (mean age =13.6;
60% girls) and 15 parents (mean age =42.0; 62% mothers). Inductive thematic analysis of focus group
transcripts revealed that cultural socialization and the lack of preparation for bias were the most salient RES
messages Indian American parents provided their adolescents. Parentsmessages related to cultural
socialization heavily centered on cultural and ethnic pride. These pride messages were often consistent
with the model minority stereotype. Despite many parents and adolescents reporting experiencing
discrimination, parents typically refrained from providing preparation for bias messages. Parentsper-
spectives also revealed a shared difculty in discerning when an event was racially discriminatory. When
parents did provide coping with discrimination messages, these messages most often encouraged adoles-
cents to simply avoid itor ignore it.Consequently, adolescents reported feeling ill-prepared to face
racial-ethnic discrimination, indicating an unmet need for timely and helpful preparation for bias messages.
What is the public signicance of this article?
Very little is known about how Indian American immigrant families navigate conversations around
racism and discrimination. Along with identifying several facets of racial-ethnic socialization (RES)
messages, the study highlights the discrepancy between possible reservations held by the parents and the
need for RES messages voiced by the adolescents. These ndings call attention to the complexity and
importance of further studying RES within Indian American communities.
Keywords: racial-ethnic socialization, Indian American, model minority, preparation for bias
In the U.S., minoritized parents (i.e., parents experiencing mar-
ginalization because of historical and contemporary racism;
Gillborn, 2005) are faced with raising their youth in the context
of racism and discrimination. To help youth thrive in this context,
parents engage in racial-ethnic socialization (RES) whereby parents
provide their children with messages aimed at fostering a sense of
pride in their group as well as how to cope with racism and racial-
ethnic discrimination (Priest et al., 2014). These messages focus
both on the transmission of cultural messages due to shared lan-
guage, values, traditions, and norms within an ethnic group (i.e., a
group of people that share cultural heritage) as well as messages
about racialized experiences (i.e., discrimination and racism) due to
shared phenotypic characteristics (Hughes et al., 2006). As such, we
use the umbrella term RES to refer to both cultural messages and
messages about racialized experiences. Furthermore, because it is
difcult to disentangle racial and ethnic socialization messages in
the lived experiences of immigrant groups (Umaña-Taylor & Hill,
2020), throughout this article, we will refer to racial-ethnic messages
and racial-ethnic discrimination. Although minoritized families
around the globe engage in RES processes due to increased migra-
tion (Pew Research Center, 2020), the bulk of research on RES
processes has described the experiences of African American and
Black families in the U.S. leaving room for work describing these
processes in other groups (Priest et al., 2014).
For Asian American populations in the U.S., these conversations
are critical as a recent Pew study found that 39% of Asian adults in
the U.S. report racial-ethnic discrimination, but little is known about
how families prepare their youth to navigate these experiences
(Juang et al., 2017). As such, there has been increased attention
to Asian American parental RES processes. Yet, South Asian voices
(e.g., Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Sri Lankan, Nepal, Bhutan,
Maldives, and Afghanistan) are largely missing among extant
literature (Juang et al., 2017). This is surprising as Indian Americans
make up the second-largest Asian American group in the U.S.
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
This article was published Online First June 16, 2022.
Puja Patel https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8201-7743
Giant Steps Grant from University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Puja
Patel, Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at
Greensboro, 296 Eberhart Building, Greensboro, NC 27412, United
States. Email: pppatel2@uncg.edu
Asian American Journal of Psychology
© 2022 American Psychological Association 2023, Vol. 14, No. 3, 250261
ISSN: 1948-1985 https://doi.org/10.1037/aap0000296
250
... Research concerning the ethnic-racial socialization of these two generational groups suggests that 1st-generation AIA parents place more emphasis on their children's connection with Indian culture and less emphasis on preparation for racism, encouraging a nonconfrontational approach to racism (Daga & Raval, 2018;Inman et al., 2015;Patel et al., 2023;Tummala-Narra et al., 2024). To maintain consistency and continuity within one's cultural heritage, both 1.5-and 2nd-generation AIAs are encouraged to engage in their cultural heritage and maintain Asian Indian values (e.g., close family times, engaging with people from their own communities) over White American values (e.g., independence, dating; Inman et al., 1999Inman et al., , 2001. ...
... Yet, research with AIAs demonstrates that this characterization diminishes the complexity of social position and identity based in racial ambiguity and coloniality, including the influence of immigration and acculturation dynamics across generations, within a xenophobic and racist society. For instance, the "model minority myth" has been equated to success for AIAs when, in fact, there is clear research evidence that this myth has created significant mental health issues and barriers to help for this community (Daga & Raval, 2018;Mudambi, 2019;Patel et al., 2023). What is considered as healthy adjustment needs to be contextualized at the intersection of access (privilege) and inequities (oppression) and with consideration of immigrant waves and generations. ...
... Clinicians should also explore how clients' ethnic-racial identity may have transformed across time and context. When considering the tendency to internalize the model minority stereotype and avoid discussions about race and racism within AIA communities, we encourage clinicians to inquire with their clients about early life and present-day experiences of pre-and postmigration contexts, including sociocultural socialization, stereotyping and racism (Daga & Raval, 2018;Inman et al., 2015;Patel et al., 2023;Tummala-Narra et al., 2024). Given the negative consequences of racism on health and identity, clinicians need to validate the negative effects of racism on clients' lives, especially as most people do not identify racism as a potential source of sustained emotional distress. ...
Article
Full-text available
Identity formation among immigrant communities, particularly for ethnic–racial minorities like Asian Indian Americans, is a multifaceted process. Shaped by preimmigration histories of British colonization and the caste system and the Indian diasporic postimmigration, experiences of physical and psychological displacement alongside racism in the United States contribute to the complexity of identity for this community. Although existing racial and ethnic identity models offer valuable frameworks, they may not fully capture the nuanced in-between spaces created by the intersectionality of ethnicity and race for Asian Indian Americans in the United States. Drawing from psychological critical race theory (CRT), Asian CRT, DesiCRT, and colonial mentality framework, this article proposes a unique identity model tailored to Asian Indian American experiences. Drawing from recent research, the model illuminates the dynamics of pre- and postimmigrant frictions in the negotiations and coping inherent in Asian Indian American identity formation. By using a multidimensional lens that captures tensions between ethnic identities based in sociopolitical histories and dominant societal categorizations and racism in the United States, this model aims to provide a more comprehensive and strength-based understanding of Asian Indian American identity development across the lifespan of multiple generations.
... Thus, for this study we used a RES scale designed specifically for Asian American families that included more targeted assessment of cultural heritage maintenance (e.g., cooking Asian food, using "ethnic" media), preparation for bias, and experiences of race-based discrimination (Juang et al., 2016). The RES scale also includes an additional subscale that measures parents' minimization of race, a construct that has been documented with qualitative data (Patel et al., 2023;Wang et al., 2022;Young et al., 2021) but less systematically included in survey studies. ...
... While research examining links between experiences of racial discrimination and cultural maintenance is limited, a sample of immigrant Chinese mothers who experienced more racial discrimination was shown to pass along fewer cultural pride messages to their children (Hagelskamp & Hughes, 2014). Further evidence indicates that among a sample of immigrant Indian American parents with adolescents, parents primarily relied on cultural pride messages, regardless of prior experiences of racial discrimination (Patel et al., 2023). In sum, while the association between parents' experiences of racial discrimination and cultural maintenance practices is less clear, research suggests that more frequent experiences of racial discrimination may push parents to engage in conversations to raise awareness of discrimination with their children and minimize race less. ...
... Firstgeneration Asian American parents (i.e., immigrants) may have a strong sense of REI having lived in their heritage country and consequently engage in high levels of cultural heritage maintenance (Anderson et al., 2015;Atkin & Yoo, 2021). Whereas some studies found that first-generation parents have trouble recognizing racial discrimination in the United States and may avoid talking about racism with their children (Gonzalez et al., 2022;Patel et al., 2023), other evidence suggests that parents may transmit more preparation for bias messages to their children after they experience racial discrimination (e.g., Hagelskamp & Hughes, 2014). In contrast, with less direct access to cultural knowledge, there may be more variation in second + generation parents' (i.e., U.S.-born) sense of REI, and they may feel less capable of engaging in cultural heritage maintenance (Juang et al., 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic and resurgence of overt anti-Asian racism have prompted many Asian American parents to grapple with ways to discuss race and ethnicity with their children. Racial–ethnic socialization (RES) has been shown to have promotive and protective influences on Asian American adolescents’ adjustment but remains understudied among Asian American families with younger children. This study examined parent (i.e., racial–ethnic identity [REI], experiences of discrimination) predictors of RES among Asian American families with preadolescent-aged children and moderation by parental generational status. Method: We surveyed a sample of 404 Asian American parents (Mage = 38.4, SD = 7.0; 66% female) with 6- to 12-year-olds (Mage = 8.9, SD = 2.0; 56% boys). Results: Findings revealed that parents with higher levels of REI centrality were more likely to report engaging in cultural maintenance practices and those with higher levels of REI private regard were less likely to minimize race. Parents’ experiences of racial discrimination were also associated with more frequent cultural maintenance practices and discussions of anti-Asian discrimination. Tests for moderation by parental generational status indicated that the positive association between experiences of racial discrimination and discussions of anti-Asian discrimination was stronger among first-generation than second+ generation parents. Conclusion: Findings highlight that among Asian American parents of preadolescent-aged children, RES approaches and practices are nuanced and differentially responsive to parents’ views of their own REI, their experiences of racial discrimination, and by generational status.
... Some studies documented other ERS strategies in AAPI families, such as egalitarianism (French et al., 2013;Kiang et al., 2022;Kim, Hunt, et al., 2023;Patel et al., 2022), pluralism Kim, Hunt, et al., 2023;Ren et al., 2022), minimization of race (Keum et al., 2023;Kiang et al., 2022;Kim, Hunt, et al., 2023), exposure to diversity (Alvarez et al., 2006;Park, 2020;Tian, 2023), avoidance of race talk (Keum et al., 2023), becoming American ( Two studies evaluated profiles of ERS. Using the MY-Soc, Atkin and Ahn (2022) identified profiles among Asian ...
... Three studies linked perceptions of children's risk for discrimination to ERS. Patel et al. (2022) found that if Indian American parents felt their child was unlikely to experience discrimination, even if they themselves experienced discrimination, they avoided preparation for bias. Waters and Kasinitz (2010) found the opposite: Chinese parents who perceived a high risk of discrimination engaged in greater preparation for bias. ...
... They attributed their parents' perspectives to their parents' own discrimination experiences, homogeneous ethnic social networks, especially among immigrants, and uncritical consumption of both mainstream and ethnic media. Patel (2022) found that Indian American parents' internalization of the model minority myth was associated with greater cultural socialization. Tian (2023) found that parents' desire to expose their child to diversity depended on their perspectives of other ethnic-racial groups which, in turn, was related to social class. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study systematically reviewed the literature on ethnic‐racial socialization (ERS) in mono‐racial Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) families in the United States. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we examined what is known about (1) ERS strategies used, (2) child and parent factors related to ERS, and (3) the relation of ERS to child outcomes in mono‐racial AAPI families. We included peer‐reviewed, original studies published between January 2002 and August 2023, abstracted in Sociological Abstracts, PubMed, and/or PsychINFO, and focused on ERS in AAPI families. Fifty‐eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The reviewed studies show that mono‐racial AAPI families engage in ERS, but parents' messages tend to focus on positive aspects of ethnicity‐race (e.g., ethnic pride) and avoid negative aspects (e.g., discrimination). However, due to the COVID‐19 pandemic and Black Lives Matter, parents are increasingly willing to address the negative aspects of ethnicity‐race, including racism and anti‐racism, to prepare their children for a racialized society. ERS is related to AAPI child identity, psycho‐social outcomes, ethnic‐racial attitudes and experiences, and other outcomes but in a variety of contingent ways. We identify gaps in the literature and recommend future research on ERS in AAPI families.
... Prior research suggests that Asian American parents more often engage in conversations about heritage culture with less emphasis on racial issues (e.g., inequities and discrimination) than parents of other racial minority groups (Juang et al., 2017;Patel et al., 2023). This may be influenced by factors like immigrant generation status, pre-migration and post-migration messages about race, personal experiences with racism, and sociocultural contexts (Hughes et al., 2016;Juang et al., 2018;Kim et al., 2024;Tummala-Narra et al., 2024). ...
... It is well known that Asian American families are socializing their children, particularly culturally, but not so much racially compared to their Black and Latinx counterparts (Ayón et al., 2020;Simon, 2021). While research indicates that Asian American parents are hesitant about bringing up negative aspects such as inequities and discrimination (Ahn et al., 2022;Patel et al., 2023), the context of Covid-19 has contributed to a shift in racial discussions for Asian American families (Kiang et al., 2021;. Knowing well and doing well maybe two different commands, especially for Asian Americans whose values conflict with what the social-racial terrain necessitates. ...
Article
Full-text available
While Asian American parents are key contributors in racially socializing their children, past research indicates that issues of race are not frequently discussed among Asian American families. Moreover, there is limited research on how Asian American parents' sociocultural factors predict the amount and ways they talk about race to their children. We conducted latent profile analyses among 150 Asian American parents' (Mage = 42.36, range = 26–65 years) racial discussions, and the profiles' association with parents' sociocultural factors (i.e., enculturation, acculturation, internalized racism, collectivism, and loss of face) were examined. Four distinct profiles were identified with distinct levels of awareness of discrimination, avoidance of outgroups, minimization of race, and promotion of equality messages. Findings underscore the importance of Asian American parents engaging in nuanced racial discussions with their children, highlighting the need for culturally responsive interventions, educational programs, and policy initiatives to support families in navigating complex racial landscapes and fostering positive youth outcomes.
Article
Although many parents worry that their child will be the target of racial profiling, there is a dearth of literature on how parental worries about children facing racism are linked to racial socialization (RS) practices and youth internalizing symptoms. Additionally, it is unclear how RS content relative to competency may uniquely influence whether and how parental worries influence youth internalizing outcomes. Using data from 203 Black parents ( M age = 44.099, 68% mothers) of adolescents, the current study examines the direct effects of parental worries on RS content (cultural socialization, preparation for bias, and promotion of mistrust) and competency (confidence, skills, general stress, and call to action stress) on youth internalizing outcomes, as well as whether RS content and competency indirectly links parental worries about racial profiling with youth internalizing symptoms. Parental worries were positively related to greater RS content across domains and child internalizing symptoms, but there were no indirect links. Parents' worries about racial profiling were positively associated with more call to action stress, general stress, and youth internalizing symptoms. RS confidence and general stress were associated with fewer and greater internalizing symptoms, but there were similarly no significant indirect effects. Findings speak to supporting and addressing parental stress in the context of family racial worries and child adjustment and have implications for policy efforts to dismantle racism and fund programs that support youth and caregivers in managing the ongoing consequences of this insidious stressor.
Preprint
Our review, situated within the context of the United States, explores how societal forces shape youths’ racial socialization processes. Specifically, we explore how youth learn beliefs about race through interactions with their environment, how these processes affect youths’ engagement with race in multiple contexts, and how they contribute to the perpetuation and dismantling of racial inequality. First, we discuss key psychological theories that inform our understanding of racial socialization. Second, we discuss how families, peers, media, and environmental cues shape racial socialization processes. Finally, we discuss interventions to enhance racial socialization and offer directions for future psychological research to advance our understanding of both racial and broader socialization processes in the U.S. and internationally.
Article
There is a dearth of knowledge in the coping literature on how minoritized youth cope with racism‐related stressors and the predictors of effective coping responses. This two‐wave study examined the direct and indirect effects of ethnic‐racial socialization on depressive and anxiety symptoms via proactive coping with discrimination in a community sample of 135 Latinx adolescents ( M age = 16, SD = 1.27; 59% female). Results indicate that cultural socialization was related to higher use of proactive coping with discrimination 6 months later, which in turn, was related to fewer depressive and anxiety symptoms. There were no direct or indirect effects between preparation for bias and mental health outcomes.
Article
Immigrants currently account for close to 14% of the United States’ population with one in four children growing up in an immigrant household. Yet, little is known about how immigrant parents and their adolescents dialogue about race and ethnicity within the evolving sociopolitical environment. Traditionally, the adolescents’ role in racial-ethnic socialization (RES) has been conceptualized as receivers of messages around race and ethnicity from their parents. However, differential rates at which adolescents and parents acculturate to the mainstream society could lead the adolescent to possess a more contemporary understanding of the social and racial landscape in the United States, thereby becoming the “deliverer” of messages on racial socialization rather being just a “receiver.” To inform our understanding of the potential process of how adolescents might be positioned to socialize their parents on race/ethnicity, this paper integrates key aspects of RES, racial-ethnic identity, and critical consciousness among Latinx and Asian immigrant adolescents to inform a conceptual model of adolescent-directed RES. The current conceptual model highlights several important avenues for future research to empirically assess individual and familial factors associated with adolescent-directed RES.
Chapter
Full-text available
Racial socialization research emerged in opposition to the corpus of theories and studies that failed to include youth of color in research conceptualization and research designs. Informed by 12 years of observational research, I present the Theory of Racial Socialization in Action (TRSA). I present a conceptual framework for the TRSA and describe the evidence that undergirds its four theoretical assumptions. This chapter also describes the ways the TRSA complements and extends both foundational and newer theories in racial socialization theory. This chapter also describes the development of the Racial Socialization Observational Task and Coding System (RSOTCS), a measurement tool designed to assess observed race-related communication for use with African American adolescents and their families. This chapter concludes with a discussion of the applications of the TRSA and the RSOTCS to families of different racial-ethnic backgrounds. Suggestions for adapting the RSOTCS for use with families of different racial-ethnic backgrounds are provided in this chapter.KeywordsRacial socializationTheoryAdolescentsParentingAfrican American familiesZone of proximal developmentObservational methods
Article
Full-text available
Drawing on Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory (1977), this study examined the antecedents and outcomes of internalized model minority myth (MMM) within the microsystem of family and the macrosystem of culture. Among Korean immigrant families, we examined how mothers' internalized MMM (i.e., achievement orientation, unrestricted mobility) and youth's cultural orientations (i.e., acculturation, enculturation) were related to youth's internalized MMM and had direct and indirect relations to youth outcomes (i.e., life satisfaction, depression, antisocial behaviors, and academic performance). In a sample of 334 Korean immigrant mother-youth dyads (155 female youth; 132 foreign-born youth; Mage of youth = 16.37; Mage of mothers = 46.94), we conducted a path analysis by using the maximum likelihood and bootstrapping methods. A path analysis revealed mothers' achievement orientation was indirectly related to youth's academic performance via youth's beliefs in unrestricted mobility. In general, mothers' internalized MMM had harmful relationships to youth's depression and antisocial behaviors versus mixed relationships to academic performance. Importantly, mothers' internalized MMM indicated greater direct and indirect associations with youth outcomes than youth's own internalized MMM. A follow-up analysis of moderated mediation ruled out the possibility that academic performance moderated the relations of youth's internalized MMM and outcomes and thus masked any significant associations. Overall, the current findings highlighted the importance of understanding the internalized MMM within the microsystem of the close-knit Korean immigrant family relations. Implications for research, family intervention, parent education and outreach were discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Asian Americans are the fastest growing U.S. immigrant group, projected to become the largest immigrant group by 2065, but the quantity of research on Asian Americans' health has not mirrored changing demographics. Asian Americans have been understudied for more than 25 years, with only 0.17% of National Institutes of Health (NIH) expenditures allocated to projects including Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander populations (Ðoàn et al., 2019). This disproportionality may result in part from the model minority stereotype (MMS) being extended to health, perpetuating the ideas that Asian Americans are well-positioned with regard to health status and that associated research is not essential. Accordingly, the aims for this article are threefold: (a) bring attention to the inadequate representation of the Asian American population in health-related science, (b) question the MMS in health, and (c) outline potential pathways through which the MMS limits what is knowable on Asian American health issues and needs. We discuss the limited meaningfulness of nonrepresentative aggregated statistics purporting the model minority image and provide counterexamples. We also present a stereotype-constraints model with the MMS contributing to a bottleneck for Asian American health-related knowledge, accompanied by present-day circumstances (e.g., sparse data, few psychologists/behavioral medicine scientists focused on Asian American health). We conclude with initial recommendations for addressing MMS-associated constraints in psychology and more broadly. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Article
Full-text available
This study examines adjustment patterns among a group neglected in developmental science—Asian American students in high-achieving schools. National reports have declared such schools to connote risk for elevated problems among teens. Asian American students are commonly referred to as model minorities, but little is known about adjustment issues within academically competitive settings, specifically. Guided by past research on culturally salient issues, multiple U.S. high schools were examined to (a) determine areas of relative strength versus weakness in adjustment of Asian Americans compared with Whites, and (b) more importantly, to illuminate salient within-group processes related to Asian Americans’ well-being. Risk modifiers examined were perceptions of ethnic discrimination, parent perfectionism, internalized achievement pressure, authenticity in self-presentation, and closeness to school adults. Outcome variables included depression, anxiety, and isolation at school. Results demonstrated that Asian Americans fared better than Whites on anxiety and school isolation, but with low effect sizes. By contrast, they fared more poorly on almost all risk modifiers, with a large effect size on discrimination. Regression results showed that among Asian Americans the most consistent associations, across cohorts and outcomes, were for discrimination and authenticity. Findings underscore the need for greater recognition that discrimination could be inimical for students not typically thought of as vulnerable—Asian Americans in high-achieving schools; these issues are especially pressing in light of increased racism following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Results also suggest that feelings of inauthenticity could be a marker of generalized vulnerability to internalizing symptoms. Implications for future theory and interventions are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Social science researchers often define filial piety as a set of norms, values, and practices regarding how children should behave toward their parents. In this article, we trace the conceptual development of filial piety research in Chinese and other societies to highlight the assumptions underlying this traditional approach to filial piety research. We identify the limitations of these assumptions, including the problem of an evolving definition and lack of cross-cultural applicability. We then advocate an alternative framework that overcomes these limitations by focusing on the deep structure of filial piety: the dual filial piety model (DFPM). The DFPM applies the concept of contextualized personality to reconceptualize filial piety in terms of authoritarian and reciprocal psychological motivations particular to the parent-child context. Because the focus is on a universal psychological mechanism rather than cultural norms, values, and behavior, the DFPM may be applied for investigation of filial piety at individual, social, and cultural levels within and across various societies. We discuss application of the DFPM in relation to existing filial piety and intergenerational relations research from several societies and conclude with a comparison to other recent proposals for measuring Chinese filial piety.
Article
Full-text available
Learning how to conduct qualitative research may seem daunting for those new to the task, especially given the paradigm ’s emphasis on complexity and emergent design. Although there are guidelines in the literature, each project is unique and ultimately the individual researcher must determine how best to proceed . Reflexivity is thus considered essential, potentially facilitating understanding of both the phenomenon under study and the research process itself . Drawing upon the contents of a reflective journal, the author provides an inside view of a first project, making connections between theory and practice. This personal narrative highlights the value of reflexivity both during and after a study, and may help to demystify the research process for those new to the field.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives: The current study contributes to the field’s limited knowledge about the sociopolitical consequences of internalized Model Minority Myth (MMM) among Asian Americans. In particular, we examine how the MMM serves as a legitimizing ideology, in which the perpetuation of beliefs about society as fair ultimately maintain racial inequality. Methods: Using path analysis with 251 Asian American college students, we tested a model linking internalized MMM (i.e., attitudes towards Asian Americans as achievement oriented and as having unrestricted mobility, compared to other racial minorities) to anti-Black attitudes and opposition to affirmative action for Black Americans. We examined direct effects of internalized MMM on such outcomes, as well as indirect effects through other legitimizing ideologies, including just world beliefs and racial colorblindness. Results: Findings demonstrated that greater levels of internalized MMM among Asian American college students predicted greater anti-Black attitudes and opposition to affirmative action. Greater internalized MMM achievement orientation and unrestricted mobility also directly predicted greater just world beliefs and colorblindness. Results from our test of indirect effects showed that internalized MMM achievement orientation and unrestricted mobility both indirectly predicted opposition to affirmative action through colorblindness, and unrestricted mobility also indirectly predicted anti-Black attitudes through colorblindness. Also, achievement orientation and unrestricted mobility indirectly predicted anti-Black attitudes through just world beliefs. Conclusions: Our findings have implications for research and practice that promotes awareness of and seeks to challenge the MMM, anti-Blackness, and beliefs about affirmative action among Asian Americans.
Article
Full-text available
The ongoing Covid-19 outbreak has brought increased incidents of racism, discrimination, and violence against “Asians,” particularly in the United States, with reports of hate crimes of over 100 per day. Since January 2020, many Asian Americans have reported suffering racial slurs, wrongful workplace termination, being spat on, physical violence, extreme physical distancing, etc., as media and government officials increasingly stigmatize and blame Asians for the spread of Covid-19. The links with social media are increasingly evident, as anti-Asian sentiment increases, with reports of anti-Asian sentiment spreading and Asian-Americans fighting hate via social media. Using integrated threat theory, this study explores the links between prejudice/hate toward Asians-Americans, in particular Chinese, and social media use. Three key results emerged from the study. First, the more a social media user believes their most used daily social media is fair, accurate, presents the facts, and is concerned about the public (social media believe), the more likely that user is to believe Chinese pose a realistic and symbolic threat to America. Second, men and women significantly differed on each type of prejudice, with men scoring higher on intergroup anxiety and women higher on symbolic and realistic threat. Third, respondents who do not use social media on a daily basis are less likely than those who use Facebook to perceive Chinese as a symbolic threat. Implications and recommendations for practitioners, health workers and government are proposed.
Article
Racial-ethnic inequity is deeply entrenched in U.S. social systems, yet adolescents’ voices and understanding around inequity are not often directly examined. The current qualitative study uses focus group data from African American ( n = 21), Chinese- ( n = 17), Indian- ( n = 13), and Mexican- ( n = 17) origin adolescents ( M age = 12.93 years; SD = 1.23; 51% boys) to provide insight on how youth navigate their attitudes and beliefs about these issues. Using a racial-ethnic socialization lens, we explore proximal (e.g., parents, peers, teachers) and distal (e.g., media, society) ways in which adolescents come to understand racial-ethnic inequity. Three themes characterized adolescents’ discussions. School diversity, of peers and of thought, and messages around egalitarianism were two prominent influences on their perceptions. A third theme related to perceptions of social hierarchies, which appeared to be shaped by stereotypes, peer interactions, and ideas about inequity itself. Emergent themes suggest that the school context is a particularly salient social setting that encompasses multiple sources of socialization (e.g., teachers, classmates, academics, climate), and parents, peers, and the media also play prominent roles.