Content uploaded by Hanadi Alrashdan
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Hanadi Alrashdan on Jun 08, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal of Educational
and Psychological Sciences
Volume (6), Issue (17) : 30 Apr 2022
P: 41 - 60
ISSN: 2522-3399
617
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26389/AJSRP.D210921
ps://www.ajsrp.comhttAvailable at:
The Dialogue Method in Small Groups and Its Impact on The Achievement of
Primary School Students From the teachers' point of view in schools in
northern Palestine
Nadia Hassan Ghalia
The Arab Academic College for Education || Haifa || Palestine
Ahlam Mahmood Darawsheh
Sakhnin Academic College || Palestine
Hanadi Sodqi Alrashdan
Faculty of Educational Sciences || Jadara University || Jordan
Abstract: This study aimed to identify the effect of the dialogue method in small groups on the achievement of primary
school students. The study targeted a community of primary school teachers in northern Palestine, and the sample includes
approximately (70-100) male and female teachers, whom are selected according to the available sample. The data has been
processed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), where the tests included descriptive statistics; t-test for
independent samples, one way Anova test, simple linear regression test and Cronbach's alpha coefficient.
In order to achieve the objectives of the research, the researchers have used the descriptive survey method by adopting the
form as a data collection tool, whereas the form will consist of; a consent to participate in the study, demographic data of the
participants, as well as the questionnaire’s paragraphs and fields, which will be evaluated according to the five-point Likert
scale.
The study resulted to the presence of statistically significant differences between the averages of students' achievement; The
use of the small group dialogue method has a positive effect in teaching, which may show the presence of differences
between students in their academic achievement
Keywords: Dialogue Method, Small Groups, Teaching Methods, The Primary Stage of Education.
SPSS
one way anova
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
"
-
-
.
-
o
.
-
o
-
o
-
o
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Spss
-
- Arauz & wells,2006
25
25
48
48
27
27
48
.594
.000
.544
.000
.537
.000
.559
.000
.605
.000
.607
.000
.620
.000
.641
.000
.509
.000
.540
.000
.673
.000
.591
.000
.517
.000
.700
.000
.529
.000
.656
.000
.581
.000
.629
.000
.618
.000
.630
.000
.564
.000
.554
.000
.540
.000
.603
.000
.487
.000
.589
.000
.657
.000
.575
.000
.512
.000
.560
.000
.573
.000
.428
.000
.580
.000
.709
.000
.559
.000
.583
.000
.575
.000
.691
.000
.630
.000
.604
.000
Covid-19
Spss
One Way ANOVA
Independent Sample t-test
4.5400
.61002
4.5600
.57419
4.3300
.71145
4.3800
.74914
4.1400
.75237
3.8900
.85156
4.2800
.73964
4.3000
.68902
4.2700
.73656
4.4700
.65836
4.3700
.77401
4.2100
.70058
4.2800
.77954
4.1700
.75284
4.4000
.72474
4.3060
.41086
4.4700
3.8900
4.0400
.90921
4.3000
.74536
4.5000
.67420
4.3200
.82731
4.3200
.72307
4.4100
.71202
4.4700
.75819
4.2900
.75605
4.3600
.74563
4.3200
.80252
4.1300
.76085
4.3800
.76251
4.4100
.75338
4.6800
.60101
4.6200
.61595
4.3700
.44529
4.6800
4.0400
4.4400
.76963
4.5400
.68785
4.4900
.61126
4.4300
.63968
4.2900
.76930
4.4000
.66667
4.1800
.75719
4.3200
.77694
4.1700
.77921
4.2500
.82112
4.3510
.43426
4.3510
4.3060
.41086
4.3700
.44529
4.3510
.43426
4.3423
.38508
4.3060
4.3700
4.3510
4.3423
α≤0.05
T.test
69
4.3459
1.457
.148
31
4.2172
69
4.3923
.744
.458
31
4.3204
69
4.3623
.387
.699
31
4.3258
69
4.3668
.949
.345
31
4.2878
α
.148
.458
.699
.345α
α
α≥0.05
One Way Anova
F
.137
2
.069
.402
.670
16.575
97
.171
.780
2
.390
2.006
.140
18.850
97
.194
.261
2
.130
.687
.505
18.409
97
.190
.337
2
.169
1.141
.324
14.343
97
.148
α
.670
.140
.505
.324α
α
α≥0.05
ANOVA
One Way Anova
F
.080
2
.040
.233
.792
16.632
97
.171
.029
2
.015
.072
.930
19.601
97
.202
.096
2
.048
.251
.779
18.574
97
.191
.023
2
.012
.078
.925
14.657
97
.151
α
.792
.930
.779
.925α
α
α
.
.
. .
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
-
- https:
//institute.global/sites/default/files/inline-files/IGC_Essentials%20of%20Dialogue_Arabic_0.pdf
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Explosion Box
-
- Sort Card
-
- Arauz, Rebeca and Wells, Gordon, Dialogue in the Classroom, Journal of Learning Sciences, 2006, 15
(3),379-428.
- University of Cambridge, Faculty of Education, Research, Research Programmes, Dialogic, https:
//www.educ.cam.ac.uk/research/programmes/dialogic/whatis.html, Last visited on 15th March 2020.