ArticlePublisher preview available

Publisher Correction: Situational factors shape moral judgements in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample

Authors:
Bence Bago at Toulouse School of Economics
Bence Bago
Marton Kovacs
Marton Kovacs
John Protzko at Central Connecticut State University
John Protzko
Tamás Nagy at Eötvös Loránd University
Tamás Nagy
Show all 270 authorsHide
Read publisher preview
Download citation
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.
A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Learn more
Content available from Nature Human Behaviour
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
AmEndmEntS
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01403-w
Publisher Correction: Situational factors shape moral judgements in the trolley dilemma
in Eastern, Southern and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample
Bence Bago   , Marton Kovacs   , John Protzko   , Tamas Nagy   , Zoltan Kekecs   , Bence Palfi   , Matus Adamkovic,
Sylwia Adamus   , Sumaya Albalooshi   , Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir   , Ilham N. Alfian, Sinan Alper   ,
Sara Alvarez-Solas   , Sara G. Alves   , Santiago Amaya   , Pia K. Andresen   , Gulnaz Anjum   , Daniel Ansari   ,
Patrícia Arriaga   , John Jamir Benzon R. Aruta   , Alexios Arvanitis   , Peter Babincak   , Krystian Barzykowski   ,
Bana Bashour   , Ernest Baskin   , Luisa Batalha   , Carlota Batres   , Jozef Bavolar   , Fatih Bayrak   ,
Benjamin Becker   , Maja Becker   , Anabel Belaus   , Michał Białek   , Ennio Bilancini   , Daniel Boller,
Leonardo Boncinelli   , Jordane Boudesseul   , Benjamin T. Brown, Erin M. Buchanan   , Muhammad M. Butt   ,
Dustin P. Calvillo   , Nate C. Carnes   , Jared B. Celniker   , Christopher R. Chartier   , William J. Chopik   ,
Poom Chotikavan, Hu Chuan-Peng   , Rockwell F. Clancy   , Ogeday Çoker   , Rita C. Correia   , Vera Cubela Adoric   ,
Carmelo P. Cubillas   , Stefan Czoschke   , Yalda Daryani   , Job A. M. de Grefte   , Wieteke C. de Vries   ,
Elif G. Demirag Burak   , Carina Dias, Barnaby J. W. Dixson   , Xinkai Du   , Francesca Dumančić   ,
Andrei Dumbravă   , Natalia B. Dutra   , Janina Enachescu, Celia Esteban-Serna   , Luis Eudave   ,
Thomas R. Evans   , Gilad Feldman   , Fatima M. Felisberti, Susann Fiedler, Andrej Findor   , Alexandra Fleischmann   ,
Francesco Foroni   , Radka Francová, Darius-Aurel Frank   , Cynthia H. Y. Fu   , Shan Gao   , Omid Ghasemi   ,
Ali-Reza Ghazi-Noori, Maliki E. Ghossainy   , Isabella Giammusso   , Tripat Gill   , Biljana Gjoneska   ,
Mario Gollwitzer   , Aurélien Graton   , Maurice Grinberg   , Agata Groyecka-Bernard, Elizabeth A. Harris,
Andree Hartanto, Widad A. N. M. Hassan, Javad Hatami, Katrina R. Heimark   , Jasper J. J. Hidding   ,
Evgeniya Hristova   , Matej Hruška   , Charlotte A. Hudson   , Richard Huskey   , Ayumi Ikeda   , Yoel Inbar   ,
Gordon P. D. Ingram   , Ozan Isler   , Chris Isloi   , Aishwarya Iyer, Bastian Jaeger   , Steve M. J. Janssen   ,
William Jiménez-Leal   , Biljana Jokić   , Pavol Kačmár   , Veselina Kadreva, Gwenaël Kaminski   ,
Farzan Karimi-Malekabadi   , Arno T. A. Kasper   , Keith M. Kendrick   , Bradley J. Kennedy   , Halil E. Kocalar   ,
Rabia I. Kodapanakkal   , Marta Kowal   , Elliott Kruse   , Lenka Kučerová, Anton Kühberger   , Anna O. Kuzminska   ,
Fanny Lalot   , Claus Lamm   , Joris Lammers   , Elke B. Lange   , Anthony Lantian   , Ivy Y.-M. Lau   ,
Ljiljana B. Lazarevic   , Marijke C. Leliveld   , Jennifer N. Lenz, Carmel A. Levitan   , Savannah C. Lewis, Manyu Li   ,
Yansong Li   , Haozheng Li, Tiago J. S. Lima   , Samuel Lins   , Marco Tullio Liuzza   , Paula Lopes, Jackson G. Lu   ,
Trent Lynds   , Martin Máčel   , Sean P. Mackinnon   , Madhavilatha Maganti   , Zoe Magraw-Mickelson   ,
Leon F. Magson, Harry Manley   , Gabriela M. Marcu   , Darja Masli Seršić, Celine-Justine Matibag,
Alan D. A. Mattiassi   , Mahdi Mazidi   , Joseph P. McFall   , Neil McLatchie   , Michael C. Mensink   ,
Lena Miketta   , Taciano L. Milfont   , Alberto Mirisola   , Michal Misiak   , Panagiotis Mitkidis   ,
Mehrad Moeini-Jazani   , Arash Monajem   , David Moreau   , Erica D. Musser   , Erita Narhetali   ,
Danielle P. Ochoa   , Jerome Olsen   , Nicholas C. Owsley   , Asil A. Özdoğru   , Miriam Panning,
Marietta Papadatou-Pastou   , Neha Parashar   , Philip Pärnamets   , Mariola Paruzel-Czachura   ,
Michal Parzuchowski   , Julia V. Paterlini   , Jerey M. Pavlacic   , Mehmet Peker   , Kim Peters   ,
Liudmila Piatnitckaia   , Isabel Pinto, Monica Renee Policarpio   , Nada Pop-Jordanova   , Annas J. Pratama,
Maximilian A. Primbs   , Ekaterina Pronizius   , Danka Purić   , Elisa Puvia, Vahid Qamari   , Kun Qian   ,
Alain Quiamzade, Beáta Ráczová   , Diego A. Reinero   , Ulf-Dietrich Reips   , Cecilia Reyna   , Kimberly Reynolds   ,
Matheus F. F. Ribeiro   , Jan P. Röer   , Robert M. Ross   , Petros Roussos   , Fernando Ruiz-Dodobara   ,
Susana Ruiz-Fernandez   , Bastiaan T. Rutjens   , Katarzyna Rybus   , Adil Samekin, Anabela C. Santos   ,
Nicolas Say   , Christoph Schild, Kathleen Schmidt   , Karolina A. Ścigała, MohammadHasan Sharifian   , Jiaxin Shi   ,
Yaoxi Shi   , Erin Sievers, Miroslav Sirota   , Michael Slipenkyj, Çağlar Solak   , Agnieszka Sorokowska   ,
Piotr Sorokowski, Sinem Söylemez   , Niklas K. Steens   , Ian D. Stephen   , Anni Sternisko   , Laura Stevens-Wilson,
Suzanne L. K. Stewart   , Stefan Stieger   , Daniel Storage   , Justine Strube, Kyle J. Susa, Raluca D. Szekely-Copîndean   ,
Natalia M. Szostak   , Bagus Takwin   , Srinivasan Tatachari   , Andrew G. Thomas   , Kevin E. Tiede   , Lucas E. Tiong,
Mirjana Tonković   , Bastien Trémolière   , Lauren V. Tunstead, Belgüzar N. Türkan   , Mathias Twardawski   ,
Miguel A. Vadillo   , Zahir Vally   , Leigh Ann Vaughn   , Bruno Verschuere   , Denis Vlašiček   , Martin Voracek   ,
Marek A. Vranka   , Shuzhen Wang, Skye-Loren West, Stephen Whyte, Leigh S. Wilton   , Anna Wlodarczyk   ,
Xue Wu   , Fei Xin, Su Yadanar, Hiroshi Yama   , Yuki Yamada   , Onurcan Yilmaz   , Sangsuk Yoon   ,
Danielle M. Young   , Ilya Zakharov   , Rizqy A. Zein   , Ingo Zettler   , Iris L. Žeželj   , Don C. Zhang   , Jin Zhang,
Xiaoxiao Zheng, Rink Hoekstra    and Balazs Aczel   
Nature HumaN BeHaviour | VOL 6 | JUNE 2022 | 897–898 | www.nature.com/nathumbehav 897
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
Moral foundations of pro-choice and pro-life women
Article
Full-text available
  • Jun 2023
  • CURR PSYCHOL
Opinions on abortion are more polarized than opinions on most other moral issues. Why are some people pro-choice and some pro-life? Religious and political preferences play a role here, but pro-choice and pro-life people may also differ in other aspects. In the current preregistered study (N = 479), we investigated how pro-choice women differ in their moral foundations from pro-life women. When the Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ) was applied (i.e., when declared moral principles were measured), pro-life women scored higher than pro-choice women in loyalty, authority, and purity. However, when women were asked about moral judgments indirectly via more real-life problems from the Moral Foundations Vignettes (MFV), pro-choice women scored higher than pro-life women in emotional and physical care and liberty but lower in loyalty. When we additionally controlled for religious practice and political views, we found no differences between groups in declaring moral foundations (MFQ). However, in the case of real-life moral judgments (MFV), we observed higher care, fairness, and liberty among pro-choice and higher authority and purity among pro-life. Our results show intriguing nuances between women pro-choice and pro-life as we found a different pattern of moral foundations in those groups depending on whether we measured their declared abstract moral principles or moral judgment about real-life situations. We also showed how religious practice and political views might play a role in such differences. We conclude that attitudes to abortion “go beyond” abstract moral principles, and the real-life context matters in moral judgments. Graphical abstract
View
Registered report: Social face evaluation: ethnicity-specific differences in the judgement of trustworthiness of faces and facial parts
Article
Full-text available
  • Oct 2022
Social face evaluation is a common and consequential element of everyday life based on the judgement of trustworthiness. However, the particular facial regions that guide such trustworthiness judgements are largely unknown. It is also unclear whether different facial regions are consistently utilized to guide judgments for different ethnic groups, and whether previous exposure to specific ethnicities in one’s social environment has an influence on trustworthiness judgements made from faces or facial regions. This registered report addressed these questions through a global online survey study that recruited Asian, Black, Latino, and White raters (N = 4580). Raters were shown full faces and specific parts of the face for an ethnically diverse, sex-balanced set of 32 targets and rated targets’ trustworthiness. Multilevel modelling showed that in forming trustworthiness judgements, raters relied most strongly on the eyes (with no substantial information loss vis-à-vis full faces). Corroborating ingroup–outgroup effects, raters rated faces and facial parts of targets with whom they shared their ethnicity, sex, or eye color as significantly more trustworthy. Exposure to ethnic groups in raters’ social environment predicted trustworthiness ratings of other ethnic groups in nuanced ways. That is, raters from the ambient ethnic majority provided slightly higher trustworthiness ratings for stimuli of their own ethnicity compared to minority ethnicities. In contrast, raters from an ambient ethnic minority (e.g., immigrants) provided substantially lower trustworthiness ratings for stimuli of the ethnic majority. Taken together, the current study provides a new window into the psychological processes underlying social face evaluation and its cultural generalizability. Protocol registration The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 7 January 2022. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.18319244.
View
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.