ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

Marine protected areas (MPAs) are widely used tools to conserve marine ecosystems and their services. They are complex socio-ecological systems where human activities and nature interact. Croatia has 409 protected areas, of which 19 are coastal-marine. The aim of this paper is to analyze the management model of MPAs in Croatia and to identify their strengths and weaknesses. For this purpose, three MPAs have been chosen: Brijuni National Park, Telašćica Nature Park, and Pakleni Islands Significant Landscape. The methodology used assesses 26 specific indicators to analyze the status of 4 key factors: management body, planning subprocess, public participation, and implementation subprocess. The results of this evaluation are 5 possible scenarios: proactive (1), learning (2), interactive (3), centralized (4), and formal (5) management. The results show that Brijuni presents a proactive scenario (1), Telašćica an interactive scenario (3), and Pakleni Islands a centralized scenario (4). A series of measures are presented, which can improve the score. In general, MPA management in Croatia tends towards a proactive model, where the management body is its greatest strength. There is a shift from a top-down to a bottom-up approach, which implies a greater involvement of the population in decision-making. However, public participation is not yet fully consolidated.
Diversity2022,14,448.https://doi.org/10.3390/d14060448www.mdpi.com/journal/diversity
Article
MarineProtectedAreasManagementintheMediterranean
Sea—TheCaseofCroatia
MaríaMaestro
1,
*,JuanAdolfoChicaRuiz
1
,ZvjezdanaPopovićPerković
2
andMaríaLuisaPérezCayeiro
1
1
FacultyofMarineandEnvironmentalSciences,UniversityofCadiz,11510PuertoReal,Spain;
adolfo.chica@uca.es(J.A.C.R.);isa.perez@uca.es(M.L.P.C.)
2
UniversityDepartmentofMarineStudies,UniversityofSplit,21000Split,Croatia;
zvjezdana.popovic@unist.hr
*Correspondence:maria.maestro@uca.es
Abstract:Marineprotectedareas(MPAs)arewidelyusedtoolstoconservemarineecosystemsand
theirservices.Theyarecomplexsocioecologicalsystemswherehumanactivitiesandnatureinter
act.Croatiahas409protectedareas,ofwhich19arecoastalmarine.Theaimofthispaperistoana
lyzethemanagementmodelofMPAsinCroatiaandtoidentifytheirstrengthsandweaknesses.For
thispurpose,threeMPAshavebeenchosen:BrijuniNationalPark,TelašćicaNaturePark,and
PakleniIslandsSignificantLandscape.Themethodologyusedassesses26specificindicatorstoan
alyzethestatusof4keyfactors:managementbody,planningsubprocess,publicparticipation,and
implementationsubprocess.Theresultsofthisevaluationare5possiblescenarios:proactive(1),
learning(2),interactive(3),centralized(4),andformal(5)management.Theresultsshowthat
Brijunipresentsaproactivescenario(1),Telašćicaaninteractivescenario(3),andPakleniIslandsa
centralizedscenario(4).Aseriesofmeasuresarepresented,whichcanimprovethescore.Ingeneral,
MPAmanagementinCroatiatendstowardsaproactivemodel,wherethemanagementbodyisits
greateststrength.Thereisashiftfromatopdowntoabottomupapproach,whichimpliesagreater
involvementofthepopulationindecisionmaking.However,publicparticipationisnotyetfully
consolidated.
Keywords:assessment;Croatia;management;marineprotectedarea;publicparticipation
1.Introduction
Marineprotectedareas(MPAs)arewidelyusedtoolstoconservemarineecosystems
andtheirservices.Theyarefoundworldwide[1]andhaveproventobeasuccessfulman
agementinstrumenttoconservebiodiversity[2–4],beingcriticalforhumanwellbeing
[5,6]andprovidingnumerousbenefitstosociety,especiallyrelatedtorecreationandtour
ism[7,8].Inrecentyears,theyhaveevolvedfromapristinemodel,wherenohumanpres
encewasallowed,toanecosystemapproach,wherethesocialpartisequallyimportant
asthephysical–naturalone[9–15].
Nowadays,MPAsarecomplexsocioecologicalsystemsinwhichhumanactivities
andnatureinteract.Theyaretypicallyfoundincoastalorcoastalmarineareas,which
havehistoricallybeenusedbyfishermenandindigenouspeople[16–18].Infact,only
1.18%ofMPAsarefoundininternationalwaters[19].Thismeansthattheircreationand
managementdirectlyaffecttheactivitiesandbehaviorofpopulationslivingalongthe
coast,makingitnecessarytoreconciletheuseandexploitationofresourceswithconser
vation.
MPAscanhavedifferentdegreesofprotectionand/oruseofsitesandtheirresources.
Generally,benefitsforlocalcommunitiesandgeneralpopulation,andforbiodiversity,
tendtobegreaterasthedegreeofprotectionincreases[20–22].However,resultsarenot
alwaysobviousorimmediate.Sometimes,localpeoplearelimitedintheiraccessto
Citation:Maestro,M.;ChicaRuiz,
J
.A.;PerkovićPopović,Z.;
PérezCayeiro,M.L.Marine
ProtectedAreasManagementinthe
MediterraneanSea—TheCaseof
Croatia.Diversity2022,14,448.
https://doi.org/10.3390/d14060448
AcademicEditors:MichaelWink
andCharalamposDimitriadis
Received:12May2022
Accepted:31May2022
Published:2June2022
Publisher’sNote:MDPIstaysneu
tralwithregardtojurisdictional
claimsinpublishedmapsandinstitu
tionalaffiliations.
Copyright:©2022bytheauthors.Li
censeeMDPI,Basel,Switzerland.
Thisarticleisanopenaccessarticle
distributedunderthetermsandcon
ditionsoftheCreativeCommonsAt
tribution(CCBY)license(https://cre
ativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Diversity2022,14,4482of24
resourcesafterdeclaration,andthiscanleadtoconflictorlackofsupportandrespectfor
regulations[23].Nonetheless,MPAsarefundamentaltotheeconomicandsocialwell
beingofthepopulation.
Therefore,conservationofecosystemsandtheirresourcesmustbeaddressedto
getherwiththecommunitiesthatusethesespaces.Infact,severalauthorsconsidersocial
acceptanceasthemainindicatortomeasurethesuccessofanMPA[24–27].Nowadays,
notonlyistheinclusionofthepopulationintheuseandenjoymentofresourcesbeing
contemplated,butthereisanincreasingtrendtowardsaparticipatorymanagement
model,inwhichsocietyhasthetoolstoinfluencedecisionmaking[11,28].
AnothernotableproblemisthatmanyofthecurrentMPAsdonothavemanagement
plansandarenotbeingadequatelymanaged[9].Sometimes,theonlyprotectiontheyre
ceiveisdesignationasaprotectedarea,butwithoutappropriatehumanandfinancialre
sources,biodiversityconservationisnotensured.Thisleadstopoormanagementand,in
theworstcases,tosocalled“paperparks”,i.e.,areasthathavebeendesignatedaspro
tected,butinpracticereceivenomanagementatall[29–31].Appropriatemanagement
thatisadaptiveandensuresthesustainableandequitableuseofecosystemsandtheir
servicesisneeded.
Forallthesereasons,theimprovementofmanagementandthedevelopmentofdif
ferenttoolstohelpmanagerstoexerciseamoreparticipativemanagementandtomonitor
progressarebeingpromoted.Toanalyzehowmanagementactionsandcomponentsare
doing,andtoidentifystrengthsandweaknesses,amanagementassessmentisaveryuse
fulelement.Numerousframeworksconsiderthisasanintegralstepbecauseitmakesit
possibletoreceivefeedbackthatfacilitatesdecisionmakinganderrorcorrection[32,33].
Itdoesnotonlymeanobservingproblemsbutalsoidentifyingandanalyzingthoseas
pectsthatarebeingdonewell,inordertoprovidethenecessaryinformationfordecision
makingbyareamanagers[34].Differentmethodologiesexisttoevaluatemanagement
[35–43].However,thereisalackofinternalanalysisofthemanagementbodyitselfand
oftheMPAmanagementmodel.
Croatiaisextremelyrichintermsoflandscapeandfavorableclimateandhasagreat
biologicaldiversity.Ithas409protectedareas,ofwhich19arecoastalmarine.Thesystem
ofprotectedareasnationallydesignatedcoversapproximately1.04%ofthesea,although
theCroatianpartoftheNatura2000networkincludes8.79%ofthemarinearea[44].The
NatureProtectionActensurestheconservationofthenaturalenvironment.Itprovides
forninecategoriesofprotectedareasthatcorrespond,asfaraspossible,tooneofthe
internationallyrecognizedIUCNcategories.Nationalandnatureparksaredesignatedby
theParliament,strictandspecialreservesbytheGovernment,andtheothercategoriesby
thecountyassembliesandtheZagrebCityAssembly.ThisActprovidesforpublicpartic
ipationandaccesstodesignationacts[45].ProtectedareasaremanagedbyPublicInstitu
tions,whosemainfunctionistheprotection,maintenance,andpromotionofprotected
areas,andmonitoringcompliancewithregulations.
TheaimofthepaperistoanalyzethemanagementmodelofMPAsinCroatiaandto
identifystrengthsandweaknesses.Forthispurpose,threeMPAswithdifferentprotection
statuseshavebeenchosen:BrijuniNationalPark,TelašćicaNaturePark(bothmanagedat
nationallevel)andPakleniIslands(significantlandscapemanagedbySplitDalmatia
County)(Figure1a).Thesethreecasesstudiesaccountfor2.48%ofCroatia’sprotected
coastalandmarinearea.
Diversity2022,14,4483of24
(a)(b)
(c)(d)
Figure1.(a)MapofCroatiashowingthelocationofthethreestudyareas:(b)MapofBrijuniNa
tionalPark;(c)MapofTelašćicaNaturePark;(d)MapofPakleniIslandsSignificantLandscape.
2.MaterialsandMethods
2.1.StudyAreas
2.1.1.BrijuniNationalPark
BrijuniNationalPark(Figure1b)consistsof14islands,islets,andcliffslocatedalong
thewesterncoastofIstria.Itwasdeclaredanationalparkandmemorialsiteon1Novem
ber1983bytheNationalParksActandtheBrijuniMemorialSite.Ithasalmost47kmof
coastlineandis3395.0ha,ofwhich2651.7aremarine[46].Itwasdeclaredthankstoits
geomorphological–hydrological,climatic,andlandscapecharacteristics,togetherwiththe
flora,fauna,anditsuniqueculturalheritage.In2021,itwasawardedtheBlueParkprize
forachievingthehighestscientificstandardsofmarinelifeprotectionandmanagement.
AswithallnationalparksinCroatia,commercialfishingaroundBrijuniisprohibited.
Therearenopopulationcentersinthenationalpark.Assomeislandsareveryclosetothe
mainlandandlocalpeoplehavealwaysenjoyedtherighttofish,todaythePublicInstitu
tionstillissuespermitforrecreationalfishingaroundtwoislands.However,thereissig
nificantpressureonfishstocksinandbeyondtheboundariesofthePark,andtheestab
lishmentofabufferzonearoundthecurrentparkboundariesisunderconsideration.
2.1.2.TelašćicaNaturePark
TelašćicaNaturePark(Figure1c)wasdesignatedassuchin1988withtheseparation
fromKornatiNationalPark,ofwhichitwasapartoffrom1980to1988.Telašćicaobtained
thestatusofaprotectedareathankstoitsfaunaandflora,geologicalandgeomorpholog
icalphenomena,diverseseabedcommunities,andarchaeologicalheritage.Threebasic
unitsrepresentthefundamentalcharacteristicsofthisarea:thebayofTelašćica,thecliffs
ofDugiOtok,andthesaltlake“Mir”.Thetotalareaofthenatureparkis70.50km2,with
25.95km2inDugiOtokandtheislets,and44.55km2inthesea[47].
Diversity2022,14,4484of24
OnLongIslandthereare2873inhabitants(accordingtotheCensusofPopulation,
HouseholdsandDwellings.RepublicofCroatia:CentralBureauofStatistics,2011).The
populationworksintourism,agriculture,orfishing,althoughasurveyconductedin2010
revealedpublicconcernaboutthestateoffishstocks.Respondentspointedoutthatthere
havebeenchangesinthecommunityduetotheemigrationofyoungpeoplefromthe
islandandreducedqualityoflifeduetoinabilitytofindemploymentandinsufficient
culturaloffer[48].
FishingactivitiesinNatureParksinCroatiaareregulatedthroughtheFisheriesAct
withnodifferencesinsizeandtypeoffishinggearoutsideandinsideprotectedareas.
OnlyrecreationalfishinghasbeenregulatedsinceJuly2018.Specific(morerestricted)
regulationsarejustabouttobedevelopedandadopted.
2.1.3.PakleniIslandsSignificantLandscape
PakleniIslands(Figure1d)areanarchipelagoof19islandsandisletsdeclared“sig
nificantlandscape”in1968fortheircomplexgeographyof634.38ha.Theunderwater
environmentssurroundingtheislandsarepartoftheEuropeanecologicalnetwork
Natura2000andwerechosenwiththeaimofpreservingPosidoniaoceanicabeads,reefs
withestablishedalgalandcoralbiocenoses,infralittoralsands,mudflats,andsandflats
notcoveredbyseawateratlowtideandseacaves.Theyaremanagedbythe“MoreiKrš”
Institution,undertheCountyofSplitDalmatia.
Onthenearestinhabitedisland,Hvar,thereare11,077inhabitants,whileonthe
largerisland,Sv.Klement,therearethreevillagesthatareonlyoccasionallyinhabited
[49].Tourismisoneofthemainsourcesofincomeforthecommunities.Manyareengaged
inagriculture,animalhusbandry,orfishing.
2.2.Methodology
ThemethodologyusedtoanalyzethemanagementofPakleniIslands,TelašćicaNa
turePark,andBrijuniNationalParkhasbeenappliedbeforeinAzoresMarinePark[50]
andinthreenationalparksofCostaRica[51].Ithasasocialperspectivethatisbasedon
theanalysisoftwofundamentalelements:processesandpeopleinvolved.Thestepstobe
takenareasfollows.
2.2.1.Step1.SelectionofKeyManagementAspects
Fourmanagementaspectswereidentifiedaskey.Keyaspectsarethoseofatransver
salnaturethatalsoencompassdifferentelements.Theseare:managementbody,planning
subprocess,publicparticipation,andimplementationsubprocess.Basedonthemethod
ologiesdevelopedbytheWorldDatabaseofProtectedAreas(WDPA),thesefouraspects
havebeenchosenbecause,inafirstapproach,weaimtocoverthewholeprocessofplan
ningandexecution,andthepeopleinvolvedinthemanagement:themanagersandstake
holders.
2.2.2.Step2.IdentificationofSpecificIndicators
Aseriesofspecificindicatorswereselectedforeachaspect.Anindicatorisaspecific,
observable,andmeasurablecharacteristicthatcanbeusedtoshowthestatusofanaspect
ofmanagement.Inthiscase,indicatorsareinquestionformat.Thisresultedin26indica
tors(Table1),whichwerechosenbasedontheliteraturereviewedandonourexpertcri
teria.Someofthemweredevelopedbytheauthors,whileotherswereadaptedfromother
methodologies.Table2showsthegeneralthemesthatweredrawnfromthesesources.

Diversity2022,14,4485of24
Table1.IndicatorsforMPAmanagementanalysis.
KeyManagement
AspectIndicatorEvaluation
ManagementBody
1.Backgroundofthestaff
1Withoutbasictrainingoreducation.
2Highereducation:onlynaturalsciences.
3Highereducation:multidisciplinaryteam(naturalandsocialsciences)
2.Technicaltrainingofferedtostaff
1No,orsporadically.
2Yes.
3Italsoanticipatesfutureneeds.
3.MPAstaffparticipationintheplanning
processes
1No.
2Sporadic.
3Inallplanningprocesses.
4.MPAstaffhavethenecessaryproceduresto
participateintheplanningprocesses
1No.
2Ithassomeprocedures,sometimesinsufficient.
3Yes.
5.Cooperationwithotherinstitutionsatthe
locallevel
1No.
2Notwithallinstitutionsornotonaregularbasis.
3Itexistsonaregularbasiswithallinstitutions.
6.Cooperationwithotherinstitutionsatthe
regionallevel
1No.
2Notwithallinstitutionsornotonaregularbasis.
3Itexistsonaregularbasiswithallinstitutions.
7.Cooperationwithotherinstitutionsatthe
internationallevel
1No.
2Notonaregularbasis.
3Itexistsonaregularbasis,withalargenumberofinstitutions.
8.Collaborationandexchangeofknowledge
withotherinternationalprojects/programs
1No.
2Notonaregularbasis.
3Itexistsonaregularbasis,withalargenumberofprojects/programs.
Planningsubprocess
9.Managementplan
1No.
2Notimplemented,oronlypartiallyimplemented.
3Itexists,isupdated,isfullyimplemented,andhasanestablished
scheduleforregularreviewsandupdates.
10.Strategiesandmanagementmeasures
identifiedwiththemanagementobjectives
1Theydonotexistorarenotrelatedtotheobjectives.
2Theyexistpartlyinrelationtotheobjectives.
3Theyexistandarecompletelyidentifiedwiththeobjectives.
11.OperationalPlan
1No.
2Partiallyimplemented.
3Fullyimplemented.
12.Ecosystemdiagnosiscarriedoutpriorto
thedevelopmentofthemanagementplan
1No.
2Notavailabletointerestedparties.
3Yes,anditispublishedoravailable.
13.TheMPAintegratedintoanMPA
network
1No.
2Itisintheprocessofbeingintegrated.
3Yes.
PublicParticipation
14.Publicparticipationintheprocessof
developingthemanagementplan
1Therewasorisnomanagementplan.
2Yes.
3Yes,atallstagesofthedevelopmentofthemanagementplanand
participationisforeseenfortheevaluationofthemanagementplan.
15.Representativepublicparticipationinthe
processofdevelopingthemanagementplan
1Therewasnomanagementplan,itwasnotrepresentative,orthereis
nomanagementplan.
2Onlytheprioritygroupswererepresented.
3Bothprimaryandsecondaryuserswererepresented.
16.Socialactorsparticipationinmanagement
decisionmakingorplanningprocesses
1No.
2Throughconsultation
3Interactiveparticipationwithadirectimpactondecisionmaking
17.Collegiatebodyforparticipation
1No.
2Isnotrepresentativeand/ordoesnotfunctionproperly.
3Itexists,itisrepresentative,anditworksproperly.
18.Communicationbetweenstakeholders
andmanagers
1Verylittleornone.
2Notwithinanestablishedprogram.
3Acommunicationprogramsisbeingimplementedtobuild
stakeholdersupportfortheMPA.
Diversity2022,14,4486of24
19.Sustainabilityeducationactivities
1No.
2Sporadically.
3Onaregularbasisandwithwideparticipation.
20.Volunteerorenvironmental
communicationactivities
1No.
2Sporadically.
3Onaregularbasisandwithwideparticipation.
21.MPAinformationavailableto
stakeholdersandthegeneralpublic
1No.
2Partisavailableuponrequesttotheparkmanagement.
3Itisavailableonthewebsite,availabletoanyinterestedparty.
ImplementationSubProcess
22.ZoningoftheMPA
1Itdoesnotexistfortheuseorconservationofresources.
2Itexistsforuseandconservation,butitisonlypartiallyfunctionalor
outdated.
3Itexistsupdated,withmeasuresandconcreteusesforeachzone.
23.Budgetallocatedforthemanagementof
theMPAisadequate
1Thisinformationisnotaccessible.
2
Thebudgetguaranteesthecostsoftheadministrationand
surveillancestaffandthemeansnecessaryformanagement(vehicles,
equipment,fuel,etc.).
3Thebudgetalsoallowsforotherinnovativeactivitiessuchas:
research,development,etc.
24.Monitoringandevaluationofbiophysical,
socioeconomicandgovernanceindicators
1No.
2Itdoesnotfollowastrategyorregularcollectionofresults,whichare
notsystematicallyusedformanagement.
3Thereisagoodsystemofmonitoringandevaluation,whichiswell
implementedandusedinadaptivemanagement.
25.Scientificinformationintegratedinto
MPAmanagement
1No.
2Insomecases.
3ItservestoevaluateandimprovethemanagementoftheMPA.
26.TheMPAconsideredasocioecosystem
1No.
2Thesocialsystemisanimportantfactor,butthenaturalsystemisa
priority.
3Itisconsideredandtakenintoaccountthroughouttheprocess.
Table2.Topicsevaluatedwithindicatorsadaptedfromothermethodologies.
TopicsSources
Trainings[37,38,52]
Planningtools[52]
Managementplans[37–39,52]
Operativeplans[37,38]
Publicparticipation[38,52]
Collegiatebodies[39]
Communication[37–39,52]
Environmentaleducation[38,52]
Volunteer[38]
Information[39]
Budget[38,52]
Monitoring[38,52]
Scientificknowledge[37–39]
2.2.3.Step3.DataCollectionandAssessmentofIndicators:Scorefrom1to3Points
Eachoftheindicatorshasbeenratedonascaleofonetothree,withonebeingthe
mostunfavorablesituationandthreetheoptimum.Althoughusingtheseoptionsisasim
plerepresentation,itcoverstheentirespectrumofresponses,fromanegativeassessment
oftheindicatortoanoptimalsituation,passingthroughanintermediatestate.Thissystem
facilitatesresponsesandfutureproposalsforimprovement.Foreachindicator,eachof
therangeshasbeenspecifiedtoidentifywhat“optimalstate”means.
Torespondtotheindicators,severalsourcesofinformationhavebeenused,primar
ilyinterviewswiththemanagersoftheprotectedareas.Onemanagerwasinterviewedin
BrijuniandPakleni,andthreeinTelašćica.Semistructuredfacetofaceinterviewswere
conductedwithmanagersatthreeparks,alwaysbythesameperson.Thesewerebased
Diversity2022,14,4487of24
onaquestionnairewithopenendedquestions,buttheconversationwasallowedtobring
upnewtopicsorissuesofrelevancetotheinterviewee.Theinformationobtainedfrom
theinterviewsandfieldobservationswascontrastedwiththebibliographicsourcesto
determinethescoreobtainedforeachindicator.Specifically,managementplans,annual
reports,technicaldocuments,projectdocuments,andscientificarticleswereanalyzed.
Fieldobservationsincludedvisitstothefacilitiesoftheparkadministrationandtothe
mostimportantphysical,natural,andculturalsites.Onceallsourceswereanalyzed,the
scoreforeachindicatorwasdetermined.
2.2.4.Step4.DefinitionofFiveManagementScenarios:ExpertCriteria
Onceallindicatorshaveavaluefrom1to3,theaverageiscalculatedtofindouthow
eachofthefourkeyaspectsisvalued.Thedifferentpossibilitiesthatcanbefoundare
considered,dependingonthevaluefrom1to3ofeachoftheaspects.Fromthiscombina
tion,wehaveproposedfivemodelsthatrepresentfiverealities,dependingonfourvari
ableseach(Table3).Theyareorderedfromtheidealsituationtotheleastfavorableas
follows:
Scenario1:Proactivemanagement.Theteamthatmakesupthemanagingbodyis
multidisciplinaryandhighlytrained.Theycollaborateandcooperatewithotherin
stitutions.Participatorymanagementiscarriedoutwhereallstakeholdersarerepre
sented.Itisplannedyearsaheadandpossibleproblemsareanticipated.
Scenario2:Learningmanagement.Allfourelementshavethesameintermediate
value;therefore,theyareinasituationwheretheycouldbeimproved.Themanage
mentbodyismultidisciplinary.Itisplannedforthemediumtermandismanaged
inresponsetopastmistakesandsuccesses.Thereispublicparticipation,butitisnot
fullyrepresentativeorwellconsolidated.
Scenario3:Interactivemanagement.Themanagementresponsibilityfallslargelyon
socialactors.Allstakeholdersarewellrepresentedandhaveappropriateparticipa
tionmechanisms.Planningandimplementationsubprocessesarecarriedouttrans
parentlybytheauthorities.Awarenessishighamongthepopulation.
Scenario4:Centralizedmanagement.Themanagingbodyissoundandmultidisci
plinaryandfunctionscorrectly.Itcanbelongtodifferentscales.Ithasresponsibility,
determinesthemanagementobjectives,anddevelopsandexecutesthemanagement
plan.However,publicparticipationisnotverycommonindecisionmaking.
Scenario5:Formalmanagement.Priorityisgiventoshorttermmanagement.Plan
ningisextremelystatic,publicparticipationindecisionmakingisnotcarriedout,
norarethereevaluationmechanismsorstrategicmediumtolongtermobjectives.
Diversity2022,14,4488of24
Table3.ManagementScenarios.
Typeof
Management
Rating
Figures
Management
Body
PlanningSub
Process
Public
Participation
Implementation
SubProcess
Proactive
3333
Learning
2
222
Interactive*
1,2,3
1,2,331,2,3
Centralized
31,2,31,21,2,3
Diversity2022,14,4489of24
Formal**
1,21,21,21,2
*Interactivemanagementiswherepublicparticipationscoresthehighestbutatleastoneofthe
other3aspectsdoesnothaveascoreof3.**Formalmanagementoccurswithanycombinationof
oneandtwowhenthetotalisnottwo.
Amethodofanalysisandprojectionofrealitythroughtheconstructionofscenarios
wasused,byapplyingalternative(fiveoptions)andcontrasted(canbecompared)scenar
ios[50].Thisisatoolforunderstandingthepotentialandlimitsofmanagement.Thefac
torsthatdefinethesescenarioscanchangeovertime,andthusareimagesofpresent,fu
ture,and/ordesirablesituations[53,54].Therefore,itisaproposalthatallowsustoun
derstandtheevolutionofamanagementmodel.Inaddition,itcanbeseenwhethercertain
specificchanges(inanyoftheindicators)causesignificantchangestothegeneralmodel
ornot.
3.Results
BrijuniNationalParkscored2.9forthemanagementbody,2.8fortheplanningstage,
2.5forpublicparticipation,and2.6fortheimplementationstage.Withtheseresults,the
parkmanagementmodelisconsideredtoresembletheproactivescenario(Figure2a).
TelašćicaNatureParkscored2.9forthemanagementbody,2.6fortheplanningstage,
2.5forpublicparticipation,and2.2fortheimplementationstage.Withtheseresults,the
parkmanagementmodelisincludedintheinteractivescenario(Figure2b).
(a)(b)(c)
Figure2.(a)EvaluationofthemanagementofBrijuniNationalPark;(b)Evaluationofthemanage
mentofTelašćicaNaturePark;(c)EvaluationofthemanagementofPakleniIslandsSignificant
Landscape.
PakleniIslandsscored2.9forthemanagementbody,2fortheplanningstage,2.1for
publicparticipation,and2fortheimplementationstage.Withtheseresults,theparkman
agementmodelfallsintothecentralizedscenario(Figure2c).
Figure3showstheassessmentforeachoftheindicatorsanalyzedinBrijuniNational
Park,TelašćicaNaturePark,andPakleniIslandsSignificantLandscape.Table4shows
somedetailsontheassessmentofeachoftheindicators.
Diversity2022,14,44810of24
Figure3.Assessmentofindicators.
Managementbody
Planningsubprocess
Publicparticipation
Implementationsubprocess
Diversity2022,14,44811of24
Table4.Detailsoftheratinggiventoeachindicator.
Key
Management
Aspect
Indicator
Details
BrijuniTelašćicaPakleniIslands
ManagementBody
1.Backgroundofthe
staff
Boardof5members,
multidisciplinary,
managedbythe
BrijuniNationalPark
PublicInstitution
Boardof5members,
multidisciplinary,
managedbythe
PublicInstitutionof
theTelašćicaNature
Park
Boardof5members,
multidisciplinary,
managedbythe
InstitutionMorei
Krš,underthe
CountyofSplit
Dalmatia
2.Technicaltraining
offeredtostaff
Budgetissetaside,
butthereisnoset
program
Budgetissetaside,
butthereisnoset
program
Budgetissetaside,
butthereisnoset
program
3.MPAstaff
participationinthe
planningprocesses
YesYesYes
4.MPAstaffhavethe
necessaryproceduresto
participateinthe
planningprocesses
YesYesYes
5.Cooperationwith
otherinstitutionsatthe
locallevel
YesYesYes
6.Cooperationwith
otherinstitutionsatthe
regionallevel
YesYesYes
7.Cooperationwith
otherinstitutionsatthe
internationallevel
YesYesYes
8Collaborationand
exchangeofknowledge
withotherinternational
projects/programmes
Yes,itisinvolvedin
manyprojects
Yes,e.g.,
FishMPABlue2Yes
PlanningSubProcess
9.Managementplan
Yes,validfor10years
(2016–2025).Currently
underrevision.In
additiontothisplan,
thedocumentsthat
regulatethe
organization,use,
planning,protection,
andmanagementof
MPAsarethespatial
planandtheinternal
organizationalrules
Yes,validfor10years
(2012–2021).Anew
oneiscurrentlybeing
developed.In
additiontothisplan,
thedocumentsthat
regulatethe
organization,use,
planning,protection,
andmanagementof
MPAsarethespatial
planandtheinternal
organizationalrules
Underdevelopment
Diversity2022,14,44812of24
10.Strategiesand
managementmeasures
identifiedwiththe
managementobjectives
YesYes‐
11.OperationalPlanYesYes
Yes,ithasexercised
thefunctionsofthe
managementplanso
far
12.Ecosystem
diagnosiscarriedout
priortothe
developmentofthe
managementplan
No,butanexternal
analysisofthestateof
ecosystemswas
developed
No
No,butanecosystem
servicesassessment
wasdeveloped
13.TheMPAintegrated
intoanMPAnetwork
Yes,national
(CroMPA)and
international
(MedMPAnet)
Yes,national
(CroMPA)and
international
(MedMPAnet)
Yes,national
(CroMPA)and
international
(MedMPAnet)
PublicParticipation
14.Publicparticipation
intheprocessof
developingthe
managementplan
Yes,participationwas
mainlythroughtwo
workshops,providing
phonenumbersand
emailsforenquiries
andinterviewing
visitors.Thefirstwas
“Objectivesand
activitiesofBrijuni
NationalPark
management”andthe
second“Zoningof
BrijuniNationalPark”
[46]
Yes,itwasthefirst
eventthatincluded
thepopulation.The
implementationof
themanagementplan
iscarriedoutin
cooperationwiththe
SunceAssociation
andtheMedPAN
SouthProject[47]
Yes
15.Representative
publicparticipationin
theprocessof
developingthe
managementplan
YesYesYes
16.Socialactors
participationin
managementdecision
makingorplanning
processes
No
Population
participatesinsome
monitoring
No
Diversity2022,14,44813of24
17.Collegiatebodyfor
participation
No
Forsomespecific
aspects,suchas
fishing.Anetwork
hasbeencreated
betweenfishermen,
thegovernment
(Directorateof
Fisheries),thepark
management,and
WWFAdriatoco
managefisheries.The
networkispartofthe
FishMPABlue2
project
No
18.Communication
betweenstakeholders
andmanagers
Yes,thereisanannual
marketingplan,and
theparkisveryactive
onsocialmedia
Yes,thereisno
communicationplan
inplace,butthepark
isveryactiveon
socialmedia
Thereisno
communicationplan,
butthereisa
telephoneandemail
available,andannual
meetingsareheld
withthepopulation
19.Sustainability
educationactivitiesYesYes
Yes.Someinitiatives
aremobile
applicationsto
identifyinvasive
speciesorillegal
activities
20.Volunteeror
environmental
communication
activities
Yes
Yes,butthereare
areaswheremore
informationpanels
androutesare
needed.An
informationpointis
underconstruction
Yes
21.MPAinformation
availableto
stakeholdersandthe
generalpublic
YesYes
Asitismanagedat
Countylevel,the
websiteandsocial
mediaareshared
withtherestofthe
MoreIKršprotected
areas,and
informationabout
thisparticularareais
morelimitedtothe
public,althoughitis
availableonrequest
Diversity2022,14,44814of24
ImplementationSubProcess
22.ZoningoftheMPA
Yes,butthereisagap
betweenthe
managementplanand
thespatialplan
Yes,butthereareno
powerstomanageit.
Anewinternal
regulationis
currentlybeing
developedthatwill
giveauthoritytothe
park
No.Thereisonlyone
habitatmap.Zoning
isnotmandatoryfor
thisprotection
category
23.Budgetallocatedfor
themanagementofthe
MPAisadequate
Ithassufficient
budgetforbasic
management,butnot
forthefull
implementationof
projectsandallthe
necessarystaff.Ithas
attractedattentionfor
itssustainable
financingstrategy,
whichincludesa
concessionprogram
fortourismactivities
thatwasusedto
achieveconservation
objectives.TheSARS
CoVpandemichas
significantlyaffected
theCroatianeconomy
Ithassufficient
budgetforbasic
management,butnot
forthefull
implementationof
projectsandallthe
necessarystaff.The
SARSCoVpandemic
hasconsiderably
affectedtheCroatian
economy
Ithassufficient
budgetforbasic
management,butnot
forthefull
implementationof
projectsandallthe
necessarystaff.The
SARSCoVpandemic
hasconsiderably
affectedtheCroatian
economy
24.Monitoringand
evaluationof
biophysical,socio
economic,and
governanceindicators
Whenthereare
projects.Biophysical
andsociocultural
indicators
Whenthereare
projects.Biophysical
indicators
Whenthereare
projects.Biophysical
indicators
25.Scientific
informationintegrated
intoMPAmanagement
Yes.Severaldatabases
havebeencreated,for
exampleoneon
marinehabitats,
culturalheritagesites
fromprehistorictimes
tothe20thcentury,
andgeological–
paleontologicalsites
ofinterest
Forexample,the
analysisofmetal
concentrationsin
waterisservingasa
basisfordelimiting
thecarryingcapacity
ofanchoredvessels
andisabouttobe
determinedonland
[47].Adatabaseon
thefishingsituation
inthemarinepartof
theparkwouldbe
needed,whichis
planned
Yes
26.TheMPA
consideredasocio
ecosystem
YesInprocessInprocess
Diversity2022,14,44815of24
4.Discussion
Allparkshavealmostthehighestscore(2.9)forthemanagementbody,showingthat
itisoneofthegreateststrengthsoftheCroatianprotectedareasystem.Thisissimilarin
otherEuropeancountries,suchasFranceandtheUK[55].AppropriatetrainingofMPA
managersortechniciansshouldbemultidisciplinary.InCroatia,eachparkhasaManage
mentBoard,whichisresponsibleforadoptingthemanagementplanandannualplans,
drawingupafinancialplanandmanagingtheaccounts[46].Inaddition,ithasanexpert
service,withspecializeduniversitytraining,whichadvisestheBoardinmakingdecisions
thathaveadirectimpactonthebiophysicalsystems.Therefore,theparkshaveamulti
disciplinaryteamthatallowsthemtoapproachmanagementwithanecosystemap
proach,whichisnecessarytoreconciletheprotectionofecosystemsandtheirservices
withtheeconomicdevelopmentoflocalpopulations[56,57].
Thereisnodoubtthatcapacitybuildingisfundamentaltosuccessfullyaddressing
managementofprotectedspaces.VanderMolen[58]arguesthatconflictresolutionand
workingtowardsasustainablerelationshipbetweenenvironmentandsocietyisamulti
facetedprocessthatencompassesdifferentformsofcapacitybuilding.ThethreeMPAs
provideforstafftrainingbasedoncurrentprioritiesandspecificneeds.However,thereis
noestablishedtrainingplanassuch,andtheresponsibilityandinitiativeliewiththeem
ployeehimself/herself.Nevertheless,ananalysisoftheannualreportsshowsahighlevel
ofstaffinvolvement,asmanymultidisciplinarycoursesareheldeachyear.Atthemore
operationallevels,thereiscompulsorytrainingtoenablethemtocarryoutcertainactivi
ties.Theabsenceofaregulatedtrainingprogramisashortcomingobservedinother
MPAsaroundtheworld,suchasCostaRica[51],eventhoughtheymanagetheirresources
adequately.
IntheMediterranean,MPAsaregenerallyunderstaffed(Brijuniisanexception)or
havestaffwithnoexperienceinmanagement,conservation,andplanning[59],making
capacitybuildingprogramsveryuseful.DiCarloetal.[59]identified250trainingoppor
tunitiesrelatedorapplicabletoMPAmanagementintheMediterranean,providedover
thepastfiveyearsby51nationalandinternationalorganizations.Ofthese,onlyfourwere
extensivecoursescoveringthefullrangeofmanagementtopics.Mostofthemareone
timecoursesanddonotbelongtoanyregulartrainingprogram.Withafewexceptions,
onlyonlinecoursesareavailableonacontinuousbasisandcanbetakenatanytime.How
ever,MPAstaffmaychange(newstaffjoiningandrequiringtraining)orfaceemerging
problemsandneeds,somechanismsneedtobeputinplacetoensurethatknowledge
remainswiththemanagingbodyandMPAstaffandiscontinuouslyupdated.Examples
ofwaystoovercomethisproblemarethecreationoflearningnetworks,supportteams,
oracoregroupoftrainers.
Cooperationwithotherlevelsofadministrationandevenwithotherinternational
agenciesandbodiesshouldbehighlighted.Theseincludenationalandinternationaluni
versitiestoresearchinstitutesandlocalassociations.ProjectssuchasMedPanSouthPro
ject,whichsupportedthecreationofBrijuniandTelašćicamanagementplans,standout.
Brijuni,beinganationalpark,isinvolvedinalargenumberofprojects.Thisbroadcollab
orationisaverypositivefactor,asitiskeytotheimplementationofmarinepolicies[60]
andfosterspublicawarenessandsupportforprotection.Increasingly,MPAmanagement
ismovingtowardsinterdisciplinarity.
Itisclearthatgoodmanagementrequirestheadoptionofclearobjectivesandgov
ernancesystems,theallocationofadequateandappropriateresources,andtheimplemen
tationofmanagementstrategiesandprocesses[61].Moreeffortneedstobedevotedto
planningforthefutureandplanningandimplementingcurrentactivities[62].Benefits
derivedfromMPAsarerelatedtothedesign,thenumberofresources,thedegreeofpro
tectionprovidedthroughfairgovernanceandeffectivemanagement,andthescaleat
whichitworks[63].Brijuniscorednearthehighestscoreintheplanningstage,demon
stratingthatthisprotectioncategory(nationalpark)iscommittedtoshort,medium,and
longtermplanningformarineenvironment.ThemanagementplansforBrijuniand
Diversity2022,14,44816of24
Telašćicaarealmostfullycompliedwith.InPakleniIslandsthemanagementplanisinthe
processofdevelopmentand,sofar,theannualoperationalplanhasexercisedthefunc
tionsofthemanagementplan.However,theimplementationoftheactivitiesofthethree
parkshasbeenreducedduetotheSARSCoVpandemic.Thishasoccurredinmanycoun
tries,includingBrazil,CostaRica,Namibia,Ecuador,Indonesia,Canada,theUnited
States,andSouthAfrica[64–66].AdaptingMPAmanagementtothecurrentsituationleft
bythepandemicisaglobalchallenge.Parksfaceemergingchallenges,suchasdrastically
decreasingbudgets[64,67]orincreasingcontaminationfromsingleusemasks[68],andit
isessentialtoaddresstheminaholisticmanner,seekingnaturebasedsolutions[64].
CroatiahasanetworkofMPAs(CroMPA),whichwaspromotedbytheBrijuniPublic
Institutionwiththeobjectivesofincreasingmanagementeffectiveness,capacitybuilding,
dataexchange,implementingacommonapproachtosolvingmanagementproblems,in
fluencingthefuturedevelopmentofastrategiclegalframework,andplanning,preparing,
andimplementingcommonprojects.Thisnetworkprovidestheopportunitytoestablish
Croatiaasaleadingcountryintheprotectionofthemarineenvironment.Inaddition,all
parksarepartoftheMediterraneanMPANetwork(MedMPAnet),whichisindispensable
forlongtermmarinebiodiversitymonitoringprojects[69].
AnimportantpartofMPAplanningandmanagementisunderstandingandincor
poratingtheprioritiesofdifferentgroups[70–73].ThedesignandmanagementofanMPA
shouldbebasedonknowledgeofthephysicalandecologicalsystemsthataffectit,and
onhumandimensions,includinggovernance,socioeconomic,andculturalaspects
[74,75].Managementmustbeadaptedtothesocioculturalsituationofeachplace.Fur
thermore,thedesignofthedecisionmakingprocessmustbetransparentandcoverall
stagesofmanagement.
Until2004,aneffectivesystemwasinplacetoensurearepresentativeinclusionof
stakeholdersinmanagement.Boardsconsistedofrepresentativesofscientificcommuni
ties,localcommunities,theNatureProtectionDirectorate,andpoliticalrepresentatives.
However,thissystemwasabandoned,andmembersarenowdeterminedsolelyonpolit
icalgrounds[76].Despitethis,thereisabalancebetweenallsectorsinvolvedintheBoards
ofthethreeparks,whicharemultidisciplinary.RecentpublicationssuggestthatMPA
managementshouldevolvetowardsabottomupmodel,inwhichlocalpeoplearein
volvedinplanningprocesses[77],ortowardsanintermediatemodelcombiningbothtop
downandbottomupelements[78–80].
Inthissense,Croatiaisgettingclosertothisdesirablesituation.Forexample,inthe
caseofTelašćica,thedevelopmentofthemanagementplanwasthefirsteventthatin
cludedthepopulation.Sincethen,ithascollaboratedinsomemonitoringandlocalfish
eriescouncilshavebeenestablished.IntheframeworkoftheFishMPABlue2project,for
thefirsttimeinCroatia,fishermenwereinvolvedinthedesignofthefisheriesmanage
mentplan.TheydecidedtocreatenotakezoneintheMPAthemselvesandreplacedtheir
netswithmoreselectiveonestoreducefishingpressureandcatchperuniteffort.Thisis
agoodexampleofamanagementplandevelopedinabottomupapproachinvolving
fishermen,scientists,nongovernmentalorganizations,andthegovernment[81].
However,thereisstillalongwaytogo.MPAsareonlylegallyobligedtoensure
stakeholderparticipationinrelationtothedesignationofanMPAandintheformofpub
licconsultationsregardingproposalsformanagementplansandactsofsecondarylegis
lationaffectingtheirinterests.Nevertheless,aneffectivesystemofstakeholderparticipa
tionindaytodaymanagementhasnotbeendeveloped[76].
ThissituationisfoundinotherMPAsaroundtheworld,forexampleinCalifornia,
wherethedesignandplanningofitsMPAnetworkwashighlyparticipatory.Stakehold
ersplayedakeyroleandwerethesolegroupresponsibleforproposingMPAconfigura
tionsandlocations[82].However,withoutspecificstructuresforthisprocess,maintaining
thehighlevelofparticipationandengagementischallenging,especiallywiththetop
downmodelthatislegallyinplace[82].InThailand,meanwhile,nationallegislationcon
tainsprovisionsforparticipation,butministerialmandatesandlocalmanagersmaintain
Diversity2022,14,44817of24
topdownapproaches,leadingtoconflictsbetweenthecommunityandmanagers[83].As
canbeseen,itisessentialthatpublicpoliciesarealignedatallscales,andthattheinstitu
tionsinchargeofmanagingMPAshavethewillandthetoolstodosoinaparticipatory
way,beyondthedesignoftheMPAortheelaborationofthemanagementplan.
TherearenopopulationcentersinBrijuniNationalPark,sostakeholdersbelongto
thenearestcommunities(mainlyFažana).Oneoftheactivitiescarriedoutduringthede
velopmentofthemanagementplanwereinterviewswithvisitors.Itwasobservedthat
mostofthemhaveconcernsrelatedtoproblemswithinfrastructureandservices,tourism
management(hotelsandvisitors),andconservationofnaturalandhistoricalculturalher
itage[46].Someofthemhavenoproblemswiththecurrentlevelsofcooperationandex
pecttocontinuetodoso(inresearch,education,orvolunteering),whileotherswantto
increasethelevelofcooperationandparticipatemoreactivelyinthepark’sactivities[46].
Overall,thesefindingsshowthatthedesiresofcommunitiesinterestedincoastal
MPAsarecontextspecific,evenwhenthegroupsappeartobesimilar.Asimilarfinding
occursinaCanadianMPA,BasinHead,wherestrongcommunitysupportwasfound[84].
Mostintervieweesinthisparkindicatedthattheyweresatisfiedwithjustreceivingup
datesandallowinglocalmanagementandleaderstomakemanagementdecisions.This
wasinfluencedbythefactthatthepartnershipformedbymanagersandthepopulation
generatedahighleveloftrust,allowingotherstakeholderstotakeahandsoffapproach.
However,inBrijuni,sincethecreationofthemanagementplan,socialactorshavenot
beeninvolvedinmanagementprocessesandrelationswiththecommunityarenotascon
solidated,althoughcommunicationchannelsarealwaysopenforsuggestionsandconsul
tations.
Toavoidconflict,itisimperativethatallstakeholdersareinvolvedinplanningand
managementprocessesinarepresentativemanner[85,86],leadingtogreatertransparency
andrecognitionoftheviewsandconcernsofdifferentactors.Thisincreasesthelikelihood
ofagreementsandimprovessocialacceptability,legitimacy,andsupportforfuture
MPAs.InCroatia,effortshavebeenmadetoinvolvestakeholdersinoceanprojectsand
management.However,despiteitslongexperienceincreatingandimplementingpark
policies,thereareobviousdifficultiesingettingprotectedareastoplaytheirrolethrough
theinvolvementoflocalcommunities[87].Successfulparticipatoryconservationrequires
alegislativeframework,understandinganddeterminationofmanagement,andlocalwill
ingnesstoimplementconservationprograms.OnecaseofanMPAthathassignificantly
improveditspublicparticipationisTubbataha,inthePhilippines.Initially,thestatedid
nottakecommunityinputintoconsiderationduringthedesignoftheMPA.However,
eightyearslater,aparticipatorygovernancesystemwasestablished,whichhasbeenin
strumentalinthesuccessofthisarea.Themanagementplanwassubjecttoextensivecon
sultation,andparticipatoryevaluationiscarriedoutaspartofanadaptiveplanningpro
cess.Research,information,andeducationcampaignsareoftencarriedoutincollabora
tionwithvariousorganizations[88].Zengetal.[89]proposepromotingpublicparticipa
tionthroughbetteradvocacyandincentivemechanisms,andthecreationoflocaladvisory
councils,whichallowformoreactivestakeholderparticipationandprovideopportunities
tointeractwithmanagementagencies.
BothTelašćicaandBrijunihaveeducationandvolunteerprogramsandactivities,alt
houghbothwereaffectedduetorestrictionscausedbytheSARSCoVpandemic.In
Brijuniseveralactivitiesarebeingdevelopedtobetterpresenttheparkanditsheritage
[46],andinTelašćicatherearevariousactivitiesonthevaluesofthepark.However,there
aresomeproblems,especiallyintheMirBayarea,whichreceivesmorethan100,000vis
itorsduringthetouristseason[47].
Inordertoimplementmanagementactionseffectively,sufficienthumanandfinan
cialresourcesareessential.ThemainsourcesofincomeinCroatianparksareEUand
nationalfunds,donations,andsponsorships,andthosegeneratedthroughtheirownac
tivities.ThefundsfortheannualbudgetoftheBrijuniPublicInstitutioncomefromthe
incomeearnedbytheinstitution.Until2014,theparkreceivedsmallfinancial
Diversity2022,14,44818of24
contributionsfromtheCroatiangovernmentforcertainstaffsalariesandcapitalprojects.
Sincethen,theparkhasbeenfinanciallyindependentfromthegovernmentandisfunded
throughtourismrevenues,donations,andEUsponsoredprojects.Ithasattractedatten
tionforitssustainablefundingstrategy,whichincludesaconcessionprogramfortourism
activitiesthatwasusedtoachieveconservationobjectives.This,amongotherreasons,has
ledtoitbeingawardedtheBlueParkAwardin2021.
However,itisrelevanttonotetheimpactthattheSARSCoVpandemichashadon
theCroatianeconomy,whichisheavilydependentontourism.InthePlitviceLakesNa
tionalPark(alsoinCroatia),tourismrelatedrevenuesaccountforapproximately98%of
thetotal,whichleadstoMPAsbeingunabletocarryouttheiractionsandmanagement
plansintheabsenceofvisitors.Aparadigmshiftisneeded,includingdiversificationof
fundingsourcesforareasandcommunities,effectiveallocationoffinancialresources,and
responsibletourismrecoveryplans[64].
Themeaningofmanagementisnoneotherthantoimplementtheplanandprograms
thathaveemergedintheplanningstage.Inadditiontoexecutingthevariousmeasures,
itisalsoessentialtomonitorimplementation[90].Severalauthoritiesadoptadaptive
managementasacentralorientationofconservationmanagement[79].Itisthecyclical
processofsystematicallytestingassumptions,generatinglearningbyevaluatingresults,
andcontinuingtocorrectandimprovemanagementpractices[33].Thisenablestheiden
tificationofthemosteffectivemeasurestoachievedesiredoutcomes,andabetterunder
standingofhowobjectivesshouldbemodifiedinthecontextofchangingconditions[91].
Itrequiresaregularsystemofmonitoringandevaluation.Attentionshouldbepaidtothe
analysisofsocioeconomicaspectsoftheMPAandlocalperceptions[92,93].
Monitoringofindicatorsiscarriedoutwhenthereisaprojectthatrequiresit.In
TelašćicaandPakleniIslands,onlybiophysicalindicatorsareconsidered.InBrijunithey
alsohavevisitormonitoring.Thisaspectcouldbeimprovedbyestablishingaregular
monitoringsystem,asitsabsencecanleadtoconflictsbetweenmanagers,fishermenand
thescientificcommunity,ashashappenedintheSanyaCoralReefs[94].However,all
threeparkshaveasystemofannualevaluation,throughreporting,whichexaminesthe
degreeofcompliancewiththeoperationalplan.Thisevaluationisusedtopropose
changestothemanagementplanforthefollowingyear.Thisprocedureisusedinother
successfulMPAs,suchastheAustralianGreatBarrierReef[95],althoughpublicpartici
pationinthisparkishigher.Monitoringofmanagementactivitiesiswellestablishedin
Croatiabutmonitoringofbiophysicalandsocioeconomicindicatorsisnotsystematic.
Despitethis,allparkshavealongscientifictraditionandresultsareintegratedinto
management.InthecaseofBrijuni,biophysical,cultural,andarchaeologicalissuesare
studied.Forexample,severaldatabaseshavebeencreated,suchasmarinehabitats,cul
turalheritagesitesfromprehistorytothe20thcentury,andsitesofgeological–paleonto
logicalinterest.InTelašćica,thebiophysicalpartisthemostimportant,althoughthesocial
partisbecomingincreasinglyimportant.Adatabaseonthefishingsituationisplanned.
ThelicenseholdersarenotobligedtoreporttheamountoftheircatchestothePublic
Institution,soithasnotbeenpossibletomonitorthefishingeffortwithinthepark.Con
sideringthatalmostthewholeareaisprivatelyowned(95%),itsmanagementbecomes
morecomplex,andmutualcooperationisofutmostimportance.Anotherexampleofthe
useofscientificinformationinmanagementinthisparkistheanalysisofmetalconcen
trationsinthewater,whichisservingasabasisfordelimitingthecarryingcapacityof
anchoredvessels[47].
Ingeneral,publicparticipationandtheimplementationstagearetheaspectsthat
needtobestrengthenedthemost.Theseweaknesseshavebeenidentifiedatleastsince
2014[96].Atthetime,theidentifiedweaknesseswerefacilitationandconflictresolution,
communicationwiththelocalcommunityandtheirparticipationinmanagement,dissem
inationofMPAvalues,issuesandrulesofbehaviorwithvisitors(publicparticipation),
andmonitoring,evaluation,andmanagementoftheprojectcycle(implementationstage).
Theseelementscouldserveasastartingpointfordevelopingatrainingprogramfor
Diversity2022,14,44819of24
managersatthenationallevel,strengtheningcommunityrelationsandadaptivemanage
mentthroughconstantfeedback.ThishappensinmanyMPAs.CasestudiesinFrance,
England,andPortugalshoweddeficienciesintheimplementationoftheiractions,which
waspresentinonly40%ofcases,whilethispercentagewassomewhathigherinSpain
[55].Thismaybedueto