Content uploaded by María Maestro
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by María Maestro on Jun 03, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
Diversity2022,14,448.https://doi.org/10.3390/d14060448www.mdpi.com/journal/diversity
Article
MarineProtectedAreasManagementintheMediterranean
Sea—TheCaseofCroatia
MaríaMaestro
1,
*,JuanAdolfoChica‐Ruiz
1
,ZvjezdanaPopovićPerković
2
andMaríaLuisaPérez‐Cayeiro
1
1
FacultyofMarineandEnvironmentalSciences,UniversityofCadiz,11510PuertoReal,Spain;
adolfo.chica@uca.es(J.A.C.‐R.);isa.perez@uca.es(M.L.P.‐C.)
2
UniversityDepartmentofMarineStudies,UniversityofSplit,21000Split,Croatia;
zvjezdana.popovic@unist.hr
*Correspondence:maria.maestro@uca.es
Abstract:Marineprotectedareas(MPAs)arewidelyusedtoolstoconservemarineecosystemsand
theirservices.Theyarecomplexsocio‐ecologicalsystemswherehumanactivitiesandnatureinter‐
act.Croatiahas409protectedareas,ofwhich19arecoastal‐marine.Theaimofthispaperistoana‐
lyzethemanagementmodelofMPAsinCroatiaandtoidentifytheirstrengthsandweaknesses.For
thispurpose,threeMPAshavebeenchosen:BrijuniNationalPark,TelašćicaNaturePark,and
PakleniIslandsSignificantLandscape.Themethodologyusedassesses26specificindicatorstoan‐
alyzethestatusof4keyfactors:managementbody,planningsubprocess,publicparticipation,and
implementationsubprocess.Theresultsofthisevaluationare5possiblescenarios:proactive(1),
learning(2),interactive(3),centralized(4),andformal(5)management.Theresultsshowthat
Brijunipresentsaproactivescenario(1),Telašćicaaninteractivescenario(3),andPakleniIslandsa
centralizedscenario(4).Aseriesofmeasuresarepresented,whichcanimprovethescore.Ingeneral,
MPAmanagementinCroatiatendstowardsaproactivemodel,wherethemanagementbodyisits
greateststrength.Thereisashiftfromatop‐downtoabottom‐upapproach,whichimpliesagreater
involvementofthepopulationindecision‐making.However,publicparticipationisnotyetfully
consolidated.
Keywords:assessment;Croatia;management;marineprotectedarea;publicparticipation
1.Introduction
Marineprotectedareas(MPAs)arewidelyusedtoolstoconservemarineecosystems
andtheirservices.Theyarefoundworldwide[1]andhaveproventobeasuccessfulman‐
agementinstrumenttoconservebiodiversity[2–4],beingcriticalforhumanwell‐being
[5,6]andprovidingnumerousbenefitstosociety,especiallyrelatedtorecreationandtour‐
ism[7,8].Inrecentyears,theyhaveevolvedfromapristinemodel,wherenohumanpres‐
encewasallowed,toanecosystemapproach,wherethesocialpartisequallyimportant
asthephysical–naturalone[9–15].
Nowadays,MPAsarecomplexsocio‐ecologicalsystemsinwhichhumanactivities
andnatureinteract.Theyaretypicallyfoundincoastalorcoastal‐marineareas,which
havehistoricallybeenusedbyfishermenandindigenouspeople[16–18].Infact,only
1.18%ofMPAsarefoundininternationalwaters[19].Thismeansthattheircreationand
managementdirectlyaffecttheactivitiesandbehaviorofpopulationslivingalongthe
coast,makingitnecessarytoreconciletheuseandexploitationofresourceswithconser‐
vation.
MPAscanhavedifferentdegreesofprotectionand/oruseofsitesandtheirresources.
Generally,benefitsforlocalcommunitiesandgeneralpopulation,andforbiodiversity,
tendtobegreaterasthedegreeofprotectionincreases[20–22].However,resultsarenot
alwaysobviousorimmediate.Sometimes,localpeoplearelimitedintheiraccessto
Citation:Maestro,M.;Chica‐Ruiz,
J
.A.;PerkovićPopović,Z.;
Pérez‐Cayeiro,M.L.Marine
ProtectedAreasManagementinthe
MediterraneanSea—TheCaseof
Croatia.Diversity2022,14,448.
https://doi.org/10.3390/d14060448
AcademicEditors:MichaelWink
andCharalamposDimitriadis
Received:12May2022
Accepted:31May2022
Published:2June2022
Publisher’sNote:MDPIstaysneu‐
tralwithregardtojurisdictional
claimsinpublishedmapsandinstitu‐
tionalaffiliations.
Copyright:©2022bytheauthors.Li‐
censeeMDPI,Basel,Switzerland.
Thisarticleisanopenaccessarticle
distributedunderthetermsandcon‐
ditionsoftheCreativeCommonsAt‐
tribution(CCBY)license(https://cre‐
ativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Diversity2022,14,4482of24
resourcesafterdeclaration,andthiscanleadtoconflictorlackofsupportandrespectfor
regulations[23].Nonetheless,MPAsarefundamentaltotheeconomicandsocialwell‐
beingofthepopulation.
Therefore,conservationofecosystemsandtheirresourcesmustbeaddressedto‐
getherwiththecommunitiesthatusethesespaces.Infact,severalauthorsconsidersocial
acceptanceasthemainindicatortomeasurethesuccessofanMPA[24–27].Nowadays,
notonlyistheinclusionofthepopulationintheuseandenjoymentofresourcesbeing
contemplated,butthereisanincreasingtrendtowardsaparticipatorymanagement
model,inwhichsocietyhasthetoolstoinfluencedecision‐making[11,28].
AnothernotableproblemisthatmanyofthecurrentMPAsdonothavemanagement
plansandarenotbeingadequatelymanaged[9].Sometimes,theonlyprotectiontheyre‐
ceiveisdesignationasaprotectedarea,butwithoutappropriatehumanandfinancialre‐
sources,biodiversityconservationisnotensured.Thisleadstopoormanagementand,in
theworstcases,toso‐called“paperparks”,i.e.,areasthathavebeendesignatedaspro‐
tected,butinpracticereceivenomanagementatall[29–31].Appropriatemanagement
thatisadaptiveandensuresthesustainableandequitableuseofecosystemsandtheir
servicesisneeded.
Forallthesereasons,theimprovementofmanagementandthedevelopmentofdif‐
ferenttoolstohelpmanagerstoexerciseamoreparticipativemanagementandtomonitor
progressarebeingpromoted.Toanalyzehowmanagementactionsandcomponentsare
doing,andtoidentifystrengthsandweaknesses,amanagementassessmentisaveryuse‐
fulelement.Numerousframeworksconsiderthisasanintegralstepbecauseitmakesit
possibletoreceivefeedbackthatfacilitatesdecision‐makinganderrorcorrection[32,33].
Itdoesnotonlymeanobservingproblemsbutalsoidentifyingandanalyzingthoseas‐
pectsthatarebeingdonewell,inordertoprovidethenecessaryinformationfordecision‐
makingbyareamanagers[34].Differentmethodologiesexisttoevaluatemanagement
[35–43].However,thereisalackofinternalanalysisofthemanagementbodyitselfand
oftheMPAmanagementmodel.
Croatiaisextremelyrichintermsoflandscapeandfavorableclimateandhasagreat
biologicaldiversity.Ithas409protectedareas,ofwhich19arecoastal‐marine.Thesystem
ofprotectedareasnationallydesignatedcoversapproximately1.04%ofthesea,although
theCroatianpartoftheNatura2000networkincludes8.79%ofthemarinearea[44].The
NatureProtectionActensurestheconservationofthenaturalenvironment.Itprovides
forninecategoriesofprotectedareasthatcorrespond,asfaraspossible,tooneofthe
internationallyrecognizedIUCNcategories.Nationalandnatureparksaredesignatedby
theParliament,strictandspecialreservesbytheGovernment,andtheothercategoriesby
thecountyassembliesandtheZagrebCityAssembly.ThisActprovidesforpublicpartic‐
ipationandaccesstodesignationacts[45].ProtectedareasaremanagedbyPublicInstitu‐
tions,whosemainfunctionistheprotection,maintenance,andpromotionofprotected
areas,andmonitoringcompliancewithregulations.
TheaimofthepaperistoanalyzethemanagementmodelofMPAsinCroatiaandto
identifystrengthsandweaknesses.Forthispurpose,threeMPAswithdifferentprotection
statuseshavebeenchosen:BrijuniNationalPark,TelašćicaNaturePark(bothmanagedat
nationallevel)andPakleniIslands(significantlandscapemanagedbySplit‐Dalmatia
County)(Figure1a).Thesethreecasesstudiesaccountfor2.48%ofCroatia’sprotected
coastalandmarinearea.
Diversity2022,14,4483of24
(a)(b)
(c)(d)
Figure1.(a)MapofCroatiashowingthelocationofthethreestudyareas:(b)MapofBrijuniNa‐
tionalPark;(c)MapofTelašćicaNaturePark;(d)MapofPakleniIslandsSignificantLandscape.
2.MaterialsandMethods
2.1.StudyAreas
2.1.1.BrijuniNationalPark
BrijuniNationalPark(Figure1b)consistsof14islands,islets,andcliffslocatedalong
thewesterncoastofIstria.Itwasdeclaredanationalparkandmemorialsiteon1Novem‐
ber1983bytheNationalParksActandtheBrijuniMemorialSite.Ithasalmost47kmof
coastlineandis3395.0ha,ofwhich2651.7aremarine[46].Itwasdeclaredthankstoits
geomorphological–hydrological,climatic,andlandscapecharacteristics,togetherwiththe
flora,fauna,anditsuniqueculturalheritage.In2021,itwasawardedtheBlueParkprize
forachievingthehighestscientificstandardsofmarinelifeprotectionandmanagement.
AswithallnationalparksinCroatia,commercialfishingaroundBrijuniisprohibited.
Therearenopopulationcentersinthenationalpark.Assomeislandsareveryclosetothe
mainlandandlocalpeoplehavealwaysenjoyedtherighttofish,todaythePublicInstitu‐
tionstillissuespermitforrecreationalfishingaroundtwoislands.However,thereissig‐
nificantpressureonfishstocksinandbeyondtheboundariesofthePark,andtheestab‐
lishmentofabufferzonearoundthecurrentparkboundariesisunderconsideration.
2.1.2.TelašćicaNaturePark
TelašćicaNaturePark(Figure1c)wasdesignatedassuchin1988withtheseparation
fromKornatiNationalPark,ofwhichitwasapartoffrom1980to1988.Telašćicaobtained
thestatusofaprotectedareathankstoitsfaunaandflora,geologicalandgeomorpholog‐
icalphenomena,diverseseabedcommunities,andarchaeologicalheritage.Threebasic
unitsrepresentthefundamentalcharacteristicsofthisarea:thebayofTelašćica,thecliffs
ofDugiOtok,andthesaltlake“Mir”.Thetotalareaofthenatureparkis70.50km2,with
25.95km2inDugiOtokandtheislets,and44.55km2inthesea[47].
Diversity2022,14,4484of24
OnLongIslandthereare2873inhabitants(accordingtotheCensusofPopulation,
HouseholdsandDwellings.RepublicofCroatia:CentralBureauofStatistics,2011).The
populationworksintourism,agriculture,orfishing,althoughasurveyconductedin2010
revealedpublicconcernaboutthestateoffishstocks.Respondentspointedoutthatthere
havebeenchangesinthecommunityduetotheemigrationofyoungpeoplefromthe
islandandreducedqualityoflifeduetoinabilitytofindemploymentandinsufficient
culturaloffer[48].
FishingactivitiesinNatureParksinCroatiaareregulatedthroughtheFisheriesAct
withnodifferencesinsizeandtypeoffishinggearoutsideandinsideprotectedareas.
OnlyrecreationalfishinghasbeenregulatedsinceJuly2018.Specific(morerestricted)
regulationsarejustabouttobedevelopedandadopted.
2.1.3.PakleniIslandsSignificantLandscape
PakleniIslands(Figure1d)areanarchipelagoof19islandsandisletsdeclared“sig‐
nificantlandscape”in1968fortheircomplexgeographyof634.38ha.Theunderwater
environmentssurroundingtheislandsarepartoftheEuropeanecologicalnetwork
Natura2000andwerechosenwiththeaimofpreservingPosidoniaoceanicabeads,reefs
withestablishedalgalandcoralbiocenoses,infralittoralsands,mudflats,andsandflats
notcoveredbyseawateratlowtideandseacaves.Theyaremanagedbythe“MoreiKrš”
Institution,undertheCountyofSplit‐Dalmatia.
Onthenearestinhabitedisland,Hvar,thereare11,077inhabitants,whileonthe
largerisland,Sv.Klement,therearethreevillagesthatareonlyoccasionallyinhabited
[49].Tourismisoneofthemainsourcesofincomeforthecommunities.Manyareengaged
inagriculture,animalhusbandry,orfishing.
2.2.Methodology
ThemethodologyusedtoanalyzethemanagementofPakleniIslands,TelašćicaNa‐
turePark,andBrijuniNationalParkhasbeenappliedbeforeinAzoresMarinePark[50]
andinthreenationalparksofCostaRica[51].Ithasasocialperspectivethatisbasedon
theanalysisoftwofundamentalelements:processesandpeopleinvolved.Thestepstobe
takenareasfollows.
2.2.1.Step1.SelectionofKeyManagementAspects
Fourmanagementaspectswereidentifiedaskey.Keyaspectsarethoseofatransver‐
salnaturethatalsoencompassdifferentelements.Theseare:managementbody,planning
sub‐process,publicparticipation,andimplementationsub‐process.Basedonthemethod‐
ologiesdevelopedbytheWorldDatabaseofProtectedAreas(WDPA),thesefouraspects
havebeenchosenbecause,inafirstapproach,weaimtocoverthewholeprocessofplan‐
ningandexecution,andthepeopleinvolvedinthemanagement:themanagersandstake‐
holders.
2.2.2.Step2.IdentificationofSpecificIndicators
Aseriesofspecificindicatorswereselectedforeachaspect.Anindicatorisaspecific,
observable,andmeasurablecharacteristicthatcanbeusedtoshowthestatusofanaspect
ofmanagement.Inthiscase,indicatorsareinquestionformat.Thisresultedin26indica‐
tors(Table1),whichwerechosenbasedontheliteraturereviewedandonourexpertcri‐
teria.Someofthemweredevelopedbytheauthors,whileotherswereadaptedfromother
methodologies.Table2showsthegeneralthemesthatweredrawnfromthesesources.
Diversity2022,14,4485of24
Table1.IndicatorsforMPAmanagementanalysis.
KeyManagement
AspectIndicatorEvaluation
ManagementBody
1.Backgroundofthestaff
1Withoutbasictrainingoreducation.
2Highereducation:onlynaturalsciences.
3Highereducation:multidisciplinaryteam(naturalandsocialsciences)
2.Technicaltrainingofferedtostaff
1No,orsporadically.
2Yes.
3Italsoanticipatesfutureneeds.
3.MPAstaffparticipationintheplanning
processes
1No.
2Sporadic.
3Inallplanningprocesses.
4.MPAstaffhavethenecessaryproceduresto
participateintheplanningprocesses
1No.
2Ithassomeprocedures,sometimesinsufficient.
3Yes.
5.Cooperationwithotherinstitutionsatthe
locallevel
1No.
2Notwithallinstitutionsornotonaregularbasis.
3Itexistsonaregularbasiswithallinstitutions.
6.Cooperationwithotherinstitutionsatthe
regionallevel
1No.
2Notwithallinstitutionsornotonaregularbasis.
3Itexistsonaregularbasiswithallinstitutions.
7.Cooperationwithotherinstitutionsatthe
internationallevel
1No.
2Notonaregularbasis.
3Itexistsonaregularbasis,withalargenumberofinstitutions.
8.Collaborationandexchangeofknowledge
withotherinternationalprojects/programs
1No.
2Notonaregularbasis.
3Itexistsonaregularbasis,withalargenumberofprojects/programs.
Planningsub‐process
9.Managementplan
1No.
2Notimplemented,oronlypartiallyimplemented.
3Itexists,isupdated,isfullyimplemented,andhasanestablished
scheduleforregularreviewsandupdates.
10.Strategiesandmanagementmeasures
identifiedwiththemanagementobjectives
1Theydonotexistorarenotrelatedtotheobjectives.
2Theyexistpartlyinrelationtotheobjectives.
3Theyexistandarecompletelyidentifiedwiththeobjectives.
11.OperationalPlan
1No.
2Partiallyimplemented.
3Fullyimplemented.
12.Ecosystemdiagnosiscarriedoutpriorto
thedevelopmentofthemanagementplan
1No.
2Notavailabletointerestedparties.
3Yes,anditispublishedoravailable.
13.TheMPAintegratedintoanMPA
network
1No.
2Itisintheprocessofbeingintegrated.
3Yes.
PublicParticipation
14.Publicparticipationintheprocessof
developingthemanagementplan
1Therewasorisnomanagementplan.
2Yes.
3Yes,atallstagesofthedevelopmentofthemanagementplanand
participationisforeseenfortheevaluationofthemanagementplan.
15.Representativepublicparticipationinthe
processofdevelopingthemanagementplan
1Therewasnomanagementplan,itwasnotrepresentative,orthereis
nomanagementplan.
2Onlytheprioritygroupswererepresented.
3Bothprimaryandsecondaryuserswererepresented.
16.Socialactorsparticipationinmanagement
decisionmakingorplanningprocesses
1No.
2Throughconsultation
3Interactiveparticipationwithadirectimpactondecisionmaking
17.Collegiatebodyforparticipation
1No.
2Isnotrepresentativeand/ordoesnotfunctionproperly.
3Itexists,itisrepresentative,anditworksproperly.
18.Communicationbetweenstakeholders
andmanagers
1Verylittleornone.
2Notwithinanestablishedprogram.
3Acommunicationprogramsisbeingimplementedtobuild
stakeholdersupportfortheMPA.
Diversity2022,14,4486of24
19.Sustainabilityeducationactivities
1No.
2Sporadically.
3Onaregularbasisandwithwideparticipation.
20.Volunteerorenvironmental
communicationactivities
1No.
2Sporadically.
3Onaregularbasisandwithwideparticipation.
21.MPAinformationavailableto
stakeholdersandthegeneralpublic
1No.
2Partisavailableuponrequesttotheparkmanagement.
3Itisavailableonthewebsite,availabletoanyinterestedparty.
ImplementationSub‐Process
22.ZoningoftheMPA
1Itdoesnotexistfortheuseorconservationofresources.
2Itexistsforuseandconservation,butitisonlypartiallyfunctionalor
outdated.
3Itexistsupdated,withmeasuresandconcreteusesforeachzone.
23.Budgetallocatedforthemanagementof
theMPAisadequate
1Thisinformationisnotaccessible.
2
Thebudgetguaranteesthecostsoftheadministrationand
surveillancestaffandthemeansnecessaryformanagement(vehicles,
equipment,fuel,etc.).
3Thebudgetalsoallowsforotherinnovativeactivitiessuchas:
research,development,etc.
24.Monitoringandevaluationofbiophysical,
socio‐economicandgovernanceindicators
1No.
2Itdoesnotfollowastrategyorregularcollectionofresults,whichare
notsystematicallyusedformanagement.
3Thereisagoodsystemofmonitoringandevaluation,whichiswell
implementedandusedinadaptivemanagement.
25.Scientificinformationintegratedinto
MPAmanagement
1No.
2Insomecases.
3ItservestoevaluateandimprovethemanagementoftheMPA.
26.TheMPAconsideredasocio‐ecosystem
1No.
2Thesocialsystemisanimportantfactor,butthenaturalsystemisa
priority.
3Itisconsideredandtakenintoaccountthroughouttheprocess.
Table2.Topicsevaluatedwithindicatorsadaptedfromothermethodologies.
TopicsSources
Trainings[37,38,52]
Planningtools[52]
Managementplans[37–39,52]
Operativeplans[37,38]
Publicparticipation[38,52]
Collegiatebodies[39]
Communication[37–39,52]
Environmentaleducation[38,52]
Volunteer[38]
Information[39]
Budget[38,52]
Monitoring[38,52]
Scientificknowledge[37–39]
2.2.3.Step3.DataCollectionandAssessmentofIndicators:Scorefrom1to3Points
Eachoftheindicatorshasbeenratedonascaleofonetothree,withonebeingthe
mostunfavorablesituationandthreetheoptimum.Althoughusingtheseoptionsisasim‐
plerepresentation,itcoverstheentirespectrumofresponses,fromanegativeassessment
oftheindicatortoanoptimalsituation,passingthroughanintermediatestate.Thissystem
facilitatesresponsesandfutureproposalsforimprovement.Foreachindicator,eachof
therangeshasbeenspecifiedtoidentifywhat“optimalstate”means.
Torespondtotheindicators,severalsourcesofinformationhavebeenused,primar‐
ilyinterviewswiththemanagersoftheprotectedareas.Onemanagerwasinterviewedin
BrijuniandPakleni,andthreeinTelašćica.Semi‐structuredface‐to‐faceinterviewswere
conductedwithmanagersatthreeparks,alwaysbythesameperson.Thesewerebased
Diversity2022,14,4487of24
onaquestionnairewithopen‐endedquestions,buttheconversationwasallowedtobring
upnewtopicsorissuesofrelevancetotheinterviewee.Theinformationobtainedfrom
theinterviewsandfieldobservationswascontrastedwiththebibliographicsourcesto
determinethescoreobtainedforeachindicator.Specifically,managementplans,annual
reports,technicaldocuments,projectdocuments,andscientificarticleswereanalyzed.
Fieldobservationsincludedvisitstothefacilitiesoftheparkadministrationandtothe
mostimportantphysical,natural,andculturalsites.Onceallsourceswereanalyzed,the
scoreforeachindicatorwasdetermined.
2.2.4.Step4.DefinitionofFiveManagementScenarios:ExpertCriteria
Onceallindicatorshaveavaluefrom1to3,theaverageiscalculatedtofindouthow
eachofthefourkeyaspectsisvalued.Thedifferentpossibilitiesthatcanbefoundare
considered,dependingonthevaluefrom1to3ofeachoftheaspects.Fromthiscombina‐
tion,wehaveproposedfivemodelsthatrepresentfiverealities,dependingonfourvari‐
ableseach(Table3).Theyareorderedfromtheidealsituationtotheleastfavorableas
follows:
‐ Scenario1:Proactivemanagement.Theteamthatmakesupthemanagingbodyis
multidisciplinaryandhighlytrained.Theycollaborateandcooperatewithotherin‐
stitutions.Participatorymanagementiscarriedoutwhereallstakeholdersarerepre‐
sented.Itisplannedyearsaheadandpossibleproblemsareanticipated.
‐ Scenario2:Learningmanagement.Allfourelementshavethesameintermediate
value;therefore,theyareinasituationwheretheycouldbeimproved.Themanage‐
mentbodyismultidisciplinary.Itisplannedforthemediumtermandismanaged
inresponsetopastmistakesandsuccesses.Thereispublicparticipation,butitisnot
fullyrepresentativeorwellconsolidated.
‐ Scenario3:Interactivemanagement.Themanagementresponsibilityfallslargelyon
socialactors.Allstakeholdersarewellrepresentedandhaveappropriateparticipa‐
tionmechanisms.Planningandimplementationsubprocessesarecarriedouttrans‐
parentlybytheauthorities.Awarenessishighamongthepopulation.
‐ Scenario4:Centralizedmanagement.Themanagingbodyissoundandmultidisci‐
plinaryandfunctionscorrectly.Itcanbelongtodifferentscales.Ithasresponsibility,
determinesthemanagementobjectives,anddevelopsandexecutesthemanagement
plan.However,publicparticipationisnotverycommonindecision‐making.
‐ Scenario5:Formalmanagement.Priorityisgiventoshort‐termmanagement.Plan‐
ningisextremelystatic,publicparticipationindecision‐makingisnotcarriedout,
norarethereevaluationmechanismsorstrategicmediumtolong‐termobjectives.
Diversity2022,14,4488of24
Table3.ManagementScenarios.
Typeof
Management
Rating
Figures
Management
Body
PlanningSub‐
Process
Public
Participation
Implementation
Sub‐Process
Proactive
3333
Learning
2
222
Interactive*
1,2,3
1,2,331,2,3
Centralized
31,2,31,21,2,3
Diversity2022,14,4489of24
Formal**
1,21,21,21,2
*Interactivemanagementiswherepublicparticipationscoresthehighestbutatleastoneofthe
other3aspectsdoesnothaveascoreof3.**Formalmanagementoccurswithanycombinationof
oneandtwowhenthetotalisnottwo.
Amethodofanalysisandprojectionofrealitythroughtheconstructionofscenarios
wasused,byapplyingalternative(fiveoptions)andcontrasted(canbecompared)scenar‐
ios[50].Thisisatoolforunderstandingthepotentialandlimitsofmanagement.Thefac‐
torsthatdefinethesescenarioscanchangeovertime,andthusareimagesofpresent,fu‐
ture,and/ordesirablesituations[53,54].Therefore,itisaproposalthatallowsustoun‐
derstandtheevolutionofamanagementmodel.Inaddition,itcanbeseenwhethercertain
specificchanges(inanyoftheindicators)causesignificantchangestothegeneralmodel
ornot.
3.Results
BrijuniNationalParkscored2.9forthemanagementbody,2.8fortheplanningstage,
2.5forpublicparticipation,and2.6fortheimplementationstage.Withtheseresults,the
parkmanagementmodelisconsideredtoresembletheproactivescenario(Figure2a).
TelašćicaNatureParkscored2.9forthemanagementbody,2.6fortheplanningstage,
2.5forpublicparticipation,and2.2fortheimplementationstage.Withtheseresults,the
parkmanagementmodelisincludedintheinteractivescenario(Figure2b).
(a)(b)(c)
Figure2.(a)EvaluationofthemanagementofBrijuniNationalPark;(b)Evaluationofthemanage‐
mentofTelašćicaNaturePark;(c)EvaluationofthemanagementofPakleniIslandsSignificant
Landscape.
PakleniIslandsscored2.9forthemanagementbody,2fortheplanningstage,2.1for
publicparticipation,and2fortheimplementationstage.Withtheseresults,theparkman‐
agementmodelfallsintothecentralizedscenario(Figure2c).
Figure3showstheassessmentforeachoftheindicatorsanalyzedinBrijuniNational
Park,TelašćicaNaturePark,andPakleniIslandsSignificantLandscape.Table4shows
somedetailsontheassessmentofeachoftheindicators.
Diversity2022,14,44810of24
Figure3.Assessmentofindicators.
Managementbody
Planningsub‐process
Publicparticipation
Implementationsub‐process
Diversity2022,14,44811of24
Table4.Detailsoftheratinggiventoeachindicator.
Key
Management
Aspect
Indicator
Details
BrijuniTelašćicaPakleniIslands
ManagementBody
1.Backgroundofthe
staff
Boardof5members,
multidisciplinary,
managedbythe
BrijuniNationalPark
PublicInstitution
Boardof5members,
multidisciplinary,
managedbythe
PublicInstitutionof
theTelašćicaNature
Park
Boardof5members,
multidisciplinary,
managedbythe
InstitutionMorei
Krš,underthe
CountyofSplit‐
Dalmatia
2.Technicaltraining
offeredtostaff
Budgetissetaside,
butthereisnoset
program
Budgetissetaside,
butthereisnoset
program
Budgetissetaside,
butthereisnoset
program
3.MPAstaff
participationinthe
planningprocesses
YesYesYes
4.MPAstaffhavethe
necessaryproceduresto
participateinthe
planningprocesses
YesYesYes
5.Cooperationwith
otherinstitutionsatthe
locallevel
YesYesYes
6.Cooperationwith
otherinstitutionsatthe
regionallevel
YesYesYes
7.Cooperationwith
otherinstitutionsatthe
internationallevel
YesYesYes
8Collaborationand
exchangeofknowledge
withotherinternational
projects/programmes
Yes,itisinvolvedin
manyprojects
Yes,e.g.,
FishMPABlue2Yes
PlanningSub‐Process
9.Managementplan
Yes,validfor10years
(2016–2025).Currently
underrevision.In
additiontothisplan,
thedocumentsthat
regulatethe
organization,use,
planning,protection,
andmanagementof
MPAsarethespatial
planandtheinternal
organizationalrules
Yes,validfor10years
(2012–2021).Anew
oneiscurrentlybeing
developed.In
additiontothisplan,
thedocumentsthat
regulatethe
organization,use,
planning,protection,
andmanagementof
MPAsarethespatial
planandtheinternal
organizationalrules
Underdevelopment
Diversity2022,14,44812of24
10.Strategiesand
managementmeasures
identifiedwiththe
managementobjectives
YesYes‐‐
11.OperationalPlanYesYes
Yes,ithasexercised
thefunctionsofthe
managementplanso
far
12.Ecosystem
diagnosiscarriedout
priortothe
developmentofthe
managementplan
No,butanexternal
analysisofthestateof
ecosystemswas
developed
No
No,butanecosystem
servicesassessment
wasdeveloped
13.TheMPAintegrated
intoanMPAnetwork
Yes,national
(CroMPA)and
international
(MedMPAnet)
Yes,national
(CroMPA)and
international
(MedMPAnet)
Yes,national
(CroMPA)and
international
(MedMPAnet)
PublicParticipation
14.Publicparticipation
intheprocessof
developingthe
managementplan
Yes,participationwas
mainlythroughtwo
workshops,providing
phonenumbersand
emailsforenquiries
andinterviewing
visitors.Thefirstwas
“Objectivesand
activitiesofBrijuni
NationalPark
management”andthe
second“Zoningof
BrijuniNationalPark”
[46]
Yes,itwasthefirst
eventthatincluded
thepopulation.The
implementationof
themanagementplan
iscarriedoutin
cooperationwiththe
SunceAssociation
andtheMedPAN
SouthProject[47]
Yes
15.Representative
publicparticipationin
theprocessof
developingthe
managementplan
YesYesYes
16.Socialactors
participationin
managementdecision
makingorplanning
processes
No
Population
participatesinsome
monitoring
No
Diversity2022,14,44813of24
17.Collegiatebodyfor
participation
No
Forsomespecific
aspects,suchas
fishing.Anetwork
hasbeencreated
betweenfishermen,
thegovernment
(Directorateof
Fisheries),thepark
management,and
WWFAdriatoco‐
managefisheries.The
networkispartofthe
FishMPABlue2
project
No
18.Communication
betweenstakeholders
andmanagers
Yes,thereisanannual
marketingplan,and
theparkisveryactive
onsocialmedia
Yes,thereisno
communicationplan
inplace,butthepark
isveryactiveon
socialmedia
Thereisno
communicationplan,
butthereisa
telephoneandemail
available,andannual
meetingsareheld
withthepopulation
19.Sustainability
educationactivitiesYesYes
Yes.Someinitiatives
aremobile
applicationsto
identifyinvasive
speciesorillegal
activities
20.Volunteeror
environmental
communication
activities
Yes
Yes,butthereare
areaswheremore
informationpanels
androutesare
needed.An
informationpointis
underconstruction
Yes
21.MPAinformation
availableto
stakeholdersandthe
generalpublic
YesYes
Asitismanagedat
Countylevel,the
websiteandsocial
mediaareshared
withtherestofthe
MoreIKršprotected
areas,and
informationabout
thisparticularareais
morelimitedtothe
public,althoughitis
availableonrequest
Diversity2022,14,44814of24
ImplementationSub‐Process
22.ZoningoftheMPA
Yes,butthereisagap
betweenthe
managementplanand
thespatialplan
Yes,butthereareno
powerstomanageit.
Anewinternal
regulationis
currentlybeing
developedthatwill
giveauthoritytothe
park
No.Thereisonlyone
habitatmap.Zoning
isnotmandatoryfor
thisprotection
category
23.Budgetallocatedfor
themanagementofthe
MPAisadequate
Ithassufficient
budgetforbasic
management,butnot
forthefull
implementationof
projectsandallthe
necessarystaff.Ithas
attractedattentionfor
itssustainable
financingstrategy,
whichincludesa
concessionprogram
fortourismactivities
thatwasusedto
achieveconservation
objectives.TheSARS‐
CoVpandemichas
significantlyaffected
theCroatianeconomy
Ithassufficient
budgetforbasic
management,butnot
forthefull
implementationof
projectsandallthe
necessarystaff.The
SARS‐CoVpandemic
hasconsiderably
affectedtheCroatian
economy
Ithassufficient
budgetforbasic
management,butnot
forthefull
implementationof
projectsandallthe
necessarystaff.The
SARS‐CoVpandemic
hasconsiderably
affectedtheCroatian
economy
24.Monitoringand
evaluationof
biophysical,socio‐
economic,and
governanceindicators
Whenthereare
projects.Biophysical
andsocio‐cultural
indicators
Whenthereare
projects.Biophysical
indicators
Whenthereare
projects.Biophysical
indicators
25.Scientific
informationintegrated
intoMPAmanagement
Yes.Severaldatabases
havebeencreated,for
exampleoneon
marinehabitats,
culturalheritagesites
fromprehistorictimes
tothe20thcentury,
andgeological–
paleontologicalsites
ofinterest
Forexample,the
analysisofmetal
concentrationsin
waterisservingasa
basisfordelimiting
thecarryingcapacity
ofanchoredvessels
andisabouttobe
determinedonland
[47].Adatabaseon
thefishingsituation
inthemarinepartof
theparkwouldbe
needed,whichis
planned
Yes
26.TheMPA
consideredasocio‐
ecosystem
YesInprocessInprocess
Diversity2022,14,44815of24
4.Discussion
Allparkshavealmostthehighestscore(2.9)forthemanagementbody,showingthat
itisoneofthegreateststrengthsoftheCroatianprotectedareasystem.Thisissimilarin
otherEuropeancountries,suchasFranceandtheUK[55].AppropriatetrainingofMPA
managersortechniciansshouldbemultidisciplinary.InCroatia,eachparkhasaManage‐
mentBoard,whichisresponsibleforadoptingthemanagementplanandannualplans,
drawingupafinancialplanandmanagingtheaccounts[46].Inaddition,ithasanexpert
service,withspecializeduniversitytraining,whichadvisestheBoardinmakingdecisions
thathaveadirectimpactonthebiophysicalsystems.Therefore,theparkshaveamulti‐
disciplinaryteamthatallowsthemtoapproachmanagementwithanecosystemap‐
proach,whichisnecessarytoreconciletheprotectionofecosystemsandtheirservices
withtheeconomicdevelopmentoflocalpopulations[56,57].
Thereisnodoubtthatcapacitybuildingisfundamentaltosuccessfullyaddressing
managementofprotectedspaces.VanderMolen[58]arguesthatconflictresolutionand
workingtowardsasustainablerelationshipbetweenenvironmentandsocietyisamulti‐
facetedprocessthatencompassesdifferentformsofcapacitybuilding.ThethreeMPAs
provideforstafftrainingbasedoncurrentprioritiesandspecificneeds.However,thereis
noestablishedtrainingplanassuch,andtheresponsibilityandinitiativeliewiththeem‐
ployeehimself/herself.Nevertheless,ananalysisoftheannualreportsshowsahighlevel
ofstaffinvolvement,asmanymultidisciplinarycoursesareheldeachyear.Atthemore
operationallevels,thereiscompulsorytrainingtoenablethemtocarryoutcertainactivi‐
ties.Theabsenceofaregulatedtrainingprogramisashortcomingobservedinother
MPAsaroundtheworld,suchasCostaRica[51],eventhoughtheymanagetheirresources
adequately.
IntheMediterranean,MPAsaregenerallyunderstaffed(Brijuniisanexception)or
havestaffwithnoexperienceinmanagement,conservation,andplanning[59],making
capacitybuildingprogramsveryuseful.DiCarloetal.[59]identified250trainingoppor‐
tunitiesrelatedorapplicabletoMPAmanagementintheMediterranean,providedover
thepastfiveyearsby51nationalandinternationalorganizations.Ofthese,onlyfourwere
extensivecoursescoveringthefullrangeofmanagementtopics.Mostofthemareone‐
timecoursesanddonotbelongtoanyregulartrainingprogram.Withafewexceptions,
onlyonlinecoursesareavailableonacontinuousbasisandcanbetakenatanytime.How‐
ever,MPAstaffmaychange(newstaffjoiningandrequiringtraining)orfaceemerging
problemsandneeds,somechanismsneedtobeputinplacetoensurethatknowledge
remainswiththemanagingbodyandMPAstaffandiscontinuouslyupdated.Examples
ofwaystoovercomethisproblemarethecreationoflearningnetworks,supportteams,
oracoregroupoftrainers.
Cooperationwithotherlevelsofadministrationandevenwithotherinternational
agenciesandbodiesshouldbehighlighted.Theseincludenationalandinternationaluni‐
versitiestoresearchinstitutesandlocalassociations.ProjectssuchasMedPanSouthPro‐
ject,whichsupportedthecreationofBrijuniandTelašćicamanagementplans,standout.
Brijuni,beinganationalpark,isinvolvedinalargenumberofprojects.Thisbroadcollab‐
orationisaverypositivefactor,asitiskeytotheimplementationofmarinepolicies[60]
andfosterspublicawarenessandsupportforprotection.Increasingly,MPAmanagement
ismovingtowardsinterdisciplinarity.
Itisclearthatgoodmanagementrequirestheadoptionofclearobjectivesandgov‐
ernancesystems,theallocationofadequateandappropriateresources,andtheimplemen‐
tationofmanagementstrategiesandprocesses[61].Moreeffortneedstobedevotedto
planningforthefutureandplanningandimplementingcurrentactivities[62].Benefits
derivedfromMPAsarerelatedtothedesign,thenumberofresources,thedegreeofpro‐
tectionprovidedthroughfairgovernanceandeffectivemanagement,andthescaleat
whichitworks[63].Brijuniscorednearthehighestscoreintheplanningstage,demon‐
stratingthatthisprotectioncategory(nationalpark)iscommittedtoshort‐,medium‐,and
long‐termplanningformarineenvironment.ThemanagementplansforBrijuniand
Diversity2022,14,44816of24
Telašćicaarealmostfullycompliedwith.InPakleniIslandsthemanagementplanisinthe
processofdevelopmentand,sofar,theannualoperationalplanhasexercisedthefunc‐
tionsofthemanagementplan.However,theimplementationoftheactivitiesofthethree
parkshasbeenreducedduetotheSARS‐CoVpandemic.Thishasoccurredinmanycoun‐
tries,includingBrazil,CostaRica,Namibia,Ecuador,Indonesia,Canada,theUnited
States,andSouthAfrica[64–66].AdaptingMPAmanagementtothecurrentsituationleft
bythepandemicisaglobalchallenge.Parksfaceemergingchallenges,suchasdrastically
decreasingbudgets[64,67]orincreasingcontaminationfromsingle‐usemasks[68],andit
isessentialtoaddresstheminaholisticmanner,seekingnature‐basedsolutions[64].
CroatiahasanetworkofMPAs(CroMPA),whichwaspromotedbytheBrijuniPublic
Institutionwiththeobjectivesofincreasingmanagementeffectiveness,capacitybuilding,
dataexchange,implementingacommonapproachtosolvingmanagementproblems,in‐
fluencingthefuturedevelopmentofastrategiclegalframework,andplanning,preparing,
andimplementingcommonprojects.Thisnetworkprovidestheopportunitytoestablish
Croatiaasaleadingcountryintheprotectionofthemarineenvironment.Inaddition,all
parksarepartoftheMediterraneanMPANetwork(MedMPAnet),whichisindispensable
forlong‐termmarinebiodiversitymonitoringprojects[69].
AnimportantpartofMPAplanningandmanagementisunderstandingandincor‐
poratingtheprioritiesofdifferentgroups[70–73].ThedesignandmanagementofanMPA
shouldbebasedonknowledgeofthephysicalandecologicalsystemsthataffectit,and
onhumandimensions,includinggovernance,socio‐economic,andculturalaspects
[74,75].Managementmustbeadaptedtothesocio‐culturalsituationofeachplace.Fur‐
thermore,thedesignofthedecision‐makingprocessmustbetransparentandcoverall
stagesofmanagement.
Until2004,aneffectivesystemwasinplacetoensurearepresentativeinclusionof
stakeholdersinmanagement.Boardsconsistedofrepresentativesofscientificcommuni‐
ties,localcommunities,theNatureProtectionDirectorate,andpoliticalrepresentatives.
However,thissystemwasabandoned,andmembersarenowdeterminedsolelyonpolit‐
icalgrounds[76].Despitethis,thereisabalancebetweenallsectorsinvolvedintheBoards
ofthethreeparks,whicharemultidisciplinary.RecentpublicationssuggestthatMPA
managementshouldevolvetowardsabottom‐upmodel,inwhichlocalpeoplearein‐
volvedinplanningprocesses[77],ortowardsanintermediatemodelcombiningbothtop‐
downandbottom‐upelements[78–80].
Inthissense,Croatiaisgettingclosertothisdesirablesituation.Forexample,inthe
caseofTelašćica,thedevelopmentofthemanagementplanwasthefirsteventthatin‐
cludedthepopulation.Sincethen,ithascollaboratedinsomemonitoringandlocalfish‐
eriescouncilshavebeenestablished.IntheframeworkoftheFishMPABlue2project,for
thefirsttimeinCroatia,fishermenwereinvolvedinthedesignofthefisheriesmanage‐
mentplan.Theydecidedtocreateno‐takezoneintheMPAthemselvesandreplacedtheir
netswithmoreselectiveonestoreducefishingpressureandcatchperuniteffort.Thisis
agoodexampleofamanagementplandevelopedinabottom‐upapproachinvolving
fishermen,scientists,non‐governmentalorganizations,andthegovernment[81].
However,thereisstillalongwaytogo.MPAsareonlylegallyobligedtoensure
stakeholderparticipationinrelationtothedesignationofanMPAandintheformofpub‐
licconsultationsregardingproposalsformanagementplansandactsofsecondarylegis‐
lationaffectingtheirinterests.Nevertheless,aneffectivesystemofstakeholderparticipa‐
tioninday‐to‐daymanagementhasnotbeendeveloped[76].
ThissituationisfoundinotherMPAsaroundtheworld,forexampleinCalifornia,
wherethedesignandplanningofitsMPAnetworkwashighlyparticipatory.Stakehold‐
ersplayedakeyroleandwerethesolegroupresponsibleforproposingMPAconfigura‐
tionsandlocations[82].However,withoutspecificstructuresforthisprocess,maintaining
thehighlevelofparticipationandengagementischallenging,especiallywiththetop‐
downmodelthatislegallyinplace[82].InThailand,meanwhile,nationallegislationcon‐
tainsprovisionsforparticipation,butministerialmandatesandlocalmanagersmaintain
Diversity2022,14,44817of24
top‐downapproaches,leadingtoconflictsbetweenthecommunityandmanagers[83].As
canbeseen,itisessentialthatpublicpoliciesarealignedatallscales,andthattheinstitu‐
tionsinchargeofmanagingMPAshavethewillandthetoolstodosoinaparticipatory
way,beyondthedesignoftheMPAortheelaborationofthemanagementplan.
TherearenopopulationcentersinBrijuniNationalPark,sostakeholdersbelongto
thenearestcommunities(mainlyFažana).Oneoftheactivitiescarriedoutduringthede‐
velopmentofthemanagementplanwereinterviewswithvisitors.Itwasobservedthat
mostofthemhaveconcernsrelatedtoproblemswithinfrastructureandservices,tourism
management(hotelsandvisitors),andconservationofnaturalandhistorical‐culturalher‐
itage[46].Someofthemhavenoproblemswiththecurrentlevelsofcooperationandex‐
pecttocontinuetodoso(inresearch,education,orvolunteering),whileotherswantto
increasethelevelofcooperationandparticipatemoreactivelyinthepark’sactivities[46].
Overall,thesefindingsshowthatthedesiresofcommunitiesinterestedincoastal
MPAsarecontext‐specific,evenwhenthegroupsappeartobesimilar.Asimilarfinding
occursinaCanadianMPA,BasinHead,wherestrongcommunitysupportwasfound[84].
Mostintervieweesinthisparkindicatedthattheyweresatisfiedwithjustreceivingup‐
datesandallowinglocalmanagementandleaderstomakemanagementdecisions.This
wasinfluencedbythefactthatthepartnershipformedbymanagersandthepopulation
generatedahighleveloftrust,allowingotherstakeholderstotakeahands‐offapproach.
However,inBrijuni,sincethecreationofthemanagementplan,socialactorshavenot
beeninvolvedinmanagementprocessesandrelationswiththecommunityarenotascon‐
solidated,althoughcommunicationchannelsarealwaysopenforsuggestionsandconsul‐
tations.
Toavoidconflict,itisimperativethatallstakeholdersareinvolvedinplanningand
managementprocessesinarepresentativemanner[85,86],leadingtogreatertransparency
andrecognitionoftheviewsandconcernsofdifferentactors.Thisincreasesthelikelihood
ofagreementsandimprovessocialacceptability,legitimacy,andsupportforfuture
MPAs.InCroatia,effortshavebeenmadetoinvolvestakeholdersinoceanprojectsand
management.However,despiteitslongexperienceincreatingandimplementingpark
policies,thereareobviousdifficultiesingettingprotectedareastoplaytheirrolethrough
theinvolvementoflocalcommunities[87].Successfulparticipatoryconservationrequires
alegislativeframework,understandinganddeterminationofmanagement,andlocalwill‐
ingnesstoimplementconservationprograms.OnecaseofanMPAthathassignificantly
improveditspublicparticipationisTubbataha,inthePhilippines.Initially,thestatedid
nottakecommunityinputintoconsiderationduringthedesignoftheMPA.However,
eightyearslater,aparticipatorygovernancesystemwasestablished,whichhasbeenin‐
strumentalinthesuccessofthisarea.Themanagementplanwassubjecttoextensivecon‐
sultation,andparticipatoryevaluationiscarriedoutaspartofanadaptiveplanningpro‐
cess.Research,information,andeducationcampaignsareoftencarriedoutincollabora‐
tionwithvariousorganizations[88].Zengetal.[89]proposepromotingpublicparticipa‐
tionthroughbetteradvocacyandincentivemechanisms,andthecreationoflocaladvisory
councils,whichallowformoreactivestakeholderparticipationandprovideopportunities
tointeractwithmanagementagencies.
BothTelašćicaandBrijunihaveeducationandvolunteerprogramsandactivities,alt‐
houghbothwereaffectedduetorestrictionscausedbytheSARS‐CoVpandemic.In
Brijuniseveralactivitiesarebeingdevelopedtobetterpresenttheparkanditsheritage
[46],andinTelašćicatherearevariousactivitiesonthevaluesofthepark.However,there
aresomeproblems,especiallyintheMirBayarea,whichreceivesmorethan100,000vis‐
itorsduringthetouristseason[47].
Inordertoimplementmanagementactionseffectively,sufficienthumanandfinan‐
cialresourcesareessential.ThemainsourcesofincomeinCroatianparksareEUand
nationalfunds,donations,andsponsorships,andthosegeneratedthroughtheirownac‐
tivities.ThefundsfortheannualbudgetoftheBrijuniPublicInstitutioncomefromthe
incomeearnedbytheinstitution.Until2014,theparkreceivedsmallfinancial
Diversity2022,14,44818of24
contributionsfromtheCroatiangovernmentforcertainstaffsalariesandcapitalprojects.
Sincethen,theparkhasbeenfinanciallyindependentfromthegovernmentandisfunded
throughtourismrevenues,donations,andEU‐sponsoredprojects.Ithasattractedatten‐
tionforitssustainablefundingstrategy,whichincludesaconcessionprogramfortourism
activitiesthatwasusedtoachieveconservationobjectives.This,amongotherreasons,has
ledtoitbeingawardedtheBlueParkAwardin2021.
However,itisrelevanttonotetheimpactthattheSARS‐CoVpandemichashadon
theCroatianeconomy,whichisheavilydependentontourism.InthePlitviceLakesNa‐
tionalPark(alsoinCroatia),tourism‐relatedrevenuesaccountforapproximately98%of
thetotal,whichleadstoMPAsbeingunabletocarryouttheiractionsandmanagement
plansintheabsenceofvisitors.Aparadigmshiftisneeded,includingdiversificationof
fundingsourcesforareasandcommunities,effectiveallocationoffinancialresources,and
responsibletourismrecoveryplans[64].
Themeaningofmanagementisnoneotherthantoimplementtheplanandprograms
thathaveemergedintheplanningstage.Inadditiontoexecutingthevariousmeasures,
itisalsoessentialtomonitorimplementation[90].Severalauthoritiesadoptadaptive
managementasacentralorientationofconservationmanagement[79].Itisthecyclical
processofsystematicallytestingassumptions,generatinglearningbyevaluatingresults,
andcontinuingtocorrectandimprovemanagementpractices[33].Thisenablestheiden‐
tificationofthemosteffectivemeasurestoachievedesiredoutcomes,andabetterunder‐
standingofhowobjectivesshouldbemodifiedinthecontextofchangingconditions[91].
Itrequiresaregularsystemofmonitoringandevaluation.Attentionshouldbepaidtothe
analysisofsocio‐economicaspectsoftheMPAandlocalperceptions[92,93].
Monitoringofindicatorsiscarriedoutwhenthereisaprojectthatrequiresit.In
TelašćicaandPakleniIslands,onlybiophysicalindicatorsareconsidered.InBrijunithey
alsohavevisitormonitoring.Thisaspectcouldbeimprovedbyestablishingaregular
monitoringsystem,asitsabsencecanleadtoconflictsbetweenmanagers,fishermenand
thescientificcommunity,ashashappenedintheSanyaCoralReefs[94].However,all
threeparkshaveasystemofannualevaluation,throughreporting,whichexaminesthe
degreeofcompliancewiththeoperationalplan.Thisevaluationisusedtopropose
changestothemanagementplanforthefollowingyear.Thisprocedureisusedinother
successfulMPAs,suchastheAustralianGreatBarrierReef[95],althoughpublicpartici‐
pationinthisparkishigher.Monitoringofmanagementactivitiesiswellestablishedin
Croatiabutmonitoringofbiophysicalandsocio‐economicindicatorsisnotsystematic.
Despitethis,allparkshavealongscientifictraditionandresultsareintegratedinto
management.InthecaseofBrijuni,biophysical,cultural,andarchaeologicalissuesare
studied.Forexample,severaldatabaseshavebeencreated,suchasmarinehabitats,cul‐
turalheritagesitesfromprehistorytothe20thcentury,andsitesofgeological–paleonto‐
logicalinterest.InTelašćica,thebiophysicalpartisthemostimportant,althoughthesocial
partisbecomingincreasinglyimportant.Adatabaseonthefishingsituationisplanned.
ThelicenseholdersarenotobligedtoreporttheamountoftheircatchestothePublic
Institution,soithasnotbeenpossibletomonitorthefishingeffortwithinthepark.Con‐
sideringthatalmostthewholeareaisprivatelyowned(95%),itsmanagementbecomes
morecomplex,andmutualco‐operationisofutmostimportance.Anotherexampleofthe
useofscientificinformationinmanagementinthisparkistheanalysisofmetalconcen‐
trationsinthewater,whichisservingasabasisfordelimitingthecarryingcapacityof
anchoredvessels[47].
Ingeneral,publicparticipationandtheimplementationstagearetheaspectsthat
needtobestrengthenedthemost.Theseweaknesseshavebeenidentifiedatleastsince
2014[96].Atthetime,theidentifiedweaknesseswerefacilitationandconflictresolution,
communicationwiththelocalcommunityandtheirparticipationinmanagement,dissem‐
inationofMPAvalues,issuesandrulesofbehaviorwithvisitors(publicparticipation),
andmonitoring,evaluation,andmanagementoftheprojectcycle(implementationstage).
Theseelementscouldserveasastartingpointfordevelopingatrainingprogramfor
Diversity2022,14,44819of24
managersatthenationallevel,strengtheningcommunityrelationsandadaptivemanage‐
mentthroughconstantfeedback.ThishappensinmanyMPAs.CasestudiesinFrance,
England,andPortugalshoweddeficienciesintheimplementationoftheiractions,which
waspresentinonly40%ofcases,whilethispercentagewassomewhathigherinSpain
[55].Thismaybedueto