ArticlePDF Available

The 1:2,500,000-scale geologic map of the global Moon

Authors:
  • National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Journal Pre-proofs
Short Communications
The 1:2,500,000-scale geologic map of the global moon
Jinzhu Ji, Dijun Guo, Jianzhong Liu, Shengbo Chen, Zongcheng Ling,
Xiaozhong Ding, Kunying Han, Jianping Chen, Weiming Cheng, Kai Zhu,
Jingwen Liu, Juntao Wang, Jian Chen, Ziyuan Ouyang
PII: S2095-9273(22)00231-6
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2022.05.021
Reference: SCIB 1774
To appear in: Science Bulletin
Received Date: 13 April 2022
Revised Date: 10 May 2022
Accepted Date: 13 May 2022
Please cite this article as: J. Ji, D. Guo, J. Liu, S. Chen, Z. Ling, X. Ding, K. Han, J. Chen, W. Cheng, K. Zhu, J.
Liu, J. Wang, J. Chen, Z. Ouyang, The 1:2,500,000-scale geologic map of the global moon, Science Bulletin
(2022), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2022.05.021
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover
page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version
will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are
providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors
may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Short Communication
The 1:2,500,000-scale geologic map of the global Moon
Jinzhu Jia,g, Dijun Guoh, Jianzhong Liua,i,*, Shengbo Chenb,i, Zongcheng Lingc,i, Xiaozhong Dingd,
Kunying Hand, Jianping Chene, Weiming Chengf,i, Kai Zhua, Jingwen Liua,j, Juntao Wanga, Jian Chenc,
Ziyuan Ouyanga
a Center for Lunar and Planetary Science, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Guiyang 550081, China
b College of Geoexploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130000, China
c Shandong Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy and Solar-Terrestrial Environment, Institute of Space
Sciences, School of Space Science and Physics, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China
d Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
e School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
f State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information Systems, Institute of Geographic
Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
g School of Mining, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010051, China
h National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
i Center for Excellence in Comparative Planetology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230026, China
j College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049,
China
* Corresponding author, e-mail: liujz@mail.gyig.ac.cn
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Received 2022-04-13revised 2022-05-10accepted 2022-05-13
Geologic maps of the Moon provide comprehensive information about the geologic
strata, structural features, lithologies, and chronology of the lunar crustal surface, which
reflect the evolution of lunar crust under igneous processes, catastrophic impacts, and
volcanic activities [1]. As syntheses of current knowledge on lunar geology and evolution
history, lunar geologic maps are fundamental resources in science research, exploration
planning, and landing site selection. In the Moon Race era from the late 1950s to mid
1970s, huge amounts of data were obtained through a volley of robotic and crewed
missions, in which the Apollo and Luna missions set the greatest milestones by returning
~382 kg lunar samples in total. Using the data returned from the Moon and collected
through Earth-based telescopes, the United States Geological Survey (USGS) compiled
seven atlases of lunar regional geologic maps at scales of 1:5,000,000, 1:250,000,
1:100,000, 1:50,000, 1: 5000, 1:10,000, and 1:5000. However, those maps were compiled
using different standards because they were completed by different groups in different
periods of time, and often lead to confusion and misunderstanding. Though the six
1:5,000,000-scale quadrangular maps can cover the entire Moon in combination [2], their
unit schemes are not compatible with each other. After being digitalized and adjusting the
203 units across the six maps to 43 unified units, Fortezzo et al. [2] stitched the six maps
together and released a globally consistent 1:5,000,000-scale geologic map.
Since the 1990s, the lunar exploration has entered a new booming phase and nearly
20 spacecrafts have been launched to the Moon from not only the US but also new
agencies such as China, India, and Japan. Benefitting from those missions,
unprecedented exploration data and new discoveries have profoundly renewed our
understanding of the geologic processes and evolution of the Moon. However, the
integrated cartographic work had remained lagging until we initiated the 1:2,500,000-scale
lunar global mapping project, led by Ouyang Ziyuan and Liu Jianzhong. Although the
1:5,000,000-scale global geologic map is available [2], it is only a uniformity of the
previous quadrangular maps and does not incorporate the subsequent scientific advances
(Text S1 online). USGS also proposed to map the global Moon at 1:2,500,000 scale [3],
but little progress has been reported.
In this mapping work, one basic principle is to regard the lunar geologic units and
evolution history from the dynamic perspective, i.e., endogenous or exogenous. The
exploration datasets and products from China’s Lunar Exploration Program (CLEP) [4] are
used as the primary data (Table S1 online) for mapping geologic units. As important
supplementary data, we also collected the high-quality datasets and products from
international exploration missions (Table S1 online). The scale, 1:2,500,000, is restricted
by the resolution of the primary datasets on one hand, and with considerations of the
workload and compatibility with USGS 1:2,500,000-scale scheme on the other hand [3].
The global Moon was subdivided into 30 quadrangles and mapped individually with the
same standard and unit scheme. To minimize the map distortions, different map
projections are employed for different quadrangles depending on the latitudinal range (Fig.
S1 online). The Mercator projection is used for 0°30°N/S; the Lambert conformal conic
projection is used for 30°65°N/S; and the Polar stereographic projection is used for the
polar regions with latitude of 65°90°N/S. Our mapping work was performed on ESRI
(Environmental Systems Research Institute) ArcMap platform, and all the maps have their
own geodatabases. The global map was created by stitching the 30 quadrangular maps
together.
The geologic time scale, which categorizes geologic units into different chronologic
periods with respect to the most significant evolutionary events, is the foundation for a
geologic map. The current lunar time scale was proposed by Wilhelms et al. [5], while the
past decades have seen great progresses in studying the geological evolution of the
Moon. From the dynamic perspective, the evolution of the Moon can be divided into three
phases [6, 7], and in different phases the endogenic and exogenic processes have made
relatively different contributions in shaping the lunar crust (Fig. 1). The first phase
specifically represents the magma ocean solidification period and was dominated by
endogenic processes. The formation of the oldest South Pole-Aitken (SPA) impact basin
at ~4.3 Ga [8] implies a transition in dynamics. In the second phase, the effects of
endogenic (igneous activities, magmatism, and volcanism) and exogenic (meteorite
impacts) processes were comparable. With the cooling of the Moon, the magnitude of
endogenic processes has declined since ~3.13.3 Ga and the magmatic products
became much less than previous periods, while impact craters have been continuously
formed on lunar surface. Thus, the exogenic processes has dominated over endogenic
processes in this period and it is the third lunar evolution phase. From a geochronologic
point of view, we defined three Eon/Eonothem-level time-scale units corresponding to the
three dynamical evolutionary phases, which are Eolunarian, Paleolunarian, and
Neolunarian from old to young (Fig. 1). However, the current Period-level units do not
readily fit in this scheme, as the Pre-Nectarian Period includes both the magma ocean
evolution and formations of the SPA and subsequent dozens of basins [5]. Therefore, the
pre-Nectarian Period is divided into Magma-oceanian and Aitkenian Periods [7], and the
ejecta deposit of the SPA basin, i.e., the Das Formation is defined as the stratigraphic
boundary (Fig. 1). The other Period-level units are unchanged from Wilhelms et al. [5]. So,
only by small modifications, the updated lunar time scale scheme shows great advantage
in highlighting the dynamic evolution of the Moon, which is important for revealing the
evolution history from geologic maps.
Fig. 1. The updated lunar time scale from the dynamic evolution perspective.
Following the principle of dynamic genesis (i.e., exogenic products or endogenic
products), with integrated considerations of previous maps, geologic architectures,
morphologic characteristics, compositional distribution, and structural features, there are
90 map units were expressed in our geologic map (Fig. S2 online). The exogenic units
include three groups: crater materials [9, 10] (Fig. S3 online), basin formations [11] (Fig.
S4 online), and structures formed in exogenic processes. It should be noted that a basin is
a crater in fact yet with highly-developed central peak or peak ring(s) and are usually
greater than 200 km diameter [11]. The endogenic units are categorized into two groups:
lithologies that formed in igneous and volcanic processes [12] (Fig. S5 online), and
geological structures of various types [13, 14] (Fig. S6 online). There are some locations
on lunar surface that have particular implications such as landing sites and elevation
points (the highest and lowest elevations in quadrangle maps). They are categorized in
the group of special features and are marked on maps. In accord with the map unit
scheme, we designed the standard legends for the 1:2,500,000-scale geologic maps [15]
(Fig. S7 online). The unit scheme and legend will be publicly available and can serve as a
basis for the other lunar geologic mapping scenarios.
More information about the geologic units is given as follows.
(1) Crater materials. Impact craters are the dominant features on the Moon, and the
cratering excavation is the most common geological process on the lunar crust. As a
result of the impact cratering mechanism, materials of a typical fresh crater usually appear
as five facies (Text S2 and Fig. S3 online): central peak, floor, wall, continuous ejecta, and
discontinuous ejecta. The central peak only appears in the crater with relatively greater
diameter (usually >15 km) and such a crater is called a complex crater. On our global map,
crater materials of 6153 dated and 1395 undated impact craters are identified and
mapped. Due to the morphologic degradation with age and space weathering effects,
some parts of the facies may be demolished and hardly recognized. In summary, the
global map includes 1265 central peak units, 6830 floor units, 7548 wall units, 4768
continuous ejecta units, and 79 discontinuous ejecta units.
(2) Basin formations. Impact basins are primary geological structures on the Moon
formed in ~4.33.8 Ga, and play key roles in revealing the lunar history. Based on the
characteristics observed from new high-resolution morphologic data and research results,
we established the criteria to define a basin and the basin types [11]. Under these criteria,
we produced a new lunar basin catalog with 81 basins, including 24 proto-basins, 31
peak-ring basins, 25 multiring basins, and 1 super basin specifically referring to the SPA
basin (Table S2 online). Based on the isotopic ages and crater size-frequency
distributions, there are 49 Aitkenian-aged basins, 25 Nectarian-aged basins, and 7
Imbrian-aged basins. Analysis of the ring-diameter ratios, pure anorthosite distribution,
and radial textures of basin ejecta suggests that the basin rock-stratigraphic units may
include six parts (Text S3 and Fig. S4 online): central peak, peak-ring, basin-floor,
basin-wall, basin-rim, and basin-ejecta [11]. These basin units are regarded as "geological
formation" referring to the lithostratigraphic unit having a consistent set of physical
characteristics that distinguishes it from an adjacent unit. Our geologic map shows that
the stratigraphic units of basins cover near 70% of the lunar surface, though those of most
basins are only partially preserved due to modification from late impact events and mare
basalts filling. Several basin-ejecta units are "Golden Spikes" used as the base strata of
lunar chronostratigraphy scheme, making them equivalent roles to the Global Standard
Straotype-section and Points (GSSP) (or "Golden Spike") in terrestrial chronostratigraphy
scheme. These include the Das Formation of the SPA basin, Janssen Formation of the
Nectaris basin, Fra Mauro Formation of the Imbrium basin, and Hevelius Formation of the
Orientale basin, which are the "Golden Spike" of the Moon.
(3) Endogenic lithologies. The types and distribution of lunar endogenic rocks are
important information for understanding the geologic evolution of the Moon. In the scheme
of our geologic map, the lunar endogenic lithology includes 17 rock types categorized into
three groups (Fig. S5 and Table S3 online): 5 types of mare basalts (very low-Ti, low-Ti,
medium-Ti, high-Ti, and very high-Ti), 7 types of non-mare rocks (ferroan noritic suite,
ferroan anorthositic suite, magnesian anorthositic suite, Mg-suite, Alkali suite, KREEP
suite, and KREEP basalt), and 5 special outcrops (pure anorthosite, spinel anorthosite,
olivine-rich outcrop, pyroclastic deposits, and silicic dome).
(4) Structures. The development and distribution of geological structures can reflect
the force conditions and mechanical properties of lunar crust. In our geologic map, we
mapped out 14 types of geologic structures classified into two groups considering their
dynamic genesis (Fig. S6 online). The structures usually appear as either linear shapes or
circular shapes. The 10 endogenic structure types consist of 16839 linear structures (358
inferred deep faults, 1335 shallow faults, 11046 wrinkle ridges, 474 rillles, 816 grabens,
2583 crater-floor fractures, and 227 lobate scarps) and 364 circular structures (271
volcanic vents, 47 domes, and 46 mascons). The 4 exogenic structure types consist of
2137 linear structures (1882 impact fractures and 255 impact crater chains) and 4874
circular structures (4793 impact craters and 81 impact basins). To avoid the bewildering
map elements, only the craters with recognizable morphologic characteristics but the
crater materials have been demolished and unmapped are expressed as circular
structures, while the craters whose crater materials are mapped are excluded in structure
features. The smallest craters and linear structures being mapped are 10 km in diameter
and 2.5 km in length, respectively.
(5) Special features. These include the landing sites of all the previous landing
exploration missions (i.e., Apollo, Luna, and Chang’e missions), locations of
chronostratigraphic "Golden spikes" (Das Formation, Janssen Formation, Fra Mauro
Formation, and Hevelius Formation), elevation peak and bottom of each quadrangle
(elevation points), and geological contacts.
Fig. 2. Thumbnail of the 1:2,500,000-scale global geologic map of the Moon. The global
map in the center is in Mollweide projection, and the north and south polar maps on the top are
in Polar stereographic projection. The maps in the center of the left and right sides are the
global lithologic map and global structure outline map, respectively.
The first 1:2,500,000-scale global geologic map of the Moon (Fig. 2) provides a
state-of-the-art illustration of impact basins, craters, rocks, and structures of lunar surface,
which reveals the geological processes and evolution of the Moon. This geologic map is
compiled in both Chinese and English, and will be published in hard copies by the
Geological Publishing House, and the digital version will be released as well. For further
investigation and to make the best use of the map, the geodatabases of the map will be
publicly accessible. As unprecedented integrative product of lunar exploration results, the
1:2,500,000-scale lunar geologic map will play important roles for the scientific study of the
Moon and lunar exploration in the future. With 10 years of endeavors, the experience we
learned from this lunar mapping project lays the foundation for mapping other planets.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by National Science and Technology Infrastructure Work
Projects (2015FY210500), the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, Chinese
Academy of Sciences (QYZDY-SSW-DQC028), the Strategic Priority Program of the
Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB41000000), the National Natural Science Foundation
of China (41773065, 41941003, and 41902317), and the Natural Science Foundation of
Inner Mongolia, China (2020LH04002). We thank the cartographers including dozens of
graduate students who compiled the quadrangular maps, the editor for handling the
manuscript, and two reviewers for their comments and suggestions. The full size of the
geologic map is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.12176/03.99.02797.
Author contributions
Jianzhong Liu and Ziyuan Ouyang conceptualized this work. Jinzhu Ji and Dijun Guo
wrote the manuscript and performed the analyses. Jianzhong Liu and Dijun Guo updated
the lunar time scale scheme. Jianzhong Liu, Juntao Wang, and Jingwen Liu contributed to
mapping the crater materials and basin formations. Zongcheng Ling and Jian Chen
completed the endogenic lithologic map of lunar surface. Shenbo Chen and Kai Zhu
mapped the geologic structures of the Moon. Xiaozhong Ding and Kunying Han designed
the legend and map layout. Jianping Chen contributed to creating the geodatabase.
Weiming Cheng contributed to map pre-publish editing. All authors contributed to
discussions on many aspects of the maps.
References
[1] Ouyang Z, Liu J. The origin and evolution of the Moon and its geological mapping.
Earth Sci. Front. 2014; 21: 16.
[2] Fortezzo CM, Spudis PD, Harrel SL. Release of the digital unified global geologic map
of the Moon at 1:5,000,000-scale. In: The 51th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference.
2020, #2760.
[3] Gaddis L, Tanaka K, Hare T, et al. A new lunar geologic mapping program. In: The 35th
Lunar and Planetary Science. 2004, #1418.
[4] Zuo W, Li C, Zhang Z, et al. China's lunar and planetary data system: preserve and
present reliable Chang'e project and Tianwen-1 scientific data sets. Space Sci. Rev. 2021;
217: 88.
[5] Wilhelms DE, McCauley JF, Trask NJ. The geologic history of the Moon. Washington:
US Government Printing Office, 1987.
[6] Guo D, Liu J, Zhang L, et al. The methods of lunar geochronology study and the
subdivisions of lunar geologic history. Earth Sci. Front. 2014; 21: 4561.
[7] Guo D. A lunar timescale from geodynamic evolution perspective. Doctor Dissertation.
Guiyang: Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2018.
[8] Orgel C, Michael G, Fassett CI, et al. Ancient bombardment of the inner solar system:
reinvestigation of the "fingerprints" of different impactor populations on the lunar surface. J.
Geophys. Res.: Planets 2018; 123: 748762.
[9] Wang J, Kreslavsky MA, Liu J, et al. Quantitative characterization of impact crater
materials on the Moon: changes in topographic roughness and thermophysical properties
with age. J. Geophys. Res.: Planets 2020; 125: e2019JE006091.
[10] Liu J, Ji J, Zhu K, et al. The explanation for global geologic map of the Moon at
1:2,500,000 scale. Beijing: Geological Publishing House; 2022.
[11] Liu JW, Liu J, Yue Z, et al. Characterization and interpretation of the global lunar
impact basins based on remote sensing. Icarus 2022; 378: 114952.
[12] Chen J, Ling Z, Li B, et al. Lunar lithologic map for 1:2,500,000 digital geologic map.
Beijing: Geological Publishing House; 2022.
[13] Luo L, Liu J, Zhang L, et al. Research on the classification system of lunar lineaments.
Acta Petrol. Sin. 2017; 33: 32853301.
[14] Lu T. Study on remote sensing recognition and evolution of lunar tectonics. Doctor
Dissertation. Changchun: Jilin University, 2020.
[15] Xu K, Wang L, Han K, et al. Design and implementation of symbol library of lunar
geological map at 1: 2.5 M. Earth Sci, 2020; 45: 26502661.
Jinzhu Ji is a lecturer at School of Mining, Inner Mongolia
University of Technology and visiting scholar at Center for
Lunar and Planetary Science, Institute of Geochemistry,
Chinese Academy of Sciences. His research is about lunar
geologic mapping.
Dijun Guo is an associate professor at National Space
Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences. His research
focuses on the evolution history and surface processes of
terrestrial planets.
Jianzhong Liu is a professor at Center for Lunar and
Planetary Science, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese
Academy of Sciences. His research focuses on lunar and
planetary geology, especially cartography and digital
planetary models.
... The slope was then computed based on this DEM using Esri ArcGIS (Esri 2018). For other factors, corresponding data products were downloaded either from NASA's Planetary Data System (NASA 2023a) and Moon Trek (NASA 2023b), or obtained by clipping the 1:2.5 million lunar topographic maps (Ji et al. 2022;Lu et al. 2022). Detailed information of all the geographic data products is listed in Table 3. ...
... Abundance data of olivine, Orthopyroxene, Clinopyroxene, Iron oxide, and Titanium oxide, water ice exposures data, optical maturity data are downloaded from Moon Trek: Moon Trek (nasa.gov). The distribution of the impact craters with central peak is derived from the 1:2,500,000-scale geologic map of the global moon (Ji et al. 2022). Ejecta from SPA, shallow faults, impact fractures, and lobate scarps data is derived from the 1:2,500,000-scale global tectonic map of the Moon (Lu et al. 2022). ...
... Tectonic map and geologic map in the study region on the Moon(Ji et al. 2022;Lu et al. 2022). ...
Article
Full-text available
Countries are now shifting from one-off lunar exploration missions to the establishment of a lunar base for long-term sustainable surveys. The selection of a suitable site plays a crucial role in sustaining the base’s operation and facilitating scientific research. Previous site selection methods have been limited in their ability to consider multiple objectives and factors simultaneously, often relying heavily on expert knowledge. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a comprehensive site selection method that integrates multiple engineering and scientific objectives/factors. Through site selection factor comprehending, gridded data processing and site evaluation based on Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), the proposed method balances subjective and objective considerations and outputs quantitative descriptions of the most suitable candidate sites. This paper applies the proposed method to the range of 75°S − 90°S. The results reveal four large areas with continuous high suitability near the South Pole, while a small area located at the rim of Cabeus B crater shows the highest suitability. Qualitative and quantitative comparisons are conducted between the areas selected by the proposed method, areas recommended by previous studies, and areas announced by Artemis III. The candidate areas identified in this paper outperform others in terms of a wider range of site selection factors, making them valuable references for future lunar base site determination. Additionally, the proposed site selection method holds relevance for similar site selection tasks where multiple objectives are set. It offers a more automated and quantifiable approach, minimizing manual intervention and providing robust results for decision-making processes.
... Geological map: Jinzhu Ji et al. [52] provided a 1:2,500,000 scale global geological map of the Moon, mainly using data from the China Lunar Exploration Project (CLEP) and international exploration missions, with distortions reduced by the division of 30 regions with different map projections, and mapped using the ESRI ArcMap platform. The lunar geological map is divided into three periods, Eolunarian, Paleolunarian, and Neolunarian, according to the geological time scale, and defines 90 geological units covering impact craters, basin formation, endogenous orogeny, and so on. ...
... The lunar South Pole remote sensing data used in Figure 2 can be found at the following locations: slope (Planetary Data System LOLA Data node (http://imbrium.mit. edu/EXTRAS/SLDEM2015/ (accessed on 24 January 2022))), Sun visibility and Earth visibility [9], roughness [48], FeO [49], hydrogen abundance [50], water ice exposure [38], geological map [52], and gravity [51]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The permanently shadowed regions of the lunar South Pole have become a key target for international lunar exploration due to their unique scientific value and engineering challenges. In order to effectively screen suitable landing zones near the lunar South Pole, this research proposes a comprehensive evaluation method based on a self-organizing map (SOM). Using multi-source remote sensing data, the method classifies and analyzes candidate landing zones by combining scientific purposes (such as hydrogen abundance, iron oxide abundance, gravity anomalies, water ice distance analysis, and geological features) and engineering constraints (such as Sun visibility, Earth visibility, slope, and roughness). Through automatic clustering, the SOM model finds the important regions. Subsequently, it integrates with a supervised learning model, a random forest, to determine the feature importance weights in more detail. The results from the research indicate the following: the areas suitable for landing account for 9.05%, 5.95%, and 5.08% in the engineering, scientific, and synthesized perspectives, respectively. In the weighting analysis of the comprehensive data, the weights of Earth visibility, hydrogen abundance, kilometer-scale roughness, and slope data all account for more than 10%, and these are thought to be the four most important factors in the automated site selection process. Furthermore, the kilometer-scale roughness data are more important in the comprehensive weighting, which is in line with the finding that the kilometer-scale roughness data represent both surface roughness from an engineering perspective and bedrock geology from a scientific one. In this study, a local examination of typical impact craters is performed, and it is confirmed that all 10 possible landing sites suggested by earlier authors are within the appropriate landing range. The findings demonstrate that the SOM-model-based analysis approach can successfully assess lunar South Pole landing areas while taking multiple constraints into account, uncovering spatial distribution features of the region, and offering a rationale for choosing desired landing locations.
... Chinese researchers have completed the compilation of the 1:2.5 Million Lunar Geological Map and achieved remarkable international recognition including the lunar geological maps, the lunar lithologic maps and the lunar tectonic maps [70][71][72][73][74]. Based on the 1:2.5 Million Lunar Geological Map, we have mapped out the geologic structures, rocks and crater units in the target of the Reiner Gamma region with 1:10,000-scale through the high-resolution geochemical composition data, image data, and the DEM data collected and produced in 2.1 and 2.2. ...
Article
Full-text available
Reiner Gamma is a potential target for low-orbiting spacecraft or even surface-landed missions in the near future. Unfortunately, thus far, no comprehensive low-altitude (below 20 km) or surface measurements of the magnetic field, magnetic source and plasma environment have been made post-Apollo to complement and complete our understanding of the solar wind interaction with lunar magnetic anomalies and swirl formation. Acquiring the detailed geological knowledge of the Reiner Gamma region is significant for the above scientific targets. In this study, the following research work in the lunar Reiner Gamma magnetic anomaly region was carried out for the regional geological investigation: (1) topographic and geomorphologic analysis; (2) element, mineral, and sequence analysis; and (3) a 1:10,000 regional geological map analysis. Our work helps define measurement requirements for possible future low-orbiting or surface-landed missions to the Reiner Gamma area or similarly magnetized regions of the lunar surface.
Article
Mare basalts are volcanic products that filled the large topographic depressions on the Moon. Investigating volcanic activity aids in deeply understanding the lunar endogenic geological processes and thermal evolution over time. Previous studies on lunar volcanism mainly focused on using optical, spectral, and topographical data, which are good at analyzing lunar surface morphology and composition, but detection of its subsurface regolith property has been greatly restricted. Chang′E-2 microwave radiometer data can reveal the thermal and dielectric properties of mare deposits to variable depths and identify potential lava flows, providing a new perspective for delineating volcanic units. This work presents a comprehensive analysis of the regolith properties, chronology, and composition of mare basalts in the Imbrium basin, aiming to reveal the details of the basin’s volcanic history and thermal evolution. Trend surface analysis was applied to remove latitude effects, generating detrended brightness temperature difference (dTB) maps that distinctly highlight major mare deposits. We identified Imbrium mare units using detrended dTB maps, which effectively capture the diurnal temperature variations. Results show at least three major episodes of lava filling events in the basin, approximately occurring at 3.51 Ga, 3.26 Ga, and 2.76 Ga, respectively. Although the range of compositions varied in each eruption, the general trend suggests an increasingly highly evolved composition for the mare deposits emplaced in the Imbrium basin over time. The updated geological map provides detailed regional background information for understanding the evolution of the Imbrium basin.
Preprint
Full-text available
Impact cratering plays a major role in shaping the Moon’s surface, producing widespread ejecta deposits that archive the sedimentary and morphological imprint of planetary surface processes. Since early 2019, Chang’e-4 mission has been investigating such deposits within Von Kármán crater, where materials ejected from the nearby Finsen crater were emplaced across a complex landscape. This setting offers a rare opportunity to study ejecta emplacement directly from the ground. Yet, despite valuable in-situ subsurface exploration, the geomorphic patterns and depositional mechanisms of these ejecta remain unconstrained at the scale of individual landforms. Here we integrate digital terrain analysis with lunar penetrating radar data to characterize the morphology and internal structure of the landform traversed by the mission’s rover. The analysis defines the spatial extent of the landform and reveals its intricate morphology, configured as an ridge over a sheet-like flow. Internally, we identify two stacked sedimentary sequences overlying mare basalt: a basal paleoregolith marked by hummocky structure, overlain by Finsen ejecta. Ejecta morphology reflects interactions between local topography and deposition volume, with ridge areas reaching ~30 m in thickness, including ~10 m imaged by radar. The landform’s shape and subsurface architecture support the interpretation that emplacement triggered a syn-depositional dry debris flow that remobilized the underlying paleoregolith. These findings provide an example of medial-to-distal ejecta emplacement shaped by dynamic processes, contrasting with more static classical models. They demonstrate how integrating surface and subsurface data supports reproducible ejecta models, offering a framework for investigations across the Moon and other planetary surfaces.
Article
Mare Insularum (7°S–18°N, 0°–38°W), a basaltic lunar mare enriched in FeO + TiO2 abundance (FTA) and characterized by numerous impact craters, exhibits notable brightness temperature (TB) anomalies. This study used TB data from the Chang’e-2 Lunar Microwave Sounder (CELMS), in conjunction with FeO and TiO2 data, to investigate the spatial distribution of thermal anomalies and their geological origins. Two prominent hot regions were identified within Mare Insularum, attributed to variations in FTA, highlighting the influence of compositional heterogeneity on surface thermal behavior. In addition, three cold spots near the Hortensius crater were analyzed using contour plots of rock abundance (RA) and TB. The maps reveal a strong inverse relationship, where higher RA values correspond to significant reductions in TB. This pattern underscores the role of RA enrichment in driving thermal anomalies by enhancing radiative cooling as a result of altered regolith thermal properties. These findings provide new insights into the interplay between compositional factors and thermal dynamics on the lunar surface, advancing our understanding of the thermal evolution of Mare Insularum.
Article
摘 要:月表冷异常是月球科学研究关注的重要内容之一。相对于热红外冷点异常,本文基于嫦娥二号微波辐 射计数据,结合月表 Clementine UV-VIS、LRO Diviner 和 DEM 数据,首次在莫斯科盆地发现并提出了低亮温差异 常,并在史密斯海确认了低亮温差异常的存在;以亮温差表现正常的嫦娥五号着陆区为参考,发现当前已知成 分无法解释低亮温差异常的成因;通过对阿波罗盆地和巴尔默隐月海地区低亮温差异常的研究,发现造成低亮 温差异常的物质很有可能来自撞击事件对月壳深部物质的挖掘,代表了月壳成分在纵向分布上的不均匀性。论 文结果对进一步研究月球撞击演化历史和浅层月壳物质成分特征提供了新的重要参考。 关键词: 低亮温差异常,微波辐射计,亮温,月壤成分,地质意义 中图分类号: P691/P2 引用格式: 孟治国, 赵瑞, 蔡占川, 张小平, 张渊智, 邹猛 .2025. 基于嫦娥二号微波辐射计数据的月表低亮温差异常提出和地质成 因分析. 遥感学报, 29(2): 472-481 Meng Z G, Zhao R, Cai Z C, Zhang X P, Zhang Y Z and Zou M. 2025. Proposal and geological significance of lunar low brightness temperature difference anomaly based on CE-2 MRM data. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 29(2):
Article
Full-text available
Research on lunar oxides abundance has been spotlighted for its great significance in reconstructing the evolutionary history of the moon. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have been introduced to map oxides abundance on the lunar surface for their reliability and robustness. However, there are still some shortcomings in existing studies. Firstly, the majority of these studies rely on spectral data and used in-situ (drilled) ground truth samples collected by satellite missions. The detection depth of spectral sensors and the drilled depths of the returned samples are not consistent, lowering the reliability of the results. Moreover, existing machine/deep learning models may not be suitable for processing the data acquired in lunar exploration. In this paper, we propose a novel deep learning model named Multi-Frequency Brightness Temperature Feature Fusion Network (MFBTFF-Net) for processing Chang'e-2 Lunar Microwave Sounder (CELMS) data and it exploits the thermal radiation features related to various drilling depths to acquire the global lunar oxides abundance maps. The experimental results demonstrated that the proposed MFBTFF-Net model can significantly improve the estimation precision of most lunar oxides. The proposed method achieved root mean square error (RMSE) indices of 1.4449, 1.4826, and 0.9824 (wt.%) on estimating Al2O3, FeO and TiO2, which outperformed the state-of-the-art models by at least 0.0674, 0.6217, and 0.0578 respectively. Furthermore, based on the proposed model, we generated a new set of lunar oxides abundance maps. Compared with the abundance maps derived from spectral data, some discoveries can be obtained due to the unique penetration depth-related information provided by Chang'e-2 CELMS data. This study demonstrates the large potential of Chang'e-2 CELMS as a powerful new tool to understand the vertical structures of the moon under the regolith. The source code related to the experiments of this paper is publicly available at: https://github.com/liyuatbjut/MFBTFF-Net.
Article
Full-text available
Data infrastructure systems such as the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Planetary Data System (PDS), European Space Agency (ESA) Planetary Data Archive (PSA)and Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) Data Archive and Transmission System (DARTS) archive large amounts of scientific data obtained through dozens of planetary exploration missions and have made great contributions to studies of lunar and planetary science. Since China started lunar exploration activities in 2007, the Ground Research and Application System (GRAS), one of the five systems developed as part of China’s Lunar Exploration Program (CLEP) and the Planetary Exploration of China (PEC), has gradually established China’s Lunar and Planetary Data System (CLPDS), which involves the archiving, management and long-term preservation of scientific data from China’s lunar and planetary missions; additionally, data are released according to the policies established by the China National Space Administration (CNSA). The scientific data archived by the CLPDS are among the most important achievements of the CLEP and PEC and provide a resource for the international planetary science community. The system plays a key and important role in helping scientists obtain fundamental and original research results, advancing studies of lunar and planetary science in China, and improving China’s international influence in the field of lunar and planetary exploration. This paper, starting from CLEP and PEC mission planning, explains the sources, classification, format and content of the lunar and Mars exploration data archived in the CLPDS. Additionally, the system framework and core functions of the system, such as data archiving, management and release, are described. The system can be used by the international planetary science community to comprehensively understand the data obtained in the CLEP and PEC, help scientists easily access and better use the available data resources, and contribute to fundamental studies of international lunar and planetary science. Moreover, since China has not yet systematically introduced the CLPDS, through this article, international data organizations could learn about this advanced system. Therefore, opportunities for international data cooperation can be created, and the data service capability of the CLPDS can be improved, thus promoting global data sharing and application for all humankind.
Article
Full-text available
Impact craters are the dominant features on the Moon, and their degradation with time is the most common geological process on this body. This work is aimed at detailed quantitative characterization of this process. We quantitatively characterize crater materials by (1) the topographic roughness calculated from Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter and (2) rock abundances and nighttime soil temperatures derived from Diviner measurements. In contrast to preceding works, we separately consider crater material subunits: central peaks, floors, walls, and continuous ejecta to study their degradation in detail. We mapped totally 4,770 individual crater material subunits. All subunits of the youngest craters are characterized by increased roughness, rock abundance, and soil temperature. These parameters decrease with age and tend toward equilibrium, stable state; the continuous ejecta reach equilibrium more rapidly than other subunits. Kilometer‐baseline roughness of crater walls in the lunar maria is higher than in the highlands. Rock abundances and soil temperatures of the walls and floors of simple craters in the maria are also higher than in the highlands. We attribute these trends to differences in the mechanical properties of the target materials. Although the properties studied are not exact proxies for age, they can be used to assess individual age predictions; for example, several craters that were erroneously classified as Copernican have been detected. We also found that the unusual thermophysical signature of the walls of the Late Imbrian crater Bonpland D is due to recent regolith flows that could have been caused by a strong, shallow seismic event.
Article
Full-text available
The lineament is one of the most important component in the scientific research to the moon, and building the lineament classification system of the moon is the point of compile and study to the geologic map of the moon. Previous classification system research of the lineaments of the moon mainly based on morphology features of the lunar surface, and the types of lineament division are unreasonable enough, not yet forming an accepted, normative and popular lineaments classification system, which result in a bad relative property and low indicative and operability of the classification result, also go against drawing the lineaments outline map of the moon. The concept confusion and term disunity of the lineaments prejudice the global unified mapping and the exhibition and use of the achievement, further-more, the phenomenon that same things with different names, different meanings with same word spelling, different words with same meanings, or unclear meaning also have the above influence. Given that, this paper use the classification method with several indicators combined, formation mechanism and morphology features as the main indexes combined material composition and dynamic mechanism of forming lineaments, building the new lineaments classification scheme ultimately, which avoid possible disorder if we use morphology as the index only and have better scientificity and operability. In the end, we divided lineaments of the moon in as: lineaments formed with endogenic geologic progress, including wrinkle ridges, rilles, grabens and fractures: lineaments formed with exogenic geologic progress, including crater rim fractures and bottom fractures, and some special lineaments types with several formation mechanism and power source, like crater chains and so on. On that basis, the building of lineaments identification marks with multi-source remote sensing data, which is easy to distinguish and possess strong representativeness can provide typical reference for the global lineaments unity mapping.
Article
Full-text available
The methods of dating lunar stratigraphic units relative age and absolute age are summarized. There are four ways to establish the relative age: the geological law of superposition, crater size-frequency distribution, crater morphology as degradation , soil maturity. While the absolute age can be determined only by isotopic geochronology or lunar cratering chronology. To know better about the lunar stratigraphic subdivisions presently used, the formation and evolution of the stratigraphic units are reviewed here. Based on the analysis of the established lunar stratigraphic subdivisions and lunar evolution theory, we suggest that use the term Eolunarisian Eon for representation of the lunar history when endogenic process dominates, use the term Paleolunarisian Eon for the lunar history when endogenic process and exogenic process both weight, and use the term Neolunarisian Eon for the lunar history when exogenic process dominates. And we suggest the stratigraphic unit pre-Nectarian Period should be substituted with pre-Aitkenian Period and Aitkenian Period, which are divided by the impact event forming south pole-aitken basin. The pre-Aitkenian Period is included in Eolunarisian Eon, while the Aitken Period represents the early stage of Paleolunarisian Eon, during which the impact event is the most typical geologic process. This kind of modified subdivisions not only corresponds to the lunar dynamic evolvement rule, but also provides convenience for the study of lunar farside.
Article
Impact basins are primary geological structures on the Moon, and play key roles in revealing the lunar history. Due to the different identification standards currently used, the basin identification results are highly inconsistent. Except for the major basins (e.g., Orientale, Schrödinger, Imbrium, Crisium, Apollo, and Nectaris Basin), detailed sub-formation interpretations for most other basins are lacking, which hampers the construction of a complete (global) geological interpretation for the lunar impact basins. Based on multisource remote sensing data and previous works, we established a basin identification standard, and a new global lunar basin catalog containing 81 basins. According to the ring diameter ratios, the purest anorthosite (PAN) distribution, and basin radial textures, we divided the basin sub-formations into the central-peak, peak-ring, basin-floor, basin-wall, basin-rim, and basin-ejecta formations. We interpreted the ejecta formation and other basin sub-formations by combining the Focal Flow data with LROC WAC images, topographic data, gravity anomalies, and spectral data. Our new lunar geologic map shows more precise distribution of basin formations, covering nearly 70% of the lunar surface. Moreover, we obtained the origin of basin rings using basin sub-formations map. Additionally, the basin sub-formation map can contribute to the basin impact conditions, such as the discovered ring (concentric with the outermost ring) provides evidence for three impacts in the Mare Moscoviense, and the SPA sub-formation distribution indicates the impact direction of SPA is SE-NW. Furthermore, the sub-formation distribution can facilitate the geological characteristics and evolution study of the lunar exploration sites.
Article
The lunar cratering record provides valuable information about the late accretion history of the inner Solar System. However, our understanding of the origin, rate, and timing of the impacting projectiles is far from complete. To learn more about these projectiles, we can examine crater size-frequency distributions (CSFDs) on the Moon. Here, we re-investigate the crater populations of 30 lunar basins (≥ 300 km) using the buffered non-sparseness correction (BNSC) technique, which takes crater obliteration into account, thus providing more accurate measurements for the frequencies of smaller crater sizes. Moreover, we revisit the stratigraphic relationships of basins based on N(20) crater frequencies, absolute model ages, and observation data. The BNSC-corrected CSFDs of individual basins, particularly at smaller crater diameters are shifted upwards. Contrary to previous studies, the shapes of the summed CSFDs of Pre-Nectarian (excluding South Pole-Aitken Basin), Nectarian (including Nectaris) and Imbrian (including Imbrium) basins show no statistically significant differences, and thus provide no evidence for a change of impactor population.
Article
According to the Giant Impact hypothesis, the Moon was born from a great impact event, during which the ejected material was splashed to the earth orbit and then accreted to form the Moon. The original lunar core and mantle differentiated rapidly, and the global molten magma resulted in the formation of the lunar magma ocean, which evolved into the lunar crust by crystallization differentiation and solidification. The impact event was the most important geological process in the following lunar history, and a large number of craters and basins of different sizes came into being in different periods. Especially, the greatest basins were all produced in the early history of the Moon. Lunar map is an important tool to study the origin and evolution of the Moon. The first series of lunar maps were completed during 1960s to 1970s, which summarized the achievements in the Apollo age. The second lunar exploration upsurge started from 1990s, and a large number of new findings about the lunar origin and evolution have been discovered. However, never has a lunar geological map been published. This condition makes it very urgent to carry out a new lunar mapping plan to conclude the exploration and study results in the post-Apollo age. In this lunar mapping plan, much more attention should be paid to the scale, the subdivisions of lunar geochronology, and the expression of lunar tectonic and geological formation.
Article
We describe a new pilot program for systematic, global lunar geologic mapping. A 1:2.5 M mapping scale will be used to map a single quad encompassing the Copernicus crater region.
Release of the digital unified global geologic map of the Moon at 1:5,000,000-scale
  • Fortezzo