A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Nature
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
992 | Nature | Vol 606 | 30 June 2022
Article
A vaccine targeting resistant tumours by
dual Tcell plus NK cell attack
Soumya Badrinath1,2, Maxence O. Dellacherie3,4,13, Aileen Li3 ,4,1 0,13 , Shiwei Zheng5,11 ,13,
Xixi Zhang1,2, Miguel Sobral3,4, Jason W. Pyrdol1, Kathryn L. Smith1, Yuheng Lu5,
Sabrina Haag1,2, Hamza Ijaz4, Fawn Connor-Stroud6, Tsuneyasu Kaisho7, Glenn Dranoff8,1 2,
Guo-Cheng Yuan5,11, David J. Mooney3,4 & Kai W. Wucherpfennig1,2,9 ✉
Most cancer vaccines target peptide antigens, necessitating personalization owing
to the vast inter-individual diversity in major histocompatibility complex (MHC)
molecules that present peptides to Tcells. Furthermore, tumours frequently
escape Tcell-mediated immunity through mechanisms that interfere with peptide
presentation1. Here we report a cancer vaccine that induces a coordinated attack
by diverse Tcell and natural killer (NK) cell populations. The vaccine targets the
MICA and MICB (MICA/B) stress proteins expressed by many human cancers as a
result of DNA damage2. MICA/B serve as ligands for the activating NKG2D receptor
on Tcells and NK cells, but tumours evade immune recognition by proteolytic
MICA/B cleavage3,4. Vaccine-induced antibodies increase the density of MICA/B
proteins on the surface of tumour cells by inhibiting proteolytic shedding, enhance
presentation of tumour antigens by dendritic cells to Tcells and augment the
cytotoxic function of NK cells. Notably, this vaccine maintains ecacy against
MHC class I-decient tumours resistant to cytotoxic Tcells through the
coordinated action of NK cells and CD4+ Tcells. The vaccine is also ecacious in a
clinically important setting: immunization following surgical removal of primary,
highly metastatic tumours inhibits the later outgrowth of metastases. This vaccine
design enables protective immunity even against tumours with common escape
mutations.
We developed a conceptually new cancer vaccine that targets a
tumour immune escape mechanism. The vaccine targets the MICA
and MICB (MICA/B) stress proteins that are upregulated in response
to DNA damage in many types of human cancers but are expressed
at low or undetectable levels by healthy cells
2,3,5,6
. Engagement of
the activating NKG2D receptor by membrane-bound MICA/B trig-
gers the cytotoxicity programme in natural killer (NK) cells and
co-stimulatory signalling in CD8+ Tcells7–9. However, many human
tumours evade this important immune recognition pathway by
proteolytic shedding of MICA/B from the cell surface
4,10–13
. Shed-
ding substantially reduces the surface density on tumour cells of
these immunostimulatory ligands for the NKG2D receptor12,14. Shed
MICA/B proteins have also been reported to induce NKG2D recep-
tor internalization and inhibit NK cell function12,14–16. Patients with
melanoma responding to an autologous cell-based cancer vaccine
(GVAX) plus anti-CTLA-4 were found to develop anti-MICA antibod-
ies, and the presence of these antibodies correlated with reduced
serum levels of shed MICA and augmented CD8
+
Tcell and NK cell
responses17,18.
Design of the MICA and MICB α3 domain vaccine
Our vaccine targeted the highly conserved α3 domain in MICA/B, the site
of proteolytic shedding, and was designed to induce tumour immunity
by Tcells and NK cells (Fig.1a)19. We intentionally omitted the α1–α2
domains to avoid induction of antibodies that could block NKG2D
receptor binding
20
. Multivalent display of vaccine antigens greatly
enhances immunogenicity
21
, and we therefore fused the α3 domain
of MICB or MICA to the N terminus of ferritin from Heliobacter pylori,
which forms particles composed of 24 subunits22 (Extended Data
Fig.1a–c). Ferritin was used as a control antigen in all experiments.
A recently developed mesoporous silica rod (MSR) biodegradable
scaffold formulated with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating
factor (GM-CSF; for dendritic cell (DC) recruitment) and CpG ODN 1826
(adjuvant) was used for vaccine delivery23.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04772-4
Received: 30 July 2021
Accepted: 19 April 2022
Published online: 25 May 2022
Check for updates
1Department of Cancer Immunology and Virology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. 2Department of Immunology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 3John A. Paulson
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. 4Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA. 5Department
of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. 6Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. 7Department of Immunology, Institute of
Advanced Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan. 8Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. 9Department of Neurology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 10Present address: Lyell Immunopharma, South San Francisco, CA, USA. 11Present address: Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Charles
Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. 12Present address: Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
13These authors contributed equally: Maxence O. Dellacherie, Aileen Li, Shiwei Zheng. ✉e-mail: Kai_Wucherpfennig@dfci.harvard.edu
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved