Article

Mapping the Inter-relation of Abuse of Dominant Position and Merger Control Regime vis-à-vis Big Data: The Curious Case of WhatsApp Privacy Policy

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

The meteoric rise of the digital platforms and their increasing dominance can be easily considered the highlight of the latter half of the previous decade. Even though antitrust laws do apply to such online markets, the determination of the competitive strength of in these digital markets was often determined by the quantum of data accumulated by the entities. The article is an attempt by the authors to evaluate the feasibility of applicability of the existing competition law framework to the growing platform economies and the resultant implications of personal data being collected by such entities. For this research, the authors have outlined three specific questions. First, what is the inter-relation between the growing platform economy and merger control regime of a country? Second, what are the possible avenues of concerns that may arise due to collection of personal data? Finally, what are the possible enforcement challenges that would hamper the applicability of existing competition regimes to the digital platforms? The research is doctrinal research, and the authors have adopted a comparative-analytical research methodology for evaluating the above-mentioned research questions. The authors have considered the jurisdictions of the EU and India as the geographical scope for the research. The authors consider the following upon the conclusion of the study. First, the use and access of this data after the merger with companies with low turnover confer the acquiring enterprise a market power by which it can have an edge over its competitors in the market which will ultimately harm the competition in the market. Second, the digital market is data-driven; hence, collection of copious amounts of data places the big-tech players in a position of control, allowing them to indulge in exclusionary and exploitative conduct. Third, the assessment basis of combinations, more specifically in cases of data-based entities within the competition law, needs a serious re-assessment to include data within the scope of assessment as it is the primary asset in such cases.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.

... They found that users who valued privacy were likely to select platforms that provided robust privacy affordances, thus allowing them to control the visibility of their information and communication. Similarly, Singh and Mishra (2020) highlight that users' decisions to disclose information are influenced by the platform's reputation and perceived control over their data. ...
... Qualitative data could enrich our understanding of the motivations for proactive or avoidant behaviors regarding privacy-safeguarding activities on What-sApp and in a broader online environment. Recent studies, such as those by Sur and Goswami (2021) and Singh and Mishra (2020), highlight the complex interplay between digital privacy concerns and user behavior, suggesting that qualitative insights can provide a more comprehensive understanding of these dynamics. By integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches, future research could offer a more holistic view of privacy, informing more effective policymaking and user education strategies. ...
... As regulations become more stringent, particularly in areas like data privacy and antitrust, tech companies must invest in robust compliance mechanisms to address potential risks. For instance, incorporating advanced data governance practices and conducting comprehensive due diligence have become essential components of M&A strategies (Singh & Mishra, 2020). Companies must also ensure that their operations align with local laws to avoid penalties and reputational damage. ...
Article
Full-text available
Unlocking global opportunities, this article dives into the intricate world of cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&As) for tech companies. It explores critical U.S. regulations like CFIUS and antitrust laws, alongside international standards on data privacy and national security. Packed with actionable insights, it equips businesses to navigate legal hurdles, ensuring compliance while maximizing the strategic potential of global tech M&As.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.