Content uploaded by Sourav Choudhury
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Sourav Choudhury on May 02, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education (INT-JECS)
ISSN: 1308-5581 Vol 14, Issue 03 2022
2103
Significance of Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP) for learning
and development of learners
Faiza Qasmi1, Dr. Fakira Mohan Nahak2, Sarujin Sarujin3, Femmy Effendy4, Sourav Choudhury5
1Lecturer, Department of General Education, 25669, Khawarizmi International College, Al Ain, Abu
Dhabi, UAE, faizaqasmi27@gmail.com
2Professor, University Institute of Media Studies, Chandigarh University,Mohan.fakir@gmail.com
3Lecturer, Universitas PGRI Ronggolawe Tuban, Indonesia, sarujin59@gmail.com
4Lecturer, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia,femmy.effendy@upi.edu
5Research Scholar, School of Education, Lovely, Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India,
souravchdhry@yahoo.com
Abstract
This study looks at how preservice early childhood teachers define and interpret developmentally appropriate
practices (DAP), as well as DAP principles and features. Early childhood preservice teachers had relatively strong
beliefs about DAP, according to the study. DAP views were stronger among preservice teachers who were further
along in their teacher training program than instructors who had just started their teacher training program.
Similarly, teachers who had completed more field placements had more positive attitudes toward DAP. The
definitions and concepts of developmentally appropriate/inappropriate practice as defined by teachers were
investigated. The findings' implications for educating teachers to apply proper practice are highlighted. The concept
of Developmentally Appropriate Practice (DAP) has long been seen as important in early childhood education. Even
though the NAEYC(National association for the education of young children) DAP principles have become
canonical in early childhood education, there are many different interpretations of what DAP is, how to implement
it, and how significant it is in connection to overall classroom practice. The variance in teacher beliefs on the
importance of DAP reflects their level of understanding about DAP.
Keywords: Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP), development of learners, convictions
Introduction:
In the study of instructor convictions concerning DAP, in-service educators' convictions stand out enough to be
noticed more than preservice instructors' convictions. This could be because the analysts are worried about what
instructors' viewpoints have meant for their generally settled education techniques. However, the preservice
instructive stage is a pivotal time for future instructors to layout and elucidates their convictions. One of the most
essential parts of turning into an expert instructor is educator schooling, which altogether affects educators'
perspectives and information practices (Hegde and Hewett2021). The thoughts of preservice educators are shaped
through a blend of instructor schooling projects and individual and expert encounters (i.e., practicum, temporary
position). It's challenging to change these perspectives after they've been shaped. Considering this unique situation,
inspecting preservice instructors' convictions at different seasons of their vocations can be a valuable symptomatic
device for deciding the elements that impact DAP convictions. Besides, to empower mindfulness among instructor
teachers and analysts, research that investigates different insights about the ideas of DAP among youth instructors is
required.
This quantitative review applied an overview plan to analyze Indian preschool educators' commitment to proper and
unseemly convictions and practices of DAP. Through and 182 respondents from 13 preschools in India finished the
Instructor Convictions and Practices Study (three to five-year-old) (counting Educator Convictions Scale and
Educational Exercises Scale). Discoveries proposed that educators embraced both proper and improper convictions
and occupied with both appropriate and unseemly practices (as characterized by DAP standards), however with
essentially more significant levels of support in suitable (when contrasted with improper) convictions and
commitment in proper (when contrasted with improper) rehearses (Zou2022).
Research questions
Research questions are presented because of the requirements examined.
1. What is the view of Developmentally Appropriate Practice (DAP) among youth preservice educators?
International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education (INT-JECS)
ISSN: 1308-5581 Vol 14, Issue 03 2022
2104
2. Is there a connection between youth preservice educators' perspectives on DAP and their scholarly status
and field insight?
3. What is the educators' depiction of DAP and what are its core values?
Literature review
DAP is an expansive, enveloping idea that covers a wide scope of formative perspectives for kids matured 0 to 8. In
1997 and 2009, DAP proclamations were refreshed to reflect present-day instructive requests and measures (Al Rub
et al. 2022). In 1997, refreshed announcements accentuated three sorts of basic information for teachers: age
propriety, individual reasonableness, and culture appropriate. Age, individual, and social and social climate are as
yet remembered for the latest DAP announcements, which were given in 2009. What's more, modified standards and
rules for settling on DAP were introduced, which incorporated the accompanying five arrangements: making a
mindful local area of students, instructing to improve advancement and picking up, arranging educational plans to
accomplish significant objectives, surveying kids' turn of events and learning, and laying out equal associations with
families, to mirror a fresher system for ideal training and basic issues in youth schooling. Despite the way that DAP
contains exact standards and models, there is nobody’s size-fits-all idea of developmentally hopeful practice.
Instructors from different social, financial, and etymological foundations might decipher, apply, and carry out
appropriate practices in various ways (Tariman 2022).
Table 1: Post-hoc comparison tests for academic status in DAP beliefs
(Source: Essuman et al. 2021, p.821)
"Values, which house the evaluative, contrasting, and judgmental elements of convictions and supplant inclination
with a desire to activity" is the way the expression "conviction" has been portrayed. Educators' convictions are
interwoven with their psychological cycles and are essential in shaping an enthusiastic disposition. Convictions can
be characterized as a singular's demeanor toward the truth of an idea, and they address an educator's disposition
toward activity. Convictions can be gotten from an educator's way of behaving, which is connected with activity.
Instructors' perspectives and dynamic cycles are connected, as per research, since everyday choices are established
on their convictions (Essuman et al. 2021).The convictions of preservice educators might act as an establishment for
proficient development. Along these lines, extending the review to incorporate an examination of preservice
educators' mentalities could help forthcoming instructors' expert development and affect educator arrangement
programs.
Implications for Teachers’ Education
Youth preservice instructors had deep-seated convictions about DAP, as indicated by the examination. In any case,
the discoveries showed a uniqueness in academic and subject skills among preservice educators. Instructors who
had more deep-seated suppositions about DAP showed attention to significant DAP standards in the arrangement
of meetings. Educators, they found, assume a basic part in the execution of DAP. Their portrayals of DAP and
reactions to inadmissible practice, then again, were generally worried about 'how to instruct' instead of 'what to
educate.' as far as how to carry out DAP on showing subjects and learning norms, a befuddle among DAP and
showing content has been introduced (Stipek and Johnson 2021). Albeit a few instructors were energetic about
DAP, they might have experienced issues showing explicit subjects in a developmentally proper way since their
perspectives on DAP were more worried about how to educate than what to instruct.
International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education (INT-JECS)
ISSN: 1308-5581 Vol 14, Issue 03 2022
2105
Table 2: Comparison of DAP principles
(Source: Essuman et al. 2021, p.139)
The unseemly practice was characterized by the respondents as the utilization of an excessive number of
worksheets, work area, and seat settings, and an absence of learning focuses and free decision exercises. Most of
the depictions didn't target explicit advancement spaces or content. This shows an unevenness in the unmistakable
quality of the subject. The preservice educators hoped to be taught with the educational highlights of DAP,
however, their perception of the many courses expected for a development ally appropriate study hall
demonstrated clashes and inconsistencies. Accordingly, instructor teachers ought to focus more on how explicit
subjects might be educated to small kids inside the DAP structure. Preservice instructors should learn legitimate
showing procedures, yet proper subjects to educate (Moses 2021).
The study of instructor convictions in youth schooling must be extended to incorporate a more extensive scope of
areas and the connections between them. Numerous improvements centered on conviction concentrates on youth
instruction have been executed. Looking at area explicit convictions might assist us with better getting the
conviction frameworks of educators (Tooth, 1996). Through encounters and learning, instructors' convictions
advance and change. Instructors might meet various thoughts, clashes with their convictions, or difficulties
applying explicit practices once they start the showing calling as fledgling educators. Preservice educators might
confront strains between their feeling about the benefit of presenting play-based exercises and the tension of
scholastic accomplishment, regardless of whether they have deep-seated thoughts regarding DAP (Gupta 2022).
Figure 1: Difference phases of DAP
(Source: Rattana-Umpa et al. 2021, p.181)
Overall. Subsequently, a matched examples t-test was utilized to test this directional elective speculation. The mean
conviction for the suitable practices surpassed that for the unseemly practices, t(181)= 15.976, p< .0005 (one-
International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education (INT-JECS)
ISSN: 1308-5581 Vol 14, Issue 03 2022
2106
followed). The connected 90% certainty stretch for delta, the contrast between the two related populace implies was
(.671, .825) showing that the mean conviction reaction concerning the significance for the appropriate practices was
around .75 units more than that for the unseemly practices (Regassa et al. 2021).
Methods and techniques
A sum of 65 preservice youth instructors partook in this review. The members were signed up for a youth training
program at a college in the US's southeastern area. This instructor schooling program is a three-year educational
plan wherein understudies start as youngsters and finish. It is an all-around organized course arrangement during
which understudies progress in a gathering. Every year, preservice educators (junior, senior, and graduate) had taken
the indistinguishable courses. Seniors and youngsters partake in four unmistakable kinds of pre-entry level positions
(pre-K, K, specialized curriculum, first third grade), while expert understudies take part in a one-semester temporary
job. Understudies get a M.Ed. degree after finishing expert projects (Johnson2021).
Approx 97% of all members (M=21.85, SD=1.82) were between the ages of nineteen and 24. Caucasians (74%) and
Hispanics (14%) made up most of the members (14%). 25 (38.5 percent) of the members were youngsters, while 24
(36.7 percent) were seniors. Every lesser member had two practicum encounters, while every senior had four. Every
one of the alumni understudies had finished four practicums and one temporary position semester. Each of the
members spent a normal of around twenty weeks in field situations. Three of the meetings were female and 21 years
of age. Two of them were seniors, while the difference was lesser (Garrity and Catlett 2022).
The Instructor Convictions Scale (TBS) was utilized to inspect convictions concerning DAP. The TBS was made to
quantify the convictions and ways of behaving of youth teachers concerning DAP. TBS was made in 1991 by
Charles worth, Hart, Burts, and Hernandez, given the NAEYC DAP standards given in 1986. TBS was then
refreshed as per new NAEYC standards.
TBS is comprised of 37 things, including one that asks the amount of impact you possess in planning and executing
instructing and 36 things that are partitioned into 22 developmentally suitable and fourteen inadmissible convictions
questions. DAP included adequate social, individualization, proficiency exercises, coordinated curricular qualities,
ill-advised exercises and materials, and unseemly design. Developmentally improper exercises and materials (r
=.84), appropriate social things (r =.77), suitable individualization (r =.70), proper education exercises (r =.60),
proper incorporated educational plan convictions (r =.66), and unseemly construction (r =.58) were tried for inside
consistency utilizing Cronbach's alpha.
The researcher administered the teacher information questionnaire and the Teacher Beliefs Scale (TBS) in person.
Each survey packet was assigned a number, which was utilized instead of names to identify each participant and
ensure participant confidentiality. Individual interviews with open-ended questions were done with three
preservice teachers after the questionnaires were collected to explore in-depth comprehension of preservice
teachers' ideas regarding DAP. Three people were chosen at random from the broader questionnaire research to
engage in follow-up interviews (Allee-Herndon et al. 2022).
All of the interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcripts of the interviews were coded using an
open coding scheme. Protocols were coded using domain analysis (Leng et al. 2021). To safeguard participant
confidentiality, the pseudo names Kathy, Sera, and Amy are used to identify each interviewee. Member checking
and peer review approaches were used to reducing researcher bias and support the study's reliability. The instrument
utilized in this study is the Instructor Convictions and Practices Overview (three to five-year-olds). The review has
two subscales: the Instructor Conviction Scale (TBS) which estimates educators' convictions, and the Educational
Exercises Scale (IAS) which estimates instructors' training. This instrument has solid proof of unwavering quality
and legitimacy. It is "the most popular and most often utilized quantitative proportions of youth educators'
convictions and practice" in the US.
The Chinese form of TBS contains 37 things, including 1 positioning inquiry, 23 things that address
developmentally suitable convictions, and 13 things that address improper convictions. Subjects are to assess
everything utilizing a 5-point Likert scale with the accompanying anchors: 1 = not under any condition significant, 2
= not vital, 3 = genuinely significant, 4 = vital, and 5= critical. The Chinese form of the IAS contains 34 things,
comprising 17 things of developmentally suitable practices and 17 things of developmentally improper practices for
preschools. The anchors are 1 = never (not exactly month to month), 2= Once in a blue moon (month to month), 3 =
Here and there (week by week), 4 = consistently (2 times each week), and 5 = Frequently (day to day). Cronbach's
alpha for TBS and IAS (Chinese variant) were both 0.86.A segment survey was utilized to gather data about the
members, including their orientation, age, instructive foundation, showing experience, school type, and class size.
International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education (INT-JECS)
ISSN: 1308-5581 Vol 14, Issue 03 2022
2107
Results and findings
The creator applied one-followed one-example t-tests to look at whether educators in Indian kindergartens thought
Spot as significant (i.e., the typical Touch score is altogether more than 3) and DIB as less significant (i.e., the
typical DIB score is essentially under 3).As detailed in Table 1, there was proof to propose that the typical score
concerning development ally appropriate convictions (Spot) of instructors is essentially more than 3, implying that
the number of inhabitants in Indian kindergarten educators think the developmentally proper convictions are
significant, t(181) =17.376, p<.0005 (one-followed). We were 95% certain that the mean is somewhere around
3.783 and at generally 3.983, which fell nearest to a reaction of "4" (vital).There was proof to recommend that the
typical score in regards to developmentally unseemly convictions (DIB) of all educators is essentially under 3,
t(181) = - 2.481(one-followed). In any case, given the 95% certainty stretch, the mean was somewhere around 2.802
and generally 2.977, which falls nearest to a reaction of "3" (genuinely significant). In this manner, it implied that
kindergarten educators in Indian thought the developmentally unseemly practice was near genuinely significant yet
appeared to be less significant than the suitable convictions.Subsequently, a matched examples t-test was utilized to
test this directional elective theory (Rahimi2021).
Figure 2: Implementing the DAP checklist
(Source: Rattana-Umpa et al. 2021, p.81)
TBS things evaluating DAP had a mean score of 57.32 and a standard deviation of 4.8. With a potential scope of
13 to 65, the scores went from 47 to 65. This examination backs up the reason that preservice educators believe in
embracing development ally appropriate methods basic. This finding is predictable with prior research on
preservice teachers. Youngsters, seniors, and graduate understudies had mean scores of 54.68(5.45), 59.29(3.09),
and 58.50(4.36), individually, with standard deviations in the enclosure.
F (2, 62) = 7.40, p =.001, the impact of scholastic status was genuinely critical. The Scheffe method was utilized to
decide the area of genuinely huge mean contrasts. To start with, there was a measurably huge contrast between
youngsters and seniors, t(62) = 4.61, p =.002. Second, there was a genuinely tremendous contrast between
youngsters and graduates, t(62) = 3.82, p =.032. Table 1 shows the consequences of post-hoc correlations. Seniors
and graduate understudies had higher great perspectives toward DAP than youngsters. This recommends that the
length of an instructor's schooling and how much coursework finished gainfully affect DAP convictions. All
observed that coursework affects instructor training.The number of practicum situations and the number of
convictions regarding music had a genuinely critical affiliation (n = 65, r =.364, p =.003). DAP convictions are
connected to how many practicum situations. The connection between DAP convictions and practicum experience
length was additionally genuinely huge (n = 64, r =.384, p =.002). This infers that lengthier field encounters are
related to higher DAP sees.
Preservice instructors who had more field tasks throughout a more drawn-out timeframe had more uplifting
outlooks toward DAP. The past examination has additionally observed a connection between field insight (like
temporary jobs and apprenticeships) and instructor convictions. Temporary positions or apprenticeships
significantly affect instructor convictions, as per this examination. The alumni understudies, specifically, had done
International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education (INT-JECS)
ISSN: 1308-5581 Vol 14, Issue 03 2022
2108
an entry-level position and had acquired more than 60 credits in youth schooling courses, including a youth
educational plan. Subsequently, graduate understudies had more of an open door than youngsters and seniors to
find out about DAP and structure their perspectives about it. Since these encounters might give amazing chances to
notice DAP and consider DAP standards, instructor conclusions about DAP might be affected by an assortment of
encounters in different circumstances and terms of involvement (Rattana-Umpa et al. 2021).
Figure 3: Assessment preference of DAP
(Source: Rattana-Umpapreferences al. 2021, p.581)
This concentrate previously analyzed Indian kindergarten educators' convictions about the standards of
Developmentally Proper Practice. Given the reaction choice names, the outcomes propose that Indian kindergarten
instructors think the developmentally suitable standards or practices are vital (M= 3.88), and the developmentally
unseemly standards or practices are near genuinely significant (M= 2.89). As such, this study showed that Indian
kindergarten educators' underwriting of developmentally proper standards or practices is very high, yet they likewise
acknowledge a few unseemly standards and practices too.
The outcomes may at first not be normal, however, they match with the aftereffects of past examinations finished
with Chinese educators. In Hu's review finished with kindergarten educators in Beijing, China, the mean scores of
instructors' suitable and improper convictions both surpassed 3 (genuinely significant). Chan and Elliott likewise
gave proof that the two convictions could co-happen as they found in their concentration on instructors in Hong
Kong. Chinese kindergarten instructors appear to support both the appropriate and improper convictions
characterized by the Developmentally Suitable Practices (DAP) standards given in the US. The ongoing review's
outcomes show an impact of both western and conventional Chinese societies working closely together. From one
viewpoint, Indian kindergarten instructors truly do impart a few normal ideas and convictions to American educators
by in regards to the suitable standards and convictions as "vital." As the segment data of the respondents showed,
Indian kindergarten instructors currently in administration are generally taught in schools with youth training
foundations and have related capabilities before they work. What they realized in school were primarily western
hypotheses, ideas and practices got by the changes in Chinese instruction starting around forty years prior. The new
educational program change in youth training in Indian beginning in 2004 additionally to a great extent lines up with
the standards of Developmentally Suitable Practice (DAP). It is then sensible to observe instructors have high
support for the standards of developmentally proper convictions (DAP). Then again, seeing the improper standards
and convictions as "genuinely significant" shows a social distinction between Chinese and American educators.
Chinese educators were probably going to underwrite "instructor coordinated" or "early school expertise arranged
informative" standards and convictions since they were educated in this manner when they were youthful. This
study upholds this clarification by observing that Indian kindergarten educators think it is "genuinely significant" or
near "genuinely significant" for "kids to work discreetly at work areas or tables" (M= 3.29), to "variety inside pre-
drawn structures" (M= 2.87), and "every educational program region be instructed as isolated subjects at
independent times" (M= 2.89), which are viewed as improper as per the DAP standards. In any case, contrasted and
the unseemly convictions, educators' proper convictions have a critical higher mean score. That's what this study's
outcomes show, as a rule, Indian kindergarten educators have higher support for suitable convictions than improper
convictions, characterized by the system of Developmentally Proper Practices (DAP) standards. The westernized
schooling system from kindergarten to school and the educational program changes advanced by the Chinese
government all add to this outcome (Leng et al. 2021).
International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education (INT-JECS)
ISSN: 1308-5581 Vol 14, Issue 03 2022
2109
Figure 4: Deep l learning approach for DAP impetration
(Source: Johnson, P., 2021, p.731)
This concentrate then, at that point, analyzed Indian kindergarten instructors' homeroom practices of the standards of
Developmentally Suitable Practice (DAP). The outcomes propose that Indian kindergarten instructors take part in
proper practices nearly "consistently (2-4 times each week)," while they participate in unseemly practices almost
"some of the time (week by week)". As such, Indian kindergarten instructors take part in proper practices often and
they added some of the time leads to improper practices in the study hall. This outcome again is fundamentally
steady with the discoveries of Hu. In Hu's review, the mean score of instructors' proper and improper practices both
surpass. Like instructors' convictions, Indian kindergarten educators' commitment to both appropriate and unseemly
practices mirrors an impact of both western and customary Chinese societies working closely together. The
instructors attempt to rehearse in their homerooms the westernized youth schooling speculations, ideas, and
strategies they learned, however, a portion of their understandings of DAP standards stay at the hypothetical level
which brings about them not completely carrying out the DAP standards by and. The Chinese customary culture has
focused on kids' gaining scholarly abilities from early on. Similarly, to how they were educated as youngsters,
instructors are more familiar with direct guidance and assuming command over the class as opposed to giving kids a
lot of opportunities or including guardians in homeroom instruction. Leung in his concentrate on Hong Kong
instructors called attention to that educators will quite often lead instructor coordinated and instructor arranged
exercises since they think these exercises are great for kids' learning. The class size of kindergartens in India,
typically somewhere in the range of 25 and 30 (41.2% in this review), and some significantly more than 30 (33.5%),
likewise forces educators to do more gathering exercises than focusing on every individual understudy. As the
review shows, instructors "once in a blue moon" let guardians "lead or get ready learning exercises" (M=2.02)
(which is viewed as appropriate practices by DAP standards), however "some of the time" (M=3.14) let kids "sit and
tune in at work areas over 15 minutes" (which is improper as indicated by DAP standards).
Contrasting the mean scores, there is a massive distinction between the recurrence of Indian kindergarten instructors'
appropriate practices (M=3.59) and their improper practices (M=2.86). Underlining the formative suitability of kids,
the Indian youth educational program change (2004) expected educators to decrease time spent doing aggregate
learning exercises and focused on free play. With over 10 years of execution, the public authority started a change
that might be assisting with lessening the recurrence of instructors' commitment to unseemly practices.
The topic of the longing for association was stressed the most in each of the three meetings concerning DAP
standards. Sera pushed the study hall requests, though Kathy zeroed in on the youngsters' viewpoint. Amy focused
on gathering the particular necessities of every kid. The examination of the standards is displayed in Table 2. When
contrasted with the standards for DAP in NAEYC explanations, the depiction of DAP exhibits that instructors center
more around individual kid advancement instead of improvement in light of socio-social settings.
Conclusion
By detailing an elevated degree of the underwriting of proper convictions and a high recurrence of commitment to
suitable practices, the review results recommend the Indian kindergarten educational plan change, which adjusts a
lot to the DAP standards, has been, undoubtedly somewhat, compelling. The concurrence of improper convictions
and unseemly practices found in this study shows the impact of Chinese conventional culture and the upsides of
International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education (INT-JECS)
ISSN: 1308-5581 Vol 14, Issue 03 2022
2110
schooling. Subjective investigations might be done to additionally investigate educators' convictions of youth
instruction, how they might interpret the educational program change, and their concerns and troubles in rehearses.
Perceptions inside educators' genuine homerooms can be utilized to gather more precise data about their training in
later examinations of the conviction practice relationship.
References
Hegde, A.V. and Hewett, B.S., 2021. Examining the effectiveness of online teaching modules on Developmentally
Appropriate Practices (DAP) for guiding young children’s behavior: student and instructor perspectives. Journal of
Early Childhood Teacher Education,42(1), pp.93-109.
Al Rub, M.F.A., Alnaser, L. and Rababah, E.Q., 2022. Field Experience Make Difference: Early Childhood Student-
Teachers' Beliefs about Best Practices for Jordanian Kindergarten Children. International Journal of Early
Childhood Special Education,14(1).
Tariman, J.D., 2022. Developmentally appropriate practices for learners’ literacy in Public Elementary
Schools. South Florida Journal of Development,3(2), pp.2611-2626.
Muswell, N.B., 2021. DEVELOPMENTALLY APPROPRIATE PRACTICES IN ECE IN BOTSWANA: A MYTH
OR REALITY?. European Journal of Education Studies,8(7).
Essuman, S.A., Korda, D.R. and Essigyan, P.K., 2021. Investigating the Developmentally Appropriate Practices of
Teachers in the Early Childhood Classroom. International Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Science,9(4), pp.22-
32.
Stipek, D. and Johnson, N.C., 2021. Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood education redefined:
The case of math. Advancing Knowledge and Building Capacity for Early Childhood Research, p.35.
Moses, A., 2021. Individuality and Inclusive Practices for Early Childhood. YC Young Children,76(4), pp.4-6.
Gupta, A., 2022. Global and local discourses in India’s policies for early childhood education: policy borrowing and
local realities. Comparative Education, pp.1-19.
Regassa, T., Tefera, B., Negassa, D. and Jebessa, F., 2021. Beliefs and Practices of Teachers about Developmental
Appropriateness of Early Childhood Care and Education Provisions in Selected Centers at Adama Administrative
Town.
Johnson, P., 2021. Attitudes Towards Developmentally Appropriate Classroom Practices Among Kindergarten
Teachers in Tennessee (Doctoral dissertation, Middle Tennessee State University).
Garrity, S. and Catlett, C., 2022. Preparing Equitable and Inclusive Early Childhood Educators. YC Young
Children,77(1), pp.8-16.
Allee-Herndon, K.A., Roberts, S.K., Hu, B., Clark, M.H. and Stewart, M.L., 2022. Let’s talk play! Exploring the
possible benefits of play-based pedagogy on language and literacy learning in two titles I kindergarten
classrooms. Early Childhood Education Journal,50(1), pp.119-132.
Leng, A.P.W., Hui-Shen, C.L., Dhamotharan, M. and Mustafa, M.C., 2021. Preschool teachers’ beliefs and
classroom practices of child-centered learning at private preschools in central region, Malaysia. Southeast Asia
Early Childhood Journal,10(2), pp.69-83.
Rahimi, M., 2021. The influence of pedagogy And language intelligence Towards an English DAP-based learning
outcome (Experimental research for second-year students SDN Samarinda, East Borneo). Journal of
Humanities,1(1), pp.15-20.
Rattana-Umpa, N., Tanwatthanakul, J., Sota, C. and Santiboon, T.T., 2021. Developmentally appropriate practices
on knowledge skills for contributing child’s intelligences of receptive language skills in appropriate and
inappropriate early childhoods. Archives of Psychiatry and Mental Health,5(1), pp.042-050.
Zou, B., 2022, January. An Investigation of the Relationship Between Shanghai Preschool Teachers’
Developmentally Appropriate Beliefs and Practices. In 4th International Seminar on Education Research and Social
Science (ISERSS 2021) (pp. 110-113). Atlantis Press.