Content uploaded by Prashant P Sharma
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Prashant P Sharma on Apr 27, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
Page 1 of 38
The rediscovery of a relict unlocks the first global phylogeny of whip spiders (Amblypygi)
Gustavo S. de Miranda1,*, Siddharth S. Kulkarni2,*, Jéssica Tagliatela3, Caitlin M. Baker2,
Alessandro P.L. Giupponi4, Facundo M. Labarque3, Efrat Gavish-Regev5, Michael G. Rix6,
Leonardo S. Carvalho7, Lívia Maria Fusari8, Hannah M. Wood1, Prashant P. Sharma2
1 Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, 10th
and Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC, 20560, USA
2 Department of Integrative Biology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706,
USA
3 Departamento de Ecologia e Biologia Evolutiva, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, campus
São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luís, Km 235, 13565-905, São Paulo, Brazil
4 Laboratório de Referência Nacional em Vetores das Riquetsioses, LIRN-FIOCRUZ, Rio de
Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
5 National Natural History Collections, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 91904 Jerusalem,
Israel
6 Biodiversity and Geosciences Program, Queensland Museum, South Brisbane, QLD 4101,
Australia
7 Campus Amílcar Ferreira Sobral, Universidade Federal do Piauí, 64808-605, Floriano, PI,
Brazil
8 Departamento de Hidrobiologia, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, campus São Carlos,
Rodovia Washington Luís, Km 235, 13565-905, São Paulo, Brazil
* Equal author contribution
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 2 of 38
Abstract
Asymmetrical rates of cladogenesis and extinction abound in the Tree of Life, resulting in
numerous minute clades that are dwarfed by larger sister groups. Such taxa are commonly
regarded as phylogenetic relicts or “living fossils” when they exhibit an ancient first appearance
in the fossil record and prolonged external morphological stasis, particularly in comparison to
their more diversified sister groups. Due to their special status, various phylogenetic relicts tend
to be well-studied and prioritized for conservation. A notable exception to this trend is found
within Amblypygi (“whip spiders”), a visually striking order of functionally hexapodous
arachnids that are notable for their antenniform first walking leg pair (the eponymous “whips”).
Paleoamblypygi, the putative sister group to the remaining Amblypygi, is known from Late
Carboniferous and Eocene deposits, but is survived by a single living species, Paracharon
caecus Hansen, 1921, that was last collected in 1899. Due to the absence of genomic sequence-
grade tissue for this vital taxon, there is no global molecular phylogeny for Amblypygi to date,
nor a fossil-calibrated estimation of divergences within the group. Here, we report several
individuals of a previously unknown species of Paleoamblypygi from a cave site in Colombia.
Capitalizing upon this discovery, we generated the first molecular phylogeny of Amblypygi,
integrating ultraconserved element sequencing with legacy Sanger datasets and including
described extant genera. To quantify the impact of sampling Paleoamblypygi on divergence time
estimation, we performed in silico experiments with pruning of Paracharon. We demonstrate
that the omission of relicts has a significant impact on the accuracy of node dating approaches
that outweighs the impact of excluding ingroup fossils. Our results underscore the imperative for
biodiversity discovery efforts in elucidating the phylogenetic relationships of “dark taxa”, and
especially phylogenetic relicts in tropical and subtropical habitats.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 3 of 38
Keywords: phylogenomics | ultraconserved | molecular dating | concordance factor | extinction
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 4 of 38
Introduction
A phylogenetic relict represents the remnant of a previously more diverse fauna that has
undergone faunal turnover and extinction events (Simpson 1955; Darlington 1957; Holmquist
1962; Gould et al. 1977). The evidence for this condition often consists of an ancient appearance
of a lineage in the fossil record and an historically broad distribution of fossils, with the retention
of only a small number of geographically-restricted extant species (Grandcolas et al. 2014).
Typically, phylogenetic relicts represent an example of extreme phylogenetic attenuation, either
as a result of extinction, low speciation rate, or a combination of these two processes. Relicts are
often the sister taxa of diverse clades, which confers a special status upon these small groups for
evolutionary and genomic studies, as well as conservation priority. Renowned examples of
phylogenetic relicts include coelocanths, lungfishes, tuataras, monotremes, nautiloids, horseshoe
crabs, gingko, and Amborella trees (Grandcolas et al. 2014; 2016).
Recapitulating a historical fascination with the causal mechanisms that create relicts, modern
investigations of phylogenetic relicts have focused on evidence of bradytelic evolution at the
level of genes and genome architecture, as well as the signatures of extinction and faunal
turnover (Soltis et al. 2008; Amemiya et al. 2010, 2013; Combosch et al. 2017; Meyer et al.
2021; Nong et al. 2021). Regardless of the cause of their taxonomic attenuation, the significance
of phylogenetic relicts is twofold from the perspective of phylogenetics. First, as the established
sister groups of more diverse clades, such relicts play an outsized role in polarizing character
states and reconstructing patterns of morphological evolution and genome organization. Second,
as an extension of both topological placement and their fossil record, phylogenetic relicts play
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 5 of 38
vital roles in molecular dating, specifically through the provision of calibration points for node
dating.
Given the attention and research focus that many phylogenetic relicts command, obtaining
genomic and phylogenetic representation for such groups is often prioritized, even in cases
where these taxa are geographically restricted (e.g., Amborella; tuataras; Cryptocercus
cockroaches; Inward et al. 2007; Soltis et al. 2008; Gemell et al. 2020). One notable exception to
this trend is the monotypic family Paracharontidae, the sister group to the remaining Amblypygi,
commonly known as whip spiders. The order Amblypygi is comprised of ca. 260 species, yet has
a broad global distribution across tropical and subtropical habitats (Weygoldt, 1996; Harvey
2003; Miranda et al. 2022). Whip spiders are notable for the fearsome appearance of their
hypertrophied raptorial pedipalps, as well as the modification of the first walking leg pair into
antennal analogs—these arachnids are functionally hexapodous (Fig. 1). Amblypygi have also
featured prominently in studies of arachnid behavior and communication, as they exhibit
complex behaviors such as homing, learning, and aggregation as a function of kinship groups
(Fowler-Finn and Hebets 2006; Wiegmann et al. 2016; Flanigan et al. 2021).
Whereas higher-order (and often, genome-scale) molecular phylogenies are now available for
almost all extant chelicerate orders (Klompen et al. 2007; Giribet et al. 2014; Clouse et al. 2017;
Fernández et al. 2017; Wheeler et al. 2017; Klimov et al. 2018; Benavides et al. 2019, 2021;
Ballesteros et al. 2021; Santibáñez-López et al. 2022), a global molecular phylogeny for
Amblypygi remains unavailable (Miranda et al. 2022). This gap is specifically attributable to the
elusive nature of the putative sister group of the remaining extant whip spiders; the family
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 6 of 38
Figure 1. Exemplars of whip spider diversity and overview of morphology-based classification
schema. a) Habitus of adult Paracharon sp. from Colombia. Note orthognathous articulation of
the pedipalps. b) Magnification of the prosoma of Paracharon sp., highlighting the absence of
eyes. c) Trichodamon princeps. d) Adult female of Damon medius, carrying juveniles on the
dorsal opisthosoma. e) Paraphrynus aztecus. f) Heterophrynus batesii. g) Catageus sp. h) Sarax
sp. i). Charinus cearensis j) Cladogram from Quintero (1986). Genera have been replaced with
current familial assignments. k) Interfamilial relationships inferred by Weygoldt (1996). l)
Interfamilial relationships inferred by Garwood et al. (2017). Green squares and circle represent.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 7 of 38
Paracharontidae was known from a single species, Paracharon caecus, described one century
ago from two localities in modern day Guinea Bissau (Hansen 1921). Morphological
phylogenetic analyses have suggested that the oldest known crown group whip spider fossils,
from Carboniferous deposits in North America and the British Isles, constitute stem groups of
Paracharontidae (Garwood et al. 2017). A more recent discovery of this lineage in Cambay Basin
amber in South Asia supports a historically broader distribution of Paracharontidae across the
Paleotropics by the Eocene (Engel and Grimaldi 2014). Fossils of the remaining extant
Amblypygi taxa (Euamblypygi) are comparatively recent, dating between the Cretaceous and the
Miocene (Engel and Grimaldi 2014).
Such patterns of early branching phylogenetic relicts are common within Chelicerata
(Supplementary Table S1). As examples, mesothele spiders (ca. 0.36% of described spider
diversity) once had a broad geographic range including Western Europe in the Carboniferous,
but are presently restricted to parts of east and southeast Asia (Selden 1996, Kallal et al. 2021).
Cyphophthalmi, the cryptic sister group of the remaining Opiliones (ca. 3.1% of described
harvestman diversity), exhibit distributions, internal relationships, and molecular divergence
times that nearly mirror the sequence and timing of supercontinental fragmentation (Boyer et al.
2007; Giribet et al. 2012; Baker et al. 2020). But in the case of Amblypygi, the absence of the
‘living fossil’ Paracharon in any recent historical collections has effectively barred any higher-
level molecular phylogenetic assessment of this group, as well as molecular dating that leverages
the availability of fossil data. A handful of morphological cladistic analyses have tackled whip
spider relationships, but these exhibit marked incongruence in higher-level nodes (Quintero
1986; Weygoldt 1996; Garwood et al. 2017; Fig. 1). This incongruence is partly attributable to
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 8 of 38
the morphological conservatism of extant whip spiders, which incurs a paucity of discrete
variable characters in the group.
Propitiously, we discovered an undescribed species of Paracharon from a collection at a cave in
Colombia, consisting of one adult and two juvenile specimens. The rediscovery of this lineage
after 123 years opens the door to the first higher-level molecular phylogeny of this poorly
understood arachnid group. Here, we present a global molecular phylogeny of Amblypygi using
ultraconserved element sequencing in tandem with Sanger datasets, and sampling all extant
genera. To quantify the impact of this relict lineage on evolutionary analyses, we performed
multiple divergence time estimations with and without Paracharon sequence data, as well as
with and without Amblypygi fossils. We show that the sampling of Paracharon plays a more
significant role in the accuracy of divergence time estimation than the use of ingroup calibration
fossils. Our results underscore the significance of phylogenetic relicts in evolutionary analyses.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 9 of 38
Materials and Methods
Species sampling
Specimens sequenced for this study were hand collected from field sites or contributed by
collections of the National Museum of Natural History, the Smithsonian Institution, Washington,
DC, USA (USNM); the Museum of Comparative Zoology, USA (MCZ); the Natural History
Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen (NHMD); the Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
(MNRJ); the California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, USA (CAS); the State Museum of
Natural History Stuttgart, Germany (SNMS); and the Universidade Federal do Piauí, Brazil
(CHNUFPI). We selected exemplars of each of the five described extant families, and all 17
described genera: 20 specimens of Charinidae (133 described species), one Charontidae (15
described species), 1 Paracharontidae (1 described species), two Phrynichidae (35 described
species), and ten Phrynidae (77 described species). Outgroup sampling leveraged previous
phylogenomic works that have established Amblypygi as the sister group of vinegaroons
(Thelyphonida), and short-tailed whip scorpions (Schizomida) (the clade Pedipalpi; Sharma et al.
2014; Ballesteros and Sharma 2019; Ballesteros et al. 2019). Pedipalpi in turn is understood to
form a clade with spiders, scorpions, and pseudoscorpions, a relationship supported by rare
genomic changes (e.g., Ontano et al. 2021, 2022; Ballesteros et al. 2022). We therefore included
two representatives of spiders, one vinegaroon, three Schizomida, and rooted the tree with three
scorpions. Accession data for all specimens in this study are provided in Supplementary Table
S2.
Ultraconserved element sequencing
Ultraconserved element (UCE) sequences generated in this study were augmented with
published UCE and RNASeq datasets (Supplementary Table S3). We analyzed 47 terminals with
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 10 of 38
UCE data including 38 Amblypygi. For newly sequenced specimens, one leg was used for DNA
extractions from one specimen using the DNeasy™ Tissue Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA).
Libraries were prepared and enriched following protocols in Faircloth et al. (2015), but following
the modifications detailed in the Supplementary Material. All pools were enriched with the
Arachnida probe set (Starrett et al. 2017) except Heterophrynus and Charon, which were
enriched using the Spider2Kv1 probe set (Kulkarni et al. 2020) following the myBaits protocol
4.01 (Arbor Biosciences).
Inclusion of Sanger-sequenced terminals
While UCE datasets have demonstrated great potential for leveraging historical collections, the
compatibility of these data with legacy datasets in Sanger-sequencing studies is often not
evaluated. To integrate historical datasets in a comprehensive phylogenetic framework, we
compiled another matrix comprised of 109 terminals for six publicly available Sanger-sequenced
loci: 12S ribosomal RNA (12S), 16S rRNA (16S), cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI),
histone H3 (H3), and the small and large subunits of nuclear ribosomal genes (18S and 28S,
respectively). We integrated this data set by querying the raw files of the UCE data set for any
potential match with 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA. Finally, COI and H3 markers were aligned with
peptide translation using MACSE (Ranwez et al. 2011), with the invertebrate mitochondrial code
implemented for COI. The remaining markers (12S, 16S, 18S and 28S) were aligned using
MAFFT version 7 (Katoh and Standley 2013). Trimming was performed on all alignments using
trimAL (Capella-Gutiérrez et al. 2009) with -gappyout.
Phylogenomic analyses
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 11 of 38
The assembly, alignment, trimming and concatenation of data were done using the PHYLUCE
pipeline (publicly available at https://phyluce.readthedocs.io/en/latest/). UCE contigs were
extracted using the Spider2Kv1 probe set (Kulkarni et al. 2020) and the Blended probe set
(Maddison et al. 2020). We applied gene occupancies of 10%, 25% and 40% on the UCE data
set. Additionally, we also analyzed 1% occupancy of the UCE data set to allow inclusion of all
loci in the reconstruction of the phylogeny. We screened for orthologous and duplicate loci with
the minimum identity and coverage of 65 and 65 matches.
To augment the UCE dataset with RNASeq datasets, we followed the assembly, sanitation and
reading frame detection pipeline as in Fernández et al. (2018) for assembling the transcriptomes.
Additionally, we ran the Perl script for Rcorrector (Song and Florea, 2015) for error correction
and downstream efficiency prior to assembly. FASTA files of transcriptomes resulting from CD-
HIT-EST were converted to 2bit format using faToTwoBit, (Kent et al. 2002). In the PHYLUCE
environment (publicly available at https://phyluce.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tutorial-three.html),
we created a temporary relational database to summarize probe to assembly match using:
phyluce_probe_run_multiple_lastzs_sqlite function on the 2bit files. The ultraconserved loci
were recovered by the phyluce_probe_slice_sequence_from_genomes command. The resulting
FASTA files were treated as contigs and used to match the reads to the Blended probe set of
Maddison et al. (2020).
Phylogenetic analyses were performed on two types of data sets: an unpartitioned UCE
nucleotide data set alone (at difference thresholds of occupancy); and a matrix of unpartitioned
UCE paired with the partitioned six Sanger loci matrix. Maximum likelihood analyses were
performed using IQ-TREE (Nguyen et al. 2015) version 2. Model selection was allowed for each
unpartitioned dataset using the TEST function (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2018, Hoang et al. 2018).
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 12 of 38
Nodal support was estimated via 1,000 ultrafast bootstrap (UFBoot) replicates (Hoang et al.
2018) and Shimodaira-Hasegawa approximate likelihood ratio testing (SH-aLRT) with 1,000
iterations. We used the flag -bnni which reduces the risk of overestimating branch support with
UFBoot due to model violations. This flag optimizes each bootstrap tree using a hill-climbing
nearest neighbor interchange (NNI) search based on the corresponding bootstrap alignment
(Hoang et al. 2018). We used gene (gCF) and site concordance factors (sCF) to evaluate the
percentage of gene trees and decisive alignment sites containing a given branch in the maximum
likelihood tree implemented in IQ-TREE (Minh et al. 2020).
To evaluate topological robustness of selected nodes, we evaluated signal for alternative
placements using quartet likelihood mapping (Strimmer and Von Haeseler 1997) in IQ-TREE.
Likelihood mapping was performed against the complete dataset, representing all UCE loci (i.e.,
not filtered for any occupancy threshold).
Phylogenomic dating
Divergence time estimation was performed using a Bayesian inference approach, as implemented
in codeml and MCMCTree (both part of PAML v.4.8; Yang 2007; dos Reis and Yang 2019). We
optimized the fossil information-based calibrations on a matrix comprising smallest UCE matrix
(selected for highest taxon occupancy), plus the six Sanger loci. The maximum likelihood tree
topology inferred for this dataset served as the basis for divergence time estimation,
implementing uniform node age priors to accommodate the scarcity of terrestrial chelicerate
fossils. The root age was set to a range of 545 Mya to 435 Mya, based on the age of
Eramoscorpius brucensis, the oldest known arachnopulmonate. Weygoldtina anglica, the oldest
known stem-Palaeoamblypygi, was used to constrain the most recent common ancestor (MRCA)
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 13 of 38
of crown Amblypygi. The Cretaceous fossils Kronocharon prendinii and Britopygus weygoldtii
were assigned to the MRCA of (Charinidae + Charontidae) and (Phrynidae + Phrynichidae),
respectively. Four other outgroup nodes were calibrated using the oldest unambiguous fossils
representing those clades. Justifications and references for node calibrations are provided in
Supplementary Table S3. Both chains were run for 20,000 generations, with an additional 5%
set for burnin. We used the independent rates clock model for all partitions and all analyses were
run using the same seed value (arbitrarily set to 5) to make the results reproducible.
Separately, we inferred divergence times under a penalized likelihood approach, as implemented
in LSD2, which uses a least-squares approach based on a Gaussian model and is robust to
uncorrelated violations of the molecular clock (To et al. 2016). The root age was set to a
maximum of 545 Ma (Supplementary Table S3). We used the commands prime and thorough to
optimize the analyses, and cross validation was used to select the optimal smoothing parameter.
Following Eberle et al. (2018), penalized likelihood optimization iterations were increased from
the default of 2 to 5, and the number of penalized likelihood simulated annealing was doubled
from 5,000 to 10,000. LSD2 requires at least one fixed date, so we used 314.6 Mya as a fixed
date for the most recent common ancestor of Scorpiones.
To investigate the influence of the relict Paracharon on divergence time estimation (i.e.,
simulate the effect of not having discovered the Colombian specimens), we performed a separate
family of analyses for both dating approaches (MCMCTree and LSD2), wherein we removed the
terminal Paracharon sp.; the MRCA of the remaining Amblypygi (Euamblypygi) was therefore
calibrated with the minimum age constraint reflecting the age of the Carboniferous fossil
Weygoldtina anglica. We compared the median age and variance of nodes between runs to assess
which parts of the chronogram were most prone to node age overestimation. In addition, to
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 14 of 38
compare the significance of sampling Paracharon versus ingroup fossil calibrations, we
performed a third family of analyses wherein we retained all terminals, but removed the three
ingroup fossil node calibrations and keeping only the five calibration points for outgroups.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 15 of 38
Results
Phylogenomics
We reconstructed an Amblypygi phylogeny using UCE datasets, as well as a combination of
UCEs and six Sanger loci. Phylogenetic relationships obtained from UCE datasets with varying
levels of missing data (10%, 25%, and 40% occupancy) were grossly similar (Fig. 2;
Supplementary Fig. S1). The 40% occupancy data set contained 135 loci and represented the
least amount of missing data, and was therefore combined with the six-locus Sanger dataset for
dating analyses. Six-locus alignments were combined with 44 out of 48 UCE alignments
(Supplementary Table S4).
All datasets recovered Paracharontidae as sister to all other extant Amblypygi (Euamblypygi), as
proposed by Weygoldt (1996) (Figs. 2, 3). Together with some extinct taxa, Paracharontidae
forms Paleoamblypygi (Weygoldt, 2000; Garwood et al., 2017), distinguished from the
remaining whip spiders (i.e., Euamblypygi) by the dorso-ventral articulation of the pedipalps and
the anterior projection of the carapace (Weygoldt, 1996; Garwood et al. 2017). Phrynichidae and
Phrynidae (Phrynoidea) were recovered in a clade sister to Charinidae plus Charontidae
(Charontoidea). Phrynoidea and Charontoidea are similar to the older groups Pulvillata and
Apulvillata, respectively, as conceived by Quintero (1986). However, these names were
abandoned by Weygoldt (1996, 2000) and Harvey (2003), so we follow Weygoldt (1996) and
Harvey (2003) in naming Phrynichidae + Phrynidae as Phrynoidea, and Charontoidea for
Charinidae + Charontidae.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 16 of 38
Figure 2. a) Phylogenomic relationships of Amblypygi based on 135 UCE loci (40%
occupancy). Numbers on nodes correspond to SH-aLRT / UFBoot, respectively; unmarked nodes
are maximally supported. Rhombus icons on selected nodes reflect nodal support values,
corresponding to the legend in (b). b) Four-cluster likelihood mapping assessing support for
Charontida (Charontidae + Charinidae), based on the supermatrix of all UCE loci. Red numbers
indicate higher-level taxa: 1, Paleoamblypygi; 2, Euamblypygi; 3, Phrynoidea; 4, Charontoidea.
Topologies of phrynichid genera in analyses of UCE matrices (Fig. 2; Supplementary Fig. S1)
were congruent with the morphological cladistic analysis of Miranda et al. (2018). In Phrynidae,
monophyly of each of the two subfamilies Heterophryninae and Phryninae was recovered.
Charon, the type genus of Charontidae, was recovered as a sister group to (10% and 40%
occupancy), or nested within (25% occupancy matrix), Charinidae (Fig. 2; Supplementary Fig.
S1), contradicting Weygoldt (1996) and Garwood et al. (2017), who recovered Charinidae as
sister-group to the remaining Euamblypygi taxa.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 17 of 38
Analyses of the 109-terminal UCE + Sanger loci dataset also recovered Paracharon sp. as the
sister group to Euamblypygi (Fig. 3), a clade formed by Phrynoidea and Charontoidea. In
Phrynichidae, Xerophrynus was recovered sister to all other Phrynichidae genera, followed by
the divergence of the reciprocally monophyletic subfamilies Phrynichinae and Damoninae. The
topology for Phrynichinae accords with morphological analyses by Weygoldt (1996) and
Miranda et al. (2018), with Trichodamon sister to Phrynichus + Euphrynichus. In Damoninae,
Damon was found polyphyletic, with D. medius and D. johnstoni nested in a clade with
Musicodamon and Phrynichodamon. Phrynidae was recovered in two main branches,
Heterophryninae and Phryninae. Phrynus and Paraphrynus were recovered as polyphyletic.
Within Charontoidea, Charontidae (represented by a single Charon and three Catageus; Miranda
et al. 2018) was recovered as polyphyletic, and all four exemplars were nested within Charinidae
with robust support. Two species identified as Catageus by Weygoldt (in Arabi et al. 2011) were
recovered as the sister group to Weygoldtia, and together formed the sister group to the
remaining Charontoidea. The third species identified as Catageus by Weygoldt (in Arabi et al.
2011) was recovered in a clade with Charon that was nested within Sarax. The non-monophyly
of various genera support the need for systematic revision of shallow-level taxa, as exemplified
by recent changes implemented within the phylogeny of Charinidae (Miranda et al. 2022).
Our analyses thus revealed phylogenetic relationships that conflicted with morphological
interpretations with respect to the position of Charinidae (unambiguously forming a clade with
Charontidae, contra Weygoldt 2000; Garwood et al. 2017), for all matrices analyzed, regardless
of occupancy and taxon composition. When support for (Charinidae +_Charontidae) was
assessed, the likelihood mapping results strongly favor the placement of Charinidae and
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 18 of 38
Charontidae as sister groups (78.5% of quartets; Fig. 2b). From the unfiltered UCE data set,
2.1% of the sampled quartets were uninformative.
Molecular dating
Divergence time estimation using five outgroup and three ingroup fossil calibrations in
MCMCTree recovered a 330 Mya age for the crown group of Amblypygi (95% highest posterior
density [HPD] interval: 374-295 Mya), with diversification of family-level taxa occurring in the
late Permian and Triassic (Fig. 3). Removal of Paracharon resulted in node age overestimates
for the deepest nodes in Ambypygi, but negligible effects on shallow nodes (Supplementary Fig.
S2). The estimated age of Charinidae accorded closely with previous estimates based on two
fossil calibrations and a reduced representation of Amblypygi higher-level diversity (Miranda et
al. 2022).
By comparison to MCMCTree, divergence time estimation using a penalized likelihood
approach with LSD2 exhibited a more pronounced impact upon the removal of Paracharon.
When Paracharon sp. was removed and a node calibration from the oldest known whip spider
fossil was instead applied to the most recent common ancestor of Euamblypygi, the resulting
analysis recovered a 314 Mya age for crown group Euamblypygi (95% HPD interval: 353-314
Mya), and divergences of the family-level taxa in the Jurassic. All node ages were overestimated
by LSD2 when Paracharon sp. was excluded, with the magnitude of overestimation correlating
with phylogenetic depth (Supplementary Fig. S2). This result suggests that the sampling of
Paracharontidae strongly influences divergence time estimation within Amblypygi, as a function
of estimation method.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 19 of 38
Figure 3. a) Divergence time estimation for Amblypygi, based on five outgroup and three
ingroup node calibrations marked with a star. Data matrix is derived from a fusion of UCEs
(40% occupancy) and six Sanger loci. b) Simplified maximum likelihood tree of the UCE and
Sanger dataset, showing intergeneric relationships.
To compare the relative influence of denser sampling of extant lineages versus the use of ingroup
fossil calibrations, we performed a third analysis wherein we retained all terminals, but removed
the three ingroup fossil calibrations. Divergence time analyses using only outgroup node
calibrations resulted in broader variance (HPD intervals) for all node age estimates of interest,
regardless of the use of MCMCTree or LSD2 (Fig. 4), but median age estimates did not
significantly change as a result of removing the ingroup fossil calibrations.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 20 of 38
Figure 4. Divergence time estimates optimized by MCMCTree and LSD2 using fossil-based
node calibrations. Conventions of HPD intervals follow the bottom legend.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 21 of 38
Discussion
Considerable strides have been achieved in deciphering the relationships of chelicerate
arthropods in the past decade. An emphasis on denser taxonomic sampling, together with the
availability of new sequencing technologies, has revolutionized modern investigations of
relationships within poorly studied groups, such as mites, pseudoscorpions, and sea spiders (e.g.,
Klimov et al. 2018; Benavides et al. 2019; Ballesteros et al. 2021). Such datasets have facilitated
greater precision in hypothesis-testing with regard to diversification dynamics, biogeographic
history, and both morphological and molecular evolution (e.g., Giribet et al. 2012; Bond et al.
2014; Wheeler et al. 2017; Benavides et al. 2019; Santibáñez-López et al. 2022). Surprisingly,
there remain a handful of higher level taxa within arthropods for which molecular phylogenies
still do not exist, as exemplified by Amblypygi. In this specific case, the sister group to the
remaining whip spiders long consisted of a single elusive relict species that had not been
rediscovered for over a century, effectively barring any sequencing-based efforts to infer
higher-level phylogeny. The phylogeny of Amblypygi was last assessed in an analytical
framework using morphological characters by Weygoldt (1996). Thereafter, phylogenetic works
focused on small species-groups (Prendini et al., 2005; Seiter et al., 2020), fossil placements
(Garwood at al., 2017), or the systematics of individual families (Miranda et al., 2018, 2021);
relationships across the order were never reinvestigated. Here, our rediscovery of a long-lost
relict breaks an erstwhile phylogenetic impasse, greatly expands the known range of the relictual
lineage Paracharontidae, and significantly improves the precision of molecular dating efforts.
Our analyses of whip spider relationships recovered a well-resolved topology that placed
Paracharontidae as the sister group of the remaining Amblypygi, consistent with the
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 22 of 38
interpretations of Weygoldt (1996) and Garwood et al. (2017). Paracharontids closely resemble
Carboniferous fossils of Amblypygi, such as Weygoldtina anglica (315 Ma). The articulation of
the paracharontid pedipalp is parallel to the body axis, in contrast to the remaining Amblypygi.
This feature is shared by the Paleozoic fossil whip spiders, as well as by non-whip spider
arachnopulmonates, such as Schizomida and spiders. All analyses additionally recovered the
clades Phrynidae + Phrynichidae, as well as Charinidae + Charontidae with robust support.
These results are partly congruent with each of the preceding morphological analyses of
Amblypygi (Quintero 1986; Weygoldt 1996; Garwood et al. 2017).
The undescribed species of Paracharon that we identified from the Neotropics is
morphologically similar to Paracharon caecus from Guinea Bissau, including in its extreme
reduction of eyes and its troglobitic habitus, which likely reflects a case of convergence (Hansen
1921). Together with the Indian amber species Paracharonopsis cambayensis, as well as the
Nearctic Carboniferous taxa (Weygoldtina; Graeophonus), these localities suggest a broad
former distribution of Paleoamblypygi that underwent significant range contraction. Given the
comparatively large size and visibility of whip spiders, we postulate that the remaining species of
Paracharontidae may be restricted to caves and other microrefugia of Tropical Gondwana.
Beyond testing the validity of phylogenetic relationships inferred on the basis of morphology,
there are two critical benefits to phylogenetic analyses that hinge upon sampling phylogenetic
relicts with molecular data. First, we demonstrate that the omission of relicts has a significant
impact on node dating approaches. When Paracharon sp. is artificially excluded from the
dataset, the next available crown group node is treated as the most recent common ancestor of
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 23 of 38
Amblypygi. The effect of this incorrect calibration is that the crown age of Amblypygi is
overestimated, particularly by penalized likelihood approaches. This overestimation of node ages
has downstream implications for any hypothesis-testing that relies upon divergence time
estimation (namely, historical biogeography; Miranda et al. 2022). Second, phylogenetic relicts
such as Paracharon have the effect of breaking branches that subtend crown group taxa (Inward
et al. 2007; Soltis et al. 2008). The sampling of such basally branching groups is critical to
phylogenetic accuracy when unstable relationships are driven by heterogeneous evolutionary
rates across taxa. In the case of chelicerate phylogeny, a recent work showed that the strategy of
densely sampling the basal nodes of an unstable taxon outperformed filtering by taxon
occupancy, filtering by evolutionary rate, algorithmic approach to tree reconstruction, and use of
site heterogeneous models, as predictors of phylogenetic accuracy (Ontano et al. 2021).
Our results, therefore, underscore the imperative for biodiversity discovery and continued
campaigns to survey and document the diversity of tropical invertebrates, with the goal of
finding taxa that represent phylogenetically and evolutionarily significant groups, including
relicts (Griswold et al. 2012; Cruz-López et al. 2016; Aharon et al. 2019). Future efforts to
advance invertebrate systematics must emphasize the completion of higher-level phylogenies for
dark parts of the Tree of Life, in tandem with recognition of the scientific value of depauperate
groups of phylogenetic significance.
Funding
G.S.M. was supported by a Buck Postdoctoral Fellowship and Global Genome Initiative
Postdoctoral Fellowship from the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 24 of 38
S.S.K. and P.P.S. were supported by National Science Foundation IOS-2016141 to P.P.S.
Sequencing was supported by the Global Genome Initiative grants (GGI-Peer-2018-179 and
GGI-Rolling-2018-200 to G.S.M. and H.M.W.) from the National Museum of Natural History.
J.T. was supported by grants from the Coordenação Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível
Superior (CAPES; 88882.426372/2019-01; 88887.631058/2021-00) at the ‘Programa de Pós-
Graduação em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais’, Universidade Federal do São Carlos, and
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Comparada, Universidade de São Paulo. Fieldwork in
Israel and some UCE sequencing was additionally supported by Binational Science Foundation
2019216 to E.G.R. and P.P.S.
Acknowledgements
This work is dedicated to the legacy of Peter Weygoldt. Access to natural history collections was
provided by Jairo Moreno González, Lorenzo Prendini, Gonzalo Giribet, Lauren Esposito,
Joachim Holstein, and Nikolaj Scharff, and access to recently-collected material from Australia
was provided by Kieran Aland. Siegfried Huber provided the photograph of Damon medius.
Sample preparation for sequencing was performed at the Laboratory of Analytical Biology,
Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC; and at the BioTechnology Center, University of
Wisconsin-Madison. Scientific computation was performed on the Smithsonian High
Performance Cluster (SI/HPC), Smithsonian Institution, High Performance Computing Cluster at
The George Washington University, Research Technology Services, and at the Biotechnology
Resource Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 25 of 38
References
Aharon, S., Ballesteros, J. A., Crawford, A. C., Friske, K., Guilherme, G., Langford, B.,
Santibáñez-López, C. E., Ya'aran, S., Gavish-Regev, E., and Sharma, P. P. (2019). The anatomy
of an unstable node: A Levantine relict precipitates phylogenomic dissolution of higher-level
relationships of the armored harvestmen (Arachnida: Opiliones: Laniatores). Invertebrate
Systematics 33, 697–717.
Amemiya, C., Alföldi, J., Lee, A., Fan, S., Philippe, H., Maccallum, I., Braasch, I., Manousaki,
T., Schneider, I., Rohner, N., Organ, C., Chalopin, D., Smith, J., Robinson, M., Dorrington, R.,
Gerdol, M., Aken, B., Biscotti, M., Barucca, M., Baurain, D., Berlin, A., Blatch, G., Buonocore,
F., Burmester, T., Campbell, M., Canapa, A., Cannon, J., Christoffels, A., De Moro, G., Edkins,
A., Fan, L., Fausto, A., Feiner, N., Forconi, M., Gamieldien, J., Gnerre, S., Gnirke, A.,
Goldstone, J., Haerty, W., Hahn, M., Hesse, U., Hoffmann, S., Johnson, J., Karchner, S., Kuraku,
S., Lara, M., Levin, J., Litman, G., Mauceli, E., Miyake, T., Mueller, M., Nelson, D., Nitsche,
A., Olmo, E., Ota, T., Pallavicini, A., Panji, S., Picone, B., Ponting, C., Prohaska, S., Przybylski,
D., Saha, N., Ravi, V., Ribeiro, F., Sauka-Spengler, T., Scapigliati, G., Searle, S., Sharpe, T.,
Simakov, O., Stadler, P., Stegeman, J., Sumiyama, K., Tabbaa, D., Tafer, H., Turner-Maier, J.,
van Heusden, P., White, S., Williams, L., Yandell, M., Brinkmann, H., Volff, J., Tabin, C.,
Shubin, N., Schartl, M., Jaffe, D., Postlethwait, J., Venkatesh, B., Di Palma, F., Lander, E.,
Meyer, A., and Lindblad-Toh, K. (2013). The African coelacanth genome provides insights into
tetrapod evolution. Nature 496, 311–6.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 26 of 38
Amemiya, C. T., Powers, T. P., Prohaska, S. J., Grimwood, J., Schmutz, J., Dickson, M.,
Miyake, T., Schoenborn, M. A., Myers, R. M., Ruddle, F. H., and Stadler, P. F. (2010).
Complete HOX cluster characterization of the coelacanth provides further evidence for slow
evolution of its genome. PNAS 107, 3622–3627.
Arabi, J., Judson, M. L. I., Deharveng, L., Lourenço, W. R., Cruaud, C., and Hassanin, A.
(2012). Nucleotide Composition of CO1 Sequences in Chelicerata (Arthropoda): Detecting New
Mitogenomic Rearrangements. Journal of Molecular Evolution 74, 81-95
Baker, C. M., Boyer, S. L., and Giribet, G. (2020). A well-resolved transcriptomic phylogeny of
the mite harvestman family Pettalidae (Arachnida, Opiliones, Cyphophthalmi) reveals signatures
of Gondwanan vicariance. Journal of Biogeography 47, 1345–1361.
Ballesteros J.A., Santibáñez-López C.E., Baker C.M., Benavides L.R., Cunha T.J., Gainett G.,
Ontano A.Z., Setton E.V.W., Arango C.P., Gavish-Regev E., Harvey M.S., Wheeler W.C.,
Hormiga G., Giribet G., Sharma P.P. (2022). Comprehensive species sampling and sophisticated
algorithmic approaches refute the monophyly of Arachnida. Molecular Biology and Evolution
39, msac021.
Ballesteros, J.A., Santibáñez-López, C.E., Kovác, L’., Gavish-Regev, E., Sharma, P.P. (2019).
Ordered phylogenomic subsampling enables diagnosis of systematic errors in the placement of
the enigmatic, long branch arachnid order Palpigradi. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 286,
20192426.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 27 of 38
Ballesteros, J. A., Setton, E. V., Santibáñez-López, C. E., Arango, C. P., Brenneis, G., Brix, S.,
Corbett, K. F., Cano-Sánchez, E., Dandouch, M., Dilly, G. F., Eleaume, M. P., Gainett, G.,
Gallut, C., McAtee, S., McIntyre, L., Moran, A. L., Moran, R., López-González, P. J., Scholtz,
G., Williamson, C., Woods, H. A., Zehms, J. T., Wheeler, W. C., and Sharma, P. P. (2021).
Phylogenomic resolution of sea spider diversification through integration of multiple data
classes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 38, 686–701.
Ballesteros J.A., Sharma P.P. (2019). A critical appraisal of the placement of Xiphosura
(Chelicerata) with account of known sources of phylogenetic error. Systematic Biology 68, 896–
917.
Benavides, L. R., Cosgrove, J. G., Harvey, M. S., and Giribet, G. (2019). Phylogenomic
interrogation resolves the backbone of the Pseudoscorpiones tree of life. Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 139, 106509.
Benavides, L. R., Daniels, S. R., and Giribet, G. (2021). Understanding the real magnitude of the
arachnid order Ricinulei through deep Sanger sequencing across its distribution range and
phylogenomics, with the formalization of the first species from the Lesser Antilles. Journal of
Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 59, 1850–1873.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 28 of 38
Bond, J. E., Garrison, N. L., Hamilton, C. A., Godwin, R. L., Hedin, M., and Agnarsson, I.
(2014). Phylogenomics resolves a spider backbone phylogeny and rejects a prevailing paradigm
for orb web evolution. Current Biology 24, 1765–1771.
Boyer, S. L., Clouse, R. M., Benavides, L. R., Sharma, P., Schwendinger, P. J., Karunarathna, I.,
and Giribet, G. (2007). Biogeography of the world: a case study from cyphophthalmid Opiliones,
a globally distributed group of arachnids. Journal of Biogeography 34, 2070–2085.
Capella-Gutiérrez, S., Silla-Martínez, J. M., and Gabaldón, T. (2009). trimAl: a tool for
automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–
1973.
Clouse, R. M., Branstetter, M. G., Buenavente, P., Crowley, L. M., Czekanski-Moir, J., General,
D. E. M., Giribet, G., Harvey, M. S., Janies, D. A., Mohagan, A. B., Mohagan, D. P., Sharma, P.
P., and Wheeler, W. C. (2017). First global molecular phylogeny and biogeographical analysis of
two arachnid orders (Schizomida and Uropygi) supports a tropical Pangean origin and mid-
Cretaceous diversification. Journal of Biogeography 44, 2660–2672.
Combosch, D. J., Lemer, S., Ward, P. D., Landman, N. H., and Giribet, G. (2017). Genomic
signatures of evolution in Nautilus—An endangered living fossil. Molecular Ecology 26, 5923–
5938.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 29 of 38
Cruz-López, J. A., Proud, D. N., and Pérez-González, A. (2016). When troglomorphism dupes
taxonomists: morphology and molecules reveal the first pyramidopid harvestman (Arachnida,
Opiliones, Pyramidopidae) from the New World. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 177,
602–620.
Darlington, P. J. (1957). "Zoogeography : the geographical distribution of animals," Wiley, New
York.
dos Reis, M., and Yang, Z. (2019). "Bayesian Molecular Clock Dating Using Genome-Scale
Datasets.," Humana, Methods in Molecular Biology, New York, NY.
Eberle, J., Dimitrov, D., Valdez-Mondragón, A., and Huber, B.A. (2018). Microhabitat change
drives diversification in pholcid spiders. BMC Evolutionary Biology 18, 141.
Engel, M. S., and Grimaldi, D. A. (2014). Whipspiders (Arachnida: Amblypygi) in amber from
the Early Eocene and mid-Cretaceous, including maternal care. Novitates Paleoentomologicae 9,
1–17.
Faircloth, B. C., Branstetter, M. G., White, N. D., and Brady, S. G. (2015). Target enrichment of
ultraconserved elements from arthropods provides a genomic perspective on relationships among
Hymenoptera. Molecular Ecology Resources 15, 489–501.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 30 of 38
Faircloth, B. C., and Glenn, T. C. (2012). Not all sequence tags are created equal: designing and
validating sequence identification tags robust to indels. PLoS One 7, e42543.
Fernández, R., Kallal, R. J., Dimitrov, D., Ballesteros, J. A., Arnedo, M. A., Giribet, G., and
Hormiga, G. (2018). Phylogenomics, diversification dynamics, and comparative transcriptomics
across the spider tree of life. Current Biology 28, 1489-1497.e5.
Fernández, R., Sharma, P. P., Tourinho, A. L., and Giribet, G. (2017). The Opiliones tree of life:
shedding light on harvestmen relationships through transcriptomics. Proceedings of the Royal
Society B: Biological Sciences 284, 20162340.
Flanigan, K. A. S., Wiegmann, D. D., Hebets, E. A., and Bingman, V. P. (2021). Multisensory
integration supports configural learning of a home refuge in the whip spider Phrynus
marginemaculatus. Journal of Experimental Biology 224, jeb238444.
Fowler-Finn, K. D., and Hebets, E. A. (2006). An Examination of Agonistic Interactions in the
Whip Spider Phrynus marginemaculatus (Arachnida, Amblypygi). Journal of Arachnology 34,
62-76.
Garwood, R. J., Dunlop, J. A., Knecht, B. J., and Hegna, T. A. (2017). The phylogeny of fossil
whip spiders. BMC Evolutionary Biology 17, 105.
Gemmell, N. J., Rutherford, K., Prost, S., Tollis, M., Winter, D., Macey, J. R., Adelson, D. L.,
Suh, A., Bertozzi, T., Grau, J. H., Organ, C., Gardner, P. P., Muffato, M., Patricio, M., Billis, K.,
Martin, F. J., Flicek, P., Petersen, B., Kang, L., Michalak, P., Buckley, T. R., Wilson, M., Cheng,
Y., Miller, H., Schott, R. K., Jordan, M. D., Newcomb, R. D., Arroyo, J. I., Valenzuela, N., Hore,
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 31 of 38
T. A., Renart, J., Peona, V., Peart, C. R., Warmuth, V. M., Zeng, L., Kortschak, R. D., Raison, J.
M., Zapata, V. V., Wu, Z., Santesmasses, D., Mariotti, M., Guigó, R., Rupp, S. M., Twort, V. G.,
Dussex, N., Taylor, H., Abe, H., Bond, D. M., Paterson, J. M., Mulcahy, D. G., Gonzalez, V. L.,
Barbieri, C. G., DeMeo, D. P., Pabinger, S., Van Stijn, T., Clarke, S., Ryder, O., Edwards, S. V.,
Salzberg, S. L., Anderson, L., Nelson, N., Stone, C., Stone, C., Smillie, J., Edmonds, H., and
Ngatiwai Trust, B. (2020). The tuatara genome reveals ancient features of amniote evolution.
Nature 584, 403-409.
Giribet, G., McIntyre, E., Christian, E., Espinasa, L., Ferreira, R. L., Francke, Ó. F., Harvey, M.
S., Isaia, M., Kováč, Ĺ., McCutchen, L., Souza, M. F., and Zagmajster, M. (2014). The first
phylogenetic analysis of Palpigradi (Arachnida)–the most enigmatic arthropod order.
Invertebrate Systematics 28, 350–360.
Giribet, G., Sharma, P. P., Benavides, L. R., Boyer, S. L., Clouse, R. M., Bivort, B. L. D.,
Dimitrov, D., Kawauchi, G. Y., Murienne, J., and Schwendinger, P. J. (2012). Evolutionary and
biogeographical history of an ancient and global group of arachnids (Arachnida: Opiliones:
Cyphophthalmi) with a new taxonomic arrangement. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
105, 92–130.
Gould, S. J., Raup, D. M., Sepkoski, J. J., Schopf, T. J., and Simberloff, D. S. (1977). The shape
of evolution: a comparison of real and random clades. Paleobiology 3, 23-40.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 32 of 38
Grandcolas, P., Nattier, R., and Trewick, S. (2014). Relict species: a relict concept? Trends in
Ecology & Evolution 29, 655–663.
Grandcolas, P., Trewick, S.A. (2016). What Is the Meaning of Extreme Phylogenetic Diversity?
The Case of Phylogenetic Relict Species. In: Pellens, R., Grandcolas, P. (eds) Biodiversity
Conservation and Phylogenetic Systematics. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation 14.
Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22461-9_6
Griswold, C. E., Audisio, T., and Ledford, J. M. (2012). An extraordinary new family of spiders
from caves in the Pacific Northwest (Araneae, Trogloraptoridae, new family). ZooKeys 215.
Hansen, H. J. (1921). The Pedipalpi, Ricinulei, & Opiliones (exc. Op. Laniatores) collected by
Mr. Leonardo Fea in tropical West Africa & adjacent islands. Studies on Arthropoda,
Gyldendalske Boghandel: København 1, 1–55.
Harvey, M. S. (2003). "Catalogue of the smaller arachnid orders of the world. Amblypygi,
Uropygi, Schizomida, Palpigradi, Ricinulei and Solifugae," CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood.
Hoang, D. T., Chernomor, O., Haeseler, A. v., Minh, B. Q., and Vinh, L. S. (2018). UFBoot2:
Improving the Ultrafast Bootstrap Approximation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35, 518–
522.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 33 of 38
Holmquist, C. (1962). The relict concept: Is it a merely zoogeographical conception? Oikos 13,
262–292.
Inward, D., Beccaloni, G., and Eggleton, P. (2007). Death of an order: a comprehensive
molecular phylogenetic study confirms that termites are eusocial cockroaches. Biology letters 3,
331-335
Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B. Q., Wong, T. K. F., Haeseler, A. v., and Jermiin, L. S. (2017).
ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14, 587–
589.
Katoh, K., and Standley, D. M. (2013). Mafft multiple sequence alignment software version 7:
Improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30, 772-780.
Kent, W. (2002). BLAT—the BLAST‐like alignment tool. Genome Resources 12, 656–664.
Klimov, P. B., OConnor, B. M., Chetverikov, P. E., Bolton, S. J., Pepato, A. R., Mortazavi, A.
L., Tolstikov, A. V., Bauchan, G. R., and Ochoa, R. (2018). Comprehensive phylogeny of
acariform mites (Acariformes) provides insights on the origin of the four-legged mites
(Eriophyoidea), a long branch. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 119, 105–117
Klompen, H., Lekveishvili, M., and Black, W. C. (2007). Phylogeny of parasitiform mites
(Acari) based on rRNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43, 936-951.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 34 of 38
Kulkarni, S., Wood, H., Lloyd, M., & Hormiga, G. (2020). Spider‐specific probe set for
ultraconserved elements offers new perspectives on the evolutionary history of spiders
(Arachnida, Araneae). Molecular Ecology Resources 20, 185-203.
Maddison, W. P., Beattie, I., Marathe, K., Ng, P., Kanesharatnam, N., Benjamin, S. P., & Kunte,
K. (2020). A phylogenetic and taxonomic review of baviine jumping spiders (Araneae,
Salticidae, Baviini). ZooKeys 1004, 27–97. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1004.57526
Meyer, A., Schloissnig, S., Franchini, P., Du, K., Woltering, J. M., Irisarri, I., Wong, W. Y.,
Nowoshilow, S., Kneitz, S., Kawaguchi, A., Fabrizius, A., Xiong, P., Dechaud, C., Spaink, H. P.,
Volff, J.-N., Simakov, O., Burmester, T., Tanaka, E. M., and Schartl, M. (2021). Giant lungfish
genome elucidates the conquest of land by vertebrates. Nature 590, 284-289.
Minh, B. Q., Hanh, M. W., and Lanfear, R. (2020). New methods to calculate concordance
factors for phylogenomic datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 37, 2727–2733.
Miranda, G. S., Giupponi, A. P., Prendini, L., and Scharff, N. (2018). Weygoldtia, a new genus
of Charinidae Quintero, 1986 (Arachnida, Amblypygi) with a reappraisal of the genera in the
family. Zoologischer Anzeiger 273, 23–32.
Miranda, G. S., Giupponi, A. P., Scharff, N., and Prendini, L. (2022). Phylogeny and
biogeography of the pantropical whip spider family Charinidae (Arachnida, Amblypygi).
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 194, 136–180.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 35 of 38
Nguyen, L.-T., Schmidt, H. A., von Haeseler, A., and Minh, B. Q. (2014). IQ-TREE: A fast and
effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular
Biology and Evolution 32, 268-274.
Nong, W., Qu, Z., Li, Y., Barton-Owen, T., Wong, A. Y. P., Yip, H. Y., Lee, H. T., Narayana,
S., Baril, T., Swale, T., Cao, J., Chan, T. F., Kwan, H. S., Ngai, S. M., Panagiotou, G., Qian, P.-
Y., Qiu, J.-W., Yip, K. Y., Ismail, N., Pati, S., John, A., Tobe, S. S., Bendena, W. G., Cheung, S.
G., Hayward, A., and Hui, J. H. L. (2021). Horseshoe crab genomes reveal the evolution of genes
and microRNAs after three rounds of whole genome duplication. Communications Biology 4, 83.
Ontano, A. Z., Gainett, G., Aharon, S., Ballesteros, J. A., Benavides, L. R., Corbett, K. F.,
Gavish-Regev, E., Harvey, M. S., Monsma, S., Santibáñez-López, C. E., Setton, E. V. W.,
Zehms, J. T., Zeh, J. A., Zeh, D. W., and Sharma, P. P. (2021). Taxonomic sampling and rare
genomic changes overcome long-branch attraction in the phylogenetic placement of
Pseudoscorpions. Molecular Biology and Evolution 38, 2446-2467.
Ontano, A.Z., Steiner, H.G., Sharma P.P. (2022). How many long branch orders occur in
Chelicerata? Opposing effects of Palpigradi and Opilioacariformes on phylogenetic stability.
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 168, 107378.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 36 of 38
Prendini, L., Weygoldt, P., and Wheeler, W. C. (2005). Systematics of the Damon variegatus
group of African whip spiders (Chelicerata: Amblypygi): Evidence from behaviour, morphology
and DNA. Organisms Diversity & Evolution 5, 203–236.
Quintero, D. J. (1986). Revision de la clasificacion de amblypygidos pulvinados: Creacion de
subordenes, una nueva familia y un nuevo genero con tres nuevas especies (Arachnida:
Amblypygi). In "Ninth International Congress of Arachnology" (W. G. Eberhard, Y. D. Lubin
and B. C. Robinson, eds.), pp. 203–212. Smithsonian Institution Press, Panama.
Santibáñez-López, C. E., Aharon, S., Ballesteros, J. A., Gainett, G., Baker, C. M., González-
Santillán, E., Harvey, M. S., Hassan, M. K., Abu Almaaty, A. H., Aldeyarbi, S. M., Monod, L.,
Ojanguren-Affilastro, A., Pinto-da-Rocha, R., Zvik, Y., Gavish-Regev, E., and Sharma, P. P.
(2022). Phylogenomics of scorpions reveal contemporaneous diversification of scorpion
mammalian predators and mammal-active sodium channel toxins. Systematic Biology. (doi:
10.1093/sysbio/syac021)
Seiter, M., Lerma, A. C. R., Král, J., Sember, A., Divišová, K., Vargas, J. G. P., Colmenares, P.
A., Loria, S. F., and Prendini, L. (2020). Cryptic diversity in the whip spider genus Paraphrynus
(Amblypygi: Phrynidae): integrating morphology, karyotype and DNA. Arthropod Systematics
& Phylogeny 78, 265–285.
Simpson, G. (1955). "The Major Features of Evolution.," Columbia University Press, New York
City, New York.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 37 of 38
Sharma, P.P., Kaluziak, S.T., Pérez-Porro, A.R., González, V.L., Hormiga, G., Wheeler, W.C.,
Giribet, G. (2014). Phylogenomic interrogation of Arachnida reveals systemic conflicts in
phylogenetic signal. Molecular Biology and Evolution 31, 2963–2984.
Soltis, D. E., Albert, V. A., Leebens-Mack, J., Palmer, J. D., Wing, R. A., dePamphilis, C. W.,
Ma, H., Carlson, J. E., Altman, N., Kim, S., Wall, P. K., Zuccolo, A., and Soltis, P. S. (2008).
The Amborella genome: an evolutionary reference for plant biology. Genome Biology 9, 402.
Song, L., and Florea, L. (2015). Rcorrector: efficient and accurate error correction for Illumina
RNA-seq reads. GigaScience 4, s13742–015–0089–y.
Starrett, J., Derkarabetian, S., Hedin, M., Jr., R. W. B., McCormack, J. E., and Faircloth, B. C.
(2017). High Phylogenetic Utility of an Ultraconserved Element Probe Set Designed for
Arachnida. Molecular Ecology Resources 17, 812–823.
Strimmer, K., and Haeseler, A. v. (1997). Likelihood-mapping: A simple method to visualize
phylogenetic content of a sequence alignment. PNAS 94, 6815–6819.
To, T.-H., Jung, M., Lycett, S., and Gascuel, O. (2016). Fast dating using least-squares criteria
and algorithms, Systematic Biology 65, 82–97.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint
Page 38 of 38
Weygoldt, P. (1996). Evolutionary morphology of whip spiders: towards a phylogenetic system
(Chelicerata: Arachnida: Amblypygi). Journal of Zoological Systematics & Evolution Research
34, 185–202.
Weygoldt, P. (2000). "Whip spiders (Chelicerata: Amblypygi). Their Biology, Morphology and
Systematics," Apollo Books, Stenstrup.
Wheeler, W. C., Coddington, J. A., Crowley, L. M., Dimitrov, D., Goloboff, P. A., Griswold, C.
E., Hormiga, G., Prendini, L., Ramírez, M. J., Sierwald, P., Almeida-Silva, L., Alvarez-Padilla,
F., Arnedo, M. A., Silva, L. R. B., Benjamin, S. P., Bond, J. E., Grismado, C. J., Hasan, E.,
Hedin, M., Izquierdo, M. A., Labarque, F. M., Ledford, J., Lopardo, L., Maddison, W. P., Miller,
J. A., Piacentini, L. N., Platnick, N. I., Polotow, D., Silva-Dávila, D., Scharff, N., Szűts, T.,
Ubick, D., Vink, C. J., Wood, H. M., and Zhang, J. (2017). The spider tree of life: phylogeny of
Araneae based on target-gene analyses from an extensive taxon sampling. Cladistics 33, 574–
616.
Wiegmann, D. D., Hebets, E. A., Gronenberg, W., Graving, J. M., and Bingman, V. P. (2016).
Amblypygids: Model organisms for the study of arthropod navigation mechanisms in complex
environments? Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 10, 47.
Yang, Z. (2007). PAML 4: Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood. Molecular Biology
and Evolution 24, 1586-1591.
.CC-BY 4.0 International licenseavailable under a
was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made
The copyright holder for this preprint (whichthis version posted April 27, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.26.489547doi: bioRxiv preprint