Research ProposalPDF Available

Call for papers Special Issue: "Cultural and creative industries and the challenge of sustainable development: opportunities for higher education, businesses and communities", Deadline 30 November 2022

Authors:

Abstract

Industry and Higher Education Journal, Call for papers, Special Issue: “Cultural and creative industries and the challenge of sustainable development: opportunities for higher education, businesses and communities”. Keywords: sustainability; cultural and creative industries; higher education; culture. Guest editors: Elisa Salvador, Professor (PhD, HDR) of Innovation and Creativity at ESSCA School of Management, France, corresponding editor; Roberta Comunian, Reader in Creative Economy, Department of Culture, Media and Creative Industries, King’s College, London, UK. This Special Issue of Industry and Higher Education offers an opportunity to discover how CCIs are embracing the challenge of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and to highlight best practices for the implementation of sustainable solutions through HEI–industry collaboration in various CCI sectors. Research questions and topics include, but are not limited to, the following: - What role do HEIs play or what role can they play in developing creative human capital engaged in a sustainability agenda? - What role can businesses networks and platforms led or developed by HEIs play in developing local and national level agendas for sustainable CCIs? - What opportunities for collaboration are emerging between HEIs and CCIs in relation to the SDGs? - How does the presence of HEI and CCI networks support the SDGs agenda? - What practices are being implemented and could be considered as “smart” solutions for the sustainable growth of CCIs and HEIs?
1
Industry and Higher Education
Call for papers
Special Issue: Cultural and creative industries and the challenge of sustainable development:
opportunities for higher education, businesses and communities
Keywords: sustainability; cultural and creative industries; higher education; culture
Guest editors:
Elisa Salvador, Professor (PhD, HDR) of Innovation and Creativity at ESSCA School of Management,
France, corresponding editor
Roberta Comunian, Reader in Creative Economy, Department of Culture, Media and Creative
Industries, Kings College, London, UK
In the last decade the relevance of universities’ “third mission” has been growing (Etzkowitz, 2008;
Leydesdorff and Meyer, 2006) and knowledge transfer processes have shifted towards more active
academic engagement in economic and social development. In this context, the concept of the
entrepreneurial university has continued to evolve (Etzkowitz et al., 2000; Hytti, 2021), and a close
relationship between the dynamics of universityindustry collaborations and regional governance and
development has been observed (Lazzeroni and Piccaluga, 2015). This relationship has been explored
in various contexts, including that of the creative and cultural industries (CCIs) and the creative campus
(Comunian and Gilmore, 2016).
Meanwhile, we have witnessed in recent years the emergence of a critical issue that now plays a
leading role in policy debates and initiatives throughout the world: sustainability and the Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs). Starting from the seminal report “Our Common Future”, released in 1987
by the World Commission on Environment and Development, the term “sustainable” has become more
and more widely used (WCED, 1987). The scientific debate about “sustainability”, embracing
economic, environmental and social goals, has grown substantially in the last 15 years and ambitious
programmes like the European Green Deal have been launched (Ratten et al., 2020).
Climate change, resource scarcity and social inequality are precipitating a revolution in companies’
behaviour and consumers’ habits. Consequently, in recent years higher education institutions (HEIs)
have been launching programs to educate and train students to become responsible leaders.
Environmental and social sustainability goals are now considered to be strategic competitive drivers.
CCIs are not immune from this challenge; indeed, these industries are among the pivotal actors that
have the potential to provide original and unexpected solutions thanks to their creativity, skills and
talent (Amabile, 1988)solutions that can be transferred to other industrial sectors.
The UK Department for Culture, Media and Sport’s Creative Task Force defined CCIs as “those
industries which have their origin in individual creativity, skill and talent and which have a potential for
wealth and job creation through the generation and exploitation of intellectual property” (DCMS, 1998
2
and 2001: 5). Starting from this definition and initiatives carried out in the UK, many subsequent
studies have underlined the unique contribution to economic growth and organizational design
offered by the CCIs (cf UNCTAD reports; Green Paper, 2010). The information and communication
technologies revolution and the digital age have only accelerated this process (Benghozi et al., 2021;
Salvador and Benghozi, 2021).
Considering the role played by HEIs and CCIs, we recognize that more knowledge is needed to provide
a better understanding of their relations, collaborations and work in relation to sustainable
development.
Like other industrial sectors, the CCIs are adopting sustainable practices to green their value chain: as
highlighted by a report of EIF-KEA (2021), CCIs are rethinking the ways in which cultural products and
services are produced and consumed by adopting more sustainable practices. Overall, we see an
important shift especially after the 2008 global financial crisis towards creative social economies
(Comunian et al. 2020) and engagement with environmental issues (Oakley and Banks, 2020). For
example, recycled materials are being used in greater quantities in production processes; plastic
bottles are being replaced by more eco-friendly solutions during cultural events; energy-saving lighting
systems are being implemented in museums and other cultural spaces; certifications like the Creative
Green Certification, designed specifically for the arts and CCIs by Julie’s Bicycle1 are more and more
common; the fashion industry is implementing eco-friendly practices in its production systems and is
paying greater attention to the lifecycle of its products (cf. EIF-KEA, 2021).
Furthermore, collective movements are emerging to encourage artists and creators to take a stand on
climate change and ecological emergencies and to increase awareness about more sustainable
production and consumption choices (EIF-KEA, 2021).
Higher education and the knowledge it develops are potentially connected with all the 17 SDGs (United
Nations General Assembly, 2015) but some are interconnected and are highly relevant to the specific
area of interaction between higher education and CCIs (Duxbury et al., 2016). The connection between
CCIs and SDGs spans a range of topics often relating to the development of sustainable cities and
communities (SDG 11). We suggest that there are three key issues in this context that require further
exploration:
The connection between HEIs, CCIs and sustainable economic growth. This relates to the need
to engage with ideas of “decent work and economic growth(8) but also improving industry
innovation and infrastructure (9) and engaging with responsible consumption and
production(12).
The connection between HEIs, CCIs and societal agendas for development. In particular, the
importance of high-quality education (4), “gender equality(5) and reduced inequalities
(10).
The connection between HEIs, CCIs and environmental agendas, including climate action(13)
affordable and clean energy(7) and the protection of life on land” (15) and below water
(14).
1 See https://juliesbicycle.com/creativegreen-certification/
3
This Special Issue of Industry and Higher Education offers an opportunity to discover how CCIs are
embracing the challenge of SDGs and to highlight best practices for the implementation of sustainable
solutions through HEIindustry collaboration in various CCI sectors.
Research questions and topics include, but are not limited to, the following:
- What role do HEIs play or what role can they play in developing creative human capital
engaged in a sustainability agenda?
- What role can businesses networks and platforms led or developed by HEIs play in developing
local and national level agendas for sustainable CCIs?
- What opportunities for collaboration are emerging between HEIs and CCIs in relation to the
SDGs?
- How does the presence of HEI and CCI networks support the SDGs agenda?
- What practices are being implemented and could be considered as “smart” solutions for the
sustainable growth of CCIs and HEIs?
The initial ideas behind this call were developed in the course of preparing the Special Session on
“Cultural and creative industries and the challenge of sustainable development: opportunities for
universities, policy, industries and communities” chaired by the Guest Editors at the 20th Triple Helix
Conference in Florence, 2729 June 2022.
We invite contributions that will enlighten our understanding of sustainability matters in the arts and
cultural sector and further our collective knowledge concerning the mission of HEIs and their recent
development of programmes oriented towards education in sustainability.
The Special Issue aims at collecting original contributions on these topics. We welcome original
qualitative or quantitative contributions in the form of theoretical, conceptual and empirical papers.
Submission and review process
All submissions will be desk-reviewed by the Guest Editors. Only selected manuscripts will be sent for
anonymous review by two external reviewers.
All submissions must be written in fluent English and should comply with the journal’s guidelines,
available at: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/industry-and-higher-
education/journal202558#submission-guidelines.
Full papers should preferably be between 4,000 and 8,000 words. Papers should be submitted online
at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ihe. Please include in your covering letter that the paper is
submitted to the ‘CCIs, SDGs & IHE special issue’.
For enquiries concerning the suitability of planned submissions, please contact Professor Elisa
Salvador, ESSCA School of Management (elisa.salvador@essca.fr ) including in your message the title
of your proposed paper and an abstract of around 200 words.
Submission deadline:
The final date for submission of papers is Monday 31 October 2022.
4
About the Guest Editors
Salvador Elisa (HDR, University of Paris 13; PhD, University of Turin) has worked on innovation policy
for the Italian National Research Council (CNR) and was awarded CNR’s Promotion of Research 2005
prize. She has collaborated with the Polytechnic of Turin and with the ESCP-Europe Business School;
she taught at IÉSEG School of Management; she worked as a researcher at Ecole Polytechnique, Paris,
investigating R&D and innovation in the cultural and creative industries. Currently she is a Professor at
ESSCA School of Management, where she coordinates the Master’s course in Managing Creativity and
Innovation and the Bachelor’s course on Managing Innovation.
Roberta Comunian is Reader in Creative Economy at the Department of Culture, Media and Creative
Industries at King's College London. She is interested in cultural policy, cultural and creative work and
creative higher education. She has published extensively on the role of creative and cultural industries
in local development. She has coordinated two AHRC international research networks of the Arts and
Humanities Research Council (AHRC) and is currently involved in the H2020 EU funded project DISCE:
Developing Inclusive and Sustainable Creative Economies.
About the journal
Industry and Higher Education, published bimonthly by Sage, focuses on the multifaceted and complex
relationships between higher education institutions and business and industry. It looks in detail at the
processes and enactments of academiabusiness cooperation as well as examining the significance of
that cooperation in wider contexts, such as regional development, entrepreneurship and innovation
ecosystems. While emphasizing the practical aspects of academiabusiness cooperation, IHE also
locates practice in theoretical and research contexts, questioning received opinion and developing our
understanding of what constitutes truly effective cooperation.
References
Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior
10:123-167.
Benghozi P-J, Salvador E and Simon J-P (2021) Strategies in the cultural and creative industries: static but flexible
vs dynamic and liquid. The emergence of a new model in the digital age. Revue d’Economie Industrielle
174(2): 117-157.
Comunian R and Gilmore A (eds.) (2016) Higher education and the creative economy: Beyond the campus.
Abingdon: Routledge.
Comunian R, Rickmers D and Nanetti A (2020) Guest editorial: The creative economy is dead long live the
creative-social economies. Social Enterprise Journal 16 (2):101-119.
DCMS (1998) Creative Industry Task Force Report. London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport
DCMS (2001) Green Paper: Culture and Creativity: the Next 10 Years. London: Department for Culture, Media and
Sport, http://www.culture.gov.uk/reference_library/publications/4634.aspx/
Duxbury N, Hosagrahar J and Pascual J (2016). Why must culture be at the heart of sustainable urban
development?. Agenda 21 for culture.
EIF-KEA (2021) Market analysis of the cultural and creative sectors in Europe. A sector to invest in. Brussels:
European Investment Fund, Deloitte, KEA.
Etzkowitz H (2008) The Triple Helix. University, industry, government innovation in action. New York: Routledge.
Etzkowitz H, Webster A, Gebhardt C and Cantisano Terra BR (2000) The future of the university and the university
of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy 29(2): 313-330
5
Green Paper (2010) Unlocking the potential of cultural and creative industries. Brussels: European Commission,
COM (2010) 183.
Hytti U (2021) A Research Agenda for the Entrepreneurial University. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Lazzeroni M and Piccaluga A (2015) Beyond “town and gown”: the role of the university in small and medium-
sized cities. Industry&Higher Education 29(1): 11-23.
Leydesdorff L and Meyer M (2006) Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems. Introduction
to the special issue. Research Policy 35(10): 1441-1449.
Oakley K and Banks M (2020) Cultural Industries and Environmental Crisis: An Introduction. In Cultural Industries
and the Environmental Crisis. Cham: Springer, pp. 1-10.
Ratten V, Ramirez-Pasillas M and Lundberg H (2020) eds. Managing Sustainable Innovation. Abingdon:
Routledge.
Salvador E and Benghozi P-J (2021) The digital strategies of publishing houses: a matter of book content?.
International Journal of Arts Management 23(2): 56-74.
UNCTAD (2010), Creative Economy Report 2010. Creative economy: a feasible development option. Geneva:
UNCTAD
UNCTAD (2018), Creative Economy Outlook: Trends in international trade in creative industries,
UNCTAD/DITC/TED/2018/3, Geneva: UNCTAD.
United Nations General Assembly (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable
development. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our Common Future. The Brundtland
Report.
... Notwithstanding this urgency, investigations related to sustainability and sustainable development in the CCIs are surprisingly still at an early stage, and a significant gap can be observed in the academic literature. Salvador and Comunian (2024) focused on sustainability matter in the arts and culture sector and the Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) mission and recent evolutions towards sustainable education programs, while Salvador and Pappalepore (2025) have recently tried to fill the gap on 'Responsible Consumption and Production in the Cultural & Creative Industries'. Nonetheless, to date the matter of sustainable innovations and technologies in the CCIs' industries has not received the deserved attention. ...
Research Proposal
Full-text available
This Special Issue aims at investigating how the several CCIs’ sectors are complying with sustainable development and what kinds of innovations and technologies these industries are adopting to achieve this goal. On Wednesday the 21st May 2025 a 1-day workshop will be organized by the Guest Editors at the University of Turin (Italy) - within the UNESCO Chair in “Economics of culture and heritage: strategies for protection and development” (chair-holder Prof. G. Segre) - with hybrid option: the workshop will bring the guest editors and authors of potential papers together (online or in-person) to discuss the content of the proposals, share ideas, and help each other to finalize their manuscript before the deadline for submission.
Article
Full-text available
The cultural and creative industries (CCIs) were among the first to be disrupted by the digital revolution. General lessons can thus be learned from the strategies they adopted in the digital age. Alongside a reversal model and a differentiation policy, CCI companies now face a new alternative between two main strategies, which cannot easily be classified using traditional theories. The first model is a static but flexible strategy whereby the organization equips itself with skills and tries to be sufficiently flexible and ambidextrous to absorb the shocks of changing environments. This strategy aims at overcoming organizational inertia through slow and cautious steps, even if they are not always in line with the rapidity of changes in the digital age. The second model, the liquid one, consists of a proactive and agile strategy where the organization moves quickly, adapts hastily, and changes constantly to be in tune with the new configurations that are emerging around it.JEL classification: L22, L82, O32, Z10.
Article
Full-text available
Traditional editorial houses are now confronted with the emergence of the online diffusion of e-books. This phenomenon has forced publishing houses to also make their catalogue of printed books available as digital versions. However, it would be inaccurate to envision and report on the digital strategies of publishing houses in a global way since digitisation has very different effects according to the various types of books: dictionaries, illustrated books or novels, for example. The aim of this article is therefore to examine to what extent the type and categories of books influence — or not — in a differentiated way the behaviour of publishers in their digitisation strategies and the design of their e-book catalogues. The expected results should reflect divergent approaches towards proactive behaviour and the appropriation of e-book technologies. Not all publishers are on the path towards publishing in digital formats. Consequently, this article provides a comparative analysis of catalogues of printed books and e-books. It compares the strategy of 104 editorial houses, focusing on a specific country – in this case, France. The most widely diffused book categories with the total number of books available in printed and digital formats have been identified for every editorial house analysed. The analysis is supported and processed thanks to the use of the national systematic databank of French publishers (Electre). The results shed light on the effective influence of the digital book on printed book categories and make it possible to characterise accordingly the strategies of editorial houses in the digital age.
Book
Full-text available
Available: http://www.agenda21culture.net/images/a21c/articles/documentos/Culture_SD_cities.pdf Examining “why must culture be at the heart of sustainable urban development?“, the paper strongly contributes to the acknowledgment of culture as a central element in the paradigm of sustainable cities. Inspired by the three models for Culture and Sustainable development, the analysis clearly shows that “there are multiple ways of viewing culture’s relationship with sustainability, and [that] myths about culture present obstacles to fully integrating culture into urban development planning and strategies.” Culture should be fully integrated in urban development planning, while taking care that it is not “made invisible” in this process, the study says. “The distinctive features and benefits of cultural expressions, activities, and a diversity of approaches must be appreciated and nurtured, and culture and cultural heritage conserved and safeguarded through informed, intelligent, and sensitive cultural policies”. Alongside the global conversation on sustainable development, and the approval of the new “Habitat III” urban agenda, this Culture 21 policy paper brings important reflections on myths, counter-narratives, but also challenges and recommendations on the role of culture in sustainable development. It reminds local governments of their responsibility in facilitating this specific equilibrium between integrating culture in urban development, while appreciating it as a whole and recognizing its belonging to citizens and communities. (CultureActionEurope NR)
Article
Full-text available
In recent years, universities have become more active in performing new activities that have been added to those regarded as 'traditional'. This trend has led to a number of changes, among which is a transformation of the status of universities in urban and regional contexts and, in particular, an increase in their impact on the development of medium-sized university cities. From a methodological point of view the contribution of universities to urban development can be analysed from three different perspectives: knowledge and economic; relational; and cultural. Starting from these points of view, this paper analyses three cases of European medium-sized university cities (Oxford, Leuven and Pisa), in which the presence of one or more universities represents an important asset not only for the construction and evolution of knowledge spaces but also for urban development as a whole, by leaving tangible and intangible 'traces', reinforcing the relationship between academia and local community and contributing to the identity of knowledge cities.
Article
Full-text available
When two selection environments operate upon each other, mutual shaping in a co-evolution along a particular trajectory is one possible outcome. When three selection environments are involved, more complex dynamics can be expected as a result of interactions involving bi-lateral and tri-lateral relations. Three selection environments are specified in the Triple Helix model: (1) wealth generation (industry), (2) novelty production (academia), and (3) public control (government). Furthermore, this model somewhat reduces the complexity by using university-industry-government relations for the specification of the historical conditions of the non-linear dynamics. One can no longer expect a one-to-one correspondence between institutions and functions; a statistics is needed for the evaluation of how, for how long, and to what extent institutional arrangements enhance synergies among different selection environments. The empirical contributions to this Triple Helix issue point in the direction of "rich ecologies": the construction of careful balances between differentiation and integration among the three functions.
Chapter
Culture and the arts—where they are considered at all in environmental debates—are generally viewed as either benign low carbon activities that bring pleasure and meaning, or as irrelevant in the face of existential crisis. As cultural industry scholars, we reject both these readings and instead argue for a critical consideration of the role and potential of cultural activities in the face of mounting crises, environmental and otherwise. At the very least, cultural industries are part of the way we make sense of things and sense making is as vital as ever, but in addition they are huge commercial entities, instruments of public policy across the globe, and, in some cases, major polluters and resource consumers.
Article
We introduce a new hybrid approach to joint estimation of Value at Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES) for high quantiles of return distributions. We investigate the relative performance of VaR and ES models using daily returns for sixteen stock market indices (eight from developed and eight from emerging markets) prior to and during the 2008 financial crisis. In addition to widely used VaR and ES models, we also study the behavior of conditional and unconditional extreme value (EV) models to generate 99 percent confidence level estimates as well as developing a new loss function that relates tail losses to ES forecasts. Backtesting results show that only our proposed new hybrid and Extreme Value (EV)-based VaR models provide adequate protection in both developed and emerging markets, but that the hybrid approach does this at a significantly lower cost in capital reserves. In ES estimation the hybrid model yields the smallest error statistics surpassing even the EV models, especially in the developed markets.
Guest editorial: The creative economy is dead -long live the creative-social economies
  • R Comunian
  • D Rickmers
  • A Nanetti
Comunian R, Rickmers D and Nanetti A (2020) Guest editorial: The creative economy is dead -long live the creative-social economies. Social Enterprise Journal 16 (2):101-119.