Content uploaded by Jing Tang
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Jing Tang on Apr 23, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
ARTICLE
Integrated cooling (i-Cool) textile of heat
conduction and sweat transportation for personal
perspiration management
Yucan Peng 1,9, Wei Li 2,3,9, Bofei Liu1, Weiliang Jin 2, Joseph Schaadt4,5, Jing Tang1, Guangmin Zhou1,
Guanyang Wang6, Jiawei Zhou 1, Chi Zhang 7, Yangying Zhu1, Wenxiao Huang1, Tong Wu1,
Kenneth E. Goodson7, Chris Dames4,5, Ravi Prasher 4,5, Shanhui Fan 2& Yi Cui 1,8 ✉
Perspiration evaporation plays an indispensable role in human body heat dissipation. How-
ever, conventional textiles tend to focus on sweat removal and pay little attention to the basic
thermoregulation function of sweat, showing limited evaporation ability and cooling efficiency
in moderate/profuse perspiration scenarios. Here, we propose an integrated cooling (i-Cool)
textile with unique functional structure design for personal perspiration management. By
integrating heat conductive pathways and water transport channels decently, i-Cool exhibits
enhanced evaporation ability and high sweat evaporative cooling efficiency, not merely liquid
sweat wicking function. In the steady-state evaporation test, compared to cotton, up to over
100% reduction in water mass gain ratio, and 3 times higher skin power density increment for
every unit of sweat evaporation are demonstrated. Besides, i-Cool shows about 3 °C cooling
effect with greatly reduced sweat consumption than cotton in the artificial sweating skin test.
The practical application feasibility of i-Cool design principles is well validated based on
commercial fabrics. Owing to its exceptional personal perspiration management perfor-
mance, we expect the i-Cool concept can provide promising design guidelines for next-
generation perspiration management textiles.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8 OPEN
1Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. 2E. L. Ginzton Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering,
Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. 3GPL Photonics Lab, State Key Laboratory of Applied Optics, Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and
Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, China. 4Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. 5Energy
Technologies Area, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA. 6Department of Mathematics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
7Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. 8Stanford Institute for Materials and Energy Sciences, SLAC National
Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
9
These authors contributed equally: Yucan Peng, Wei Li. ✉email: yicui@stanford.edu
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:6122 |https://doi .org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1
1234567890():,;
Satisfaction with the thermal environment for human body is
significant, not merely due to the demand for comfort, but
more importantly because thermal conditions are crucial for
human body health1. Heat-resulted physiological and psycholo-
gical problems not only can be threatening for human health2,
but also negatively influence labor productivity and society
economy3. Personal thermal management focusing on thermal
conditions of human body and its local environment is emerging
as an energy-efficient and cost-effective solution4,5. Without
consuming excess energy on managing the temperature of the
entire environment6,7, innovative textiles have been designed for
controlling human body heat dissipation routes8,9. In general,
human body dissipates heat via four different pathways: radiation,
convection, conduction and evaporation10. Recently, textiles with
engineered radiative properties11–16, convective and conductive
properties17–19 have been demonstrated as promising approaches
for personal thermal management especially for mild scenarios.
However, for intense scenarios, textiles for ideal personal per-
spiration or evaporation management are still lacking.
For the delicate human body system with a narrow tempera-
ture range (36–38 °C core temperature at rest and up to 41 °C for
heavy exercise)20, evaporation plays an indispensable role in
human body thermoregulation. Even at a mild state, about 20% of
heat dissipation of the dry human body relies on the water vapor
loss via insensible perspiration10,21. With further increase of heat
load, liquid sweat evaporation contributes to more and more heat
loss and becomes the major route for human body heat dissipa-
tion in intense scenarios such as heavy exercise and hot/humid
environments, where excess heat cannot be dissipated efficiently
by other pathways22,23. State-of-the-art textiles for daily use are
usually sufficiently good at water vapor transmission to ensure
comfort at the mild state (See Supplementary Note 1 and Sup-
plementary Figs. 1–2 for more discussion)24. Nevertheless, the
cooling performance of conventional textiles is to be improved
when human body is in more intense scenarios, such as moder-
ate/profuse perspiration situations in which liquid sweat is
inevitably present.
In order to avoid increased wettedness on the skin which
causes less comfort in such cases25,26, state-of-the-art textiles,
including moisture management fabrics, tend to focus on sweat
removal. Textiles made of natural fibers, such as cotton, show
strong water absorption capacity, which can help alleviate sense
of wettedness quickly27. In spite of diminished absorbing ability,
synthetic fibers (with profiled cross-section), such as polyester,
are developed to possess enhanced moisture transportation than
natural fibers to deliver water to the textile surface for faster
evaporation28,29. Microfibres are also explored for improved
wicking30. Besides, strategies including surface hydrophilicity/
hydrophobicity modification31–33, multiple-layer design with
differential wettability34,35 and hierarchical design of multiscale
interconnected pores with capillarity gradient36,37 are reported to
realize better controlled directional water transportation. These
textiles serve as a buffer absorbing water to provide dry sense for
people and can potentially offer a comparatively larger surface
area for evaporation.
However, how to efficiently unlock the cooling power of sweat
evaporation for human body thermoregulation and design textiles
based on laws of human body perspiration process have not been
taken into account. In the aspect of thermoregulation, sweat is
secreted to be evaporated and take away the excess heat. Never-
theless, although sweat evaporation does happen on the con-
ventional textiles, human skin underneath is not effectively cooled
since heat for vaporization is not efficiently drawn from the skin
because of the limited heat transfer38–40. One extreme case is that
only the textile surface rather than human skin can be cooled. In
other words, the sweat absorbed in the conventional textiles
shows decreased evaporative cooling efficiency in cooling the
human body, which means sweat is less efficiently utilized. Also,
even regarding evaporation rate of conventional textiles, it is
relatively restrained because skin heat cannot be efficiently
delivered to the evaporation interface to accelerate evaporation.
The inefficient cooling effect will lead to further perspiration, and
meanwhile the slow sweat evaporation, will result in the accu-
mulation of sweat in the textile. This process may undermine the
buffer effect of the textiles once the absorption limit of the fabric
is reached, at which point the human body will get wet and sticky
again. The excessive perspiration can also cause potential risk of
dehydration, electrolyte disorder, physical and mental deteriora-
tion or even death41. Moreover, when people are in highly active
scenarios, the maximum cooling power of sweat evaporation that
can be achieved actually limits the maximum activity level of
human body42. Accordingly, in addition to decent wicking
property, an optimal textile for perspiration scenario should show
high evaporation ability and more importantly high sweat eva-
porative cooling efficiency to utilize sweat in a highly efficient
manner, to provide adequate cooling effect using minimized
amount of sweat.
In this work, we propose a novel concept of integrated cooling
(i-Cool) textile of heat conduction and sweat transportation to
achieve the as-mentioned goals based on human body perspira-
tion process, as illustrated in Fig. 1a. We introduce heat con-
ductive components into the textile and divide the functionalities
of heat conduction and sweat transport into two operational
components. The heat conductive matrix and sweat transporta-
tion channels are integrated together in the i-Cool textile. The
synergistic effect of the two components results in excellent
performance at sweat wicking, fast evaporation, efficient eva-
porative cooling for human body and reducing human body
dehydration. As shown in Fig. 1b, the sweat transport channels
can pull liquid water up from skin and spread it out in the sweat
transport channels for evaporation. On the other hand, the heat
conductive matrix can efficiently transfer skin heat to the eva-
poration spots that are integrated on the heat conductive
matrix43,44. Therefore, combined with large evaporation area and
efficient heat conduction from skin, sweat absorbed in the water
transportation channels can be evaporated quickly into air, taking
away a huge amount of heat from the skin. The efficient heat
removal from the skin provides improved evaporative cooling
effect and decrease skin temperature effectively, which will con-
sequently reduce human body dehydration. As illustrated in
Fig. 1c, compared to the conventional textiles, the i-Cool textile
functions not only to wick sweat but also provide heat conduction
paths for the accelerated evaporation and efficiently take away a
great amount of heat from the skin. Furthermore, the enhanced
evaporation ability and high sweat evaporative cooling efficiency
can prevent the i-Cool textile from flooding to a much greater
extent and avoid excessive perspiration. The improved evapora-
tive cooling effect does not mean more sweat needs to be gen-
erated or even evaporated. Therefore, the i-Cool textile can help
human body achieve enhanced cooling effect with greatly reduced
sweat secretion by using the sweat in a highly efficient manner.
Results and discussion
On the basis of the i-Cool functional structure design principles
as outlined above, we selected copper (Cu) and nylon 6 nano-
fibres for proof of concept. It is worthwhile to mention that Cu
and nylon 6 nanofibres are not the only choices. Other materials
satisfying the design principles can be applied as well. Here, Cu is
well-known for its extraordinary thermal conductivity (~400
W·m−1·K−1), and nylon 6 nanofibres are capable of water
wicking. As illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 3, electrospinning
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8
2NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:6122 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications
was utilized to generate nylon 6 nanofibres, which were trans-
ferred to the heat conductive Cu matrix prepared by laser cutting.
With press lamination, the i-Cool (Cu) textile with desired
functional structure design was fabricated. The photograph of as-
fabricated i-Cool (Cu) textile is displayed in Fig. 2a. Nylon 6
nanofibres not only cover the Cu top surface, but also fill inside
the pores, as shown in the magnified photograph of the bottom
side of the i-Cool (Cu) textile in the inset of Fig. 2b. Nanofibres
on the skeleton of Cu matrix are denser with smaller void space
among the nanofibres than the ones in the pores of Cu matrix,
which can be clearly observed in the scanning electron micro-
scope (SEM) images in Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 4. The
capillarity difference resulted from the morphology difference
benefits one-way directional water transportation from inner
surface to outer surface. To evaluate the performance of the
i-Cool (Cu) textile, we selected cotton textile as the main control
textile since it is arguably the most widely used and accepted
textile in human history. We have also chosen other well-known
activewear fabrics for comparison purposes.
Liquid water transport characterization. Textiles designed for
perspiration scenarios must be able to wick sweat from the skin
(in contact with textile bottom) and spread it out. Correspond-
ingly, we tested in parallel the i-Cool (Cu) textile and commercial
textiles including cotton, Dri-FIT, CoolMax and Coolswitch via
mimicking the sweat transport process from the human body skin
to the outer surface of the textile. Textile samples covered a
certain amount of liquid water on the platform respectively, and
the wicking rate was calculated via dividing wicking area by
wicking time for every sample (Supplementary Fig. 5). It turned
out that the interconnected nylon 6 nanofibres in the i-Cool (Cu)
textile was able to quickly transport liquid water from bottom to
top and spread it out, which exhibited comparable or higher
wicking rate in comparison with conventional textiles (Fig. 2c).
Besides, due to the unique structure design and the nanofibre
morphology variation from i-Cool (Cu) bottom to the outer
surface, i-Cool (Cu) exhibits good one-way water transport
property. As displayed in Supplementary Fig. 6a, the water dro-
plet added onto the inner side of i-Cool (Cu) can be transported
to the outer surface and spread out very quickly while little water
remained on the inner side. In reverse, water transportation was
limited when the water droplet added to the outer side. As a
comparison, for cotton, the testing time on the outer side and
inner side was almost the same no matter which side the water
droplet was added onto (Supplementary Fig. 6b), which means
the conventional cotton fabric shows no one-way transport cap-
ability. Also, in the scenario of adding water onto inner side, the
water spreading rate on the inner surface and outer surface (Sinner
and Souter) and one-way transport index (µ) were defined (See
Methods for more details) and plotted in Supplementary Fig. 745.
The i-Cool (Cu) shows obviously different Sinner and Souter, and
very large µ, while Sinner and Souter are very similar for cotton and
its µis very close to 1, which demonstrates the apparent one-way
sweat transport advantage of i-Cool (Cu) again. This property can
also help faster evaporation, because sweat can spread on the
outer surface quickly and liquid water transport to the nanofibres
right on the heat conductive Cu matrix is preferential37.
Water vapour
Heat
conductive
matrix
Sweat transportation
channels
Sweat
Skin
ab
Sweat
wicking and
spreading
Heat
conduction
Sweat
evaporation
Cool skin
c
i-Cool textile
Conventional textile Skin T
Low
High
Skin
Heat conduction
Sweat wicking Sweat evaporation
Sweat
Fig. 1 Schematic of the functional structure design of integrated cooling (i-Cool) textile of heat conduction and sweat transportation for personal
perspiration management and its working mechanism. a, Schematic of the i-Cool textile. The synergistic effect of the heat conductive matrix and sweat
transport channels provides a solution to textile in personal perspiration management. b, Schematic of the working mechanism of the i-Cool textile. When
human body perspires, the water transport channels can wick sweat from the skin surface and spread sweat onto the large-area top surface made of fibers
quickly. The heat conductive matrix transfers human body heat efficiently to where the evaporation happens, to assist fast evaporation. Meanwhile, it can
deliver the evaporative cooling effect to human body skin efficiently. c, Comparison between conventional textiles and the i-Cool textile. Conventional
textiles usually offer comfort via buffer effect of absorbing sweat, which is helpful to relieve discomfort of wet and sticky sense. However, its limited
evaporation rate and evaporative cooling efficiency cannot provide effective cooling effect for skin and may undermine the buffer effect soon. Different
from normal textiles, the i-Cool textile functions not only to transport sweat but also provide an excellent heat conduction path for the accelerated
evaporation and taking away a great amount of heat from the skin, which can prevent the i-Cool textile from flooding to a much greater extent and avoid
excessive perspiration. Therefore, the i-Cool textile can help human body achieve enhanced cooling effect with greatly reduced sweat, by using the sweat in
a highly efficient manner. The weight contrast in red arrows drawing illustrates the heat transport ability difference. The dot size and density contrast in the
sweat evaporation drawing shows the different evaporation ability. The drop size contrast in the sweat drawing illustrates that i-Cool textile can help
reduce sweat consumption.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8 ARTICLE
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:6122 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 3
Thermal resistance measurement. To quantify the enhancement
of heat transport capability of the i-Cool (Cu) textile, we per-
formed the measurement of thermal resistance using cut bar
method, as illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 8. Using this
method, we measured the dry thermal resistance of the i-Cool
(Cu) textile and other commercial textile samples all under an
additional contact pressure of ~15 psi (103 kPa). As exhibited in
Fig. 2d, the i-Cool (Cu) textile shows about 14–20 times lower
thermal resistance compared to the conventional textiles (See
Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Fig. 8 for more details
and discussion). A thermal resistor model was built up to inter-
pret the measured thermal resistance. It was found out the nylon
6 nanofibre layer contributes to the major thermal resistance, and
increasing the thickness of heat conductive matrix (Cu) will only
cause minor increase of thermal resistance (Supplementary
Fig. 9). It provides support for the possibility of extending the
i-Cool concept into fabrics of various thickness.
Transient droplet evaporation test. We further used a transient
droplet evaporation test to compare the evaporation performance
of the i-Cool (Cu) textile and the conventional textiles. Figure 2e
illustrates the experimental setup: A heater placed on an insu-
lating foam was used to simulate human skin with a thermo-
couple attached to the heater surface; We added liquid water at
37 °C to mimic sweat onto the artificial skin, then textile samples
covered on the wet artificial skin immediately; The power density
of the artificial skin was maintained constant during the mea-
surement. During the whole evaporation process, skin tempera-
ture was always monitored and recorded. For example, a group of
typical curves of skin temperature versus time are shown in
Supplementary Fig. 10. Generally, the curves can be divided into
three stages for every tested textile sample. Initially, when water
was just added onto the artificial skin, skin temperature dropped
sharply. Then, skin temperature was relatively stable only fluc-
tuating in a small range in the evaporation stage. Eventually, skin
temperature rose again quickly once water was completely
evaporated.
Two pieces of important information can be obtained through
comparing the curves of i-Cool (Cu) and the conventional
textiles. Firstly, the evaporation time with i-Cool (Cu) was much
shorter, which indicates that i-Cool (Cu) exhibits higher
evaporation rate. This conclusion can also be verified by
measuring the mass loss of liquid water over time during the
evaporation test (Supplementary Fig. 11). Secondly, skin
temperature with i-Cool (Cu) textile was lower than the
conventional textiles during evaporation, demonstrating human
body can evaporate sweat faster with even lower skin temperature
when a person wears i-Cool textile. The summarized comparison
of average skin temperature and average evaporation rate between
the i-Cool (Cu) textile and the conventional textiles is displayed
in Fig. 2f (0.1 mL initial water, 422.5 W/m2power density,
ambient temperature: ~22 °C). The i-Cool (Cu) shows 2.3–4.5 °C
lower average skin temperature and about twice faster average
evaporation rate compared to the conventional textiles.
Furthermore, measurements under assorted skin power density
and initial liquid water amount for i-Cool (Cu) and cotton were
performed. With different experimental parameters, the average
evaporation rate was calculated and plotted versus the average
skin temperature during evaporation in Supplementary Fig. 12a
and Supplementary Fig. 12b. In our measurement range, a linear
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
i-Cool(Cu),T
skin
=35
o
CCotton,T
skin
=35
o
C
i-Cool(Cu),T
skin
=40
o
C Cotton,T
skin
=40
o
C
)
h/Lm
(
e
t
a
rn
oi
t
a
r
o
p
a
v
e
eg
ar
ev
A
Initial water amount (mL)
i-Cool(Cu),T
skin
=30
o
CCotton,T
skin
=30
o
C
31.16
34.64
33.83
35.68
33.51
0.8381
0.42726
0.45755
0.44273 0.46414
i-Cool(Cu) Cotton Dri-FIT CoolMax Coolswitch
26
28
30
32
34
36
er
u
tare
p
m
e
t
n
i
ksega
r
ev
A(
o
C)
Skin temperature
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Evaporation rate
Average evaporation rate (mL/h)
****
1.895E-4
0.00315
0.00392 0.00381
0.00271
0.0000
0.0005
0.0010
0.0015
0.0020
0.0025
0.0030
0.0035
0.0040
0.0045
ec
nat
s
iserl
a
mrehT(K*m
2
/W)
*
**
*
69.5
48.43
72.33
6.67 9.37
0
20
40
60
80
100
et
arg
n
ik
ci
W(m
m
2
/s)
No
wicking
**
**
**
c
f
d
Textile
sample
Insulating
foam
Heater
Thermocouple
Water
Cover
ab
eg
Sweat
Fig. 2 Wicking performance, thermal resistance and transient droplet evaporation test of the i-Cool (Cu) textile. a, Photograph of as-prepared i-Cool
(Cu) textile. Scale bar, 1 cm. b, SEM image of nylon 6 nanofibres in the pores of heat conductive matrix (blue dash box) and on the top of heat conductive
matrix skeleton (red dash box). Sweat tends to be transported to the nanofibres on the heat conductive matrix skeleton due to the morphology difference.
Scale bar, 1 µm. Inset is the magnified photograph of the bottom side of i-Cool (Cu) textile showing its integrated heat conduction channels and water
transport channels. The holes are 2 mm in diameter and 3 mm pitch. Scale bar, 4 mm. c, Wicking rate of the i-Cool (Cu), cotton and other commercial
textiles. It shows how fast water underneath the textile can be pulled up and spread on the top surface. Double asterisks, Statistical significance between
the i-Cool (Cu) and labeled sample, Welch’st-test p< 0.1; Asterisk, Statistical significance between the i-Cool (Cu) and labeled sample, Welch’st-test p<
0.001. d, Thermal resistance of the i-Cool (Cu), cotton and other commercial textiles measured by cut-bar method (See more discussion in Supplementary
Note 2). Asterisk, Statistical significance between the i-Cool (Cu) and labeled sample, Welch’st-test p< 0.001. e, Schematic illustration of the transient
droplet evaporation test. f, Average skin temperature and average evaporation rate of the i-Cool (Cu) textile and the conventional textiles (initial water
amount: 0.1 mL, skin heater power density: 422.5 W/m2). Asterisk, Statistical significance of average skin temperature between the i-Cool (Cu) textile and
other textile samples, Welch’st-test p< 0.001. Statistical significance of average evaporation rate between the i- Cool (Cu) textile and other textile
samples, Welch’s test p< 0.001.g, Fitted average evaporation rate of i-Cool (Cu) and cotton versus initial water amount at different skin temperature. All
the error bars represent standard deviation of measured data.
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8
4NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:6122 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications
relationship between the average evaporation rate and the average
skin temperature was observed with a certain amount of initial
water. Employed the linear fitting relationship and replotted from
Supplementary Fig. 12, Fig. 2g shows the fitted relationship
between the average evaporation rate and the initial water
amount at different skin temperatures for the i-Cool (Cu) and
cotton. Generally, the average evaporation rate increases as the
initial water amount increases and it shows an approaching
saturation trend as the initial water amount reaches a certain
level. This is perhaps consistent with the change trend of average
evaporation area during the drying process when the initial water
amount is changed. It is obvious that the i-Cool (Cu) exhibits
overall higher evaporation rate than cotton. Besides, i-Cool (Cu)
can achieve this with lower initial water amount and lower skin
temperature, indicating the superiority in sweat evaporation of
the i-Cool functional structure design.
Steady-state evaporation test. In order to further characterize the
evaporation features of i-Cool (Cu) and analyze its advantages over
conventional textiles, we performed a steady-state evaporation test.
Compared to the transient droplet evaporation test above, the
steady-state evaporation test can help derive additional useful
indexes to differentiate the evaporation property of textiles during
human body perspiration. The measurement apparatus is illu-
strated in Fig. 3a. Similarly, a heater placed on an insulating foam
was used to simulate human skin. Thermocouples and a water inlet
which were sealed in a thin acrylic board were attached to the
artificial skin surface. Not adding a certain initial amount of water,
water heated to 37 °C was pumped onto the skin surface at a
specific rate continuously, and textiles on it wicked the intake
water. Power density of the skin was adjusted to maintain skin
temperature stable at 35°C. The system with textile samples finally
reached a steady-state. By changing steady-state evaporation rate (i.
e. water pumping rate), the corresponding stable water mass gain
and power density can be measured for different textiles.
Figure 3b exhibits the measured water mass gain ratio (i. e.
water mass gain/textile sample dry mass*100%, denoted as W)of
i-Cool (Cu), cotton and Dri-FIT versus increasing evaporation
rate (denoted as v). Firstly, it was observed that the water mass
gain ratio of i-Cool (Cu) was always lower than cotton and Dri-
FIT at the same evaporation rate, indicating that less sweat is
required to “activate”i-Cool (Cu) to reach the same evaporation
rate compared to the conventional ones. For example, when the
steady-state evaporation rate was 1.1 mL/h, i-Cool (Cu) only
showed about 20 percent of water mass gain ratio, while Wof
cotton was approximately 130 percent. This phenomenon was
also in accordance with the transient droplet evaporation test
results. Furthermore, we fitted the curves in Fig. 3b and calculated
water mass gain ratio gradient (dW/dv), as shown in Fig. 3c. dW/
dvof i-Cool (Cu) is apparently smaller than the conventional
textiles, even if all of them displayed water mass gain increase as
the growth of evaporation rate. Besides, dW/dvof cotton and Dri-
FIT rises rapidly with the increase of evaporation rate, especially
cotton. It means that it becomes even more and more difficult to
achieve higher evaporation rate. Nevertheless, this index for
i-Cool (Cu) stays almost unchanged in the measurement range.
During real human body perspiration, these features of i-Cool
(Cu) enables it to fast evaporate sweat before sweat accumulates a
lot and to retain a relatively dry state even during very profuse
perspiration that requires high evaporation rate.
The measured power density (denoted as q) of artificial skin in
this test is shown in Fig. 3d. Overall, the skin power density with
i-Cool (Cu) was higher than the conventional textiles when they
were at the same evaporation rate, demonstrating the cooling
ability of i-Cool (Cu) during perspiration is stronger. It is
worthwhile to mention that i-Cool (Cu) is easier to reach higher
evaporation rate, thus the cooling power difference between
i-Cool (Cu) and conventional textiles in practical use can
be further enlarged. Besides, the curves in Fig. 3d were fitted
and power density gradient (dq/dv) could be derived, as displayed
in Fig. 3e. This index (dq/dv) exhibits the cooling power
increment rate when evaporation rate increases. Obviously, dq/
dvof i-Cool (Cu) is much higher than cotton and Dri-FIT, which
means i-Cool (Cu) can provide much higher cooling power when
every unit of sweat evaporates. To be specific, dq/dvof i-Cool
(Cu) is about 3 times higher than that of cotton and Dri-FIT.
Furthermore, to some extent, dq/dvcan be converted into sweat
evaporative cooling efficiency (denoted as η) (See Supplementary
Note 3 for more discussion). Based on our estimation, the
evaporative cooling efficiency of i-Cool (Cu) is 0.8~1, while ηof
cotton and Dri-FIT is only 0.2~0.4 (Supplementary Fig. 13).
Therefore, we demonstrated i-Cool (Cu) shows evident advan-
tages in both evaporation ability and sweat evaporative cooling
efficiency, which makes it to be promising in next-generation
textiles for personal perspiration management.
Artificial sweating skin platform with feedback control loop.
Human body is capable of adjusting itself to maintain home-
ostasis in the means of feedback control loops46. Taking per-
spiration as an example, when the human body temperature
exceeds a threshold, the sympathetic nervous system stimulates
the eccrine sweat glands to secrete water to the skin surface. In
reverse, water evaporation on the skin surface accelerates heat
loss and thus body temperature decreases, which will reduce or
suspend the perspiration of human body (Fig. 4a)47,48.
To mimic human body perspiration situation and show the
performance difference between the i-Cool (Cu) textile and the
conventional textiles, we designed an artificial sweating skin
platform with feedback control loop, as illustrated in Fig. 4b. In
this system, an artificial sweating skin that can generate sweat
uniformly from every fabricated perspiration spot was built up
and served as the test platform. Power was supplied to the
artificial sweating skin platform to generate heat flux simulating
human body metabolic heat. A syringe pump and a temperature
controller were utilized to provide continuous liquid water supply
at a constant temperature (37 °C) for the artificial sweating skin.
A thermocouple was attached to the artificial sweating skin
platform surface, monitoring skin temperature with a thermo-
couple meter that transmitted skin temperature data to the
computer in real time. Subsequently, the internal set program
could instantly alternate the pumping rate of the syringe pump
that corresponds to the sweating rate of artificial sweating skin,
which realized the feedback control loop imitating human body’s
feedback control mechanism.
To achieve uniform water outflow through each artificial sweat
pore mimicking human body skin sweating, we designed the
artificial sweating skin platform as illustrated in Fig. 4c. In the
bottom, an enclosed small cuboid cavity connecting to water inlet
acted as a water reservoir. When water was pumped in, water in
the reservoir was forced out upwards through the channels on the
reservoir cap. On the top of it, a perforated hydrophilic heater
was attached to generate heat, in the meantime through which
water can flow out. The uniform “sweating”from each artificial
sweat pore was realized by the fabricated Janus-type wicking layer
with limited water outlets that was placed above the perforated
heater (See Supplementary Note 4–5 and Supplementary
Figs. 14–16 for more details and discussion).
We believe that the measurement results obtained with the as-
built artificial sweating skin platform can provide reasonable
parallel thermal comparison among the textile samples, even
though this set-up cannot fully represent the human body due to
the lack of some other feedback control mechanisms such as
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8 ARTICLE
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:6122 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 5
blood flow feedback control and the differences in size, shape,
thermal capacity, etc. With the realization of scale-up, we expect
to conduct the human physiological wear experiment42 in the
near future.
Artificial sweating skin test. On the artificial sweating skin
platform, we first performed a demonstrative experiment to
intuitively show the sweat evaporative cooling efficiency differ-
ence. In this experiment, the same power density was used for the
i-Cool (Cu) textile and cotton textile while the sweating rate was
varied for different ones to realize the same skin temperature
(34.5 °C), then we observed the condition of the artificial skin
device and the textile samples after stabilization of 30 minutes. As
shown in Supplementary Fig. 17, bare skin remained almost dry.
The skin with the i-Cool (Cu) textile also remained dry while
there was a little water absorbed in the sample. Nevertheless,
there was a much larger amount of water remaining on both the
skin platform and the cotton textile. These results intuitively
demonstrated the i-Cool (Cu) can cool down the skin more
efficiently consuming much less sweat.
Then, we performed measurements with constant skin power
density for i-Cool (Cu) and other commercial textile samples, to
mimic an exercise scenario of human body (See Supplementary
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
225
300
375
450
525
600
675
yt
i
sne
dre
w
oP (W/m
2
)
Evaporation rate (mL/h)
i-Cool(Cu)
Cotton
Dri-FIT
◊
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
dq/dv (W/m
2
*h*mL
-1
)
Evaporation rate (mL/h)
i-Cool(Cu)
Cotton
Dri-FIT
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
)%(
o
itar
ni
ags
sa
mr
e
t
a
W
Evaporation rate (mL/h)
i-Cool(Cu)
Cotton
Dri-FIT
◊
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
dW/dv(%*mL
-1
*h)
Evaporation rate (mL/h)
i-Cool(Cu)
Cotton
Dri-FIT
a
bc
de
Textile sample
Insulating foam
Heater
Thermocouple
Water flow
Liquid Water
Water evaporation
Steady state:
Water flow rate (in)
= Evaporation rate (out)
'
'
Fig. 3 Steady-state evaporation test of the i-Cool (Cu) textile, cotton and Dri-FIT. a, Schematic illustration of the measurement apparatus and method.
b, Measured water mass gain ratio (W) at different evaporation rate (v). Triangle, Statistical significance between the i-Cool (Cu) and cotton, Welch’s
t-test p< 0.1 at 0.3 mL/h, p< 0.001 at 0.7 mL/h, p< 0.01 for others. Diamond, Statistical significance between the i-Cool (Cu) and Dri-FIT, Welch’s test
p< 0.05 at 0.3 mL/h, no statistical significance at 0.5 mL/h, p< 0.01 for others. c,dW/dvobtained by fitting data in (b). i-Cool (Cu) can achieve a certain
evaporation rate with much lower water gain. The required water gain increase for larger evaporation rate is also reduced. d, Measured power density (q)
at different evaporation rate (v). Triangle, Statistical significance between the i-Cool (Cu) and cotton, Welch’st-test p< 0.05 at 0.3 mL/h, p< 0.001
at 0.7 mL/h, 0.9 mL/h, p< 0.01 for others. Diamond, Statistical significance between the i-Cool (Cu) and Dri-FIT, Welch’s test shows no statistical
significance at 0.3 mL/h, p< 0.05 at 0.5 mL/h, p< 0.01 at 0.7 mL/h, 0.9 mL/h, p< 0.001 for others. e,dq/dvobtained by fitting data in (d). The i-Cool
(Cu) can show enhanced cooling effect with higher sweat evaporative cooling efficiency. All the error bars represent standard deviation of measured data.
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8
6NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:6122 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Note 6 and Supplementary Fig. 18 for more discussion for this
measurement). All the measurements were performed from the
same initial state. The skin temperature and sweating rate (i.e.
water pumping rate) after stabilization were measured. Figure 4d
shows the experimental results when skin power density was
~750 W/m2and ambient temperature was 22 °C. The cooling
performance of i-Cool (Cu) is very similar to the bare skin, which
is recognized as the most efficient cooling approach since sweat
evaporation can directly take away heat from the skin. Compared
to the conventional textiles, i-Cool (Cu) exhibited evidently lower
skin temperature (~2.8 °C lower than cotton, ~2 °C temperature
difference with Dri-FIT and Coolswitch, ~3.4 °C temperature
difference with CoolMax). The sweating rate provided for the
conventional textiles was over 2–3 times as much as i-Cool (Cu).
It proves that conventional textiles cannot achieve better cooling
effect even with much more available sweat. On the other hand,
i-Cool (Cu) is able to unlock the cooling power of sweat more
efficiently, which can deliver improved cooling effect with
reduced sweating dehydration. As a result, conventional textiles
would become highly wet after perspiration, whereas i-Cool (Cu)
could retain a much drier state (insets of Fig. 4d), which is a
comprehensive effect of evaporation ability and sweat evaporative
cooling efficiency.
We tested the Cu heat conductive matrix and nylon 6
nanofibre film separately. The departure of the heat conduction
component and water transport component makes both of them
less efficient in evaporative cooling, as exhibited in Supplemen-
tary Fig. 19. These tests illustrate the key factor to achieve an
effective cooling effect is the integrated functional design of heat
conduction and sweat transportation. Different cotton samples
with various area mass density were also tested (See Supplemen-
tary Note 7 and Supplementary Fig. 20 for more details). In our
experiments, the thinnest cotton sample (26.5 g/m2) that is too
transparent to be practically used still exhibited around 1.5 °C
higher skin temperature than the i-Cool (Cu) textile. These results
further validate the superiority of the i-Cool structure that is an
integrated one with both heat conduction and sweat
transportation.
The artificial sweating tests under different skin power
densities to simulate changed human body metabolic heat
production were also conducted. As displayed in Fig. 4e, the
enhanced cooling performance showing lower skin temperature
and reduced sweating rate in comparison to conventional textiles
was still true when different skin power densities were applied. It
verifies the advantages of i-Cool in a wide range of heat
production.
Besides, the evaluation of performance under diverse ambient
environment conditions was performed, especially in high
temperature circumstances and high relative humidity surround-
ings in which perspiration is more likely to happen. At the
ambient temperature of 40 °C, the evaporative cooling perfor-
mance of i-Cool (Cu) textile and the conventional textiles is
shown in Fig. 4f. The cooling performance distinction between
the i-Cool (Cu) and the conventional textiles was still very
apparent. To take a step further, we decreased skin power density
of the artificial sweating skin to make skin temperature lower
38.58 39
42.03 41.66
42.56
41.55
1.31 1.44
2.41 2.29
2.58
2.26
35.0
37.5
40.0
42.5
45.0
erutarepmetnikS(
o
C)
0
1
2
3
)h/Lm
(e
targ
ni
tae
w
S
RH ≈80%
*****
0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
35
36
37
38
39
Bare skin
i-Cool(Cu)
Cotton
Dri-FIT
CoolMax
Coolswitch
erutarepmetnikS(
o
C)
Sweating rate (mL/h)
Conventional
textiles
i-Cool(Cu)
Cotton
35.47 35.95
38.82
38.07
39.38
37.95
37.41 38.26
40.82 40.57
42.68
40.35
39.95
40.85
43.18 42.84
44.43
42.59
0.31 0.46
1.38
1.14
1.56
1.1
0.93 1.2
2.02 1.94
2.62
1.87
1.74
2.03
2.78 2.67
3.18
2.59
35.0
37.5
40.0
42.5
45.0
erutarepmetnikS(
oC)
750 W/m
2
880 W/m
2
1035 W/m
2
0
1
2
3
)h/Lm(etargnitaewS
Tambient = 22 °C
Body temperature
Body temperature
abc
Artificial sweating
skin
Thermocouple
Data reading
Feedback control
gde
40.01
40.99
43.82
43.08
44.69
43.09
1.76
2.08
2.98
2.75
3.26
2.85
35.0
37.5
40.0
42.5
45.0
e
r
u
ta
re
p
metnik
S(
o
C)
0
1
2
3
)h/Lm(etargnitaewS
Tambient = 40 °C
*****
f
water
Capillary force
water
Wicking layer
Hydrophobic “baffle”
Perforated heater
Water reservoir
*
*
*
*
*
*****
Syringe
pump
Water
temperature
controller
Power
supply
Thermocouple
meter
Fig. 4 Artificial sweating skin platform with feedback control loop and measurements on it. a, Schematic of human body temperature self-regulation
mechanism. When body temperature increases, human body perspires to cool down its own temperature, which leads to reduction or suspension of
perspiration in reverse. b, Schematic of the artificial sweating skin platform with feedback control loop simulating human body temperature self-regulation
mechanism. c, Schematic of the detailed structure of the artificial sweating skin. The schematic in the red dash box shows the working mechanism of the
modified Janus-type wicking layer which realizes uniform sweating mimicking human skin sweating scenario. d, Measurement results of skin temperature
and sweating rate for bare skin, i-Cool (Cu) and commercial textiles (skin power density: 750 W/m2, ambient temperature: 22 °C). Insets show the
photographs of i-Cool (Cu) and cotton after one-hour stabilization during the tests. Asterisk, Statistical significance of skin temperature and sweating rate
between the i-Cool (Cu) and other textiles, Welch’st-test p< 0.001. e, Measurement results of skin temperature and sweating rate for bare skin, i-Cool
(Cu) and other conventional textiles under different skin power densities. Asterisk, Statistical significance of skin temperature and sweating rate between
the i-Cool (Cu) and other textiles at 750 W/m2, 880 W/m2and 1035 W/m2, Welch’st-test p< 0.001. f, Measured skin temperature and sweating rate at
high ambient temperature (40 °C). 750 W/m2power density was applied. Asterisk, Statistical significance of skin temperature and sweating rate between
the i-Cool (Cu) and other textiles, Welch’st-test p< 0.001. g, Measured skin temperature and sweating rate in high relative humidity ambient (~80%).
Asterisk, Statistical significance of skin temperature and sweating rate between the i-Cool (Cu) and other textiles, Welch’st-test p< 0.001. All the error
bars represent standard deviation of measured data.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8 ARTICLE
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:6122 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 7
than ambient temperature to compare bare skin, i-Cool (Cu) and
cotton, to see if the high thermal conductivity design in the i-Cool
(Cu) will cause adverse effect for skin temperature. Consequently,
skin temperature with the i-Cool (Cu) was almost the same as
bare skin and showed better performance than cotton, as shown
in Supplementary Fig. 21, indicating its evaporative cooling effect
surpassed the opposing heat conduction from the ambient. In
addition to high ambient temperature, we also investigated the
performance of i-Cool (Cu) and other conventional textiles in a
high relative humidity (RH) environment (Fig. 4g). As the relative
humidity was raised, skin temperature with all the textile
swatches rose correspondingly. Nevertheless, the skin tempera-
ture of the i-Cool (Cu) was still much lower than the conventional
textiles.
Moreover, we performed measurements to see how the
parameters in the functional structure design of i-Cool (Cu)
influence its performance (See Supplementary Note 8 and
Supplementary Fig. 22 for more details). The results provide
additional guidelines for personal perspiration management
textile design.
i-Cool practical application demonstration. To further study the
cooling effect of the i-Cool textile on human body, we developed
a thermal simulation considering the coupled heat transfer,
moisture vapor and liquid water transfer processes based on the
actual human body with complex structure and dynamic phy-
siological responses (See Supplementary Note 9, Supplementary
Dataset 1 and Supplementary Fig. 23 for more details)49–51. The
simulation results show that the i-Cool textile with improved
evaporation ability and sweat evaporative cooling efficiency can
achieve temperature reduction in both the skin temperature and
core temperature of the human body compared to that with
conventional textiles (Supplementary Fig. 23), which further
validates the potential of the i-Cool structure design in efficient
evaporative cooling for the human body.
To bridge the gap between i-Cool (Cu) concept demonstration
to practical use, we demonstrated the feasibility via fabricating the
i-Cool textile based on commercial fabrics. Firstly, we verified the
replacement of Cu matrix by polymer materials with heat
conductive coatings. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 24, the
i-Cool textiles using silver (Ag) coated polyester (PET) and
nanoporous polyethylene (NanoPE) matrices exhibit almost the
same performance as i-Cool (Cu) in the artificial sweating skin
test (experimental parameters: same as Fig. 3d). Furthermore, we
fabricated i-Cool textiles based on commercial knitted fabrics
made of PET fibers. Here, we chose Dri-FIT and CoolMax which
were already tested as control samples as the substrates. Figure 5a
illustrates the fabrication process: holes were cut by laser cutting
on the original fabric, after which it went through a facile
electroless plating process. The Ag coating was deposited onto
every fiber’s surface of the fabric. Next, cellulose fibers were filled
into the holes of the fabric, and prepared nylon 6 nanofibre film
was transferred onto the fabric via press lamination to realize the
i-Cool (Ag) textile which possessed the desired i-Cool structure. It
is worthwhile to point out the fabrics we selected and the
electroless plating method are not the only choices. Other textile
material and other methods offering heat conductive coatings can
be utilized. Alternatively, heat conductive fibers can be applied as
well for the heat transport matrix. Figure 5b shows the
photograph of the i-Cool (Ag) textile sample swatch (Dri-FIT
as substrate). The photograph viewing from the i-Cool (Ag)
bottom is exhibited in the inset of Fig. 5c, and the SEM images of
the Ag coated PET fibers (Fig. 5c, Supplementary Fig. 25) show
the Ag coating is conformal and uniform. The branched structure
formed in the electroless plating process can potentially enlarge
evaporation area as well. The photograph and SEM images of
i-Cool textile with CoolMax substrate are shown in Supplemen-
tary Figs. 26 and 27.
Successively, we performed the same steady-state evaporation
test and artificial sweating skin test for the i-Cool (Ag) textile. In
the steady-state evaporation test, the curves of i-Cool (Ag) plotted
with curves of i-Cool (Cu), cotton and Dri-FIT (Fig. 5d, e)
exhibited that i-Cool (Ag) exhibited very similar performance to
the i-Cool (Cu) textile. Compared to the original Dri-FIT textile
acting as the substrate, i-Cool (Ag) owns significantly improved
evaporation performance and evaporative cooling efficiency,
which is owing to the i-Cool functional structure. Also, in the
artificial sweating skin test, i-Cool (Ag) and i-Cool (Cu) presented
comparable cooling performance for personal perspiration
management, which was significantly improved in contrast to
cotton and Dri-FIT. This is also true for the i-Cool textile
prepared with CoolMax substrate (Supplementary Fig. 28). With
only sweat transportation channels, the modified Dri-FIT and
CoolMax showed weaker cooling performance (Supplementary
Fig. 28), which verifies the i-Cool structure combining heat
conduction with water transportation provides superior strategy
in personal perspiration management. These results demonstrate
the feasibility of readily applying the i-Cool concept to
practical usage.
In summary, we report a novel concept of i-Cool textile with
unique functional structure design for personal perspiration
management. The innovative employment of integrated water
transport and heat conductive functional components together
ensures not only its wicking ability, but also the fast evaporation
rate, enhanced evaporative cooling effect and reduction of human
body dehydration for human body via utilizing sweat in a highly
efficient manner, which was demonstrated by the transient and
steady-state evaporation test. An artificial sweating skin platform
with feedback control loop simulating human body perspiration
situation was realized, on which the i-Cool (Cu) textile shows
comparable performance to the bare skin and apparent cooling
effect with less provided sweat compared to the conventional
textiles. Also, the structure advantage maintains under various
conditions of exercise and ambient environment. Besides, the
practical application feasibility of the i-Cool design principles was
demonstrated, exhibiting decent performance. Therefore, we
expect the i-Cool textile will open a new door and provide new
insights for the textiles for personal perspiration management.
Methods
Textile preparation. The Cu matrix used in the i-Cool (Cu) textile sample (main
text) was prepared with Cu foil (~25 µm thickness, Pred Materials) laser cut via
DPSS UV laser cutter. A pore array (2 mm diameter, 3 mm pitch) on the Cu foil
was created to realize the Cu matrix. Nylon 6 nanofibre film was prepared by
electrospinning. The nylon 6 solution system used in this work is 20 wt% nylon-6
(Sigma-Aldrich) in formic acid (Alfa Aesar). The polymer solution was loaded in a
5 mL syringe with a 22-gauge needle tip, which is connected to a voltage supply
(ES30P-5W, Gamma High Voltage Research). The solution was pumped out of the
needle tip using a syringe pump (Aladdin). The nanofibres were collected by a
grounded copper foil (Pred Materials). The applied potential was 15 kV. The
pumping rate was 0.1 mL/h. The distance between the needle tip and the collector
is 20 cm. After collecting nylon 6 nanofibres of desired mass, the nylon 6 nanofibre
film (~4.5 g/m2, ~25 µm thickness) was transferred and laminated on the Cu
matrix. A hydraulic press (MTI) was used to press nylon 6 nanofibres both into the
holes and on the top of the Cu matrix. The fabricated i-Cool (Cu) was ~45 µm
thick and 107.7 g/m2. The varied parameters of the i-Cool (Cu) textile are shown in
Supplementary Fig. 22. To fabricate the i-Cool (Ag) textile sample, same pore array
as above was cut by laser cutter (Epilog Fusion M2 laser cutter) for the Dri-FIT or
CoolMax textiles. Then, the fabric was cleaned and modified with polydopamine
(PDA) coating for 2 h in an aqueous solution that consists of 2 g/L dopamine
hydrochloride (Sigma Aldrich) and 10 mM Tris-buffer solution (pH 8.5,
Teknova)52. For electroless plating of silver (Ag), the PDA-coated fabrics were then
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8
8NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:6122 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications
dipped into a 25 g/L AgNO
3
solution (99.9%, Alfa Aesar) for 30 min to form the
Ag seed layer. After rinsing with deionized (DI) water, the fabric was immersed
into the plating bath solution containing 4.2 g L−1Ag(NH
3
)
2
+(made by adding
28% NH
3
·H
2
O dropwise into 5 g L−1AgNO
3
until the solution became clear again)
and 5 g L−1glucose (anhydrous, EMD Millipore Chemicals)53 for 2 h. Next, the
fabric was turned over and placed into a new plating bath for another 2 h. After
drying, cellulose fibers were filled into the cut pores by extraction filtration of paper
pulp. Then, nylon 6 nanofibre film (~2-2.5 g/m2) was added onto it by the same
process described above. The as-prepared i-Cool (Ag) (based on Dri-FIT) is ~175
g/m2. The one based on CoolMax is ~199 g/m2. For i-Cool samples based on Ag-
coated PET and NanoPE film matrix, the PET matrix (~50 µm thickness) and
NanoPE matrix (~25 µm thickness) were prepared by laser cutting in the same way,
and went through the same Ag coating process and nylon 6 nanofibre film
lamination. The cotton textile sample was from a common short-sleeve T-shirt
(100% cotton, single jersey knit, 135 g/m2, ~400 µm thickness, Dockers). The Dri-
FIT textile sample was from a regular Dri-FIT T-shirt (100% PET, single jersey
knit, 143 g/m2, ~400 µm thickness, Nike). The CoolMax textile sample was from a
T-shirt made of 100% CoolMax Extreme polyester fibers (100% PET, single jersey
knit, 166 g/m2, ~445 µm thickness, purchased from Galls.com). The Coolswitch
textile sample was from a Coolswitch T-shirt (91%PET/9% Elastane, French terry
knit, 140 g/m2, ~350 µm thickness, Under Armour).
Material characterization. The optical microscope images were taken with an
Olympus optical microscope. The SEM images were taken by a FEI XL30 Sirion
SEM (5 kV) and a FEI Nova NanoSEM 450 (5 kV).
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
225
300
375
450
525
600
675
y
t
i
sn
ed
r
ewo
P(W/m
2
)
Evaporation rate (mL/h)
i-Cool(Ag)
i-Cool(Cu)
Cotton
Dri-FIT
35.47
35.95 36.29
38.82
38.07
0.31
0.46 0.57
1.38
1.14
34
36
38
40
erutarepmetnikS(
o
C)
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
)h/Lm(etargnitaewsartxE
Tambient = 22 °C
****
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
)
%
(
o
itarni
ags
s
a
m
re
taW
Evaporation rate (mL/h)
i-Cool(Ag)
i-Cool(Cu)
Cotton
Dri-FIT
a
b
c
d
e
f
Laser
cutting
Electroless
plating
i-Cool (Ag) textile
nanofibre film
Fibre
filling
Ag coated
fabric
Original fabric
Press
lamination
:
)
6
6
:
)
6
Electrospun
Fig. 5 Practical application feasibility demonstration of the i-Cool functional structure via i-Cool (Ag) textile. a, Illustration of the fabrication process of
i-Cool (Ag) textile based on a commercially available fabric. b, Photograph of as-fabricated i-Cool (Ag) textile based on Dri-FIT as the substrate. Scale bar,
1 cm. c, SEM image showing the uniform and conformal Ag coating on the PET fibers of the fabric substrate. Scale bar, 50 µm. The inset shows the
photograph of i-Cool (Ag) viewing from its bottom. Scale bar, 4 mm. d, Measured water mass gain ratio of i-Cool (Ag) and other textiles at different
evaporation rate in the steady-state evaporation test. Omega symbol, Statistical significance between the i-Cool (Ag) and i-Cool (Cu), Welch’st-test p<
0.1 at 0.3 mL/h and 0.5 mL/h, no statistical significance for others. Phi symbol, Statistical significance between the i-Cool (Ag) and cotton, Welch’s test p<
0.05 at 0.3 mL/h, p< 0.001 for others. Sigma symbol, Statistical significance between the i-Cool (Ag) and Dri-FIT, Welch’s test shows no statistical
significance at 0.5 mL/h, p< 0.05 at 0.7 mL/h, 1.1 mL/h, p< 0.01 for others. e, Measured power density of i-Cool (Ag) and other textiles at different
evaporation rate in the steady-state evaporation test. Omega symbol, Statistical significance between the i-Cool (Ag) and i-Cool (Cu), Welch’st-test p<
0.01 at 0 mL/h, 1.1 mL/h, p< 0.05 at 0.7 mL/h, no statistical significance for others. Phi symbol, Statistical significance between the i-Cool (Ag) and
cotton, Welch’s test p< 0.001 at 0.7 mL/h and 0.9 mL/h, p< 0.01 for others. Sigma symbol, Statistical significance between the i-Cool (Ag) and Dri-FIT,
Welch’s test p< 0.05 at 0.5 mL/h, p< 0.01 at 0.3 mL/h and 0.7 mL/h, p< 0.001 for others. f, Measured skin temperature and sweating rate of the i-Cool
(Ag) textile on the artificial sweating skin platform with feedback control loop. Asterisk, Statistical significance of skin temperature and sweating rate
between the i-Cool (Ag) and other textiles, Welch’st-test p< 0.001. All the error bars represent standard deviation of measured data.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8 ARTICLE
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:6122 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 9
Wicking rate measurement. The wicking rate measurement method was based on
AATCC 198 with modification. 5 × 5 cm textile samples were prepared ahead.
0.1 mL of distilled water was placed on the simulated skin platform by pipette.
Then textile samples were covered on the water, and the time of water reaching the
circle of 1.5 cm in radius on the top surface of textile was recorded. Wicking rate
was calculated using wicking area divided by wicking time.
One-way water transport characterization. A 5 × 5 cm textile sample was fixed
onto an acrylic frame that had a 4 × 4 cm square hole. Camera was placed right
above the frame or underneath the frame to shoot videos. In total 20 µL of deio-
nized water was added onto one side of textile sample and the water transport
process was filmed. The testing time was calculated by an image processing soft-
ware (SketchAndCalc Area Caculator). We calculated the Sinner ,Souter and µat the
testing time of 15 s. S
inner
or S
outer
=water spreading area/testing time. µis a one-
way transport index, which is defined as S
outer
/S
inner
.
Thermal resistance measurement. The cut bar method adapted from ASTM
5470 was used to measure thermal resistance. In this setup, eight thermocouples are
inserted into the center of two 1 inch × 1 inch copper reference bars to measure the
temperature profiles along the top and bottom bar. A resistance heater generates a
heat flux which flows through the top bar followed by the sample and then the
bottom bar after which the heat is dissipated into a large heat sink. The entire
apparatus (top bar, sample, bottom bar) is wrapped in thermal insulation. A
modest pressure of approximately 15 psi was applied at the top bar to reduce
contact resistance, and no thermal grease was used due to the material porosity.
The temperature profiles of the top and bottom copper bars are then used to
determine both the heat flux and the temperature drop across the sample stack,
which can derive the total thermal resistance (RTOT ). Plotting the RTOT versus the
number of sample layers, the sample thermal resistance with contact thermal
resistance between samples can be obtained from the slope of the line.
Water vapor transmission property tests. The upright cup testing procedure
was based on ASTM E96 with modification. Medium bottles (100 mL; Fisher
Scientific) were filled with 80 ml of distilled water, and sealed with the textile
samples using open-top caps and silicone gaskets (Corning). The exposed area of
the textile was 3 cm in diameter. The sealed bottles were placed into an environ-
mental chamber in which the temperature was held at 35 °C and relative humidity
was 30 ± 5%. The mass of the bottles and the samples was measured periodically.
By dividing the reduced mass of the water by the exposed area of the bottle (3 cm in
diameter), the water vapor transmission was calculated. The evaporative resistance
measurement was based on ISO 11092/ASTM F1868 with modification. A heater
was used to generate stable heat flux mimicking the skin. A metal foam soaked with
water was placed on the heater. A waterproof but vapor permeable film was cov-
ered on the top of the metal foam to protect the textile sample from contact with
water. The whole device was thermally guarded. For different textile samples, we
adjusted the heat flux to maintain the same skin temperature (35 °C) for all
measurements. The ambient temperature was controlled by the water recirculation
system at 35 °C, and the relative humidity was within 24 ± 4%. The evaporative
resistance was calculated by Ref ¼ðPsPaÞA
HRebp, where Psis the water vapor
pressure at the plate surface, which can be assumed as the saturation at the tem-
perature of the surface, Pais the water vapor pressure in the air, Ais the area of the
plate test section, His the power input, and Rebp is the value measured without any
textile samples.
Water vapor thermal measurement. The artificial sweating skin platform was
utilized in this measurement. A steady power density (580 W/m2) and water flow
rate (0.25 mL/h) were adopted. An acrylic frame (thickness: 1.5 mm) with a
crossing was laser cut and placed on the platform to support the textile samples
avoiding the liquid water contact. Stable skin temperature was read. The ambient
was 22 °C ± 0.2 °C, 40 ± 5% relative humidity.
Transient droplet evaporation test. The skin was simulated by a polyimide
insulated flexible heater (McMaster-Carr, 25 cm2) which was connected to a power
supply (Keithley 2400). A ribbon type hot junction thermocouple (~0.1 mm in
diameter, K-type, Omega) was in contact with the top surface of the simulated skin
to measure the skin temperature. The heater was set on a 10 cm-thick foam for heat
insulation. During the tests, water (37 °C) was added onto the simulated skin and
textile samples were covered on the simulated skin immediately. The skin tem-
peratures with wet textile samples during water evaporation were measured with an
assorted combination of initial water amount and generated area power density of
simulated skin. The average evaporation rate was calculated by dividing the initial
water amount by evaporation time. The end point of the evaporation was defined
as the inflection point between the relatively stable range and the rapid increase
stage of temperature. The average skin temperature referred to the average tem-
perature reading spanned the evaporation stage in which skin temperature was
relatively stable. The mass of wet textile samples was measured by a digital balance
(U. S. Solid, 0.001g accuracy) to track the water mass loss during the evaporation.
The tests were all performed in an environment of 22 ± 0.2 °C, 40 ± 5% relative
humidity.
Steady-state evaporation test. The skin was simulated by a polyimide insulated
flexible heater (McMaster-Carr, 25 cm2) which was connected to a power supply
(Keithley 2400). It was covered by a 1.5 mm-thick acrylic board with grooves made
by laser cutting (Epilog Fusion M2 laser cutter) on its top surface. A ribbon type
hot junction thermocouple (~0.1 mm in diameter, K-type, Omega) was sealed in a
groove by PDMS to measure the skin temperature. A needle connected to a tube
and a syringe pump (Harvard, PHD 2000) was also sealed in one groove of the
acrylic board, but with head exposed for water outage. The heater was set on a
10 cm-thick foam for heat insulation. During the tests, water in the tube was heated
by a proportional–integral–derivative (PID) temperature controller (Omega
Engineering) at 37 °C before flowing onto the artificial skin. Textile samples were
placed on the artificial skin surface. The applied power density was adjusted to let
measured skin temperature fluctuate around 35 °C. After stabilization for a period
of time, the mass of wet textile samples was measured by a digital balance (U. S.
Solid, 0.001g accuracy), and power density was recorded. The tests were all per-
formed in an environment of 19.5 ± 0.3 °C, 35 ± 5% relative humidity.
Fabrication of Janus-type wicking layer with limited water outlets.Afilter
paper (Qualitative, Whatman) was used as the wicking layer. An acrylic board was
laser cut into a mask with Epilog Fusion M2 Laser and placed on the top of the
filter paper. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) base and curing agent (Sylgard 184,
Dow Corning) with mass ratio of 10:1 were dispersed into hexane (Fisher Scien-
tific) with volume ratio 1:10. The PDMS solution was sprayed onto the masked
filter paper that was on a heating plate, which helped with faster volatilization of
hexane. After drying and curing, the PDMS formed hydrophobic coating layer only
on the uncovered place of the top surface of the filter paper, which could absorb
and transport water from the bottom surface but provide limited water outlets on
the top surface.
Artificial sweating skin test with feedback control loop. The water reservoir
(5 cm × 5 cm × 2.5 mm) with water inlet (whole part size: 8 cm × 8 cm × 3.5 mm)
was made by 3D printing (FlashForge Creator Pro). A cover with a 9 × 9 hole
(diameter: 3 mm) array (hole array area: 5 cm × 5 cm, whole part size: 8 cm ×
8 cm× 1.5 mm) was also 3D printed and bound with the water reservoir part. The
water reservoir was connected to a syringe pump (Harvard, PHD 2000). The
pumped water was heated at 37 °C by a heater (Omega Engineering) and a
proportional–integral–derivative (PID) temperature controller (Omega Engineer-
ing). A polyimide insulated flexible heater (McMaster-Carr, 25 cm2) with laser cut
water outlets was adhered to the holey cover. The heater was connected to a power
supply (Keithley 2400). Then, the fabricated Janus-type wicking layer with limited
water outlets was attached to the heater layer to serve as the skin surface. A ribbon
type hot junction thermocouple (~0.1 mm in diameter, K-type, Omega) connected
to a thermocouple meter (Omega Engineering) was in contact with the top surface
of the Janus-type wicking layer to measure the skin temperature. The thermocouple
meter, syringe pump and power supply were all controlled by a LabView program,
which can alter the pumping rate (extra sweating rate) according to the thermo-
meter reading (skin temperature) in real time. Before the test, the artificial sweating
skin platform was filled with water in advance. The perspiration threshold skin
temperature was set to be 34.5 °C, over which the sweating rate was linearly
dependent on skin temperature47,48. The relationship between pumping rate and
skin temperature was set as pumping rate (mL/h) =0.32*skin temperature (°C)
−11.04, which was decided according to previous research and reasonable human
body perspiration rate range. The whole set-up was in a space without forced
convection. No chamber with cover for the set-up was used to avoid water vapor
accumulation except the high-humidity test. In the high-humidity test, a humidifier
was placed next to the testing platform and they are enclosed together to change
the humidity. The initial air temperature in the chamber was 22 °C but about
1–2 °C reading variation of the ambient temperature thermometer was observed,
perhaps due to the water vapor condensation, but no obvious influence on the skin
temperature was observed. In other cases, if no ambient temperature and relative
humidity are specified, the ambient temperature was 22 ± 0.2 °C and ambient
relative humidity was 40 ± 5%.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding
author upon reasonable request.
Code availability
The code for thermal simulation of actual human body is available from the
corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Received: 16 May 2021; Accepted: 10 September 2021;
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8
10 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:6122 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications
References
1. Kjellstrom, T. et al. Heat, human performance, and occupational health: a key
issue for the assessment of global climate change impacts. Annu. Rev. Public
Health 37,97–112 (2016).
2. Goldstein, L. S., Dewhirst, M. W., Repacholi, M. & Kheifets, L. Summary,
conclusions and recommendations: adverse temperature levels in the human
body. Int. J. Hyperth. 19, 373–384 (2003).
3. Chan, A. P. C. & Yi, W. Heat stress and its impacts on occupational health and
performance. Indoor Built Environ. 25,3–5 (2016).
4. Hsu, P.-C. et al. Personal thermal management by metallic nanowire-coated
textile. Nano Lett. 15, 365–371 (2015).
5. Tong, J. K. et al. Infrared-transparent visible-opaque fabrics for wearable
personal thermal management. ACS Photonics 2, 769–778 (2015).
6. Raman, A. P., Anoma, M. A., Zhu, L., Rephaeli, E. & Fan, S. Passive radiative
cooling below ambient air temperature under direct sunlight. Nature 515,
540–544 (2014).
7. Li, W., Shi, Y., Chen, Z. & Fan, S. Photonic thermal management of coloured
objects. Nat. Commun. 9,1–8 (2018).
8. Zhang, X. A. et al. Dynamic gating of infrared radiation in a textile. Sci. (80-.)
363, 619–623 (2019).
9. Peng, Y. & Cui, Y. Advanced textiles for personal thermal management and
energy. Joule 4, 724–742 (2020).
10. Hardy, J. D. & DuBois, E. F. Regulation of heat loss from the human body.
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 23, 624–631 (1937).
11. Hsu, P.-C. et al. Radiative human body cooling by nanoporous polyethylene
textile. Sci. (80-.) 353, 1019–1023 (2016).
12. Hsu, P.-C. et al. A dual-mode textile for human body radiative heating and
cooling. Sci. Adv. 3, e1700895 (2017).
13. Peng, Y. et al. Nanoporous polyethylene microfibres for large-scale radiative
cooling fabric. Nat. Sustain 1, 105–112 (2018).
14. Cai, L. et al. Warming up human body by nanoporous metallized polyethylene
textile. Nat. Commun. 8, 496 (2017).
15. Cai, L. et al. Spectrally selective nanocomposite textile for outdoor personal
cooling. Adv. Mater. 30, 1802152 (2018).
16. Cai, L. et al. Temperature regulation in colored infrared-transparent
polyethylene textiles. Joule 3, 1478–1486 (2019).
17. Gao, T. et al. Three-dimensional printed thermal regulation textiles. ACS
Nano 11, 11513–11520 (2017).
18. Cui, Y., Gong, H., Wang, Y., Li, D. & Bai, H. A thermally insulating textile
inspired by polar bear hair. Adv. Mater. 30, 1706807 (2018).
19. Zhao, M. et al. A study on local cooling of garments with ventilation fans and
openings placed at different torso sites. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 43, 232–237 (2013).
20. Katić, K., Li, R. & Zeiler, W. Thermophysiological models and their
applications: a review. Build. Environ. 106, 286–300 (2016).
21. Kuno, Y. HUMAN PERSPIRATION.ByKuno, Yas. Springfield, Illinois:
Charles C. Thomas.Blackwell Scientific Publications:Oxford.1956.Pp. xv +
417. 72s. (Charles C Thomas, 1957). https://doi.org/10.1113/
expphysiol.1957.sp001275.
22. Nielsen, B. Regulation of body temperature and heat dissipation at different
levels of energy-and heat production in man. Acta Physiol. Scand. 68, 215–227
(1966).
23. Mack, G. W. & Nadel, E. R. Body fluid balance during heat stress in humans.
in Comprehensive Physiology (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.cp040110.
24. Angelova, R. A., Reiners, P., Georgieva, E. & Kyosev, Y. The effect of the
transfer abilities of single layers on the heat and mass transport through
multilayered outerwear clothing for cold protection. Text. Res. J. 88,
1125–1137 (2018).
25. Davis, J. K. & Bishop, P. A. Impact of clothing on exercise in the heat. Sport.
Med. 43, 695–706 (2013).
26. Scheurell, D. M., Spivak, S. M. & Hollies, N. R. S. Dynamic surface wetness of
fabrics in relation to clothing comfort. Text. Res. J. 55, 394–399 (1985).
27. Gavin, T. P. Clothing and Thermoregulation during exercise. in Textiles and
the Skin vol. 31 35–49 (KARGER, 2003).
28. Varshney, R. K., Kothari, V. K. & Dhamija, S. A study on thermophysiological
comfort properties of fabrics in relation to constituent fibre fineness and cross-
sectional shapes. J. Text. Inst. 101, 495–505 (2010).
29. Hu J. Y., Li Y. I., Y. K. No Title. in Clothing biosensory engineering. (ed. Li Y.,
W. A.) 229–231 (Cambridge: Woodhead, 2006).
30. Senthilkumar, M., Sampath, M. B. & Ramachandran, T. Moisture
management in an active sportswear: techniques and evaluation—a review
article. J. Inst. Eng. Ser. E 93,61–68 (2012).
31. Nazir, A., Hussain, T., Abbas, G. & Ahmed, A. Effect of design and method of
creating wicking channels on moisture management and air permeability of
cotton fabrics. J. Nat. Fibers 12, 232–242 (2015).
32. Wang, Y. et al. Reversible water transportation diode: temperature-adaptive
smart janus textile for moisture/thermal management. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30,
1–9 (2020).
33. Lao, L., Shou, D., Wu, Y. S. & Fan, J. T. “Skin-like”fabric for personal
moisture management. Sci. Adv. 6,1–12 (2020).
34. Dai, B. et al. Bioinspired janus textile with conical micropores for human body
moisture and thermal management. Adv. Mater.31, (2019).
35. Dong, Y. et al. Tailoring surface hydrophilicity of porous electrospun
nanofibers to enhance capillary and push-pull effects for moisture wicking.
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 14087–14095 (2014).
36. Sarkar, M., Fan, J., Szeto, yu, C. & Tao, X. Biomimetics of plant structure in
textile fabrics for the improvement of water transport properties. Text. Res. J.
79, 657–668 (2009).
37. Wang, X. et al. Biomimetic fibrous murray membranes with ultrafast water
transport and evaporation for smart moisture-wicking fabrics. ACS Nano.
8b08242 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b08242.
38. Craig, F. N. & Moffitt, J. T. Efficiency of evaporative cooling from wet
clothing. J. Appl. Physiol. 36, 313–316 (1974).
39. Havenith, G. et al. Evaporative cooling: effective latent heat of evaporation in
relation to evaporation distance from the skin. J. Appl. Physiol. 114, 778–785
(2013).
40. Guan, M. et al. Apparent evaporative cooling efficiency in clothing with
continuous perspiration: a sweating manikin study. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 137,
446–455 (2019).
41. Campbell, I. Body temperature and its regulation. Anaesth. Intensive Care Med
12, 240–244 (2011).
42. Jiao, J. et al. Effects of body-mapping-designed clothing on heat stress and
running performance in a hot environment. Ergonomics 60, 1435–1444
(2017).
43. Wilke, K. L., Barabadi, B., Lu, Z., Zhang, T. & Wang, E. N. Parametric study of
thin film evaporation from nanoporous membranes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 111,
171603 (2017).
44. Hanks, D. F. et al. High heat flux evaporation of low surface tension liquids
from nanoporous membranes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 7232–7238
(2020).
45. Yao, B. Guo, Li, Y., Hu, Jyan, Kwok, Ylin & Yeung, Kwing An improved test
method for characterizing the dynamic liquid moisture transfer in porous
polymeric materials. Polym. Test. 25, 677–689 (2006).
46. Kuht, J. & Farmery, A. D. Body temperature and its regulation. Anaesth.
Intensive Care Med. 19, 507–512 (2018).
47. Nadel, E. R., Bullard, R. W. & Stolwijk, J. A. Importance of skin temperature in
the regulation of sweating. J. Appl. Physiol. 31,80–87 (1971).
48. McCaffrey, T. V., Wurster, R. D., Jacobs, H. K., Euler, D. E. & Geis, G. S. Role
of skin temperature in the control of sweating. J. Appl. Physiol. 47, 591–597
(1979).
49. li, Y. & Holcombe, B. V. Mathematical simulation of heat and moisture
transfer in a human-clothing-environment system. Text. Res. J. (1998) https://
doi.org/10.1177/004051759806800601.
50. Li, F., Li, Y. & Wang, Y. A 3D finite element thermal model for clothed human
body. J. Fiber Bioeng. Inform. 6, 149–160 (2013).
51. Zhu, Q. Y. & Li, Y. A model of coupled liquid moisture and heat transfer in
porous textiles with consideration of gravity. Numer. Heat. Transf. Part A 43,
501–523 (2003).
52. Lee, H., Dellatore, S. M., Miller, W. M. & Messersmith, P. B. Mussel-inspired
surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Sci. (80-.) 318, 426–430 (2007).
53. Hsu, P.-C. et al. Electrolessly deposited electrospun metal nanowire
transparent electrodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 10593–10596 (2014).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the great help of P. Zhu, C. Lau, G. Gerboni, Z. Yu, and Y. Zheng. Part
of this work was performed at the Stanford Nano Shared Facilities and the Stanford
Nanofabrication Facility. J.S., C.D., and R.P. acknowledge the support of the Laboratory
Directed Research and Development Program (LDRD) at Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory under contract # DE-AC02-05CH11231.
Author contributions
Y.C. and Y.P. conceived the idea. Y.P. designed and conducted the experiments. Y.P.,
W.L., and B.L. performed the feedback control loop construction and programming.
W.L. and W.J. conducted the simulation. B.L. drew the schematics. J.T. and G.Z. helped
with sample preparation. J.S. and J.Z. performed the thermal resistance measurement.
G.W. helped with statistical analysis. Y.Z. and C.Z. helped with laser cutting process.
W.H. and T.W. provided helpful discussion. Y.C. and R.P., C.D., S.F., K.G. supervised the
project. All the authors provided helpful discussion on this project and contributed to
manuscript writing.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8 ARTICLE
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:6122 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 11
Additional information
Supplementary information The online version contains supplementary material
available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8.
Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to Yi Cui.
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Yi Li for their contribution to
the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Reprints and permission information is available at http://www.nature.com/reprints
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing,
adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give
appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative
Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party
material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless
indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the
article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory
regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from
the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by/4.0/.
© The Author(s) 2021
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8
12 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:6122 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26384-8 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications