BookPDF Available

Abstract

The Third SUNYMathics Competition
The Third SUNYMathics
Gabriel T. Prˇajiturˇa
ii
Copyright ©2022 Gabriel T. Prˇajiturˇa
iii
In memory of Ioan Serdean
iv
Foreword
The pandemic interrupted our competition. The second edition took place in
the spring of 2020 the weekend before all students were sent home and instruc-
tion was switched overnight to 100% online. As neither the campuses nor the
professors were prepared for such a change, that created a lot of issues and took
a lot of energy from everybody. For the time being, all competitions (including
the math ones) were cancelled.
We had a timid restart this spring. It takes time to develop a culture of
problem solving and math competitions, especially after a forced interruption.
Not all competitions restarted this year, but I preferred to have it back as soon
as possible because we all need to feel that we are back to our normal lives.
And we are not back to normal until we do not go off the geodesic. I was glad
all the SUNY campuses who participated before took part in it again and this
year we welcomed Bard College to the challenge.
I also have a personal reason to start this competition as soon as possible.
Last year I lost a friend who gave up a programmer job and worked for many
years to train middle and high school students for math competitions. An
analogy with Jaime Escalante, of “Stand and Deliver” fame, came to mind.
He did not stop working with the students just because the competitions were
cancelled. And he was right. We need to find ways to continue so we can keep
the culture alive.
I would like to thank the Seaway section of MAA for its support and to the
local organizers from each campus.
All comments with no name belong to the author. I welcome any new
approach and comment to any of these problems as well as new problems for
the next competitions.
This work was done while the author was a Fulbright scholar visiting the
Polytechnic University of Bucharest. I would like to thank the Fulbright Scholar
Program, Fulbright Commission Romania, Mathematical Institute of the Ro-
manian Academy, Central University Library of Bucharest and the Department
of Applied Sciences of the Polytechnic University of Bucharest for their support.
Gabriel T. Prˇajiturˇa
Bucharest
April 2022
Contents
1 The Problems 1
2 Top Six Students 5
3 Solutions 7
4 Comments 19
v
vi CONTENTS
Chapter 1
The Problems
1
2CHAPTER 1. THE PROBLEMS
1. Find a four - digit square number such that the first two digits are identical
and the last two digits are identical.
2. Find the least number starting with 1 such that if we move 1 from the
beginning to the end of the number the resulting number is 3 times bigger.
3. ABCD is a parallelogram and E a point such that EA AB and EC BC.
Prove that the angles AEC and DEB have the same bisector.
Mihai Barbu
4. Let fbe a continuous function such that
πZ1
0
f(x)dx = 2
Prove that there is a number a(0,1) such that
f(a) = sin(πa)
Dumitru Batinet¸u
5. Let A, B, C be three points on a circle of radius 1 such that the 4ABC is
equilateral. Find all points Pon the same circle such that the product
||P A|| · ||P B|| · ||P C ||
has the maximum value.
Marius Munteanu
3
6. Prove that for all n2
n
r1 + n!
nn+n
r1n!
nn<2
7. If n3 is an odd number prove that 72 divides
3n+ 4n+ 5n
8. Let XYZU be a tetrahedron such that the faces XYU, XZU, and YZU are
all right triangles with the right angle U. Let T (Y Z) such that XT YZ.
a) Prove that UT YZ
b) Prove that if, for some integer k2, the areas of the faces XYU, XZU,
and YZU are given by 2k, 6kand 2k25 respectively, then the area of XYZ
is also an integer.
Laura Munteanu
9. Prove that there is no natural number nsuch that
2022!
n!
is an integer ending with 100 zeros.
10. Prove that in a chess tournament in which each player plays everyone else
there are at least two players with the same number of draws.
11. If we pick up at random 5 numbers from 1 to 1,000 what is the probability
that their sum is divisible by 3?
12. Prove that every natural number has a multiple whose digits are only zeros
and ones.
4CHAPTER 1. THE PROBLEMS
Chapter 2
Top Six Students
1. Nathaniel Paddock, Brockport
2. Joshua Krienke, Bard & Matthew Too, Brockport
3. George Clapper, Geneseo; Hadley Chan, Oneonta & Stacey Do, Brockport
5
6CHAPTER 2. TOP SIX STUDENTS
Chapter 3
Solutions
Problem 1
First solution
Every number of the type aabb is divisible by 11 since aa+bb= 0 is
divisible by 11. Being a square it must, in fact, be divisible by 121.
Then we multiply 121 by other squares to see which one leads to a product
of the type we want.
We get 121 ·64 = 7744 = 882.
Second solution
One can prove that if a square ends with two identical digits the only pos-
sibilities are either 00 or 44.
First, since a square cannot end in 2, 3, 7, or 8, we discard 22, 33, 77, 88.
Next I will show that if a square ends with an odd digit then the digit before
last must be even. This will allow us to discard 11, 55, 99.
When the last digit is odd the number that is squared also ends with an odd
digit. Let this number be 10x+ywhere yis the last digit, odd.
Then
(10x+y)2= 100x2+ 20yx +y2
7
8CHAPTER 3. SOLUTIONS
Notice that 100x2does not influence the last two digits of the square while
20yx ends with a 0 and the digit before last is even.
y2is, for odd y, one of 01, 09, 25, 49, or 81, all having an even digit before
last.
Therefore for the square the digit before last is even.
The only case that remains to be discarded is 66.
I will show that if a square ends in 6 then the digit before last is odd.
If the square ends in 6 then the number that is squared ends either with a 4
or with a 6.
In the first case
(10x+ 4)2= 100x2+ 80x+ 16
while in the second
(10x+ 6)2= 100x2+ 120x+ 36
As before, 100x2does not influence the last two digits of the square. Both
80xand 120xend with a 0 and the digit before last is even. In both cases,
added with the odd digit of the third term will result in an odd digit before last.
Therefore if aabb is a square then it is either aa00 or aa44.
In the first case
aa00 = aa ·100
which cannot be a square since there is no two digit square number with identical
digits.
Therefore for the number we are looking for, the only possibility is aa44.
The rest is just checking which of the 9 possibilities is actually a square.
Problem 2
Let n+ 1 be the number of digits of the number and let xbe the number
made by the last ndigits.
Then the condition in the problem can be expressed by the equation
3(10n+x) = 10x+ 1 7x= 3 ·10n1 = 299 . . . 9
where the number of 9s is n.
Therefore the problem asks for the smallest nsuch that 7 divides the number
2 followed by n9s. Checking the possibilities we find that the least such nis 5
and thus the number is 142857.
Problem 3
9
Since CD||AB and AB EA we have that CD EA.
Since CB||AD and CB E C we have that EC AD.
Therefore AD and CD are altitudes in 4AE C. This means that the point
Dis the orthocenter of the triangle and that the third altitude is ED. That is,
ED AC .
Let Fbe the point where ED intersects AC.
Then, from 4AEF ,
m(AEF ) = π
2m(EAC )
while from 4EAB,
m(BAC) = π
2m(EAC )
Hence
AEF BAC
Since
m(EAB) + m(ECB) = π
we conclude that the quadrilateral EABC is cyclic. Thus
CE B BAC.
Thus we get that
AEF C EB
which implies the conclusion.
Problem 4
πZ1
0
f(x)dx = 2 Z1
0
f(x)dx =2
πZ1
0
f(x)dx =Z1
0
sin(πx)dx
Z1
0
(f(x)sin(πx))dx = 0
By the mean value theorem for integrals, there is a(0,1) such that
Z1
0
(f(x)sin(πx))dx =f(a)sin(πa),
which implies the conclusion.
10 CHAPTER 3. SOLUTIONS
Problem 5
We will show that the maximum is 2.
First solution (Marius Munteanu)
Without loss of generality, we may assume that the circle is centered at the
origin of the plane coordinate system and that A, B, C correspond to the com-
plex numbers 1, ω, ω2,where ωis a third root of unity. With Pcorresponding
to z, the inequality to be proven becomes
|(z1)(zω)(zω2)| ≤ 2
for all zwith |z|= 1.
However, given that ωis a third root of unity, the left side of the inequality
is equal to |z31|.By the triangle inequality,
|z31| ≤ |z|3+ 1 = 2.
Equality above is achieved when z3=1.This is equivalent to z6= 1 and
z36= 1.If we consider the regular hexagon having A(thus, also Band C)as
a vertex, then zmust correspond to one of the three vertices of this regular
hexagon, different from A, B, and C. In other words, Pmust be the midpoint
of one of the arcs AB, B C, or AC.
Second solution (Marius Munteanu)
Let x, y, z denote the lengths of P A, P B , and P C.
Without loss of generality, we may assume that Pis on the small arc AB.
By Ptolemy’s theorem applied to the cyclic quadrilateral AP BC, we then have
z=x+y.
Thus, the inequality to be proven becomes
xy(x+y)2.
Since P C =z=x+yis at most as long as the diameter of the circle, we
obtain that x+y2.By the triangle inequality, we also have
xy x+y
22
1.
Thus, xy(x+y)1·2=2.
11
Equality occurs when x=yand z(= x+y=P C) = 2,which means
x=y= 1,corresponding to Pbeing the midpoint of arc AB. Of course, by
symmetry, equality also holds when Pis the midpoint of arcs AC or AB.
Third solution (Marius Munteanu)
With xand ydenoting the lengths of P A and P B, we get P C =x+yby
Ptolemy’s theorem.
Now, under the assumption that Pis on the small arc AB, since angle AP B
has measure 120,by the Law of Cosines in triangle AP B, we have x2+y2+xy =
AB2= 3.
Thus, we have to maximize the function f(x, y) = xy(x+y) = x2y+xy2
subject to the constraints x2+y2+xy = 3, x 0, y 0.So, by using Lagrange
multipliers, we obtain
2xy +y2=λ(2x+y), x2+ 2xy =λ(2y+x).
Subtracting the two equations shows that y2x2=λ(xy),which implies
that either x=yor λ=xy.
In the first case, by x2+xy +y2= 3,we get that x=y= 1.
The second case is actually impossible due to the nonnegativity of xand y,
the nonpositivity of λand the equations above (x=y= 0 is also impossible
due to the constraint).
Since f(1,1) = 2 and since f(0,3) = f(3,0) = 0,the largest value of f
is 2 and is achieved when x=y, meaning that Pis the midpoint of the minor
arc AB.
Symmetry considerations imply that the same maximal value is obtained at
the midpoints of arcs AC and BC.
Fourth solution
By symmetry it suffices to solve the problem for Pon the small arc BC.
Let Dbe the midpoint of this arc.
Then
||P A|| ≤ ||DA|| = 2
because DA is a diameter.
In the same time
||P B|| · ||P C || = Area4P BC ·1
2 sin BP C =1
3Area4P BC
Let abe the distance from Pto BC and bthe distance from Dto BC. Then
12 CHAPTER 3. SOLUTIONS
||P B|| · ||P C || =2
3a· ||BC|| ≤ 2
3b· ||BC||
=4
3Area4DBC = 1
Therefore ||P A|| · ||P B|| · ||P C || ≤ 2 = ||DA|| · ||DB|| · ||DC||.
As a byproduct, here we also solved the problem of finding the point Pfor
which
Area4P BC ·Area4P AC ·Area4P B A
is maximal as well as the one where the product of the distances from Pto the
sides of the 4ABC is maximal.
Problem 6
Let f: [0,1] R,
f(x) = n
1 + x+n
1x
fis differentiable on [0,1) and
f0(x) = 1
nn
1 + x1
nn
1x
For x(0,1),
1
nn
1 + x1
nn
1x<01
nn
1 + x<1
nn
1x
n
1x < n
1 + x1x < 1 + x⇒ −2x < 0
which is true.
Therefore f0(x)<0 and thus the function is strictly decreasing. Hence for
x(0,1)
f(x)< f(0) = 2.
To complete the proof we need to notice that for n2
0<n!
nn<1
Problem 7
13
First solution
Since 72 = 8·9 and gcd(8,9) = 1 it suffices to show that 8 divides 3n+4n+ 5n
and that 9 divides 3n+ 4n+ 5n.
Let n= 2k+ 1, with k1. Then
32k+1 + 42k+1 + 52k+1 = 16 ·42k1+ 32k+1 + 52k+1
16 ·42k1+ (3 + 5)(32k+ 32k1·5 + · ·· + 3 ·52k+ 52k)
which is divisible by 8.
In the same time,
32k+1 + 42k+1 + 52k+1 = 9 ·32k1+ (4 + 5)(42k+ 42k1·5 + · ·· + 4 ·52k1+ 52k)
which is divisible by 9
Second solution
It can also be proved by induction. Let P(k) : 72 divides 32k+1+42k+1+52k+1
for k1.
Then P(1) : 72 divides 33+ 43+ 53= 27 + 64 + 125 = 216 = 72 ·3, which is
true.
Assume that 72 divides 32k+1 + 42k+1 + 52k+1.
Then
32k+3 + 42k+3 + 52k+3 = 9 ·33k+1 + 16 ·42k+1 + 25 ·52k+1
= 25(32k+1 + 42k+1 + 52k+1)16 ·32k+1 9·42k+1
= 25(32k+1 + 42k+1 + 52k+1)144 ·32k172 ·42k1
which is divisible by 72 because each part of the sum is. This completes the
induction.
Problem 8
First solution (Laura Munteanu)
a) By hypothesis, triangles 4XUY and 4XU Z are right triangles at U. As
such, XU U Y and XU UZ. Therefore X U is perpendicular to the entire
plane determined by the points U, Y, Z and so XU will be perpendicular on
any line or segment included in this plane. Since Y Z (Y UZ), it follows that
XU Y Z.
14 CHAPTER 3. SOLUTIONS
On the other hand, XT Y Z, by hypothesis, and so Y Z is perpendicular
to both XT and XU , which implies that
Y Z (X U T )
Since UT (XU T ), it follows that
UT Y Z
b) Let us first note that, from part a), XU (Y UZ),and so XU U T . As
such, triangle 4XU T is a right triangle at U.
Now, let XT =hand U T =h1.The area of 4XY Z equals
h·Y Z
2,
and so the square of this area equals
h2·Y Z2
4
In the same time
h2=XU2+h2
1,
based upon the Pythagorean theorem applied to the right triangle 4X UT ,
whereas
Y Z2=Y U 2+UZ 2,
based upon the Pythagorean theorem applied to the right triangle 4Y UZ.
Then
(Area4XY Z )2=(XU2+h2
1)(Y U2+UZ2)
4=XU2·Y U 2
4+XU2·U Z 2
4+h2
1·Y Z2
4
This says that
(Area4XY Z )2= (Area4XU Y )2+ (Area4X U Z )2+ (Area4Y U Z )2,
meaning that
(Area4XY Z )2= (2k)2+ (6k)2+ (2k25)2= (2k2+ 5)2
Thus,
Area4XY Z = 2k2+ 5,
which is an integer value.
Second solution for part b)
15
Let a, b, c be the lengths of the line segments U X, U Y, U Z respectively. Then
ab = 4k, ac = 12k bc = 4k210
Then
a2=ab ·ac
bc =48k2
4k210 =24k2
2k25
In a similar way we get
b2=4k210
3and c2= 12k230.
Let p, q, r be the lengths of the line segments XY , Y Z, Z X respectively.
Using the Pythagorean theorem we have
p2=8k4+ 32k2+ 50
3(2k25) q2=40k2100
3r2=24k496k2+ 150
2k25
In the same time, using Heron’s formula, the area of 4XY Z is
1
4p(p+q+r)(p+qr)(pq+r)(p+q+r)
=1
4p((p+q)2r2)(r2(pq)2)
=1
4p(p2+q2+ 2pq r2)(r2p2q2+ 2pq)
=1
4p4p2q2(p2+q2r2)2
=1
4r160(4k4+ 16k2+ 25)
916(2k25)2
9
=1
9p36k4+ 180k2+ 225 = p4k4+ 20k2+ 25 = p(2k2+ 5)2
= 2k2+ 5
Problem 9
For the result to be a natural number we need n2022.
The number of zeros at the end of a factorial equals the power of 5 in the
prime factor decomposition of the factorial. That is because the power of 2 is
always greater than the power of 5 and a zero at the end comes from of factor
of 10, that is, from a 2 ·5.
16 CHAPTER 3. SOLUTIONS
The power of 5 in 2022! is
2022
5+2022
25 +2022
125 +2022
625
because for bigger powers of 5 the floor will be 0.
This sum is
404 + 80 + 16 + 3 = 503.
Hence, to complete the problem, we need to show that there is no number
n2022 such that n! ends with 403 zeros.
Notice that the number of zeros at the end of n! is an increasing function of
n. The reason there is no factorial with 403 zeros is because 1624! ends with
1624
5+1624
25 +1624
125 +1624
625 = 324 + 64 + 12 + 2 = 402
zeros, while
1625
5+1625
25 +1625
125 +1625
625 = 325 + 65 + 13 + 2 = 405
zeros.
Problem 10
Let nbe the number of players. Thus, the number of draws of a player is
some number between 0 and n1.
However, if some player has n1 draws this means that he had a draw with
each of the other players, so nobody got 0 draws, while if somebody got 0 draws
nobody could get n1.
This implies that the numbers of draws are either from 0 to n2 or from 1
to n1.
In both cases there are only n1 options. Since we have nplayers, the
pigeonhole principle implies that two players must have the same number of
draws.
Problem 11
I will denote by 3knumbers divisible by 3, by 3p+ 1 numbers 1 more than
a multiple of 3 and by 3q+ 2 numbers 2 more than a multiple of 3.
17
There are 7 possibilities for a sum of five numbers to be divisible by 3, as a
function of the three cases above:
I
5·3k
II
3·3k+ (3p+ 1) + (3q+ 2)
III
2·3k+ 3(3p+ 1)
IV
2·3k+ 3(3q+ 2)
V
3k+ 2(3p+ 1) + 2(3q+ 2)
VI
4(3p+ 1) + (3q+ 2)
VII
(3p+ 1) + 4(3q+ 2)
From 1 to 1000 we have 333 3knumbers, 334 3p+ 1 numbers, and
333 3q+ 2 numbers.
Therefore for Case I we have
333
5= 33,108,454,071
choices, for Case II
333
3334
1333
1= 678,343,645332
choices, for Case III
333
2334
3= 340,196,510,952
choices, for Case IV
333
2333
3= 337,140,853,668
choices, for Case V
333
1334
2333
2= 1,023,663,597,714
choices, for Case VI
334
4333
1= 169,585,911,333
18 CHAPTER 3. SOLUTIONS
choices, while for Case VII
334
1333
4= 168,058,110,330
choices.
Therefore the total number of choices resulting in a sum divisible by 3 is
33,108,454,071 + 678,343,645332 + 340,196,510,952 + 337,140,853,668
+1,023,663,597,714+169,585,911,333+168,058,110,330 = 2,750,097,083,400
The total number of choices is
1000
5= 8,250,291,250,200
and hence the probability is
2,750,097,083,400
8,250,291,250,200 =1
3
Problem 12
Let nbe the number.
We consider the numbers 1, 11, 111 . . . 111 . . . 1, where the last one has n+ 1
digits.
When we divide a number by nthere are npossible remainders. Since we
have n+ 1 numbers, the pigeonhole principle implies that two of them must
have the same remainders when divided by n.
Therefore their difference will be divisible by n. Their difference is a number
with only 1s and 0s.
Here we actually proved something more specific, that every number has a
multiple of the type
1. . . 10 . . . 0=1. . . 1·10k
Using this we can prove now that if a number nis such that gcd(n, 10) = 1
than nhas a multiple made entirely of 1s.
In particular this will be true if nis a prime number other than 2 and 5,
which is a 1915 problem of Traian Lalescu.
Chapter 4
Comments
19
20 CHAPTER 4. COMMENTS
Problem 1
The problem can be solved by trial and error but the theory used in the
solutions helps reduce the number of trials.
The use of the test of divisibility by 11 is incidental. However, it provides
the simplest solution.
The test says that a number is divisible by 11 if and only if the alternating
sum of its digits is divisible by 11.
Problem 2
This problem can also be solved by trial and error trying to figure out the
digits of the number one by one, starting either from the end or from the be-
ginning.
Problem 3
The two main theorems about cyclic quadrilaterals play a part in the proof.
One says that a quadrilateral is cyclic if and only if the sum of the measures
of two opposite angles is π.
The other one says that a quadrilateral is cyclic if and only if the angle made
by a side and a diagonal is congruent to the angle made by the opposite side
and the other diagonal.
The main idea of the proof is that when one angle is in the interior of another
one, having the same bisector means that the two angles outside the interior
one are congruent.
Problem 4
The first step of the proof is to recognize that 2is equal to the integral
that replaced it in the proof. That could be guessed from the fact that the
function sin(pix) comes up in the conclusion of the problem so it has to come
in the problem from somewhere.
Another important part of the proof is to apply the Mean Value Theorem
21
to the integral of the difference rather than to each integral separate.
If we have
Zb
a
f(x)dx =Zb
a
g(x)dx
and we apply the theorem for each integral we get that there are numbers
c1, c2(a, b) such that
Zb
a
f(x)dx = (ba)f(c1)
and
Zb
a
g(x)dx = (ba)g(c2)
which implies that
(ba)f(c1)=(ba)g(c2)f(c1) = g(c2)
which, although is correct, it is not the conclusion we want.
However, if we first write the equation as
Zb
a
(f(x)g(x))dx = 0
when we apply the Mean Value Theorem we get the same cfor both functions.
Problem 5
The use of complex numbers in the first solution is just a more elegant version
of analytic geometry. It gives us a simple algebraic version of the inequality.
Ptolemy’s Theorem, used in the second and the third solution says that in
a cyclic quadrilateral the sum of the products of the opposite sides equals the
product of the diagonals.
The fourth solution relates the product we need to maximize to certain areas.
In fact maximizing
||P A|| · ||P B|| · ||P C ||
is equivalent to maximize
||P A||2· ||P B||2· ||P C ||2= (||P A|| · ||P B||)·(||P B || · ||P C||)·(||P C || · ||P A||)
4
3Area4P AB ·4
3Area4P BC ·4
3Area4P CA
=64
33Area4P AB ·Area4P BC ·Area4P C A
22 CHAPTER 4. COMMENTS
If we denote by x, y, z the distances from Pto AB,BC, and CA respectively,
the last product equals
64
33·1
2x||AB|| · 1
2y||BC|| · 1
2z||CA||
Since the side of the equilateral triangle is 3 the product equals
8xyz
Therefore we also solved the problem of maximizing the product of the areas
and the problem of maximizing the product of the distances from the point to
the sides of the triangle.
Problem 6
The proof is independent of the quantity
n!
nn
The only relevant part is that this quantity belongs to the interval (0,1).
We can obtain an infinite number of similar inequality replacing it by other
quantities in the same interval.
The proof also shows that
n
r1 + n!
nn+n
r1n!
nn>n
2.
One thing to remember from here is that inequalities are always maximum
or minimum problems and tools from calculus may be used to prove them.
Problem 7
The main ingredient of the first proof is the fact that if adivides c,bdivides
cand gcd(a, b) = 1 then ab divides c.
This is no longer true if gcd(a, b)>1 (try to find an example).
The rest is just an application of the decomposition formula for the sum of
odd powers.
Problem 8
23
Part a) use the fact that a line is perpendicular to a plane if and only if
it is perpendicular on two non parallel lines in the plane if and only if it is
perpendicular on every line in the plane.
Problem 9
The theory used here is the following: if pis a prime number then the
exponent of pin the prime number decomposition of n! is
n
p+n
p2+n
p3+n
p4+. . .
Notice that even though the sum is infinite, except for a finite number of
terms at the beginning, the sum consists of zeros.
Problem 10
The solution is a more careful application of the pigeonhole principle.
Problem 11
The answer is both surprising and expected.
Check if it remains true for 1001 and 1002.
Check if it remains true if 4 numbers are chosen.
Problem 12
One fact from number theory used here is that if adivides xy and gcd(a, y) =
1 then adivides x.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.