ArticlePublisher preview available

The Direct Reproductive Cost of Same-Sex Attraction: Evidence from Two Nationally Representative U.S. Samples

Springer Nature
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract and Figures

Same-sex attraction is associated with a direct reproductive cost, i.e., a reduced number of biological children. The current study aimed to assess this cost for different forms of sexual attraction (i.e., only attracted to opposite sex, mostly attracted to opposite sex, equally attracted to both sexes, mostly attracted to same-sex, only attracted to same-sex), using two large nationally representative datasets (N = 15,208) from the USA. The results indicated that same-sex attraction was associated with substantial loss in direct reproductive output. More specifically, significant differences between the different types of same-sex attraction were found: Exclusive and mostly homosexual orientation identities were associated with the highest direct reproductive cost, while mostly attracted to opposite sex orientation and bisexuality identities were associated with lower direct reproductive costs. In addition, bisexual women did not differ significantly from exclusively heterosexual women in terms of their reproductive output. The implications of these findings for the evolutionary origins of same-sex attraction are further discussed.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 3
Archives of Sexual Behavior (2022) 51:1857–1864
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02199-y
ORIGINAL PAPER
The Direct Reproductive Cost ofSame‑Sex Attraction: Evidence
fromTwo Nationally Representative U.S. Samples
MenelaosApostolou1
Received: 15 July 2019 / Revised: 16 October 2021 / Accepted: 16 October 2021 / Published online: 4 April 2022
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022
Abstract
Same-sex attraction is associated with a direct reproductive cost, i.e., a reduced number of biological children. The current
study aimed to assess this cost for different forms of sexual attraction (i.e., only attracted to opposite sex, mostly attracted
to opposite sex, equally attracted to both sexes, mostly attracted to same-sex, only attracted to same-sex), using two large
nationally representative datasets (N = 15,208) from the USA. The results indicated that same-sex attraction was associated
with substantial loss in direct reproductive output. More specifically, significant differences between the different types of
same-sex attraction were found: Exclusive and mostly homosexual orientation identities were associated with the highest
direct reproductive cost, while mostly attracted to opposite sex orientation and bisexuality identities were associated with
lower direct reproductive costs. In addition, bisexual women did not differ significantly from exclusively heterosexual women
in terms of their reproductive output. The implications of these findings for the evolutionary origins of same-sex attraction
are further discussed.
Keywords Same-sex attraction· Direct reproductive cost· Homosexuality· Bisexuality· Lesbianism· Sexual orientation
Introduction
Same-sex attraction motivates people to divert their mating
effort toward same-sex outlets from which children cannot be
born. Accordingly, it is expected that individuals who experi-
ence same-sex attraction would have fewer biological children
than those who do not (Vasey etal., 2014). Yet, the research
identifying the reproductive losses associated with same-sex
attraction is limited, and the current study aims to add to the
existing literature by examining how direct reproductive output
(i.e., number of biological children) varies across the different
types of sexual attraction (i.e., only attracted to opposite sex,
mostly attracted to opposite sex, equally attracted to both sexes,
mostly attracted to same-sex, only attracted to same-sex). Such
endeavor is important, especially for evolutionary theorizing.
More specifically, same-sex attraction appears to be an evo-
lutionary paradox as it impairs reproductive success by direct-
ing mating effort to same-sex outlets from which children can-
not be born. Same-sex attraction appears to have also a genetic
basis (Burri etal., 2011; Ganna etal., 2019), which means that
there are alleles which predispose for it, and were somehow
allowed by selection forces in the genepool. On this basis, most
evolutionary theories in the area proposed benefits which could
potentially balance the reproductive costs, allowing for this trait
to exist in the population (see Discussion for a review of some
of these theories).
Yet, the direct reproductive cost may not be as high as these
theories assumed. For instance, people who experience same-
sex attractions may have a strong preference to have children
(see Gates etal., 2007), which motivates them to have hetero-
sexual relationships in order to do so. Similarly, many people
who experience same-sex attractions are heterosexuals (Apos-
tolou, 2020; LeVay, 2016), and presumably direct most of their
mating effort to opposite-sex outlets. Accordingly, it could be
the case that same-sex attraction, when found in heterosexual
individuals, has little impact on the direct reproductive output.
Therefore, the endeavor of identifying the direct reproductive
cost associated with different types of same-sex attraction is
key in evolutionary theorizing in the area.
* Menelaos Apostolou
m.apostolou@gmail.com
1 Department ofSocial Sciences, University ofNicosia, 46
Makedonitissas Ave., 1700Nicosia, Cyprus
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... We found that gay men and lesbian women have lower fertility than their straight counterparts; this finding is in line with numerous other studies (Apostolou, 2022;Camperio Ciani et al., 2009, 2018Coome et al., 2020;King et al., 2005;Schwartz et al., 2010). We have also found that the difference in fertility of lesbian vs. straight women was smaller (τ = −0.03) ...
... than the difference in fertility of gay vs. straight men (τ = −0.23). This was also reported in Study 1 (but not Study 2) of Apostolou (2022). This association, with a similar magnitude, also held in the subsamples of atheist and Christian men. ...
Article
Full-text available
One proposal for the persistence of homosexuality in the human population is the sexually antagonistic gene hypothesis, which suggests that the lower fertility of homosexual individuals, especially men, may be compensated by higher fertility of their relatives of the opposite sex. To test this hypothesis, we have collected data from 7,312 heterosexual men, 459 gay men, 3,352 heterosexual women, and 79 lesbian women mainly from Czechia. In an online survey, participants answered questions regarding their own as well as their parents’ and grandparents’ fertility. For men, we obtained no significant results except for higher fertility of gay men’s paternal grandmothers, but the magnitude of this effect was very small. For the female sample, we recorded lower fertility of lesbian women’s mothers and fathers. In line with our expectations, both gay men and lesbian women had lower fertility rates than their heterosexual counterparts. Our results are consistent with recent studies which likewise do not support the sexually antagonistic gene hypothesis.
... The FBOE is a well-established proximate developmental pathway to male androphilia that is often considered separately from ultimate explanations for the existence and maintenance of male androphilia at the population level, such as female fecundity effects (FFEs). FFEs are leading ultimate hypotheses to explain the persistence of male androphilia, positing that the lower reproduction of androphilic males [e.g., (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)] is offset by female relatives reproducing at elevated rates [e.g., (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)]. One example of an FFE model would be mothers of androphilic males reproducing significantly more than mothers of men who are gynephilic (i.e., sexually attracted to and aroused by feminine adult females), which invokes balancing selection to help resolve the evolutionary paradox of male androphilia (11,21). ...
... FFEs are leading ultimate hypotheses to explain the persistence of male androphilia, positing that the lower reproduction of androphilic males [e.g., (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)] is offset by female relatives reproducing at elevated rates [e.g., (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)]. One example of an FFE model would be mothers of androphilic males reproducing significantly more than mothers of men who are gynephilic (i.e., sexually attracted to and aroused by feminine adult females), which invokes balancing selection to help resolve the evolutionary paradox of male androphilia (11,21). ...
Article
Two separate but related literatures have examined familial correlates of male androphilia (i.e., sexual attraction and arousal to masculine adult males). The fraternal birth order effect (FBOE) is a widely established finding that each biological older brother a male has increased the probability of androphilia 20–35% above baseline rates. Other family demographic variables, such as reproduction by mothers, maternal aunts, and grandmothers, have been used to test evolutionary hypotheses that sexually antagonistic genes lead to androphilia among males, lowering or eliminating reproduction, which is offset by greater reproductive output among their female relatives. These proposed female fecundity effects (FFEs), and the FBOE, have historically been treated as separate yet complementary ways to understand the development and evolution of male androphilia. However, this approach ignores a vital confound within the data. The high overall reproductive output indicative of an FFE results in similar statistical patterns as the FBOE, wherein women with high reproductive output subsequently produce later-born androphilic sons. Thus, examination of the FBOE requires analytic approaches capable of controlling for the FFE, and vice-versa. Here, we present data simultaneously examining the FBOE and FFE for male androphilia in a large dataset collected in Samoa across 10 y of fieldwork, which only shows evidence of the FBOE.
... Even in stable relationships, gay and bisexual men are more open to consensual non-monogamy than heterosexuals (Cohen & Wilson, 2017;Costa & Ribeiro-Gonçalves, 2020). Despite this, different sexual orientations may have different reproductive costs, operationalized as the number of offspring, where exclusively gay men have the lowest mean number of children, thus the highest direct reproductive cost, while heterosexuals have the highest number of children, thus the lowest direct reproductive cost (Apostolou, 2022). Additionally, bisexual individuals tend to fall between gay men and heterosexuals across many domains, such as sexual desire, mating strategies, occupational preferences, gender typicality, and number of children (Jabbour et al., 2020;Lippa, 2020;Valentova et al., 2022aValentova et al., , 2022b. ...
Article
Full-text available
Male sexual functioning is a prerequisite for conception and consequently for reproduction and is thus a crucial mechanism from an evolutionary and social perspective. Previous studies reported better sexual functioning in coupled compared to single individuals. However, it is not clear whether sexual functioning increases or decreases with a short-term casual sexual strategy, which is another possibility, along with a long-term strategy. Furthermore, sexual orientation may represent yet another mating strategy that may influence sexual functioning. Here, we aimed to test the possible associations between male sexual functioning and sexual strategies, as measured through sociosexuality, relationship status, and sexual orientation. We hypothesize that due to its relationship with the evolved motivation of mate acquisition and mate retention, both stable relationships and sociosexuality would be positively associated with male sexual functioning. We did not expect significant differences in sexual functioning among men with different sexual orientations. We sampled 427 healthy men of different sexual orientations (203 heterosexuals, 77 bisexuals, and 147 gay men) who completed the Male Sexual Function Index (MSFI) and its subscales of desire, arousal, erection, orgasm, and satisfaction; the Sociosexual Orientation Inventory-Revised; and sociodemographic questions. A multivariate general linear model showed that, compared to single individuals, partnered individuals reported greater MSFI-arousal, MSFI-erection, MSFI-orgasm, and MSFI-satisfaction. Sociosexuality and sexual orientation only weakly predicted MSFI domains. Male sexual functioning thus seems to be moderately associated with a long-term mating strategy and can thus serve for relationship maintenance rather than for acquiring new partners.
... Sexual attraction toward same-sex individuals has a heritable component (estimated around 0.32, ranging between 0.08 and 0.60; Alanko et al., 2010;Bailey et al., 2000Bailey et al., , 2016Burri et al., 2015;Kirk et al., 2000) and, despite its costly effect on direct reproductive output (Apostolou, 2022;Coome et al., 2020;Vasey et al., 2014), has persisted across different historical time periods and cultural contexts (Murray, 2002). For these reasons, same-sex attraction has puzzled researchers and despite much speculation and study, our understanding of its proximal or ultimate causes is still incomplete (Bailey et al., 2016). ...
Article
Full-text available
Previous research suggests that both same-sex attraction and the personality trait “openness” are associated with sex-atypical preferences and behaviors. Here, we examined the links between adulthood occupational preferences, childhood play behavior, and openness among Iranian cisgender gynephilic males (n = 228), cisgender ambiphilic males (n = 48), cisgender androphilic males (n = 178), transgender androphilic males (n = 58), cisgender androphilic females (n = 226), cisgender ambiphilic females (n = 94), cisgender gynephilic females (n = 31), and transgender gynephilic females (n = 121) from Iran. Cisgender and transgender same-sex attracted males and females exhibited sex-atypical occupational preferences with the latter group showing even more sex-atypicality than the former. The personality trait openness did not differ between cisgender groups. Transgender androphilic males had a significantly higher mean score for openness compared to cisgender androphilic females and transgender gynephilic females, whereas transgender gynephilic females had a significantly lower mean score compared to cisgender androphilic males. In both males and females, childhood sex-atypicality, same-sex attraction, and openness were associated with sex-atypical occupational preferences. Our findings from Iran provides cross-cultural support for interconnectedness of childhood and adulthood sex-atypicality, openness, and same-sex attraction in males and females who are cisgender and transgender.
... In addition to potential within-sex benefits to women's same-sex attraction, it remains critical to consider the between-sex selection pressures. Men report considerably greater tolerance toward having a bisexual partner than women while similarly indicating that such infidelity from women is not necessarily egregious enough to terminate a relationship (Apostolou, 2022;Wang & Apostolou, 2019). This tolerance corresponds with evidence suggesting that women's same-sex attraction is less of a deal-breaker for men relative to men's same-sex attraction to women (Confer & Cloud, 2011;Lippa, 2005). ...
Article
Full-text available
Heterosexual men report less distress at infidelity from female interlopers than male interlopers. In addition to presenting no risk of cuckoldry, men could also perceive these women as additional sexual opportunities if they assume mutual interest from the female interloper. The current study considered this possibility by experimentally manipulating the sex role assumption of a female interloper (either masculine or feminine presentation) for expected sexual interest in men. Heterosexual men reacted to infidelity from hypothetical long‐term romantic partners in two experiments. The extrapair mate was another man, a feminine woman, or a masculine‐presenting woman. Although infidelity elicited an overall negative reaction, men reported less distress when the extradyadic partner was female. The feminine woman was additionally regarded as affording the most sexual opportunity. Effects were particularly amplified when this information included images of the extradyadic partner. Studies provide evidence for complementary hypotheses based on intrasexual conflict and intersexual opportunities.
... Using genome-wide association study (GWAS), Ganna et al. (2) discovered five genomic loci that are associated with SSB. Because SSB leads to fewer children (2,8,9), it has been a long-standing evolutionary puzzle why natural selection has not eliminated the genetic variants underlying SSB. Many hypotheses have been proposed to explain the genetic persistence of SSB, including, for example, sexual antagonism (10,11), antagonistic pleiotropy (12,13), kin selection (14,15), and overdominance (13,16). ...
Article
Full-text available
Because human same-sex sexual behavior (SSB) is heritable and leads to fewer offspring, how SSB-associated alleles have persisted and whether they will remain in human populations are of interest. Using the UK Biobank, we address these questions separately for bisexual behavior (BSB) and exclusive SSB (eSSB) after confirming their genetic distinction. We discover that male BSB is genetically positively correlated with the number of offspring. This unexpected phenomenon is attributable to the horizontal pleiotropy of male risk-taking behavior–associated alleles because male risk-taking behavior is genetically positively correlated with both BSB and the number of offspring and because genetically controlling male risk-taking behavior abolishes the genetic correlation between male BSB and the number of offspring. By contrast, eSSB is genetically negatively correlated with the number of offspring. Our results suggest that male BSB–associated alleles are likely reproductively advantageous, which may explain their past persistence and predict their future maintenance, and that eSSB-associated alleles are likely being selected against at present.
... It is unlikely that nonheterosexuality is maintained by recurrent mutation. The substantial direct fitness losses associated with same-sex attraction are incompatible with such a model (Apostolou, 2022). Indirect fitness effects of kin selection may offset some of the direct losses in fitness Vasey & VanderLaan, 2014). ...
Article
Full-text available
Same-sex attraction may be linked to low prenatal androgen (in men) and high prenatal androgen (in women). Digit ratio (2D:4D) is thought to be a negative correlate of prenatal androgen and right-left 2D:4D (Dr-l) to reflect lateralized differences in sensitivity to prenatal androgen. Lower 2D:4D has been reported for lesbians compared to heterosexuals, but links to high 2D:4D in gay men are less clear. The largest study thus far (the BBC Internet study) found no significant difference between the 2D:4D of lesbians and heterosexual women but a higher 2D:4D in gay men compared to heterosexual men. Here we consider the possibility that low and high prenatal androgen is associated with same-sex attraction in men (n = 108,779) and women (n = 87,742), resulting in more than two phenotypes. We examined the associations between 2D:4D, Dr-l, and same-sex attraction scores in the BBC Internet study. In contrast to the earlier report, which considered sexual orientation in categories, there were positive linear associations in men (right and left 2D:4D, but not Dr-l) and negative linear associations in women (right 2D:4D and Dr-l, but not left 2D:4D). There were no curvilinear relationships for right and left 2D:4D. However, Dr-l showed a U-shaped association with same-sex attraction in men. Thus, (1) high prenatal androgen may be implicated in female homosexuality, while both low and high prenatal androgen may be implicated in male homosexuality, and (2) large side differences in sensitivity to androgen may be associated with elevated same-sex attraction in men.
... Evolutionary reasoning implies that same-sex sexual attractions and behaviors are associated with substantial reproductive costs, given that humans need the reproductive resources of opposite-sex individuals. Indeed, several studies from contemporary societies indicate that samesex attractions are linked to lower fertility, which is pronounced even more when it forms into exclusive same-sex attraction (Apostolou, 2022;Camperio Ciani et al., 2018). Moreover, behavioral genetics studies show that same-sex attractions have a non-negligible genetic basis (Ganna et al., 2019;Långström et al., 2010). ...
Article
There is robust evidence to the effect that homosexual individuals have systematically less offspring. The sexually antagonistic genes hypothesis claims that this fitness-related disadvantage of homosexual individuals is compensated by their other-sex relatives exhibiting greater fertility than the relatives of straight individuals. It would allow explain how genetic variants associated with homosexuality persist in the human population. Nevertheless, previous studies yielded conflicting results and, moreover, they focused almost solely on the fertility of gay men's relatives. We present the results of a large preregistered study based on data on fertility of both gay men's and lesbian women's relatives. We have analyzed the fertility and biological kin fertility of 693 gay men, 843 straight men, 265 lesbian women, and 331 straight women from Czechia and Slovakia. As expected, gay men and lesbian women sired significantly less offspring than straight individuals. However, we also found no evidence supporting the sexually antagonistic genes hypothesis, i.e., no difference between the fertility of other-sex relatives of homosexual and heterosexual individuals. Interestingly, though, paternal grandparents of gay men had more offspring than the paternal grandparents of straight men did. The mothers of lesbian women had a higher fertility than the mothers of straight women, but that could be attributed to intervening effects, such as the excess of older brothers in homosexual individuals. Our results suggest that mechanisms other than those predicted by the sexually antagonistic genes hypothesis are involved in the evolution of human homosexual orientation.
Article
Full-text available
The genetics of sexual orientation Twin studies and other analyses of inheritance of sexual orientation in humans has indicated that same-sex sexual behavior has a genetic component. Previous searches for the specific genes involved have been underpowered and thus unable to detect genetic signals. Ganna et al. perform a genome-wide association study on 493,001 participants from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Sweden to study genes associated with sexual orientation (see the Perspective by Mills). They find multiple loci implicated in same-sex sexual behavior indicating that, like other behavioral traits, nonheterosexual behavior is polygenic. Science , this issue p. eaat7693 ; see also p. 869
Article
Full-text available
About one in five individuals is not attracted exclusively to members of the opposite sex. The presence of same-sex attraction in such a high frequency constitutes a major evolutionary puzzle. One solution that has been proposed is weak negative selection pressures exercised on deviations from exclusive heterosexual attraction in ancestral human societies. The current paper employs a population genetics model in order to assess the explanatory power of this hypothesis. By investigating different scenarios, it is found that weak selection pressure falls short in accounting for the observed prevalence rates of same-sex attraction. On this basis, it is argued that positive selection is also required. By examining the shape of the distribution of same-sex attraction, it is further argued that positive selection pressure has been exercised on heterosexual orientation with same-sex attraction in women and possibly in men, and on homosexual orientation in men. In addition, it is proposed that male preferences for same-sex attraction are the main source of positive selection of female same-sex attraction. The source(s) of positive selection of male same-sex attraction is, however, obscure.
Article
Full-text available
Male homosexual preference (MHP) challenges evolutionary thinking because the preference for male–male relationships is heritable, implies a fertility cost (lower offspring number), and is relatively frequent in some societies (2–6% in Western countries) for a costly trait. It has been proposed that individuals with a MHP counterbalance reproductive costs through the transfer of resources to kin, thereby improving their indirect reproduction through kin’s reproductive success. This kin selection hypothesis is not supported in Western countries and Japan, although consistent evidence has been obtained in Samoa. In this study, data from Java (Indonesia) were obtained to assess the avuncular tendencies of men with contrasting sexual orientation to measure possible resource transfer. Consistent with the kin selection hypothesis, males with a homosexual orientation reported an increased willingness to transfer resources toward nephews and nieces and declared having transferred more money to nephews and nieces. We developed a method to quantitatively estimate the contribution of kin selection on inclusive reproduction associated to sexual orientation, taking into account various possible biases. Kin selection reduced the direct reproductive cost of homosexual men by 20%, so suggesting that kin selection alone is insufficient to explain the maintenance of male homosexuality. Other potential factors are discussed, as well as the limitations of the study and the social determinant operating for the expression of increased avuncular tendencies of homosexual men.
Article
Full-text available
A growing number of researchers suggest that female homosexuality is at least in part influenced by genetic factors. Unlike for male homosexuality, few familial studies have attempted to explore maintenance of this apparently fitness-detrimental trait in the population. Using multiple recruitment methods, we explored fecundity and sexual orientation within the pedigrees of 1,458 adult female respondents. We compared 487 homosexual and 163 bisexual with 808 heterosexual females and 30,203 of their relatives. Our data suggest that the direct fitness of homosexual females is four times lower than the direct fitness of heterosexual females of corresponding ages. The prevalence of nonheterosexuality within the homosexual female respondents’ families (2.83%) appear to be more than four times higher than the basal prevalence in the Italian population (0.63%). Pedigree size and relative fecundity in both the paternal and maternal sides of the homosexual women’s families were significantly higher than in the heterosexuals’ families. If confirmed, the relative average fecundity increase within the family seems to offset the loss in fitness due to the low direct fitness of homosexual females. Therefore, the balanced fecundity in the homosexual females’ families may allow the trait to be maintained at a low-frequency equilibrium in the population.
Article
Full-text available
Background Few data exist regarding pregnancy in lesbian and bisexual (LB) women. Objectives To determine the likelihood of LB women becoming pregnant, naturally or assisted, in comparison with heterosexual women Search strategy Systematic review of papers published 1 January 2000 to 23 June 2015. Selection criteria Studies contained details of pregnancy rates among LB women compared with heterosexual women. No restriction on study design. Data collection and analysis Inclusion decisions, data extraction and quality assessment were conducted in duplicate. Meta‐analyses were carried out, with subgroups as appropriate. Main results Of 6859 papers identified, 104 full‐text articles were requested, 30 papers (28 studies) were included. The odds ratio (OR) of ever being pregnant was 0.19 (95% CI 0.18–0.21) in lesbian women and 1.22 (95% CI 1.15–1.29) in bisexual women compared with heterosexual women. In the general population, the odds ratio for pregnancy was nine‐fold lower among lesbian women and over two‐fold lower among bisexual women (0.12 [95% CI 0.12–0.13] and 0.50 [95% CI 0.45–0.55], respectively). Odds ratios for pregnancy were higher for both LB adolescents (1.37 [95% CI 1.18–1.59] and 1.98 [95% CI 1.85, 2.13], respectively). There were inconsistent results regarding abortion rates. Lower rates of previous pregnancies were found in lesbian women undergoing artificial insemination (OR 0.17 [95% CI 0.11–0.26]) but there were higher assisted reproduction success rates compared with heterosexual women (OR 1.56 [95% CI 1.24–1.96]). Conclusions Heterosexuality must not be assumed in adolescents, as LB adolescents are at greater risk of unwanted pregnancies and terminations. Clinicians should provide appropriate information to all women, without assumptions about LB patients’ desire for, or rejection of, fertility and childbearing. Tweetable abstract Review of likelihood of LB women becoming pregnant: LB teenagers at greater risk of unwanted pregnancies.
Chapter
Homosexuality is an evolutionary paradox in search for a resolution, not a medical condition in search for a cure. Homosexual behavior is common among social animals, and mainly expressed within the context of a bisexual sexual orientation. Exclusive homosexuality is less common, but not unique to humans. Poiani and Dixson invite the reader to embark on a journey through the evolutionary, biological, psychological and sociological aspects of homosexuality, seeking an understanding of both the proximate and evolutionary causes of homosexual behavior and orientation in humans, other mammals and birds. The authors also provide a synthesis of what we know about homosexuality into a biosocial model that links recent advances in reproductive skew theory and various selection mechanisms to produce a comprehensive framework that will be useful for anyone teaching or planning future research in this field.
Article
This book provides a comprehensive analysis of the evolutionary origins of same-sex attraction, evaluating multiple existing evolutionary theories. It combines empirical findings with theoretical arguments in order to review evidence on the prevalence rates of same-sex attraction and determine its genetic and environmental basis. Among the topics addressed: • Attitudes towards same-sex attraction across human history • Assessing the weak selection pressures hypothesis of attraction • Assessing the male choice hypothesis of attraction • Evolution of same-sex attraction in men versus women The Evolution of Same-Sex Attraction will be of interest to academics and students of evolutionary and psychological sciences, filling a gap in literature on the origins of specifically same-sex attraction.
Article
Prevalence studies indicate that about one in five women experience some degree of same-sex attraction. The evolutionary origins of such attraction are not well understood. Accordingly, this paper proposed a theoretical framework where, during the period of human evolution, same-sex attractions in women were under positive selection. The source of positive selection has been male preferences for opposite-sex sex partners who experienced same-sex attractions. This theoretical framework was used to generate four predictions that were tested in two online studies which employed a total of 1509 heterosexual participants. It was found that heterosexual women did not desire partners who experienced same-sex attractions, but a considerable proportion of heterosexual men desired partners who experienced same-sex attractions. In addition, it was found that men were more sexually excited than women by the same-sex infidelity of their partners, and they desired more than women, their opposite-sex partners to have sex with same-sex individuals. Finally, participants' preferences were contingent on the seriousness of the relationships, with same-sex attraction to be preferred more in short-term than in a long-term partner. These findings were employed in understanding the evolutionary origins of same-sex attraction in women.