A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Archives of Sexual Behavior
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 3
Archives of Sexual Behavior (2022) 51:1857–1864
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02199-y
ORIGINAL PAPER
The Direct Reproductive Cost ofSame‑Sex Attraction: Evidence
fromTwo Nationally Representative U.S. Samples
MenelaosApostolou1
Received: 15 July 2019 / Revised: 16 October 2021 / Accepted: 16 October 2021 / Published online: 4 April 2022
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022
Abstract
Same-sex attraction is associated with a direct reproductive cost, i.e., a reduced number of biological children. The current
study aimed to assess this cost for different forms of sexual attraction (i.e., only attracted to opposite sex, mostly attracted
to opposite sex, equally attracted to both sexes, mostly attracted to same-sex, only attracted to same-sex), using two large
nationally representative datasets (N = 15,208) from the USA. The results indicated that same-sex attraction was associated
with substantial loss in direct reproductive output. More specifically, significant differences between the different types of
same-sex attraction were found: Exclusive and mostly homosexual orientation identities were associated with the highest
direct reproductive cost, while mostly attracted to opposite sex orientation and bisexuality identities were associated with
lower direct reproductive costs. In addition, bisexual women did not differ significantly from exclusively heterosexual women
in terms of their reproductive output. The implications of these findings for the evolutionary origins of same-sex attraction
are further discussed.
Keywords Same-sex attraction· Direct reproductive cost· Homosexuality· Bisexuality· Lesbianism· Sexual orientation
Introduction
Same-sex attraction motivates people to divert their mating
effort toward same-sex outlets from which children cannot be
born. Accordingly, it is expected that individuals who experi-
ence same-sex attraction would have fewer biological children
than those who do not (Vasey etal., 2014). Yet, the research
identifying the reproductive losses associated with same-sex
attraction is limited, and the current study aims to add to the
existing literature by examining how direct reproductive output
(i.e., number of biological children) varies across the different
types of sexual attraction (i.e., only attracted to opposite sex,
mostly attracted to opposite sex, equally attracted to both sexes,
mostly attracted to same-sex, only attracted to same-sex). Such
endeavor is important, especially for evolutionary theorizing.
More specifically, same-sex attraction appears to be an evo-
lutionary paradox as it impairs reproductive success by direct-
ing mating effort to same-sex outlets from which children can-
not be born. Same-sex attraction appears to have also a genetic
basis (Burri etal., 2011; Ganna etal., 2019), which means that
there are alleles which predispose for it, and were somehow
allowed by selection forces in the genepool. On this basis, most
evolutionary theories in the area proposed benefits which could
potentially balance the reproductive costs, allowing for this trait
to exist in the population (see Discussion for a review of some
of these theories).
Yet, the direct reproductive cost may not be as high as these
theories assumed. For instance, people who experience same-
sex attractions may have a strong preference to have children
(see Gates etal., 2007), which motivates them to have hetero-
sexual relationships in order to do so. Similarly, many people
who experience same-sex attractions are heterosexuals (Apos-
tolou, 2020; LeVay, 2016), and presumably direct most of their
mating effort to opposite-sex outlets. Accordingly, it could be
the case that same-sex attraction, when found in heterosexual
individuals, has little impact on the direct reproductive output.
Therefore, the endeavor of identifying the direct reproductive
cost associated with different types of same-sex attraction is
key in evolutionary theorizing in the area.
* Menelaos Apostolou
m.apostolou@gmail.com
1 Department ofSocial Sciences, University ofNicosia, 46
Makedonitissas Ave., 1700Nicosia, Cyprus
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.