ArticlePDF Available

Oxfordian Benthic Foraminifera and Ostracods from the Hanifa Formation (Hawtah Member), Central Saudi Arabia

Authors:
  • Ministry of education

Abstract

The Hanifa Formation in Saudi Arabia consists of mostly carbonate units of Late Jurassic age and is well exposed along the Tuwaiq Mountain escarpment. Micropaleontological analyses of samples from three outcrops have revealed the presence of benthic foraminifera and ostracods. The study of fossil faunas from the Hawtah Member, has led to the identification of six foraminiferal species: Alveosepta (Redmondellina) powersi, Oolina globosa, Nautiloculina oolithica, Kurnubia palastiniensis, Pseudomarssonella cf. maxima, Lenticulina sp. and two ostracod species: Hutsonia asiatica and Cytherella cf. umbilica. The survey of species covered in this research suggests that they indicate a predominantly euryhaline to polyhaline marine setting, possibly with a slightly brackish influence and deposited in a supratidal environment, suggesting a progressively shallowing environment on the inner shelf with intermittent shoal complexes.
Oxfordian Benthic Foraminifera and Ostracods
from the Hanifa Formation (Hawtah Member),
Central Saudi Arabia
Saleh Suliman Aba Alkhayl
Al-Bukiriyah Education Directorate, Science Teaching supervision unit,
Al-Bukiriyah, Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia
email: ssb467@buk.gov.sa
ABSTRACT: The Hanifa Formation in Saudi Arabia consists of mostly carbonate units of Late Jurassic age and is well exposed along
the Tuwaiq Mountain escarpment. Micropaleontological analyses of samples from three outcrops have revealed the presence of benthic
foraminifera and ostracods. The study of fossil faunas from the Hawtah Member, has led to the identification of six foraminiferal species:
Alveosepta (Redmondellina) powersi,Oolina globosa,Nautiloculina oolithica,Kurnubia palastiniensis,Pseudomarssonella cf. max-
ima,Lenticulina sp. and two ostracod species: Hutsonia asiatica and Cytherella cf. umbilica.The survey of species covered in this re-
search suggests that they indicate a predominantly euryhaline to polyhaline marine setting, possibly with a slightly brackish influence
and deposited in a supratidal environment, suggesting a progressively shallowing environment on the inner shelf with intermittent shoal
complexes.
Keywords: Saudi Arabia, Oxfordian, Hanifa Formation, micropaleontology
INTRODUCTION
The sedimentology and stratigraphy of the Hanifa Formation
have been described by several authors including Powers et al.
(1966), Powers (1968), Vaslet et al. (1983), Okla (1983),
Moshrif (1982) and Moshrif and Al-Asa’ad (1984), El-Sabbagh
et al. (2017) Fallatah and Kerans (2018) and Al-Mojel et al.
(2020). Paleontological and biostratigraphical studies on the
formation include the works of El-Asa’ad (1991), Abaalkail
(2006), Hughes et al. (2008), Zakhera et al (2017), and Hughes
(2004a,b, 2018). The main purpose of this study is to identify
some foraminifera and ostracod species from the lower part of
the Hanifa Formation (Hawtah Member) at Khashm
Al-Qaddiyah, Jabal Abakkayn and Al-Ghat areas, central Saudi
Arabia (text-fig. 1) and report their paleoecological aspects.
Geological setting
The Hanifa Formation was named after Wadi Hanifa where the
type section was measured at Jabal Abakkayn near Sadoos in
the northeast of Dhruma quadrangle. In terms of stratigraphic
studies, Valset et al. (1983) described two informal members
(the Hawtah and Ulayyah members) in the Wadi ar Rayn Quad-
rangle. In 1983, Okla studied Hanifa rock units at Jabal
Al-Abakkayn and at Wadi Nisah. He subdivided the formation
into lower and upper units based on lithofacies and microfacies.
Moshrif (1982) and Moshrif and Al-Asa’ad (1984), presented
detailed investigations of Hanifa rock units, and concluded that
this formation is generally composed of various carbonate
lithofacies intercalated with shale beds at several intervals. In
the context of macropaleontology, El-Asa’ad (1991) shed light
on the coral paleontology. His work has shown that the middle
to late Oxfordian corals occur at three different levels, the lower
level of occurrence is a coral parareef located at the top of the
Tuwaiq Limestone (El-Asa’ad 1991). The second and the third
levels of coral occurrences are located, respectively, in the
lower and upper parts of the Hanifa Formation. The Hanifa
coral patches can be traced along the northern side of Wadi
Hanifa from Kashm Al-Gaddiyah north to Wadi Juwayy in cen-
tral Saudi Arabia. Biostratigraphic works of significance in-
clude Enay et al. (1987) for ammonites, Tintant (1987) for
nautiloids, Almeras (1987) for brachiopods, and Depeche et. al.
(1987) for ostracods. Hughes (2004a) used the correlation of the
Pseudocyclammina lituus cycles to assist in correlating
subsurface depositional layers, interpret paleoenvironments and
sequence stratigraphy in the Khurais Field. In the same context,
Hughes (2018) used thin sections study to develop a compre-
hensive foraminiferal biozonation of the entire Jurassic forma-
tions in Saudi Arabia, including the Oxfordian strata of the
Hanifa Formation.
Powers et al. (1966) and Powers (1968) assigned the Hanifa
Formation a Kimmeridgian age while Enay et al. (1986) as-
signed an Oxfordian age based on the Plicatilis ammonite Zone.
Brachiopods recovered from the formation are consistent with
an Early to Middle Oxfordian age (Almeras 1987). De Matos
and Hulstrand (1994) assigned an early Kimmeridgian age to
the Hanifa Formation based on fossil content and strontium iso-
tope dating.
MATERIALS and METHODS
Three localities along the Tuwaiq escarpment in central Saudi
Arabia, namely: Khashm Al-Gaddiyah, Jabal al Abakkayn and
Al-Ghat were studied in order to measure sections and collect
fossil-bearing rock specimens. The studied sections cover a re-
gion that is approximately 450 km, from Al-Mizahmiah in the
south to Al-Ghat, north of Riyadh. The present study is based on
Micropaleontology, vol. 67, no. 6, plate 1, text-figures 1–6, table 1, pp. 573–586, 2021 http://doi.org/10.47894/mpal.67.6.04 573
574
Saleh Suliman Aba Alkhayl: Oxfordian Benthic Foraminifera and Ostracods from the Hanifa (Hawtah Member), Central Saudi Arabia
TEXT-FIGURE 1
Geological map showing the study area and localities examined mentioned in the text (modified after Google Earth and Zakhera et al. 2017).
76 samples collected from three outcrops: Al-Gaddiyah west of
Riyadh (N: 24° 31' 50" E: 46° 25' 08"), Jabal Al Abakkayn (N:
24° 56' 84"; E: 46° 13' 00") and Al-Ghat (N: 26° 03' 59"; E: 44°
59' 03") (text-fig. 2). The microfossils were extracted by
disaggregating samples with hydrogen peroxide or boiling in
water, wet sieved, and cleaned by ultrasonic water bath.
Microfossils were imaged by Scanning Electron Microscope.
The taxonomy in this study follows mostly Loeblich and
Tappan (1987), Hughes (2004a,b, 2018), Kaminski (2014),
Talib et al. (2016), the Paleobiology Database
http://paleodb.org), World Register of Marine Species
http://www.marinespecies.org) and Colin et al. (2008) for the
ostracod taxonomy. All figured specimens were deposited in
the Geology Museum, College of Science, Department of Geol-
ogy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
RESULTS
Stratigraphy and facies
The Hanifa Formation forms a succession of small questas
above the Tuwaiq Mountain escarpment in the east of the Wadi
Rayn Quadrangle. At the type locality, the Hanifa Formation
consists of cream to tan, relatively soft, chalky limestones with
limited amounts of interbedded marl and tan clay-shale beds.
Several prominent brown oolite units occur in the middle and
upper portions, with a particularly prominent one at the top
(Bramkamp and Steineke 1952). The calcarenitic, oolitic, and
bioclastic limestones of the Oxfordian to lower Kimmeridgian
Hanifa Formation are immediately and conformably succeeded
by the aphanitic limestones of the upper Kimmeridgian Jubaila
Formation. This formation is generally composed of various
575
Micropaleontology, vol. 67, no. 6, 2021
TABLE 1
Summary of depositional textures and lithological characters for investigated sections (F.: foraminifera, Os.: Ostracoda, Ga.: Gastropoda, Ec.:
Echinoderms)
carbonate lithofacies intercalated with shale units at several lev-
els. The measured thickness of the Hanifa Formation is about
103 m near Safarrat village (El-Asa’ad 1987).
Investigations of the Hawtah member at Al-Gaddiyah revealed
a thickness of 65.39 m. The lowermost part of the succession is
soft, shaly, and rich with brachiopods and oysters. The overly-
ing layers are interbedded beds of hard limestones and calcare-
ous shales with three assemblages of coral reef bioherms. The
depositional texture ratios are grainstone (45.4%), packstone
(4.5%), wackestone (31.8%), and mudstone (18.1%). The
Hawtah member is 51.1 m thick at Jabal Al Abakkayn. The
lowermost part at this locality is comprised of predominantly
yellow to light grey, soft to friable, chippy, weathered,
gypsiferous, brachiopod-rich calcareous shales and pale yellow,
soft argillaceous limestones interbedded with hard, light beige
colored, coral bearing limestone. The upper part consists of pre-
dominant interbedded ledge-forming light golden limestones
with some pale-yellow, indurated limestones with common
presence of Pholadomya and gastropods. The composition is
25% grainstone, 6.25% packstone, 43.7% wackestone and 25%
mudstone. At Al Ghat locality, the Hawtah member is 37.48 m
thick and has 20% of grainstone, 15.2% packstone, 41.5%
wackestone and 33.3% mudstone with rare occurrences of
brachiopods, common gastropods, and foraminifera (text-fig.
2). The depositional texture and calculated ratios for the three
sections along with lithological characters are summarized in
Table 1; the microfaciesare presented in text-figures 3 and 4.
DISCUSSION
Powers et al. (1966) suggested that shallow Tethys sea depos-
ited carbonates during the Callovian to Early Kimmeridgian
time in central Arabia extending east towards Iran and to the
south across Yemen and Aden. During the Late Jurassic, partic-
ularly in the Oxfordian, ammonoids were not abundant (Nazer
1973). The Hanifa Formation was deposited on an expanded
shallow marine carbonate platform with localized intra-shelf
basins (Hughes 2004b; Al-Mojel et al. 2020). The Hawtah and
Ulayyah Members described from surface outcrops probably
represent transgressive and highstand systems tracts, respec-
tively (Hughes 2004b).
The nautiloid Paracenoceras aff. hexagonum also confirms a
middle Oxfordian age (Tintant 1987). The nannofossil species
Vekshinella stradneri makes its appearance within the Hawtah
Member and is consistent with an Early to Middle Oxfordian
age (Hughes 2004b). Subsurface investigations by Saudi
Aramco within the Khurais Field have revealed the presence of
Pseudocyclammina lituus and Alveosepta jaccardi, which sug-
gests a late Oxfordian age (Hughes 2003). Based on regional
evidence and correlations, a maximum flooding surface has
been proposed within the lower part of the Hanifa Formation
(MFS J50, mid Oxfordian) (Sharland et al. 2001; Hughes
2003).
In this study, six foraminifera and two ostracod species were re-
covered and identified from the Hawtah Member of the Hanifa
Formation namely: Alveosepta (Redmondellina) powersi,
Nautiloculina oolithica,Kurnubia palastiniensis Pseudo-
marssonella cf. maxima,Lenticulina sp., Oolina globosa,
Hutsonia asiatica and Cytherella cf. umbilica at three locations.
The identified species have been previously recorded from the
Jurassic rocks of Morocco, Switzerland, Syria, Yemen, Leba-
non Germany, France, Netherlands, and Alaska. Redmond
(1964a,b) published additional details about Jurassic
foraminifera in Saudi Arabia, later, in 1965, Redmond stated
that P. maxima was rare to common throughout the lower to
middle Dhruma Formation (Bathonian and possibly to early
Callovian), which also documented from the Bajocian (Hughes
2018; Malik et al. 2020). The well-known species of Lenticu-
lina (e.g., L. protracta,L. muensteri and L. muendensis)have
been widely reported from Bathonian, Callovian and Oxfordian
rocks of Europe, Iran, and India (Norling 1970; Gordon 1967;
Talib et al. 2016). Diverse Lenticulina species suggest a high
level of dissolved oxygen and deeper, open sea environments
where the salinity was normal (Talib et al. 2016). Alveosepta
powersi was first described from the Kimmeridgian of the upper
Jubaila Formation of Saudi Arabia. Hottinger’s (1967) speci-
mens came from the Kimmeridgian of eastern Morocco in asso-
ciation with Kurnubia and Clypeina jurassica. Later, Clark and
BouDagher-Fadel (2001) identified this species in the Bikfaya
Formation in Lebanon. Simmons and Al Thour (1994) recorded
this species from the mid lower Kimmeridgian of Yemen. Ac-
cordingly, Clark and BouDagher-Fadel (2001) concluded that it
could be considered the age range inclusive of its appearance
within the Bikfaya Formation from the upper Oxfordian to the
mid Kimmeridgian. Nautiloculina oolithica was reported from
the Oxfordian of Switzerland (Mohler 1938). In Saudi Arabia
Nautiloculina is observed to range from the Bajocian–Bathonian
Dhruma Formation (Hughes 2018; Kaminski et al. 2020; Malik
et al. 2020), to the upper Kimmeridgian Arab-D member
(Hughes 2018). The genus is known to range up to the Early
Cretaceous (early Aptian) (Loeblich and Tappan 1987).
The associated foraminiferal assemblages reported here exhibit
a mixture of open deep marine conditions with a lagoonal facies
assemblage below wave base that is typified by the presence of
Pseudocyclammina, Kurnubia palastiniensis, Lenticulina, and
Nautiloculina oolithica.N. oolitica indicates a shallow lagoonal
environment within mixed facies. The presence of the benthic
foraminifer N. oolithica associated with the trace fossils
Thalassinoides and Chondrites (Text-fig. 6) indicates deposi-
tion in a supratidal environment, suggesting a progressively
shallowing environment on the inner shelf above the wave base
(El-Asa’ad 1987) and the prevalence of warm climatic condi-
tions. Likewise, the presence of Pseudomarssonella cf. maxima,
N. oolithica and Lenticulina sp. indicate a shift in the
depositional environment from low-energy lagoonal to intermit-
tent shoal complexes (Ismanto et al. 2019). Accordingly, the
presence of these biofacies can be interpreted as either having a
wide paleoecological tolerance range, or their appearance may
be assigned to allochthonous, tidal or storm derived, causes
(Hughes 2004b).
The argillaceous limestones were probably deposited in deeper
waters where fine sediments were laid down below the wave
base and where both wave and current action were nearly ab-
sent. This is supported by the associated fauna of ichnofossils,
bivalves, gastropods, echinoid debris, and sponge spicules.
Echinoderm spines are abundant at several levels in the Hawtah
member, they are recognized from cidaroids (Paracidaris sp.),
generally, cidaroids live at almost all depths, and they also pre-
fer a hard bottom, such as reefs even in deeper offshore water
because they have shorter spines. Paracidaris sp. individuals
feed upon many benthic animals including mollusks, annelids,
foraminifera, crustacea and sponges.
576
Saleh Suliman Aba Alkhayl: Oxfordian Benthic Foraminifera and Ostracods from the Hanifa (Hawtah Member), Central Saudi Arabia
A few ostracod specimens have been found in the formation
(Depeche et al. 1987). In the present study, only three poorly
preserved specimens belonging to the genera Hutsonia asiatica
and Cytherella cf. umbilica were found in the Hawtah Member.
Hutsonia asiatica has been reported from the Bathonian–
Oxfordian of Kutch, India (Neale and Singh 1985). Also,
Cytherella umbilica was described from the upper Oxfordian of
Tanzania (Sames 2008). It can be seen that both species
(Hutsonia asiatica and Cytherella cf. umbilica) agree with an
Oxfordian age. According to the ostracod species reported, the
Hawtah Member is characterized by a well-oxygenated
highly-bioturbated environment (Al-Mojel 2020). The ge-
nus Cytherella as well as the benthic foraminifera indicate a
predominantly marine euryhaline to polyhaline setting possibly
with a slightly brackish water influence with a rapid sedimenta-
tion rate (Sames 2008; Filho et al. 2015) (text-fig. 5).
SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY
The benthic foraminifera are arranged here according to the sys-
tematics of Kaminski (2014) and Loeblich and Tappan (1987).
Order FORAMINIFERIDA Eichwald 1830
Suborder TEXTULARINA Delage and Herouard 1896
Superfamily LITUOLACEA de Blainville 1827
Family HAURANIIDAE Septfontaine 1988
Subfamily AMIJELLINAE Septfontaine 1988
Alveosepta Hottinger 1967
Subgenus Redmondellina Banner and Whittaker 1991
Type species: Cyclammina jaccardi Schrodt 1894
577
Micropaleontology, vol. 67, no. 6, 2021
TEXT-FIGURE 2
Stratigraphy and simplified lithology of the Oxfordian Hawtah Member in the three measured sections.
Alveosepta (Redmondellina) powersi (Redmond 1964)
Plate 1, figures 1, 2
Pseudocyclammina powersi REDMOND 1964a, p. 406, pl. 1, figs. 5-8,
pl. 2, figs. 5-8. REDMOND 1965, p. 406, pl. 2, figs. 1-9.
Alveosepta powersi (Redmond). HOTTINGER 1967, p. 81-83, figs.
41-42; pl. 1, fig. 15; pl. 16, fig. 20; pl.17, figs. 1-16; pl. 18, figs. 1-12.
Alveosepta (Redmondellina) powersi (Redmond). BANNER and
WHITTAKER 1991, p. 43, pl. 1, figs. 1-8.
Material: about 53 tests.
Occurrence: Al-Gaddiyah, Jabal Al Abakkayn and Al-Gaht.
Hanifa Formation, Hawtah Member, Oxfordian.
Dimensions: Diameter = 1.60 mm.
Description: Test coiled, wholly involute, very rarely uncoiled
in the last few chambers, semicircular in side view, an involute,
with broadly rounded margins, cyclamminoid, sutures curved.
Remarks: The specimens are poorly preserved, so the internal
structures cannot be seen clearly. For further details and a com-
prehensive discussion about Pseudocyclammina species of Up-
per Jurassic of Saudi Arabia see: Redmond (1964, p. 406, pl. 2,
figs. 1–9).
Depository: Geology Museum, Department of Geology, King
Saud University; slide No.: KSU.G. FO-100.
Suborder NEZZAZATINA Kaminski 2004
Superfamily NEZZAZATOIDEA Hamaoui and Saint-Marc
1970
Family NAUTILOCULINIDAE Loeblich and Tappan 1985
Nautiloculina Mohler 1938
Type species: Nautiloculina oolithica Mohler 1938
Nautiloculina oolithica Mohler 1938
Text-figure 4, G-H
Nautiloculina oolithica MOHLER 1938, p. 19, pl. 4, fig. 1-3: p. 19, fig.
6, pl. 4. figs. 1-3, 6. LOEBLICH and TAPPAN 1987, p. 71, pl. 54.
HUGHES 2018, pl. 1, fig, 2-3. GHALANDARI et al. 2019, text-fig.
6F, G. KAMINSKI et al. 2020, pl. 2, figs. d–i.
Material: Three specimens in thin sections from Al-Gaddiyah.
Description: Test small, planispiral and involute, with numer-
ous chambers in each whorl, lenticular, globular proloculus fol-
lowed by numerous chambers that increase gradually in size,
almost square chambers in the final whorl lenticular, consists of
approximately 6 whorls of a coil, with approximately 13 low, al-
most square chambers in the final whorl, completely involute,
bilaterally symmetrical.
Dimensions: Diameter between 0.7 and 1 mm.
Occurrence: Al-Gaddiyah.
Remarks: Only one thin section contained Nautiloculina
oolithica, separate specimens were not found.
Depository: Geology Museum, Department of Geology, King
Saud University; slide No.: KSU.G. FO-105.
Order LOFTUSIIDA Kaminski and Mikhalevich 2004
Suborder ORBITOLININA Kaminski 2004
Superfamily PFENDERINOIDEA Smout and Sugden 1962
Family PFENDERINIDAE Smout and Sugden 1962
Subfamily KURNUBIINAE Redmond 1964
Kurnubia Henson 1948
Type species: Kurnubia palastiniensis Henson 1948
Kurnubia palastiniensis Henson 1948
Plate 1, figures 5-9
Kurnubia palastiniensis HENSON 1948, p. 608, pl. 16, figs. 8, 11, pl. 18,
figs. 10, 11. SMOUT and SUGDEN 1962, p. 589–590, pl. 73, fig. 16.
REDMOND 1964; p. 252-254, plate 1, figs. 1-8. HOTTINGER
1967, p. 90–93, pl. 19, figs. 30–34, 38–48, text-figs. 45, 46.
KUZNETSOVA 1996, p. 161, pl. 11, figs. 9a, 9b, pl. 12, figs. 4, pl. 19,
figs. 4, 5, 7–9. HUGHES 2018, pl. 2, figs. 7-8. GHALANDARI et
al. 2019, text-fig. 7E.
Material: 38 specimens.
Description: Test elongate, fusiform becoming rectangular, test
wall smooth and polished. The proximal end is rounded while
578
Saleh Suliman Aba Alkhayl: Oxfordian Benthic Foraminifera and Ostracods from the Hanifa (Hawtah Member), Central Saudi Arabia
TEXT-FIGURE 3
Examples of microfacies. Scale bar = 200 µm
A Packstone, Al-Ghat.
B Mudstone, Jabal Al Abakkayn.
C Algal wackstone with cf. Salpingoporella sp., Jabal
Al Abakkayn.
D Grainstone with echinoid spines, Jabal Al Abakkayn.
E Spicular grainstone, Jabal Al Abakkayn.
F Wackstone, Jabal Al Abakkayn.
G Grainstone with brachiopod spine, Jabal Al
Abakkayn.
H Foraminiferal wackstone, Jabal Al Abakkayn.
I Grainstone, Al-Gaddiyah.
J Wackstone, Al-Gaddiyah.
K Grainstone with gastropod, Al-Gaddiyah.
L Spicular wack-mudstone, Al-Gaddiyah.
M Wackstone, Al-Gaddiyah.
N Onchoidal grainstone, Al-Gaddiyah.
O Onchoidal grainstone, Al-Gaddiyah.
579
Micropaleontology, vol. 67, no. 6, 2021
the distal end tip. The thickness is approximately constant from
early chambers.
Dimensions: Length = 1.50 mm, width = 0.6 mm.
Occurrence: Al-Gaddiyah, Jabal Al Abakkayn and Al-Gaht.
Depository: Geology Museum, Department of Geology, King
Saud University; slide No.: KSU.G. FO-102.
Suborder TEXTULARIINA Delage and Hérouard 1896
Superfamily TEXTULARIACEA Ehrenberg 1838
Family EGGERELLIDAE Cushman 1937
Subfamily PARAVALVULININAE Banner, Simmons and
Whittaker 1991
Pseudomarssonella Redmond 1965
Type species: Pseudomarssonella maxima Redmond, 1965
Pseudomarssonella cf. maxima Redmond 1965
Plate 1, figures 11-14, text-figure 4, I
Pseudomarssonella maxima REDMOND 1965, p. 133, pl. 1, figs. 6-7.
Material: About 41 tests.
Description: Test broadly conical, initial part of test a short,
narrow cone increasing slowly in size. Test surfaces generally
flat in early part, slightly inflated in final whorl, surfaces
smooth.
Dimensions: Length = 0.49 mm, width = 0.31 mm.
Occurrence: Al-Gaddiyah, Jabal Al Abakkayn and Al-Gaht.
Depository: Geology Museum, Department of Geology, King
Saud University; slide No.: KSU.G. FO-101.
Suborder LAGENINA Delage and Hérouard 1896
Superfamily ROBULOIDACEA Reiss 1963
Family VAGINULINIDAE Reuss 1860
Subfamily LENTICULININAE Chapman, Parr and Collins
1934
Lenticulina Lamarck 1804
Type species: Lenticulites rotulatus Lamarck 1804, p. 188, pl. 62,
fig. 11
Lenticulina sp.
Plate 1, figsures 3-4
Material: Two specimens.
Description: Test planispiral, discoidal. Sutures radial, curved.
Chambers increase gradually in size. The distal chamber is
large, elongate to ovate and with flat part at the end.
Dimensions: Length 0.6, width = 1.3 mm.
Occurrence: Al-Gaddiyah and Al-Gaht. Hanifa Formation,
Hawtah Member, Oxfordian.
Depository: Geology Museum, Department of Geology, King
Saud University; slide No.: KSU.G. FO-103.
Family ELLIPSOLAGENIDAE Silvesteri 1923
Subfamily OOLININAE Loeblich and Tappan 1961
Oolina d’Orbigny 1839
Type species: Oolina laevigata d’Orbigny 1839
Oolina globosa (Montagu 1803)
Plate 1, figure 10
Vermeculum globosum MONTAGU 1803, p. 3, pl. 1, fig. 8.
Oolina globosa (Montagu). JONES 1994, pp. 61-62, pl. 56, figs. 1-3,
15-16. GALAL and KAMAL 2004, p. 66, fig. 5/15.
Material: Only one specimen.
580
Saleh Suliman Aba Alkhayl: Oxfordian Benthic Foraminifera and Ostracods from the Hanifa (Hawtah Member), Central Saudi Arabia
TEXT-FIGURE 4
Examples of microbiofacies. Scale bar = 200 µm.
AKurnubia sp., Al-Ghat.
B Reefal coral, Al-Ghat.
C Branched stromatoporoid, Al-Ghat.
D Stromatoporoid, Al-Ghat.
E Bivalve cf. Biostra buchi, Al-Gaddiyah.
F Gastropod, Al-Gaddiyah.
GNautiloculina oolithica, Al-Gaddiyah.
HN. oolithica, Transverse section, Al-Gaddiyah.
IPseudomarssonella cf. maxima, Al-Gaddiyah.
JLenticulina sp., Al-Gaddiyah.
K Costate gastropod, Al-Gaddiyah.
LKurnubia palastiniensis. Hawtah Member. Al-Gad-
diyah.
M Tetraxon sponge spicules, Al-Gaddiyah.
N Echinoid spine, Al-Gaddiyah.
OCytherella cf. umbilica ostracod, Al-Gaddiyah.
581
Micropaleontology, vol. 67, no. 6, 2021
Description: Test single, globular to ovate chamber, symmetri-
cal. Chamber slightly longer than wide, wall calcareous, Sur-
face smoothly ornamented with some striae near the aperture.
Aperture is terminal, rounded and has radiating grooves.
Dimensions: Length = 1.95 mm, width = 1.55 mm, max. diame-
ter = 0.98 mm
Occurrence: Al-Gaddiyah. Hanifa Formation, Hawtah Mem-
ber, Oxfordian.
Remarks: Only one specimen of Oolina globosa is found in
present work.
Depository: Geology Museum, Department of Geology, King
Saud University; slide No.: KSU.G. FO-104.
Subclass OSTRACODA Llatreille 1806
Order PLATYCOPIDA Sars 1866
Suborder PLATYCOPASars 1866
Superfamily CYTHERELLOIDEA Sars 1866
Family CYTHERELLIDAE Sars 1866
Cytherella Jones 1849
Type species: Cytherina ovata Roemer 1840
Cytherella cf. umbilica Bate 1975
Plate 1, figures 15a-b
Cytherella umbilica BATE 1975, p. 173, pl. 1, figs. 12-14.
Material: Two specimens.
Description: Valve elongate, subovate, with maximum thick-
ness in the posterior part, gradually reduces towards margin.
Anterior end high, symmetrically rounded. Posterior end nearly
of the same height as anterior, with the upper part more sharply
rounded than the lower end. Dorsal margin convex, ventral
margin slightly convex. Surface of the valve smooth. Ventral
posterior margin more sharply rounded than the dorso-ventral
margin.
Dimensions: Length = 0.68 mm, width = 0.33 mm.
Occurrence: Al-Gaddiyah and Jabal Al Abakkayn.
Depository: Geology Museum, Department of Geology, King
Saud University; slide KSU.G. OS-1203-1204.
Order PODOCOPIDA Muller 1894
Suborder PODOCOPINA Sars 1866
Superfamily CYTHERACEA Baird 1850
Family CYTHERIDAE Baird 1850
Subfamily PROTOCYTHERINAE Baird 1850
Hutsonia Swain 1946
Hutsonia asiatica Neale and Singh 1985
Plate 1, figure 16
Hutsonia asiatica NEALE and SINGH 1985, p. 357, pl. 3, fig. 3-4.
Material: Two specimens.
Description: Carapace elongate in lateral view, slightly tapering
towards the posterior. Highest point of carapace at anterior car-
dinal angle. Surface ornamentation consists of reticulation and
subordinate ribs. Ventro-lateral ridge weak in the posterior part.
Anterior marginal rim elevate. Internal details not seen.
Dimensions: Length = 0.59 mm, width = 0.30 mm.
Occurrence: Al-Gaddiyah and Jabal Al Abakkayn.
Depository: Geology Museum, Department of Geology, King
Saud University; slide KSU.G. OS-1201.
582
Saleh Suliman Aba Alkhayl: Oxfordian Benthic Foraminifera and Ostracods from the Hanifa (Hawtah Member), Central Saudi Arabia
TEXT-FIGURE 5
Bioturbated mixed facies model of an Oxfordian lagoonal inter-shelf environment supported with selected foraminiferal and ostracod species (modified
after Hughes 2004b).
CONCLUSIONS
All the above taxa provide clear evidence of generally quiet and
shallow water, but some possibly indicate higher energy shal-
low water conditions. Generally, deeper open marine conditions
below the wave base are typified by the presence of Lenticulina
sp., Kurnubia sp., and Nautiloculina oolithica. Open marine ag-
glutinated foraminifera that include Pseudocyclammina sp.,
Kurnubia sp. and Nautiloculina oolithica typify moderately
deep marine conditions. The shoal complex includes both lami-
nated and branched stromatoporoids, of which the laminated
form is interpreted as being typical of the distal, higher energy
shoal, probably above wave base. A deep lagoonal environment
is interpreted for the Kurnubia cf. palastiniensis and
Nautiloculina oolithica dominated assemblage. In the studied
sections, no shallow marine miliolid-dominated sediments have
yet been encountered. With regard to age, the identified species
suggest that the Hawtah Member can be assigned an Oxfordian
age.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author is grateful to Prof. Dr. Abdulmalik El-Khayal, King
Saud University for supervising this work, helpful suggestions,
guiding in field trips, corrections, detailed suggestions and
comments to the manuscript. The author gratefully acknowl-
edges the financial support from KSU, King Abdulaziz City for
Science and Technology (KACST) and the Ministry of Educa-
tion. Thanks are also due to Prof. Dr. Okla, Mr. Hussain Salem
(KSU), Wyn Hughes (Applied Microfacies Ltd.), John
Whittaker, Noel Morris,Clive Jones and Ellis Owen (Natural
History Museum, London) for their numerous stimulating dis-
cussions and helpful suggestions. Dr. Lamidi Babalola
(KFUPM), Septriantri Chan (KFUPM) and Muhammad Malik
(KFUPM) kindly reviewed the paper. I also thank Prof. Michael
Kaminski (KFUPM) for assistance with the literature and for
editing the manuscript.
REFERENCES
ABALKHAIL, S. S., 2005. Biostratigraphy of Lower Hanifa Formation
(Hawtah Member) central Saudi Arabia. M.Sc. Thesis. King Saud
University. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
ALMERAS, Y., 1987. Les Brachiopodes du Lias-Dogger: Paleontologie
et Biostratigraphie. Geobios,Memoir Special, 9: 161–219.
AL-MOJEL, A., RAZIN, P. and DERA, G., 2020. High-resolution
sedimentology and sequence stratigraphy of the Oxfordian-Kim-
meridgian, Hanifa, Jubaila and Arab outcrops along Jabal Tuwaiq,
Central Saudi Arabia. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 165: 1–26.
BANNER, F. T. and WHITTAKER, J. E., 1991. Redmond’s new lituolid
foraminifera from Mesozoic of Saudi Arabia. Micropaleontology,37
(1): 41–59.
BANNER, F. T., SIMMONS, M. D. and WHITTAKER, J. E., 1991. The
Mesozoic Chrysalidindae (Foraminifera, Textulariacea) of the Mid-
dle East: the Redmond (Aramco) taxa and their relatives. Bulletin of
Britain Museum of Natural History (Geology), 47 (2): 101–152.
BATE, R. H., 1975. Ostracods from Callovian to Tithonian sediments of
Tanzania. East African Bulletin British Museum (Natural History),
26 (5): 161–223.
BRAMKAMP, R. A. and STEINEKE, M. 1952. Part 1. Stratigraphical
Introduction. In: Arkell, W. J., Ed., Jurassic ammonites from Jebel
Tuwaiq, central Arabia. Royal Society London Philosophical Trans-
actions, Series B, 36: 242–256.
CLARK, G. N. and BOUDAGHER-FADEL, K. M., 2001. The larger
benthonic foraminifera and stratigraphy of the Upper Jurassic/Lower
Cretaceous of central Lebanon. Revue de Micropaléontologie, 44 (3):
215–232.
COLIN, J., DEJAXB, J., and GÈZEC, R., 2008. Ostracodes of the
Bhanness Formation, Kimmeridgian (Upper Jurassic) of Central
Lebanon: Taxonomy, palaeoecology and palaeobiogeography.
Annales de Paléontologie, 94 (1): 13–27.
583
Micropaleontology, vol. 67, no. 6, 2021
TEXT-FIGURE 6
1. Thalassinoides sp., Y-shaped branched burrows. 2. Chondrites sp., open branched burrow system.
DE MATOS, J. E. and HULSTRAND, R. F., 1994. Regional
characterstics and depositional sequences of the Oxfordian and
Kimmeridgian, Abu Dhabi. In: Al-Husseini, M. I., Ed., Middle East
Petroleum Geosciences, GEO94. Manama: Gulf PetroLink, 1:
346–356.
DEPECHE, F., LE NINDER, Y., MANIVIT, J. and VASLET, D., 1987.
Le Ostracodes Du Jurassique D’Arabie Saudite centrale: systim-
atique, repartition stratigraphique et paleogeographique. Geobios,
Memoire Special, 9: 221–275.
EL-ASA’AD, G.M.A. 1987. Rudist faunas from the Late Cretaceous of
Central Saudi Arabia. Journal of the College of Science, King Saud
University, 18 (1): 53–71.
———, 1991. Oxfordian Hermatypic Corals from central Saudi Arabia.
Geobios, 42: 267–287.
EL-SABBAGH, A. M., EL-HEDENY, M. M. and MANSOUR, A. S.,
2017. Paleoecology and paleoenvironment of the Middle–Upper Ju-
rassic sedimentary succession, central Saudi Arabia. Proceedings of
the Geologists’ Association, 128: 340–359.
ENAY, R., LE NINDRE, Y. M., MANGOLD, C., MANIVIT, J. and
VASLET, D., 1986. The Jurassic central Saudi Arabia; new data on
lithostratigraphy units, Paleo-invironments, ammonite fauna, ages
and correlations. Saudi Arabian Deputy Ministry for Mineral Re-
sources, Jeddah, Technical Record BRGM-TR-06-3.
–––––, 1987. Arrivals of Arabian origin among ammonite faunas of Mo-
rocco during the Bajocian–Bathonian. Paleogeography, Paleo-
climatology, Palaeoecology, 61: 107–120.
FILHO, M. A B., ENELISE, P., PIOVESAN, K., FAUTH, G. and
SRIVASTAVA, N. K, 2015. Paleoenvironmental interpretation
through the analysis of ostracodes and carbonate microfacies: study
of the Jandaíra Formation, Upper Cretaceous, Potiguar Basin. Bra-
zilian Journal of Geology, 45 (1): 23–34.
FALLATAH, M. I. and KERANS, C., 2018. Stratigraphic evolution of
the Late Jurassic Hanifa Formation along the Tuwaiq Escarpment,
Saudi Arabia: Evidence for a carbonate ramp system. Sedimentary
Geology, 363: 152–180.
GALAL, G. and KAMAL, S., 2004. Benthic Foraminifera from the
Callovian Middle Jurassic Tuwaiq Formation, Central Saudi Arabia.
Journal of the Faculty of Science, 13: 57–72.
GHALANDARI, Z., VAHIDINIA, M. and MOUSAVI-HARAMI, S. R.
2019. Jurassic biostratigraphy in the Persian Gulf, South of Iran.
Micropaleontology, 65 (5), 449–458.
GORDON, W.A., 1967. Foraminifera from the Callovian (Middle Juras-
sic) of Brora, Scotland. Micropaleontology, 13 (4): 445–464.
HENSON, F. R. S., 1948. New Trochamminidaeand Verneulinidae from
the Middle East. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 11, 14:
605–630.
HOTTINGER, L., 1967. Foraminifères imperforés du Mésozoique
marocain. Mémoires Service Géologique du Maroc, 209: 1–129.
HUGHES, G. W., 2003. Jurassic Carbonates of SaudiArabia, FieldTrip
Guide Book, Geological Technical Services Division,Technical
Memorandum, 31. Saudi Aramco.
–––––, 2004a. Palaeoenvironmental and sequence stratigraphic implica-
tions of Pseudocyclammina lituus events in the Upper Jurassic
(Oxfordian), Hanifa Formation of Saudi Arabia, In: Bubik, M. and
Kaminski, M.A., Eds., 2004. Proceedings of the Sixth International
Workshop on Agglutinated Foraminifera. Grzybowski Foundation
Special Publication, 8: 209–216.
–––––, 2004b. Middle to Upper Jurassic Saudi Arabian carbonate petro-
leum reservoirs: biostratigraphy, micropalaeontology and palaeo-
environments. GeoArabia, 9 (3): 79–114.
–––––, 2018. A new thin-section based micropaleontological bio-
zonation for the Saudi Arabian Jurassic carbonates. Micropale-
ontology, 64 (5-6): 331–364.
584
Saleh Suliman Aba Alkhayl: Oxfordian Benthic Foraminifera and Ostracods from the Hanifa (Hawtah Member), Central Saudi Arabia
PLATE 1
Scale bar = 200 µm
1-2 Alveosepta (Redmondellina) powersi, lateral views, 1.
Locality: Al-Gaddiyah. 2. locality: Jabal Al Abak-
kayn.
3-4 Lenticulina sp., lateral views, 1. Locality: Al-Gad-
diyah. 2. Locality: Al-Ghat.
5-9 Kurnubia palastiniensis, lateral views, 5-6. Locality:
Al-Gaddiyah. 7-8. Locality: Al-Ghat. 9. Locality:
Jabal Al Abakkayn.
10 Oolina globosa, lateral view, Locality: Al-Gaddiyah.
11-14 Pseudomarssonella cf. maxima lateral views, 11-12.
Locality: Jabal Al Abakkayn; 13. Locality: Al-Gad-
diyah; 14. Locality: Al-Gaht.
15 Cytherella cf. umbilica, lateral views, Locality:
Al-Gaddiyah.
16 Hutsonia asiatica, lateral view, Locality: Jabal Al
Abakkayn.
Micropaleontology, vol. 67, no. 6, 2021 585
Saleh Suliman Aba Alkhayl Plate 1
HUGHES, G. W., VAROL, O. and AL-KHALID, M., 2008. Late
Oxfordian micropalaeontology, nannopalaeontology and
palaeoenvironments of Saudi Arabia. GeoArabia, 13 (2): 15–46.
ISMANTO, A. W, CHAN, S. A., BABALOLA, L. O., KAMINSKI, M.
A., AL-RAMADAN, K. A. and ABDULLATIF, O. M, 2019.
Microfacies, biofacies, and depositional environments of the
Bajocian–Bathonian Middle Dhruma carbonates, central Saudi Ara-
bia. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 108: 2577–2601.
KAMINSKI, M. A., 2014. The year 2010 classification of the aggluti-
nated foraminifera. Micropaleontology, 60 (1): 89–108.
KAMINSKI, M. A., AMAO, A. O., BABALOLA, L. O., BALC, R.,
CHAN, S. A., GULL, H. M., BU KHAMSIN, A. and MALIK, M.
A., 2020. Benthic foraminiferal assemblages from Maximum Flood-
ing Surface J30, Middle Jurassic Dhruma Formation, Saudi Arabia.
Stratigraphy, 17 (4): 279–292.
KUZNETSOVA, K. I., GRIGELIS, A. A. and ADJAMIAN, J., 1996.
Zonal Stratigraphy and Foraminifera of the Tethyan Jurassic (East-
ern Mediterranean). Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Publishers,
256 pp.
LOEBLICH, A. R. and TAPPAN, H., 1987. Foraminiferal genera and
their classification. New York:Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1–970.
MALIK, M. H., BABALOLA, L. O., AL-RAMADAN, Kh. and
KAMINSKI, M. A. 2020. Integrated Micropaleontology, Sediment-
ology and Sequence Stratigraphy of the Middle Jurassic D5-D6
Members of the Dhruma Formation, Central Saudi Arabia.
Micropaleontology, 66 (6): 519–547.
MOHLER, W., 1938. Mikropaläontologische Untersuchungen in der
nordschweizerischen Juraformation. Schweizerische Paläonto-
logische Abhandlung, 60: 1–53.
———, 1982. Sedimentation and environmental analysis of Hanifa For-
mation (Upper Jurassic) in Central Saudi Arabia. 11th National con-
gress on Sedimentology (Abstract), Hamilton, Ontario, Canada:
154–155 pp.
MOSHRIF, M., A. and AL-ASA`AD, G. A., 1984. Sedimentation and
environmental interpretation of Hanifa Formation (Upper Jurassic)
central Saudi Arabia. Journal of King Saud University, 15 (2):
479–504.
NAZER, N. M., 1973. Middle and Upper Jurassic Terebratulida from
Saudi Arabia. PhD. Thesis, University of Wales, Swansea, 1–260 pp.
NEALE, J. W. and SINGH, P., 1985. Jurassic Ostracoda from theBanni
well n. 2, Kutch India. Revista Española de Micropaleontologia, 17
(3): 347–372.
NORLING, E., 1970. Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous stratigraphy of the
Rydebäck–Fortuna borings in Southern Sweden. Geologiska
Föreningen i Stockholm Förhandlingar, 92 (3): 261–287.
OKLA, S. M., 1983. Microfacies of Hanifa Formation (Upper Jurassic)
Central Tuwaiq Mountain. Journal of King Saud University, 14 (1):
121–142.
POWERS, R. W., RAMIREZ, L. F., REDMOND, C. D. and ELBERG,
E. L., 1966. Geology of the Arabian Peninsula, Sedimentary Geology
of Saudi Arabia. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 560D,
147 pp.
POWERS, R., W., 1968. Lexique Stratigraphic International, 3, Centre
National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, 171 pp.
REDMOND, C. D., 1964a. The foraminiferal family Pfenderinidae in
the Jurassic of Saudi Arabia. Micropaleontology, 10 (2): 251–263.
–––––, 1964b. Lituolid foraminifera from Jurassic and Cretaceous of
Saudi Arabia. Micropaleontology, 10 (4): 405–414.
–––––, 1965. Three new genera of foraminifera from the Jurassic of
Saudi Arabia. Micropaleontology, 11 (2): 133–140.
SAMES, B., 2008. Application of Ostracoda and Charophyta from the
Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous Tendaguru formation at Tendaguru,
Tanzania (East Africa) Biostratigraphy, palaeobiogeography and
palaeoecology. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecol-
ogy, 264: 213–229.
SHARLAND, P. R., ARCHER, R., CASEY, D. M., DAVIES, R. B.,
HALL, S. H., HEWARD, A. P., HORBURY, A. and SIMMONS, M.
D., 2001. Arabian plate sequence stratigraphy. GeoArabia Special
Publication, 2, 370 pp
SIMMONS, M. D. and AL-THOUR K., 1994. Micropalaeontological
biozonation of the Ainrau Series (Jurassic) in the Sana’a Region, Ye-
men Republic. In: M.D. Simmons, Ed., Micropalaeontology and Hy-
drocarbon Exploration in the Middle East, 43–61. London:
Chapman and Hall.
SMOUT, A. H. and SUGDEN, W., 1962. New information on the
foraminiferal genus Pfenderina.Palaeontology, 4 (4): 581–591.
TALIB,A., WASIMS. M. and SHARMA B., 2016. Benthic foraminifera
from Black Limestone Member, Habo Formation, Habo Dome,
Kutch, India: age and palaeoecologic implications. Arabian Journal
of Geosciences, 9: 263: 1–13.
TINTANT, H., 1987. Les Nautiles du Jurassique D’Arabie Saudite.
Geobios, Memoir Special, 9: 67–159.
VASLET, D., DELFOUR, J., MANIVIT, J., LE NINDRE, Y.-M.,
BROSSE, J.-M. and FOURNIQUET, J., 1983. Geologic map of the
Wadiar Rayn Quadrangle sheet 23H, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (with
text). Saudi Arabian Deputy Ministry Mineral Resources, Geo-
science Map GM-63, scale 1/250000.
ZAKHERA, M., EL-HEDENY, M., EL-SABBAGH, A. and AL
FARRAJ, S., 2017. Callovian–Oxfordian bivalves from central
Saudi Arabia: Systematic paleontology and paleobiogeography.
Journal of African Earth Sciences, 130: 60–75.
586
Saleh Suliman Aba Alkhayl: Oxfordian Benthic Foraminifera and Ostracods from the Hanifa (Hawtah Member), Central Saudi Arabia
... Several authors (Hughes, 2004(Hughes, , 2018Hughes et al., 2008;Alkhayl, 2021) presented detailed descriptions of the Hanifa Formation biofacies in Central Saudi Arabia. The lower member of the Hanifa Formation (Hawtah Member) is dated as early-middle Oxfordian (Fischer et al., 2001;Hughes et al., 2008). ...
Article
Strata deposited in middle carbonate ramps are often highly burrowed. Such strata are easy to recognize in the stratigraphic record and have been recorded from numerous stratigraphic sections worldwide. However, the spatial patterns of these strata are poorly known, despite being intervals of flow zones in many hydrocarbon reservoirs and water aquifers. In this study, we trace one stratum (in the upper Hanifa Formation, central Saudi Arabia) that was deposited in the middle carbonate ramp of the Late Jurassic for ~21 km, cored it in three localities, and investigated its spatial stratigraphic, sedimentological and ichnological patterns by field investigation and laboratory analysis (petrographic analysis and computer tomography (CT) scanning). The results of the field investigation show that the stratum has a similar spatial stratigraphic pattern over the study area (sharp contacts with the underlying and overlying strata), suggesting one depositional cycle product. Nevertheless, the laboratory analysis revealed that the stratum varies spatially and distinctly in rock composition, burrow percentage (BP), and burrowing style, suggesting various controls on its rock texture. The bottom interval of the stratum comprises wackestone and packstone rock texture which are interpreted as a product of bio-retexturing that took place at the time of the initial flooding stage of the deposition cycle. In the middle (5% to 10% BP) and upper intervals (20% to 40% BP), the stratum has mudstone and wackestone host rock matrix penetrated by a Thalassinoides burrow network (pipe framework) with passive infills (grain-dominated carbonates). The stratum exhibits both vertical and lateral variations in burrow percentage and burrowing styles, which are interpreted to be controlled by variations in bathymetry due to sea-level change and seafloor topography. Such variations influenced the rock texture of the studied stratum and would eventually control the spatial patterns of its petrophysical properties. The results provide insights into the nature and controls on the spatial patterns of burrowed strata of a middle ramp carbonate, patterns that can be similar to many hydrocarbon reservoirs and can be used to predict the distribution of petrophysical properties.
Article
Subsurface reservoirs with Thalassinoides are well known. Using a CT scan of an 18.5 cm-diameter core (top cross section, 267.21 cm²; length, 26.5 cm) with Thalassinoides, this study demonstrates the scale dependence of sampling, and variables important in selecting representative sample dimensions for modeling these reservoirs. In the CT scan, 40 vertical square prism subsamples were extracted with cross sectional area ranging from 1.44 cm² to 92.16 cm². The results illustrate the scale dependence and sampling biases on Thalassinoides morphology, burrow percentage (BP), and connectivity of burrows from the top to bottom of subsamples (a proxy for permeability). Analysis of the entire scan shows a BP of ∼38%. The 40 subsamples vary in BP from 7% to 44% with the smallest cross sections showing the expected highest variance, but also showing the lowest mean BP. This illustrates that small-diameter vertical subsamples are likely to under sample Thalassinoides networks. In the full core, Thalassinoides connects across the top and bottom. Subsample cross sections >51.84 cm² have 100% probability of showing this, whereas subsample cross sections <12.96 cm² have 0% probability of showing this. To find the dimensions of representative samples to model Thalassinoides-bearing reservoirs, burrow diameter, BP, vertical length of sample, and core diameter must all be considered.
Article
Full-text available
An optimization experiment with different acid concentrations was carried out to assess the use of acid to minimum sustainable limits for the extraction of microfossils from indurated limestones. Two different limestone formations of Jurassic and Miocene ages were tested. Different concentrations of acid ranging from 50–100% and processing times varying from 2–10 hours were tested for optimal recoveries. The acid residue recoveries show a similar trend for both formations. The weight percentage of residue with particle size >1 mm decreased as the acid concentration increased, especially in the 50 to 80% acid concentration range. On the other hand, the weight percentage of the smallest size particles >0.063 mm increased as acid concentration increased. This means that the higher concentrations of acid dissolve more of the unnecessary large particles while the foraminifera, which comprise the sand fraction size, are left in the residue. Although higher acid concentrations with longer reaction times yielded better recoveries than with less reaction time, we recommended a 60% concentration of acetic acid and a reaction time of 10 hours for optimal recovery of micropaleontological samples in Saudi Arabian carbonate rocks. By lowering the recommended concentration, the consumption of acid is reduced without compromising the recovery of microfossils. • Acetic acid leaching method is applied on two different age limestone samples to extract foraminifera. • Different concentrations of acetic acid are tried and tested, and consensus is made on an optimum concentration of 60% for a submersion time of 10 hours. • The sample recoveries are optimal while using this concentration for a time of 10 hours.
Article
Full-text available
The Middle Jurassic Dhruma Formation of Saudi Arabia is of economic importance because it contains three hydrocarbon reservoirs. We report the first record of physically extracted benthic foraminiferal assemblages from the Middle Jurassic D5 and D6 member outcrops near Riyadh, Central Saudi Arabia, using the acetic acid method. This study of Middle Jurassic limestone units is intended to improve our understanding about the depositional environments of the area and related bio-events. Microfossils such as foraminifera are important in this aspect in that they can be recovered from core samples where entire macrofossils such as ammonites are rare. This study focuses on the taxonomy and biostratigraphy of the foraminifera and examines their contribution to the previously established Jurassic biozonation. A total of 35 species belonging to 19 genera are identified. Ten sedimentological facies showing depositional energy variations from deep marine muds to shallow high-energy oolitic grainstones are identified. The extracted foraminifera are tied to the stratigraphic and sedimentological columns of the D5-D6 member outcrop. The depositional environment model of this portion of the formation is interpreted to be an open marine ramp setting.
Article
Full-text available
The benthic foraminiferal have been studied from mudstone-wackestones of the D5 Unit of the Dhruma Formation that represent the Middle Jurassic J30 maximum flooding surface of Sharland et al. (2001). The benthic assemblage consists of a mixture of smaller agglutinated species, Haplophragmoides, Kutsevella, Sculptobaculites, Trochammina), and calcareous species (Nautiloculina, nodosariids, ophthalmidiids, polymorphinids, and spirillinids) without any larger foraminifera. The assemblage is indicative of open-marine midshelf conditions, and contains a number of cosmopolitan taxa that are known from the Middle Jurassic in other areas of the Tethys. The recovery of open-marine and cosmopolitan smaller benthic foraminifera in the D5 Unit of the Dhruma Formation provides a new tool for identifying the J30 maximum flooding surface and correlating the interval with other regions of the Tethys.
Article
Full-text available
Three cliff-forming outcrops of the Dhruma Formation representing the carbonate platform in the Hafirat Nisha district west of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, were investigated to identify and understand the microfacies variability in a carbonate ramp setting. An integrated approach including detailed field investigations, petrographic, biofacies, and micropaleontological analyses was used to construct a model of the depositional environments of the investigated outcrop sections. The depositional model indicates that the identified lithofacies were predominantly deposited in outer ramp, middle ramp, inner ramp, and lagoonal settings. The presence of the benthic foraminifera Redmondoides lugeoni and Nautiloculina oolithica and the trace fossil Thalassinoides indicates deposition in shallow-water environments and the prevalence of warm climatic conditions during the Middle Jurassic. The occurrences of calcareous and agglutinated benthic foraminiferal species Pseudomarssonella maxima, Siphovalvulina variabilis, Timidonella sarda, N. oolithica, R. lugeoni, Praekurnubia crusei, Paleopfenderina salernitana, Haurania deserta, Siphovalvulina spp., Lenticulina sp., Textulariopsis sp., and Amijella amiji imply that our studied sections are situated within the Dm-2 to Dm-5 biozones (Bajocian to early Bathonian). This is also supported by the calcareous nannofossil assemblages that show a Bajocian to early Bathonian age. The depositional sequences indicate a shift in the depositional environment from low-energy lagoonal with intermittent shoal complexes in the D2 and D3 Units to predominantly shoal complex and open-marine settings in the D4 Unit, suggesting a seaward shift towards the top of the D4 Unit. The interpreted depositional settings are similar to those previously documented in the subsurface equivalent, Faridah reservoir. This indicates that the investigated D2–D4 Units outcrops are excellent analogues of the subsurface reservoir.
Article
The International Workshops on Agglutinated Foraminifera (IWAF) are part of a long-term effort to understand the taxonomy, classification, ecology, and biostratigraphy of this ancient and diverse group of microfossils. Since 1981, the IWAF meetings have been held approximately every four years in a different European country, and have produced a remarkable body of scientific literature. The 9th IWAF in Zaragoza, Spain hosted 53 scientists who gave a total of 56 contributions. The current Micropaleontology issue contains the scientific results of eight presentations given at the IWAF-9.
Article
The Neyriz, Surmeh and Hith Formations outcrop in the Persian Gulf area. Assemblages of benthic foraminifera and green algae were studied in 789 meters from these formations in the onshore middle part of the Persian Gulf, South of Iran. These formations consist of grey shales, dolomite, limestone and anhydrite. The Neyriz andHith formations are barren of fossils and the age of Neyriz Formation is Early Jurassic and the age of Hith Formation is Late Jurassic (Tithonian) based on stratigraphy. In the Surmeh Formation 18 genera and 17 species of benthic foraminifera, 5 genera and 3 species of algae, one genus of bivalve and one genus of crinoid have been determined. Five biozones are defined based on the microfossil distribution, and consist of the Lithiotis Range zone, Pfenderina Range zone, Trocholina palastinensis-Trocholina Assemblage zone, Kurnubia jurassica Interval zone and the Clypeina jurassica zone. Diagnostic larger benthic foraminifera indicate a Toarcian to Tithonian age for the Surmeh Formation in this part of the Persian Gulf Basin.
Article
The sequence stratigraphy of the Late Jurassic (Oxfordian to Kimmeridgian) of the central Arabia is based on outcrop measured sections. The sequence stratigraphic framework is extended eastward across the Arabian Basin through surface-to-subsurface gamma-ray correlations (550 km long to the east). It provides an insight into the development of an intrashelf basin in a large epeiric tropical platform. The outcrop depositional environments range from semi-arid shoreline to carbonate inner-lagoon and back-barrier lagoon. These formed an aggraded flat-topped platform with evident syndepositional differential subsidence. The Upper Jurassic successions are composed of several transgressive third-order sequences interrupted by short emersion sequence boundaries. The Hanifa Platform evolved from proximal argillaceous-limestone with low-faunal diversity to open-marine carbonate platforms with reef bearing and high-faunal diversity adjacent to a deep intrashelf basin in the subsurface. The Hanifa maximum flooding surfaces (MFS's) are placed in terrigenous-free open-marine carbonate sediments. The Jubaila-Arab-D is a conformable succession marked at the base by storm-influenced inner-platform grainstones with quartz sandstone, and proximal barren lime-mudstone. The Jubaila-Arab-D MFS is placed higher in the Arab-D reservoir in a backstepping of back-barrier high-energy reef facies. During sea-level highstand, the reef facies are gently prograding toward the Rimthan Arch leaving behind a restricted lagoon deposits consists of sabkhah/salina anhydride. These composite sequences are probably controlled by climatic driven eustasy, coupled with local tectonic disruption, as they have some similarity with other Tethyan sequence stratigraphy. For the first time, this outcrop study reveals a detailed and complete stratigraphic framework that subdivided the Upper Jurassic prolific petroleum systems into genetically related sequences that are not always obvious from subsurface data. The study allows the assessment of the Upper Jurassic tectono-stratigraphic events of the central Arabian Platform.
Article
A sequence stratigraphic framework of the Late Jurassic (Oxfordian) Hanifa Formation at its exposure in Central Arabia is presented for the first time. This study offers the first high-resolution stratigraphic framework of the Hanifa along the Tuwaiq Escarpment by measuring 15 sections (~ 770 m total thickness) over an oblique-to-dip distance of 260 km and collecting 295 samples for petrographic analysis. On the basis of these data, the Hanifa Formation can be subdivided into eight facies; 1) tabular cross-bedded quartz-peloidal-skeletal grainstone, 2) cross-bedded skeletal-peloidal grainstone, 3) bioturbated foraminiferal wackestone/mud-dominated packstone, 4) oncolitic rudstone, 5) stromatoporoid-coral biostrome/bioherm, 6) peloidal/composite-grain grain-dominated packstone/grainstone, 7) bioturbated spiculitic wackestone/mud-dominated packstone, and 8) thinly-bedded argillaceous mudstone/wackestone. The vertical and lateral distributions of these facies along the exposure define their sequence setting using the principals of sequence stratigraphy. By recognizing erosional surfaces, facies offset, and changes in facies proportions, five third-order sequences, with an average duration of 1.1 Myr, are interpreted for the Hanifa Formation. The correlation of the sequences across the study area shows that only four sequences are preserved in the north where shallow-water deposits are well-developed. Facies trends within these sequences are further illustrated in depositional models representing the highstand systems tracts (HST) and the transgressive systems tracts (TST) of the Hanifa Formation. These proposed models represent depositional settings of a carbonate ramp with normal open-marine conditions. The HST depositional model is characterized by a high-energy shoreline and depicts the presence of an offshore, structurally controlled skeletal-peloidal shoal body described here for the first time at the Hanifa exposure in the Hozwa area. This work provides a predictive framework and outcrop analog for applications in hydrocarbon exploration and development. Furthermore, a basinal setting predicted to the south of the study area is a potential site for unconventional plays.
Article
Two hundred and seventy-eight specimens of fossil bivalves were collected from the Tuwaiq Mountain Limestone (Callovian) and the Hanifa Formation (Oxfordian), Central Saudi Arabia. Of all the outcrops studied, the Khashm al Qaddiyah contains the richest assemblage of the bivalves (49 %), as regards variety and frequency; followed by Dirab (27 %), Jabal al Abakkayn (13 %) and Maáshabah (11 %). Twenty bivalve species have been identified and systematically described. They belong to fourteen genera, twelve families and nine orders. Among these species, six Callovian species; Grammatodon (Cosmetodon) elongatum (J. Sowerby, 1824), Limea (Pseudolimea) duplicata (Sowerby, 1827), Liostrea multiformis (Koch and Dunker, 1837), Actinostreon marshi (Sowerby, 1814), Eopecten velatus (Goldfuss, 1833) and Ceratomya striata (Sowerby, 1815) and four Callovian‒Oxfordian taxa; Musculus (M.) somaliensis (Cox, 1935), Actinostreon erucum (Defrance, 1821), Pholadomya (Ph.) deltoidea Sowerby, 1827 and Ph. (Ph.) socialis Morris and Lycett, 1854 were reported for the first time from the Jurassic deposits of Saudi Arabia. Paleobiogeographically, the studied bivalve assemblage has a dominantly Tethyan character and shows close relationships with Europe, East Africa, India and Iran. In addition, there are considerable links with the Middle East, North Africa and China. No endemic species were recorded from the studied sections.
Article
The Late Cretaceous rudists from Central Saudi Arabia described here can be grouped into biostrome builders and one solitary form. Shells of scattered individuals and some aggregative forms built up a rudist biostromal limestone unit (Santonian-Campanian) beneath the top of the Al-Khanasi Limestone Member of the Aruma Formation. The solitary form belongs to the genus Apricardia Gueranger of the family Requieniidae; fossils of this species were collected from the top of the Al-Khanasir Limestone Member (Campanian). The early diagenetic cementation of the nodular limestone beneath the rudist biostromal unit may have provided suitable hardgrounds for the rudists to grow on. A shallow, inner sublittoral, warm, marine shelf palaeoenvironment for the rudist biostromal limestone unit and an open marine shelf palaeoenvironment with quieter water for the solitary form is suggested. A new name (Durania assemblage zone) is suggested here for the Santonian rudist assemblage faunas from Central Saudi Arabia instead of the earlier name (Sphaerulites/Biradiolites assemblage zone).-from Author