PreprintPDF Available

The impact of the Ukraine-Russia war on world stock market returns

Authors:
Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet.

Abstract

As a topical issue, this paper studies the responses of world stock market indices to the ongoing war between Ukraine and Russia. Using daily stock market returns in a sample of 94 countries and covers the period from 22 January 2022 to 24 March 2022, we consistently document a negative relationship between the Ukraine-Russia war and world stock market returns. Our results point to a larger impact at the onset of war, especially during the first two weeks after the invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022. The reaction of global stock markets was weaker in the weeks that followed. Furthermore, we find that these effects were most pronounced for countries bordering Ukraine and Russia, as well as for those UN member states that demanded an end to the Russian offensive in Ukraine. Overall, we provide the first empirical evidence of the effect of the Ukraine-Russia war on world stock market returns.
BORDEAUX ECONOMICS WORKING PAPERS
CAHIERS D’ECONOMIE DE BORDEAUX
MARCH 2022
BxWP2022-06
The impact of the Ukraine-Russia war on world stock
market returns
Whelsy Boungou
Paris School of Business, Paris, France
Alhonita Yatié
Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, BSE, UMR 6060, F-33600 Pessac, France
BSE UMR CNRS 6060
Université de Bordeaux
Avenue Léon Duguit, Bât. H
33608 Pessac France
Tel : +33 (0)5.56.84.25.75
http://bse.u-bordeaux.fr/
BxWP2022-06
Abstract
As a topical issue, this paper studies the responses of world stock market indices to the ongoing war
between Ukraine and Russia. Using daily stock market returns in a sample of 94 countries and
covers the period from 22 January 2022 to 24 March 2022, we consistently document a negative
relationship between the Ukraine-Russia war and world stock market returns. Our results point to a
larger impact at the onset of war, especially during the first two weeks after the invasion of Ukraine
on 24 February 2022. The reaction of global stock markets was weaker in the weeks that followed.
Furthermore, we find that these effects were most pronounced for countries bordering Ukraine and
Russia, as well as for those UN member states that demanded an end to the Russian offensive in
Ukraine. Overall, we provide the first empirical evidence of the effect of the Ukraine-Russia war on
world stock market returns.
Keywords: Stock index, War, Ukraine, Russia.
JEL: H56, G11, G14, G15.
To cite this paper: Boungou Whelsy and Yatié Alhonita (2022), The impact of the Ukraine-
Russia war on world stock market returns, Bordeaux Economics Working Papers, BxWP2022-06
https://ideas.repec.org/p/grt/bdxewp/2022-06.html
Bordeaux Economics Working Papers series
2
1. Introduction
The war is expected to have a considerable impact on the global economy.
Christine Lagarde, President of the ECB,
27 March 2022.
Several months after the deployment of military bases close to the border with
Ukraine, Russia officially attacked Ukraine on 24 February 2022. The ongoing
military action raises concerns about: (i) the duration of the conflict; (ii) how
Russia will respond to Western sanctions; (iii) its potential impact on the global
economy and in particular on the reaction of global financial markets. In this
paper, we focus on the latter. In tandem with the loss of life and destruction of
property, this attack has introduced new uncertainty into world stock markets
(in addition to those related to the COVID-19 pandemic). Although anecdotal,
the New York Times
1
noted that on the day of the attack, the S&P 500 index
recorded its first correction since October 2020, i.e. it fell by more than 10% from
its recent peak
2
. To the best of our knowledge, there are no empirical studies yet
exploring the impact of the Ukraine-Russia war on world stock markets. This
paper is an attempt to fill this gap.
For our empirical investigation, we use daily data of stock market returns in a
sample of 94 countries over the period from 22 January 2022 to 24 March 2022.
Our results highlight a negative and significant effect of the armed conflict
between Ukraine and Russia on world stock returns. Although tensions
between Ukraine and Russia have existed for a long time, the responses of stock
1
nytimes.com/2022/03/07/business/stock-market-today.html
2
Other stock indices also fell after the Russia attack, such as IMOEX (-33.28%), Wig Poland Index (-
10.53%), DAX (-3.96%), FTSE Italia (-4.04%).
3
market indices to the conflict were more pronounced starting with Russia's
invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022. However, the reaction of global stock
markets was weaker in the weeks following the invasion. Finally, we notice that
the performance of the stock market indices was weaker for the countries
bordering Ukraine and Russia, as well as for the UN member countries that
demanded an end to the Russian offensive in Ukraine.
The results of our analysis are important on at least two aspects. First, they
allow us to understand the financial impacts of the ongoing conflict so that
investors, portfolio managers and policy makers can design effective financial
strategies. Second, by considering the Ukraine-Russia war, we extend the
previous studies on the relationship between wars and stock markets, which
focused mainly on the Second World War (such as Frey and Kucher, 2003;
Hudson and Urquhart, 2015; Goel et al. 2017; Richard et al. 2022).
2. Data and model
The level of our analysis is country-day and covers the period from 22 January
2022 to 24 March 2022 (without weekends). Although the start of the war is 24
February 2022, many of the world's major forces had already been planning for
it for some time and considered it only a matter of time. The daily world stock
index data was obtained from the https://www.investing.com/, consisting of
almost 3750 daily observations. We use the daily log return of each stock market
index. Our sample is based on stock market returns in 94 countries around the
4
world
3
. Data on search volumes related to the Ukraine-Russia war was
downloaded from Wikipedia Trends
4
.
Using panel data, we analyze the reaction of world stock market returns to the
Ukraine-Russia war. The panel data describes a worldwide sample of 94
countries and is estimated as follows:
     
where  denotes the log of the stock market index of country c on day d.
 represents the log of Wikipedia Trends search data in country c on day d,
related to the war between Ukraine and Russia (including words like conflict,
war, Ukraine, Russia, Vladmir, Putin). It therefore measures the intensity (or
anxiety) of internet searches related to the current armed conflict between
Russia and Ukraine (reported in Tables with "Ukraine-Russia war").
The regression controls for time fixed-effects, , absorbing a level shift for each
day, capturing the overall trend. The country fixed-effects, , absorbs the
different fixed and time-invariant levels of search intensities across countries.
The standard errors are robust and clustered at the country level. Our empirical
3
Algeria, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Benin, Bosnia-Herzegovinia,
Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cyprus,
Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia,
Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Ivory Coast, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Lebanon,
Malaysia, Malta, Mauritius, Mexico, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Namibia, Netherlands, New-
Zealand, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar,
Romania, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South-Africa, South-
Korea, Spain, Sri-Lanka, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Tanzania, Czech Republic, Thailand, Togo,
Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, United Kingdom, United Arab Emirates, United States, Venezuela, Vietnam,
Zambia, and Zimbabwe.
4
Wikipedia Trends is considered a metric for expressing public interest in a topic. High interest can
express anxiety (stress) or intensity. Consequently, it allows the analysis of stock market responses (Moat
et al. 2013).
5
analysis captures the impact of the Ukraine-Russia war on world stock market
returns.
3. Results
In this section, we present the results of our analysis on the impact of the war
between Ukraine and Russia on world stock market indices. We organize our
study in several steps by investigating: (i) the impact of the war on global stock
market returns (Table 1); (ii) how global stock market responses evolved from
the invasion (Table 2) and several weeks afterwards (Table 3); (iii) whether the
effects differed according to geographical proximity to Ukraine and Russia
(Table 4); (iv) whether stock market responses differed between neutral and
condemning countries (Table 5).
Table 1 presents our main results considering several specifications. Our results
highlight a negative and statistically significant relationship at the 1% level
between the current conflict and stock market indices. Indeed, our results show
that tensions between Ukraine and Russia have a significant negative impact on
the performance of world stock market indices
5
. This result highlights the
sensitivity of world markets to the Ukraine-Russia war
6
. This result is consistent
with previous analyses that have also found a negative relationship between
5
We recognize that a longer period of analysis would have been preferable in order to capture long-term
effects. However, we believe that our results will go some way to initiating the debate on the financial
impact of the war.
6
As a robustness check, we lag our stock market variable by one day, assuming that stock market
responses are not immediate (Kaplanski and Levy, 2010; Hudson and Urquhart, 2015). We find similar
results, not reported to save space (but available on request).
6
conflict and stock market indices (e.g. Frey and Kucher, 2003; Hudson and
Urquhart, 2015, 2022; Goel et al. 2017; Richard et al. 2022). For instance,
exploring the effect of the Second World War (WWII) on the British stock
market, Hudson and Urquhart (2015) find that the British stock market reacted
negatively to WWII
7
.
Table 1. Ukraine-Russia war and stock market index
To deepen our discussion, we investigate how the stock market returns evolved
before and after the invasion of the Russian armies in Ukraine, i.e. on 24
February 2022. To do so, we organize our sample into two subsets from: (i) 22
January 2022 to 23 February 2022 (Pre-invasion); (ii) 24 February 2022 to 24
March 2022 (Post-invasion). The results of this analysis are reported in Table 2.
We still observe a negative relationship between the Ukraine-Russia war and
global stock market indices. However, we highlight that this negative impact
was significantly greater from the time of Russia's invasion of Ukraine
compared to the period prior to 24 February 2022.
7
Taking the case of terrorist attacks, Arin et al (2008) also find that terrorism has a significant and negative
impact on global stock markets.
(I) (II) (III) (IV)
Ukraine-Russia war -1.412*** -0.889*** -1.466*** -0.858***
[0.42] [0.33] [0.46] [0.26]
Number of observations 3747 3747 3747 3747
Number of countries 94 94 94 94
Country fixed-effect No No Yes Yes
Day fixed-effect No Yes No Yes
R2 (within) 0.001 0.017 0.001 0.017
Notes: Robust stantard errors clustered at the country level are presented in brackets. ***, **, and * stand
for significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively.
7
Table 2. The impact before and during the war
To better understand the dynamics of the propagation of global shocks, we
investigate how global stock market indices have adjusted their responses as
the war persists (Table 3). To do so, we analyze the reactions of the stock
markets week by week. While we reveal a stronger impact at the beginning of
the war (especially two weeks after the invasion), this impact becomes weaker
three to four weeks after, thus highlighting a recovery in global stock markets.
All periods Pre-invasion Post-invasion
Ukraine-Russia war -0.858*** -0.224 -1.001***
[0.26] [0.36] [0.20]
Number of observations 3747 1945 1802
Number of countries 94 94 94
Country fixed-effect Yes Yes Yes
Day fixed-effect Yes Yes Yes
R2 (within) 0.017 0.142 0.016
Stock market index
Notes: Robust stantard errors clustered at the country level are presented in brackets.
***, **, and * stand for significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively.
8
Table 3. The impact several weeks after the invasion
Furthermore, we complete our analysis by assessing whether the impact is
stronger in countries geographically close to Ukraine and Russia. We find that
the stock market indices of countries geographically close to the conflict have
been the most impacted by the war (Table 4).
Table 4. Nearby vs. geographically distant countries
1 week 2 weeks 3 weeks 4 weeks
Ukraine-Russia war -0.610*** -1.121* -0.888** -0.858***
[0.19] [0.57] [0.36] [0.26]
Number of observations 2375 2811 3266 3747
Number of countries 94 94 94 94
Country fixed-effect Yes Yes Yes Yes
Day fixed-effect Yes Yes Yes Yes
R2 (within) 0.215 0.017 0.017 0.017
Stock market index
Notes: Robust stantard errors clustered at the country level are presented in brackets. ***, **, and * stand
for significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively.
The weeks after the invasion:
Nearby
countries
Distant
countries
Ukraine-Russia war -7.780** -0.901**
[3.41] [0.37]
Number of observations 724 3023
Number of countries 18 76
Country fixed-effect Yes Yes
Day fixed-effect Yes Yes
R2 (within) 0.36 0.022
Stock market index
Notes: Robust stantard errors clustered at the country level are
presented in brackets. ***, **, and * stand for significance at the 1%,
5%, and 10% levels, respectively.
9
Finally, we examine whether the impact of the war was stronger for those UN
member countries that condemned the invasion compared to countries that
remained neutral (e.g. China, India, South Africa)
8
.We still observe a negative
stock market reaction for both the countries that condemned the invasion and
those that remained neutral. However, the impact was significantly greater for
the countries that condemned the invasion (Table 5).
Table 5. Neutral countries vs. countries that condemned the invasion
4. Conclusion
This paper provides the first empirical evidence of the impact of the war
between Ukraine and Russia on world stock market returns. Using daily data
on stock returns for a sample of 94 countries over the period from 22 January
2022 to 24 March 2022, our results show significant negative effects of the
Ukraine-Russia war on global stock indices. The results of this analysis are
8
For more information on the UN resolution demanding an end to the Russian offensive in Ukraine:
https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/03/1113152
Neutral
countries
Condemn
countries
Ukraine-Russia war -0.266* -0.944***
[0.14] [0.29]
Number of observations 711 3036
Number of countries 19 75
Country fixed-effect Yes Yes
Day fixed-effect Yes Yes
R2 (within) 0.106 0.021
Stock market index
Notes: Robust stantard errors clustered at the country level are
presented in brackets. ***, **, and * stand for significance at the 1%,
5%, and 10% levels, respectively.
10
important for at least one reason: To understand the financial impacts of the
ongoing conflict so that investors, portfolio managers and policy makers can
design effective financial strategies.
References
Arin P., Ciferri D., Spagnolo N., 2008. The price of terror: The effects of
terrorism on stock market returns and volatility. Economics Letters, 101 (3),
164-167.
Frey B., Kucher M., 2003. Wars and markets: How bond values reflect the
second world war. Economica, 68 (271), 317-333.
Goel S., Cagle S., Shawky H. 2017. How vulnerable are international financial
markets to terrorism? An empirical study based on terrorist incidents
worldwide. Journal of Financial Stability, 33, 120132.
Hudson R., Urquhart A., 2015. War and stock markets: The effect of World War
Two on the British stock market. International Review of Financial Analysis,
40, 166-177.
Hudson R., Urquhart A., 2022. Naval disasters, world war two and the British
stock market. Research in International Business and Finance, 59, 101556.
Kaplanski G., Levy H., 2010. Sentiment and stock prices: The case of aviation
disasters. Journal of Financial Economics, 95 (2), 174-201.
11
Moat H., Curne C., Avakian A., Kenett D., Stanley E., Preis T., 2013.
Quantifying Wikipedia usage patterns before stock market moves. Scientic
Reports, 3, 1801.
Richard C., Burdekin K., Siklos P., 2022. Armageddon and the stock market: US,
Canadian and Mexican market responses to the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis.
Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 84, 112-117.
BxWP2022-06
BSE UMR CNRS 6060
Université de
Bordeaux
Avenue Léon
Duguit, Bât.
H 33608
Pessac,
France
Tel : +33 (0)5.56.84.25.75
http://bse.u-bordeaux.fr/
Derniers numéros Last issues
2022-05 Instability of preferences due to Covid-19 Crisis and emotions: a natural experiment
from urban Burkina Faso by Delphine Boutin & Larène Petifour & Haris MEGZARI
2022-04 Intensification or Diversification: Responses by Anti Health-PassEntrepreneurs to
French Government Announcements by Christophe LEVEQUE & Haris MEGZARI
2022-03 De l’homo oeconomicus empathique à l’homo sympathicus Les apports de la sympathie
smithienne à la compréhension des comportements prosociaux by Vanessa MICHEL (OLTRA)
2022-02 What drives the risk of European banks during crises? New evidence and insights by Ion
LAPTEACRU
2022-01 The Impact of Technical Barriers to Trade and Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures on
Trade in the Forest-Wood-Paper Sector by Bossoma Doriane N’DOUA
2021-24 Viable and ecosystem-based management for tropical small-scale fisheries facing
climate change by Helene GOMES & Luc DOYEN & Fabian BLANCHARD & Adrien LAGARDE
2021-23 Non-Practicing Entities in Europe: an Empirical Analysis of Patent Acquisitions at the
European Patent Oce by Valerio STERZI & Cecilia MARONERO & Gianluca ORSATTI & Andrea
VEZZULLI
2021-22 Why do Social Nudges Actually Work? Theoretical and Experimental Elements
from a Randomized Controlled Trial with Bordeaux Winegrowers by Yann RAINEAU & Eric
GIRAUD-HERAUD
Ernest MIGUELEZ is the scientific coordinators of the Bordeaux Economics Working
Papers. The layout and distribution are provided by Cyril MESMER.
Bordeaux Economics Working Papers series
... Cirera's findings (2021) highlight that, while firms initially face steep declines, many gradually improve by adopting digital technologies, strengthening managerial practices, and diversifying into new markets. Similarly, Boungou and Yatié (2022) underscores the immediate negative impact of the Ukraine conflict on global stock markets, especially in countries geographically closer to the conflict or strongly condemning the invasion, but with some evidence of partial recovery over time. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
This study analyzes the financial resilience of agricultural and food production companies in Spain amid the Ukraine-Russia war using cluster analysis based on financial ratios. This research utilizes centered log-ratios to transform financial ratios for compositional data analysis. The dataset comprises financial information from 1197 firms in Spain's agricultural and food sectors over the period 2021-2023. The analysis reveals distinct clusters of firms with varying financial performance, characterized by metrics of solvency and profitability. The results highlight an increase in resilient firms by 2023, underscoring sectoral adaptation to the conflict's economic challenges. These findings together provide insights for stakeholders and policymakers to improve sectorial stability and strategic planning.
... Additionally, [39] observed that stock markets reacted swiftly to the pandemic, with market returns consistently falling in response to rising COVID-19 cases.In contrast, studies on the Russia-Ukraine conflict emphasise the distinct negative effects of geopolitical tensions on stock markets. In their study, [40] identified a significant negative relationship between the conflict and the global stock market. Likewise, [41] observed a negative impact of this military action on the G20 and other selected stock markets. ...
Article
Full-text available
Employing the quantile coherency method, we analyze the different impacts of the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the global shock caused by COVID-19 on energy and stock markets, highlighting how market behaviors varied under these two crises. The findings reveal that natural gas performed better than oil during the pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine conflict in the short and medium term. In contrast, oil outperforms natural gas over the long term.
... The war caused a sharp increase in commodity prices, fueling uncertainty and reinforcing concerns about prolonged inflationary pressures (Bouri et al. 2023;Tong 2024). The conflict has disrupted the supply of critical resources such as energy (Yang et al. 2022;Yilmazkuday 2024), fertilizers (Sheth and Uslay 2023), and grains , creating significant economic challenges, in particular through a negative shock to business performance (Boungou and Yatié 2022). These disruptions have amplified cost pressures and driven inflation to elevated levels, profoundly reshaping inflation dynamics in developed countries and creating ripple effects across their economies (Bouri et al. 2023;Cheikh, Zaied, and Mattoussi 2023;Badran et al., 2024). ...
Article
How does geopolitical risk influence inflation? Using monthly data from 1996 to 2023, this study examines the impact of geopolitical risk on inflation across nine advanced economies, the USA, Canada, Belgium, Germany, Spain, France, the UK, Italy, and the Netherlands. A four-step empirical approach is employed: (1) a fixed-effects panel regression model estimates the baseline relationship, (2) a Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS) approach addresses potential endogeneity, (3) a Panel Vector Autoregressive (Panel-VAR) model explores dynamic interactions, and (4) impulse response functions (IRFs) assess the persistence of geopolitical shocks. The analysis reveals distinct inflationary patterns, showing that while geopolitical risks generally moderate inflation during non-conflict periods, the Russia-Ukraine conflict significantly heightens inflationary pressures over the short, medium, and long term, reflecting prolonged economic disruptions, supply chain issues, and market volatility. These findings offer valuable insights for policymakers, emphasizing the need to integrate geopolitical risks into inflation forecasting and monetary policy to improve accuracy and resilience in the face of global uncertainties.
... CET policy is closely linked to fluctuations in global economic policies. Specifically, the intensifying geopolitical conflicts not only heighten global economic uncertainty but also increase financial market volatility, leading to reduced lending, investment, and economic activity, thereby further exacerbating financial frictions for firms (Boungou and Yatié 2022;Saharti et al. 2024). In this context, the CET policy, as a market-driven environmental regulation policy (Tang and Yang 2020), demonstrates dual potential to effectively reduce firms' financial constraints. ...
... In early 2022, the Russia-Ukraine conflict raised new macroeconomic concerns, including inflation fueled by rising energy prices and rising interest rates Soliman and Le Saout 2024). This geopolitical instability contributed to the stock market declines across all major global financial markets, which persisted through September 2022 (Boungou and Yatié 2022;Zaghum et al. 2022). To test the SR/Islamic indices' ability to act as a hedge and safe haven for the conventional financial stock markets during the recent crisis periods (global financial crisis (GFC), European Sovereign crisis (Greek), and Ukrainian-Russian conflict (Ukraine)), we estimate the following model: ...
Article
Our work aims to compare and specify the role that Islamic and socially responsible stocks can play in times of stock market crises. For crises, we extend our study to the four crises that have occurred since 2008: the global financial crisis, the European Sovereign crisis, the COVID-19 crisis, and the Ukrainian-Russian conflict. In this paper, we study the dynamics of the correlation between Islamic stock returns, socially responsible stocks, and US stock returns for the period 2008-2022. We adopt the DCC-GARCH model to determine the best strategy to hedge a portfolio against the risk of adverse price movements in the US stock market. Our main results demonstrate the important diversifying role of Islamic and socially responsible indices for conventional US stocks and reject the role of safe haven and hedge, respectively, in times of crisis and stability. ARTICLE HISTORY
Article
Full-text available
This study examines market reactions to the US-Houthi conflict on January 11, 2024, across various markets, regions, and industries within the financial sector, emphasizing the role of military strength in shaping global financial responses. An event study methodology is applied to a sample of 3,239 financial sector companies, observing market reactions over multiple event windows: a 15-day pre-event phase and a 15-day post-event phase surrounding the conflict announcement. Cross-sectional analysis is conducted to assess how military strength impacts financial market reactions. The results indicate significant market vulnerability to the US-Houthi conflict, particularly during the period from the event day on January 11, 2024, to the post-event phase, with developed markets experiencing the greatest impact. While American markets showed mixed responses, European, Middle Eastern, and African markets faced notable negative effects due to disrupted trade routes; Asian markets also showed negative reactions, though to a lesser extent. The banking industry recorded the most adverse reaction within the financial sector, and military strength emerged as a critical factor influencing investor behavior in response to the conflict. These findings highlight the need for policymakers to enhance financial market stability by considering military strength and trade route security in risk mitigation strategies, particularly in times of geopolitical uncertainty, such as the period surrounding the US-Houthi conflict in early 2024.
Article
Purpose This study aims to underline the unique reactions of stock markets to the event of war. The paper undertakes a comparative assessment of the impact of the ongoing Israel war on selected indexes of leading stock markets. Design/methodology/approach The research design of this study is based on the autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity models (Bollerslev, 1986; Nelson, 1991) to examine returns and volatilities, the event study methodology (Fama et al. , 1969) to assess abnormal returns surrounding event days and the quantile regression approach (Koenker and Bassett, 1978) to further appraise the robustness of the results. The dataset includes principal stock exchanges collected from international markets and from the region of the war. Findings The results indicated a significant effect of the war on the volatility and returns of the selected markets. The cumulative abnormal returns revealed several distinctive findings. Among them, two seminal indications can be pointed out. First, the considerable declines to the war were identified at the event window [2, 11] for the entire sample of capital markets. Second, a salient number of stock exchanges established positive reactions during the post-event period of the war. This outcome suggests that abnormal profits are possible instantaneously after the war. Further, the results of the quantile regression analysis demonstrated that international stock markets are not showing substantial responses to the war, and regional stock markets disclosed significant positive effects. In a nutshell, the results are in line with the efficient market hypothesis. They documented the significance of wars to abnormal returns of stock markets. Research limitations/implications The findings of the paper are notable for investment decisions and portfolio management. Evidence proposed that the performance of advanced markets is favorable during the war. Investors and market participants can adopt this output to enhance investment strategies to achieve sustainable returns. Further, this paper highlighted a necessity to design policies to support financial activities in stock markets that displayed damages due to the war. Such policies call for close collaborations between policymakers and business leaders. Besides, the limitation of the research is possibly the exclusion of control variables due to a lack of data. Originality/value This study is considered the first to originate a comparative analysis of the effect of the current Israel war on selected stock exchanges. Further, it challenges findings that wars have a durable negative effect on overall stock markets. Therefore, the core results contribute prominent evidence to the steadily growing literature on the performance of stock markets during wartime.
Article
Full-text available
The threat of nuclear annihilation has never been higher than in 1962, when US President Kennedy and Soviet Premier Khruschev engaged in brinkmanship over the placement of Soviet missiles in Cuba during October 16-28. Although the resolution of the crisis was followed by a sustained recovery in the US, Canadian and Mexican stock markets, the stock market impact of the crisis itself, at first glance, seems relatively limited. Notwithstanding the fact that empirical analysis of 1962 US market data reveal a significant break on October 23, 1962, which is the day after President Kennedy's television address about the Cuban Missile Crisis, the drop on this day was smaller than prior one day declines seen in the earlier part of the year. When we focus on the 1% left tail of the distribution of stock returns, that is, just the very largest and least probable negative returns, a different story emerges, however. US uncertainty is now seen to have a significant negative impact on returns across each of the US, Canadian and Mexican markets. Moreover, the size of the negative response to the rise in uncertainty is comparable in all three cases notwithstanding the fact the pre-crisis Mexican stock market trajectory had been very different from that seen in the United States and Canada.
Article
Full-text available
Financial crises result from a catastrophic combination of actions. Vast stock market datasets offer us a window into some of the actions that have led to these crises. Here, we investigate whether data generated through Internet usage contain traces of attempts to gather information before trading decisions were taken. We present evidence in line with the intriguing suggestion that data on changes in how often financially related Wikipedia pages were viewed may have contained early signs of stock market moves. Our results suggest that online data may allow us to gain new insight into early information gathering stages of decision making.
Article
This paper studies investor sentiment by examining the impact on the British stock market of naval disasters. Since the British Empire was a world power and its navy was held in great regard, Britain was dependent on control of the sea for survival during World War Two and the sinking of capital ships was a huge blow to the fight against the Axis powers. We find that the market was only significantly affected by a handful of naval disasters which have very clear strategic and political importance. The market was generally not affected by other individual disasters or successes, no matter how emotive those disasters were.
Article
Each year, millions of dollars are reported lost due to terrorist attacks around the world. In this paper, we conduct a systematic examination of the impact of terrorist attacks on financial markets. We specifically explore the relationship between world stock market indices and large-scale terrorist incidents. We consider sixteen incidents outside the U.S. and thirty-three incidents in the U.S. We use several indices in our analysis, including the S&P 500, the 10-year US Treasury bond yield, gold prices, and several other domestic and international stock market indices. Given the physical asset losses and the psychological impact on citizens, our expectation was to see a strong correlation between terrorist incidents and financial market valuations. However, to our surprise, with the exception of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, our results show that acts of terrorism do not have a significant or lasting economic effect on stock and bond market returns. Contrary to our starting hypothesis, we find no evidence of ‘flight to safety’ behavior in any of the markets.
Article
This paper studies the effect of World War Two (WWII) on the British stock market. It contributes to the literature in several ways. First, this paper thoroughly investigates the impact of historically major events on the British stock market using a variety of empirical approaches in order to ensure a comprehensive examination of the impact of WWII on British stock returns. We utilise an event study of pre-selected historically major events, an investigation of the possible causes of the largest price movements as well as utilising an endogenous procedure testing for structural breaks. Secondly we extend the literature on behavioural finance and investor sentiment in extreme circumstances. In particular we examine the ‘negativity effect’, documented by Akhtar et al (2011) and determine whether stock returns reacted more strongly to negative events or positive events. Overall we find limited evidence of strong links between war events and market returns although there is support for the ‘negativity effect’.
Article
In this paper we investigate the effects of terrorism on the financial markets. Evidence from six different financial markets shows that terror has a significant impact on both stock markets and the stock market volatility, and the magnitude of these effects are larger in emerging markets.
Article
Behavioral economic studies reveal that negative sentiment driven by bad mood and anxiety affects investment decisions and may hence affect asset pricing. In this study we examine the effect of aviation disasters on stock prices. We find evidence of a significant negative event effect with an average market loss of more than 60billionperaviationdisaster,whereastheestimatedactuallossisnomorethan60 billion per aviation disaster, whereas the estimated actual loss is no more than 1 billion. In two days a price reversal occurs. We find the effect to be greater in small and riskier stocks and in firms belonging to less stable industries. This event effect is also accompanied by an increase in the perceived risk: implied volatility increases after aviation disasters without an increase in actual volatility.
Article
Historical events are reflected in asset prices. Based on a unique data-set, we analyse government bond prices of Germany and Austria traded on the Swiss bourse during the Second World War. Some war events generally considered crucial are clearly reflected in government bond prices; this holds, in particular, for the official outbreak of the war and the loss and gain of national sovereignty. Other events to which historians attach great importance are not reflected in bond prices, most prominently Germany's capitulation in 1945. The analysis of financial markets provides a fruitful method for evaluating the importance contemporaries attached to historical events. Copyright 2001 by The London School of Economics and Political Science