Available via license: CC BY 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 3 (2022) 429–445
Journal of the
Nigerian Society
of Physical
Sciences
Quantum Chemical Studies on C4H4N2Isomeric Molecular
Species
E. E. Etima,∗, M. E. Khanb, O. E. Godwina, G. O. Ogofothab
aDepartment of Chemical Science, Federal University Wukari, Nigeria
bDepartment of Chemistry, Federal University Lokoja, Kogi State, Nigeria
Abstract
Quantum chemical calculations have been carried out on C4H4N2isomeric molecular species using the G4 method and compared with experimen-
tal values where available, probing parameters like thermochemistry, structural parameters (e.g. bond length, bond angles), rotational constants,
vibrational spectroscopy and dipole moments. Pyrimidine was found to be the most stable of all the isomers with ∆fH0=37.1 kcal/mol. A critical
analysis showed high correlation and consistency between the computed and experimental values of all the parameters under study and therefore
providing the needed rationale to validate the values provided for the isomers which do not have available experimental data.
DOI:10.46481/jnsps.2021.282
Keywords: Isomers, Pyrimidine, Experimental, Computational
Article History :
Received: 30 June 2021
Received in revised form: 16 August 2021
Accepted for publication: 07 September 2021
Published: 29 November 2021
c
2021 Journal of the Nigerian Society of Physical Sciences. All rights reserved.
Communicated by: B. J. Falaye
1. Introduction
Quantum Chemistry is an area of computational chemistry
which could reproduce experimental chemical phenomena math-
ematically, this branch of study avails one the opportunity to
understand the electronic structures and model the nature of in-
teractions molecules undergo not just for stable molecules as
usually provided by experimental procedures but also for the
short-lived intermediates or unstable analogues [1- 4]. It has
been applied in different fields in chemistry where researchers
have been able to make accurate predictions of future reactions
[5, 6], physicochemical properties, docking, rate constants, pro-
tein calculations, calculations of potential energy surfaces, elec-
tronic structures of molecules and their isomers, molecules in
the interstellar medium (ISM) [7].
∗Corresponding author tel. no:
Email address: emmaetim@gmail.com (E. E. Etim )
C4H4N2has many isomeric species of wide spread relevance.
Pyrazines (C4H4N2) also known as 1,4-Diazines are hetero-
cyclic aromatic organic compounds commonly distributed in
nature such as in bacteria, fungi, insects and plants e.g. pota-
toes, coffee, nuts. They are responsible for the nutty and roasty
smell which is reminiscent of cocoa and coffee. These com-
pounds are used to improve aroma/flavor in food and cosmetic
industries [8 – 11]. Nucleotides (such as cytosine, thymine), vi-
tamin such as thiamine (i.e. vitamin B1), HIV drug Zidovudine
and synthetic compounds like barbitutrates all contain the iso-
mer pyrimidine [12]. The isomer pyridazine finds applications
as herbicides (such as pyridafol, pyridate, credazine), as drugs
such as minaprine, cadralazine, cefozopran[13].
It has been cumbersome studying certain molecules whose iso-
mers or themselves are unstable molecules such as the present
case. This challenge may be overcome to a certain level by the
application of computational approach which has been shown
429
Etim et al. /J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 3 (2022) 429–445 430
Table 1: Standard enthalpy of formation of C4H4N2isomeric species
Molecules ∆fH0(kcal/mol)
1,2-diisocyanoethane 92.4
1,3-butadiene-1,4-diimine 88.0
4-amino-2-butynenitrile 83.0
Iminopyrrole 62.3
2-methylene-2H-imidazole 60.1
Pyridazine 59.0
1,1-dicyanoethane 54.7
Pyrazine 41.0
Pyrimidine 37.1
to be a relative good substitute for experimental approach. Thus,
the present study aims at using computational methods to in-
vestigate the isomers of the C4H4N2group by predicting the
standard enthalpy of formation, bond length and angles, dipole
moment, vibrational frequencies, rotational constants etc., and
comparing their results with the available experimental values
where available.
2. Computational Methods
GAUSSIAN 09 suite of program was employed in perform-
ing all the quantum chemical calculations reported in this study.
The effectiveness of the G4 composite method has been re-
ported in many literatures [14-16] in addition to experience
from our previous studies [17- 23]; as such the molecule un-
der study was optimized using the G4 level of theory.
3. Result and Discussion
The possible isomers of the C4H4N2isomeric group in-
clude; 1,2-diisocyanoethane, 1,3-butadiene-1,4-diimine, 4-amino-
2-butynenitrile, iminopyrrole, 2-methylene-2H-imidazole, pyri-
dazine, 1,1-dicyanoethane, pyrazine, pyrimidine. The results of
the quantum chemical calculations carried out on the C4H4N2
isomeric species using the G4 level of theory are presented and
discussed below under the different subheadings:
3.1. Thermochemistry
The focal point of thermochemistry is energy changes such as
enthalpy of formation and many other energy related parame-
ters. Fig 1 shows the optimized geometries of the C4H4N2iso-
meric molecular species while the standard enthalpies of forma-
tion (∆fHO) computed for these isomeric species are presented
in Table 1. Pyrimidine has the least enthalpy of formation of
37.1 Kcal/mol which corresponds to the most stable of all the
isomers, 1,2-diisocyanoethane is shown to be the least stable of
all the isomers of the C4H4N2isomeric group having the value
of 92.4 Kcal/mol as the heat of formation. The experimentally
reported standard heat of formation of pyrimidine ranges from
46.1±0.5 to 47.75±0.4 [24-26], the disparity between the com-
puted and experimental values point towards the possibility of
an error in the experimentally reported value as Weisenburger
and co-workers [27]. According to them, experimental mea-
surement of heat of formation is always inaccurate and imprac-
tical. From previous studies, the G4 method has proven to be
effective in predicting the enthalpy of formation that is in good
accuracy with experimental results [14-23]. Standard enthalpy
of formation is an important parameter that can be applied for
safe and scaling up of chemical processes involving thermal sta-
bility. It helps researchers in predicting the spontaneity of a re-
action, know whether a reaction can be favourable or not and
the reactants and products quantities [27].
3.2. Vibrational Spectroscopy
Table 2 depicts the vibrational frequencies of pyrimidine (the
most stable isomer of the C4H4N2isomeric group) with the cor-
responding spectrum in Figure 2. The vibrational frequencies
and the corresponding spectra for other isomers of the C4H4N2
isomeric group are presented in the appendix (Tables A1-A3
and Figure A respectively). Table 1 contains the calculated and
experimental values of the vibrational frequencies of pyrimi-
dine. The error between the values ranges between 0.3-4 cm−1.
The computed values are in excellent agreement with the re-
ported experimental values. Thus, for the other isomers with
no experimentally measured vibrational frequencies, the val-
ues computed at the G4 level (presented in the appendix) are
believed to be accurate. The G4 composite method has also
been reported to give accurate predictions for vibrational spec-
troscopic parameters for other molecular species with experi-
mentally known values [14-23]. Among other applications, the
vibrational spectroscopy parameters are useful in the chemical
examination of the interstellar medium especially for the astro-
nomical observation of interstellar molecular species with no
dipole moment [17,20].
3.3. Rotational Constants
Rotational spectroscopy remains the most important spectro-
scopic technique employed in the astronomical observation of
molecular species from different regions of the interstellar medium.
The experimentally measured rotational constants (from the NIST
Webbook) for pyrimidine and the values obtained at the G4
level are presented in Table 3 below. As shown in the Table,
there is a good agreement between the experimental and the
computed values of the rotational constant of pyrimidine. The
Table also contains the rotational constants calculated for other
isomers of the C4H4N2isomeric group at the G4 level of theory
with no experimentally measured values. Analysis of the dif-
ference showed errors of 0.0261635, 0.0330026 and 0.0156889
GHz for the A, B and C rotational constants of pyrimidine re-
spectively. This level of accuracy suggests a good level of ac-
curacy for the rotational constants obtained for other isomers at
the G4 level with no experimentally measured values.
3.4. Structural Parameters
The bond lengths and bond angles of Pyrimidine are pre-
sented in Table 4 while Fig. 3 depicts the optimized geom-
etry. As shown in the Table, there is an excellent agreement
430
Etim et al. /J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 3 (2022) 429–445 431
1,2-diisocyanoethane 1,3-butadiene-1,4-diimine 4-amino-2-butynenitrile
Iminopyrrole 2-methylene-2H-imidazole Pyridazine
1,1-dicyanoethane Pyrazine Pyrimidine
Figure 1: Optimized geometry of C4H4N2isomeric groups
Figure 2: Calculated IR frequencies of pyrimidine
between the experimentally measured values and the computa-
tionally predicted values. For example, both the experimental
(1.087Å) and the computational (1.087Å) values for rCH bond
length. For the other bond lengths reported for pyrimidine, the
difference between the experimental and the computational val-
ues range 0.36-0.46 Å while for the predicted bond angles, the
difference between the experimental and the computational val-
ues range from 0.19-1.10 degrees. These findings suggest that
431
Etim et al. /J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 3 (2022) 429–445 432
Table 2: Vibrational frequencies of pyrimidine
Calculated Frequency (cm−1) ExperimentalFrequency (cm−1) Error(cm−1)
353 347 1.69
411 398 2.9
632 621 1.58
693 679 1.45
744 719 3.36
835 804 3.59
988 960 2.74
1009 969 3.96
1011 980 2.97
1030 1033 -0.29
1083 1065 1.01
1095 1155 2.7
1165 1158 0.85
1227 1224 5.6
1260 1356 2.78
1395 1224 2.79
1439 1356 1.95
1496 1411 2.07
1610 1465 2.55
1612 1569 2.48
3154 1572 3.36
3157 3047 3.39
3165 3053 3.51
3207 3082 3.89
Table 3: Rotational Constant of C4H4N2isomers
Molecules Rotation constants (GHz)
A B C
Pyrimidine Calculated 6.3010414 6.0983826 3.0990279
Experimental 6.2748779 6.06538 3.083339
Error 0.0261635 0.0330026 0.0156889
1,2-
diisocyanoethane
Calculated 7.4362588 2.5722569 2.0604923
1,3-
butadiene-
1,4-diimine
Calculated 23.1647044 1.3418215 1.2867453
4-amino-2-
butynenitrile
Calculated 23.0996150 1.3419073 1.2868109
Iminopyrrole Calculated 8.5048965 4.1234186 2.7770331
2-methylene-
2H-imidazole
Calculated 8.7736412 4.2378633 2.8575861
Pyridazine Calculated 6.4337599 5.9503379 3.0913068
Pyrazine Calculated 6.4337599 5.9503379 3.0913068
the bond lengths and bond angles predicted with the G4 method
for the other isomers of the C4H4N2isomeric group presented
in the appendix (Tables A4-A6) with no experimental values
will have a good level of accuracy and can be used when re-
quired.
3.5. Dipole Moments
Dipole moment is useful in determining the polar nature of the
chemical bond. It is also useful in astrophysics and related ar-
eas such as astrochemistry and astrobiology as the dipole of
a molecule plays an important role in the astronomical obser-
vation of such molecule [2]. The dipole moments obtained at
the G4 level for all the isomeric molecular species in this study
432
Etim et al. /J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 3 (2022) 429–445 433
Table 4: Bond Distances/Angles of Pyrimidine and its Isomers
Description Calculated
Value (Å)
Exp.
Value (Å)
Error Connectivity
Atom 1 Atom 2 Atom 3
rCH 1.087 1.087 0 4 4 -
rCH 1.079 1.083 0.36 3 3 -
rCH 1.082 1.087 0.46 2 2 -
rCC 1.393 1.389 0.29 3 2 -
rCN 1.328 1.334 0.45 1 1 -
aCCC 117.8 116.5 1.10 4 3 2
aHCC 120.90 121.13 0.19 2 2 3
aCCN 121.20 122.37 0.97 3 4 2
Table 5: Dipole Moment of C4H4N2isomers
Molecule Calculated Dipole
moment (Debye)
Experimental Dipole
moment (Debye)
1,2-diisocyanoethane 5.1506 -
1,3-butadiene-1,4-
diimine
3.6290 -
4-amino-2-butynenitrile 3.7238 -
Iminopyrrole 3.2055 -
2-methylene-2H-
imidazole
1.0758 -
Pyridazine 4.5926 -
1,1-dicyanoethane 4.5904 -
Pyrazine 0.0000 -
Pyrimidine 2.4133 2.33
Figure 3: Optimized geometry of pyrimidine
are presented in Table 5. The experimental dipole moment of
2.33D [29] reported for pyrimidine is in good agreement with
the value (2.41D) calculated at the G4 level. There are no exper-
imentally reported dipole moments values for the other isomers
of the pyrimidine isomeric group. However, the good agree-
ment between the experinmentally measured and the compu-
tationally calculated values for pyrimidine suggest a good ac-
curacy for the dipole moments predicted for those molecular
species with no experimental values.
4. Conclusion
The Gaussian G4 compound model has been applied in com-
puting some quantum chemical properties for the C4H4N2isomeric
molecular species. Spectroscopic parameters (rotational and
vibrational), bond distances, bond angles and dipole moments
have been calculated for all the isomeric molecular species con-
sidered in this study. The results show a good agreement be-
tween the values obtained with the G4 method and the available
experimentally measured values. This good agreement suggests
a good accuracy for those the computationally predicted values
with no experimental values. Thus, the predicted values at the
G4 level of theory could serve as useful data where there are no
experimental values.
Acknowledgments
The authors will like to appreciate the handling editor and
the anonymous reviewers for their advice to make this work a
success.
Appendix
Figure A: IR spectra of C4H4N2isomeric species.
433
Etim et al. /J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 3 (2022) 429–445 434
Table A1: IR Frequencies and Intensities of C4H4N2isomers
Pyrazine 1,1-dicyanoethane Pyridazine
Frequency
(cm−1)
IR Intensi-
ties
Frequency
(cm−1)
IR Intensi-
ties
Frequency
(cm−1)
IR Intensities
350.2454 0 142.6498 10.3325 377.4241 8.4376
436.8441 20.8309 212.9721 0.0061 378.1465 0
609.3268 0 217.325 10.417 629.7531 0.1251
718.6392 0 232.5641 0.1562 678.7734 3.7111
784.4478 0 390.8231 0.6653 773.826 26.977
813.6882 16.8768 501.3777 0.5045 784.7741 0
954.5671 0 577.079 2.0394 955.9237 0
995.7849 0 591.9736 0.0401 988.5043 0.0273
1004.4743 0 789.326 0.9436 1015.5701 6.7412
1032.2801 41.3863 924.1966 0.5222 1025.6928 0
1043.5004 0 1024.5549 3.0293 1057.3562 1.8513
1091.2542 11.3623 1077.6373 1.9773 1085.4055 1.9376
1168.3175 3.0353 1137.7852 11.4915 1094.3822 10.9875
1234.2883 3.3451 1293.1894 0.2956 1172.7042 0
1257.5615 0 1325.8192 10.5516 1198.4094 0.0296
1377.4992 0 1412.7563 0.8374 1315.9121 2.7813
1443.5577 32.5811 1489.6743 7.1366 1438.4468 17.1702
1516.3516 1.6121 1495.8979 2.9216 1480.3479 1.0699
1581.3618 0 2369.8219 1.4472 1604.0217 4.1776
1617.6288 0 2375.5886 1.0261 1608.3885 6.5778
3154.1328 0 3040.9897 0.0176 3171.291 11.3104
3154.5805 6.8491 3064.7956 7.0787 3175.4201 0.6737
3170.0288 69.5698 3150.5629 6.2676 3191.228 18.3941
3176.6122 0 3154.8613 4.5128 3205.5438 8.2119
434
Etim et al. /J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 3 (2022) 429–445 435
Table A2: IR Frequencies and Intensities of C4H4N2isomers
2-methylene-2H-
imidazole
Iminopyrrole 4-amino-2-butynenitrile
Frequency
(cm−1)
IR Intensi-
ties
Frequency
(cm−1)
IR Intensi-
ties
Frequency
(cm−1)
IR Intensi-
ties
231.2641 16.2028 222.6459 1.5177 102.9298 3.212
367.2831 5.0478 437.8852 15.624 136.5392 6.7159
545.8568 0 513.7051 0.5416 249.5854 0.2682
729.7105 0.9392 673.5182 13.329 273.9337 21.0114
757.4695 6.9218 709.63 1.5332 384.9431 30.924
778.714 0.0001 821.884 0.5162 500.8402 11.2464
893.0866 0.2762 839.2175 34.5306 575.9942 2.9544
912.9179 8.5062 878.6648 11.3524 582.7078 1.7895
915.8468 10.8072 926.5924 10.2062 699.5133 11.1841
954.3095 42.6853 967.2053 5.8961 889.2243 0.0003
961.4052 0.0001 969.8546 11.5774 895.8998 201.8104
979.8251 16.2158 993.4477 44.2831 1098.3395 26.2627
991.4666 31.7917 1058.7038 51.7342 1148.1344 4.2125
1202.2146 17.8701 1093.3592 5.4566 1183.4347 0.2291
1303.1681 6.2567 1280.4929 34.9662 1356.3555 33.0669
1346.2606 21.0282 1341.6019 75.8567 1383.0345 0.0121
1412.9732 17.8688 1353.3948 11.9765 1459.7535 5.1009
1496.1998 11.0291 1548.0035 19.6616 1669.8384 18.9874
1613.199 2.8089 1646.7243 11.3723 2258.8654 0.001
1714.8692 3.0856 1740.6104 20.5283 2396.7797 101.4735
3180.8768 0.0002 3175.7293 18.3444 3036.9215 13.0137
3196.1465 6.9809 3234.5262 3.2481 3070.8682 4.6604
3211.1464 15.5153 3266.179 1.1482 3496.6081 1.6966
3283.7487 0.0178 3434.2972 4.1245 3574.5662 3.4152
435
Etim et al. /J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 3 (2022) 429–445 436
Table A3: IR Frequencies and Intensities of C4H4N2isomers
1,3-butadiene-
1,4-diimine
1,2-diisocyanoethane
Frequency
(cm−1)
IR Intensities Frequency
(cm−1)
IR Intensities
83.6289 4.2328 78.7298 4.2564
127.629 1.9142 168.9156 0.5605
247.6388 0 192.4169 3.7141
413.9178 39.0839 262.623 0.1196
422.8897 0.0001 299.0842 0.3214
553.3442 90.5491 389.5249 0.2258
572.2602 0.0004 551.2205 13.3477
602.0439 17.4793 827.5204 7.2786
678.4837 0 859.6152 9.5185
879.0897 0.0004 1035.2344 3.9097
905.6999 99.6452 1041.9629 7.1071
1033.4248 0.0001 1091.3162 0.7493
1042.7608 612.5875 1268.8807 1.8639
1064.7913 0.0002 1304.1572 0.188
1144.81 40.0234 1384.277 13.328
1186.8856 0 1392.4053 22.9043
1291.0522 42.9681 1485.0234 17.2458
1485.9837 0 1486.765 0.1757
2123.9009 896.411 2224.3091 150.9267
2130.4724 0.1389 2226.309 166.4745
3174.8502 0.0003 3052.5648 3.5487
436
Etim et al. /J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 3 (2022) 429–445 437
Table A4: Bond radius and angles of C4H4N2isomers
Pyrazine 1,1-dicyanoethane Pyridazine
Description Cal.
Value
Description Cal.
Value
Description Cal.
Value
R(1-2) 1.393 R(1-2) 1.154 R(1-2) 1.333
R(1-6) 1.334 R(1-3) 1.470 R(1-6) 1.332
R(1-7) 1.087 R(3-4) 1.470 R(2-3) 1.395
R(2-3) 1.334 R(3-6) 1.549 R(2-8) 1.086
R(2-8) 1.087 R(3-10) 1.098 R(3-4) 1.381
R(3-4) 1.334 R(4-5) 1.154 R(3-7) 1.084
R(4-5) 1.393 R(6-7) 1.092 R(4-5) 1.395
R(4-9) 1.087 R(6-8) 1.091 R(4-9) 1.084
R(5-6) 1.334 R(6-9) 1.092 R(5-6) 1.333
R(5-10) 1.087 A(2-1-3) 178.0 R(5-10) 1.086
A(2-1-6) 122.1 A(1-3-4) 110.7 A(2-1-6) 119.4
A(2-1-7) 120.8 A(1-3-6) 111.3 A(1-2-3) 123.8
A(1-2-3) 122.1 A(1-3-10) 107.3 A(1-2-8) 114.9
A(1-2-8) 120.8 A(4-3-6) 111.3 A(1-6-5) 119.4
A(6-1-7) 117.1 A(4-3-10) 107.3 A(3-2-8) 121.2
A(1-6-5) 115.9 A(3-4-5) 178.0 A(2-3-4) 116.8
A(3-2-8) 117.1 A(6-3-10) 108.9 A(2-3-7) 120.9
A(2-3-4) 115.9 A(3-6-7) 109.5 A(4-3-7) 122.3
A(3-4-5) 122.1 A(3-6-8) 110.5 A(3-4-5) 116.8
A(3-4-9) 117.1 A(3-6-9) 109.5 A(3-4-9) 122.3
A(5-4-9) 120.8 A(7-6-8) 109.0 A(5-4-9) 120.9
A(4-5-6) 122.1 A(7-6-9) 109.3 A(4-5-6) 123.8
A(4-5-10) 120.8 A(8-6-9) 109.0 A(4-5-10) 121.2
A(6-5-10) 117.1 R(1-2) 1.154 A(6-5-10) 114.9
R(1-2) 1.393 R(1-3) 1.470 R(1-2) 1.333
R(1-6) 1.334 R(3-4) 1.470 R(1-6) 1.332
R(1-7) 1.087 R(3-6) 1.549 R(2-3) 1.395
R(2-3) 1.334 R(3-10) 1.098 R(2-8) 1.086
R(2-8) 1.087 R(4-5) 1.154 R(3-4) 1.381
R(3-4) 1.334 R(6-7) 1.092 R(3-7) 1.084
R(4-5) 1.393 R(6-8) 1.091 R(4-5) 1.395
R(4-9) 1.087 R(6-9) 1.092 R(4-9) 1.084
R(5-6) 1.334 A(2-1-3) 178.0 R(5-6) 1.333
R(5-10) 1.087 A(1-3-4) 110.7 R(5-10) 1.086
A(2-1-6) 122.1 A(1-3-6) 111.3 A(2-1-6) 119.4
A(2-1-7) 120.8 A(1-3-10) 107.3 A(1-2-3) 123.8
A(1-2-3) 122.1 A(4-3-6) 111.3 A(1-2-8) 114.9
A(1-2-8) 120.8 A(4-3-10) 107.3 A(1-6-5) 119.4
A(6-1-7) 117.1 A(3-4-5) 178.0 A(3-2-8) 121.2
A(1-6-5) 115.9 A(6-3-10) 108.9 A(2-3-4) 116.8
A(3-2-8) 117.1 A(3-6-7) 109.5 A(2-3-7) 120.9
A(2-3-4) 115.9 A(3-6-8) 110.5 A(4-3-7) 122.3
A(3-4-5) 122.1 A(3-6-9) 109.5 A(3-4-5) 116.8
A(3-4-9) 117.1 A(7-6-8) 109.0 A(3-4-9) 122.3
A(5-4-9) 120.8 A(7-6-9) 109.3 A(5-4-9) 120.9
A(4-5-6) 122.1 A(8-6-9) 109.0 A(4-5-6) 123.8
A(4-5-10) 120.8 R(1-2) 1.154 A(4-5-10) 121.2
A(6-5-10) 117.1 R(1-3) 1.470 A(6-5-10) 114.9
437
Etim et al. /J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 3 (2022) 429–445 438
Table A5: Bond radius and angles of C4H4N2isomers
2-methylene-
2H-imidazole
Iminopyrrole 4-amino-2-butynenitrile
Description Cal.
Value
Description Cal.
Value
Description Cal.
Value
R(1-2) 1.413 R(1-2) 1.437 R(1-2) 1.466
R(1-3) 1.295 R(1-3) 1.289 R(1-5) 1.465
R(2-5) 1.414 R(2-8) 1.484 R(1-9) 1.097
R(2-8) 1.339 R(2-9) 1.270 R(1-10) 1.097
R(3-4) 1.473 R(3-4) 1.486 R(2-3) 1.209
R(3-7) 1.084 R(3-7) 1.087 R(3-4) 1.365
R(4-5) 1.295 R(4-6) 1.081 R(4-6) 1.162
R(4-6) 1.084 R(4-8) 1.341 R(5-7) 1.016
R(8-9) 1.082 R(5-8) 1.079 R(5-8) 1.016
R(8-10) 1.083 R(9-10) 1.025 A(2-1-5) 115.2
A(2-1-3) 103.6 A(2-1-3) 104.8 A(2-1-9) 108.9
A(1-2-5) 113.0 A(1-2-8) 109.2 A(2-1-10) 108.9
A(1-2-8) 123.6 A(1-2-9) 125.3 A(1-2-3) 177.1
A(1-3-4) 109.9 A(1-3-4) 114.1 A(5-1-9) 108.7
A(1-3-7) 122.8 A(1-3-7) 121.5 A(5-1-10) 108.7
A(5-2-8) 123.5 A(8-2-9) 125.5 A(1-5-7) 109.7
A(2-5-4) 103.5 A(2-8-4) 106.2 A(1-5-8) 109.7
A(2-8-9) 120.3 A(2-8-5) 124.1 A(9-1-10) 106.0
A(2-8-10) 120.2 A(2-9-10) 108.7 A(2-3-4) 179.7
A(4-3-7) 127.2 A(4-3-7) 124.4 A(3-4-6) 180.0
A(3-4-5) 110.0 A(3-4-6) 125.4 A(7-5-8) 106.2
A(3-4-6) 127.2 A(3-4-8) 105.9 W1(A) 102.9
A(5-4-6) 122.8 A(6-4-8) 128.7 W2(A) 136.5
A(9-8-10) 119.5 A(4-8-5) 129.8 W3(A) 249.6
W1(A) 231.3 W1(A) 222.6 W4(A) 273.9
W2(A) 367.3 W2(A) 437.9 W5(A) 384.9
W3(A) 545.9 W3(A) 513.7 W6(A) 500.8
W4(A) 729.7 W4(A) 673.5 W7(A) 576.0
W5(A) 757.5 W5(A) 709.6 W8(A) 582.7
W6(A) 778.7 W6(A) 821.9 W9(A) 699.5
W7(A) 893.1 W7(A) 839.2 W10(A) 889.2
W8(A) 912.9 W8(A) 878.7 W11(A) 895.9
W9(A) 915.8 W9(A) 926.6 W12(A) 1098.3
W10(A) 954.3 W10(A) 967.2 W13(A) 1148.1
W11(A) 961.4 W11(A) 969.9 W14(A) 1183.4
W12(A) 979.8 W12(A) 993.4 W15(A) 1356.4
W13(A) 991.5 W13(A) 1058.7 W16(A) 1383.0
W14(A) 1202.2 W14(A) 1093.4 W17(A) 1459.8
W15(A) 1303.2 W15(A) 1280.5 W18(A) 1669.8
W16(A) 1346.3 W16(A) 1341.6 W19(A) 2258.9
W17(A) 1413.0 W17(A) 1353.4 W20(A) 2396.8
W18(A) 1496.2 W18(A) 1548.0 W21(A) 3036.9
W19(A) 1613.2 W19(A) 1646.7 W22(A) 3070.9
W20(A) 1714.9 W20(A) 1740.6 W23(A) 3496.6
W21(A) 3180.9 W21(A) 3175.7 W24(A) 3574.6
W22(A) 3196.1 W22(A) 3234.5 R(1-2) 1.466
W23(A) 3211.1 W23(A) 3266.2 R(1-5) 1.465
W24(A) 3283.7 W24(A) 3434.3 R(1-9) 1.097
438
Etim et al. /J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 3 (2022) 429–445 439
Table A6: Bond radius and angles of C4H4N2isomers
1,3-butadiene-
1,4-diimine
1,2-diisocyanoethane
Description Cal.
Value
Description Cal.
Value
R(1-2) 1.316 R(1-5) 1.173
R(1-5) 1.226 R(2-3) 1.538
R(2-3) 1.461 R(2-5) 1.416
R(2-9) 1.085 R(2-7) 1.094
R(3-4) 1.316 R(2-8) 1.095
R(3-10) 1.085 R(3-6) 1.416
R(4-6) 1.225 R(3-9) 1.095
R(5-7) 1.023 R(3-10) 1.094
R(6-8) 1.023 R(4-6) 1.173
A(2-1-5) 173.7 A(1-5-2) 179.0
A(1-2-3) 124.3 A(3-2-5) 112.1
A(1-2-9) 116.9 A(3-2-7) 109.7
A(1-5-7) 115.8 A(3-2-8) 108.4
A(3-2-9) 118.8 A(2-3-6) 112.1
A(2-3-4) 124.3 A(2-3-9) 108.4
A(2-3-10) 118.8 A(2-3-10) 109.7
A(4-3-10) 116.9 A(5-2-7) 109.2
A(3-4-6) 173.7 A(5-2-8) 109.2
A(4-6-8) 115.8 A(7-2-8) 108.1
W1(A) 83.6 A(6-3-9) 109.2
W2(A) 127.6 A(6-3-10) 109.2
W3(A) 247.6 A(3-6-4) 179.1
W4(A) 413.9 A(9-3-10) 108.1
W5(A) 422.9 W1(A) 78.7
W6(A) 553.3 W2(A) 168.9
W7(A) 572.3 W3(A) 192.4
W8(A) 602.0 W4(A) 262.6
W9(A) 678.5 W5(A) 299.1
W10(A) 879.1 W6(A) 389.5
W11(A) 905.7 W7(A) 551.2
W12(A) 1033.4 W8(A) 827.5
W13(A) 1042.8 W9(A) 859.6
W14(A) 1064.8 W10(A) 1035.2
W15(A) 1144.8 W11(A) 1042.0
W16(A) 1186.9 W12(A) 1091.3
W17(A) 1291.1 W13(A) 1268.9
W18(A) 1486.0 W14(A) 1304.2
W19(A) 2123.9 W15(A) 1384.3
W20(A) 2130.5 W16(A) 1392.4
W21(A) 3174.9 W17(A) 1485.0
W22(A) 3183.6 W18(A) 1486.8
W23(A) 3422.3 W19(A) 2224.3
W24(A) 3422.6 W20(A) 2226.3
R(1-2) 1.316 W21(A) 3052.6
R(1-5) 1.226 W22(A) 3056.6
R(2-3) 1.461 W23(A) 3096.1
R(2-9) 1.085 W24(A) 3107.6
R(3-4) 1.316 R(1-5) 1.173
439
Etim et al. /J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 3 (2022) 429–445 440
Pyrazine
440
Etim et al. /J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 3 (2022) 429–445 441
1,1-dicyanoethane
Pyridazine
441
Etim et al. /J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 3 (2022) 429–445 442
2-methylene-2H-imidazole
Iminopyrrole
442
Etim et al. /J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 3 (2022) 429–445 443
4-amino-2-butynenitrile
1,3-butadiene-1,4-diimine
443
Etim et al. /J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 3 (2022) 429–445 444
1,2-diisocyanoethane
444
Etim et al. /J. Nig. Soc. Phys. Sci. 3 (2022) 429–445 445
References
[1] E. E. Etim, A. I. Onen, C. Andrew, U. Lawal, I.S. Udegbunam & O. A.
Ushie, “Computational Studies of C5H5N Isomers”,J. Chem Soc. Nige-
ria, 43 (2018) 1.
[2] E. E. Etim, U. Lawal, C. Andrew & I.S. Udegbunam,”Computational
Studies on C3H4N2 Isomers”, International Journal of Advanced Re-
search in Chemical Science (IJARCS), 5 (2018) 29.
[3] E. E Etim, G. E. Oko, A. I. Onen, O. A. Ushie, C. Andrew, U. Lawal
& G. Khanal, “Computational Studies of Sulphur Trioxide (SO3) and its
Protonated Analogues” J. Chem Soc. Nigeria, 43 (2018) 10.
[4] C. J. Cramer, “Essentials of Computational Chemistry: Theories and
Models” 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: West Sussex, England,
(2004).
[5] C. J. Cramer, “Essentials of computational chemistry” (1998).
[6] F. Jensen, “An introduction to computer chemistry”. 2nd Edition, John
Wiley and Sons (1998).
[7] E. E. Etim, Prsanta Gorai, Ankan Das & E. Arunan, “Interstellar Proto-
nated Molecular Species” Advances in Space Science,60, (2017) 709.
[8] T. Guilford, C. Nicol, M. Rothschild & B. P. Moore, “The biological roles
of pyrazines: evidence for a warning odour function” Biol. J. Linn. Soc.,
31 (1987) 113.
[9] J. S. Dickschat, S. Wickel, C. J. Bolten, T. Nawrath, S. Schulz & C.
Wittmann, “Pyrazine Biosynthesis in Corynebacterium glutamicum” Eur.
J. Org. Chem., 2010 (2010) 2687.
[10] B. P. Moore, W. V. Brown & M. Rothschild, “Methylalkylpyrazines in
aposematic insects, their hostplants and mimics” Chemoecol,1(1990) 43.
[11] F. B. Mortzfeld, C. Hashem, K. Vrankov´
a, M. Winkler & F. Rudroff,
“Pyrazines: Synthesis and Industrial Application of these Valuable Fla-
vor and Fragrance Compounds”. Biotechnology Journal.15 (2020) 11.
[12] I. M. Lagoja, ”Pyrimidine as Constituent of Natural Biologically Active
Compounds” . Chemistry and Biodiversity, 2(2005) 1.
[13] S. Gumus, “A computational study on substituted diazabenzenes”. Turk J
Chem., 35 (2011) 803.
[14] M. J. Frisch, G.W. Trucks & H. B. Schlegel,Expanding the limits of
computational chemistry , G09:RevC.01, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT
(2009).
[15] L. A. Curtiss, K. Raghavachari, P. C. Redfern & J. A. Pople, “Assess-
ment of Gaussian-2 and density functional theories for the computation
of enthalpies of formation”. J. Chem. Phys., 106 (1997) 1063.
[16] L. A. Curtiss, P. C. Redfern & K. Raghavachari. “Gaussian-4 theory using
reduced order perturbation theory”J. Chem. Phys., 126 (2007a) 084108.
[17] E. E Etim & E. Arunan, “Rotational Spectroscopy and Interstellar
Molecules” Planex News letter, 2(2015) 16.
[18] E. E. Etim, P. Gorai, A. Das, S. Charabati & E. Arunan, “Systematic
Theoretical Study on the Interstellar Carbon Chain Molecules” The As-
trophysical Journal, 832 (2016) 144.
[19] P. Gorai, A. Das, A. Das, B. Sivaraman , E. E. Etim & S. K. Chakrabarti,
“A Search for Interstellar Monohydric Thiols” The Astrophysical Journal
836 (2017) 70.
[20] E. E. Etim & E. Arunan, “Accurate Rotational Constants for linear Inter-
stellar Carbon Chains:Achieving Experimental Accuracy” Astrophysics
and Space Science,362 (2017) 4.
[21] E. E. Etim & E. Arunan, “Partition Function and Astronomical Obser-
vation of Interstellar Isomers” Advances in Space Research, 59 (2017)
1161.
[22] E. E. Etim & E. Arunan, “Interstellar Isomeric Species: Energy, stabil-
ity and Abundance Relationship” European Physical Journal Plus, 131
(2016) 448.
[23] E. E. Etim, P. Gorai, A. Das & E. Arunan, “Interstellar Protonated Molec-
ular Species” Advances in Space Science, 60 (2017) 709.
[24] J. Tjebbes, “The heats of combustion and formation of the three diazines
and their resonance energies”, Acta Chem. Scand., 16 (1962) 916.
[25] J. B. Pedley, R. D. Naylor & S. P. Kirby, Thermochemical Data of Organic
Compounds, Chapman and Hall, New York, (1986).
[26] P. M. Nabavian, R. Sabbah, R. Chastel & M. Laffitte, “Thermodynamique
de composes azotes. II. Etude thermochimique des acides aminoben-
zoiques, de la pyrimidine, de l’uracile et de la thymine” J. Chm. Phys.,
74 (1977) 115.
[27] G. A. Weisenburger, R. W. Barnhart, J. D. Clark, D. J. Dale, M.
Hawksworth, P. D. Higginson, Y. Kang, D. J. Knoechel, B. S. Moon,
S. M. Shaw, G. P. Taber & D. L. Tickner, “Determination of Reaction
Heat: A Comparison of Measurement and Estimation Techniques”, Org.
Process Res. Dev. American Chemical Society, 11 (2007) 1112.
[28] P. Perrot, A to Z of Thermodynamics, Oxford University Press, (1998).
ISBN 0-19-856552-6
[29] P. C. Mishra & R. D. Tewari, R. D. “Study of the para-directing effect of
n-singlrt transition by isopotential mapping”, Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys.
25 (1987) 387.
445