ArticlePDF Available

Hip Abductor Strength Asymmetry: Relationship to Upper Extremity Injury in Professional Baseball Players

Authors:
  • San Diego Padres

Abstract and Figures

Background: Hip strength is an important factor for control of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex. Deficits in hip strength may affect throwing performance and contribute to upper extremity injuries. Hypothesis: Deficits in hip abduction isometric strength would be greater in those who sustained an upper extremity injury and hip strength would predict injury incidence. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Methods: Minor League baseball players (n = 188, age = 21.5 ± 2.2 years; n = 98 pitchers; n = 90 position players) volunteered. Hip abduction isometric strength was assessed bilaterally with a handheld dynamometer in side-lying position, expressed as torque using leg length (N·m). Hip abduction strength asymmetry was represented by [(trail leg/lead leg) × 100]. Overuse or nontraumatic throwing arm injuries were prospectively tracked. Poisson regression models were used to estimate relative risk ratios associated with hip asymmetry; confounders, including history of prior overuse injury in the past year, were included. Results: Hip abduction asymmetry ranged from 0.05% to 57.5%. During the first 2 months of the season, 18 players (n = 12 pitchers) sustained an upper extremity injury. In pitchers, for every 5% increase in hip abduction asymmetry, there was a 1.24 increased risk of sustaining a shoulder or elbow injury. No relationship between hip abduction strength and injury was observed for position players. Conclusion: Hip abduction asymmetry in pitchers was related to subsequent upper extremity injuries. The observed risk ratio indicates that hip abduction asymmetry may contribute a significant but small increased risk of injury. Clinical Relevance: Hip abduction muscle deficits may affect pitching mechanics and increase arm stress. Addressing hip asymmetry deficits that exceed 5% may be beneficial in reducing upper extremity injury rates in pitchers.
Content may be subject to copyright.
1
SPORTS HEALTHvol. XX no. X
1078830SPHXXX10.1177/19417381221078830Plummer et alSPORTS HEALTH
research-article2022
Hip Abductor Strength Asymmetry:
Relationship to Upper Extremity Injury
in Professional Baseball Players
Hillary A. Plummer, PhD, ATC* , Zhongjie Cai, MS, Hannah Dove, PT, DPT, SCS, ATC,
Geoff Hostetter, ATC, Thomas Brice, PT, DPT, Audrey Chien, MS, ATC,
and Lori A. Michener, PhD, PT, ATC, FAPTA
Background: Hip strength is an important factor for control of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex. Deficits in hip strength may
affect throwing performance and contribute to upper extremity injuries.
Hypothesis: Deficits in hip abduction isometric strength would be greater in those who sustained an upper extremity
injury and hip strength would predict injury incidence.
Study Design: Prospective cohort study.
Level of Evidence: Level 3.
Methods: Minor League baseball players (n = 188, age = 21.5 ± 2.2 years; n = 98 pitchers; n = 90 position players)
volunteered. Hip abduction isometric strength was assessed bilaterally with a handheld dynamometer in side-lying position,
expressed as torque using leg length (N·m). Hip abduction strength asymmetry was represented by [(trail leg/lead leg) ×
100]. Overuse or nontraumatic throwing arm injuries were prospectively tracked. Poisson regression models were used to
estimate relative risk ratios associated with hip asymmetry; confounders, including history of prior overuse injury in the past
year, were included.
Results: Hip abduction asymmetry ranged from 0.05% to 57.5%. During the first 2 months of the season, 18 players (n =
12 pitchers) sustained an upper extremity injury. In pitchers, for every 5% increase in hip abduction asymmetry, there was a
1.24 increased risk of sustaining a shoulder or elbow injury. No relationship between hip abduction strength and injury was
observed for position players.
Conclusion: Hip abduction asymmetry in pitchers was related to subsequent upper extremity injuries. The observed risk
ratio indicates that hip abduction asymmetry may contribute a significant but small increased risk of injury.
Clinical Relevance: Hip abduction muscle deficits may affect pitching mechanics and increase arm stress. Addressing hip
asymmetry deficits that exceed 5% may be beneficial in reducing upper extremity injury rates in pitchers.
Keywords: core stability; elbow injury; pitching; shoulder injury
*Address correspondence to Hillary A. Plummer, PhD, ATC, U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory, 6901 Farrell Road, Fort Rucker, AL 36362 and Oak Ridge Institute
for Science and Education, 1299 Bethel Valley Road, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 (email: hplummer47@gmail.com).
All authors are listed in the Authors section at the end of this article.
The following authors declared potential conflicts of interest: L.A.M. received grant from Major League Baseball. J.C.S. received grant from Major League Baseball. H.A.P.
received grant from Major League Baseball to support travel to meetings or other purposes. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education provided support for H.A.P. for
manuscript preparation.
Funding for this study was provided by Major League Baseball. This research was supported in part by an appointment to the postgraduate research program at the U.S. Army
Aeromedical Research Laboratory administered by Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy
and the U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command.
Disclaimer: The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this report are those of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position,
policy, or decision, unless so designated by other official documentation. Citation of trade names in this report does not constitute an official Department of the Army endorse-
ment or approval of the use of such commercial items.
DOI: 10.1177/19417381221078830
© 2022 The Author(s)
Mon Mon 2022Plummer et al
2
The baseball throw is a coordinated sequence of motion
from the lower extremities through the trunk to the upper
extremities. The hip complex and lower extremities
provide a stable base for the transfer of force in a proximal to
distal sequence.10,21 Specifically, the hip abductor muscles
stabilize and control hip motion during a pitch or throw.
Deficits of the hip abductors can negatively affect the force
transfer and contribute to poor performance during pitching
and throwing.15,24,25 Hip abduction weakness in pitchers was
related to increased knee and pelvic motion during a dynamic
single-leg step-down task.26 Specifically, decreased hip torque
was related to increased knee valgus, and increased pelvic drop
on the trail leg during the single-leg step-down task.26 Lumbo-
pelvic-hip stability deficits have also been shown to relate to
shoulder strength deficits and injuries in throwers.6,9,13,20
However, the relationship between arm injuries and hip
abductor strength deficiencies in professional baseball players
has not been identified.
Upper extremity injuries accounted for 51% of injuries in
professional baseball players in 2002-2008.19 Of these injuries,
21% occurred at the shoulder and 16% occurred at the elbow.5,19
Elbow injuries represent the highest average number of days
missed of all musculoskeletal injuries in professional baseball.7
Identification of modifiable physical factors related to upper
extremity injuries is critically needed. Despite the importance of
the role of the kinetic chain, very few studies have examined
hip abduction strength profiles and their relationship to injuries
in baseball players. In a small sample of professional players,
Laudner et al15 reported that position players have greater hip
abduction strength on the trail leg compared with pitchers.
Additionally, collegiate pitchers have similar isokinetic hip
abduction strength profiles between their lead and trail legs.23
Investigations into hip strength deficits as possible risk factors
for upper extremity injuries are needed. Specifically, exploring
the relationship between hip abduction strength and upper
extremity injuries can help inform the development of injury
prevention programs.
The purpose of this study was to determine if hip abductor
isometric strength deficits are related to the incidence of upper
extremity injuries in professional baseball pitchers and position
players. It was hypothesized that deficits in hip abduction
isometric strength would be greater in those who sustained an
upper extremity injury and that hip strength would predict
injury incidence. Understanding the relationship between
preseason hip abduction isometric strength with upper
extremity injury will provide foundational knowledge to
optimize screening for injury risk and the development of
prevention and treatment programs.
Methods
Participants
This study was approved by the University of Southern
California Institutional Review Board. Before participation, the
approved procedures, risks, and benefits were explained to all
participants. Written informed consent was obtained from the
participants. Data were routinely collected as part of 2017 and
2018 preseason physical examinations on Minor League baseball
players from a single organization. Participant data were
included for those with the inclusion criteria of (1) freedom
from injury at the time of preseason testing and (2) on team
roster for the full competitive season. Participants were
excluded if any of the following criteria were met: (1) not
cleared to participate in baseball activities, (2) currently
receiving treatment for an injury, and (3) players joining the
organization after spring training. History of an upper extremity
injury was not considered for exclusion from participation but
was assessed in the analysis. Preseason strength training
program records were not available. Standard strength and
conditioning programs for the organization were performed
during the season, but details were not available.
Sample size calculation assumed the healthy group has on
average no hip abduction torque asymmetry, size of injured
versus healthy subjects 2:3, and the injured group has 15%
asymmetry as the cutoff to increase risk of injury.14 The standard
deviation (SD) can vary; we performed a sample size calculation
on a range of SDs (5%-20%), resulting in a required minimum
sample size of 25 injured participants (Table 1).
Procedures
Data were collected at the organization’s Minor League training
facility. A health history questionnaire was used to collect
information regarding current upper extremity injury status and
upper extremity overuse injury history from the past year.
Specific injury questions included the following: body part
injured, injury diagnosis, time lost due to the injury, and upper
extremity surgical history. Demographic data of age, height,
weight, position, throwing arm, and years of Minor League
Baseball participation were recorded.
Hip Abduction Isometric Strength
Strength was assessed with the participants in a side-lying
position with the top leg fully extended and in line with the
trunk. A pillow was placed between the participant’s legs, so
the testing leg was in a neutral hip abduction. A strap was
placed just proximal to the iliac crest and secured firmly around
the underside of the table to stabilize the participant’s trunk
(Figure 1). A handheld dynamometer (HHD) (MicroFet 2,
Hoggan Scientific) was used to obtain bilateral strength
measurements. The HHD was placed 5 cm proximal to the
lateral knee joint line on the top leg and a stabilization strap
was placed over the HHD and around the table.11 Once
positioned, the participants performed 2 maximal effort
isometric contractions against the HHD for 5 seconds, measured
in newtons (N). Leg length in meters (m) was measured from
the greater trochanter to the placement of the HHD, and then
multiplied by isometric strength to present normalized hip
abduction torque (N·m). Hip abduction strength ratio was
calculated by dividing the trail leg strength by the lead leg
strength and then multiplied by 100 to represent the percent of
SPORTS HEALTHvol. XX no. X
3
hip asymmetry. Two trials were measured bilaterally, and the
average was used for data analysis. One minute of rest was
provided between trials. The lead leg is the leg contralateral to
the throwing arm, and the trail leg is ipsilateral to the throwing
arm. Test-retest reliability for hip abduction isometric strength
was established before data collection. Interclass correlation
coefficient (3, 2), standard error of the mean, and minimal
detectable change (MDC90) calculated for hip abduction
isometric strength were 0.98, 18.6 N·m, and 26.1 N·m,
respectively.
Injury Tracking
All players who reported upper extremity pain were examined
and diagnosed by the sports medicine staff, and injuries were
recorded. An upper extremity–related injury was defined as (1)
occurred as a result of baseball participation, (2) missed at least
1 day of practice or a game because of the injury, and (3)
diagnosed as a related injury of any shoulder, elbow, or wrist
muscle, joint, tendon, bone, and nerve-related pain of the
throwing arm. Injuries occurring outside of baseball-related
training were excluded. Upper extremity injuries were recorded
during the entire season; however, for this current study, only
injuries from March through April (2 months) were examined.
Statistical Analysis
Hip abduction torque asymmetry greater than 100% indicates
the leading side hip is stronger than the trail hip. As the dataset
contains multiple records of the same player, a mixed effect
model was built to check intraclass correlation between
repeated measurements and determine if multilevel models
were needed.16 A 15% threshold was used for the power
analysis, but in the analysis we did not find nonlinearity
indicating a cut-point for hip abduction asymmetry in the
association between the risk of upper extremity injury, so hip
abduction asymmetry was treated as a continuous variable. The
risk of upper extremity injury for each 5% hip strength
asymmetry was assessed by using robust Poisson regression
models to estimate relative risks (RRs).27 Fractional polynomial
was used to assess linearity of the relationship between injury
and hip strength asymmetry. If complicated modeling of hip
strength asymmetry is needed, asymmetry would be categorized
for better interpretation with cut points being the turning points
of a plot with log-transformed P(injury) versus hip strength
asymmetry.
Potential confounders including player demographics (age,
weight, and height), throwing arm prior injury (yes/no),
throwing arm surgery history (yes/no), shoulder pain on testing
day (yes/no), years of professional experience, and
directionality of asymmetry (lead strong vs trail strong) were
assessed and those that change the parameter estimate of hip
strength asymmetry by more than 15% were kept in the model.
Interaction between directionality and hip strength asymmetry
was also tested. Any observations with missing variables
mentioned above were removed. Analysis was completed on 2
sets of data, with players stratified by position (pitcher vs
Table 1. Estimated sample size calculations
Mean Hip
Asymmetry
Healthy
Mean Hip
Asymmetry
Injured SD N1 (Healthy) N2 (Injured) Total N
0 0.15 0.05 5 3 8
0 0.15 0.08 7 5 12
0 0.15 0.1 11 7 18
0 0.15 0.12 14 10 24
0 0.15 0.15 22 14 36
0 0.15 0.18 30 20 50
0 0.15 0.2 37 25 62
Figure 1. Testing position for isometric hip abduction
strength.
Mon Mon 2022Plummer et al
4
position player). The analyses were generated using SAS
software (SAS Institute Inc).
Results
A total of 188 players (98 pitchers and 90 position players) had
complete datasets. During the first 2 months of the season, 18
players were classified as injured—12 pitchers and 6 position
players (Table 2). The characteristics of pitchers and position
players are shown in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. Mixed effect
model was attempted to measure intraclass correlation
coefficient and we did not find evidence of significant intraclass
correlation. Therefore, single-level models were performed.
Using fractional polynomial, the relationship between injury
and hip strength asymmetry was linear for pitchers while
quadratic for position players. None of the injured players had a
history of surgery on the throwing arm, or pain in shoulder or
elbow on the testing day; therefore, these 2 variables were
omitted from all the models. History of prior injury was
included in the model as a predictor for injury; however, it did
not meet the threshold of 15% for a confounder of the
relationship between hip abduction torque and injury.
Specifically, history of injury changed the RR per 5% hip
abduction torque asymmetry by 2% for pitchers and 4% for
position players. All potential confounders and interactions were
not significant and removed from the model.
In pitchers, the regression model revealed a marginally
significant association between hip strength asymmetry and
injury; with each 5% increase in asymmetry the risk of injury
was 1.17 times higher (95% CI 0.99-1.38), P = 0.05. In position
players, there was no significant association between hip
asymmetry and risk of upper extremity injury (P = 0.18).
Table 2. Upper extremity injuries sustained by study participants
Injury Pitchers Position Players
Shoulder injury
Biceps tendonitis 1 0
Biceps strain 0 0
Glenohumeral ligament tear 1 0
SLAP tear 0 1
Pectoralis minor strain 1 0
Rotator cuff strain 1 2
Impingement 1 1
Latissimus dorsi strain 0 0
Total 5 4
Elbow injury
Ulnar collateral ligament sprain 3 0
Triceps strain 0 0
Valgus extension overload 1 1
Ulnar neuritis 1 0
Flexor strain 2 0
Olecranon fracture 0 0
Ulnar nerve irritation 0 0
Lateral epicondylitis 0 1
Total 7 2
SLAP tear, superior labrum anterior and posterior tear.
SPORTS HEALTHvol. XX no. X
5
A sensitivity analysis was done by removing extreme observations
with Cook’s D for values greater than 2 SDs to assess their impact
on the final models. This removed 2 observations for pitchers and
1 observation for position players. The 2 removed pitchers were
both not injured and had hip strength asymmetry of 57.5% and
8.4%; the position player removed was not injured and had an
asymmetry of 8.7%. The final model summaries are shown in
Tables 5 and 6. In pitchers, the association between hip
abduction asymmetry and injury was significant (P < 0.01) with
an RR of 1.24 (95% CI 1.06-1.46). Using the model estimates, the
percent increased risk of injury based on the amount of hip
asymmetry can be calculated; 5% asymmetry has an increased
risk of injury of 17%, 10% asymmetry has an increased risk of
37%, and 15% asymmetry has an increased risk of injury of 60%.
For position players, there was no significant association between
hip asymmetry and risk of upper extremity injury after outlier
removal.
discussion
This is the first study to quantify upper extremity injury risk
related to hip abduction strength. Hip abduction strength
asymmetry increases the risk of injury incidence in professional
baseball pitchers within the first 2 months of the baseball
season. Specifically, for a 5% increase in hip abduction strength
asymmetry, there was a 1.24 increased risk of sustaining a
shoulder or elbow injury. This RR indicates a small but
significant increased risk of injury with hip abduction strength
asymmetry. The 5% increment is arbitrary, as a continuous
variable any percentage increment will give the same
Table 3. Hip strength and characteristic data for injured and noninjured pitchers
Pitchers’ characteristics Injured (n = 12) Noninjured (n = 86)
Ag, y 21.3 (2.6) 22(2.3)
Height, cm 186.3 (7.6) 188.3(6.3)
Weight, kg 86.2 (9.2) 91.8 (11.5)
Years in MiLB 3.3 (1.6) 3.7 (2)
Prior injury, % 33.3 25.6
History of surgery on throwing arm, % 0.0 15.1
Hip asymmetry ratio, % 15.6 (14.4) 10 (9.6)
Lead leg stronger than trail leg, % 33.3 47.7
MiLB, Minor League Baseball.
Table 4. Hip strength and characteristic data for injured and noninjured position players
Position players’ characteristics Injured (n = 6) Noninjured (n = 84)
Age, y 19.5 (2.1) 21.2 (2)
Height, cm 181.2 (5.9) 181.6 (5.6)
Weight, kg 81.4 (10.7) 85.1 (10.3)
Years in MiLB 3.3 (1.4) 3.5 (1.6)
Prior injury, % 33.3 21.8
History of surgery on throwing arm, % 0 9.5
Hip asymmetry ratio, % 8.2 (5) 10.6 (9.5)
Lead leg stronger than trail leg, % 50 48.8
MiLB, Minor League Baseball.
Mon Mon 2022Plummer et al
6
conclusion. Hip abduction asymmetry contributes to arm injury
in pitchers. Interestingly, absolute hip abduction torque for the
trail leg and the lead leg did not differentiate injured and
noninjured pitchers or position players. Asymmetry in hip
abduction strength in pitchers appears to be related to the
development of upper extremity injuries. Hip abduction strength
asymmetry may indicate that altered adaptations or strength
compensations occur between hips as a result of pitching,
which contributes to increased likelihood injury.
Upper extremity injuries represent a significant source of
disability among professional baseball players. Identifying
modifiable physical factors related to these injuries provide
foundational knowledge for the developmental of targeted
prevention and treatment strategies. Hip abductor muscles are
critical for optimal throwing and pitching mechanics.
Specifically, hip abductor muscle performance in the trail leg
enables hip stabilization during both the single- and double-leg
stance phases of pitching and throwing.15 The hip abductors of
the trail leg function to lengthen the pitcher’s stride and prevent
pelvic drop during the wind-up and early cocking phases of the
motion.12,15 In the lead leg, the hip abductors provide
stabilization to the leg at foot contact that contributes to
increased rotation and flexion of the trunk after the late cocking
phase.24 Hip abductor muscle performance in both limbs is
critical for hip stability and movement during pitching and
throwing. Hip abductor strength asymmetry is of greater
importance than individual hip abductor limb muscle
performance for identifying upper extremity injury risk in
pitchers.
Previous lower extremity research has identified leg strength
asymmetry as a risk factor for injury.1,17 Hip abductor weakness
inhibits energy transfer from the lower extremity to the wrist at
ball release and increases loads at the shoulder and elbow,
which may contribute to injury.4 Hip abductor muscle strength
asymmetry may be a more sensitive metric of altered hip
stabilization than absolute hip abductor strength. Pitchers who
were injured had higher hip asymmetry compared with those
who were healthy. This same trend was not observed in
position players. Position players who did not sustain an injury
had greater mean hip asymmetry, but lower median hip
asymmetry than the players who were injured. The sample size
of injured pitchers and position players was relatively small,
thus limiting generalizability. Beckett et al3 examined
normalized hip abduction strength in adolescent baseball
players and the ratio of hip abduction between legs was 1.02.
Strength asymmetry greater than 10% between limbs may
increase injury rates in athletes.14 Similarly, a cutoff of less than
10% between limbs is a suggested benchmark for determining
return to play in injured athletes.2,18,22
Altered muscle performance and hip stabilization have been
speculated to contribute to upper extremity injury in baseball
players, but the evidence supporting this is limited. Culiver et al8
suggest that larger hip abduction strength asymmetry may affect
a pitcher’s ability to generate and transfer forces during pitching,
which may increase the risk of injury. Hip abduction strength or
asymmetry did not contribute to increased risk in position
players. Position players generally sustain less shoulder and
elbow injuries compared with pitchers and they also face
different sport-related demands, which may help explain why
no difference in upper extremity injury risk was observed.
Zipser et al26 reported that hip abduction strength was not
related to single-leg step-down mechanics in position players
Table 6. Final model summary for position players (n = 89)
95% CI
Parameter Relative Risk PLower Limit Upper Limit
Intercept 0.02 0.004 0.002 0.31
Asymmetric (continuous, every 5% increment) 6.01 0.17 0.47 76.68
Asymmetric squared 0.63 0.08 0.38 1.06
Table 5. Final model after sensitivity analysis for pitchers (n = 98)
95% CI
Parameter Relative Risk PLower Limit Upper Limit
Intercept 0.07 <0.0001 0.03 0.16
Asymmetric (continuous, every 5% increment) 1.24 0.008 1.06 1.46
SPORTS HEALTHvol. XX no. X
7
and speculated that these results may be due to position players
having throwing patterns that vary in distance and intensity.
Position players also do not throw from a mound.
Previous studies have identified that a history of injury increases
the risk of injury in the subsequent competitive season. History of
upper extremity overuse injury in the past year was assessed in
the current study; however, it was not found to be a confounder
and was not included in the final model. Adjusting for history of
upper extremity overuse injury changed the RR per 5% increase
in hip abduction torque asymmetry by 2% for pitchers and 4% for
position players. It is speculated that the small sample size of
both players with a history of upper extremity overuse injury in
the past year and players who sustained an injury during the
season were small. Further research is needed to more
comprehensively examine the contributions of other hip strength
measures on injury risk and how these measures are related to
the severity or time-loss of an injury.
There are several major limitations to this study. Because of
time constraints during testing, only hip abduction strength was
assessed. Other hip abduction muscle strength assessments may
contribute to the ability to differentiate baseball players who are
more susceptible to injury. Hip abduction strength was measured
in an anatomic static position, which does not represent the
dynamic position of the pitcher’s hips during the push-off and
landing phases of the pitch when propulsion and stabilization are
important. This study did not account for training, rehabilitation,
and injury prevention programs that may have occurred after
preseason testing. Hip abduction strength was measured during
preseason, leaving time for changes in muscle performance with
training as the season progressed. By limiting the time to
primarily pre- to early-season, we controlled for longer term
changes in hip abduction strength over the season. Comparisons
for hip abduction strength for the position players should be
interpreted with caution because of the low number of injured
players. Including the findings for the position players is
important because the results indicate hip asymmetry and injury
risks are different between pitchers and position players. Too
often, null findings are removed and then no one knows that a
group may not have similar injury risk profiles. Results could vary
across position; however, we did not have enough participants to
do a subgroup analysis that stratified the data by position.
Unfortunately, the accuracy of the HHD tested against another
testing device was not obtained.
conclusion
Hip abduction torque asymmetry in pitchers was related to
subsequent incidence of upper extremity injury in the first 2
months of the baseball season. For each 5% increase in hip
abduction strength asymmetry between legs, the risk of
sustaining a shoulder or elbow injury was 1.24 times higher in
pitchers. Hip abduction asymmetry muscle deficits may affect
pitching mechanics and increase arm stress. No relationship
between hip abduction strength and injury was observed for
position players.
AuthoRs
Hillary A. Plummer, PhD, ATC (University of Southern
California, Los Angeles, California, USA; U.S. Army Aeromedical
Research Laboratory, Fort Rucker, Alabama, USA; Oak Ridge
Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee,
USA); Zhongjie Cai, MS (University of Southern California, Los
Angeles, California, USA); Hannah Dove, PT, DPT, SCS, ATC
(Performance Therapy at St. John’s Health Center, Santa Monica,
California, USA); Geoff Hostetter, ATC (Los Angeles Angels,
Anaheim, California, USA); Thomas Brice, PT, DPT (EXOS,
Phoenix, Arizona, USA); Audrey Chien, MS, ATC (University
of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA); Jonathan
C. Sum, PT, DPT (University of Southern California, Los
Angeles, California, USA); Andrew Hawkins, PT, DPT, ATC
(ARC Physical Therapy, Topeka, Kansas, USA); Bernard Li,
PT, DPT (Los Angeles Dodgers, Los Angeles, California, USA);
and Lori A. Michener, PhD, PT, ATC, FAPTA (University of
Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA).
oRcid id
Hillary A. Plummer https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3282-2538
RefeRences
1. Abt JP, Sell TC, Crawford K, et al. Warrior model for human performance and
injury prevention: Eagle Tactical Athlete Program Part II. J Spec Oper Med.
2010;10:22-33.
2. Augustsson J, Thomee R, Karlsson J. Ability of a new hop test to determine
functional deficits after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg
Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004;12:350-356.
3. Beckett M, Hannon M, Ropiak C, Gerona C, Mohr K, Limpisvasti O. Clinical
assessment of scapula and hip joint function in preadolescent and adolescent
baseball players. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:2502-2509.
4. Burkhart SS, Morgan CD, Ben Kibler W. The disabled throwing shoulder:
spectrum of pathology Part III: the SICK scapula, scapular dyskinesis, the kinetic
chain, and rehabilitation. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:641-661.
5. Camp CL, Conte S, D’Angelo J, Fealy SA, Ahmad CS. Effect of predraft ulnar
collateral ligament reconstruction on future performance in professional baseball:
a matched cohort comparison. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46:1459-1464.
6. Chaudhari AM, McKenzie CS, Pan X, Onate JA. Lumbopelvic control and days
missed because of injury in professional baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med.
2014;42:2734-2740.
7. Ciccotti MG, Pollack KM, Ciccotti MC, et al. Elbow injuries in professional
baseball: epidemiological findings from the Major League Baseball Injury
Surveillance System. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45:2319-2328.
8. Culiver A, Garrison JC, Creed KM, Conway JE, Goto S, Werner S. Correlation
among Y-balance test-lower quarter composite scores, hip musculoskeletal
characteristics, and pitching kinematics in NCAA Division I baseball pitchers.
J Sport Rehabil. 2019;28:432-437.
9. Endo Y, Sakamoto M. Correlation of shoulder and elbow injuries with muscle
tightness, core stability, and balance by longitudinal measurement in junior high
baseball players. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26:689-693.
10. Fortenbaugh D, Fleisig GS, Andrews JR. Baseball pitching biomechanics in
relation to injury risk and performance. Sports Health. 2009;1:314-320.
11. Ireland ML, Willson JD, Ballantyne BT, Davis IM. Hip strength in females
with and without patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33:
671-676.
12. Kageyama M, Sugiyama T, Takai Y, Kanehisa H, Maeda A. Kinematic and kinetic
profiles of trunk and lower limbs during baseball pitching in collegiate pitchers.
J Sports Sci Med. 2014;13:742-750.
13. Kantrowitz DE, Trofa DP, Woode DR, Ahmad CS, Lynch TS. Athletic hip injuries
in Major League Baseball pitchers associated with ulnar collateral ligament tears.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018;6:2325967118800704.
Mon Mon 2022Plummer et al
8
14. Knapik JJ, Bauman CL, Jones BH, Harris JM, Vaughan L. Preseason strength
and flexibility imbalances associated with athletic injuries in female collegiate
athletes. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19:76-81.
15. Laudner KG, Moore SD, Sipes RC, Meister K. Functional hip characteristics of
baseball pitchers and position players. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:383-387.
16. McGraw KO, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation
coefficients. Psychol Methods. 1996;1:30-46.
17. Nadler SF, Malanga GA, DePrince M, Stitik TP, Feinberg JH. The relationship
between lower extremity injury, low back pain, and hip muscle strength in male
and female collegiate athletes. Clin J Sport Med. 2000;10:89-97.
18. Orchard J, Best TM, Verrall GM. Return to play following muscle strains. Clin J
Sports Med. 2005;15:436-441.
19. Posner M, Cameron KL, Wolf JM, Belmont PJ Jr, Owens BD. Epidemiology of
Major League Baseball injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:1676-1680.
20. Radwan A, Francis J, Green A, et al. Is there a relationship between shoulder
dysfunction and core instability? Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9:8-13.
21. Seroyer ST, Nho SJ, Bach BR, Bush-Joseph CA, Nicholson GP, Romeo AA.
The kinetic chain in overhand pitching: its potential role for performance
enhancement. Sports Health. 2010;2:135-146.
22. Thorborg K, Serner A, Petersen J, Madsen TM, Magnusson P, Holmich P. Hip
adduction and abduction strength profiles in elite soccer players: implications for
clinical evaluation of hip adductor muscle recovery after injury. Am J Sports Med.
2011;39:121-126.
23. Tippett SR. Lower extremity strength and active range of motion in college
baseball pitchers: a comparison between stance leg and kick leg. J Orthop Sports
Phys Ther. 1986;8:10-14.
24. Yanagisawa O, Taniguchi H. Changes in lower extremity function and pitching
performance with increasing numbers of pitches in baseball pitchers. J Exerc
Rehabil. 2018;14:430-435.
25. Yanagisawa O, Wakamatsu K, Taniguchi H. Functional hip characteristics and
their relationship with ball velocity in college baseball pitchers. J Sport Rehabil.
2019;28:854-859.
26. Zipser MC, Plummer HA, Kindstrand N, Sum JC, Li B, Michener LA. Hip
abduction strength: relationship to trunk and lower extremity motion during a
single-leg step-down task in professional baseball players. Int J Sports Phys Ther.
2021;16:342-349.
27. Zou G. A modified Poisson regression approach to prospective studies with
binary data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:702-706.
For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
... One study was a randomized controlled trial 21 and eighteen studies were prospective cohort studies. 5,[17][18][19][20][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] Thirteen studies received an overall rating of low risk of bias, 5,17,19,[21][22][23]26,[28][29][30][31][32]34 six received an overall rating of moderate risk of bias 18,20,24,25,27,33 with no studies rated as having high risk of bias overall. Element 2, study attrition, was what led to most articles receiving a score other than low, with three studies receiving a score of high risk of bias 18,20,24 and ten receiving a score of moderate risk of bias. ...
... One study was a randomized controlled trial 21 and eighteen studies were prospective cohort studies. 5,[17][18][19][20][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] Thirteen studies received an overall rating of low risk of bias, 5,17,19,[21][22][23]26,[28][29][30][31][32]34 six received an overall rating of moderate risk of bias 18,20,24,25,27,33 with no studies rated as having high risk of bias overall. Element 2, study attrition, was what led to most articles receiving a score other than low, with three studies receiving a score of high risk of bias 18,20,24 and ten receiving a score of moderate risk of bias. ...
... Element 2, study attrition, was what led to most articles receiving a score other than low, with three studies receiving a score of high risk of bias 18,20,24 and ten receiving a score of moderate risk of bias. 19 26 An investigation of 113 recreational overhead athletes (Female: 59; Male: 54) found that less scapular upward rotation at 45° (OR: 1.038) and 90° (OR: 0.986) of humeral ad- • Female: ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction There is a high incidence of shoulder injuries among overhead athletes. Identifying and understanding risk factors for these injuries, particularly those that can be modified, is a necessary step towards being able to effectively develop and implement shoulder specific injury prevention programs. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to identify risk factors associated with a new onset of shoulder pain and injury among the athletic population. Design Systematic Review. Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed within PubMed, Embase, AMED, CINAHL, and EmCare databases. Studies were screened utilizing the following inclusion criteria; (a) athletes currently pain free or no history of pain at baseline, (b) athletes with shoulder and or arm pain originating from a musculoskeletal shoulder problem (c) risk factors captured prospectively (d) pathoanatomy and biomechanics in isolation or in addition to personal characteristics, etc. (e) reporting relative risk, odds ratios, and/or hazard ratios and (f) follow up ≥ 6 months. Due to data heterogeneity, only a descriptive data synthesis was performed. Data were extracted and underwent risk of bias assessment utilizing the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. PRISMA guidelines were utilized throughout. Results Nineteen papers were included. A total of four studies investigated baseball, five handball, three swimming, two tennis, two military, one cricket, one American football, and one with multiple sports, totaling 7,802 athletes. The risk of bias among the included studies was rated from moderate to low overall with no single study being identified as high risk of bias. All studies designs were a level of evidence of II except for two studies that were level III. The most significant risk factors included range of motion, reduced strength, history of local/regional musculoskeletal pain, previous injury, and training load. There are inconsistencies in how injury and pain are defined within studies. Conclusion Many risk factors are easily objectifiable and modifiable which may help in developing shoulder injury mitigation strategies. Three of the five significant risk factors for injury can be identified by objective pre-screening measures. While previous pain and injury cannot be mitigated, training loads should be closely monitored and adapted according to other risk factors and the athlete’s response. Level of Evidence 2
... Only a total of 5 articles had an adequate sample size justification in the form of a formal power analysis. 31,39,40,42,43 This systematic review presents hip ROM and strength data on a total of 3947 uninjured baseball players. One study included up to 141 youth female baseball athletes but did not specify the inclusion of females in a "Normal Group" versus an "Injury Group;" and therefore, the total number of females included in the final review could not be determined. ...
... 23,24,33,35,[45][46][47][48] Seven studies included professional baseball players (840 total; 446 pitchers and 394 nonpitchers). 17,22,26,34,40,41,49 Detailed study characteristics are presented in Table 3. ...
... 42 [45][46][47] and 3 studying professional players. 34,40,49 Study methods varied considerably with hip abduction strength being the most consistently assessed in 8 of the 10 studies. 25,30,32,34,[45][46][47]49 Hip internal and ER were also reported in 5 of the studies. ...
Article
Context: The baseball athlete incorporates the use of the entire kinetic chain while throwing. Hip range of motion (ROM) and strength have been previously studied in its relation to injury development. It is a clinical necessity to understand the normative profiles of hip musculoskeletal function across the playing career. Objectives: To identify the normative hip ROM and strength profiles of baseball players across level of play. Evidence acquisition: The researchers searched the electronic databases MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, and Embase using a custom search strategy. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 31 articles were reviewed. Of these 31 articles, 22 examined hip ROM and/or strength in uninjured baseball athletes. A manual search of the references of those 22 articles revealed 4 additional articles that met the inclusion criteria. In total, 26 articles were included in data collection. Evidence synthesis: Articles were assessed for quality using the appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies. The appropriate hip ROM and strength data, along with player demographics, were extracted and reviewed to ensure accuracy. Articles were also categorized based on level of play and player position. Conclusions: Hip ROM and strength profiles of baseball athletes across all levels of play were identified and presented to comprehensively summarize the available data on normative musculoskeletal hip profiles. Observed differences between positions and across levels of play were documented. In general, hip external rotation ROM was greater than internal rotation across all levels and between the stance and lead limbs. As age and level of play increased, the difference between hip external rotation and internal rotation ROM also increased. Hip strength increased as level of play (and subsequently age) increased. These summarized data can be used as benchmarks to compare clinical populations.
... For example, increased hip strength, strength asymmetry, and ROM have been associated with increased ball velocity, EVT, and risk of injury. 3,4,38,47,64 Finally, deficits in lumbopelvic stability, defined as the ability to limit anterior-posterior or medial-lateral pelvic motion in unipedal stance, have also been associated with increased EVT and arm injury. 15,30,31 While these associations link modifiable physical factors with upper extremity demand and injury risk, most studies assessed these relationships in isolation. ...
... Hip abduction strength was measured with the participants side lying and the test leg at 0°of abduction. 47,65 One strap secured an HHD 5 cm proximally to the lateral femoral condyle of the test (top) leg, while a second was secured just above the iliac crests for stabilization. Hip strength was expressed as torque by multiplying hip abduction force (N) by leg length (m) measured using a tape measure. ...
... Increased side-to-side asymmetry may elicit upstream compensations and increase the risk of sustaining a shoulder or elbow injury. 47 The second variable associated with increased EVT in univariate analysis alone was increased trail hip lumbopelvic stability, which increased EVT by 0.07 NÁm for each second beyond the mean hold time ( Table 2). The increased gluteal strength and motor control required for increased trail hip lumbopelvic stability may facilitate greater power generation, transfer, and eventually ball velocity. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background The mechanism of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injury during pitching is excessive elbow varus torque (EVT). The EVT–ball velocity (T-V) relationship allows concurrent assessment of player performance and UCL injury risk. Modifiable physical capacities may underlie individual variation seen in the T-V relationship. Purpose To identify physical performance characteristics that impact the T-V relationship during pitching. Study Design Descriptive laboratory study. Methods A total of 87 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I pitchers participated. Pitching collection involved measurement of EVT and ball velocity during 5 maximal effort fastballs thrown to a catcher. Physical measures collected were the following: shoulder and hip passive range of motion (ROM) and strength, shoulder rate of torque development (RTD), grip strength, and lumbopelvic stability. Physical measures were entered into univariate linear mixed models with ball velocity as a covariate to predict EVT. Variable reduction for multivariate models involved selection of physical measures based on random forest–derived variable importance and univariate relationship significance, rendering a 27-variable pool. Multivariate linear mixed models predicting EVT, adjusting for physical measures and other physical characteristics, were then created using backward elimination. Results In univariate analysis, for every 1 m/s (2.2 mph) increase in ball velocity, the mean EVT increased by 1.51 Nċm (95% CI, 0.66-2.37 Nċm; P = .001). In univariate analysis, hip abduction strength symmetry and bilateral lumbopelvic stability significantly increased EVT, while dominant-shoulder ROM, scaption RTD symmetry, and hip ROM significantly decreased EVT. Variables that increased EVT while controlling for ball velocity in the final model include grip strength symmetry, lead-leg lumbopelvic stability, and bodyweight. Increased dominant-shoulder internal rotation (IR) strength, dominant-shoulder flexion ROM, and scaption strength asymmetry decreased EVT as ball velocity increased. Conclusion Several modifiable physical measures affected EVT in the univariate analysis. In our final model, when controlling for ball velocity, EVT increased with increased grip strength symmetry, lead-leg lumbopelvic stability, and bodyweight and decreased with increased dominant-shoulder IR strength, dominant-shoulder flexion ROM, and scaption strength asymmetry. Clinical Relevance Defining the individual and multivariate effects of these physical capacities on EVT contextualizes their role in the T-V relationship and helps identify access points through which coaches and clinicians can optimize a pitcher's T-V relationship.
... 78 Aberrant hip mobility and strength have also demonstrated links to increased risk for shoulder and elbow injury. 76,[86][87][88] One study of adolescent throwers found a potential link to elbow pain and injury in throwers with limited hip ROM. 86 Plummer et al. showed a decrease in trunk rotation to home plate in pitchers with decreased stance leg internal rotation in a study of high school throwers. ...
... 87 Hip abduction strength asymmetry and lower scores on the lower extremity Y-balance have been present in injured athletes. 76,88 Arm Injury Reduction Program Arm injury reduction programs are framed by the DAG and informed by the risk factors discussed. Throwing athletes that have an injury history should be prioritized given their reinjury and subsequent injury risk. ...
Article
Full-text available
Arm injuries are the most common throwing injury, with growing concern as the most severe injuries, such as UCL reconstruction, continue to rise. Furthermore, throwing injuries are frequently recurrent, suggesting once injured, players are at increased risk for another arm injury. The increase in injury rates and severity has been attributed to increases in pitching volume and year-round participation, and specialized training. Thus, initial efforts to prevent arm injuries by USA Baseball and Little League have focused on the extrinsic factor of pitching exposure in the form of pitch counts, yet arm injury rates have stayed constant. Therefore, injury prevention strategies should include extrinsic factors and address modifiable, intrinsic factors that are associated with arm injury. Collectively addressing factors, such as shoulder range of motion and strength deficits, trunk and lower extremity function, and implantation of training programs yields a comprehensive approach to reduce arm injury rates. We will use a directed acyclic graph (DAG) to organize how the internal factors (i.e., fatigue, injury history, range of motion, and strength) interact with the external factors (i.e., training load and pitching exposure) and how together they are thought contribute to potential injury and inform arm injury reduction strategies. This will provide a roadmap to build adaptable arm injury reduction strategies to improve the modifiable physical factors in context of the external factors that change over time and between throwing athletes. Level of Evidence Level V, expert opinion.
... A series of studies highlighted the relationship between the asymmetric development of the muscle mass of the upper limbs and the dimensions of the bones in subjects who practice sports that involve predominantly unilateral technical executions [82][83][84]. Studies have shown that asymmetries between the upper and lower segments increase the risk of injury with an impact on health and sports performance [85,86]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study was to identify the asymmetries between the dimensions of the upper limbs, in relation to manual laterality, of the athletes who practice team sports with a ball and those who practice other sports without a ball. We consider the fact that ball handling influences the development of anthropometric parameters at the level of the upper limbs and especially at the level of the hand in correlation with the execution technique and with the characteristics of the practiced sport. This study included 161 student-athletes, who were male and right-handed, divided into two groups: the group of athletes practicing ball sports (G_BS) with 79 (49%) subjects and the group of athletes practicing non-ball sports (G_NBS) with 82 (51%) subjects. The anthropometric measurements of the upper limbs were performed on both sides (right and left): upper limb length, hand length, palm length, hand breadth, hand span, pinky finger, ring finger, middle finger, index finger and thumb. The most relevant symmetries, between the two groups, were recorded in the following anthropometric parameters on the right side (recording the smallest average differences): ring finger 0.412 cm and thumb 0.526 cm; for the left side, they were the ring finger 0.379 cm and thumb 0.518 cm. The biggest asymmetries between the two groups were recorded, for both the right and left sides, for the following parameters: upper limb length > 6 cm; hand span > 2 cm; and hand length > 1 cm. For all the anthropometric parameters analyzed, the athletes from the ball sports group (G_BS) recorded higher average values than those from the other group (G_NBS) for both upper limbs. The results of this study reflect the fact that handling the ball over a long period of time, starting from the beginning of practicing the sport until the age of seniority, causes changes in the anthropometric dimensions of the upper segments, causing asymmetries between the dominant (right) and the non-dominant (left) side.
... Lower extremity strengthening has also been shown to be important in mitigating injury risk and improving performance. Several studies in baseball have shown that improving core stability lowers injury risk and improves performance [24][25][26][27][28][29]. Oliver et al. (2011) evaluated 10 softball pitchers with an average age of 17 [30]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Fastpitch softball is one of the most popular sports among youth and high school female athletes. Despite some similarities to baseball, key differences between the two sports result in different injury patterns, and there is comparatively less literature describing injury epidemiology in fastpitch softball. The purpose of this review is to describe the epidemiology, biomechanics, and injury prevention efforts in regards to fastpitch softball injury with a particular focus on underhand pitching. The injury rate in softball is relatively low and extended time loss injuries in particular are uncommon. Lower extremity injuries are more common overall in softball, but pitchers more often suffer upper extremity injury. Pitchers account for a relatively small proportion of all injuries recorded, but represent a similarly small subset of team rosters, with most teams carrying only a few pitchers in total. The underhand pitching motion exerts significant glenohumeral distractive forces and high stress across the biceps-labrum complex. Core and lower extremity strengthening play an important role in injury prevention for softball pitchers and position players. Fatigue and number of games pitched are tied to increased strength deficiencies and pain in fastpitch softball pitchers, yet pitch count limits are not employed in any major fastpitch softball leagues. While overall injury incidence is low in fastpitch softball players, the potential for overuse injury in pitchers in particular is noteworthy and not nearly as scrutinized as within the baseball community. Critical longitudinal tracking of softball injuries at varying levels of play would be helpful to better understand the sport’s injury risk. There are currently no formal pitch count limits enforced in a majority of fastpitch softball leagues. Core and lower extremity strengthening, pre-season conditioning, and monitoring of pitchers for signs of fatigue may be helpful in injury prevention.
... Postoperative strength asymmetries can generate a risk of functional imbalance and might have important consequences. They have already been reported as a risk factor for musculoskeletal injuries [43] or for intrinsic hip pathologies such as osteoarthropathy [44] while possibly affecting structures beyond the concerned joint [45]. Setting up adequate strengthening exercises in order to rectify this strength asymmetry is, therefore, essential for patients both in the short-and long-term. ...
Article
Full-text available
Simple Summary Femoroacetabular impingement represents an important burden for affected patients in their daily life. Possible and successful treatments to alleviate patient symptoms are corrections of bone deformities using either arthroscopy or surgical hip dislocation. Nevertheless, the aforementioned surgeries might also weaken the operated hip in addition to the impact of the pathology itself. There is, however, little or no published data on the impact of arthroscopy and surgical hip dislocation on hip muscles strength, which motivated us to perform this study. For arthroscopy, we found that patients exhibited on the operated hip a moderate decrease in abductors strength, as well as a small but noticeable decrease in hamstrings, external rotators and flexors strengths three months after surgery. Interestingly, patients also had a small but relevant strength decrease on the non-operated side, located on external rotators. For surgical hip dislocation, patients exhibited on the operated hip a large decrease in internal rotators strength and a moderate decrease in abductors, quadriceps and external rotators strengths. These findings suggest that several hip muscles can be moderately or largely affected after arthroscopy (abductors) or surgical hip dislocation (internal and external rotators, abductors and quadriceps). This study also suggests that a rehabilitation method based on isolated muscle reinforcement and functional exercises is needed and emphasizes the need for a rehabilitation protocol that goes beyond three postoperative months. Abstract Hip arthroscopy and surgical hip dislocation (SHD) can be adequate surgical options for patients suffering from femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome, but there is to date no published data on their impact on hip muscles strength. The purpose of this retrospective study was, therefore, to evaluate it on a consecutive series of 50 FAI patients treated either by arthroscopy (n = 29, aged 27.4 ± 7.5 years, 76% of women) or SHD (n = 21, aged 25.9 ± 6.5 years, 38% of women) at La Tour Hospital between 2020 and 2021. The bilateral isometric strengths of eight hip-related muscles were evaluated before and three months after surgery (halfway through the rehabilitation program). For arthroscopy, a statistically significant (p < 0.05) reduction in hip muscles strength could be noted on the operated hamstrings (1.49 ± 0.43 vs. 1.39 ± 0.38 Nm/kg), flexors (1.88 ± 0.46 vs. 1.73 ± 0.41 Nm/kg), abductors (1.97 ± 0.42 vs. 1.72 ± 0.40 Nm/kg) and external rotators (1.17 ± 0.40 vs. 1.04 ± 0.37 Nm/kg). The abductors were the most affected muscles, with 45% of the patients suffering from a strength reduction ≥15%. The non-operated external rotators were also affected but to a lesser extent (1.21 ± 0.38 vs. 1.10 ± 0.36 Nm/kg). For SHD, a statistically significant strength reduction could be noted on the operated extensors (2.28 ± 0.84 vs. 2.05 ± 0.70 Nm/kg), abductors (1.87 ± 0.49 vs. 1.65 ± 0.41 Nm/kg), quadriceps (2.96 ± 0.92 vs. 2.44 ± 0.89 Nm/kg), external rotators (1.16 ± 0.42 vs. 0.93 ± 0.36 Nm/kg) and internal rotators (1.26 ± 0.38 vs. 0.96 ± 0.30 Nm/kg). The internal rotators were the most affected muscles, with 75% of the patients suffering from a strength reduction ≥15%. To conclude, particular attention should be paid to operated abductors for patients treated by arthroscopy as well as operated internal/external rotators, abductors and quadriceps for those treated by surgical hip dislocation. It reinforces that a rehabilitation method based on isolated muscle reinforcement and functional exercises that goes beyond three postoperative months is needed.
Article
Full-text available
Background: The single-leg step down task (SLSD) is a clinical tool to assess movement and control of the lower extremity and trunk. Hip abduction weakness may impact movement quality during the SLSD, however the relationships between movement and strength are unclear. Purpose: To determine the relationship between hip abduction isometric strength and movement during the SLSD of trunk lean, pelvic drop, knee valgus, and hip flexion. Study design: Cross sectional, cohort study. Methods: One hundred-eighteen Minor League baseball players (age=21.6 ± 2.0 years; n=68 pitchers, n=50 position players) participated. Bilateral hip abduction isometric strength was measured using a handheld dynamometer (HHD), and then multiplied by distance from the greater trochanter to the HHD and expressed as hip abduction torque. Video cameras captured the SLSD, with participants standing on one leg while lowering their contralateral heel to touchdown on the floor from a 0.203m (8in.) step. Trunk lean, trunk flexion, pelvic drop, knee valgus, and hip flexion were measured using Dartfish at heel touchdown. A value of 180° indicated no knee valgus. Pearson correlations examined the relationships between hip abduction torque and SLSD motions. Results: There were no significant correlations for position players. For pitchers, on the lead leg increased hip abduction torque weakly correlated with a decrease in knee valgus (r= 0.24, p=0.049). Also for pitchers on the trail leg, increased hip abduction torque weakly correlated with decreased pelvic drop (r= -0.28, p=0.021). Conclusion: Hip abduction strength contributes to dynamic control of the trunk and legs. Specifically in pitchers, hip abduction weakness was related to increased movement of the lower extremity and lumbopelvic regions during the dynamic SLSD task. These deficits could translate to altered pitching performance and injury. Levels of evidence: 2.
Article
Full-text available
Background Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction is a reliable treatment for elite overhand throwers with UCL tears. In recent years, this procedure has become increasingly common among Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers. Predisposing factors and associated comorbidities, however, have not been fully elucidated. Purpose/Hypothesis The purpose of this study was to determine whether professional baseball pitchers who underwent UCL reconstruction had an increased incidence of hip or groin injuries 4 years before or after surgery. We hypothesized that MLB pitchers who sustain hip or groin injuries may be more likely to develop UCL tears because of alterations and overcompensation in the kinetic chain during overhand throwing. Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods A comprehensive list of all 247 MLB players who underwent UCL reconstruction between 2005 and 2017 was created using publicly accessible online data. The application of inclusion criteria yielded a final sample size of 145 athletes. These athletes’ injury histories were identified and cross-referenced with the official MLB disabled list. Matched controls were generated for a comparison of results. Results Of the 145 MLB pitchers who underwent UCL reconstruction between 2005 and 2017, 40 (27.6%) endured a proximal lower extremity injury within 4 years of their surgery. Specifically, 16 pitchers sustained hip injuries, 13 suffered hamstring injuries, and 14 experienced groin injuries. A significantly lower rate of hip- and groin-related injuries (17.9%) was identified in matched controls during a similar time frame (P = .049). Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that MLB pitchers who required UCL reconstruction sustained a higher frequency of proximal lower extremity injuries both before and after surgery compared with matched controls. This finding is significant as the treatment of antecedent hip lesions, as well as an emphasis on hip and core muscle mobility and strengthening, may help reduce injuries to the UCL.
Article
Full-text available
Compared to upper extremity function, the changes in lower extremity function with increasing numbers of pitches have not fully been investigated in baseball pitchers. In addition, little is known about the correlation between lower extremity function and pitching performance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of fatigue on lower extremity function and pitching performance in a simulated baseball game. Eighteen collegiate baseball pitchers threw 117 pitches in 9 innings (13 pitches per inning) with 5-min rest between innings at an official pitching distance in a simulated game. Isometric hip muscle strength (abduction and adduction) and squat jump performance (height, mean/peak power, and mean/peak velocity) were measured before and after the game. The mean ball velocity and pitching accuracy were assessed per inning. Ball velocity significantly decreased in the 7th (P=0.026) and 9th (P=0.001) innings compared to the 1st inning, but pitching accuracy did not change significantly. Hip abduction (P=0.009) and adduction (P=0.001) strength significantly decreased after the game, but squat jump performance did not significantly change before and after the game. A significant correlation between decreased ball velocity in the 9th inning and decreased hip adduction strength was found (P=0.011, r=0.583). Our findings suggest that hip abduction and adduction strength are susceptible to fatigue owing to repetitive throwing motions and that hip adduction strength, especially, is an important physical fitness factor for maintaining ball velocity during a game in baseball pitchers.
Article
Context:: Compared to shoulder and elbow functions, the hip functional characteristics of baseball pitchers have not been fully investigated. Therefore, little is known about the relationship between hip function and pitching performance. Objective:: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of hip flexibility and strength focusing on their influences on the ball velocity in baseball pitchers. Design:: Descriptive laboratory study. Setting:: Laboratory and University baseball facility. Participants:: Twenty-three college baseball pitchers. Interventions:: Passive hip range of motion (ROM) and isometric hip muscle strength were bilaterally measured. The pitchers threw 20 fastballs at an official pitching distance. Main outcome measures:: Bilateral hip ROM and strength in flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, and external and internal rotation; the maximal ball velocity. Results:: The pivot side showed smaller hip external rotation ROM (p < 0.01), larger hip internal rotation ROM (p = 0.03), and greater hip adduction strength (p = 0.03) than the stride side. The hip extension ROM on the stride side had a negative correlation with the maximal ball velocity (r = -0.58, p < 0.01). The maximal ball velocity (135.3 ± 4.1 km/h) positively correlated with the hip extension (r = 0.59, p < 0.01), flexion (r = 0.57, p < 0.01), abduction (r = 0.55, p < 0.01), and adduction (r = 0.55, p < 0.01) strength on the pivot leg, and the hip flexion (r = 0.53, p = 0.01), abduction (r = 0.67, p < 0.01), and adduction (r = 0.46, p = 0.03) strength on the stride leg. Conclusions:: These findings suggest that baseball pitchers do not have marked side-to-side differences in the hip flexibility and strength, and that an important fitness factor for increasing ball velocity is not the hip flexibility but the hip muscle strength of both legs.
Article
Background: In recent years, there has been a dramatic rise in the annual number of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstructions performed in amateur baseball pitchers. Accordingly, increasing numbers of players are entering professional baseball having already undergone the procedure; however, the effect of prior UCL reconstruction on future success remains unknown. Purpose: (1) To provide an epidemiologic report on baseball players who undergo UCL reconstruction before being selected in the Major League Baseball (MLB) Draft, (2) to define the outcomes in terms of statistical performance, and (3) to compare these results with those of matched controls (ie, non-UCL reconstruction). Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The MLB Amateur Draft Database was queried to identify all drafted pitchers who underwent UCL reconstruction before being drafted. For each pitcher drafted from 2005 to 2014 with prior UCL reconstruction, 3 healthy controls with no history of elbow surgery were randomly identified for matched analysis. A number of demographic and performance comparisons were made between these groups. Results: A total of 345 pitchers met inclusion criteria. The annual number of pitchers undergoing predraft UCL reconstructions rose steadily from 2005 to 2016 ( P < .001). For matched control analysis, 252 pitchers with a UCL reconstruction and a minimum 2-year follow-up (drafted between 2005 and 2014) were matched to 756 controls (non-UCL reconstruction). As compared with the non-UCL reconstruction group, pitchers who underwent predraft UCL reconstruction reached the MLB level with greater frequency (20% vs 12%, P = .003), and their MLB statistical performances were similar for all measures. Compared with all other pitchers drafted during that period, players who had a predraft UCL reconstruction demonstrated an increased likelihood of reaching progressive levels of play (Full Season A, AA, and MLB) within a given time frame ( P < .05 for all). Conclusion: The number of UCL reconstructions performed in amateur baseball players before the draft increased year over year for the entire study period. Professional pitchers who underwent UCL reconstruction as amateurs appear to perform at least as well as, if not better than, matched controls without elbow surgery.
Article
Context: Numerous studies have reported kinematic data on baseball pitchers using 3D motion analysis, but no studies to date have correlated this data with clinical outcome measures. Objective: To examine the relationship among Y Balance Test-Lower Quarter (YBT-LQ) composite scores, musculoskeletal characteristics of the hip and pitching kinematics in NCAA Division I baseball pitchers. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: 3D motion analysis laboratory. Participants: 19 healthy male collegiate baseball pitchers. Main outcome measures: Internal and external hip passive range of motion (PROM); hip abduction strength; YBT-LQ composite scores; kinematic variables of the pitching motion. Results: Stride length demonstrated a moderate positive correlation with dominant limb YBT-LQ composite score (r=0.524, p=0.018) and non-dominant limb YBT-LQ composite score (r=0.550, p=0.012), and a weak positive correlation with normalized time to maximal humerus velocity (r=0.458, p=0.043). Stride length had a moderate negative correlation with normalized time to maximal thorax velocity (r= -0.522, p=0.018) and dominant hip TRM (r= -0.660, p=0.002), and had a strong negative correlation with normalized time from SFC to maximal knee flexion (r= -0.722, p<0.001). Dominant limb YBT-LQ composite score had a weak negative correlation with hip abduction strength difference (r= -0.459, p=0.042) and normalized time to maximal thorax velocity (r= -0.468, p=0.037), as well as a moderate negative correlation with dominant hip TRM (r= -0.160, p=0.004). Non-dominant limb YBT-LQ composite score demonstrated a weak negative correlation with normalized time to maximal thorax velocity (r= -0.450, p=0.046) and had a moderate negative correlation with dominant hip TRM (r= -0.668, p=0.001). Hip abduction strength difference demonstrated a weak positive correlation with dominant hip TRM (r=0.482, p=0.032). Dominant hip TRM had a moderate positive correlation with normalized time to maximal thorax velocity (r=0.484, p=0.031). There were no other significant relationships between the remaining variables. Conclusions: YBT-LQ is a clinical measure which can be used to correlate with hip musculoskeletal characteristics and pitching kinematics in NCAA Division I pitchers.
Article
Background: Elbow injuries cause significant disability for the throwing athlete. Scant data are available on the distribution and characteristics of these injuries in elite baseball players. No study exists that focuses solely on the epidemiological characteristics of elbow injuries in professional baseball players using a comprehensive injury surveillance system. Hypothesis: Professional baseball players have a high occurrence of elbow injuries influenced by factors including length of time playing, time period within the annual baseball season, and specific position played. Study design: Descriptive epidemiological study. Methods: Data on elbow injuries occurring during the 2011-2014 seasons were collected from Major League Baseball's Health Injury and Tracking System, a comprehensive injury surveillance system. Each specific type of elbow injury was evaluated with respect to overall injury rate, years as a professional player, mechanism of injury, treatment, average time lost, and return to play. Results: During the study period, 3185 elbow injuries (n = 430 Major League; n = 2755 Minor League) occurred. The mean number of days missed and percentage requiring surgery were similar between Major and Minor League players. Overall, 20.0% (650/3185) of the injuries required surgical treatment. Pitchers were the most likely to incur an elbow injury (40.0% of injured athletes were pitchers), were the most likely to require surgery (34.2% of injured pitchers required surgery), and had the greatest mean number of days missed when treated nonsurgically (33.2 days). Medial injuries composed 42.1% (1342/3185) of all elbow injuries. Of all elbow surgeries performed during the study period, the highest percentage involved ligaments (372/650; 57.2%). Conclusion: Elbow injuries are a considerable source of disability in professional baseball players. Pitchers are most likely to incur these injuries, are most likely to require surgery, and have the highest mean number of days missed when treated nonsurgically. The most common injuries involve the medial elbow, with ligament injuries most often requiring surgery. This study represents the only investigation to date using a comprehensive injury surveillance system to examine elbow injuries in professional baseball players. It provides a basis for injury prevention and treatment recommendations, establishes the most thorough framework for determining elbow injury risk, and focuses continued research on elbow injury prevention in the elite baseball player.
Article
The purpose of this study was to clarify differences in the kinematic and kinetic profiles of the trunk and lower extremities during baseball pitching in collegiate baseball pitchers, in relation to differences in the pitched ball velocity. The subjects were 30 collegiate baseball pitchers aged 18 to 22 yrs, who were assigned to high- (HG, 37.4 ± 0.8 m·s-1) and low-pitched-ballvelocity groups (LG, 33.3 ± 0.8 m·s-1). Three-dimensional motion analysis with a comprehensive lower-extremity model was used to evaluate kinematic and kinetic parameters during baseball pitching. The ground-reaction forces (GRF) of the pivot and stride legs during pitching were determined using two multicomponent force plates. The joint torques of hip, knee, and ankle were calculated using inverse-dynamics computation of a musculoskeletal human model. To eliminate any effect of variation in body size, kinetic and GRF data were normalized by dividing them by body mass. The maxima and minima of GRF (Fy, Fz, and resultant forces) on the pivot and stride leg were significantly greater in the HG than in the LG (p < 0.05). Furthermore, Fy, Fz, and resultant forces on the stride leg at maximum shoulder external rotation and ball release were significantly greater in the HG than in the LG (p < 0.05). The hip abduction, hip internal rotation and knee extension torques of the pivot leg and the hip adduction torque of the stride leg when it contacted the ground were significantly greater in the HG than in the LG (p < 0.05). These results indicate that, compared with low-ball-velocity pitchers, high-ball-velocity pitchers can generate greater momentum of the lower limbs during baseball pitching.