ArticlePDF Available

Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Recommended Immunization Schedule for Adults Aged 19 Years or Older — United States, 2022

Authors:

Abstract

At its November 2021 meeting, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices* (ACIP) approved the Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule for Ages 19 Years or Older, United States, 2022. The 2022 adult immunization schedule summarizes ACIP recommendations, including several changes to the cover page, tables, and notes from the 2021 immunization schedule.† In addition, the 2022 adult immunization schedule provides an appendix that lists the contraindications to and precautions for all routinely recommended vaccines in the schedule. This schedule can be found on the CDC immunization schedule website (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules). Health care providers are advised to use the cover page, tables, notes, and appendix together. This adult immunization schedule is recommended by ACIP (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip) and approved by CDC (https://www.cdc.gov), the American College of Physicians (https://www.acponline.org), the American Academy of Family Physicians (https://www.aafp.org), the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (https://www.acog.org), the American College of Nurse-Midwives (https://www.midwife.org), the American Academy of Physician Associates (https://www.aapa.org), and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (https://www.shea-online.org).
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
Weekly / Vol. 71 / No. 7 February 18, 2022
INSIDE
234 Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices
Recommended Immunization Schedule for Children
and Adolescents Aged 18 Years or Younger —
United States, 2022
238 Multistate Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529
(Omicron) Variant Infections Among Persons in a
Social Network Attending a Convention — New York
City, November 18–December 20, 2021
243 Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 Transmission
Associated With a Large Indoor Convention —
New York City, November–December 2021
249 Safety Monitoring of COVID-19 Vaccine Booster
Doses Among Adults — United States, September 22,
2021–February 6, 2022
255 Waning 2-Dose and 3-Dose Effectiveness of mRNA
Vaccines Against COVID-19–Associated Emergency
Department and Urgent Care Encounters and
Hospitalizations Among Adults During Periods of
Delta and Omicron Variant Predominance — VISION
Network, 10 States, August 2021–January 2022
264 Effectiveness of Maternal Vaccination with mRNA
COVID-19 Vaccine During Pregnancy Against
COVID-19–Associated Hospitalization in Infants Aged
<6 Months — 17 States, July 2021–January 2022
271 Hospitalizations of Children and Adolescents with
Laboratory-Confirmed COVID-19 — COVID-NET,
14 States, July 2021–January 2022
279 Notes from the Field: Outbreak of COVID-19 Among a
Highly Vaccinated Population Aboard a U.S. Navy
Ship After a Port Visit — Reykjavik, Iceland, July 2021
282 QuickStats
Continuing Education examination available at
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/mmwr_continuingEducation.html
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Recommended Immunization
Schedule for Adults Aged 19 Years or Older — United States, 2022
Neil Murthy, MD1; A. Patricia Wodi, MD1; Henry Bernstein, DO2; Veronica McNally, JD3; Sybil Cineas, MD4; Kevin Ault, MD5
At its November 2021 meeting, the Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices* (ACIP) approved the Recommended
Adult Immunization Schedule for Ages 19 Years or Older,
United States, 2022. The 2022 adult immunization schedule
summarizes ACIP recommendations, including several changes
to the cover page, tables, and notes from the 2021 immuni-
zation schedule. In addition, the 2022 adult immunization
schedule provides an appendix that lists the contraindications
to and precautions for all routinely recommended vaccines
in the schedule. This schedule can be found on the CDC
immunization schedule website (https://www.cdc.gov/vac-
cines/schedules). Health care providers are advised to use the
cover page, tables, notes, and appendix together. This adult
immunization schedule is recommended by ACIP (https://
www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip) and approved by CDC (https://
www.cdc.gov), the American College of Physicians (https://
www.acponline.org), the American Academy of Family
Physicians (https://www.aafp.org), the American College of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists (https://www.acog.org), the
American College of Nurse-Midwives (https://www.midwife.
org), the American Academy of Physician Associates (https://
www.aapa.org), and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology
of America (https://www.shea-online.org).
* Recommendations for routine use of vaccines in adults are developed by ACIP,
a federal advisory committee chartered to provide expert external advice and
guidance to the CDC director on use of vaccines and related agents for the
control of vaccine-preventable diseases in the civilian population of the United
States. Recommendations for routine use of vaccines in adults are harmonized
to the greatest extent possible with recommendations made by the American
Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, and the
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACIP recommendations
approved by the CDC director become agency guidelines on the date published
in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Additional information about
ACIP is available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip.
Past immunization schedules are available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/
schedules/past.html.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
230 MMWR / February 18, 2022 / Vol. 71 / No. 7 US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
The MMWR series of publications is published by the Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA 30329-4027.
Suggested citation: [Author names; first three, then et al., if more than six.] [Report title]. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022;71:[inclusive page numbers].
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Rochelle P. Walensky, MD, MPH, Director
Debra Houry, MD, MPH, Acting Principal Deputy Director
Daniel B. Jernigan, MD, MPH, Deputy Director for Public Health Science and Surveillance
Rebecca Bunnell, PhD, MEd, Director, Office of Science
Jennifer Layden, MD, PhD, Deputy Director, Office of Science
Leslie Dauphin, PhD, Director, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services
MMWR Editorial and Production Staff (Weekly)
Charlotte K. Kent, PhD, MPH, Editor in Chief
Jacqueline Gindler, MD, Editor
Paul Z. Siegel, MD, MPH, Associate Editor
Mary Dott, MD, MPH, Online Editor
Terisa F. Rutledge, Managing Editor
Teresa M. Hood, MS, Lead Technical Writer-Editor
Leigh Berdon, Glenn Damon, Soumya Dunworth, PhD,
Tiana Garrett-Cherry, PhD, MPH, Srila Sen, MA,
Stacy Simon, MA, Morgan Thompson,
Technical Writer-Editors
Martha F. Boyd, Lead Visual Information Specialist
Alexander J. Gottardy, Maureen A. Leahy,
Julia C. Martinroe, Stephen R. Spriggs, Tong Yang,
Visual Information Specialists
Quang M. Doan, MBA, Phyllis H. King,
Terraye M. Starr, Moua Yang,
Information Technolog y Specialists
MMWR Editorial Board
Timothy F. Jones, MD, Chairman
Matthew L. Boulton, MD, MPH
Carolyn Brooks, ScD, MA
Jay C. Butler, MD
Virginia A. Caine, MD
Jonathan E. Fielding, MD, MPH, MBA
David W. Fleming, MD
William E. Halperin, MD, DrPH, MPH
Jewel Mullen, MD, MPH, MPA
Jeff Niederdeppe, PhD
Celeste Philip, MD, MPH
Patricia Quinlisk, MD, MPH
Patrick L. Remington, MD, MPH
Carlos Roig, MS, MA
William Schaffner, MD
Nathaniel Smith, MD, MPH
Morgan Bobb Swanson, BS
Abbigail Tumpey, MPH
Ian Branam, MA,
Acting Lead Health Communication Specialist
Shelton Bartley, MPH, Leslie Hamlin,
Lowery Johnson, Amanda Ray,
Health Communication Specialists
Will Yang, MA,
Visual Information Specialist
ACIP’s recommendations for the use of each vaccine are
developed after in-depth reviews of vaccine-related data,
including the epidemiology and societal impacts of the vaccine-
preventable disease, vaccine efficacy and effectiveness, vaccine
safety, quality of evidence, feasibility of program implemen-
tation, and economic analyses of immunization policy (1).
The adult immunization schedule is published annually to
consolidate and summarize updates to ACIP recommendations
on vaccination of adults and to assist health care providers in
implementing current ACIP recommendations. The use of
vaccine trade names in this report and in the adult immuniza-
tion schedule is for identification purposes only and does not
imply endorsement by ACIP or CDC.
For further guidance on the use of each vaccine, includ-
ing any changes that might occur between annual pub-
lication of the adult immunization schedule, health care
providers are referred to the respective ACIP vaccine
recommendations at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/
acip-recs.§ Printable versions of the 2022 adult immuniza-
tion schedule and ordering instructions are available at
§ CDC encourages organizations to use syndication as a more reliable method
for displaying the most current and accurate immunization schedules on an
organization’s website rather than copying these schedules to their websites.
Use of content syndication requires a one-time step that ensures an organization’s
website displays current schedules as soon as they are published or revised;
instructions for the syndication code are available on CDC’s website (https://
www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/syndicate.html). CDC also offers technical
assistance for implementing this form of content syndication (requests can be
e-mailed to ncirdwebteam@cdc.gov).
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/adult.html#note.
For CDC’s interim clinical considerations for the use of
COVID-19 vaccines, health care providers are referred to:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-consider-
ations/covid-19-vaccines-us.html.
Changes in the 2022 Adult Immunization Schedule
Vaccine-specific changes in the 2022 immunization sched-
ule for adults aged ≥19 years include new or updated ACIP
recommendations for hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) (2), influ-
enza vaccine (3), pneumococcal vaccines (4), recombinant
zoster vaccine (RZV) (5), and COVID-19 vaccine (available
at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/vacc-specific/
covid-19.html). Changes have also been made to the human
papillomavirus (HPV); measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR);
meningococcal; and varicella (VAR) vaccination sections to
improve clarity in the language. In addition, an appendix list-
ing the contraindications to and precautions for each vaccine
has been added to the schedule this year.
Cover page
A step instructing providers to review the newly added
appendix has been added to the “How to use the adult
immunization schedule” box.
The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America has
been added as a partner organization approving the
adult schedule.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
MMWR / February 18, 2022 / Vol. 71 / No. 7 231
US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
PCV15 (Vaxneuvance) and PCV20 (Prevnar 20) have been
added to the table of vaccine abbreviations and trade names.
PCV13 (Prevnar 13) has been removed from the list of
vaccine abbreviations and trade names.
A QR code has been added at the bottom of the cover page
for health care providers to access the online schedule (https://
www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/adult.html).
Table 1 (Routine Immunization Schedule)
Zoster row: For adults aged 19–49 years, the color of the
row was changed to purple indicating that RZV is now
recommended for adults in this age group who have
immunocompromising conditions. The text overlay now
states, “2 doses for immunocompromising conditions
(see notes).”
Pneumococcal row: All recommended pneumococcal
vaccines (i.e., PCV15, PCV20, and PPSV23) have been
collapsed into one row. Guidance on which vaccines are
indicated for certain age groups is displayed by the
corresponding colors and overlying text. For adults aged
19–64 years, the row is purple, indicating that pneumococcal
vaccination is recommended for adults in this age group
only if they have an additional risk factor or another
indication. For adults aged ≥65 years, the row is yellow,
indicating that pneumococcal vaccination is universally
recommended for adults in this age group, if they have
never received a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
previously or if their previous pneumococcal vaccination
history is unknown. The text overlay now states, “1 dose
PCV15 followed by PPSV23 OR 1 dose PCV20
(see notes).”
Hepatitis B row: For adults aged 19–59 years, the row is
yellow, indicating that HepB vaccination is universally
recommended for adults in this age group, and purple for
adults aged ≥60 years, indicating that HepB vaccination
is recommended for adults in this age group if they have
an additional risk factor or another indication. The text
overlay now states “2, 3, or 4 doses depending on vaccine
or condition.”
Table 2 (Immunization by Medical Indication Schedule)
Header: For the HIV infection columns, CD4 percentages
are displayed along with CD4 counts to harmonize
presentation of this information with that in the child/
adolescent schedule.
Legend: The description of the color red in the legend has
been reworded to “Contraindicated or not recommended.
LAIV4 row: The text overlay in the red box was changed
to “Contraindicated” to increase clarity in the language
and to align more closely with ACIP recommendations.
MMR row: The text overlay for the red boxes was changed
to “Contraindicated” to increase clarity in the language
and to align more closely with ACIP recommendations.
VAR row: The text overlay for the red boxes was changed
to “Contraindicated” to increase clarity in the language
and to align more closely with ACIP recommendations.
RZV row: Under the Immunocompromised and HIV
infection columns, the row is yellow indicating that RZV is
recommended for these subgroups. In addition, the text overlay
under these columns now states, “2 doses at age ≥19 years.
HepB row: The row is now entirely yellow, indicating that
hepatitis B vaccination is recommended for all risk-based
groups in Table 2. The text overlay states, “3 doses (see notes)”
in the pregnancy column, and “2, 3, or 4 doses depending
on vaccine or condition,” in the remaining columns.
Notes
The notes for each vaccine are presented in alphabetical
order. Edits have been made throughout the Notes section
to harmonize language between the child/adolescent and the
adult immunization schedules to the greatest extent possible.
COVID-19: The hyperlinks to the ACIP recommendations
for the use of COVID-19 vaccines and the CDC’s Interim
Clinical Considerations for the use of COVID-19 vaccines
are included in this box.
• HepB: The “Routine vaccination” section now states that
adults aged 19–59 years are recommended to receive a 2-,
3-, or 4-dose series, with details provided. The “Special
situations” section outlines the risk-based recommendations
for adults aged ≥60 years. In addition, language has been
added stating that “anyone age 60 years or older who does
not meet risk-based recommendations may still receive
Hepatitis B vaccination.
HPV: A minor edit was made to the “Routine vaccination”
section to increase clarity; it now states, “No additional
dose recommended when any HPV vaccine series has been
completed using the recommended dosing intervals.” In
addition, minor wording changes were made to the “Special
situations” section, under the immunocompromising
conditions sub-bullet, which now reads, “3-dose series,
even for those who initiate vaccination at age 9 through
14 years.” Wording for the pregnancy sub-bullet was
rearranged to improve clarity.
• Influenza: The language was edited to clarify the age as
“19 years or older,” to be consistent with the schedule. A
hyperlink to the 2021–22 influenza recommendations and
a bullet for the 2022–23 influenza recommendations were
added. The “Special situations” section was condensed by
referring health care providers to the appendix listing the
contraindications and precautions for the influenza vaccines.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
232 MMWR / February 18, 2022 / Vol. 71 / No. 7 US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Meningococcal vaccination: At the end of the section, a
note was added that states, “MenB vaccines may be
administered simultaneously with MenACWY vaccines if
indicated, but at a different anatomic site, when feasible.
MMR: In the “Special situations” section, CD4
percentages in addition to CD4 counts in the HIV
infection bullet were added to harmonize language with
the child/adolescent schedule.
Pneumococcal vaccination: The section has been updated
to reflect ACIP’s new recommendations for PCV15 and
PCV20 vaccines. The “Routine vaccination” section now
states that persons aged ≥65 years “who have not previously
received a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine or whose
previous vaccination history is unknown should receive
1 dose of PCV15 or 1 dose of PCV20. If PCV15 is used,
this should be followed by a dose of PPSV23.” Similarly,
the “Special situations” section has changed, and this
section states that anyone “aged 19 through 64 years with
certain underlying medical conditions or other risk factors
who has not previously received a pneumococcal conjugate
vaccine or whose previous vaccination history is unknown
should receive 1 dose of PCV15 or 1 dose of PCV20. If
PCV15 is used, this should be followed by a dose of
PPSV23.” Guidance for dosing intervals between PCV15
and PPSV23 and for patients who have previously received
PCV13 or PPSV23 in the past is also included. A note
added at the end lists all the underlying medical conditions
or risk factors that would render those aged 19–64 years
eligible to receive pneumococcal vaccination.
Varicella: In the “Special situations” section, CD4
percentages in addition to CD4 counts in the HIV
infection bullet were added to harmonize language with
the child/adolescent schedule.
Zoster: In the “Special situations” section under the
pregnancy bullet, the language was revised to increase
clarity. This bullet now states, “There is currently no ACIP
recommendation for RZV use in pregnancy. Consider
delaying RZV until after pregnancy.” In addition, the
immunocompromising conditions bullet was revised to
reflect the new ACIP recommendations for zoster
vaccination. This bullet now states, “RZV is recommended
for use in persons aged 19 years and older who are or will
be immunodeficient or immunosuppressed because of
disease or therapy.”
Appendix (Contraindications and Precautions)
The appendix includes all the contraindications to and
precautions for each of the vaccines listed in the 2022
adult immunization schedule. The information presented
in this appendix is adapted from the 2021–22 influenza
vaccine recommendations (3) and from ACIP General
Best Practice Guidelines for Immunization (6).
Additional Information
The Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule, United
States, 2022, is available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/
schedules/hcp/adult.html and in the Annals of Internal Medicine
(https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M22-0036). The
full ACIP recommendations for each vaccine are also avail-
able at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/index.
html. All vaccines identified in Tables 1 and 2 (except PCV15,
PCV20, and zoster vaccine) also appear in the Recommended
Immunization Schedule for Children and Adolescents, United
States, 2022 (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/
imz/child-adolescent.html). The notes and appendices for
vaccines that appear in both the adult immunization schedule
and the child and adolescent immunization schedule have been
harmonized to the greatest extent possible.
Acknowledgments
Rosters of current and past members of the Advisory Committee
on Immunization Practices are available at https://www.cdc.gov/
vaccines/acip/committee/members-archive.html.
ACIP Combined Immunization Schedule Work Group
Kevin Ault (Chair). Members: Henry Bernstein, Carolyn Bridges,
Uzo Chukwuma, Sybil Cineas, Sarah Coles, Sean Dade, Katherine
Debiec, Marci Drees, John Epling, Holly Fontenot, Sandra Fryhofer,
Kathleen Harriman, Robert Hopkins, Molly Howell, Paul Hunter,
Karen Ketner, David Kim, Jane Kim, Marie-Michelle Leger, Susan
Lett, Veronica McNally, Sarah McQueen, Amy B. Middleman,
Sean O’Leary, Diane Peterson, Chad Rittle, William Schaffner, Ken
Schmader, Rhoda Sperling, Patricia Stinchfield, Peter Szilagyi, L.J.
Tan, Thomas Weiser. Contributors: Neil Murthy (CDC co-Lead),
A. Patricia Wodi (CDC co-Lead). CDC Contributors: Anna Acosta,
Tara Anderson, Kathy Byrd, Margaret Cortese, Kathleen Dooling,
Amy Parker-Fiebelkorn, Mark Freedman, Paul Gastañaduy, Lisa
Grohskopf, Susan Hariri, Aaron Harris, Fiona Havers, Holly Hill,
Tara Jatlaoui, Suzanne Johnson-DeLeon, Miwako Kobayashi, Ram
Koppaka, Andrew Kroger, Tatiana Lanzieri, Mona Marin, Lauri
Markowitz, Sarah Mbaeyi, Lucy McNamara, Elissa Meites, Noele
Nelson, Sara Oliver, Gabriela Paz-Bailey, Priti Patel, Tamara Pilishvili,
Hilda Razzaghi, Janell Routh, Sarah Schillie, Mark Weng, Akiko
Wilson, JoEllen Wolicki.
Corresponding author: Neil Murthy, ycz4@cdc.gov, 404-718-5514.
1Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and
Respiratory Diseases, CDC; 2Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell
and Cohen Children’s Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York; 3Fanny
Strong Foundation, West Bloomfield, Michigan; 4The Warren Alpert Medical
School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; 5University of Kansas
Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
MMWR / February 18, 2022 / Vol. 71 / No. 7 233
US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
All authors have completed and submitted the International
Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of
potential conflicts of interest. Henry Bernstein reports that he is
the editor of Current Opinion in Pediatrics Office Pediatrics Series
and received a presentation honorarium from the Florida chapter
of American Academy of Pediatrics. Veronica McNally reports that
she is the president of the Franny Strong Foundation. Kevin Ault
reports having received a grant from the National Cancer Institute,
consulting fees from PathoVax, and payments supporting attending
meetings and/or travel from the American College of Obstetricians
and Gynecologists. In addition, Kevin Ault reports that he serves as
a volunteer on the medical advisory board of Family Fighting Flu,
and as a member of the infectious disease working group for the
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. No other
potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
References
1. CDC. Charter of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.
Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC;
2018. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/committee/acip-charter.pdf
2. CDC: Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). ACIP
Recommendations. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human
Services, CDC; 2021. Accessed January 25, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/
vaccines/acip/recommendations.html
3. Grohskopf LA, Alyanak E, Ferdinands JM, et al. Prevention and
control of seasonal influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices—United States,
2021–22 influenza season. MMWR Recomm Rep 2021;70(RR-5):1–28.
PMID:34448800 https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr7005a1
4. Kobayashi M, Farrar JL, Gierke R, et al. Use of 15-valent pneumococcal
conjugate vaccine and 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine among
U.S. adults: updated recommendations of the Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices—United States, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal
Wkly Rep 2022;71:109–17. PMID:35085226 https://doi.org/10.15585/
mmwr.mm7104a1
5. Anderson TC, Masters NB, Guo A, et al. Use of recombinant zoster
vaccine in immunocompromised adults aged ≥19 years: recommendations
of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices—United States,
2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022;71:80–4. PMID:35051134
https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7103a2
6. Kroger A, Bahta L, Hunter P. General best practice guidelines for
immunization: best practices guidance of the Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices (ACIP). Atlanta, GA: Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices: 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-
recs/general- recs/downloads/generalrecs.pdf
... Una creciente evidencia en la última década sitúa la vacunación dentro de las guías de práctica clínica, como una prioridad en estos pacientes con objeto de reducir complicaciones graves relacionadas con infecciones inmunoprevenibles. La reciente actualización de 2024 de las recomendaciones de la ADA 6 , así como el consenso de 2023 de la Sociedad Americana de Endocrinología Clínica (AACE) 7 incluyen el consejo vacunal en las personas con DM según criterio de edad, atendiendo a la recomendación emitida por el organismo regulador estadounidense, el Comité Asesor sobre Inmunización (ACIP) 8 . En España, al margen de la normativa específica de vacunación de cada comunidad autónoma, la última actualización de 2018 respecto al calendario vacunal de población con DM reflejaba la recomendación de vacunar anualmente frente a la gripe y completar la pauta de inmunización antineumocócica 9 , estrategia que fue ratificada en el Consejo Interterritorial del Sistema Nacional de Salud de 2023 10 . ...
Article
La diabetes mellitus (DM) es una enfermedad con tendencia al alza a nivel global; no solo conlleva complicaciones cardiovasculares, sino también mayor susceptibilidad a diversas infecciones, con peor evolución, mayor necesidad de hospitalización e incremento en la mortalidad. Factores como la neuropatía periférica o la hiperglucemia sostenida deterioran la respuesta inmunitaria, facilitando la infección. Otros factores adicionales, muy prevalentes en la diabetes, como la obesidad, el tabaquismo, la edad avanzada y el tiempo de evolución de la enfermedad, aumentan la vulnerabilidad a la enfermedad infecciosa. La creciente evidencia de la última década sitúa la vacunación, dentro de las guías de práctica clínica, como una prioridad en estos pacientes con objeto de reducir complicaciones graves relacionadas con infecciones inmunoprevenibles. Así lo recoge la última actualización de las recomendaciones de la Sociedad Americana de Diabetes (ADA) en 2024 que hace especial énfasis en la inmunización frente a la gripe de forma anual, COVID-19, neumococo, hepatitis B y herpes zóster, disponibles todas ellas en el territorio nacional. La última y reciente incorporación es la inmunización contra el virus respiratorio sincitial, cuya vacuna se incorporará previsiblemente a lo largo del 2024 en España.
... The advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP), recently updated in 2022, has stressed the importance of 2 vaccines (hep B and pneumonia) that are recommended for patients receiving dialysis. 2 The Forum of End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Networks also published a vaccination toolkit online. 3 The common vaccines for influenza, pneumococcal pneumonia, and hepatitis B are summarized in Table 1. ...
Article
Vaccinating patients receiving dialysis may prevent morbidity and mortality in this vulnerable population. The National Forum of End-Stage Renal Disease Networks (the Forum) published a revised vaccination toolkit in 2021 to update evidence and recommendations on vaccination for patients receiving dialysis. Significant changes in the last 10 years include more data supporting the use of a high-dose influenza vaccine, the introduction of the Heplisav-B vaccine for hepatitis B, and changes in pneumococcal vaccines, including the approval of the PCV15 and PCV20 to replace the PCV13 and PPSV23 vaccines. Additional key items include the introduction of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and a new vaccine to prevent respiratory syncytial virus disease. Historically, influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations were routinely administered by dialysis facilities, and because of possible risks of hematogenous spread of hepatitis B, dialysis providers often have detailed hepatitis B vaccine protocols. In March 2021, COVID-19 vaccines were made available for dialysis facilities to administer, although with the end of the public health emergency, vaccine policies by dialysis facilities against COVID-19 remains uncertain. The respiratory syncytial virus vaccine was authorized in 2023, and how dialysis facilities will approach this vaccine also remains uncertain. This review summarizes the Forum’s vaccination toolkit and discusses the role of the dialysis facility in vaccinating patients to reduce the risk of severe infections.
... Hastalık Önleme ve Kontrol Merkezi Aşılama Danışma Komitesi 2013 yılında erişkin aşılama için güncellenmiş standart öneriler yayınladı ve aşılanması gereken riskli erişkinleri belirledi (4). En son yayınlanan önerilerde de yakalanan her fırsatta da riskli grupların aşılanması gerektiğini belirtti (5). ...
Article
Full-text available
z Amaç: Erişkin bağışıklama toplum sağlığı ve koruyucu hekimlikte önemli bir yer tutar. Erişkin bağışıklamada çocukluk çağı aşılarında olduğu gibi zorunluluk olmaması nedeniyle, aşı uygulanabilecek hiçbir fırsatın kaçırılmaması gerekir. Bu nedenle hastanelerde "Erişkin Aşılama Ünite"lerinin önemli olduğunu düşünüyoruz. Bu çalışma ile hastanemiz bünyesinde hizmet veren "Erişkin Aşılama Ünitesi" deneyimimizi paylaşarak, bu ünitelerin yaygınlaşmasına katkıda bulunmak amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada 01.01.2021-31.12.2021 tarihleri arasında hastanemiz erişkin aşı odasında yapılmış olan aşılar değerlendirilmeye alınmıştır. Başvuran tüm hastaların ilk başvurusu analiz edilmiştir. Aşılama yapılan hastaların bilgilerine tutulan aşı kayıt defterinden ve bilgi işlem sistemi üzerinden ulaşılmış, hastalara ait yaş, cinsiyet, yönlendirildiği birim, uygulanan aşı, aşıya neden olan altta yatan durum bilgileri kaydedilmiştir. Aynı zamanda aşı uygulanan kişilerin aşılama sonrasında 1 hafta içinde aşıya bağlı herhangi bir yan etki şikayeti ile enfeksiyon hastalıkları polikliniğine başvurusu olup olmadığı hastanemiz bilgi işlem kayıtlarından kontrol edilmiştir. Toplanan veriler, sayı ve yüzde olarak ifade edilmiştir. Bulgular: Ünitemizde bir yıllık süre içerisinde 1005 kişiye aşı uygulanmıştır. Aşı yapılan kişilerin ortalama yaşları 37,64±14,35 olup, %55,2'si erkekti. Aşı ünitesinde en çok uygulanan aşı hepatit B aşısı (%44,2) olup, bunu sırası ile tetanos aşısı (%14,4), pnömokok aşısı (%11,9), meningokok aşısı (%11,4), hepatit A aşısı (%9,3), ve Kızamık-Kızamıkçık-Kabakulak aşısı (%7,8) izlemiştir. Sonuç: Yaşam süresinin uzaması, immünosüpresif tedavilerin artması nedeniyle erişkin bağışıklama giderek önem kazanmaktadır. Ek hastalıkları nedeniyle riskli erişkin hastaların, takip edildikleri merkezlerde aşı ünitelerinin olması, bu kişilerin aşıya ulaşımını kolaylaştırmaktadır. Bir yıllık sürede bini aşkın kişinin aşılanması, bu ünitelerin ne kadar önemli olduğunu ve işlevsel potansiyelini ortaya koymaktadır. Erişkin hastalara ulaşabilmek için ülke çapında "Erişkin Aşılama Üniteleri"nin artırılması önemlidir. Abstract Objectives: Adult immunization is important for community health and preventive medicine. Since adult immunization is not compulsory, as in childhood vaccinations, opportunity to vaccination should not be missed. For this reason, we think that "Adult Vaccination Units" are important in hospitals. With this study, it is aimed to contribute to the spread of these units by sharing our "Adult Vaccination Unit" experience within our hospital Materials and Methods: In this study, the vaccines made in the adult vaccination room of our hospital between 01.01.2021 and 31.12.2021 were evaluated. The first application of patients was analysed. The information of the patients was obtained from the vaccine registry and the data processing system, and the age, gender, referred unit to, the vaccine administered, and underlying diseases were recorded. It was checked from the data processing records of hospital whether the vaccinated people applied to the infectious diseases polyclinic with any complaints of side effects related to the vaccine within 1 week after the vaccination. Collected data are expressed as numbers and percentages. Results: In our unit, vaccination was applied to 1005 people within one year. The mean ages of vaccinated people were 37.64±14.35 and 55.2% were male. The most frequent applied vaccine was hepatitis B vaccine (44.2%), which was followed by tetanus vaccine (14.4%), pneumococcal vaccine (11.9%), meningococcal vaccine (11.4%), hepatitis A vaccine (9.3%) and Measles-Rubella-Rubeola vaccine (7.8%).
... Immunization Practices (ACIP), released in February 2022 (Murthy et al., 2022). ...
Chapter
Chapter 2: This chapter discusses the global prevalence as well as the geographic distribution of HIV-1 and HIV-2 infections and updates on recent shared global initiatives. The demographic trends in HIV in the United States, especially regarding gender, sexuality, race, ethnicity, age, injection-drug use, socioeconomic status, and recent initiatives are reviewed. Special attention is paid to HIV among communities of color, as well as women, children, and adolescences. The role of HIV in men who have sex with men and the transgender community is reviewed in detail. Chapter 8: HIV Testing and Counselling lists and describes the various types of HIV testing available. The chapter also presents an overview of HIV counselling. HIV testing terminology and algorithms are presented to the reader along with descriptive figures. Laboratory markers for HIV are reviewed. The chapter describes who should be tested, as well as pre and post-test counselling elements. A section of the chapter is dedicated to special populations and environments (blood supply screening, prenatal screening, testing settings) Strategies to improve uptake of HIV testing are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Global evidence on the association between vaccines and renal adverse events (AEs) is inconclusive. This pharmacovigilance study analyzed a total of 120,715,116 reports from VigiBase collected between 1967 and 2022. We evaluated the global reporting of acute kidney injury (AKI), glomerulonephritis (GN), and tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN) and assessed disproportionate signals between vaccines and renal AEs using reporting odds ratios (ROR) and the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval of the information component (IC025) in comparison with the entire database. The number and proportion of reports on AKI, GN, and TIN gradually increased, with a substantial increase after 2020. Disproportionate reporting of AKI was significant for COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (ROR, 2.38; IC025, 1.09). Fourteen vaccines were significantly disproportionate for higher GN reporting, and the highest disproportionality for GN reporting was observed for COVID-19 mRNA (ROR, 13.41; IC025, 2.90) and hepatitis B vaccines (ROR, 11.35; IC025, 3.18). Disproportionate TIN reporting was significant for COVID-19 mRNA (ROR, 2.43; IC025, 0.99) and human papillomavirus (ROR, 1.75; IC025, 0.19) vaccines. Significant disproportionality in the reporting of AKI, GN, and TIN was observed in patients exposed to multiple vaccines, including COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, alongside increasing global reports of vaccine-associated renal AEs.
Article
Full-text available
Spatial, temporal, and space–time scan statistics can be used for geographical surveillance, identifying temporal and spatial patterns, and detecting outliers. While statistical cluster analysis is a valuable tool for identifying patterns, optimizing resource allocation, and supporting decision-making, accurately predicting future spatial clusters remains a significant challenge. Given the known relative risks of spatial clusters over the past k time intervals, the main objective of the present study is to predict the relative risks for the subsequent interval, k+1. Building on our prior research, we propose a predictive Markov chain model with an embedded corrector component. This corrector utilizes either multiple linear regression or an exponential smoothing method, selecting the one that minimizes the relative distance between the observed and predicted values in the k-th interval. To test the proposed method, we first calculated the relative risks of statistically significant spatial clusters of COVID-19 mortality in the U.S. over seven time intervals from May 2020 to March 2023. Then, for each time interval, we selected the top 25 clusters with the highest relative risks and iteratively predicted the relative risks of clusters from intervals three to seven. The predictive accuracies ranged from moderate to high, indicating the potential applicability of this method for predictive disease analytic and future pandemic preparedness.
Article
Disclaimer In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. Purpose There is a growing number of specialty medications with accompanying requirements that exceed standard characteristics, which may be referred to as “ultra complex.” This article details examples of ultra-complex specialty medications, including the characteristics that make them ultra complex, and strategies implemented by an integrated health-system specialty pharmacy (IHSSP) to maintain an optimal patient journey. Summary Before therapy initiation, ultra-complex specialty medications often require additional steps that go beyond what is required of traditional specialty treatments, such as ensuring patients have appointments scheduled and attended and coordinating medical procedures. At the time of initiation, ultra-complex therapy might require additional immunizations or dosing based on specific tests. Finally, specialty pharmacists managing ultra-complex medications often have to dedicate more time and effort to medication monitoring to ensure patients are able to stay on appropriate doses without treatment interruption. Manufacturers of ultra-complex medications must consider the resources and requirements that will be needed to ensure the success of these medications in the real world. Health systems must be aware of resource and staffing requirements necessary to ensure the success of ultra-complex medications. One consideration is the addition of a dedicated risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) pharmacist whose primary role is to ensure compliance with REMS requirements. Conclusion Ultra-complex specialty medications provide unprecedented therapeutic advancements but demand multidisciplinary resources and workflows to enable safe medication initiation, appropriate dosing and monitoring, and achievement of desired therapeutic goals. IHSSPs are integrated into the care team and provide advanced monitoring capabilities, making them an ideal setting for managing ultra-complex specialty medications. External IHSSP partnerships working together before and after the launch of ultra-complex specialty medications allow for an optimal patient and provider journey from medication initiation through ongoing care coordination and monitoring.
Chapter
Chapter 2: This chapter discusses the global prevalence as well as the geographic distribution of HIV-1 and HIV-2 infections and updates on recent shared global initiatives. The demographic trends in HIV in the United States, especially regarding gender, sexuality, race, ethnicity, age, injection-drug use, socioeconomic status, and recent initiatives are reviewed. Special attention is paid to HIV among communities of color, as well as women, children, and adolescences. The role of HIV in men who have sex with men and the transgender community is reviewed in detail. Chapter 8: HIV Testing and Counselling lists and describes the various types of HIV testing available. The chapter also presents an overview of HIV counselling. HIV testing terminology and algorithms are presented to the reader along with descriptive figures. Laboratory markers for HIV are reviewed. The chapter describes who should be tested, as well as pre and post-test counselling elements. A section of the chapter is dedicated to special populations and environments (blood supply screening, prenatal screening, testing settings) Strategies to improve uptake of HIV testing are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Zoster Vaccine Recombinant, Adjuvanted (Shingrix, GlaxoSmithKline [GSK]) is a 2-dose (0.5 mL each) subunit vaccine containing recombinant glycoprotein E in combination with adjuvant (AS01B) that was licensed in the United States for prevention of herpes zoster for adults aged ≥50 years by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and recommended for immunocompetent adults aged ≥50 years by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) in 2017* (1). On July 23, 2021, the FDA expanded the indication for recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) to include adults aged ≥18 years who are or will be at increased risk for herpes zoster because of immunodeficiency or immunosuppression caused by known disease or therapy (2). On October 20, 2021, ACIP recommended 2 doses of RZV for the prevention of herpes zoster and related complications in adults aged ≥19 years† who are or will be immunodeficient or immunosuppressed because of disease or therapy. RZV is the first herpes zoster vaccine approved for use in immunocompromised persons. With moderate to high vaccine efficacy and an acceptable safety profile, RZV has the potential to prevent considerable herpes zoster incidence and related complications. This report updates previous ACIP recommendations for the prevention of herpes zoster (1,3).
Article
Full-text available
This report updates the 2020–21 recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) regarding the use of seasonal influenza vaccines in the United States (MMWR Recomm Rep 2020;69[No. RR-8]). Routine annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all persons aged ≥6 months who do not have contraindications. For each recipient, a licensed and age-appropriate vaccine should be used. ACIP makes no preferential recommendation for a specific vaccine when more than one licensed, recommended, and age-appropriate vaccine is available. During the 2021–22 influenza season, the following types of vaccines are expected to be available: inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV4s), recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV4), and live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4). The 2021–22 influenza season is expected to coincide with continued circulation of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Influenza vaccination of persons aged ≥6 months to reduce prevalence of illness caused by influenza will reduce symptoms that might be confused with those of COVID-19. Prevention of and reduction in the severity of influenza illness and reduction of outpatient visits, hospitalizations, and intensive care unit admissions through influenza vaccination also could alleviate stress on the U.S. health care system. Guidance for vaccine planning during the pandemic is available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pandemic-guidance/index.html. Recommendations for the use of COVID-19 vaccines are available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/vacc-specific/covid-19.html, and additional clinical guidance is available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/covid-19-vaccines-us.html. Updates described in this report reflect discussions during public meetings of ACIP that were held on October 28, 2020; February 25, 2021; and June 24, 2021. Primary updates to this report include the following six items. First, all seasonal influenza vaccines available in the United States for the 2021–22 season are expected to be quadrivalent. Second, the composition of 2021–22 U.S. influenza vaccines includes updates to the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and influenza A(H3N2) components. U.S.-licensed influenza vaccines will contain hemagglutinin derived from an influenza A/Victoria/2570/2019 (H1N1)pdm09-like virus (for egg-based vaccines) or an influenza A/Wisconsin/588/2019 (H1N1)pdm09-like virus (for cell culture–based and recombinant vaccines), an influenza A/Cambodia/e0826360/2020 (H3N2)-like virus, an influenza B/Washington/02/2019 (Victoria lineage)-like virus, and an influenza B/Phuket/3073/2013 (Yamagata lineage)-like virus. Third, the approved age indication for the cell culture–based inactivated influenza vaccine, Flucelvax Quadrivalent (ccIIV4), has been expanded from ages ≥4 years to ages ≥2 years. Fourth, discussion of administration of influenza vaccines with other vaccines includes considerations for coadministration of influenza vaccines and COVID-19 vaccines. Providers should also consult current ACIP COVID-19 vaccine recommendations and CDC guidance concerning coadministration of these vaccines with influenza vaccines. Vaccines that are given at the same time should be administered in separate anatomic sites. Fifth, guidance concerning timing of influenza vaccination now states that vaccination soon after vaccine becomes available can be considered for pregnant women in the third trimester. As previously recommended, children who need 2 doses (children aged 6 months through 8 years who have never received influenza vaccine or who have not previously received a lifetime total of ≥2 doses) should receive their first dose as soon as possible after vaccine becomes available to allow the second dose (which must be administered ≥4 weeks later) to be received by the end of October. For nonpregnant adults, vaccination in July and August should be avoided unless there is concern that later vaccination might not be possible. Sixth, contraindications and precautions to the use of ccIIV4 and RIV4 have been modified, specifically with regard to persons with a history of severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to an influenza vaccine. A history of a severe allergic reaction to a previous dose of any egg-based IIV, LAIV, or RIV of any valency is a precaution to use of ccIIV4. A history of a severe allergic reaction to a previous dose of any egg-based IIV, ccIIV, or LAIV of any valency is a precaution to use of RIV4. Use of ccIIV4 and RIV4 in such instances should occur in an inpatient or outpatient medical setting under supervision of a provider who can recognize and manage a severe allergic reaction; providers can also consider consulting with an allergist to help identify the vaccine component responsible for the reaction. For ccIIV4, history of a severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to any ccIIV of any valency or any component of ccIIV4 is a contraindication to future use of ccIIV4. For RIV4, history of a severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to any RIV of any valency or any component of RIV4 is a contraindication to future use of RIV4. This report focuses on recommendations for the use of vaccines for the prevention and control of seasonal influenza during the 2021–22 influenza season in the United States. A brief summary of the recommendations and a link to the most recent Background Document containing additional information are available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/vacc-specific/flu.html. These recommendations apply to U.S.-licensed influenza vaccines used according to Food and Drug Administration–licensed indications. Updates and other information are available from CDC’s influenza website (https://www.cdc.gov/flu); vaccination and health care providers should check this site periodically for additional information.
Article
In 2021, 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) (PCV20) (Wyeth Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Pfizer Inc.) and 15-valent PCV (PCV15) (Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.) were licensed by the Food and Drug Administration for adults aged ≥18 years, based on studies that compared antibody responses to PCV20 and PCV15 with those to 13-valent PCV (PCV13) (Wyeth Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Pfizer Inc.). Antibody responses to two additional serotypes included in PCV15 were compared to corresponding responses after PCV13 vaccination, and antibody responses to seven additional serotypes included in PCV20 were compared with those to the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) (Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.). On October 20, 2021, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended use of either PCV20 alone or PCV15 in series with PPSV23 for all adults aged ≥65 years, and for adults aged 19-64 years with certain underlying medical conditions or other risk factors* who have not previously received a PCV or whose previous vaccination history is unknown. ACIP employed the Evidence to Recommendation (EtR) framework,† using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE)§ approach to guide its deliberations regarding use of these vaccines. Before this, PCV13 and PPSV23 were recommended for use for U.S. adults and the recommendations varied by age and risk groups. This was simplified in the new recommendations.
General best practice guidelines for immunization: best practices guidance of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)
  • A Kroger
  • L Bahta
  • P Hunter
Kroger A, Bahta L, Hunter P. General best practice guidelines for immunization: best practices guidance of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Atlanta, GA: Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices: 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/aciprecs/general-recs/downloads/generalrecs.pdf