A preview of this full-text is provided by The Royal Society.
Content available from Proceedings of the Royal Society B
This content is subject to copyright.
royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rspb
Research
Cite this article: Sheardown E, Torres-Perez
JV, Anagianni S, Fraser SE, Vallortigara G,
Butterworth B, Miletto-Petrazzini ME, Brennan
CH. 2022 Characterizing ontogeny of quantity
discrimination in zebrafish. Proc. R. Soc. B 289:
20212544.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.2544
Received: 22 November 2021
Accepted: 7 January 2022
Subject Category:
Behaviour
Subject Areas:
behaviour, cognition
Keywords:
zebrafish, numerical cognition, ontogeny,
quantity discrimination
Authors for correspondence:
Maria Elena Miletto-Petrazzini
e-mail: mariaelena.milettopetrazzini@gmail.
com
Caroline H. Brennan
e-mail: c.h.brennan@qmul.ac.uk
Characterizing ontogeny of quantity
discrimination in zebrafish
Eva Sheardown
1,3
, Jose Vicente Torres-Perez
2,3
, Sofia Anagianni
3
,
Scott E. Fraser
4
, Giorgio Vallortigara
5
, Brian Butterworth
6
,
Maria Elena Miletto-Petrazzini
3,7
and Caroline H. Brennan
3
1
Centre for Developmental Neurobiology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College
London, New Hunt’s House, Guy’s Campus, London SE1 1UL, UK
2
Departament de Biologia Cellular, Biologia Funcional i Antropologia física, Fac. de CC. Biològiques, Universitat
de València, C/ Dr. Moliner 50, 46100 Burjassot (València), Spain
3
School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London,
E1 4NS, UK
4
Michelson Center for Convergent Bioscience, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
5
Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
6
UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AZ, UK
7
Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy
ES, 0000-0002-1801-7025; JVT-P, 0000-0001-6390-9690; SA, 0000-0001-5784-582X;
SEF, 0000-0002-5377-0223; GV, 0000-0001-8192-9062; BB, 0000-0001-8201-3347;
MEM-P, 0000-0002-5204-5863; CHB, 0000-0002-4169-4083
A sense of non-symbolic numerical magnitudes is widespread in the animal
kingdom and has been documented in adult zebrafish. Here, we investi-
gated the ontogeny of this ability using a group size preference (GSP) task
in juvenile zebrafish. Fish showed GSP from 21 days post-fertilization and
reliably chose the larger group when presented with discriminations of
between 1 versus 3, 2 versus 5 and 2 versus 3 conspecifics but not 2
versus 4 conspecifics. When the ratio between the number of conspecifics
in each group was maintained at 1 : 2, fish could discriminate between 1
versus 2 individuals and 3 versus 6, but again, not when given a choice
between 2 versus 4 individuals. These findings are in agreement with studies
in other species, suggesting the systems involved in quantity representation
do not operate separately from other cognitive mechanisms. Rather they
suggest quantity processing in fishes may be the result of an interplay
between attentional, cognitive and memory-related mechanisms as in
humans and other animals. Our results emphasize the potential of the use
of zebrafish to explore the genetic and neural processes underlying the onto-
geny and function of number cognition.
1. Introduction
One aspect of quantity discrimination is the evaluation of the number of items
in a group, the numerosity. Although quantitative abilities of many species
have been studied [1–3], research into the ontogeny of the ability to assess
numerosity has been restricted so far to humans [4,5], fish (Poecilia reticulata)
and domestic chicks (Gallus gallus) [6,7]. Typically, in species other than
chicks, which are a precocial species, the ability to assess numerosity changes
with age until individuals reach adulthood. However, 1-day-old guppies
(P. reticulata) can distinguish between a small number of conspecifics in a
similar way to 40-day-old guppies [8].
Interestingly, guppies show no ratio effect for contrasts between numeros-
ities 1 to 4, but the familiar ratio effect, Weber’s Law, for larger numerosities
[9]. Similar findings have been observed in human infants [10–14] suggesting
the existence of conserved mechanisms of numerosity discrimination, though
little is known about either the neural or genetic bases of these abilities (for a
recent review see Lorenzi et al. [15]).
© 2022 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.