ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Psilocybin for Treating Psychiatric Disorders: A Psychonaut Legend or a Promising Therapeutic Perspective?

MDPI
Journal of Xenobiotics (JoX)
Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Psychedelics extracted from plants have been used in religious, spiritual, and mystic practices for millennia. In 1957, Dr. Hofmann identified and synthesized the prodrug psilocybin, a substance present in more than 200 species of psychedelic mushrooms. Although there were limitations related to the scientific design of many studies, clinical observations performed during the 1950s and 1960s showed a potential therapeutic effect of psilocybin for patients affected by depressive symptoms, anxiety, and conversion disorder. Psilocybin was classed as a schedule I substance in 1970, but the fascination with psychedelics has remained almost unchanged over time, promoting a new scientific interest starting in the 1990s. Recent studies have provided further evidence supporting the suggestive hypothesis of the therapeutic use of psilocybin for treating various psychiatric disorders, including pathological anxiety, mood depressive disorder, and addiction.
Content may be subject to copyright.


Citation: Coppola, M.; Bevione, F.;
Mondola, R. Psilocybin for Treating
Psychiatric Disorders: A Psychonaut
Legend or a Promising Therapeutic
Perspective? J. Xenobiot. 2022,12,
41–52. https://doi.org/10.3390/
jox12010004
Academic Editor: Wen-Tsong Hsieh
Received: 25 June 2021
Accepted: 24 November 2021
Published: 7 February 2022
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2022 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
Review
Psilocybin for Treating Psychiatric Disorders: A Psychonaut
Legend or a Promising Therapeutic Perspective?
Maurizio Coppola 1, * , Francesco Bevione 1and Raffaella Mondola 2
1
Department of Addiction, ASL CN2, Corso Coppino 46, 12051 Alba, CN, Italy; francescobevione@gmail.com
2Department of Mental Health, ASL CN1, Via Torino 70/B, 12037 Saluzzo, CN, Italy;
raffaellamondola@virgilio.it
*Correspondence: mauriziocoppola1974@gmail.com; Tel.: +39-017-331-6210; Fax: +39-017-335-067
Abstract:
Psychedelics extracted from plants have been used in religious, spiritual, and mystic
practices for millennia. In 1957, Dr. Hofmann identified and synthesized the prodrug psilocybin,
a substance present in more than 200 species of psychedelic mushrooms. Although there were
limitations related to the scientific design of many studies, clinical observations performed during the
1950s and 1960s showed a potential therapeutic effect of psilocybin for patients affected by depressive
symptoms, anxiety, and conversion disorder. Psilocybin was classed as a schedule I substance in 1970,
but the fascination with psychedelics has remained almost unchanged over time, promoting a new
scientific interest starting in the 1990s. Recent studies have provided further evidence supporting the
suggestive hypothesis of the therapeutic use of psilocybin for treating various psychiatric disorders,
including pathological anxiety, mood depressive disorder, and addiction.
Keywords: psilocybin; psilocin; psychedelics; magic mushrooms
1. Introduction
Psychedelics extracted from plants have been used in religious, spiritual, and mystic
practices for millennia [
1
]. The use of peyote cactus buttons and red beans containing
mescaline by humans has been documented for 5700 years in the northeastern region of
Mexico [
2
]. The analysis of archaeological artifacts has confirmed that the use of psilocybin-
containing mushrooms has been ubiquitous since prehistory [
3
]. The first report of the
use of psychedelic mushrooms in Western medicine was made by Prentiss and Morgan in
1895. The authors described the ceremonial use of peyote cactus buttons by indigenous
people in Central America [
4
]. Mescaline, an active alkaloid contained in peyote, was
isolated by Arthur Heffter in 1897 and synthesized by Ernest Spath in 1919. Subsequently,
it was made available as a research chemical by the Merck & Co. pharmaceutical com-
pany [
5
]. In 1938, at the Sandoz laboratories in Switzerland, Albert Hofmann synthesized
lysergic acid diethylamide, best known as LSD. This substance was synthesized during a
systematic study investigation of ergot alkaloids in which LSD was the 25th compound
produced. In 1947, LSD was marketed under the trade name “Delysid” and was made
freely available to researchers interested in investigating its pharmacological properties [
6
].
In 1957, Dr. Hofmann also identified and synthesized the prodrug psilocybin, a substance
present in more than 200 species of psychedelic mushroom. In 1958, psilocybin was made
available by Sandoz under the brand name “Indocybin”. During the 1950s and 1960s,
psilocybin, LSD, and mescaline were largely used for treating non-psychotic disorders. In
more than 1000 scientific reports, authors described the results obtained from the treatment
of about 40,000 patients [
7
]. Although there were limitations related to the scientific design
of many studies, clinical observations performed during the pre-prohibition era showed
a potential therapeutic effect of psilocybin for patients affected by depressive symptoms,
anxiety, and conversion disorder [
8
12
]. Contrariwise, there is very limited information
about the therapeutic effects of psilocybin in psychotic patients [
13
,
14
]. On the whole,
J. Xenobiot. 2022,12, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.3390/jox12010004 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/jox
J. Xenobiot. 2022,12 42
patients treated with psycholytic or psychedelic doses of psilocybin reported no significant
side effects [
15
]. In the 1960s, psychedelics became widely used as recreational drugs, as
well as a symbol of the counterculture. Most human studies reported low toxicity; however,
some severe psychiatric reactions and occasional tragic events reported in the scientific
literature produced socio-political alarm in many countries [
16
,
17
]. Consequently, the
interest in medical research for studying the potential therapeutic activity of psychedelics
was reduced, and these substances became considered unethical for medical use [
17
]. Psilo-
cybin was classed as a schedule I substance in 1970, but the fascination with psychedelics
remained almost unchanged over time, promoting a new scientific interest starting from
the 1990s [
17
,
18
]. Recent studies have provided further evidence supporting the suggestive
hypothesis of the therapeutic use of psilocybin for treating various psychiatric disorders,
including pathological anxiety, mood depressive disorder, and addiction [
17
,
18
]. In our re-
view, we summarize the clinical, pharmacological, and toxicological information currently
available about psilocybin, focusing our attention on evaluating the therapeutic effects
in humans.
2. Chemistry
Psilocybin (Figure 1) and psilocin (Figure 2) are tryptophan indole-based compounds
present in mushrooms of the genus Psilocybe, Panaeolina, Pluteus, Panaeolus, Stropharia,
Conocybe, and Gymnopilus. These mushrooms are known and distributed worldwide
[1921]
.
Their indole ring structure derives from a fusion between a pyrrole ring and a benzene
ring, joined to an amino group by a two-carbon side chain [
22
]. Psilocybin, IUPAC name
[3-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-1H-indol-4-yl] dihydrogen phosphate, is a tertiary amino
compound belonging to the tryptamine alkaloid group. This substance, with a molecular
weight of 284.25 g/mol, has a phosphoryloxy substituent attached at position four of the
N,N-dimethyltryptamine structure. Psilocin, IUPAC name 3-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-1H-
indol-4-ol, is the dephosphorylated psilocybin derivative representing the active compound
of psilocybin. Psilocin, molecular weight 204.27 g/mol, is a tryptamine alkaloid in which an
additional hydroxy group is attached to the N,N-dimethyltryptamine skeleton. Psilocybin
has a water solubility of 2.7 g/L and a melting point of 224
C. Psilocin has a water solubility
of 4.08 g/L and a melting point of 174.5
C [
23
]. Psilocybin is a zwitterion alkaloid with a
highly polar phosphate group; consequently, it is more soluble in water than psilocin [24].
Contrariwise, psilocin is more lipid soluble than psilocybin. Both substances are soluble in
methanol and ethanol but almost insoluble in ether, chloroform, and petroleum. In pure
form, psilocybin and psilocin are white crystalline powders, unstable in light but relatively
stable under an inert atmosphere, in the dark, and at low temperatures [23,24].
J. Xenobiot. 2022, 12, FOR PEER REVIEW 3
Figure 1. Psilocybin. PubChem: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/10624#section=2D-
Structure (accessed on 10 June 2021).
Figure 2. Psilocin. PubChem: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/4980#section=2D-
Structure (accessed on 10 June 2021).
3. Pharmacokinetics
Magic mushrooms are usually taken orally or, less frequently, smoked. The concen-
trations of psilocybin and psilocin in psychedelic mushrooms are 2% and 0.5%, respec-
tively [25]. However, the concentrations of active principles may vary in relation to the
species, origin, size, age, growing, and drying conditions [26]. In animal studies, it was
found that after oral administration, 50% of the 14C-labelled psilocin was absorbed and
almost evenly distributed throughout the body, including the brain [27]. In pregnant rat
studies, after intravenous administration, the 14C-psilocin crossed the placental barrier
reaching fetal tissue concentrations lower than maternal tissue, but with a slower elimi-
nation half-life [28]. In adult men, following oral administration, psilocybin is
dephosphorylated to psilocin from the hydrochloric acid made by the stomach [29,30].
Furthermore, psilocybin is dephosphorylated to psilocin in the intestine, kidney, and
blood by the alkaline phosphatase and nonspecific esterases [29,30]. In rat studies, it was
found that psilocybin was more easily absorbed from the jejunum and colon than psilocin
[31]. Moreover, many other rodent tissues can convert psilocybin to psilocin before the
transit into the systemic circulation [31]. In rat studies performed with the 14C-labelled
Figure 1.
Psilocybin. PubChem: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/10624#section=2D-
Structure (accessed on 10 June 2021).
J. Xenobiot. 2022,12 43
J. Xenobiot. 2022, 12, FOR PEER REVIEW 3
Figure 1. Psilocybin. PubChem: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/10624#section=2D-
Structure (accessed on 10 June 2021).
Figure 2. Psilocin. PubChem: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/4980#section=2D-
Structure (accessed on 10 June 2021).
3. Pharmacokinetics
Magic mushrooms are usually taken orally or, less frequently, smoked. The concen-
trations of psilocybin and psilocin in psychedelic mushrooms are 2% and 0.5%, respec-
tively [25]. However, the concentrations of active principles may vary in relation to the
species, origin, size, age, growing, and drying conditions [26]. In animal studies, it was
found that after oral administration, 50% of the 14C-labelled psilocin was absorbed and
almost evenly distributed throughout the body, including the brain [27]. In pregnant rat
studies, after intravenous administration, the 14C-psilocin crossed the placental barrier
reaching fetal tissue concentrations lower than maternal tissue, but with a slower elimi-
nation half-life [28]. In adult men, following oral administration, psilocybin is
dephosphorylated to psilocin from the hydrochloric acid made by the stomach [29,30].
Furthermore, psilocybin is dephosphorylated to psilocin in the intestine, kidney, and
blood by the alkaline phosphatase and nonspecific esterases [29,30]. In rat studies, it was
found that psilocybin was more easily absorbed from the jejunum and colon than psilocin
[31]. Moreover, many other rodent tissues can convert psilocybin to psilocin before the
transit into the systemic circulation [31]. In rat studies performed with the 14C-labelled
Figure 2.
Psilocin. PubChem: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/4980#section=2D-
Structure (accessed on 10 June 2021).
3. Pharmacokinetics
Magic mushrooms are usually taken orally or, less frequently, smoked. The concen-
trations of psilocybin and psilocin in psychedelic mushrooms are 2% and 0.5%, respec-
tively [
25
]. However, the concentrations of active principles may vary in relation to the
species, origin, size, age, growing, and drying conditions [
26
]. In animal studies, it was
found that after oral administration, 50% of the 14C-labelled psilocin was absorbed and al-
most evenly distributed throughout the body, including the brain [
27
]. In pregnant rat stud-
ies, after intravenous administration, the 14C-psilocin crossed the placental barrier reaching
fetal tissue concentrations lower than maternal tissue, but with a slower elimination half-
life [
28
]. In adult men, following oral administration, psilocybin is dephosphorylated to
psilocin from the hydrochloric acid made by the stomach [
29
,
30
]. Furthermore, psilocybin is
dephosphorylated to psilocin in the intestine, kidney, and blood by the alkaline phosphatase
and nonspecific esterases [
29
,
30
]. In rat studies, it was found that psilocybin was more eas-
ily absorbed from the jejunum and colon than psilocin [
31
]. Moreover, many other rodent
tissues can convert psilocybin to psilocin before the transit into the systemic circulation [
31
].
In rat studies performed with the 14C-labelled psilocybin, psilocin crossed the blood–brain
barrier and entered the central nervous system, where it exerted its psychotropic effect [
32
].
In humans, if administered in the empty stomach, psilocybin is rapidly converted to
psilocin, which is detectable in the plasma within 20–40 min [
29
]. Maximum psilocin
plasma concentrations are reached within 80–100 min [
29
]. Since psilocin is structurally
related to the neurotransmitter serotonin, it follows a comparable human metabolism [
33
].
In fact, about 4% of psilocin is metabolized by demethylation and oxidative deamina-
tion, catalyzed by the liver monoamine oxidase (MAO) or aldehyde dehydrogenase, via a
presumed intermediate metabolite, 4-hydroxyindole-3-acetaldehyde, to yield 4-hydroxy-
indole-3-acetic acid, 4-hydroxy-indole-3-acetaldehyde, and 4-hydroxytryptophole [
34
,
35
].
After oral administration, the plasma elimination half-lives estimated for psilocybin and
psilocin are 160 and 50 min, respectively [
29
,
36
]. In rat studies, after oral administration,
it was found that psilocin was excreted in the urine at 65%, and in the bile and feces at
approximately 15–20% within 8 h [
34
38
]. In rat studies, about 25% of the whole psilocybin
dose was excreted unaltered, whereas about 10–20% remained in the body, with its metabo-
lites detected in the urine for 6–7 days [
34
]. In a study performed on male volunteers,
around 3.5% of the oral psilocybin dose was excreted in the urine as free psilocybin within
24 h [
29
,
36
]. As emerged in pharmacokinetic and forensic studies, approximately 80% of
psilocin is eliminated as psilocin-O-glucuronide [
37
,
38
]. In the small intestine, glucuronida-
tion is mediated by the glucuronosyltransferase UGT1A10 [
39
]. Instead, when psilocin is
administered intravenously, glucuronidation is mediated by the glucuronosyltransferase
J. Xenobiot. 2022,12 44
UGT1A9 [
39
]. Conversely, N-glucuronidation was not observed in cell studies [
39
]. Finally,
the third metabolic pathway might be the oxidation of psilocin by the hydroxyindole
oxidases to produce compounds with an o-quinone or iminoquinone structure [40].
4. Pharmacodynamic
Psilocybin and psilocin exert a predominant agonist activity at serotonin receptors,
particularly the 5HT2A receptor. Agonist activity at the 5HT2A receptor is generally
considered a key pharmacological mechanism for inducing hallucinogenic effects. The
role of other receptors is documented, but less investigated [
41
]. In all studies, psilocin
displayed high 5HT2A receptor affinity (ki = 6 nM). In addition, psilocin binds many other
serotonin and non-serotonin receptors including: 5HT2B; 5HT1D; D1; 5HT1E; 5HT1A;
5HT5A; 5HT7; 5HT6; D3; 5HT2C; 5HT1B. A weak imidazoline 1, alpha 2A, alpha 2B,
alpha 2C receptors, and 5HT transporter affinity was also demonstrated [
42
]. Unlike
LSD, there was no information showing the pharmacodynamic activity of psilocin at the
D2 receptor [
43
]. In human studies, pre-treatment with the 5HT2A receptor antagonist
ketanserin blocked the psychotomimetic effects of psilocybin in a dose-dependent man-
ner [
44
]. Furthermore, psychotomimetic effects were also blocked using a pre-treatment
with the atypical antipsychotic risperidone [44]. On the contrary, psychotomimetic effects
were increased by the dopamine antagonist and typical antipsychotic haloperidol. In
line with this result, psilocybin could exert its psychotropic effect with a mechanism of
action independent/partially independent from dopamine stimulation [
44
]. However, in a
positron emission tomography (PET) study performed on male volunteers using the D2
dopamine receptor antagonist [11C]-raclopride, psilocybin decreased the [11C]-raclopride
receptor-binding bilaterally in the caudate nucleus (19%) and putamen (20%). These results
suggest an increase in endogenous dopamine in response to psilocybin administration.
In humans, changes in the [11C]-raclopride receptor-binding in the ventral striatum have
been correlated with depersonalization and euphoria; consequently, 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A
receptor stimulation could be important for striatal dopamine release. Psychotropic effects
induced by psilocybin could be related to both striatal dopamine release and serotonin
transmission [
45
]. In human studies, equimolar amounts of psilocybin and psilocin induced
the same psychotropic effects [
46
]. However, the inhibition of dephosphorylation using the
alkaline phosphatase competitive antagonist beta-glycerophosphate prevented all symp-
toms induced by psilocybin. This clinical information has strongly confirmed that psilocin
is the main active metabolite, and responsible for the psychedelic effects experienced [47].
5. Functional Studies
Electroencephalographic alterations induced by psilocybin in humans and animal
models have been studied since the 1960s [4852]. The first electroencephalographic stud-
ies performed in primates and humans under psilocybin intoxication showed numerous
electroencephalographic tracing alterations, such as a decrease in alpha and theta activity,
an increase in fast activity, and desynchronization [
48
52
]. Changes in visually evoked
potentials were described in humans [
51
,
52
]. In a visual-evoked potentials study performed
on 26 healthy male volunteers, psilocybin decreased prestimulus parieto-occipital
α
-power
values, precluding a subsequent stimulus-induced
α
-power decrease. Moreover, psilocybin
decreased N170 potentials that were associated with visual perceptual alterations, including
visual hallucinations. All effects were blocked by pre-treatment with the 5-HT2A antago-
nist ketanserin [53]. In a magnetoencephalography study performed on a group of fifteen
healthy male volunteers, after the intravenous infusion of psilocybin, a spontaneous cortical
oscillatory power reduction from 1 to 50 Hz in the posterior association cortex was found,
and from 8 to 100 Hz in the frontal association cortex. Conversely, no effect was found on
low-level visually induced or motor-induced gamma-band oscillations. Dynamic causal
modelling showed a correlation between posterior cingulate cortex desynchronization and
increased excitability of the deep-layer pyramidal neurons. This correlation appeared to
be triggered by the 5-HT2A receptor-mediated excitation of deep pyramidal cells [
54
]. In
J. Xenobiot. 2022,12 45
a PET and [F-18]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) study performed on 10 healthy volunteers,
prior to and following a 15 or 20 mg dose of psilocybin, authors found a global increase in
the cerebral metabolic rate of glucose with a predominant localization in the frontomedial
and frontolateral cortex, anterior cingulate, and temporomedial cortex. Instead, a smaller
increase in the metabolic rate of glucose was found in the basal ganglia, sensorimotor
area, and occipital cortex [
55
]. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study performed on
healthy volunteers using the [F-18]-fluorodeoxyglucose FDG PET, psilocybin increased
the metabolic rate of glucose in the right anterior cingulate, right frontal operculum, and
right inferior temporal region. Conversely, a significant decrease in the metabolic rate of
glucose was found in the right thalamus, left precentral region, and left thalamus. Authors
have further observed a trend decrease in the metabolic rate of glucose in the compos-
ite right hemisphere and bilateral subcortical regions, as well as a trend increase in the
cortical/subcortical ratio of the right hemisphere [
56
]. Carhart-Harris et al. designed a
functional MRI study to capture the transition from normal waking consciousness to the
state induced by the intravenous infusion of 2 mg of psilocybin. Arterial spin labelling
perfusion and a blood–oxygen level-dependent functional MRI were used to map cerebral
blood flow and changes in venous oxygenation before and after the placebo and psilocybin
infusion. Results showed a significant cerebral blood flow (CBF) decrease in the subcortical
(bilateral thalamus, putamen, and hypothalamus) and cortical regions (posterior cingulate
cortex (PCC), retrosplenial cortex, precuneus, bilateral angular gyrus, supramarginal gyrus,
rostral and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), paracingulate gyrus, medial prefrontal
cortex (mPFC), frontoinsular cortex, lateral orbitofrontal cortex, frontal opercu-lum, pre-
central gyrus, and superior, middle and inferior frontalgyrus). Subjective effects were
strongly related to the decreased activity and connectivity in the brain’s key connector
hubs including thalamus, mPFC, and ACC [
57
]. In their placebo-controlled, double-blind
study—performed to measure perfusion changes, with and without adjustment for global
brain perfusion, after two doses of oral psilocybin (low dose: 0.160 mg/kg; high dose:
0.215 mg/kg)—in two groups of healthy volunteers, Lewis et al. showed a reduction in ab-
solute perfusion in the frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes, bilateral amygdalae,
anterior cingulate, insula, striatal regions, and hippocampi. The data that emerged from
the study suggest that relative changes in brain perfusion should be interpreted in relation
to the absolute signal variations and analysis method [
58
]. In a psilocybin vs. placebo
cross-over functional MRI study, psilocybin enhanced the autobiographical recollection
facilitating the underlying neural processes. Significant activation was found in the limbic
and striatal region in the early phase. Otherwise, significant activation in the late phase
was found in the medial prefrontal cortex. Additional visual and sensory cortical activation
in the late phase was found under psilocybin only. Rating of memory vividness and visual
imagery was significantly higher after psilocybin than placebo. Furthermore, authors
found a significant positive correlation between vividness and subjective well-being at
follow-up [
59
]. In a PET study performed on eight healthy volunteers using the 5-HT2A
receptor agonist radioligand [11C]-Cimbi-36, oral intake of 3–30 mg of psilocybin produced
a dose-related 5-HT2A receptor occupancy. Moreover, the study highlighted a correlation
between subjective effects induced by psilocybin, 5-HT2A receptor occupancy, and plasma
psilocin levels [
60
]. In two PET studies performed on healthy volunteers using the 5-HT2A
receptor agonist radioligand [11C]-Cimbi-36, after psilocybin administration, individual
brain 5-HT2A receptor-binding predicted subjective mystical effects [
61
], mindfulness, and
openness [62].
6. Toxicity
Psilocybin is generally considered to be well tolerated and low in toxicity. Some
cases of fatal intoxication have been reported; however, the majority of them were not
directly linked to the toxic effects induced by psilocybin. They were related to mixed drug
intoxication, suicide, and jumping out of the window during hallucinations [
26
,
63
]. In 1996,
Gerault and Picart described a case in which a massive dose of psilocybe semilanceata was
J. Xenobiot. 2022,12 46
considered as the cause of death. Toxicological examination evidenced a psilocin plasma
level of 4
µ
g/mL [
64
]. The human lethal dose is not known; however, the LD50 for a rat,
mouse and rabbit, after the intravenous administration of psilocybin, were 280 mg/kg,
275 mg/kg, and 13 mg/kg, respectively [
65
]. In comparison, the LD50 for a rat, mouse
and rabbit, after intravenous administration of psilocin, were 75 mg/kg, 74 mg/kg, and
7 mg/kg, respectively [
66
]. The human toxic dose low (TDLo) for oral psilocybin adminis-
tration was 0.04–0.06 mg/kg, whereas TDLo for intravenous psilocybin administration was
1–2 mg, corresponding to a psilocin plasma level of 4–6 ng/mL. At these dosages, patients
reported visual field changes, muscle weakness, nausea, and vomiting. In dose-effect
studies, psilocybin was found to be 66 times more potent than mescaline and 45 times
less potent than LSD [
67
] In two cross-over studies performed at the end of the 1950s,
authors found cross tolerance between psilocybin and LSD [
68
]. Psilocybin is principally
used for its psychedelic effects, including altered self-perception, impaired perception
of time and space, alteration in thought contents, derealization, depersonalization, body
image distortion, and alterations in mood and emotions [
69
71
]. As previously reported,
symptoms induced by psilocybin can be reverted using the 5HT2A/C antagonist ketanserin
or 5HT2A/C and D2 antagonist risperidone. Haloperidol, a D2 antagonist, can normalize
euphoria, derealization and depersonalization [
44
]. On the other hand, MAO inhibitors
can intensify psychedelic effects induced by psilocybin [
72
]. Alcohol can enhance the
psychedelic effects induced by psilocybin, since its metabolite acetaldehyde reacts with the
endogenous biogenic amines producing the MAO inhibitors tetrahydroisoquinoline and
β
-carbolines [
73
]. Psilocybin effects can be prolonged by tobacco, because it may reduce the
central nervous system and peripheral tissue MAO B levels [
74
]. In addition to the central
nervous system, psilocybin can affect other organs and systems, including the renal [
75
],
cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, visual, and musculoskeletal systems [
76
], as
reported in Table 1. Overall, psychotropic and neuropsychological effects appear to be
influenced by personal expectations, setting, and brain structure metrics [
41
,
77
]. Pro-
longed hallucinations or psychotic experiences are rarely reported in healthy persons,
when compared with people affected by psychotic or personality disorders [
78
] However,
long-lasting unpleasant experiences, best known as “bad trips” or hallucinogen-persisting
perception disorder (HPPD), have been reported [
79
]. Psilocybin does not directly affect
the mesolimbic dopaminergic pathway involved in the reward system; consequently, it
does not induce craving, addiction or withdrawal [
41
,
76
]. Finally, there is not enough
information to confirm or exclude genotoxicity or teratogenicity [80].
Table 1. Psilocybin effects [6971].
Central Nervous System
Dream-like state, illusions, hallucinations, synesthesiae,
paraesthesia altered state of consciousness, altered self-perception,
derealization, depersonalization, altered perception of time and
space, altered mood, altered concentration, delusions or unusual
ideas, altered emoziona state, euphoria, panic attacks,
convulsions, headache, verigo, flushing.
Visual System Mydriasis
Cardiovascular System Achicardia, hypertension, hypotension
Respiratory System Hypoxemia
Gastrointestinal System Nauseas, vomiting, abdominal pain
Renal System Urinary incontinence, renal failure
Musculoskeletal System Muscle weakness
7. Psilocybin and Mood Disorders
In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study performed on 12 patients (11 women
and 1 man), affected by advanced-stage cancer, 0.2 mg/kg of psilocybin administered in a
single dose produced a significant reduction in anxiety at 1 and 3 months, and depressive
symptoms at 6 months, compared with the placebo (niacine 250 mg). Symptoms of anxiety
and depression were assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and Beck Depression
J. Xenobiot. 2022,12 47
Inventory [
81
]. In a two-session, double-blind cross-over study, authors compared the effect
of low (1 or 3 mg/70 kg) versus high (22 or 30 mg/70 kg) psilocybin dose on depressive
symptoms, anxiety, and quality of life in 51 patients with life-threatening cancer. High-dose
psilocybin produced a significant decrease in depressive symptoms, anxiety and death
anxiety, along with a significant increase in quality of life and optimism. At the 6-month
follow-up, improvement in mood, anxiety and quality of life were confirmed in about
80% of the patients [
82
]. In a similar double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial
performed on 29 patients affected by life-threatening cancer, a single-dose psilocybin of
0.3 mg/kg improved depressive symptoms, anxiety and quality of life in the weeks after
administration. At the 6.5-month follow-up, around 80% of patients had kept these clinical
benefits [
83
]. In an open-label study performed on 12 patients (6 men and 6 women),
affected by moderate-to-severe unipolar, treatment-resistant major depression, two oral
doses of psilocybin (10 mg and 25 mg, 7 days apart) in association with psychological
support, before, during, and after each session, produced a marked reduction in depressive
symptoms, as assessed by the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (QIDS) at
1 week and 3 months. Patients reported mild adverse effects such as transient headaches,
anxiety, confusion, and nausea [
84
]. In another open-label study performed on 20 patients
(12 males and 6 females), affected by severe unipolar, treatment-resistant major depression,
two oral doses of psilocybin (10 mg and 25 mg, 7 days apart), in association with psycho-
logical support, produced a marked reduction in depressive symptoms, as assessed by the
16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (QIDS) at 1 week, 5 weeks, 3 months,
and 6 months. Depressive symptom reduction at 5 weeks was predicted by the quality
of the acute psychedelic experience [
85
]. Recently, two further clinical studies have con-
firmed the efficacy of psilocybin in patients affected by major depressive disorder. In the
first study, 24 of 27 patients completed a randomized, waiting-list-controlled clinical trial
at the Johns Hopkins Medical Center. Patients received psilocybin at moderately high
(20 mg/70 kg) and high (30 mg/70 kg) doses in two sessions. Statistical analysis showed
a significant decrease in GRID-HAMD scores from baseline to weeks 1 and 4 [
86
]. In
the second study, 59 patients affected by moderate to severe major depressive disorder
were enrolled in a phase 2, double-blind randomized, controlled trial in which the an-
tidepressant effect of psilocybin was compared to escitalopram. The authors showed no
difference between the groups at week 6 in the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive
Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR-16) score [87].
8. Psilocybin and Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder
Clinical information regarding the potential therapeutic effects of psilocybin in pa-
tients affected by obsessive–compulsive disorder is very limited. In a double-blind study
performed on 9 patients (7 males and 2 females), affected by resistant obsessive–compulsive
disorder, psilocybin showed to be safe and effective in reducing obsessive–compulsive
symptoms for a duration extended beyond the psychedelic effect [
88
]. Psilocybin was
administered in up to four different doses in a modified dose escalation from very low
dose (25
µ
g/kg) to high dose (300
µ
g/kg) [
87
]. In 2014, Wilcox described a case report in
which a patient had used psilocybin for years in order to reduce obsessive–compulsive
symptoms [
89
]. This case report followed the case report of Leonard and Rapoport, in
which authors described the history of a 17 year-old patient who used LSD and psilocybin
to reduce obsessive–compulsive symptoms [90].
9. Psilocybin and Addiction
In a proof-of-concept study performed on 10 volunteers (6 men and 4 women), oral ad-
ministration of psilocybin in one or two sessions in combination with motivational enhance-
ment therapy induced a reduction in drinking days during the subsequent
5–12 weeks
.
Drinking-day reduction was correlated to the mystical quality of psychedelic experience.
Patients did not report significant side effects [
91
]. The first pilot study performed on
15 people (10 males and 5 females)—which involved a smoking cessation program, and
J. Xenobiot. 2022,12 48
psilocybin in combination with cognitive behavioural therapy—induced a seven-day point
prevalence abstinence at 6-month follow-up in 12 of the 15 participants [
91
]. In a simi-
lar open-label pilot-study performed on 12 people—which involved smoking cessation
treatment, and psilocybin in combination with cognitive behavioural therapy—6 months
of abstinence was produced in 80% of volunteers, without significant side effects. In the
sample, abstinence was related to the mystical quality of psychedelic experience [
92
]. An
open label study is currently in progress, in which the primary endpoint is the assessment
of the safety of concurrent buprenorphine and naltrexone administration. The estimated
study completion date is November 2021 [93].
10. Discussion
In recent years, there has been a resurgence of scientific interest about the potential
use of psilocybin and other psychedelics for treating psychiatric disorders, in particular
mood disorders, anxiety and addiction [
17
,
18
]. Recent clinical studies have tried to fill
the methodological errors presented by the past studies, including the small size of the
enrolled samples, absence of double-masking design, non-use of validated tools for mea-
suring the life expectancy of patients, and non-use of biomarkers [
94
]. As emerged from
the 1950s and 1960s studies, psilocybin has been shown to be safe and well tolerated,
particularly when used at therapeutic doses. The most commonly reported side effects
were anxiety, headaches, nausea, confusion, vomiting, and slight sympathomimetic symp-
toms [
67
69
,
72
,
73
,
81
]. All symptoms were described as transient, and no patients required
any specific pharmacological treatment. In patients affected by mood depressive disorder
and anxiety, psilocybin was displayed to be effective in reducing depressive symptom in
short-, medium- and long-term analysis [
78
82
]. Antidepressant activity lasted longer than
psychotropic effects; however, the quality of acute psychedelic experience significantly
influenced the therapeutic results [
82
,
88
]. The most important pharmacological property
showed by psilocybin, in all trials, was the rapid onset of the antidepressant effect. This
effect could allow an improvement if used in conjunction with traditional antidepressants
therapy, which has a long latency of action [
90
]. However, no study compared psilocybin
with other rapid-acting antidepressants such as ketamine. On the other hand, our analysis
of information extracted by clinical studies performed on patients affected by depression
has shown two principal limitations: first, the small size of the enrolled samples; second, the
comorbidity between depressive symptoms and severe diseases (cancer) in many patients.
Overall, the studies have only enrolled a few dozen patients; therefore, results cannot be
generalized for more heterogeneous people in terms of age, social status, and disease dura-
tion. Moreover, depressive symptoms associated with other diseases could have different
expression/evolution compared with primary mood depressive disorder. Consequently,
the pharmacological response to therapeutic dosages of psilocybin could be different in
primary and secondary depression. In addition, no study included personal expectancy
measures as a concomitant variable in the statistical analyses of clinical responses. The
unblinding design, expectancy of participants, and evaluators, could be in part responsible
of the good results found in all clinical studies. Further and more robust trials are needed
to better understand the potential therapeutic properties of this psychedelic. Recently, in a
clinical study performed on patients affected by depression, the antidepressant effect of
psilocybin was comparable to that of citalopram [
87
]. Finally, the effectiveness of psilocybin
for treating other illnesses, such as obsessive–compulsive disorder and addiction, is not
demonstrable, due to the paucity of clinical information currently available. The positive
results reported by the authors can be considered interesting hypotheses to be explored
in future and more robust clinical studies. In conclusion, psilocybin confirms to be safe
and well tolerated when administered at therapeutic doses. Clinical studies currently
available, in particular those performed in patients affected by mood depressive disorder,
show encouraging therapeutic results requiring further and better designed trials.
Author Contributions:
Authors have equally contributed to the manuscript. All authors have read
and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
J. Xenobiot. 2022,12 49
Funding: This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Nutt, D. Psychedelic drugs—A new era in psychiatry? Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 2019,21, 139–147.
2. Bruhn, J.G.; de Smet, P.A.; El-Seedi, H.R.; Beck, O. Mescaline use for 5700 years. Lancet 2002,359, 1866. [CrossRef]
3.
Akers, B.P.; Ruiz, J.F.; Piper, A.; Ruck, C.A.P. A prehistoric mural in Spain depicting neurotropic psilocybe mushrooms? Econ. Bot.
2011,65, 121–128. [CrossRef]
4. Prentiss, D.W.; Morgan, F.P. Anhalonium lewinii (mescal buttons). Ther. Gaz. 1895,11, 577–585.
5. Jay, M. Mescaline: A Global History of the First Psychedelic; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 2019; pp. 1–304.
6. Hofmann, A. LSD—My Problem Child; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2019; pp. 1–256.
7. Grinspoon, L.; Bakalar, J. The psychedelic drug terapie. Curr. Psychiatr. Ther. 1981,20, 275–283. [PubMed]
8.
Sercl, M.; Kovarik, J.; Jaros, O. Clinical experiences with psilocybin Sandoz. Sb. Ved. Pr. Lek. Fak. Karlov. Univ. V Hradci Kral.
1961
,
4, 421–426.
9.
Heimann, H. On the treatment of therapy-resistant neuroses with model psychoses (psilocybin). Schweiz Arch. Neurol. Neurochir.
Psychiatr. 1962,89, 214–220.
10.
Reda, G.C.; Vella, G.; Cancrini, L.; D’Agostino, E. Clinical and psychopathological study of psilocybin. Riv. Sper. Freniatr. Med.
Leg. Alien. Ment. 1964,88, 7–76. [PubMed]
11.
Delay, J.; Pichot, P.; Lemperiere, T.; Quetin, A.M. Therapeutic effect of psilocybin on convulsive neurosis. Ann. Med. Psychol.
1959
,
117, 509–515.
12. Duche, D.J. The effects of psilocybin in a case of hysteria. Sem. Hop. 1961,37, 3061–3062.
13.
R ˚uzicková, R.; Bílý, D.; Vyhnánková, M.; Dubanský, B.; Konias, V.; Soucek, Z. Effect of psilocybine in chronic schizophrenias. I.
Clinical findings. Ceskoslov. Psychiatr. 1967,63, 158–165.
14. Fisher, G. The psycholytic treatment of a childhood schizophrenic girl. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry 1970,16, 112–130. [CrossRef]
15.
Mentzner, R. Sacred Mushroom of Visions: Teonanacatl: A Sourcebook on the Psilocybin Mushroom; Mentzer, R., Ed.; Simon and Schuster
Park Street Press: Rochester, VT, USA, 2005; pp. 1–293.
16. Keeler, M.H.; Reifler, C.B. Suicide during an LSD reaction. Am. J. Psychiatr. 1967,123, 884–885. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17.
Rucker, J.J.H.; Iliff, J.; Nutt, D.J. Psychiatry & psychedelic drugs. Past, present & future. Neuropharmacology
2018
,142, 200–218.
[PubMed]
18.
Tyls, F.; Palenicek, T.; Horacek, J. Psilocybin- Summary of knowledge and new perspectives. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol.
2014
,24,
342–356. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19.
Cody, J.T. Chapter 4 Hallucinogenes. In Handbook of Analytical Separations; Bogusz, M.J., Science, B.V., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam,
The Netherlands, 2008; pp. 175–201.
20. StiJve, T. Worldwide occurrence of psychoactive mushrooms-an update. Czen Mycol. 1995,48, 11–19. [CrossRef]
21.
Derosa, G.; Maffioli, P. Alkaloids in the nature: Pharmacological applications in clinical practice of berberine and mate tea. Curr.
Top. Med. Chem. 2014,14, 200–206. [CrossRef]
22.
Tittarelli, R.; Mannocchi, G.; Pantano, F.; Romolo, F.S. Recreational use, analysis and toxicity of tryptomines. Curr. Neuropharmacol.
2015,13, 26–46. [CrossRef]
23.
Cayman Chemicals. Psilocybin. Available online: https://www.caymanchem.com/product/14041/psilocybin (accessed on
9 November 2020).
24.
Ballesteros, S.; Ramon, M.F.; Iturralde, M.J.; Martinez-Arrieta, R. Natural source of drugs of abuse: Magic mushrooms. In New
Research on Street Drugs; Cole, S.M., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 167–186.
25.
Pendersen-Bjergaard, S.; Sannes, E.; Rasmussen, K.E.; Tonnesen, F. Determination of psilocybin in Psilocybe semilanceata by
capillary zone electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. Biomed. Sci. Appl. 1997,694, 375–381. [CrossRef]
26.
van Amsterdam, J.; Opperhuizen, A.; van den Brink, W. Harm potential of magic mushroom use: A review. Regul Toxicol.
Pharmacol. 2011,59, 423–429. [CrossRef]
27. Hopf, A.; Eckert, H. Distribution patterns of 14C-psilocin in the brains of various animals. Act. Nerv. Supp. 1974,16, 64–66.
28.
Law, F.C.P.; Poon, G.; Chui, Y.C.; He, S.H. 14C-Psilocin tissue distribution in pregnant rats after intravenous administration. Funct.
Foods Health Dis. 2014,4, 232–244. [CrossRef]
29.
Hasler, F.; Bourquin, D.; Brenneisen, R.; Bär, T.; Vollenweider, F.X. Determination of psilocin and 4-hydroxyindole-3-yl-acetic-acid
in plasma by HPLC-ECD and pharmacokinetic profiles of oral and intravenous psilocybin in man. Pharm. Acta Helv.
1997
,72,
175–184. [CrossRef]
30.
Hasler, F.; Bourquin, D.; Brenneisen, R.; Vollenweider, F.X. Renal excretion profiles of psilocin following oral administration of
psilocybin: A controller study in man. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2002,30, 331–339. [CrossRef]
J. Xenobiot. 2022,12 50
31.
Eivindvik, K.; Rasmussen, K.E.; Sund, R.B. Handling of psilocybin and psilocin by everted sacs of rat jejunum and colon. Acta
Pharm. Nord. 1989,1, 295–302. [PubMed]
32.
Passie, T.; Seifert, J.; Schneider, U.; Emrich, H.M. The pharmacology of psilocybin. Addict. Biol.
2002
,7, 357–364. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
33.
Helsley, S.; Fiorella, D.; Rabin, R.A.; Winter, J.C. A comparison of N,N-dimethyltryptamine, harmaline, and selected congeners in
rats trained with LSD as a discriminative stimulus. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 1998,22, 649–663. [CrossRef]
34. Kalberer, F.; Kreis, W.; Rutschmann, J. The fate of psilocin in the rat. Biochem. Pharmachol. 1962,11, 261–269. [CrossRef]
35.
Lindenblatt, H.; Kramer, E.; Holzmann-Erens, P.; Gouzoulis-Mayfrank, E.; Kovar, K.A. Quantitation of psilocin in human
plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography and electrochemical detection: Comparison of liquid-liquid extraction with
automated on-line solid-phase extraction. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 1998,709, 255–263. [CrossRef]
36.
Martin, R.; Schurenkamp, J.; Gasse, A. Determination of psilocin, bufotenine, LSD, and its metabolites in serum, plasma and
urine by SPE-LC-MS/MS. Int. J. Legal Med. 2013,127, 593–601. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
37.
Grieshaber, A.F.; Moore, K.A.; Levine, B. The detection of psilocin in human urine. J. Forensic Sci.
2001
,46, 627–630. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
38. Sticht, G.; Kaferstein, H. Detection of psilocin in body fluids. Forensic Sci. Int. 2000,113, 403–407. [CrossRef]
39.
Manevski, N.; Kurkela, M.; Hoglund, C.; Mauriala, T.; Court, M.H.; Yli-Kauhaluoma, J.; Finel, M. Glucuronidation of psilocin and
4-hydroxyindole by the human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2010,38, 386–395. [CrossRef]
40. Kovacic, P. Unifying electron transfer mechanism for psilocybin and psilocin. Med. Hypotheses 2009,73, 626. [CrossRef]
41. Nichols, D.E. Hallucinogens. Pharmacol. Ther. 2004,101, 131–181. [CrossRef]
42. Ray, T.S. Psychedelics and the human receptorome. PLoS ONE 2010,5, e9019. [CrossRef]
43.
Creese, I.; Burt, D.R.; Snyder, S.H. The dopamine receptor: Different binding of d-LSD and related agents to agonist and antagonist
states. Life Sci. 1975,17, 15–20. [CrossRef]
44.
Vollenweider, F.X.; Vollenweider-Scherpenhuysen, M.F.I.; Babler, A.; Vogel, H.; Hell, D. Psilocybin induces schizophrenia-like
psychosis in humans via serotonin-2 agonist action. Neuroreport 1998,9, 3897–3902. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
45.
Vollenweider, F.X.; Vontobel, P.; Hell, D.; Leenders, K.L. 5-HAT modulation of dopamine release in basal ganglia in psilocybin-
induced psychosis in man-a PET study with [11C] raclopride. Neuropsychopharmacology 1999,112, 424–434. [CrossRef]
46.
McKenn, D.J.; Repke, D.B.; Lo, L.; Peroutka, S.J. Differential interactions of indolealkylamines with 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor
subtypes. Neuropharmacology 1990,29, 193–198. [CrossRef]
47. Horita, A. Some biochemical studies on psilocybin and psilocin. J. Neuropsychiatr. 1963,4, 370–373.
48. Fink, M. EEG and human psychopharmacology. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. 1969,9, 241–258. [CrossRef]
49. Horibe, M. The effects of psilocybin on EEG and behaviour in monkeys. Act. Nerv. Super. 1974,16, 40–42.
50.
Meldrum, B.S.; Naquet, R. Effects of psilocybin, dimethyl-tryptamine, mescaline and various lysergic acid derivatives on the
EEG and on photically induced epilepsy in the baboon (Papio papio). Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.
1971
,31, 563–572.
[CrossRef]
51.
Da Fonseca, J.S.; Cardoso, C.; Salgueiro, E.; Fialho, M.L. Neuro-physiological and psychological study of psilocybin-induced
modification of visual information processing in man. Neuro Psychopharmacol. 1965,4, 315–319.
52.
Rynearson, R.R.; Wilson, M.R., Jr.; Bickford, R.G. Psilocybin-induced changes in psychologic function, electroencephalogram, and
light-evoked potentials in humans ubjects. Mayo Clin. Proc. 1968,43, 191–204. [PubMed]
53.
Kometer, M.; Schmidt, A.; Jäncke, L.; Vollenweider, F.X. Activation of serotonin 2A receptors underlies the psilocybin-induced
effects on
α
oscillations, N170 visual-evoked potentials, and visual hallucinations. J. Neurosci.
2013
,33, 10544–10551. [CrossRef]
54.
Muthukumaraswamy, S.D.; Carhart-Harris, R.L.; Moran, R.J.; Brookes, M.J.; Williams, T.M.; Errtizoe, D.; Sessa, B.; Papadopoulos,
A.; Bolstridge, M.; Singh, K.D.; et al. Broadband Cortical Desynchronization Underlies the Human Psychedelic State. J. Neurosci.
2013,33, 15171–15183. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
55.
Vollenweidera, F.X.; Leendersb, K.L.; Scharfettera, C.; Maguire, P.; Stadelmann, O.; Angsta, J. Positron emission tomogra-
phy and fluorodeoxyglucose studies of metabolic hyperfrontality and psychopathology in the psilocybin model of psychosis.
Neuropsychopharmacology 1997,16, 357–372. [CrossRef]
56.
Gouzoulis-Mayfrank, E.; Schreckenberger, M.; Sabri, O.; Arning, C.; Thelen, B.; Spitzer, M.; Kovar, K.A.; Hermle, L.; Büll, U.;
Sass, H. Neurometabolic effects of psilocybin, 3, 4 methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDE) and d-methamphetamine in healthy
volunteers. A double-blind, placebo-controlled PET study with [18F]FDG. Neuropsychopharmacology
1999
,20, 565–581. [CrossRef]
57.
Carhart-Harris, R.L.; Erritzoe, D.; Williams, T.; Stone, J.M.; Reed, L.J.; Colasanti, A.; Tyacke, R.J.; Leech, R.; Malizia, A.L.;
Murphy, K.; et al. Neural correlates of the psychedelic state as determined by fMRI studies with psilocybin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 2012,109, 2138–2143. [CrossRef]
58.
Lewis, C.R.; Preller, K.H.; Kraehenmann, R.; Michels, L.; Staempfli, P.; Vollenweider, F.X. Two dose investigation of the 5-HT-
agonist psilocybin on relative and global cerebral blood flow. NeuroImage 2017,159, 70–78. [CrossRef]
59.
Carhart-Harris, R.L.; Leech, R.; Williams, T.M.; Erritzoe, D.; Abbasi, N.; Bargiotas, T.; Hobden, P.; Sharp, D.J.; Evans, J.; Feilding, A.;
et al. Implications for psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy: Functional magnetic resonance imaging study with psilocybin. Br. J.
Psychiatry 2012,200, 238–244. [CrossRef]
J. Xenobiot. 2022,12 51
60.
Madsen, M.K.; Fisher, P.M.; Burmester, D.; Dyssegaard, A.; Stenbæk, D.S.; Kristiansen, S.; Johansen, S.S.; Lehel, S.; Linnet, K.;
Svarer, C.; et al. Psychedelic effects of psilocybin correlate with serotonin 2A receptor occupancy and plasma psilocin levels.
Neuropsychopharmacology 2019,44, 1328–1334. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
61.
Stenbæk, D.S.; Madsen, M.K.; Ozenne, B.; Kristiansen, S.; Burmester, D.; Erritzoe, D.; Knudsen, G.M.; Fisher, P.M. Brain serotonin
2A receptor binding predicts subjective temporal and mystical effects of psilocybin in healthy humans. J. Psychopharmacol.
2021
,
35, 459–468. [CrossRef]
62.
Madsen, M.K.; Fishera, P.M.; Stenbæka, D.S.; Kristiansen, S.; Burmester, D.; Lehelc, S.; Páleníˇcek, T.; Kuchaˇrde, M.; Svarera, C.;
Ozenne, B.; et al. A single psilocybin dose is associated with long-term increased mindfulness, preceded by a proportional change
in neocortical 5-HT2A receptor binding. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020,33, 71–80. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
63.
Garg, U.; Knoblauch, J.; FrazeeII, C.; Baron, A.; Dudley, M. Accidental death involving psilocin from ingesting “magic mushroom”.
In Toxicology Cases for the Clinical and Forensic Laboratory; Ketha, H., Garg, U., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020;
pp. 379–382.
64.
Gerault, A.; Picart, D. Intoxication mortelle a la suite de la consommation volontaire et en groupe de champignons hallucinogenes.
Bull. Soc. Mycol. Fr. 1996,112, 1–14.
65.
PubChem. Psilocyn. Available online: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/10624#section=Acute-Effects&fullscreen=
true (accessed on 28 January 2021).
66.
PubChem. Psilocin. Available online: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/4980#section=Hazard-Classes-and-
Categories (accessed on 28 January 2021).
67.
Harris, I.; Wolbach, A.B.; Wikler, A.; Miner, E.J. Cross tolerance between LSD and psilocybin. Psychopharmacologia
1961
,2, 147–149.
68.
Geyer, M.A.; Vollenweider, F.X. Serotonin research: Contributions to under standing psychoses. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
2008
,29,
445–453. [CrossRef]
69.
Hasler, F.; Grimberg, U.; Benz, M.A.; Huber, T.; Vollenweider, F.X. Acute psychological and physiological effects of psilocybin in
healthy humans: A double-blind placebo-controlled dose effect study. Psychopharmacology 2004,172, 145–156. [CrossRef]
70.
Hollister, L.E. Clinical, biochemical and psychologic effects of psilocybin. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. Ther.
1961
,130, 42–52. [PubMed]
71.
Halpern, J.H. Hallucinogenes and dissociative agents naturally growing in the United States. Pharmacol. Ther.
2004
,102, 131–138.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
72.
Denis-Oliveira, R.J. Metabolism of psilocybin and psilocin: Clinical and forensic toxicological relevance. Drug Metab. Rev.
2017
,
49, 84–91. [CrossRef]
73.
Fowler, J.S.; Volkow, N.D.; Wang, G.J.; Pappas, N.; Logan, J.; MacGregor, R.; Alexoff, D.; Shea, C.; Schlyer, D.; Wolf, A.P.; et al.
Inhibition of monoamine oxidase B in the brains of smokers. Nature 1996,379, 733–736. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
74.
Austin, E.; Myronc, H.S.; Summerbell, R.K.; Mackenzie, C.A. Acute renal injury cause by confirmed Psilocybe cubensis mushroom
ingestion. Med. Mycol. Case Rep. 2019,23, 55–57. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
75.
Peden, N.; Bisset, A.F.; Macaulay, K.E.C.; Crooks, J. Clinical toxicology of ‘magic mushroom’ ingestion. Postgrad. Med. J.
1981
,57,
543–545. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
76.
Johnson, M.; Richards, W.; Griffiths, R. Human hallucinogen research: Guideline for safety. J. Psychopharmacol.
2008
,22, 603–620.
[CrossRef]
77.
Lewis, C.R.; Preller, K.H.; Braden, B.B.; Riecken, C.; Vollenweider, F.X. Rostral anterior cingulate thickness predicts the emotional
psilocybin experience. Biomedicines 2020,8, 34. [CrossRef]
78.
Strassman, R.J. Adverse reactions to psychedelic drugs. A review of the literature. J. Ment. Dis.
1984
,172, 577–595. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
79.
van Went, G.F. Mutagenicity testing of 3 hallucinogenes: LSD, psilocybin and delta-9-THC, using the micronucleus test. Experientia
1978,34, 324–325. [CrossRef]
80.
Grob, C.S.; Danforth, A.L.; Chopra, G.S.; Hagerty, M.; McKay, C.R.; Halberstadt, A.L.; Greer, G.R. Pilot study of psilocybin
treatment for anxiety in patients with advanced-stage cancer. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2011,68, 71–78. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
81.
Griffiths, R.R.; Johnson, M.W.; Carducci, M.A.; Umbricht, A.; Richards, W.A.; Richards, B.D.; Cosimano, M.P.; Klinedinst, M.A.
Psilocybin produces substantial and sustained decreases in depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: A
randomized double-blind trial. J. Psychopharmacol. 2016,30, 1181–1197. [CrossRef]
82.
Ross, S.; Bossis, A.; Guss, J.; Agin-Liebes, G.; Malone, T.; Cohen, B.; Mennenga, S.E.; Belser, A.; Kalliontzi, K.; Babb, J.; et al. Rapid
and sustained symptom reduction following psilocybin treatment for anxiety and depression in patients with life-threatening
cancer: A randomized controlled trial. J. Psychopharmacol. 2016,30, 1165–1180. [CrossRef]
83.
Carhart-Harris, R.L.; Bolstridge, M.; Rucker, J.; Day, C.M.J.; Erritzoe, D.; Kaelen, M.; Bloomfield, M.; Rickard, J.A.; Forbes, B.;
Feilding, A.; et al. Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: An open-label feasibility study.
Lancet Psychiatry 2016,3, 619–627. [CrossRef]
84.
Carhart-Harris, R.L.; Bolstridge, M.; Day, C.M.J.; Rucker, J.; Watts, R.; Erritzoe, D.; Kaelen, M.; Giribaldi, B.; Bloomfield, M.;
Pilling, S.; et al. Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: Six-month follow-up. Psychopharmacol-
ogy 2018,235, 399–408. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
85.
Davis, A.K.; Barrett, F.S.; May, D.G.; Cosimano, M.P.; Sepeda, N.D.; Johnson, M.W.; Finan, P.H.; Griffiths, R.R. Effects of
psilocybin-Assisted therapy on major depressive disorder. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry
2021
,78, 481–489.
[CrossRef]
J. Xenobiot. 2022,12 52
86.
Carhart-Harris, R.; Giribaldi, B.; Watts, R.; Baker-Jones, M.; Murphy-Beiner, A.; Murphy, R.; Martell, J.; Blemings, A.; Erritzoe, D.;
Nutt, D. Trial of psilocybin versus escitalopram for depression. Trial of psilocybin versus escitalopram for depression. N. Engl. J.
Med. 2021,384, 1402–1411. [CrossRef]
87.
Moreno, F.A.; Wiegand, C.B.; Taitano, E.K.; Delgado, P.L. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of psilocybin in 9 patients with
obsessive-compulsive disorder. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2006,67, 1735–1740. [CrossRef]
88. Wilcox, J.A. Psilocybin and obsessive compulsive disorder. J. Psychoact. Drugs 2014,46, 393–395. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
89.
Leonard, H.L.; Rapoport, J.L. Relief of obsessive-compulsive symptoms by LSD and psilocin. Am. J. Psychiatry
1987
,144,
1239–1240.
90.
Bogenschutz, M.P.; Forcehimes, A.A.; Pommy, J.A.; Wilcox, C.E.; Barbosa, P.C.R.; Strassman, R.J. Psilocybin assisted treatment for
alcohol dependance: A proof-of-concept study. J. Psychopharmacol. 2015,29, 289–299. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
91.
Johnson, M.W.; Garcia-Romeu, A.; Cosimano, M.P.; Griffiths, R.R. Pilot study of the 5-HT2AR agonist psilocybin in the treatment
of tobacco addiction. J. Psychopharmacol. 2014,28, 983–992. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
92.
Garcia-Romeu, A.; Griffiths, R.R.; Johnson, M.W. Psilocybin-occasioned mystical experiences in the treatment of tobacco addiction.
Curr. Drug Abuse Rev. 2014,7, 157–164. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
93.
NIH. U.S. National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04161066
(accessed on 23 February 2021).
94.
Muthukumaraswamy, S.; Forsyth, A.; Lumley, T. Blinding and expectancy confounds in psychedelic randomised controlled trials.
Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. 2021,14, 1133–1152. [CrossRef]
... 5-HT 2A receptors are extensively distributed in the brain; the region with the highest concentration of binding sites is the neocortex. [93][94][95] There is a high concentration of 5-HT 2A receptors in the prefrontal cortex, increasing the structural and functional plasticity of these cells. Activation of this receptor modulates mood, cognition and perception. ...
... 96,97 The significance of psilocin's capacity to bind to the 5-HT 2A receptor has been demonstrated in both rats and humans: pre-treatment with ketanserin, a 5-HT 2A receptor antagonist, blocks the psychotomimetic action of psilocin. [93][94][95]98,99 There is also evidence that activation of 5-HT 2A receptors leads to the release of dopamine in the ventral striatum of the basal ganglia as well as glutamate release from pyramidal neurons. 63,[100][101][102][103][104] Serotonin 5-HT 2A receptors have been detected on all major immune-related cells including macrophages, monocytes, and neutrophils. ...
... Stimulation of 5-HT 2A receptors blocks TNF-α and IL-1β activity, inhibits release of IL-6, and suppresses NF-κB, which is necessary for the maximal transcription of these cytokines. 63,94,100 Activation of the 5-HT 2A receptor with the agonist (R)-2,5-Dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI) in rats has demonstrated robust blockade of TNF-α activity, with reduced expression of cytokines, chemokines, and pro-inflammatory cell adhesion, including reduction in IL-6. 105 Mason et al studied the immune status of healthy humans after administration of oral psilocybin compared with placebo, and found an immediate reduction in the plasma concentration of TNF-α in the treatment group. ...
Article
Full-text available
The incidence of mental health disorders is increasing worldwide. While there are multiple factors contributing to this problem, neuroinflammation underlies a significant subset of psychiatric conditions, particularly major depressive and anxiety disorders. Anti-inflammatory interventions have demonstrated benefit in these conditions. Psilocin, the active ingredient of mushrooms in the Psilocybe genus, is both a potent serotonin agonist and anti-inflammatory agent, increases neuroplasticity, and decreases overactivity in the default mode network. Studies using hallucinogenic doses of psilocin under the supervision of a therapist/guide have consistently demonstrated benefits to individuals with depression and end-of-life anxiety. Microdosing psilocybin in sub-hallucinogenic doses has also demonstrated benefit in mood disorders, and may offer a safe, less expensive, and more available alternative to full doses of psilocybin for mood disorders, as well as for other medical conditions in which inflammation is the principal pathophysiology.
... Accordingly, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) are first-line Psilocybin is an indole alkaloid found in more than 200 species of mushrooms with global distribution. Genus Psilocybe is the main source of this compound, but some species from the genera Panaeolina, Pluteus, Panaeolus, Stropharia, Conocybe, and Gym-nopilus also contain psilocybin in lower concentrations [7,8]. Psilocybin, the active ingredient found in hallucinogenic mushrooms, also called "magic mushrooms'', is a powerful psychedelic. ...
... Contemporary scientific reports have indicated the therapeutic use of psilocybin to treat mental health disorders such as MDD, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Psilocybin may potentially meet the therapeutic needs for many indications, including depression, without addictiveness and overdose risk [6,8,9]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Major depressive disorder (MDD), also known as clinical depression, is a serious mental disorder and ranks first among psychiatric disorders that dominate the global disease burden. Recently, it was found that psilocybin, active compound derived from psychotropic mushrooms, can relieve depression symptoms rapidly and sustained benefits for several months. Beside MDD, psilocybin can alleviate symptoms of anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder. In the human body, psilocybin is dephosphorylated to form its active metabolite, psilocin which exhibits its effect through binding to various serotonin receptors. Is is considered relatively safe and can potentially meet the therapeutic needs without addictiveness and overdose risk. Although psilocybin has great potential in treating MDD and other psychological disorders, many studies so far lack homogeneity in their methodology, which limits conclusions. Further studies are needed in more extensive and diverse populations.
... Ambas moléculas pueden existir en equilibrio bioquímico a nivel metabólico en los hongos del género Psilocybe gracias a la enzima PsiK[27]. La psilocina presenta una hidrosolubilidad menor que la de la psilocibina; sin embargo, presenta una mayor liposolubilidad que su precursor[28]. Al igual que la psilocibina, la psilocina es un análogo estructural de la serotonina, razón por la cual, la psilocina es capaz de unirse a 15 receptores relacionados a la serotonina[26]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Los hongos juegan un papel clave en el mantenimiento de la vida en la tierra, ya que desempeñan múltiples funciones a nivel ecológico. Adicionalmente, son productores de diversos metabolitos secundarios, entre estos, los alcaloides, los cuales en ciertos casos pueden proveer propiedades alucinógenas. Psilocybe cubensis es una especie común de hongos alucinógenos conocida como “hongos mágicos”. Esta especie del filo Basidiomycota, originaria de Mesoamérica, produce alcaloides como la psilocibina y su derivado desfosforilado, la psilocina. Se ha estudiado el potencial de estos compuestos en el tratamiento contra distintas enfermedades como la depresión, la ansiedad, el trastorno de déficit de atención, el estrés postraumático y el trastorno obsesivo-compulsivo. Los hongos que acumulan psilocibina no suelen ser tóxicos para el consumo, pero sí pueden tener efectos colaterales como náuseas, vómito, dolor de cabeza, aumento del ritmo cardíaco y de la presión sanguínea. Dado esto y a limitaciones legales, este hongo y sus compuestos no se encuentran inmersos en el mercado; sin embargo, nuevas investigaciones demuestran su potencial y evidencian la necesidad de considerar su comercialización
... Other targets of psilocybin and psilocin include 5-HT 1B , 5-HT 1E , 5-HT 2B , 5-HT 5A , 5-HT 6 , 5-HT 7 , D1, and D3 receptors. Both substances also display a weak affinity towards imidazoline, adrenergic-α 2A , -α 2B , -α 2C receptors, and the SERT transporter [21,22]. Furthermore, psilocybin enhances intracellular signal transmission by a direct influence on the further steps of signaling cascades, including the early growth response proteins 1 and 2 (EGR1 and EGR2), involved in the modulation of synaptic plasticity and neuronal activity [23]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic mental disease that affects approximately 2% of the population. Obsessions and compulsions are troublesome for patients and may disturb their everyday activities. The pathogenesis of this disease is still not fully elucidated, but dysfunctions of serotonin-, dopamine- and glutamate-mediated neurotransmission together with early maladaptive schemas seem of importance. Pharmacological treatment includes drugs affecting the serotoninergic, dopaminergic, and glutamatergic systems, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Providing that up to 40% of patients with OCD are resistant to the currently available medications, there is a need for novel and effective therapies. Recent discoveries suggest that psilocybin, a non-physically addictive psychoactive substance, may ameliorate disease symptoms. When used in appropriate doses and under strict clinical control, psilocybin appears as a valuable treatment for OCD. This narrative article provides a thorough overview of OCD’s etiology, current treatment options, and the emerging evidence supporting psilocybin’s efficacy in managing OCD symptoms.
... In recent years there has been a great deal of clinical interest in the use of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and psilocybin for the treatment of mood disorders, anxiety disorders and substance dependence [1][2][3][4][5][6]. LSD is a synthetic ergot alkaloid derivative with a half-life of approximately 5 hours [7]. ...
Article
Background and aims Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and psilocybin are used as recreational drugs, and there is renewed interest in their clinical use. The current study aimed to (1) determine the circumstances of death and case characteristics of LSD‐ and psilocybin‐related death in Australia, 2000–23; and (2) determine the toxicological profile and major autopsy findings of these cases. Methods This was a retrospective exploratory study of all cases of LSD‐ and psilocybin‐related death in Australia, 2000–23, retrieved from the National Coronial Information System. Results A total of 43 cases were identified: 33 LSD and 10 psilocybin. The median ages were 24 years [interquartile range (IQR) = 13, range = 16–53] (LSD) and 26 years (IQR = 18.5, range = 20–58) (psilocybin), and fewer than five cases were female. The most common circumstance of death among both groups was traumatic accident (LSD 36.4%, psilocybin 40.0%). There were 12 cases of self‐harm, all of which involved LSD, all by physical means. In a fifth, death was attributed to multiple drug toxicity (LSD 18.2%, psilocybin 20.0%). In one case, death was attributed solely to LSD toxicity, while in a further two cases death was attributed to a cardiovascular event following LSD consumption (one LSD only, one multiple drug toxicity). In four psilocybin cases, the cause of death was undetermined. The most common clinical presentation was severe agitation (LSD 27.3%, psilocybin 20.0%). Median blood concentrations were LSD 0.8 μg/l (IQR = 1.7, range = 0.1–3), psilocin 20 μg/l (IQR = 53.5, range = 6–83). LSD was the only drug present in 25.0% of LSD cases and psilocybin in 20.0% of psilocybin cases. Pre‐existing organ pathology was uncommon. Conclusions Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD)‐ and psilocybin‐related death in Australia from 2000 to 2023 was primarily due to traumatic injury, whether through accident or self‐harm. Cases of acute toxic reactions that were attributed solely to LSD were rare.
Article
Introduction Psilocybin, a classical psychedelic, has been rescheduled for use in psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy for treatment-resistant depression in Australia. While evidence for its use is promising, understanding the associated risks is crucial. Accordingly, this review aims to collate adverse event data from psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy clinical trials and evaluate its definition, way of measurement and reporting. Methods A systematic method was employed to identify clinical trials related to the use of psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy in clinical populations that reported on adverse events. The quality assessment focused on relevant criteria related to adverse event definition, monitoring and reporting methods. Results A total of 24 articles were included. The studies reported heterogeneous psilocybin doses, study designs and indications. Physical and psychological adverse events during and after psilocybin sessions were examined, revealing variations in measuring, reporting methods and occurrences. The most common adverse events during and after sessions included elevated blood pressure, headaches, nausea, vomiting, fatigue and anxiety. In addition, both suicidal ideation and behaviour were observed infrequently and mainly in participants with a history of suicidal ideation or suicide attempt(s). Conclusion The review highlights the need to standardise the defintion of an adverse event, including how they are measured and reported, in psychedelic clinical trials to ensure consistent reporting across studies. In addition, screening participants for suicidality history and ongoing monitoring remains important, given the potential risk identified in the literature. However, based on the available data, the safety of psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy is generally supported, and no deaths were attributed to psilocybin. Nevertheless, cautious optimism is needed due to the preliminary nature and heterogeneity of the safety data.
Article
Full-text available
Key Takeaways * Syndemics reveal the clustering of diseases within social groups, exacerbating health disparities and highlighting the importance of targeting vulnerable populations. * The child mental health crisis is debated, with concerns about access to care, the prevalence inflation hypothesis, and the impact of adverse childhood experiences. * Loneliness is declared an epidemic, with digital technology increasing isolation, despite its intent to maintain relationships. * Psychiatry is shifting towards psychotherapy, emphasizing social determinants and interdisciplinary approaches, while addressing the treatment gap and integrating diverse methodologies.
Article
Psilocin, or 4-HO-DMT (or 3-(2-dimethylaminoethyl)-1H-indol-4-ol), is a psychoactive alkaloid substance from the tryptamine family, isolated from Psilocybe mushrooms. This substance is being studied by various research groups because it has a clear therapeutic effect in certain dosages. In this work, the study of the structure and properties of psilocin was carried using theoretical methods: the effects of polar solvents (acetonitrile, dimethylsulfoxide, water, and tetrahydrofuran) on the structural parameters, spectroscopic properties (Raman, IR, and UV–Vis), frontier molecular orbital (FMO), molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) surface, and nonlinear optical parameters (NLO). Theoretical calculations were performed at the B3LYP/6–311++G(d,p) level by the density functional theory (DFT) method. IEFPCM was used to account for solvent effects. The types and nature of non-covalent interactions (NCI) between psilocin and solvent molecules were determined using Atoms in Molecules (AIM), the reduced density gradient method (RDG), the electron localization function (ELF), and the localization orbital locator (LOL). Experimental and calculated FT-IR, FT-Raman, and UV–Vis spectra were compared and found to be in good agreement.
Article
Full-text available
Importance: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a substantial public health burden, but current treatments have limited effectiveness and adherence. Recent evidence suggests that 1 or 2 administrations of psilocybin with psychological support produces antidepressant effects in patients with cancer and in those with treatment-resistant depression. Objective: To investigate the effect of psilocybin therapy in patients with MDD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, waiting list–controlled clinical trial was conducted at the Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research at Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center in Baltimore, Maryland. Adults aged 21 to 75 years with an MDD diagnosis, not currently using antidepressant medications, and without histories of psychotic disorder, serious suicide attempt, or hospitalization were eligible to participate. Enrollment occurred between August 2017 and April 2019, and the 4-week primary outcome assessments were completed in July 2019. A total of 27 participants were randomized to an immediate treatment condition group (n = 15) or delayed treatment condition group (waiting list control condition; n = 12). Data analysis was conducted from July 1, 2019, to July 31, 2020, and included participants who completed the intervention (evaluable population). Interventions: Two psilocybin sessions (session 1: 20 mg/70 kg; session 2: 30 mg/70 kg) were given (administered in opaque gelatin capsules with approximately 100 mL of water) in the context of supportive psychotherapy (approximately 11 hours). Participants were randomized to begin treatment immediately or after an 8-week delay. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome, depression severity was assessed with the GRID-Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (GRID-HAMD) scores at baseline (score of ≥17 required for enrollment) and weeks 5 and 8 after enrollment for the delayed treatment group, which corresponded to weeks 1 and 4 after the intervention for the immediate treatment group. Secondary outcomes included the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Rated (QIDS-SR). Results: Of the randomized participants, 24 of 27 (89%) completed the intervention and the week 1 and week 4 postsession assessments. This population had a mean (SD) age of 39.8 (12.2) years, was composed of 16 women (67%), and had a mean (SD) baseline GRID-HAMD score of 22.8 (3.9). The mean (SD) GRID-HAMD scores at weeks 1 and 4 (8.0 [7.1] and 8.5 [5.7]) in the immediate treatment group were statistically significantly lower than the scores at the comparable time points of weeks 5 and 8 (23.8 [5.4] and 23.5 [6.0]) in the delayed treatment group. The effect sizes were large at week 5 (Cohen d = 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4-3.0; P < .001) and week 8 (Cohen d = 2.6; 95% CI, 1.7-3.6; P < .001). The QIDS-SR documented a rapid decrease in mean (SD) depression score from baseline to day 1 after session 1 (16.7 [3.5] vs 6.3 [4.4]; Cohen d = 3.0; 95% CI, 1.9-4.0; P < .001), which remained statistically significantly reduced through the week 4 follow-up (6.0 [5.7]; Cohen d = 3.1; 95% CI, 1.9-4.2; P < .001). In the overall sample, 16 participants (67%) at week 1 and 17 (71%) at week 4 had a clinically significant response to the intervention (≥50% reduction in GRID-HAMD score), and 14 participants (58%) at week 1 and 13 participants (54%) at week 4 were in remission (≤7 GRID-HAMD score). Conclusions and Relevance: Findings suggest that psilocybin with therapy is efficacious in treating MDD, thus extending the results of previous studies of this intervention in patients with cancer and depression and of a nonrandomized study in patients with treatment-resistant depression. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03181529
Article
Full-text available
Psilocybin is the psychoactive compound of mushrooms in the psilocybe species. Psilocybin directly affects a number of serotonin receptors, with highest affinity for the serotonin 2A receptor (5HT-2Ar). Generally, the effects of psilocybin, and its active metabolite psilocin, are well established and include a range of cognitive, emotional, and perceptual perturbations. Despite the generality of these effects, there is a high degree of inter-individual variability in subjective psilocybin experiences that are not well understood. Others have shown brain morphology metrics derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can predict individual drug response. Due to high expression of serotonin 2A receptors (5HT-2Ar) in the cingulate cortex, and its prior associations with psilocybin, we investigate if cortical thickness of this structure predicts the psilocybin experience in healthy adults. We hypothesized that greater cingulate thickness would predict higher subjective ratings in sub-scales of the Five-Dimensional Altered State of Consciousness (5D-ASC) with high emotionality in healthy participants (n = 55) who received oral psilocybin (either low dose: 0.160 mg/kg or high dose: 0.215 mg/kg). After controlling for sex, age, and using false discovery rate (FDR) correction, we found the rostral anterior cingulate predicted all four emotional sub-scales, whereas the caudal and posterior cingulate did not. How classic psychedelic compounds induce such large inter-individual variability in subjective states has been a long-standing question in serotonergic research. These results extend the traditional set and setting hypothesis of the psychedelic experience to include brain structure metrics.
Article
Full-text available
This article covers the renaissance of classical psychedelic drugs such as psilocybin and LSD plus 3,4-methylene dioxymethamphetamine (MDMA—ecstasy) in psychiatric research. These drugs were used quite extensively before they became prohibited. This ban had little impact on recreational use, but effectively stopped research and clinical treatments, which up to that point had looked very promising in several areas of psychiatry. In the past decade a number of groups have been working to re-evaluate the utility of these substances in medicine. So far highly promising preliminary data have been produced with psilocybin in anxiety, depression, smoking, alcoholism, and with MDMA for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and alcoholism. These findings have led to the European Medicines Agency approving psilocybin for a phase 3 study in treatment-resistant depression and the Food and Drug Administration for PTSD with MDMA. Both trials should read out in 2020, and if the results are positive we are likely to see these medicines approved for clinical practice soon afterwards.
Article
Introduction: There is increasing interest in the potential for psychedelic drugs such as psilocybin, LSD and ketamine to treat several mental health disorders, with a growing number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) being conducted to investigate the therapeutic effectiveness of psychedelics. Areas covered: We review previous literature on expectancy effects and blinding in the context of psychedelic RCTs – literature which strongly suggest that psychedelic RCTs might be confounded by de-blinding and expectancy. We conduct systematic reviews of psychedelic RCTs using Medline, PsychInfo and EMBASE (Jan 1990 – Nov 2020) and show that currently reported psychedelic RCTs have generally not reported pre-trial expectancy, nor the success of blinding procedures. Expert opinion: While psychedelic RCTs have generally shown promising results, with large effect sizes reported, we argue that treatment effect sizes in psychedelic RCTs are likely over-estimated due to de-blinding of participants and high levels of response expectancy. We suggest that psychedelic RCTs should routinely measure de-blinding and expectancy. Careful attention should be paid to clinical trial design and the instructions given to participants to allow these confounds to be reduced, estimated and removed from effect size estimates. We urge caution in interpreting effect size estimates from extant psychedelic RCTs.
Article
Background Psilocybin may have antidepressant properties, but direct comparisons between psilocybin and established treatments for depression are lacking. Methods In a phase 2, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial involving patients with long-standing, moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder, we compared psilocybin with escitalopram, a selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor, over a 6-week period. Patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive two separate doses of 25 mg of psilocybin 3 weeks apart plus 6 weeks of daily placebo (psilocybin group) or two separate doses of 1 mg of psilocybin 3 weeks apart plus 6 weeks of daily oral escitalopram (escitalopram group); all the patients received psychological support. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in the score on the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology–Self-Report (QIDS-SR-16; scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater depression) at week 6. There were 16 secondary outcomes, including QIDS-SR-16 response (defined as a reduction in score of >50%) and QIDS-SR-16 remission (defined as a score of ≤5) at week 6. Results A total of 59 patients were enrolled; 30 were assigned to the psilocybin group and 29 to the escitalopram group. The mean scores on the QIDS-SR-16 at baseline were 14.5 in the psilocybin group and 16.4 in the escitalopram group. The mean (±SE) changes in the scores from baseline to week 6 were −8.0±1.0 points in the psilocybin group and −6.0±1.0 in the escitalopram group, for a between-group difference of 2.0 points (95% confidence interval [CI], −5.0 to 0.9) (P=0.17). A QIDS-SR-16 response occurred in 70% of the patients in the psilocybin group and in 48% of those in the escitalopram group, for a between-group difference of 22 percentage points (95% CI, −3 to 48); QIDS-SR-16 remission occurred in 57% and 28%, respectively, for a between-group difference of 28 percentage points (95% CI, 2 to 54). Other secondary outcomes generally favored psilocybin over escitalopram, but the analyses were not corrected for multiple comparisons. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the trial groups. Conclusions On the basis of the change in depression scores on the QIDS-SR-16 at week 6, this trial did not show a significant difference in antidepressant effects between psilocybin and escitalopram in a selected group of patients. Secondary outcomes generally favored psilocybin over escitalopram, but the analyses of these outcomes lacked correction for multiple comparisons. Larger and longer trials are required to compare psilocybin with established antidepressants. (Funded by the Alexander Mosley Charitable Trust and Imperial College London’s Centre for Psychedelic Research; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03429075.) VISUAL ABSTRACT Psilocybin versus Escitalopram for Depression
Article
Background Psilocybin is a serotonergic psychedelic with psychoactive effects mediated by serotonin 2A receptor (5-HT2AR) activation. It produces an acute psychedelic altered state of consciousness with a unique phenomenology that can be temporally characterized by three intensity phases: onset of psychoactive effect, a peak plateau and return to normal consciousness. Aims We evaluated whether pre-drug brain 5-HT2AR binding predicted the three phases of psilocybin subjective drug intensity (SDI) and retrospective self-report of mystical type experiences in healthy individuals. Method Sixteen participants completed a pre-drug [ ¹¹ C]Cimbi-36 positron emission tomography scan to assess 5-HT2AR binding. On a separate day, participants completed a single psilocybin session (oral dose range 0.2–0.3 mg/kg), during which SDI was assessed every 20 min. The Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ) was completed at the end of the session. The three SDI phases were modelled using segmented linear regressions. We evaluated the associations between neocortex 5-HT2AR binding and SDI/MEQ outcomes using linear regression models. Results Neocortex 5-HT2AR was statistically significantly negatively associated with peak plateau duration and positively with time to return to normal waking consciousness. It was also statistically significantly negatively associated with MEQ total score. Conclusion This is the first study to investigate how individual brain 5-HT2AR binding predicts subjective effects of a single dose of psilocybin. Our findings reinforce the role of cerebral 5-HT2AR in shaping the temporal and mystical features of the psychedelic experience. Future studies should examine whether individual brain levels of 5-HT2AR have an impact on therapeutic outcomes in clinical studies.
Chapter
A 34-year-old male was discovered unresponsive. Night before, the subject was seen consuming alcohol and mushrooms, and acting strange. The drug screen was positive for benzodiazepines, opiates, cannabinoids, ethanol, and psilocin. The cause of death was ruled as mixed-drug toxicity.
Article
A single dose of the serotonin 2A receptor (5-HT2AR) agonist psilocybin can have long-lasting beneficial effects on mood, personality, and potentially on mindfulness, but underlying mechanisms are unknown. Here, we for the first time conduct a study that assesses psilocybin effects on cerebral 5-HT2AR binding with [¹¹C]Cimbi-36 positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and on personality and mindfulness. Ten healthy and psychedelic-naïve volunteers underwent PET neuroimaging of 5-HT2AR at baseline (BL) and one week (1W) after a single oral dose of psilocybin (0.2–0.3 mg/kg). Personality (NEO PI-R) and mindfulness (MAAS) questionnaires were completed at BL and at three-months follow-up (3M). Paired t-tests revealed statistically significant increases in personality Openness (puncorrected = 0.04, mean change [95%CI]: 4.2[0.4;∞]), which was hypothesized a priori to increase, and mindfulness (pFWER = 0.02, mean change [95%CI]: 0.5 [0.2;0.7]). Although 5-HT2AR binding at 1W versus BL was similar across individuals (puncorrected = 0.8, mean change [95%CI]: 0.007 [−0.04;0.06]), a post hoc linear regression analysis showed that change in mindfulness and 5-HT2AR correlated negatively (β [95%CI] = −5.0 [−9.0; −0.9], pFWER= 0.046). In conclusion, we confirm that psilocybin intake is associated with long-term increases in Openness and – as a novel finding – mindfulness, which may be a key element of psilocybin therapy. Cerebral 5-HT2AR binding did not change across individuals but the negative association between changes in 5-HT2AR binding and mindfulness suggests that individual change in 5-HT2AR levels after psilocybin is variable and represents a potential mechanism influencing long-term effects of psilocybin on mindfulness.
Article
An update is given on there corded psilocybin - and ibotenic acid containing mushrooms on a worldwide scale. Many new psilocybian species have been discovered during the last 15 years, including representatives of the genera Psilocybe, Panaeolus, Inocybe, Gymnopilus and Pluteus, whereas only Amanita regalis was identified as a new and potent source of ibotenic acid. Recreational use of psychoactive mushrooms has spread from the USA to Europe, but here, like anywhere else, it remains a marginal phenomenon. The mushrooms commonly used are limited to a few species: in Europe it is almost invariably Psilocybe semilanceata, whereas in the USA Ps. cubensis, is widely used. Locally, Ps. stuntzii and Panaeolus subbalteatus have also gained some popularity. Misuse in South America or Asia is virtually unknown, inspite of the easy availability of psychoactive fungi. The trade in “magic mushrooms” e.g. Ps. cubensis and Copelandiacyanescens on the Thai island of Koh Samui, or in Indonesian Bali only caters to European and American tourists. Finally, young people and members of the drug-using subculture in Australia and New Zealand have also become aware of the psychoactive fungi growing in their respective countries