ArticlePDF Available

Spatial patterns of regional inequalities: Empirical evidence from a large panel of countries

Authors:

Abstract

This paper investigates regional inequality from two standpoints. First, it explores them from a global perspective by assessing the incidence of economic growth for 2867 regions from 161 countries. Results show that middle income regions had the highest growth rates after the Great Recession, whilst regions from deciles 9 and, to a lower extent, those from decile 10 had suffered the most negative impact. Hence, the incidence of regional growth resembles the “elephant curve” of global inter-personal inequality. Second, the paper explores within-country regional inequality for a panel of 25 countries, over the period 2000–2018. Using OECD data and following both cross-sectional and time series approaches, results show that, while regional inequality decreases with growing GDPPC, regional polarization is more persistent and does not necessarily follow the same rule. The paper also delivers a first systematic assessment of sigma-convergence and regional polarization for a considerable number of countries, with findings pinpointing the importance of spatial clustering (which is contributing considerably to regional inequality levels), but also its complementarity with sigma-convergence measures (as regional inequality trajectories are not necessary associated with spatial clustering trajectories). Overall, findings also suggest that convergence approaches cannot provide an adequate theoretical background for understanding regional problems as long as they remain aspatial.
Applied Geography 140 (2022) 102638
0143-6228/© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Spatial patterns of regional inequalities: Empirical evidence from a large
panel of countries
Mihail Eva
a
,
*
, Alexandra Cehan
b
, Ema Corodescu-Roșca
a
, S´
ebastien Bourdin
c
a
Alexandru Ioan CuzaUniversity of Iasi, Faculty of Geography and Geology, Department of Geography, Iasi, Romania
b
Alexandru Ioan CuzaUniversity of Iasi, The Institute of Interdisciplinary Research, Department of Social Sciences and Humanities, Iasi, Romania
c
EM Normandie Business School, M´
etis Lab, France
ARTICLE INFO
Keywords:
Regional convergence
Geographical polarization
Spatial auto-correlation
Spatial Gini
Global inequality
Spatial disparity
ABSTRACT
This paper investigates regional inequality from two standpoints. First, it explores them from a global perspective
by assessing the incidence of economic growth for 2867 regions from 161 countries. Results show that middle
income regions had the highest growth rates after the Great Recession, whilst regions from deciles 9 and, to a
lower extent, those from decile 10 had suffered the most negative impact. Hence, the incidence of regional
growth resembles the elephant curveof global inter-personal inequality. Second, the paper explores within-
country regional inequality for a panel of 25 countries, over the period 20002018. Using OECD data and
following both cross-sectional and time series approaches, results show that, while regional inequality decreases
with growing GDPPC, regional polarization is more persistent and does not necessarily follow the same rule. The
paper also delivers a rst systematic assessment of sigma-convergence and regional polarization for a consid-
erable number of countries, with ndings pinpointing the importance of spatial clustering (which is contributing
considerably to regional inequality levels), but also its complementarity with sigma-convergence measures (as
regional inequality trajectories are not necessary associated with spatial clustering trajectories). Overall, ndings
also suggest that convergence approaches cannot provide an adequate theoretical background for understanding
regional problems as long as they remain aspatial.
1. Introduction
Entrenched and persistent spatial disparities (Pike, Rodrí-
guez-Pose, Tomaney, Torrisi, & Tselios, 2012) are hard to ignore. They
have marked both economic geography thinking and history of coun-
tries and economic unions around the world. Researchers showed that
high disparities and structural differences can result in extremely
different regional reactions to external economic shocks (Cuadrado-R-
oura, Martin, & Rodríguez-Pose, 2016), that could further undermine
the existence of monetary unions. Others, including Stiglitz (2015),
brought ethical and economic arguments in favor of a more equitable
world, that should aim at providing the same opportunities for people
irrespective of where they are born. Another group of researchers found
considerable evidence concerning the role of regional inequality in
fueling political instability and armed conicts (Ezcurra, 2019; Less-
mann, 2015; Østby, Nordås, & Rød, 2009). Moreover, and more
recently, spatial disparities received increased interest due to their
presumed role in explaining the emergence of the places that dont
matterin the post-Trump and post-Brexit era, which culminated with
their revenge in the form of voting populist candidates (Rodríguez-Pose,
2018). Divergent regional economic trajectories over the long-term are
thus pinpointed to have an ascendant on the election results (Rodrí-
guez-Pose, 2020), leading to the emergence of a geography of discon-
tent (Dijkstra, Poelman, & Rodríguez-Pose, 2019; Los, McCann,
Springford, & Thissen, 2017).
On the other hand, convergence approaches have shown that (ab-
solute or conditional) convergence is happening at a speed of roughly
2% per year, both between countries and between regions of the same
country (Gennaioli, La Porta, De Silanes, & Shleifer, 2014; Sala-i-Martin,
1996b, 1996a), further suggesting that there is no reason for govern-
ments to particularly be concerned about regional economic inequality
on the long run. However, convergence approaches have been criticized
* Corresponding author. Carol I Boulevard, no. 20A, Iași, 700506, Romania.
E-mail address: mihail.eva@uaic.ro (M. Eva).
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Applied Geography
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/apgeog
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102638
Received 1 August 2020; Received in revised form 17 August 2021; Accepted 11 January 2022
Free access for the full paper until 27th of March 2022 at the following link:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622822000091?dgcid=coauthor
Permanent link:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102638
... La concentration des activités économiques a fait l'objet d'une vaste littérature dans les pays développés (Capello, 2009). Elle est aujourd'hui plus largement étudiée dans les pays en développement car elle est une cause importante des inégalités économiques (Eva et al., 2022). En Tunisie, les disparités sont particulièrement marquées entre les régions de l'intérieur et celles du littoral où est localisée la majorité de l'emploi et des entreprises (Amara et Thabet, 2012 ;Tizaoui, 2015 ;Laajimi et al., 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
La Révolution du 14 Janvier 2011 et le printemps arabe qui s’en est suivi a eu des conséquences sur le développement économique en Tunisie. L’article s’intéresse à la distribution de l’emploi du secteur industriel en Tunisie à l’échelle de délégations sur la période 2003-2018. Il s’agit de mettre en évidence un potentiel retournement des disparités régionales et de discuter l’efficacité des politiques économiques mises en œuvre pour réduire les inégalités de l’emploi industriel après la Révolution. Bien que l’analyse exploratoire des données spatiales (ESDA) ait permis de modéliser plusieurs phénomènes géographiques, elle a pendant longtemps ignoré la dimension temporelle dans son approche. Dans notre article, nous proposons une approche spatio-temporelle des données spatiales (ESTDA). Nos résultats montrent que malgré la concentration de l’emploi global, qui a baissé après la Révolution, on identifie toujours un regroupement local de l’emploi dans la région du littoral. Les résultats montrent également que de nouvelles formes de disparités régio-nales apparaissent. Elles se forment plutôt entre les régions du littoral qu’entre le littoral et l’intérieur du pays mettant l’accent sur l’inefficacité des politiques de développement régional.
... Reducing socioeconomic disparities across regions is a key target in any strategy of regional development (European Commission 2017;OECD 2018;Rodríguez-Pose 2018), possibly promoting spatially cohesive territories with mild density divides (Bachtrögler et al. 2020). However, spatial inequalities persist at the continental and country scale in Europe (Stockdale, 2016;Palaskas et al. 2015;Iammarino et al. 2019;Pavone et al. 2021), calling for the need of research approaches more sensitive to contextual and spatially-specific local drivers of inequality (Eva et al. 2022). Earlier studies have proposed a preliminary investigation of the relationship between economic downturns, metropolitan cycles, and population trends with the aim of identifying demographically dynamic and resilient regions, and the related socioeconomic profile (e.g. ...
Article
Full-text available
Social dynamics and economic cycles have driven population growth in Europe toward heterogeneous and hardly predictable spatial patterns. To assess the role of economic expansion and recession, our study identifies contextual factors of population growth and decline at the prefectural scale in Greece, a peripheral economy in Europe, estimating the differential impact of economic scale, agglomeration, accessibility, and amenities since the early 2000s. With economic expansion (2002–2009), population growth was largely dependent on agglomeration forces in both high and medium-density prefectures. The spatial model observed during recession (2010–2017) has instead reflected the inherent decline of agglomeration economies—with population increasing in accessible, rural districts with (natural and cultural) amenities. In more recent years, population growth in low-density coastal areas definitely suggests how demographic trends have been decoupled from the geography of income and wealth, reducing the divide in central and peripheral locations. The dominance of Athens and Thessaloniki in the Greek urban hierarchy progressively lowered, leading to a settlement model based on population growth in ‘intermediate towns’ and attractive/accessible rural locations. Such dynamics delineate a development path grounded on the spatial distribution of amenities, suggesting the existence of a ‘reverse density dividend’ that requires a specific investigation in advanced economies.
... Among the most well-known metrics are the Gini coefficient and the Lorenz curve. They are applied to measure, for example, the distribution of wealth in society [14][15][16], the equality of access to health care in a region [17], the availability of employment for residents [18], or perhaps also the distribution of individual races across a geopolitical area [19]. These methods were subsequently applied in other areas as well. ...
Article
Full-text available
In this article, we aim to develop the theoretical background for the possible application of Economic-Geographical metrics in the field of population protection. We deal with various options for analyzing the availability of “safety” for citizens using studied metrics. Among others, we apply well-known metrics such as the Gini coefficient, Hoover index and even establish their generalizations. We develop a theoretical background and evaluate our findings on generated and actual data. We find that the metrics used can have an opposite interpretation depending on the scenario we are considering. We also discover that some scenarios demand a modification to the usual metric. We conclude that Economic-Geographical metrics give valuable tools to address specific security challenges. Metric’s generalizations could serve as a potent tool for other authors working in the field of population protection. Nevertheless, we must keep in mind that metrics also have drawbacks.
... These results show that the spatial autocorrelation parameter ρ is statistically significant at 0.1%, which indicates the existence of spatial autocorrelation in the observations. Therefore, this spatial autocorrelation responds to a spatial lag process, that is, income inequality in a country can be influenced by inequality in neighboring economies (Achten & Lessmann, 2020;Anselin & Bera, 1998;Puškárová & Vašková, 2021 In a similar global sample, although regional inequality decreases with increasing GDP per capita, regional polarization is more persistent and does not necessarily follow the same rule (Eva et al., 2022). However, other regional studies contradict the results found in this study, such as the one presented by: Artelaris (2021) in Greece; Blanco and Ram (2019) Table 6. ...
Article
Full-text available
Abstract Inequality has been of growing interest in the political debate and in theoretical and empirical studies for some decades. Therefore, the study of regional inequality raises some relevant questions related to the spatial nature of the data. In fact, adopting a regional point of view implies the opportunity to consider spatial interactions, which traditional studies do not include in their analyses. Therefore, the study aims to analyze income inequality before ( GINI1 ) and after ( GINI2 ) income and transfers, using a data set of 116 countries during a time period from 1985 to 2018. Spatial Durbin and Spatial Lag Models are applied to address spatial interactions and the spillover effect between countries and regions. First, the estimation results verify the existence of spatial correlations in income inequality for both GINI1 and GINI2 . Second, both GINI1 and GINI2 produce relatively similar scenarios, which implies that the effects of the independent variables do not differ in both scenarios. Third, globalization widens the income differences of neighboring regions significantly. Fourth, urbanization has a negative and significant effect, which generates a spillover effect and reduces the inequality of neighboring economies. Finally, there is evidence that an inverted Kuznets U is rejected both for economic and financial development. Thus, inequality at the regional level provides useful insights for policy makers, as it facilitates the assessment of the effectiveness of strategies aimed at reducing regional disparities and helps to develop actions based on the location and its environment. KEYWORDS: global sample, income inequality, Kuznets inverted U, spatial panel data, spillovers
Article
China has witnessed 556 million people migrating to urban areas over the past three decades with the process of urbanization, which has brought enormous pressure on electricity consumption and urban sustainable development. This paper establishes the generalized Divisia Index Decomposition Method (GDIM) model, and aims to reveal the electricity consumption mechanism of urban residents in China between 2000 and 2018. The results show that residential income, per capita electricity consumption and residential appliances are the main driving factors for the growth of urban residential electricity consumption, while the energy-saving willingness and expenditure structure have the inhibiting effect. With the expansion of urban residential income, the increase in income and air-conditioning numbers will continue to promote the growth of urban residential electricity consumption. Then, this paper puts forward relevant suggestions to alleviate the pressure of electricity demand and sustainable development from urban residents in China.
Article
Full-text available
p>A Organização para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico (OCDE) publica anualmente dados sobre os indicadores de Crescimento Verde de todos os países. Em geral, essa base é discutida na literatura usando estatísticas descritivas, as quais fornecem uma visão geral sobre o desempenho sustentável dos países. No entanto, não há trabalhos que relatem a aplicação de técnicas de agrupamento associadas aos algoritmos de mineração de dados com o intuito de encontrar fatores que explicam as semelhanças e diferenças entre os países avaliados por esses indicadores. Por essa razão, este trabalho relata a aplicação de técnicas de agrupamento k-means e clusterização hierárquica para encontrar grupos de países com desempenhos semelhantes com relação aos indicadores sustentáveis e demográficos avaliados pela OCDE. Para essa aplicação, foram usados os dados do ano de 2019 considerando todos os países de forma individual, excluindo os dados sobre blocos econômicos. Após a limpeza e preparação dos dados, 153 países e 15 indicadores foram avaliados, resultando em 5 grupos de países. Alguns grupos apresentaram características dominantes entre os países nele incluídos. O cluster 3 foi o maior grupo, englobando 96 países subdesenvolvidos ou em desenvolvimento, com economia agroexportadora. O cluster 0 agrupou países com grande crescimento populacional, e o Cluster 1 destacou países com altas taxas de mortalidade por exposição ao radônio. Por fim, o cluster 2 teve como destaque as variáveis demográficas referentes à idade e gênero e o cluster 4 agrupou países com baixas taxas de exposição a poluição decorrente de materiais particulados.</p
Article
Full-text available
This paper explores the nature and scale of inter-regional and inter-urban inequalities in the UK in the context of international comparisons and our aim is to identify the extent to which such inequalities are associated with strong national economic performance. In order to do this, we first discuss the evolution of UK interregional inequalities relative to comparator European economies over more than a century. We then focus specifically on comparisons between the UK and the reunified Germany. These two exercises demonstrate that the experience of the UK has been rather different to other countries. We further explore UK inter-urban inequalities in the light of international evidence and then explain why observations of cities only tell us a partial story about the nature of interregional inequalities, especially in the case of the UK. Finally, we move onto an OECD-wide analysis of the relationships between economic growth and interregional inequality. What we observe is that any such relationships are very weak, and the only real evidence of a positive relationship is in the post-2008 crisis period, a result which points to differentials in regional resilience rather than inequality-led growth. Moreover, once former transition economies are removed from the sample, the relationship disappears, or if anything becomes slightly negative. As such, the international evidence suggests that the UK’s very high spatial inequalities have hampered, rather than facilitated, national economic growth.
Article
Full-text available
Populism is on the rise, especially in the developed world. It has gone from being a force to be reckoned with to becoming one of the main challenges for society today. But the causes behind its rise remain hotly debated. Many of the economic analyses of the ascent of populism have focused on growing inequalities – both from an interpersonal and territorial dimension. In this essay, I argue that the rise of the vote for anti-system parties is far more related to the long-term economic decline of places that have seen far better times and have been disadvantaged by processes that have rendered them exposed and somewhat ‘expendable’ than to increases inequality. Fixing this type of ‘places that don’t matter’ is possibly one of the best ways to tackle anti-system voting. This will imply the implementation of well-targeted place-sensitive polices, going beyond the traditional wealthy and less developed places that have attracted the bulk of investment and considering long-term economic trajectories.
Article
Full-text available
Traditional inequality measures fail to capture the geographical distribution of income. The failure to consider such distribution implies that, holding income constant, different spatial patterns provide the same inequality measure. This property is referred to as anonymity and presents an interesting question about the relationship between inequality and space. Particularly, spatial dependence could play an important role in shaping the geographical distribution of income and could be usefully incorporated into inequality measures. Following this idea, this paper introduces a new measure that facilitates the assessment of the relative contribution of spatial patterns to overall inequality. The proposed index is based on the Gini correlation measure and accounts for both inequality and spatial autocorrelation. Unlike most of the spatially based income inequality measures proposed in the literature, our index introduces regional importance weighting in the analysis, thereby differentiating the regional contributions to overall inequality. Starting with the proposed measure, a spatial decomposition of the Gini index of inequality for weighted data is also derived. This decomposition permits the identification of the actual extent of regional disparities and the understanding of the interdependences among regional economies. The proposed measure is illustrated by an empirical analysis focused on Italian provinces.
Article
Full-text available
Support for parties opposed to European Union (EU) integration has risen rapidly, and a wave of discontent has taken over the EU. This discontent is purportedly driven by the very factors behind the surge of populism: differences in age, wealth, education, or economic and demographic trajectories. This paper maps the geography of EU discontent across more than 63,000 electoral districts in the EU-28 and assesses which factors push anti-EU voting. The results show that the anti-EU vote is mainly a consequence of local economic and industrial decline in combination with lower employment and a less educated workforce. Many of the other suggested causes of discontent, by contrast, matter less than expected, or their impact varies depending on levels of opposition to European integration.
Article
Full-text available
This paper examines the issue of whether the UK displays high levels of interregional inequality or only average levels of inequality. The question arises due to major differences in public perceptions. Following on from recent UK public debates, the UK evidence is examined in the context of 28 different indicators and 30 different Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries. Answering this question involves a careful consideration of the ways in which we use different spatial units of analysis, different measures of prosperity and different indices of inequality in order to understand interregional inequality, and the issues that arise are common to all countries. In the specific case of the UK, the result is clear. The UK is one of the most regionally unbalanced countries in the industrialized world.
Article
Since some decades, inequality is attracting a growing interest within the political debate as well as in theoretical and empirical studies. Considering inequality at regional level offers useful insights for policy makers, facilitating the assessment of the effectiveness of strategies aimed at reducing regional disparities and helping in developing place‐based actions. The study of regional inequality poses some relevant issues related to the spatial nature of data. In fact, dealing with georeferenced data implies the opportunity of considering the spatial interactions among regional units that are likely to play a role in shaping the inequality dynamics. Some studies highlighted the importance of incorporating spatial effects in a traditional measure of inequality such as the Gini index. These studies are based on the definition of a proximity structure, that allows one to discriminate between the spatial and the non‐spatial component of inequality. Different definitions of the proximity structure are likely to influence the spatial component of inequality. Those aspects are analysed in the present paper to offer more detailed insight in the territorial dimension of inequality. The measures and their decompositions are discussed in the case of European NUTS 3 regions.
Article
This paper investigates differences in economic growth determinants for 187 regions across 12 European countries. The study focuses on a period of increasing inequalities including the peak of global recession (1981 – 2009). The conditional convergence model is estimated, removing the assumption of linearity, by using a spatial quantile regression. Spatial quantile results are used for the identification of groups of regions that share a common path in terms of economic growth determinants. This approach allows us to analyse if different growth performances may cause disparities across regions. The empirical evidence shows how European regions are characterized by different convergence rates as well as heterogeneity in the effect of investments, population growth, human capital, and spillovers. Besides, convergence tends to be higher for the European regions that grow slower, producing a stronger reduction of disparities between these regions. This last outcome highlights how EU regions are different in their economic performance, pointing out the need for ad hoc policies.
Article
Regional economic divergence has become a threat to economic progress, social cohesion and political stability in Europe. Market processes and policies that are supposed to spread prosperity and opportunity are no longer sufficiently effective. The evidence points to the existence of several different modes of regional economic performance in Europe, responding to different development challenges and opportunities. Both mainstream and heterodox theories have gaps in their ability to explain the existence of these different regional trajectories and the weakness of the convergence processes among them. Therefore, a different approach is required, one that strengthens Europe's strongest regions but develops new approaches to promote opportunity in industrial declining and less-developed regions. There is ample new theory and evidence to support such an approach, which we have labelled 'place-sensitive distributed development policy'. © The Author(s) (2018). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: [email protected]
Article
Persistent poverty, economic decay, and lack of opportunities are at the root of considerable discontent in declining and lagging-behind areas the world over. Poor development prospects and an increasing belief that these places have ‘no future’ – as economic dynamism has been posited to be increasingly dependent on agglomeration economies – have led many of these so-called ‘places that don’t matter’ to revolt against the status quo. The revolt has come via an unexpected source: the ballot-box in a wave of political populism with strong territorial, rather than social foundations. I will argue that the populist wave is challenging the sources of existing well-being in both the less-dynamic and the more prosperous areas and that better, rather than more, place-sensitive territorial development policies are needed in order to find a solution to the problem. Place-sensitive development policies need, however, to stay clear of the welfare, income-support, and big investment projects of past development strategies if they are to be successful and focus on tapping into untapped potential and on providing opportunities to those people living in the places that ‘don’t matter’.