ArticlePublisher preview available

Youth Exposure to Endemic Community Gun Violence: A Systematic Review

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

Community gun violence persists as a daily reality for many youth in low-income urban communities. While most gun violence research has focused on the direct victims of firearm homicide, exploration into the broader public health repercussions of community gun violence on youth has lagged. This systematic review aimed to synthesize and critically assess the state of evidence on indirect exposure to community gun violence among low-income urban youth in the U.S. PubMed, Web of Science, ProQuest, and SCOPUS were searched for peer-reviewed articles exploring the scope, risk factors, and impacts of community gun violence exposure on this population. Of the 143 studies identified and screened, 13 studies were ultimately included. The broad themes emerging include (1) a lack of consensus regarding the range of experiences that constitute community gun violence, (2) exposure to violence involving a firearm as distinct from that with other weapons, (3) a need to conceptualize multiple dimensions of gun violence exposure, (4) differential impacts of exposure to community gun violence across developmental stages, and (5) how indirect gun violence exposure uniquely contributes to cycles of community violence. Future research must move toward a consistent typology, multidimensional conceptualization, and developmental- and context-specific examination of community gun violence exposure.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 3
Adolescent Research Review (2022) 7:383–417
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-022-00178-5
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Youth Exposure toEndemic Community Gun Violence: ASystematic
Review
PilarBancalari1 · MarniSommer1· SonaliRajan2,3
Received: 26 August 2021 / Accepted: 1 January 2022 / Published online: 2 February 2022
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022
Abstract
Community gun violence persists as a daily reality for many youth in low-income urban communities. While most gun vio-
lence research has focused on the direct victims of firearm homicide, exploration into the broader public health repercussions
of community gun violence on youth has lagged. This systematic review aimed to synthesize and critically assess the state
of evidence on indirect exposure to community gun violence among low-income urban youth in the U.S. PubMed, Web of
Science, ProQuest, and SCOPUS were searched for peer-reviewed articles exploring the scope, risk factors, and impacts of
community gun violence exposure on this population. Of the 143 studies identified and screened, 13 studies were ultimately
included. The broad themes emerging include (1) a lack of consensus regarding the range of experiences that constitute
community gun violence, (2) exposure to violence involving a firearm as distinct from that with other weapons, (3) a need
to conceptualize multiple dimensions of gun violence exposure, (4) differential impacts of exposure to community gun vio-
lence across developmental stages, and (5) how indirect gun violence exposure uniquely contributes to cycles of community
violence. Future research must move toward a consistent typology, multidimensional conceptualization, and developmental-
and context-specific examination of community gun violence exposure.
Keywords Child· Adolescent· Exposure to violence· Gun violence· Firearms· Public health
Introduction
The public health impact resulting from gun violence has
historically been operationalized by quantifying physical
injuries and deaths resulting from gunshots (Mitchell etal.,
2019). Less explored are the physiological and psychosocial
consequences of chronic and indirect exposure to commu-
nity gun violence among the populations who are dispropor-
tionately impacted—primarily low-income urban communi-
ties of color. Indirect exposure to community gun violence
poses broad threats to youth development and wellbeing.
These threats warrant a shift in the paradigm of gun violence
exposure to encompass indirect experiences as distinct expo-
sures to be comprehensively studied and prevented. While
the effects of direct gun violence victimization have been
described extensively throughout the literature, the dis-
tinct repercussions of indirect exposure on youth represent
an overlooked externality of endemic gun violence in the
United States (U.S.), meriting separate analysis. The aim of
this review is to summarize and critically appraise the state
of evidence on indirect exposure to community gun violence
among low-income urban youth in the U.S. Although there
is no standardized definition, for the purposes of this review,
indirect exposure to community gun violence will refer to
witnessing gunfire or hearing gunshots in public places such
as streets, parks, and schools, knowing a friend or family
member who has been shot or carries a gun, or being aware
of gun violence in one’s community.
* Pilar Bancalari
pilarbancalari@gmail.com
1 Department ofSociomedical Sciences, Mailman School
ofPublic Health, Columbia University, 722 West 168th
Street, NewYork, NY10032, USA
2 Department ofHealth andBehavior Studies, Teachers
College, Columbia University, 525 West 120th Street,
NewYork, NY10027, USA
3 Department ofEpidemiology, Mailman School ofPublic
Health, Columbia University, 722 West 168th Street,
NewYork, NY10032, USA
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... 11 Likewise, youth indirectly exposed to community violence exhibit poor mental health outcomes to varying degrees depending on physical proximity to the shooting and time since the event. 12 Firearm injuries of all types (e.g., peer and partner violence, mass shootings, suicide and self-harm, and unintentional injury) are associated with high rates of mental and physical harm for children and adolescents. 13 Each year, these injuries lead to approximately 30,000 initial in-patient hospital stays, with each stay costing around $31,000. ...
... 3 Similar reviews addressed youth exposure to firearm violence, noting a need to conceptualize the 'multiple dimensions of firearm violence exposure'. 12, 13 Sorenson and Schut investigated non-fatal firearm use in intimate partner violence, underscoring a need to expand homicide research to include the impact non-fatal usage of firearms for control. 15 Notably, these reviews focus on mass shootings, emphasize prevention, and highlight a lack of evidence regarding cumulative impacts of firearm violence. ...
... Isolation caused by physical and social restriction due to fear is particularly common in urban areas and may lead to negative coping mechanisms including gun carrying or avoidance of medical services as a result of distrust. 12,38 • "It made me think that anything can happen at any given time. Anything. ...
Article
Full-text available
Exposure to firearm violence produces ripples of impact that extend far beyond the physical wounds of direct survivors. This scoping review aimed to describe the breadth of the last 25 years of literature on short-term, long-term, and cumulative impacts of firearm violence in the United States across physical, psychological, social, and economic domains. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ProQuest Social Science Premium (ASSIA, NCJRS, and ERIC) and Web of Science until March 2024. Among 3172 articles, 87 met inclusion criteria. Our findings suggest that research most often explores short-term and psychological impacts on direct survivor-witnesses. The review highlights notable gaps, particularly regarding long-term and cumulative impacts among both the immediate social networks of survivor-witnesses and their wider communities. Further research is necessary for the effective development of trauma-informed interventions and the provision of economic resources aimed at supporting a growing population of survivors and communities affected by violence.
... 1.1 People can be exposed to firearm violence, threats, and risky behaviors in a variety of ways Researchers note that the field of firearm violence research has most often focused on direct victims and perpetrators of firearm violence and outcomes including fatalities and injuries (15). These are critical public health questions. ...
... These are critical public health questions. However, a growing body of work has begun to examine the negative collateral effects of exposure to firearm violence beyond direct victims and perpetrators (15). This has at times involved limited definitions of exposure, such as studies using census tract rates of firearm fatalities (16). ...
... Quimby and colleagues (19) expanded this topic to focus on exposure to guns (rather than violence) to include a variety of dimensions of gun access as a risk factor. Researchers call for the continued development of broader measures of exposure to firearm violence (15), including understudied dimensions like exposure to guns and someone else's self-directed gun violence, and exposure to threats of gun violence. The current study sought to examine a broader set of firearm exposure items in a national general population sample. ...
Article
Full-text available
This article provides prevalence rates for a wide range of types of exposure to someone else’s firearm violence, threats, and risky behavior among youth and young adults across several different demographic and structural characteristics. Data are from the Growing Up with Guns study of 5,311 participants recruited through the AmeriSpeak Panel. Data were collected from September 2023 to January 2024. Eligibility included U.S. residents who were ages 10–34 years old and proficient in either English or Spanish. A majority of participants (69.5%) reported exposure to someone else’s firearm violence, threats, or risky firearm behavior—either interpersonal or self-directed—in their lifetime. Rates of exposure were high across age categories, ranging from 48.0% of 10–17 year olds to 80.3% of 25–34 year olds. Odds of exposure also varied by race, sexual minority identity as well as deficits in social determinants of health (SDOH). Such wide-spread exposure introduces opportunities to prevent shootings before they occur and can inform the development of bystander interventions targeting those who are witnesses or otherwise know about another person’s firearm violence, threats or risky behaviors.
... depression, anxiety), and future violence victimization (Bancalari et al., 2022;Bottiani et al., 2021;Gastineau et al., 2021;Oliphant et al., 2019;Schmidt et al., 2019;Smith et al., 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: Caregiver socialization is an important component of youth behavior development, yet little research has considered whether caregiver messages about use of fighting and nonviolent conflict resolution may be related to youths’ beliefs about fighting and subsequent firearm carriage. This study examined the extent to which youths’ beliefs about fighting moderated the relation between caregiver messages about how to manage conflict and youth firearm carrying. Method: Participants were 254 youth (ages 12–17; 56% female; 88% African American) drawn from a larger community-based study of positive youth development and youth violence prevention in a low-income urban area. Binary logistic regression analyses were conducted in Statistical Package for the Social Scences. Covariates included age, sex, race, and intervention community. Results: Significant direct effects were produced between caregiver messages supporting fighting and nonviolence and youth firearm carrying, as were youth beliefs supporting reactive and instrumental aggression with firearm carrying. Though the interaction term was significant in the first two models, further examination of conditional probabilities indicated that youth beliefs were did not moderate the relations between caregiver messages and firearm carrying. Conclusions: This study establishes preliminary relations between caregiver socialization messages and youth firearm carrying. Further longitudinal research is needed to understand caregiver-youth socialization and messages about how to manage conflict and reduce firearm behavior.
... These results suggest that those who face the greatest risk of community exposure to firearm homicide also face the greatest consequences of such exposure when it comes to substance use (James et al., 2021;Kravitz-Wirtz et al., 2022). This finding corroborates prior studies documenting the impact of firearm violence on the lives of adolescents in communities at highest risk (Bancalari et al., 2022;Buggs et al., 2022). That these associations were strongest when adolescents were exposed to multiple firearm homicide incidents suggests that chronic exposure may contribute to an accumulation of co-occurring stressors linked to structural disadvantage that place adolescents living in households and neighborhoods with limited socioeconomic resources at increased risk of marijuana use. ...
Article
Full-text available
In areas with high levels of violence, not just the individuals involved but entire communities experience harm. Acts of violence in the community that a young person did not witness or experience directly can still have consequences for their health behaviors. Using survey data from the Future of Families and Child Wellbeing Study merged with the Gun Violence Archive (N = 3042), we investigate associations between community exposure to firearm homicide and adolescent substance use. Results indicate that exposure to a local firearm homicide in the past 180 days is associated with 1.56 higher odds of adolescent marijuana use, and exposure to multiple incidents nearly doubles the odds of use. There is no significant association between exposure and either alcohol or cigarette use. Moderation analyses show a positive association between firearm homicide exposure and marijuana use among Black and low-income adolescents and adolescents living in disadvantaged neighborhoods. These results suggest that health and healing-centered prevention and intervention strategies aimed at reducing exposure to firearm violence and mitigating subsequent harm, including substance use, are particularly important for those most impacted by co-occurring stressors linked to structural disadvantage.
Article
This study explored the association between youth gun beliefs, behaviors, and violence. Hierarchical regression examined whether gun beliefs predicted defensive and offensive gun behaviors and gun violence. The EFA confirmed gun belief subscales and indicated two gun behavior subscales. Emotional risk beliefs were negatively related to all outcomes, social perception related to defensive behavior, gun presence related to offensive behavior, and neighborhood concerns related to gun violence. The results validate the gun belief subscales for youths and differentiate gun behaviors which aids understanding. This study provides novel insight into the link between youth gun beliefs and behaviors. It suggests interventions to reduce gun presence, challenge positive gun perceptions, and enhance awareness of gun dangers can decrease youth gun violence.
Article
Gun violence is one of the leading causes of premature death in the United States. While research examining the impact of gun violence has focused on direct victimisation, exposure within residential communities experiencing gun violence is consequential. However, exposure is not a spatially bounded process, as residents spend significant time outside of their neighbourhoods and travel to neighbourhoods both near and far. As such, a more complete portrait of gun violence exposure must consider this higher-order, neighbourhood network. Using 2018–2019 mobile phone data from SafeGraph, I construct neighbourhood networks based on daily mobility flows for the 100 largest US metropolitan areas. I compare neighbourhood gun violence exposure in the residential neighbourhood, the neighbourhoods bordering the residential neighbourhood, and the non-residential and non-adjacent neighbourhoods visited by residents. I find that gun violence exposure is greater in visited neighbourhoods compared to home and adjacent neighbourhoods, most metro areas exhibit either greater or equal exposure in visited neighbourhoods relative to home neighbourhoods, Black neighbourhoods exhibit greater gun violence exposure across all scales, and segregation increases gun violence exposure in neighbourhood networks for Black, Hispanic and mixed racial/ethnic neighbourhoods.
Article
The study addresses community violence among Arab social workers in Israel. Data from 14 in-depth interviews were thematically analyzed. The findings reveal that participants encounter challenges in the personal, familial, as well as the professional spheres. They report collegial supportive coping mechanisms used by social workers after exposure to community violence. This study highlights the importance of enhancing social workers’ well-being, safety, and professional effectiveness after exposure to community violence. Tailored peer support is crucial in addressing the challenges they face.
Article
This study investigated young Black and Latine organizers' perceptions of how mainstream narratives of gun violence relate to and influence their antigun violence organizing work. We analyzed interview data from 22 Black and Latine young people (Mage = 19.91, 55% women) who were engaged in gun violence prevention organizations in the United States. The results centered on three themes: (1) Young people's journeys of gaining awareness of structural racism through personal experience with gun violence, (2) media's perpetuation of structural racism through its dismissal of community gun violence, and (3) the need for community‐based solutions to address the root causes of gun violence. These findings shed light on how societal elements, including the media, policymakers, and white‐led gun violence prevention organizations, perpetuate structural racism and pose challenges to the organizing efforts of Black and Latine youth. Furthermore, these findings amplify young Black and Latine gun violence prevention organizers' experiences with gun violence and their frustrations towards the discriminatory media portrayals of gun violence in their communities, as well as recognize the importance of their organizing work.
Article
Background Firearms-related health sciences research has documented disparities in fatal and nonfatal firearm injury impacting populations in the United States defined by race and ethnicity, age, gender, and geography. Recent reports from research and advocacy organizations have highlighted a need for this research to include sexual and gender minority (ie, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer [LGBTQ+]) populations to guide public health efforts to prevent homicide, suicide, and injury. Purpose The current review examines and summarizes existing research related to firearms and LGBTQ+ populations in the United States. Methods A search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, LGBT Life, and Scopus was conducted in May 2024 using search strings related to LGBTQ+ populations, firearms, and suicide. Articles were included in this review if they were peer-reviewed, empirical studies assessing any construct related to firearms among LGBTQ+ people in the United States. Results Ultimately, 35 studies were included. Constructs examined in included studies were suicide (n = 6), homicide (n = 4), responses to the Pulse nightclub shooting (n = 9), nonfatal interpersonal violence (n = 4), and firearm access and ownership (n = 12). Conclusions Findings identified substantial gaps in the literature, underscoring an urgent need for LGBTQ+ health researchers and firearm injury prevention researchers to collaboratively extend and improve the evidence base on firearms among LGBTQ+ populations. Key recommendations include improving Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity data collection in firearms research, collecting original data to address LGBTQ+-specific and LGBTQ+-inclusive research questions regarding firearms, broadening the scope of firearms constructs assessed among LGTBQ+ populations, and using intersectionality to guide future research.
Article
Full-text available
This study assessed the prevalence of trauma exposure among middle school students and evaluated the effectiveness of a school-based, trauma- and grief-focused group psychotherapy protocol in treating a subset of students with severe exposure, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and functional impairment. Using a stratified screening procedure, 812 students completed a screening survey; 58 students (7.1% of those surveyed) met criteria for group treatment, and 26 students participated in the group. Group participation was associated with improvements in posttraumatic stress and complicated grief symptoms and in academic performance. Results suggest that students who are exposed to severe levels of community violence often may not be identified or treated. The findings also suggest that severe PTSD in adolescence may be associated with impaired school functioning, and that a reduction in PTSD symptoms may be related to academic remediation.
Article
Full-text available
Prior research has illustrated the importance of some types of local community crime for adolescents' outcomes. However, we have little knowledge about the extent to which gun homicides within adolescents' neighborhoods affect their mental health and behavioral outcomes. This is important because local gun homicide incidents may be uniquely harmful for adolescents and their association with adolescents' mental health and behavior may represent an underappreciated externality of the U.S.‘s gun violence epidemic. In this study, we used data on the geocoded location of gun homicides linked with restricted Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study data to examine whether gun homicides incidents near adolescents' homes and/or schools were associated with their mental health and behavioral outcomes. We found that the occurrence of a gun homicide near an adolescent's home or school was associated with significantly worse symptoms of anxiety and depression for girls and, in some cases, with symptoms of anxiety for boys. We further found that these relationships varied depending on the distance of gun homicide incidents to homes and schools.
Article
Full-text available
Repeated exposure to violent crime and drug use among youth of color can have negative health and behavioral outcomes. Using a community trauma theoretical framework, this qualitative study examines the lived experiences of Black and Latinx youth living in an under-resourced community with high levels of violent crime. Data were collected through eleven focus groups comprising of (N = 59) youth. Common themes arose including daily occurrences of witnessing gun violence, feelings of hopelessness, and lack of opportunities among youth. Implications highlight the importance of youth serving community-based organizations to nurture resilience and community healing within trauma-exposed neighborhoods.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this article is to systematically review the existing literature regarding intervention and prevention programs that ameliorate the negative effects of exposure to community violence (ECV) on children and adolescents. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review (PRISMA) Guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of the literature aimed at providing a synthesis of the extant Randomized Control Trials (RCT) and peer-reviewed empirical literature on intervention and prevention programs for those affected by ECV. Nine randomized controlled trials were identified: seven studies with elementary school students in the USA, one study with elementary school students in Colombia, and one study with middle school students in the USA. Most trials compared intervention and no-treatment control groups; three studies compared active interventions. The intervention and prevention trials conducted in school settings in the USA showed most impact on reducing internalizing and PTSD symptoms. The evidence base of intervention and prevention programs for child and adolescent exposure to community violence is very limited. This systematic review synthesizes extant evidence of the effectiveness of intervention programs in reducing internalizing and externalizing symptoms, PTSD, exposure to community violence, and in enhancing academic performance. More studies are needed to provide a better understanding of how interventions might ameliorate the adverse consequences of exposure to community violence.
Article
Full-text available
Background Gun violence has shortened the average life expectancy of Americans, and better knowledge about the root causes of gun violence is crucial to its prevention. While some empirical evidence exists regarding the impacts of social and economic factors on violence and firearm homicide rates, to the author’s knowledge, there has yet to be a comprehensive and comparative lagged, multilevel investigation of major social determinants of health in relation to firearm homicides and mass shootings. Methods and findings This study used negative binomial regression models and geolocated gun homicide incident data from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2015, to explore and compare the independent associations of key state-, county-, and neighborhood-level social determinants of health—social mobility, social capital, income inequality, racial and economic segregation, and social spending—with neighborhood firearm-related homicides and mass shootings in the United States, accounting for relevant state firearm laws and a variety of state, county, and neighborhood (census tract [CT]) characteristics. Latitude and longitude coordinates on firearm-related deaths were previously collected by the Gun Violence Archive, and then linked by the British newspaper The Guardian to CTs according to 2010 Census geographies. The study population consisted of all 74,134 CTs as defined for the 2010 Census in the 48 states of the contiguous US. The final sample spanned 70,579 CTs, containing an estimated 314,247,908 individuals, or 98% of the total US population in 2015. The analyses were based on 13,060 firearm-related deaths in 2015, with 11,244 non-mass shootings taking place in 8,673 CTs and 141 mass shootings occurring in 138 CTs. For area-level social determinants, lag periods of 3 to 17 years were examined based on existing theory, empirical evidence, and data availability. County-level institutional social capital (levels of trust in institutions), social mobility, income inequality, and public welfare spending exhibited robust relationships with CT-level gun homicide rates and the total numbers of combined non-mass and mass shooting homicide incidents and non-mass shooting homicide incidents alone. A 1–standard deviation (SD) increase in institutional social capital was linked to a 19% reduction in the homicide rate (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.81, 95% CI 0.73–0.91, p < 0.001) and a 17% decrease in the number of firearm homicide incidents (IRR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.73–0.95, p = 0.01). Upward social mobility was related to a 25% reduction in the gun homicide rate (IRR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.66–0.86, p < 0.001) and a 24% decrease in the number of homicide incidents (IRR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.67–0.87, p < 0.001). Meanwhile, 1-SD increases in the neighborhood percentages of residents in poverty and males living alone were associated with 26%–27% and 12% higher homicide rates, respectively. Study limitations include possible residual confounding by factors at the individual/household level, and lack of disaggregation of gun homicide data by gender and race/ethnicity. Conclusions This study finds that the rich–poor gap, level of citizens’ trust in institutions, economic opportunity, and public welfare spending are all related to firearm homicide rates in the US. Further establishing the causal nature of these associations and modifying these social determinants may help to address the growing gun violence epidemic and reverse recent life expectancy declines among Americans.
Article
Full-text available
Although statistics on youth homicide and injury from gun violence are available, little research has focused on how gun violence overlaps with other victimizations or on the psychological impact of gun violence on children. Pilot survey data were collected on the experiences of 630 U.S. children (age range: 2–17 years) from Boston, Philadelphia, and rural areas of eastern Tennessee. Youth aged 10–17 years completed a self-report survey on a wide range of gun violence exposures, and parents of younger children (aged 2–9 years) completed the survey as a proxy for that child. Direct gun violence exposure, witnessing gun violence, and hearing gunshots were all significantly associated with other forms of victimization, rs =.10–.38, p <.001. The findings suggest that youth who experience direct gun violence are often exposed to multiple violent contexts. For older youth (ages 10–17 years) polyvictimization was most strongly associated with posttraumatic symptoms, β =.35, p <.001, although witnessing gun violence still uniquely predicted a higher level of symptoms, β =.18, p <.01. For younger children (ages 2–9 years), hearing and witnessing gun violence were both related to posttraumatic symptoms, β =.15, p <.01 for both, even after controlling for polyvictimization. Mental health professionals and trauma-informed services should be mindful that the traumatic impact of gun violence for children may not necessarily be attached to direct victimization experiences but may also result from simply seeing or hearing it in their neighborhoods.
Article
Introduction Exposure to violence is a risk factor for firearm carriage. Youth exposed to violence also have difficulty envisioning positive future outcomes (e.g., educational outcomes), which can increase the likelihood of firearm carriage over time. Researchers, however, have not yet examined whether changes in exposure to violence over time can influence the developmental trajectories of firearm carriage. To address this gap, we (1) examined the longitudinal association between exposure to violence and firearm carriage (grades 9 to 12) and then (2) examined whether changes in future expectations mediated this longitudinal association. Method The longitudinal association between exposure to violence and firearm carriage through future expectations was examined among 850 adolescents from the Flint Adolescent Study. Participants were recruited from four high schools in a midwestern city in the United States. Parallel latent growth models and latent growth mediation models were estimated. Results A positive association was observed between the rate of change in exposure to violence and firearm carriage. Exposure to violence also indirectly increased the risk for firearm carriage over time by decreasing future expectation in the 9th grade. Conclusions Our results support the idea that helping youth develop positive attitude about educational success may help reduce firearm carriage. Increasing positive expectations about future may help prevent firearm carriage within the context of violence exposure.
Article
Purpose This study aimed to explore the association between direct exposure, indirect exposure, and perpetration of gun violence and suicidal ideation among young adults experiencing homelessness (YAEH). Methods YAEH (n = 1,426) in seven cities across the U.S. were surveyed. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between lifetime gun violence exposure and suicidal ideation in the past 12 months. Results Forty-five percent (n = 641) of YAEH had experienced direct or indirect gun violence, whereas 17% (n = 247) had engaged in gun violence perpetration. Gun violence perpetration is associated with elevated suicidal ideation risk (odds ratio = 1.46; 95% confidence interval = 1.02–2.01) among YAEH. Conclusions A high percentage of YAEH were exposed to firearm violence. Cross-sector, multiagency collaborations are warranted to reduce firearm violence exposure among this vulnerable population. Homeless service providers should screen for gun violence exposure and suicide risk and target prevention efforts on YAEH with a history of gun violence perpetration.
Article
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to estimate the effect of firearm involvement during violent victimization on the level of distress experienced and daily functioning within sociodemographic subgroups. Methods: We used cross-sectional data from the National Crime Victimization Survey (n = 5698) and Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation. Sociodemographic subgroups were defined by age, race, sex, and socioeconomic position. Outcomes included experiencing the victimization as severely distressing and problems in the workplace or at school, or with peers or family. Results: Among people victimized with a firearm, nearly 40% experienced the victimization as severely distressing and 28% reported daily functioning problems as a result of the victimization, compared with 25% and 27% of those victimized without a firearm. In most of the subgroups examined, a greater proportion of people described the event as severely distressing when a firearm was involved in the victimization, ranging up to 19 percentage points higher among women and among black respondents (95% CI for women = 10%-28%; for blacks = 6%-31%). Conclusions: Our findings suggest an almost universal negative response to firearm involvement during a violent victimization as compared with violent victimizations involving other or no weapons. These findings highlight the need for efforts by medical and mental health practitioners to address the potential sequelae of experiencing severe distress during a firearm victimization.
Article
Rationale: Given the widespread availability of firearms, high prevalence of gun violence in the U.S., and the intersection of race, cumulative violence and adverse mental health outcomes, it is important to understand the mental health consequences of exposure to gun violence fatality on racially/ethnically diverse secondary victims. Objective: The aims of this study were to examine 1) the prevalence and demographic differences in exposure to gun violence fatality; 2) the associations between exposure and depression, psychological distress, suicidal ideation and psychosis-like experiences; and 3) the interaction between race and exposure in relation to depression, psychological distress, suicidal ideation and psychotic experiences. Methods: Participants (n=1615) were adult community residents from Baltimore, New York, Philadelphia, and Washington, D.C, who participated in the online Survey of Police-Public Encounters. Chi-square, linear, and logistic regression were used to test study aims. Results: Twenty-four percent of respondents reported exposure to gun violence fatality. Black, Latinx, younger, and those of lower income and education were disproportionately exposed. Exposed respondents had significantly higher levels of psychological distress, depression, suicidal ideation and/or psychotic experiences compared to those not exposed. There was a significantly stronger association between exposure and depression among Latinxs and "other" races relative to Whites. Conclusions: Findings suggest that vicarious exposure to gun violence fatality is widespread, disproportionately experienced by racial/ethnic minorities, and related to a higher prevalence of mental health symptoms. Implications of these findings are that clinicians should attend to the mental health needs of people vicariously exposed to gun violence fatality, and that gun violence reduction interventions may positively impact community-level mental health. Given that Blacks and Latinxs are disproportionately exposed to gun violence, a more extensive examination of exposure to gun violence fatality as a social determinant of mental health is warranted using longitudinal and nationally representative data.