International Journal of Communication 16(2022), 981–1005 1932–8036/20220005
Copyright © 2022 (Traci Kristin Gillig, Jared Macary, and Ron Price). Licensed under the Creative Commons
Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd). Available at http://ijoc.org.
Virtual Camp: LGBTQ Youths’ Collective Coping During the COVID-19
TRACI KRISTIN GILLIG
Washington State University, USA
University of Oregon, USA
Washington State University, USA
The COVID-19 pandemic prompted school closures across the United States, removing
important social support sources for many LGBTQ youths. The current research examines
the collective coping of young LGBTQ people (majority transgender/nonbinary) who
participated in the first known virtual camp program for pandemic-affected youths. In
Study 1, in-depth, semistructured interviews with 15 youths (aged 14–20) revealed
youths used the virtual camp space to develop unique support networks, maintain
connections with trusted individuals, dwell where LGBTQ identity is celebrated, find
grounding through synchrony, and fill unscheduled time. In Study 2, 41 participants in a
second virtual camp session (aged 12–19) were longitudinally surveyed. Findings
demonstrated youths experienced reduced depressive symptoms, and new friendships
made through virtual camp influenced self-esteem. Results across both studies indicate
the importance of tailored virtual spaces in facilitating social connections, providing a
sense of safety and belonging, and addressing LGBTQ youths’ mental health during a
Keywords: COVID-19, pandemic, coronavirus, social media, Instagram, virtual, queer,
LGBTQ, summer camp, crisis, resilience, public health
In spring 2020, the rapid spread of the COVID-19 virus prompted school closures across the United
States, affecting at least 50.8 million public school students (Decker, Peele, & Riser-Kositsky, 2020). For
many youths, days spent primarily at school became days spent at home with parents/guardians. While the
Traci Kristin Gillig: email@example.com
Jared Macary: firstname.lastname@example.org
Ron Price: email@example.com
Date submitted: 2021-03-08
This research was supported by Washington State University.
982 Traci Kristin Gillig, Jared Macary, and Ron Price International Journal of Communication 16(2022)
home environment can be a refuge for many youths, for others, it is an unsupportive space. The latter is
still the case for many LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, nonbinary, or related identities)
youths in the United States today (Witcomb et al., 2019). Though attitudes toward gay and lesbian people
have steadily improved among U.S. adults (Poushter & Kent, 2020), views toward transgender people
remain mixed (McCarthy, 2021). The pandemic-prompted shift to virtual instruction reduced or removed
access to identity-affirming school groups, such as Genders and Sexualities Alliances (GSAs), as well as
supportive teachers, counselors, and classmates (Ioverno, Belser, Baiocco, Grossman, & Russell, 2016).
This interrupted access to support outside the home could have negative consequences for LGBTQ youths,
who experience higher rates of psychological distress, such as depression, than their non-LGBTQ peers (Fish
& Pasley, 2015). In this context, many young LGBTQ people sought social connection online.
Historically, online spaces have enabled LGBTQ individuals to interact with similar others, whom
they may not have access to in their local, geographically bounded communities (Gross, 2007). Today, LGB
individuals (lesbian, gay, bisexual) have higher rates of online engagement than their non-LGB peers
(Seidenberg et al., 2017). For LGBTQ youths, accessing online communities of shared interest (McInroy,
2019) and identity-specific resources (Craig & McInroy, 2014) can have positive psychological effects by
providing collaborative social support (Homan, Lu, Tu, Lytle, & Silenzio, 2014), an escape from stigma, and
a sense of belonging, among other processes (Austin, Craig, Navega, & McInroy, 2020). For youths in
general, the number of friends on social networking sites has a small, positive association with positive
mental health (i.e., a state of mind characterized by emotional well-being, good behavioral adjustment,
relative freedom from anxiety and disabling symptoms, and a capacity to establish constructive relationships
and cope with the ordinary demands of life; American Psychological Association [APA], 2021; Meier &
Reinecke, 2020). However, evidence that time spent online (e.g., using social media) can negatively affect
mental health also exists.
Meta-analytic evidence suggests a small, negative association between social media use and overall
mental health for the general U.S. population (Meier & Reinecke, 2020). Kross and colleagues (2020) note
that how individuals use social media affects their mental health. Factors contributing to negative outcomes
include passive social media use (in contrast with active, communicative use; Stevic, Schmuck, Matthes, &
Karsay, 2021), nonconnection-promoting use (in contrast with use promoting meaningful social connections;
Clark, Algoe, & Green, 2018), high levels of use (Hou, Xiong, Jiang, Song, & Wang, 2019), and victimization
(McConnell, Clifford, Korpak, Phillips, & Birkett, 2017). LGBTQ people may experience victimization online
more frequently than heterosexual/cisgender individuals (GLAAD, 2021). Questions remain about the factors
promoting positive versus negative mental health outcomes from social media use.
In the context of pandemic-prompted school closures, the nonprofit organization Brave Trails
launched a virtual camp program for LGBTQ youths. Brave Trails was the first known U.S.-based camp
organization to translate its youth programming to the virtual space in the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak
(Deratt, 2020). The organization launched the first of two virtual camp programs on March 15, 2020, four
days after the World Health Organization declared a pandemic and 10 days after a shift to distance learning
began for schools in the United States (i.e., Northshore School District in Washington state announced a
International Journal of Communication 16(2022) “Virtual Camp” 983
move to online learning on March 5, becoming the first district to do so; Decker et al., 2020). Brave Trails
launched the program for youths encountering social support challenges during the pandemic. Typically, the
organization hosts nonvirtual summer camps in California and Maryland (see Gillig, Miller, & Cox, 2019, for
a detailed background).
Brave Trails’ first virtual camp was a two-week program taking place from March 15–29, 2020. The
program was free of charge for all participants and was hosted on the social media platform Instagram, with
synchronous programming through Instagram Live (the platform’s streaming, interactive video function).
Program leaders included the Brave Trails directors and 27 volunteers, most of whom had volunteered at a
prior on-site session of Camp Brave Trails. The virtual camp schedule ran for nearly 12 hours per day, from
8:45 a.m. to 8 p.m. Pacific Time, and included activities such as workshops, supportive conversations, photo
challenges, and a variety/talent show, which youths could join and leave freely. An example daily schedule
is as follows: 8:45 a.m.—Riddle Me This, 9:30 a.m.—Photo Challenge, 12:00 p.m.—Question of the Day,
1:00 p.m.—In-Cabin Chill #Unplug, 3 p.m.—Zine Workshop, 4:30 p.m.—LGBTQ+ Movies, 6 p.m.—Poetry
101, 8 p.m.—Goodnight Brave Trails. Some activities directly addressed and affirmed LGBTQ identity (e.g.,
LGBTQ+ Movies), whereas others provided entertainment and education in supportive contexts where
youths could determine to what extent they wanted to focus on LGBTQ identity (e.g., Poetry 101). Youths
were welcome to join whether they identified as LGBTQ or heterosexual/cisgender and whether they had
attended Camp Brave Trails before or not. The large majority of youths engaging with Brave Trails online
and at camp identify as LGBTQ. Community rules (e.g., treat people with respect) were shared before
synchronous events to encourage positive communication. Approximately 100 youths participated in the
first virtual camp (Jake Young, personal communication, May 23, 2021).
From June 26 to August 8, 2020, Brave Trails conducted a second virtual camp, which met daily
via the online videoconferencing platform Zoom. The 81 campers paid a fee for programming expenses,
including a supply kit mailed to their homes. Activities aligned with the first virtual camp; however, Zoom’s
functionality allowed participants to meet daily in breakout rooms (i.e., small groups within the larger
meeting). Each room represented a “virtual cabin,” assigned based on participant age. Youths could use
Zoom’s private chat feature to communicate with peers. Program staff included Brave Trails directors and
This two-study project examines the role of the virtual camp sessions in LGBTQ youths’ collective
coping during the early emergence of COVID-19. Understanding the effects of community-led initiatives to
support LGBTQ youths is critical, as such initiatives may more closely attend to youths’ priorities and
aspirations, compared with “top-down” interventions designed by individuals more distant from the
community. Thus, this research is conducted with the aim of informing the development of future culturally
meaningful programming. In the following, we first discuss the theoretical framing, methodology, and
findings of interviews with virtual camp participants (Study 1). Then, we discuss Study 2, a two-wave
longitudinal survey of youths who participated in the second virtual camp. We conclude with an overarching
discussion of findings and implications.
984 Traci Kristin Gillig, Jared Macary, and Ron Price International Journal of Communication 16(2022)
Study 1 seeks to understand youths’ experiences with Brave Trails’ first virtual camp program.
Theorizing of collective coping and social identity guides the study’s approach.
Crises throw individuals and communities into states of uncertainty and prompt individuals to enact
coping strategies, which are “conscious, purposive behaviors or cognitions initiated in response to the
experience of a chronically stressful situation or following the occurrence of a stressful life event”
(Eckenrode, 1991, p. 1). Individuals may cope on their own (e.g., meditating, using media), which is called
individual coping, or in conjunction with others (e.g., initiating conversation, seeking support), which is
called collective coping.
Collective coping is a social process through which people experiencing stressors reach out to others
for support and to make sense of their experiences (Lyons, Mickelson, Sullivan, & Coyne, 1998; Tandoc &
Takahashi, 2017). This coping emerges from a cultural or social group’s collectivist orientation (Kuo, 2013).
Functionally, collective coping engages others in culturally congruent ways to improve well-being (Moore &
Multiple theories pertaining to the collective coping process have been proposed. The cultural
transactional model of stress and coping (Chun, Moos, & Cronkite, 2006) addresses the links between
collectivism-individualism and stress-coping, arguing that culture influences the entire coping process,
including how individuals perceive stressful events. Chun and colleagues (2006) view collective coping as a
distinct form of responses enacted because of the tendency of collectivist-oriented individuals to seek
support from in-group members. Kuo (2013) synthesized the existing theories and research findings to
identify four broad categories of collective coping, each prioritizing one of the following: tradition and
authority, interpersonal relationships, culturally shaped emotional and cognitive strategies, and
religion/spirituality. Each category encapsulates specific strategies (e.g., interpersonal relationships includes
the strategy seeking family support).
Online spaces can enable coping during a crisis. Tandoc and Takahashi (2017) examined social
media use for collective coping in the wake of Typhoon Haiyan, which occurred in the Philippines in 2013.
They found that individuals enacted three collective coping strategies on Facebook: (1) informing family and
friends that they survived, (2) socially constructing the collective crisis experience, and (3) managing
feelings/memories. These strategies align with Kuo’s (2013) categories of interpersonal relationships and
culturally shaped emotional and cognitive strategies. For LGBTQ youths isolating at home during the
pandemic, shared experiences may drive collective coping online.
During a crisis, people may choose with whom they cope, and they may tend to seek support from
others they perceive to be similar to themselves. Theorizing of social identity highlights how people derive
self-worth and affirmation from their social identities (Tajfel & Turner, 1979). If a stressor threatens self-
worth, individuals may seek comfort with others whose identities affirm their own. Individuals in one’s own
International Journal of Communication 16(2022) “Virtual Camp” 985
social group (e.g., LGBTQ) may be perceived as being more attuned to the nuances of the individual-level
experience of a crisis, thus better equipped to provide support.
Based on theorizing of collective coping, the importance of online communication during crises and
historically for LGBTQ people, and the potential influence of social identity on coping, the following research
question is posed:
RQ1: How did LGBTQ youths engage in collective coping in an identity-affirming virtual camp space
during the COVID-19 pandemic?
Procedures and Materials
On May 12, 2020, six weeks after the completion of the first Brave Trails virtual camp program,
Brave Trails posted an Instagram announcement about the research opportunity (reposting on May 19). The
post summarized the study and directed potential participants to e-mail the lead author or access a website
for details. The website screened individuals and collected names and e-mail addresses for eligible youths,
whom the lead author e-mailed, sharing consent/assent/parental permission information and a
demographics questionnaire, also initiating interview scheduling. Interviews were completed over four
weeks via Zoom and lasted 30–60 minutes each. All authors conducted semistructured interviews guided
by an interview protocol. The lead author developed the protocol through discussion with Brave Trails about
virtual camp goals and processes as well as a review of relevant literature and media coverage. Interview
questions were primarily open-ended and included “How did you feel when you heard that your school would
be closing?” and “Can you tell me about your experience with Virtual Camp Brave Trails?” See the appendix
for the complete protocol. Each participant received a $25 Amazon gift card. Washington State University’s
Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved the procedure.
Study 1 participants were 15 LGBTQ youths aged 14–20, average age 16.5 years. The most
prevalent gender identities were transgender male (53.3%, n = 8) and nonbinary (33.3%, n = 5).
Transgender individuals are those whose gender identities do not align with their sex assigned at birth (APA,
2015a, 2015b). Nonbinary people do not identify as exclusively male or female and experience their gender
as existing outside of the traditional conceptualizations of male and female (Abrams, 2019). The most
prevalent sexual/romantic orientations were queer (46.6%, n = 7) and gay/lesbian (20.0%, n = 3). Most
participants were White (80.0%, n = 12) or multiracial (13.3%, n = 2). See Table 1.
986 Traci Kristin Gillig, Jared Macary, and Ron Price International Journal of Communication 16(2022)
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics for Study 1 (N = 15).
53.3% (n = 8)
33.3% (n = 5)
Transgender nonbinary male
6.6% (n = 1)
6.6% (n = 1)
46.6% (n = 7)
20.0% (n = 3)
13.3% (n = 2)
13.3% (n = 2)
6.6% (n = 1)
80.0% (n = 12)
13.3% (n = 2)
6.6% (n = 1)
Note. Subgroups may not sum to 15 when data are missing.
Interviews were audio/video recorded and transcribed using Zoom or the online platform Trint.
As literature influenced our interview protocol, we returned to it to guide our analysis. Rather than
develop stringent coding protocol, we opted for an open-ended iterative process that, in keeping with
constant comparative method (Glaser & Strauss, 1967), used a close reading and interpretation of the data
for the inductive development of findings (Williams & Moser, 2019). In reviewing and discussing the relevant
literature (Tajfel & Turner, 1979; Tandoc & Takahashi, 2017), the first and third authors’ attention was
drawn to the potential for individuals from marginalized groups to cope together in unique ways during a
collective crisis. This guided our organic theme development through open coding. We used this approach,
rather than applying existing coping categories, because as Schwandt and Gates (2018) argue, meanings
are complex and situated in social settings. We did not want prior findings to heavily influence our
In the first round of analysis, we used open coding. The first and third authors analyzed the data
with the literature in mind. This helped determine sections that were in and out of scope and that merited
deeper investigation. We distinguished areas of similarity and difference in the data but did not label them
in a detailed way. This follows Lincoln’s and Guba (1985) argument that theme development can employ
“classification reasoning plus tacit and intuitive senses to determine which data ‘look alike’ and ‘feel alike’
when grouping them together” (p. 347).
Next, we used axial coding for in-depth analysis. In axial coding, “themes are explicitly stated,
examined, and categorized” (Williams & Moser, 2019, p. 52). Independently, the first and third authors
International Journal of Communication 16(2022) “Virtual Camp” 987
again completed line-by-line analyses of all transcripts, taking descriptive notes to stay accountable to their
potential biases (Yin, 2010). Detailed themes began to emerge, which the authors organized in unifying
conceptual bins (Tracy, 2013). Finally, the authors collaboratively grouped data into themes. Narratives
were developed around the themes and exemplars employed. As noted by Williams and Moser (2019),
“Meaning comes from progressive coding: The construction of meaning from collected data is the result of
the progressive data coding process” (p. 46). Our data analysis reflects a process of progressive analysis.
Five virtual collective coping strategies emerged. The following describes each theme and provides
Developing Unique Social Support Networks
By prompting closures of schools and other organizations, COVID-19 disrupted supportive
communities. Many LGBTQ youths turned to online spaces, including the virtual camp space, for social
support. Participants in the current study described how virtual camp provided a means for them to build
unique social support networks online. One study participant said that virtual camp “helps me create a
resource for myself.” Another participant said, “The queer people, we’ve always supported each other, and
even in a time like right now, when we’re separated, we’re still trying to find each other and give each other
support.” In this way, virtual camp brought together youths with shared identities and enabled them to
forge supportive connections to meet individual and collective needs.
Maintaining Connections With Trusted Individuals
Closures prompted youths to engage with known, trusted individuals online. One virtual camp
The only thing we can do right now is stay connected. Stay connected to the people we
know, the people we love, the people we care about, and that’s the biggest thing that we
can do . . . to talk to others. Talk to the people that you know will help us.
Another study participant reported not typically using social media but accessing it during the pandemic to
meet a need to interact with trusted contacts: “I really didn’t care about social media much. . . . [Through
virtual camp], I was grounding myself with those. . . . those things that are important to me.” Beyond the
direct social interaction virtual camp facilitated, youths reported that the space filled a need for a supportive
environment more broadly, as described next.
Dwelling Where LGBTQ Identity Is Celebrated
Many LGBTQ youths live with family members who do not support their identities. Youths
experiencing challenges at home reported that the virtual camp space became a “bubble” of positivity for
them. One participant said: “[My parents] are rather supportive, not always. . . . It has been a struggle
988 Traci Kristin Gillig, Jared Macary, and Ron Price International Journal of Communication 16(2022)
hearing my dead name and not my preferred pronouns. . . . [During the pandemic], I haven’t had that
escape or the community who’s been super supportive.” Another participant explained how virtual camp
provided an affirming alternative to the home environment:
I would describe my experience with Brave Trails as kind of like an alternate reality. In
the Brave Trails multiverse, let’s say, you can be whoever you want, use whatever
pronouns you want, and just be truthful about your identity regardless of your parents
because your parents aren’t there. And you know it’s a place for you to grow regardless
of whatever else is happening in your life.
Finding Grounding Through Synchrony
For some youths, spending all day, every day at home caused a feeling of social detachment.
Participants described how virtual camp’s live videos helped them regain a sense of connection with the
world around them by knowing what others were doing at that moment. One participant appreciated “just
feeling connected to other people; just having something to do that you know other people are doing, and
you can see what they’re doing.” Two participants cited the synchronous nature of singing the “good-night
song” at the end of each virtual camp day as providing comfort. One said:
We can all kind of come together for this one moment. And it was very nice knowing, very
peaceful knowing, that all these people were calming down at the same time as I was and
all of us are tuning in to see people telling us everything’s gonna be okay, right before
bed, you know.
In this way, the virtual programming filled a need for a sense of unity and coordinated action during an
Filling Unscheduled Time
While school closures were sometimes initially a welcome break, many youths began to feel adrift
without structured days. Some didn’t know what to do with their newfound free time. For example, one
study participant said, “I’d rather be at school and not at home all day with nothing to do.” Another echoed:
“I'm just trying to stay in contact with friends and keep myself busy, but it’s not the same. . . . It’s really
difficult, but I’m doing my best.” Some participants described virtual camp as an enjoyable way to pass
time. One said, “There’s not much I’m doing anyways. . . . It’s a fun thing, keeps the time passing by, keeps
you connected with the community.” Youths’ psychological outcomes over time during the second iteration
of the virtual camp are captured in Study 2.
International Journal of Communication 16(2022) “Virtual Camp” 989
Study 2 is guided by scientific literature examining the impact of identity-affirming programming
on mental health and the influence of friendships on youth well-being.
In clinical psychology and social work (Crisp & McCave, 2007; Grzanka & Miles, 2016), strategies
affirming the relevant identities of a person experiencing identity-based stressors have long been enacted
to improve mental health. Across populations, an affirmed identity is associated with lower levels of
depressive symptoms (Cruwys, Haslam, Dingle, Haslam, & Jetten 2014), anxiety (Brittian et al., 2013),
and stress (Creswell, Dutcher, Klein, Harris, & Levine, 2013) and higher self-esteem (Ghavami, Fingerhut,
Peplau, Grant, & Wittig, 2011). Programming prompting identity affirmation may be particularly important
for youths, who are developing their sense of self. One such form of programming—summer camp—has
been found to increase youths’ self-esteem (Thurber, Scanlin, Scheuler, & Henderson, 2007) and
perceived social support (Goodwin, Leiberman, Johnston, & Leo, 2011) and reduce anxiety (Ehrenreich-
May & Bilek, 2011) and depressive symptoms (Gillig et al., 2019).
Based on research demonstrating the positive effects of identity-affirming programming on mental
health, the following hypotheses are posed:
H1 a–d: During virtual camp, youths will experience increases in (a) self-esteem and (b) perceived social
support and decreases in (c) anxiety and (d) depressive symptoms.
Supportive relationships, like friendships, promote positive mental health. The APA (2021)
defines friendships as voluntary, relatively long-lasting relationships between two people in which those
involved are concerned with meeting the other’s needs as well as satisfying their own desires. Increased
quantity of friendships is associated with reduced depressive symptoms for youths in general (Field,
Miguel, & Sanders, 2001; Nangle, Erdley, Newman, Mason, & Carpenter, 2003) and for young LGBTQ
people in the social media context (Homan et al., 2014). While social media platforms have been criticized
for promoting shallow social interactions (Baym, 2015), online communities created intentionally to
promote frequent social interactions and ongoing emotional concern can positively influence mental health
(Baumeister & Leary, 1995).
Based on the positive relationship between youths’ quantities of friends and mental health, the
following hypotheses are posed:
H2 a–d: New friendships made during virtual camp will moderate the pre-postrelationships between (a)
self-esteem, (b) perceived social support, (c) anxiety, and (d) depressive symptoms, such that the
pre-postrelationships will be stronger for youths developing fewer new friendships.
990 Traci Kristin Gillig, Jared Macary, and Ron Price International Journal of Communication 16(2022)
Two waves of survey data collection occurred. The first launched on June 11, 2020, two weeks
before the second program. A Brave Trails director e-mailed study information to registered campers
through the online camp management system CampSite. Interested participants followed a link to a
Qualtrics survey. Consent/assent/parental permission information was shared, and consenting/assenting
participants completed the first wave of questions. The first survey closed on June 25, 2020, the day before
virtual camp started. The second wave began on August 6, 2020, lasting two weeks. Survey links were
shared during final cabin meetings and e-mailed through CampSite. Participants who completed both
surveys were included in a raffle for a $100 Amazon gift card. The procedure was approved by Washington
State University’s IRB.
Forty-one youths participated in both waves of data collection (Wave 1: N = 54, 66.7%; Wave 2:
N = 58, 71.6%). The average age was 15.5 years, ranging from 12–19. The most prevalent gender identities
were transgender male (33.3%, n = 13) and nonbinary (23.1%, n = 9). The most prevalent sexual/romantic
orientations were bisexual/pansexual (33.3%, n = 13) and queer (30.8%, n = 12). Most participants were
White (89.5%, n = 34) or multiracial (7.9%, n = 3). See Table 2.
International Journal of Communication 16(2022) “Virtual Camp” 991
Table 2. Descriptive Statistics for Study 2 (N = 41).
33.3% (n = 13)
20.2% (n = 8)
23.1% (n = 9)
10.3% (n = 4)
5.1% (n = 2)
7.7% (n = 3)
33.3% (n = 13)
30.8% (n = 12)
20.5% (n = 8)
5.1% (n = 2)
2.6% (n = 1)
7.7% (n = 3)
89.5% (n = 34)
7.9% (n = 3)
2.6% (n = 1)
Prior Brave Trails attendance
36.6% (n = 15)
26.8% (n = 11)
24.4% (n = 10)
7.3% (n = 3)
4.9% (n = 2)
Note. Subgroups may not sum to 41 when data are missing.
Both pre- and postcamp surveys used validated scales to assess mental-health-related outcomes
for which LGBTQ youths experience disparities. Tailored questions assessing camp friendship connections
were also posed at both waves of data collection. Demographics were assessed in the first wave.
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Short Form (CES-D-4; Lewinsohn, Seeley,
Roberts, & Allen, 1997; Melchior, Huba, Brown, & Reback, 1993) measured depressive symptoms. The scale
has been used in prior research with LGBTQ youths (Gillig, 2020; Rhoades et al., 2018). Participants selected
the number of days during the previous week during which they experienced each of four emotions or
behaviors, such as sadness. Barlett’s Test of Sphericity, which tests the overall significance of the
correlations in the correlation matrix, was significant (χ2 (6) = 93.77, p < .001), indicating the
appropriateness of using a factor analytic model on the data. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling
Adequacy indicated that the strength of the relationships among items was high (KMO = .82); thus, it was
992 Traci Kristin Gillig, Jared Macary, and Ron Price International Journal of Communication 16(2022)
acceptable to proceed with factor analysis. Principal components analysis (PCA) with Varimax rotation
showed items loaded on one factor explaining 71.0% of the variance. Reliability was moderate (Cronbach’s
a = .84). Items were averaged to create one depressive symptoms score for each participant.
Anxiety was assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder subscale of the Youth Anxiety
Measure for DSM-5 (YAM-5-I; Muris et al., 2017). Participants indicated how many days during the previous
week they experienced each of six psychological or physical states. Items included “I found it hard to stop
worrying” and “I didn’t feel well because I worried so much.” Barlett’s Test was significant (χ2 (15) = 221.17,
p < .001), and KMO was high (.88). PCA with Varimax rotation showed items loaded on one factor explaining
66.2% of the variance. Reliability was high (a = .94) after one item pertaining to school-based worry was
removed (original a = .84). Items were averaged to create one score per participant.
Self-esteem was assessed using Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale (Rosenberg, 1965). Participants
reported on a scale of 1 = Strongly disagree to 7 = Strongly agree the extent to which they experienced
various thoughts toward themselves. Items included “I am a person of worth” and “I have much to be proud
of.” Barlett’s Test was significant (χ2 (45) = 384.44, p < .001), and the KMO was high (.88). PCA with
Varimax rotation showed items loaded on one factor explaining 63.5% of the variance. Reliability was high
(a = .90). Items were averaged to create one score per participant.
Perceived social support was assessed with the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
in Youth (Bruwer, Emsley, Kidd, Lochner, & Seedat, 2008). Items assessed adequacy of social support from
three sources: family, friends, and a special person (e.g., partner, other trusted person). Twelve item ratings
were made on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = Very strongly disagree to 7 = Very strongly agree.
Items included “I get the emotional help and support I need from my family,” “I can count on my friends
when things go wrong,” and “I have a special person who is a real source of comfort for me.” Barlett’s Test
was significant (χ2 (66) = 647.72, p < .001), and KMO was high (.78). Principal components analysis with
Varimax rotation showed items loaded on three factors (family, friends, special person) explaining 83.9%
of the variance. Reliability was high (a = .93). Items were averaged to create one score.
At both waves of data collection, participants selected names of friends in the program (up to 10)
from a list of registered participants. Youths could write in names of participating friends not on the list. If
youths did not have existing friendships to report, they could skip this question. Friends named were
counted, resulting in one score per participant.
The covariate “Prior Brave Trails attendance” was captured through participants’ reporting of
previous summers during which they attended Brave Trails’ on-site camp. The variable was a count of prior
summers, ranging from 0 to 4.
Of the 54 youths who completed the pretest, 41 completed the posttest. Little’s Test (Little, 1988)
assessed the nature of missing posttest depressive symptoms, self-esteem, perceived social support, and
International Journal of Communication 16(2022) “Virtual Camp” 993
anxiety data. Results were nonsignificant (χ2 = .581, p = .901), indicating data were missing at random.
Listwise deletion was used.
A repeated measures analysis of variance was conducted to assess Hypothesis 1 (H1a–d). The
analysis showed no significant main effects of time on self-esteem (H1a; F(1, 38) = .015, p < .908, ηp2 <
.001), perceived social support (from the sources family, friends, special other) (H1b; F(1, 38) = .328, p =
.570, ηp2 = .009), and anxiety (H1c; F(1, 38) = 2.831, p = .101, ηp2 = .069). A significant main effect of
time on depressive symptoms was found (H1d; F(1, 38) = 4.841, p = .034, ηp2 = .113). Depressive
symptoms decreased from 2.84 days per week before the program (SD = 1.56) to 2.37 days per week at
the end of the program (SD = 1.69). Time and the covariate prior Brave Trails attendance had no significant
interaction effect on outcomes (self-esteem: F(1, 38) = 1.418, p = .241, ηp2 = .036; perceived social
support: F(1, 38) = .968, p = .331, ηp2 = .025; anxiety F(1, 38) = .026, p = .872, ηp2 = .872; depressive
symptoms: F(1, 38) = 1.029, p = .317, ηp2 = .026). The observed power for within-subjects analysis was
To assess Hypothesis 2 (H2a–d), a series of moderation models were run (Model 1) using the
PROCESS macro (v3.4; Hayes, 2013) in SPSS v26. Results showed an interaction between new friends and
self-esteem approaching significance at p < .05 (H2a; b = −.085, SE = .043, p = .058, 95% CI = [−.17,
.003]). The relationship between self-esteem before and after the program was strongest for youths who
made the fewest new friends (0 friends; b = 1.19, SE = .13, p < .001, 95% CI = [.86, 1.37]) and weakest
for those who made the most new friends (5.44 friends; b = .66, SE = .18, p = .001, 95% CI = [.29, 1.02]).
Among youths who made the most friends and had moderate self-esteem before camp, self-esteem tended
to increase (see Figure 1). The covariate prior attendance was nonsignificant (b = .095, SE = .090, p = .29,
95% CI = [−.09, .28]). New friends did not moderate the pre-post relationships for perceived social support
(H2b; b = −.029, SE = .053, p = .59, 95% CI = [−.14, .078]), anxiety (H2c; b = −.039, SE = .049, p =
.44, 95% CI = [−.14, .06]), and depressive symptoms (H2d; b = −.039, SE = .063, p = .54, 95% CI =
994 Traci Kristin Gillig, Jared Macary, and Ron Price International Journal of Communication 16(2022)
Figure 1. Moderation model depicting the influence of new friendships made on the relationship
between self-esteem at Time 1 and at Time 2.
A posthoc linear regression found changes in self-esteem predicted changes in depressive
symptoms (unstandardized residualized change scores) during virtual camp (b = −.63, SE = .31, p = .050,
95% CI = [−1.26, .001]).
This research aimed to better understand the virtual collective coping experiences of LGBTQ youths
during COVID-19. Study 1’s in-depth interviews revealed five themes in youths’ use of virtual spaces for
coping: developing unique support networks, maintaining connections with trusted individuals, dwelling
where LGBTQ identity is celebrated, finding grounding through synchrony, and filling unscheduled time.
These findings elucidate the processes through which LGBTQ youths collectively cope online in the pandemic
context, which tend to reflect a focus on interpersonal relationships and culturally based emotional and
cognitive strategies (Kuo, 2013). The findings extend the literature examining collective coping in other
populations, highlighting how people from marginalized groups may enact strategies that have identity-
affirming functions, which may not be central considerations for individuals from dominant social groups.
For example, Tandoc and Takahashi (2017) identified strategies pertaining to informing sharing, socially
constructing the crisis, and managing memories—strategies that did not reflect individual-level needs for
social identity affirmation. Our results bolster prior work that has found synchronicity in computer-mediated
International Journal of Communication 16(2022) “Virtual Camp” 995
communication can enhance feelings of social presence and support for young people (Petrocchi, Marciano,
Annoni, & Camerini, 2020). Findings demonstrate synchronicity as an important social media affordance
(e.g., Khazraee & Novak, 2018) for positive mental health in the crisis/social isolation context.
Study 2’s longitudinal survey showed that youths participating in virtual camp experienced
reduction in depressive symptoms. New friendships formed through virtual camp influenced changes in self-
esteem (p = .058). Youths with lower self-esteem at pretest who made an above-average number of friends
through virtual camp experienced increased self-esteem. For all youths, changes in self-esteem predicted
changes in depressive symptoms. The finding that depressive symptoms decreased confirms prior work
demonstrating the positive impact of identity-affirming programming and shows the promise for novel virtual
programming (i.e., identity-affirming activities modeled on summer camp approaches) to reduce LGBTQ
youths’ depressive symptoms. Furthermore, the findings that new friendships influenced self-esteem over
time and changes in self-esteem predicted changes in depressive symptoms indicate the positive influence
of online friendship formation on LGBTQ youths’ mental health.
This study has practical implications. First, in the crisis context, parents of LGBTQ children should
consider their child’s identity-based needs when setting time limits or other boundaries around social
media use, recognizing that some online communities may become important sites for LGBTQ children to
experience identity-specific support that parents and others within the household may not be equipped
to provide. For educators, the closure of affirming school spaces may put LGBTQ youths at special risk
for negative mental health outcomes. Incorporating LGBTQ-affirming content into the virtual classroom
(e.g., displaying pronouns in Zoom) may bolster LGBTQ students’ feelings of support. For policy makers,
when a crisis makes extended school closures necessary, providing emergency funding to organizations
that use virtual spaces to meet the needs of LGBTQ youths and other marginalized groups can improve
mental health outcomes.
Second, in the everyday (noncrisis) context, parents should consider letting LGBTQ children spend
time online in affirming informal communities and organized programming. Such contexts can help meet
youths’ identity-related needs. Parents can find information about safe online spaces for LGBTQ youths on
the websites of organizations such as the Human Rights Campaign, The Trevor Project, QueerDoc, Lambert
House, and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. However, parents should also encourage
LGBTQ children to identify nonmediated routes for interacting with supportive others, when possible, given
other research findings that suggest in-person, face-to-face communication may be better for mental health
over time. Educators and counselors should also stay knowledgeable about supportive virtual spaces to
make appropriate recommendations for struggling LGBTQ youths.
The current research provided an in-depth look at LGBTQ youths’ collective coping during the initial
COVID-19 shutdowns and a longitudinal evaluation of a novel virtual program; however, some limitations
warrant discussion. For Study 1, participants may have completed interviews at home. If parents or others
were in proximity, participants may not have spoken completely freely. Postpandemic interviews would
benefit from being conducted outside the home. Study participants also needed parental permission,
possibly preventing some youths (e.g., those “closeted”) from participating. Thus, the voices of LGBTQ
youths in the least supportive home environments may not be represented. Additionally, the sample size (N
996 Traci Kristin Gillig, Jared Macary, and Ron Price International Journal of Communication 16(2022)
= 15) is relatively small. However, the researchers interviewed all interested, eligible participants, and
saturation was reached in thematic analysis. LGBTQ adolescents younger than 18 (the majority of our
sample) are considered a hard-to-reach population for research. This is perhaps particularly relevant to
interview-based research, which may require parental permission and a private location for a conversation.
Accordingly, few recent studies with LGBTQ youths involve interviews. Our sample size aligns with such
recent work (e.g., Erhard & Ben-Ami’s, 2016 interviews with 20 LGB youths). Regarding theorizing of
collective coping, future interview-based research with LGBTQ youths may benefit from asking more direct
questions about various target aspects of youths’ experiences enacting strategies, as our interview protocol
used broad, open-ended questions to elicit coping-related responses. Study 2 also represents a small sample
size (41 youths participating in two waves of data collection) resulting in low observed power for within-
subjects analysis (.37). Because of this, significant changes in youths’ outcomes may not have been
statistically significant. For example, with higher power, the main effect of time on anxiety (H1c) may have
emerged as significant (F(1, 38) = 2.831, p = .101, ηp2 = .069). A significant finding here would align with
prior research demonstrating LGB-affirming therapy can reduce anxiety among young gay and bisexual men
(Pachankis, Hatzenbuehler, Rendina, Safren, & Parsons, 2015). Additional limitations are the unavailability
of a control group and potentially relevant covariates (e.g., total time spent on social media), no direct
measurement of campers’ levels of engagement with the virtual programming (e.g., the number of activities
completed), as well as the use of retrospective self-report data for psychological experiences. A promising
direction for future research would be capturing youths’ psychological experiences using ecological
momentary assessment. Though limitations exist, it is promising that both Study 1’s qualitative findings and
Study 2’s quantitative, longitudinal results indicate LGBTQ youths experienced improved well-being and
social connectedness in the virtual camp context.
In conclusion, there is an ongoing need for affirming spaces—virtual and otherwise—for LGBTQ
youths. As one study participant said in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, “The only thing we can do
right now is stay connected. Stay connected to the people we know, the people we love, the people we care
about.” Future research should continue to elucidate the processes through which LGBTQ youths use virtual
spaces for collective coping as well as the impacts of such behaviors and interactions on their mental health
Abrams, M. (2019, December 20). What does it mean to identify as nonbinary? Healthline. Retrieved from
American Psychological Association. (2015a). Definitions related to sexual orientation and gender diversity
in APA documents. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/pi/lgbt/resources/sexuality-
American Psychological Association. (2015b). Guidelines for psychological practice with transgender and
gender nonconforming people. American Psychologist, 70(9), 832–864. doi:10.1037/a0039906
International Journal of Communication 16(2022) “Virtual Camp” 997
American Psychological Association. (2021). APA dictionary of psychology. Retrieved from
Austin, A., Craig, S. L., Navega, N., & McInroy, L. B. (2020). It’s my safe space: The life-saving role of the
Internet in the lives of transgender and gender diverse youth. International Journal of
Transgender Health, 21(1), 33–44. doi:10.1080/15532739.2019.1700202
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a
fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-
Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Brittian, A. S., Umaña-Taylor, A. J., Lee, R. M., Zamboanga, B. L., Kim, S. Y., Weisskirch, R. S., . . .
Caraway, S. J. (2013). The moderating role of centrality on associations between ethnic identity
affirmation and ethnic minority college students’ mental health. Journal of American College
Health, 61(3), 133–140. doi:10.1080/07448481.2013.773904
Bruwer, B., Emsley, R., Kidd, M., Lochner, C., & Seedat, S. (2008). Psychometric properties of the
multidimensional scale of perceived social support in youth. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 49(2),
Chun, C. A., Moos, R. H., & Cronkite, R. C. (2006). Culture: A fundamental context for the stress and
coping paradigm. In P. T. P. Wong & L. C. J. Wong (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural perspectives
on stress and coping (pp. 29–53). New York, NY: Springer.
Clark, J. L., Algoe, S. B., & Green, M. C. (2018). Social network sites and well-being: The role of social
connection. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(1), 32–37.
Craig, S. L., & McInroy, L. (2014). You can form a part of yourself online: The influence of new media on
identity development and coming out for LGBTQ youth. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health,
18(1), 95–109. doi:10.1080/19359705.2013.777007
Creswell, J. D., Dutcher, J. M., Klein, W. M. P., Harris, P. R., & Levine, J. M. (2013). Self- affirmation
improves problem-solving under stress. PLoS One, 8(5), e62593. doi:10.1371/
Crisp, C., & McCave, E. L. (2007). Gay affirmative practice: A model for social work practice with gay,
lesbian, and bisexual youth. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 24(4), 403–421.
998 Traci Kristin Gillig, Jared Macary, and Ron Price International Journal of Communication 16(2022)
Cruwys, T., Haslam, S. A., Dingle, G. A., Haslam, C., & Jetten, J. (2014). Depression and social identity:
An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(3), 215–238.
Decker, S., Peele, H., & Riser-Kositsky, M. (2020, July 1). The coronavirus spring: The historic closing of
U.S. schools. EducationWeek. Retrieved from
Deratt, N. (2020, March 25). ACA camps offering free online activities for kids during coronavirus
outbreak. Outside Business Journal. Retrieved from
Eckenrode, J. (1991). Introduction and overview. In J. Eckenrode (Ed.), The social context of coping (pp.
1–12). New York, NY: Springer.
Ehrenreich-May, J., & Bilek, E. L. (2011). Universal prevention of anxiety and depression in a recreational
camp setting: An initial open trial. Child & Youth Care Forum, 40(6), 435–455.
Erhard, R. L., & Ben-Ami, E. (2016). The schooling experience of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth in
lsrael: Falling below and rising above as a matter of social ecology. Journal of Homosexuality,
63(2), 193–227. doi:10.1080/00918369.2015.1083778
Field, T., Diego, M., & Sanders, C. (2001). Adolescent depression and risk factors. Adolescence, 36(143),
Fish, J. N., & Pasley, K. (2015). Sexual (minority) trajectories, mental health, and alcohol use: A
longitudinal study of youth as they transition to adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,
44(8), 1508–1527. doi:10.1007/s10964-015-0280-6
Ghavami, N., Fingerhut, A., Peplau, L. A., Grant, S. K., & Wittig, M. A. (2011). Testing a model of minority
identity achievement, identity affirmation, and psychological well-being among ethnic minority
and sexual minority individuals. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 17(1), 79–88.
Gillig, T. K. (2020). Longitudinal analysis of depressive symptoms among LGBTQ youth at a social media-
free camp. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 24(4), 360–374.
International Journal of Communication 16(2022) “Virtual Camp” 999
Gillig, T. K., Miller, L. C., & Cox, C. M. (2019). “She finally smiles. . .for real”: Reducing depressive
symptoms and bolstering resilience through a camp intervention for LGBTQ youth. Journal of
Homosexuality, 66(3), 368–388. doi:10.1080/00918369.2017.1411693
GLAAD. (2021). Social media safety index. Retrieved from https://www.glaad.org/smsi
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative
research. London, UK: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Goodwin, D. L., Lieberman, L. J., Johnston, K., & Leo, J. (2011). Connecting through summer camp: Youth
with visual impairments find a sense of community. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 28(1),
Gross, L. (2007). Gideon who will be 25 in the year 2012: Growing up gay today. International Journal of
Communication, 1(1), 121–138.
Grzanka, P. R., & Miles, J. R. (2016). The problem with the phrase “intersecting identities”: LGBT
affirmative therapy, intersectionality, and neoliberalism. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 13,
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A
regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Homan, C. M., Lu, N., Tu, X., Lytle, M. C., & Silenzio, V. M. B. (2014, February). Social structure and
depression in TrevorSpace. Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 2014,
Hou, Y., Xiong, D., Jiang, T., Song, L., & Wang, Q. (2019). Social media addiction: Its impact, mediation,
and intervention. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 13(1).
Ioverno, S., Belser, A. B., Baiocco, R., Grossman, A. H., & Russell, S. T. (2016). The protective role of
gay–straight alliances for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and questioning students: A prospective
analysis. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 3(4), 397–406.
Khazraee, E., & Novak, A. N. (2018). Digitally mediated protest: Social media affordances for collective
identity construction. Social Media+ Society, 4(1), 1–14. doi:10.1177/2056305118765740
Kross, E., Verduyn, P., Sheppes, G., Costello, C. K., Jonides, J., & Ybarra, O. (2020). Social media and
well-being: Pitfalls, progress, and next steps. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(1), 55–66.
1000 Traci Kristin Gillig, Jared Macary, and Ron Price International Journal of Communication 16(2022)
Kuo, B. C. (2013). Collectivism and coping: Current theories, evidence, and measurements of collective
coping. International Journal of Psychology, 48(3), 374–388.
Lewinsohn, P. M., Seeley, J. R., Roberts, R. E., & Allen, N. B. (1997). Center for Epidemiologic Studies
Depression Scale (CES-D) as a screening instrument for depression among community-residing
older adults. Psychology and Aging, 12(2), 277–287. doi:10.1037/0882-79220.127.116.117
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
Little, R. J. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values.
Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202.
Lyons, R. F., Mickelson, K. D., Sullivan, M. J. L., & Coyne, J. C. (1998). Coping as a communal process.
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(5), 579–605. doi:10.1177/0265407598155001
McCarthy, J. (2021, May 26). Mixed views among Americans on transgender issues. Gallup. Retrieved
McConnell, E. A., Clifford, A., Korpak, A. K., Phillips, G., & Birkett, M. (2017). Identity, victimization, and
support: Facebook experiences and mental health among LGBTQ youth. Computers in Human
Behavior, 76, 237–244. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.026
McInroy, L. B. (2019). Building connections and slaying basilisks: Fostering support, resilience, and
positive adjustment for sexual and gender minority youth in online fan communities. Information,
Communication & Society, 23(13), 1874–1891. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2019.1623902
Meier, A., & Reinecke, L. (2020). Computer-mediated communication, social media, and mental health: A
conceptual and empirical meta-review. Communication Research, 48(8), 1182–1209.
Melchior, L. A., Huba, G. J., Brown, V. B., & Reback, C. J. (1993). A short depression index for women.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(4), 1117–1125.
Moore, J. L., & Constantine, M. G. (2005). Development and initial validation of the collectivistic coping
styles measure with African, Asian, and Latin American international students. Journal of Mental
Health Counseling, 27(4), 329–347. doi:10.17744/mehc.27.4.frcqxuy1we5nwpqe
International Journal of Communication 16(2022) “Virtual Camp” 1001
Muris, P., Simon, E., Lijphart, H., Bos, A., Hale, W., & Schmeitz, K. (2017). The youth anxiety measure for
DSM-5 (YAM-5): Development and first psychometric evidence of a new scale for assessing
anxiety disorders symptoms of children and adolescents. Child Psychiatry & Human Development,
48(1), 1–17. doi:10.1007/s10578-016-0648-1
Nangle, D. W., Erdley, C. A., Newman, J. E., Mason, C. A., & Carpenter, E. M. (2003). Popularity,
friendship quantity, and friendship quality: Interactive influences on children's loneliness and
depression. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 32(4), 546–555.
Pachankis, J. E., Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Rendina, H. J., Safren, S. A., & Parsons, J. T. (2015). LGB-
affirmative cognitive-behavioral therapy for young adult gay and bisexual men: A randomized
controlled trial of a transdiagnostic minority stress approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Psychology, 83(5), 875–889. doi:10.1037/ccp0000037
Petrocchi, S., Marciano, L., Annoni, A. M., & Camerini, A. L. (2020). “What you say and how you say it”
matters: An experimental evidence of the role of synchronicity, modality, and message valence
during smartphone-mediated communication. PLoS One, 15(9), e0237846.
Poushter, J., & Kent, N. (2020, June 25). Rising acceptance of homosexuality by people in many countries
around the world over the past two decades. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from
Rhoades, H., Rusow, J. A., Bond, D., Lanteigne, A., Fulginiti, A., & Goldbach, J. T. (2018). Homelessness,
mental health, and suicidality among LGBTQ youth accessing crisis services. Child Psychiatry and
Human Development, 49(4), 643–651. doi:10.1007/s10578-018-0780-1
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSE). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy.
Measures Package, 61, 52.
Schwandt, T. A., & Gates, E. F. (2018). Case study methodology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.),
The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 341–359). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
Seidenberg, A., Jo, C., Ribisl, K., Lee, J., Buchting, F., Kim, Y., & Emery, S. (2017). A national study of
social media, television, radio, and Internet usage of adults by sexual orientation and smoking
status: Implications for campaign design. International Journal of Environmental Research and
Public Health, 14(4), 450. doi:10.3390/ ijerph14040450
1002 Traci Kristin Gillig, Jared Macary, and Ron Price International Journal of Communication 16(2022)
Stevic, A., Schmuck, D., Matthes, J., & Karsay, K. (2021). “Age matters”: A panel study investigating the
influence of communicative and passive smartphone use on well-being. Behaviour & Information
Technology, 40(2), 176–190. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2019.1680732
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social
psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Tandoc, E. C., Jr., & Takahashi, B. (2017). Log in if you survived: Collective coping on social media in the
aftermath of Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines. New Media & Society, 19(11), 1778–1793.
Thurber, C. A., Scanlin, M. M., Scheuler, L., & Henderson, K. A. (2007). Youth development outcomes of
the camp experience: Evidence for multidimensional growth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,
36(3), 241–254. doi:10.1007/s10964-006-9142-6
Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating
impact. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Williams, M., & Moser, T. (2019). The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research.
International Management Review, 15(1), 45–55.
Witcomb, G. L., Claes, L., Bouman, W. P., Nixon, E., Motmans, J., & Arcelus, J. (2019). Experiences and
psychological wellbeing outcomes associated with bullying in treatment-seeking transgender and
gender-diverse youth. LGBT Health, 6(5), 216–226. doi:10.1089/lgbt.2018.0179
Yin, R. (2010). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Thank you for agreeing to participate in this study. To facilitate our note-taking, we would like to record our
conversation, as mentioned in the questionnaire you completed. I am the only person who will have access
to the recording, which I will eventually destroy.
We have planned this interview to last 30–45 minutes, and we have several questions to ask you. If time
starts to run short, it may be necessary for us to ask you to pause so we can move to the next question.
You have been selected to speak with us today because you have participated in Virtual Camp Brave Trails
during the COVID-19 pandemic. If you’re ready, let’s begin with questions about your experience during the
pandemic, then move into questions specifically about virtual camp.
International Journal of Communication 16(2022) “Virtual Camp” 1003
First, I’m interested in hearing about your experiences with school this spring.
Were you a student this spring semester?
If yes. . .
What grade were you in this spring? For example, ninth grade.
Did your school close due to the COVID situation?
How did you feel when you heard that your school would be closing?
Did school closing affect your living situation? For example, were you living at school and had to
Can you describe what a normal day has been like for you during the shelter-in-place orders?
Transition: Now I’d like to ask a few questions about your living situation.
Are you currently living with anyone? If so, who? For example, parents, guardians, friends?
If Cohabiting. . .
Do you identify as LGBTQ?
How do the people you live with feel about your LGBTQ identity?
Have you had any conflicts related to your identity? If so, please explain.
If Living Alone. . .
How has your experience been living alone during the shelter-in-place order?
Do you feel like you’ve been able to get support if or when needed?
Probe: What challenges have you needed support regarding?
Probe: Where have you looked for support, or who have you reached out to?
1004 Traci Kristin Gillig, Jared Macary, and Ron Price International Journal of Communication 16(2022)
Transition: I’m interested in hearing about your experiences as an LGBTQ person.
In what location, environment, or space do you feel most supported in your LGBTQ identity?\
Probe: What about that space makes you feel supported?
Do you think that your identity as an LGBTQ person affected your ability to cope with, or adjust to, the
Probe: How so? Please explain.
What have you heard, if anything, from LGBTQ friends and peers about their experiences with staying
Transition: Next, I’d like to ask about your experience with Brave Trails and summer camp.
Questions: Virtual Camp
How did you first hear about Brave Trails?
Have you attended Camp Brave Trails in past summers?
Probe, if yes: How many summers have you attended?
Can you tell me about your experience with Virtual Camp Brave Trails? For example, did you present during
virtual camp programming, attend programming, or both?
Probe: What activities did you participate in?
Why did you participate in virtual camp?
What were some memorable parts of participating in it?
What was the most meaningful or important part of virtual camp for you?
Did you meet any new friends through virtual camp?
Probe: How did you connect with them?
Are there other social media spaces, online activities, etc., that have been important to you adjusting to
changes related to the pandemic? If so, we’re interested in hearing about them.
International Journal of Communication 16(2022) “Virtual Camp” 1005
That wraps up our interview today. If you felt any distress during any of these questions, please immediately
reach out to people at The Trevor Project, who can support you. You can find the phone number and online
chat at TheTrevorProject.org.
Within one week, you will receive a $25 Amazon e-gift card from an employee of Washington State
University. When you receive your card, please reply to the employee to confirm you got the card. Is your
preferred e-mail address for receiving the card the e-mail address we have used to communicate about
Thank you again for your participation!