No full-text available
To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.
Extracorporeal photopheresis in the treatment of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease: A position statement from the Turkish Society of Apheresis (TSA)
Abstract
Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is still the most important cause of mortality and morbidity after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Though perfect response rates are not achieved, steroids are still the first-line treatment. In the face of the presence of the drugs approved by FDA in recent years for acute and chronic GVHD as second-line therapy in the steroid-refractory group, there exists no standard approach.
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) with an immunomodulatory effect, is favored in the treatment of both acute and chronic steroid refractory GVHD as it does not increase the risk of relapses or infections. Having a low profile of side effects, ECP is also generally well-tolerated by patients. Being a time requiring procedure, the fact is that it is not able to be practiced in all health centers and requires central venous catheters in patients unfit for venous access may be enumerated among its shortcomings.
No complete standard is available with respect to ECP application frequency-time; it varies from one center to another. The Turkish Society of Apheresis established the Turkish ECP group and sought some answers to the questions regarding the use of ECP in the treatment of GVHD, and issued a position statement.
... There is no standard for ECP application frequency and application time. 9 Sakellari et al's study shows that ECP is safe and effective for GVHD and should be considered early in the GVHD course before irreversible end organ damage is created. 10 In this study, ECF procedure was performed in patients with steroid refractoriness but without endorgan damage. ...
Background: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is the main nonpharmacological
approach accompanying systemic medical treatments in steroidresistant
acute or chronic graft versus host disease. The study aimed to examine
the effect of ECP on survival in acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD).
Methods: A total of 35 patients who were followed up in the adult hematology
clinic of _Inönü University Turgut Özal Medical Center for aGVHD were
included in the study. Stem cell transplantation and ECP application parameters
that may affect the survival of the patients were examined.
Results: In aGVHD using ECP, the degree of involvement affects survival.
Involvements with a clinical and laboratory score (Glucksberg system) of
2 and above significantly reduced survival. The duration of ECP use is associated
with survival. Especially, 45 days and longer use increases survival
(hazard ratio, P-value <.05). The duration of steroid use was found to be effective
in survival in aGVHD (P < .001). ECP administration day (P = .003), duration
of steroid use (P < .001), duration of ECP use (P = .001), and grade of
aGVHD (P < .001) affect survival.
Conclusion: ECP use is effective in survival in patients with aGVHD score
≥2. In patients with aGVHD, especially the use of 45 days and longer has a
positive effect on survival. The duration of steroid use is associated with
survival in aGVHD.
KEYWORDS: acute graft versus host disease, extracorporeal photopheresis, survival
Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity following allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Steroids are currently used as first-line treatments for acute and chronic GvHD (aGvHD and cGvHD, respectively). However, the prognosis of steroid-refractory GvHD is poor, and no standard second-line treatments are available for these patients. As a result, efforts to develop novel treatment approaches continue.
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), a leukapheresis-based procedure for the treatment of aGvHD and cGvHD, has become a significant alternative for treating steroid-refractory aGvHD because it does not induce systemic immunosuppression, and it has demonstrated significant efficacy and an excellent safety profile. However, when used alone, it is not superior to other treatment options. In randomized studies, ruxolitinib, a selective Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor, has shown high response rates for both aGvHD and cGvHD. The combination of ruxolitinib and ECP may improve outcomes in cases of steroid-refractory GvHD. Nevertheless, further experimental and randomized controlled studies are needed to determine the optimal patient selection criteria and treatment regimens for aGvHD.
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) is a potentially life-threatening complication following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Despite significant advancements in this field, cGvHD remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality among transplant recipients. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for managing cGvHD. Several clinical studies and case series have demonstrated the efficacy of ECP in treating cGvHD, including its ability to reduce the overall burden of the disease and its steroid-sparing effects. However, challenges remain, such as determining optimal patient selection, treatment protocols, timing, session duration, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness. ECP represents a valuable therapeutic approach, offering immunomodulatory effects and a favorable safety profile for patients with cGvHD. Further research and larger-scale prospective studies are needed to address these challenges, elucidate its mechanism of action, and explore combination strategies.
Objective: Chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) develops after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, when immune cells from a non-identical donor initiate an immune reaction against the transplant recipient. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) can be used in combination with prednisone in steroid-resistant cGVHD. In this study, the effect of ECP use on survival in cGVHD was examined. Patients and Methods: Twenty-six patients who were followed up in the adult Hematology Clinic of Inonu University Turgut Ozal Medical Center for cGVHD were included in the study. Stem cell transplantation and ECP application parameters that may affect the survival of the patients were examined. Results: The degree of involvement in cGVHD affects survival. Involvements with clinical and laboratory scores of 2 and above according to the National Institutes of Health consensus criteria, significantly reduced survival. The development time of cGVHD was found to be associated with survival, and that it had a positive impact on survival, especially when the disease developed after 220 days after the transplantation. It was observed that steroid dose taken during ECP, patient age and cGVHD prophylaxis used affected survival. Conclusion: The use of ECP may be effective in survival, especially, in patients who develop cGVHD, 220 days after allogeneic transplantation. Concurrent use of steroids with ECP affects survival.
Background: Oral graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is characterized by mucosal lesions, salivary gland dysfunction etc., accompanied by pain and oral dysfunction. The efficacy of photobiomodulation (PBM) in managing pain and inflammation has been demonstrated. PBM has been applied in oral GVHD and is regarded as a potent adjunctive therapy. Objective: To review the application of PBM for oral GVHD and summarize its biological mechanisms and recommended parameters. Materials and Methods: The article provides an overview of the therapeutic effects of PBM in oral GVHD cases. It analyzes the biological mechanisms from different aspects and explores the potential prospects of PBM, and appropriate parameters and frequency for GVHD are recommended. Conclusions: The efficacy of PBM in oral GVHD has been demonstrated through symptom alleviation and function improvement. It is recommended as an adjuvant therapy for oral GVHD. However, further research is required to explore optimal devices, parameters, and potential complications associated with using PBM in oral GVHD.
Zusammenfassung
Die extrakorporale Photopherese (ECP) hat in jüngster Zeit bei der Behandlung verschiedener Krankheiten an Bedeutung gewonnen. Ursprünglich als neue Therapie zur Behandlung von Patienten mit kutanem T‐Zell‐Lymphom vorgestellt, hat sich der Indikationsbereich für die ECP auf Hämatologie und Transplantationsimmunologie erweitert. Die ECP hat ihren festen Platz im Therapieplan bei kutanen T‐Zell‐Lymphomen, systemischer Sklerose, Graft‐versus‐Host‐Erkrankung, Organtransplantationen wie Herz und Lunge, teilweise als Erstlinientherapie und sehr häufig in Kombination mit verschiedenen systemischen immunsuppressiven Therapien. Das Verfahren besteht im Wesentlichen aus drei Schritten: Leukapherese, Photoaktivierung und Reinfusion. Im folgenden Artikel werden die noch nicht vollständig verstandenen Wirkmechanismen dargestellt, die fünf häufigsten Indikationen für die Behandlung mit ECP diskutiert und Therapieempfehlungen für die jeweilige Indikation gegeben.
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has gained importance in the treatment of several diseases. Initially introduced as a new therapeutic modality for the treatment of patients with cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma, the indications for the use of ECP have expanded to include hematology and transplantation immunology. Extracorporeal photopheresis has found its place in the treatment plan of cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma, systemic sclerosis, graft‐versus‐host disease, organ transplantation such as heart and lung, sometimes as first‐line therapy and very often in combination with various systemic immunosuppressive therapies. The procedure basically consists of three steps: leukapheresis, photoactivation and reinfusion. The following article presents possible theories about the mechanism of action, which is not yet fully understood, and discusses the five most common indications for ECP treatment with corresponding therapy recommendations.
Background:
Following the first investigational study on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma published in 1983, this technology has received continued use and further recognition for additional earlier as well as refractory forms. After the publication of the first guidelines for this technology in the JEADV in 2014, this technology has maintained additional promise in the treatment of other severe and refractory conditions in a multi-disciplinary setting. It has confirmed recognition in well-known documented conditions such as graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, systemic sclerosis, solid organ transplant rejection including lung, heart and liver and to a lesser extent inflammatory bowel disease.
Materials and methods:
In order to further provide recognized expert practical guidelines for the use of this technology for all indications, the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) again proceeded to address these questions in the hands of the recognized experts within and outside the field of dermatology. This was done using the recognized and approved guidelines of EDF for this task. All authors had the opportunity to review each contribution as it was added.
Results and conclusion:
These updated 2020 guidelines provide at present the most comprehensive available expert recommendations for the use of extracorporeal photopheresis based on the available published literature and expert consensus opinion. The guidelines are divided in two parts: PART I covers cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, chronic graft-versus-host disease and acute graft-versus-host disease while PART II will cover scleroderma, solid organ transplantation, Crohn's disease, use of ECP in paediatrics practice, atopic dermatitis, type 1 diabetes, pemphigus, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and erosive oral lichen planus.
Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a serious complication after stem cell transplantation and is associated with high non-relapse mortality. If steroid treatment as first-line therapeutic approach fails, treatment options are limited. In retrospective studies, ruxolitinib, a selective Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor as well as extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) could show high efficacy in treatment of steroid refractory acute and chronic GVHD. Here, we report single-center experience of combining JAK-inhibitor treatment with ECP in 18 patients with severe steroid refractory aGVHD of lower GI-tract. The treatment was well tolerated and no severe cytopenia (grade IV) occurred, in three patients grade III cytopenia could be observed. Response was complete or partial in 44% and 11%, respectively, resulting in an estimated 2 year overall survival of 56%. Steroids were tapered rapidly with a median time of 2 days for halving of dosage avoiding additional steroid-associated side effects. Under treatment with ruxolitinib and ECP, an increased level of regulatory T cells could be observed elucidating direct effects of this treatment on immune response.
Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) involves the infusion of hematopoietic progenitor cells into patients with hematologic disorders with the goal of re-establishing normal hematopoietic and immune function. HCT is classified as autologous or allogeneic based on the origin of hematopoietic cells. Autologous HCT uses the patient’s own cells while allogeneic HCT uses hematopoietic cells from a human leukocyte antigen-compatible donor. Allogeneic HCT is a potentially curative treatment option for patients with certain types of hematologic malignancies, and autologous HCT is primarily used to support patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy. Advances in HCT methods and supportive care in recent decades have led to improved survival after HCT; however, disease relapse and posttransplant complications still commonly occur in both autologous and allogeneic HCT recipients. Allogeneic HCT recipients may also develop acute and/or chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which results in immune-mediated cellular injury of several organs. The NCCN Guidelines for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation focus on recommendations for pretransplant recipient evaluation and the management of GVHD in adult patients with malignant disease.
Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a common complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Systemic steroid therapy is the first-line treatment for aGVHD, although about half of patients will become refractory to treatment. As the number of patients undergoing alloHCT increases, developing safe and effective treatments for aGVHD will become increasingly important, especially for those whose disease becomes refractory to systemic steroid therapy. This paper reviews current treatment options for patients with steroid-refractory aGVHD and discusses data from recently published clinical studies to outline emerging therapeutic strategies.
Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major factor contributing to mortality and morbidity after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. Because of the small number of results from well designed, large-scale, clinical studies there is considerable variability in the prevention and treatment of GVHD worldwide. In 2014, to standardise treatment approaches the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation published recommendations on the management of GVHD in the setting of HLA-identical sibling or unrelated donor transplantation in adult patients with haematological malignancies. Here we update these recommendations including the results of study published after 2014. Evidence was searched in three steps: first, a widespread scan of published trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews; second, expert opinion was added for specific issues following several rounds of debate; and third, a refined search to target debated or rapidly updating issues. On the basis of this evidence and the 2014 recommendations, five members of the EBMT Transplant Complications Working Party created 38 statements on GVHD prophylaxis, drug management, and treatment of acute and chronic GVHD. Subsequently, they created the EBMT GVHD management recommendation expert panel by recruiting 20 experts with expertise in GVHD management. An email-based, two-round Delphi panel approach was used to manage the consensus. Modified National Comprehensive Cancer Network categories for evidence and consensus were applied to the approved statements. We reached 100% consensus for 29 recommendations and 95% consensus for nine recommendations. Key updates to these recommendations include a broader use of rabbit anti-T-cell globulin; lower steroid doses for the management of grade 2 acute GVHD with isolated skin or upper gastrointestinal tract manifestations; fluticasone, azithromycin, and montelukast should be used for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome; and the addition of newer treatment options for resteroid-refractory acute and chronic GVHD. In addition, we discuss specific aspects of GVHD prophylaxis and management in the setting of haploidentical transplantation and in paediatric patients, but no formal recommendations on those procedures have been provided in this Review. The European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation proposes to use these recommendations as a basis for the routine management of GVHD during stem-cell transplantation.
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is one of the most used and established therapies for steroid‐refractory graft‐vs‐host disease (GvHD), with a good effect to side effect profile. In this review, we present a summary of present literature and provide evidence‐based treatment guidelines for ECP in GvHD. The guidelines constitute a consensus statement formed by the Nordic ECP Quality Group representing all ECP centres in the Nordic countries, and aims to facilitate harmonisation and evidence‐based practice. In developing the guidelines, we firstly conducted a thorough literature search of original articles and existing guidelines. In total, we identified 26 studies for ECP use in acute GvHD and 36 in chronic GvHD. The studies were generally small, retrospective and heterogeneous regarding patient characteristics, treatment schedule and outcome assessment. In general, a majority of patients achieved partial response or better, but response rates varied by the organs affected. Head‐to‐head comparisons to other treatment modalities were lacking. Overall, we consider the quality of evidence to be low–moderate (GRADE) and encourage future prospective multi‐armed trials to strengthen the present recommendations. However, despite limitations in evidence strength, standardised treatment schedules and regular follow‐up are imperative to ensure the best possible patient outcome.
Several international recommendations address the assessment of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). This position statement by GvHD experts from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) reviews the existing guidelines for both acute and chronic GvHD, addresses potential confusions that arise in daily practice and proposes consensus definitions for many key terms. We provide a historical perspective on the currently available guidelines and recommend the Mount Sinai Acute GvHD International Consortium (MAGIC) criteria for acute GvHD and the NIH 2014 criteria for chronic GvHD as the most comprehensive and detailed criteria available. This statement also offers practical guidance for the implementation of these recommendations and a set of consensus definitions for commonly used GvHD terms in order to facilitate future clinical and translational research. To assist the dissemination of these recommendations, a web-application based on this position statement is available ( https://www.uzleuven.be/egvhd ). We believe that adherence to a common set of GvHD assessment criteria is vitally important to improve the quality of data, compare results of retrospective studies and prospective clinical trials, and make therapeutic recommendations based on quality evidence.
Extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) is considered as an immune modulating therapy majorly targeting the T cells of the Immune system. ECP induces an anti-inflammatory condition with tolerogenic responses without inducing a global immunosuppression state which is a typical feature of other therapeutic options such as steroids. Clinical indication of ECP has grown over time since its initial applications. Our review discusses the technical aspects of the concept of photopheresis with the available methods for its clinical applications.
Background:
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is considered a valid second-line treatment for acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD).
Methods:
Ninety-four patients with aGVHD (n=45) and cGVHD (n=49), retrospectively recruited in 6 Italian Centers, were submitted to ECP for second-line treatment. At the time of ECP, 22 (49%) and 23 (51%) out of 45 patients with aGHVD were non responsive (NR) and in partial remission (PR) after steroids, respectively, and all the 49 patients with cGVHD were steroid refractory.
Results:
Forty-one out of 45 (91%) patients with aGVHD achieved complete remission (CR) after ECP. Fifteen out of 45 (33%) patients developed cGVHD. The CR rate in patients who started ECP being NR and in PR after steroid was 86% and 96%, respectively. After a median follow up of 20 months (range 2-72), 15/45 patients (33%) developed cGHVD and 16/45 patients (35%) died, in 3 cases for aGVHD. A trend for a better survival was seen among patients who started ECP in PR after steroid (80% vs 50% at 2 years; p=0,07). Overall, 22/49 (45%) and 17/49 (35%) patients with steroid refractory cGHVD achieved CR and PR after ECP, respectively. After a median follow up of 27 months, 44/49 patients (90%) are alive, 21 of whom (48%) on steroid.
Conclusions:
ECP is confirmed as an effective second-line treatment in both acute and chronic GVHD, as it can induce a response in more than 80% of the patients and a long term survival in at least 50% of the cases.
Apheresis with different procedures and devices are used for a variety of indications that may have different adverse events (AEs). The aim of this study was to clarify the extent and possible reasons of various side effects based on data from a multinational registry.The WAA-apheresis registry data focus on adverse events in a total of 50846 procedures in 7142 patients (42% women). AEs were graded as mild, moderate (need for medication), severe (interruption due to the AE) or death (due to AE).More AEs occurred during the first procedures versus subsequent (8.4 and 5.5%, respectively). AEs were mild in 2.4% (due to access 54%, device 7%, hypotension 15%, tingling 8%), moderate in 3% (tingling 58%, urticaria 15%, hypotension 10%, nausea 3%), and severe in 0.4% of procedures (syncope/hypotension 32%, urticaria 17%, chills/fever 8%, arrhythmia/asystole 4.5%, nausea/vomiting 4%).Hypotension was most common if albumin was used as the replacement fluid, and urticaria when plasma was used. Arrhythmia occurred to similar extents when using plasma or albumin as replacement. In 64% of procedures with bronchospasm, plasma was part of the replacement fluid used.Severe AEs are rare. Although most reactions are mild and moderate, several side effects may be critical for the patient. We present side effects in relation to the procedures and suggest that safety is increased by regular vital sign measurements, cardiac monitoring and by having emergency equipment nearby.
Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens minimize early toxicity after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) by placing greater reliance on establishing a graft-versus-leukemia effect (GVL). Because graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and GVL are tightly linked, inhibition of T-cell populations that cause GVHD may lead to an unintended increased risk of relapse in the RIC setting. Although not completely understood, etanercept and extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) are thought to ameliorate GVHD without direct T cell inhibition. We hypothesized that adding these two agents to a standard GVHD prophylaxis regimen of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) would improve survival by reducing GVHD related mortality without increasing relapse rates. Therefore, we conducted a prospective phase II clinical trial that incorporated tacrolimus, MMF, etanercept, and ECP as GVHD prophylaxis in 48 patients undergoing RIC unrelated donor transplant (URD HCT). The preferred RIC was fludarabine 160 mg/m(2) + busulfan 6.4-12.8 mg/kg +/- TBI 200 cGy. Etanercept 0.4 mg/kg (max dose 25 mg) was given subcutaneously twice weekly for eight weeks post-HCT and ECP was given for 12 treatments, starting weekly on day 28 weekly and tapering off by day 180. The median age of the study patients was 60 (18-71) years. Donors were 7/8 (n=14, 29%) or 8/8 (n=34, 71%) HLA-matched. All patients engrafted neutrophils at a median of 12 days. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD at day 100 was 46%, but it was typically sensitive to initial steroid treatment (84% day 56 CR/PR rate). Overall survival at one year in this older, frequently mismatched unrelated donor setting was excellent (73%) due to low rates of non-relapse mortality (21%) and relapse (19%). However, this strategy was not effective at preventing a high incidence of chronic GVHD and late deaths led to a drop in two-year survival declined to 56% reflecting a high incidence of chronic GVHD.
Purpose
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) treatment in patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD).
Methods
An electronic search was carried out on the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index (SCI), and Cochrane Library databases. We included prospective clinical trials in SR-aGVHD treated by ECP. The main endpoints consisted of mortality, exacerbation, or response.
Results
Only seven studies involving 121 patients met the inclusion criteria for further review. Our analysis showed positive results of ECP for aGVHD. The overall response rate (ORR) was 0.71 and the complete response rate (CRR) was 0.71. The efficacy of ECP for skin aGVHD, liver aGVHD, and gut aGVHD were 0.86, 0.60, and 0.68, respectively. However, no sufficient evidence verifies the exact benefit in this review, because the number of patients enrolled in trials is limited and publish bias exists.
Conclusion
ECP is an effective therapy for skin, liver, and gut aGVHD, and large double-blind clinical trials are required to prove the outcome of this meta-analysis.
Corticosteroids are the accepted primary therapy for acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), but durable responses are seen in only about half of the patients. Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) 0802, a phase 3 multicenter randomized double-blinded trial, was designed to test whether mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) plus corticosteroids was superior to corticosteroids alone as initial therapy for acute GVHD. Patients with newly diagnosed acute GVHD were eligible if they required systemic therapy. Patients were randomized to receive prednisone with either MMF or placebo. The primary end point was acute or chronic GVHD-free survival at day 56 after initiation of therapy. A futility rule for GVHD-free survival at day 56 was met at a planned interim analysis after 235 patients (of 372) were enrolled: 116 MMF, 119 placebo. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between treatment groups including grade and organ distribution of GVHD. GVHD-free survival at day 56, cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 12 months, overall survival, Epstein-Barr virus reactivation, severe, life-threatening infections, relapse at 12 months, and quality of life were similar. The addition of MMF to corticosteroids as initial therapy for acute GVHD does not improve GVHD-free survival compared with corticosteroids alone. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01002742.
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) and the purine analog pentostatin exert potent immunomodulatory effects. We evaluated the use of these treatment modalities to prevent GVHD in a canine model of unrelated dog leukocyte Ag-mismatched hematopoietic cell transplantation, after conditioning with 920 cGy TBI. We have shown previously in this model that 36/40 dogs given MTX alone as postgrafting immunosuppression engrafted and that 25 of 40 dogs had severe GVHD and median survival of 21 days. In the current study, nine dogs received conditioning with 920 cGy TBI and postgrafting MTX either with ECP on days -2 to -1 alone (n=5) or ECP on days -6 and -5 combined with two doses of pentostatin (days -4 to -3) (n=4). Seven of nine dogs achieved engraftment. Six dogs developed severe acute GVHD (four in the group with ECP alone and two with pentostatin and ECP). We failed to demonstrate a positive impact of ECP and pentostatin for the prevention of GVHD compared with historical control dogs.Bone Marrow Transplantation advance online publication, 21 July 2014; doi:10.1038/bmt.2014.137.
Acute and chronic GVHD remains major obstacles for successful allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Extracorporeal photopheresis modulates immune cells such as alloreactive T cells and dendritic cells, and improves GVHD target organ function(s) in steroid-refractory GVHD patients. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the totality of evidence regarding the efficacy of ECP for treatment of acute and chronic steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent GVHD. Nine studies, including one randomized controlled trial, met inclusion criteria with a total of 325 subjects. In pooled analyses, ORR were 0.69 (95%CI: 0.34-0.95) and 0.64 (95%CI: 0.47-0.79) for acute and chronic GVHD, respectively. In acute GVHD organ-specific responses, ECP resulted in highest ORR for cutaneous with 0.84 (95%CI: 0.75-0.92) followed by gastrointestinal with 0.65 (95%CI: 0.52-0.78). Similar response rates were seen in chronic GVHD involving skin and gastrointestinal tract. Conversely, ORR for chronic GVHD involving the lungs was only 0.15 (95%CI: 0-0.5). In chronic GVHD, grade 3-4 adverse events were reported at 0.38 (95%CI: 0.06-0.78). ECP-related mortality rates were extremely low. Rates of immunosuppression discontinuation were 0.55 (95%CI: 0.40-0.70) and 0.23 (95%CI: 0.07-0.44) for acute and chronic GVHD, respectively. In summary, albeit limited by numbers of available studies, pooled analyses of prospective studies demonstrate encouraging responses following ECP treatment in acute and chronic GVHD after failing corticosteroids. Further research efforts are needed to improve organ-specific responses.
After the first investigational study on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma was published in 1983 with its subsequent recognition by the FDA for its refractory forms, the technology has shown significant promise in the treatment of other severe and refractory conditions in a multi-disciplinary setting. Among the major studied conditions are graft versus host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, systemic sclerosis, solid organ transplant rejection and inflammatory bowel disease.
In order to provide recognized expert practical guidelines for the use of this technology for all indications the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) proceeded to address these questions in the hands of the recognized experts within and outside the field of dermatology. This was done using the recognized and approved guidelines of EDF for this task.
These guidelines provide at present the most comprehensive available expert recommendations for the use of extracorporeal photopheresis based on the available published literature and expert consensus opinion.
Despite prophylaxis with immunosuppressive agents or a variety of other approaches, many patients suffer from acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Although consensus has emerged supporting the use of high-dose methylprednisolone or prednisone for initial treatment of aGVHD, practices differ among centers with respect to the initial glucocorticoid dose, the use of additional immunosuppressive agents, and the approach to withdrawal of treatment after initial improvement. Despite many studies, practices vary considerably with respect to the selection of agents for treatment of glucocorticoid-resistant or refractory GVHD. Investigators and clinicians have recognized the lack of progress and lamented the absence of an accepted standard of care for secondary treatment of aGVHD. The American Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation has developed recommendations for treatment of aGVHD to be considered by care providers, based on a comprehensive and critical review of published reports. Because the literature provides little basis for a definitive guideline, this review also provides a framework for the interpretation of previous results and the design of future studies.
Patients with steroid-resistant acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) have a dismal prognosis, with mortality rates in excess of 90%. We sought to identify a subgroup of patients less likely to benefit from initial therapy with corticosteroids as well as the impact of response on day 14 on outcome. Retrospective evaluation was performed of patients with biopsy-proven aGVHD treated with corticosteroids after allogeneic HSCT at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center from 1998 through 2002 (N = 287). Overall response to first-line therapy on day 14 was 56%. Grade III-IV aGVHD and hyperacute GVHD were the most significant factors predicting failure. Patients who fail to respond to steroids by day 14 should be considered for clinical trials. Severity of aGVHD, hyperacute GVHD, and sex mismatch could be integrated into prognostic scoring systems which may allow for pretreatment identification of patients unlikely to benefit from standard therapy with corticosteroids.
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) was given to 23 patients with steroid-refractory acute GVHD (aGVHD, grade II (n=10), III (n=7) or IV (n=6)). The median duration of ECP was 7 months (1-33) and the median number of ECP cycles in each patient was 10. Twelve patients (52%) had complete responses. Eleven patients (48%) survived and 12 died, 10 of GVHD with or without infections and two of leukaemia relapse. The average grade of GVHD was reduced from 2.8 (on the first day of ECP) to 1.4 (on day +90 from ECP) (P=0.08), and the average dose of i.v. methylprednisolone from 2.17 to 0.2 mg/kg/d (P=0.004). Complete responses were obtained in 70, 42 and 0% of patients, respectively, with grades II, III and IV aGVHD; complete responses in the skin, liver and gut were 66, 27 and 40%. Patients treated within 35 days from onset of aGVHD had higher responses (83 vs 47%; P=0.1). A trend for improved survival was seen in grade III-IV aGVHD treated with ECP as compared to matched controls (38 vs 16%; P 0.08). ECP is a treatment option for patients with steroid refractory aGVHD and should be considered early in the course of the disease.
In a prior multicenter randomized controlled trial, we found that a 12-week course of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) plus standard immunosuppressive therapy resulted in several beneficial outcomes in patients with corticosteroid-refractory/intolerant/dependent chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Here, we report the results of an open-label crossover ECP study in 29 eligible participants randomized initially to the standard of care non-ECP (control) arm. Eligible for the crossover ECP study were control arm patients who either (1) had progression of cutaneous chronic GVHD (cGVHD), defined as >25% worsening from baseline as measured by the percent change in the total skin score (TSS) at any time, or (2) had less than 15% improvement in the TSS, or had a ≤25% reduction in corticosteroid dose at week 12 of the initial study. ECP was administered 3 times during week 1, then twice weekly until week 12, followed by 2 treatments monthly until week 24. The median age of the study cohort was 43 (20-67) years and 90% had extensive cGVHD. The median months from onset of cGVHD to start of ECP were 26 (range: 4-79). Twenty-five of 29 patients (86%) completed the 24-week course of ECP. Complete or partial skin response at week 24 was noted in 9 patients (31%). The median percent of decrease in TSS from baseline to weeks 12 and 24 was -7.9 and -25.8, respectively. In 4 (17%) and 8 (33%) patients, a ≥50% reduction in corticosteroid dose at weeks 12 and 24 was observed. Extracutaneous cGVHD response was highest in oral mucosa with 70% complete and partial resolution after week 24. In conclusion, progressive improvement in cutaneous and extracutaneous cGVHD was observed after a 24-week course of ECP in patients who previously had no clinical improvement or exhibited worsening of cGVHD while receiving standard immunosuppressive therapy alone in a randomized study. These results confirm previous findings and support the notion that prolonged ECP appears to be necessary for optimal therapeutic effects in corticosteroid-refractory cGVHD patients.
Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) has various risk factors and outcomes. We defined distinct aGVHD treatment response groups based on response to first-line corticosteroids: steroid sensitive (SS), steroid resistant (SR), and the rarely studied steroid dependent (SD) aGVHD. In 1143 consecutive adult and pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients, 385 (34%) developed aGVHD, with 10% having SS aGVHD, 9% SD aGVHD, and 14% SR aGVHD. The only factor significantly associated with SD in comparison with SS was older age (odds ratio [OR], 3.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-11.3, when comparing 18- to 60-year-olds with <18-year-olds). Factors significantly associated with SR in comparison with SS were unrelated donor (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.2-7.4) and Minnesota high-risk aGVHD (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.3-4.6). SR aGVHD was independently associated with higher risk for 2-year overall mortality (hazards ratio [HR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.8) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM; HR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.2-3.9). SS and SD GVHD groups had similar overall survival and NRM. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was highest in the SD group, followed by the SR and SS groups (46%, 41%, and 29%, respectively). SD and SS GVHD had similar prognoses, both markedly better than those of the SR groups.
Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) was first described in 1959, since then major efforts have been made in order to understand its physiopathology and animal models have played a key role. Three steps, involving different pathways, have been recognised in either acute and chronic GvHD, identifying them as two distinct entities. In order to reduce GvHD incidence and severity, prophylactic measures were added to transplant protocols. The combination of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) plus an antimetabolite remains the standard of care. Better knowledge of GvHD pathophysiology has moved this field forward and nowadays different drugs are being used on a daily basis. Improving GvHD prophylaxis is a major goal as it would translate into less non-relapse mortality and better overall survival. As compared to CNI plus methotrexate the combination of CNI plus mycophenolate mophetil (MMF) allows us to obtain similar results in terms of GvHD incidence but a lower toxicity rate in terms of neutropenia or mucositis. The use of ATG has been related to a lower risk of acute and chronic GvHD in prospective randomized trials as well as the use of posttransplant Cyclophosphamide, with no or marginal impact on overall survival but with an improvement in GvHD-relapse free survival (GRFS). The use of sirolimus has been related to a lower risk of acute GvHD and significantly influenced overall survival in one prospective randomized trial. Other prospective trials have evaluated the use of receptors such as CCR5 or α4β7 to avoid T-cells trafficking into GvHD target organs, cytokine blockers or immune check point agonists. Also, epigenetic modifiers have shown promising results in phase II trials. Attention should be paid to graft-versus-leukemia, infections and immune recovery before bringing new prophylactic strategies to clinical practice. Although the list of novel agents for GvHD prophylaxis is growing, randomized trials are still lacking for many of them.
Background
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an effective treatment for graft‐vs‐host‐disease (GvHD). Photopheresis can be performed in offline or inline method. The first uses a conventional cell separator for collection of mononuclear‐cells that are photoactivated by a separate device and manually reinfused; the second one involves a dedicated device performing the entire procedure (collection, photoactivation and reinfusion).
Study design and methods
The objective was to compare the two methods and cell product features to highlight key process, devices performance, and to evaluate ECP clinical response. Patients developing steroid‐resistant GvHD underwent ECP as second‐line treatment using either inline (Therakos CellEx) or offline system (Terumo BCT Spectra or Optia and UVA PIT system). Data about patients' features, pre‐apheresis blood‐count, cell product characteristics and clinical response were collected for analysis.
Results
We evaluated 494 procedures performed on 28 patients from April 2018 to March 2019. The offline procedure allows to achieve greater cell yield, it is characterized by larger processed blood volume, longer runtime, and higher ACD consumption. The inline procedure shows shorter runtime, high mononuclear‐cells percentage and low percentage of granulocytes in cell product. We observed a significant difference in cell yields between inline and offline system; furthermore we did not find a significant relationship between cell dose and clinical response.
Conclusion
Inline ECP is fast, highly automated and productive, making it particularly suitable for ECP treatments. Offline ECP collects high cell yields implying longer procedure and greater operator intervention. Our study did not find a significant relationship between cell dose and GVHD response.
Background aims. Corticosteroids are the standard first-line treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), but they are associated with many complications, and less than half of patients have a sustained response.
Methods. To improve outcomes, we performed a retrospective study to analyze the efficacy of the addition of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) to low-dose corticosteroids in 37 adult patients (median age, 57 years) with skin-predominant aGVHD (grade I, n = 17; grade II, n = 18; and grade III, n = 2). All patients received ECP in combination with 1 mg/kg prednisone (n = 26) or topical steroids (n = 11).
Results. Overall response rate was 81% after a median of three ECP procedures (range, 2–8), including 22 complete responses (CR, 59%) and eight very good partial responses (VGPR, 22%). The 11 patients treated with topical corticosteroids achieved CR. Furthermore, 16 (62%) patients reached prednisone withdrawal at a median of 100 days (range, 42–174 days) after its initiation. Eighteen patients developed chronic GVHD (cGVHD); 11 of them (who were in CR of aGVHD) had a new-onset cGVHD, and seven experienced progressive cGVHD (five non-responding and two VGPR patients). A second-line immunosuppressive treatment was initiated in only five (14%) non-responding patients. With a median follow-up of 31 months (range, 6–57 months) 2-year overall survival and non-relapse mortality were 74% and 11%, respectively.
Conclusions. Overall, the combination of low-dose corticosteroids and ECP appear to be safe and effective for first-line treatment of skin predominant aGVHD.
Extracorporeal exposure of peripheral blood mononuclear cells to the photosensitizing compound 8-methoxypsoralen and ultraviolet A radiation has been shown to be effective in the treatment of several T-cell–mediated diseases, including cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and rejection after organ transplantation. We present 21 patients (10 men and 11 women) with hematological malignancies with a median age of 36 years (range, 25 to 55 years) who had received marrow grafts from sibling (n = 12) or unrelated (n = 9) donors. Six patients had acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade II to III not responding to cyclosporine A (CSA) and prednisolone when referred to extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP). In 15 patients, 2 to 24 months after bone marrow transplantation (BMT), extensive chronic GVHD with involvement of skin (n = 15), liver (n = 10), oral mucosa (n = 11), ocular glands (n = 6), and thrombocytopenia (n = 3) developed and was unresponsive to conventional therapy, including steroids. All patients were treated with ECP on 2 consecutive days every 2 weeks for the first 3 months and thereafter every 4 weeks until resolution of GVHD. ECP was tolerated excellently without any significant side effects. After a median of 14 cycles of ECP, acute GVHD resolved completely in 4 of 6 patients (67%) and partially in another 2 patients. Cutaneous chronic GVHD completely resolved in 12 of 15 (80%) patients. Contractures of knees and elbows due to scleroderma resolved partially. Oral mucosal ulcerations resolved in all patients. Seven of 10 patients (70%) with liver involvement had complete responses after ECP. After discontinuation of ECP, no severe infections were observed. Our findings suggest that ECP is a safe and effective adjunct therapy for both acute and extensive chronic GVHD with skin and visceral involvement and resistance to conventional therapy.
© 1998 by The American Society of Hematology.
Background. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is increasingly used in the treatment of acute and chronic graft versus host disease (aGVHD). It is recognized as an immunomodulatory therapy that can decrease inflammation and allow for immune tolerance. Interesting results have obtained using ECP as salvage therapy in patients with steroid-refractory GVHD after failure of one or more lines of immunosuppressive therapy. With this background, we hypothesized that incorporation of ECP as part of first line treatment for aGVHD may improve response rate and avoid the development of steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent aGVHD, mainly in cases of aGVHD with predominant skin involvement.
Patients and methods. Forty consecutive patients who received ECP as part of their first line treatment of aGVHD with skin involvement between 2013 and 2016 were included in this single center analysis. 36 patients (90%) received granulocyte-colony stimulating factor mobilized PBSC as grafts, 3 patients (7.5%) received a bone marrow graft and one patient (2.5%) received an umbilical cord blood graft. Donor was a matched related one for 10 patients, haploidentical for 8 patients, matched unrelated for 16 patients and mismatched unrelated for 6 patients. 4 patients received a reduced intensity conditioning regimen and 36 a myeloablative reduced toxicity conditioning regimen. All patients received a combination of cyclosporine A (CsA) and mycophenolate mofetil for GVHD prophylaxis, except for patients with a matched related donor who received cyclosporine A alone. Patients transplanted with a haploidentical donor, received post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy; 50mg/kg/d at d+3/d+5). ECP was initiated as soon as possible after the diagnosis of aGVHD with predominant skin involvement. The primary endpoint was to determine the best response achieved through the use of ECP for first line treatment of aGVHD.
Results. Median age was 57 (range, 22-66) years, with 28 male patients (49%). Diagnoses were myeloid (n=32) or lymphoid malignancies (n=8) and disease status at transplant was complete remission in 23 patients, partial remission in 8 patients, relapse/progression in 8 patients and untreated in 2 patients. Patients developed aGVHD at a median of 31 days after alloHCT (range, 11-129). 5 patients had late onset aGVHD and two patients developed aGVHD after DLI. None of them had an overlap syndrome. aGVHD grade was I in 13 patients, II in 18 patients and III-IV in 9 patients. All patients had skin involvement and 10 patients had gut (n=8) and/or liver (n=5) involvement. All patients, but one, were still receiving CsA at time of aGVHD diagnosis. Systemic corticosteroids were initiated in 29 patients, while 11 patients received only topical dermo-corticoids. ECP was initiated at a median of 9 days (range, 0-83) after the diagnosis of aGVHD. ECP was performed weekly for 26 patients and twice weekly for 14 patients. Overall response rate (ORR) was 80% after a median of 3 (range, 1-9) weeks of treatment, including 24 complete responses (CR, 60%), 6 very good partial responses (VGPR, 15%) and 2 partial responses (PR, 5%). According to aGVHD grade, in patients with grade I aGVHD, the ORR was 92%, including 11 CR and 1 VGPR. In patients with grade II aGVHD, the ORR was 83%, including 8 CR and 7 VGPR/PR. In patients with grade III-IV aGVHD, ORR was 55%, all of them being in CR. In responding patients, 1 patient presented a recurrence of aGVHD and 15 developed chronic GVHD, including 4 overlap syndromes. Median follow-up was 32 months (range, 22-58) among surviving patients. At 24 months after transplant, the OS and PFS rates were respectively 78% (95% CI, 61%-88%) and 56% (range, 39%-70%). The 2-years cumulative incidence of relapse was 33% (95% CI, 19%-49%) and the 2-years cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality was 10% (95% CI, 3%-22%).
Conclusion. ECP is an effective and well-tolerated option for treatment of acute GVHD with predominant skin involvement with a 2 years cumulative incidence of NRM of 10% and an ORR of 80%. Best responses were seen in patients with grade I-II aGVHD, suggesting that ECP should be started as early as possible after the diagnosis of aGVHD. Incorporation of ECP as part of first line treatment for aGVHD may improve response rate and avoid the development of steroid-refractory aGVHD. Prospective randomized trial are warranted to evaluate ECP as adjuvant treatment for first line treatment of skin aGVHD.
Disclosures
Mohty: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MaaT Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Molmed: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria.
Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is most often treated with high dose glucocorticoids, but less than half of patients have durable overall improvement. Previous phase I and phase II studies suggested that treatment with a CD5-specific immunotoxin (XomaZyme-CD5 Plus) could ameliorate symptoms of GVHD. In a randomized, double-blind trial, we compared XomaZyme-CD5 Plus and glucocorticoids versus placebo and glucocorticoids as initial therapy for 243 patients who developed acute GVHD after allogeneic marrow transplantation. The study drug (XomaZyme. CD5-Plus or an identical appearing placebo) was administered at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg body weight on each of 14 consecutive days. All patients were treated concomitantly with a standard regimen of methylprednisolone. At the time of entry on study, 94% of patients had a rash, 56% had hyperbilirubinemia, 61% had diarrhea, and 84% had nausea and vomiting. At 3, 4, and 5 weeks after starting treatment, symptom severity was less in the CD5 group than in the placebo group. At 4 weeks, 40% of patients assigned to the CD5 group had complete response compared with 25% of those assigned to the control group (P = .019). At 6 weeks, 44% of patients assigned to the CD5 group had complete response as compared with 38% in the placebo group (P = .36). Clinical extensive chronic GVHD developed in 65% of patients in the CD5 group compared with 72% in the control group (P = .35). Survival at 1 year after treatment was 49% in the CD5 group and 45% in the control group (P = .68). Side effects required close monitoring and appropriate adjustment of treatment. The combined administration of a CD5-specific immunotoxin and glucocorticoids controls GVHD manifestations more effectively than treatment with glucocorticoids alone during the first 5 weeks after starting treatment. Use of this immunotoxin does not result in any long-term clinical benefit for patients with acute GVHD.
The investigation of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) plus standard of care (SoC) (SoC+ECP) in chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) within prospective, randomized clinical studies is limited, despite its frequent clinical use. This phase 1/pilot study was the first randomized, prospective study to investigate ECP use as first-line therapy in cGVHD, based on the 2015 National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus criteria for diagnosis and response assessment. Adult patients with new-onset (≤3 years of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation) moderate or severe cGVHD were randomized 1:1 to 26 weeks of SoC+ECP vs SoC (corticosteroids and cyclosporine A/tacrolimus) between 2011 and 2015. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), defined as complete or partial response, at week 28 in the intention-to-treat population (ITT). Other outcomes included quality of life (QoL) measures and safety. Sixty patients were randomized; ITT included 53 patients (SoC+ECP: 29; SoC: 24). Week 28 ORR was 74.1% (SoC+ECP) and 60.9% (SoC). Investigator-assessed ORR was 56.0% (SoC+ECP) and 66.7% (SoC). Patients treated with SoC experienced a decline in QoL over the 28-week study period; QoL remained unchanged in SoC+ECP patients. Most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in SoC+ECP patients were hypertension (31.0%), cough (20.7%), dyspnea (17.2%), and fatigue (17.2%). Seventeen patients (SoC+ECP: 8; SoC: 9) experienced 35 serious adverse events (SAEs). No TEAEs or SAEs were considered related to the ECP instrument or methoxsalen. The encouraging short-term results of this study could inform the design of subsequent studies. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01380535.
Approximately 35% to 50% of patients otherwise cured of hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation will develop the pleomorphic autoimmune-like syndrome known as chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). Since in 2005, National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus panels have proposed definitions and classifications of disease to standardize treatment trials. Recently, the first agent was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for steroid-refractory cGVHD. Despite these advances, most individuals do not achieve durable resolution of disease activity with initial treatment. Moreover, standardized recommendations on how to best implement existing and novel immunomodulatory agents and taper salvage agents are often lacking. Given the potential life-threatening nature of cGVHD, we employ in our practice patient assessment templates at each clinic visit to elucidate known prognostic indicators and red flags. We find NIH scoring templates practical for ongoing assessments of these complex patient cases and determination of when changes in immunosuppressive therapy are warranted. Patients not eligible or suitable for clinical trials have systemic and organ-directed adjunctive treatments crafted in a multidisciplinary clinic. Herein, we review these treatment options and offer a management and monitoring scaffold for representative patients with cGVHD not responding to initial therapy.
Background
Graft vs host disease (GVHD) is the most severe complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Conventional immunosuppressive therapy increases morbidity and mortality without improving survival. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been introduced as an alternative treatment in steroid‐dependent and steroid‐refractory disease.
Study design and methods
We studied the safety and efficacy of ECP as a second‐ or third‐line treatment in GVHD.
Results
ECP was administered in 21 patients with grade III‐IV acute GVHD and 88 patients with extensive chronic GVHD, without ECP‐related adverse events. Eight patients receiving four or less ECP sessions were not further analyzed. The majority of acute GVHD patients (84%) presented partial (15) or complete (1) response to ECP. Immunosuppression was reduced in 10 of 19 patients and ceased in 1 of 19 patients. One‐year cumulative incidence (CI) of transplant‐related mortality (TRM) (17.6%) was associated with the lack of response to ECP and steroid refractoriness. With a follow‐up of 17.5 (1.8‐58.3) months, 1‐year overall survival (OS) (52.5%) was independently associated with a higher number of ECP sessions. Regarding chronic GVHD, complete response was achieved in 35 patients, whereas partial response in 25 patients, leading to an overall response rate of 73%. Cutaneous sclerosis manifestations were associated with higher response rates. With a follow‐up of 68.1 (5.4‐283.1) months, 5‐year CI of TRM (24.1%) was associated only with a number of ECP sessions. The 5‐year OS (64.5%) was independently associated with number of ECP sessions and cutaneous manifestations.
Conclusion
Our findings suggest that ECP is safe and effective for GVHD and should be considered early in the course of GVHD, before irreversible end‐organ damage has been established.
Background:
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an effective treatment. However, protocols differ widely, and some questions, such as the number of cells to be collected or the number of ECP treatment days per treatment cycle, are still unsolved. The aim of this study was to compare a multistep (offline) (Spectra Optia and Macogenic G2) against an integrated (inline) ECP system (Therakos Cellex system) with respect to mononuclear cell (MNC) collection.
Study design and methods:
The number and quality parameters of the MNC products collected were evaluated together with some machine parameters, such as collection time. Comparisons were made through paired sample analysis with the t test.
Results:
Fourteen patients underwent 15 double-paired procedures using both ECP protocols. The average MNC collected in the multistep procedure was 77.4 × 108 , four times more than in the integrated procedure (18.5 × 108 ). MNC purity (84.4% vs. 63.8%) and enrichment (27.9 vs. 5.9) in the product collected were also higher in the multistep procedure. The whole ECP time was higher in the multistep than in the integrated procedure (272 vs. 106 min), but the calculated time to collect 25 × 108 MNCs in the multistep was shorter compared with the one-step procedure (77.8 vs. 172 min). All these differences between the two protocols were statistically significant.
Conclusions:
These two ECP protocols are different with respect to MNC collection and length of procedure. Some unresolved questions, such as the better MNC dose to inactivate or the number of consecutive days that ECP should be performed for optimal clinical efficacy, require further review.
Extracorporeal photopheresis is an immunomodulatory therapy indicated for patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, graft-versus-host disease, and heart or lung allograft rejection. Whole blood from the patient is drawn into the photopheresis instrument where it is separated into its components. Plasma, red blood cells, and the treated buffy coat are subsequently returned to the patient. Consistent, adequate blood flow is necessary to successfully complete the procedure. Vascular access options for photopheresis include peripheral vein cannulation, tunneled central venous catheters, and subcutaneous ports. Photopheresis is a very safe procedure; however, the complications and impact on the patient's quality of life associated with vascular access devices can be significant.
Therapeutic plasma exchange is an apheresis modality in which plasma is separated from the blood cellular components ex vivo, discarded, and replaced with an isosmotic fluid (most commonly 5% albumin) to maintain appropriate oncotic pressure in the patient. Therapeutic plasma exchange is used in the treatment of many diseases and indications. The recent seventh edition of the American Society for Apheresis guidelines indicates approximately 72 diseases and 116 indications for which therapeutic plasma exchange may be effective. One of the critical aspects for the successful performance of therapeutic plasma exchange is appropriate vascular access to provide high blood flow for the collection and return phases of the procedure, especially because most patients who need therapeutic plasma exchange will require more than one treatment over days to weeks. This article provides an overview of the characteristics of therapeutic plasma exchange, the clinical diseases and indications that may be treated with therapeutic plasma exchange, and the different types of vascular access employed, with their advantages and disadvantages. The latter may include peripheral venous access and intravascular or implantable access devices, such as arteriovenous grafts and fistulas, central venous catheters, and central venous catheters tunneled with ports.
Chronic GVHD, an autoimmune disease that follows allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation, is characterized by infections and debilitating tissue injury leading to irreversible fibrosis. Insights into the pathophysiology of the disease are providing new therapeutic targets.
We performed a prospective multicenter phase 2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prophylactic Extracorporeal Photopheresis (ECP) in adult patients with hematological malignancies early after RIC allo-HSCT on day 21 twice per week during the first two weeks and then once per week for the next four weeks for a total of eight ECP courses. A total of 20 patients were included; 10 were males, median age was 60 years. All patients engrafted, 17 (85%) received the total eight ECP courses. There were no adverse effects related to ECP. Seven patients developed acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), with 15% grade ≥ II cumulative incidence at day 100. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 2 years was 22%. The 2 years probability of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 84 and 74%, respectively. This study shows encouraging results with low acute and chronic GVHD incidence and no interference with graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect.
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been used for over 35 years in the treatment of erythrodermic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and over 20 years for chronic and acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and solid organ transplant rejection. ECP for CTCL and GvHD is available at specialised centres across the UK. The lack of prospective randomised trials in ECP led to the development of UK Consensus Statements for patient selection, treatment schedules, monitoring protocols and patient assessment criteria for ECP. The recent literature has been reviewed and considered when writing this update. Most notably, the national transition from the UVAR XTS(®) machine to the new CELLEX machine for ECP with dual access and a shorter treatment time has led to relevant changes in these schedules. This consensus statement updates the previous statement from 2007 on the treatment of CTCL and GvHD with ECP using evidence based medicine and best medical practise and includes guidelines for both children and adults.
The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating, and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the Committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Seventh Edition, like its predecessor, has consistently applied the category and grading system definitions in the fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was used since the fourth edition has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis in a specific disease entity. The Seventh Edition discusses 87 fact sheets (14 new fact sheets since the Sixth Edition) for therapeutic apheresis diseases and medical conditions, with 179 indications, which are separately graded and categorized within the listed fact sheets. Several diseases that are Category IV which have been described in detail in previous editions and do not have significant new evidence since the last publication are summarized in a separate table. The Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue serves as a key resource that guides the utilization of therapeutic apheresis in the treatment of human disease. J. Clin. Apheresis 31:149-162, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an immunomodulatory alternative for treatment of graft versus host disease (GVHD). The blood is then separated into its various components through apheresis; buffy coat cells are thereafter treated with 8-methoxypsoralen before exposure to ultraviolet light and finally reinfused into the patient. There is a general agreement that this treatment has an anti-GVHD effect, but the mechanisms of action behind this effect are only partly understood. However, altered maturation of dendritic cells (DC) and thereby indirect modulation of T-cell reactivity seems to be one important mechanism together with DC-presentation of antigens derived from apoptotic donor T cells and induction of regulatory T cells. The treatment has been best studied in patients with chronic GVHD (both pediatric and adult patients), but most studies are not randomized and it is difficult to know whether the treatment is more effective than the alternatives. The clinical studies of ECP in adults with acute GVHD are few and not randomized; it is not possible to judge whether this treatment should be a preferred second- or third-line treatment. There is no evidence for increased risk of leukemia relapse or suppression of specific graft versus leukemia reactivity by this treatment, so specific antileukemic immunotherapy may still be possible. Thus, even though the treatment seems effective in patients with GVHD, further clinical (especially randomized) as well as biological studies with careful standardization of the treatment are needed before it is possible to conclude how ECP should be used in acute and chronic GVHD.
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been used for over 20 years to treat acute GVHD (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD. Evidence on the efficacy of response in aGVHD has continued to accrue and data suggest that there is a good response and prolonged survival in both children and adults with grade II-IV aGVHD. Unlike chronic GVHD where treatment schedules are typically one or two times monthly for 12-18 months, patients with aGVHD respond rapidly to an intense weekly treatment schedule for 8 weeks, typically allowing steroids to be discontinued without flare-ups of aGVHD. Maintenance ECP therapy is generally not required. Many centres across Europe and United States treat aGVHD with ECP as second-line therapy and responses are excellent in a subset of patients. Unlike other second-line therapies, ECP is not immunosuppressive and has no reported drug interactions. Importantly, ECP does not have a negative impact on the graft-versus-malignancy effect of the transplant. This statement aims to select those patients most likely to respond to treatment and summarises treatment and monitoring schedules for the management of aGVHD in adult and paediatric patients to ensure the correct patients are treated with the optimal protocol for efficacy.Bone Marrow Transplantation advance online publication, 2 June 2014; doi:10.1038/bmt.2014.106.
We hypothesized that clinical risk factors could be identified within 2 weeks of onset of severe (stage 3 or 4) acute gut GVHD for identifying a patient population with a very poor outcome. Among 1462 patients who had allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) between January 2000 and December 2005, 116 (7.9%) developed stage 3-4 gut GVHD. The median time for onset of stage 3-4 gut GVHD was 35 (4-135) days after allogeneic HCT. Eighty-five of the 116 patients (73%) had corticosteroid resistance before or within 2 weeks after the onset of stage 3-4 gut GVHD. Significant risk factors for mortality included corticosteroid resistance (hazards ratio (HR)=2.93; P=0.0005), age >18 years (HR=4.95; P=0.0004), increased serum bilirubin (HR 2.53; P=0.0001) and overt gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 2.88; P=0.0004). Among patients with stage 3-4 gut GVHD, the subgroup with 0, 1 or 2 risk factors had a favorable prognosis, whereas the subgroup with 3 or 4 risk factors had a dismal prognosis. This information should be considered in designing future studies of severe gut GVHD and in counseling patients about prognosis.Bone Marrow Transplantation advance online publication, 28 April 2014; doi:10.1038/bmt.2014.69.
Bone Marrow Transplantation is a high quality, peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of clinical and basic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a challenging therapeutic problem after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effect of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), and its impact on intensivity of immunosuppresive therapy in allogeneic HSCT patients.
In this study 443 Therakos ECP procedures were performed in 21 patients after allogeneic HSCT with acute (aGVHD, 8 patients) or chronic (cGVHD, 13 patients) therapy-refractory GVHD. The median age at ECP onset was 20.5 years (range, 10-55). Venous access was provided by a nontunelized central venous catheter (12 patients) or 9.6-French portacath (9 patients).
In the cGVHD group 9/13 patients were improved with a 4-year overall survival rate of 67.7%. ECP led to steroid discontinuation in 6 and substantial dose reduction in 5 patients. The prednisone dose equivalent per kilogram body weight decreased from 0.32 mg to 0.07 mg after therapy. Therapy of aGVHD led to complete or partial symptom remission in 3/9 subjects. The change in steroid dose in the aGVHD group was not significant, there were no long-term survivors. Portacath access was well tolerated and provided adequate blood flow rates.
The ECP therapy significantly reduced the rates of remissions with steroid discontinuation among cGVHD but not aGVHD patients. Rare ECP-related complications were either catheter related or anticoagulation induced during ECP procedures. Photopheresis was a safe, effective method to treat steroid-resistant cGVHD.
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic apheresis was found to be reasonably safe in prior studies using instruments that are now largely obsolete. The incidence of adverse effects with current instruments and techniques has not been assessed in a large multicenter study.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A survey was conducted in 1995 using a uniform questionnaire that asked about 32 specific events but excluded transient paresthesia and mild vasovagal events. Eighteen centers returned 3429 responses concerning 125 to 500 therapeutic apheresis procedures per center.
RESULTS: Two hundred forty-two adverse events were reported in 163 procedures (4.75% of all procedures; 6.87% of first-time procedures and 4.28% of repeat procedures). The numbers (incidence) of selected specific events were transfusion reaction, 56 (51 in plasma exchange [PE] with plasma replacement) (1.6%); citrate-related nausea and/or vomiting, 41 (1.2%); systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg, 34 (1.0%); vasovagal nausea and/or vomiting, 17 (0.5%); pallor and/or diaphoresis, 16 (0.5%); pulse >120, 14 (0.4%); respiratory distress, 9 (0.3%); tetany or seizure, 9 (0.2%); and chills or rigors, 6 (0.2%). Rates for other specific events were <0.1 percent. Vasovagal phenomena were more frequent in procedures done in neurologic patients than in those done in hematology or oncology patients (p = 0.011) or renal or rheumatic patients (p = 0.038). Procedure-specific rates were red cell exchange, 8 (10.26%) of 78; PE (plasma), 89 (7.81%) of 1140; PE (no plasma), 42 (3.35%) of 1255; leukapheresis, 4 (5.71%) of 70; plateletpheresis, 0 of 18; and autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell collection, 11 (1.66%) of 664. Three deaths were reported; all were attributed to primary disease.
CONCLUSION: Therapeutic apheresis procedures are relatively safe, with a 4.75-percent overall incidence of mostly reversible adverse effects. Among the most commonly performed procedures, the risk is higher for blood component exchanges, especially if allogeneic red cell or plasma transfusion occurs, and lower for peripheral blood progenitor cell collection.
A joint working group established by the Haemato-oncology subgroup of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology (BCSH) and the British Society for Bone Marrow Transplantation (BSBMT) has reviewed the available literature and made recommendations for the diagnosis and management of acute graft-versus-host disease. This guideline includes recommendations for the diagnosis and grading of acute graft-versus-host disease as well as primary treatment and options for patients with steroid-refractory disease. The goal of treatment should be effective control of graft-versus-host disease while minimizing risk of toxicity and relapse.
Therapeutic apheresis (TA) is performed using either centrifugation-based or filter-based systems. The blood flow rate (BFR) used for TA using centrifugation-based systems is less than 100 mL/min. Because of this low BFR requirement, even peripheral veins can be considered as an option for TA, especially for less-frequent treatments and those performed for short periods. Other options for vascular access (VA) include central venous catheters (temporary or tunneled), totally implantable ports, and arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) or grafts (AVG). Nontunneled catheters should be considered as the choice of VA for relatively short-term treatments mainly in the inpatient settings. For long-term treatments, ports and tunneled catheters should be considered because of lower rates of infections compared to nontunneled catheters. However, studies in hemodialysis (HD) patients have demonstrated significantly higher morbidity and mortality rates associated with the use of tunneled catheters as compared to AVF. Therefore, if TA is being considered for several years, AVG and AVF would be the preferred options of VA. Studies in HD population indicate far better outcomes with the use of AVF as compared to AVG. This article, as presented at the Therapeutic Apheresis Academy in September 2011, is an overview of the available VA options for TA based on indication and duration of treatment. Pros and cons of each option are mentioned briefly. Finally, for those considered for AVF placement for chronic TA, specific recommendations are made for the care of AVF based on our own experience at University of Virginia.
The success of therapeutic apheresis (TA), similar to hemodialysis, depends on the integrity of the extracorporeal circuit as well as a reliable vascular access. However, unlike hemodialysis, which requires high flow of blood around 400 mL/minute through the extracorporeal circuit for effective clearance, TA is usually carried out with much lower blood flow rates (<100 ml/minute). Therefore, even peripheral venous access can be considered for TA. The main determinants of the choice of vascular access for TA is the duration of the planned treatment and, to a certain degree, the indication for its use. While peripheral venous access and temporary central venous catheters are sufficient for short-term TA, tunnelled catheters and arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) are usually used for long-term treatments. Because of the large body of evidence in the hemodialysis literature on the advantages of AVF over tunnelled catheters and AV grafts, they should be considered as the preferred access for chronic TA as well. However, advance planning for the care of AVF after creation is of critical importance especially since many of the healthcare providers dealing with TA are less familiar with caring for AVF than nephrologists and dialysis nurses. In this article we first review the similarities and differences between HD and TA procedures. The pros and cons of different vascular access options are discussed next. Finally, we have included a list of recommendations on maintenance of AVF created for TA based on our own experience.
Over the last decades significant advances have been made in the field of donor selection, alternative transplant sources, immunosuppressive treatment and supportive care, as well as in the better understanding of the immunobiology of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloTx). Nevertheless, several factors still affect unfavorably the outcome of the procedure. Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) remains the leading cause of morbidity, non-relapse mortality and treatment failure post alloTx. So far, steroids are the widely used 1st line treatment for GvHD achieving considerable response rate however, patients who fail to respond to the initial therapy have a dismal prognosis and no standard treatment is well established for them to date. In recent years, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been proposed as an efficacious and safe treatment for steroid refractory GvHD. Overall responses of 75% have been reported in the cutaneous and mucosal involvement and 45-65% in other organ manifestations (lung, liver and intestinal), allowing reduction and even discontinuation of steroids, thus contributing towards a significant reduction of morbidity. Although the mechanism of action of ECP is not fully understood, it seems that it has an immunomodulatory rather than an immunosuppression effect and induces immunotolerance, preserving the beneficial graft-versus-tumor effect. Given these very promising results in steroid-refractory or steroid-depended GvHD, currently, extracorporeal photopheresis is being investigated as both first-line and prevention therapy also.
Therapeutic apheresis procedures are a form of extracorporeal therapy that use different techniques to separate blood into the different components out of which the part containing the etiological agent in a disease process is discarded and the rest of the components of blood are re-infused into the patient, frequently with the addition of a replacement fluid or volume. These complex procedures have inherent risks of adverse events and factors that may impact on the incidence these events include the underlying disease state, anticoagulation techniques, replacement fluid type including the volume, issues related to the vascular access used, and the therapeutic apheresis procedure type and technique. We present a representative case based review of common complications of therapeutic apheresis and suggestions about how to prevent or manage these as presented at the 2010 Therapeutic Apheresis Academy.
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a well-tolerated procedure that suppresses T-lymphocyte activity in a clonally-specific way. It is an effective therapy that has established indications in the management of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, graft-versus-host disease and some scenarios of solid-organ transplant rejection. It is being used increasingly around the world. Its applications are evolving, including exploration of its potential for treating autoimmune diseases where cytotoxic T-cell-mediated mechanisms appear to be involved, such as Crohn's disease. This article reviews scientific insights into its mechanism of action on the immune system, details of the clinical procedure, its clinical applications in various diseases, and the current evidence for its efficacy and place in medical therapeutics.